Link Budget UMTS

30
Public User Data Bite Rate, UDBR [kbps] Target Load Nos. of Users Transmistter Power [W] Max Transmit Power [dBm] Ant Gain [dBi] Body Loss [dB] Cable Loss [dB] Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) [dBm] Receiver Thermal noise density [dBm/Hz] Receiver noise figure [dB] Noise density [dBm/Hz] Receiver noise power [dBm] Interference margin [dB] Total effective noise/interference [dBm] Processing Gain, PG [dB] Required Eb/No [dB] Receiver Sensitivity [dBm] Antenna gain [dBi] Cable loss in the base station [dB] Fast fading margin [dB] Max. path loss [dB] Log-normal fading (Shadowing) margin [dB] Soft handover gain [dB], multicell Indoor Pentration loss [dB] Allowed propagation loss for cell range [dB] Rx Level Cuttoff Values [dBm] Cell Radius Calculation mid-size city Frequency [MHz] Base Station Ant Height, Ht [m] Mobile Ant Height, Hm [m] COST-231 Hata Model Morphology (DU, U, SU, RU)

description

--

Transcript of Link Budget UMTS

Page 1: Link Budget UMTS

Public

Downlink UplinkDense Urban

User Data Bite Rate, UDBR [kbps] 12.2 12.2Target Load 0.5 0.3Nos. of Users 99 34

Transmistter Node B Mobile

Power [W] 20 0.25Max Transmit Power [dBm] 25.2 24.0Ant Gain [dBi] 18.0 0.0Body Loss [dB] 0.0 0.0Cable Loss [dB] 0.5 0.0Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) [dBm] 42.7 24.0

Receiver Mobile Node B

Thermal noise density [dBm/Hz] -174 -174Receiver noise figure [dB] 7.0 2.0Noise density [dBm/Hz] -166.8 -171.8Receiver noise power [dBm] -101.0 -106.0Interference margin [dB] 2.6 3.0Total effective noise/interference [dBm] -98.4 -103.0Processing Gain, PG [dB] 25.0 25.0Required Eb/No [dB] 1.8 2.2Receiver Sensitivity [dBm] -121.6 -125.8Antenna gain [dBi] 0.0 18.0Cable loss in the base station [dB] 0.0 0.5Fast fading margin [dB] 1.8 2.0Max. path loss [dB] 162.5 165.3Log-normal fading (Shadowing) margin [dB] 10.8 10.8Soft handover gain [dB], multicell 1.5 1.5Indoor Pentration loss [dB] 25.0 25.0Allowed propagation loss for cell range [dB] 128.2 131.0Rx Level Cuttoff Values [dBm] -85.6

Cell Radius Calculationmid-size cityFrequency [MHz] 940.1 895.1Base Station Ant Height, Ht [m] 20 20Mobile Ant Height, Hm [m] 1.5 1.5

COST-231 Hata Model

Morphology (DU, U, SU, RU) DU DU

Page 2: Link Budget UMTS

Public

Path Loss: Cost 231 Model 132.1 131.4dB/decade 36.4 36.4Std. Deviation (Sigma) 10.0 10.0a factor 0.76368 0.76368b factor 1.11681 1.11681t(a) 0.73568 0.73568erf(a) 0.71988 0.71988exponent (a,b) 8.75259 8.75259argument (a,b) 1.65908 1.65908t(a,b) 0.56162 0.56162erf (a,b) 0.98102 0.98102Cell Radius/range [Km] 0.78 0.97Cell Range [Km] 0.78Cell Area for hexagonal cell [sq. Km] 1.19

Cell coverage 94.3%

Edge Reliability 86.0%

DU UClutter Area of a TOWN [Km^2] 33.78 24.95

Nos. of proposed Sites 29 10

RSCP coverage: pl refer Sheet "Link Budget - CPICH"

Page 3: Link Budget UMTS

Public

Downlink Uplink Downlink Uplink Downlink UplinkUrban Sub Urban Rural12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.20.5 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.399 34 99 34 99 34

Node B Mobile Node B Mobile Node B Mobile

20 0.25 20 0.25 20 0.2525.2 24.0 25.2 24.0 25.2 24.018.0 0.0 18.0 0.0 18.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0

42.7 24.0 42.7 24.0 42.7 24.0

Mobile Node B Mobile Node B Mobile Node B

-174 -174 -174 -174 -174 -1747.0 2.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 2.0

-166.8 -171.8 -166.8 -171.8 -166.8 -171.8-101.0 -106.0 -101.0 -106.0 -101.0 -106.0

2.6 3.0 2.6 3.0 2.6 3.0-98.4 -103.0 -98.4 -103.0 -98.4 -103.025.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.01.8 2.2 1.8 2.2 1.8 2.2

