L O C K H E E D M A R T I N 7+ Y/ER-301

Bear Creek Valley Floodplain Hot Removal Action Project Plan,

Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee

Spot

D OF THis

This document has been approved by the Y- 12 Plant Technical Information Office for release to the public. Date: 01/02/98

ENERGY SYSTEMS

contributed to the preparation of this document and should not be I considered an eligible contractor for its review.

Science Applications International Corporation

DISCLAIMER

Portions of this document may be illegible electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document.

Y/ER-30 I

Bear Creek Valley Floodplain Hot Spot Removal Action Project Plan,

Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee

Date Issued-January 1998

Prepared by Science Applications International Corporation

Oak Ridge, Tennessee under subcontract 12B-99341 C

Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy

Office of Environmental Management under budget and reporting code EW 20

Environmental Management Activities at the OAK RIDGE Y- 12 PLANT

Oak Ridge, Tennessee 3783 1 managed by

LOCKHEED MARTIN ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. for the

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under contract DE-AC05-840R2 1400

3

PREFACE

The Bear Creek Valley Floodplain Hot Spot Removal Action Project Plan, Oak Ridge Y-i2 Plant, OakRidge, Tennessee (Y/ER-30 1) was prepared (1) to safely, cost-e ffectively, and efficiently evaluate the environmental impact of solid material in the two debris areas in the context of industrial land uses (as defined in the Bear Creek Valley Feasibility Study) to support the Engineering Evaluation/Cost Assessment and (2 ) to evaluate, define, and implement the actions to mitigate these impacts. This work was performed under WorkBreakdown Structure I .x.01.20.01 .OS.

DISCLAIMER

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United State Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsi- bility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Refer- ence herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement. recom- mendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

... 111

CONTENTS

... PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111

ABBREVIATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii

1 . MISSIONNISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2 . TECHNICAL PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.1 SITEHISTORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.3 PROJECT SCOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

2.3.1 Project Planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.3.2 Characterization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.3.3 EEKA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.3.4 AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.3.5 RmAWP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.3.6 Removal Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

2.4 REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.5 PROJECT PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

2.5.1 Project Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 ' 2.5.2 Work Breakdown Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.5.3 Method of Accomplishment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.5.4 Project Completion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

2.6 PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

3 . REFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

V

ABBREVIATIONS

AM BCV BMPP CA CDBA CERCLA DMP DOE DQO EE/CA Energy Systems FS HSP ORR QAPjP RDBA RI RmAR - RmAWP SAP WBS WMP

Action Memorandum Bear Creek Valley Best Management Practices Plan Characterization Area Creekside Debris Burial Area Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Data Management Plan U S . Department of Energy Data Quality Objective Engineering Evaluation/Cost Assessment Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. Feasibility Study Health and Safety Plan Oak Ridge Reservation Quality Assurance Project Plan Roadside Debris Burial Area remedial investigation Removal Action Report Removal Action Work Plan Sampling and Analysis Plan work breakdown structure Waste Management Plan

vii

2

contamination, evaluate the risks to public health and the environment, and determine the goals for an FS of potential remedial actions.

The need to complete the Rl/FS process in a timely manner resulted in the establishment of watershed Characterization Areas (CAS) ori the ORR, one of which is the Bear Creek Valley (BCV) CA at the Y-12 Plant. The BCV CA consists of the area west of the Y-12 Plant defined by the watershed of Bear Creek. The watershed CA approach examines all the waste areas, groundwater, and surface water in a watershed and coordinates remediation activities in the context of managing the watershed as a single entity. Thle BCV {CA is an operationally and hydrogeologically complex area that contains numerous contaminants and contaminant sources.

Characterization work for the BCV CA RI identified three areas of soil contamination or debris disposal on the Bear Creek floodpli3in outside of the Y-12 Plant boundary that may pose potential risk to future industrial workers (Fig. 1). TWO of these areas are located at the east end of the BCV watershed-the Roadside Debris Burial Area (RDBA) and the Creekside Debris Burial Area (CDBAjand are both areas where contaminated debris has been disposed. A third area is located in the middle of BCV at the confluence between the tributary draining the Bear Creek Burial Grounds and Bear Creek (referred to as theEJT8 area). Soil contamination at the NTS area is derived from downgradient migration ofcontaminated sediment from the Bear Creek Burial Grounds. Risks posed by contamination in each of these three areas are marginal for industrial land use (between 1 x l o 6 and 1 x however, for the RDBA and CDBA, risk assessment is based on limited environmental data.

