(034) :JgL.uJ o!.ll.oJlCi.u:ll:;l+96611 467 44 47 ..Ail&-966 1146742 53 ..,u5L9

ti.,!:J~I~J.LII~111451",,~J.l12455 W.,p

www.ksu.edu.sa

ci.......s2.... ~ ".:lQS2.uI dJ..oJ IKing Saud University

nlrll~ru~ ..

,. L..o:i'll ,.l.....iJ ,.~j.tt ;;.,..'1 t ;;~Ia.M

,.L..o:i'lt u~.J u~j.tl ul.,..'11 ;;~1a.M

I~.J III ~~..H.J .JJt ~.JJ jO'J'e ,.~tl.7'-"4J1 rL..1J 0-'~13 L.....oWId; ,'?':" !1L,l\U ' '70).;--:9 ~:~

U\.L, 3 [~ ~ ~ I~ I 0La" (~..)-") .A' l.r•.../AI , l. t:-'...J t:;,. ,..Iy;..ll .A' l.n/,H A

wl.,JLbJ I/ ,-;-,).lb1J l:~ 1~ t..9~ ~ J.:->- jj '-:!Ji ~ ,..I~ 13j-J~ ,) L, l\

.,!IL,l\ rL....1l1 ~,

t:-'...J L..:;,>~~)' I ..LJ,.r:J1~ \"s.:i..ll£_...J iY" j '0 >.J I 1~ 1 ; O! 0 • ; I l..1lW 13'(I" '1'• 'AI' . / V) .A' l. l. • / , / rv

~ u~ J~ ¥lbtl/.,.ulbtl"I~iI"!!;;,l 4.oj~1 '::'I.J~~I~.)-! 0j~ ~

~~ ~ 01~ ,~)lc.l , )L, l\ ~ )~ ~ ~l;jl ~I ~ 4=Jl.)L;J,13 ~~I,

..A , l. l. . / , l.n ~W I '?""" I.)...u1~ 10-" \},~<:.1 '-:!J ':l1

'F-"~ I ("-'~ 3 P 3L..:;F=U..l L........J 0-'~L:;,

III ~.J.7iJ.J ~~ ~LiII.J'{ij;.J

~l ~ /f:A."....J~, t'" ~)~ •~l~J/fJL.....J~It'";;.J~ •

~l$'il <JJ,.:J1~1..1SJ (OJt....J~1 t'";;)~ •

~\S.'il :;J,.:J1~l J.¥J ti~l....-/fJL.....J ~l t'";;)~ •

I"'/,./~....•,'\ ~'..JJ't t -I. Tf. c :-:1;1.:1'

<. \.) '::'W.>"'I

111111/llllllIlllllIlIlll 11111 ifl/I III 111111III

~.

~I'~e..

J]

~1

'Jr

~~

"-,

••,

.)

}j,Q

,].

•...~

(,-

,)0"

-<:::

t,"1

::1~

.....t.

J]

:.J~.

"

vJ-::'1

-,,.

II

II

..•J)

"'";:-

Y0-

••'"

).,J

-=J'Q

~~

,1-..

J4

.,J1,

3:~.~t

::1,--

~

~

.~-

"~J

••1

JoJ

-..J.

"'~

.3"-

~

J<

.,)

~

-

~.

"~

)

)

{l

:~.,

:v

••-..

.rJ

~JI

.t-..

,~, .•.

0'1-

3

~

.)0~

>-j

-..

1"t

•••

jI"J

l-..

,':J

~1

4{

~~

,.j.~

;..

•...~

.-.1'1,

:3'

~. .J'

.~1

.~T

J~

;J'1

1,

~,

'R:i

uJ'1

J.~

",.

.-'J.

-..

l-..1

~

,.j.~

~."

..,~

~

~

...::-.-

u

1,~

~

JI"

.,1

;J'.\

J....

JI,.

J.:J

,';/.'loJl

:::-J

j•...

~"

;;J~

.2'1

.J'••

31.

"1-

.!I.1-1

:J'1

-,)0.

1;J

~,J.

"J.1

!.!I

1"

-.

••1

,'0-=J

'OJ,

'Q

~1

:~"'

,.O'l

~

.2'J

~

.;J

~~J

1c

~1

.-J

,~J.:

"-

:j

,i

-=J.;;

..•

~Hl

J.:

'"..1)

.2'],'j

,.O'l

t.'!J

f..,

•....::::

1.2'

~{

~~~

3"'

1"-

.;~

,'5,~

"0'1

,"...

I:)

~~~

"-.J

~"],

.)03

~

V,.

