Lindsay Lohan Sued by Ex-Bodyguard over Salary

8/14/2019 Lindsay Lohan Sued by Ex-Bodyguard over Salary

1/17

I234567I9

l01lL213l4l5r6t7l8

eggyRoman-Jacobson,ar No. 210E53)o,,gJas. Lirde, StateBar No. 217584 FITEDIOSAN6BI,83SI,NERIOROURTAPR7?000

{s}twclffiieLrnr(gYlIAffiGNG1A EFU1Yai"\bh$AX8c$'r$s't.!i

L Allen, StatcBa No. 234922LindelawFirmSunsEt lvd., Suite1025n Angeles,CA9006910)203-yJ33LO>m3-9233AX

forPlaintiffVID KIM, an ndividual

DAVID KIM, an individualPlaintiff,

vs.LINDSAY LOIIAN, an ndividual;CROSSHEART RODUCTIONS,NC.,Acorporation; nd DOES THROUCH50,INCLUSIVE,

Defendants,

ST'}tsRIORCOURTOFINE STATEOF CALIFORNHFORTTIECOUNTYO['LOS AIi{GELES

l9202122

)))I))))))))I)))))))

No. BC388654COMPI,AINT FOR DAMAGESI. BREACHOFORALCONTRACTL VTOLATION OT CALIFORNIALABOR CODE SECTION 2033. VIOLATTON OF CALIFORMALABOR CODESESIION 2264. VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIALABOR CODESECTION rr945. VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIALABOR CODE SDCTION2tO26, UNFAIR COMPETITION7, ITRAUI)8. COT{VERSION9. INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OFEMOTIONAL DISTRESSDBMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

23rptPsflettn28

)J

JIrR$p.g'TroNAElpVENIJEThecourt haspcrsonalurisdicrionover rheDefcndanebccauseheyaus i*ia"rro

and/q doingbusinessnrheStare f Califomia.


2/17

Venue s propern thiscountyn accordance ith Sec'tion 95(a)of theCalifomiaof Civil Rocedurebocausel) sone of thedefendantseside n los AngelesCounty nd (ii)

harmsoccunedn l-os AngelcsComty.

P[.AINTIT'T3. Plaintiff,DAVIDKII\[ ("Plaintiff')san ndividual. laintiffs,and tal1tirnesmentioned ereinwas.a residont f the Statcof Californiq Countyof L,osAngeles.

all relevant times herein, Plaintiffentered into an employment agreementwith Ms.ISllAN toidepersonal eauity senricerexclusivelyo her, or whichMs. LOTIANagrccd opay

oompensation. laintiffwasemploycd y Ms, LOIIAN from October13,2006 o Marctr0, 2007duringwhichtimc Mt. LOHAN conrrolledhe manncrandmeans yrvhichPlaintiff

thc work. Plaintiff dulyperfonned ll theconditionsof thecontact tobcby him. Notwithstanding, s. OHAN failedand efusedo payPtaintiffanyion for hiswotk or reirntnrseanycostsncuned n conjunctionwith thcperformanoef

jobduties.

DETE}TDANTS4. DefcndantUNDSAY LOHAN sanadult ndividual,Dcfsndants, andatalltimesmentionedherein was,a residentof tbe Statcof California, County of Ins Angeles.

is a well-knownaclresswhohasperformed n televisionand n motion picnrres.At alttimesnrentioned erein.Dcfcndantwas heemployerof Plaintiff andcontrotledheandmeansbyvhich Plaintiff accomplishedhework.5. DefendantCROSSHEART RODUCTIONS,NC. is a corporation xistingunder

e awgof thestateof Californiawith tsprincipal lace f businessn NewYork ar125Vf. SS'h8i Floor,New York,NY l00lg.6. DefendantDOES I tbrouglrSO nclusivqarc n eomewayrqryonsiblcor thesufferpdby Plaintiff. The tnrc namesandcapocitiesof defendantsnaryredhcreinas DOES

lhtough 5O' nclusive, whother individual, oorporate,associate,or othrnnisc, arcunknown m

I23456189

l011t2tg74

'15t6t7l8l9202L2223

intiff whothercforcsuessudr defendantsy such ictitiousnamesFnsuantro C.C.p. 474.


3/17

I23

will amendhisComplaint o show nrenames ndcapacitieswhen bcy havebeenPlaintiff is infiormed ndbelieves, ndonthe basisof suchrtformationandbalief

that eachDefendantDOE hereins in somemanner esponsiblcor thcwrongfulconductdamagcshcrcin alleged.

