Literacy in the Content Area Classroom - Illinois State · 6. Use technology to produce,...
Transcript of Literacy in the Content Area Classroom - Illinois State · 6. Use technology to produce,...
Literacy in the Content Area Classroom
Grades 6-12
Literacy in the Content Area Classroom
Grades 6-12
Illinois State Board of Education ELA Content Area Specialist
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
Today’s Outcomes Discuss Literacy in Today’s WorldReview the Illinois Learning StandardsDetermine Literacy Needs in Content Classrooms
1. What’s Happening2. What Needs to Happen3. How To Make it Happen
--Strategies for the Classroom
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
Students who develop an even broader set of in-demand competencies will be at an even greater advantage in work and in life:
- the ability to think critically about information, - solve novel problems, - communicate and collaborate , - create new products and processes, and - adapt to change .
4
Employers Expect More• Reading and
Writing• Collaboration• Independence• Critical Thinkers• Perseverance• Problem Solvers
Literacy for the 21st Century“Adolescents entering the adult world in the 21st
century will read and write more than at any other time in human history. They will need advancedlevels of literacy to perform their jobs, run their households, act as citizens, and conduct theirpersonal lives. They will need literacy to cope with the flood of information they will find everywhere they turn. In a complex and sometimes even dangerous world, their ability to read will be crucial.”
(IRA, 1999)
Overview of your 10 Reading Standards1. Cite evidence to support analysis...2. Determine central idea… provide a summary….3. Identify key steps, sequences…. (analyze in high school)4. Determine meanings of words…5. Describe how a text presents information.. sequentially,
comparatively (analyze in high school)6. Author’s purpose/point of view (compare two or more authors)7. Integrate visual information with other information8. Distinguish among fact, opinion (M.S.) Assess whether text
support’s the author’s claim(s). (H.S.)9. Analyze the relationship between a primary and secondary
source on the same topic. (H.S. Compare and contrast….)10. Read and comprehend texts in your content independently….
Overview of Your 10 Writing Standards1. Write opinion/arguments2. Write informative/explanatory texts3. Write narratives
Standards 4‐10 help accomplish standards 1,2 or 34. Produce clear coherent writing….5. Develop and strengthen writing… 6. Use technology to produce, publish….7. Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects…8. Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital
sources…9. Draw evidence from texts…10. Write routinely for extended and shortened time frames….
Schools/Districts Have Choice
All students in all districts are expected to demonstrate the same reading and writing skills at each grade level standards.
9
Increased quantity of materials and instructional time devoted to informational text
English Language Arts Teachers
Literaturefiction, drama,
poetry
Literary NonfictionMemoirBiography
Social Studies, Science, Technical Subjects
Other informational Text
70% of the reading instruction students receive across their instructional day will be devoted to
informational text.
10
Are students really reading in all of the subjects?
Two Biggest Problems Faced by Teachers
• Students have difficulty reading the texts of various content areas
• Students don’t want to read
C. Shanahan, 2013
Simply assigning hard books will not ensure that studentslearn at high levels!
Simply assigning hard books will not ensure that studentslearn at high levels!
www.fisherandfrey.com
The New Illinois Learning Standards Cannot Be Met without
Reading and WritingAcross all content areas students should… Read Write Listen/view Discuss/present Think critically and creatively Use language and vocabulary to read and
comprehend text to support the contenthttps://www.teachingchannel.org/videos/reading-like-a-historian-corroboration
Content Area vs. Discipline Literacy• “Content-area literacy”
– Generalizable routines, generic comprehension strategies intended to be taught by reading and content teachers alike and applied across the curriculum
• “Disciplinary literacy”– Specialized ways of learning and
communicating in each specific discipline– Includes the language differences across
disciplines
14
Chemistry: experiments,
processes; connections between texts,
formulas, graphs & charts.
History: Consider author’s perspective, contextualize the text
with historical period & place, corroborating information across
sources.
Goal: arrive at truthClose reading is highly importantHeavy emphasis on error detection
Precision of understanding essential
Math – Disciplinary Reading
Elements:Pythagorean Theorem
Properties:Relation in Euclidean Geometry among the 3 sides of a right triangle
ProcessesValues are represented by a, b, and c. To find a missing value, substitute the known values and solve for the missing value.
Key DetailsVocab:• Right triangle• Side or leg• Hypotenuse• Equal• Square• area
Analogies Illustrations:
Allows prediction of how world works
Understanding of processes and
experimentsClose connections among graphs, charts, and formulas
Reading strategies
are corroboration
and transformation
Science – Disciplinary Reading
Chemistry Note-taking
Substances Properties Processes InteractionsAtomic Expression
Single texts are problematic
(no corroboration)
View history as argument based on partial evidence; narratives are more than facts
Interpretive, authors and sourcing are central in interpretation (must consider bias/perspective)
History/Social Studies –Disciplinary Reading
History Sources• Who is the author? Can I trust what
he/she says? Why or why not?• Who was the author writing to? Why?• When did the author write it? Does that
make a difference?• Do others agree? If not, who is more
credible?• What does the author say that makes
him/her believable?https://sheg.stanford.edu/rlh
Multiple Text Discussion Web
Yes/No Question
YES
Text 1 Evidence
Text 2 Evidence
Text 3 Evidence
NO
Text 1 Evidence
Text 2 Evidence
Text 3 Evidence
Our View
Inquiry ChartQ 1 Q 2 Q 3 Credible?
Text 1
Text 2
Text 3
My Opinion
Is Oprah dangerous?
Is Oprah self-serving?
Is Oprah compassionate?
Credible?
Text 1Answer/evidence
No: [her accomplishments] “speak …to touching hearts, and leaving each one uplifted”
Text 2 Answer/evidence
Text 3Answer/evidence
Yes: “Oprah is a conduit to lead people to hell”
My Opinion
Deals with the human conditionConveys themes about the human experience