MACHINERY IN THE TEXTILE INDUSTRY. JOHN KAY’S FLYING SHUTTLE, 1733 Could weave wider cloth Could...

6
MACHINERY IN THE TEXTILE INDUSTRY

Transcript of MACHINERY IN THE TEXTILE INDUSTRY. JOHN KAY’S FLYING SHUTTLE, 1733 Could weave wider cloth Could...

MACHINERY IN THE TEXTILE INDUSTRY

JOHN KAY’S FLYING SHUTTLE, 1733

• Could weave wider cloth• Could weave faster so greater production• More expensive• Needs a larger space• Threatened weavers jobs

JAMES HARGREAVES SPINNING JENNY, 1765

• Could spin many threads at once• Produced quite coarse/rough yarn• Threat to traditional jobs

RICHARD ARKWRIGHT’S WATER FRAME, 1769

• Spun stronger yarn but quite coarse/rough• Operated by water power so need to be in a

factory• Threatened traditional jobs

SAMUEL CROMPTON’S SPINNING MULE

• Made finer cloth for more expensive cloth• Could produce much more as a large-scale

machine• Threat to traditional jobs

EDMUND CARTWIGHT’S POWER LOOM, 1785

• Weaving could now take places in factories so mass production possible

• Skilled weavers lost their livelihoods