7 Plaintiff is informedandbelieves n therconallegcs hat eachDefendants,andattimes mentionedwas, he agent, rnplo)e, r rep'resentadvef cactro0pt Defendant.Each

in doing heacts, r in omitting o actar allegedn this Complaint, asactingwithinscope fhis orher actual r apparentu0rority r thealleged ctsandomissions f each

as agentsubsequentlyere atifiedandadopted y eachotherDefeudant sprincipal.notedotherwise erein he ermDefendanrehallnran artd efer o LINDSAY I-OHAN

CROSSHEART RODUCTIONS,NC.,andDOES tluorgh5Q coliectively ndeadrofindividually.

FACTS COMMON TO ALL CAUSESOF ACJTONIn eatlyOctobo, 2006,DefendantsecruitedPlainriff to work exclusively or tbem

thecapacityof providingpersoul security cnices n excbangcor compensatiorr.efsrdantsto payPlaintiffs rates,$4,000.00 crwcek ar A hourservicesnd$2,800perweckwhcn

limiredo everrings,lus cimbursdnent f all costs ndexpenses.9. Plaintiff undentoodandagroeilhat due o theexclusiveernploymentgreement,wouldnoibeable o providesecurity enviccsor anyotherclients arrd rrrtherhat

wouldcontnol hcmanncrandmcans y whictr Plainriff accomplishedhework,directinghiruvhen to workonddetermininghenattrreof work tobeperformcd.

10. Plaintiff accepted efendants' fferof emplolmentandoommencedorkon13'2006.Duringhiscmployurent, r. Kim prorided he ollowingpersonalecgrityexclusivelytoDefendanrs,ithout imitation: t) errsuring s.LoHAN's phpical

from fansand hepeparaza;2) aoconrpanyingerro ndusrrycvents; 3)obtainingVIpat ctubsandconcerts;4) ensr:ringhatstalfatvenueseceived ratuiticsathis expense)

a:rangingfor VIP parting at venueEartdensuring hat valets reoeived gratuiries(at his(6) arrangingandpayingor (athis expense)or additionalsccuriryo vgriousconoerrs

3

4lIslI6l7I9

l0l l1213t4l5t6171819202l2273

w4

+,6"H,28


4/17

sl6i789

l011t213L4l5l6t7l8l9202l2223lu7r'po

2728

evenrasneeded uchas heTure Tao"club n LasVegas;7)providingdoor o doordrivingto Ms. I-OHAN andher riendsupon equest; nd 8) providingpersonrlsecurity o hcr

wbenprcsent.I l. Plaintiff plovided heabovc cilices(arnong therservices) xclusivelyo

' for aperiodof approximatelyourmonthsOctober13, 2006'March10,2007t.Toin unpaidwages lone, laintiff s owcd norehan$55,0m calculateds ollows:$2,800

l? weeks/ 4,000 2 weeksl. Notwithstanding,laftrtifPsepeatedequestsm payment f hiseamed,Def,endantsailedand cfuaedo payhim anycompensation hatsocver.12. In mnjunctionwith theperfonnanccf his ob duties,Plafutiffalso ncuncdun-reimburscdosls or mileagq lppingvalets,andhiring of additionalsecurityoprotccl

LOHAN, Additionelly,n oraboutateNovembcr 006,Defendans' ssignedriver, Iazz"an llegal ight um in frontof Plaintiff o avoid hepaparazzindcollidedwithPlaintiJPs

causingsubstantialdamageohis personal ehicle. Plaintiff incunri $1,468 n repairThe total amount of the$ecostsareapproximately$10,000. Notwithstanding Plaintiffs

requestsorpaymcntof 0u abovc osts,Defcndantsailedandrefusodo payhim anywbatsoever.

13. As arcsultof Defcndsnts'efusalopayPlaintiffwages ueor indemnify laintiffcosls ttclured n conjunctionwith theperformaneof his ob duties,Plaintiffwas oroedohis employment Thereafter, laintiffmndea rrthq dernandor paymentonoavail.

rcsponded o PlaintifPs detnandby falsclydenying hatshe mw Plaintiff, falselying thatshgeveremplopd Plaintiff, alselydenying ratPlaintiffpcformedsecuritycrvice

herand alselydenyingheamounts ueandowing o Plaintiff and rc validitythereof.

FIRSLCAUSE OF ACTIONBREACHOF ORAL CONTRACT

(ByPlainittf AgalnstAII llefendants)14. Plaintiffhcrebyncorporateoyrcferencelt allegarionsf thisComplaint s f

set oilh herein15. Plaintiff entffod ntoanernployrnentgreement ithDefendant$sheretofore


5/17

I21456789t0l lt2

pufsuafl to whichhcagreedo wolk fqDefendanu and or whichDefendantsgreeiloPtaintiff compensation. uring heerrtire ou$eof Plaintiff s emptoyment ith Defendants,

at thedmeof Plaintiff's discharge,ncluded, utwasnot imitedto the ollowingtcrmsand

A. Defcndants ouldhirc Plaintiffto providepersonal ecurity crvicesoheron oncxclusive asis;

B. Defendanrsgreedo payPtaintiffcompcnsa$onn theamount f $4'00Operwoek u 24hourseniceand$2,800perweekwhen imited oevenings.

