Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
-
Upload
heraldo-ferreira-borges -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
0
Transcript of Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
1/63
A low carbon and
resilient urban future
An integrated approach to planning for
climate change
Prof Barbara Norman
Urban and Regional Planning
University of Canberra
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
2/63
A L ow C arbon and R es ilientUrban F uture
A Discussion Paper on an IntegratedA pproac h to P lanning for C limate
Change
Professor Barbara Norman
Urban and Regional PlanningUniversity of Canberra
July 2010
Paper prepared for the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
3/63
Commonwealth of Australia 2010
ISBN 978-1921298-81-3
This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act
1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission
from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and
rights should be addressed to the:
Commonwealth Copyright Administration
Attorney Generals Department
Robert Garran Offices
National Circuit BARTON ACT 2600
Or posted at: http://www.ag.gov.au/cca
While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication, the
Commonwealth provides no warranties and makes not representations that the
information contained is correct, complete or reliable. The Commonwealth
expressly disclaims liability for any loss, however caused and whether due to
negligence or otherwise, arising directly or indirectly from the use or reliance on
information contained in the publication by any person.
Editing by Biotext, Melbourne
Page layout by Biotext, Melbourne
http://www.ag.gov.au/ccahttp://www.ag.gov.au/cca -
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
4/63
1
Contents
Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................3
Acronyms and abbreviations ............................................................................................5
Executive summary ............................................................................................................7
1 Introduction .........................................................................................................11
1.1 Context ......................................................................................................11
1.2 Purpose of the discussion paper ................................................................13
1.3 Approach to the discussion paper .............................................................13
2 Australian initiatives on urban planning and climate change .........................15
2.1 National initiatives ....................................................................................15
2.2 State, regional and local initiatives ...........................................................18
2.3 Initiatives by the insurance industry and the builtenvironment professions ...........................................................................21
3 Barriers to planning for climate change ............................................................23
3.1 An emerging field of professional expertise .............................................23
3.2 National urban planning policy .................................................................23
3.3 Risk and liability .......................................................................................24
3.4 Financing and governing the transition .....................................................25
4 International initiatives on urban planning and climate change ....................27
4.1 United Kingdom ........................................................................................28
4.2 European Union ........................................................................................30
4.3 Canada .......................................................................................................33
4.4 United States .............................................................................................34
4.5 Asia-Pacific region ....................................................................................36
4.6 C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group ......................................................37
5 National engagement in urban policy and climate change ..............................39
5.1 Strategic urban policy ...............................................................................40
5.2 Integrating planning processes ..................................................................41
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
5/63
2
5.3 Governance, regulation and leadership .....................................................41
5.4 Research and skills training ......................................................................42
5.5 A national agenda for urban policy and climate change ...........................43
5.6 Role of the Australian Government ..........................................................44
6 Conclusion ............................................................................................................49
References .........................................................................................................................51
Appendix 1 ........................................................................................................................57
Appendix 2 ........................................................................................................................59
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
6/63
3
Acknowledgements
I wish to acknowledge the support and advice of Jo Mummery and her team from
the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (DCCEE), and Professor
Bruce Thom, University of Sydney. I would also like to thank the valuablecontributions by the participants in DCCEEs February roundtable on Urban
Planning and Climate Change. Information is also drawn from theNational Climate
Change Adaptation Research Plan: Settlements and Infrastructure.
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
7/63
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
8/63
5
Acronyms and abbreviat ions
ACTU Australian Council of Trade UnionsADAM Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies project (European Union)
ADC Australian Davos Connection
AHURI Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute
ARK National Programme for Spatial Adaptation to Climate Change (Netherlands)
COAG Council of Australian Governments
DEWHA Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts
DCCEE Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency
EU European Union
IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
NCCARF National Climate Change and Adaptation Research Facility
NYCPCC New York City Panel on Climate ChangeOECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
PEMSEA Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia
PIA Planning Institute of Australia
SDC Sustainable Development Commission (United Kingdom)
TAFE Technical and Further Education
VROM Ministry for Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (Netherlands)
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
9/63
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
10/63
7
Execut ive summary
To reduce the impacts of climate change on settlements and infrastructure, it is
critical to develop appropriate mitigation and adaptation responses. The Australian
Government is taking a national approach to climate change mitigation andadaptation, including in urban areas. A range of measures have already been
identified, such as:
revising, renewing and enforcing building codes to take account of changingclimatic conditions
introducing more consistent planning measures (eg planned retreat, dunemanagement, building designs, regulation of new structures)
managing urban growth in climate sensitive areas through zoning andregulation.
We need a suite of measures to build more resilient urban settlements andcommunities, including urban planning and management responses. Internationally,
new ways of designing cities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to develop
climate change adaptation plans are being developed at the national and city level.
This discussion paper raises issues about the challenges of increasing urbanisation
and climate change, and seeks to present a more strategic approach to settlement
planning in Australia for climate change. It focuses on cities and explores the issues
and the barriers to change. The impacts of urbanisation and climate change bring
with them opportunities to rethink how we can manage future urban growth.
Current Australian initiatives in planning for climate change are outlined, to provide
a benchmark for further action. The paper describes some key international
initiatives from the United Kingdom, the European Union, Canada, the United
States and the AsiaPacific region. The Australian Government, particularly the
Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, in partnership with others,
can make a significant contribution in facilitating the transition to a low carbon and
resilient urban future.
The rapid growth of our capital cities and regional urban growth centres, combined
with climate change and evolving climate scenarios, is a very dynamic context in
which to effect change. There is a need to facilitate appropriate actions at the
national, state and territory, regional and local levels. To identify the actions
required, it is important to define the barriers to planning for climate change inAustralian cities and major urban centres.
This paper highlights four barriers to implementing climate change policy in our
rapidly growing urban centres:
a lack of professional skills in urban climate policy
an absence of a national urban policy framework that integrates climate changeconsiderations
risk and liability issues that may arise from the impact of climate change on thebuilt environment
significant policy challenges for financing and governing the transition to a lowcarbon and more resilient urban form.
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
11/63
8
Each of these barriers are developed further within the paper, to explore the
institutional and regulatory reforms that may be required.
Examples where climate change considerations have been incorporated into urban
policy within Australia and internationally are explored in the body of the paper.
The Australian case studies include examples of initiatives at the national, state and
territory, regional and local levels. Mitigation and adaptation programs of the
Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, together with recent
decisions by the Council of Australian Governments on strategic urban planning
and disaster resilience, frame the current national action on climate change and
cities. At the state, territory and local levels, specific climate change plans for large
urban centres and capital cities are growing in number. However, these are one-off
initiatives that could be framed within a more integrated approach across
governments.
International examples provide alternative approaches to cities and climate change
many show the advantages of improved links between national and local action,
both in policy terms and projects on the ground. The approach set out in the United
Kingdoms Planning for a Sustainable Future: White Papercould be considered inAustralia, as could the approach taken by the New York Climate Change Panel and
the New York City Plan (PlaNYC).
These examples of climate change policy and cities highlight a number of climate
change considerations for Australian urban policy. The initiatives explored in this
paper show that many countries are moving rapidly to national approaches to
climate change and cities. Recently in Australia, there has been a move towards
developing urban policy at the national level this needs to be integrated with
national objectives on climate change.
At the state, territory and local levels, opportunities exist to develop current urbanand environmental planning processes to incorporate climate change mitigation and
adaptation policies. Cities are being built every day the challenge is to identify
strategic interventions that can be made to effectively integrate climate change
policy in urban and regional planning systems. The whole-of-council approach by
the Gold Coast City Council is a good template for consideration.