2.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVE

Each alternative action described in the BCV FS includes remediation of soil contamination on the Bear Creek Floodplain. Data for the RDBA and CDBA are limited and do not allow evaluation ofthe preferred remedial action for the floodplain in the FS. Data available for the NT-8 area in the RI is sufficient to define the nature iznd extent of Contamination at this area. The objective of this project is to better characterize the RDBA and CDBA and to evaluate a preferred removal alternative for the two remaining contaminated areas on the floodplain. When the preferred remedial action is selected, this project will implement the remedial action.

This project plan addresses the technicai objectives, system requirements, regulatory strategy, work breakdown structure (WBS), schedule, and documentation for completion of the BCV Fioodplain Hot Spot Project.

2.3 PROJECT SCOPE

2.3.1 Project Planning

2.3.1.1 Project Plan

The scope of the BCV Floodplain Hot Spot Removal Early Action was determined at the Project Scoping meeting held on October 22, 1997. The Project Plan is based on the meeting minutes, which outline the scope for this early action and define the project team, roles and

.

1 I I -. BEAR CREEK VALLEY KEY MAP 'I

L ........... !.... ....... ............ * c w1

I ..^..I ..... .@ .. ..__I.._.. ;;

......... ,, .............

i... ... .- ......

.......... .......... i

/ ........ .... I .-

e E A R h K I

! i

.~ ........ " 2 ..............

BEAR CREEK VALLEY

LEGEND : ...................... .ROADS

BEAR CREEK & -. ................ TRIBUTARIES

I]. ................ WASTE AREA UNITS

I

j

... $1. ........... *;

.......... ..J. .................

1 ! ! @,,.., . . . . . .......... I'. u.iy... ! ..__ .... ............

Y /

Fig. 1. Location of the soil contamination "hot spots" on the Bear Creek Floodplain.

4

responsibilities for the project team, the project schedule, key milestones, and regulatory requirements for the BCV Floodplain Hot Spot Project.

2.3.1.2 DQO meeting

Sampling for the characterization phase of this project will be optimized through the use of the seven step DQO process (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1993). The project team will meet to define the DQOs for this action. The: DQOs will define the requirements for sampling and analysis at the hot spots that will satisfy the need to make decisions concerning selection of a remedial alternative.

2.3.2 Characterization

2.3.2.1 DQO meeting minutes/S.AP

The meeting minutes from the DQO meeting will constitute a SAP for the characterization phase. This document will define the number of samples, their locations and sample procedures, analyte lists, detection limits, and accuracy requirements for the characterization effort.

The Y-12 Waste Management Checklist and Health and Safety Checklist will be completed. These will constitute the characterization phase Waste Management Plan (WMP) and Health and Safety Plan (HSP). In addition, a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPjP) and Data Management Plan (DMP) will be completed.

2.3.2.2 Characterization field work

Characterization field work will be conducted following the SAP and according to the HSP and QAPjP. Field work may include walkover radiological surveys, detailed site description, sampling and analysis of soils and subsoils, :surveying, and characterization of debris (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, radiological). Any waste produced from characterization (e.g., personal protective equipment, unused samples) will be disposed ofaccording to the WMP. Analytical results and field observations will be managed following the DMP.

2.3.2.3 Preliminary Characterization daita interpretation meeting

The project team will meet to define the results of the evaluation of characterization data. The objective of this meeting will be to provide the EEKA team with an evaluation of the data that is consistent with the final characterization report. At this meeting, a preliminary evaluation of potential contaminants of concen; and the volume of debris/contaminated soil will be provided to the EE/CA team.

2.3.2.4 Characterization report

The characterization report will include an evaluation of the characterization data. The document will be produced in a preliminary draft form for review by DOE and the project team. The document will be issued as an appendix to the EE/CA in the D1 and D2 submittals of that document.

5

2.3.3 EEKA

The EE/CA will contain a detailed analysis of a limited number of alternative remedial actions identified in the BCV FS covering the range of remedial alternatives. For each alternative, the EE/CA will include review of compliance with applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements, a determination of waste disposition, and an estimate of cost. The document will be produced in a preliminary draft form for review by DOE and the project team. The document will be issued for DOE and regulatory approval in the form of D1 and D2 submittals. The D1 draft ofthe EE/CA will be submitted to the regulators on April 15, 1998. Between submitting the D1 draft and completing the D2 draft, the project will also conduct a public meeting, if necessary, and incorporate public review comments into the D2 draft.

