Madeline Gorham
-
Upload
madeline-gorham -
Category
Documents
-
view
256 -
download
6
description
Transcript of Madeline Gorham
MadelineGorhamgraduate landscape architect/environmental scientist
There are things I do know,There are things that I do not know.It is the challenge to learn the things I do not know, which encourages me to do better.
The beauty of this: I will never know everything.
PICTURE CREDIT: Jörn Kaspuhl
Relevant Skills
Photoshop InDesign Sketchup Illustrator AutoCad SPSS
Excel Microsoft Word ArcMap
ADEQUATE//GOOD//EXCELLENT
Background
{2006}
{2007}
{2008}
{2009}
{2010} {2012}
Year 12 Certificate:Red Bend Catholic College, Forbes, N.S.W
{2011} Life
University of Guelph, Canada.
Final year exhibition.
Final project selected to exhibit at the Gallery of Australian Design
Nominee of the HASSELL Travelling Scholarship 2010: Robin Edmond Award (Canberra)
Graduated with a Bachelor of Landscape Architecture/Environmental ScienceUniversity
of Canberra
commenced
Recipient of Carole Lomas Award for design development.
Contents
SHRUB PLANTING 1:4062TREE PLANTING 1:206
1
GROUNDCOVER PLANTING 1:4063
Temporary topsoil saucer
Min. 50MM layer tanbark or otherapproved equal hardwood mulch
Ground level
Undisturbed rootball - finishedlevel even with surroundingground level
500MM
Temporary topsoil saucerMin 50MM layer tanbark orother approved equal hardwoodmulch
Hypothetical sloping grade
Scarify sides & base of plantingpit
Undisturbed rootball - finishedlevel even with surroundingground level.
Fill planting pit with type C soilmixed with 10% forest littercompost or approved equal
Undisturbed subgrade orcompacted fill
Dig planting pit 34 of the mature
width &50MM deeper thanfinished sitting height.
FillCut
Ground level
2M
Temporary topsoil saucer
Encase non-corrodable wirein reinforced rubber gardenhose at points of contact withtree.
Keep soil 50mm away fromtrunk flare
Remove dead or damagedbranches by pruningaccording to recognisedhorticultural practices do notcut leader.
100mm layer tanbark or otherapproved equal hardwoodmulch.
Ground Level
Stakes to be min. 1.5mn @50x50mm pressure treatedtimber, driven min 500mm intoundisturbed native soil outsideof rootball; placeperpendicular to prevailingwind; cut to uniform height; nointerference with branches .
Scarify sides and base ofplanting pit.
Undisturbed rootball - finishedlevel even with surroundingground level
Fill planting pit with type C soilmixed with 10% forest littercompost or approved equal.
Undisturbed subgrade orcompacted fill
Dig planting pit twice thevolume of rootball.
Landscape TechnologyDocumentation Project
Planting detail
Dig planting pit 34 of the mature
width &50MM deeper thanfinished sitting height.Fill planting pit with type C soilmixed with 10% forest littercompost or approved equal
Scarify sides & base of plantingpit
Undisturbed subgrade orcompacted fill
D607 MEG
A biophysical characterization of the upper Billabong Creek The Upper Billabong Creek catchment is situated in Southern N.S.W, ap-proximately 60 kilometres north of Albury. The catchment itself encompasses 300,000 ha. between the Murrumbidgee and Murray River and is predominantly cleared for agricultural purposes. This study assessed the contributions of past and present actions to determine factors that influence regolith, vegetation and hydrolo-gy to deduce on the overall quality of the catch-ment. Regolith differed at each site with vary-ing results of highly alkaline and acidic soils. These extremes in alkalinity and acidity are unusual and can be attributed to the poor plant growth in the riparian zone of the catchment. pH, EC, turbidity and dissolved oxygen were recorded at each site and found that each had a negative downstream effect on water quality. It can be concluded that the biophysical char-acter of the catchment has been detrimentally altered as a result of clearing for agricultural practices and the increasing threat of salinity. Characterisation of unregulated tributary impacts on the physical, chemical and biolog-ical components in the upper Murrumbidg-ee River, New South Wales, Australia.1.0 A b s t r a c t The abrupt meeting of two channels each hav-ing independent flow and