Long-Lasting Insecticide-treated Bednet Supplier ... GF Sub Sahara LLIN ... India Royal Sentry...
Transcript of Long-Lasting Insecticide-treated Bednet Supplier ... GF Sub Sahara LLIN ... India Royal Sentry...
Long-Lasting Insecticide-treated Bednet Supplier Conference - Geneva - 13 May 2013
AGENDA
Time Title and Objectives
8.30-9.00 Welcome Coffee and Registration
9.00-9.45 Introduction, Objectives and Agenda: Alan Court, Special Advisor, UN Special Envoy Office
9.45-10.15 Welcoming remarks: Christopher Game, Chief Procurement Officer Keynote Speech: Dr. Mark Dybul, Executive Director
10.15-10.45 Coffee break
10.45-12.30 Setting the Scene: Global Fund: Where we are today and our new approach to supplier management - Christopher Game / Mariatou Tala Jallow PMI: Approach to procurement and Challenges – Megan Fotheringham, Public Health Adviser UNICEF: Approach to procurement and challenges – Elena Trajkovska, Contracts Specialist IVCC: Barriers to innovation – Dr. Tom McLean, Chief Operating Officer RX360: Overview and Structure-Lynn Byers VP GSK RBM HWG/ALMA: LLINs in Africa – Melanie Renshaw, Chief Technical Officer (ALMA), RBM HWG Co-Chair
12.30-13.30 Lunch
13.30-14.30 The New Approach in the context of LLIN and the implications for suppliers – Christopher Game Q&A
14.30-1600 The Supplier Perspective: Group Discussion and Plenary Presentation 1. What worked well and not so well under the previous arrangements? 2. What are the key get rights for the Global Fund and partner agencies to make this work?
1600-1645 Executive Forum with Buyers Q&A
16.45-17.00 A re-cap on the day and next steps
The Global Fund
LLIN Supplier Conference
Geneva Monday 13th May 2013
1
Today’s Agenda: am
3
Time Title and Objectives
8.30-9.00 Welcome Coffee and Registration
9.00-9.45 Introduction, Objectives and Agenda: Alan Court, Special Advisor, UN Special
Envoy Office
9.45-10.15 Welcoming remarks: Christopher Game, Chief Procurement Officer
Keynote Speech: Dr. Mark Dybul, Executive Director
10.15-10.45 Coffee break
10.45-12.30 Setting the Scene:
Global Fund: Where we are today and our new approach to supplier
management - Christopher Game / Mariatou Tala Jallow
PMI: Approach to procurement and Challenges – Megan Fotheringham, Public
Health Adviser
UNICEF: Approach to procurement and challenges – Elena Trajkovska,
Contracts Specialist
IVCC: Barriers to innovation – Dr. Tom McLean, Chief Operating Officer
RX360: Overview and Structure-Lynn Byers VP GSK
RBM HWG/ALMA: LLINs in Africa – Melanie Renshaw, Chief Technical Officer
Today’s Agenda: pm
4
Time Title and Objectives
12.30-13.30 Lunch
13.30-14.30 The New Approach in the context of LLIN and the implications for
suppliers – Christopher Game
Q&A
14.30-1600 The Supplier Perspective: Group Discussion and Plenary Presentation
1. What worked well and not so well under the previous arrangements?
2. What are the key get rights for the Global Fund and partner agencies to
make this work?
1600-1645 Executive Forum with Buyers
Questions & Answers
16.45-17.00 A re-cap on the day and next steps
6
Introducing
a mass
murderer
Malaria in Perspective
In Countries where Malaria is prevalent
average life span can be as low as 30
Malaria in Perspective
Malaria has shaped Africa in terms of
Colonization - Independence then shaped
Malaria
Malaria in Perspective
• Affects 500 Million people world wide
• 50 Million dead in the last 15 years
• 85% of those are children
• 1 Child dies every 20 seconds
Malaria in Perspective
And now a personal
experience :
For those of you who have read Great
Expectations by Charles Dickens,
these are Pip’s graves. Dickens lived
at Shorne, near to this Church in
Cooling, Kent half an hour from
London in the United Kingdom.
These graves are in fact those of the
Comport Children, none is more than a
meter long, and if memory serves me
correctly there are 11 or 12 of them.
They died of Malaria, not far from one
of the worlds great cities.
200 years ago.
