GO EAST! Easy, Attractive, Social and Timely nudges to steer students in the right direction.
M E T R Monitoring and Evaluation for Timely Responses “Measuring the right things in the right...
-
Upload
hector-oneal -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of M E T R Monitoring and Evaluation for Timely Responses “Measuring the right things in the right...
M E T R Monitoring and Evaluation for Timely Responses
“Measuring the right things in the right way at the right time”
Briefing for Discussion at FEMA, IPB DramagaWednesday 20th May 2015, v2
Documents also provided,- METR two-page summary- METR checklist- METR team-building and project engagement
METR adds value to existing methodologies for M&E of development
projectsguided by project goals within wider development contextexternal rapid project performance assessment (3-4 weeks)
World Bank (2004) Monitoring and Evaluation: Some Tools, Methods and Approaches, Section 14
extension of EuropeAID M&E EuropeAid (2002) Project Cycle Handbook, Annex 5.3.3.
ex-post, midterm evaluation
METR Informs,
PROJECT IMPLEMENTERSPROJECT DESIGNERS of donor agenciesPROJECT BENEFICIARIES / PARTNERSPOLICY MAKERS, directly or indirectly
Projects appropriate for METR
1) Natural resource / environmental management2) Fisheries, forestry, agroforestry, agriculture production and trade3) Public health & education4) Microfinance 5) Conflict resolution6) Rehabilitation and Reconstruction after Natural/Human Disaster relief7) Climate change adaptation
METR Team Resources to assess project interventions
Science and Technology Economics Institutional Development
METR Emphasis1.Impact-oriented, direct and proxy indicators2.Clearly distinguishes between design and implementation
contribution to success/failure3.Employs counterfactuals to assess attribution4.Achieves understanding of the nature of the problem and its
solution ~ from Problem Tree to Program Logic5.Follows objective yet appreciative inquiry6.Assesses the crucial role of MUTUAL TRUST among key
stakeholders7.Encourages Shared learning among not only project
beneficiaries/partners, implementers and donors but also policy-makers
Five Guiding Questions about the Project
1. “Is there sufficient mutual trust among key stakeholders (ToT)?”2. “What we thought we knew but experience taught us
otherwise?”3. “Are lessons being learned and shared or just identified?” 4. “What was your best moment on the project?”5. “What will happen on the first day after the last day of the
project?”
METR Report Structure covers
I. PROJECT DESIGN:Understanding the nature of the problem ~ problem treeTranslating understanding into program logic ~ logical framework
II. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION:• Efficiency of delivery of benefits• Effectiveness of outreach to targeted groups• Impact beyond set-up of projects with target groups• Sustainability beyond the project assistance lifetime (likelihood, if project still on-going)• Lessons Learned about unexpected outcomes of the project, good and bad• Recommendations for improvement addressed to donor provider
III. FEEDBACK: incorporating key stakeholder responses
Distinguishing between maximizing and optimizing productivity