sediment discharge regimes creates a change in physical, chemical and biological elements, directly downstream of tributaries (Miller, 1958, Best 1986). A study conducted on the upper Murrumbidgee River, New South Wales, Australia, looked directly at testing this theory by examining the physical, chemical and biological elements upstream and downstream of Yaouk Creek and Goorudee Riv-ulet, along with the unregulated reference site on the Goodradigbee River. The study aimed to establish any changes between sites and wheth-er these changes had the potential to improve the river condition of the upper Murrumbidgee River. It was concluded that the scaling rela-tionship between the main stem rivers, Mur-rumbidgee River and Goodradigbee River, and the tributaries, Yaouk Creek, Goorudee Rivu-let and Cooleman Creek, displayed low to no variance in physical, biological and chemical attributes between upstream and downstream sites. It is therefore likely that abiotic impacts and biotic responses are complex, such that individual or composite habitat changes occur at different confluences and at individual con-fluences at different times (Benda et al. 2004). A biophysical characterization of the upper Billabong Creek The Upper Billabong Creek catchment is situated in Southern N.S.W, ap-proximately 60 kilometres north of Albury. The catchment itself encompasses 300,000 ha. between the Murrumbidgee and Murray River and is predominantly cleared for ag-ricultural purposes. This study assessed the contributions of past and present actions to determine factors that influence regolith, veg-
{08} {16} {18} {20} {28} {19}
65 Shumack Street
Client:Alicia and Pete Dankiw
Weetangera, ACT 2602
M: P:
Title:Landscape Plan
Scale Date Dwn1:100 Nov 10 MG
GROUNDCOVERS
NO.10132318
NO.2929
CODEEjmCaPmRo
POT SIZE140mm140mm140mm140mm
CODEGpGs
POT SIZE140mm140mm
SPECIESEuonymus japonicus micrphyllusCorrea albaPhilotheca myoporoides Rhaphiolepis Oriental Pearl
SPECIESGrevillea poorinda ‘royal mantle’Gelsemium sempervirens
SHRUBS
TREES
SPECIESZelkova serrata ‘vase’Pyrus calleryanaAcer palmatum
NO.311
CODEZsvPcAp
SIZEmin 1.5mmin 1.5mmin 1.5m
SPECIESWestringia fruticosaPrunus lusitanica
SPECIESliriope gigantea ‘russian giant’Dianella revoluta
NO.4448
NO.272717
CODEWfPl
CODELgDr
POT SIZE200mm200mm
POT SIZE200mm200mm200mm
SHRUBS: (HEDGE)PLANT SCHEDULE: WEETANGERA RESIDENCE
GRASSES & FLAX
12 x Pm
8 x Wf
40 x Pl
existing paved entrance
bus stop
existing tree
existing maple
existing bush
residence
drive-way
lawn
crushed red granite
existing gate
19 xGp 9 xGs
14 x Gs
6 xGs
12 x Pm
3 X Wf
11 xLg
1 x Ejm
5x Ejm8x Dr
9 x Ca
10 x Lg
4 x Ca
4 xEjm
9 x Pm
5 x Dr
8 x Pl
6 x Dr
20 x Gp
6 x Lg8 x Dr
3 x Wf
3 xRo
3 xPm
3 X Wf
6 x Pm
2 x Wf
1 x Zsv
1 x Zsv
1 x Pc
1 x Zsv
1 x Ap
15 Ro
25 x Wf
{33}
{Project I }The Belconnen town centre is an example of a space which possesses all the necessary facilities to encourage dwelling but does not meet its social potential. The design looks at the existing services which act as social conductors, the nature of pedestrian circulation and overall how these two work together to create a social overlap.
By identifying areas of social overlap and understanding existing circulation patterns, the design proposes spaces suitable for dwelling, while following guidelines for crime prevention.
resid
entialhigh density
res & shops
art gallery
food
lightho
use schoolskatepark
mall
m.t park
student accomcommunity centre
option 2
roa
d
pa
rkin
g
wa
lkw
ay
/la
ke a
ce
ss
pe
de
stria
n/
cyc
list
wa
y
bo
ard
wa
lk
existing
pe
de
stria
n/
cyc
lepr
iva
te
u
se
are
-a
fo
r
option 1
roa
d
pe
de
stria
nw
alk
wa
y
wa
lkw
ay
/la
ke a
ce
ss
pa
rkin
g
pe
de
stria
n/
cyc
list
wa
y
bo
ard
wa
lk
option 3
roa
d
pa
rkin
g
cyc
lep
ath
wa
lkw
ay
/la
ke a
ce
ss
pe
de
stria
n
wa
lkw
ay
bo
ard
wa
lk
243m28
4m302m 173m
190m
sou
the
rn la
ke in
let
ligh
tho
use
bre
eze
wa
y
co
nn
ec
tion
co
rrid
or
exi
stin
g c
arp
ark
lake
wa
lkw
ay
the
pe
nin
sula
art
ce
ntr
e in
let
em
u b
an
k
social node
social node
social node
john knight memorial park
lake ginninderracollege
proposed wetland systembelconnen
communitycentre
be
nja
min
wa
y
m a r g a r e t timpson park
belconnen arts centre.