The paper also discusses the importance of leadership and innovation, and
investment in research and skills development in the field of urban climate change
policy. Because urban research funding is relatively minor in Australia and the field
of climate change policy (particularly adaptation) is relatively new, there is a
significant gap in research and innovation for cities and climate change. This needs
to be addressed so that decision makers are supported appropriately.
The paper seeks to define national considerations in relation to climate change and
cities. For the purposes of promoting discussion, it outlines a possible national
agenda in urban policy and climate change. Such an agenda is inherently
interdisciplinary and will inevitably involve a range of government departments and
agencies at all levels. The broader context must be understood so that the roles and
responsibilities of each contributing agency can be defined clearly.
The paper concludes by exploring potential contributions by the Department of
Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, in partnership with other agencies, to
facilitate the transition to a low carbon and resilient urban future, including:
developing national climate change and urban growth outcomes
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
12/63
9
facilitating education and research in planning for climate change
contributing to the implementation of the Council of Australian Governmentsdecisions on strategic urban planning and disaster mitigation.
The issue of climate change and growing cities is interdisciplinary and inter-
sectoral. In Australia, we need to connect urban and regional planning, climate
change mitigation and adaptation, and emergency management. The quality of thepartnerships developed between government, nongovernment, business and
industry, the training sector and the community, are critical. The Australian
Government can play a strategic and important leadership role in linking these
groups to facilitate the implementation of national climate change objectives.
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
13/63
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
14/63
11
1 Introduct ion
Two major global phenomena urbanisation and climate change require a new
emphasis on the planning of Australian settlements and a new partnership between
the three levels of government in Australia. The intersection of these challenges inour cities presents significant threats and opportunities in tackling climate change.
As a recent Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
paper states: Cities are part of the climate change problem, but they are also a key
part of the solution (Kamal-Chaoui and Robert 2009:3). Furthermore, how cities
develop matters to the delivery of a low-carbon, climate resilient future, and it will
also determine the feasibility of sustainable economic development across the
OECD and worldwide (Corfee-Morlot et al 2009:8).
1.1 Context
Climate change poses significant threats to the physical infrastructure and social
fabric of our towns and cities. Settlements and infrastructure will be affected by
changes in climate conditions, including extreme weather events. Climate change is
likely to result in increased damage to buildings (eg concrete joints, steel, asphalt),
energy services, telecommunications, transport structures (eg roads, railways, ports,
bridges) and water services (Thom et al 2009).
The 2009 Victorian bushfires and the high temperatures in Adelaide at the time
provide an indication of possible fatal consequences of extreme weather events.
Coastal settlements and infrastructure will be especially vulnerable to the effects of
climate change sea-level rise, increased air and sea surface temperatures,
increased storm intensity, ocean acidification, and changes to rainfall and runoff.
Sea-level rise will cause increased coastal inundation, erosion, loss of wetlands andsalt-water intrusion into freshwater sources, with impacts on infrastructure, coastal
resources and existing coastal management programs.
It will be critical to develop appropriate mitigation and adaptation responses to
reduce the impacts of climate change on settlements and infrastructure. The
Australian Government is taking a lead role in a national approach to mitigation to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Attention is now turning to possible adaptation
responses, or a mix of mitigation and adaptation measures, in relation to cities.
A range of measures have already been identified, including revising, renewing and
enforcing building codes to take account of changing climatic conditions,introducing more consistent planning measures (eg planned retreat, dune
management, building designs, regulation of new structures), and managing urban
growth in climate-sensitive areas through zoning and regulation. However, there
remains much to be done and the process will present opportunities, especially in
the implementation of adaptation responses and the promotion of shifts in the
behaviour and expectations of urban, regional and remote populations. As stated inBusiness Week:
Perhaps the greatest design opportunity the economic stimulus can give us isfor green and sustainable design to become an automatic and essential part of
the architecture of new buildings, not just an added extra (Schubert 2009).
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
15/63
12
The 2010 Intergenerational ReportAustralia to 2050: Future Challenges highlights
significant population growth projected to reach 35.9 million in 2050 (Australian
Government 2010:5). Most of this growth will occur in our cities and will place new
demands on infrastructure, housing, and water and energy supply. The Australia
Government through the Council of Australian Governments (COAG 2009)
recognises the future challenge of creating sustainable cities in the context of
urbanisation and climate change, and has begun a process of national urbanplanning reform:
The Australian Government is committed to creating cities that are productive,
liveable, and sustainable. By 2012, each capital city will have a strategic
planning system that addresses housing affordability, tackles urban congestion,
deals with climate change and meets important national criteria (Australian
Government 2010:13)
The pressures of increasing urbanisation and climate change, combined with
projections of significant increases in population for Australia, necessitate a
transdisciplinary approach to urban growth management climate science,
emergency management, urban and regional planning, city design, governance, and
economic and social policy. Although the focus of this paper is on climate change
and cities, it recognises the multidimensional nature of the policy issues involved.
In this context, the paper seeks to define the positive contribution that national
climate policy can make in creating more sustainable cities.
The process of urbanisation is a long-term trend in Australia. Over 80 per cent of
Australians live in urban settlements. More than 86 per cent of the population lives
by the coast. The growth of Australian capital cities continues to be significant, with
metropolitan Melbourne expecting to reach five million by 2030 (DPCD 2009). The
Australia State of the Environmentreports in 1996, 2001 and 2006 expressed
concern about the impact of the continued expansion of the major capital cities and
the urbanisation of the coastline. In relation to human settlements, the State of theEnvironment Report 2006(DEH 2006:18) concluded in part that:
population growth and urban expansion, particularly in coastal areas and capitalcities, are placing increasing pressure on the environment
the design of urban areas has a significant impact on their efficiency andenvironmental impact and some progress has been made towards recognising
this fact in new developments, but the legacy of past urban and building design
will continue to impact on the environment.
The State of the Environment Report 2006recommended a strong policy response
of strategic urban planning:
Much urban environmental progress can be achieved by adopting strategies
that reduce the harmful impacts of unsustainable consumption on the
environment and nationally recognising that urban form and liveability have apowerful influence on human settlements. The development and
implementation of an Australian Government policy on cities would provide
leadership and guidance to the other two levels of government, as well as to
developers, producers and consumers so as to achieve a common approach to
the creation of sustainable settlements (DEH 2006:4).
Climate change has brought a significant new dimension to the urban problem.
Sea level rise, rising temperatures and projected more extreme weather events
(Pachauri and Reisinger 2007) are some of the significant future impacts on cities.The economic, social and environmental costs of extreme weather events in 2009
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
16/63
13
have highlighted some of the policy challenges. Extreme heatwaves, severe
flooding and devastating bushfires have had substantial impacts on urban and
regional communities. Although these specific events may not be directly
attributable to climate change, they provide some insight into challenges that urban
settlements may face in the future.
Building more resilient urban settlements and communities will require a range of
adaptive measures, including urban planning and management responses.
Internationally, considerable action is occurring at the city level to examine new
ways of designing cities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Similarly,
international research is occurring on planning for adaptation to accommodate the
impacts of climate change that are already predicted to occur; for example, sea level
rise. Australia is no exception and Australian governments at all levels are
supporting a range of initiatives to strengthen local and regional understanding of
the impacts and the mechanisms to climate-proof urban settlements.
1.2 Purpose of the discussion paper
The purpose of this discussion paper is to provide some insight into the challengesof increasing urbanisation and climate change. It presents a more strategic approach
to settlement planning for climate change in Australia. The paper focuses on cities,
and explores the issues and the barriers to change. It recognises that the impacts of
urbanisation and climate change also bring opportunities to rethink how we manage
future urban growth.
