machine discussion + result.docx

download machine discussion + result.docx

of 8

Transcript of machine discussion + result.docx

  • 8/10/2019 machine discussion + result.docx

    1/8

    1. Muhammad Nur Ikhwan bin Mazli 168699

    2. Vincent Ong Shu Lin 168798

    3. Yokasundery A/P Muniandy 168636

    Lecturer :Dr.Mohd Roshdi bin Hassan

    Date conduct experiment : 30th

    October 2014

    Date of Submission : 6th

    November 2014

    Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing

    Engineering

    EMM 3504 Machine Mechanics

    Laboratory Report:DETERMINATION OF MOMENTUM OF INERTIA

    OF A GYROSCOPE DISK

    Semester : Semester 1, 2014/2015

    Group : B4

    Group Members:

    http://profile.upm.edu.my/barkawi/en/profail.htmlhttp://profile.upm.edu.my/barkawi/en/profail.html
  • 8/10/2019 machine discussion + result.docx

    2/8

    EXPERIMENT:

    Result

    Also obtained,

    Solid cylinder (disc) = 900g

    Hollow = 900g

    Drive weight = 100g

    Experimental, r = 0.01m

    = 11cm

    = 12cm

    = 12cmPart 1: Distance, h = 69cm

    Types Time (s)

    1 2 3 Average

    Solid 2.84 2.02 2.16 2.34

    Hollow 3.04 2.87 3.13 3.103

    Table 1: Result for experiment part 1.

    Referring to the values in table above obtained during the experiment used to calculate inertia,

    I:

    Equations for calculating the moment of inertia for both theoretically and experimentally are

    as follows:

    Theoretically

    (A) Solid cylinder

    = m = (1/8) x 0.9kg x ( = 1.62 x

  • 8/10/2019 machine discussion + result.docx

    3/8

    (B) Hollow

    = m ( )

    = (1/8) x 0.9kg x ( ) = 2.98 x Experimentally

    I=

    = ()(( (= 3.97 x kg

    = ()(( (= 6.58 x

    Types Theoretical value Experimental value Percentage error (%)

    Solid 1.62 x 3.97 x kg 75.5Hollow 2.98 x 6.58 x 77.9

    Table 2: Percentage of error for hollow and solid.

  • 8/10/2019 machine discussion + result.docx

    4/8

    Part 2:

    Distance, = 26cmHeight of hanging load, h: 69 cm

    Distance, d1: 260 mm

    Mass of load: 100g

    Mass (g) Time (s)

    1 2 3 Average

    200 7.60 7.30 7.49 7.463

    400 10.33 10.57 10.17 10.357

    800 13.92 13.97 13.92 13.937

    Table 3: Time readings for different mass of loads at 260 mm.

    Distance, = 6cmHeight of hanging load, h: 69 cm

    Distance, d2: 60 mm

    Mass of load: 100g

    Mass (g) Time (s)

    1 2 3 Average

    200 3.51 3.50 3.57 3.527

    400 3.87 4.00 3.91 3.927

    800 4.82 4.69 4.78 4.763

    Table 4: Time readings for different mass of loads at 60 mm.

  • 8/10/2019 machine discussion + result.docx

    5/8

    Sample calculation for theoretical moment of inertia:

    ((= Sample of calculation for experimental value moment of inertia:

    ()(

    ( (=

    Theoretical value for moment

    of inertia,(x10-4kg m2)Experimental value for

    moment of inertia,100 g D = 60 mm 3.6 9.01

    D = 260mm 67.6 40.4

    200 g D = 60 mm 7.2 11.2

    D = 260mm 135.2 77.7

    400 g D = 60 mm 14.4 16.4

    D = 260mm 270.4 140.8

    Table 5: Values for theoretical and experimental for different mass.

  • 8/10/2019 machine discussion + result.docx

    6/8

    Figure 1: Graph of Ix vs Mass for D = 60mm

    Figure 2: Graph of Ix vs Mass for D = 260mm.