emu bank drive
proposed lake drive prop
osed
lake
wal
k
197
met
res
ginninderra lake
B
A.1
5
2
A.2
3
ALTITUDE APARTMENTSEXPECTED POPn: 690
TOWNSEND PLACECAR SPACES: 70
a
KANGARA WATERAPPROX POPN: 400masterplan
ginninderra lake walk
gro
und
tre
atm
ent
pla
nt m
ate
rial
ma
teria
ls
jour
ney
time
line
EXISTING BRIDGE THE PENINSULA BRIDGE ENTRANCE
3 MINS0 MINS
1 2 3 4
TIMBER
BOA
RD
ELECTR
IC BBQ
BRIDGE DROPOFF BOARDWALK CARPARK ROAD SEATING STEPS
TERRACE
8 MINS 8.5 MINSTIMBER
BOA
RD
WA
LK
BOU
LEVAR
D LIG
HTIN
G
PLAN
E TREE
SAN
DBLA
STED C
ON
CR
ETE
SAN
DBLA
STED C
ON
CR
ETE
STAIR
LIP LIGH
TING
ginninderra lake walk
LAKE WALK BRIDGE
LIGH
TS UN
DER
RA
ILING
STEEL WIR
E RA
ILING
(B) area 6 pocket park11.5 MINS
EMU BANK PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYENTRANCE TO AREA 6
GRASSLAND INSTALLATIONDISABLED RAMP
1 2 3 4
VER
TICA
L CO
NC
RETE SLA
TS
STAIR
LIP LIGH
TING NA
TIVE G
RA
SSES
(B) area 6 pocket park15 MINS
DISABLED RAMPNOOK SEATING
STEPS/SEATING
CHANDLER ST.
TIMBER
PLAIN
TREE
SAN
DBLA
STED C
ON
CR
ETE
GR
AN
ITE TILE
BOU
LEVAR
D LIG
HTIN
G
{Project II}The aim of the project was to provide a level of outdoor spaces for winter/summer entertaining, natural spaces and overall an element of privacy.
While the garden was design to mimics a garden style Australian bush land, the structure and shape of the design takes full advantage of the prevailing views of the surrounding hills, mountains and grasslands.
main residence
studio
pool carportlawn
lawn
(water tank)
retention pond
parking
parking
terrace
terrace
main entrance
clothes line
1
2 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1415
16
c
C
B
b
A
a
D
d
grassstone wall
birch forestdeck
retention pond
wooden planter box
garden grassland
section Bb: retreat creek
public park
blac
k resid
ence
arboretum
mt tay-
neig
hbou
ring v
iew
of a
rbor
etum
subu
rb of
garden grassland
terracedecking
birch featureretaining wall granite path
retention ponddeck
garden grass land
gate a blended garden
section Cc: front garden
park raised hedgeobjectives
birch grove lawn
lawn
paved area houseobjectives
sloped retaining wall
fire pit
fence
section Dd: winter entertaining
{Project III}The Namadgi National Park is under utilised and in most cases unknown as an area for recreation. By connecting the three tourist areas; the tracking station, the campground and the picnic area, with a walking trail, these three entities unite to provide a more enjoyable recreational experience. It was the purpose of this project to not only connect all the sites together, but create a level of interaction, ranging from intimate (or secluded) to a communal experience within the camping ground and the picnic area. These areas were connected through necessary services, such as toilet blocks and bbq areas.
PARKING
TRAIL TO TRACKING STATION
FIRE TRAIL
SEPTIC TANK
ORRORAL CREEK
PARKING
TOILET
ORR
ORA
L RO
AD
10
8
6
9
7
4
3
1
1
5
ROUND-ABOUT
TOILET
A
B
C
D
COMMUNAL AREA
SECLUDED AREAS
SECLUDED AREAS
{Project IV}Guelph is a small town in Ontario, Canada.Being unfamiliar with the area, a time lapse video was recorded over a 48 period of time to demonstrate how the sqaure was utilised and illustrate the main pedestrian circulation patterns. The video indicated that the downtown square acts as a bus drop off area and has fluctuations of activity at a 30 minute interval.
The re-design of the square relies upon the relocation of the vehicular movement to ultimately improve the economic, social and functional elements within the site. This was coupled with the incorporation of pedestrian friendly dwelling spaces to encourage people to remain within the site throughout the seasons.
Wyndham
Street
Quebec Street
Dou
glas
Str
eet
1. 2. 3. cgorham. laFontaine. ulmer.