2.3.4 AM

After DOE has selected the preferred alternative, the project will develop the AM that will contain an abbreviated removal action analysis and the recommended removal action. The document will be produced in a preliminary draft form for review by DOE and the project team. The document will be issued for DOE and regulatory approval in the form of D1 and D2 submittals. The D1 draft of the AM will be submitted to the regulators on August 14, 1998.

2.3.5RmAWP

The RmAWP will be prepared as specified in the AM. The RmAWP will include the following supporting documentation: WMP, QAPjP, Environmental Monitoring Plan, DMP, Best Management Practices Plan (BMPP), and HSP. The document will be produced in a preliminary draft form for review by DOE and the project team. The document will be issued for DOE and regulatory approval in the form of D1 and D2 submittals. The D1 draft of the RmAWP will be submitted to the regulators on October 30, 1998.

In conjunction with preparing the RmAWP, the Remedial Design Report will be prepared. This will include contractual binding drawings and specifications that will be used by the construction contractor to perform the work.

2.3.6 Removal Action

On the basis of the current preferred remedial action in the FS, this task includes excavation of 14,460 m3 (18,800 yd3) of contaminated soil at two sites on Bear Creek Floodplain: RDBA [ 13,000 m3 (1 6,900 yd3)] and CDBA [ 1,460 m3 (1,900 yd3)]. This component also includes backfill of the excavation with clean soil, monitoring of surface water in nearby Bear Creek, confirmatory sampling to ensure completeness, and transport and disposal of 14,460 m3 (1 8,800 yd3) of mixed waste at an off-site disposal facility. Wastewater derived from dewatering operations and decontamination of equipment will be collected and treated at the Y-12 Plant West End Treatment Facility. The removal action may change from that currently planned based on the results of characterization and alternative evaluation in the EE/CA.

The RmAR will be prepared upon completion of the removal action and will document compliance with, or deviation from, the RmAWP and the Removal Design Package.

6

2.4 REQUIREMENTS

The Project Team will comply with the requirements of applicable laws and regulations and applicable requirements of DOE orders. At the removal action stage, requirements and laws such as the National Environmental Policy Act, the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System, DOE orders, and industrial hygiene will be identified in a BMPP. The BMPP will also define the regulatory strategy for the removal action. The strategy for compliance with requirements at the characterization stage will be contained in the WMP, HSP, and the QAPjP for the characterization.

2.5 PROJECT PLAN

2.5.1 Project Schedule

The project schedule is shown in Fig. 2.

2.5.2 Work Breakdown Structure

The BCV Floodplain Hot Spats Early Action is a level-6 Project within a Project Baseline Summary(OR42102)ofMajor System Acquisition-1, WJ3Selement01.20.01.08. Thetaskhas been further subdivided into WBS elements for project planning and management (0 I), characterization (02), the EE/CA (03), the AM (04), ;RmAWP and Removal Design (05), and the removal action and RmAR (06) (Fig. 3).

2.5.3 Method of Accomplishment

Primary roles and responsibilities within the BCV Floodplain Hot Spot Project are assigned by the WBS structure: Energy Systems is res,ponsible for project planning and management (Ol), characterization (02), RmAWP and Remedi,al Design (05), and the removal action and RmAR (06); Jacobs Engineering is responsible for the EIYCA (03) and the AM (04). Energy Systems employs various subcontractors in roles that include planning and management, characterization, document preparation, and construction. In addition, the project team is composed of a multidisciplinary team representing various entities. Each team member plays a role in providing support to other team members for their primary responsibility.

2.5.4 Project Completion

This project will be completed when an appropriate removal action has been safely selected and implemented at the BCV Floodplain Hot Spot sites. The appropriate removal action will be selected using the EE/CA process and will be based on the additional characterization data obtained during this project. The appropriate removal actioin may range from excavation of contaminated soils to no action.

2.6 PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDIER INVOLVEMENT

The goal of the Environmental Ivlanagement Community Relations Program is to involve local stakeholders in an open and accessible (decision-making process that identifies issues and alternatives during the planning and development stages of projects. This involvement is expected

5ti"it" w scription start Finisn Dur

M.20.0j.08.Eo.l WUCMIZATIM '1025260iO PROuFCT PLANNIffi MElIM) 1026260i5 AEPIRE PROJECT RAN

I02626025 OOE/TEAH REVIEW 'to2626030 INMlAPDRLTE COIIIIENTS 'io2626033 SUBMIT PAOJECT PLAN TO REGS '102626040 REGUATWS REVIW OF PRWCT PLAN '1026625345 IKWWTE COwnEMS '102626dO Pi3€REPAfE FOR 000 KIR(SH0P '102626055 000 WORKSHOP

