Liquid/Semiconductor Interfaces through Vibrational Spectroscopy R. Kramer Campen Physical Chemistry...

38
Liquid/Semiconductor Interfaces through Vibrational Spectroscopy R. Kramer Campen Physical Chemistry Department Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society 1 / 37 25/3/1 3 w/ Maria Sovago, Cho-Shuen Hsieh, Mischa Bonn, Ana Vila Verde

Transcript of Liquid/Semiconductor Interfaces through Vibrational Spectroscopy R. Kramer Campen Physical Chemistry...

Liquid/Semiconductor Interfaces through

Vibrational Spectroscopy

R. Kramer CampenPhysical Chemistry Department

Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society

1 / 3725/3/13

w/ Maria Sovago, Cho-Shuen Hsieh, Mischa Bonn, Ana Vila Verde

Outline

I. Justification: why vibrational spectrocopy?

II. Background: making vibrational spectroscopy interface specific: vibrational sum frequency spectroscopy

III. Interfacial Solvent (Water): structure and dynamics

IV. Semiconductor Interface: optical detection of surface phonons

2 / 3725/3/13

Outline

Why vibrational spectroscopy?

3 / 3725/3/13

Vibrations report, label free, on inter/intramolecular forces (and structure)

I. Justification

Barth and Zscherp (2002) Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics, 35, 4 from

Zscherp and Heberle (1997) Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 101, 10542

Spectrum of local oscillators modified by environment,

1. Through-bond coupling

2. Hydrogen bonding

3. Transition dipole coupling

Macromolecules (proteins)

4 / 3725/3/13

Why vibrational spectroscopy?Vibrations report, label free, on

interatomic/molecular forces (and structure)

Liquids (water)

I. Justification

OH stretch modulated by anharmonic coupling to low frequency modes.

5 / 3725/3/13

II. Background

Interface specific vibrational spectroscopyVibrational Sum Frequency Spectroscopy

irvis sfg

ν=0forbidden in bulk water

c(2)=0

c(2)=0 ν=1

6 / 3725/3/13

II. Background

What is detected?The field radiated by the second order induced

polarizationInduced polarization can be expanded in a Taylor series

Assuming two incident plane waves and just considering the second order term,

7 / 3725/3/13

Origin of Interfacial SpecificityEven order nonlinear susceptibilities

Second order nonlinear susceptibilities are third rank tensors

…Changing the sign of all indices is equivalent to inverting the axes: the material response must change sign…

But, with inversion symmetry, all directions are equivalent so…

For materials with inversion symmetry (χ(2)=0), inversion symmetry is always broken at interfaces.

II. Background

8 / 3725/3/13

Origin of Chemical SpecificityRaman scattering off an excited, coherent, vibration

II. Background

VSF active modes must be Raman and IR active.

9 / 3725/3/13

III. Solvent to Interface: Structure

III. Approaching the Interface from the Solvent Side:

Interfacial Water Structure

10 / 3725/3/13

The OH stretch at the air/water interface

Two (or three) qualitative populations

Free OH

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

3800360034003200IR frequency (cm-1)

3000

IR Abs: Liquid Water

Hydrogen Bonded OH

I SFG (a

rbitr

ary

units

)

free

III. Solvent to Interface: Structure

VSF spectral features are apparent that are absent in bulk IR.

11 / 3725/3/13

III. Solvent to Interface: Structure

Is the double peaked feature general?Yes!

Double peaked feature appears at all interfaces

Kataoka,…, Cremer (2004) Langmuir, 20(5), 1662

Becraft and Richmond (2005) Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 109(11), 5108

12 / 3725/3/13

III. Solvent to Interface: Structure

Is the free OH feature general?It appears at all hydrophobic interfaces

CCl4 / H2O

Hexane / H2O

Air/ H2O

Scatena, Brown, Richmond (2001) Science, 292, 908

Silica/OTS/Water Interface

Ye, Nihonyanagi, Uosaki (2001) PCCP, 3(16), 3463

13 / 3725/3/13

III. Solvent to Interface: Structure

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

3800360034003200IR frequency (cm-1)

liquid water

3000

I SFG

Du,…, Shen(1993) Physical Review Letters, 70(15), 2313

ice

weak‘water-like’

strong‘ice-like’

What causes the double peaked feature ?