Technical Drawing
568.60
GENERAL NOTES1. All services shall be located onsite prior to works commencing with the appropriate servicesauthority. Make all arrangements and pay costs or charges.2. Set-out of all elements shall be approved by the Landscape Architect.3.Existing contours and conditions shall be checked and verified by the Contractor before proceeding with work.4. Levels shown are a guide only and shall be checked and approved by the contractor and theLandscape Architect.5. All works are to be in accordance with the Standard Specification for Urban Infrastructure Works Edition 1, Revision 0/September 2002
Issues Revision Description DrawnCheck DateFor ApprovalA
Project Consultant Drawing Files
Client NameTitle
Landscape TechnologyDocumentation Project
University of Canberra
Madeline GorhamDrawing # Drawn by
Date checked
Scale
as noted
Checked by
Custom timber bench seatsee detail
15
Landscape Plan
D602 MEG
1:250
Proposed treesee detail 1
6
sandstone pathsee detail 2
7
Custom timber planter boxsee detail 1
8
KEY
Crushed granite
400SQ Bink conc.sandstone paversee detail
Concrete
proposed turfsee note & plan D603
Native grasssee note & plan D603
Proposed treesee plan D603
Proposed treesee plan D603
water feature to be commissioned
COR10 seating wall
71
Concrete dividersee detail
17
2Proposed plantingsee detail
568.700
569.50569.80570.10569.10
568.60568.75
568.800
569.35
568.845
568.845
570.141570.110
Issues Revision Description DrawnCheck DateFor ApprovalA
Project Consultant Drawing Files
Client NameTitle
Landscape TechnologyDocumentation Project
Sheet Cover University of Canberra
Madeline GorhamDrawing # Drawn by
Date checked
Scale
as noted
Checked by
568.700
569.50569.80570.10569.10
568.60568.75
568.800
569.35
568.845
568.845
570.141570.110
Issues Revision Description DrawnCheck DateFor ApprovalA
Project Consultant Drawing Files
Client NameTitle
Landscape TechnologyDocumentation Project
Sheet Cover University of Canberra
Madeline GorhamDrawing # Drawn by
Date checked
Scale
as noted
Checked by
Issues Revision Description DrawnCheck DateFor ApprovalA
Project Consultant Drawing Files
Client NameTitle
Landscape TechnologyDocumentation Project
University of Canberra
Madeline GorhamDrawing # Drawn by
Date checked
Scale
as noted
Checked by
CodeBotanical Name
Container Size
MinHeight
MatureWidth
Quantity Comments
Pl
Eg
Pc
Poalabillardier
Eucalyptusgregsoniena
Pyruscalleryana
140mm
1.2 m
2.5 m
N/A N/A
install & maintain tocompanyspecification
300 mm
3 m
8 m
800 mm
2 m
4 m
Planting notes
1. Trees being retained shall be protected.2. No site shed, storage sheds, site amenitiesor billboards to be erected within thedripline of any trees3. No carparking or equipmentparking aloowed within the dripline of trees.4. All services shall be located onsite prior to works commencing with theappropriate service authority5. Setout of planting positions shall be approved by the superintendent prior toexcavation of planting holes6.Refer Planting Details7.All works are to be in accordance with the standard specification for UrbanInfrastructure Works Edition 1, revision 0/september 2002
Irrigated canturfCanberrablend w/clover:
Planting Plan
D605 MEG
1:250
N/AturfCtPl x 63
93
Pl x 9
Pl x 4
Pl x 23
Ct: as specified
Pc x 4
Pc x 4
Pc x 2
Eg x 7
7
10
arrangementseeD604
arrangementseeD604
500 mmcentres
Plant Schedule Plan No. UC3858_D605_PP-ACt: as specified
Issues Revision Description DrawnCheck DateFor ApprovalA
Project Consultant Drawing Files
Client NameTitle
Landscape TechnologyDocumentation Project
University of Canberra
Madeline GorhamDrawing # Drawn by
Date checked
Scale
as noted
Checked by
38
INTERNAL CROSS- SECTION:LONG SIDE OFPLANTER BOX TIMBER REMOVED - 1:20
18
INTERNAL CROSS-SECTION: SHORT SIDE OFPLANTER BOX TIMBER REMOVED - 1:20
28
INTERNAL CROSS-SECTION: LONG SIDE OFPLANTER BOX - TIMBER RETAINED 1:20
48
FRAMEWORK PLAN:TIMBER REMOVED - 1:20
58
TIMBER FRAMEWORKPLAN - 1:20
Planterbox section
D609 MEG
Binding beams 14/8/295.6cm,joined together using L-steel50/50mm
Recycled iron-barkmoldings 5.4/3.4cm,screwed using stainlesssteel screws, jointwidth 0.5cm,cornerjoining to lateralcladding using mitercut
Ballast beamsas for 2 laidon ballast bed
