Liquid Hydrocarbons1

download Liquid Hydrocarbons1

of 12

Transcript of Liquid Hydrocarbons1

  • 7/29/2019 Liquid Hydrocarbons1

    1/12

    Hydrogen Production by Catalytic Reforming of LiquidHydrocarbons

    Dong Ju Moon

    Published online: 6 November 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

    Abstract In this review, we are reporting the catalytic

    reforming of liquid hydrocarbon fuels carried out in ourresearch group, covering the catalytic reforming of iso-

    octane and toluene as surrogate of gasoline, gasoline fuel

    processor system and steam reforming ofn-hexadecane and

    decahydronaphthalene, main constituents of diesel. The

    commercial ICI reforming catalyst is prone to be poisoned

    by sulfur contained in iso-octane. We investigated various

    supported transition metal formulations and developed Ni/

    Fe/MgO/Al2O3 (KIST-5) catalyst with prolonged catalytic

    stability ([760 h), higher activity and sulfur tolerance

    ability over commercial ICI and HT catalysts for ATR

    reaction of iso-octane. We found that the concentration of

    CO can be reduced to\1,800 ppm by the gasoline fuel

    processor system charged with KIST-5 reforming catalyst,

    commercial HTS catalyst and KIST PtNi/CeO2 LTS cat-

    alyst. The addition of Rh metal to spc-Ni/MgAl catalyst

    as promoter was found to be very effective in inhibiting

    the deactivation of spc-Ni/MgAl catalyst by sintering of

    reduced Ni metal at high temperature during steam

    reforming ofn-hexadecane. A 0.3 wt% Rh loading on spc-

    Ni/MgAl catalyst was optimized to have the best perfor-

    mance for steam reforming of n-hexadecane among the

    prepared catalysts. The addition of Rh to spc-Ni/MgAl

    catalyst also restricted the deactivation of the catalyst due

    to carbon formation at high reaction temperature. In view

    point of prolonged stability and higher activity, these

    developed reforming catalysts have a good scope in the

    reforming process of gasoline and diesel for hydrogen

    station and fuel processor system applications.

    Keywords Catalytic reforming Hydrogen production Fuel processor system Hydrogen station Steamreforming Gasoline Iso-octane Toluene N-hexadecane

    1 Introduction

    Hydrogen has the potential to offer cleaner, more-efficient

    alternatives to the combustion of gasoline and other fossil

    fuels. Though transition from a petroleum-based to a

    hydrogen-based economy is expensive, in the long run it is

    affordable. A total conversion to a hydrogen economy

    society is possible in the near future. Limited petroleum-

    based fuels resources, rising natural gas prices, dependency

    on other countries for fuel, green house gas emissions are

    the driving forces to shift towards hydrogen economy

    society. Hydrogen economy will revolutionize the world in

    energy crises. It is eco-friendly and produces no air pol-

    lutants, green house gases when used in the fuel cells. It

    can be produced using diverse domestic resources

    including fossil fuels such as natural gas, liquid hydro-

    carbons and coal, nuclear, biomass and other renewable

    energy technologies, such as solar, wind and hydro-elec-

    tric power [1].

    Most of the hydrogen is now produced as an industrial

    scale by the process of steam reforming of natural gas or as

    a byproduct of petroleum refining and chemicals produc-

    tion. Generally, it is produced by the following processes

    such as steam reforming (SR), partial oxidation (POX) and

    autothermal reforming (ATR) of hydrocarbons.

    Steam reforming uses thermal energy to separate

    hydrogen from the carbon components of hydrocarbons,

    D. J. Moon (&)

    Clean Energy Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology

    (KIST), 39-1, Hawolgok-dong, Sungbuk-ku, Seoul,

    Republic of Korea

    e-mail: [email protected]

    123

    Catal Surv Asia (2011) 15:2536

    DOI 10.1007/s10563-010-9105-5

  • 7/29/2019 Liquid Hydrocarbons1

    2/12

    and involves the reaction of these fuels with steam on

    catalytic surfaces. The first step of the reaction is the

    decomposition of the fuel into hydrogen and carbon mon-

    oxide, followed by water gas shift reaction (WGS) of the

    carbon monoxide and water to carbon dioxide and hydro-

    gen [24]. Steam reforming is an endothermic process,

    hence some of the fuel must be burned and the heat

    transferred to the reformer via heat exchangers.Partial oxidation involves [5] the reaction of oxygen

    with fuel to produce H2 and CO when the oxygen-to-fuel

    ratio is less than that required for total combustion. Partial

    oxidation can be conducted with a catalyst (catalytic partial

    oxidation) or without a catalyst (non-catalytic partial oxi-

    dation). The reaction rates are much higher for partial

    oxidation than for steam reforming, but the H2 yield per

    carbon in the fuel is lower.

    Autothermal reforming involves the reaction of oxygen,

    steam and fuel to produce H2 and CO, and can be viewed

    as a combination of partial oxidation and steam reforming.

    This reforming step generates gases which contain 812%CO besides H2, CO2, CH4 and air. This CO must be con-

    verted with the help of steam to CO2 and hydrogen via

    WGS reaction to enrich the hydrogen [612].

    Hydrogen produced by catalytic reforming of hydro-

    carbons such as methane, methanol, ethanol, liquid petro-

    leum gas (LPG), gasoline, kerosene, diesel and other oil

    derivatives can be used as fuel for fuel cell [1316].

    Hydrogen contains less energy than gasoline or diesel on a

    per-volume basis, so it is difficult to store enough hydrogen

    onboard a vehicle to travel long distance. The lack of an

    infrastructure for the production and distribution of H2 has

    stimulated research in fuel processing, in particular, the

    development of fuel processors for reforming of infra-

    structured fuels such as natural gas, liquefied petroleum

    gas, gasoline and diesel at the point of applications.

    In our previous review [1720], the hydrogen produc-

    tion by catalytic reforming of gaseous hydrocarbons has

    been reviewed. Liquid fuels can be used as the energy

    carriers in many applications, especially residential power

    generation (RPG) systems in remote areas and the auxiliary

    power units (APU) based on solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC)

    systems. Especially, diesel is an attractive fuel for the

    production of hydrogen by reforming because of its high

    gravimetric and volumetric hydrogen density and well-

    established delivery infrastructure. Ahmed et al. [21] dis-

    cussed the advantages of using liquid hydrocarbons for

    portable and stationery fuel processors. The main problems

    associated with the reforming of diesel are related to cat-

    alyst degradation during the reaction due to the harsh

    operating conditions such as high temperatures and high

    H2O/C ratios, the necessary to obtain high yield of

    hydrogen. Degradation may be due to poisoning of the

    catalysts by sulfur, thermal sintering and extensive carbon

    formation due to the low H/C ratio and the high molecular

    weight of the molecules present in diesel fuel.

    Recently, proton exchanged membrane (PEM) fuel

    cells operating with hydrogen from hydrocarbon reform-

    ing technologies are being increasingly accepted as the

    most appropriate power source for future generation

    vehicles. It has polymer electrolyte and operates at 80 C

    with hydrogen as reformate, prepared externally. ForPEM fuel cells, the concentration of CO should be

    reduced as it poisons an anode catalyst. Solid oxide fuel

    cell is also gaining interest, though the operating tem-

    perature is high (700900 C). It has ceramic electrolyte

    and can use H2/CO2/CH4 reformate as fuel which can be

    reformed internally or externally. It is tolerant to sulfur

    and there is no CO poison effect as observed in PEM

    fuel cells.