Current Australian initiatives on planning for climate change are outlined here to
provide a benchmark to build upon for future action. Key international initiatives in
the United Kingdom, European Union, Canada, the United States and the Asia
Pacific region are described. The outcome of this discussion paper is to suggest the
contribution the Australian Government and in particular the Department of ClimateChange and Energy Efficiency (DCCEE) could make to facilitate the transition to a
low carbon and resilient urban future.
1.3 Approach to the discussion paper
This discussion paper is designed to stimulate discussion on the critical issue of how
we respond to the twin challenges of urbanisation and climate change in Australia:
Chapter 1 outlines the purpose of the paper and its approach to the twinchallenges of urbanisation and climate change
Chapter 2 provides examples of Australian initiatives in planning for climatechange, to establish a benchmark for developing a more integrated approach
Chapter 3 identifies barriers to change in urban growth management in thecontext of climate change
Chapter 4 provides insight into international initiatives in responding tourbanisation and climate change, to inform the national policy agenda
Chapter 5 identifies a role for the Australian Government and DCCEE tofacilitate a new approach that addresses the challenges of planning for
urbanisation and climate change, and suggests a way forward.
Incorporating climate change considerations into city form and structure is a task
that is multisectoral and interdisciplinary. It will involve the urban design
professions, government, industry, and the building and construction sector. It is
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
17/63
14
also multijurisdictional and will involve the nations capital cities and the growing
conurbation (where larger and smaller cities and towns are merging to form
continuous urban development) on the eastern seaboard, involving more than one
state.
Implementing national climate change policy through all eight of the Australian
urban planning systems will require the engagement of all levels of government,
ranging from national infrastructure planning to local adaptive planning responses.
This discussion paper concludes with a possible pathway forward for responding to
climate change when planning and rebuilding Australian urban settlements.
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
18/63
15
2 Austral ian ini t iat ives on urbanplanning and cl imate change
The remit of DCCEE is to coordinate Australias response to climate change
nationally, with the involvement of all levels of government. The urban planningand design of Australian cities has, in the past, been regarded as a state or territory
and local government responsibility. However, recently (in December 2009) the
Australian Government re-engaged directly with national urban and cities policy,
due to significant decisions made by the Council of Australian Governments
(COAG), including:
establishing a set of national criteria for future strategic planning of capitalcities (Appendix 1)
a related statement on national disaster resilience (Appendix 2).
As the science of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) developsfurther on climate change and Australian cities continue to grow, the question is
what role can the Australian Government have in partnership with state, territory
and local governments to provide a more strategic approach to settlement planning
for climate change?
Some Australian initiatives on urban planning and climate change
Council of Australian Governments and planning ministers decisions on national
urban reform (from December 2009)
House of Representatives Inquiry into Climate Change and Environmental
Impacts on Coastal Communities (October 2009)
Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency programs on coastal
vulnerability, local adaptation pathways, integrated assessment of settlements,
national climate change research and planning for climate change capacity
building
Australias Solar Cities program
Infrastructure Australia (established under the Infrastructure Australia Act 2008)
and the Major Cities Unit
the Victorian Climate Change Green Paper(June 2009)
the South East Queensland Climate Change Management Plan Draft for PublicConsultation (July 2009)
the Climate Change Strategy 20092014, Gold Coast City Council
various capital city urban planning and climate change programs
2.1 National initiatives
Australia has a long tradition of urban planning that has benefited the quality of
urban planning and design of Australian settlements. The new challenges presented
by climate change have significant implications for the future design of cities and
towns. Future strategies will involve a mix of mitigation and adaptation measures,and will involve all three levels of government.
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
19/63
16
Planning for climate change is now a global issue, and many nations are developing
urban policy responses to climate change. On the issue of urban growth
management, the Australian Government has established Infrastructure Australia to
provide a national approach to planning, funding and implementing the nations
future infrastructure needs. The Major Cities Unit provides advice to the Australian
Government and Infrastructure Australia to identify opportunities where federal
leadership can make a difference to the prosperity of our cities and the wellbeing oftheir residents (DITRDLG 2009).
Some of the key initiatives in Australia are provided here, although this is not
intended to be a comprehensive list. Rather, it demonstrates that a wide range of
governments and nongovernment organisations are engaged in this field of public
policy, which is expected to grow along with increasing urbanisation and impacts of
climate change.
Climate change is a cross-sectoral issue and will at some stage involve nearly every
government agency. However, at the national level, key government departments
include:
Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency
Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet
Treasury
Attorney Generals Department
Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA)
Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and LocalGovernment (DITRDLG)
Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs
(specifically housing policy).
DCCEE is the lead coordinator of national government action on climate change,
with a focus on mitigation and adaptation. DCCEEs overall approach is threefold:
...reduce greenhouse pollution in Australia in the short and long term, work with
the international community to develop a global response that is effective and fair
and prepare for the climate change that we cannot avoid (DCCEE 2009).
In relation to urban settlements and climate change, there are several relevant
DCCEE initiatives, including:
the coastal vulnerability program
the local adaptation pathways program
the integrated assessment of settlements subprogram
national climate change adaptation research on settlements and infrastructure
the climate change adaptation skills for professions program, including forurban planning and design professionals.
DEWHA has a wide range of programs on sustainability and human settlements,
including energy efficiency for housing and commercial buildings, urban transport
and renewable energy. A key example for urban planning and climate change is the
Australias Solar Cities program. These contribute significantly to DCCEEs broadclimate change mitigation and adaptation-related goals.
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
20/63
17
Australias Solar Cities
Australias Solar Cities is a program designed to assist communities explore and
demonstrate new approaches to generating and delivering energy to urban and
regional settlements. In 2009, there were seven designated solar cities Alice
Springs, Blacktown, Central Victoria, Moreland, Perth and Townsville. The program is
currently funded until 2012 (DEWHA 2009).
www.environment.gov.au/settlements/solarcities/index.html(accessed June 2009)
The decisions of Infrastructure Australia and the work of the Major Cities Unit will
influence the future design and shape of Australian settlements. Mitigation and
adaptation measures for urban and planning change will need to be an integral part
of the agenda. Both initiatives indicate a renewed interest at the national level in
Australian cities. In addition to the COAG decisions of December 2009, the Local
Government and Planning Ministers Council (LGPMC) has also resolved to
develop a national urban policy, and to take a intergovernmental approach to the
question of urban planning and climate change (see LGPMC Communiques, Mayand October 2009).
1
Alongside these Australian Government programs, major Commonwealth
parliamentary inquiries have also recommended a more strategic approach to
settlement planning, including considerations of climate change. These include the
House of Representatives inquiries:
Sustainable Cities 2025 (in 2005)
Sustainability for Survival: Creating a Climate for Change (in 2007)
Climate Change and Environmental Impacts on Coastal Communities (in 2009).