Ballast bed: 4 cmhard stone, chippings 2 / 5,25cm ballast basecourse/angular grain
Issues Revision Description DrawnCheck DateFor ApprovalA
Project Consultant Drawing Files
Client NameTitle
Landscape TechnologyDocumentation Project
University of Canberra
Madeline GorhamDrawing # Drawn by
Date checked
Scale
as noted
Checked by
15
CROSS- SECTION: TIMBER BENCH SEAT 1: 20
25
ELEVATION: TIMBER BENCH SEAT 1: 20
35
TIMBER FRAMEWORK PLAN 1: 20
Recycled Iron-Bark 21/21/408cm,rounded edges 3mm
Round pipe spacer, d= 30 mm, l = 48mm
U-molding 90/40/616mm, neoprene strip asseperating layer between the moldings
M18 threaded rods, with washerd= 50 mm and domed nut V2A,domed nut flush with wood molding
Rectangular molding 90/40/400 mm,in strip foundation C25/30 reinforced
Exposed aggregate path: ground level
Coarse (Max 20mm) 95% MMDDcompacted aggregateCompacted sub-grade
Concrete footing (min 300mm deep)
Timber bench seat detail
D606 MEG
Issues Revision Description DrawnCheck DateFor ApprovalA
Project Consultant Drawing Files
Client NameTitle
Landscape TechnologyDocumentation Project
University of Canberra
Madeline GorhamDrawing # Drawn by
Date checked
Scale
as noted
Checked by
15
CROSS- SECTION: TIMBER BENCH SEAT 1: 20
25
ELEVATION: TIMBER BENCH SEAT 1: 20
35
TIMBER FRAMEWORK PLAN 1: 20
Recycled Iron-Bark 21/21/408cm,rounded edges 3mm
Round pipe spacer, d= 30 mm, l = 48mm
U-molding 90/40/616mm, neoprene strip asseperating layer between the moldings
M18 threaded rods, with washerd= 50 mm and domed nut V2A,domed nut flush with wood molding
Rectangular molding 90/40/400 mm,in strip foundation C25/30 reinforced
Exposed aggregate path: ground level
Coarse (Max 20mm) 95% MMDDcompacted aggregateCompacted sub-grade
Concrete footing (min 300mm deep)
Timber bench seat detail
D606 MEG
Issues Revision Description DrawnCheck DateFor ApprovalA
Project Consultant Drawing Files
Client NameTitle
Landscape TechnologyDocumentation Project
University of Canberra
Madeline GorhamDrawing # Drawn by
Date checked
Scale
as noted
Checked by
17
CROSS SECTION: CONCRETE DIVIDER 1:10
27
CROSS-SECTION: SANDSTONE PATH 1:20
Concrete slab
C/12 /15 Concete
Building ground as subsoil or substructure
0 /32 frost protectioncourse
Crushed sand base and filler, 3cm
Hard surface material detail
D608 MEG
Concrete slab to meetflush with lawn2% drainage
In case of catileveredentry - fill with conc. andexpansion joint as per4/7 detail
400SQX50MMsandstone pavers
Turf Area
Min 50MM conc.haunch
5MM gaps securedwith pavelock orapproved equal.
0 /32 ballast base course, 15cm0/ 45 frost protection course
building ground as subsoil or substrate
37
PAVING TURF JUNCTION 1:5
47
PAVING/ CONCRETE JUNCTION 1:5Sandstone landingthe meet flush withconcrete path edge
SHRUB PLANTING 1:4062TREE PLANTING 1:206
1
GROUNDCOVER PLANTING 1:4063
Temporary topsoil saucer
Min. 50MM layer tanbark or otherapproved equal hardwood mulch
Ground level
Undisturbed rootball - finishedlevel even with surroundingground level
500MM
Temporary topsoil saucerMin 50MM layer tanbark orother approved equal hardwoodmulch
Hypothetical sloping grade
Scarify sides & base of plantingpit
Undisturbed rootball - finishedlevel even with surroundingground level.
Fill planting pit with type C soilmixed with 10% forest littercompost or approved equal
Undisturbed subgrade orcompacted fill
Dig planting pit 34 of the mature
width &50MM deeper thanfinished sitting height.
FillCut
Ground level
2M
Temporary topsoil saucer
Encase non-corrodable wirein reinforced rubber gardenhose at points of contact withtree.
Keep soil 50mm away fromtrunk flare
Remove dead or damagedbranches by pruningaccording to recognisedhorticultural practices do notcut leader.
100mm layer tanbark or otherapproved equal hardwoodmulch.
Ground Level
Stakes to be min. 1.5mn @50x50mm pressure treatedtimber, driven min 500mm intoundisturbed native soil outsideof rootball; placeperpendicular to prevailingwind; cut to uniform height; nointerference with branches .
Scarify sides and base ofplanting pit.
Undisturbed rootball - finishedlevel even with surroundingground level
Fill planting pit with type C soilmixed with 10% forest littercompost or approved equal.
Undisturbed subgrade orcompacted fill
Dig planting pit twice thevolume of rootball.
