Liu Sanping - Beijing General Research Institute of Mining and Metallurgy - Leaching processes for...
-
Upload
informa-australia -
Category
Business
-
view
251 -
download
5
Transcript of Liu Sanping - Beijing General Research Institute of Mining and Metallurgy - Leaching processes for...
TWO STAGES OF LEACHING
PROCESS FOR NICKEL LATERITE
ORES
Representor:Liu Sanping
Beijing General Research of Mining and Matallurgy
E-mail: [email protected]
Shanghai, May 25th 2016
CONTENTS
• Introduction
• Atmospheric Tank – Autoclave Combined Leach
• Autoclave – Autoclave combined Leach
• Conclusions
INTRODUCTION
High pressure acid leaching (HPAL): a standard technology for limonite ores.
•High nickel extraction (ENi >97%);
•Low acid consumption (iron precipitated as hematite);
•High CAPEX and OPEX (high pressure up to 5.5MPa, high temp. up to
250~270C).
Atmospheric tank leaching (ATL): a alternative technology for saprolite ores.
•Low CAPEX and OPEX;
•Lower nickel extraction (ENi 85~93%) ;
•Higher acid consumption (iron leached as Fe3+)
INTRODUCTION
What is the suitable process for the TRANSITION laterite or MIDDLE Ni/Fe/Mg
grade laterite(Ni 1.2%~1.5%) ?
Limonite (high Fe, low Mg)
Saprolite (low Fe, high Mg)
INTRODUCTION
The impact factors for Ni recovery during laterite acid leaching :
•Acid Consumption;
•Reacting Temperature;
•Residence Time;
•Particle Size;
•Solid Concentration;
•……
The reason for Limonite High pressure acid leaching (HPAL):
High Ni recovery needs high Acid concentration(25~35 g/L) in the residual slurry;
Fe precipitation in the high acid concentration slurry needs high temperature
(250~270 oC ).
INTRODUCTION
BGRIMM idea for transition laterite:
HPAL is divided two stages:
Primary leaching: feed – high Fe laterite(smaller particle size), high acid
concentration leaching to make sure high Ni Extraction;
Secondary leaching: feed - high magnesium laterite (bigger particle, saprolite),
high temperature(~150 oC) to make sure Fe precipitation with saprolite leach;
Advantages:
•Reacting Temperature: From 250 oC to150 oC;
•Reacting Pressure: From 5 MPa to 0.5 MPa;
•Reducing Capex and Opex dramatically.
INTRODUCTION BGRIMM’s special flowsheet — an inverse leaching process
Primary leaching: atmosphere tank leaching
•Feed: small particle size portion of laterite ores;
•~95 C, input: 100% acid, 97~99% ENi & EFe;
Secondary leaching: autoclave leaching
•Feed: big particle size portion of laterite ores;
•Around 150~160C, no acid input, 500~600kPa;
•Total ENi 93~96%;
•No acid consumption for 90~95% Fe.
The leaching combination changes the BIG DIFFICULTY of HPAL to “a
common routine process”!
Atmospheric Tank – Autoclave Combined Leach
Effective size classification of laterite ores for the primary and secondary
leaching stages into order to enhance the ENi and to reduce acid
consumption.
- The fine portion ore with higher Fe and lower Mg is fed into the
primary leaching; and
- The coarse portion ore with lower Fe and higher Mg is fed to
the secondary leaching.
A primary to secondary feed ratio (65/35) was determined to be the
optimum to minimize the acid consumption.
Bench Scale Test – Leaching feed classification
Transition
Laterite
-1mm = 47%
+1mm = 53%
High Mg
Low Fe
Grinding
Secondary leaching feed
35% of total feed
(low Fe, high Mg)
Primary leaching feed
65% of total feed
(high Fe, low Mg) High Fe
Low Mg
Feed Distribution
Bench Scale Test – Ore Characteristics
Grade distribution (GD) analysis and Head grade of the primary and secondary
leaching feeds
Grade Distribution Analysis of the
Blended Ore
Feed Assay, %
Ni Fe Si Mg
Primary leach 1.54 18.68 15.19 12.63 Secondary
leach 1.47 11.95 17.76 16.82
The Primary and Secondary Feed Head Grade
Bench Scale Test – Primary Leaching
Laboratory Set-up
The objective of primary leaching is to
extract as much Ni as possible, while
maintaining a reasonably low acid
consumption.
The -1mm slurry from scrubbing and
screening is thickened to the required
solid density for leaching.
During leaching, 98% sulfuric acid, is
added as the leaching agent.