Climate Change and Environmental Impacts on Coastal Communities (2009)
Recommendation 16
The Committee notes that major initiatives relating to climate change adaptation risk
assessment and infrastructure are currently in progress. Given that much of
Australias infrastructure is in the coastal zone and the particular threats facing the
coastal zone from climate change, involving significant socioeconomic costs, the
Committee recommends that the Australian Government ensure there is a
comprehensive national assessment of coastal infrastructure vulnerability to
inundation from sea level rise and extreme sea level events
A report on theInfrastructure 21 Summit Infrastructure 21: From
Incrementalism to Transformational Change (ADC 2009) was prepared by the
Australian Davos Connection with contributions from a wide range of
constituencies. The report confirmed the need for a more integrated approach to
infrastructure and urban planning and the significance of planning for climate
change. In considering Transforming Australian Cities for a more sustainable
future, it recommended a new approach to city design supported by a more
nationally consistent planning framework enhanced by a national spatial plan (ADC
1 www.lgpmcouncil.gov.au/communique/
http://www.environment.gov.au/settlements/solarcities/index.htmlhttp://www.environment.gov.au/settlements/solarcities/index.htmlhttp://www.environment.gov.au/settlements/solarcities/index.html -
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
21/63
18
2009:21). The need to transform our cities through a more integrated approach to
urban transport was a major recommendation in the December 2008Report to the
Council of Australian Governments by Infrastructure Australia (Adams and Loader
2009).
2.2 State, regional and local initiatives
Climate change is already a major national issue. Urban planning for Australian
cities is also becoming a national issue. Climate change plans have been developed
for several capital cities, and state and territory governments are at various stages of
incorporating climate change into state and metropolitan urban planning. These are
a range of leading initiatives in connecting climate change adaptation and mitigation
with urban and regional planning.
There is still considerable work to be done in translating these plans from policy to
on-the-ground implementation. A future strategy might be to provide targeted
funding programs to facilitate the implementation of national policy at the local
level. This would be particularly useful where successful implementation can
provide tangible case studies that other jurisdictions can learn from.
Victorian Climate Change Green Paper
The VictorianClimate Change Green Paperplaces significant emphasis on the
potential for planning and infrastructure decisions to improve water and energy
efficiency (DPC 2009:40). It argues that the structure and form of Australian cities
will have a direct impact on climate change.
The paper focuses on incorporating both mitigation and adaptation measures into
the urban planning system. This includes reviewing urban planning processes, urban
design and infrastructure provision (including retrofitting the existing builtenvironment), increasing the resilience of urban form and providing relevant
evidence-based ongoing research into adapting our built environment and
infrastructure. It is also argues for increasing professional and industry skills, and
wider community capacity to adapt to climate change. This process will require an
integrated approach to city planning.
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
22/63
19
South East Queensland Climate Change Management Plan
The South East Queensland Climate Change Management Plan Draft for Public
Consultation (DIP 2009a) is a regional action plan containing draft actions to
implement the climate change policies of the South East Queensland Regional Plan
20092031. It is ambitious in addressing the significant climate change impacts for
the region. The draft plan highlights the impacts of sea level rise and storm surge,
reduced water availability and increased temperatures (DIP 2009:9).
As in the Victorian green paper, a mix of mitigation and adaptation measures is
proposed, which can be undertaken to make the transition to a more low carbon and
resilient urban future. A suite of actions is based on two themes: reducing
greenhouse gas emissions, building resilience to natural hazards and adapting to
climate change. Mitigation measures are proposed for urban transport, energy
efficiency, renewable energy and community awareness. Adaptation measures
include managing coastal hazards and extreme weather events, and building
resilience through awareness and behavioural change.
This draft plan confirms the increasing awareness that influencing the planning anddevelopment of our cities will require a range of measures across portfolios
(transport, environment, urban planning, housing, energy, water). The regional
approach is a model of how to integrate these measures and effect change.
Sustainable Sydney 2030 and Melbourne 2030
The Planning Institute of Australia (PIA) National Awards for Planning Excellence
provide an indication of emerging best planning practice in Australia. The
Presidents Award in 2009 was jointly awarded to the Cities of Sydney and
Melbourne for their most recent capital city plans Sustainable Sydney 2030 (City
of Sydney 2008) and Future Melbourne Community Plan (City of Melbourne2008). Both plans adopt a triple bottom line approach to city planning and
development encompassing economic, environmental and social considerations
including the theme of planning for climate change.
The City of Melbourne (see box) provides a particularly comprehensive approach
from strategy to policy to action.
City Melbourne: a comprehensive approach to planning and climate change
Award winning Future Melbourne Community Plan (2008) andwiki (www.futuremelbourne.com.au)
City of Melbourne Climate Change Adaptation Strategy(April 2009, adopted
June 2009)
Aims to become a zero net emissions city by 2020
Retrofitting 1200 existing commercial buildings by 2020 in the 1200 Buildings
program
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
23/63
20
Figure 2.2 Northern Green Faade, Melbourne City Council Chambers - 6 star environmentalCouncil Chambers for Melbourne City Council. Photo courtesy of Ronstan Tensile Architecture
Far North Queensland Regional Plan 2025
The PIA Planning Ministers Award went to the draft Far North Queensland
Regional Plan 2025, developed by the Queensland Department of Infrastructure andPlanning. This is now a major non-metropolitan plan with a strong focus on urban
planning and climate change (DIP 2009b).
Gold Coast City Council Climate Change Strategy 20092014
The Gold Coast City Council Climate Change Strategy 20092014 is one of the
most comprehensive local plans for climate change. It takes a strategic approach to
climate change mitigation and adaptation, by addressing five key areas
(GCCC 2009):
governance and leadership
research
advocacy and awareness
infrastructure
planning and regulation.
Specific actions of the strategy include reviewing the corporate governance
framework, incorporating risk mitigation and adaptation, and incorporating climate
change considerations into local transport plans. Other measures are to amend
design standards for council infrastructure and to construct all new council
buildings to a standard that is better than the Australian Greenhouse Building
Rating of 5 stars.
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
24/63
21
By taking a whole-of-council approach, the Gold Coast City Council has
demonstrated the extensive impact of climate change will have on the Gold Coast
and provides a template for other local governments in Australia.
2.3 Initiatives by the insurance industry and the built environmentprofessions
The insurance industry is understandably concerned with the impacts of climate
change, particularly in relation to extreme weather events. The Insurance Council of
Australia has prepared a reportImproving Community Resilience to Extreme
Weather Events (ICA 2008) that focuses on two strategies:
risk management of the built environment
policies and human behaviours that underpin community resilience to extremeweather events.
In the report, the Insurance Council of Australia recommends that governments
implement:
risk-appropriate land use planning legislation harmonised across the states toprevent inappropriate development on land subject to inundation
a southerly expansion of cyclone and wind storm-related building codes tocounter the predicted southerly expansion of severe cyclones
harmonised legislation across all states requiring mandatory disclosure of allknown and predicted risk data by state and local governments to property
purchasers during property conveyance and title search processes (ICA
2008:17).
A very significant increase in urban development has occurred in some Australiancoastal environments in recent decades.
Townsville 2009
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
25/63
22
The insurance industry supports a strengthening of the relationship between
emergency management and the planning and design of urban settlements. This key
issue was raised in the submissions to the 2009 House of Representatives Inquiry
into Climate Change and Environmental Impacts on Coastal Communities and the
2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission.
The parliamentary inquiry released its final reportManaging Our Coastal Zone in a
Changing Climate in October 2009, which included a number of recommendations
in relation to climate risk and insurance (Recommendations 1923).2
Although these major inquiries are specific to the coast or bushfires, patterns of
urban settlement and predicted urban growth rates mean that there will be an
increasing number of people living in high-risk areas. This includes the urban
periphery of capital cities, rapidly growing coastal urban areas (eg Mandurah, Surf
Coast, Gold Coast) and some regional growth centres (eg Geelong and surrounds).
These are now
subject to government consideration. The 2009 Victorian Bushfire Commission
initially focused on emergency response issues, but in 2010 is moving into the
broader issues of land use planning.