Landscape TechnologyDocumentation Project
Planting detail
Dig planting pit 34 of the mature
width &50MM deeper thanfinished sitting height.Fill planting pit with type C soilmixed with 10% forest littercompost or approved equal
Scarify sides & base of plantingpit
Undisturbed subgrade orcompacted fill
D607 MEG
Environmental Science
Managing Conflict: Coal Seam Gas Extraction in Pilliga: A case study. Executive SummaryWhile the industry of CSG extraction in Pilliga is seen as having significant economic potential, and is considered to be capable of providing a cost-effective energy supply with lower greenhouse gas emissions than coal, there are concerns that the extraction of this resource will impact adversely on the nationally significant habitats within the Pilliga forest and will threaten some of the State’s prime agricultural land. This has caused a divide in opinion and viewpoints of stakeholders that are directly and indirectly affected by the proposed development. This has subsequently caused environmental conflict and litigation has occured. In order to achieve a desired outcome, conflict should be approached in a procedural way. This will require a shift in power and the effective involvement of all stakeholders in the decision-making process.
Characterisation of unregulated tributary impacts on the physical, chemical and biological components in the upper Murrumbidgee River, New South Wales, Australia.1.0 Abstract The abrupt meeting of two channels each having independent flow and sediment discharge regimes creates a change in physical, chemi-cal and biological elements, directly downstream of tributaries (Miller, 1958, Best 1986). A study conducted on the upper Murrumbidgee River, New South Wales, Australia, looked directly at testing this theory by examining the physical, chemical and biological elements upstream and downstream of Yaouk Creek and Goorudee Rivulet, along with the unregulated reference site on the Goodradigbee River. The study aimed to establish any changes between sites and whether these changes had the potential to improve the river condition of the upper Murrumbidgee River. It was concluded that the scaling relationship between the main stem rivers, Murrumbidgee River and Goodradigbee River, and the trib-utaries, Yaouk Creek, Goorudee Rivulet and Cooleman Creek, displayed low to no variance in physical, biological and chemical attributes be-tween upstream and downstream sites. It is therefore likely that abiotic impacts and biotic responses are complex, such that individual or com-posite habitat changes occur at different confluences and at individual confluences at different times (Benda et al. 2004).
Landscape Ethics: (abstract from a reflection essay)
{Robison from the Rochester Institute of Technology, emphasises the importance of recognising an ethical problem and the issues associated with each given response; “where the world fails to match up, we respond with whatever seems appropriate to the seriousness of the failure”. (Robinson, W. 2008)
Aristotle reiterates this and states “we must do the right thing, at the right time, toward the right objects, toward the right people, for the right reason, and in the right manner.” (Robinson, W. 2008) However the capacity of an individual to deem what is right, in any given situation has become dependant on their capacity to recognise ethical situations, as we can hardly begin to respond ethically if we are blind to the ethical issue itself.
He deduced this ability to form recognition down to five individual factors. These are summarised as follows; 1. Character: We take into account the person’s character in assessing what the person did. We give ethical credit for someone with a good character and judge the very act of a person with a bad character; 2. Knowledge: Even if we have the best of moral characters, we must know what is right if ethical criticism is to be minimised; 3. Intention: We must also intend to do what is right. Intentions are important enough for ethical judgments that we even use our not having had an intent to cause harm as an excuse when we do cause harm; 4. Doing what is right: We must not only intend to do what is right, but do it; 5. Consequences: Anything we do has consequences, where our actions become a cause that will have its effects, whatever they may be. We may fail to consider that any complex course of action that involves others is likely to be changed by the actions or moral criticisms of others.}
Inclusion of regional policy to develop targeted salinity management in the Boorowa Region.
Executive SummaryWhile the Basin Salinity Management Strategy 2001-2015 has been tackling salinity problems for decades with a significant and measurable drop in River Murray salinity, salt problems in the Boorowa River continue to be identified as having nutrient concentrations frequently higher than those recommended for the protection of modified aquatic systems (Thurtell, 2003). Incorporating and building on the NSW Salinity Strategy (2000) and the Catchment Authority Plans 2003, this strategy adopts the existing framework to implement targeted salinity management actions for the Boorowa region. It is recommended that localized targets are set and met through three crucial steps; 1. The Boorowa CMA sets new targets, 2. implementation of management targets and 3. monitoring and evaluation of targets.
A biophysical characterization of the upper Billabong Creek Area, N.S.W
1.0 AbstractThe Upper Billabong Creek catchment is situated in Southern N.S.W, approximately 60 kilometres north of Albury. The catchment itself encompasses 300,000 ha. between the Murrumbidgee and Murray River and is predominantly cleared for agricultural purposes. This study assessed the contributions of past and present actions to determine factors that influence regolith, vegetation and hydrology to deduce on the overall quality of the catchment. Regolith differed at each site with varying results of highly alkaline and acidic soils. These extremes in alkalinity and acidity are unusual and can be attributed to the poor plant growth in the riparian zone of the catchment. pH, EC, turbidity and dissolved oxygen were recorded at each site and found that each had a negative downstream effect on water quality. It can be concluded that the biophysical character of the catchment has been detrimentally altered as a result of clearing for agricultural practices and the increasing threat of salinity.
