Low Prime Volume
-
Upload
gustavoarmando-de-la-cerda -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Low Prime Volume
-
8/6/2019 Low Prime Volume
1/5
INTRODUCTIONA significant advance in coronary artery
revascularization was reported by Favarolo1 in 1968.
Further improvements in operative techniques and
devices have continued since then. The influence of
cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been reported
in several articles.24 After undergoing CPB, some
patients exhibit various homeostasis dysfunctions
(involving respiratory function, renal function and
the clotting system) that have been described aspost-perfusion syndrome. To reduce the deleterious
effects of CPB, various improvements have been
made.58 Utilizing these improvements, we devised a less
invasive CPB (low prime volume closed CPB; LPVP).
In this article, we demonstrate the decreased
invasiveness and improved efficacy of LPVP using
molecular biological techniques.
PATIENTS AND METHODSAfter approval by the institutional review board,
we studied 14 patients undergoing isolated
coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Patients
were randomized into two groups prospectively:
patients undergoing LPVP, Group L (8 cases),
and those with normal prime volume CPB,
Group N (6 cases).
The exclusion criteria were as follows: emergentand urgent cases, renal dysfunction cases
(serum creatinine > 1.5 mgdL1), low ejection
fraction cases (EF < 35%), single bypass cases,
on-pump beating-heart CABG cases, patients with
severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or
uncontrolled asthma, preoperative use of steroids
and previous heart surgery.
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Demonstration and Operative Influence ofLow Prime Volume Closed Pump
Hideaki Takai, MD, Kiyoyuki Eishi, MD, Shiro Yamachika, MD,
Shiro Hazama, MD, Tsuneo Ariyoshi, MD, Katsuo Nishi, MD
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery
Nagasaki University School of Medicine
Nagasaki, Japan
For reprint information contact:
Hideaki Takai, MD Tel: 81 95 849 7307 Fax: 81 95 849 7311 Email: [email protected]
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan.
2005, VOL. 13, NO. 1 65 ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS
ABSTRACTVarious improvements have been made in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in the
past few decades. We designed a new type of CPB to reduce the secretion of
systemic inflammatory markers. We used a low prime volume pump (LPVP),
completely closed CPB circuit and examined coagulant factors and inflammatory
cytokines. In this study, we demonstrate the efficacy of LPVP using molecularbiological data. Fourteen patients were randomized prospectively into two groups:
Group L patients underwent LPVP (n = 8) and Group N patients underwent
normal prime volume CPB (n = 6). We measured thrombin-antithrombin III
complex (TAT), complement factor (C3a), and interleukin (IL)-10 levels at
four time points. TAT (66.1 15.1 ngmL1), C3a (1895 282 ngmL1) and
IL-10 (486 114 pgmL1) levels in Group N were significantly higher
than in Group L (TAT, 19.5 4.4 ngmL1; IL-10, 105 24.6 pgmL1;
C3a, 1349 369 ngmL1) immediately following CPB. LPVP demonstrated a
lower systemic inflammatory response compared to normal prime volume CPB,
as assessed using a molecular biological approach.
(Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2005;13:659)
-
8/6/2019 Low Prime Volume
2/5
ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS 66 2005, VOL. 13, NO. 1
Demonstration and Operative Influence of LPVP Takai
The characteristics of the two types of CPB are showed
in Table 1. A CAPIOX EBS (Terumo Co., Tokyo, Japan)
with a heparin-coated circuit was used in the LPVP circuit.
A needle vent was placed in the aortic root and connected
to the vent circuit and the cardioplegic solution circuit.
A removable soft reservoir bag (500 mL capacity) was
fixed in the middle of the blood removal circuit and the
vent circuit, and was primed with Ringers lactate solutionwithout blood (Figure 1). The priming solution
(total volume 590 mL) was drained through the
circuit (Figure 1), before starting CPB. The soft reservoir
collected the blood that remained in the circuit after CPB,
which was subsequently used for autologous transfusion.
Suction was provided using the cell saver (Medtronic Inc.,
Blood Management Business Electromedics, Parker,
CO, USA). The cell saver was set up independently
and not connected to the LPVP circuit. Each patient
was administered an initial pre-bypass bolus dose
of heparin (100 IUkg1). During CPB, activated
clotting time (ACT) was maintained at 250300 sec.