-

3-1

Jj

•....

••

-,~'J

]-=J

.-~

•...:.J

d'-

\,:i'J

l..1'

.J',.O

'l~

},.

~

1<

u.J

",-

.-Jj

~'l.~

>-..l

'J,1••

..,}

~~

~~

-~,

..

~-

.'J.!!I.:l

.-..

......-

-.::.

-~~%

.•.1-

••••

'J-..

>-]

jj

••••

.~

3~

..1

"~

~-

=s,.......;

~,

"

}-

r'"1

,';/..1'

~~

~~

'1

.~~

"

.~

r~ '.D\~-.."!'

r1:::::=

~$;£

o"""

-'.

(034) :l9L1LJ cl.LoJl <LUll:!"96611 467 44 47 ...nJ~"96611467,\2 53 ~

ci.,!:.9LJ.lll1 Cl..,!-,IjL.JIll5..L.tI-(),JI11451v"u;)1 2455 w ..p

www.ksuedu.sa

.,: v 'I?, '",,'" .,'c'.CL...n.-O L....:i.:lQ2>JJ r..:J.1D.j1King Saud University

499 xxx Learning Outcomes

•• •

The student should be able to:1 Reco 'nize contemporary design, theOi ,and ractice.2 Define research techni ue suitable to the individual ro' ecl of research.3 Ex lain research techni ue s ccific to the individual ro'ect of research.4 Anal ze, com are and conclude the obtained results and conclusions.5 Direct himsel I' independently through the development and management of a

ro' ect of research,6 Demonstrate high quality communication skills in tutorials and in project

outcomes: in documents, artefacts and design work in appropriate visual,verbal, material and written formats.

Evaluation Criterion Unsatisfactory (0-4) Marginally Satisfactory (5-6) Good (7-8) Excellent (9-10) Team Score

Attendance 20% CanNever be found Occasionally in assigned area (s) Usually in assignedarea (s) Always in assigned area (s)

Appearance 5% Appearance unclean and Somewhat meets dress code Meets dress code look professional and neat

unprofessional

Ability to follow instruction Cannot follow the simplest Rarely able to follow instructions, Can usually follow basic Always able to follow

10% of Instructions no much help in department instructions with guidance instructions

Quality of the work 15% Quality of work often failed Quality of work sometimes failed Quality of work meet our Quality of work frequently

to meet our expectations to meet our expectations expectations exceeded our expectations

Motivation 10% Poor motivation, will not Fair motivation, sometimes Well.motivated, perform Highly motivated, wants to

perform tasks without direct requires assigned tasks tasks with little perform every task possible

order encouragement

Reaction to criticism 10% Very defensive with Sometimes defensive with Usually accepts criticism well Consistently accepts

criticism, makes no effort criticism, correct mistakes and tries to correct mistakes criticism well and tries to

correct mistakes occasionally correct mistakes

Group/Partner Team work Completely unwilling or Some difficulty adjusting Usually helps, works well with Always willing to help

10% unable to work with other personality to work with others most people anyone in need, easy to

people work with

leadership 5% Passive in respect to goal Was supportive but displayed Showed initiative in helping Was a positive force in

setting, initiating tasks and little initiative in moving the team the team solve problems and looking ahead and

resolving problems towards its goals achieve its goals supporting other teammembers to achieve itsgoals

Safety 15% Proper safety precautions Proper safety precautions arc Proper safety precautions are Proper safety precautions

are consistently used generally used often missed are consistently missed

Evaluation Unsatisfactory (0-4) Marginally Satisfactory (5-6) Good (7-8) Excellent (9-10) Team

CriterionScore

Summary and The summary is missing or exists The summary is like an introduction The sumlTlary is just reflect the report The summary is professional and creates

Content but lacks a lot of relevant to the report. It lacks some of the parts and include the necessary curiosity in the reader to go further in the

information about the work. important information about the information such as motivation, report. The content is well organized.

S% work. The content is will presented. problem statement, deliverables .. The

content is complete.

Introduction The introduction provides The introduction contains scientific The introduction contains enough The introduction contains complete scientific

and scientific incorrect statement of the background about the work. scientific background about the work, background about the work, the scope of the

background problem.the scope of the project; organization project, organization of the report. It also

of the report. includes concluding remarks about the content

10%presented in the report

Problem The problem is roughly stated. The The problem is stated. The proposed The problem is clearly stated. The The problem is clearly stated. The proposed

Statement and proposed solution and objectives solution is identified. The objectives proposed solution is clearly identified. solution and measurable objectives are clearly

Objectives are not identified. are presented but not measurable. Objectives are identified with some of identified.

them are not measurable.