C. Defendmrtsgreedo reimbursePlsintiffforcostsexparded.16. ThisemploynentContractwagevidencedyvariousoralrcpresentatiottsnd pxt

to plaintiff by Ddendants and,/orher geil$ or cmployecs,aridby the panic$'Gntirof conduct..17. througboutthecourse f hisemploymnt ith Defendants, laintiffduly

his ob dutiesasagoodand aiihfulemployee ndperformcdall conditions ndall requircmentstder heContract s cpresentedo hirnby Defendants. $a result f

actionsandre,?rrescntations,laintiff carneeasonablyo expestand o rely onthepromiseDefcndantshathc wouldbepaidcornpensationsherctoforealleged.Plaintiff, n goodaith'upon hesc epresentadonsrdbelicvcd hcm o be rue.

18. Plaintife relianceon,belicf in, andacceptancen good aith of all theassurancesor reprcsntationssallcged ercinedplaintiff ttuoughouthis employment ith

to reasqnablyelievehat he would receive ompsosationor his work. In additionohis rcgular utiee sanemployeefDefendmts, laintiff,as urthcrconsideradon,

ftom seeking ndaccepting nyotlreremployment.19. Plairuiff undertook and continued employmmt with Defcndrrts andduly

all thc oonditions of the contract to beperformcd by him. Plaintiff wasat all tirnes,willing, andable o perfono arrdhad offered o pcrform,all of theonditions of tlre

to be performEdby him.20. By the abovcdescribedactsandomissions,Defefldanrs ailed to c'arryout their

5

l3l4l5l6r7r8r92A2l2223


6/17

l l I" l

E9

r0I tL2t3l4l5r6t7l819202l222tw,\:

Ezst:rH,6n28

under he ermsof the enploymorrt greementith Ptaintiff. Plaintiffis informedbelicves nd hereon llegeshatDefendants'refusalo payPlaintiffcompcruationor work

wereunlaurfrrl n natureand n bneach f Plaintiffs aErecrnent ith Defendants21, As adirectand egal esult f Defendants'leachof theenploymenl gltemnt,hassufferedandcontinueso suffersubsmnrialoss n eamings,andotheremploymcntwhichhe wouldhave eceivedadDefendantsotbrcached aidagccment, lusincurred in obtainirrg substituteernploymerrt,all to his damage n an amount accorrding

pnoof.Plaintiff has akco easonabletepso findcomparablemploymat in aneffontohisdamages-

SECONDCAUSBOr AgrrQNVIOLATICI\ OT LABOR CODE S203

(By Plaintift AgpinstAll Defendanh)22. Ptaintiffhereby ncorporatesyrefercnce ll allegations f this C.omplaints f

set orth herein.21. CaliforniaLabc CodeSection203providesn pertinantpart

If anemployet willfullyfails to pay,witho.rt abaternentor reduction in rc.cordancswith Scctions20L,?01.5,202 and202.5,any wagesof anemployeewho jsdisdrarged or wbo quits, thewagesof the employeeshall corriinuem a1rcnalryfrom thedue darc fiereof at dre same ate uruil paid or until an actiom lrcrcfore scomrnonced;but thewages sholl not continue fir morc than 30 days.

24, Flaintiffresigncdhisernployrnentn Mardr lO,200?bocausc cf,endantsiltfullyandcontirnreso rduse o payPlainiff wages ue. By wiltfully refirsing o payPlaintiff

duewithin 72hoursof his resignations eguired y LaborCodeSecrion?fiL, efcndanrcliable for pe.naltiesprsuant to Labor Code Section2Cf3,n an arnounteqnal to tlrirty driysof

prwailing wage ate.These enalties,n a sum o beprcvenattrial, areowedand

25. Plaindff s attitledunderlaborCodc$ 218.5o rccovreasonablenorney'seescosts n addition o penaltytself.

THrRp CAIJSEOFACTTON6


7/17

l.234567I9

10l lt2l31415l6l718r9202L7'

vroLATroN oFLABORCODES226(ByPlatntiff Agninsn l Detendants)

26. Plaintiff hcrebyncorporatesy refaenocall allegations f this Complaintas fy set orthheroin.

n. California abor CodeSection226(a)pncvidesn pedinentparl:

IF23'y'7zsf3@oFn28

ratespaid or anyothernformatione,quired nderCal. -aborCodc$226.Byrefusing o providePlaintiff withan a@uratc nd ternizcdwagestatement, efendants

lated labor Code Section 226.29. As a resultof theviolation f labor Code$226,Plaintiffseeksall remedies

in LaborCode $226(e),ncludingattomeys es,oosts,damages nd/orpenalties,is entitled o greater f aeualdamagxor fifty dollars or the nitial paypcriod n whichaoccur$andonehundrcddollarsperunployeeor eadrviolation n a subaequentay

, not exceedingan aggregate enaltyof four tbousanddollarsperemployee. Plairrtiff s alsoto an award to an awsrd of costsandrcasqnableattomey's fees.

