M /s. S RF LIM ITED - environmentclearance.nic.in...M /s. S RF LIM ITED PL O T N O. D -2 /1 , G .I.D...
Transcript of M /s. S RF LIM ITED - environmentclearance.nic.in...M /s. S RF LIM ITED PL O T N O. D -2 /1 , G .I.D...
1
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
M/s. SRF LIMITED PLOT NO. D-2/1 , G.I.D.C. Phase II,
PCPIR, Dahej, Taluka : Vagra,
District: Bharuch 392130,
Gujarat
RISK ASSESSMENT STUDY (Manufacturing of Fluorochemicals and Specialty Chemicals)
July-2015
PREPARED BY
VAIBHU SAFETY CONSULTANTS FF 10-11, Akshat Complex,
Nr. Reliance petrol pump,
High Tension Road, Subhanpura,
Vadodara-390023
Phone: 9825756467 / 8980004562(M)/ 0265-2395798(O)
Email: [email protected]
Web site: www.vaibhusafety.com
2
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
INDEX
SECTION NO.
PARTICULAR
PAGE NO.
SUB
SECTION
1 Executive Summary
4
2 Objectives, Philosophy and methodology of Risk assessment
6
3 Introduction of the unit
8
3.1 Company Introduction 8
3.2 Details of Unit 10
3.3 Project setting 14
3.4 Organizational setup 19
3.5 List Of product 19
3.6 List of Raw material 23
3.7 Details Of Storage Of Hazardous Materials In Bulk & Control
Measures
29
3.8 Hazardous Material Storage and Handling Safety 31
3.8.1 For Above ground storage tank farm and PESO licensed
premises
31
3.8.2 For SMPV licenced premises.( n-Butane, Ethane and Ehtylene) 32
3.8.3 For Hydrogen cylinders
32
3.8.4 For Anhydrous Ammonia cylinders 33
3.8.5 Bromine Storage & Handling Safety
33
3.8.6 Hydrofluoric acid (AHF) 37
3.8.7 Safety Measures for AHCL gas cylinder 38
3.8.8 Safety Measures for Oleum storage tank area 38
3.8.9 For Drum Storage area 38
3.8.10 For Acid and Alkali storage area (Sulfuric Acid and Hydrochloric
Acid )
39
3.8.11 Process Safety 39
3.9 Transportation, Loading and handling procedure for hazardous
chemicals
40
3.9.1 For Flammable chemicals 40
3.9.2 Bromine Transportation, Unloading and handling Procedure 42
3.9.3 Transportation , Unloading and handling procedure for Oleum 46
3.9.4 Drums Transportation , Unloading and handling procedure 48
3.10 HAZARDOUS PROPERTIES OF THE CHEMICALS,
COMPATIBILITIES AND SPECIAL HAZARD
51
3.11 Occupational health impact on employees, control measures,
action plan if accident occur
65
3
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
3.12 Brief Description Of Process. 80
3.13 Existing Fire Prevention & Protection System 81
3.13.1 Fire Fighting System (Fire Hydrant System ) 81
3.13.2 Emergency Mitigation Measures And Emergency Control
Facilities
89
4 Hazard identification
90
4.1 Introduction 90
4.2 DOW’s Fire and Explosion Index 91
4.3 Identification of Hazardous area 91
4.4 Failure Frequency
92
5 Risk Assessment
94
5.1 Effects of Release of Hazardous Substances 94
5.2 Tank on Fire / Pool Fire 94
5.3 Fire ball/BLEVE 95
5.4 UVCE 95
5.5 Dispersion Cases 95
5.5.1 Plumes 95
5.5.2 Puffs 95
5.5.3 Spill Pool 95
5.6 Identification of High Risk Areas 95
5.7 Modes of Failure 95
58 Damage Criteria for heat radiation
96
6 6.0 Consequence Analysis
98
6.1 Consequence Analysis 98
6.1.1 Maximum Credible loss scenarios (MCLS) 98
Scenarios 1 to 41 100-183
6.2 Detail regarding consequences analysis table 184
6.3 Conclusions 187
7 Risk Reduction Measures
188
4
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
SECTION I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Executive Summary
M/s. SRF Limited intends to Manufacturing of Fluorochemicals and Specialty Chemicals which is
set-up at PLOT NO. D-2/1 , G.I.D.C. Phase II, PCPIR, Dahej, Taluka : Vagra, District: Bharuch
392130, Gujarat
1.1 Experts from our organization visited the site on 20.07.2015 and subsequently inspection of
site as per site plan and the environs along with collection of relevant information about the
proposed installation and the operations of the plant. Also a detailed discussion was held on
various aspects including storage facilities, process safety and emergency preparedness with
the officers of the company.
1.2 Petroleum product like Toluene, Ethanol, Methanol etc. solvents are received through road
tanker and stored in PESO approved above ground storage tank farm area as per Petroleum
Act and Rules. All safety measures are provided at design level and foolproof safety features
are adopted.
1.3 Anhydrous Hydrofluoro Acid(AHF) stored in dedicated tank farm area. All safety measures
are adopted at design level and constructed as per PESO requirements.
1.4 Hydrogen and Ammonia cylinder storage area will be constructed at separate locations and
all safety measures to be adopted as per Gas cylinders rules and all preventive and protection
system to installed for safety.
1.5 Bromine storage tank will be installed away from the existing process and storage area. All
safety measures are to be provided at design level and foolproof safety measures are to be
adopted.
1.6 N-Butane, Ethane and ethylene tank farm area away from the other tank farm area and safe
distances maintained as per SMPV rule and PESO requirements.
1.7 Some flammable/combustible/ Toxic liquid/solid chemicals will be received in drums or
bags or in carboys and it will be stored in drum storage area and in RM store as per its
incompatibility and other properties like flammable, toxic, corrosive and reactive.
1.8 Based on the data furnished and the study of the installation, certain hazards have been
identified and their consequences are modeled mathematically using HAMSGAP software.
Mapping of various scenario are with hazardous distances and safe distances are drawn on
site plan for easy understanding of the consequences of the accident/ incident.
The study indicates that possible hazards associated with the plant are confined to (a)
Petroleum product PESO licence premises.(b) Liqufied petroleum storage (SMPV) PESO
area.(c) Non petroleum product but highly flammable class A chemical storage tank farm
area.(d) Hydrogen gas cylinder storage area. (e) Ammonia gas cylinder storage area.(f)
Bromine storage tank area (g) AHF tank farm area (h) AHCL cylinder storage (e) Oleum and
Sulfuric acid storage tank farm area. (f) Drums storage area ( Warehouse). Various hazardous
scenarios have been identified for Risk Assessment and the consequences modeled.
5
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
1.9 The results of the analysis have been summarized in the table appended.
1.10 It is observed from the summary that the consequences of hazards associated with any
possible spills / leaks for catastrophic failure of storage tanks, road tanker release scenarios
would be of large in nature and would be taken care of with the proposed emergency
facilities and manpower employed.
1.11 The possibility of occurrence of such hazards and their effects could be further reduced by
implementing the suggestions made in this report.
1.12 Catastrophic failure of storage tanks, road tanker, resulting in major disaster due to fire and
explosion and toxic releas due to AHF, Bromine, AHCL, Ammonia are very unlikely events
barring gross neglect of time tested safety standards and procedures set up by the industry.
1.13 The possibility of occurrence of major disaster due to fire, explosion and toxic release and
mishaps are considered very remote.
1.14 However considering the potential for major hazards, however remote they may be,
associated with storage area, some suggestions are made in the subsequent chapters for
further improvement in the areas of safety, environmental impact, Emergency facilities and
emergency preparedness plan.
1.15 Conclusion Based on the
1) Risk Analysis study and information regarding the layout plan and safety systems.
2) Discussions with company officials,
6
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
SECTION II
OBJECTIVE, PHILOSOPHY AND METHODOLOGY OF RISK ASSESSMENT
2.1 Objective :
The main objectives of the Risk Assessment (RA) study is to determine damage due to major
hazards having damage potential to life & property and provide a scientific basis to assess
safety level of the facility.
The principle objective of this study was to identify major risks in the manufacture of
specialty fine chemicals and storage of hazardous chemical at site and to evaluate on-site &
off-site consequences of identified hazard scenarios. Pointers are then given for effective
mitigation of hazards in terms of suggestions for effective disaster management, suggesting
minimum preventive and protective measures & change of practices to ensure safety.
2.2 PHILOSOPHY :
This report is limited to the following:-
Identification of major risk areas.
Hazard identification/Identification of failure cases
Consequential analysis of probable risks / failure cases
Evaluation of heat radiation & pressure wave profiles for identified failure cases
Risk assessment on the basic of the above evaluation & risk acceptability
Minimum preventive & protective measures to be taken to minimize risks to maximum
possible extent.
Giving pointers for effective disaster management
Suggesting other measures to further lower the probability of risk
2.3 Methodology
The procedure used for carrying out the Quantitative Risk Assessment Study is outlined
below:-
Identify Credible Loss Scenarios for the facility under the study by discussion with M/s. SRF
Limited Simulate loss Scenarios to determine the vulnerable zones for toxic dispersion, pool
fire, Tank on fire (Thermal Radiation ), Flash fire, Explosion over pressure (Vapour cloud
Explosion, Ball fire using software packages HAMSGAP.
Suggest mitigating measures to reduce the damage, considering all aspects of the facilities.
The flowchart of the methodology for the present study is shown in following page.
7
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
RISK ASSESSMENT STUDY METHODOLOGY FLOWCHART
START
FACILITY, PROCESS AND METEOROLOGICAL DATA COLLECTION
LISTING OUT OF HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS & STORAGE DETAILS
DEFINING OF PARAMETERS FOR EACH OF CHEMICALS & EACH OF HAZARDS
IDENTIFICATION OF FAILURE SCENARIOS & QUANTIFICATION OF PROBABLE HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH THEM
DEFINING RELEASE TYPE (CONTINUOUS OR INSTANTANIOUS ) & DETERMINE RELEASE RATES
SIMULATION OF SELECTED CASES FOR CONSEQUENCE MODELING
PREPARATION OF SUMMERY OF CONSEQUENCE RESULTS
EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL RISK TO THE SURROUNDING POPULATION
DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDATION OF MITIGATIVE / REMEDIAL MEASURES
END
8
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
SECTION III
INTRODUCTION OF THE UNIT
3.1 COMPANY INTRODUCTION:-
M/s. SRF Limited intends to Manufacturing of Fluorochemicals and Specialty Chemicals
which is set-up at PLOT NO. D-2/1 , G.I.D.C. Phase II, PCPIR, Dahej, Taluka : Vagra, District:
Bharuch 392130, Gujarat.
The plant of SRF Ltd. was commissioned in 2012 at Dahej, Gujarat and at present the major
products being produced are Tricholoethylene, Perchloroethylene, Anhydrous Hydrofluoric
Acid( AHF), 1,1,1,2 Tetrafluroethane (HFC 134a) and Captive Power.
SRF began as Shri Ram Fibres in 1970 when its parent company DCM decided to set up a
separate entity to manufacture nylon tyre cord fibres. Its formation was a result of the
foresight that nylon was the future material for tyre cord fibres. The company established its
first plant in Manali near Chennai in 1973. With an initial annual capacity of 2000 tonnes of
nylon cords, the plant started operations in 1974. Shri Ram Fibres thus became one of the
first companies in India to start manufacturing nylon tyre cords. Over the years, the company
expanded its product line in technical textiles and also diversified into other businesses like
Chemicals, Packaging Films and Engineering Plastics. The company was no longer
manufacturing fibres alone, a fact that necessitated the change in the name of the company.
Shri Ram Fibres thus became SRF Ltd. in 1990. SRF Ltd. is a multi-business entity engaged in
the manufacture of chemical based industrial intermediates. Its business portfolio covers
Technical Textiles, Fluorochemicals, Specialty Chemicals, Packaging Films and Engineering
Plastics. As a manufacturer of a wide range of products that make people'sdaily lives safer
and more comfortable, SRF Ltd. claims to touch everyone's life every day in more ways than
one.
With headquarters in Gurgaon, India, the 5500-strong global workforce company has
operations in two more countries, Thailand and South Africa. SRF Ltd. is the market leaders
in most of its businesses in India and also enjoys significant global presence in some of its
businesses, the company exports its products to over 60 countries.
The company, equipped with state-of-the-art R&D facilities, boasts of its Chemical
Technology Group that is actively involved in process innovations and product development.
A winner of the prestigious Deming Prize for two of its businesses, tyre cord business in 2004
and Chemicals Business in 2012, SRF Ltd. adopts TQM as a management way.
The company through its social wing, SRF Ltd. Foundation, remains committed to continue to
contribute towards the cause of education, vocational skills, health, natural resource
management and affirmative actions.
SRF Ltd. boasts of a lineage which is a century old. The company remains committed to
creating wealth for its stakeholders in business while holding fast to the rigid standards of
ethics and morality of its founders. The company continues to cherish and defend the values
of serving the needs of its community.
SRF Ltd. is also keeping the traditions of its founders alive through promoting arts, culture,
music and sports. Building on the legacy of its founding group that established some of the
premiere academic institutes of the country, SRF Ltd. continues to strive to advocate the
cause of quality education in India.
9
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
With our state-of-the-art R&D facilities and an ingenious team of scientists and technologists
we are making tomorrow happen today. We at SRF Ltd., make efforts to develop products,
which not only meets the specifications, but also are economical and ecological.
Committed to provide cutting-edge solutions to its customers, most of businesses of SRF Ltd.
today boast their own dedicated R&D centre.
The Chemicals Technology Group (CTG), created specifically to focus on developing new
processes and technologies for specialty chemicals, has been the silent performer behind the
success of Fluorochemicals and Specialty Chemicals Business of SRF Ltd. The team of
scientists working in the Chemicals Technology Group continues to develop products to cater
needs of agrochemical, pharmaceuticals and other niche customers through two R&D centres,
one at Bhiwadi in Rajasthan and the second one at Manali near Chennai in Tamil Nadu.
Equipped with state-of- the-art facilities, the R&D centres under CTG, employ the best of
talent from some of the most reputed educational institutions in the country. The R&D teams
work on synthesis of new halogenated organic compounds as well as development of
analytical methods for them. The R&D labs are equipped with cutting edge in-process and
product testing facilities like LC, LC/MS, GC,GC/MS, FT-IR, Spectrophotometer etc.
SRF Ltd. provides an integrated service from research (process development) to kilo scale
synthesis to commercial scale supply, supported by its in-house process development and
engineering expertise. SRF Ltd. has a rich experience and successful track record of
development & commercialization of various complex organic molecules, while maintaining
high standards of EHS. At SRF Ltd., the focus is on providing highest value to its customers,
while supporting them throughout the life cycle of their products with a high level of
professionalism, ensuring confidentiality and transparency to them.
At its new site at Dahej, a couple of projects have already been commercialized and more are
in pipeline, based on in-house technologies. Captive power plant has also been set- up to
cater to the current requirement of the Power & Steam.
The manufacturing operations of SRF’s Fluorochemicals Business & Specialty Chemicals Business are located at two locations: Dahej in Gujarat & Bhiwadi in Rajasthan. The business
derives its revenue from the sale of Specialty Chemicals & Fluorochemicals Products.
In the Specialty chemicals segment, further strategic tie-ups with global agro and pharma
majors have been established. New products have been introduced and fructification of
others is in the pipeline.
Refrigerants are primarily used as a cooling medium in the air conditioning and refrigeration
industry. SRF Ltd. continues to be one of the larger and more credible players in the industry
globally. It is the domestic market leader with about 50 percent share. Exports of the
business are spread across 60 countries worldwide, and account for over 60 percent of the volumes produced. SRF’s portfolio of refrigerants includes hydrochlorofluorocarbon-22
(HCFC-22), the new-generation refrigerant, hydrofluorocarbon-134a (HFC-134a), and the
refrigerant blend R410a. The company continues to invest in further capacities of HFC-134a
keeping in view the medium and long-term growth of India’s automobile industry, as well as in the rest of the developing world.
Currently, in line with long-term strategy, SRF Ltd. has contemplated expansion of Specialty
Chemicals & Fluorochemicals manufacturing plant at Plot No. D-2/1, Village: Suva, GIDC-
Phase II, Dahej, Taluka: Vagra, District: Bharuch (Gujarat).
13
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
22. Explosive License
Sr.
No.
Name License Number Valid Up to Chemical
Name
No's tank
/cylinder
/jugs/can
Qty of
Chemical
/Gas
Storage
1. Ammonia cylinder
storage shed
G/WC/GJ/06/17
85 (G31700)
30.09.2022 Ammonia _ 44
Cylinders
2. Anhydrous HCl
cylinder storage
shed
G/WC/GJ/06/17
85 (G31700)
30.09.2022 Anhydrous
HCl
_ 96
Cylinders
3. Petroleum Class -
A storage shed
(Barrels)
P/WC/GJ/16/43
3(P311879)
31.12.2023 Petroleum
Class A
(Barrel)
_ 18 KL
4. R -22 & HFP
storage tank farm
S/HO/GJ/03/13
78(S50692)
31.03.2017 R-22 2 Nos. (65 M3
each)
140544
Kg
HFP 1No. (65 M3
each)
67925 Kg
5. Petroleum Class -
A & B storage tank
farm
P/HQ/GJ/15/52
08 (P269396)
31.12.2015 Class-A:
Toluene,
Methanol,
Ethanol,
Acetone,
Hexane
7 Nos. (35 KL
each)
210 KL
Class-B:
Xylene
35 KL
6. Liquid Nitrogen
storage tank farm
S/HO/GJ/03/13
53 (S49959)
31.03.2017 Liquid
Nitrogen
02 Nos. (01
tank19.411
M3) (02 tank
52.961M3)
01 tank-
13976 Kg
02-38132
Kg
7. Chlorine Tonner
shed
G/HO/GJ/06/69
8 (G29142)
30.09.2022 Chlorine _ 168
Cylinders
8. Chlorine Bulk
storage
S/HO/GJ/03/13
84 (S47422)
31.03.2018 Chlorine 3Nos.
(132 M3
each)
02 operation
01 standby)
300960
Kg
9. Petroleum class B
& C storage
S/HO/GJ/15/52
00 (P27033)
31.12.2024 Class-
B,HSD
1 No. 50 KL
Class-C,FO 1 No. 150 KL
10. AHF Tank Farm
storage.
S/HO/GJ/03/15
10(S55654)
31.03.2016 AHF 6 Nos.
(87974 M3
each)
526044
Kg
11. R134a Storage
tank farm
G/HO/GJ/05/75
2&06/742
(G35688)
31.03.2016 HFC 134 a 3 Nos.
(110.51 M3
each)
289758
Kg
12. HFC 134 a filling
shed & storage
G/HO/GJ/05/75
2 (G35688)
G/HO/GJ/06/74
30.09.2021 HFC 134 a
Storage 1.
Cylinder
1.(5 Kg & 10
Kg) 2. (62 Kg
/ 61 Kg)
1.:- 3600
2.:- 1000
3:- 21000
14
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
2 (G35688) R-
134a/R22
2. Cylinder
R-
134a/R22
3.R-134a /
R-22 4. R-
134a & R-
22 :-
345000
Nos 5.CAN
R-134a
3.DOT.39
JUGS :-
4.Tonner
(825 Kg) 5.
CAN (340 /
450 Gm)
4.:-100
5:-
345000
HFC 134 a
Filling
1. R-
134a/R22
2. R-
134a/R22
3. R-134a
/ R-22
4. R-134a
& R-22
:-02 Nos
5. R-134a
(340 / 450
Gm)
1.Cylinder (5
Kg & 10 Kg)
2.Cylinder
(62 Kg/61
Kg)
3.DOT.39
JUGS
4.Tonner
5.CAN
1.:-02 Nos
2.:-02 Nos
3.:-08 Nos
4.:-825
Kg
5. :-02
Nos
13. Hydrogen Storage G/WC/GJ/06/19
84 (G39948)
23.09.2024 Hydrogen 50
Cylinders.
3.3 PROJECT PROPOSAL SETTING:
M/s. SRF Ltd. has proposed for expansion of existing Specialty Chemicals & Fluorochemicals
manufacturing Plant (1, 75,000 MTPA to 22, 08, 600 MTPA) and Captive Power Plant (25 MW
to 75 MW) at Plot No. D-2/1, Village: Suva, GIDC-Phase II, Dahej, Taluka: Vagra, District:
Bharuch (Gujarat).The existing, proposed expansion and the total plant production capacities
after the proposed expansion are given in Figure: 1.1.
Latitude ° ’ . N to ° ’ . N
Longitude ° ’ . E to ° ’ . E
17
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Figure 1.3
Site Plan.
18
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Figure 1.4
Fire Hydrant Network.
19
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
3.4 OHC ORGANIZATIONAL SET UP
3.5 LIST OF PRODUCTS
The proposed expansion project has 80 products and 52 co-products. The quantity of each
existing and proposed products and co-products has been given in Table: 3.2.
TABLE NO: 3.2
Product list
Sr.
No.
Name of Product Existing Capacity
(MT/Annum)
Proposed Capacity
(MT/Annum)
1. Trifluro Acetic Acid - 2000
2. Parabromofluorobenzene - 500
3. Tetrafluorobenzyl Alcohol 10000 100
4. Ethyldifluoroacetate 4000
5. Ethyltrifluoroacetate 1000
6. Ethyltrifluoroacetoacetate 1000
7. Amino crotonate 1000
8. Trifluoroacetic anhydride 500
9. Pentafluorobenzoic Acid 500
10. Pyrazole Acid 2000
11. Chloro Trichloro Methyl-
Cyclopentene
2000
12. 2-methyl-4- (1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoro-
2-propyl aniline)
1000
20
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Sr.
No.
Name of Product Existing Capacity
(MT/Annum)
Proposed Capacity
(MT/Annum)
13. Fluoromethyl ester 1000
14. Diphenylphenol 1000
15. Tetrafluoropropane- 1234yf 10000
16. 1,1,2,2- Tetrafluoroethyl Methyl Ether - 4000
17. Hexafluropropylene - 1000
18. Ethyl Difluoroacetoacetate - 1000
19. Difluoromethanesulphonylchloride - 1000
20. Triflic Acid - 1000
21. Trifluoromethanesulfonic Anhydride - 1000
22. Trimethylsilyl
trifluoromethanesulfonate
- 1000
23. 3-Trifluoromethylacetophenone - 1000
24. 2,6-dichloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)
aniline
- 1000
25. Cyanapyrazole - 2000
26. Trifluoromethylbenzamide - 2000
27. Trifluoroacetyl chloride - 1000
28. Sulphur Tetrafluoride - 500
29. 2- Trifluoromethyl benzochloride - 1000
30. Trifluoromethyl-2-EthoxyVinyl Ketone - 1000
31. 2-(2-Methoxy-ethoxymethyl)-6-
Trifluoromethyl-nicotinic acid ethyl
ester
- 2000
32. Mefenamic Acid - 1000
33. Hexafluoropropylene oxide - 500
34. Pentafluorophenol - 500
35. Monomethylhydrazine - 4000
36. [3-(4,5-dihydro-1,2-oxazol-3-yl)-4-
mesyl-o-toly](5-hydroxy-1-
methylpyrazol-4-yl) methanone
- 500
37. Tri Fluro acetone - 500
38. Methyl tri fluoro acetate - 500
39. Chlorodifluoroacetic Anhydride - 100
40. Bromopentafluorobenzene - 500
41. 4-Chlorobenzotrichloride - 600
42. 4-Chlorobenzotrifluoride - 600
43. Methyl hydroxy Pyrazole - 100
44. 6-Fluoro methyl indole - 100
45. Difluoroethoxy ethanol - 20
46. 5-Bromo-2-2-difluoro-1-3-
benzodioxide
- 1000
47. Difluorobenzodixole methyl ester - 20
21
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Sr.
No.