One idea: interfacial structural heterogeneity

14 / 3725/3/13

What causes the double peaked feature ?

A second idea: symmetric/asymmetric stretch

O-D O-D

asym

symm

(same water molecule)

III. Solvent to Interface: Structure

15 / 3725/3/13

Two peaks should collapse to one

SSAS

Sym/Asym hypothesis

D2O

HDO

SS AS

StrongWeak

D2O

HDO

‘Ice/Liquid-like’ hypothesis

The amplitude of the whole spectrum should change.

How can we distinguish these scenarios experimentally

Isotopic dilution

III. Solvent to Interface: Structure

16 / 3725/3/13

Two peaks collapse to onedouble peaked spectral feature ≠ water structure

2

1

0

SFG

inte

nsi

ty (

arb

. unit

s)

3200300028002600240022002000

IR frequency (cm-1)

O-D

C-Hwater /lipid ÷10

water/air

H2O:D2O 2:1

pure D2O

H2O:D2O 2:1

pure D2O

III. Solvent to Interface: Structure

17 / 3725/3/13

300028002600240022002000

IR frequency (cm-1)

water/air

bend overtone (dOH=2)

O-D O-D

asym

symm dOH=2

*

**

D2O HOD switches off coupling

H

D

*

Two peaks have same symmetry!#

# Gan,…, Wang (2006) Journal of Chemical Physics, 124, 114705.

Are the two peaks sym/asym?

III. Solvent to Interface: Structure

18 / 3725/3/13

freq

uenc

y

stretch mode DOS

coupling offcoupling on

Evanswindow

bend overtone (dOH=2)

300028002600240022002000IR frequency (cm-1)

water/air

bend overtone (dOH=2)

**

Hypothesis one: two peaks are from a Fermi Resonance with the Bend

Overtone

III. Solvent to Interface: Structure

19 / 3725/3/13

Hypothesis two: low frequency peak from collective effects (intermolecular

coupling)

III. Solvent to Interface: Structure

Buch et al. (2007) Journal of Chemical Physics, 127(20), 204710

coupling switched off

Computation suggests the low frequency peak is a the result of intermolecular coupling (vibrational

delocalization).

20 / 3725/3/13

In either case using HDO allows more straightforward access to structure

Fitting the HDO data

III. Solvent to Interface: Structure

25/3/13

III. Solvent to Interface: Dynamics

III. Solvent to Interface: Dynamics

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

3800360034003200IR frequency (cm-1)

3000

IR Abs: Liquid Water

I SFG (a

rbitr

ary

units

)

free

Free OH

21 / 37

25/3/13

III. Solvent to Interface: Dynamics

Probing dynamics: IR pump – VSF Probe

IR (100 fs)

vis (100 fs)

SFG

v = 0

v = 1

IR pump (100 fs)

twait

• SFG signal decreases due to depletion of ground state.

• Recovery reflects vibrational relaxation and possibly reorientation.

wait

SFG

pump

22 / 37

25/3/13

III. Solvent to Interface: Dynamics

Probing reorientation of the free OH

23 / 37

25/3/13

III. Solvent to Interface: Dynamics

different rates the same rateSignals relax at…

At long times…

signals do not converge signals converge

Developing intuition for the signal

24 / 37

25/3/13

III. Solvent to Interface: Dynamics

Free OH relaxation is intermediate

τp, pump = 640 ± 20 fs

τs. pump = 870 ± 50 fs

25 / 37

25/3/13

III. Solvent to Interface: Dynamics

A brief simulation interlude

•Simulation box is 30*30*60 Å.•Periodic boundary conditions.•NVE at T = 300 K.•Simulation run for 2 ns (step = 1 fs).•SPC/E potential.

