Long-term musical training alters the interaction between frames of reference
-
Upload
simon-landry -
Category
Science
-
view
14 -
download
0
Transcript of Long-term musical training alters the interaction between frames of reference
1
Long-term musical training alters the interaction between frames of referenceSimon P. LandryDoctoral candidate | Université de Montréal, CanadaPresented at the International Multisensory Research Forum Suzhou, ChinaJune 15th, 2016
2
Introduction• Musical training can alter sensory abilities (Herholz et al.,
2012)• Musicians have faster tactile RTs (Landry et al.,
submitted)• Crossed arm TOJ task (Yamamoto et al., 2001).
• RTs increases when the SOA decrease (Yamamoto et al., 2001; Heed et al., 2012).
• No significant difference between groups with pianists• Excluded “inverted responses” (Kobor et al., 2006).• Can eliminate a significant differences (Cadieux et al., 2010).
• The impact of musical training on this task and its RT remains unknown.
3
Objective• Investigate the crossed-arm TOJ task in musicians and
measure reaction times.
4
Participants• Musicians (n=17)
• 6 males; 11 females• mean age=24• Mean musical training: 92th percentile
• Control group (n=20)• 5 males; 15 females• mean age=24• Mean musical training: 34th percentile
5
Methodology (Cadieux et al., 2010)
• Participants indicated which cube vibrated first using foot pedals.
• 8 stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) :• ±400ms, ±200ms, ±100ms, ±50ms• + = right first, - = left first• 40 times in random order
• Arms uncrossed and crossed.• Uncrossed: Indicate which side vibrated first• Crossed: Indicate which side in space vibrated first
• Unspeeded reaction times were recorded for every stimulation.
Crossed-arm TOJ
-400 -200 0 200 4000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Controls: uncrossed
Musicians: uncrossed
Stimulus onset asychrony (ms)
Pro
porti
on "
Rig
ht fi
rst"
resp
onse
s
6
Crossed-arm TOJ
-400 -200 0 200 4000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Controls: uncrossed
Controls: crossed
Musicians: uncrossed
Musicians: crossed
Stimulus onset asychrony (ms)
Pro
porti
on "
Rig
ht fi
rst"
resp
onse
s
7
Crossed-arm TOJ
-400 -200 0 200 4000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Controls: uncrossed
Controls: crossed
Musicians: uncrossed
Musicians: crossed
Stimulus onset asychrony (ms)
Pro
porti
on "
Rig
ht fi
rst"
resp
onse
s
2
3
4
5
PC
D s
core
*
8
9
Reaction times: Uncrossed posture
-400 -200 -100 -50 50 100 200 400200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600Controls
Musicians
Stimulus Onset Asynchrony (ms)
Reac
tion
time
(ms)
*
*
**
10
Reaction times: Crossed posture
-400 -200 -100 -50 50 100 200 400400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000Controls
Musicians
Stimulus Onset Asynchrony (ms)
Reac
tion
time
(ms)
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
11
Discussion• Musicians have a higher PCD score.
• More incorrect responses in the crossed condition.• Musicians have faster RTs:
• all crossed SOAs• -200ms, -100ms, -50ms, and 50ms uncrossed SOAs
• Faster musician RT could cause incorrect responses.• In accordance with a theory proposed by Shore et al. (2002)• No time to consolidate conflicting information before TOJ response.
• New understanding of the behavioural mechanism underlying the crossed-arm TOJ task.
• Novel insight on the effects of musical training on sensory abilities.