LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.
-
Upload
sharlene-webb -
Category
Documents
-
view
294 -
download
0
Transcript of LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.
![Page 1: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law
Alex Fawke
![Page 2: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
LSS Reminder #1
Barrister Shadowing Program During holidays or semester Consult LSS website
![Page 3: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
LSS Reminder # 2
Just Leadership Program 2 hours per week Weekly guest speakers including Michael
Kirby, Marilyn Warren, Robert Clark and Paul Grant
Apply via LSS website by May 30
![Page 4: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
LSS Reminder # 3
Michael Kirby lecture Tomorrow in H3 at 3pm
![Page 5: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Disclaimer
Seminar will not be recorded It has not been prepared by the
Faculty of Law and has not received the Faculty’s approval
The issues discussed are speculative, based on past exams, and not necessarily relevant to this exam.
![Page 6: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Presentation
Objectives and overview
![Page 7: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Seminar objectives
To consider the manner in which to approach a problem question in the exam
To consider key themes from Constitutional Law which may be relevant to an essay/policy question in the exam
![Page 8: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Overview Part 1: answering a problem question Part 2: answering an essay question Part 3: division of powers between the
Federal and State governments Part 4: methods of constitutional
interpretation Part 5: implications drawn by the High
Court Part 6: major cases
![Page 9: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Part 1: Answering a problem question Only two issues:
Validity of the law Validity of applying the law to party X
Structure 1. Head of power?
Federal, State (see below) External affairs, corporations, grants
2. Implied limitations? IGIs, SoJP, IFPC
3. Express limitations? Interstate trade and commerce, inconsistency
![Page 10: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Answering a problem question: head of power State: plenary (consider manner & form) Federal: external affairs, corporations,
grans External affairs
Four aspects: extraterritoriality relations w/ other countries/IOs treaty implementation, matters of international concern
Corporations Is this a constitutional corporation? Is the law within the scope of the corps power?
![Page 11: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Answering a problem question: head of power (cont.)
Grants Scope (inducement vs. coercion)
![Page 12: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Answering a problem question: implied limitations IGIs
Hard to spot: look for any regulation across different levels of govt.
Curtailment of capacity to function as a govt? SoJP
Hard to spot: look for a body set up to do something or a judge being given new powers
Principle 1 (+ exceptions), Principle (+ exceptions + limitations on the exceptions)
IFPC Burden on FPC? Justification?
![Page 13: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Answering a problem question: express limitations
Freedom of interstate trade and commerce (s. 92) Burden on interstate trade? Discrimination b/w products of same kind? Protectionist effect? Export restrictions Exception: legitimate non-protectionist end
Inconsistency (s. 109)
![Page 14: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Answering a problem question: state legislation
Plenary power (s. 16) Implied limitations (esp. IGIs and
SoJP) Express limitations Discrete issue: manner and form
![Page 15: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Preparing for problem questions
Past exams Tutorial questions/revision material Further reading on law exams:
Patrick Keyzer, Legal Problem Solving: a guide for students
Enid Campbell & Richard Fox, Students’ Guide to Legal Writing and Law Exams
![Page 16: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Final tips on problem questions
Most Cth head of power issues will be easy to spot
But make sure you double-check a list of all possible issues before you start righting.
Argue both sides
![Page 17: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Part 2: Answering an essay question
“Policy” – sometimes misleading Examine the question carefully Descriptive/historical, predictive and normative
questions (or a combination) Answer the question being asked Create a list of all relevant cases/issues Answers won’t be obvious: no ‘right’ answer Problem question or essay question first?
![Page 18: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Structuring an essay All academic essays follow a similar
structure Introduction: summarise your contention and
reasoning Main body: give your reasoning, including
examples Conclusion: summarise your contention and
reasoning; possibly mention related issues The content within that structure will vary
![Page 19: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Preparing for essay questions
Recurring themes throughout the course
Past exams Know the starred cases well
![Page 20: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Issues to be covered today 1. Division of powers between the States
and the Federal Parliament 2. Methods of constitutional interpretation 3. Implications drawn by the High Court 4. Major cases Note that some questions may combine
multiple issues Undoubtedly, other issues have arisen
throughout the course
![Page 21: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Issue 1: division of powers between the Federal and State parliaments
Expansion of Federal power over time
![Page 22: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Types of possible questions
Descriptive/historical Has Commonwealth power expanded?
What has caused this? Predictive
Will Commonwealth power continue to expand?
Normative Is it a good or bad thing that
Commonwealth power has expanded?
![Page 23: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Example
“The High Court has failed miserably in its role as protector of federalism as protector of federalism under the Australian Constitution” Evaluate the accuracy of this statement using examples from cases and readings. (Semester 1, 2006)
![Page 24: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Look at the question: one possible approach
Start by looking at what the question asks “Evaluate the accuracy of this statement” = to
what extent is this statement correct? “using examples from cases and readings”
Then look at what the statement entails: That the High Court has not protected federalism That it is the role of the High Court to protect
federalism in a certain way That this failure is “miserable”
![Page 25: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Another example
The literal approach to the characterisation of federal powers, adopted in Engineers in 1920, has caused the High Court to consistently adopt decisions that inexorably expand the power of the Commonwealth at the expense of the States. There are no policy areas left where the Commonwealth cannot exert control.