Name of Product Existing Capacity
(MT/Annum)
Proposed Capacity
(MT/Annum)
48. 2-Fluoro-5-nitrobenzoic acid - 30
49. 5-Chloro-3-(difluoromethyl)-1-
methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-
carboxaldehyde
- 500
50. 3-Difluoromethyl-5-fluoro-1-methyl-
1H-pyrazole-4-carboxaldehyde
- 500
51. 2,5-Dichloro-4-(1,1,2,3,3,3
hexafluoroprppoxy) benzenamine
- 500
52. 2,4,5-Trifluorophenyl acetic acid - 50
53. 3-Aminobenzotrifluoride - 1000
54. 2,4-Dichloro-3,5-
dinitrobenzotrifluoride
- 1000
55. 3-phenoxy benzaldehyde - 4000
56. 3-phenoxy toluene - 200
57. Methyl-2-Fluoroacrylate - 400
58. Lithium tetrakis (pentafluorophenyl)
borate
- 100
59. 2-fluoro-5bromobenzonitrile - 50
60. Ethyl-Trifluoropyruvaqte - 200
61. Isoflurane - 250
62. Desflurane - 100
63. Sevoflurane - 200
64. Trichloroacetyl chloride - 2000
65. Trichloroethylene 80000 62727
66. Perchloroehtylene 27273
67. Caustic Chlorine 60000 80000
68. Anhydrous Hydrofluoric acid 15000 40000
69. Chlorotrifluoroethane (HCFC 133a) - 500
70. 1,1,1,2 Tetrafluoroethane (HFC 134a) 10000 20000
71. Pentafluoroethane (HFC 125) - 20000
72. Difluoromethane (HFC32) - 20000
73. R600a (ISO Butane) - 1000
74. R290 (Propane) - 1000
75. R410a - 500
76. R404a - 500
77. R407c - 500
78. Blend of R152a + R134a - 500
79. Blend of R142b + R22 - 500
80. Blend of R134a + DME (Di Methyl
Ether)
- 500
22
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
TABLE NO:-3.3
CO-PRODUCT
Sr. No. Name of Co-Product Proposed
Capacity(MT/Annum) 1. 2-methyl-4-(1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluro-2-propyl aniline &
Toluene
1250
2. Acetone, Trimethylorthoformate, Ethyl acetate & Acetic
anhydride
9782
3. Aluminium trifluoride 1000
4. AmmoniumSolution (10-15%) 6871
5. Ammonium Chloride 5811
6. Bromopentaflurobenzene 17
7. Calcium Chloride 176
8. Calcium Fluoride 8479
9. Caustic Iye/Flakes 260116
10. Copper chloride 52
11. Dicyclopentadyene &Chlorobenzene 436
12. Diethylether & Toluene 295
13. Dimethylformamide 810
14. Ethane 205
15. Ethanol 684
16. Ethyl acetate & Ethanol 3963
17. Ethyldifluroacetate & Methyldifluroacetate 76
18. Ethyldifluroacetate & Polydifluroacetate 4
19. Gypsum 162400
20. hydrochloric acid Anhyudrous 1500
21. hydrochloric acid (15-30%) 933681
22. Hydrofluoric acid (20-60%) 34641
23. Hydrofluorosilic acid (15-40%) 24000
24. Hydrogen 2240
25. Hydrogen bromide Solution (40-50%) 5691
26. Methyl isobutyl Ketone & Mix Xylene 938
27. Methylene chloride 59390
28. Mix Xylene , Triethylorthoformate, Ethyl acetate &Acetic
anhydride
6519
29. n-Butane 4981
30. Ethyl acetate, Methylene Chloride, Hexane &Toluene 6630
31. Phosphoric acid (25-75%) 2421
32. Phosphorus trichloride 1837
33. Potassium carbonate 30
34. Potassium fluoride & Potassium bromide 2039
35. Potassium fluoride & Potassium chloride 1704
36. Potassium fluoride & Potassium sulphate 1288
37. R & D Based Products 2000
38. R 290 (Propane) 688
23
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Sr. No. Name of Co-Product Proposed
Capacity(MT/Annum) 39. R 600a (Isobutane) 1453
40. Sodium bromide 30
41. Sodium chloride 4270
42. Sodium fluoride 47
43. Sodium hydroxide, Barium hydroxide & Barium chloride 40
44. Sodium hypo chlorite 149516
45. Sodium methoxide Solution 120
46. Sodium sulphate 15
47. Sulphuric Acid (70%-95%) 117932
48. Succinimide (C4H5NO2) 31
49. Terpene 75
50. Toluene 23
51. Trichloethylene & Perchloroethylene 33395
52. Zinc fluoride & Zinc oxide cake
787
3.6 LIST OF RAW MATERIALS:
TABLE: 3.4
Sr. No. Material Name Quantity
tons
/day
Quantity
tons /Month
Physical
form
Mode of
Storage
1. 1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoroethyl Methyl
Ether
17.0 424.3 Liquid Tank
2. 1,3 Benzodioxole 0.1 1.7 Liquid Barrels
3. 1,3-Dimethyl-2-imidazolidinone 0.1 3.5 Liquid Barrels
4. 1,4-Dioxane (C4H8O2) 1.6 39.2 Liquid Tank
5. 1-3 Benzodioxide 2.7 66.9 Liquid Barrels
6. 20% H2SiF6 Solution 29.6 739.8 Liquid Barrels
7. 2-Fluorobenzonitrile 0.1 3.2 Liquid Barrels
8. 3-Aminobenzotrifluoride (TFMA) 4.4 110.8 Liquid Barrels
9. 3-Nitro-o-xylol 2.5 62.6 Liquid Barrels
10. Acetaldoxime 50% 4.3 108.3 Liquid Barrels
11. Acetic Acid 16.9 421.6 Liquid Tank
12. Acetic Anhydride 40.0 1000.8 Liquid Tank
13. Acetone 15.8 394.7 Liquid Tank
14. Acetonitrile 0.4 9.2 Liquid Barrels
15. Activated Carbon 3.2 80.3 Solid Barrels
16. AIBN 0.5 12.8 Fine
crystals
Barrels
17. Alumina 0.1 1.7 Solid Barrels
18. Alumina Balls 0.5 12.6 Solid
Barrels
24
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Sr. No. Material Name Quantity
tons
/day
Quantity
tons /Month
Physical
form
Mode of
Storage
19. Alumina Carbon 0.1 1.7 Solid Barrels
20. Aluminium Chloride 15.4 384.9 Powder Barrels
21. Aluminum 1.1 26.7 Solid Barrels
22. Ammonia (NH3) 1.8 44.1 Gas Cylinder
23. Ammonium hydroxide solution
(25%)
3.1 76.8 Liquid Barrels
Anhydrous Calcium Chloride 0.4 10.5 Crystalline Barrels
24. Anthranilic acid 0.1 2.4 Solid Barrels
25. Antimony Chloride based Catalyst 0.0 0.3 Solid Barrels
26. Barium Hydroxide/ Sodium
Hydroxide
4.1 102.8 Powder Barrels
27. Benzaldehyde 8.8 220.4 Liquid Barrels
28. Benzonitrile 1.3 31.5 Liquid Barrels
29. Benzotrichloride 4.4 110.8 Liquid Barrels
30. Benzyl Chloride 2.0 49.2 Liquid Barrels
31. BF3.etherate solution (50%) 0.0 0.6 Liquid Barrels
32. Boron trifluoride ethereate 0.6 14.3 Liquid Barrels
33. BPFB 2.9 71.4 Liquid Barrels
34. Bromine 10.4 259.0 Liquid Tank
35. Bromobenzene 1.2 30.1 Liquid Barrels
36. Butyl Acetate 13.4 334.5 Liquid Tank
37. Butyl Nitrite 3.1 77.5 Liquid Barrels
38. C2 2.6 65.8 Gas Cylinder
39. Calcium Hydroxide 1.9 47.2 Solid Barrels
40. Calcium oxide 8.9 221.7 Solid Barrels
41. Calcuim Chloride 0.0 0.7 Solid Barrels
42. Carbon monoxide 0.5 12.8 Compresse
d gas
Cylinder
43. Carbontetrachloride 4.7 116.5 Solid Tank
44. Catalyst - Nitrile based 0.1 1.7 Solid Barrels
45. Catalyst cromia based 0.1 3.3 Solid Barrels
46. Caustic lye 48% 325.16 8129.1 Liquid Tank
47. Celite 0.1 2.7 Solid Barrels
48. Ceramic Balls 0.0 0.2 Solid Barrels
49. Charcoal 2.1 53.0 Solid Barrels
50. Chlorine 763.4 19084.4 Liquid/gas Cylinder
51. Chloro Malonic Ester 4.9 121.4 Liquid Barrels
52. Chlorobenzene 2.2 54.4 Liquid Tank
53. Chlorobenzonitrile 0.2 4.7 Crystalline Barrels
54. Chlorodifluoroacetic acid(CDFA) 0.7 17.8 Liquid Barrels
55. Chlorodifluoromethane (R 22) 41.3 1032.6 Liquefied
Gas
Tank
56. Chloroform 0.1
2.5 Liquid Barrels
25
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Sr. No. Material Name Quantity
tons
/day
Quantity
tons /Month
Physical
form
Mode of
Storage
57. Chlorosulfuric acid 1.1 26.8 Liquid Barrels
58. Copper 0.4 9.5 Powder Barrels
59. Copper Acetate 2.9 73.2 Powder Barrels
60. Copper chloride 0.2 4.1 Powder Barrels
61. Crome- Alumina 0.5 11.9 Granules Barrels
62. Cromia 0.0 0.7 Solid Barrels
63. Cuprous Chloride 0.0 0.8 Crystals. Barrels
64. CuSO4 Solution 10.7% 2.6 64.2 Liquid Barrels
65. Cyclohexane 0.5 12.3 Liquid Barrels
66. Cyclohexanone 14.7 368.1 Liquid Tank
67. Dichloroacetophenone 0.4 10.9 Needles Barrels
68. Dichlorobenzotrichloride 4.1 101.7 Liquid Barrels
69. Dichlorobenzotrifluoride 2.6 64.2 Liquid Barrels
70. Dichloromethane (DCM) 0.5 12.2 Liquid Barrels
71. Dichlorophenol 1.0 25.0 Crystalline Barrels
72. Dicyclopentadiene (DCPD) 2.5 63.5 Liquid Barrels
73. Diethyl ethoxymethylenemalonate
(DEMM)
0.9 23.1 Liquid Barrels
74. Diethylamine (DEA) 0.0 1.0 Liquid Barrels
75. Diethylether 0.8 18.8 Liquid Barrels
76. Difluorobenzene 1.8 44.0 Liquid Barrels
77. Difluoromethane R-32 24.3 608.3 Liquefied
Gas
Tank
78. Dimethyl disulfide (C2H6S2) 1.5 36.7 Liquid Barrels
79. Dimethyl Sulfoxide (C2H6OS) 0.7 16.9 Liquid Barrels
80. Dimethylamine 2.3 56.4 Liquid Barrels
81. Dimethylether 0.8 20.8 Liquid Barrels
82. Dimethylformamide 16.8 421.2 Liquid Tank
83. Dioxane 0.3 8.3 Liquid Barrels
84. DMAN 6.2 155.1 Liquid Barrels
85. Ethanol 8.5 213.7 Liquid Tank
86. Ethyl Acetate 36.7 916.7 Liquid Tank
87. Ethyl Vinyl Ether 2.9 71.4 Liquid Barrels
88. Ethyldifluoroacetate 21.9 546.6 Liquid Tank
89. Ethyldifluoroacetoacetate 6.2 154.8 Liquid Tank
90. Ethyledichloride 316.6 7915.0 Liquid Tank
91. Ethylene 1.5 38.2 Gas Cylinder
92. Ethyltrifluoroacetate 3.0 75.8 Liquid Tank
93. Ethyltrifluoroacetoacetate 6.8 171.0 Liquid Tank
94. Ferric Chloride 0.7 18.6 Solid Barrels
95. Ferric Chloride based (Catalyst) 0.0 0.8 Solid Barrels
96. Flourinating catalyst 0.1 2.1 Solid Barrels
97. Fluorine 1.3 33.1 Gas Cylinder
26
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Sr. No. Material Name Quantity
tons
/day
Quantity
tons /Month
Physical
form
Mode of
Storage
98. Fluorobenzene 0.9 23.3 Liquid Barrels
99. Fluorspar 346.7 8666.7 Solid Covered
Shed 100. Formic acid 3.1 76.9 Liquid Barrels
101. Heptane 2.9 71.7 Liquid Barrels
102. Hexafluoroacetone 1.2 29.5 Compresse
d gas
Cylinder
103. Hexafluoroisopropanol 1.1 27.8 Liquid Barrels
104. Hexafluoropropylene (HFP) 9.9 246.8 Gas Cylinder
105. Hexane 3.8 95.0 Liquid Tank
106. Hydrazine Hydrate 100% 10.9 272.3 Liquid Tank
107. Hydrochloric Acid (HCl) 82.6 2064.7 Liquid Tank
108. Hydrochloric acid Anhydride 19.7 492.6 Gas Cylinder
109. Hydrofluoric acid Anhydride 248.0 6199.2 Gas Tank
110. Hydrogen 0.8 19.2 colorless
gas
Cylinder
111. Hydrogen bromide 8.6 214.1 Liquid Tank
112. Hydroquinone 0.0 0.4 Crystalline Barrels
113. Hyflow 0.2 6.1 Solid Barrels
114. Hyodrogen Peroxide (H2O2) 5.324 133.1 Liquid Barrels
115. Iron Powder 0.9 22.4 Granules Barrels
116. Isoflurane 1.3 32.7 Liquid Barrels
117. Isopropanol 3.1 76.5 Liquid Barrels
118. KHCO3 Solution 25% 0.5 13.6 Crystalline Barrels
119. Liquified Petroleum Gas 31.1 777.3 Liquefied
Gas
Tank
120. Lithium aluminium hydride 3.3 83.5 Solid Barrels
121. Magnesium 0.3 7.0 Solid Barrels
122. m-Cresol 0.4 10.3 Liquid Barrels
123. Methanesulfonyl chloride (MSCl) 3.9 97.4 Liquid Tank
124. Methanol 52.2 1306.2 Liquid Tank
125. Methoxy AA 5.1 128.4 Liquid Barrels
126. Methyl Acetoacetate 0.7 16.4 Liquid Barrels
127. Methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK)
0.9 21.5 Liquid Barrels
128. Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 4.1 101.5 Liquid Barrels
129. Methylene Chloride 128.1 3201.6 Liquid Tank
130. MHP (C4H6N2O) 0.6 15.0 Liquid Barrels
131. Mix Xylene 4.8 120.2 Solid Barrels
132. Molecular Sieve 3.7 91.3 Solid Barrels
133. Monochlorobenzene (MCB) 0.5 13.0 Liquid Tank
134. Monoethylene glycol 0.8 20.3 Liquid Barrels
135. Monoglyme 0.2 4.9 Liquid Barrels
136. Monomethylhydrazine 22.2 554.8 Liquid Tank
27
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Sr. No. Material Name Quantity
tons
/day
Quantity
tons /Month
Physical
form
Mode of
Storage
137. Morpholine 0.3 7.6 Liquid Barrels
138. N-Bromosuccinimide (C4H4BrNO2) 0.2 4.6 Solid Barrels
139. n-Butyllithium 0.0 0.9 Liquid Barrels
140. NH3 Solution 25% 17.3 432.8 Liquid Tank
141. Nitric Acid 8.8 219.5 Liquid Barrels
142. Nitrogen 184.8 4619.4 Gas Cylinder
143. NMP 3.8 96.0 Solid Barrels
144. Oleum 165.0 4123.8 Liquid Tank
145. O-Toluidine 2.2 55.2 Liquid Barrels
146. O-Xylene 10.6 264.6 Liquid Tank
147. P2O5 4.4 108.8 Crystaline Barrels
148. Paladium /alumina 0.2 4.9 Solid Barrels
149. Palladium chloride (PdCl2) 0.0 0.1 Solid Barrels
150. Palladium on carbon 0.3 8.6 Powder Barrels
151. Parabromofluoro Benzene 1.8 44.5 Liquid Barrels
152. Paraformaldehyde 1.2 30.8 Crystalline Barrels
153. P-Chloro toluene 11.5 287.8 Liquid Tank
154. Pentafluoro Benzonitrile 0.6 15.1 Liquid Barrels
155. Pentafluorobenzene 1.5 38.5 Liquid Barrels
156. Perchloroethylene 103.3 2583.3 Liquid Tank
157. Phenol 7.8 194.4 Liquid Barrels
158. Phosphoric Acid (85%) 0.2 4.1 Liquid Barrels
159. Phosphorus oxychloride (POCl3) 9.4 235.4 Liquid Barrels
160. Phosphorus pentachloride 8.7 216.3 Powder Barrels
161. Potassium Carbonate 6.1 151.6 powder Barrels
162. Potassium Fluoride 10.1 251.7 Solid Barrels
163. Potassium methoxide 1.9 47.3 Solid Barrels
164. Potassium Phosphate 0.0 1.1 Solid Barrels
165. Potassium sulfite 0.1 2.4 Crystaline Barrels
166. Potassiun Hydroxide 32.6 815.2 Solid Barrels
167. Precipitated Silica 0.1 3.7 Solid Barrels
168. Process Water 5037.2 125929.3 Liquid Tank
169. PTC 0.0 0.9 Liquid Barrels
170. p-Toluenesulfonic acid 0.0 1.2 Liquid Barrels
171. Pyridine 1.2 30.9 Liquid Barrels
172. R 134a (1112 - Tetrafluoroethane) 20.3 508.3 Liquefied
Gas
Tank
173. R 142 b (Chlorodifluoroethane) 0.8 20.8 Liquefied
Gas
Tank
174. R 152 a (Difluoroethane) 0.8 20.8 Liquefied
Gas
Tank
175. R-125 39.7 991.7 Liquefied
Gas
Tank
28
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Sr. No. Material Name Quantity
tons
/day
Quantity
tons /Month
Physical
form
Mode of
Storage
176. R-143a 17.3 433.3 Liquefied
Gas
Tank
177. Raney nickel 0.1 1.7 Slurry Barrels
178. Sidium Tungstate Dihydrate
(Na2WO4.2H2O)
0.0 0.2 Crystals
and
fragments
Barrels
179. Silica Gel 0.1 3.2 Crystal Barrels
180. Soda ash 0.7 16.7 Granual Barrels
181. Sodium Acetate 0.2 6.1 Solid Barrels
182. Sodium Bi sulphite 0.0 0.1 Solid Barrels
183. Sodium bicarbonate 7.3 183.1 Crystalline Barrels
184. Sodium Borohydride 0.1 2.2 Powder Barrels
185. Sodium Carbonate 0.7 17.9 Powder Barrels
186. Sodium Chloride 459.2 11480.3 Solid Barrels
187. Sodium dithionite (Na2S2O4) 0.9 22.3 Powder Barrels
188. Sodium Ethoxide 15.3 383.2 Powder Barrels
189. Sodium Fluoride 0.2 4.0 Solid Barrels
190. Sodium iodide 1.5 38.3 Crystalline Barrels
191. Sodium Methoxide (30%) 0.8 20.0 Liquid Tank
192. Sodium Nitrite 3.0 75.7 Solid Barrels
193. Sodium Sulphite 0.0 0.4 Solid Barrels
194. Sodium thiosulphate 0.8 20.1 Powder Barrels
195. Stabilizer (Thymol) 1.7 41.8 Crystalline Barrels
196. Sulfolane 0.1 3.1 Crystalline Barrels
197. Sulfur 0.6 14.2 Solid Barrels
198. Sulphuric acid (98%) 509.0 12724.2 Liquid Tank
199. Synthon-2 1.9 47.1 Liquid Barrels
200. Terpene 0.3 6.3 Liquid Barrels
201. tert-Butyllithium in pentane
solution (24%)
0.2 4.7 Liquid Barrels
202. Tetrabutyl ammonium
hydrogensulphate
0.9 21.6 Crystalline Barrels
203. Tetrafluoroethylene 2.0 49.1 Gas Cylinder
204. Tetramethyl ethylene diamine 0.1 3.3 Liquid Barrels
205. TFEMe 5.3 133.3 Liquid Barrels
206. Therminol 55 0.2 5.3 Liquid Barrels
207. THF 0.5 12.4 Liquid Tank
208. Thiourea 3.0 74.2 Crystalline Barrels
209. Toluene 27.3 683.7 Liquid Tank
210. TPP 0.1 1.6 Liquid Barrels
211. Tri ethyle amine 4.8 120.3 Liquid Barrels
212. Trichloroacetyl chloride 12.6 314.3 Liquid Barrels
213. Trichloroethylene 95.4 2384.0 Liquid Tank
29
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Sr. No. Material Name Quantity
tons
/day
Quantity
tons /Month
Physical
form
Mode of
Storage
214. Trichlorofluoromethane 5.4 133.8 Liquid Tank
215. Triflic Acid 6.8 170.0 Liquid Barrels
216. Trifluoro acetal fluoride (TFAF) 4.3 107.3 Liquid Barrels
217. Trifluoro acetic acid 3.5 88.5 Liquid Barrels
218. Trifluoro Acetyl Fluoride 4.8 119.0 Gas Cylinder
219. Trifluoroethanol 0.8 18.8 Liquid Barrels
220. Trifluoromethyl-2-ethoxyvinyl
ketone
4.4 109.1 Liquid Barrels
221. Trimethylorthoformate 30.1 752.3 Solid Barrels
222. Trimethylsilyl chloride 1.8 45.3 Liquid Barrels
223. Trioxane 0.2 6.0 Crystalline Barrels
224. Xylene 0.7 18.1 Liquid Tank
225. Zinc 1.6 39.5 Solid Barrels
3.7 DETAILS OF STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN BULK & CONTROL MEASURES:
TABLE: 3.5
SR.
NO
AME OF
HAZARDOUS
SUBSTANCE
MAX.
STORAGE
CAP.(QTY)
EXISTING
MAX.
STORAGE
CAP.(QTY)
PROPOSED
PLACE OF IT’S STORAGE
OPERATIN
G
PRESSURE
AND
TEMP.
TYPE OF
HAZARD
CONTROL
MEASURE
PROVIDED
.
1. Methanol 35 KL X 2
Nos. A/G
tanks= 70 KL
35 KL X 11
Nos. A/G
tanks= 385 KL
Tank
farm area
ATP
Ambient
Fire Provided
below as
point No: 3.8.1
2. Toluene 35 KL X 2
Nos. A/G
tanks= 70 KL
35KL X 4
Nos. A/G
tanks= 140 KL
Tank ATP
Ambient
Fire Provided
below as
point No: 3.8.1
3. Acetone 35 KL X 1 Nos. A/G
tanks= 35 KL
35 KL X 3 Nos. A/G
tanks= 105
KL
Tank farm area
ATP Ambient
Fire Provided below as
point No:
3.8.1
4. Isopropyl alcohol Nil 35 KL X 1
Nos. A/G tanks= 35
KL
Tank ATP
Ambient
Fire Provided
below as point No:
3.8.1
5. Ethanol 35 KL X 1
Nos. A/G tanks= 35 KL
35 KL X 1
Nos. A/G tanks= 35
KL
Tank
farm area
ATP
Ambient
Fire Provided
below as point No:
3.8.1
6. Ethyl Acetate 35 KL X 1
Nos. A/G
tanks= 35 KL
35 KL X 7
Nos. A/G
tanks= 245 KL
Tank
farm area
ATP
Ambient
Fire Provided
below as
point No: 3.8.1
30
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
7. Diethylether 35 KL X 1 Nos. A/G
tanks= 35 KL
Nil Tank farm area
ATP Ambient
Fire Provided below as
point No:
3.8.1
8. Hexane 35 KL X 1
Nos. A/G
tanks= 35 KL
Nil Tank ATP
Ambient
Fire Provided
below as
point No:
3.8.1
9. Butyl Acetate Nil 50 KL X 2
Nos. A/G tanks= 100
KL
Tank ATP
Ambient
Fire Provided
below as point No:
3.8.1
10. O-Xylene 35 KL X 1
Nos. A/G
tanks= 35 KL
Nil Tank ATP
Ambient
Fire Provided
below as
point No: 3.8.1
11. Acetic Acid 35 KL X 1 Nos. A/G
tanks= 35 KL
35 KL X 2 Nos. A/G
tanks= 70
KL
Tank ATP Ambient
Fire Provided below as
point No:
3.8.1
12. Monomethyl Hydrazine (MMH)
(35%) Solution
35 KL X 1 Nos. A/G
tanks= 35 KL
35 KL X 4 Nos. A/G
tanks= 140
KL
Tank ATP Ambient
Fire Provided below as
point No:
3.8.1
13. Ethylene
dichloride
100 KL X 1
Nos. A/G 250 KL X
2Nos.=600
KL
250 KL X
4Nos. =1000 KL
Tank ATP
Ambient
Fire Provided
below as point No:
3.8.1
14. Acetonitrile 10 KL X 1 Nos. A/G
tanks= 10 KL
Nil Tank ATP Ambient
Fire Provided below as
point No: 3.8.1
15. MIBK Nil 10 KL X 1 Nos. A/G
tanks= 10
KL
Tank ATP Ambient
Fire Provided below as
point No:
3.8.1
16. Acetic Anhydride 50 KL X 1
Nos. A/G tanks= 50 KL
50 KL X 4
Nos. A/G tanks= 200
KL
Tank ATP
Ambient
Fire Provided
below as point No:
3.8.1
17. Dicyclopentadien
e (DCPD)
50 KL X 1
Nos. A/G tanks= 50 KL
Nil Tank ATP
Ambient
Fire Provided
below as point No:
3.8.1
18. n-Butane Nil 60 KL X 1
Nos.
Bullet= 60 KL
Tank ATP
Pressure
storage
Fire Provided
below as
point No: 3.8.2
19. Ethane Nil 10 KL X 1 Nos. Bullet
= 10 KL
Tank ATP Pressure
storage
Fire Provided below as
point No:
3.8.2
20. Ethylene Nil 20 KL X 1
Nos. Bullet = 20 KL
Tank ATP
Pressure storage
Fire Provided
below as point No:
3.8.2
31
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
21. Hydrogen 50 cylinders 700 cylinders
CS Cylinder
ATP Pressure
cylinder
Fire /Explosion
Provided below as
point No:
3.8.3
22. Ammonia (NH3) 50 kgX 44
Nos. cylinders
50kg X 200
Nos.
cylinders
CS
Cylinder
ATP
Pressure
cylinder
Toxic Provided
below as
point No:
3.8.4
23. Bromine 16 KL X 2
Nos=32 KL
Nil Tank ATP
Ambient
Toxic Provided
below as point No:
3.8.5
24. Anhydrous
Hydrofluoric acid
88 KL X 6
Nos=528 KL
88 KL X 5
Nos=440
KL
Tank ATP
2 kg/cm2
Corrosive/
Toxic
Provided
below as
point No: 3.8.6
25. Hydrochloric acid Anhydride
40 kgX 96 Nos. cylinders
40 kgX 520 Nos.
cylinders
Cylinder ATP Pressure
cylinder
Corrosive/
Toxic
Provided below as
point No:
3.8.7
26. Oleum 250 KL X 2Nos. tanks=
500 KL
Nil Tank ATP Ambient
Corrosive/
Toxic
Provided below as
point No:
3.8.8
3.8 Hazardous Material Storage and Handling Safety :
3.8.1 For Above ground storage tank farm and PESO licenced premises.
1. Class A petroleum products are received through road tanker and stored
in PESO storage tank as per petroleum rules .
2. Tank farm is constructed as per explosive department requirement and
separation distance will be maintained.
3. Static earthing provision is made for road tanker as well as storage
tank.
4. Flame arrestor with breather valve will be provided on vent l ine.
5. Road tanker unload ing procedure is prepared and implemented.
6. Fire load calculation is done and as per f ire load Hydrant System is
provided as per Indian std. and Fire extinguishers are provided as per
f ire load calculation.
7. Spark arrestor on tanker exhaust l ine is being provided to al l vehicles in
side premises.
8. Flame proof type equipment s and l ighting are provided.
9. Trained and experience operator s are employed for tank farm area.
10. NFPA label (hazard identif ication ) capacity and content are displayed
on storage tank training for the same
11. Solvents are transferred by pump only in plant area and day tanks are
providedin process area . DCS operation logics provided in tanks and all
controls with interlocking system provided for process as well as
storage tank farm safety.
12. Double Jumpers are provided on f lammable chemical handling pipeline
f langes.
13. Flexible SS hose are used for road tanker unloading and loading
purpose.
32
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
14. Satic earthing automation arrangement provided at unloading and
loading station for road tanker.
15. Nitrogen blacketing provided whre is it is required.
16. Dyke wall wil l be provided to storage tank
17. Double static earthing provided to storage tank.
18. Nitrogen blanketing & vapor balancing l ine provided to minimize VOC
levels .
19. Foam making arranment provided in tank farm ar ea.
3.8.2 For SMPV licenced premises.( n-Butane, Ethane and Ehtylene)
1 Double Safety valve provided.
2 Dyke with separate fencing area is provided.
3 SOP prepared
4 Road tanker unloading procedure prepared
5 Flame-proof area.
6 Work permit followed
7 Firefighting equipment provided.
8 Hydrant system provided.
9 PPEs used
10 Safety shower, eye wash provided.
11 NFPA labeling system adopted for drums as well as storage tanks.
12 Level indicator at local as well as on DCS
13 Alarm for high level & temperature.
14 Sprinkler system is provided on bullet .
15 Foam arrangement provided for f ire f ighting.
3.8.3 For Hydrogen cylinders
1 Hydrogen cylinders will be stored in cylinder storage area. Cylinder
storage l icence will be obtained from PESO as per Gas cylinder rules .
2 Hydrogen cylinder storage area will be made well ventilated and safe
distance will be maintained as per gas cylinder rule.
3 Sprinkler system provision will be made in cylinder storage area.
4 Gas deptectors will be provided in Hydrogen cylinder storage area.
5 Copper tube will be used f or Hydrogen cylinder connection with header.
PRV station will be provided for Hydrogen and nitrogen cylinder jeader.
6 Non sparking tools wil l be used for cylinder connection with header.
For Hydrogen Cylinder connecting header :
1 Hydrogen cylinder will be received by road will be stored away from
process plant .
2 PRV station provided with shut off valve and safety valve .
3 Flame proof l ight f itt ing installed.
4 Static earthing and electric earthing (Double) provided.
5 Jumpers for static earthing on pipeline f lang es of f lammable chemical
wil l be provided.
6 Non sparking tools wil l be used for hydrogen l ine f itt ing.
Hydrogenation Plant:
1 FLP type area will be provided.
2 Total enclosed process system.
33
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
3 Instrument & Plant Air System.DCS operational plant
4 Nitrogen blanketing in Hydrogenation reactor.
5 Safety valve and Rupture disc provided on reactor.
6 Cooling Chil l ing and power alternative arrangement have been made
on reactor.
7 Hydrogen and Nitrogen Cylinder bank away from the autoclavereactor.
8 PRV station with shut off valve, safety valve provision will be made for
hydrogenation reaction safety.
9 Before Hydrogen Gas charging in to reactor and after completion of
reaction Nitrogen f lushing will be done.
10 Flame arrestor will be provided on vent l ine of reactor and it wil l be
extended up to roof level .
11 Open well ventilated and fragile roof wil l be provided to on reactor.
12 Safe Catalyst charging method will be adopted.
13 SOP will be prepared and operators will be trained for the same.
14 Static earthing and electric earthing (Dou ble ) provided.
15 Rector vent extended out side the process area and f lame arrestor
provided on vent l ine.
16 Dumping vessel arrangement will be made.
17 Jumpers for static earthing on pipeline f langes of f lammable chemical
wil l be provided.
3.8.4 For Anhydrous Ammonia cylinders :
1 Ammonia cylinders will be stored in cylinder storage area. Cylinder
storage l icence will be obtained from CCOE as per Gas cylinder rules .
2 Ammonia cylinder will be made well ventilated and safe distance will be
maintained.
3 Sprinkler system provision will be made in cylinder storage area.
4 Ammonia cylinder leakage identif ication will be done by HCL torch.
5 Ammonia cylinder leakage control Kit wil l be kept available at store.
6 Hazard identif ication, control measures in case of leakage and f irst Aid
procedure will be prepared and displayed at handling locations.
7 Copper tube will be used for Ammonia cylinder connection with header.
8 Sprinkler point and Eyewash / Safety shower will be provided near
Ammonia header point .
3.8.5 Bromine Storage & Handling Safety
1. The amount of bromine in storage will be kept to a minimum.
2. Minimize the dispersal of bromine vapors by locating the storage area
on low ground. Low curbs or walls (called dikes), 200 mm high, wil l be
provided to protect the area from external f looding and to minimize the
dispersal of bromine vapors. The minimum diked volume will be
equivalent to the largest storage tank plus 10%.
3. Adequate size sump will be provided for collecting bromine spil ls and
pump away collected rainwater and f ire -f ighting water.
4. Floors will be of impervious construction, preferably concrete.
5. Bromine ISO tank should be stored no closer than 10 meters from
human or animal consumable articles . Explosives and f lammable
materials should not be stored close to bromine.
6. There should be a strengthened approach way for emergency vehicles on
two sides of the installation.
34
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
7. Hoses will be PTFE with stainless steel braid covering and carbon steel
f langes. Screwed f itt ings will not used.
8. Provide l ightning protection.
9. There would be suff icient br omine storage tank capacity or an empty
ISO tank to accommodate the transfer of bromine from a leaking
container
10. Area where bromine will be used or stored will be enclosed so that
unauthorized persons and animals are prevented from entering the area.
Adequate l ighting will be provided to al low suff icient night surveil lance.
Surveil lance will be provided 24 hours a day.
11. Personnel escape routes will be clearly marked and it wil l be maintained
without any obstructions including adequately sized doors and
windows.
12. Facil it ies l ike off ices , eating, showering and changing rooms, wil l be
located in up wind direction and remote from the area where bromine is
handled or stored. Provide an adequate supply of clean water for
washing and showers.
13. Emergency siren, telephone will be provided in storage area for the
reporting of accidents or emergency situations. The emergency
telephone numbers will be displayed at prominent locations and it
include the f ire department, ambulance service, emergency response
team, hospital a nd police.
14. A wind sock will be provided which will clearly visible from all points
on the site and replaced as required. This is required for indicating
wind strength and direction.
15. Emergency respirator equipment cabinets( Cupboard) will be installed
not more than 30 meters or ten seconds walking distance from any
location in the storage area.
16. Showers and eyewash fountains will be provided, clearly marked, well
l it and with unobstructed access.
17. Signs will be posted prominently at the site entrance and throughout the
installation with area maps showing access ways, hydrant locations,
emergency showers, location of emergency equipment and emergency
telephone numbers.
18. All management and operating personnel involved in the use or handling
of bromine will undergo safety training, in addit ion to specif ic task
training.
19. Only experienced well -trained operators will be al lowed to receive and
unload bromine receptacles .
20. The management will ensure that emergency response plans have been
made and coordinated with th e emergency response local authorit ies .
21. Bromine glass bott le capacity 2.5 l itters and six bott les are stored in
one packing box.