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    1214

    16

    18

    0 100 200 300 400 500

    InertiaMoment((x10-4k

    gm2)

    Mass (g)

    Graph of Ix vs Mass for D = 60mm

    Theoretical Ix value

    Experimental Ix value

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    0 100 200 300 400 500

    InertiaMoment((x10-4kg

    m2)

    Mass (g)

    Graph of Ix vs Mass for D = 260mm

    Theoretical Ix value

    Experimental Ix value

  • 8/10/2019 machine discussion + result.docx

    7/8

    Discussion

    From the experiment part 1 above, we found out that hollow cylinder took longer time in

    order to let the drive weight to reach the bottom compared with solid cylinder. This is

    because hollow cylinder has a higher moment of inertia compared to solid cylinder. Hence,

    hollow cylinder has a lower angular acceleration due to its high moment of inertia compared

    to the solid cylinder.

    Meanwhile, for the experiment part 2, we found out that when the distance between 2

    masses longer, time taken to let the drive weight to reach the bottom point longer. This is

    because the longer the distance between the masses, the higher the inertia of moment, hence,

    the lower the angular acceleration. So more time needed in order to let the drive weight

    reaches the bottom point.

    Besides, we also found out that the heavier the mass, time taken to let the drive weight

    to reach the bottom point longer. This is because the heavier the mass, the higher the inertia

    of moment, hence, the lower the angular acceleration. So more time needed in order to let the

    drive weight reaches the bottom point.

    There is some percentage error in the experiment. This is due to some errors such as

    human error and random error. For human error, there is some delay when we take the time

    taken as the drive weight reached the bottom point. This is because one of the member need

    to observe whether the drive weight have reach the bottom point or not and another member

    handled the stopwatch. Hence, there is some delay when both members communicate with

    each other in order to record the time taken as the drive weight reached the bottom point. The

    random error is affected by the environment where the experiment carried out. For an

    example, there is some air movement in the laboratory which produced by the air conditioner,

    hence, this will affect the quality of the result. So in order to improve the accuracy of the

    result, the experiment should carried out at a place without air movement.

    Industrial application

    Flywheels are often used to provide continuous energy in systems where the energy

    source is not continuous. In such cases, the flywheel stores energy when torque is applied by

    the energy source, and it releases stored energy when the energy source is not applying torque

    to it. For example, a flywheel is used to maintain constant angular velocity ofthecrankshaft in a reciprocating engine. In this case, the flywheel which is mounted on the

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crankshafthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crankshaft
  • 8/10/2019 machine discussion + result.docx

    8/8

    crankshaft stores energy when torque is exerted on it by a firingpiston,and it releases energy

    to its mechanical loads when no piston is exerting torque on it. Other examples of this

    arefriction motors,which use flywheel energy to power devices such astoy cars.

    A flywheel may also be used to supply intermittent pulses of energy at transfer rates

    that exceed the abilities of its energy source, or when such pulses would disrupt the energy

    supply (e.g., public electric network). This is achieved by accumulating stored energy in the

    flywheel over a period of time, at a rate that is compatible with the energy source, and then

    releasing that energy at a much higher rate over a relatively short time. For example,

    flywheels are used inriveting machines to store energy from the motor and release it during

    the riveting operation.

    The phenomenon ofprecession has to be considered when using flywheels in

    vehicles. A rotating flywheel responds to any momentum that tends to change the direction of

    its axis of rotation by a resulting precession rotation. A vehicle with a vertical-axis flywheel

    would experience a lateral momentum when passing the top of a hill or the bottom of a valley

    (roll momentum in response to a pitch change). Two counter-rotating flywheels may be

    needed to eliminate this effect. This effect is leveraged in reaction wheels,a type of flywheel

    employed in satellites in which the flywheel is used to orient the satellite's instruments

    without thruster rockets.

    Conclusion

    This report has discussed the momentum of inertia of a gyroscope disk by

    measurement of its angular acceleration. Where the hollow cylinder took longer time in order

    to let the drive weight to reach the bottom compared with solid cylinder due to its inertia. The

    objectives of this experiment was achieved. But due to some errors, the value that we get may

    slightly different from the theoretical value.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pistonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friction_motorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toy_carhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riveting_machineshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precessionhttp://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/rollhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaction_wheelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaction_wheelhttp://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/rollhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precessionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riveting_machineshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toy_carhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friction_motorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piston