'102828(120 mIt PROJER PLAN IO OE/TEAH

:i0262tio~) PREPARE m wo~(s~op MIMIIES vt02626070 SUFINIT wo YMIKW RINUTES FOR

OWTEAR w I E n

a220CT97 o r220CT97 1-97 17

l W 9 7 0 l M V 9 7 20MV97 5 2111w97 OlEC97 5

OIIIEMI'I 0 02oEC97 0 2 J W 2i D5JAN9809515198 I tONOV97 12lUJV97 3 1MV97 I m W 7 1 14Now7 m v 9 7 F

20NOV97 I

VI02626075 WE/T€M4 KVIEW 2 i m 7 OilKC97 ~ ~ 0 2 ~ 2 m o IKWPMUTE DMITEAN COWNTS OEEC97 08oEC97 Y 102626O11S SIBNIT FINAL Dw HIMlES FMI DOVTEAY O€!JJEC97

1102626100 m)BR12E FMI FIELD W O R K 02DEC97 03uC97 1102625105 CONOUCT SOIL WRACKRIZATION 04OEC97 22OEC97 Y102626110 LA6OAAlMIY ANLLISIS 05oEC97 0 7 J W Y10252611S AECEIVE FINAL OATA PACXAES FACW T I E 0751188

Y 102626i20 VERIFY DATA zpEc97 22JAN9E If02626125 PRELIUINlRY Dlrh ANALYSIS 23DEC97 O a * N 9 B V102626130 c m t DATA ANALYSIS HWWP OWAM O S J W yioxajtxi pREpne CHARACTERIZATIW REWAT OWAH98 O!N€BW Yi02W137 FINAL DATA INIEFPRETIIIIW 2ww V102626140 WWIT DRAFT WARACTERIZATION REPORT TO 05FEB98

V102626145 W/lEnn A E v t w om89n 12FFE898 Y i026Z6190 INCWIPCRATE COFIIENTS rmese i9FEBge v i 0 2 ~ m s s w r r FINAL CHARACTERIZATIM( REPORI TO 19Fm

REVIEN

LABORATORY

DDE/IEAM

WE

i 1: 2 I

l! 11

li I I

! ! I

01.a. 61.48. Eo. 10 MIPEERIM EvaL,4WSl ANALYSIS Y10262A005 U / C A OUTLINE REVIEK WEETIffi 22oEC97 I

I sat EL LN - 'R

mm . .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

L

mm 5m mm . .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

- L

;mm * .

. .

. .

* .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

-

JL

Fig. 2. Project schedule for the BCV Floodplain Hot Sport Removal Action.

Lctivitv Descriotjon Start Flnish Cur

vimaoio mmnE PRELIMINARY EERA Y10262A012 SVWIT PRELIHINARr EE/CA TO WE FOR

REVIEW Y10262A014 WE REVIEW YiO26211016 IxCMlp WE COWMNTS Vi02621018 TRWITTAL TO REGS Y10262A020 SUBMIT aUFT EE/U TO REGS FOR R V l E H

Y10262A022 REGS REVEN V10262A023 INCW AGS WnRMS .

VlO262AO25 M)E/REG Af'PROVAl. V10262A026 TRWITTAL FOR PUBLIC NOTIFIQTILIN YiO262AO28 WBLIC NOTIFICATION V10262A030 PUBLIC AEVIEW

mi1

r 1 0 2 ~ 2 ~ 2 4 SVBNIT FINIL E/CA TO WE FOR APPROVAL

~ 1 0 2 6 2 ~ 0 ~ 2 INCOAP FWLIC izvIEn NNWNIS

c:.,Y.M.%..L2?.,2? CTIIW d&xmNw Y102626002 DOE SELECT PREFERWO KTERNATlYE r i o z ~ ~ e o o 4 i c i m MMORANOW OUTLINE REVIEW

~10262~012 ~ I T DRIFT ACTION YUO TO OWTEAM

~ioz62eoi4 u w m n REVIEW r i o m ~ o i 6 INCORP REVIEH C O ~ N T S ~ i a 2 6 2 ~ o i e TRANSMITTAL TO ~EGS V10262S024 %SNIT W F T ACTION MnO TO REO9 FOR

