List of the Canons of Statutory Interpretation
-
Upload
ian-ghrist -
Category
Documents
-
view
98 -
download
8
description
Transcript of List of the Canons of Statutory Interpretation
The Cannons of Statutory Construction
The Rule Against Surplusage If possible, each word/phrase has meaning Encourages narrow interpretation
Noscitur a sociis List without a catchall Common traits limit the termsEjusdem Generis List with a catchall Catchall limited by the common traits of the preceding words
Expressio Unius Including terms precludes other terms Look for indicators that the terms or phrases are either exhaustive or abridged E.g. the words “may include” = abridged, whereas the word “only” = exhaustive, also look
for a series, sharp contrast, and context to help decide if it’s exhaustive or abridged.
In Pari Materia aka The Whole Act Rule 1. Words in a section read in context of the whole statute2. Also read in context with related statutes (scope v. aim)Identical Words Presumption Words have the same meaning in the text They also potentially have the same meaning across related statutes
Punctuation Traditionally, irrelevant (scribes did all the punctuation, judges just talked) Today, minor element, judges don’t give it much weight
Rule of the Serial Comma The first term in a list is the first word or phrase to be bound by a comma E.g. “real property and buildings, …” v. “real property, buildings, …” Former: Real property and buildings is a single lexeme Latter: Real property is a lexeme and buildings is another separate lexeme
The Last Antecedent Rule Qualifiers/Restrictive Phrases only modify the immediately preceding word, phrase, or
clause If the qualifier is set off by commas, it can apply more expansively E.g. planes, trains, and cars with blue paint = any plane, any train, only blue cars E.g. planes, trains, and cars, with blue paint = blue planes, blue trains, and blue cars Courts invalidate this rule whenever the evident meaning leads to a different result, i.e.,
they give this cannon very little weight
Provisos v. Savings Clauses Provisos, e.g., “provided that” construed narrowly Savings Clauses, e.g., “notwithstanding” construed broadly