Protamine sulfate was administered at a rate of 100
IUkg1 in LPVP. Myocardial protection was provided
by intermittent antegrade injection of warm blood
cardioplegia, according to the protocol of Calafiore et al9
in which cardioplegia flows into every anastomosis.
A CAPIOX-SX (HP) (Terumo Co., Tokyo, Japan)with a heparin-coated circuit was used in the normal
prime volume open CPB circuit. This type of CPB
was primed with 1.5 liters of 6% hydroxyethylated
starch (10 mLkg1) and Ringers lactate solution
without blood. A Sarns 9000 roller pump
(Terumo Cardiovascular Systems, Ann Arbor, MI,
USA) was used. Myocardial protection was provided
by intermittent, antegrade injection of cold (4C)
cardioplegic solution (St. Thomas solution). Each
patient was administered an initial pre-bypass
bolus dose of heparin (150 IUkg1). ACT was
Table 1. Characteristics of CPB
LPVP Normal Prime Volume CPB
Pump Centrifugal Roller
Oxygenator Membranous Membranous
Suction Yes No
Venous reservoir Soft reservoir Hard shell cardiotomy reservoirPriming volume (mL) 590 1500
Circuit Completely closed circuit Open circuit
Figure 1. Schema of the improved CPB circuit.
Right Atrium Asc. Aortic
Venting
Aortic Root
Calafiore Solution
Reservoir Bag
Pump & Oxygenator
A
-
8/6/2019 Low Prime Volume
3/5
Takai Demonstration and Operative Influence of LPVP
2005, VOL. 13, NO. 1 67 ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS
kept > 400 sec during CPB. Protamine sulfate was
administered at a rate of 150 IUkg1 in the standard
prime volume open CPB.
All samples were measured for thrombin-antithrombin III
complex (TAT), complement factor (C3a), and interleukin
(IL)-10 levels prior to the initiation of CPB
(the beginning of operation; T1), just after the end of
CPB (the end of total anastomosis; T2), 4 hours after the
end of CPB (total anastomosis; T3), and 24 hours afterthe end of CPB ( total anastomosis; T4).
All samples were stored at 80C until analysis by
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: IL-10 (CytoscreenUS
hIL-10 Ultra Sensitive; Biosource International, Camarillo,
CA, USA), TAT (Enzygnost TAT micro; Dade Behring,
Liederbach, Germany), or radioimmunoassay C3a
(Human Complement C3a des Arg (125I) assay system;
Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK). The limits of
sensitivity were 0.5 pgmL1 (IL-10), 20 ngmL1 (C3a),
and 0.5 ngmL1 (TAT).
All values are expressed as the mean standard
deviation (SD). The non-repeated analysis of
variance (ANOVA) and Mann-Whitney U-test were
used for intragroup comparisons. All computations
were performed using SPSS statistical software
packages version 11.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Ap-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
The progress of all patients was uneventful during the perioperative and postoperative course. Preoperative
values between the 2 groups were not statistically
different (Table 2).
The value of intraoperative minimum hematocrit (Hct)
in Group L was significantly higher than that
in Group N ( p < 0.05). The preoperative Hct
percent ratio and the intraoperative minimum Hct
value (% R-Hct) were determined as an index of
hemodilution. The value of % R-Hct in Group N
was lower (67.2%) than in Group L (76.3%). Blood
Table 2. Preoperative Data
Group L Group N p-Value
Age (years) 66 7.3 68 7.3 NS
Body weight (kg) 65 7.6 58.3 6.9 NS
Height (m) 1.60 0.15 1.57 0.07 NS
BSA (m2) 1.69 0.11 1.54 0.21 NSBMI 25.7 2.6 24.1 2.1 NS
Anastomosis 3.3 1.1 2.8 0.69 NS
Operation time (min) 288 59 297 61 NS
CPB time (min) 122 48 121 25 NS
Clamp time (min) 80 38 76 21 NS
EF (%) 67 15 71 12 NS
NS = no statistically significant difference between groups; BSA = body surface area; BMI = body mass index;
EF = ejection fraction.