14
Investing for Impact and The Global Fund Strategy
Procurement for Impact P4I
LLIN Procurement Facts and Figures
The Global Fund: Where
we are today and our new
approach to supplier
management
Christopher Game
Mariatou Tala Jallow
A historical perspective
15
0
20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
80,000,000
100,000,000
120,000,000
140,000,000
160,000,000
Total GF Sub Sahara LLIN Deliveries by year
2004 -2010 saw a dramatic increase in the in the supply of LLIN
before a subsequent sharp decline
Looking Forward
16
0
20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
80,000,000
100,000,000
120,000,000
140,000,000
160,000,000
180,000,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
GF LLIN Actual and Forecast orders against estimated requirement
A gap existed between the number required to maintain coverage
and the planned volumes. This was leading to short lead time
orders
Estimated number to maintain coverage (UNICEF)
GF forecast volume
Currently unplanned
A Revised Outlook
17
We now have sufficient data to provide a more detailed forecast
for 2014
0.00
20,000,000.00
40,000,000.00
60,000,000.00
80,000,000.00
100,000,000.00
120,000,000.00
2012 2013 2014
No
of
LL
IN
VPP
Non VPP
WHOPES approved suppliers
18
Company Product Name
Material BASF, Switzerland Interceptor
Polyester Bayer (PTY) Ltd, South Africa LifeNet
Polypropylene Bestnet (Insect Intelligence ,
Denmark Netprotect
Polyethylene Disease Control Technologies,
India Royal Sentry
Polyethylene Net Health Ltd, Tanzania Olyset Plus
Polyethylene Shobikaa Impex Pvt Ltd, India Duranet
Polyethylene Sumitomo Chemical Co. Ltd,
Japan Olyset
Polyethylene Tana Netting (NRS), Dubai DawaPlus 2.0
Polyester Tinajin Yorkool International
Trading Co. Ltd, China Yorkool LN
Polyster Vestergaard Frandsen,
Switzerland PermaNet 2.0 Polyester
PermaNet 2.5 Polyester
PermaNet 3.0 Polyester
Polyester / polyethylene VKA Polymers Pvt Ltd, MAGNet
Polyethylene
Supplier Name Product
Kuse Lace Co, Japan Aka Net
A to Z Textile,
Tanzania
MiraNet
Life Ideas Textiles,
China
PandaNet 1.0
PandaNet 2.0
Fujian Yamein
Industries, China
Yahe LN
There are 11 approved suppliers and 5 more products currently
going through the approval process
Price Analysis
19
Prices have dropped 45% since Q3 2009 caused by factors
including excess capacity and the new ‘generic’ suppliers
Further pricing analysis
20
A snapshot analysis has revealed the
following key statistics:
1. In 2012 VPP LLIN agency fees were 2.4%
and freight 5% of total spend.
2. There are large variations in price driven by,
specification, order size, country of
manufacture.
3. In 2012 the largest like for like variation in
cost was 29%
4. VPP purchased nets were on average 13%
cheaper than those purchased directly by
PR during 2011.
Market Capacity and Forecast Demand
21
Market Capacity 175m-200m
(excludes potential new entrants)
Market demand 90m-160m
Current excess capacity is not dramatic if replenishment levels
are attained , this is evidenced by new entrants. It is anticipated
GF will provide half the market demand.
Some graphics courtesy of PRESENTATIONPRO
Conclusions
22
• Current market competition is intense and set to increase with
new entrants.
• To succeed suppliers will need to differentiate themselves by
exploiting advantages in their cost base and levels of innovation.
• Future demand is set to be flat to increasing and still offers
significant business opportunities
• GF needs to maximise its position in the market by improving its
leverage, ordering profile and forward visibility.
• There is also significant cost across the supply chain that needs
to be optimised
23
Investing for Impact and The Global Fund Strategy
Procurement for Impact P4I
LLIN Procurement Facts and Figures
The fight goes on
24
2000 2010-12
Metric 2000 Latest
Sub –Saharan
ARV therapy 50,000 6milion
4.5 million treatments
TB Case
Detection 43% 67%
TB Treatment
Success 67% 87%
9.7 million treatments
LLIN
Ownership 5% 53%
310m nets provided
Progress However
2012
HIV/AIDS TB Deaths
2,700,000
Malaria Deaths (2010)
600,000
2014-16
Future Funding required and targeted
in period
HIV/
AIDS
$58bn
TB
$15bn
Malaria
$14bn
Other
$61bn
TGF
$15bn
$87m $76m
Maximising the value from procurement will contribute to the
number of lives saved
The Global Fund Strategy 1.
