Logistics 2013: John Roberts

35

Transcript of Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Page 1: Logistics 2013: John Roberts
Page 2: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Planning for Logistics

John Roberts

Solicitor

Planning Team

Page 3: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Introduction

• Planning system increasingly complex

• Planning permission required for operational on-site facilities

• Focus– Overview of the planning system

– Key themes in planning development– Case studies – demonstrate planning policies in action

Page 4: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Background

• 2 tiers of planning policy for England: national & local

• Previously intermediate third tier – regional– Regional Spatial Strategies– Abolished by Coalition Government

• National and local tiers in state of transition

Page 5: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

National Planning Policy

• National Planning Policy Framework– Introduced on 27 March 2012

• Previously:– PPS’s, PPG’s, Circulars, Letters to Chief Planning Officers– 44 documents– Over 1,300 pages

– 2 decades of policy development

• New document:– Single document– 59 pages

Page 6: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

What does it do?

• Sets out the Government’s planning policies for England and how these are expected to be applied

• Guidance for local planning authorities– Drawing up local plans– Determining planning applications

• Local plans should be consistent with the Framework

Page 7: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Aims

• Decision-making driven down to the local level– Ties in with localism agenda

• Replaced documents were very detailed and prescriptive

• New approach: just bare bones within national policy– Local councils to produce their own distinctive plans

Page 8: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Controversy

Page 9: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Opposition

“(The) Slim, 52-page draft National Planning Policy Framework… more unexploded mines per square inch than the most liberally strewn battlefield”

Daily Telegraph

“… a public relations exercise which will in effect encourage privatisation of services, open market sale of public assets and, through the presumption to develop, render all communities defenceless in the face of the greed of developers”

Morning Star

Page 10: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Local Planning Policy

• Where detail is found• Currently Local Plans or Unitary Development Plans

– Set out policies thematically

• Local policy changing– Local Development Frameworks– Local Plans

• Few local authorities completed process in timely manner– Result is “Saved” policies

• Draft policies can be taken into account

Page 11: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Presumption in favour of sustainable development

• At the heart of the planning system is a presumption in favour of sustainable development, which should be seen as a golden thread running through both plan-making and decision-taking

• Reference to UN definition of sustainable development

• 3 dimensions: economic, social & environmental

Page 12: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Key Considerations

• Key: frontload preparation work– Within planning application– Also at pre-application stage

• Identify requirements and stumbling blocks as early as possible– Talk to Planning Officers– Sound them out on their requirements– Make application documents detailed

• If anything is missing, somebody will spot it!– Delays

Page 13: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

24/7 Working

Page 14: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Lighting

Page 15: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Refrigeration Units

Page 16: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Environment & Protected Species

Page 17: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Lorries

Page 18: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Drainage & Flooding

Page 19: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Substations

Page 20: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Statutory Agreements

Page 21: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Planning Policy in Action

• 3 case studies:

1. World Logistics Hub, Manchester Airport

2. New Hythe Industrial Estate, Kent

3. Lancashire Business Park, Leyland

Page 22: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Case Study 1 – World Logistics Hub

Page 23: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

The Proposal

• Airport related freight logistics hub• Up to 1.4 million square feet

– Units ranging from 7,500 to 200,000 square feet

• Retail and amenity facilities for future workforce• Nearly 1,500 car parking spaces• Site: 51.7 hectares

– Mainly grazing land, surrounded by hedgerows, contains ponds– Bordered by farmland and woodland: SSSI & SBI

Page 24: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Main Issue – Green Belt Location

• Proposal within draft Manchester Airport Masterplan, 2006– Identified extensions to Airport’s Operational Area and land to be removed

from the green belt

• Masterplan considered in preparing Core Strategy– This reviewed the green belt boundary

• Core Strategy considered at Public Inquiry, 2011– Exceptional circumstances to justify altering green belt boundary

• Council considered principle of logistics hub acceptable– But … other issues required consideration

Page 25: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Other Issues

• Visual amenity– Council accepted there would not be an unduly adverse impact

• Residential amenity– Conditions dealing with dust control and acoustic insulation

• Highway network– Able to take advantage of highways improvements connected to the

second runway at Manchester Airport

• Nature conservation– 14.8 hectares proposed as landscape and ecological mitigation area

– Enables compliance with the European Habitats Directive

Page 26: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Case Study 2 – Aylesford, Kent

Page 27: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

The Proposal

• 3 warehouse units– One of just over 9,000 square metres– One of approximately 6,500 square metres– One of just under 4,000 square metres

• Full provision for car and lorry parking• Site has long history of industrial use

– Safeguarded for employment use in Tonbridge and Malling Council’s Land Allocations Development Plan Document, 2008

• 6.81 hectares & within wider industrial estate– New housing development to the west

Page 28: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Principle of Development

• Acceptable as site within area allocated for employment use

• Long previous use of site formed basis of Council’s assessment of other issues– Existing buildings remained on site at time application was considered– Could have been fully reoccupied at any time without further approval– Application was assessed against this background of historic use of site

• Key: Impact be no worse than and, if possible, less than the previous unfettered use rights of the site

Page 29: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Other Issues

• Design– New warehouses cumulatively smaller than existing building

• Lorry routing– Access only from eastern side (away from housing development to west)– Buildings on industrial estate act as noise buffer between traffic & houses

• 24 hour operation– Historically, no controls over hours of use

• Conditions to mitigate impacts of development– Acoustic barrier to be installed before units can be operational– Details of external lighting submitted & agreed prior to installation

Page 30: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Case Study 3 – Leyland, Lancashire

Page 31: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

The Proposal

• 3 storage and distribution warehouses• Nearly 400,000 square feet of accommodation

– 2 units of 166,000 square feet each– 1 unit of 50,000 square feet

• Associated car parking and secure compound areas• Replace large warehouse destroyed by fire in 2011• Surrounded on three sides by industrial units & offices

– West Coast Mainline to the east

Page 32: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Principle of Development

• National Planning Policy Framework– Planning system should support sustainable economic growth– Encourage, rather than impede, sustainable growth

• Local planning policy – South Ribble Local Plan– Within main existing employment areas, planning permission should be

granted for expansion/redevelopment of industrial & business purposes

• Scheme in accordance with both national and local policy– No problem with principle of development

Page 33: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Other Issues

• Design– Local policy requires well related to neighbouring buildings and the locality– Modern, standard industrial buildings, finished in metal cladding, proposed– Existing buildings within Business Park of similar height and materials

• Parking– Local policy requires adequate level of car parking and servicing– County Highways objected to initial plans – revised to deal with this

• Landscaping– Six silver birch trees to be removed to facilitate development– Replacement planting to compensate

– Conditions for landscaping plan and management regime

Page 34: Logistics 2013: John Roberts

Conclusion

• Identify the issues• Work around them

• Explain how an application complies with planning policy– National and local

• If compliance is not possible, justify any departure from policy thoroughly

Page 35: Logistics 2013: John Roberts