Table 3. Intra- and Postoperative Data
Group L Group N p-Value
Preoperative Hct (%) 40.1 4.7 38.1 2.9 NS
Minimum Hct (%) 30.5 5.2 25.6 2.1 0.0028
% R-Hct (%) 76.3 4.9 67.2 2.5 0.0065
Blood transfusion (U) 1.1 1.8 3.0 3.4 NS
Blood loss over 24 hours (ml) 348 152 685 434 NS
Ventilation time (hours) 5.9 2.1 6.5 3.9 NS
Max CK-MB 22.8 11.3 21.7 20.6 NS
NS = no statistically significant difference between groups; Hct = hematocrit;
CK-MB = creatine kinase-myocardial band.
-
8/6/2019 Low Prime Volume
4/5
ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS 68 2005, VOL. 13, NO. 1
Demonstration and Operative Influence of LPVP Takai
transfusion was usually performed after weaning
off CPB for Hct > 20%. The number of packed
red blood cells was greater in Group N than that
in Group L. Postoperative blood loss over 24 hours
was less in Group L (348 51 mL) than that in
Group N (685 34 mL), however this was not
significantly different.
TAT concentrations reached peak values at
T2 (Group N, 66.1 3.7 ngmL 1; Group L,
19.5 13.1 ngmL1) and decreased gradually
thereafter. There were no significant differences
between the two groups except at T2.
C3a concentrations were similar between the
two groups. The value of C3a in Group L at T2
(1349 1106 ngmL1) was lower than that of Group N
(1895 630 ngmL1).
A significant increase in IL-10 concentrations was
observed in Group N (486 255 pgmL1) at T2.
However, only a small increase was observed in Group L
(105 65.1 ngmL) at T2.
DISCUSSIONSeveral studies examining less invasive procedures forCPB have been reported.1012 Two noteworthy methods of
LPVP are commonly performed: one utilizes a completely
closed CPB with a reservoir bag, the other utilizes a low
priming volume and low volume cardioplegia. LPVP is
similar to the MECC system reported by Fromes et al12.
However, there is one distinct difference between LPVP
and the MECC system: LPVP is achieved with a reservoir
bag and vent circuit. By installing this soft reservoir
and connecting a vent circuit during CPB we are able
to drain the blood into the soft reservoir and reserve it.
Therefore, it is possible to freely control both the size
of the heart and the visual field of the target bypass
area more effectively.
The advantages of high Hct during CPB have been
reported.5,13,14 Hemodilution was avoided by reducing the
priming volume in the CPB circuit and by maintaining
a low priming volume during cardioplegia. This results
in blood conservation and a reduction in blood surface
area contact. LPVP was effective at maintaining a high
Hct compared to normal prime volume CPB.
The levels of TAT were examined as an indicator of
coagulant activity. There were statistically significantdifferences in TAT at T2. As shown in Table 4, the
transition of TAT in Group L was more stable than in
Group N. It would appear that the system of coagulation
activity was very stable during the perioperative period
in Group L.
The damaging effects of CPB, related in part to
complement activation by foreign surfaces, have
been reported.2 Similarly, CABG is associated with
a systemic inflammatory response which has been
attributed to human cytokine response.15 IL-10 plays an
anti-inflammatory role by suppressing T-cell activity.16
A significant increase in the values of C3a and IL-10 at
T2 in Group N was demonstrated, as opposed to only a
slight increase in Group L. Therefore, LPVP elicited a
reduced inflammatory response in comparison with that
of normal prime volume open CPB.
The most significant challenge encountered with LPVP
is air elimination. The future safe clinical use of LPVP
will depend on the incorporation of a device, such
as an arterial filter, in the venous line to remove air.
If such a device that can remove air efficiently was
Table 4. Values of TAT (ngmL1), IL-10 (ngmL1), and C3a (ngmL1)
T1 T2 T3 T4
TAT
Group N 8.52 4.19 66.1 33.7* 16.9 4.9 15.7 7.3
Group L 18.5 14.9 19.5 13.1 17.5 6.3 12.8 4.39
IL-10Group N 4.56 1.04 486 255* 79.2 46.5 18.5 11.3
Group L 2.70 1.69 105 65.1 29.9 15.1 9.06 6.43
C3a
Group N 290 148 1895 630* 301 128 140 47
Group L 279 104 1349 1106 417 146 295 226
All values are expressed as mean standard deviation.