FOURTII qAI'SE ()4 ACTIONVIOLATTON OF LABOR CODD$1194

@yPlainttff Against All Defendants)30. Plaintiffherebyncorporuesy reference,allllegations f thisComplaint s f

set orth herein.31. California aborCodeSeetion 194(a) rovidcsas ollovs:

Everyemployer hall,scrnimonthlyr at he imeof eachpayment f wages,furnishcachof hisorhercmplolces,eitherasadetachabteartof thechect,.draftor voucher ayingheernployeewageE, separatcly henwages repaidbypersonalheckor cash, nacc.uratercmized tatcmentn writing[.|28. Defendmtswillfully failed and chrsedo payPlaindff 6nywageswhatsoeveror

performedand ailed o provideany temized tatementn writingof wages amed,

Notwithstandingnyagrccmentowork or a esserwage, nyemplotaeeceivinless ban hc egalminiururnwagegr the egalovcrtimc-oomp-ensaiiodppticableothe emplofees entitledorecovern acivil actionheunpaiilbalance i the ullamount f thisminimumwage-or vertime omperuatbn,ncludingnrcriii - -thereon, easonableuorneyl ees,andcostsof iuit


8/17

I234567II

l0l l1213l4t5l6l7r819202l2223t*f*s

,?:tF.Br28

32. Ptaintiffreceivedno Payment hatsoeveror workpcrformedor Defendants.Plaintiffrcceived ess han he egalminimurnwageandhe s entitled o racovet he

balance f thefull amountof thisminimumwage'33. As aresultofDcfeodants'failuretopayPlaintifrminirnrlnages,Plaintiffisentitled o anawarof rcasonablyttomefs feesandcosuof suitprsuant to Cal. :bo'

Sec.1l94(a),

F',rryFr AUSFJ)F'CIIONVIoLATTON FLADOR ODEZt0z

@y Plainfiff Agatnst All Defendants)34. Plaintiff herebyrrcorporatcsyreferencc ll altcgations f thieComplaintar ify set orth hercin.35. California abor CodeSection 802(a) rovidesn pertinentpart "An employer

indemni$ hisor hercmployeeor all ueccssaryxpendituresr lossesncumed y thein ditectqooseguenctf thedischarge f hisor herduties,or of his orherobedieoceo

directionsof theemployer[.]"36. As described erein,Plaintiff incurred xpendituresnd ossesai hcretoforp

egedn dircct consequencef thedischargef hisdutiesand/orat thcdircclionof Defendantshis requestsor reimbursertntf laintiffwasnever eimbursed yDefendantsor theand ossesncuned.Defendcntsaveknowingly ithheld romplaintiff

for suchexpendituresnd ossesncurred y Plaintiff. In violationof stateaw.haveknowinglyandwiilfully refusedo pwforn theirobligationso failedtoproper

and eirnburse laintiff nviolationof LaborCode92802(a).37 As aproximateesultof theaforementionediolations nd n addition o

for expenditures, laindff is entided o intcrestatthesameatcas udgmciltsnil actionsaccruedrom thedateonwhichtheanployee ncurrcd henecessaryxpenditurerprusuanto Cal. LaborCodeS2802(a).

38- As a furtherpnoximate result of the sfcrrementioned iolations, plairriff is ehthtedt?cover all rcasonablycosts, nctuding. without limiration atlornry's feesandcosts narrrod


9/17

1234f,6789

l01lt2r314r5t6t718l9202t22

i*3a,' ',t

ft'

to Cal.LaborCode$2802(c).

STXTII CAUSEOF ACTIONVIOLATION Otr' .JNFAIRCOMPEIITION LAW

(Bus.& hof. CodeWm et scq.)(By Plstntifi AgainstAll Defenrlants)

39. Plaintiffhereby ncorpo(atesy rcference ll allegations f this Complaintas flly sct orth hcreio.

40. Thecomduct f all Ddcndantsss allcgedn this Complainthasboenaodcontinuesbeunfair,unlawful,andharmful o Plaintiffand hegeneralpublic. Plsimiff seekso enforce

rightsaffecting hcprblic interestwithin theneaningof Cal. Codeof Civ. Prcc.Sec.1021.s.41. Plaintiff is a trcrson' withinthc mcaning f Bus.& ftof. CodeSection 720l,

suffqod mqnctaryocsee s aresultof Ddcndants' ailure to payhim, aod herefore asto b,ringhisc*useof aaion pusuaut o Bus.& Prof.CodeSection17204or injrmcrivc