26 / 37

25/3/13

III. Solvent to Interface: Dynamics

f = yesθ = maybe (diffusion within a potential)

〈ϕ

2

free OH

bulk H2O

〈ω

2

〉Free OH reorientation is diffusive (in MD)

27 / 37

25/3/13

III. Solvent to Interface: Dynamics

Consistent with diffusion in a potential

Free OH has a preferred distribution in θ

28 / 37

25/3/13

III. Solvent to Interface: Dynamics

Model reorientation as diffusive in a potential

29 / 37

25/3/13

III. Solvent to Interface: Dynamics

Df = 0.32 rad2/ps, Dq = 0.36 rad2/ps

Fitting 2D diffusion model to simulation output

30 / 37

25/3/13

III. Solvent to Interface: Dynamics

MD results describe data without adjustable parameters

31 / 37

Bulk (arb orient)Dϕ = 0.1 rad2/ps

Dθ = 0.1 rad2/ps

Free OHDϕ = 0.32 rad2/ps

Dθ = 0.36 rad2/ps

On average, free OH reorient ≈ 3x faster than bulk

25/3/13

III. Solvent to Interface: Dynamics

Free OH reorientation relative to bulk

32 / 37

33 / 37IV. Solid to Interface

Phonon spectroscopy in bulk α-qtz

Gonze, Allan, Teter (1992) Physical Review Letters, 68(24), 3603

Probing these modes optically (IR or Raman) depends on:

1. Mode symmetry

2. Tranverse (couples to IR) v. longitudinal (does not)

25/3/13

34 / 3725/3/13

VSF probes both IR and Raman active transverse optical phonons: a simplified phonon spectrum that reflects bulk

symmetry.

VSF phonon spectroscopy in bulk α-qtz

Liu and Shen (2008) Physical Review B, 78(2), 024302

IV. Solid to Interface

795 cm-

1

1064 cm-1 1160 cm-1

35 / 3725/3/13

VSF surface phonon spectroscopy on α-qtz and amorphous SiO2

IV. Solid to Interface

Resonances appear in VSF response at,1. nonbulk frequencies2. nonbulk symmetries3. for amorphous material4. and are perturbed by surface

chemistry

Liu and Shen (2008) Physical Review Letters, 101(1), 016101

36 / 3725/3/13

IV. Solid to Interface

VSF surface phonon spectroscopy on α-qtz for tracking surface

reconstruction

wavenumber (cm-1)

after being baked at 100°C

rehydroxylated in ambient air

after being baked at 500°C

rehydroxylated in ambient air

rehydroxylated in boiling water

Si

Si

O

Si

OH

Liu and Shen (2008) Physical Review Letters, 101(1), 016101

Si

OH2

Si

Si

OH2O+

surface damage

= quartz= amorphous silica

+

Conclusions

37 / 3725/3/13

Conclusions

1. Using VSF spectroscopy one can probe both interfacial solvent (most work on water) and surface phonons at buried interfaces.

2. Adding additional pulses to VSF experiments makes it possible to probe structural and energy relaxation dynamics with interfacial specificity.

3. Future work: optically probing the association of interfacial molecules with particular surface sites.

Related Publications (from our previous work the results of which were discussed above)

1. Sovago, Campen, Wurpel, Müller, Bakker, Bonn (2008) Vibrational Response of Hydrogen-Bonded Interfacial Water is Dominated by Interfacial Coupling, Physical Review Letters, 100, 173901

2. Sovago, Campen, Bakker, Bonn (2009) Hydrogen bonding strength of interfacial water determined with surface sum-frequency generation, Chemical Physics Letters, 470, 7

3. Hsieh, Campen, Vila Verde, Bolhuis, Nienhuys, Bonn (2011) Ultrafast Reorientation of Dangling OH Groups at the Air-Water Interface Using Femtosecond Vibrational Spectroscopy, Physical Review Letters, 107(11), 116102

4. Vila Verde, Bolhuis, Campen (2012) Statics and Dynamics of Free and Hydrogen-Bonded OH Groups at the Air/Water Interface, Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 116(31), 9467

bonus page25/3/13