Lisrel

18
Presentation Presentation On On LISREL LISREL Under Guidance Of Submitted By Dr. Vikas Daryal Naveen Chopra Director MBA F S2 TIMT 1106.12

description

 

Transcript of Lisrel

Page 1: Lisrel

PresentationPresentationOnOn

LISRELLISREL

Under Guidance Of Submitted ByDr. Vikas Daryal Naveen ChopraDirector MBA F S2TIMT 1106.12

Page 2: Lisrel

LISRELLISREL

Linear Structural Relationship

Page 3: Lisrel

LISRELLISRELA LISREL is defined by a hypothesized

pattern of linear relationships among a set of measured and latent variables.

Such a pattern of linear relationships can be represented mathematically in a variety of ways.

There exist alternative ways of organizing variables and defining parameter matrices, which yield alternative mathematical frameworks for representing data models and covariance structure models.

Page 4: Lisrel

Tools AppliedTools AppliedPCA (Principle Component

Analysis)SEM (Structural Equation Model)

Page 5: Lisrel

Principle Component Principle Component AnalysisAnalysisPrincipal component analysis (PCA) is a

mathematical procedure uses orthogonal transformation to convert a set of observations of possibly correlated variables into a set of values of linearly uncorrelated variables called principal components.

The number of principal components is less than or equal to the number of original variables.

Principal components are guaranteed to be independent if the data set is jointly normally distributed.

PCA is sensitive to the relative scaling of the original variables.

Page 6: Lisrel

Variance ContributionVariance Contribution

Page 7: Lisrel

PCA AnalysisPCA AnalysisThis Variance analysis shows that

the “Layout” variable having the most impact on “Repurchase Link” in PC3 i.e. 0.722.

Page 8: Lisrel

Structural Equation Model Structural Equation Model Structural equation modeling (SEM) is

a statistical technique for testing and estimating causal relations using a combination of statistical data and qualitative causal assumptions.

This definition of SEM was articulated by the geneticist Sewall Wright (1921), the economist Trygve Haavelmo (1943) and the cognitive scientist Herbert A. Simon(1953), and formally defined by Judea Pearl (2000) using a calculus of counterfactuals.

Structural equation models (SEM) allow both confirmatory and exploratory modeling, meaning they are suited to both theory testing and theory development.

Page 9: Lisrel

Structural Equation ModelStructural Equation ModelThe concepts used in the model must

then be operationalized to allow testing of the relationships between the concepts in the model.

The model is tested against the obtained measurement data to determine how well the model fits the data.

The causal assumptions embedded in the model often have falsifiable implications which can be tested against the data.

Page 10: Lisrel

InterpretationInterpretationGFI (Goodness of Fit Index)NFI(Normed Fit Index)CFI (Comparative Fit Index)

Page 11: Lisrel

Goodness of Fit IndexGoodness of Fit IndexThe goodness of fit index (GFI) is

a measure of fit between the hypothesized model and the observed covariance matrix. The GFI ranges between 0 and 1, with a cutoff value of .9 generally indicating acceptable model fit.

Page 12: Lisrel

Normed Fit IndexNormed Fit IndexThe normed fit index (NFI) analyzes

the discrepancy between the chi-squared value of the hypothesized model and the chi-squared value of the null model.  However, this NFI was found to be very susceptible to sample size. Value for the NFI should range between 0 and 1, with a cutoff of .95 or greater indicating a good model fit.

Page 13: Lisrel

Comparative Fit IndexComparative Fit IndexThe comparative fit index (CFI)

analyzes the model fit by examining the discrepancy between the data and the hypothesized model, while adjusting for the issues of sample size inherent in the chi-squared test of model fit, and the normed fit index. CFI values range from 0 to 1, with larger values indicating better fit; a CFI value of .90 or larger is generally considered to indicate acceptable model fit.

Page 14: Lisrel

Path DiagramPath Diagram

Page 15: Lisrel

InterpretationInterpretationThis Path Diagram also shows the

value 1.06, which is also highest in all variables and having the high impact on the “Repurchase Link”

Page 16: Lisrel

ConclusionConclusionAt last, it concludes that, both

PCA & SEM shows the same results, so data gathered by researcher is consistent and the model is fit.

Page 17: Lisrel

Thank Thank YouYou

Page 18: Lisrel

Any Query?Any Query?