ief, rcstiurtion,andotherappropriatcquitableclief.42. Defendauts and eachof themaree "p6son" asdefined under BusinessandionsCodet702r.35,43. Bus.& Prof.Code$17200, tseg., rovidcsbat*unfaircompetitionstrallmean

includeany unlawful, unfair orfrandulentbusiness ct orprac{icel4, Wagc andhour awsexpressundamental ublic policies. Promptpayment fto theernplolrce psn eparation iom employment,ailwe to keepaccuratewag

failurc to reimburscPlaintiffnecessar),rpenditures lossesnourrcdby thein direct oorreguenc f thedisctrarge f hisor hcrdutiesand refusal o paywages ftedetnandhasbeen made s a fundamentalpublic poticy of the Stateof Califomia to enforpeminimum abor standardg,o prreventgainst rnploy'erraudandabuse f bargaining

and o ensurehatemployeesrenot requircdo work undcrunlau/firlconditions.45. Defendantsaveviolarsd tatutesndpublii policies.Throrighheconduct lege

9


10/17

It ro l- lt -^ r ---.--. +^ r,.^ra *..1t:^f flinrm Complairrt, cfefldants,ndeacn f them, ave cted

onuaryo these ublic:" ------::t::"z frraveiolatedpecific rovisionsftheLabor odc,ncludingutnot imitedo, scctions02,r fZoa,216,,226,194,802, nd avc ngagcilnother ntawful nduufairbusinpssracticesn+ fiviotationf Bus.& hot Code ection 720o,t se.tdeprivinglaintiffof rightr'bencfits'ndt ' - --n,^ ql t amnlaw:rc rrnder lnw- 5 lnrivileecsguaranteodo all employccs ndcr aw'6 [ 45. Defendants' niawfirlurd unfairconduct,asalleged ereinabovg constitutesz pnr"i.*rpgririoninviolationofus.&prof.codeseaion?200,g ll 47- Defendanrsy cogagingn the conduct ereinalleged,by failing !o payapplicableT9 flfrwailinB w6, faihngrogay benefits, cqufuinghecxecutionof uncomcionable ontractstltOfico,ntai*ogllegalpanalty rovisions ndconditioningheprovisiorof workvisason he

t I lexecution f illcgploontrscts,itberknewor in theexercise f reasonableareshould ave nownltZ [Uat tlreconductwasunlarrful, As sudr, t is aviolatisn of Bus.& Prof. CodeSection17200.13fl 48. Business hofessionsCodeSectionTM providesor apivate ca,rsef actionllt+ [staUnCthat*[alctionsfor any elief pursumrothisdupter shallbepm$ecutedxclusively n a

lS $counof mmpererrturisdiction...uFoo he complaintof anyperson .. actittg ot the nterests fIlO fliusetf,e members r tlregencralpublic."tt t 49. Busincss ProfessionsodeSection 72Q3rovideshemurt with available1Sllrcmedicsn stating har*lalny pe$on whocngagpd,rproposeso engagen unfair competitiontltl llnaf beenjoyedn anycounof competenturisdiction. Thecourtmaymakasuchorders r20 liudgrnents.. asmaybcnoc$safy o rstorEoanypetsonn inrerest nymoney rPloperty.-.I2f lwhiclrhavcbcenacquiredbymqans f unfaircompetitio'n."22|| 50. Themlawftrt andunfairbusinesgractftrsof Defendants escribedereinprqsen!.# Ir continuinghreato rnembrsf $republicn0ratDcfendantsontinuedo engage.inhe

dz+ [*"auct describederein-t li$tt I 5I. Defendants avewrongf,ullyctainedmoniesbelonging o Plaintiff rhat t mayhavB6 fiacquired.by eans f unfairandunlawful busincss acrices.L3 tl'-W n 52. Plaintiff allegeshatDefDdants,rsonallyarticipated, uthorizcd,nstnrctedT28 land/orratifiedthcaforcsaid cfprre n inducingPlaintifFserrploymanlscwices,

ll tr. Urilcss estrainedy thisCourt,Defcndantswill oominueoengagen theunlawfilIll r0


11/17

t234567II

1011t2l3l4l5l617l8l9202l22

,?3.!!.rt.EuiF!at25Ll.tz.kas, 27

asaltegedabove.Thewitlful rc,frrsalo paywages 'hcn dueandpayableaftera dernandbeenmade and the falsc denial of the amountdues validity thereof is a misdcmeanorishable y fine for each iolationpursuanto Business ndProfcssions ode$7100,andother

Theactsconstitute ontirnring ndongoingunlawfulactivitiesprohibiledby BusiressProfessionsodeg5 17000 tseq. ndustify hc ssuanoef injunctionPwsuanto 817293.

to tlreBusirrcss Prrofessionsodq his CounshouldmakcsucJr rders r udgmnts,uding hc aptrnintmentf a recciver,esmaybe rrccessaryo pteveDtheuseor ennploymcnt,y

theiragents r ernployqes,f ury unlawfuldcceptive racticeprohibited y theiness& Professkms odc,and/orrrcludingbutnot imitpdto,disgorgcmentf profitswhichbe necessaryo rcstorcPlaintiff to thcmoneyDefendsnts' aveunlaurfrrlly ailed opay.