26
Strategic Objectives
1. Invest more
strategically
2. Evolve the
funding model
3. Actively support
grant implementation
process
Str
ate
gic
Acti
on
s
1.1 Focus on the highest
impact countries interventions
and populations while keeping
the fund global
1.2 Fund based on quality
national strategies and
through national systems
1.3 Maximise the impact of the
Global Fund investments on
strengthening health systems
1.4 Maximise the impact of
Global Fund investments on
improving the health of
mothers and children
2.1 Replace the rounds
system with a more
flexible and effective model
• Iterative, dialogue
based system
• Early preparation of
implementation
• More flexible,
predictable funding
opportunities
2.2 Facilitate the strategic
refocusing of existing
investments
3.1 Actively manage grants
based on impact, value for
money and risk
3.2 Enhance the quality and
efficiency of grant
implementation
3.3 Make partnerships work
to improve grant
implementation.
27
Strategic Objectives
4. Promote and protect human
rights
5. Sustain the gains, mobilise
resources
4.1 Ensure that the Global Fund does not
support programs that infringe human rights
4.2 Increase investments in programs that
address human rights related barriers to
access
4.3 Integrate human rights considerations
throughout the grant cycle.
5.1 Increase the sustainability of Global
Fund supported programs
5.2 Attract additional funding from current
and new sources
Strategic
Enablers Enhance partnerships to deliver results
Transform to improve Global Fund governance, operations
and fiduciary controls
The Global Fund Strategy 2.
28
Investing for Impact and The Global Fund Strategy
Procurement for Impact P4I
LLIN Background and Challenge
The P4i Vision
29
The Global Fund will become the benchmark organisation in the sector for Sourcing and Procurement
Minimising waste and eliminating non value adding
activities
Using simple, clear leading edge processes and tools
designed by and for the organisation
Ensuring effective governance and watertight compliance
With measurable performance
in value and lives saved
Building collaborative relationships with partner agencies suppliers and donors
Is directly aligned to the Global Funds objectives
• Procurement based on forecast
demand • Long term, multi agency,
collaborative contracts • Understanding of total cost of
ownership across supply chain • ‘Remote’ inventory forecasting
for VPP • A standardised project based
approach. • Contractually assured best price
promulgated to all PR
What will change:
Core Products (including LLIN)
30
• Reactive procurement based on
grant disbursement • Spot tendering through PSA • Minimal cross agency leverage • Lack of cost visibility in product
and logistics • Stockouts and missed delivery
windows • Lack of standardised processes
between Sourcing and PSM • Wide discrepancy in prices
between VPP and non VPP purchasing
Today 12 Months
• Global category management for
non core spend • Enhanced commercial capability
to support value creation • Knowledge management systems • Detailed, on-going global spend
analysis • Process simplification and
standardisation to allow focus on value creation
• Management by objective • Information technology to
support co-ordinated action
What will change:
Non-Core Products and Enabling activities
31
• Little sourcing penetration in
non-core products • Limited commercial ‘ownership’
of the acquisition process • Fragmented market knowledge • Partial understanding of spend
profile • Complex processes for
straightforward secretariat purchasing
• Management by ‘heroism’ • Lack of co-ordination between
information and action
•
Today 12 Months
Achieving the Vision
32
Our objective: To Increase Access to Products
By fundamentally changing the way we work across the supply chain
Earlier involvement and closer
collaboration with
manufacturers
Improving our purchasing
capability and changing our contracting
models
Optimising the international supply chain
to reduce cost
Better planning and
scheduling to support
continuity of supply
Delivering more products at the right time and place to more
people
The Impact on the Ground
33
Multi agency demand
is combined to develop
long term forecasts
supported by the new
funding model
GF will negotiate direct
with manufacturers
offering longer term
contracts in return for
open book best pricing
GF wants open
collaborative supplier
relationships to drive
innovation and reduce
cost.
Operational
procurement will be
shared between direct
relationships with
logistics providers and
PSA.
PR will have access to
best pricing and able to
order core and non-
core items to fulfil
their requirements
The process will be
supported by improved
knowledge
management,
benchmarking and
technology to provide
improved purchasing
support for PRs.