-121.6 -125.8 -121.6 -125.8 -121.6 -125.80.0 18.0 0.0 18.0 0.0 18.00.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.51.8 2.0 1.8 1.0 1.8 1.0

162.5 165.3 162.5 166.3 162.5 166.310.8 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.81.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 3.0 1.5

22.0 22.0 18.0 18.0 12.0 12.0131.2 134.0 135.2 139.0 142.7 145.0-88.6 -92.6 -98.6

940.1 895.1 940.1 895.1 940.1 895.122 22 25 25 30 301.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5

U U SU SU RU RU

Page 4: Link Budget UMTS

Public

128.5 127.8 117.7 117.1 103.0 102.536.1 36.1 35.7 35.7 35.2 35.28.0 8.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0

0.95459 0.95459 1.27279 1.27279 1.27279 1.272791.38561 1.38561 1.82888 1.82888 1.80234 1.802340.69008 0.69008 0.62546 0.62546 0.62546 0.625460.82300 0.82300 0.92813 0.92813 0.92813 0.928136.67736 6.67736 5.42413 5.42413 5.58576 5.585761.67630 1.67630 1.81958 1.81958 1.82763 1.827630.55908 0.55908 0.53878 0.53878 0.53768 0.537680.98222 0.98222 0.98991 0.98991 0.99023 0.99023

1.18 1.48 3.08 4.09 13.40 16.091.18 3.08 13.402.73 18.52 350.24

97.1% 99.1% 99.1%

91.2% 96.4% 96.4%

SU R Total50.05 3.86 112.64

3 1 43

Page 5: Link Budget UMTS

Public

D/L U/LActivity Factor 100% 100%

Other cell to Own cell inteference 65% 65%Orthogonality 60% 0%

Load Factor = [(Eb/No)/(B/UBDR)]*[Nos. of Subs]*[Act. Factor]*[((1-(Orth.))+i)]

Input ValuesInput Values = f(fast/slow fading gain wrt UDBR)

a Mobile = 21 dBm, Dongle = 24 dBmb Ant Gain = 0 dB (mobile), 2 dB (dongle)c Body loss = 3 dB (mobile), 0 dB (dongle)c'

d=a+b-c-c'

e =10*log(kT)f

g=e+fh=g+10*log(BW), (=kTBF) BW=3840000 Hz

ij=h+i

k=10*log(3840/UDBR in kbps)l speech=5 dB, 144 kbps real time data= 1.5 dB, 384 kbps non real time data= 1.0 dB

m=l-k+j =[(Eb/No)/(B/Rb)]*k*T*B*F+[IM]nop

q=d-m+n-o-p =[EIRP]-[Rx. Sens.]+[Rx. Ant Gain]-[Cable loss]-[FFM]rst

u=q-r+s-t =[MPL]-[SFM(Shadowing)]+[SHO Gain]-[Pent. Loss]=Senst_UE+Fade Margins (Slow+Fast)+pent. Loss+C/I (Int. Margin)

Activity Factor %Voice 67Video 100Data 60HSPA 50

UplinkStart UplinkStop890.1 891.1

Page 6: Link Budget UMTS

Public

891.1 892.1892.1 893.1

893.1 894.1894.1 895.1

DownlinkStart DownlinkStop935.1 936.1936.1 937.1937.1 938.1938.1 939.1939.1 940.1

BW spacing 45

Page 7: Link Budget UMTS

Public

for Speech:66% (UL), 58% (DL) Downlink common channelfor 3 sector:65% Common pilot channel CPICHVehic. - 50%, Pedest. - 90% (only DL)

Load Factor = [(Eb/No)/(B/UBDR)]*[Nos. of Subs]*[Act. Factor]*[((1-(Orth.))+i)] Primary synchronisation channel SCHSecondary synchronisation channel SCHPrimary common control physical channel P-CCPCH

Input Values = f(fast/slow fading gain wrt UDBR) Paging indicator channel PICHAcquisition indicator channel AICH

Mobile = 21 dBm, Dongle = 24 dBm Secondary common control physical channel S-CCPCHAnt Gain = 0 dB (mobile), 2 dB (dongle)Body loss = 3 dB (mobile), 0 dB (dongle) Total common channel powers

1-Worst case2-Depends on the FACH bit rate, 32 kbps assumed here3-Depends on the amount of PCH and FACH traffic