22. Bromine will be stored in dry and cool place and well ventilated area.
23. Standard operating procedure for hazardous material load ing unloading will be
prepared and implemented.
24. Fire hydrant system and water sprinkler system installed at tank farm
area.
Safe Transportation procedure to be adopted for Bromine ISO container and bromine glass
bottle crate.
The driver and cleaner of any vehicle transporting bromine should comply
with the following requirements:
35
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
25. GPS will be installed in al l the trucks and ISO container vehicle.
26. Driver and cleaner will be trained in using GPS.
27. Open space separated from public highway and public dwelli ngs, where
public does not normally pass. No passengers are al lowed.
28. The crew shall know how to use f ire -f ighting appliances.
29. The driver or driver's assistant may not open a package containing
bromine.
30. Bromine receptacles are not to be checked with open f l ames.
31. No smoking is permitted around the transport unit or in the vicinity of
the vehicle during handling operations.
32. The engine is to be shut off during all handling operations unless
required to drive pumps, hoist , etc.
33. Parking brakes are to be applied w henever parked.
34. If the vehicle is parked on a road at night or with poor visibil ity ,
warning signs are to be placed 10 meters ahead of and behind the
vehicle.
35. TREM CARD provided to al l transporters and trained for transportation
Emergency of Hazardous chemicals .
Following personal Protective equipments are to be made compulsory when handling Bromine.
36. Indian Standard Institute (ISI) approved chemical safety goggles at all
t imes when handling Br2.
37. Use a fullface shield over eyewear.
38. Full body protection PVC suite
39. Eyewash fountains should be located in areas where bromine is handled,
used or stored.
40. When in danger of contact with l iquid bromine, wear an approved
chemical resistant suit .
41. Leather or other non -woven ISI approved steel -toed shoes or Gum boot
42. Protective rubber boots should be worn over shoes for extra protection.
43. Have NIOSH approved respirators and self -contained breathing
apparatus available.
44. Gloves : Nitrile rubber gloves, Neoprene & Butyle gloves
Safety Practices in the Work Area
45. We will inform our all employees of the potential hazards of contact
with bromine and train them in appropriate f irst -aid procedures.
46. Bromine handling areas will be clearly marked and restricted to
qualif ied, trained personnel only.
Ventilation
47. We will maintain bromine vapor concentration in the work area to less
than 0.1 ppm with adequate exhaust hoods, ventilation systems and
scrubbers. Analyze air for proper control .
48. Transfer or repackage bromine only in a controlled, closed environment.
49. Exhaust ventilating systems will be used in enclosed areas where
bromine is handled.
36
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Containers And Storage
50. Bromine glass bott le capacity 2.5 l itters and six bott les are stored in
one packing box.
51. Bromine will be stored in dry and cool pla ce and well ventilated area.
Neutralization in case of spillage leakage
52. Neutralization with sodium bisulf ite requires 3 moles of sodium
hydroxide: 1 mole sodium bisulf ite: 1 mole bromine.
53. Neutralization with sodium sulf ite requires 2 moles sodium hydroxi de:
1 mole sodium sulf ite: 1 mole bromine.
54. The weights and volumes specif ied include a 10% excess of sodium
hydroxide and sodium bisulfate or sodium sulf ite .
Emergency Procedures
In case of bromine emergencies, follow recommended first aid and emergency response
procedures adopted
Transportation Emergencies
In emergency situations resulting from vehicle accidents:
55. Notify the local police, f ire departments, emergency responders and the
carrier .
56. Isolate the area.
57. Any person not dressed in proper protect ive clothing and not using a
NIOSH approved self -contained breathing apparatus should be kept a
safe distance away.
58. Call to the supplier
59. Seek immediate medical assistance for those injured and follow
recommended f irst aid procedures.
Leaking Containers
60. When handling a leaking bottle personal protective clothing, goggles
and NIOSH approved self contained breathing equipment must be worn.
61. Clear contaminated area of non -essential personnel and send them to
assembly point .
62. Maintain a sl ight ammonia atmosphere throughout the clean up.
Carefully release anhydrous ammonia gas to neutralize bromine vapor.
The ammonia gas will convert bromine to white ammonium bromide smoke. 63. Do not al low liquid bromine and l iquid ammonia to combine; a violent
reaction will occur . Ammonia (16 to 25% by volume) can form an
explosive mixture with air .
64. Pour hypo solution*, l ime and water slurry or soda ash solution over the
spil l . Hypo-bromine reactions produce hydrobromic acid .
65. Dry sodium thiosulfate and l iquid bromine produce a violent reaction;do
not mix them.
66. Using cold water, wash neutralized bromine into a sump for transfer to
an approved waste disposal facil ity where the waste can be processed.
37
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
67. Ventilate the area to remove the ammonium bromide and any bromine
fumes. Scrub the f loors and equipment with soap and water.
First Aid Procedure
68. Immediate medical assistance is required if bromine is swallowed,
inhaled or has contacted the eyes or skin.
69. If bromine has been ingested, do not give anything by mouth. Seek
medical attention immediately. Do not induce vomiting.
70. If bromine has been inhaled, move the exposed person to a well
ventilated area. Seek medical attention immediately. The vict im should
be placed in a comfortable sitt ing or partly reclining posit ion. The
exposed individual should avoid exertion. I f vomiting occurs, turn the
patient on his side to avoid choking. Keep the patient warm. If the
patient is coughing and showing signs of respiratory distress , properly
trained personnel should administer oxygen.
71. For skin conta ct , the affected area must be f looded immediately with
large amounts of clean water from a safety shower or other appropriate
source of f lowing water. Seek medical attention immediately. All
contaminated clothing, including shoes, should be removed as quic kly as
possible while the vict im is under the shower. Washing should be
continued for a minimum of 30 minutes. I f possible, continue to wash
the affected area during transport to medical facil it ies . (Extended wash
t imes of two hours or more have proven ben eficial .)
72. If bromine l iquid or vapor contacts the eyes, they must be irrigated
immediately with large amounts of running water. Eye wash stations are
preferable for irrigation. I f one is not available, a hose, water source
with a l iberal , gentle f low may be util ized. The eyelids must be held
apart during irrigation to ensure contact of water with all accessible
t issues of the eyes and l ids . Eyes should be washed continuously for a
minimum of 30 minutes. I f possible, continue f lushing the eyes while
transporting the employee to a physician. In al l cases of bromine injury,
obtain immediate medical attention. Provide emergency personnel with
information about al l materials used by the person and provide
appropriate information about bromine and f irst aid proce dures.
3.8.6 Hydrofluoric acid (AHF)
1 Storage facil it ies and construction will be made as per SMPV Rules.
2 water curtain system and Hydrant system will be provided as per NFPA
std./ GFR 66A.
3 Mayur nozel curtaines system provided in tank farm area with auto start
provision.
4 Auto level transmeter and DCS operation tank farm area.
5 Gas detectors are provided in tank farm area and penal and alarm
provided in control room on DCS panel .
6 Double safety valve are provided.
7 Dyke wall is provided.
8 Rubbles are provided in dyke area.
9 CCTV camers are provided in tank farm area.
10 Double static earthing is provided.
11 Emergency breathing air l ine respirators are provided near bullets and
posit ive pressure suit with hood s are provided in tank farm area in a
box. SCBA sets and escape BA sets are provided in tank farm area.
38
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
12 Emergency handling equipments with r equired PPEs with canister are
provided in tank farm area.
13 Lightening arrestor is provided in tank farm area.
14 Jumpers are provided to each f langes of the HF l ines.
15 No bottom drain valve provision in tanks.
16 Automation for level , pressure and temp. provided in DCS panel and
control interlocking & trip logics provided.
17 Wind direction indicator is provided.
18 Safety Shower provided near bullets .
19 Caution note will be provided.
3.8.7 Safety Measures for AHCL gas cylinder :
1. Stored in cool and dry place and PESO approved area.
2. Empty and f il led cylinders are stored separately.
3. Hazard identif ication, control measures in case of leakage and f irst Aid
procedure to be prepared and displayed at storage location.
4. Gas detector provided in storage area.
5. Cylinder store made well ventilated and safe distance maintained.
6. Sprinkler system provision made in cylinder storage area.
7. Cylinder leakage control Kit kept available at cylinder storage area.
8. Sprinkler point and Eyewash / Safety shower provided near cylinder
f il l ing point .
9. Gas detectors provided in cylinder storage area.
3.8.8 Safety Measures for Oleum storage tank area:
1. Storage tank stored away from the process plant .
2. Tanker unloading procedure adopted and fully implemented.
3. Caution note and emergency handling procedure displayed at unloading
area and trained all operators.
4. NFPA label provided.
5. Required PPEs l ike full body protection PVC Suit , Hand gloves, gumboot,
Respiratory mask etc. provided to operator as per need.
6. Neutralizing agents kept ready for tackle spil lage emergency.
7. Safety shower, eye wash with quenching unit installed in acid storage
area.
8. Material handling in close condition in pipe l ine and transferred by
pump only.
9. Flange guard provided on oleum pipelines.
10. Dyke wall provided to al l storage tanks, collection pit with valve
provision.
11. Double drain valve provided.
12. Radar type level transmitter provided on all storage tanks.
3.8.9 For Drum Storage area :
Some chemicals wil l be received at plant in drums by road truck and stored
in a separate drum storage area.
1. FLP type l ight f itt ings will be provided.
2. Proper ventilation will be provided in godown.
3. Proper label and identif ication board /stickers will be provided in the
storage area.
39
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
4. Conductive drum pallets wil l be provided.
5. Drum handling trolley / stackers/fork l ift wil l be used for drum
handling.
6. Separate dispensing room with local exhaust and static earthing
provision will be made.
7. Materials wil l be stored as per its compatibil ity study and separate area
will be made for f lammable, corrosive and toxic chemical drums storage.
8. Smoking and other spark, f lame generating item will be banned from the
Gate.
3.8.10 For Acid and Alkali storage area (Sulfuric Acid and Hydrochloric Acid )
1. Caution note and emergency f irst aid measures will be displayed and
train for the same to al l employees.
2. Carbouys wil l be stored away from the process plant .
3. Caution note and emergency handling procedure will be displayed at
unloading area and trained all operator s.
4. NFPA label wil l be provided.
5. Required PPEs l ike full body protection PVC suit , Hand gloves, gumboot,
Respiratory mask etc. wil l be provided to operator.
6. Neutralizing agent wil l be kept ready for tackle any emergency spil lage.
7. Safety shower, eye wash with quenching unit wil l be provided in acid
storage area.
3.8.11 Process Safety:
1. DCS control system for the exist ing plant as well as proposed facil it ies .
Any rise in temperature, pressure etc. wil l be indicated with alarm
followed by necessary corrective action. Also provided Safety interlocks
and redundancy in DCS.
2. All vessels & storage tanks are provided with high level alarms and
necessary pump tripping system.
3. Gas leak detection & alarm system provided for hydrogen and solvent
usage area.
4. Fire water tank & f ire hydrant piping are provided for entire plant with
ring mains for al l plants/tank farm etc. Jet monitor with foam trolley /
hydrant points / f ire extinguisher etc. are provided at strategic points .
Exist ing f ire hydrant system will be updated and extended for proposed
facil it ies
5. Solvents and other petroleum chemicals are stored in PESO l icensed
area with all regulatory requirements.
6. Standby DG power is provided for al l process requirements.
7. HSE management system is fully implemented. All procedures l ike work
to permit , Tanker loading and unloading, Accident investigation,
Preventive maintenance schedule, Static earthing and electrical
earthing, etc. prepared and implemented.
8. The reaction is carried by heating, cooling, chil l ing, brine as a util ity
through jackets/limpet coils .
9. Control loops for control of pressure and temp. in the reactor s are
provided.
10. PRV provided from steam boiler high pressu re l ine to control required
pressure in reactor jacket .
11. Util ity l ike Chil l ing, cooling, vacuum, steaming and its alternative
provided to control reaction parameters in a safe manner.
40
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
12. Free Fall of any f lammable material in the vessel is avoided.
13. Static earthing provision made at design stage to al l solvent handling
equipments, reactors , vessels & powder handling equipments.
14. Vent l ine connected with ref lux unit or condenser in case of VOC or with
scrubber in case of toxic gas generation in reaction.
15. All emergency valves and switches and emergency handling facil it ies
are easily accessible.
16. Further al l the vessels are examined periodically by a recognized
competent person under the Gujarat Factory Rules 1963 -Rule 61(1) .
17. All the vessels and equipments are wel l earthed appropriately and well
protected against Static Electricity. Also for draining in drums proper
earthing facil it ies provided.
18. Materials transferred by pumping through pipeline from tanks .
19. Flame proof l ight f itt ings installed in the plant .
20. All the Plant Personnel provided with Personal Protection Equipments
to protect against any adverse health effect during operations, leakage,
spil lages or splash. PPE l ike Helmets, Safety Shoes, Safety Glasses, Acid -
Alkali Proof Gloves etc. provided to the emplo yees as per needs. All
employees trained and updated in Safety aspects through induction and
periodic training in safety.
21. Material Safety Data Sheets of Raw Materials & Products are readily
available at shop f loor.
3.9 Transportation , Unloading and handling procedure
3.9.1 For Flammable chemicals :-
TABLE: 3.6
SR.NO. ACTIVITY TYPE OF
POSSIBLE
HAZARD
PROCEDURES.
1 Transportation by
road tanker
Leakage,
Spillage, fire,
explosion, Toxic
release
Training will be provided to driver
and cleaner regarding the safe
driving, hazard of Flammable
chemicals, emergency handling, use
of SCBA sets.
TREM card will kept with TL.
Fire extinguishers will be kept with
TL.
Spark arrestor will be provided to TL
exhaust.
Instructions will be given not to stop
road tanker in populated area.
Clear Hazard Identification symbol
and emergency telephone number
will be displayed as per HAZCHEM
CODE.
Appropriate PPEs will be kept with
TL.
2 Road tanker
unloading at site.
Leakage,
Spillage, fire, Priority will be given to Tanker to
immediately enter the storage
41
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
explosion, toxic
release
premises at site and will not be kept
waiting near the gate or the main
road.
Security person will check License,
TREM CARD, Fire extinguisher
condition, First Aid Box condition,
Antidote Kit, required PPEs as per
SOP laid down.
Store officer will take sample as per
sampling SOP from sampling point.
After approval of QC/QA department
unloading procedure will be allowed
be started.
Following precautions will be adopted
during unloading
Wheel stopper will be provided to TL
at unloading platform.
Static earthing will be provided to
road tanker.
Tanker unloading procedure will be
followed according to check list and
implemented.
Flexible SS hose connection will be
done at TL outlet line.
All TL valves will be closed in TL.
Finally earthing connection and
wheel stopper will be removed.
Only day time unloading will be
permitted.
3 Storage tank safety Leakage,
Spillage, Fire,
Explosion, Toxic
release.
Appropriate MOC storage tank will be
provided as per IS code.
Dyke wall will be provided to storage
tank.
Level transmitter will be provided
with low level high level auto cut-off
provision.
Vent will be connected with flame
arrestor.
Fire hydrant monitor with foam
attachment facility will be provided.
Dumping / Drain vessel/alternate
vessel will be provided to collect dyke
wall spillage material.
FLP type pump will be provided.
Nitrogen blanketing will be provided
to storage tank.
Double static earthing will be
provided to storage tank.
Jumper clip will be provided to all
Solvent handling pipeline flanges.
4 Transfer from Leakage, Double mechanical seal type FLP type
42
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
storage tank to Day
tank
Spillage due to
Line rupture,
Flange Gasket
failure, Fire,
Explosion, Toxic
release.
pump will be provided.
Double on / off switch will provided
at tank farm and process area near
day tank. Pump auto cut off with day
tank high level will be provided.
Flame arrestor will be provided on
day tank vent.
Over flow will be provided for
additional safety.
NRV will be provided on pump
discharge line.
Double Jumper clip will be provided
to all solvent handling pipeline.
Double static earthing will be
provided to day tank.
5 Transfer from Day
tank to reactor.
Leakage,
Spillage due to
Line rupture,
Flange Gasket
failure, Fire,
Explosion, Toxic
release.
Transfer through closed pumping
system.
Total quantity of day tank material
will be charged in to reactor at a time.
NRV will be provided on day tank
outlet line.
Static earthing will be provided to
storage tank.
Jumpers will be provided to pipeline
flanges.
3.9.2 Bromine Transportation, Unloading and handling Procedure :
TABLE: 3.7
SR.NO. ACTIVITY TYPE OF
POSSIBLE
HAZARD
PROCEDURES.
1 Transportation of
Bromine by ISO
container
Leakage,
Spillage, Toxic
release
GPS will be installed in all the trucks
and ISO container vehicle.
Driver and Cleaner will be trained in
using GPS.
Open space separated from public
highway and public dwellings, where
public does not normally pass. No
passengers are allowed.
The crew shall know how to use fire-
fighting appliances.
The driver or driver's assistant may
not open a package containing
bromine.
Bromine receptacles are not to be
checked with open flames.
No smoking is permitted around the
transport unit or in the vicinity of the
vehicle during handling operations.
The engine is to be shut off during all
43
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
handling operations unless required
to drive pumps, hoist, etc.
Parking brakes are to be applied
whenever parked.
If the vehicle is parked on a road at
night or with poor visibility, warning
signs are to be placed 10 meters
ahead of and behind the vehicle.
TREM CARD provided to all
transporters and trained for
transportation Emergency of
Hazardous chemicals.
All trucks having 1 kg Sodium
Thiosulfate bag.
Training will be provided to driver
and cleaner regarding the safe
driving, hazard of Bromine
emergency handling, use of SCBA sets
and neutralizing agent.
All the ISO container truck will be
equipped with Global Positioning
system (GPS) and route will be
predefined.
Clear Hazard Identification symbol
and emergency telephone number
will be displayed as per HAZCHEM
CODE.
Appropriate PPEs will be kept with
Truck.
3 Bromine ISO container
unloading & handling Leakage,
Spillage, fire,
explosion, toxic
release
Directly ISO container will be placed
at storage area and connected with
process tank.
Wear recommended personal
protective equipment during
connection of ISO container.
Make sure the absorber unit is
working and capable of handling
vented bromine fumes.
BE SURE THAT DRY AIR (DEW POINT
-400C) OR DRY NITROGEN is available
in ample supply and its pressure is
controlled below 3 atm. gauge.
Check that all the Iso-container valves
are closed and blind flanges are in
place.
Remove the blind flange above the
red valve.
Connect your pressure release line to
the red valve outlet. Use a new rubber
gasket (use limit - 24 hours) to
ensure tight connection.
Open the red valve slowly and then
the depressurizing valve, to release
44
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
any pressure which might have
developed in the Iso-container.
Remove the blind flange above the
yellow valve.
Connect your line to the yellow valve
outlet. Use a new PTFE gasket (use
limit - 24 hours) to ensure tight
connection.
Open the yellow valve and all the
valves in your liquid unloading line.
Close the depressurizing valve.
Open the pressurizing valve, at first
slowly (to check for bromine leaks),
then fully, to start bromine unloading.
Use only enough pressure to lift the
bromine to the high point in the
unloading system.
NEVER EXCEED 3 ATM. PRESSURE.
When air/nitrogen blows through the
unloading line into your storage tank,
the Iso-container is empty.
Close the pressurizing valve.
Close the yellow valve and then all
the other valves in your liquid
unloading line.
Slowly open the depressurizing valve
to release the air/nitrogen pressure
on the Iso-container to your absorber
unit. Wait 5 minutes.
Close the red valve and then the
depressurizing valve.
Cautiously disconnect your liquid
unloading line from the yellow valve
of the Iso-container. Replace its blind
flange, tightening all the bolts. Do not
forget to reinstall the proper gasket.
Disconnect your pressure release line
from the red valve of the Iso-
container. Replace its blind flange,
tightening all the bolts. Do not forget
to reinstall the proper gasket.
If there has been a bromine spillage,
wash it off the Iso-container with
plenty of water to prevent corrosion.
Small bromine spills on the ground
may be neutralized with a clear soda
ash or a sodium thiosulphate
solution. Then dispose of in a manner
approved by the local authorities.
Close the cover dome and pin it
securely.
Mark the Iso-container EMPTY (use
erasable means).
45
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Bromine iso tanks should be stored
no closer than 10 meters from human
or animal consumable articles.
Explosives and flammable materials
should not be stored close to
bromine.
There would be sufficient bromine
storage tank capacity or an empty ISO
tank to accommodate the transfer of
bromine from a leaking container
Area where bromine will be used or
stored will be enclosed so that
unauthorized persons and animals
are prevented from entering the area.
Adequate lighting will be provided to
allow sufficient night surveillance.
Surveillance will be provided 24
hours a day.
Personnel escape routes will be
clearly marked and it will be
maintained without any obstructions
including adequately sized doors and
windows.
Facilities like offices, eating,
showering and changing rooms, will
be located in up wind direction and
remote from the area where bromine
is handled or stored. Provide an
adequate supply of clean water for
washing and showers.
Emergency siren, telephone will be
provided in storage area for the
reporting of accidents or emergency
situations. The emergency telephone
numbers will be displayed at
prominent locations and it include
the fire department, ambulance
service, emergency response team,
hospital and police.
A wind sock will be provided which
will clearly visible from all points on
the site and replaced as required.
This is required for indicating wind
strength and direction.
Emergency respirator equipment
cabinets( Cupboard) will be installed
not more than 30 meters or ten
seconds walking distance from any
location in the storage area.
Showers and eyewash fountains will
be provided, clearly marked, well lit
and with unobstructed access.
Signs will be posted prominently at
46
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
the site entrance and throughout the
installation with area maps showing
access ways, hydrant locations,
emergency showers, location of
emergency equipment and
emergency telephone numbers.
All management and operating
personnel involved in the use or
handling of bromine will undergo
safety training, in addition to specific
task training.
Only experienced well-trained
operators will be allowed to receive
and unload bromine receptacles.
The management will ensure that
emergency response plans have been
made and coordinated with the
emergency response local authorities.
Safety permit for hazardous material
loading unloading will be prepared
and implemented.
Fire hydrant system and water
sprinkler system installed at tank
farm area.
3.9.3 Transportation , Unloading and handling procedure for Oleum:
TABLE: 3.8
SR.NO. ACTIVITY TYPE OF
POSSIBLE
HAZARD
CONTROL MEASURES AND HANDLING
PROCEDURES.
1 Transportation of
Oleum by road tanker
Leakage,
Spillage, Toxic
release
Training will be provided to driver
and cleaner regarding the safe
driving, hazard of Flammable
chemicals, emergency handling, use
of SCBA sets administration.
TREM card will kept with TL.
Instructions will be given not to stop
road tanker in populated area.
Clear Hazard Identification symbol
and emergency telephone number
will be displayed as per HAZCHEM
CODE.
Appropriate PPEs will be kept with
TL.
Emergency telephone numbers list of
OFF site emergency agencies will be
provided in TREM CARD
2 Oleum Road tanker
unloading at site.
Leakage,
Spillage, toxic
release
Priority will be given to Tanker to
immediately enter the storage
premises at site and will not be kept
waiting near the gate or the main
47
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
road.
Security person will check Licence,
TREM CARD, Fire extinguisher
condition, SCBA set condition,
required PPEs as per SOP laid down.
Store officer will take sample as per
sampling SOP from sampling point.
After approval of QC/QA department
unloading procedure will be allowed
be started.
Following precautions will be adopted
during unloading
Wheel stopper will be provided to TL
at unloading platform.
Tanker unloading procedure will be
followed according to check list and
implemented.
Flexible hose connection will be done
at TL outlet line and checked for no
leakage.
Every time rubber gasket will be
changed.
The quantity remaining in the hose
pipeline will be drained to a small
container, which will be
subsequently transferred to the main
storage tank thus ensuring complete
closed conditions for transfer from
road tanker.
All TL valves will be closed in TL.
3 Oleum Storage tank
safety
Leakage,
Spillage, Toxic
release.
Storage tank will be stored away
from the process plant.
Tanker unloading procedure will be
prepared and implemented.
Caution note and emergency
handling procedure will be displayed
at unloading area and trained all
operators.
NFPA label will be provided.
Required PPEs like full body
protection PVC Suit, Hand gloves,
gumboot, Respiratory mask etc. will
be provided to operator.
Neutralizing agent will be kept ready
for tackle any emergency spillage.
Safety shower, eye wash with
quenching unit will be provided in
acid storage area.
Material will be handled in close
condition in pipe line.
Dyke wall will be provided to all
storage tanks, collection pit with
48
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
valve provision.
Double drain valve will provided.
Level Transmitter will be provided
on all storage tanks.
Safety permit for loading unloading
of hazardous material will be
prepared and implemented.
TREM CARD will be provided to all
transporters and will be trained for
transportation Emergency of
Hazardous chemicals.
Fire hydrant system with jockey
pump as per TAC norms will be
installed.
4 Oleum transferred
from storage tank to
Day tank
Leakage,
Spillage due to
Line rupture,
Flange Gasket
failure, Toxic
release.
Double mechanical seal type pump
will be provided.
Double on / off switch will provided
at tank farm and process area near
day tank. Pump auto cut off with day
tank high level will be provided.
Vent will be provided with sulphuric acid tanks.
Overflow will be provided for additional safety i.e- HI & HI-HI level alarm trip
logics.
NRV will be provided on pump
discharge line.
Flange Guard will be provided to all
flanges.
5 Oleum transfer from
Day tank to reactor.
Leakage,
Spillage due to
Line rupture,
Flange Gasket
failure, Toxic
release.
Transfer by pump in Close loop.
Double valve will be installed on day
tank outlet line.
Total quantity of day tank material
will be charged in to reactor at a
time.
NRV will be provided on day tank
outlet line.
Flange guard will be provided to
pipeline flanges.
3.9.4 Drums Transportation , Unloading and handling procedure
TABLE: 3.9
SR.NO. ACTIVITY TYPE OF
POSSIBLE
HAZARD
PROCEDURES.
1 Transportation of
Solvents drums
Leakage,
Spillage, fire,
explosion,
Toxic release
Training will be provided to driver
and cleaner regarding the safe
driving, hazard of Flammable
chemicals, emergency handling, use
49
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
of SCBA sets.
TREM card will kept with TL.
First Aid Kit will be kept with TL.
Fire extinguishers will be kept with
TL.
Spark arrestor will be provided to TL
exhaust.
Instructions will be given not to stop
road tanker in populated area.
Clear Hazard Identification symbol
and emergency telephone number
will be displayed as per HAZCHEM
CODE.
Appropriate PPEs will be kept with
TL.
2 Drums unloading at
site.
Leakage,
Spillage, fire,
explosion, toxic
release
Priority will be given to truck to
immediately enter the storage
premises at site and will not be kept
waiting near the gate or the main
road.
Security person will check Licence,
TREM CARD, Fire extinguisher
condition, First Aid Kit condition,
Antidote Kit, required PPEs as per
SOP laid down.
QA/QC Chemist will take sample as
per sampling SOP from sampling
point.
After approval ofQA/QC department
unloading procedure will be allowed
be started.
Following precautions will be adopted
during unloading
Wheel stopper will be provided to TL
at unloading platform.
Only day time unloading will be
permitted.
3 Godown/warehouse
safety
Leakage,
Spillage, Fire,
Explosion,
Toxic release.
FLP type light fittings will be
provided.
Proper ventilation will be provided in
godown.
Proper label and identification board
/stickers will be provided in the
storage area.
Conductive drum pallets will be
provided.
Drum handling trolley /
stackers/fork lift will be used for
drum handling.
Separate dispensing room with local
exhaust and static earthing provision
will be made.
50
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Materials will be stored as per its
compatibility study and separate
area will be made for flammable,
corrosive and toxic chemical drums
storage.
Smoking and other spark, flame
generating item will be banned from
the Gate.
4 Solvents transfer
from drum to Day
tank/ reactor
Leakage,
Spillage due to
Line rupture,
Flange Gasket
failure, Fire,
Explosion,
Toxic release.
Solvent transfer by vacuum or by
pump only.
Static earthing will be provided.
SS flexible hose / conductive hose
will be used.
5 Solvent transfer from
Day tank to reactor.
Leakage,
Spillage due to
Line rupture,
Flange Gasket
failure, Fire,
Explosion,
Toxic release.
Transfered solvent from drums to storage tank/reactor in closed loop by
pump.
Total quantity of day tank material
will be charged in to reactor at a
time.
NRV will be provided on day tank
outlet line.
Static earthing will be provided to
storage tank.
Jumpers will be provided to pipeline
flanges.
51
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
3.10 HAZARDOUS PROPERTIES OF THE CHEMICALS, COMPATIBILITIES AND SPECIAL HAZARD
Table-3.10
Sr. No NAME OF
CHEMICAL
HA
ZA
RD
FL
AS
H P
OIN
T 0
C
BP 0C
LEL
%
UEL
%
SP.GR 20 0C
VD
SO
LU
BIL
ITY
WIT
H W
AT
ER
at
20
0C
NFPA
H F R
HAZARDOUS
COMBUSTION
PRODUCT
TLV
PPM
IDLH
PPM
LC50
mg/m3
TARGET
ORGANS
CA
RC
INO
G-
EN
ICIT
Y
ANTIDOT
1. Trifluoro Acetic Acid
CAS# 76-05-1
T -3 72.4 NF NF 1.535 3.9 Soluble 3 0 0 CO, CO2, HF gas NL NL 10 gm/m3
Rat
Respiratory system,
eyes, skin, mucous
membranes
No Not available
2. Parabromofluorobe
nzene
CAS# 460-00-4
F/T 53 150 NA NA 1.6030 to
1.6060
6.03 Insoluble 1 2 0 Fire may produce
irritating, corrosive
and/or toxic gases.