Internal processes will
be improved to support
capability development
and maintain continuity
of supply
Improved Access to Products
The Benefits of the new Approach
34
$43m $85m $128m
$85m $170m $255m
$128m $255m $383m
25% 50% 75%
5%
10%
15%
% of $3bn Spend addressed
Op
tim
isat
ion
B
en
efit
For the Fund and its recipients For our suppliers
Greater visibility of requirements will support better capacity utilisation
Longer term relationships reduce the cost of sale and support better planning and more investment
Joint collaboration will reduce overall cost without jeopardising returns
What does this mean for our Suppliers?
35
We want a new style of relationship that moves away from
price centric spot tendering
We are prepared to enter into longer term contracts with
forecast volumes that will allow you to run your
businesses more effectively.
In return we will require a more open and collaborative
style which means working with us in a straightforward,
honest fashion.
We will adjust our level of business with you dependent
on your performance with us and our buying partners.
This afternoon we will share with you how we intend to
achieve these aims in our LLIN procurement
Zero tolerance of non compliance with Global Fund
policies
The Organisational Model to Support the Change
36
Malaria HIV/AIDS TB API
KM
Business
Planning Supply
Chain
Manager Manager
Core Products Procurement
Non Core Products and Indirects Procurement
Portfolio (Country Management)
CPO
The new organisational model provides greater emphasis on supplier
engagement and a focus across the complete supply chain
LLIN in the context of the overall Vision
38
Earlier involvement and closer
collaboration with manufacturers
Improving our purchasing
capability and changing our contracting
models
Optimising the international
supply chain to reduce cost
Better planning and scheduling to
support continuity of supply
Delivering more products at the right
time and place to more people
This morning we looked at our overall approach to Procurement
This afternoon we shall focus specifically on LLIN
At the moment we have many questions
We want to work with you to find the answers
Our Focus
39
This is about increasing access to products through a direct
relationship, reduced cost and supply chain optimisation.
We acknowledge businesses need to make a return
• Maintain business continuity
• Re-investment
If your return is reasonable we will be prepared to protect it and even
incentivise you based on performance against our key objectives
Production
Inbound Freight
Raw Materials
Distribution
Margin
• Total cost of • Ownership • Continuity of supply • Quality
Market dynamics (Commodity
prices)
Market sustainability
Labour arbitrage
Specification and product life
Order profiling
Payment mechanisms
Supply chain structure Quality and Lead times
Our focus
40
1. To create value for the Global Fund in LLIN through improved sourcing and
greater understanding of the market.
2. To develop a new supply chain model incorporating direct vendor management, an
updated approach to pooled procurement and improved delivery to recipients.
3. To develop new processes including forecasting to improve net availability in line
with country programmes
4. To move towards standardisation of specifications to simplify procurement
5. To reduce the risk associated with the LLIN supply chain
6. To engage with other agencies and suppliers to drive innovation and
collaboration
7. Where appropriate to encourage local manufacturing to WHO standards without de-
stabilising the market.
Objectives of LLIN Project
41
Project Structure
LLIN forms a pilot for our new ways of working and we have put
together a project team who will work with you to deliver our
objectives.
We are aligning with partners
Planning and Forecasting
42
TGF provides a 12 month master schedule for overall capacity required. Updated quarterly
Master schedule is turned into detailed forecast by product type. Blanket orders are placed by TGF for core products
Call off orders are placed 2014 VPP, thereafter all.
Fixed
Call off orders (M) M-3
months M-6
months
+/-
10%
Master Schedule Detailed Plan
Manufacturing starts earlier
with volumes underwritten by TGF.
Payment structures adjusted
We propose a new scheduling and ordering process to optimise
capacities combined with an earlier payment mechanism. (All figures and dates illustrative)
We want your input to help design the solution
Plans will be mapped to the rainy
seasons
+/-
30%
Improving our forecasting accuracy
43
To support our new planning process we will change the way we
interact with our primary recipients. This approach will also be
facilitated by the new funding proposals
Today The Future
Demands are triggered by
PSM plans which are
presented in an
inconsistent format.
Overall demand is
calculated reactively by
hand
Orders are placed on PSA
for onward transmission to
manufacturers
Overall demand will be
calculated from available
funding
This demand will be placed
on manufacturers as an
underwritten volume
Detailed PR requirements
will be presented in a
consistent format
We will use a planning tool
to convert our forecast in
to specific orders by type
44
Element Approach Typical Questions
Managing the Physical Supply Chain
We want to work with you to examine each element of the supply
chain to see how we can make improvements.