Built environment professional organisations, including the Planning Institute of
Australia (PIA), the Royal Australian Institute of Architects and the Institution of
Engineers, have all recognised the need for members to upgrade design skills for
planning for climate change; for example, PIA conducted a series of training
workshops on planning and climate change in 2006 and 2007. There is already an
identified shortage of trained urban planners and engineers within Australia that
needs to be addressed in the context of growing cities and climate change. The
design professions are working together on these issues and host an annual meeting
with the Australian Parliament (Built Environment Meets Parliament).3
2www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/ccwea/coastalzone/report.htm
3 See www.bemp.com.au
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
26/63
23
3 Barr iers to planning for cl imatechange
Transforming our major cities for climate change is a challenge that will take 10 to
15 years or more to implement. The complexity of rapidly growing capital citiesand regional urban growth centres, combined with climate change and evolving
climate scenarios makes for a very dynamic context to effect change. It is
imperative that we begin implementing mitigation and adaptation strategies for
Australian cities. Significant action is already occurring at the city and state level, as
discussed in Chapter 2.
DCCEE is keen to continue contributing to the facilitation of appropriate actions at
the national, state, regional and local levels. First, it is important to define the
barriers to planning for climate change in Australian cities and major urban centres.
3.1 An emerging field of professional expertise
The design and redesign of urban centres for climate change is an emerging field of
professional expertise and research. Urban and regional planning and urban design
are well-established fields in which considerable work is being done internationally
and locally on climate change mitigation and adaptation.
Innovation and one-off projects are being sponsored by capital cities and in some
cases large national corporations (eg Clinton Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation) .
The insurance sector is focused on possible liabilities, particularly from more
frequent and intense extreme weather events. As a step to foster research in this
important area, the Australian Government has established the National ClimateChange and Adaptation Research Facility (NCCARF), which is preparing national
research plans including one on settlements and infrastructure (Thom et al 2009).
These initiatives are important contributions and demonstrate leadership; however,
broader dissemination and uptake of this knowledge is critical to effecting change.
Such change will require collaboration and new partnerships between government,
industry and the university sector. We need to facilitate innovation and
understanding to improve the uptake of climate change mitigation and adaptation
strategies in the planning and development systems.
3.2 National urban planning policy
A significant barrier to planning for climate change in Australia is the lack of a
national urban policy framework. However, national urban policy is being
developed by the Cities COAG Taskforce and the Major Cities Unit at
Infrastructure Australia. Key policy issues include:
public transport
affordable housing
economic productivity
climate change (mitigation and adaptation).
Historically, urban and regional planning in Australia has been managed by state
and territory, and local governments. At times, the Australian Government has
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
27/63
24
assumed greater responsibility in relation to cities, notably under the governments
of Chifley (Commonwealth State Housing Agreements), Whitlam (urban area
improvements), and Hawke and Keating (Building Better Cities), and the Rudd
government has recently announced that the Australia Government will take a role
in urban management, based on three future challenges:
building productive cities with efficient transport and communications
networks
building affordable, liveable city communities
building sustainable cities (Rudd 2009:8).
These three challenges are developed further in the COAG Communiqu from
7 December 2009. Specifically, the issue of capital city strategic planning systems
is addressed along with the related areas of housing, climate change and emergency
management for extreme weather events (COAG 2009b). All of these critical policy
areas contribute to the overall theme of this report.
The outcome from the COAG meeting on 7 December 2009 was an agreement to
apply national criteria for capital city strategic planning to re-shape our capital
cities (Appendix 1). The same meeting also agreed to a national disaster resilience
statement that recognises the role of government to include developing and
implementing effective, risk-based land management and planning arrangements
and other mitigation activities (Appendix 2).
A continuing barrier to planning for change is the lack of horizontal and vertical
integration of urban policy, between different agencies and non government bodies
and between different levels of government a national urban policy could
provide this integration. The COAG agreements provide a foundation for achieving
more effective coordination. Population projections for Australia to 2050, which
estimate growth of 14 million people (Australian Government 2010), andconsequent urban growth, require a national perspective on urban settlement. A
national urban policy should provide a major platform for incorporating climate
change adaptation and mitigation policies into state and territory, and local urban
policy, thus in cities. The next challenge is to build a stronger partnership with
industry, and better links between urban and regional planning and the emergency
management sector, to ensure effective on-the-ground implementation.
3.3 Risk and liability
Impending risks and liabilities of climate change are of particular concern to the
insurance sector and local governments. The extreme weather events of 2009 and2010 (bushfires, floods, heat stress) have raised the issue of risk and liability in
relation to land use planning and how we plan and regulate for climate change in
(and on the edges of) major urban centres.
Recent public policy responses to projected sea level rise from the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predictions (IPCC 2007) are an early
indication of possible change in the regulatory environment for land use planning.
For example, the new statutory planning provision for sea level rise in Victoria
states:
Plan for sea level rise of not less than 0.8 metres by 2100, and allow for the
combined effects of tides, storm surges, coastal processes and local conditions,
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
28/63
25
such as topography and geology when assessing risks and impacts associated
with climate change. (VCC 2008:38).
This policy is to be reviewed as scientific data become available.
Barriers to change are twofold:
Planning law in Australia is relatively static, with town planning legislation ineach state and territory reviewed on average every 10 years and metropolitanstrategies every five years.
There is no connection between developments in climate change science and theday-to-day decision making that influences land use activity in cities and
regions.
Urban and regional planning (both strategic and statutory) must be reviewed to
incorporate planning for climate change. As a start, the Local Government and
Planning Ministers Council (LGPMC) asked the Australian Local Government
Association (ALGA) to prepare a report on practical issues facing local
government in dealing with climate change (LGPMC 2009).
3.4 Financing and governing the transition
A barrier to planning for climate change is how to fund the building and rebuilding
of cities and major urban centres. This is relatively new challenge, but it needs to be
integrated into urban and regional planning processes. For example, actions by the
insurance sector may have significant impacts on investment decisions, with
consequences for urban form and location.
The combination of significant population growth and demographic change
(Attorney-Generals Department 2010) will affect growth patterns of our cities.
Population growth may also necessitate increased urban growth in inland regional
centres, given the predicted impacts of climate change, but potential urban growth
centres have not yet been identified. Planning for future urban growth will need to
address critical issues such as water supply and energy, as well as social and
economic factors such as employment opportunities and the provision of health
services and education.
Financing structural change towards a low carbon and resilient urban future will
require the incorporation of climate change mitigation and adaptation responses into
key investment decisions. The building and construction industries, and research
organisations, need to enter the discussion, so that we can better understand possible
levers to shift existing practices towards more climate-sensitive outcomes. Newurban governance arrangements may also be required to manage the increased level
of risk and uncertainty.
There are debates going on currently about planning for coastal climate change (eg
House of Representatives Standing Committee on Climate Change, Water,
Environment and the Arts). All levels of government must be involved in financing
and governing planning for climate change. We need a clear delineation of
responsibilities and a suite of tools and incentives to implement new urban forms
and reduce barriers to planning for climate change.
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
29/63
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
30/63
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
31/63
28
It is clear that urban planning for sustainable cities will be a major factor in
reducing emissions and adapting to climate change. Developed and developing
cities are vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and the examples show that
responses are possible at the national and local levels where these are integrated
and mutually reinforcing there is a strong foundation for change.