NL NL Inhalation - Rat - 4 h
- 18.000 mg/m3
No data
available
Inhalation - May
cause respiratory
irritation.
No No specific antidote.
3. Ethyldifluoroacetate
CAS# 454-31-9
F/C 25 97 NA NA 1.1760 to
1.1810
NA slight soluble
in water
3 2 0 CO, CO2 Gaseous
HF
NL NL NA NA NA No specific antidote
4. Ethyltrifluroacetate
CAS# 383-63-1
F/C
/T
-1 60 - 62 NA NA 1.1900 to
1.1950
4.9 hydrolysis 2 3 0 CO, CO2 Gaseous
HF
NL NL NA Liver Not observed No specific antidote
5. Ethyltrifluoroacetoacetate
CAS# 372-31-6
F/H 28 131 NA NA 1.2490 to 1.2670
NA slight soluble in water
2 3 0 CO, CO2 Gaseous HF
NL NL NA Respiratory system, eyes, skin
NA No specific antidote
6. Amino crotonate
CAS# 7318-00-5
C 97 210-
215
NA NA 1.28-1.32 NA soluble 3 1 0 CO, CO2 & NOx NL NL NA Respiratory system NA No specific antidote
7. Trifluoroacetic anhydride
CAS#: 407-25-0
C/T NA 40 NA NA 1.487 NA Insoluble 3 2 0 CO, CO2, Gaseous HF
NL NL NA Respiratory system NA No specific antidote
8. 1,1,2,2-
Tetrafluoroethyl
Methyl Ether
CAS# 425-88-7
F -20 37.2 11.7 23.5 1.2940 4.55 Soluble 0 4 1 HF NL NL Oral: LC50, rat, >
10,000 ppm
NA NA No specific antidote
9. Triflic Acid
CAS# 1493-13-6
C NA 161-
162
NA NA 1.696 5.2 Very Soluble 3 0 1 CO, SOx, CO2, HF NL NL NA Respiratory system,
eyes, skin
NA No specific antidote
10. Trimethylsilyl
trifluoromethanesul
fonate CAS# 27607-77-8
F/T 25 140 NA NA 1.150 7.7 3 3 2 irritating and
highly toxic
gases may be generated by
NL NL NA Respiratory system,
eyes, skin.
NA No specific antidote
52
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
thermal
decomposition
11. Trifluoroacetyl
chloride
CAS# 354-32-5
T NA -19.3 NA NA 1.38 5.7 Reacts with
water
4 1 0
- -w-
HCL gas, HF, CO NL NL 4 h, rat, 40 - 90
ppm
Lungs, Liver
irritant effects
NA No specific antidote
12. Sulphur
Tetrafluoride
CAS# 7783-60-0
H
react on
contact
with
air,
heat,
light or
water
NA -38 NA NA 1.95 3.78 Reacts with
water
3 0 2 Contact with water
or moist air may
generate flammable and/or
toxic gases.
0.1 NL 1 h : 40 ppm respiratory tract NA No specific antidote
13. Monomethylhydrazi
ne
CAS# 60-34-4
F/C -8.3 87.5 2.5 92 0.874 1.03 soluble 4 3 2 toxic oxides of
nitrogen during
combustion
0.2 20 Rat inhalation 74-78
ppm/4 hr
Skin, Eye, and
Respiratory
tract
Yes
20 ppm;
NIOSH
considers
methyl
hydrazine to
be a potential
occupational carcinogen.
1) Give the victims
water or milk.
adults, 250 mL (8
oz or 1 cup).
Water or milk
should be given
only if victims are
conscious and
alert.
2) Activated charcoal
may be
administered if
victims are
conscious and
alert. 50 to 100 g
(1-3/4 to 3-1/2
oz) for adults,
with 125 to 250 mL (1/2 to 1 cup)
of water.
3) Promote excretion
by administering a
saline cathartic or
sorbitol to
conscious and
alert victims.
53
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
14. Tri Fluoro acetone
CAS# 421-50-1
F/H -30 22 NA NA 1.25 >1 Soluble
with
high heat of
reaction
when
dissolving.
2 4 1 CO, CO2, Gaseous
HF
NL NL NA Respiratory system. No No specific antidote
15. Methyl tri fluoro
acetate
CAS# 431-47-0
F/C -7 43-44 NA NA 1.273 4.41 NA 3 3 0
CO, CO2, Gaseous
HF
NL NL NA Respiratory system. No No specific antidote
16. Chlorodifluoroacetic
Anhydride
CAS# 2834-23-3
T/C NA 96-97 NA NA 1.395 3.5 NA 3 0 0 Highly toxic HCl gas
is produced during
combustion.
NL NL NA NA No specific antidote
17. 4-
Chlorobenzotrichloride
CAS# 5216-25-1
H/C > 112 245 NA NA 1.495 7.9 decomposes 3 0 1 CO, CO2, Gaseous
HCL
NL NL Inhalation, mouse:
LC50 = 125 mg/m3;
Inhalation, rat:
LC50 = 125 mg/m3
Central nervous
system, cardiovascular
system.
No No specific antidote
18. 3-
Aminobenzotrifluori
de
CAS# 455-14-1
C/T
/F
86 83
(12
mmHg)
NA NA 1.296 5.6 insoluble 3 2 1 CO,CO2, HF, NOx NL NL NA Respiratory system
19. Ethyl-
Trifluoropyruvate
CAS# 13081-18-0
F/H 31 95-98 NA NA 1.283 NA NA 2 3 0 CO, CO2, HF gas NL NL NA eyes, respiratory
system and
skin.
NA No specific antidote
20. Trichloroacetyl
chloride
C/T
100 114-
116
Na NA 1.620 6.3 Incompatible
with water
4 0 0
w
HCL gas, CO, CO2,
Phosgene gas
NL NL 475 mg/m3 ( Rat ) 4
h
Respiratory system No No specific antidote
21. Anhydrous
Hydrofluoric acid
CAS# 7664-39-3
H/T NA 19.5 NA NA 0.97 1.3-1.9 Very soluble
(violent
reaction)
4 0 1 Hydrogen over
an extended
period of time in
steel cylinders and
systems
3 30 1276 ppm (rat, 1
hour)
Eyes, skin, airway,
lungs, liver, kidney,
heart and bone.
No No specific antidote
22. Difluoromethane
(HFC - 32 )
CAS# 75-10-5
-52 12.7 33.4 1.8 2.163 NA 1 4 1 Halogen, Halogen
acid, & possibly
carbonyl halide
such as phosgene.
NL NL 1 h, rat =100,000
ppm
Central nervous
system,
cardiovascular
system.
No No specific antidote
23. R600a (ISO Butane)
CAS# 75-28-5
F -82.2 -12.2 1.6 8.4 2.51 2.05 insoluble 1 4 0 CO 800 NL rat, 4 hours =
277000 ppm (27.7%)
Central nervous
system
No No specific antidote
24. Dicyclopentadyene &
Chlorobenzene
CAS# 77-73-6
F 32 150-
190
0.8 6.3 0.977 4.5 insoluble 1 3 1 Toxic and irritating
gases
5 NL 500 Eyes, skin,
respiratory system,
central nervous
system, kidneys
No No specific antidote
54
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
25. Diethylether &
Toluene
CAS# 60-29-7
F -40 34.6 1.8 48 0.714 2.55 soluble 1 4 1 CO, CO2, Peroxides 400 1900 Inhalation - mouse -
30 min - 31000 ppm
Eyes, skin,
respiratory system,
central nervous system
No No specific antidote
26. Dimethylformamide
CAS# 68-12-2
T/F 57 153 2.2 15.2 0.949 2.51 Easily
soluble
2 2 0 carbon oxides,
nitrogen oxides
10 500 Inhalation, rat: LC50
= 3421 ppm/1H;
Eyes, skin,
respiratory system,
liver, kidneys,
cardiovascular
system
Yes
No specific antidote
27. Ethane
CAS# 74-84-0
F -135 -88.6 3 12.5 0.362 1.04 insoluble 1 4 0 Carbon oxides NL NL NA None NA No specific antidote
28. Ethanol
CAS# 64-17-5
F 14 78 3.3 19 0.790 1.59 soluble 2 3 0 CO, CO2, irritating
and toxic fumes
and gases
1000 3300 Inhalation - rat - 10 h
- 20000 ppm
Eyes, skin,
respiratory system,
central nervous
system, liver,
blood, reproductive
system
Ethanol has
been shown
to produce
fetotoxicity in
the embry o
or fetus of laboratory
animals
Teratogen
Reproductive
effect
Mutagen
2 gm sodium bi
carbonate in 250
ml water,
Diazepam 10 mg
through injection
29. Ethyl Acetate CAS # 141-78-6
F -4.0 77.0 2.0 11.5 0.902 3.0 1 ml/10ml water
1 3 0 Irritating Vapour 400 2000 200 gm/m3 Eyes, skin, respiratory
system
No No specific antidote
30. Ethyldifluoroacetate
&
Polyldifluoroacetate
CAS# 454-31-9
F/C 23.9 99 NA NA 1.18 NA slight soluble 3 2 0 COx, HF NL NL NA Respiratory system,
gastrointestinal
system, eyes, skin
NA No specific antidote
31. HCl Anhydrous
CAS #7647-01-0
T/C NA -84.9 NA NA 1.27 1.52 Soluble 3 0 1 HCL gas 5 50 1300 ppm /30
mins for hum
Eyes, skin,
respiratory
system
No No specific
Antidote
32. Hydrochloric acid
(15 - 33%)
CAS #7647-01-0
T/C NA -84.9 NA NA 1.27 1.52 Soluble 3 0 1 HCL gas 5 50 1300 ppm /30 mins
for hum
Eyes, skin,
respiratory
system
No No specific Antidote
33. Hydrofluoric acid (20
- 60%)
CAS# 7664-39-3
H/T NA 19.5 NA NA 0.97 1.3-1.9 Very
soluble
(violent
reaction)
4 0 1 Hydrogen over an
extended period
of time in
steel cylinders and
systems
3 30 1276 ppm (rat, 1
hour)
Eyes, skin, airway,
lungs, liver,
kidney, heart and
bone.
No No specific antidote
34. Hydrogen bromide
CAS# 10035-10-6
T/C -66.7 NA NA NA 2.812 3.684 Insoluble 3 0 1 NA 2 30 Inhalation - rat - 1 h
- 2860 ppm
respiratory system No No specific antidote
55
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
35. Methylene chloride
CAS# 75-09-2
H/T NA 39.75 12 19 1.3266 2.93 Partially
soluble
2 1 0 CO, CO2,
halogenated
compounds.
50 52000 1 hours [Rat]. lungs, the
nervous system,
liver, mucous
membranes,
central nervous system
Yes
Classified
2B
(Possible
for human.) by IARC
No specific antidote
36. o-Xylene
CAS # 1330-20-7
F 31 143-
145
1.7 7.6 0.878 3.7 0.2 g/l 3 2 0 CO, CO2 100 900 4550 ppm 4
hour(s) [Rat].
Eyes, skin,
respiratory
system, central
nervous system,
gastrointestinal
tract, blood, liver,
kidney
No Diazem – 1
mg/Kg.(Intraveno
us), Epinephina,
Efidrine
37. n-Butane
CAS# 106-97-8
F -60 -0.5 1.8 8.4 2.08 2.11 Insoluble 1 4 0 CO, CO2 1000 NL (Rat, inhalation) =
658g/m3/4 hours
central nervous
system
NA No specific antidote
38. Toluene
CAS # 108-88-3
F 4.0 111 1.1 7.1 0.87 3.2 Insoluble 2 3 0 Irritating Vapour
generated
50 2000 400 ppm for 24Hr
Rat
Eyes, skin,
respiratory system, central
nervous system,
liver, kidneys
No Diazem – 1
mg/Kg.(Intravenous), Epinephina,
Efidrine
39. Hexane
CAS #110-54-3
F -7 68.7 1.2 7.7 0.659 3.0 - 1 3 0 CO & CO2 50
ppm
5000
ppm
- No No specific Antidot
40. R 600a (Isobutane)
CAS# 75-28-5
F -82.8 -12.22 1.8 8.4 0.564 2.006 Insoluble 1 4 0 Carbon
monoxide.
Unidentified
organic and
inorganic
compounds
800 NL Rat inhalation LC50
(4 hr.): 658,000ppm
CNS No No specific Antidot
41. Sodium methoxide CAS #124-41-4
F 60.55 300 7.3 36 0.996 1.3 Reacts with water
3 4 3 CO, CO2, sodium oxide
200 6000 NA Respiratory system,
gastrointestinal
system, eyes,
skin
No No specific antidote
42. 1,4-Dioxane (C4H8O2)
CAS# 123-91-1
H/F 12 101 2 22 1.034 NA Soluble 2 3 1 CO, CO2, Peroxide
NIOSH
REL: 1 ppm
OSHA
PEL: 100
ppm
500 48.5 mg/L ( Rat ) 4 h
Eyes, skin, respiratory
system, liver, kidneys
Yes Group 2B -
Possibly Carcinogenic to Humans – carcinogen
by IARC
No specific antidote.
56
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
43. Acetic Acid CAS No. 64-19-7
T / F
44.4
117.9
5.4 16.0
1.015
2.1 Soluble 2 2 1 Irritating Vapour
generated
10 ppm
50 ppm
5620 ppm/1H Teeth, eyes, skin, mucous membranes
No Milk of magnesia.
44. Acetic anhydride CAS No.108-24-7
F/T 49 140 2.7 10.3
1.05 3.5 Slightly 3 2 1 Emits toxic fumes
5ppm
200 ppm
1780 mg/m3 eyes, skin, respiratory
system, lungs
No milk butter and milk of magnesia.
45. Acetone CAS# 67-64-1
F - 20 56 2.15 13.0 0.791 2.00 Soluble 1 3 0 Irritating vapour
1000 2500 Inhalation, mouse: LC50 = 44 gm/m3/4H; Inhalation, rat: LC50 = 50100
mg/m3/8H
Eyes, skin, respiratory
system, central nervous system
No 10 mg diazepam through injection
46. Ammonia (Anhydrous) CAS # 7664-41-7
C NF - 33.3
15.50
27 0.6819
at -30 C
(Water)
0.5970 at
00C 1 atm (Air 1)
Liq. 608.7 kg/m
3 210C Gas
0.771 kg/m
3 00C
Insoluble 3 1 0 N A 25 ppm
300 ppm
7040 mg/m3 Eyes, skin, respiratory
system
No Smelling Ethanol or Ether
47. Bromine CAS #7726-95-6
C/T -- 58.78
-- -- 3.11 7.1 Soluble in water
3 0 0 Non combustible
0.2 ppm
3.0 ppm
2600 mg/kg [Rat
respiratory system, eyes,
central nervous
system, skin
No Put two or three drops of Pontocane (0.5 solution) or Benoxinate (Novesine) 0.4 %. If problem in respiration, give milk, butter-milk or lemon juice or make a small cotton ball and drench with ethanol or ether solution drops
57
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
and put it near victim’s nose for smell. Apply pure oxygen.
48. Butyl Acetate CAS#: 123-86-4
H/F 27 °C
125 °C
NA NA 0.8812
4 5.3 g/l 2 3 0 Carbon Dioxide, Carbon
Monoxide.
150 1700 4 h LC50 for rats is over 2230
mg/m3
Eyes, skin, respiratory
system, central nervous system
NO No specific antidote.
49. Dichloro Methane (MDC, DCM ) CAS#: 75-09-2
T N.F 39.8 14.0 22.0 1.325 2.9 20 g/ lit. 2 0 1 CO, CO2, Cocl2, HCL (g)
generated
25 2300 52 gm/m3 inhalation
- rat
blood, central nervous system
Yes Cancer Site
[in animals:
lung, liver, salivary & mammary
gland tumors]
No specific antidote.
50. Carbon monoxide CAS# 630-08-0
F/H NA -191.5 10.9 74.2 1.250 0.97 Partially soluble
3 4 0 CO will decompose
above 752°F (400°C) to form carbon dioxide
and carbon.
50 1200 inhalation rat – 1880 ppm/4h
cardiovascular system, lungs, blood, central
nervous system
No 100% Oxygen,
51. Chlorine CAS #7782-50-5
T - The lowest known value
is 100°C
NA NA 1.424 0.62 Boils 3 0 0 Toxic and irritating gases
1 10 1017 ppm For human
Eyes, skin, respiratory system
No Milk butter and milk of magnesia.
52. Chloro Benzene CAS # 108-90-7
T/F 28 132 1.3 9.6 1.11 3.9 Insoluble 2 3 0 Phosgene & Hydrochloric
gases generated
75 1000 22,000 ppm Rat Eyes, skin, respiratory
system, central nervous
system, liver
No Diazem – 1 mg/Kg.(Intraven
ous) Epinephina,
Efidrine 53. Chlorodifluorom
ethane (R 22) CAS# 75-45-6
H -78.3 -40.7 NA NA 1.21 3.0 Partially soluble
1 0 1 Toxic and/or corrosive fumes
may be produced by thermal
NIOSH-REL: 1000
NL NA respiratory system,
cardiovascular system, central
No No specific antidote.
58
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
decomposition: Chlorides. Fluorides.
nervous system, liver, kidneys,
spleen 54. Cyclohexanone
CAS# 108-94-1 C/F 44 155 1.1 9.4 0.94 3.4 Soluble 1 2 0 CO 50 700 Inhalation rat:
8000 ppm/4-hour Eyes, skin, respiratory
system, central nervous system,
liver, kidneys
No No specific antidote.
55. Difluoromethane (R
- 32 )
CAS# 75-10-5
-52 12.7 33.4 1.8 2.163 NA 1 4 1 Halogen, Halogen
acid, & possibly
carbonyl halide
such as phosgene.
NL NL 1 h, rat =100,000
ppm
Central nervous
system,
cardiovascular
system.
No No specific antidote
56. Dimethylformamide
CAS# 68-12-2
T/F 57 153 2.2 15.2 0.949 2.51 Easily
soluble
2 2 0 carbon oxides,
nitrogen oxides
10 500 Inhalation, rat: LC50
= 3421 ppm/1H;
Eyes, skin,
respiratory system, liver, kidneys,
cardiovascular
system
Yes
May affect
genetic
material. May
cause adverse
reproductive
effects(patern
al and
maternal) and
birth defects. Embryotoxic
and/or
foetotoxic in
animal. Passes
through the
placental
barrier in
animal. May
cause cancer
No specific antidote
57. Ethyl Acetate
CAS # 141-78-6
F -4.0 77.0 2.0 11.5 0.902 3.0 1 ml/10ml
water
1 3 0 Irritating Vapour 400 2000 200 gm/m3 Eyes, skin,
respiratory
system
No No specific antidote
58. Ethyldifluoroacetoacetate CAS# 454-31-9
F/C 23.9 99 NA NA 1.18 NA slight soluble
3 2 0 COx, HF NL NL NA Respiratory system,
gastrointestinal system, eyes,
skin
NA No specific antidote
59. Ethyledichloride CAS# 107-06-2
F/T 13 83 6.2 15.9
1.253
3.4 0.87 % 2 3 1 Hcl, Phosgene NIOSH-
50 N.L Eyes, skin, kidneys, liver,
Yes Cancer Site
No specific antidote
59
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
REL: 1
ppm
central nervous system,
cardiovascular system
[in animals: forestomach, mammary gland & circulatory sys cancer]
60. Ethylene CAS# 74-85-1
F NA -104 2.7 36 NA 1.0 Partially soluble
1 4 2 COx NL NL NA central nervous system
depression, difficulty breathing
No No specific antidote
61. Ethyltrifluroacetate
CAS# 383-63-1
F/C
/T
-1 60 - 62 NA NA 1.1900 to
1.1950
4.9 hydrolysis 2 3 0 CO, CO2 Gaseous
HF
NL NL NA Liver No No specific antidote
62. Ethyltrifluoroacetoa
cetate
CAS# 372-31-6
F/H 28 131 NA NA 1.2490 to
1.2670
NA slight soluble
in water
2 3 0 CO, CO2 Gaseous
HF
NL NL NA Respiratory system,
eyes, skin
NA No specific antidote
63. Fluorine CAS# 7782-41-4
T/C
Oxidize
r
NA -188.1 NA NA 1.5 1.3 Reacts with water
4 0 4 -W-
None that are more toxic than
the product itself
0.1 25 Rat – 1 hr – 185 ppm;
Rat – 4 hr – 92.5
ppm
Eyes, skin, respiratory
system, liver, kidneys
No IV calcium should be administered to
patients with cardiac
dysrhythmias.
Electrolytes may be used to correct
imbalances resulting from
fluoride toxicity. 64. Hexafluoroaceto
ne CAS# 684-16-2
T/C NA -26 NA NA 1.320 5.73 NA 4 0 2 NA 0.1 NL Inhalation - rat - 3 h - 275 ppm
Eyes, skin, respiratory
system, kidneys, reproductive
system
No No specific antidote
65. Hexane CAS #110-54-3
F -7 68.7 1.2 7.7 0.659 3.0 Insoluble 1 3 0 CO & CO2 500 1100 48000 ppm ( Rat ) 4 h
Eyes, skin, respiratory
system, central nervous system,
peripheral nervous system
No No specific Antidot
60
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
66. Hydrazine hydrate F/T 75 113.5
3.5 99.99
1 1.1 Soluble in water
3 2 2 Irritating & toxic Gas
NL NL Acute: 570 ppm 4 hour(s) [Rat].
lungs, liver, mucous
membranes.
No No specific Antidote
67. Hydrochloric acid
(15 - 33%)
CAS #7647-01-0
T/C NA -84.9 NA NA 1.27 1.52 Soluble 3 0 1 HCL gas 5 50 1300 ppm /30 mins
for hum
Eyes, skin,
respiratory
system
No No specific Antidote
68. Hydrofluoric acid (20
- 60%)
CAS# 7664-39-3
H/T NA 19.5 NA NA 0.97 1.3-1.9 Very
soluble
(violent
reaction)
4 0 1 Hydrogen over an
extended period
of time in
steel cylinders and
systems
3 30 1276 ppm (rat, 1
hour)
Eyes, skin, airway,
lungs, liver,
kidney, heart and
bone.
No No specific antidote
69. Hydrogen Gas CAS # 1333-74-0
F/E N.A. -252.8°C
3.0 74 0.0696
- Soluble in water
1 4 0 Explosive gas 250 ppm
LC50 >800000 ppm rat
lungs, heart, upper respiratory tract, central nervous system (CNS)
No No specific Antidote
70. Hydrogen bromide
CAS# 10035-10-6
T/C -66.7 NA NA NA 2.812 3.684 Insoluble 3 0 1 NA 2 30 Inhalation - rat - 1 h
- 2860 ppm
respiratory system No No specific antidote
71. Liquified Petroleum Gas CAS# 74-98-6
F/H -104 -42.04
2.1 9.5 0.58 1.5 Very lightly soluble
2 4 0 CO, CO2, H2 gas 1000 2100 inhalation rat 658 mg/l/4h
central nervous system
No Oxygen is the antidote for asphyxiant poisoning.
72. Methanesulfonyl
chloride (MSCl) CAS# 124-63-0
T/C 110 161 NA NA 1.481 3 NA 3 1 1 CO, CO2, halogenated compounds
Nl NL NL Eyes, skin, airway, lungs
NA No specific antidote
73. Methanol CAS# 67-56-1
F/T 10 54 5.4 44 0.792 1.1 Soluble 1 3 0 Irritating vapour
200 6000 LEL
64000 ppm for 4H rat
Kidneys, heart, central
nervous system, liver,
eyes
No 10 mg diazepam through injection Activated Charcoal
74. Methylene chloride
CAS# 75-09-2
H/T NA 39.75 12 19 1.3266 2.93 Partially
soluble
2 1 0 CO, CO2,
halogenated
compounds.
50 NL 52000 1 hours [Rat]. lungs, the
nervous system,
liver, mucous membranes,
central
nervous system
Yes
Classified 2B
(Possible
for human.)
No specific antidote
61
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
by IARC
75. MonoChloro Benzene CAS # 108-90-7
T/F 28 132 1.3 9.6 1.11 3.9 Insoluble 2 3 0 Phosgene & Hydrochloric
gases generated
10 ppm
10 ppm
22,000 ppm Rat Eyes, skin, respiratory
system, central nervous
system, liver
No Diazem – 1 mg/Kg.(Intraven
ous) Epinephina,
Efidrine 76. Monomethylhydrazi
ne
CAS# 60-34-4
F/C -8.3 87.5 2.5 92 0.874 1.03 soluble 4 3 2 toxic oxides of nitrogen during
combustion
0.2 20 Rat inhalation 74-78 ppm/4 hr
Skin, Eye, and Respiratory
tract
Yes
20 ppm;
NIOSH
considers
methyl
hydrazine to
be a potential
occupational
carcinogen.
4) Give the victims water or milk.
adults, 250 mL (8
oz or 1 cup).
Water or milk
should be given
only if victims are
conscious and
alert.
5) Activated charcoal
may be
administered if
victims are
conscious and
alert. 50 to 100 g
(1-3/4 to 3-1/2
oz) for adults,
with 125 to 250
mL (1/2 to 1 cup) of water.
6) Promote excretion
by administering a
saline cathartic or
sorbitol to
conscious and
alert victims.
77. Oleum Component: SULFURIC ACID-CAS# 7664-93-9: SULFUR TRIOXIDE-CAS#
T/C
Strong
oxedizer
NA 65 NA NA 1.992 at 4 C
NA miscible 3 0 2 Toxic and irritating
vapors
1 mg/m
3
15 mg/m
3
510 mg/m3 for 2 hrs RAT
Teeth, Lungs, Heart,
Respiratory system,
Cardiovascular system
No Sodium Hydro-Carbonate (4%
Conc.), Milk, Lime Juice, Milk
of Magnesia
62
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
7446-11-09
78. o-Xylene
CAS # 1330-20-7
F 31 143-
145
1.7 7.6 0.878 3.7 0.2 g/l 3 2 0 CO, CO2 100 900 4550 ppm 4
hour(s) [Rat].
Eyes, skin,
respiratory
system, central
nervous system,
gastrointestinal tract, blood, liver,
kidney
No Diazem – 1
mg/Kg.(Intraveno
us), Epinephina,
Efidrine
79. P-Chloro toluene CAS# 106-43-4
F/H 49 162 0.7 12.2 1.07 4.4 Insoluble 1 2 0 CO , HCL gas, possibly
phosgene . Reacts with
strong oxidants.
NL NL Inhalation (rat): >26700
ppm/1h
Eyes, skin, respiratory
system
No No specific antidote
80. R 134a (1112 - Tetrafluoroethane)
H NA -26.3
NA NA NA 3.5 Insoluble 1 0 1 CO, CO2, halogenated compounds
NL NL Inhalation Vapor- Rat-4h- 1500 g/m³
NA No No specific antidote
81. R 152 a (Difluoroethane) CAS #75-37-6
H/F < 50 -25 3.7 18 NA 2.79 Slight soluble
2 4 1 CO, CO2, HF gas
NL NL Inhalation-Rat LCLo: 64,000 ppm/4 hours; Inhalation-Mouse LC50: 977 g/m3/2 hours
Respiratory system, central
nervous system,
circulatory system and
heart, kidneys.
No No specific antidote
82. R-125 (Pentafluoroethane) CAS# 354-33-6
H NA -48.5
NA NA 1.2 4.1 Slight soluble
1 0 1 toxic products which can be corrosive in the presence of moisture.
1000 NL Inhalation Vapor- Rat-4h- 2910 g/m³
NA NA No specific antidote
83. R-143a (1,1,1-TRIFLUOROETHANE) CAS# 420-46-2
F -47.2
-90 7.7 17.4 0.93 2.9 Slight soluble
1 4 1 HF gas 1000 NL Inhalation 4 hour LC50: > 540,000 ppm in rats
NA No No specific antidote
84. Raney nickel
T/F NA NA NA NA NA NA In contact with water
releases flammable
gas
3 2 0 W
obnoxious and toxic fumes
1 5 NA ATE > 20 mg/l.
Skin. Yes
Nickel is Group 2B carcinoge
No specific antidote
63
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
n- IARC
85. Sodium Methoxide (30%) CAS# 124-41-4
F/H 33 NA 7.3 36 1.1 1.1 Decomposes/reacts in water
3 2 2 CO, CO2 3 Mg/m3
NL NA Respiratory system
NA No specific antidote
86. Sulfuric Acid CAS # 7664-93-9
C -- 340 -- -- 1.84 -- Water reactive
3 0 2 Non combustible
1 mg/m3
15 mg/m
3
510 Rat Skin, eyes, Lung,
No Sodium Hydro-Carbonate (4%
Conc.), Milk, Lime Juice, Milk
of Megnesia 87. Tetrafluoroethyl
ene CAS# 116-14-3
T/F/R
NA -76 10 50 1.5 3.9 insoluble 2 4 3 halogenated compounds, acid
halides
2 NL 40000 ppm/4 hour(s) inhalation-rat
NA Yes
NTP: Anticipated Human
Carcinogen; IARC: Animal
Sufficient Evidence, Group 2B; ACGIH: A3 -Confirmed
Animal Carcinogen
No specific antidote
88. Tetrahydrofuran CAS # 109-99-9
F/E -21 66 1.5 12 0.88 2.5 miscible 2 3 0 Toxic vapour 200 ppm
2000 ppm
21000 mg/m 3 hours [Rat
Skin, eyes, Lung,
No No specific Antidote
89. Toluene
CAS # 108-88-3 F 4.0 111 1.1 7.1 0.87 3.2 Insoluble 2 3 0 Irritating
Vapour generated
50 2000 400 ppm for 24Hr Rat
Eyes, skin, respiratory
system, central nervous
system, liver, kidneys
No Diazem – 1 mg/Kg.(Intraven
ous), Epinephina,
Efidrine
90. TRICHLOROETHYLENE CAS# 79-01-6
H NA 87 8 10.5 1.464 4.53 Insoluble 2 1 0 phosgene, halogenated compounds,
oxides of carbon
100 1000 140700 mg/m3/1 hour(s) inhalation-rat
Eyes, skin, respiratory
system, heart, liver, kidneys,
Yes Cancer Site [in animals:
No specific Antidote
64
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
LC50 central nervous system
liver & kidney cancer]
91. Trichlorofluoromethane CAS# 75-69-4
H NA 23.7 NA NA 1.49 4.7 Partially soluble
1 0 0 CO, CO2, halogenated compounds,
carbonyl halides
1000 2000 Inhalation Gas-rat-1 hr-104800 ppm
Skin, respiratory
system, cardiovascular
system
NA No specific Antidote
92. Xylene CAS # 1330-20-7
F 31 143-145
1.7 7.6 0.878 3.7 0.2 g/l 3 2 0 100 ppm
150 ppm
4550 ppm 4 hour(s) [Rat].