Bench Scale Test – Primary Leaching
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Ni E
xtra
ctio
n, %
Leaching Time, hrs
0.90 acid/ore (PL-15)
0.95 acid/ore (PL-11)
1.00 acid/ore (PL-12)
1.05 acid/ore (PL-13)
1.16 acid/ore (PL-14)
ENi vs acid dosage, g-acid/g-ore
Bench Scale Test – Primary Leaching
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Ni E
xtra
ctio
n, %
Leaching Time, hrs
33% solids( PL-12)
36% solids (PL-23)
39% solids (PL-18)
ENi vs retention time at different slurry density
Bench Scale Test – Primary Leaching
ptimum conditions:
Feed slurry solids density, % 36
Acid dosage, t-acid/t-ore 1
Temperature, oC 95-100
Retetion time, h 5
Results
Metal extraction (%):
Ni 98.54, Fe 71.66, Mg 97.37
Metal concentration in PLS (g/L):
Ni 5.10, Fe 47.48, Free acid 24.48
Residue (%):
Ni 0.05, Fe 9.80, Mg 0.82, Mass remaining 49.00
Determine optimum parameters - results
Bench Scale Test – Secondary Leaching
To produce an Fe depleted PLS
- Fe concentration is <5g/L, or 50% of Ni concentration
To reduce overall acid and reagent usage
- Take advantage of the acid generated to leach
laterite wiht high Mg grade
Governing reactions:
(1) Fe2(SO4)3 + 4H2O = 2FeOOH + 3H2SO4
(2) MgO + H2SO4 = MgSO4 + H2O
Objectives
One gram Fe3+ precipitated will release 2.6 g acid Autoclave – experimental setup
Bench Scale Test – Secondary Leaching
Effect of the prim/sec ore ratio
62.79 60.80 56.34
73.77
58.01
85.70 90.42
93.81 91.60
80.65
-20.00
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
48/52 (PS-14)
45/55 (PS-17)
51.5/48.5(PS-18)
54/46 (PS-19)
43/57 (PS-20)
60/40 (PS-23)
62/38 (PS-24)
65/35 (PS-33)
68/32 (PS-26)
58/42 (PS-27)
%Ex
trac
tio
n
Primary:Secondary Ore Ratio (Test Case)
Ni and Fe Extractions
Fe Extractions
Ni Extractions
Bench Scale Test – Secondary Leaching
Effect of the prim/sec ore ratio
4.23 4.40
4.10
4.48 4.28
4.44
5.26
4.74 4.78
0.25 0.26 0.36 0.39
0.75 1.01
1.75
4.33
0.63
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
48/52 (PS-14) 45/55 (PS-17) 51.5/48.5(PS-18)
54/46 (PS-19)43/57 (PS-20)60/40 (PS-23)62/38 (PS-24)65/35 (PS-33)68/32 (PS-26)58/42 (PS-27)
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n, g
/L
Prim to Sec Ore Ratio (Test Cases)
[Ni] and [Fe] in PLS
[Ni] in PLS, g/L [Fe] in PLS, g/L
Bench Scale Test – Secondary Leaching
Effect of the prim/sec ore ratio
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.88
3.30
13.18
16.48
0.00
3.75 3.87
4.41
1.71 1.51
0.90
0.58
2.50
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
pH
Fre
e A
cid
, g
/L
Prim to Sec Ore Ratio (Test Cases)
Free Acid of PLS, g/L
pH of PLS
Bench Scale Test – Secondary Leaching
Effect of the residence time
-10.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
-20.00
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n, g
/L
Ext
ract
ion
, %
Time, h
Extraction and metal concentration kinetics
Fe extraction
Ni extraction
Mg Extraction
[Ni] in PLS, g/L
[Fe] in PLS, g/L
[Mg] in PLS, g/L
Bench Scale Test – Secondary Leaching
Optimum Parameters
Primary:Secondary Feed Ore Ratio – 65:35
Residence Time – 2hrs
Temperature – 150oC
Determination optimum parameters - results
Pilot Plant Test – Leaching circuit
Pilot plant photos
Pilot Plant Test – Overall Scenario
Pilot Plant Test – Primary Leaching
Primary Leach Stage Operating Conditions
Feed slurry concentration, % solids
36%
Acid:ore ratio, t/t 1
Operating temperature, oC 95
Reaction time, hr 5
Ore Feed grade, %
Ni 1.52
Fe 20.86
Mg 11.75
Pilot Plant Test – Secondary Leaching
Secondary Leach Stage Operating Conditions
Feed slurry concentration, % solids
36
Prim:Sec ore ratio 65:35
Operating temperature, oC 150
Reaction time, hr 2
Fresh Sec Ore Feed grade, %
Ni 1.46
Fe 9.06
Mg 18.19
Pilot Plant Test – Secondary Leaching
Composite daily averages from 29 May to 17 June 2013
Pilot Plant Test – Secondary Leaching
Composite hourly and daily % Ni extractions
Pilot Plant Test – Secondary Leaching
Hourly and daily Ni and Fe concentraction of PLS
Pilot Plant Test – Secondary Leaching
4,300 kg of feed ore was leached. Leaching performance achieved is near
identical to that obtained during the bench-scale test.