The biodiversity value of Travelling Stock Reserves in Monaro Tableland native grasslands, NSW.
1.0 Abstract Proposed land use changes in eastern Australia’s Travelling Stock Reserves (TSRs) would allow private ownership and unregulated use as permanent stock rotations, resulting in species richness decline as refuge habitat and wildlife corridors are lost. The aim of this study is to determine the biodiversity value of TSRs in the Monaro native, temperate grasslands through an analysis of reptile diversity, patch size and quality and landscape connectivity. Moreover, to judge the worth of their contingence and whether they function as intended nature reserves. Finally, the study seeks to recommend future management strategies based on these findings to ensure conservation of biodiversity both in this region and other fragmented habitats of agricultural Australia. Results show that 8 different reptile species occupy the region, including the threatened species Suta flagellum (Little Whip Snake) and critically endangered species, Tympanocryptis pinguicolla (Grassland Earless Dragon). The most abundant species was the common skink. 8 Mile TSR recorded the highest species richness. Connectivity of the sites showed a 75% rating at 8 Mile TSR, with all other sites measured at less than 50%, except 9 Mile with 0% connectivity. There was significant difference between TSRs in terms of vegetation cover (P = 0.010), vegetation height (P=0.000), bare ground (P=0.000), rock cover (P = 0.003) and number of rocks (P = 0.000). Recommendations were established to ensure conservation of biodiversity within the grasslands. A further understanding of species diversity across the Monaro region and the dispersal ability of the reptiles would contribute to effective management decisions. Threatening processes such as habitat fragmentation, disturbance, invasive species, movement barriers and further edge effects need to be actively managed to ensure high levels of biodiversity are maintained.
Lake Ginninderra, Belconnen - Canberra
LegendRoundabouts
lake
Canberra0 140 280 420 56070
Meters
Ü Created by:Madeline GorhamGIS Assignment 1
30/09/2011
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!YASS
Bowning
Bookham
Kangiara
Gundaroo
Binalong
Wee Jasper
Burrinjuck
Suitable Bunyip Habitat - Yass, N.S.W
!
!
Burrinjuck Nature Reserve
Brindabella National Park
Wee Jasper Nature Reserve
Outside NPWS Estate
Wee Jasper
Burrinjuck
LegendGrevillia iaspicula
! Towns
Roads
Rivers
Rail
National Parks
Yass, N.S.W
Bunyip Habitathsi
0.13027
0.13028 - 2.19492
2.19493 - 2.26921
2.26922 - 2.56128
2.56129 - 2.86810
0 25,0006,250 12,500 18,750 Meters
¯Madeline Gorham: GIS: Assignment 2: 28 - 10 - 2011
0 50,00025,000 Meters
Yass
Bunyip Habitat
{Arcmap Projections}
Other Works
Block 2, Section 562 Patterson Street
Client:Margaret Grant
Ainslie ACT 2602
M: P:
Title:Landscape Plan
Scale Date Dwn1:100 Oct 10 MG
GROUNDCOVERS
NO.241824
NO.843
CODERiEjmBm
POT SIZE140mm140mm140mm
CODEBmdOjN
POT SIZE140mm140mm
SPECIESRhaphiolepis indica ‘Oriental PearlEuonymus japonicus microphyllusBuxis microphylla
SPECIESBuxus x Microphylla - Dwarf BuxusOphiopogon japonicus ‘Nanus’
SHRUBS
TREES
SPECIESBetula pendula ‘fastigata’Prunus cerasifera Prunus yedoensisAcer palmatum ‘Dissectum’
NO.11416
CODEBpfPcPyApD
SIZEmin 1.8mmin 1.5mmin 1.5m
