Lower South ForkClearwater River Lower South Fork Clearwater River Nez Perce Tribe DFRM Watershed...
-
Upload
lillian-martin -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Lower South ForkClearwater River Lower South Fork Clearwater River Nez Perce Tribe DFRM Watershed...
Lower South Fork Clearwater River
Nez Perce TribeDFRM Watershed Division
Mark Johnson-Project [email protected]
1
2013 Geographic ReviewProject: 2010-003-00
May 2, 2013
2
3
Project Map Lower South Fork Clearwater River Project:
301, 000 Acres
1,047 stream miles
Focal species-Snake River ESU listed steelhead, spring chinook, bull trout
Merger of two former BPA funded projects
Original project began in 1997
4
Vicinity Map
Crooked River
American River
NewsomeCreek
Red River
5
Limiting Factors The project focus is on the key limiting factors:
high water temperatures migration barriers excess sediment degraded riparian conditions
6
Activities/ Accomplishments We are addressing limiting factors by: riparian planting and protection barrier removal/replacement
71,000 plants 388 Acres invasive
weed treatment
15 miles fence installed & maintained
protecting 5.9 miles of streambank in sensitive meadows
15 barriers removed/replaced
access to 23.9 miles of potential habitat
7
Activities/ Accomplishments We are addressing limiting factors by: removing unneeded roads restoring natural stream conditions
126 miles of roads decommissioned
0.7 miles of roads improved
600 feet of stream restored
8
Response to Previous ISRP Comments
This project has not previously undergone ISRP review, however there has been previous comments on the parent projects which were used in the adaptive management process:
Define Design
EvaluateAdjust
ADAPTIVEMANAGEMENT
STRATEGY
Comment- ISRP commented on the deficiency of a synthesized monitoring approach. NPT response- development of the “NPT DFRM Watershed Division, Tributary Habitat Programmatic Monitoring and Evaluation Plan”
Comment- ISRP questioned the use of hard-engineered methods for increasing instream habitat complexity. NPT response- use of hard-engineered methods was reduced in future actions.
9
Research, Monitoring, & Evaluation
Implementation and Compliance- All projects monitored post
construction Assess project function over time
and provide adaptive management feedback loops
Focused Status and Trend- Selected parameters based on the
limiting factors including temperature, cobble embeddedness, and fish presence/absence
18 paired sites in 9 key sub-watersheds
10
McComas Meadows Riparian Vegetation Exclosure fence installed in 1997 Planting began in 2000 Over 50,000 trees and shrubs planted
1992
2008
11
Temperature Data
Temperature Difference Between Upper McComas Meadows and Lower McComas Meadows
R2 = 0.615
0
3
6
9
12
15
Year
Tem
pera
ture
Diff
eren
ce (°
C)
Absolute max temp diff Predicted Absolute max temp diff
Linear (Absolute max temp diff)
12
Fish Data
13
Past Projects 2000-2013
Barrier ReplacementsFencing ProjectsMonitoring SitesPlanting SitesRoad DecommissioningRoad ImprovementsStream RestorationProject BoundarySub-WatershedsCritical Sub-Watersheds
Lower South Fork Clearwater River
Project Area
Proposed Projects 2014-2018
14
Proposed Projects 2014-2018 7 barrier replacements, accessing 11.4 miles 4 road decommissioning projects, totaling 50 miles 5 road improvement projects, totaling 11.3 miles 2 stream restoration projects, totaling 1800 feet planting 10,000 native riparian plants ongoing fence maintenance, ongoing monitoring
15
Questions ?