Primary Leach Results Secondary Leach Results
Ni Fe Mg Ni Fe Mg
Residue Solids Grade (%) 0.05 8.38 1.32 0.15 21.11 1.57
Residue Solution Concentration (g/L) 5.08 56.70 40.11 5.29 3.40 49.41
Solids-based Metal Extraction (%) 98.40 80.63 94.56 93.44 19.94 92.65
Residue Free Acid (g/L) 18.85 15.39
% Mass Remaining (%) 48.10 64.37
Bankable Feasibility Study
General Parameters adopted
Item Amount
Operating Hours 7884 hrs per year
Leach Feed Ore 512,444 t
Ni Grade 1.496 %
Ni Extraction
(Leaching) 94.08 %
Ni Recovery (Overall) 91.64 %
Annual Ni Production 7,027 tpa
Life of Mine 20 years
CAPEX 134 million US$
OPEX 2.65 USD/lb Ni
The CAPEX and OPEX of
BGRIMM’s Inverse leaching
process were less than 10
USD/lb-Ni and 2.65 USD/lb-Ni.
Just 40% of HPAL’s CAPEX.
Consume at least less 290kg-
acid/t-ore than ATL
Ni Extraction is at least 10%
higher than ATL
Autoclave-Autoclave Combined leaching
For some HIGHER Fe transition lateriate:
Feed Weight, % Assay, %
Ni Fe Si Mg
Primary
leach 63% 1.23 28.71 10.36 4.11
Secondary
leach 37% 1.19 11.28 13.42 5.78
Atmospheric Primary leaching
R² = 0.8762
R² = 0.6176
40.00
42.00
44.00
46.00
48.00
50.00
52.00
84.00
86.00
88.00
90.00
92.00
94.00
96.00
98.00
20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0
Re
sid
ue
So
lids
Frac
tio
n (
%)
Ni E
xtra
ctio
n (
%)
Feed Fe Grade (%)
Ni Extraction (%) Residue Solids Fraction (%) Linear (Ni Extraction (%)) Linear (Residue Solids Fraction (%))
ENi vs Feed Fe Grade
ENi vs Residence time
R² = 0.9939
R² = 0.7425
45.00
46.00
47.00
48.00
49.00
50.00
51.00
52.00
53.00
54.00
92.00
92.50
93.00
93.50
94.00
94.50
95.00
95.50
96.00
4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0
Re
sid
ue
So
lids
Frac
tio
n (
%)
Ni E
xtra
ctio
n (
%)
Leaching Time (hrs)
Ni Extraction (%) Residue Solids Fraction (%) Linear (Ni Extraction (%)) Linear (Residue Solids Fraction (%))
Atmospheric Primary leaching
ENi vs Residence time at different acid consumption
85.00
86.00
87.00
88.00
89.00
90.00
91.00
92.00
93.00
94.00
95.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Ni E
xtra
ctio
n (
%)
Leaching Time (hrs)
AL-21 (acid/ore = 1) AL-24 (acid/ore = 0.95) AL-25 (acid/ore = 1) AL-27 (acid/ore = 0.95)
Log. (AL-21 (acid/ore = 1)) Log. (AL-24 (acid/ore = 0.95)) Log. (AL-25 (acid/ore = 1)) Log. (AL-27 (acid/ore = 0.95))
Atmospheric Primary leaching
Normally, the disadventages of Atmospheric Tank leaching ( Primary leaching )
as Fe grade >25% in the feed ore:
The residence time will be very long to get a acceptable ENi
In order to speed up the primary leaching, autoclave leaching is tried to instead of
atmospheric tank leaching.
Autoclave primary leaching operating conditions:
Reacting Temperature: 150 oC
Residence Time: 2 hrs
Autoclave-Autoclave Combined leaching
Autoclave Primary leaching
45.00
46.00
47.00
48.00
49.00
50.00
51.00
52.00
53.00
54.00
92.00
92.50
93.00
93.50
94.00
94.50
95.00
95.50
96.00
- 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
Re
sid
ue
So
lids
Frac
tio
n (
%)
Ni E
xtra
ctio
n (
%)
Leaching Time (hrs)
Ni Extraction (%) Residue Solids Fraction (%) Linear (Ni Extraction (%)) Linear (Residue Solids Fraction (%))
ENi vs Residence time at different tests
The ENi of autoclave leaching at 2 hrs is close to the atmospheric tank
leaching at 8~10 hrs. the leach speed is accelerated dramatically (only
20%~25% of the atmospheric tank leaching) .
The Capex and Opex will be lower than the previous process.
Conclusions
BGRIMM’s Two-stage leaching(TL, Atmospheric-Autoclave,
Autoclave-Autoclave) process is very flexible to treat transition
laterite ores with high Ni extraction.
TL consumes at least less 290 kg acid/t-ore than the ATL and its
nickel extraction reached more than 92%, at least 10% higher
than ATL.
TL’s CAPEX and OPEX were less than 10 USD/lb-Ni and 2.6
USD/lb-Ni, respectively, just accounting for 40% of the HPAL’s
CAPEX and 65~70% of the ATL’s OPEX.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to express thanks to our
colleagues in BGRIMM, who have worked for many
years in the related researches.
Thanks!