SEVENTXT AUSEOF ACTTONFR"AT'D

@yPlaintitf fueinst All Defendants)54. Plaintiffherebyncorporatesyrefer=nce.allllegations f thisComplaint s f

y set orthherein.55. As describedherein,Dcfendantsmade alseprornises o Plbintiff with knowledge

suchpromises wer falseat the time whe,n nade, o paycompensation n exchange oridingherwith personal ecurity crvices nanexclusive asis.Suchpromisqrwertfalscwhenmade. OncePlaintiffprovidedsuchservioes nclusivelyo Defendants,refirsedohonmher agrecrnent.DefendantsberebynduccdPlaintiff,wirbfalse

to pay Plaintiff oornpcnsation pecified in groaterdetail above, to induce plaintiff tocxclusivelyorher. OncePlaintiffbegan isemploymentorEefendanrs,hepromiseshat

his agreernent crc disregarded.Defendants ade erbal nisreprcscntationsopaycompensationn theamount f S4,000 erweekor 24 hourservice nd$2,800 crweelimited to cvenings.

56. Defendantsomminedraudbymeans f the alse epresentationspecified boverepresentationswerc false asevidenccdby Ddendantc' refirsal ta pay Plaintiff any

for work perfenredatrd hcfalscdenialof 0reanounrandvalidityof wages rr.11


12/17

tllotIt llfne falsityof Defendanb' eprtsentationsrefurtlrer videncd by Defcndants'cfusalolt2 lacnaowledgchatshe new audhiredPlaintiffnotwitbstandingcrverbalacknowledgmentnd n3 llnumerouselephoneext tnessageshat hewageswercduc'I4 I 57. As allegedabovqDefenrdantsnewhal the representationcere alsewhenmade.5 I 58, Defendantsmade he epresentationso Plaintiffwith an ntent o defraudhelt6 llphintiff, tbar is, Defendants made he teprcseilationsfor the pupose of inducing thePlaintiff toiZ flretfupon t and o act n relianoc hereon sevidenced ytherequiremenrtratPlaintiff woik forAho cxclusivclyandDcfendants' ailure operform ased r thcverbalandcontractualI9 fireprescntationst the irneperformancc asdue, Defendants'cfusal o perfotmherverbslandlt10 lcontractuatobligations upon demandby Plaintiff is further evidence of Dcfendants' intent tott [oerraud.ill2 I 59. Ptaintiffwasunaware f the alsityof the epesentationsndre easonablyelied;13lupon hcpromisesrom Defendants. laintiff reasonablyeliedonthercpresentationsf thet+ flOcfenOantsor the sofepurpose f performing nderheagreement.nder hecirsumsranccs,If llfUintif was ustified n relyinguponthereprcseilrarions.16I 60. As adircc,t nd egal csultofPlaintiff'sreasonablerelianceonrheIl7 lmiseOresentationsPlainriffhassuffer,cdndconrinuesosuffergcnoral ndconsequential18lldamagcsn at amorntsubjecroproofatriat.tl19 | 61. As a frirther dircct and egal resultof the actsandconduct of Dcfcndann, andeaclri20 ilof them,asaforesaid, Plaintiffhas beencausedo anddid suffer andcontinues o sr:ffer$everezl fiernotional nd mentaldisbess.The exactnahrE,durationandextentof said njuries s presentlytlZZlluntnownto Plaindff,buthe s inforrned ndbelieves nd hereon lleges hatsomcf notall of;p3 llthenjuriesarewasonablyenaino bepermanentn character,iFttp+ | 62. Addirionally,asdircctaod egal esultof Dcfenrdants'raudulent ctions ndTI

ffS [sdcmes,Plaintiffhas ncunedossof earnings, urther,ecausebeactsn guestion ereEl lP6 lPersstallyoommittcdby Defendants,hoactedwithmalioe,oppressionr frarrd,6 wercz7 fldeliberate,ilful andactedn consciousisregardf theprobability fcausingnjury oplaintifr,2Elsf,eseeks rmitivedamagasgainstDefendantsn drder o leter hern'from rrch onductn theIfituture. al.Civ. Code93294{l112


13/17

I234567I9

l0l1t2l3t4l5l611l8l9202l2223Yps{-Ftz62728

EIGITTII CAUSEOT ACTTONCONVERSION

(By Plainttff AgainstNl Dcfendants)63. Plaintiff hereby ncorporatesyreference ll allegations f this Complaintas f

set odh herein64. As allegcd bove, efendants'rongfirllywittihcldeamedwages nd efusedo

mbusePlaintiff for expenditwesncurred y Plaintiff in directconsequencef thedischargefqrherduties. In partiorlm,Dcfendants'ailed o pay anycompensationorwotk pcrformod r

Plainriff for anycsts incurred in the dischargeof his job duties or in dirrcctobedicncethedirectionof Defendants.