10%

Experimental Important parts of the description Overall description of most parts of Adequate description of all parts of the Full description of all parts of the

Procedure of the experimental/theoretical the experimental/theoretical systems experimental/theoretical systems and experimental/theoretical systems and

systems and procedures are and procedures are indicated with procedures are indicated with procedures are clearly indicated with all

25% missing. Diagrams and figures are some diagrams and figures are diagrams and figures. related diagrams and figures.

missing. missing.

Results, Lack of presenting results. Obtained results arc partially Obtained results are clearly presented, Obtained results are clearly presented,

Conclusion No conclusion neither suggestedpresented and discussed with discussed and analyzed. Brief evaluated, discussed and analyzed. Agreement

missmg analysis and suggested future conclusion and suggested work are between the obtained results and other'sand Suggested work are provided.

workwork. included. results are discussed and justified. A

conclusion and suggested work based on the

30%analysis are included.

language The language is bad in Older to Problematic language, sometimes Good language is used in the report Strong language is adopted in writing the report.

understand the report idea. Text is making it difficult to understand the with rare difficulties. Some errors or errors or typing mistakes observed 10 the report.

10% full of errors and typing mistakes. whole report clearly. Frequent errors typing mistakes observed.

and tYping mistakes are observed.

Organization The report has many major The report has some deficiencies The report is bound and has an The report has a professional KSU format with

and mistakes related to the format. with the format. Some of the acceptable format. Most of the a consistent style and appropriate page

Appearance ofMany sections, tables and figures standards sections and figures are standards sections of a report are numbers. All standards sections of a report

the Reportare missing. A list of references is missing. A list of references is lOcluded. Captioned figures and tables arc exist. The needed supplementary details

not provided. present With incomplete CItations are present. A list of references exist are included as appendices. Captioned clear

10% and incOHect reference numbels. with adequate ("Itatians in the text. figuH's and tables are present. A suitable list ofreferences is plOvided with correct citations in

the tcxt dnd figures.

Evaluation Criterion Unsatisfactory (0-4) Marginally Satisfactory (5-6) Good (7-8) Excellent (9-10) Team

Presentation (lfthe Project Score

Sign ificance/Purpose: Even with follow.up, Moderate further Minimal further Significance/Purpose is clearly

Student clearly and concisely explained significance/purpose is unclear. explanation/follow-up needed. explanation/follow.up needed. presented for a generalist

the significance or purpose of the audience

project to a generalist audience. 15%

Methodology/Process: Even with follow-up, Moderate use of jargon nece$sitate$ Minimal jargon and dear Jargon.free; few follow-up

Student explained what methods or method/process is unclear questions to clarify. response to few follow-up questions needed

processes he used, as well as why he questions

used them, to conduct the project. 15%

Results/Findings: Student(s) is unable to articulate Connections articulated only with Appropriately articulated with Connections are clearly

Student clearly presented his results connections even with follow-up follow.up. minimal follow.up required. articulated.

and findings and connect them to the questions.

stated Problem Statement and

Objectives. 20%

Quality of the Project INonverbal Skills: Nonverbal behaviors (Avoids eye could improve on eye. contact, only minimal discomfort or No need for improvement with

Student demonstrated strong nonverbal contact, arms crossed, chewing gestures/movement, and/or nervousness exhibited. nonverbal presentation skills.

communication skills, such as gum, etc.) disengage rather than attention to nonverbal cues.

professional demeanor, eye.contact, engage audience.

gestures and movement. 15%

Verbal/Oral Presentation: Issues with articulations, good basic verbal skills but some strong verbal skills with only No need for improvement with

Student demonstrated strong verbal ramblings, etc. detract from the habits/practices distract from minor issues such as habitual verbal/oral presentation skills.

skills: he articulate clearly and slowly verbal/oral presentation. understanding. "urn" or "so" articulations.

with little to no stumbling, mumbling,

rambling, or unnecessary articulations

such as "urn" or "so". 15%

Skills Responses to Judges: Student Issup.s with articulations, good basic verbal skills but some strong verbal skills with only No need for improvement with

welcomed comments or questions and ramblings, etc. detract from the habits/practices distract from minor issues such as habitual verbal/oral presentation skills.

provide appropriate and thoughtful verbal/oral presentation. understanding. "um" or "so" articulations.

responses, even if the response is to

share that a comment/Question is

beyond the scope of the project. 20%

Evaluation Criterion Unsatisfactory (0-4) Marginally Satisfactory (S-6) Good (7-8) Excellent (9-10)TeamScore