Target load% Urban macro cells 50-60% (demanding traffic & user profiles buildings restrict cell dominance, shadowing) Urban micro cells 70% (small cells, traffic hotspots and indoor) Rural 30-40% (coverage important, lower traffic, different userprofile) Not higher than 75% (UL hard to manage, interference explodes)

speech=5 dB, 144 kbps real time data= 1.5 dB, 384 kbps non real time data= 1.0 dB

=[(Eb/No)/(B/Rb)]*k*T*B*F+[IM]

=[EIRP]-[Rx. Sens.]+[Rx. Ant Gain]-[Cable loss]-[FFM]

=[MPL]-[SFM(Shadowing)]+[SHO Gain]-[Pent. Loss]=Senst_UE+Fade Margins (Slow+Fast)+pent. Loss+C/I (Int. Margin)

Page 8: Link Budget UMTS

Public

DownlinkStop

Page 9: Link Budget UMTS

Public

Relative to CPICH, dB Activity Average power allocation with 20W maximum power, W0 100% 2.0

-3 10% 0.1-3 10% 0.1-5 90% 0.6-8 0.3-8 0.3

0.2

Control Overhead = 18% 3.6

Urban macro cells 50-60% (demanding traffic & user profiles buildings restrict cell dominance, shadowing)

Rural 30-40% (coverage important, lower traffic, different userprofile)

100% #1100% #1

0#2 10% #3

Page 10: Link Budget UMTS

Public

Clutter33.0 DU 1.7 24 12 20

U 1.8 20 10 2220.0 SU 1.9 14 7 2520.0 RU 2.4 9 6 3027.824.824.823.0

1.832.55272505127.552725051

Feeder Loss (dB)

Bldg Pent.

Loss (dB)

Log Normal

Standard deviation

(dB)

Node B Antenna Height (mtr)

Page 11: Link Budget UMTS

Public

Ec/Io (dB)

-9 40 DU-12 40 U-12 60 SU-15 65 RU

6.112.264

144384

2124

Orthogonality (%)

Page 12: Link Budget UMTS

Public

Reference Parameters Log Values Unitsa CPICH Transmit Power 33.0 dBmb CPICH Ec/Ior -10.0 dBc Cable, connectors, combiner losses -0.5 dBd Transmit Antenna Gain 18.0 dBie CPICH ERP 50.5 dBmf HPA Max Transmit Power 43.0 dBmg Max ERP 60.5 dBmh Target Load (Power) 0.0 dBmi ERP at Target Load 60.5 dBmj Thermal Noise Density -174.0 dB/Hzk Information Full Rate 65.8 dB-Hzl Receiver Noise Figure 7.0 dB

m Thermal Noise -101.2 dBm/Hzn 4.6 dBo Ec/No -15.0 dBp -16.0 dBq RSCP from Target Cell -111.7 dBmr Minimum Target RSCP -111.7 dBms Receive Antenna Gain 0.0 dBit Cable, connectors, combiner losses 0.0 dBu Rx attenuation & gain 0.0 dBv Cell Edge Probability 0.90 %w Standard Deviation 10.0 dBx Log Normal Fading -12.8 dBy Soft HO Gain 5.1 dBz Diversity Gain 0.00 dB

aa Car Pentration Loss 0.00 dBab Building Pentration Loss -25.00 dBac Body Loss -3.00 dBad Propagation Components -35.7 dBae Max Allowable Path Loss - MAPL 126.5 dBaf Target RSCP (counting propagation components) -76.0 dBm

Cell Radius Calculationmid-size city

Frequency [MHz] 2100Base Station Ant Height, Ht [m] 20Mobile Ant Height, Hm [m] 1.5

COST-231 Hata Model

Morphology (DU, U, SU, RU) DUPath Loss: Cost 231 Model 143.9dB/decade 36.4

Ioc/Ior^ (little i)

Minimum Ec/No (Eb/No-PG)

Page 13: Link Budget UMTS

Public

Std. Deviation (Sigma) 10.0a factor 0.90619b factor 1.11681t(a) 0.70110erf(a) 0.80002exponent (a,b) 11.29740argument (a,b) 1.80160t(a,b) 0.54124erf (a,b) 0.98914Cell Radius/range [Km] 0.33Cell Area for hexagonal cell [sq. Km] 0.22

Cell coverage 96.1%

Edge Reliability 90.0%

Page 14: Link Budget UMTS

Public

FormulaInput 2.0

a-fInputInputa+c+d 112.2 WInput RSCP Cut-off Valuesf+c+d Clutter Rx_LevInput DU -76g+h 1122.0 W U -81