SPECIESPittosporum tenuifolium -Euonymus japonica
SPECIESCitrus × limonPyrus ‘Kieffer’
NO.827
NO.48
CODEPtEj
CODEClPK
POT SIZE200mm200mm
POT SIZE200mm200mm
SHRUBS: (HEDGE)PLANT SCHEDULE: SIBREE RESIDENCE
residence
carp
ort
lawn
OjN x 23
OjN x 20
Bmd x 8
Ri x 12
Bm x 9
Ri x 12
Ejm x 12
Bm x 9
Ejm x 12
concrete path
Pt x 4
Ej x 7
Ej x 10
Ej x 5
Ej x 5
raised planter bedsclothes line
crushed granite path
vege-patch
scented planter box
raised decking
built in timber seating
entertaining area
wire fence
arbour/main entrance gate
drive
way
Bpf x 7
Bpf x 4
Py x1
red brick path
ApD x3
Pc x 2
ApD x3
Pc x2
Cl x 4 - espalier
ESPALIER
PK x 8 - espalier espalier design - Citrus x limon
espalier design - Pear ‘Kieffer’
dog area
DETAILS
A
A
pool gate 1pool fence
pool cover box / seating
retaining wall
rendered retaining wall
existing hedge
24 Wongoola CloseO’Connor ACT 2602
Client:Sibree Residence
Banks, A.C.T
M: 0412 822 212P: 02 6257 0488
Title:Landscape Plan
Scale Date Dwn1:200 Mar 10 MG
GROUNDCOVERS
NO.251633
NO.1611
CODEDtLgLc
POT SIZE140mm140mm140mm
CODEGgcMp
POT SIZE140mm140mm
SPECIESDianella tasmanica ‘tas red’Liriope gigantae ‘Evergreen Giant’Lomandra confertifolia ‘little pal’
SPECIESGrevillea gaudi chaudiiMyoporum parvifolium
GRASSES & FERNS
TREES
SPECIESZelkova serrata ‘vase’Pyrus calleryanaRobinia ‘Mop Top’
NO.5114
CODEZsvPcRm
SIZEmin 1.8mmin 1.5mmin 1.5m
SPECIESLoropetalum burgundyRaphiolepis springtimeWestringia Wynyabbie GemAbilias grandiflora nadaRosmarinus officinalis ‘blue lagoon’Nandina domestica ‘moonbay’Pittosporum tobira miss muffet
NO.9511631612
CODELbRsWwgAgnRoNdPt
POT SIZE200mm200mm200mm200mm200mm200mm200mm
SHRUBSPLANT SCHEDULE: SIBREE RESIDENCE
residence
pool
shade sail
proposed pool shed
paved entertaining area
proposed breakfast bar
seating
trampoline
compost
proposed vegetable patch x4
clothes linescented planter box
lawn
entrance gate
pool gate 2
Ro x 3
Nd x10
Dt x16
Lc x 10
Wwg x1
Rs x5Lb x2
Zsv x5
Lb x3
Lg x5
Ggc x8
Lg x3
Wwg x1
Pt x 5
Lb x4
gravel path
Mp x11
Lg x3
Lc x7
Pc x 11
Pt x 8
Nd x2
Nd x2
Nd x5
Lg x5
Lc x16
Dt x9
Agn x 1
Agn x 5
Wwg x3
Ggc x 8
Rm x1Rm x1
Rm x1
Rm x1
65 Shumack Street
Client:Alicia and Pete Dankiw
Weetangera, ACT 2602
M: P:
Title:Landscape Plan
Scale Date Dwn1:100 Nov 10 MG
GROUNDCOVERS
NO.10132318
NO.2929
CODEEjmCaPmRo
POT SIZE140mm140mm140mm140mm
CODEGpGs
POT SIZE140mm140mm
SPECIESEuonymus japonicus micrphyllusCorrea albaPhilotheca myoporoides Rhaphiolepis Oriental Pearl
SPECIESGrevillea poorinda ‘royal mantle’Gelsemium sempervirens
SHRUBS
TREES
SPECIESZelkova serrata ‘vase’Pyrus calleryanaAcer palmatum
NO.311
CODEZsvPcAp
SIZEmin 1.5mmin 1.5mmin 1.5m
SPECIESWestringia fruticosaPrunus lusitanica
SPECIESliriope gigantea ‘russian giant’Dianella revoluta
NO.4448
NO.272717
CODEWfPl
CODELgDr
POT SIZE200mm200mm
POT SIZE200mm200mm200mm
SHRUBS: (HEDGE)PLANT SCHEDULE: WEETANGERA RESIDENCE
GRASSES & FLAX
12 x Pm
8 x Wf
40 x Pl
existing paved entrance
bus stop
existing tree
existing maple
existing bush
residence
drive-way
lawn
crushed red granite
existing gate
19 xGp 9 xGs
14 x Gs
6 xGs
12 x Pm
3 X Wf
11 xLg
1 x Ejm
5x Ejm8x Dr
9 x Ca
10 x Lg
4 x Ca
4 xEjm
9 x Pm
5 x Dr
8 x Pl
6 x Dr
20 x Gp
6 x Lg8 x Dr
3 x Wf
3 xRo
3 xPm
3 X Wf
6 x Pm
2 x Wf
1 x Zsv
1 x Zsv
1 x Pc
1 x Zsv
1 x Ap
15 Ro
25 x Wf
Madeline Gorham p: 0415 062 949e: [email protected]