    Presently, steam reforming of hydrocarbons, especially

    of methane is the largest and generally the most econom-

    ical way to make hydrogen and has been reported by many

    researchers [1, 16, 17, 21]. However, little has beenreported on ATR of liquid hydrocarbon fuels [22]. The lack

    of infrastructure for hydrogen production and distribution

    as well as the current cost of hydrogen from nuclear or

    renewable energy has led the car manufacturers and

    researchers to consider on-board generation from various

    hydrocarbons. ATR of n-octane was applied [23] recently

    for developing on-board reformers for automotive appli-

    cations. Ni-based catalysts had moderate activity in this

    reaction than noble metal catalysts which also get deacti-

    vated under reaction conditions [24]. A bimetallic NiPd

    catalyst show high activity with good stability. Springmann

    et al. [25] tested Rh-based catalyst deposited on metal

    sheets in a monolithnic reactor for steam reforming and

    ATR of liquid hydrocarbons such as iso-octane, hexane and

    toluene.

    Very little experimental data is available on liquid

    hydrocarbon. Krumpelt et al. [26] also reported data on

    pilot scale reformer of iso-octane. Catalytic partial oxida-

    tion of higher hydrocarbons such as iso-octane, n-decane

    and diesel fuel over Rh-coated monoliths with high yield of

    H2 and CO (*80%) in autothermal millisecond reactors

    have been reported [2729]. Addition of steam to the cat-

    alytic partial oxidation of diesel and gasoline fuel and their

    surrogates over precious and transition metal catalysts

    increase H2 and CO2 and reduce CO levels at contact times

    typically greater than milliseconds compared to dry con-

    ditions [30], suggesting water gas shift and steam reform-

    ing occur with the addition of steam to the reactor.

    In this work, the catalytic reforming of liquid fuels

    carried out in our research group will be reviewed covering

    the catalytic reforming of iso-octane and toluene as a sur-

    rogate of gasoline, the steam reforming of n-hexane as a

    surrogate of diesel.

    26 D. J. Moon

    123

  • 7/29/2019 Liquid Hydrocarbons1

    3/12

    2 Features of Catalysts

    Generally, the composition of reforming catalyst typically

    comprise of transition metals (Ni, Co, Fe, etc.) or noble

    metals (Pt, Pd, Rh, etc.) deposited or incorporated into

    carefully engineered supports such as thermally stabilized

    alumina, doped alumina with promoters to accelerate car-

    bon vaporization [31] and mixed metal oxides [32].

    2.1 Hydrotalcites

    Anionic clay-based hydrotalcites-like materials have been

    extensively studied [3336] in last few decades for various

    catalytic applications such as steam reforming, base-cata-

    lyzed organic transformations, alcohol synthesis, alkylation

    of phenol with alcohols, selective oxidation, isomerization

    of allylic compounds and decomposition of nitrogen and

    sulfur oxides. Hydrotalcite-derived mixed oxides are used

    as ion exchangers, absorbers, catalysts and catalyst sup-

    ports. They show interesting properties such as high sur-face area, phase purity, basic surface properties, structural

    stability and memory effect [37]. Memory effect

    allows the reconstruction of the original hydrotalcite

    structure under mild conditions when contacting the

    product of the thermal treatment with water solutions

    containing various anions [37, 38]. Upon calcinations,

    hydrotalcite-like compounds form a homogeneous mixture

    of oxides with a very small crystal size, stable to thermal

    treatment and upon reduction form small and thermally

    stable metal crystallites [39].

    Usually, supported metal catalysts used in the reforming

    reactions of hydrocarbons are prepared by wet impregna-

    tion of different supports. But this method has drawbacks

    that it is not reproducible, gives inhomogeneity in metal

    distribution on surface and also fine metal particles tend to

    sinter at high temperature resulting in the catalyst deacti-

    vation [40]. So solid phase crystallization (spc) method

    giving stable and highly dispersed metal-supported catalyst

    using pervoskite [41] and hydrotalcite [42] as precursor

    have been reported.

    2.2 Noble Metals Loaded Hydrotalcites

    The reforming catalysts typically comprise of transition

    metals (Ni, Co, Fe, etc.) or noble metals (Pt, Pd, Rh, etc.)

    deposited or incorporated into carefully on the supports

    [43].

    Takehira et al. [44] reported that Pt or Ru doped Ni-

    based catalyst prepared from MgAl hydrotalcite-like

    anionic clay with citrate method showed high and stable

    activity for steam reforming of propane. Dreyer et al. [45]

    studied autotherrmal steam reforming of higher hydrocar-

    bons such as n-decane, n-hexadecane and JP-8 over

    Rh-coated monolith. Noble metals, especially Rh catalysts

    are active in the reforming of hydrocarbons to synthesis gas

    and also they tolerate sulfur and prevent coke formation

    unlike conventional nickel catalysts which are necessary

    properties for any reforming catalyst used for commercial

    application [46]. Commercial fuels contain sulfur as aro-

    matic rings which cannot be removed completely [47].

    Hence noble metals, especially Rh is preferred even thoughit is costly.

    Moon et al. [17] reported the steam reforming of n-

    hexadecane, a main constituent of diesel, over noble metal

    (Rh) modified Ni-based hydrotalcite catalyst. The catalysts

    were prepared by a co-precipitation and dipping methods.

    The noble metal modified Ni-based hydrotalcite catalyst

    displayed higher resistance for the sintering of active metal

    than Ni-based hydrotalcite catalysts prepared by conven-

    tional method. Rh modified Ni-based catalysts showed high

    resistance to the formation of carbon compared to the

    Ni-based catalysts.

    2.3 Mixed Oxides and/or Noble Metal Loading

    In the industrial production of H2 by steam-methane

    reforming, Ni supported on modified alumina or mixed

    metal oxides are most widely used [48]. Although other

    Group VIII metals such as Co, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ir and Pt are

    active for steam reforming. Among these Ni catalysts are

    preferred because of their lower cost. The Ni catalysts are

    prone to deactivation due to sulphur poisoning and coke

    formation. Hence, the interest in using Rh-based reforming

    catalysts for steam reforming is increasing, in spite of their

    initial higher cost as they tend to inhibit coke formation

    [49]. The role of oxide supports have been investigated on

    the performance of Rh catalysts for the autothermal

    reforming of gasoline and gasoline surrogates to hydrogen

    [13, 50]. As a part of the development of a gasoline

    reformer, the reforming of iso-octane, a model compound

    for gasoline, over a Pt catalyst supported on a CeO2ZrO2mixed oxide support was investigated by Villegas et al.

    [51]. They selected this support as its redox properties can

    promote noble metals activity, whereas its basic character

    limits carbon deposition in reforming reactions. They

    found that the ceria-zirconia support plays an active role in

    the transformation of the carbonaceous species, originating

    from iso-octane decomposition into gaseous products and

    hence, Pt/CeO2ZrO2 catalyst apparently does not get

    poisoned by carbon deposition.