10*log(kT) SU -8610*log(3840000) RU -91

Inputj+k+l 7.7E-11 W/Hz Input Values

Input (i=65%) 2.9 W Clutter Sigma Pent. Loss(E/AE)/(M+N*I/AE) DU 10 -25

Input U 8 -22e-ae-ad SU 6 -18

Input (from table) with all losses RU 6 -12InputInput

s+tInput

Input (from table)-NORMINV(v,0,w)

sqrt[NORMINV(v,0,w) - NORMINV(1-sqrt(1-v)),0,w)] * [1.6 - (8-w)/10]InputInput

Input (from table)Input

x+y+z+aa+ab+ace-r+ad+u 4.5E+12

q-ad Street level

InputInputInput

Input (Drop down)

Page 15: Link Budget UMTS

Public

DUUSURU

Page 16: Link Budget UMTS

Public

Local Down Link Interference due to ADJACENT Channel

Data Rate 12.2 kbpsProcessing Gain 25.0 dBTransmission power of Operator 2’s base station

1. Max Power transmitted 43 dBm2. Only CCH power transmitted 33 dBm

Pilot power from Operator 1’s base station 33 dBm

33 dBm

Adjacent channel attenuation -33 dBRequired Eb/No for voice connection 7 dBRequired Ec/Io for voice connection -18.0 dBreceived pilot power level from Operator 1’s base station -90 dBm

Maximum received power for voice connection -90 dBm

Maximum tolerated interference level, Io -72.0 dBmMaximum tolerated interference level on the adjacent carrier -39.0 dBmMinimum required path loss

1. Max Power transmitted by Operator2 82.0 dBm2. Only CCH power transmitted by Operator2 72.0 dBm

Minimum required distance1. Max Power transmitted by Operator2 178.2 mtr2. Only CCH power transmitted by Operator2 56.4 mtr

The adjacent channel interference in downlink may cause dead zones around interfering base stations. In this section we evaluate the sizes of these dead zones as a function of the coverage of the own signal. The coverage is defined as the received pilot power level. The results show that the dead zones can occur only if the following conditions take place at the same time: own network coverage is weak, the mobile is located close to the interfering base station that is operating on the adjacent frequency with maximum power, and UE performance is just meeting 3GPP selectivity requirements.

Maximum allocated power per voice connection from Operator 1’s base station

Page 17: Link Budget UMTS

Public

=[Eb/No]-[P.G.]

=[Max Rx Power]-[Ec/Io]=[Max tolerated Io]-[ADJ Ch atten]

Pathloss=37+20*log(d)

The adjacent channel interference in downlink may cause dead zones around interfering base stations. In this section we evaluate the sizes of these dead zones as a function of the coverage of the own signal. The coverage is defined as the received pilot power level. The results show that the dead zones can occur only if the following conditions take place at the same time: own network coverage is weak, the mobile is located close to the interfering base station that is operating on the adjacent frequency with maximum power, and UE

In this case it is equal to the pilot power level since the maximum transmission power for voice is assumed (C11) to be equal to the pilot power of 33 dBm.

Page 18: Link Budget UMTS

Public

Allowed propagation loss for cell range [dB] 80.0 85.0 90.0 95.0 100.0

Frequency [MHz] 895 895 895 895 895Base Station Ant Height, Ht [m] 25 25 25 25 25Mobile Ant Height, Hm [m] 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5Correlation Factor for Mobile Ant height a(Hm) [dB] 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02Cell Radius/range [Km] 0.05 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.17Cell Area for hexagonal cell [sq. Km] 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.08

0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40 3.60 3.80 4.00707580859095

100105110115120125130135140145150155160165170

Cell Range, Km

Path

Loss

, dB

Page 19: Link Budget UMTS

Public

105.0 110.0 115.0 120.0 125.0 130.0 135.0 140.0 145.0 150.0 155.0 160.0 165.0 170.0

895 895 895 895 895 895 895 895 895 895 895 895 895 89525 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25

1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.50.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.020.24 0.33 0.45 0.62 0.85 1.18 1.63 2.25 3.10 4.28 5.90 8.15 11.25 15.520.14 0.28 0.52 1.00 1.90 3.62 6.89 13.12 24.99 47.60 90.65 172.64 328.79 626.17

0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40 3.60 3.80 4.00707580859095

100105110115120125130135140145150155160165170

Cell Range, Km

Path

Loss

, dB

Page 20: Link Budget UMTS

Public

Cell Range [Km] Path Loss [dB]0.047 800.065 850.090 900.124 950.171 1000.236 1050.325 1100.449 1150.619 1200.855 1251.180 1301.628 1352.247 1403.101 1454.279 1505.905 1558.149 160

11.245 16515.519 170

Page 21: Link Budget UMTS

Public

Page 22: Link Budget UMTS

Public

Page 23: Link Budget UMTS

Public

Page 24: Link Budget UMTS

Public