E Y l E U mil Y102623022 REGS REVIEW

!lo2626026 WBWIT FINU ACT MHO TO WE FOR APPROVAL

Y102GB028 WE/EPA/mEC APPROVAL

HETING Y102628010 PREPARE ACTION I€MOORItUlLM

FOR REVlEW

~ 1 0 2 ~ 2 ~ 0 2 4 INCW REVIEW CWHENTS

0 i . a . 01. a9.20.3 UaYAL ACTIffl h W R U N V10262C010 PREPARE FENOVAL ACTION woA((pLAN C ROR Y10262C012 SUMIT MIIF1 W ACT NP 6 ADR TO

MWTEAM FOR REV ~ia262co i i OOEITEIN REVIEW V10262C016 INWRP RYIEW UXENTS 110262COlB CLEARANCE

23sEp98 210eT98 21

23AME 12AUG9E 35 i2Au898 0

g c 7

j ' I

I

i

:

:

:

.I .

.: .

* I . : i .. .

.. .

: * I .

: - I .

, .I . : i .: .

i .- .: . i : -

HOT SPOT

I . .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

- Fig. 2 (continued)

JL

3 0

I I

m' m d t

3 im

I

-

:T

I

I

ET

- ~3mnnad - Critical ;CL id

AN

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. ,

. .

. .

. .

-

PR

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

-

- pres~ass/canwimt - Planned - C r l t l c d l I r a t

B99 4N

- ;T

b rrm[ . .

VL zc

. .

P R L : T *

26ocT98 3oocT98 5 i Y10262C022 SU)WIT ORAFT Rn ACT WP 6 ROR TO #OS 3wcr98 0 8 !

VlO282COa TRANSNITTAL TO REGS

FOR REVIEW 01 VlO262CO24 tE6S REVIEW Omw98 0 7 J W 14 : YlOXmM6 INCMP (IEVIEY CCMENTS V10262C028 W I T FINIL Rn ACT NP 6 ROR TO WE FOA

OEJAN9l lOMM39 4 .f . loYhRS9 . .

. .

. .

- .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. ..

I

imil

-

llwIR99 wbpR99 211 i . . . . .: .

:

-! . 5 :

o i

i

0 :

0 .I .

.f .

I

: 130

:

130 .i .

: 130 . I .

40 .: . 21 i 20 .i . 5 i o i

0 : :

10

.: . 6 5 :

Y102620004 V1026EUW5 REVIEN BIOS YlD26MODS AWARD CFC WNTRACT Yi02620010 EMOVAL ACTION CWTFMTXm START YlOi?82wM) RENOVAL ACTIWI CONS'IRUCTION COWRETE

ISSUE CFC PACKAGE FOA 810

Y10262E012 SVBIllT MUFT RR ACTION WT IO WElTEAR FWI REVIEW

~ i o a 2 ~ 0 1 4 WEITEAM m E n Y 10252E016 INCOW, W l T E A M COMMENTS Y 10262E018 CI.EkRANCE V10262E020 TRANSMIlTk TO REGS YlOIPEO22 SWNIT R W A L ACTION RPT TO REGS FOR

EVIEW @I) Y10WE024 R G S REVIEN

I . . .

. . mml

- . .

. .

. .

12APRS 14CCT99

1 2 m 143x99

. . . .

. . . .

. . YlO262EO26 I M W RtS UrmNlS 1tlAmlo 19JMm 43 : Y!O262€(KB SUBWIT FINAL RDloyAl ACTION RPT TO R6S 19mOo 0 i

FOR WRYL

Fig. 2 (continued)

10

.-

- t r y 1

t ...... r...-....-.-......r.-.lr--....-...~....-...--..r.............-...........~n......-.............-..................1~,

WBS 1.x.01,20.01.08 I I Bear Creek Valley I Floodplain Hot Spot Removal Early Action

and Management and RmAR

Fig. 3. Work breakdown structure for the BCV Floodplain Hot Spot Removal Early Action.

12

to lead to a mutually agreed-upon action plan that addresses public values and concerns and is technically feasible, environmentally sound, and safety- and health-conscious.

3. RXFERENCE

U S . Environmental Protection Agency 1994. Guidance for the Data Quality Objective Process, EPA QA/G-4, U .S. Environmental Protection Agency Quality Assurance Management Staff, Washington, D.C.

c

YER-3 0 1

DISTRIBUTION

1 . C. S . Haase 2. P. T. Owen 3. L. B. Raulston 4. J. H. Vanderian 5. File-EMEF DMC-RC 6. P. D. Moss, Science Applications International Corporation, 800 Oak Ridge Turnpike,

10th Floor, Oak Ridge, TN 37830