    Kaila [52] used two bimetallic RhPt catalysts, with total

    metal loading of not more than 0.5 wt%, prepared by co-

    impregnation from Rh(NO3)3 and Pt(NH4)4(NO3)2 precur-

    sors. The Rh to Pt molar ratios of the bimetallic catalysts

    were 1.2 and 2.4 mol/mol. The performance of these

    bimetallic catalysts in ATR of the n-dodecanetoluene

    Hydrogen Production From Liquid Hydrocarbons 27

    123

  • 7/29/2019 Liquid Hydrocarbons1

    4/12

    mixture was compared with the performance of Rh, Pd, and

    Pt catalysts and the ZrO2 support. They found that thermal

    stability of Rh catalyst was improved when Rh was com-

    bined with Pt in the bimetallic RhPt catalysts.

    3 Catalytic Reforming of Liquid Hydrocarbons

    Many researchers have reported Rh catalysts for partial

    oxidation of CH4 and C2H6, steam reforming of CH4,

    ethanol and propanol and dry reforming of CH4 [53],

    however, little has reported on ATR of hydrocarbon fuels

    [22]. Steam reforming of liquid hydrocarbons such as

    gasoline, kerosene, diesel and other oil derivatives have

    been reported [5456]. Liquid fuels can be used as the

    energy carriers in many applications especially residential

    power generation (RPG) systems in remote areas and the

    auxiliary power units (APU) based on SOFC systems.

    Especially, gasoline and diesel are attractive fuels for the

    production of hydrogen by reforming because of their highgravimetric and volumetric hydrogen density and well

    established infrastructure.

    3.1 Catalytic Reforming of Gasoline

    The overall POX reforming reaction (autothermal reform-

    ing, ATR) of iso-octane, as a main component of gasoline

    (Eq. 1) is given by,

    C8H18 x O2 3:76 N2 16 2x H2O! 8CO2 25 2x H2 3:76 x N2 1

    where x is a ratio of oxygen/fuel.During POX reforming of iso-octane and toluene, the

    heat of reaction and the amount of carbon formed were

    calculated by the Gibbs free energy minimization method

    [57] were reported. Figure 1 shows the effect of O/C ratio

    on the heat of reaction in POX reforming reaction of iso-

    octane at 700 C and feed molar ratios H2O/C = 3 and 1.

    The heat of reaction for the gross-reaction is dependent on

    the molar ratio of oxygen/fuel, the molar ratio of H2O/fuel

    and the reaction temperature. There is gradual change from

    endothermic at sufficiently low O/C molar ratio to exo-

    thermic at high O/C molar ratio, 0.6. By advantage of being

    able to tune the reaction heat by properly varying O/C

    molar ratio makes POX reforming superior to steam

    reforming. Hence for low energy requirement, an O/C

    molar ratio ofC0.6 is favorable for POX reforming ofiso-

    octane.

    The amount of carbon formed as a function of temper-

    ature for five reforming reactions ofiso-octane and toluene

    are presented in Fig. 2. If the feed consists of iso-octane

    (1 gmol/h) and air at O/C = 1, more than 1 9 10-9

    mmol h-1 of coke would form in the partial oxidation of

    iso-octane at temperatures up to 950 C. If the feed consists

    of iso-octane (1 gmol/h) and H2O a t H2O/C = 1, more

    than 1 9 10-9 mmol h-1 of coke would occur in the steam

    reforming of iso-octane at temperatures up to 800 C. If

    water is added with molar ratio of H2O/C = 1 while

    maintaining the O/C ratio = 1, the reactor temperature in

    the POX reforming ofiso-octane can be lowered to 560 C

    before carbon formation occurs. It was found that the

    carbon formation temperature was increased until 600 C

    when the ATR reaction of toluene was carried out under

    the same reaction conditions ofiso-octane.

    Various transition metal formulations, M(active)/MgO/

    Al2O3, M(active)/MgO/SiO2Al2O3, Ni(major)/M(minor)/MgO/

    Al2O3, Mo(major)/M(minor)/MgO/Al2O3 and Ni/Ce/ZrO2used for ATR of toluene and iso-octane and their

    Oxygen / Carbon Ratio

    -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

    HeatofReaction(Kcal/moliso-octane)

    -400

    -200

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    H2O/C = 1

    H2O/C = 3

    Fig. 1 The effect of O/C ratio on the heat of reaction in POX

    reforming reaction ofiso-octane at 700 C and feed molar ratios H2O/

    C = 3 and 1

    Temperature( oC)400 600 800 1000 1200

    Carbon(mmol/hr)

    1e-11

    1e-10

    1e-9

    1e-8

    1e-7

    1e-6

    1e-5

    1e-4

    1e-3

    1e-2

    1e-1

    1e+0

    1e+1

    1e+2

    iso-octaneH2O/C=1

    O/C=1

    TolueneH2O/C=1

    O/C=1

    iso-octaneO/C=1

    iso-octaneH2O/C=1

    iso-octaneH

    2O/C=0.5

    O/C=0.5

    Fig. 2 Reaction temperature required to prevent the formation of

    carbon during the reforming process of iso-octane and toluene,

    assuming thermodynamic equilibrium

    28 D. J. Moon

    123

  • 7/29/2019 Liquid Hydrocarbons1

    5/12

    characterization are summarized in Table 1. Where M is a

    component selected from Ni, Co, Fe and Mo.

    3.1.1 Autothermal Reforming of Toluene

    The autothermal reforming of n-dodecane, toluene and

    their mixtures has been studied by Reeta K. Kaila et al. [52]

    over monometallic (Rh, Pd, Pt) and bimetallic (Rh/Pt)

    noble metal zirconia catalysts at 700900 C. The Rh-

    containing catalysts were more active toward ATR reac-

    tions than the other noble metal catalysts (Pt and Pd) on

    zirconia. It has been reported [58] that the addition of ZrO2to ceria leads to improvements in redox property, thermal

    resistance and catalytic activity for ATR at lower

    temperatures.

    Figure 3 shows the comparison of the product compo-

    sition and coke deposition temperature for the ATR ofiso-octane and toluene. Equilibrium conversion and carbon

    formation temperature for ATR reaction ofiso-octane and

    toluene were estimated by POR II simulation program,

    assuming thermodynamic equilibrium at 700 C, feed

    molar ratios of H2O/C = 3 and O/C = 1. The carbon

    formation in the ATR reaction of iso-octane occurred at

    less than 620 C, however, it was also found that it

    occurred at less than 640 C in the ATR reaction of tolu-

    ene. The results suggest that the selection of reasonablereforming temperature is important for the reforming of

    mixed hydrocarbons such as gasoline because of higher

    reforming temperature of toluene than that ofiso-octane. It

    was found that Ni/Fe/MgO/Al2O3 catalyst showed better

    activity and sulfur tolerance over the commercial Haldor

    Topsoe (HT) catalyst and can be applied as ATR catalyst of

    gasoline fuel processor application.