![Page 26: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
What is federalism? A system of government in which power is
divided between a central government and regional governments Eg Australia, the USA, Brazil, and some say the
European Union It does not mean equality of powers
between levels of government – that is a question of balance.
It is obviously not the only way to rule a country
It obviously has advantages and disadvantages
![Page 27: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
The Federal balance in Australia
There is a historical shift towards centralism. Many of the drafters of the Constitution would be shocked today.
Reserve powers: Reserve powers doctrine: preconception
of large sphere of state powers (Barger) Rejection of that doctrine (Engineers)
![Page 28: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The Federal balance in Australia (cont.) Uniform Tax cases
s. 96 High Court’s lack of concern for political or
economic ramifications Tasmanian Dams
s. 51 (xxix) Mason, Murphy, Deane and Brennan JJ (majority)
supported broad interpretation Any treaty obligation, regardless of subject
matter Implications: effectively new heads of power
(conservation, human rights, climate change etc.)
![Page 29: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
The Federal balance in Australia (cont.)
ILO Apparent further expansion of the
external affairs power Draft treaties and recommendations
suffice: no necessary obligation Work Choices
In Constitutional Law, we are not interested in the policy debate
We focus on the issue of federal balance and constitutional interpretation
![Page 30: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Federal balance in Australia (cont.)
Work Choices (cont.) Object of command test: any creation of rights,
obligations or conferral of benefits on corporations
States and unions’ arguments rejected, because the presupposed a certain federal balance
Further potential: private schools, hospitals, local transport, energy, defamation, liquor licensing (Kirby J in Work Choices)
![Page 31: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Federal balance in Australia (cont.) Limits to Commonwealth power?
External affairs: bona fides, specificity etc. IGIs IFPC
Is the shift to centralism good? Yes
Avoiding duplication Minimum standards
No Local expertise Laboratory argument Loss of check and balance
![Page 32: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Federal balance in Australia (cont.)
Further reading on Work Choices George Williams, ‘Goodbye to states’
rights’, The Age, Nov 15 2006 Greg Craven, ‘Industrial Relations, the
Constitution and Federalism: Facing the avalanche’, UNSW Law Journal 2006.
Peter Applegarth SC, ‘The Work Choices Case: Corporations power aspects’, Gilbert + Tobin Centre for Public Law Conference 2007
![Page 33: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Issue 2: methods of constitutional interpretation
Literalism vs. originalism Exists in all countries with a
constitution US Supreme Court
![Page 34: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Literalism
Interpret the constitution according to its natural (modern) meaning
Any implication must follow necessarily and logically from the text
Judiciary considered inappropriate for political and economic considerations
![Page 35: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Originalism
Constitution is interpreted according to its meaning at the time that it was passed
![Page 36: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Which has prevailed? Evidence of both Literalism
Engineers Tasmanian Dams Work Choices
Originalism Cole v Whitfield (convention debates allowed as
an interpretive aid; reference to history of Constitution considered – see p. 385)
![Page 37: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Which is better?
Originalism Duty to follow the framers’ intention? Unintended altering of federal balance
Literalism What original intention?
![Page 38: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Other tools and methods of interpretation
Contextualism (Sem 2 2009 Exam) Value judgments (Sem 2 2008 Exam)
“Reasonableness” and “proportionality” Progressivism and conservatism
![Page 39: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Methods of constitutional interpretation (cont.)
Further reading: Joseph and Castan
![Page 40: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Issue 3: implications
Has the High Court drawn implications from the Constitution? Where?
Is this good or bad?
![Page 41: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Example “It is one thing to interpret the terms of express
provisions in the Constitution, and another to draw implied restrictions on legislative power from such provisions. Implications are more general, vague and inherently unstable, opening the way for greater divergence among the Justices of the High Court. Most of the ‘implications’ elicited from the Constitution are debatable and do not necessarily or logically follow from the text.”
How accurate is that assessment? Give reasons for your answer, and anticipate arguments that might be raised against your position, making use of cases studied in this unit, including at least one starred case.
![Page 42: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Where has the HCA found implications?
IGIs ‘The federal compact’ Austin
IFPC Elections and representative government ACTV
SoJP Chapter division
![Page 43: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Comments on implications
Bad: Beyond the role of an unelected
judiciary? Frustration of mandate of elected
parliament/government? A breach of the Constitution? Beyond intention of framers? A poor form of law-making? Slippery slope?
![Page 44: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Comments on implications (cont.)
Good: A gap-filler to give effect to obvious
assumptions of the framers? A tool for protecting individual rights?
![Page 45: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Issue 4: major cases A number of past questions simply ask for
an evaluation of a major case These often involve themes discussed
above Starred cases Kable and subsequent cases Engineers’ Case ACTV/Lange etc. Ruddock v Vadarlis
![Page 46: LSS POLICY & REVISION SEMINAR: Constitutional Law Alex Fawke.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061408/56649e445503460f94b389a7/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Final thoughts
Careers in constitutional law Good luck!