Eyes, skin, respiratory
system, central nervous system,
gastrointestinal tract, blood, liver, kidneys
No Diazem – 1 mg/Kg.(Intraven
ous), Epinephina,
Efidrine
F = FIRE T = TOXIC C = CORROSIVE E = EXPLOSIVE R = REACTIVE STEL = SHORT TERM EXPOSURE LIMIT
BP = BOILING POINT LEL = LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT PPM = PARTS PER MILLION
UEL = UPPER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT SP.GR = SPECIFIC GRAVITY VD = VAPOUR DENSITY
ER = EVAPORATION RATE H = HEALTH HAZARD CLASS F = FIRE HAZARD CLASS
R = REACTIVE HAZARD BR = BURNING RATE TLV = THRESHOLD LIMIT VALUE
NFPA =NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION-usa N.A = NOT AVAILABLE N.L =NOT LISTED
65
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
3.11 Occupational health impact on employees, control measures, action plan if accident occur
Table-3.11
Sr.No. Chemical Occupational health impact on
employees
Control measures provided Action plan if accident occure
1. Acetic Acid
CAS No. 64-19-7
Chronic respiratory disease due to
long term exposure inhalation
Skin disease due to skin contact
Process enclosure,
Local exhaust, General
dilution ventilation,
Personal protective
equipments
Remove victim from the spillage location
into fresh air area.
Small spillage control absorb on paper
towel.
Large spillage – Evacuate area and stop
source of ignition.
Dilute with water and collect washed
out water in tank and neutralize it in
safe manner.
2. Acetic anhydride
CAS No.108-24-7
Chronic respiratory disease due to
long term exposure inhalation
Skin disease due to skin contact
Process enclosure,
Local exhaust, General
dilution ventilation,
Personal protective
equipments
Remove victim from the spillage location
into fresh air area.
Small spillage control absorb on paper
towel.
Large spillage – Evacuate area and stop
source of ignition.
Dilute with water and collect washed
out water in tank and neutralize it in
safe manner.
3. Acetone
CAS# 67-64-1 99
Chronic respiratory disease due to
long term exposure inhalation
Skin disease due to skin contact
Process enclosure,
Local exhaust, General
dilution ventilation,
Personal protective
equipments
Prevent ignition, stop leak and ventilate
the area. Contain spilled liquid with sand
or earth. DO NOT use combustible
materials such as sawdust. Use
appropriate personal protective
equipment
66
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
4. Acetonitrile
CAS #75-05-8
Potential Acute Health Effects:
skin contact (irritant), of eye
contact (irritant),
Potential Chronic Health Effects:
The substance is toxic to blood,
kidneys, lungs, liver, mucous
membranes, gastrointestinal tract,
upper respiratory tract,
skin, eyes, central nervous system
(CNS). The substance may be toxic
to the reproductive system.
Closed system, ventilation,
explosion-proof electrical
equipment and lighting. Do
NOT use compressed air for
filling, discharging, or
handling.
Ventilation. Remove all ignition sources.
Collect leaking liquid in sealable
containers. Absorb remaining liquid in
dry sand or inert absorbent and remove
to safe place. Do NOT wash away into
sewer. Personal protection: complete
protective clothing including self-
contained breathing apparatus
5. Liq. Ammonia (25 %
Solution)
Very hazardous in case of skin
contact (corrosive, irritant,
permeator), Inhalation of the
spray mist may produce severe
irritation of respiratory tract,
characterized by coughing,
choking, or shortness of breath.
Severe over-exposure can result in
death. The substance is toxic
to upper respiratory tract
Provide exhaust ventilation or
other engineering controls to
keep the airborne
concentrations of vapors
below their respective
threshold limit value. Ensure
that eyewash stations and
safety showers are proximal
to the work-station location.
Dilute with water and mop up, or absorb
with an inert dry material and place in
an appropriate waste disposal container.
If necessary: Neutralize the residue with
a dilute solution of acetic acid.
Corrosive liquid. Poisonous liquid. Stop
leak if without risk. Absorb with DRY
earth, sand or other non-combustible
material.
Do not get water inside container. Do
not touch spilled material. Use water
spray curtain to divert vapor drift. Use
water spray to reduce vapors. Prevent
entry into sewers, basements or
confined areas; dike if needed. Call for
assistance on disposal. Neutralize the
residue with a dilute solution of acetic
acid.
6. Benzaldehyde Prolonged or repeated contact Closed system, ventilation, Remove sources of ignition, stop release,
67
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
CAS No. 100-52-7 with the skin may cause contact
dermatitis. No other chronic health
hazard information is available
explosion-proof electrical
equipment and lighting. Do
NOT use compressed air for
filling, discharging, or
handling.
and provide adequate ventilation.
Prevent flow to sewer and public waters.
Recover free product, if possible. Cover
spill with inert, non-combustible
absorbent material and remove to
disposal container. Consider sealed
metal containers for disposal. Report
spill as per regulatory requirements.
Leaking drum should be emptied or
placed into an oversized (recovery)
drum.
7. Benzyl chloride
CAS#: 100-44-7
The substance is toxic
to kidneys, lungs, the nervous
system, liver, mucous membranes.
Repeated or prolonged exposure
to the substance can
produce target organs damage.
Repeated or prolonged contact
with spray mist may produce
chronic eye irritation and severe
skin irritation. Repeated or
prolonged exposure to spray mist
may produce respiratory tract
irritation leading to frequent
p. 2
attacks of bronchial infection.
Repeated exposure to a highly
toxic material may produce
general deterioration of health by
an accumulation in one or many
Provide exhaust ventilation or
other engineering controls to
keep the airborne
concentrations of vapors
below their respective
threshold limit value. Ensure
that eyewash stations and
safety showers are proximal
to the work-station location.
Combustible material. Corrosive liquid.
Keep away from heat. Keep away from
sources of ignition. Stop leak if without
risk.
Absorb with DRY earth, sand or other
non-combustible material. Do not get
water inside container. Do not touch
spilled material. Use water spray curtain
to divert vapor drift. Prevent entry into
sewers, basements or confined areas;
dike if needed.
Call for assistance on disposal. Be careful
that the product is not present at a
concentration level above TLV.
68
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
human organs. Repeated or
prolonged inhalation of vapors
may lead to chronic respiratory
irritation.
8. Chlorine
CAS #7782-50-5
Toxic by inhalation. Irritating to
eyes, respiratory system and skin.
Very toxic to
aquatic organisms.
Use only with adequate
ventilation. Use process
enclosures, local exhaust
ventilation or other
engineering controls to keep
worker exposure to airborne
contaminants below any
recommended or statutory
limits.
Immediately contact emergency
personnel. Keep unnecessary personnel
away. Use suitable protective
equipment. Eliminate all ignition
sources if safe to do so.
Do not touch or walk through spilled
material. Shut off gas supply if this can
be done safely. Isolate area until gas has
dispersed.
9. Chloroform
CAS # 7-66-3
Potential Chronic Health Effects:
CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:
Classified + (Proven.) by NIOSH.
Classified A3 (Proven
for animal.) by ACGIH, 2B
(Possible for human.) by IARC.
Classified 2 (Some evidence.) by
NTP. MUTAGENIC EFFECTS:
Mutagenic for mammalian somatic
cells. Mutagenic for bacteria
and/or yeast. TERATOGENIC
Engineering Controls: Provide
exhaust ventilation or other
engineering controls to keep
the airborne concentrations
of vapors below their
respective threshold limit
value. Ensure that eyewash
stations and safety showers
are proximal to the
workstation location.
Personal Protection: Splash
goggles. Lab coat. Vapor
respirator. Be sure to use an
approved/certified respirator
or equivalent. Gloves.
Absorb with an inert material and put
the spilled material in an appropriate
waste disposal. Be careful that the
product is not present at a concentration
level above TLV. Check TLV on the MSDS
and with local authorities.
10. Cuprous chloride
CAS#: 7758-89-6
The substance is toxic to kidneys,
lungs, liver,
Use process enclosures, local
exhaust ventilation, or other
Corrosive solid. Stop leak if without risk.
Do not get water inside container. Do
69
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
mucous membranes. Repeated or
prolonged exposure to the
substance can produce target
organs damage. Repeated
exposure of the eyes to a low level
of dust can produce eye irritation.
Repeated skin exposure can
produce local skin destruction, or
dermatitis. Repeated inhalation of
dust can produce varying degree
of respiratory irritation or lung
damage.
Repeated exposure to an highly
toxic material may produce
general deterioration of health by
an accumulation in one or many
human organs.
engineering controls to keep
airborne levels below
recommended exposure
limits. If user operations
generate dust, fume or mist,
use ventilation to keep
exposure to airborne
contaminants below the
exposure limit
not touch spilled material. Use water
spray to reduce vapors. Prevent entry
into sewers, basements or confined
areas; dike if needed. Call for assistance
on disposal. Be careful that the product
is not present at a concentration level
above TLV.
11. Diethyl ether
CAS#: 60-29-7
The substance may be toxic to
skin, central nervous system
(CNS). Repeated or prolonged
exposure to the substance can
produce target organs damage.
Provide exhaust ventilation or
other engineering controls to
keep the airborne
concentrations of vapors
below their respective
Threshold limit value. Ensure
that eyewash stations and
safety showers are proximal
to the work-station location.
Flammable liquid. Keep away from heat.
Keep away from sources of ignition. Stop
leak if without risk. Absorb with DRY
earth, sand or other non-combustible
material. Do not touch spilled material.
Prevent entry into sewers, basements or
confined areas; dike if needed. Be careful
that the product is not present at a
concentration level above TLV.
12. Dimethyl
formamide(DM F)CAS
#68-12-2
The substance is toxic to kidneys,
liver, central nervous system
(CNS). The substance may be toxic
to blood, the nervous
Provide exhaust ventilation or
other engineering controls to
keep the airborne
concentrations of vapors
Flammable liquid. Keep away from heat.
Keep away from sources of ignition. Stop
leak if without risk. Absorb with DRY
earth,
70
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
system. Repeated or prolonged
exposure to the substance can
produce target organs damage.
below their respective
threshold limit value. Ensure
that eyewash stations and
safety showers are proximal
to the work-station location.
sand or other non-combustible material.
Do not touch spilled material. Prevent
entry into sewers, basements or
confined areas; dike if needed.
13. Ethyl Alcohol
CAS # 64–17-5
The substance is toxic to blood,
the reproductive system, liver,
upper respiratory tract, skin,
central nervous
Provide close process Flammable liquid. Keep away from heat.
Keep away from sources of ignition. Stop
leak if without risk. Absorb with DRY
earth, sand or other non-combustible
material. Do not touch spilled material.
Prevent entry into sewers, basements or
confined areas; dike if needed.
14. Ethyl Acetate
CAS # 141-78-6
The substance is toxic to blood,
the reproductive system, liver,
upper respiratory tract, skin,
central nervous
Provide close process Flammable liquid. Keep away from heat.
Keep away from sources of ignition. Stop
leak if without risk. Absorb with DRY
earth, sand or other non-combustible
material. Do not touch spilled material.
Prevent entry into sewers, basements or
confined areas; dike if needed.
15. Ferric chloride
CAS#: 7705-08-0
The substance is toxic to lungs,
mucous membranes. Repeated or
prolonged exposure to the
substance can produce target
organs damage. Repeated
exposure of the eyes to a low level
of dust can produce eye irritation.
Repeated skin exposure can
produce local skin destruction, or
dermatitis. Repeated inhalation of
dust
Use process enclosures, local
exhaust ventilation, or other
engineering controls to keep
airborne levels below
recommended
exposure limits. If user
operations generate dust,
fume or mist, use ventilation
to keep exposure to airborne
contaminants
below the exposure limit.
Corrosive solid. Stop leak if without risk.
Do not get water inside container. Do
not touch spilled material. Use water
spray to reduce vapors. Prevent entry
into sewers, basements or confined
areas; dike if needed. Call for assistance
on disposal.
p. 3 Neutralize the residue with a dilute
solution of sodium carbonate. Be careful
that the product is not present at a
concentration
71
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
can produce varying degree of
respiratory irritation or lung
damage.
level above TLV.
16. Formic acid
64-18-6
The substance may be toxic to
kidneys, liver, upper
p. 2 respiratory tract, skin, eyes,
central nervous system (CNS).
Repeated or prolonged exposure
to the substance can produce
target organs damage. Repeated or
prolonged contact with spray mist
may produce chronic eye irritation
and severe skin irritation.
Repeated or prolonged exposure
to spray mist may produce
respiratory tract irritation leading
to frequent attacks of bronchial inf
Provide exhaust ventilation or
other engineering controls to
keep the airborne
concentrations of vapors
below their respective
threshold limit value. Ensure
that eyewash stations and
safety showers are proximal
to the work-station location.
Combustible material. Corrosive liquid.
Keep away from heat. Keep away from
sources of ignition. Stop leak if without
risk.
Absorb with DRY earth, sand or other
non-combustible material. Do not get
water inside container. Do not touch
spilled material. Use water spray curtain
to divert vapor drift. Prevent entry into
sewers, basements or confined areas;
dike if needed.
Call for assistance on disposal.
Neutralize the residue with a dilute
solution of sodium carbonate. Be careful
that the product is not present at a
concentration level above TLV
17. N - HEPTANE The substance is toxic to blood,
the reproductive system, liver,
upper respiratory tract, skin,
central nervous
Provide close process Flammable liquid. Keep away from heat.
Keep away from sources of ignition. Stop
leak if without risk. Absorb with DRY
earth, sand or other non-combustible
material. Do not touch spilled material.
Prevent entry into sewers, basements or
confined areas; dike if needed.
18. Hexane
CAS #110-54-3
The substance is toxic to blood,
the reproductive system, liver,
upper respiratory tract, skin,
central nervous
Provide close process Flammable liquid. Keep away from heat.
Keep away from sources of ignition. Stop
leak if without risk. Absorb with DRY
earth,
72
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
sand or other non-combustible material.
Do not touch spilled material. Prevent
entry into sewers, basements or
confined areas; dike if needed.
19. Hydrochloric Acid
Very hazardous in case of skin
contact (corrosive, irritant,
permeator), of eye contact
(irritant, corrosive), of ingestion, .
Slightly hazardous in case of
inhalation (lung sensitizer). Non-
corrosive for lungs. Liquid or spray
mist may produce tissue damage
particularly on mucous
membranes of eyes, mouth and
respiratory tract. Skin contact may
produce burns. Inhalation of the
spray mist may produce severe
irritation of respiratory tract,
characterized by coughing,
choking, or shortness of breath.
Severe over-exposure can result in
death.
Provide close process and
scrubber on process vent and
storage vent
Corrosive liquid. Poisonous liquid. Stop
leak if without risk. Absorb with DRY
earth, sand or other non-combustible
material.
Do not get water inside container. Do
not touch spilled material. Use water
spray curtain to divert vapor drift.
20. Hydrogen peroxide Very hazardous in case of skin
contact (irritant), of eye contact
(irritant). Hazardous in case of
skin contact (corrosive), of eye
contact (corrosive), of ingestion, .
Slightly hazardous in case of
inhalation (lung sensitizer).
The substance is toxic to lungs,
Provide exhaust ventilation or
other engineering controls to
keep the airborne
concentrations of vapors
below their respective
threshold limit value. Ensure
that eyewash stations and
safety showers are proximal
EXPLOSION
HAZARD: SEVERE, WHEN HIGHLY
CONCENTRATED OR PURE H2O2 IS
EXPOSED TO HEAT, MECHANICAL
IMPACT, OR CAUSED TO DECOMPOSE
CATALYTICALLY BY METALS & THEIR
SALTS, DUSTS & ALKALIES. ANOTHER
SOURCE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE
73
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
mucous membranes to the work-station location.
Use PPEs.
EXPLOSIONS IS FROM SEALING THE
MATERIAL IN STRONG CONTAINERS.
UNDER SUCH CONDITIONS EVEN
GRADUAL DECOMPOSITION OF
HYDROGEN PEROXIDE TO WATER +
1/2 OXYGEN
CAN CAUSE LARGE PRESSURES TO
BUILD UP IN THE CONTAINERS WHICH
MAY BURST EXPLOSIVELY.
Corrosive liquid. Oxidizing material.
Stop leak if without risk. Absorb with
DRY earth, sand or other non-
combustible material.
Do not get water inside container. Avoid
contact with a combustible material
(wood, paper, oil, clothing...). Keep
substance damp using water spray. Do
not touch spilled material. Use water
spray curtain to divert vapor drift.
Prevent entry into sewers, basements or
confined areas; dike if needed.
21. N - PROPANOL The substance is toxic to blood,
the reproductive system, liver,
upper respiratory tract, skin,
central nervous
Provide close process Flammable liquid. Keep away from heat.
Keep away from sources of ignition. Stop
leak if without risk. Absorb with DRY
earth, sand or other non-combustible
material. Do not touch spilled material.
Prevent entry into sewers, basements or
confined areas; dike if needed.
22. Methanol
CAS# 67-56-1
The substance is toxic to blood,
the reproductive system, liver,
Provide close process Flammable liquid. Keep away from heat.
Keep away from sources of ignition. Stop
74
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
upper respiratory tract, skin,
central nervous
leak if without risk. Absorb with DRY
earth, sand or other non-combustible
material. Do not touch spilled material.
Prevent entry into sewers, basements or
confined areas; dike if needed.
23. Methylene Chloride
CAS #75-09-2
CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:
Classified + (Proven.) by OSHA.
The substance is toxic to lungs, the
nervous system, liver, mucous
membranes, central nervous
system (CNS).
Provide exhaust ventilation or
other engineering controls to
keep the airborne
concentrations of vapors
below their respective
threshold limit value. Ensure
that eyewash stations and
safety showers are proximal
to the workstation
location.
Personal Protection:
Absorb with an inert material and put
the spilled material in an appropriate
waste disposal. Be careful that the
product is not present at a concentration
level above TLV
24. p-Xylene
CAS#: 106-42-3
The substance is toxic to blood,
kidneys, the nervous
system, liver. Repeated or
prolonged exposure to the
substance can produce target
organs damage.
Provide exhaust ventilation or
other engineering controls to
keep the airborne
concentrations of vapors
below their respective
threshold limit value. Ensure
that eyewash stations and
safety showers are proximal
to the work-station location.
Toxic flammable liquid, insoluble or very
slightly soluble in water. Keep away
from heat. Keep away from sources of
ignition.
Stop leak if without risk. Absorb with
DRY earth, sand or other non-
combustible material. Do not get water
inside container.
Do not touch spilled material. Prevent
entry into sewers, basements or
confined areas; dike if needed. Eliminate
all ignition sources. Call for assistance
on disposal. Be careful that the product
is not present at a concentration level
75
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
above TLV.
25. Liq. Ammonia (25 %
Solution)
Very hazardous in case of skin
contact (corrosive, irritant,
permeator),
Inhalation of the spray mist may
produce severe irritation
of respiratory tract, characterized
by coughing, choking, or shortness
of breath. Severe over-exposure
can result in death.
The substance is toxic
to upper respiratory tract
Provide exhaust ventilation or
other engineering controls to
keep the airborne
concentrations of vapors
below their respective
threshold limit value. Ensure
that eyewash stations and
safety showers are proximal
to the work-station location.
Dilute with water and mop up, or absorb
with an inert dry material and place in
an appropriate waste disposal container.
If necessary: Neutralize the residue with
a dilute solution of acetic acid.
Corrosive liquid. Poisonous liquid. Stop
leak if without risk. Absorb with DRY
earth, sand or other non-combustible
material.
Do not get water inside container. Do
not touch spilled material. Use water
spray curtain to divert vapor drift. Use
water spray to reduce vapors. Prevent
entry into sewers, basements or
confined areas; dike if needed. Call for
assistance on disposal.
Neutralize the residue with a dilute
solution of acetic acid.
26. Nitric acid
CAS#7697-37-2
The substance may be toxic to
lungs, mucous membranes, upper
respiratory
p. 2
tract, skin, eyes, teeth. Repeated or
prolonged exposure to the
substance can produce target
organs damage. Repeated
or prolonged contact with spray
mist may produce chronic eye
Provide exhaust ventilation or
other engineering controls to
keep the airborne
concentrations of vapors
below their respective
threshold limit value. Ensure
that eyewash stations and
safety showers are proximal
to the work-station location.
Corrosive liquid. Oxidizing material.
Poisonous liquid. Stop leak if without
risk. Absorb with DRY earth, sand or
other noncombustible material. Do not
get water inside container. Avoid
contact with a combustible material
(wood, paper, oil, clothing...). Keep
substance damp using water spray. Do
not touch spilled material. Use water
spray curtain to divert vapor drift. Use
76
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
irritation and severe skin
irritation. Repeated or prolonged
exposure to spray mist may
produce respiratory tract
irritation leading to frequent
attacks of bronchial infection.
water spray to reduce vapors. Prevent
entry into sewers, basements or
confined areas; dike if needed. Call for
assistance on disposal. Neutralize the
residue with a dilute solution of sodium
carbonate. Be careful that the product is
not present at a concentration level
above TLV.
27. OLEUM
CAS#8014-95-7
MAY BE FATAL IF ABSORBED
THROUGH SKIN, SWALLOWED OR
INHALED.
CAUSES SEVERE RESPIRATORY
TRACT BURNS. CAUSES EYE AND
SKIN
BURNS. HARMFUL IF ABSORBED
THROUGH SKIN OR IF
SWALLOWED.
CONTAINS MATERIAL THAT CAN
CAUSE TARGET ORGAN DAMAGE.
Provide exhaust ventilation or
other engineering controls to
keep the airborne
concentrations of vapors
below their respective
occupational exposure limits.
Use only
with adequate ventilation.
Prevent liquid from entering sewers or
waterways. Dike with inert material
(sand, earth, etc.). Collect into
containers for reclamation or disposal
only if container is suitable to withstand
the material. Consider insitu
neutralization and disposal. Anhydrous
sodium sulfate is useful to treat spills of
oleum. It reacts with the liquid to
contain and solidify the spill and
suppress the fume. Tools and equipment
must be properly decontaminated after
clean up. Comply with Federal,
Provincial/State and local regulations on
reporting releases.
28. Paraformaldehyde
CAS#: 30525-89-4
The substance
p. 2 is toxic to mucous membranes.
Repeated or prolonged exposure
to the substance can produce
target organs damage.
Repeated exposure of the eyes to a
low level of dust can produce eye
Use process enclosures, local
exhaust ventilation, or other
engineering controls to keep
airborne levels below
recommended
exposure limits. If user
operations generate dust,
Flammable solid. Corrosive solid. Stop
leak if without risk. Do not get water
inside container. Do not touch spilled
material. Use water spray curtain to
divert vapor drift. Use water spray to
reduce vapors. Prevent entry into
sewers, basements or confined
77
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
irritation. Repeated skin exposure
can produce local skin destruction,
or dermatitis. Repeated inhalation
of dust can produce varying
degree of respiratory irritation or
lung damage.
Repeated exposure to a highly
toxic material may produce
general deterioration of health by
an accumulation in one or many
human organs
fume or mist, use ventilation
to keep exposure to airborne
contaminants
below the exposure limit.
areas; dike if needed. Eliminate all
ignition sources. Call for assistance on
disposal.
29. Phenol
CAS#: 108-95-2
The substance may be toxic to
kidneys, liver, central
nervous system (CNS). Repeated
or prolonged exposure to the
substance can produce target
organs damage. Repeated
p. 2
exposure of the eyes to a low level
of dust can produce eye irritation.
Repeated skin exposure can
produce local skin
destruction, or dermatitis.
Repeated inhalation of dust can
produce varying degree of
respiratory irritation or lung
damage.
Repeated exposure to a highly
toxic material may produce
general deterioration of health by
Use process enclosures, local
exhaust ventilation, or other
engineering controls to keep
airborne levels below
recommended
exposure limits. If user
operations generate dust,
fume or mist, use ventilation
to keep exposure to airborne
contaminants
below the exposure limit.
Corrosive solid. Stop leak if without risk.
Do not get water inside container. Do
not touch spilled material. Use water
spray to
reduce vapors. Prevent entry into
sewers, basements or confined areas;
dike if needed. Eliminate all ignition
sources. Call
for assistance on disposal. Be careful
that the product is not present at a
concentration level above TLV.
78
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
an accumulation in one or many
human organs.
30. Phosphoric acid (85 % ) Very hazardous in case of skin
contact (irritant), of eye contact
(irritant), of ingestion, . Hazardous
in case of skin contact
(corrosive, permeator), of eye
contact (corrosive). Slightly
hazardous in case of inhalation
(lung sensitizer)
Provide exhaust ventilation or
other engineering controls to
keep the airborne
concentrations of vapors
below their respective
threshold limit value. Ensure
that eyewash stations and
safety showers are proximal
to the work-station location.
Corrosive liquid. Poisonous liquid. Stop
leak if without risk. Absorb with DRY
earth, sand or other non-combustible
material.
Do not get water inside container. Do
not touch spilled material. Use water
spray curtain to divert vapor drift. Use
water spray
to reduce vapors. Prevent entry into
sewers, basements or confined areas;
dike if needed.
31. Pyridine
CAS # 110 – 86 - 1
Target organs: Liver, kidneys,
nerves, Bone Marrow. Persons
with pre-existing disorders may be
more susceptible. This Product has
beeen reported to be a possible
carcinogen.
Long-term exposure may cause
liver, kidney or CNS damage.
Typical STEL 10 ppm. Typical PEL
15 ppm.
Use process enclosure, local
exhaust ventilation, or other
engineering controls to
control airborne levels below
recommended exposure
limits. Facilities storing or
utilizing this material should
be equipped with an eyewash
facility and a safety shower.
Ventilation fans and other
electrical service must be
non-sparking and have an
explosion-proof design.
Absorb spill with inert material (e.g.
vermiculite, sand or earth), then place in
suitable container. Clean up spills
immediately, observing precautions in
the Protective Equipment section.
Remove all sources of ignition. Use a
spark-proof tool. Provide ventilation.
Prevent spreading of vapors through
sewers, ventilation systems and
confined areas. Evacuate unnecessary
personnel. Approach spill from upwind.
Use water spray to cool and disperse
vapors, protect personnel, and dilute
spills to form nonflammable mixtures.
Control runoff and isolate discharged
material for proper disposal.
79
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
32. Sodium Acetate
127-09-3
Repeated or prolonged exposure is
not known to aggravate medical
condition.
Use process enclosures, local
exhaust ventilation, or other
engineering controls to keep
airborne levels below
recommended exposure
limits. If user operations
generate dust, fume or mist,
use ventilation to keep
exposure to airborne
contaminants below the
exposure limit.
Use a shovel to put the material into a
convenient waste disposal container.
Neutralize the residue with a dilute
solution of acetic acid. Finish cleaning by
spreading water on the contaminated
surface and allow to evacuate through
the sanitary
system.
33. Sulfur powder
CAS # 7704-34-9
Prolonged or repeated skin contact
may cause dermatitis. Chronic
inhalation may cause effects
similar to those of acute
inhalation.
Facilities storing or utilizing
this material should be
equipped with an eyewash
facility and a safety shower.
Use adequate general or local
explosion-proof ventilation to
keep airborne levels to
acceptable levels.
Vacuum or sweep up material and place
into a suitable disposal container. Clean
up spills immediately, observing
precautions in the Protective Equipment
section. Scoop up with a nonsparking
tool, then place into a suitable container
for disposal. Avoid generating dusty
conditions. Remove all sources of
ignition. Provide ventilation.
34. Sulfuric Acid
Prolonged or repeated skin contact
may cause dermatitis. Prolonged
or repeated inhalation may cause
nosebleeds, nasal congestion,
erosion of the teeth, perforation of
the nasal septum, chest pain and
bronchitis. Prolonged or repeated
eye contact may cause
conjunctivitis. Effects may be
Facilities storing or utilizing
this material should be
equipped with an eyewash
facility and a safety shower.
Use adequate general or local
exhaust ventilation to keep
airborne concentrations
below the permissible
exposure limits. Use a
Clean up spills immediately, observing
precautions in the Protective Equipment
section. Carefully scoop up and place
into appropriate disposal container.