    3.1.2 Autothermal Reforming of Iso-Octane

    Catalytic partial oxidation of hydrocarbons for generating

    hydrogen has gained much attraction in recent years owingto its direct application in proton exchange membrane fuel

    cells for generating clean electrical energy. It has been

    widely accepted as the most promising process to meet the

    efficiency, volume and cost goals of the transportation

    applications [59]. For vehicle applications, the advantage

    of catalytic POX reforming over SR is a low energy

    requirement, sulfur tolerance of a catalyst and more rapid

    and controlled response to the transient power require-

    ments [5, 60]. The use of commercial SR catalyst for POX

    reforming of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon liquids

    has been done by some researchers [19, 61]. However,

    number of problems was identified including the tendencyof deactivation of the catalyst due to formation of nickel

    aluminate spinnels, excessive coking and susceptibility

    to sulfur poisoning which limit their use for vehicle

    applications.

    The problem of catalyst deactivation by carbon depo-

    sition and sulfur poisoning in the POX reforming reaction

    of iso-octane over commercial reforming catalyst was

    reported previously [19, 62]. Based on the experience

    of our previous research [1720], we found the ideal

    Table 1 Characteristics of the prepared and the commercial catalysts used for ATR of iso-octane and toluene

    Catalyst code Catalyst composition BET surface areaa (m2/g) Total pore volumea (cc/g) Ave. pore diametera (A)

    KIST-1 Ni/MgO/Al2O3 29 0.207 286.0

    KIST-2 Fe/MgO/Al2O3 88 0.228 103.7

    KIST-3 Co/MgO/Al2O3 66 0.305 185.6

    KIST-4 Mo/MgO/Al2O3 88 0.294 134.1

    KIST-5 Ni/Fe/MgO/Al2O3 74 0.212 115.1

    KIST-6 Ni/Co/MgO/Al2O3 62 0.172 111.8

    KIST-7 Ni/Mo/MgO/Al2O3 72 0.259 124.4

    ICI Ni/CaO/Al2O3 35 0.085 96.26

    a Derived from N2 physisorption using Quantachrome Co

    I so -o ct an e To lu en e

    ProductDistribution(%)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    CarbonFormation

    Temperature(oC)

    500

    550

    600

    650

    700

    750

    H2

    CO

    CO2

    CH4

    Carbon formation temp.

    Fig. 3 The comparison of the product composition and coke

    deposition temperature for the ATR of iso-octane and toluene,

    respectively. Reaction temperature = 700 C; feed molar ratios of

    H2O/C = 1 and O/C = 1

    Hydrogen Production From Liquid Hydrocarbons 29

    123

  • 7/29/2019 Liquid Hydrocarbons1

    6/12

    operating conditions for POX-reforming reactions as:

    temperature 700 C, feed molar ratio of H2O/C = 3 and

    O/C = 1. KIST-5 catalysts showed a little higher H2selectivity than commercial ICI catalyst. Selectivity of H2and CO progressively increased with increasing reaction

    temperature. Hydrogen selectivity over KIST-5 and ICI

    catalysts were 65 and 64% at 700 C, respectively and CO

    selectivity was 11.3 and 13.4%, respectively.POX reforming of iso-octane was carried [60] over

    various catalyst formulations (Table 1) for gasoline fuel

    processor applications. The effect of sulfur impurities on

    the stability of each catalyst was also investigated in the

    POX reforming reaction ofiso-octane. The performance of

    prepared catalysts was compared with that of the com-

    mercial ICI catalyst. Generally the reforming of hydro-

    carbons always has potential to form coke. If the reactor is

    not properly designed or operated, coking is inclined to

    occur. So the reactor temperature required to prevent the

    formation of carbon during the reforming process of

    iso-octane was estimated by PRO-II simulation program,assuming thermodynamic equilibrium [1720].

    Overall, Ni/M/MgO/Al2O3 catalysts are more active

    than M/MgO/Al2O3 catalysts. Especially, the catalytic

    formulations using Ni as a major active component with a

    minor active component such as Fe or Co are found to be

    more active than the other catalytic formulations. The

    KIST-5 catalysts before and after the POX reforming

    reaction ofiso-octane have not shown any major change in

    XRD phase patterns. Also, no metallic carbide such as

    nickel carbide and ferric carbide was formed during POX

    reforming of iso-octane at 700 C for 24 h. Modified

    Ni/(Co or Fe)/MgO/Al2O3 system can be considered as

    an alternative option to the commercial reforming catalyst

    for POX reforming of iso-octane.

    Figure 4 shows the comparison of the KIST-5 catalyst

    with the commercial ICI catalyst for the product distribu-

    tion in the POX reforming of iso-octane. It was identified

    that KIST-5 catalyst showed similar activity to commercial

    ICI catalyst. To elucidate the effect of sulfur impurities

    on the catalytic deactivation, we investigated the POX

    reforming reaction of iso-octane containing 100 ppm sul-

    fur. Figure 5 represents the comparison of the KIST-5

    with commercial ICI catalyst for sulfur tolerance in the

    POX reforming of iso-octane at 700 C space veloc-

    ity = 8,776 h-1, feed molar ratios of H2O/C = 3 and

    O/C = 1. KIST-5 catalyst displayed better activity and

    sulfur tolerance than commercial ICI catalyst, even though

    none of the systems were found to be completely sulfur

    resistant. Table 2 gives characteristics of the commercial

    ICI catalyst and KIST-5 catalysts before and after ATR of

    iso-octane under tested conditions.

    Long term stability for the KIST-5 catalyst in the ATR

    reaction ofiso-octane containing sulfur less than 5 ppm at

    700 C, space velocity = 8,776 h-1, feed molar ratio of

    H2O/C = 3 and O/C = 1 is shown in Fig. 6. The KIST-5

    catalyst was found to be stable more than 800 h under the

    tested conditions. Ferrandon and Krause found out [34]

    superior activity and stability of Rh/LaAl2O3 for long

    term tests of monoliths samples for the ATR of sulfur-free

    gasoline. But KIST-5 catalyst comprising of Ni/Fe/MgO/

    Al2O3 proved to be the best in the ATR ofiso-octane with

    long term stability of more than 800 h and also economical

    unlike the noble metal based catalyst.

    3.1.3 Gasoline Fuel Processor System

    The successful development of a fuel cell system is

    dependent on the development of a fuel processor.

    Hydrogen is an ideal fuel for proton exchange membrane

    ProductDistribution(%)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    ICI

    KIST 5

    H2 CO CO2CH4

    Fig. 4 The comparison of the KIST-5 with the commercial ICI

    catalyst for the product distribution in the POX reforming of iso-

    octane. Reaction temperature = 700 C; space velocity = 8,776 h-1;

    feed molar ratios of H2O/C = 3 and O/C = 1

    Time (h)

    0 5 10 15 20 25

    ProductDistribution(%)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    KIST 5 - H2KIST 5 - CH

    4

    KIST 5 - CO

    KIST 5 - CO2

    ICI - H2

    ICI - CH4

    ICI - CO

    ICI - CO2

    Fig. 5 Sulfur tolerance for the KIST-5 (Ni/Fe/MgO/Al2O3) and

    commercial ICI catalysts in the POX reforming of iso-octane

    containing sulfur (Cs = 100 ppm). Reaction temperature = 700 C;

    space velocity = 8,776 h-1; feed molar ratios of H2O/C = 3 and

    O/C = 1

    30 D. J. Moon

    123

  • 7/29/2019 Liquid Hydrocarbons1

    7/12

    fuel cell because it simplifies system integration and hence

    being increasingly accepted as the most appropriate power

    source. Since there is no hydrogen infrastructure, the

    development of fuel processor and hydrogen station has

    been hot issue for commercialization of fuel cell system.