Significance/Purpose: Student Evenwith follow-up, Moderate further Minimal furtherSignificance/Purpose is

clearly and concisely explains the significance/purpose is explanation/follow-up needed. explanation/follow-u p clearly presented for a

significance or purpose of the unclear. needed. generalist audience

project to a generalist audience.15%

Methodology/Process: Student Evenwith follow.up, Moderate use of jargon Minimal jargon and clear Jargon-free; few follow-up

explains what methods or processes method/process is necessitates questions to response to few follow.up questions needed

they used, aswell aswhy they used unclear. clarify. questions.

them, to conduct the project. 15%

Results/Findings: Student clearly Student(s) is unable to Connections articulated only Appropriately articulated Connections are clearly

presents their results and findings articulate connections with follow-up. with minimal follow-up articulated.

and connects them to the stated even with follow.up required.

significance or purpose of the questions.project. 20%

Coherence/Organization: the poster Not clearly organized, Organization, proofreading, Organized with only minimal The poster is of near-

iswell-organized, easy to read, free contains visible use of font, color, or visuals mistakes. Font, color, and professional quality in its

of mistakes, and makes good use of mistakes, and is difficult need enhancement. visuals contribute to organization and

font, color and visuals. 15% to read. readability. coherence.

Content: Poster content is Content detracts from Needs considerable Needs limited additional Content is purposeful and

pllfposeful and understandable to rather than enhancing explanation. explanation. easily understood by an

an informed generalist. 15% understanding of the informed generalist.

project.

Contribution: The poster contributes The poster does not add The poster's contribution to Overall, the paste adds The poster is a meaningful

meaningfully to the student report value, or seems the report or presentation is value to the report or and well-integrated part of

or presentation of the project. 20% unrelated to the report minimal, or somewhat presentation and helps in the report or presentation.

or presentation. confusing. understanding the project.

King Saud University

College of Science

Department of…… College of Science

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A template for Assessment of student performance in Research Project

during 14…. /14….

Student Name: Student Number:

Project Title: *Course Code:

Type of assessment: Formative

Assessment strategy: Observation, group activities, written work

*Course code means code of course 499 or 497

Names of student Supervisor:

Signature:

Evaluation Criterion Proportions of the

assessment Marks

Supervisor Marks

Attendance 12

Appearance 3

Ability to follow instruction 6

Quality of the work 9

Motivation 6

Reaction to criticism 6

Group/Partner Team work 6

Leadership 3

Safety 9

Total 60 Marks

King Saud University

College of Science

Department of…… College of Science

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A template for Assessment of Student Report of Research Project during

14…. /14….

Student Name: Student Number:

Project Title: *Course Code:

Type of assessment: Summative

Assessment strategy: Reviewing

*Course code means code of course 499 or 497

Assessment Team: Signature:

1.

2.

3.

4.

Evaluation Criterion Proportions of

the assessment

Marks

Assessment

Committee

Marks

Summary and Content 1

Introduction and scientific background 2

Problem Statement and Objectives 2

Experimental Procedure 5

Results, Conclusion and Suggested work 6

Language 2

Organization and Appearance of the

Report

2

Total 20 Marks

King Saud University

College of Science

Department of…… College of Science

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A template for Assessment of Student Presentation of Research Project

during 14…. /14….

Student Name: Student Number:

Project Title: *Course Code:

Type of assessment: Summative

Assessment strategy: Observation, discussion

*Course code means code of course 499 or 497

Assessment Team: Signature:

1.

2.

3.

4.

Evaluation Criterion Proportions of

the assessment

Marks

Assessment

Committee Marks

Significance/Purpose 1.5

Methodology/Process 1.5

Results/Findings 2

Nonverbal Skills:. 1.5

Verbal/Oral Presentation: 1.5

Skills Responses to Judges: 2

Total 10 Marks

King Saud University

College of Science

Department of…… College of Science

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A template for Assessment of Student Poster of Research Project during

14…. /14….

Student Name: Student Number:

Project Title: *Course Code:

Type of assessment: Summative

Assessment strategy: Observation, Discussion

*Course code means code of course 499 or 497

Assessment Team: Signature:

1.

2.

3.

4.

Evaluation Criterion Proportions of the

assessment Marks

Assessment Committee

Marks

Significance/Purpose: 1.5

Methodology/Process 1.5

Results/Findings: 2

Coherence/Organization: 1.5

Content: 1.5

Contribution:. 2

Total 10 Marks