Provide ventilation. Do not get water
inside containers. Cover with dry earth,
dry sand, or other non-combustible
material followed with plastic sheet to
minimize spreading and contact with
80
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
delayed. Workers chronically
exposed to sulfuric acid mists may
show various lesions of the skin,
tracheobronchitis, stomatitis,
conjunctivitis, or gastritis.
Occupational exposure to strong
inorganic acid mists containing
sulfuric acid is carcinogenic to
humans.
corrosion-resistant
ventilation system.
water.
35. Toluene
CAS # 108-88-3
The substance is toxic to blood,
the reproductive system, liver,
upper respiratory tract, skin,
central nervous
Provide close process Flammable liquid. Keep away from heat.
Keep away from sources of ignition. Stop
leak if without risk. Absorb with DRY
earth, sand or other non-combustible
material. Do not touch spilled material.
Prevent entry into sewers, basements or
confined areas; dike if needed.
3.12 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROCESS.
Process details are provided in EIA report.
81
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
3.13 Existing Fire Prevention & Protection System
3.13.1 Fire Fighting System (Fire hydrant System )
Fire hydrant system is operational with working pressure of 8.0 kg/cm2 g. Jockey
Pump maintains pressure of the fire hydrant network. The fire hydrant is forming main ring
in which water is available from two sides.
Working of Fire hydrant System
1 In case pressure drops below 7.5 kg/Cm2 Jockey pump no.-01 starts & stops at maintaining 8.0
Kg/cm2. If further pressure drops below 7.5 kg/cm2 & reduce up to 7.0 kg/cm2 Jockey pump
no.-02 will also start and keep running till hydrant line pressure maintained 8.0 kg/cm2. 2 In case of any emergency when hydrant line pressure drops below 7 kg/ cm2 g and Jockey
pump is not able to maintain the pressure in line, Diesel (engine) pump no.1 starts at 7 kg/
cm2 g and it provide the required water for fire fighting. 3 If Diesel (engine) pump no.1 is not able to start & pressure drops below 6.5 kg/ cm2 g,
Diesel (engine) pump no.2 starts at 6.0 kg/ cm2 g automatically. 4 Pumps can only be stopped from the Pump house.
Details of Fire hydrant system
S.
No.
Item Description Nos. Installed/ Capacity
1 Diesel driven Fire Hydrant Main Pump 3
2 Capacity of Diesel driven Pumps 410 m3/ hr.
3 Hydrant Pressure 8.0 kg/ cm2 g
4 No. of Jockey Pump 2
5 Capacity Jockey Pumps 40 m3/ hr.
6 Capacity of Water reservoir 2010 m3
7 Source of water GIDC supply
8 Hydrant Points (Single headed) 276
9 Water Monitors (Manual) 27
10 Foam Monitor ( Manual ) 3
11 Ozzie Oscillator 552
12 Hose Pipe of 15 meter length 276
13 Hose Box 276
14 Nozzles 276
15 Hose Reel 86
Fire Fighting System.
Fire Extinguishers have been provided all across the Plants & departments. Fire extinguishers
selection has been made according to class of fire in the area. Capacity and Quantity of Fire
extinguishers have been decided according to floor area.
82
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Type of Extinguisher Nos. available
Actual
Nos
ABC 02 Kg 4
ABC 05Kg 35
ABC 06 Kg 253
ABC 04 Kg 21
DCP 04 Kg 30
DCP 05 Kg 87
Mechanical Foam 09 Ltr 58
Mechanical Foam 50 Ltr 3
CO2 4.5 Kg 150
CO2 6.5 Kg 30
Smoke Detectors:-
There are 67 numbers of smoke detectors are installed. The main indicator panel is
installed at Control Room and Security gate. If smoke or fumes are sensed by these
sensor, it will generate alarm and the panel operator at control room and security gate
will get the location of affected area. Security officer will work as per the instruction of
panel Operator. Mean time they will inform to OHC and keep Ambulance ready.
Manual Call Points:
There are 31 number of manual call points installed in process plant, critical area and
storage tank farm. The hooters are installed along with the call points which alarm all
the person present in the affected area. These hooters and manual call points are
addressable , so in case of any emergency, both control room and security gate will able
to identify the affected area with the help of active raptor panel & control room.
Sr. No. Location of smoke Detectors Nos. Available
1. Module -2 office (Det 34 to 36) 3
2. Control room (FMP and P-14) (Det 67 to 71) 5
3. DCS Panel (P-14 & FMP) (Det 62 to 66) 5
4. Utility / Process MCC Rooms. (Det 54 to 61) &
(Det 11 to 19)
17
5. Cable cellar of both MCC rooms (Det 20 to 33) &
(Det 40 to 53)
28
6. QA -M-2 (Det 1 to 10) 10
7. P-18 Mcc Room (Det 37 to 39) 3
8. DCS Panel (P-2 & FMP-2) (Det 4 to 7) 4
9. P-2 Control Room & ( P-2&FMP-2 Office Area)
(Det 1 to 3)
3
10. FMP-2 Mcc Room (Det 8 to 22) 15
11. FMP-2 Cable Cellar (Det 23 to 32) 10
Total 103
90
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
SECTION IV
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
4.1 INTRODUCTION
Risk assessment process rests on identification of specific hazards, hazardous areas and
areas vulnerable to effects of hazardous situations in facilities involved in processing and
storage of chemicals.
In fact the very starting point of any such assessment is a detailed study of materials
handled & their physical / chemical / thermodynamic properties within the complex at
various stages of manufacturing activity. Such a detailed account of hazardous materials
provides valuable database for identifying most hazardous materials, their behaviour under
process conditions, and their inventory in process as well as storage and hence helps in
identifying vulnerable areas within the complex.
Hazardous posed by particular installation or a particular activity can be broadly classified
as fire and explosive hazards and toxicity hazards. Whether a particular activity is fire and
explosive hazardous or toxicity hazardous primarily depends on the materials handled and
their properties.
It will be from the above discussion that study of various materials handled is a prerequisite
from any hazard identification process to be accurate. Based on this study the hazard
indices are calculated for subsequent categorization of units depending upon the degree of
hazard they pose.
In a Fluorochemicals, Specialty Chemicals Products Manufacturing Unit main hazard
handling of hazardous chemicals like, solvents, corrosive and toxic chemicals, the primary
concern has always been, fire and explosion prevention and control as these are the main
hazard posed by such unit. This concern has grown through the loss of life, property and
materials experienced after experienced after major disasters, which have occurred over
the years.
Identification of hazards is the most important step to improve the safety of any plant. The
hazard study is designed to identify the hazards in terms of chemicals, inventories and
vulnerable practices /operations.
The hazard evaluation procedures use as a first step by checklists and safety reviews. Dow
and Mond fire and explosion indices, which make use of past experience to develop relative
ranking of hazards, is also extensively used. For predictive hazard analysis, Hazard and
Operability studies (HAZOP), Fault tree analysis, Event tree analysis, Maximum credible
accident and consequence analysis etc are employed.
91
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
4.2 Dow’s fire and Explosion Index F & EI
TABLE- 4.1
Sr
No
Material
stored
N
h
N
f
N
r
MF GPH SPH FEI Degree of
Hazard
Radius of
Exp. (ft.)
Th Ts TI Degree
of
Hazard
1. Hydrogen 0 4 0 21 3.0 2.29 144 Heavy 120 - - - -
2. Class A
flammable
chemicals
and
solvents
0 3 0 16 2.55 3 122.4 Intermediate 106 125 50 11.4 Severe
3. n-Butane 2 3 0 24 3.1 3.41 168 Severe 43.0 125 75 15 Severe
4. Acetic
anhydride
2 2 1 14 2.2 3.08 95 Intermediate 27.84 125 125 15.7 Severe
5. Bromine 3 0 0 1 2.05 2.82 5.8 Light 4.9 325 125 26.4 Severe
6. AHCL 3 0 0 1 2.05 2.82 5.8 Light 4.9 250 125 22.0 Severe
7. Ammonia
cylinder
3 1 0 4 3.75 2.91 10.9 Light 8 250 75 10.9 Heavy
Nh = NFPA Health rating GPH = General Process Hazard
Nf = NFPA Fire rating SPH = Special Process Hazard
Nr = NFPA Reactive rating MF = Material Fctor Th = Penalty Factor
Ts = Penalty for Toxicity
4.3 Identification of Hazardous Areas:
A study of process for manufacturing as given in chapter 3 of the report indicates the
following:
Various raw materials used in the manufacturing processes are listed in Table-3.4 in
Section-3 along with mode / type of storage & storage conditions. It can be readily seen
that raw materials even though hazardous in nature, are used in continuous process &
inventory are low at process plant. However some chemicals list is provided in Table- 3.5
Most of hazardous chemicals are stored in dedicated Explosive licence premises and above
ground storage tank farm area. List of chemicals stored in larger quantities is provided in
Table-3.5 and all such chemical properties provided in Table-3.10
4.3.1 Major hazardous area:
Following areas considered as a Hazardous area of the plant.
(a) Petroleum product PESO licence premises.
(b) Liqufied petroleum storage (SMPV) PESO area.
(c) Non petroleum product but highly flammable class A chemical storage tank farm area.
(d) Hydrogen gas cylinder storage area.
(e) Ammonia gas cylinder storage area.
(f) Bromine storage tank area
(g) AHF tank farm area
(h) AHCL cylinder storage
(e) Oleum and Sulfuric acid storage tank farm area.
(f) Drums storage area ( Warehouse)
92
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
The materials were studied with respect to their flammability, reactivity and toxicity based
on the criteria given by the NFPA (NFPA ratings). Material factor values were determined
using these ratings. General process hazards and Special process hazards for all the
materials stored were determined as per the guidelines given by DOW Chemicals Company in
DOW Index. FEI values for all these materials were calculated form the above data.
Value of material factor, General Process Hazard & Special Process Hazard as also FEI / TI
values & degree of hazard are given in Table 4.1 It can be seen storage in tank farms is mostly
in the Severe category due to pressure storage and highly flammable and toxic nature of
chemicals. The radius of exposure for various tanks considering FEI Values is also calculated
and presented in the Table.
4.3.2 Evaluation of Process Areas :
Existing and proposed plants are DCS operation and continuous process plant.
Even storage tank farm area are DCS operation.
Produce units will do not warrant any detailed calculations as consequences due to any
worst case scenario due to very quantity of material & damage is such a case is expected
to be limited to within the factory premises.
Considering this, the risk analysis and consequences studies are concentrated on storage
in bulk as per Table -3.5.
4.4 Failure Frequencies
4.4.1 Hazardous material release scenarios can be broadly divided into 2 categories
I) catastrophic failures which are of low frequency and
II) ruptures and leaks which are of relatively high frequency.
Releases from failure of gaskets, seal, rupture in pipelines and vessels fall in the second
category whereas catastrophic failure of vessels and full bore rupture of pipelines etc fall into
the first category.
4.4.2 Typical failure frequencies are given below:-
TABLE-4.2
Item Mode of failure Failure frequencies
Atmospheric
storage
Catastrophic failure
Significant leak
10-9 /yr
10-5 /yr
Process Pipelines
< = 50 mm dia Full bore rupture
Significant leak
8.8 x 10-7 /m.yr
8.8 x 10-6 /m.yr
> 50 mm <=150mm dia Full bore rupture
Significant leak
2.6 x 10-7 /m.yr
5.3 x 10-6 /m.yr
< 150 mm dia Full bore rupture
Significant leak
8.8 x 10-8 /m.yr
2.6 x 10-6 /m.yr
Hoses Rupture 3.5 x 10-2 /m.yr
94
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
SECTION V
RISK ASSESSMENT
5.1 Effects Of Releases Of Hazardous Substances
Hazardous substances may be released as a result of failures / catastrophes,
causing possible damage to the surrounding area. In the following
discussion, an account is taken of various effects of release of hazardous
substances and the parameters to be de termined for quantif ication of such
damages.
In case of release of hazardous substances the damages will depend largely
on source strength. The strength of the source means the volume of the
substance released. The release may be instantaneous or semi -continuous. In
the case of instantaneous release, the strength of the source is g iven in kg
and in semi-continuous release the strength of the source depends on the
outf low time (kg/s.) .
In order to f ire the source strength, it is f irst necessary to determi ne the
state of a substance in a vessel . The physical properties , viz. Pressure and
temperature of the substance determine the phase of release. This may be
gas, gas condensed to l iquid and liquid in equil ibrium with its vapour or
solids .
Instantaneous release will occur, for example, if a storage tank fails .
Depending on the storage conditions the following situations may occur.
The source strength is equal to the contents of the capacity of the storage
system.
In the event of the instantaneous release of a l iquid a pool of l iquid will
form. The evaporation can be calculated on the basis of this pool .
5.2 Tank On Fire/ Pool Fire
In the event of the instantaneous release of a l iquid a pool of l iquid will
form. The evaporation can be calculated on the basis of this pool .
The heat load on object outside a burning pool of l iquid can be calculated
with the heat radiation model . This model uses average radiation intensity,
which is dependent on the l iquid. Account is also taken of the diameter -to-
height ratio of the f ire, which depends on the burning l iquid. In addit ion,
the heat load is also inf luenced by the following factors:
Distance from the f ire
The relative humidity of the air (water vapour has a relatively high heat -
absorbing capacity)
The orientation i .e . horizontal/vertical of the objective irradiated with
respect to the f ire.
95
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
5.3 Fire Ball/ BLEVE
This happens during the burning of liquid, the bulk of which is initially over rich (i.e.
abovethe upper flammable limit.). The whole cloud appears to be on fire as combustion is
takingplace at eddy boundaries where air is entrained (i.e. a propagating diffusion flame).
The buoyancy of the hot combustion products may lift the cloud form the ground,
subsequently forming a mushroom shaped cloud. Combustion rates are high and the hazard
is primarily thermal.
5.4 UVCE
UVCE stands for unconfined vapour cloud explosion. The clouds of solvent vapour mix with
air (within flammability limit 3.0 % to 11 %) may cause propagating flames when ignited. In
certain cases flame may take place within seconds. The thermal radiation intensity is severe
depending on the total mass of vapour in cloud and may cause secondary fire. When the
flame travels very fast, it explodes causing high over pressure or blast effect, resulting in
heavy damage at considerable distance from the release point. Such explosion is called UVCE
(Unconfined Vapor Cloud Explosion) and is most common cause of such industrial accident.
5.5 DISPERSION CASES :
5.5.1 PLUMES :
Plumes are continuous release of hazardous gases and vapours. Smoke from
a chimney is an example. Plumes can cause FIRES AND EXPLOSIONS as
secondary scenarios.
5.5.2 PUFFS :
Puffs are instantaneous release of hazardous gases and vapours. Puffs can
give rise to FIRE BALLS and vapour cloud explosions (VCE). A special case of
vapour cloud explosion is the Boil ing Liquid Evaporating Vapour Explosion
(BLEVE).
5.5.3 SPILLS POOL:
Spil ls are l iquid pools created by leaking l iquid chemicals . Spil ls cause
evaporation and dispersal of toxic gases and if the spil led l iquid is
f lammable, then it can catch f ire creating a pool f ire also the vapours can
cause explosion.
5.6 Identi fication of High Risk Areas :
1. Under ground Storage tank farm area, road truck unloading area
2. Drum storage area.
3. Hydrogen cylinder skid and hydrogenation reaction shed.
5.7 Modes of Failure:
Liquid release due to catastrophic failure of storage vessel or road tanker.
96
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Liquid release through a hole/crack developed at welded joints/flanges / nozzles /
valves etc.
Vapour release due to exposure of liquid to atmosphere in the above scenarios.
Gas release due to catastrophic failure of Ammonia cylinder or outlet valve/line failure.
Event Causes
Tank on Fire/ - Catastrophic failure of tank + Ignition availability
Pool fire - Failure of liquid outlet line + Ignition availability
Fire Ball/ - Catastrophic failure of road tanker/ storage tank
Flash Fire Vapour generation due to substrate and wind
UVCE Vapour cloud generation and about 15 % of
total vapour mass Above the UEL-LEL % Ignition availability
Toxic gas dispersion - Toxic Gas release due to catastrophic failure of tonner/bullet/
Tanks and ignition not available within LEL- UEL range.
Considering the quantity of storages & nature of Toxic nature and Flammable storage,
following scenarios were taken up for detailed analysis & safe distances computed :
Catastrophic failure of road tanker of Ethyl Alcohol, Methanol and presence of ignition source
poses heat radiation hazards to nearby areas.
Failure cases considered for consequence analysis are representative of worst-case
scenarios. Probability of occurrence of such cases is negligible (less than 1 x 10-6 per year)
because of strict adherence to preventive maintenance procedures within the complex.
General probabilities for various failure is provided in Table-4.2, 4.3 and 4.4, but
consequences of such cases can be grave & far reaching in case such systems fail during life
history of the company. Hence such scenarios are considered for detailed analysis. It is to be
noted however that such situations are not foreseeable or credible as long as sufficient
measures are taken. Also, consequence analysis studies help us evaluate emergency planning
measures of the Company.
5.8 Damage Criteria For Heat Radiation:
Damage effects vary with dif ferent scenarios. Calculations for various
scenarios are made for the above failure cases to quantify the result ing
damages.
The results are translated in term of injuries and damages to exposed
personnel , equipment, building etc.
Tank on f ire /Pool f ire due to direct ignit ion source on tank or road tanker
or catastrophic failure or leakage or damage from pipeline of storage
facil it ies or road tanker unloading arm, can result in heat radiation causing
burns to people depending on thermal load and period of exposure.
97
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
All such damages have to be specif ied criteria for each such resultant effect ,
to relate the quantif ier damages in this manner, damage criteria are used for
Heat Radiation.
TABLE 5.3
DAMAGE CRITERIA – HEAT RADIATION
Heat Radiation
Incident Flux KW/m2 Damage
38 100% lethality, heavy damage to tanks
37.5 100% lethality, heavy damage to equipment.
25 50% lethality, nonpiloted ignition
14 Damage to normal buildings
12.5 1% lethality, piloted ignition
12 Damage to vegetation
6 Burns (escape routes)
4.5 Not lethal, 1st degree burns
3 1st degree burns possible
(personnel only in emergency allowed)
2 Feeling of discomfort
1.5 No discomfort even after long exposure
98
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
SECTION VI
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS
6.1 Consequence analysis.
In the risk analysis study, probable damages due to worst case scenarios
were quantif ied and consequences were analyzed with object of emergency
planning. Various measures taken by the company and f indings of the study
were considered for deciding acceptabil ity o f risks.
6.1.1 Maximum Credible loss scenarios ( MCLS)
MCLS assume maximum inventory of hazardous chemicals and worst weather
condition prevail ing at the t ime of failure. Further, no credit is given for the
safety features provided in the facil ity to determine maximum possible
damage from the scenario selected. In reality , leakage of hazardous chemical
wil l be smaller in magnitude. Also the leakage will be detected immediately
by plant operating staff then init iate various mitigation measures to prevent
any disastrous situation.
The maximum credible loss Scenarios (MCLS) identified for plant base on above criteria are
listed below:
Table-6.1
Scenario
No.
Failure Type Failure Mode Consequence
1. Loss of containment in 20 KL
Road Tanker of solvents.
Unloading arm 100 %
failure and immediate
Ignition.
Unconfined Pool fire.
2. Loss of containment in 35 KL
Methanol tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
3. Loss of containment in 35 KL
Toluene tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
4. Loss of containment in 35 KL
Acetone tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
5. Loss of containment in 35 KL
IPA tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
6. Loss of containment in 35 KL
Ethanol tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
7. Loss of containment in 35 KL
Ethyl Acetate tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
8. Loss of containment in 35 KL
Diethyl Ether tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
9. Loss of containment in 35 KL
Hexan tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
10. Loss of containment in 35 KL
O-xylene tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
11. Loss of containment in 35 KL
Acitic Acid tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
99
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
12. Loss of containment in 35 KL
Monomethyl Hydrazinel
tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
13. Loss of containment in 35 KL
EDC tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
14. Loss of containment in 10 KL
Acetonitrile tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
15. Loss of containment in 10 KL
MIBK tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
16. Loss of containment in 50 KL
Butyl Acetate tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
17. Loss of containment in 50 KL
Acetic Anhydride tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
18. Loss of containment in 50 KL
DCPD tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
19. Loss of containment in 35 KL
n-Butane tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
20. n-Butane 60 KL storage Tank Over heating due to
other tank in fire
BLEVE
21. n-Butane 60 KL storage Tank Evaporation and delay UVCE/over pressure
22. Loss of containment in 10 KL
Ethan tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
23. Loss of containment in 10 KL
Ethan tank
Over heating due to
other tank in fire
BLEVE
24. Loss of containment in 10 KL
Ethan tank
Evaporation and delay UVCE/over pressure
25. Loss of containment in 20 KL
Ethylene tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Pool fire
26. Loss of containment in 20 KL
Ethylene tank
Over heating due to
other tank in fire
BLEVE
27. Loss of containment in 20 KL
Ethylene tank
Evaporation and delay UVCE/over pressure
28. Catastrophic failure of
Hydrogen pipe line rupture.
Random failure Jet fire.
29. Catastrophic failure of
Hydrogen pipe line rupture.
Random failure Flash Fire
(Explosion).
30. Fire in drum storage area. Drum spillage Unconfined Pool fire.
31. Fire in drum storage area. Due to fire domino
effect
BLEVE in drum
32. Loss of containment in
Ammonia Cylinder
Catastrophic Failure Puff release up to
LC50, IDLH and TLV
distances.
33. Loss of containment in
Ammonia Cylinder
Valve / connecting tube
failure
Point source release
up to LC50, IDLH and
TLV distances.
34. Loss containment in
Bromine tank
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Spill pool
evaporation up to
LC50, IDLH and TLV
distances.
35. Loss containment in AHF catastrophic failure Puff release up to
100
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
bullet.
LC50, IDLH and TLV
distances.
36. Loss containment in AHF
bullet.
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Spill pool
evaporation up to
LC50, IDLH and TLV
distances.
37. Loss of containment in AHCL
Cylinder
Catastrophic Failure Puff release up to
LC50, IDLH and TLV
distances.
38. Loss of containment in AHCL
Cylinder
Valve / connecting tube
failure
Point source release
up to LC50, IDLH and
TLV distances.
39. Loss containment in Oleum
Tank.
Over flow, tank bottom
line/valve failure,
Spill pool
evaporation up to
LC50, IDLH and TLV
distances.
MCA Scenario –1 Unconfined pool fire due to Loss of containment in Road Tanker.
TABLE – 1
For 20 KL Road tanker.
Scenario : UNCONFINED POOL FIRE
In put Data
Stored quantity 20 KL
Pool diameter 50.0(m)
Pool liquid depth 0.1 (m)
Wind speed 3 m/s
Liquid Density 791.7 kg/m3
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation ( IHR)
at ground level KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 26.0 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 29.1 Min. to ignite wood ( without flame contact ). 100 % fatal in 1
Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 41.1 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1 min. 1
st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 72.6 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 114.7 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 26.0 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In the 41.1 meter radius first degree burn in 10 sec.
In the 72.6 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
102
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
6.1.2 Measures to control and mitigate Emergency of road tanker accident:
Measures to be taken to prevent such accident:
1. Training will be provided to driver and cleaner regarding the safe driving, hazard of
Flammable chemicals, emergency handling, use of SCBA sets.
2. TREM card will kept with TL.
3. SCBA set will be kept with TL.
4. Fire extinguishers will be kept with TL.
5. Flame arrestor will be provided to TL exhaust.
6. Instructions will be given not to stop road tanker in populated area.
7. Clear Hazard Identification symbol and emergency telephone number will be
displayed as per HAZCHEM CODE.
8. Appropriate PPEs will be kept with TL.
Mitigation measures :
1. Off site emergency agency telephone provided in TRM CARD.
2. Fire extinguishers are provided in TL.
3. Training provided to control such emergency to driver and cleaner.
4. Evacuate the area up to 200 meters in all direction.
5. In case of leakage from valve road tanker should be deriver away from the populated
area.
6. Call to police, fire brigade, Users company and supplier company.
EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Fire
CAUTION: All these products have a very low flash point: Use of water spray when fighting
fire may be inefficient.
CAUTION: For mixtures containing alcohol or polar solvent, alcohol-resistant foam may be
more effective.
Small Fire
Dry chemical, CO2, water spray or regular foam.
Large Fire
Water spray, fog or regular foam.
Use water spray or fog; do not use straight streams.
Move containers from fire area if you can do it without risk.
Fire involving Tanks or Car/Trailer Loads
Fight fire from maximum distance or use unmanned hose holders or monitor nozzles.
Cool containers with flooding quantities of water until well after fire is out.
Withdraw immediately in case of rising sound from venting safety devices or
discoloration of tank.
ALWAYS stay away from tanks engulfed in fire.
For massive fire, use unmanned hose holders or monitor nozzles; if this is impossible,
withdraw from area and let fire burn.
103
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
SPILL OR LEAK
ELIMINATE all ignition sources (no smoking, flares, sparks or flames in immediate
area).
All equipment used when handling the product must be grounded.
Do not touch or walk through spilled material.
Stop leak if you can do it without risk.
Prevent entry into waterways, sewers, basements or confined areas.
A vapor suppressing foam may be used to reduce vapors.
Absorb or cover with dry earth, sand or other non-combustible material and transfer
to containers.
Use clean non-sparking tools to collect absorbed material.
Large Spill
dyke far ahead of liquid spill for later disposal.
Water spray may reduce vapor; but may not prevent ignition in closed spaces.
MCA Scenario -2 Pool fire due to Loss of containment in Methanol tank.
TABLE – 2
Pool Fire for Methanol Tank 35 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 35 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 180.27 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 25(m) Flame centre height 10.59 meter
Pool liquid depth 1 (m) Maximum Flame width 9.596 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 1.345 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 791.7 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 38.11 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 13.5 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1
% fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 15.6 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 22.1 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 39.0 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 61.6 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 13.5 meter radius area is considered as 100 % fatality in 1 min. and first degree burn in 10
sec.
In the 15.6 meter radius first degree burn in 10 sec.
In the 22.1 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 39.0 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
105
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 3 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in Toluene tank.
TABLE – 3
Pool Fire for Toluene Tank 35 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 35 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 143.481 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 25(m) Flame centre height 22.59 meter
Pool liquid depth 1 (m) Maximum Flame width 21.59 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 5.202 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 867 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 2.77 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 23.1 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1
% fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 28.3 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 40.0 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 70.7 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 111.8 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 23.1 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 28.3 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 40.0 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 70.7 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
107
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 4 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in Acetone tank 35 KL.
TABLE – 4
Pool Fire for Acetone Tank 35 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 35 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 242.72 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 25(m) Flame centre height 10.59meter
Pool liquid depth 1 (m) Maximum Flame width 9.59 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 1.345kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 791.7 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 9.80 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 14.8 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1
% fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 18.1 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 28.6 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 45.2 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 71.5 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 14.8 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 18.1 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 45.2 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 70.7 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
109
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 5 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in IPA tank 35 KL.
TABLE – 5
Pool Fire for IPA Tank 35 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 35 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 104.73 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 25(m) Flame centre height 24.99 meter
Pool liquid depth 1 (m) Maximum Flame width 23.99 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 6.2015 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 785 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 2.109 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 21.8 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 26.7 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 37.7 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 66.6 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 105.2 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 21.8 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 26.7 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 37.7 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 66.6 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
111
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 6 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in Ethanol tank 35 KL.
TABLE – 6
Pool Fire for ETHANOL Tank 35 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 35 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 216.41 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 25(m) Flame centre height 10.58 meter
Pool liquid depth 1 (m) Maximum Flame width 9.58 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 1.343 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 790 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 9.80 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 14.0 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 17.1 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 24.2 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 42.7 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 67.4 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 14.0 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 17.1 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 24.2 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 42.7 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
113
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 7 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in Ethyl Acetate tank 35 KL.
TABLE – 7
Pool Fire for EA Tank 35 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 35 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 278.52 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 25(m) Flame centre height 11.37 meter
Pool liquid depth 1 (m) Maximum Flame width 10.37 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 1.534 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 902 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 9.80 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 16.9 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 20.7 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 29.3 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 51.7 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 81.7 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 16.9 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 20.7 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 29.3 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 51.7 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
115
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 8 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in Diethyl Ether tank 35 KL.
TABLE – 8
Pool Fire for Diethyl Ether Tank 35 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 35 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 289.52 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 25(m) Flame centre height 11.37 meter
Pool liquid depth 1 (m) Maximum Flame width 9.019 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 1.213 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 714 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 9.80 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 15.4 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 18.8 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 26.6 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 47.0 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 74.2 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 15.4 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 18.8 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 26.6 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 47.0 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
117
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 9 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in Hexane tank 35 KL.
TABLE – 9
Pool Fire for Hexane Tank 35 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 35 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 326.26 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 25(m) Flame centre height 9.596 meter
Pool liquid depth 1 (m) Maximum Flame width 8.596 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 1.120 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 659 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 9.80 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 15.7 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 19.2 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 27.1 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 47.9 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 75.7 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 15.7 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 19.2 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 27.1 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 47.9 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
119
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 10 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in O-xylene tank 35 KL.
TABLE – 10
Pool Fire forO-xylene Tank 35 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 35 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 300.984 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 25(m) Flame centre height 11.225 meter
Pool liquid depth 1 (m) Maximum Flame width 10.225 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 1.496 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 880 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 9.80 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 17.4 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 21.3 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 30.0 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 53.1 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 83.9 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 17.4 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 30.0 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 53.1 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 83.9 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
121
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 11 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in Acetic Acid tank 35 KL.