    The lower efficiency of gasoline in comparison with

    methanol can be compensated by the much higher energydensity of gasoline compared to methanol and also by the

    well-developed infrastructure for gasoline [61]. Due to the

    favorable factors required for the on board generation of

    H2 in the fuel cell system, POX reforming of gasoline

    attracts much attention primarily because of low energy

    requirement.

    It is reported [61] that the fuel cell performance was

    progressively degraded by CO poisoning of Pt anode cat-

    alyst. Therefore, many researchers studied [6, 63, 64] high

    temperature water gas shift (HTS) and low temperature

    water gas shift (LTS) reactions and/or preferential partialoxidation (PROX) to reduce the CO concentration within

    the tolerance limit of the Pt anode catalyst. Especially, the

    WGS reaction is a critical step during the fuel processing

    since CO poisons the PEM electro-catalyst and LTS cata-

    lyst was prone to be deactivated by sulfur poisoning and

    thermal cycling [64]. The WGS reactors charged with

    currently available commercial HTS and LTS catalysts

    constitute about a third of the mass, volume and cost of the

    fuel processor system.

    Gasoline fuel processor system consists of six sections:

    feed supply section, evaporator, POX reforming reactor,

    HTS reactor, LTS reactor and GC analysis sections. As apart of the development of gasoline fuel processor system

    for integration with PEM fuel cell, we investigated [65, 66]

    POX reforming reaction of iso-octane with/without

    100 ppm sulfur over a commercial reforming catalyst. We

    also investigated HTS reaction over Fe3O4Cr2O3 com-

    mercial catalyst and LTS reaction over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3commercial catalysts to remove CO from the hydrogen

    rich-stream produced by POX reforming reaction. Table 3

    lists the characteristics of KIST reforming catalyst, com-

    mercial HTS and KISTLTS catalysts used in gasoline fuel

    processor system. It was found that the commercial

    reforming catalyst was prone to be poisoned by sulfurcontained in iso-octane, but there is no coke deposition at

    700 C under the tested conditions. The product distribu-

    tion data from three different reaction stages over the KIST

    reforming catalyst (KIST-5), commercial HTS catalyst and

    KIST-LTS catalyst are shown in Fig. 7. The H2 and CO2concentrations after the gases passed through HTS and LTS

    reactors increased while those of CO and CH4 decreased.

    The concentration of CO can be reduced to\1,800 ppm

    when KIST-5 reforming catalyst, HTS catalyst and LTS

    Table 2 Comparison of the characteristics of KIST catalyst with commercial ICI catalyst before and after ATR reaction of iso-octane

    Catalyst BET surface

    areaa (m2/g)

    Total pore

    volumea (cc/g)

    Active metal

    S. A. (m2/g)bCarbon

    contentc (wt%)

    Sulfur

    contentc (wt%)

    ICI Before the reaction 35.3 0.085 0.789 0.01 0.003

    After the reaction of iso-octane

    (Cs\ 5 ppm)

    26.7 0.069 0.543 5.8 0.004

    After the reaction of iso-octane(Cs = 100 ppm) 19.9 0.049 0.397 25.7 0.006

    KIST-5 Before the reaction 73.6 0.212 1.906 0.01 0.003

    After the reaction of iso-octane

    (Cs\ 5 ppm)

    61.9 0.185 1.528 4.9 0.004

    After the reaction of iso-octane

    (Cs = 100 ppm)

    49.4 0.166 1.397 19.6 0.005

    a Derived from N2 Physisorption using Quantachrome Cob Derived from CO chemisorption using Micromeritics Coc Measured by Elemental Analyzer

    Reaction Time (h)

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

    ProductDistribution(%)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    H2CO

    CO2CH

    4

    Fig. 6 Long term stability for the KIST-5 catalyst in the ATR

    reaction of iso-octane containing sulfur less than 5 ppm. Reaction

    temperature = 700 C; space velocity = 8,776 h-1; feed molar

    ratios of H2O/C = 3 and O/C = 1

    Hydrogen Production From Liquid Hydrocarbons 31

    123

  • 7/29/2019 Liquid Hydrocarbons1

    8/12

    (PtNi/CeO2) catalyst are charged with the gasoline fuel

    processor system. In our previous work [65, 66], it was

    reported that the concentration of CO can be reduced to

    3,000 ppm when commercial ICI, HTS and LTS catalysts

    were charged in gasoline fuel processor system.

    The partnership for a new generation of vehicles

    (PNGV) has a set a goal to reduce the weight of the shift

    reactors to 75%. For integration with PEM fuel cell, the

    preferential PROX reactor and the development of new

    high performance catalysts with sulfur and coke-resistance

    are needed.

    3.2 Catalytic Reforming of Diesel

    In previous paper [65], we reported high and stable activity

    of Ni-loaded catalysts prepared from MgAl hydrotalcite-

    like anionic clay for steam reforming of LPG. The con-

    centration of H2 after 5 h was nearly same over spc-Ni/

    MgAl and ICI catalysts for SR of LPG. The concentration

    of H2 was maintained during reaction time (186 h) at

    800 C, GHSV = 20,000 h-1 with H2O/C = 2. However,

    it decreased over commercial ICI catalyst due to the for-

    mation of carbon. Memory effect property of hydrotal-

    cite-like support allows the reconstruction of the original

    hydrotalcite structure under mild conditions when con-

    tacting the product of the thermal treatment with water

    which minimizes the degradation of the catalyst during

    steam reforming reaction.

    Steam reforming of LPG over nickel-based and noble

    metals modified nickel based catalysts using (different Ni

    to Mg ratio) hydrotalcite-like support is reported [17, 38,

    42] recently. A spc-Ni/MgAl catalyst was prepared by co-

    precipitation method and later also modified with noble

    metals (Ru, Rh) by dipping method. Among the non

    impregnated Ni-based catalysts, spc-Ni/MgAl catalyst

    shows good performance up to 186 h for steam reforming

    of LPG, though the activity was found to be declined at

    800 C, H2

    O/C = 2 and GHSV = 20,000 h-1. Figure 8

    shows the XRD patterns of hydrotalcite (MgAl) and

    0.3 wt% Rh spc-Ni/MgAl catalysts prepared by dipping

    method. XRD pattern (a) is typical hydrotalcite peak pat-

    tern taken after drying at 60 C for 12 h in air. Then after

    calcining at 850 C for 5 h, hydrotalcite structure changed

    to MgNiO crystalline form (b). When Rh modified spc-

    Ni/MgAl catalyst was prepared using spc-Ni/MgAl by

    dipping method followed by drying at 80 C for 6 h, Mg

    NiO structure was found to reconstitute to hydrotalcite by

    memory effect (c). XRD pattern (d) shows loaded Rh forms

    Rhx

    Ox

    on the surface of Rh modified spc-Ni/MgAl catalyst

    prepared by dipping method. Figure 9 shows the productdistribution of noble metal modified Ni-based catalysts for

    steam reforming reaction with time on stream up to 53 h

    at reaction conditions: temperature= 700 C, GHSV =

    20,000 h-1 and H2O/C = 1.0. Ru modified spc-Ni/MgAl

    catalyst showed H2: 64*66%, CH4: 5*7%, CO:

    18*21%, CO2: 6*10% product distribution by vol(%)

    whereas Rh modified spc-Ni/MgAl catalyst formed H2:

    67%, CH4: 4.9%, CO: 19%, CO2: 8% by vol(%). It was

    found that Rh loaded catalyst showed stable performance

    Table 3 Characteristics of catalysts used in gasoline fuel processor system

    Catalysts Reaction BET surface areaa (m2/g) Total pore volumea (cc/g) Active metal surface areab (m2/g) Maker

    Ni/Fe/MgO/Al2O3 ATR 74 0.212 0.213 KISTc

    Fe3O4Cr2O3 HTS 57 0.073 0.127 ICId

    PtNi/CeO2 LTS 78 0.049 0.086 KISTc

    a Derived from N2 physisorption using Quantachrome Cob Derived from CO chemisorptions using Micromeritics Coc KIST-Korea Institute of Science and Technology, South Koread ICI-Imperial Chemical Industries Co

    Fig. 7 The product distribution from three different reaction stages

    over the KIST-5 catalyst system (ATR: Ni/Fe/MgO/Al2O3; HTS:

    Fe3O4Cr2O3; LTS: PtNi/CeO2). The ATR over KIST catalyst was

    carried out at reaction temperature 700 C, space velocity =

    8,776 h-1

    , molar ratios H2O/C = 3 and O/C = 1. HTS and LTSreactions were carried out at 450 C and 250 C, respectively

    32 D. J. Moon

    123

  • 7/29/2019 Liquid Hydrocarbons1

    9/12

    for SR of LPG without fluctuation in product distribution

    under severe reaction conditions: temperature= 700 C,

    GHSV = 20,000 h-1, H2O/C = 1.0.

    Moon et al. reported that the TEM images and TGA

    profiles of 0.3 wt% Ru spc-Ni/MgAl and 0.3 wt% Rh spc-

    Ni/MgAl catalysts before and after the reaction [17]. It was

    found that plenty of carbon was formed on Ru spc-Ni/

    MgAl catalyst, during the reaction, compared to Rh spc-Ni/

    MgAl catalyst. The TGA profiles also show more weight

    loss for Ru spc-Ni/MgAl catalyst compared to Rh spc-Ni/

    MgAl catalyst which agrees well with TEM data. This

    infers that Ru metal is not effective for inhibition of carbon

    formation. This concludes that the addition of Rh metal to

    spc-Ni/MgAl enhanced the reforming activity of LPG as

    well as constrain to the carbon deposition. Also 0.3 wt%

    Rh spc-Ni/MgAl catalyst was found to have prolonged

    stability up to 1,100 h in the steam reforming of LPG as

    shown in Fig. 10. These results draw a conclusion that

    0.3 wt% Rh spc-Ni/MgAl catalyst is desirable LPG SR

    catalyst for application in hydrogen station and fuel pro-

    cessor systems. The spc-Ni/MgAl catalyst displayed better

    activity than ICI commercial CH4 SR catalyst, but was

    having tendency to coke formation even though carbon

    formed did not affect adversely in this reaction. It wasfound that 0.3 wt% Rh spc-Ni/MgAl catalyst showed the

    strong restraint of carbon formation compared to 0.3 wt%

    Ru spc-Ni/MgAl catalyst.

    The overall POX reforming of n-hexadecane as a sur-

    rogate of diesel is given in Eqs. (24) [6771].

    C16H34 32 H2O ! 49 H2 16CO2DH 2336 kJ=mol

    2

    C16H34 16 O2 ! 17 H2 16CO2DH 5694 kJ=mol

    3

    C16H34 16 H2O 8 O2 ! 33 H2 16CO2DH 1739 kJ=mol 4

    The main problems associated with the reforming of

    diesel are related to catalyst degradation during the reaction

    due to the harsh operating conditions (high temperature and

    H2O/C ratio) used to obtain high hydrogen yield. It is

    mainly caused due to the poisoning of catalyst by sulfur,

    thermal sintering and extensive carbon formation due to the

    low H/C ratio and high molecular weight of the molecules

    present in diesel fuel. Generally, reforming catalyst

    Fig. 8 XRD patterns of prepared catalyst: (a) spc-Ni/MgAl-hydro-

    talcite; (b) after calcination at 850 C for 5 h; (c) after dipping (b) in

    an aqueous solution of Rh(III) chloride and drying; (d) after

    calcination of 0.3 wt% RhNi/MgAl catalyst; filled circle, MgNi

    O; open square, NiAl2O4; filled square, hydrotalcite

    Time (h)

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

    OutgasVol%

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    H2

    CO

    CH4

    CO2

    Fig. 9 Out gas distribution for SR of LPG over 0.3 wt% RhNi/

    MgAl catalyst for 53 h (S/C = 1.0, GHSV = 20,000 h-1,

    temperature = 700 C)

    Time (h)

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

    Outg

    asvol.%

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    H 2CO

    CH4CO2

    Fig. 10 Out gas distribution for SR of LPG over 0.3 w%t RhNi/

    MgAl catalyst for 1,100 h (S/C = 3.0, GHSV = 20,000 h-1,

    temperature = 800 C)

    Hydrogen Production From Liquid Hydrocarbons 33

    123

  • 7/29/2019 Liquid Hydrocarbons1

    10/12

    comprise of transition metals (Ni, Co, Fe, etc.) or noble

    metals (Pt, Pd, Ru, Rh, etc.) deposited or incorporated

    on supports such as thermally stabilized alumina, doped

    alumina with promoters to accelerate reforming ofhydrocarbon [72].

    Recently, the works on steam reforming ofn-hexadecane

    (n-C16H34) as a main constituentof diesel have been reported

    [17, 73, 74] over spc-Ni/MgAl and noble metal (Rh) modi-

    fied Ni-based catalysts listed in Table 4. The spc-Ni/MgAl

    catalyst derived from hydrotalcite precursor was prepared

    by co-precipitation method and RhNi/MgAl catalyst was

    made by dipping method. The steam reforming of n-hexa-

    decane over these catalysts carried out at 900 C,

    GHSV = 10,000 h-1and feed molar ratio of H2O/C = 3.

    Catalytic performances of these catalysts after the reaction

    for 5 h and 53 h are compared in Fig. 11. The H2 concen-tration and the product distribution for the steam reforming

    ofn-hexadecane over 0.3 wt% Rh spc-Ni/MgAl catalyst was

    maintained constant during steam reforming. However, H2concentration over spc-Ni/MgAl catalyst was decreased due

    to drastic shrinkage in the metal dispersion and increase in

    active metal particle size [39]. The addition of Rh metal to

    the spc-Ni/MgAl catalyst as a promoter very effectively

    inhibited the sintering of Ni metal under tested conditions.