65. At all relevantimes,Deferdantsadandcontinueso havea egalobligationby stetnteo payPlaintiffall carnedwagcsando$er compensationue o him. Sucb

andcompcnsationelongedo Plaintiff at the imethe aborandserviceswerepiovided oand accordingly, uchwagcsandcompensationrc hepropertyof Plaintiff,not

66. Defendans nowingJymd intentiortallyaiLcdopayPlaintiff all dulyeamedandun-rcimbursedxpenditues ndconvertedthemo Defendants' wnuseandbenefit,67- Plaintiff hasbeennjurcdbyDefendants'ntcntionalconversion f suchwagcs nd. Plaintiffisentitledo immediateossessiorrf all amountsonvertedby

with interest, swell asanyandall profits hatDcferdantsacquirrdby tbeir unlawfu

68, Defcndants'actions onstituting onversionwsreoppressive,malicious, ndandwereconcealedy Defendants,ndeachof thcm, rom namedPlaintiff andas

alleged.Plaintiff hasbeur injuredby Defcndants' opprcssiv!, malieious, i.nttntionalfraudulent ctions,ntittingPlaintiff o punitiveandexernpluydamagesursuantoCal.Civ

NINTH CAUSBOF ACTTONINTENTIONAL INEI,ICTION O[' BMOTIONAL DISTRESS

$3294.

13


14/17

Itoo|IilI I (ByPtaintiff AgpinstNl Dcfcndants)I2 [ 69. plaintiff herebyncorporaresyreferencell allcgations f thisCoffiplaintas fI llnuy sot otth herein.l l -r-^ ^^, : - n^---4 [ 70. Dcfcndants aveengagedn corrduct sdescribedhrougtrorrtthisComplairnharSflwas xtremeandoutrageousnd bcyondhebounds f common ecency.SucbactionswereI6 lintendedo cause, r wetre nBagedn withacorucious isregard f thepmbabilityof causingI7 fisevereemotional isuas to Plaintiff. Such onductbyDefendantsncludes ithort imitritionhee ftonowing: r'tl9 || A- Defandants nade alsepromiseso paycornpensationo Plaintiffdcsigned10 ll to inducePlaintiff 0owork exclusively or Defendantswithout intent o pay

tlI I I Plaintiff anycompensationhatsoever.u ll B. DefendantsirectedPlaintiffto incurexpenditures nd osses nherbehalfllt, ll but hasheretofore illfully refusedo indcmnifyPlaintiff for sucht4 ll experrdituresn violationof aw, Defcndants rrew hatstrewould efuseo15[ reimburse laimifffor suchexpenditurest tre timeshedirecred ndortl16 l approveduci expenditures.Itt [ ?1. AsdirctandproximatctesultoflieDcfendants'acts,Plaintiffhassu$tainedl8 llcontinueso suffer seyere motional isress.Plaintiffseeks eneral amagesorhis sevtrel.tf fiemotionaldistress ndortrerconsequeotiatarnageso an amountnot ess hanur amountwithinZ0 llthe;urisdictionf thisoourt, heexact rnountobeproven t rial.tl,t ll 72. PlaintiffallegcshatDefendantsersonallyarticiparcd,urhorized,nstructedZ}flandtorratified heaforesaidchemen inducingPtaintifPsemployment orviccs.T,/3 ll n. Further,becausebeactsn questionwerecommittcdbyDefendane,ncludingHt l

ffa fiofficecs,directorsand/or nanaging gents, hoactcdwith rnalice,oppressionr fraud,or ]verefr25 fdchberate, ilful andactcd n onseiousdisregardf theprobabilityof csusingmjury optaintiff,Pa lt" seeks unitivedamagesgainstDefendantsn ordcr o derer hem rom sudrconduc-tn ttreZz lfirturepursuanroCal.Civil Code$3294.tlt r l

ll purpntl[ tqil


15/17

I23456789

l0l1

WHEREFORE" LAINTtrT praysor udgnntagainstDefendants,ndeadtof thern,as

For compensatoryamagecccordingo proof;An awardof wuting timepanalties usuanl o l-sbff Code$203 o thcPlaintiff nanarnount qualo 30 imcshis regularateof pay;Forpunitivcandexennplaryamagcsceordingoproof;Forattomeys'feesndoosts ursuanto Cal.LaborCodc$$2185,226(e),1194(a)2$O2(cl,Cal. iv,Code lff21.5andanyothercornract r statutory utltuity;Forar awardof intsrest,ncludingp,rejudgmentnterest,atthe egal ate;For aprcliminarymd permanentnjunctionorderingDefendantsro easeheunlawfulandunfairbusinessracticessheretofore lleged,For appointment fa receiver nd ot anaocountingnsofaras t is necessaryodeterminehcamountsue heunpaidwages nlawfully retained nd cstorchoseamountso Plaintiffsandotheremployees.Forrestitutiono Plaintiff in ananount o beprovenat tial.For sudrotherand urthm cFefas heC-ourtmaydeemust andproper.