TABLE – 11
Pool Fire for Acetic Acid Tank 35 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 35 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 89.147 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 9(m) Flame centre height 6.563 meter
Pool liquid depth 1 (m) Maximum Flame width 5.563 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 1.7867 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 1051 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 9.80 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 5.9 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 7.2 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 10.1 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 17.9 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 28.3 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 5.9 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 10.1 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 17.9 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 28.3 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
123
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 12 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in Monomethyl Hydrazinel tank 35
KL.
TABLE – 12
Pool Fire for Monomethyl Hydrazinel Tank 35 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 35 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 1393.643 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 15(m) Flame centre height 8.141 meter
Pool liquid depth 1 (m) Maximum Flame width 7.141 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 1.4926 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 878 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 9.80 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 8.9 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 10.9 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 15.3 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 27.1 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 42.7 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 8.9 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 15.3 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 27.1 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 42.7 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
125
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 13 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in EDC tank 35 KL.
TABLE – 13
Pool Fire for EDC Tank 35 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 35 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 297.659 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 35(m) Flame centre height 16.996 meter
Pool liquid depth 1 (m) Maximum Flame width 15.996 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 2.1301 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 1253 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 9.80 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 25.4 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 31.1 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 44.0 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 77.7 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 122.8 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 25.4 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 44.0 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 77.7 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 122.8 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
127
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 14 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in Acetonitrile tank 10 KL.
TABLE – 14
Pool Fire for Acetonitrile Tank 10 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 10 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 71.1331 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 8(m) Flame centre height 5.3068 meter
Pool liquid depth 1 (m) Maximum Flame width 4.3068 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 1.3379 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 787 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 9.80 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 5.0 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 5.4 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 7.6 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 13.3 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 21.3 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 5.0 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 7.6 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 13.3 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 21.3 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
129
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 15 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in MIBK tank 10 KL.
TABLE – 15
Pool Fire for MIBK Tank 10 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 10 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 110.415 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 8(m) Flame centre height 5.3559 meter
Pool liquid depth 1 (m) Maximum Flame width 4.3559 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 1.3634 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 802 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 9.80 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 5.5 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 6.7 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 9.5 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 16.7 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 26.5 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 5.5 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 9.5 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 16.7 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 26.5 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
131
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 16 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in Butyl Acetate tank 50 KL.
TABLE – 16
Pool Fire for Acetonitrile Tank 50 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 50 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 257.692 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 18(m) Flame centre height 9.09677 meter
Pool liquid depth 1 (m) Maximum Flame width 8.0967 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 1.487 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 875 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 9.80 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 13.3 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 16.3 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 23.0 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 40.6 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 64.1 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 13.3 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 23.0 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 40.6 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 64.1 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
133
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 17 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in Acetic Anhydride tank 50 KL.
TABLE – 17
Pool Fire for Acetic Anhydride Tank 50 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 50 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 132.780 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 32(m) Flame centre height 33.9458 meter
Pool liquid depth 1 (m) Maximum Flame width 32.9458 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 7.884 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 1080 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 2.2831 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 32.9 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 40.3 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 57.0 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 100.7 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 159.2 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 32.9 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 57.0 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 100.7 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 159.2 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
135
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 18 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in DCPD tank 50 KL.
TABLE – 18
Pool Fire for DCPD Tank 50 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 50 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 94.454 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 5(m) Flame centre height 19.264 meter
Pool liquid depth 1 (m) Maximum Flame width 18.264 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 7.1394 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 978 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 2.2831 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 16.1 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 19.7 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 27.9 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 49.3 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 77.9 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 16.1 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 27.9 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 49.3 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 77.9 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
137
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 19 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in n-Butane tank 60 KL.
TABLE – 19
Pool Fire for n-Butane Tank 60 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 60 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 141.24 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 35(m) Flame centre height 26.16 meter
Pool liquid depth 0.3 (m) Maximum Flame width 25.865 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 4.74 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 600.6 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 37.97 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 27.1 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 33.2 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 46.9 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 82.8 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 131.0 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 27.1 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 46.9 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 82.8 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 131.0 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
139
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 20 BLEVE simulation for n-Butane 60 KL storage Tank
TABLE –20
BLEVE simulation for n-Butane 60KL
Scenario : BLEVE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 60 KL Fire Ball radius 44.99 meter
Mass of vapour 5670 Kgs. Fire ball Intensity of Heat
radiation
601.13 Kw /m 2
Heat of combustion 49527.1 Kj/Kg Fire Ball rate of energy
release
1.52903e+007Kj/ sec.
Wind speed 3 m/s Fire- Ball total energy
release
2.80819e + 008 Kj
Liquid Density 600.6 kg/m3 Fire ball duration 18.3658 sec.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Damage effects
37.5 176 100 % Fatal . Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact)
25.0 216 Min. to ignite wood ( without flame contact ). Significant
injury.
12.5 306 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 st deg. burn .
4.0 546 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 866 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 176 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 306 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 546 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 866 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
141
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
SCENARIO-21 Unconfined Vapor Cloud Explosion / Over Pressure For Loss Of
Containment and delay ingnition for N- Butane 60 Kl Storage Tank.
MODEL-21
UVCE / over pressure For delay ingnition for N- Butane 60 Kl Storage Tank
Scenario : UVCE / Over pressure
Input Data
Stored/Spillage quantity 60 KL
Mass of vapour between LEL – UEL % 12618 lbm.
TNT equivalent 14.58
Explosion efficiency 0.05
Wind speed 3.0 m/s
Radial
Distance in
meter
Over
pressure
( psi )
% Fatality lung
Rupture
% Eardrum
rupture
% Structural
damage
% Glass
rupture
27.1 38.3 100 100 100 100
32.2 29.4 96.7 100 100 100
34.2 23.1 73.2 97.8 100 100
153.2 1.8 0.0 2.7 11.8 100
Results
In case of UVCE up to 27.1 meter distance is considered as 100 % fatality and 100 % ear
drum rupture radius.
Up to 34.2 meter distance is considered as 100 % structural Damage and up to 153.2 meter
distance for 100 % glass damage area.
143
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 22 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in Ethane tank 10 KL.
TABLE – 22
Pool Fire for ethane Tank 10 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 10 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 91.246 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 25(m) Flame centre height 19.601 meter
Pool liquid depth 0.3 (m) Maximum Flame width 19.318 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 4.3134 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 546 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 37.97 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 16.7 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 20.4 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 28.8 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 50.9 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 80.4 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 16.7 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 28.8 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 50.9 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 80.4 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
145
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 23 BLEVE simulation for Ethane 10 KL storage Tank
TABLE –23
BLEVE simulation for Ethane 10KL
Scenario : BLEVE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 10 KL Fire Ball radius 23.896 meter
Mass of vapour 819 Kgs. Fire ball Intensity of Heat
radiation
552.23 Kw /m 2
Heat of combustion 47202 Kj/Kg Fire Ball rate of energy
release
3.96289e+006Kj/ sec.
Wind speed 3 m/s Fire- Ball total energy
release
3.86584e + 007 Kj
Liquid Density 546.0 kg/m3 Fire ball duration 9.75512 sec.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Damage effects
37.5 95.0 100 % Fatal . Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact)
25.0 115.0 Min. to ignite wood ( without flame contact ). Significant
injury.
12.5 155.0 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 st deg. burn .
4.0 256.0 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 445.0 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 95.0 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 155.0 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 256.0 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 445.0 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
147
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
SCENARIO-24 Unconfined Vapor Cloud Explosion / Over Pressure For Loss Of
Containment In ethane 10 KL Storage Tank.
MODEL-24
UVCE / O.P. For Loss Of Containment In ethane
Scenario : UVCE / Over pressure
Input Data
Stored/Spillage quantity 10 KL
Mass of vapour between LEL – UEL % 1805 lbm.
TNT equivalent 29.56
Explosion efficiency 0.04
Wind speed 3.0 m/s
Radial
Distance in
meter
Over
pressure
( psi )
% Fatality lung
Rupture
% Eardrum
rupture
% Structural
damage
% Glass
rupture
16.6 40.4 100 100 100 100
21.6 27.1 93.4 100 100 100
33.2 8.6 0.0 100 100 100
102.32 2.0 0.0 3.4 16.7 100
Results
In case of UVCE up to 16.6 meter distance is considered as 100 % fatality and 100 % ear
drum rupture radius.
Up to 33.2 meter distance is considered as 100 % structural Damage and up to 102.3 meter
distance for 100 % glass damage area.
149
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 25 pool fire simulation due to Loss of containment in ethylene tank 20 KL.
TABLE – 25
Pool Fire for ethylene Tank 20 KL.
Scenario : POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 20 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 86.075 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 25(m) Flame centre height 20.0856 meter
Pool liquid depth 0.3 (m) Maximum Flame width 19.7856 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 4.4959 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 569 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 37.97 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 16.6 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 20.3 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 28.6 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 50.6 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 79.9 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 16.6 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 20.3 meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 28.6 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 50.6 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
151
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 26 BLEVE simulation for Ethylene 20 KL storage Tank
TABLE –26
BLEVE simulation for Ethylene 20KL
Scenario : BLEVE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 20 KL Fire Ball radius 30.3835 meter
Mass of vapour 1707 Kgs. Fire ball Intensity of Heat
radiation
559.89 Kw /m 2
Heat of combustion 47194 Kj/Kg Fire Ball rate of energy
release
6.49518e+006Kj/ sec.
Wind speed 3 m/s Fire- Ball total energy
release
8.05602e + 007 Kj
Liquid Density 569.2 kg/m3 Fire ball duration 12.4031 sec.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Damage effects
37.5 121 100 % Fatal . Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact)
25.0 141 Min. to ignite wood ( without flame contact ). Significant
injury.
12.5 201 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 st deg. burn .
4.0 341 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 561 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results
In the 121 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min.
In 201meter radius area is considered as 1st deg. Burn in 10 sec. and 1 % fatal in 1 minute.
In the 341 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely.
In the 561 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfiture even on long
exposure.
153
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
SCENARIO-27 Unconfined Vapor Cloud Explosion / Over Pressure For Loss Of
Containment In ethylene 20 KL Storage Tank.
MODEL-27
UVCE / O.P. For Loss Of Containment In ethylene
Scenario : UVCE / Over pressure
Input Data
Stored/Spillage quantity 20 KL
Mass of vapour between LEL – UEL % 3763 lbm.
TNT equivalent 27.89
Explosion efficiency 0.04
Wind speed 3.0 m/s
Radial
Distance in
meter
Over
pressure
( psi )
% Fatality lung
Rupture
% Eardrum
rupture
% Structural
damage
% Glass
rupture
20.3 46.5 100 100 100 100
24.2 33.0 98.8 100 100 100
33.2 14.8 2.2 93.40 100 100
133.32 1.9 0.0 2.9 13.4 100
Results
In case of UVCE up to 20.3 meter distance is considered as 100 % fatality
Upto 24.2 mtrs. Distances 100 % ear drum rupture radius.
Up to 33.2 meter distance is considered as 100 % structural Damage
up to 133.3 meter distance for 100 % glass damage area.
155
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario –28 Diffusion Jet Fire Simulation for rupture of 1.0 cm copper connecting pipe.
TABLE – 28
For Hydrogen Cylinder skid to PRV Station.
Scenario : JET FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 515 M3 Max. IHR at flame centre
height
52.49 Kw/m2
Gas Jet Diameter 1 cm Flame centre height 63 meter
Gas velocity in the
leakage hole/ pipe
143463 m/s Maximum Flame width 12 meter
Wind speed 3 m/s. Heat flux 8.5 Kw/ m2
Gas Density 0.067kg/m3 Flame surface area 3778 m2
Incident Intensity
of Heat Radiation
( IHR) at ground
level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 8.3 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 %
fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 10.2 Min. to ignite wood ( without flame contact ). 100 % fatal in
1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 14.4 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1 min.
1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 25.4 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 40.1 No discomfort even on long exposure.
157
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario –29 Over pressure / explosion for rupture of 1.0 cm copper pipe line of Hydrogen
cylinder to PRV station.
TABLE – 29
For Hydrogen Gas Copper Tube Failure
Scenario : FLASH FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 7 m3 Visible Flash Fire Height 0.52meter
Mass of Gas 1 kgs Visible Flash Fire Width 0.26 meter
Heat of combustion 42267 Kj/kg Duration of Flash-Fire in Sec. 2 sec.
Fuel-Air volume ratio in
Flash fire cloud
0.600 Radius of fuel-air cloud mixture 4.19 meter
Stochiometric Fuel-Air
Mixture
0029 Total energy release 283720 Kj
Wind speed 6.0 m/s Max. Heat Radiation from 1 m from
Flash Fire
750 Kw/ m2
Gas Density 0.067 kg/m3 Combustion efficiency 0.5
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (IHR)
at ground level KW
/m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Damage effects
37.5 19 100 % Fatal . Min. to ignite wood (without flame
contact)
25.0 24 Significant injury. Min. to ignite wood ( without flame
contact ).
12.5 32 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1st deg. burn .
4.0 57 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 89 No discomfort even on long exposure.
159
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario -30 Unconfined Pool Fire Simulation for Drum Storage Area.
TABLE – 30 Unconfined Pool Fire for Drum Storage Area
Scenario : UNCONFINED POOL FIRE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 50 KL Max. IHR at flame centre height 143.48 Kw/m2
Pool diameter 25(m) Flame centre height 21.60 meter
Pool liquid depth 0.01 (m) Maximum Flame width 21.59 meter
Wind speed 6 m/s Mass burning rate liquid 5.02 kg/ m2/min.
Liquid Density 867 kg/m3 Flame burnout time 1.66 Hrs.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 6.7 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1
% fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 8.1 Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact). 100 % fatal
in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 11.5 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1
min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 20.1 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 31.7 No discomfort even on long exposure.
161
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 31 BLEVE simulation for Drums Storage
TABLE – 31
BLEVE simulation for Drums Storage
Scenario : FIRE BALL/ BLEVE
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 20 KL Fire Ball radius 11.17 meter
Mass of vapour 80 Kgs. Fire ball Intensity of Heat
radiation
186.59 Kw /m 2
Heat of combustion 40550 Kj/Kg Fire Ball rate of energy
release
292486 Kj/ sec.
Wind speed 6 m/s Fire- Ball total energy
release
1.333e + 006 Kj
Liquid Density 867 kg/m3 Fire ball duration 4.56 sec.
Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation (
IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Damage effects
37.5 25 100 % Fatal . Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact)
25.0 30 Min. to ignite wood ( without flame contact ). Significant
injury.
12.5 42.5 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 st deg. burn .
4.0 76 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 120 No discomfort even on long exposure.
163
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Scenario-32 Puff Isopleth Simulation For Ammonia Cylinder Catastrophic Failure.
TABLE –32 FOR AMMONIA
Scenario : PUFF DISPERSION
In put Data
Stored quantity 50 kg.
Instantaneous Puff Release quantity 50000 gms.
Molecular weight 17
Density ( Air) 0.6kg/m3
Maximum ground level conc. 258295 ppm
Distance of max. ground level conc. 23m.
Hazard Level Concentration (PPM) Ground level distance (Meter)
Lc50 human 6164 179.37
IDLH 300 578.08
STEL 35 1358
TWA 25 1554
165
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Scenario-33 Point source release from valve for Ammonia Cylinder.
TABLE –33 FOR AMMONIA
Scenario : POINT SOURCE RELEASE
In put Data
Stored quantity 50 Kgs
Rate of release 346 g/s
Molecular weight 17
Density ( Air) 0.6 kg/m3
Hazard Level Concentration (PPM) Ground level distance (Meter)
Lc50 6164 18.77
IDLH 300 187.56
STEL 35 675.54
TWA 25 831.17
Results:-
LC50 HUMAN (6164 ppm) area up to 18.77 meter, IDLH (300 ppm Immediate danger to life and
health) concentration area up to 187.56 meter and TWA (25 PPM ) area up to 831.17 meter.
167
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Scenario-34 Spill pool evaporation due to loss containtment in Bromine tank
TABLE –34 FOR Bromine
Scenario : SPILL POOL EVAPORATION
In put Data
Stored quantity 16 KL
Rate of release 5734 g/s
Molecular weight 159.8
Density ( Air) 5.5 kg/m3
Hazard Level Concentration (PPM) Ground level distance (Meter)
Lc50 1075 67.26
IDLH 3.00 890.52
STEL 0.20 2307.23
TLV 0.10 2921.14
Results:-
LC50 HUMAN (1075 ppm) area up to 67.26 meter, IDLH (3.0 ppm Immediate danger to life and
health) concentration area up to 890.52 meter and STEL (0.2 PPM ) area up to 2307.23 meter.
TLV(0.10 PPM) area up to 2921.14 mtrs.
169
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Scenario-35 Puff Isopleth Simulation due to catastrophic failure of AHF bullet.
TABLE –35 FOR AHF
Scenario : PUFF DISPERSION
In put Data
Stored quantity 88 KL
Instantaneous Puff Release quantity 8.8e+007 gms.
Molecular weight 20
Density ( Air) 1.258kg/m3
Maximum ground level conc. 1e+006 ppm
Distance of max. ground level conc. 21m.
Hazard Level Concentration (PPM) Ground level distance (Meter)
Lc50 human 802 1277.40
IDLH 30.0 3107.39
TLV 3.0 5683.39
Results
LC50 HUMAN (802 ppm) area up to 1277.40 meter, IDLH (3.0 ppm Immediate danger to life and
health) concentration area up to 3107 meter and TLV (3 PPM ) area up to 5683 meter.
171
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Scenario-36 Spill pool Evaporation due to loss containment in AHF bullet.
TABLE –36 FOR AHF
Scenario : Spill pool Evaporation
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 88 KL Max. ground level conc. 53395.3
Rate of release 6674 g/s Dist. Of maxi. Ground level
conc.
21 meter
Molecular weight 20
Wind speed 3.0 m/s
Density ( Air) 1.258
Hazard Level Concentration
(PPM)
Ground level distance (Meter)
LC50 802 241.09
IDLH 30 867.46
TLV 3 1957.31
173
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Scenario-37 Puff Isopleth Simulation For AHCL Cylinder Catastrophic Failure.
TABLE –37 FOR AHCL
Scenario : PUFF DISPERSION
In put Data
Stored quantity 40 Kg
Instantaneous Puff Release quantity 40000 gms.
Molecular weight 34.1
Density ( Air) 1.189
Maximum ground level conc. 49672 ppm
Distance of max. ground level conc. 35m.
Hazard Level Concentration (PPM) Ground level distance (Meter)
Lc50 human 3940 150.82
IDLH 50.0 825.10
TWA 5.0 2053
175
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Scenario-38 Point source release for AHCL Cylinder.
TABLE –38 FOR AHCL
Scenario : POINT SOURCE RELEASE
In put Data
Stored quantity 40 Kgs
Rate of release 11290 g/s
Molecular weight 36.46
Density ( Air) 1.3
Hazard Level Concentration (PPM) Ground level distance (Meter)
Lc50 3940 99.69
IDLH 50.0 701.02
TWA/TLV 5.0 1596.90
177
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Scenario-39 Spill pool Evaporation due to loss containment in Oleum storage tank
TABLE –39 FOR Oleum
Scenario : Spill pool Evaporation
In put Data Results of Computations
Stored quantity 250 KL Max. ground level conc. 1822.38
Rate of release 2405 g/s Dist. Of maxi. Ground level
conc.
26 meter
Molecular weight 178
Wind speed 3.0 m/s
Density ( Air) 3
Hazard Level Concentration
(PPM)
Ground level distance
(Meter)
LC50 368 69.84
IDLH 10 397.79
STEL 1 930.53
TLV 0.10 2093.13
179
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
Additional Risk assessment for Natural Gas pipeline passing through SRF
premises As discussed in SEAC Meeting Held on 28/10/2015.
Pipeline Data :
1 Pipeline size 24 inch
2 Pipeline MOC As per API 5L Gr X60
3 Average Soil Cover 1.3Mtr
4 Average pipeline operating pressure
80 Bars
5 Average Natural Gas Flow in the pipeline: - 4 lac m 3 per hour .
6 Sectional isolation valve outside of the SRF
premises;
1. At Atali Vil lage on
Down Stream side-
P/L Ch.- 32.950Km
2. At Dahej-GACL on up
Stream side- P/L Ch. -
44.191Km
7 Pipeline protection on f iled:
CP protection & Regular
pipeline patroll ing
8 The Sectional Valve is fully automatic &
controlled by GSPL's MCR - Gandhinagar through
SCADA system.
In put data for MCA scenarios :
Assumption Natural Gas pipeline passing through SRF premises :
NG pipeline rupture due to over pressurized or earth quake or othe r man made reason.
Scenarios considered :
Sr. No.
Failure Type Failure Mode Consequence
1. NG line rupture
Random failure Jet Fire, Flash fire
180
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
SCENARIO : 40 DIFFUSION JET FIRE SIMULATION FOR NATURAL GAS PIPE LINE 100 % RELEASE.
MODEL-40
For Natural gas Pipe line rupture
Scenario : JET FIRE In put Data
Release quantity 4466 kgs (flash fire follows jet fire) Liquid Jet Diameter 24 inch Liquid velocity in the leakage hole/ pipe 32 m/s Wind speed 2 m/s Vapour Density 0.67 kg/m3 Frequence of the rupture of NG pipeline as per Historical failure frequency
1 X 10-6 incedent per year
Incident Intensity
of Heat Radiation
( IHR) at ground
level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth
Distance
( Meters )
Effect if IHR at Height of Simulation
37.5 14.0 Damage to process equipment. 100 % Fatal in 1 Min. 1 % fatal in 10 sec.
25.0 17.2 Min. to ignite wood ( without flame contact ). 100 % fatal in 1 Min. Significant injury in 10 sec.
12.5 24.1 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 % fatal in 1 min. 1 st deg. burn in 10 sec.
4.0 42.6 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely. 1.6 67.4 No discomfort even on long exposure.
Results In the 14.0 meter radius area is considered as 100% fatality in 1 min. In the 24.1 meter radius first degree burn in 10 sec. In the 42.6 meter radius area will give pain after 20 seconds. Blistering unlikely. In the 67.4 meter radius area is considered as safe area and no discomfort even on long
exposure.
182
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
SCENARIO : 41 FLASH FIRE SIMULATION FOR NATURAL GAS PIPE LINE RUPTURE
MODEL-41
Flash fire For Natural gas Pipe line rupture
Scenario : FLASH FIRE In put Data
Release Gas mass 4466 kgs Heat of combustion 55664 Kj/Kg Fuel-Air volume ratio in Flash fire cloud 0.600 Stochiometric Fuel-Air Mixture 0.50 Wind speed 2 m/s Gas Density 0.67 kg/m3 Combustion efficiency 0.6 Incident Intensity of
Heat Radiation ( IHR) at ground level
KW /m 2
IHR- Isopleth Distance ( Meters )
Damage effects
37.5 103 100 % Fatal. Min. to ignite wood (without flame contact)
25.0 123 Significant injury. Min. to ignite wood ( without flame contact ).
12.5 183 Min. to ignite wood (with flame contact). 1 st deg. burn .
4.0 322 Pain after 20 secs. Blistering unlikely.
1.6 503 No discomfiture even on long exposure.
Results In case of Flash Fire, up to 103 meter distance it is found to be 100 % fatality area and in this
area wood could be ignited without flame being in contact. From 123 meter distance it is found to be significant injury area. From 183 meter distance it is found to be first degree burn injury area. Above 322 meter area it is found to be a safe area.
184
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
6.2 Detail regarding consequences analysis table
TABLE - 6.3 For Fire simulations Results
Type of failure considered Spill quantity
consideration Max.
Credible loss scenario
in KL.
Heat Intensity KW/ M2
37.5 12.5 4.0
MCA Scenario –1 Unconfined pool fire
due to Loss of containment in road
tanker
20 26 41.1 72.6
MCA Scenario -2 Unconfined Pool Fire
Simulation for METHANOL tank 35 kl.
35 13.5 22.1 39.0
MCA Scenario – 3 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in Toluene
tank 35 KL
35 23.1 40.0 70.7
MCA Scenario –4 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in Acetone
tank 35 KL
35 14.8 28.6 45.2
MCA Scenario – 5 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in IPA tank
35 KL.
35 21.8 37.7 66.6
MCA Scenario – 6 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in Ethanol
tank 35 KL.
35 14.0 24.2 42.7
MCA Scenario – 7 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in Ethyl
Acetate tank 35 KL.
35 16.9 29.3 51.7
MCA Scenario – 8 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in Diethyl
Ether tank 35 KL.
35 15.4 26.6 47.0
MCA Scenario – 9 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in Hexane
tank 35 KL.
35 15.7 27.1 47.9
MCA Scenario – 10 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in O-xylene
tank 35 KL.
35 17.4 30.0 53.1
MCA Scenario – 11 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in Acitic Acid
tank 35 KL.
35 5.9 10.1 17.9
MCA Scenario – 12 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in
Monomethyl Hydrazinel tank 35 KL.
35 8.9 15.3 27.1
MCA Scenario – 13 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in EDC tank
35 KL.
35 25.4 44.0 77.7
185
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 14 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in
Acetonitrile tank 10 KL.
10 5.0 7.6 13.3
MCA Scenario – 15 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in MIBK tank
10 KL.
10 5.5 9.5 16.7
MCA Scenario – 16 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in Butyl
Acetate tank 50 KL.
50 13.3 23.0 40.6
MCA Scenario – 17 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in Acetic
Anhydride tank 50 KL.
50 32.9 57.0 100.7
MCA Scenario – 18 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in DCPD tank
50 KL.
50 16.1 27.9 49.3
MCA Scenario – 19 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in n-Butane
tank 60 KL.
60 27.1 46.9 82.8
MCA Scenario – 20 BLEVE simulation for
n-Butane 60 KL storage Tank
60 176 306 546
SCENARIO-21 Unconfined Vapor Cloud
Explosion / Over Pressure For Loss Of
Containment In N- Butane 60 Kl Storage
Tank.
60 27.1 32.2 34.2
MCA Scenario – 22 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in Ethane
tank 10 KL.
10 16.7 28.8 50.9
MCA Scenario – 23 BLEVE simulation for
Ethane 10 KL storage Tank
10 95.0 155.0 256.0
SCENARIO-24 Unconfined Vapor Cloud
Explosion / Over Pressure For Loss Of
Containment In ethane 10 KL Storage
Tank.
10 16.6 21.6 33.2
MCA Scenario – 25 pool fire simulation
due to Loss of containment in ethylene
tank 20 KL.
20 16.6 28.6 50.6
MCA Scenario – 26 BLEVE simulation for
Ethylene 20 KL storage Tank
20 121 201 341
SCENARIO-27 Unconfined Vapor Cloud
Explosion / Over Pressure For Loss Of
Containment In ethylene 20 KL Storage
Tank.
20 20.3 24.2 33.2
MCA Scenario –28 Diffusion Jet Fire
Simulation for 1.0 cm copper connecting
pipe to PRV station.
515 M3 8.3 14.4 25.4
MCA Scenario –29 Over pressure /
explosion for rupture of 1.0 cm copper
pipe line of Hydrogen
cylinder to PRV station.
7 M3 19 32 57
MCA Scenario -30 Unconfined Pool Fire
Simulation for Drum Storage Area.
50 6.7 11.5 20.1
186
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
MCA Scenario – 31 BLEVE simulation for
Drums Storage.
20 25 42.5 76
MCA Scenario – 40:-Diffusion Jet Fire
Simulation For Natural Gas Pipe Line
100 % Release.
4466 Kgs 14 24.1 42.6
MCA Scenario – 41:-Flash Fire
Simulation for Natural Gas Pipeline
Rupture.
4446 Kgs. 103 183 322
TABLE - 6.4 For Toxic gas dispersion simulations
Type of failure considered Spill quantity
consideration Max.
Credible loss
scenario in
KL
Evapora
tion
Rate
Grm. /
Sec.
LC50
Distanc
e in
meter
IDLH
Distanc
e in
meter
TLV
Distance
in meter
Scenario-32 Puff Isopleth
Simulation For Ammonia Cylinder
Catastrophic Failure.
50 kg - 179.37 578.08 1554
Scenario-33 Point source release
from valve for Ammonia Cylinder.
50 346 18.77 187.56 831.17
Scenario-34 Spill pool
evaporation due to loss
containment in Bromine tank
16 5734 67.26 890.52 2921.14
Scenario-35 Puff Isopleth
Simulation due to catastrophic
failure of AHF bullet.
88 - 1277 3107 5683
Scenario-36 Spill pool
Evaporation due to loss
containment in AHF bullet.
88 6674 241.09 867.46 1957.31
Scenario-37 Puff Isopleth
Simulation For AHCL Cylinder
Catastrophic Failure.
40 - 150.82 825.10 2053
Scenario-38 Point source release
for AHCL Cylinder.
40 11290 99 701 1596
Scenario-39 Spill pool
Evaporation due to loss
containment in Oleum storage
tank
250 2405 69.84 397.79 2093.13
187
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
6.3 Conclusions
The appended table 6.3 and 6.4 summarizes the consequences of the various Scenarios
analyzed under this study.
As can be seen from the results of the summary of the Quantitative Risk Analysis study, the
Total damage and Fatality zone due to Fire & Explosion up to 121 meters in worst case
scenario. First degree burn zone up to 201 meter.
Maximum effect due to fire and explosion the maximum quacequances limited to factory
premises.
As can be seen from the results of the summary of the Quantitative Risk Analysis study, the
Fatality distance due to toxic release dispersion is up to 1277 meter in worst case scenario.
IDLH distance ( Evacuation area) is up to 3107 meter i.e company has to plan off site
emergency plan up to 3.2 kms from the site in down wind direction.