4.1 United KingdomThe United Kingdom has a national approach to urban planning and climate change.
The Planning Act 2008 (UK) provides the framework for a national spatial
planning system. Under the Act, the government of the United Kingdom can make
national planning statements. (The Act has recently been amended to enable the
government to make national policy statements on matters such as renewable
energy). It also provides for the establishment of an Infrastructure Planning
Commission to make decisions on applications for nationally significant
infrastructure projects.5
The Planning Act 2008 (UK) stems largely from the 2007 Barker Review of Land
Use Planning
6
We need to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases to meet the challenge of
climate change and use our natural resources wisely. At the same time we need
to support economic development so that we can generate high quality jobs in
the context of rapid globalisation. We also need to build more houses so that
people can afford decent homes. And we need to put the right infrastructure inplace to meet our needs for travel, energy, water and public services (UK
DCLG 2007a, Foreword).
and the Planning for a Sustainable Future: White Paper, whichstates the future challenges for the urban planning system:
This quote covers the range of competing policy priorities for urban and regional
planning systems, including climate change mitigation and adaptation.
The Office of Deputy Prime Minister (UK) published the Planning Policy Statement
1: Delivering Sustainable Developmentin 2005 (UK ODPM 2005). This was
followed by the Planning Policy Statement: Planning and Climate Change -
Supplement to Planning Policy Statement 1 (UK ODPM 2007) and the Planning Act
2008. National planning policy in the United Kingdom identifies as key roles for
urban planning, helping to:
secure enduring progress against the UKs emission targets, by direct influenceon energy use and emissions, and in bringing together and encouraging action
by others
deliver the Governments ambition of zero carbon development
shape sustainable communities that are resilient to and appropriate for theclimate change now accepted as inevitable;
create an attractive environment for innovation and for the private sector tobring forward investment, including in renewable and low-carbon technologies
and supporting infrastructure;
5 See infrastructure.independent.gov.uk6
See Reform of the planning system
www.communities.gov.uk/planningandbuilding/planning/planningpolicyimplementation/
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
32/63
29
capture local enthusiasm and give local communities real opportunities toinfluence, and take, action on climate change (UK ODPM 2007:9).
Subsequently, two more relevant national planning policy statements were released
the Planning Policy Statement 25: Development and Flood Riskand thePlanning Policy Statement: Eco-towns A supplement to Planning Policy
Statement 1. These planning policy statements supplement earlier statements by
addressing specific challenges for the built environment: increased inundation and
low carbon urban development.
The United Kingdom also adopted a set of nationally agreed shared sustainable
development principles to guide future decision making for all levels of
government. This landmark initiative to address climate change consisted of five
principles:
living within the environment
ensuring a strong, healthy and just community
achieving a sustainable economy
using sound science responsibly
promoting good governance.
Reinforcing this approach, the Royal Town Planning Institute has made seven
commitments on climate change:
promote behavioural change
adapt existing places
work towards responsive legislation and policies
improve current practice celebrate best practice
compile a compendium of best practice
develop climate change education and skills (RTPI 2009).
The United Kingdom has also established the Sustainable Development
Commission (SDC), which is responsible for providing independent advice on
sustainable development to the Prime Minister, the First Ministers of Scotland and
Wales and the First Minister and Deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland.7
The progressive work by the City of London is a good case study of urban planning
and climate change. Commencing with an award winning London Climate Change
Adaptation Strategy 2008, the City of London has more recently undertaken the
City of London Carbon Footprint project to determine the carbon footprint of the
City of London. In the Executive summary, the project report begins with the
statement that Climate change is the biggest environmental challenge facing the
world today, particularly for the worlds major cities, often cited as consuming
A
priority for the SDC is to apply the five principles of sustainable development
agreed to by the Government of the United Kingdom (including Northern Ireland)the Scottish Executive and the Welsh Assembly.
7 www.sd-commission.org.uk
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
33/63
30
more than 75%of the worlds energy and being responsible for 80% of greenhouse
gas emissions.8
The draft Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for London (GLA 2010) is
groundbreaking in that it tackles the social, economic and environment aspects of
climate change, and, in a very practical way, documents possible courses of action
at the local level within a broader national framework. Key issues identified for
London include managing flood risks, managing water resources, managing heat
risks and air pollution and managing ground conditions. The City of London is
reviewing local urban planning policies and controls to ensure that they support the
implementation measures for adaptation (City of London 2010).
The Mayor of London released theLondon Plan: Spatial Development Strategy for
Greater London Consultation draft replacement plan in October 2009:9
London has to be ready to deal with a warmer climate, and one likely to be
significantly wetter in the winter and drier during the summer. We also have to
play our part in making sure the extent and impacts of future climate change
are limited. Action taken now and over the period covered by the new Plan
will help reduce what has to be done for the years after that (GLA 2009:21).
United Kingdom initi atives on urban planning and climate change
Planning Policy Statement 25: Development and Flood Risk(2010)
Planning Policy Statement: Eco-towns A supplement to Planning PolicyStatement 1 (2009)
Planning Policy Statement: Planning and Climate Change - Supplement to
Planning Policy Statement 1 (2007)
Planning Policy Statement 1: Delivering Sustainable Development(2005)
Establishment of the Sustainable Development Commission
The London Plan: Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London
Consultation draft replacement plan (October 2009)
The draft Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for London (2010)
The City of London Carbon Footprintproject and report
The City of London Climate Change Adaptation Strategy (2010 update)
4.2 European Union
The European Union (EU) has long taken a leadership role in strategies addressing
spatial planning and climate change. Under the EU, it is now a requirement that
national spatial plans tackle climate change, including the planning systems. As
stated by the President of the European Commission, Jos Manuel Duro Barroso:
action on the economy or action against climate change is a false
dichotomy. These economic and environmental challenges must be tackled
together. Indeed, they are part and parcel of a strategy of smart, sustainable,
8 www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/CAA2442E-9825-401B-9D17-32DB163D83E4/0/SUS_CarbonFootprintreport.pdf9 www.london.gov.uk/shaping-london/london-plan/docs/london-plan.pdf
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
34/63
31
low carbon growth. Low carbon growth must be the hallmark of the post-crisis
economy.10
The European Union has looked at cities and climate change through the EU
Sustainable Development Strategy (renewed and adopted June 2006),
11which is an
overarching strategy for all EU policies which sets out how we can meet the needs
of present generations without compromising the ability of future generations to
meet their needs.12
climate change and clean energy
It covers a range of interrelated matters, including:
sustainable transport
sustainable consumption and production
conservation and management of natural resources
public health
social inclusion, demography and migration
global poverty.
The most recent paper on climate change adaptation by the EU is the White Paper
Adapting to Climate Change: Towards a European Framework for Action (EU
2009a). The White Paper presents the framework for adaptation measures and
policies to reduce the European Unions vulnerability to the impacts of climate
change.13
It also draws upon a range of national adaptation strategies already in
place in Denmark, Finland, Germany, France, Hungary, Netherlands, Spain,
Sweden and the United Kingdom. In June 2009, the Council of the European Union
welcome[d] the Commission White PaperAdapting to Climate Change: Towards a
European Framework for Action as a basis for developing a more strategic
approach to adaptation with the aim of having a European adaptation strategy in
place from 2013 (Section 2).14
The following three examples are EU projects stemming from the EU overarching
strategies about urban planning and climate change. First, the National Programme
for Spatial Adaptation to Climate Change (ARK), coordinated by the Ministry for
Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM) in the Netherlands builds
upon the National Spatial Strategy to address the impacts of climate change. The
program states that the overlap between climate-related and spatial planning issues
is giving rise to important new questions and challenges relating both to risks and
opportunities (VROM 2007:1). ARK is concerned with climate proofing of Dutch
spatial planning focusing on the following questions:
The same meeting specifically referred to theimpacts of climate change on urban planning, infrastructure and spatial planning
and stressed the need for cross-sectoral approach (Section 3).
what are the nature and scope of effects that can already be observed and effectsthat are expected to occur?
what spatial issues does this raise?
how can these spatial issues be tackled?