April4, 2008

1. ,

t3l4r5l6r7l8l9202taa

4,5.

8.

2lW*s?stu28

Auorncp forPlaintiff DAVID KIM

t5


16/17

I23456789

l0l lt2l3t4l5l6r718l92Q2l2223$-i2s

5H6n28

pEMA,r{pEORrIrRYTRIALPlaintiffDAVIDKIM erebyemandsrialby uryonall claims.

April4,2008

l6


17/17

fCqgY lsumall-JN|ruI) rDtvDii6ac A Lindo,SBN2175t4T}iE UNDELAWFIRM9000SuneatEtvd.G.1045,ra.Epgof.,o,:3 l0) 203rrneraocaes: l I N. Hill Sttet

ComplexCesoedgnatlml-l counter l---l Jotrra*Flled with&rt appatrancob'ydfsndanttcal.Rulcs tCou( rulc

Check rr boxAub lort

Date:

Wfurgfulcrmlnadon38)olier

case ype hatbestdescdbeshlscsif,! a,,roetl-l Untnart* nroloietao)Othr PlPDtttlD Pe|.on l hFryPrcperttPaqrm/t{rongtul Dc.th)Tod| | A$besb(D4)E ttoout labillrlv(2l)| | Modicalrne,pracilca45)[--l otrr puporwotas)!q+I/PDJIYD (o|hcr)TodLl guclrus tortfunfalt rtus pnctic6(07)u cwrrierrts08)LJ Oearnetonta}LJ frrro ttalEl tnbttcctuat'opt'ty19)=l P.!fi?nlmdngllsnc.2s)I I Otlernm-PUPD/WObd(35)

Co|1irrqtEl sr"d, o{.Dnltacrrvrernntyoo)rl nub f .fcooo,taolion$og)Fl om*.n""u-"tos)l-l In$rnneaovTrase (18)Ll ormconrraalszl!99.[nroPrnYI I fi{0c.rtdofi'raintl0versec.ndmn.lion (14)E wrongrulvlctbn33)l-'l otnerreatrgpedv2s)pq!+rfulDettlnrI I Cottrtrlsoll3.|)=l Raddantal(34L-l Drugs3e)Judisial lrvicw

Plov|EflroltyGompl|fiClvilLlfg.llon(GlRrt6 of cooi,ruh.t.aohta3)[--l furirrudtrrrdc reguldon(ol)E Conutr,*ondfed(lo)l-l t*,tas on(to)fl s"-ritl"" tllllalbn (2s)f] Enutonr.rr"t/foxk lort(30)E ln.r]Bn*.wcrago cbimsarisrE tofi thosbovg istdpro\rbionallyflrplsr casstypes(41)Enlorceme$t of JualotDartrf-l Er*oroeroootot udpmsnt (20)tlrcda|t.ou6 clvil Goil|PLlntE nrcotzttL-f Othor om4ail (rd W'M tuY.) 142)XFcellalFour C vi PctifionEtf

2.

_ iseueshatwil bednra+oneuming r3olve". l_-l Substntlal mount fdocumantaryvidencRencdie!sought ch*k atl hal apptg:a.lV mondaryNurnbertcausd ofa{!g! (spaclty):nis oae" l-l b El r not ad&F ection utt.

Arset btrellurc 05) E padrlfship ndcoeorE{o orrrrrfics21)Fc&n rs:oltlb&tt urd (11) l--J on.t p"rt* (norsprc,fiedbovr) (43)wrlt ofr|andrte(@)

Inoher countier, lalcs, rcounlfus, f Ina foderaloulL E Sulsto tal poctjugmentudlcldsupeoisionb.[-l nonnonsts'X 6cfantory r niurrtve elief c. punltlve

This ase I I is l, ' | 18 rt complexnder ule3.1O0 f heGallforniaules f Court.f theceseecomdo(,markErefators requiringxccptlonaludidalmenagement:r. I--''l Larg" number of separatglyrqrsEnlcd partice d.l-l Largenurnber of vdtlesEsU. -l exbnsiw motinnprsclloe raislngdiff,cult or novet ", l---l Goordinailonwlth rlalectactions pendlng n one or rnorecoufts

3.4.5.6. aroany knonn ehted

Lindsay Lohan Sued by Ex-Bodyguard over Salary

Documents

Transcript of Lindsay Lohan Sued by Ex-Bodyguard over Salary