M-theoretic Matrix Models - Conferences at ITP / ETH Zürich

15
M-theoretic Matrix Models Alba Grassi Université de Genève Mostly based on: A.G. , M. Mariño, 1403.4276

Transcript of M-theoretic Matrix Models - Conferences at ITP / ETH Zürich

M-theoretic Matrix Models

Alba GrassiUniversité de Genève

Mostly based on: A.G. , M. Mariño, 1403.4276

Outline

The ABJM theory: it has been possible to compute exactly the full partition function which includes the full series of instanton corrections.

M-theoretic matrix models: generalize the ideas behind ABJM. They are excellent laboratories to understand the structure of non- perturbative effects in the large N expansion, and also, via gauge/string dualities, non-perturbative effects in M-theory and string theory.

The Matrix Model: is an M-theoretic matrix model with large N dual which displays a similar structure to ABJM.

Nf

Review of ABJM

• 2 Super Chern-Simons nodes with opposite coupling ABJM:

U(N) U(N)

k -kAharony, Bergman,

Jafferis,Maldacena.

1) It has large N string / M theory dual:

Maldacena

• matter in bifundamental of U(N)k ⇥U(N)�k

•Type IIA string dual onAdS4 ⇥CP3

•M-theory dual on AdS4 ⇥ S7/Zk

Review of ABJM

Kapustin, Willett, Yaakov

P1 ⇥ P1

S3

Aganagic, Klemm, Mariño, Vafa - Mariño, Putrov

2) Localization: the partition function on reduces to a matrix model

3) ABJM is deeply related to topological strings on local

Z

ABJM

(N, k) =

1

N !

ZNY

i=1

dx

i

4⇡k

1

2 cosh

xi2

Y

i<j

✓tanh

✓x

i

� x

j

2k

◆◆2

.

A related quantity: The Grand Potential

Z(N, k) =1

2⇡i

ZdµeJ(µ,k)�Nµ

J(µ,k)

Review of ABJMABJM can be studied in two different regimes:

• N large, k large: fixed

1) The ’t Hooft regime:

� = Nk • N large, k fixed

2) M theory regime:

• Make contact with IIA theory • Make contact with M-theory

⇣Lls

⌘4⇠ �, gst ⇠ 1

k

⇣Llp

⌘6⇠ Nk, k : geometrical

• is the partition function of a Fermi gas and this regime is the thermodynamic limit .

Mariño, Putrov

ZABJM•The grand potential has a genus expansion

J0tHooft =

Pgk2�2gJg(

µk )

Review of ABJM

The Grand potential reads The Grand potential reads

Polynomial part

J0t Hooft = Jp

⇣µk

⌘+ JWS(

µ

k)

JWS⇣µk

⌘=

X

m�1

cm(k)e�4mµk

poles for finite k

Invisible in Fermi gas approach !around k=0.

poles for finite k

J(µ, k) = J(µ, k)p + Jnp(µ, k)

Jnp (µ, k) =X

`�1

dm(k, µ)e�2`µ

Polynomial part

M-Theory: M2 Membrane !wrapping 3-cycle

Type IIA: worldsheet !wrapping CP1 ⇢ CP3

Gopakumar-Vafa

Hatsuda,Mariño,

Moriyama,Okuyama

1) The ’t Hooft regime: 2) M theory regime:

µ ⇠ kp� : Invisible in ’t Hooft

expansion.!

The point:

1) There are two types of instanton corrections:

One visible in ’t Hooft expansion

!One visible in M-theory expansion / Fermi gas

2) Thanks to Topological strings we have an exact expression for n.p. corrections. Each of them has poles at physical value of the coupling constant. But when we sum them the poles cancel ( HMO cancellation).

Hatsuda, Moriyama, Okuyama

The ’t Hooft expansion is fundamentally incompleteThe Fermi gas approach makes possible to go beyond ’t Hooft expansion

Review of ABJM

Generalization to others models.

We define “M-theoretic matrix models” as these models that can be studied in the two following expansions:

The ’t Hooft expansion: N large and the others parameters scale with N.

The M-theory expansion: N large and the others parameters are kept fixed. From a statistical mechanics point of view this corresponds to

!

Examples

!

Models with a large N dual: the Model

Models appearing in 2D statistical physics: !the polymer matrix model

Benini,Closset,Cremonesi Nf

Zamolodchikov

the thermodynamic limit.!

• one adjoint hypermultiplet

• fundamental hypermultiplets

• one vectormutliplet with gauge group U(N)

Localization : the partition function on reduces to a matrix model: S3

Z(N,Nf

) = 1

N !

R QN

i=1

dx

i

4⇡

1

(2 cosh

x

i

2 )N

f

Qi<j

⇣tanh

⇣x

i

�x

j

2

⌘⌘2

Kapustin, Willett, Yaakov

: this is the partition function of ABJM for k=1

We consider the SYM in 3d with the following matter content:

Nf

N = 4

Nf = 1

The Matrix ModelNf

The partition function on can be expressed as a O(2) matrix model: S3

The Matrix ModelNf

By exploiting the O(2) formalism we solved the planar and genus one limit:

d2F0d2�

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4!6

!5

!4

!3

!2

!1

Example:

--

-

exactstrongweak

Z(N,Nf ) =R NQ

i=1

dzi e�Nf log(z1/2

+z�1/2) Qi<j

(zi � zj)2

Qi,j

(zi + zj)�1

F0 = J0 � µN/N2f

From the point of view of M theory:

In the large N limit we have the M-theory on

C2 ⇥�C2/ ZNf

�, Describes N M2 branes probing the space

where the action is

e2⇡i/Nf · (a, b) =�e2⇡i/Nf a, e�2⇡i/Nf b

Benini,Closset,Cremonesi

AdS4 ⇥ S7/ZNf

Nf

ANf�1This corresponds to an singularity / multi-Taub-NUT space

The Matrix ModelNf

Summary

Very similar to ABJM structure, but without underlying topological strings!

’t Hooft expansion M-theory/Fermi gas expansion

N large, large, fixed N large, fixed

The model is a O(2) model

The polynomial part of the Grand Potential is the same .

!Dual WS instantons?

! Dual membrane instantons?

non perturbative: !membrane instantons

non perturbative:!ws instantons

NfNf �

e�2⇡p2� e�2⇡Nf

p�2

The Matrix ModelNf

Nf ZNf = ZFermi Gas

Hard task without topological strings

’t Hooft regime: we solved the planar limit and the genus one, but we lack an efficient method to go beyond ( Holomorphic anomaly equation? )

How to resum the whole series of WS/Membrane instantons?

The Matrix ModelNf

Recent numerical work by Hatsuda & Okuyama shows that there seems to be a pole cancellation mechanism also for this model.

A possible solution

!10 !5 0 5 10

1

2

3

4

5

E1

E2

E3

We have an Ideal Fermi gas, hence the full information is contained in!knowledge of the the energy levels. !

The energy levels are determined by the this integral equation:

1R�1

⇢(x1, x2)�n(x2)dx2 = e

�En�n(x1), n � 0

Nevertheless we can treat this integral equation numerically and!check our previous analytic results.

Problem: We lack an analytic method to solve it.

The Matrix ModelNf

Conclusions

• For these other theories, in order to fully solve the problem, we

• There are many models that share the characteristics of ABJM.

• ABJ(M) is privileged because of the connection with topological

need a method to solve analytically the integral equation appearing !in the spectral problem.

strings.

Kazakov, Kostov ,Nekrasov Jafferis, Tomasiello Honda,Okuyama - KallenNekrasov, Shatashvili