    The SR ofn-hexadecane on spc-Ni/MgAl and Rh spc-Ni/

    MgAl catalysts was carriedout at 900 C, feed molar ratioof

    H2O/C = 3 and GHSV of 10,000 h-1 for 53 h to confirm the

    role of Rh metal with restraint of Ni metal sintering.Figure 12 represents the product distribution with time on

    stream over 0.3 wt% Rh spc-Ni/MgAl catalyst for 53 h. The

    initial activityfromstart up to 5 h overspc-Ni/MgAl catalyst

    was found to be similar to 0.3 wt% Rhspc-Ni/MgAl catalyst.

    However, activity of 0.3 wt% Rhspc-Ni/MgAl was constant

    during the SR ofn-hexadecane. On the other hand, activity of

    spc-Ni/MgAl catalyst decreased slowlywith enhancement in

    degree of deactivation from 45 h after the commencement of

    the reaction. The SR of decahydronaphthalene as a second

    constituent of diesel onspc-Ni/MgAl catalyst wascarried out

    at 900 C, feed molar ratio of H2O/C = 3 and GHSV of

    10,000 h-1 [75, 76]. Figure 13 shows the product distribu-

    tion with time on stream overspc-Ni/MgAl catalyst for 53 h.

    The concentration of CO was slowly decreased with

    increasing CO2 and carbon formation. This result may be

    consideredthat the deactivation of catalyst was caused by the

    carbon formation by Boudart reaction (Reaction 5) under the

    tested conditions.

    2CO ! CO2 C 5

    4 Conclusions and Future Directions

    This is a review on the works carried out on the production

    of hydrogen by catalytic reforming of liquid hydrocarbon

    fuels namely a main surrogate of gasoline and diesel.

    Table 4 Characteristics of the modified spc-Ni/Mg/Al based catalysts before and after steam reforming of n-hexadecane

    Catalyst BETa (m2/g) Before the reaction After the reaction

    Dispersionb (%) Active metal particle

    size (nm)

    Dispersionb (%) Active metal particle

    size (nm)Before After Ni Ni ? Rh Ni Ni ? Rh

    spc-Ni/MgAl 198 42 17.12 6.33 0.25 401.73

    RhNi/MgAlA 105 12.16 8.34 1.04

    c

    93.23

    c

    1.54 66.03

    RhNi/MgAlB 107 13.53 7.50 2.75 36.89

    RhNi/MgAlC 106 13.80 7.37 3.13 32.41

    a Measured by N2 physisorption using Quantachrome Cob Measured by CO chemisorption using Micromeritics Coc After SR of n-hexadecane for 53 h at 950 C

    after 5h

    H2inoutgas(vol%)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    after 53h after 5h after 53h

    H2

    CO

    20wt% Ni/MgAl 0.3wt% Rh-Ni/MgAl

    Fig. 11 The comparison of concentrations of H2 and CO in the SR of

    n-hexadecane over spc-Ni/MgAl and 0.3 wt% RhNi/MgAl catalysts

    for 53 h (S/C = 3.0, GHSV = 10,000 h-1, temperature = 900 C)

    34 D. J. Moon

    123

  • 7/29/2019 Liquid Hydrocarbons1

    11/12

    We investigated various supported transition metal for-

    mulations for reforming of gasoline and compared to

    commercial ICI catalyst. We found that Ni/Fe/MgO/Al2O3(KIST-5) catalyst showed higher catalytic activity and

    sulfur tolerance than commercial ICI and HT catalysts. We

    suggested that Ni/Fe/MgO/Al2O3 catalyst can be an alter-

    native option to the commercial ATR reforming catalyst

    for fuel cell system. As a part of the development of the

    gasoline fuel processor system for integration with the

    PEM fuel cell, we investigated the POX reforming reaction

    of iso-octane over KIST reforming catalyst(KIST-5),

    commercial HTS (Fe3O4Cr2O3) catalyst and KIST-LTS

    (PtNi/CeO2) catalyst. The concentration of CO was found

    to be reduced to\1,800 ppm in this system. We found that

    commercial reforming catalyst was prone to be poisoned

    by sulfur contained in iso-octane.

    We investigated modified hydrotalcite based formula-

    tions for the reforming of diesel and compared to spc-Ni/

    MgAl catalyst. The addition of Rh metal to the spc-Ni/

    MgAl catalyst also acts as a promoter, inhibiting the sin-tering of Ni metal particles during catalytic reforming of

    n-hexadecane, a surrogate of diesel under tested conditions.

    For applications in commercial process studies on the

    catalytic reforming over structured catalyst by the modifi-

    cation of the developed catalysts in this work will be

    needed in near future.

    Acknowledgments Author would like to thank our coworkers for

    their valuable research contributions in reforming of liquids hydro-

    carbons summarized in this review. The author would also like to

    acknowledge financial support from KIST to carry out this research in

    Clean Energy Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology

    (KIST).

    References

    1. Chalk SG, Milliken J, Miller JF, Venkateswaran SR (1998)

    J Power Sources 71:26

    2. Brown LF (2001) Int J Hydrogen Energy 26:381

    3. Recupero V, Pino L, Vita A, Cipit F, Cordaro M, Lagana M

    (2005) Int J Hydrogen Energy 30:963

    4. Docter A, Lamn A (1999) J Power Sources 84:194

    5. Krummenacher JJ, West KN, Schmidt LD (2003) J Catal 215:332

    6. Hilaire S, Wang X, Luo T, Gorte RJ, Wagner (2001) Appl Catal

    A 215:271

    7. Choudary VR, Rajput AM, Prabhakar B (1993) J Catal 139:326

    8. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M, Voecks GE (1983) Int J Hydrogen

    Energy 8:539

    9. Lee SHD, Applegate DV, Ahmed S, Calderone SG, Harvey TL

    (2005) Int J Hydrogen Energy 30:829

    10. Newson E, Truong TB (2003) Int J Hydrogen Energy 28:1379

    11. Takehira K, Shishido T, Kondo M (2002) J. Catal 207:307

    12. Shiozaki R, Andersen AG, Hayakawa T, Hamakawa S, Suzuki K,

    Shimizu M, Takehira KJ (1997) Chem Soc Faraday Trans

    93:3235

    13. Moon DJ, Sreekumar K, Lee SD, Lee BG, Kim HS (2001) Appl

    Catal A: General 215:1

    14. Kopasz JP, Applegate D, Miller L, Liao HK, Ahmed S (2005) Int

    J Hydrogen Energy 30:1243

    15. Borup RL, Inbody MA, Semelsberger TA, Tafoya JI, Guidry DR(2005) Catal. Today 99:263

    16. Suzuki T, Iwanami H, Yoshinari T (2000) Int J Hydrogen Energy

    25:119

    17. Kim DH, Kang JS, Lee YJ, Park NK, Kim YC, Hong SI, Moon

    DJ (2008) Catal Today 136:228

    18. Moon DJ, Park JM, Kang JS, Yoo KS, Hong SI (2006) J Ind Eng

    Chem 12:149

    19. Moon DJ, Ryu JW (2003) Catal Lett 89:207

    20. Moon DJ, Ryu JW (2003) Catal Today 87:255

    21. Ahmed S, Krumpelt M (2001) Int J Hydrogen Energy 26:291

    22. Kaila RK, Gutierrez A, Korhonen ST, Krause AOI (2007) Catal

    Lett 115:1

    Time (h)