*Significant difference between the two groups.
Significant difference in T2 vs T1, T3 and T4.
-
8/6/2019 Low Prime Volume
5/5
Takai Demonstration and Operative Influence of LPVP
2005, VOL. 13, NO. 1 69 ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS
available, it might be possible to perform aortic valve
replacement using LPVP. This study was designed to be
a small-scale pilot study to evaluate a possible positive
effect of LPVP. LPVP should be further investigated in
a larger cohort.
In conclusion, the value of Hct was maintained higher
in LPVP than with normal prime volume CPB. This
study showed that the transitions of TAT in LPVP were
more stable than those found in normal prime volume
CPB. The inflammatory reaction in LPVP, as evidenced
by C3a and IL-10, was preferable to that demonstrated
with normal prime volume CPB. We believe that LPVP,
as a new device for on-pump CABG, is less invasive
than normal prime volume CPB.
REFERENCES1. Favaloro RG. Saphenous vein autograft replacement of severe
segmental coronary artery occlusion: operative technique.
Ann Thorac Surg 1968;5:3349.2. Kirklin JK, Westaby S, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW,
Chenoweth DE, Pacifico AD. Complement and the damaging
effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg 1983;86:84557.
3. Butler J, Rocker GM, Westaby S. Inflammatory response to
cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55:5529.
4. Wan S, Izzat MB, Lee TW, Wan IY, Tang NL, Yim AP. Avoiding
cardiopulmonary bypass in multivessel CABG reduces cytokine
response and myocardial injury. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:527.
5. Cormack JE, Forest RJ, Groom RC, Morton J. Size makes a
difference: use of a low-prime cardiopulmonary bypass circuit and
autologous priming in small adults. Perfusion 2000;15:12935.
6. Yoshikai M, Hamada M, Takarabe K, Okazaki Y, Ito T. Clinical
use of centrifugal pump and the roller pump in open heart surgery:a comparative evaluation. Artif Organs 1996;20:7046.
7. Giomarelli P, Naldini A, Biagioli B, Borrelli E. Heparin
coating of extracorporeal circuits inhibits cytokine release
from mononuclear cells during cardiac operations. Int J Artif
Organs 2000;23:2505.
8. Johnell M, Elgue G, Larsson R, Larsson A, Thelin S,
Siegbahn A. Coagulation, fibrinolysis, and cell activation in
patients and shed mediastinal blood during coronary artery
bypass grafting with a new heparin-coated surface. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:32132.9. Calafiore AM, Teodori G, Mezzetti A, Bosco G, Verna AM,
Di Giammarco G, et al. Intermittent antegrade warm blood
cardioplegia. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:398402.
10. Mueller XM, Jegger D, Augstburger M, Horisberger J, Godar G,
von Segesser LK. A new concept of integrated cardiopulmonary
bypass circuit. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:8406.
11. McCusker K, Vijay V, Debois W, Helm R, Sisto D. MAST
system: a new condensed cardiopulmonary bypass circuit for
adult cardiac surgery. Perfusion 2001;16:44752.
12. Fromes Y, Gaillard D, Ponzio O, Chauffert M, Gerhardt MF,
Deleuze P, et al. Reduction of the inflammatory response following
coronary bypass grafting with total minimal extracorporeal
circulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;22:52733.
13. Shapira OM, Aldea GS, Treanor PR, Chartrand RM,DeAndrade KM, Lazar HL, et al. Reduction of allogeneic
blood transfusions after open heart operations by lowering
cardiopulmonary bypass prime volume. Ann Thorac
Surg 1998;65:72430.
14. Eising GP, Pfauder M, Niemeyer M, Tassani P, Schad H,
Bauernschmitt R, et al. Retrograde autologous priming: is it
useful in elective on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery?
Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:237.
15. Struber M, Cremer JT, Gohrbandt B, Hagl C, Jankowski M,
Volker B, et al. Human cytokine responses to coronary artery
bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass.
Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:13305.
16. Markewitz A, Faist E, Lang S, Hultner L, Weinhold C,
Reichart B. An imbalance in T-helper cell subsets alters
immune response after cardiac surgery. Eur J CardiothoracSurg 1996;10:617.