Wh
at is
the m
ost e
ffectiv
e w
ay to
dep
loy P
SA
in V
PP
to s
up
po
rt t ou
r ob
jectiv
es
Specifications and Quality
45
• Specification
Work has started on the standardising specifications and this will
continue. we want your input and ideas and engagement with
WHOPES to maintain the momentum.
• Quality
To date the focus has been on third party quality control (checking
the products are of the required quality). We now want to include other
elements of quality assurance.
The Commercial Relationship
46
To ensure we maintain a competitive price in a longer term
contractual framework we will need to change our commercial
model.
How we want to work with our suppliers
47
These changes imply a different way of working together………and
we expect the bulk of our orders to be placed as part of a framework
contract.
TGF LLIN Suppliers PSA PR
Framework Contracts
• Selected Suppliers • Bulk Volumes • Target priced • Collaborative
• Order execution, QC • and logistics
• Aggregated demand • New Funding model
Tenders • Spot orders • Benchmarking • Small volume
+ 80%
20%
The Implications for our Suppliers
48
1
2
3
4
5
A Closer, more strategic relationship
With appropriate governance and regular reviews. 1
Longer term contracts
supported by increased focus on planning and
scheduling
Collaboration to drive continuous improvement
Joint teams working together to achieve specific
objectives
Our Commitment
We are committed to this way forward and will
ensure our people have the right skills and
attitude to make it work.
A fair return
Based on market norms and with the opportunity for
incentivisation.
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
The Proposed Timeline
49
Initial
Concept
Co-plan
with
UNICEF
PSA
Alignment
Supplier Conference
Supplier
Feedback
Supplier Engagement and selection
Finalise design and then build
Contracting
Potential joint RFP
Design finalisation Go live
Note 1
Note 1: the joint RFP will represent a move in our direction of travel but may not incorporate all the end state requirements
Next Steps
50
We have shared our thoughts with you
Now we would like your feedback
This afternoon we would request your thoughts in open
forum
Tomorrow we will meet individually to decide the way
forward.
Looking Back: What went well
52
• Competition…but the equivalence process made the competition not level
• Transparency in the tendering process
• Circulation of the bid opening report gave opportunity to become more
competitive. Supplier had opportunity to correct mistake and change price
on any new or unused capacity
• Fair and relatively transparent process through VPP
• Reducing timeframe and ensuring shorter procurement order process
• VPP reduces risk exposure in comparison to local tenders
• Establishing the volume created the market and brought down prices
• A pool of suppliers brought down the price but no innovation followed
• Created market and opportunities
• Visibility of orders and money from VPP
• Created need for harmonisation
• VPP reduces corruption
• Some kind of centralised and harmonised system
• Price reductions through economies of scale
Looking Back: What went not so well…
53
• Speed of disbursement , lack of demand pooling and forecast
• VPP not voluntary
• Non commodity cost gaps not covered through funding
• VPP not smooth payments
• Lots of short lead time orders
• Unclear and undefined objectives for innovation, no incentive for innovation
• Non standard processes
• VPP not exactly voluntary
• Delays in funding owing to risk averse environment
• Disconnect with country expectation for lead times
• No pool effect
• Too long a lead time from grant signature to contract
• No technical evaluation of proposals
• Lack of visibility of production capacity
• Product quality and poor technical specification
• Poor issue resolution
• Violation of the normative space
• Time wastage through cancellations, changes of specs etc
• Payment terms
Key “get rights” going forward
54
• Better planning and forecasting
• Set up quality assurance mechanisms building national capacity
• Set up mechanism to review country generated procurement decisions
• Need to involve end users
• Work with existing solutions, don’t invent all the solutions
• Criteria for selection for LTA
• Value not cost
• Be transparent about processes
• Identify best possible proxies for GF in country presence
• Resolve PSM bottlenecks
• Have adequate in house procurement capability
• Categorise products based on quality and durability
• Respect normative space and IP
• Guidance on non-value of post shipment inspection
• Make sure PRs understand implications of new model
• Steady money flow
• Commitment
• Responsiveness to PRs and manufacturers
• Do not lose sight of country preferences