10www.europa-eu-un.org/articles/en/article_8829_en.htm
11 register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/06/st10/st10917.en06.pdf12 ec.europa.eu/sustainable/welcome/index_en.htm13
ec.europa.eu/environment/water/adaptation/index_en.htm14 www.europa-eu-un.org/articles/en/article_8822_en.htm
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
35/63
32
what technical, administrative, economic and social dilemmas do we encounterwhen we attempt to solve these spatial issues (VROM 2007:ii)?
TheNational Spatial Strategy for Ireland 2002 2020 is also concerned with
limitations on greenhouse gas emissions in the context of the [Irish] National
Climate Change Strategy, measures to support sustainable agriculture, and
initiatives to address the impact of transport on the environment in the wider
context of providing a coherent national planning framework to achieve a better
balance of social, economic and physical development supported by more effective
planning (IDEHLG 2001).
Second, the European Green Capital Awards is a tangible program where cities are
evaluated against a list of environmental criteria and one city is selected as the
European Green Capital of the year. The program brings together urban planning
and climate change challenges. The first winner of the European Green City for
2010 is Stockholm and Hamburg has been selected as the winner for 2011. The EU
states that the winner had a track record of integrated urban management, credible
green credential and ambitious plans for the future (EU 2009b).15
Third, the ADAM project (adaptation and mitigation strategies), which ran from
2006 to 2009, was funded by the European Commission. Under the project, 24
European research institutions examined strategies for climate change mitigation
and adaptation, and assessed and developed climate change policy options (ADAM
2009).
The award
provides an incentive for cities to be recognised for their achievements insustainability and gives a positive marketing image for subsequent investment.
The final report of the ADAM project draws a number of important conclusions. It
emphasises that effective climate policy involves a portfolio of both adaptation and
mitigation activities (ADAM 2009). More specifically, in relation to urbanplanning and climate change, the report concludes that scenario planning can be
very useful in assessing potential synergies and tradeoffs in more detail (e.g.
climate impacts on bio-energy; integrated urban planning; hydropower). The
important point emerging from this research is to confirm the importance of
involving stakeholders (including urban planners) in any adaptive management
process for capacity building.
European init iatives on urban planning and climate change
European Green Capital Award (from 2010)
European Commission White Paper Adapting to Climate Change: Towards aEuropean Framework for Action (2009)
The ADAM project (20062009)
EU Sustainable Development Strategy (renewed and adopted June 2006)
National spatial plans and national adaptation strategies (eg the Netherlands)
15 ec.europa.eu/environment/europeangreencapital/docs/apply/jury-report_2010_2011.pdf
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
36/63
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
37/63
34
During 2009, the Canadian Government launched the EQuilibrium Communities
Initiative to provide financial, technical and promotional assistance to sustainable
community projects selected through a national competition to showcase the
talents and innovation of Canadian residential developers, planners, designers and
municipalities. 19
energy
It is a joint project of the Canada Housing and Mortgage
Corporation and Natural Resources Canada. Six neighbourhood development
projects selected through the competition will be judged on:
land use and housing
water, waste water and storm water
transportation
natural environment
financial viability.20
The EQuilibrium Communities Initiative is a good example of a nationally funded
cross-sectoral project aimed at developing professional skills and excellence,delivering benefits to local communities and increasing resilience to climate change.
Canadian initiatives on u rban planning and climate change
Building Resilience to Climate Change in Human Settlementsprogram (2009)
EQuilibrium Communities Initiative (2009)
Sustainable Development Strategy 20072009
From Impacts to Adaptation: Canada in a Changing Climate 2007
Sustainable Development Act 2008
4.4 United States
On 27 July 2010, President Obama placed climate change clearly on the national
agenda in the United States with a proposed climate change bill; however, this has
not yet been accepted into legislation. The report Global Climate Change Impacts in
the United States previously outlined a range of climate impacts and the
interrelationship with population growth and urban settlements:
Climate change will interact with many social and environmental stresses.
Climate change will combine with pollution, population growth, overuse of
resources, urbanization, and other social, economic, and environmentalstresses to create larger impacts than any one of these alone (Karl et al.
2009:101).
The report makes ten key findings, two of which are particularly relevant to urban
planning and climate change:
coastal areas are at increasing risk from sea level rise and storm surge(Finding 6)
climate change will interact with many social and environmental stresses(Finding 8).
19www.ecoaction.gc.ca/equilibrium-eng.cfm
20 www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/en/inpr/su/eqsucoin/index.cfm
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
38/63
35
These findings are just as relevant in Australia; they confirm the need to develop
much stronger links between urban planning and climate change. Importantly the
report calls for a rethink of urban planning as a result of climate change:
The movement of populations into harms way creates a rising baseline of
insured losses upon which the consequences of climate change will be
superimposed. These observations confirm a recurring theme in this report: the
past cannot be used as a basis for planning for the future (Karl et al.2009:105).
Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States documents a range of case
studies throughout the United States, placing a significant emphasis on urban
planning policies and processes to deal with the impacts on infrastructure and
development of climate change, including urban heat stress and sea level rise. It
concludes that there is a substantial gap between the available information about
climate change and the development of new guidelines for infrastructure such as
housing, transportation, water systems, commercial buildings, and energy systems
(Karl et al. 2009:156).
In the United States, urban planning and climate change are being specifically
addressed at the city level. The New York City plan (PlaNYC)21
and the New York
City Panel on Climate Change (NYCPCC) are examples of serious attempts to bring
the issues of urban planning and climate change closer together. The New York
example provides a possible template for a more integrated approach to planning for
climate change. The PlaNYC Progress Report 201022 foreshadows the release of the
comprehensive Climate Change Adaptation in New York City: Building a Risk
Management Response .23
The NYCPCC was established during 2008 as a key recommendation of PlaNYC.
With the financial support of the Rockefeller Foundations Developing Climate
Change Resilience program, the New York City Council has established a panelincluding a wide range of stakeholders to prepare a climate plan of action for the
city. Its first major report- Climate Risk Information focuses on future risks to city
infrastructure (NYCPCC 2009). In its opening statement, the report states that
Climate change poses a range of hazards to New York City and its infrastructure.
These changes suggest a need for the city to rethink the way it operates and adapts
to its evolving environment.
The City of Chicagos Chicago Climate Action Plan is another example that has
been inclusive in its approach, focussing on five key areas:
energy efficient buildings
clean and renewable energy sources
improved transportation options
reduced waste and industrial pollution
adaptation. 24
21 www.nyc.gov/html/planyc203022 www.nyc.gov/html/planyc2030/downloads/pdf/planyc_progress_report_2010.pdf23
Click through from www.nyc.gov/html/planyc2030/html/downloads/download.shtml24 www.chicagoclimateaction.org
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
39/63
36
There are a number of programs within the Chicago Climate Action Plan, many
involving urban planning. The City of Chicago has prepared a guide outlining the
experience of preparing its climate action plan Chicagos Guide to Completing
an Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy (City of Chicago 2009).
These city climate change plans are indicative of a range of projects occurring
throughout the United States at the local level. The connection between urban
planning and climate change is integral to implementing these plans and the work
being done at the national level. Links between these two levels of government is
critical to achieving long-term change. The United States climate change bill is
generating broader discussion on how to incorporate national measures into
citywide urban measures, to help deliver the national objectives of climate change
mitigation and adaptation.