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

    Outgasv

    ol(%)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    H2

    COCH

    4

    CO2

    Fig. 12 The product distribution with time on stream in the SR of

    n-hexadecane over 0.3 wt% RhNi/MgAl catalyst for 53 h (S/C =

    3.0, GHSV = 10,000 h-1, temperature = 900 C)

    Fig. 13 The product distribution with time on stream in the SR of

    decahydronaphthalene over spc-Ni/MgAl catalyst for 53 h (S/C =

    3.0, GHSV = 10,000 h-1, temperature = 900 C)

    Hydrogen Production From Liquid Hydrocarbons 35

    123

  • 7/29/2019 Liquid Hydrocarbons1

    12/12

    23. Wang Y, Wu D (2001) Int J Hydrogen Energy 26:795

    24. Qi A, Wang S, Fu G, Wu D (2005) Appl Catal A 293:71

    25. Springmann S, Bohnet M, Docter A, Lamm A, Eigenberger GC

    (2004) J Power Sources 128:13

    26. Krumpelt M, Krause TR, Carter JD, Kopasz JP, Ahmed S (2002)

    Catal Today 77:3

    27. Connor RPO, Klein EJ, Schmidt LD (2000) Catal Lett 70:99

    28. Krummenacher JJ, Schmidt LD (2004) J Catal 222:429

    29. Schmidt LD, Klein EJ, Leclerc CA, Klummenacher JJ, West KN

    (2003) Chem Eng Sci 58:1037

    30. Tsolakis A, Megaritis A (2004) Int J Hydrogen Energy 29:1409

    31. Moon DJ, Kang JS, Noh WS, Kim DH, Lee BG, Lee SD (2005)

    Korea Patent 10-0732729; (2007) US Patent 11-787555

    32. Ferrandon M, Krause T (2006) Appl Catal A 311:135

    33. Velu S, Swamy CS (1994) Appl Catal A 119:241

    34. Corma A, Ibora S, Primo J, Rey F (1194) Appl Catal A 114:215

    35. Lim YS, Moon DJ, Park NK, Shin HS, Kim JH, Kim YC (2007)

    J Nanosci Nanotech 7:4009

    36. Tichit D, Coq B (2003) Cat Tech 7:1384

    37. Takehira K, Shishido T, Wang P, Kosaka T, Takaki K (2004)

    J Catal 221:43

    38. Cavani F, Trifiro F, Vaccari A (1991) Catal Today 11:173

    39. Choudary BM, Madhi S, Chowdari N, Kantam ML, Sreedhar B

    (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:14127

    40. Sehested J, Carlsson A, Janssens TVW, Hansen PL, Datyey AK

    (2001) J Catal 197:200

    41. Hayakawa T, Suzuki S, Hamakawa S, Suzuki K, Shishido T,

    Takehira K (1999) Appl Catal A 183:273

    42. Shishido T, Sukenobu M, Morioka H, Kondo M, Wang Y, Takaki

    K, Takehira K (2002) Appl Catal A 223:35

    43. Ayabe S, Omoto M, Utaka T, Kikuchi R, Sasaki K, Teraoka Y,

    Eguchi K (2003) Appl Catal A 241:261

    44. Zhan Y, Li D, Nishida K, Shishido T, Oumi Y, Sano T, Takehira

    K (2009) Appl Catal A 363:231

    45. Dreyer BJ, Lee IC, Krummenacher JJ, Schmidt LD (2006) Appl

    Catal A 307:184

    46. Ishihara A, Qian EW, Finahari IN, Sutrisna IP, Kabe T (2005)

    Fuel 84:1462

    47. Cheekatamarla PK, Lane AM (2005) J Power Sources 152:256

    48. Clause O, Rebours B, Merlen E, Trifiro E, Vaccari A (1992)

    J Catal 133:231

    49. Aupretre F, Descorme C, Duprez D, Casanave D, Uzio D (2005)

    J Catal 233:464

    50. Acvi AK, Trimm DL, Aksoylu AE, Onsan ZI (2004) Appl Catal

    A 258:235

    51. Villegas L, Guilhaume L, Provendier H, Daniel C, Masset F,

    Mirodatos C (2005) Appl Catal A 281:75

    52. Kaila RK, Gutie0rrez A, Slioor R, Kemell M, Leskela M, Krause

    AOI (2008) Appl Catal B 84:223

    53. Tsyganok AI, Tsunoda T, Suzuki K, Hamakawa S, Takehira K,

    Hayakawa T (2003) J Catal 213:191

    54. Aicher T, Lenz B, Gschnell F, Groos U, Federici F, Caprile L,

    Parodi L (2006) J Power Sources 154:503

    55. Cai X, Dong X, Lin WJ (2006) Natural Gas Chem 15:122

    56. Xu J, Froment GF (2004) AIChE J 35:88

    57. Springmann S, Friedrich G, Himmen M, Sommer M, Eigenberger

    G (2002) Appl Catal A 235:101

    58. Takeguchi T, Furukawa S, Inoue M, Eguchi K (2003) Appl Catal

    A 240:223

    59. Liu D, Kaun TD, Liao HKHK, Ahmed S (2004) Int J Hydrogen

    Energy 29:1035

    60. Moon DJ, Ryu JW, Lee SD, Lee BG, Ahn BS (2004) Appl Catal

    A 272:53

    61. Raman V (1999) Soc Automot Eng 1999-01-0529:1

    62. Kumar P, Idem R (2007) Energy & Fuels 21:522

    63. Jacobs G, Crawford AC, Davis BH (2005) Catal Lett 100:147

    64. Patt J, Moon DJ, Phillips C, Thompson L (2000) Catal Lett

    65:193

    65. Moon DJ, Kim DH, Kang JS, Lee BG, Lee SD, Choi JS, Kim MJ

    (2008) Korea Patent 2005-0099208 and PCT Patent PCT/

    KR2006/004047

    66. Moon DJ (2009) Catal Surv Asia 13:191

    67. Ayabe S, Omoto H, Utaka T, Kikuchi R, Sasaki K, Teraoka Y,

    Eguchi K (2003) Appl Catal A 241:261

    68. Moon DJ (2008) Catal Surv Asia 12:188

    69. Ahmed S, Krumpelt M (2001) Int J Hydrogen Energy 26:291

    70. Takehira K, Shishido T, Wang P, Kosaka T, Takaki K (2003)

    Phys Chem Chem Phys 5:3801

    71. Ahmed K, Gamman J, Foger K (2002) Solid State Ionics 152/

    153: 485

    72. Rostrup-Neilsen JR, Sehested J, Nrskov JK (2002) Adv Catal

    47:65

    73. Velu S, Swamy CS (1994) Appl Catal A 119:241

    74. Flynn TJ, Privette RM, Perna MA, Kneidel KE, King DL, Cooper

    M, (1999) Soc Automot Eng 1999-01-0536:47

    75. Moon DJ, Lee SH, Hur E, Cho SH, Jung JS, Park MJ, Lee YJ,

    Lee BG, Lee SD, Nam SW (2010) Korea Patent 10-2010-

    0099509

    76. Lee SH, Moon DJ (2010) Trans of the Korean Hydrogen & New

    Energy Society in accepted

    36 D. J. Moon

    123