On site emergency preparedness plan to be prepared as per risk assessment findings.
Emergency control facilities and resources to be plan and rehearsal / Mock- Drill to be
conducted regularly to combat emergency in minimum time.
188
M/s. SRF Limited
Vaibhu Safety Consultants Risk Assessment Study July -2015
SECTION VII
RISK REDUCTION MEASURES
7.1 Recommendations
7.1.1 From the Risk Analysis studies conducted, it would be observed that by and large, the risks
are confined within the factory boundary walls in case of fire, explosion and spillage of
chemicals. On site emergency plan & preparedness plan to be prepared and implemented to
combat such situations. To minimize the consequential effects of the risk scenarios, following
steps are recommended.
Plant should meet provisions of the Manufacture, storage & Import of Hazardous
Chemicals Rules, 1986 & the factories Act, 1948.
Fire hydrant system needs to be installed as per NFPA / GFR 66 A Norms in plant and
buildings.
Process hazard analysis and HAZOP study to be conducted for each process and
recommendation to be implemented.
HSE management system to be implemented.
Induction course for HSE to be implemented at very initial stage of the plant employees
recruitment.
Periodic On Site Emergency Mock Drills and occasional Off Site Emergency Mock Drills to
be conducted, so those staffs are trained and are in a state of preparedness to tackle any
emergency.
Emergency handling facilities to be maintained in tip top condition at all time.
Safe operating procedure to be prepared for hazardous process and material handling
process.
Smoke detectors and srinklersytem to be provided in godown/ware house, drum storage
area etc.
Safety devices and control instruments to be calibrated once in a year.
Proper colour work as per IS 2379 to plant pipeline and tank, equipments to be done
once in a six month to protect from corrosion.
Preventive maintenance schedule to be prepared for all equipments.
Permit to work system to be implemented 100 % for hazardous work in the plant.
Safety manual as per Gujarat Factories Rule-68 K & P and Public awareness manual as
per Gujarat Factories Rule 41 B & C needs to be prepared and distributed to all
employees and nearby public.
Fire & Safety organization setup to be extended to implement batter plant process safety.
Plant process safety recommendations provided in relavent section of the report should
be complied at plant comissining stage.
SRF P11 PLANT DAHEJ,
GUJARAT.
CO
NSE
QU
EN
CE
AN
AL
YSI
S R
EPO
RT
OF
SR
F P
11 P
LA
NT
- DA
HE
J, G
UJA
RA
T.
Report Prepared By: Asia Pacific Risk Management Services Pvt. Ltd., 6th Floor Mookambika Complex, No. 4 Lady Desika Road, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004, Ph no. 044-45518182 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.aprms.in
Report No. RPT – 216/ SRF P 11 Plant-DAHEJ/APRMS/12/CL/R0
DATE: 03rd JAN 2012
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
2
Disclaimer
This report does not guarantee, assure or warrant in any way that the client is in compliance with any laws,
status, regulations or directives or that compliance with the recommendations of this report will eliminate all
hazards or accidents.
The report is based upon an analysis of information provided by Naik Associates. Asia Pacific Risk Management Services Pvt. Ltd. (APRMS) therefore makes no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of this data or to the calculations or opinion, based upon this data, given herein and it is a condition of any contractual agreement between APRMS and its client that APRMS shall not be liable for any loss or damage arising out of or in connection with such data, calculation or opinions.
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
3
Table of Contents
S.NO DESCRIPTION PAGE NO
1 Summary 1
2 Introduction 5
3 Process Description 6
4 Chlorine and its hazards 7
5 Methodology 9
6 Consequence Analysis 10
7 Summary of Consequence Analysis results 30
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
1
1. Summary
Material Scenario Damage effects for 1.5/F
Chlorine
Tonner Leak
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 1 (100% lethality) covers chlorine tonner shed; Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers nearly 50% of the plant area which includes petroleum product tank farm(35), Workshop(25), training centre(05), Process pad area(13), 9m wide road and 4MW captive plant; Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers almost entire plant area excluding security cabin & medical centre(10) and Raw & fire water storage & pump house(08).
Catastrophic rupture of header – tonner to bullet
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers nearly 50% of the plant area which includes petroleum product tank farm(35), Workshop(25), training centre(05), Process pad area(13), 9m wide road and 4MW captive plant; Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers entire plant area and goes out of the plant boundary.
Bullet transfer line to relay tank
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers CMS filling station (46), organic & hazardous tank farm (20), cooling tower (101) and MCC & control room for plant & utility (16); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) extends out of the plant in all directions except north where it covers a part of acid tank farm(34).
Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to vaporizer
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers CMS filling station (46), organic & hazardous tank farm (20), cooling tower (101) and MCC & control room for plant & utility (16); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) extends out of the plant in all directions except north where it covers HOG area(31), Cooling tower(29) and part of solvent tank farm(33).
Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers Chlorine storage area (17), Chlorine
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
2
vaporizer in main plant area tonner shed (18), MCC & control room for plant & utility (16), R22 chiller room (19), Liquid nitrogen area(22), ESP(108) and RCC chimney(109); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) extends out of the plant in all directions except north where it covers a part of Acid tank farm (34).
Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer outlet pipeline
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) extends out of the plant in all directions except north where it covers Petroleum product tank farm (35) and ETP area (37); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) extends out of the plant in all directions except north where it covers up to FMP plant (27).
Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers Liquid nitrogen area (22), ESP (108), RCC Chimney (109), P11 main plant (11), cracker section (12), process pad area (13) and UG tank farm (14); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers nearly 40% of the plant area which includes ETP (26), P11 plant, 9m wide road, cooling tower (101) and part of organic & hazardous tank farm (20).
Catastrophic failure of bullet Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers entire plant area; Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers entire plant area and extends out of the plant boundary.
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
3
Material Scenario Damage effects for 5/D
Chlorine
Tonner Leak
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers CMS filling station (46), organic & hazardous tank farm (20), cooling tower (101) and MCC & control room for plant & utility (16); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers nearly 50% of the plant area which includes petroleum product tank farm (35), Workshop (25), training centre (05), Process pad area (13), 9m wide road and 4MW captive plant.
Catastrophic rupture of header – tonner to bullet
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers organic & hazardous tank farm (20), cooling tower (101) and MCC & control room for plant & utility (16); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers nearly 40% of the plant area which includes ETP (26), Process pad area(13), 9m wide road and 4MW captive plant.
Bullet transfer line to relay tank
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further in south direction. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers chlorine storage area and a part of chlorine tonner shed; Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers MCC & control room for plant & utility (16), Chlorine storage area(17), Chlorine tonner shed(18) and R22 chiller room(19).
Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to vaporizer
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further in south direction. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers MCC & control room for plant & utility (16), Chlorine storage area (17), Chlorine tonner shed (18) and R22 chiller room (19); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers Liquid nitrogen area(22), part of organic & hazardous tank farm(20), ESP, RCC Chimney, P11 main plant(11), cracker section(12), process pad area(13) and UG tank farm(14).
Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to vaporizer in main plant area
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further in south direction. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers MCC & control room for plant & utility (16), part of cooling tower (23), Chiller shed (15), P11 main plant (11), cracker section (12), Process pad area (13), and UG tank farm (14); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers MCC & control room for plant & utility (16), cooling tower (23), Chiller shed (15), P11 main plant (11), cracker section (12), Process pad
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
4
area (13), and UG tank farm (14), part of liquid nitrogen area and chlorine storage area.
Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer outlet pipeline
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) extends out of the plant in all directions except north where it covers up to ETP area (37); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) extends out of the plant in all directions except north where it covers up to Acid tank farm (34).
Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers Liquid nitrogen area (22), ESP (108), RCC Chimney (109), P11 main plant (11), cracker section (12), process pad area (13) and UG tank farm (14); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers nearly 40% of the plant area which includes ETP (26), P11 plant, 9m wide road, cooling tower (101) and part of organic & hazardous tank farm (20).
Catastrophic failure of bullet
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 1 (100% lethality) is confined to chlorine storage area; Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers P11 plant, 4 MW captive plant and ETP area (37); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) extends out of the plant in all directions except north where it extends nearly up to FMP plant (27).
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
5
2. Introduction About the Company
SRF is a multi-business entity engaged in the manufacture of chemical based industrial intermediates. Today,
its business portfolio covers Technical Textiles, Chemicals, Packaging Films and Engineering Plastics. The
company also enjoys a significant presence among the key domestic manufacturers of Polyester Films and
Fluorospecialities.
Building on its in-house R&D Facilities for technical textiles business and chemicals business, the company
strives to stay ahead in business through innovations in operations and product development. A winner of the
prestigious Deming Application prize for its tyre cord business, SRF continues to redefine its work and
corporate culture with the TQM as its management way.
Over the years, SRF has not only upgraded its refrigerant portfolio by adding new generation ozone-friendly
refrigerant, but also enriched its product mix. Today, SRF also manufactures and markets chloromethanes and
a variety of Fluorospecialities, the fluorine based high value speciality chemicals. These are used as
intermediates in the manufacturing of agro and pharma chemicals. As part of its long term strategy, SRF is
now developing a multipurpose chemical complex at Dahej (Gujarat) with the purpose of expanding its
fluorospeciality business.
Study objective
The main objective of this consequence analysis was to study the risk to safety of plant personnel and the
plant layout. It was required to give a clear concise picture of the identified failure scenarios and their
consequences.
Scope of study Consequence analysis
Superimposition of consequence contours on the plot plan provided.
Summary of all consequence results
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
6
3. Process Description
Chlorine is one of the major raw materials for P11/P12 and the requirement is about 120MT/day. The liquid
chlorine is received in tonners and is unloaded into chlorine bullets. The tonner unloading facility consists of 4
unloading bays with 21 unloading points in each bay. The liquid chlorine is transferred from tonners to bullets
using nitrogen pressure in the tonners.
The liquid chlorine storage consists of 3 bullets (V-1011 A/B/C) of each 132KL capacity. Out of three bullets,
one (V-11011C) will be kept as emergency spare.
The liquid chlorine from bullets is continuously pumped to chlorine vaporizer (E-11033) using a relay tank V-
11017 and liquid chlorine transfer pumps P – 11017 A/B. The relay tank is jacketed with continuous
circulation of chilled P11 so that the chlorine is chilled before going to pump suction.
The vapour chlorine from vaporizer is continuously fed to chlorination reactor in the plant at the rate of 5000
kg/hr.
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
7
4. Chlorine and its Hazards
Pure Chlorine comes in two forms; gas and liquid. Chlorine gas is easily liquefied under pressure.
Typically, a commercial cylinder contains liquefied gas under pressure. Chlorine gas has a disagreeable,
sharp, pungent, penetrating odour. In air-borne concentration above 1000ppm, it has a greenish-yellow
colour. In smaller concentrations, it is colourless. Chlorine gas is 2.5 times heavier than air and tends to
flow downhill and pool in lower areas. Wind & weather, however will cause a chlorine gas cloud to
disperse, spreading it all directions, even uphill.
Liquid chlorine is a transparent, amber-coloured, oily fluid that is 1.5times heavier than water. Liquid
chlorine has a high compression ratio. The ratio of liquid to gas is 1 to 460, which means that 1 litre of
liquid chlorine expands to form 460 litres of pure chlorine gas.
Hazards of Chlorine
Chlorine is corrosive. It can burn moist body surfaces such as the eyes, nose, throat, lungs and wet skin
because it forms harmful acids when reacts with moisture. Long-term exposure to low concentration of
chlorine may cause a gradual decrease in lung efficiency. A single exposure to a high concentration can
cause the same effect.
Toxic effects of Chlorine
Chlorine
Concentration (ppm) Effect
0.03 – 0.1 Range of Odour threshold
1 – 3 May cause mild irritation of eyes, nose and throat
3 – 5 Stinging or burning in eyes, nose and throat; may cause headache, watering eyes,
sneezing, coughing, breathing difficulty, bloody nose and blood tinged sputum.
5 – 15 Severe irritation of the eyes, nose and respiratory tract.
30 - 60 Immediate breathing difficulty resulting in pulmonary edema (fluid build-up in
lungs), possible causing suffocation and death.
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
8
430 Lethal after 30 minutes
1000 or more Fatal after a few breaths
Source: Chlorine Safe work Practices, 2002 edition
Exposure limits of Chlorine
Exposure level (ppm) Exposure limit
0.5 Maximum allowable concentration averaged over an eight-hour period.
1 Maximum allowable short-term exposure (15 mins)
10 or more Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health
Note: The IDLH exposure level is the point at which a person without appropriate respiratory protection
could be fatally injured or could suffer irreversible or in capacitating health effects.
Fire: Chlorine will not burn by itself, but will support combustion.
Chemical Action: Chlorine, in both gas and liquid forms, reacts with almost all chemicals usually with a
release of heat. At high temperature, chlorine reacts vigorously with most metals. For instance, a chlorine
reaction can cause stainless steel to catch fire or melt.
Corrosive Action: Chlorine reacts with water or moisture in the air to form highly corrosive acids. Every
precaution must be taken to keep chlorine and chlorine equipment moisture free. Never use water on a
chlorine leak.
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
9
5. Methodology Study workflow
The steps involved in the study were:
Data collection
Identification of possible scenarios
Modelling of the scenarios
Results & Summary
1. Meteorological Data
Weather conditions considered for the analysis are
Stability class F and Wind speed 1.5m/s
Stability class D and Wind speed 5 m/s
Ambient temperature of 320C
Relative humidity of 70%
Surface roughness length: 1m
2. Toxic
Maximum Concentration Cloud Footprint for IDLH (Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health) and
Toxic lethality contours were plotted to estimate the extent to which it can cause harm to personnel in
the facility and surrounding.
Software tool
DNV’s PHAST version 6.7 was used to model various physical effects. PHAST is extensively used in
the hydrocarbon industry and is also validated for a number of substances. As for any software, the
accuracy of results depends on the accuracy of data input.
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
10
6. Consequence Analysis
Chlorine Scenarios:
Material: Chlorine
S.No Failure Scenario Hole size / Line size Consequence modelled
1 Tonner leak 15 mm Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
2 Catastrophic rupture of header – tonner to bullet
- Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
3 Bullet transfer line to relay tank – 10 mins release
- Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
4 Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to vaporizer
- Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
5 Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to vaporizer in main plant area
- Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
6 Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer outlet pipeline
- Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
7 Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer
- Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
8 Catastrophic rupture of bullet - Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
TL – Toxic Lethality
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
13
Scenario: Catastrophic rupture of header – tonner to bullet
Toxic Maximum Concentration Cloud Footprint
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
21
Scenario: Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to vaporizer in main plant area
Toxic Maximum Concentration Cloud Footprint
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
25
Scenario: Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer
Toxic Maximum Concentration Cloud Footprint
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
28
Scenario: Catastrophic rupture of bullet
Toxic Maximum Concentration Cloud Footprint
SRF P11 PLANT DAHEJ,
GUJARAT.
CO
NSE
QU
EN
CE
AN
AL
YSI
S R
EPO
RT
OF
SR
F P
11 P
LA
NT
- DA
HE
J, G
UJA
RA
T.
Report Prepared By: Asia Pacific Risk Management Services Pvt. Ltd., 6th Floor Mookambika Complex, No. 4 Lady Desika Road, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004, Ph no. 044-45518182 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.aprms.in
Report No. RPT – 216/ SRF P 11 Plant-DAHEJ/APRMS/12/CL/R0
DATE: 03rd JAN 2012
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
2
Disclaimer
This report does not guarantee, assure or warrant in any way that the client is in compliance with any laws,
status, regulations or directives or that compliance with the recommendations of this report will eliminate all
hazards or accidents.
The report is based upon an analysis of information provided by Naik Associates. Asia Pacific Risk Management Services Pvt. Ltd. (APRMS) therefore makes no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of this data or to the calculations or opinion, based upon this data, given herein and it is a condition of any contractual agreement between APRMS and its client that APRMS shall not be liable for any loss or damage arising out of or in connection with such data, calculation or opinions.
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
3
Table of Contents
S.NO DESCRIPTION PAGE NO
1 Summary 1
2 Introduction 5
3 Process Description 6
4 Chlorine and its hazards 7
5 Methodology 9
6 Consequence Analysis 10
7 Summary of Consequence Analysis results 30
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
1
1. Summary
Material Scenario Damage effects for 1.5/F
Chlorine
Tonner Leak
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 1 (100% lethality) covers chlorine tonner shed; Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers nearly 50% of the plant area which includes petroleum product tank farm(35), Workshop(25), training centre(05), Process pad area(13), 9m wide road and 4MW captive plant; Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers almost entire plant area excluding security cabin & medical centre(10) and Raw & fire water storage & pump house(08).
Catastrophic rupture of header – tonner to bullet
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers nearly 50% of the plant area which includes petroleum product tank farm(35), Workshop(25), training centre(05), Process pad area(13), 9m wide road and 4MW captive plant; Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers entire plant area and goes out of the plant boundary.
Bullet transfer line to relay tank
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers CMS filling station (46), organic & hazardous tank farm (20), cooling tower (101) and MCC & control room for plant & utility (16); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) extends out of the plant in all directions except north where it covers a part of acid tank farm(34).
Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to vaporizer
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers CMS filling station (46), organic & hazardous tank farm (20), cooling tower (101) and MCC & control room for plant & utility (16); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) extends out of the plant in all directions except north where it covers HOG area(31), Cooling tower(29) and part of solvent tank farm(33).
Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers Chlorine storage area (17), Chlorine
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
2
vaporizer in main plant area tonner shed (18), MCC & control room for plant & utility (16), R22 chiller room (19), Liquid nitrogen area(22), ESP(108) and RCC chimney(109); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) extends out of the plant in all directions except north where it covers a part of Acid tank farm (34).
Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer outlet pipeline
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) extends out of the plant in all directions except north where it covers Petroleum product tank farm (35) and ETP area (37); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) extends out of the plant in all directions except north where it covers up to FMP plant (27).
Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers Liquid nitrogen area (22), ESP (108), RCC Chimney (109), P11 main plant (11), cracker section (12), process pad area (13) and UG tank farm (14); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers nearly 40% of the plant area which includes ETP (26), P11 plant, 9m wide road, cooling tower (101) and part of organic & hazardous tank farm (20).
Catastrophic failure of bullet Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers entire plant area; Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers entire plant area and extends out of the plant boundary.
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
3
Material Scenario Damage effects for 5/D
Chlorine
Tonner Leak
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers CMS filling station (46), organic & hazardous tank farm (20), cooling tower (101) and MCC & control room for plant & utility (16); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers nearly 50% of the plant area which includes petroleum product tank farm (35), Workshop (25), training centre (05), Process pad area (13), 9m wide road and 4MW captive plant.
Catastrophic rupture of header – tonner to bullet
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers organic & hazardous tank farm (20), cooling tower (101) and MCC & control room for plant & utility (16); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers nearly 40% of the plant area which includes ETP (26), Process pad area(13), 9m wide road and 4MW captive plant.
Bullet transfer line to relay tank
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further in south direction. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers chlorine storage area and a part of chlorine tonner shed; Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers MCC & control room for plant & utility (16), Chlorine storage area(17), Chlorine tonner shed(18) and R22 chiller room(19).
Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to vaporizer
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further in south direction. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers MCC & control room for plant & utility (16), Chlorine storage area (17), Chlorine tonner shed (18) and R22 chiller room (19); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers Liquid nitrogen area(22), part of organic & hazardous tank farm(20), ESP, RCC Chimney, P11 main plant(11), cracker section(12), process pad area(13) and UG tank farm(14).
Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to vaporizer in main plant area
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further in south direction. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers MCC & control room for plant & utility (16), part of cooling tower (23), Chiller shed (15), P11 main plant (11), cracker section (12), Process pad area (13), and UG tank farm (14); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers MCC & control room for plant & utility (16), cooling tower (23), Chiller shed (15), P11 main plant (11), cracker section (12), Process pad
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
4
area (13), and UG tank farm (14), part of liquid nitrogen area and chlorine storage area.
Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer outlet pipeline
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) extends out of the plant in all directions except north where it covers up to ETP area (37); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) extends out of the plant in all directions except north where it covers up to Acid tank farm (34).
Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers Liquid nitrogen area (22), ESP (108), RCC Chimney (109), P11 main plant (11), cracker section (12), process pad area (13) and UG tank farm (14); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) covers nearly 40% of the plant area which includes ETP (26), P11 plant, 9m wide road, cooling tower (101) and part of organic & hazardous tank farm (20).
Catastrophic failure of bullet
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint covers the entire plant area and extends further. Effect zone 1 (100% lethality) is confined to chlorine storage area; Effect zone 0.5 (50% lethality) covers P11 plant, 4 MW captive plant and ETP area (37); Effect zone 0.1 (10% lethality) extends out of the plant in all directions except north where it extends nearly up to FMP plant (27).
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
5
2. Introduction About the Company
SRF is a multi-business entity engaged in the manufacture of chemical based industrial intermediates. Today,
its business portfolio covers Technical Textiles, Chemicals, Packaging Films and Engineering Plastics. The
company also enjoys a significant presence among the key domestic manufacturers of Polyester Films and
Fluorospecialities.
Building on its in-house R&D Facilities for technical textiles business and chemicals business, the company
strives to stay ahead in business through innovations in operations and product development. A winner of the
prestigious Deming Application prize for its tyre cord business, SRF continues to redefine its work and
corporate culture with the TQM as its management way.
Over the years, SRF has not only upgraded its refrigerant portfolio by adding new generation ozone-friendly
refrigerant, but also enriched its product mix. Today, SRF also manufactures and markets chloromethanes and
a variety of Fluorospecialities, the fluorine based high value speciality chemicals. These are used as
intermediates in the manufacturing of agro and pharma chemicals. As part of its long term strategy, SRF is
now developing a multipurpose chemical complex at Dahej (Gujarat) with the purpose of expanding its
fluorospeciality business.
Study objective
The main objective of this consequence analysis was to study the risk to safety of plant personnel and the
plant layout. It was required to give a clear concise picture of the identified failure scenarios and their
consequences.
Scope of study Consequence analysis
Superimposition of consequence contours on the plot plan provided.
Summary of all consequence results
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
6
3. Process Description
Chlorine is one of the major raw materials for P11/P12 and the requirement is about 120MT/day. The liquid
chlorine is received in tonners and is unloaded into chlorine bullets. The tonner unloading facility consists of 4
unloading bays with 21 unloading points in each bay. The liquid chlorine is transferred from tonners to bullets
using nitrogen pressure in the tonners.
The liquid chlorine storage consists of 3 bullets (V-1011 A/B/C) of each 132KL capacity. Out of three bullets,
one (V-11011C) will be kept as emergency spare.
The liquid chlorine from bullets is continuously pumped to chlorine vaporizer (E-11033) using a relay tank V-
11017 and liquid chlorine transfer pumps P – 11017 A/B. The relay tank is jacketed with continuous
circulation of chilled P11 so that the chlorine is chilled before going to pump suction.
The vapour chlorine from vaporizer is continuously fed to chlorination reactor in the plant at the rate of 5000
kg/hr.
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
7
4. Chlorine and its Hazards
Pure Chlorine comes in two forms; gas and liquid. Chlorine gas is easily liquefied under pressure.
Typically, a commercial cylinder contains liquefied gas under pressure. Chlorine gas has a disagreeable,
sharp, pungent, penetrating odour. In air-borne concentration above 1000ppm, it has a greenish-yellow
colour. In smaller concentrations, it is colourless. Chlorine gas is 2.5 times heavier than air and tends to
flow downhill and pool in lower areas. Wind & weather, however will cause a chlorine gas cloud to
disperse, spreading it all directions, even uphill.
Liquid chlorine is a transparent, amber-coloured, oily fluid that is 1.5times heavier than water. Liquid
chlorine has a high compression ratio. The ratio of liquid to gas is 1 to 460, which means that 1 litre of
liquid chlorine expands to form 460 litres of pure chlorine gas.
Hazards of Chlorine
Chlorine is corrosive. It can burn moist body surfaces such as the eyes, nose, throat, lungs and wet skin
because it forms harmful acids when reacts with moisture. Long-term exposure to low concentration of
chlorine may cause a gradual decrease in lung efficiency. A single exposure to a high concentration can
cause the same effect.
Toxic effects of Chlorine
Chlorine
Concentration (ppm) Effect
0.03 – 0.1 Range of Odour threshold
1 – 3 May cause mild irritation of eyes, nose and throat
3 – 5 Stinging or burning in eyes, nose and throat; may cause headache, watering eyes,
sneezing, coughing, breathing difficulty, bloody nose and blood tinged sputum.
5 – 15 Severe irritation of the eyes, nose and respiratory tract.
30 - 60 Immediate breathing difficulty resulting in pulmonary edema (fluid build-up in
lungs), possible causing suffocation and death.
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
8
430 Lethal after 30 minutes
1000 or more Fatal after a few breaths
Source: Chlorine Safe work Practices, 2002 edition
Exposure limits of Chlorine
Exposure level (ppm) Exposure limit
0.5 Maximum allowable concentration averaged over an eight-hour period.
1 Maximum allowable short-term exposure (15 mins)
10 or more Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health
Note: The IDLH exposure level is the point at which a person without appropriate respiratory protection
could be fatally injured or could suffer irreversible or in capacitating health effects.
Fire: Chlorine will not burn by itself, but will support combustion.
Chemical Action: Chlorine, in both gas and liquid forms, reacts with almost all chemicals usually with a
release of heat. At high temperature, chlorine reacts vigorously with most metals. For instance, a chlorine
reaction can cause stainless steel to catch fire or melt.
Corrosive Action: Chlorine reacts with water or moisture in the air to form highly corrosive acids. Every
precaution must be taken to keep chlorine and chlorine equipment moisture free. Never use water on a
chlorine leak.
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
9
5. Methodology Study workflow
The steps involved in the study were:
Data collection
Identification of possible scenarios
Modelling of the scenarios
Results & Summary
1. Meteorological Data
Weather conditions considered for the analysis are
Stability class F and Wind speed 1.5m/s
Stability class D and Wind speed 5 m/s
Ambient temperature of 320C
Relative humidity of 70%
Surface roughness length: 1m
2. Toxic
Maximum Concentration Cloud Footprint for IDLH (Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health) and
Toxic lethality contours were plotted to estimate the extent to which it can cause harm to personnel in
the facility and surrounding.
Software tool
DNV’s PHAST version 6.7 was used to model various physical effects. PHAST is extensively used in
the hydrocarbon industry and is also validated for a number of substances. As for any software, the
accuracy of results depends on the accuracy of data input.
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
10
6. Consequence Analysis
Chlorine Scenarios:
Material: Chlorine
S.No Failure Scenario Hole size / Line size Consequence modelled
1 Tonner leak 15 mm Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
2 Catastrophic rupture of header – tonner to bullet
- Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
3 Bullet transfer line to relay tank – 10 mins release
- Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
4 Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to vaporizer
- Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
5 Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to vaporizer in main plant area
- Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
6 Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer outlet pipeline
- Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
7 Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer
- Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
8 Catastrophic rupture of bullet - Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
Maximum Concentration cloud footprint, TL
TL – Toxic Lethality
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
11
Scenario: Tonner Leak Toxic Maximum Concentration Cloud Footprint
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
13
Scenario: Catastrophic rupture of header – tonner to bullet
Toxic Maximum Concentration Cloud Footprint
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
17
Scenario: Bullet transfer line to relay tank – 10 mins release
Toxic Maximum Concentration Cloud Footprint
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
19
Scenario: Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to vaporizer
Toxic Maximum Concentration Cloud Footprint
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
21
Scenario: Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to vaporizer in main plant area
Toxic Maximum Concentration Cloud Footprint
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
23
Scenario: Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer outlet pipeline
Toxic Maximum Concentration Cloud Footprint
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
25
Scenario: Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer
Toxic Maximum Concentration Cloud Footprint
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
28
Scenario: Catastrophic rupture of bullet
Toxic Maximum Concentration Cloud Footprint
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SRF P-11 PLANT, DAHEJ
31
7. Summary of Consequence Analysis Results
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR 1.5/F
MATERIAL: CHLORINE
Scenario
Toxic Distances (m)
Max Conc (IDLH)
Effect zone 1 (100%
lethality)
Effect zone 0.5
(50% lethality)
Effect zone 0.1
(10% lethality)
Tonner leak 10835.8 17.5 229.7 448.6 Catastrophic rupture of header – tonner to bullet 8338.1 - 241.5 615.8
Bullet transfer line to relay tank – 10 mins release 4544.8 - 146 307.1
Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to vaporizer 4835.0 - 154.3 397.5
Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to vaporizer in main plant area
4835.0 - 154.3 397.5
Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer outlet pipeline 10897.1 - 343.2 553.1
Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer 5019.3 - 160.0 243.5 Catastrophic rupture of bullet 14888.1 - 561.2 1355.8
32
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR 5/D
MATERIAL: CHLORINE
Scenario
Toxic Distances (m)
Max Conc (IDLH)
Effect zone 1 (100%
lethality)
Effect zone 0.5
(50% lethality)
Effect zone 0.1
(10% lethality)
Tonner leak 1724.7 - 125.0 202.8 Catastrophic rupture of header – tonner to bullet 1290.3 - 114.2 193.7
Bullet transfer line to relay tank – 10 mins release 699.0 - 39.9 77.3
Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to vaporizer 791.7 - 76.0 122.8
Catastrophic rupture of pump discharge line – relay tank to vaporizer in main plant area
791.7 - 76.0 122.8
Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer outlet pipeline 4221.2 - 329.7 452.0
Catastrophic rupture of vaporizer 2130.1 - 166.6 229.6 Catastrophic rupture of bullet 2248.5 21.8 253.7 446.6