United States initiatives on u rban planning and cl imate change
White House Office of Urban Affairs 2009
United States climate change bill 2009
Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States report 2009
New York Panel on Climate Change 2008
PlaNYC (from 2009)
Chicago Climate Action Plan (from 2006)
4.5 Asia-Pacific region
In the Asia-Pacific region, a considerable number of national or city-specific,
projects have been set up with particular focuses on the impacts of sea level rise,
extreme weather events, desertification and the planning for urbanisation andclimate change. There are too many to be summarised here. International
organisations, such as United Nations agencies and the World Bank, are involved,
which indicates the importance of urbanisation and climate change in the Asia-
Pacific region, where cities are expanding rapidly as evidenced in the United
Nations State of Worlds Cities 2008/2009: Harmonious Cities (UN-HABITAT
2009a) and State of Worlds Cities 2009/2010: Bridging the Urban Divide (UN-
HABITAT 2010).
At the international level, the World Bank with partners including the Organisation
for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and UN-HABITAT hosted
the urban research symposium Cities and Climate Change: Responding to anUrgent Agenda in 2009 to better understand climate change and cities. The
symposium focused on five research clusters:
understanding and measuring how cities impact, and are impacted by, climatechange
planning efficiently and effectively to increase the resilience of cities
improving management, coordination, and planning of cities to meet climatechange challenges
understanding how and why cities respond to climate change
understanding and reducing vulnerability of urban populations to climatechange.
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
40/63
37
At the regional level, the UN and World Bank are supporting a range of initiatives
to better understand the impact of climate change on communities and to develop
mitigation and adaptation measures. Partnerships in Environmental Management for
the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA) is one such initiative, which is an example of
regional cooperation in Australias immediate region, PEMSEA has built up shared
knowledge and experience in the Southeast Asia-Pacific region on integrated
coastal management through partnerships between governments, agencies andacross a range of sectors. In the past, PEMSEA has focused on the environmental
challenges of coastal management, but now is also interested in planning for climate
change. This is not surprising given that most urbanisation is occurring on
coastlines.
PEMSEA organised the East Asian Seas Congress 2009 with the theme:
Partnerships at Work: Local Implementation and Good Practices in the Philippines
in November 2009. At the congress, the third PEMSEA Ministerial Forum
Adaptation to Climate Change through Integrated Coastal and Ocean Management
focused on increasing ecosystem resilience. The Manila Declaration, signed by
Cambodia, China, Korea, Indonesia, Japan, Lao, Philippines, Korea, Singapore,
Timor-Leste and Vietnam, resolved in part to recognize that our region needs toenhance its capacity building efforts in order to adequately reduce the risks posed
by climate change to sustainable development (PEMSEA 2009). Such agreements
by neighbouring nations are relevant to developing Australian policy responses,
particularly in relation to adaptive planning for low-lying urban areas in the Asia-
Pacific region.
Although land use systems in the Asia-Pacific region are generally different to
Australian urban planning systems, there are opportunities for shared knowledge
and understanding on these critical issues. There are also avenues for Australian
engagement in programs, such as participation by Australian firms in the carbon
neutral sustainable city Dongtan, near Shanghai in China.
Asia-Pacific initiatives on urban planning and c limate change
Manila Declaration at the East Asian Seas Congress 2009 on adaptation toclimate change through integrated coastal and ocean management 2009
World Bank urban research symposium Cities and Climate Change: Respondingto an Urgent Agenda 2009
United Nations and World Bank funding programs on climate change and
communities
Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of South East Asia(PEMSEA)
Dongtan near Shanghai, China, a carbon neutral sustainable city.
4.6 C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group
C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group is a network of large cities including
Melbourne and Sydney committed to addressing issues of climate change. It is
supported financially by the Clinton Climate Initiative.
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
41/63
38
Key initiatives of C40 Cities include:
the Carbon Finance Capacity Building program with a three-year objective ofraising awareness and examining how carbon finance activities could work
effectively at a city level
the Climate Positive Development Program, initiated to meet the dualchallenge of rapid urban growth and climate change by setting a new global
benchmark for leadership in large-scale urban development
the Clinton Climate Initiative City programs to help C40 cities create andconsume energy more sustainably.
The C40 Cities group hosts C40 Large Cities Climate Summits for mayors, senior
staff and business leaders from major cities. In Copenhagen, at the UN Climate
Change Conference in December 2009, the City of Copenhagen hosted the
Copenhagen Climate Change Summit for Mayors with cooperation from C40 Cities
and ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability.
Sydney 2008
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
42/63
39
5 Nat ional engagement in urban pol icyand cl imate change
The examples discussed in previous section provide an insight to international and
national experience on urban planning for climate change, with a wide range ofapproaches. The challenge is to identify the contributions that climate change
policies can make to building more sustainable and resilient cities in Australia.
As discussed elsewhere in this paper, urbanisation and climate change are two
major global challenges for national policy, as evidenced by the 2010
Intergenerational Report on demographic and population growth (Australian
Government 2010) and the outcomes of the Climate Change Conference 2009 in
Copenhagen. They present significant policy challenges for a sustainable urban
future, but also significant opportunities to make the transition to a low carbon and
resilient urban future.
This section draws upon the discussion from the previous sections barriers to
planning and possible policy responses, Australian and international initiatives in
urban planning and climate change to outline a possible pathway for the
Australian Government on planning for climate change and cities. A particular
focus is the role the Australian Government can play in facilitating planning
responses at all levels of government, and with industry and the community.
Australia is one of the most urbanised nations in the world (DEH 1996, 2001, 2006)
and the impacts of climate change are projected to affect major urban areas. Given
the high levels of engagement by global organisations and leaders, and the range of
activities already occurring at the state and local level, the Australian Governmenthas the opportunity to provide the critical connection between the global and the
local, to build an effective bridge to facilitate action on planning for climate change.
In reviewing some of the international and Australian experiences discussed in this
paper, a number of key points emerge:
National policy frameworks for both urban settlements and climate changeplanning exist, and many countries have the equivalent of a national sustainable
development strategy (United Kingdom, European Union, Canada, United
States)
A combination of mitigation and adaptation strategies are necessary for
managing climate change and cities.
Urban planning needs to be better connected with emergency management toplan for more extreme weather events.
New locations for urban development need to be identified, to accommodate thepossible relocation of existing urban communities after extreme weather events
and to accommodate the pressures of urban growth in existing metropolitan
areas. A national settlements policy would place Australia in a better position of
preparedness in the event of disaster.
Many global organisations and governments at all levels are engaged inidentifying and funding programs so that urban and regional planning systems
are better equipped to respond to climate change.
-
8/6/2019 Low Carbon Resilient Urban Future
43/63
40
There is increasing global and regional cooperation in sharing knowledge andlearning between nations and cities (eg C40 Cities, PEMSEA, UN-HABITAT,
Clinton Climate Initiative).
Professional and industry training is required to develop skills to meet thedemands of building carbon neutral and more resilient built environments.
Best practice programs and projects should be funded to demonstrate andrecognise innovation, particularly at the regional and local level (eg EU Green
Capital City awards, national awards, funding by philanthropic organisations,
DCCEE Local Adaptation Pathways Program).
The Australia Government has an important role in providing a strategic approach
to settlement planning for climate change. This paper raises some discussion points.
Many are not new, but have been recommended in various forms over the last
decade of national inquiries into urban policy, cities and climate change. Issues are
also been raised around the growing body of research on coastal development and
climate change, and the need for a national approach to climate change and coastal
communities (G