Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment for the Proposed ...
Transcript of Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment for the Proposed ...
Limited Phase II Environmental
Site Assessment for the Proposed
Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility
334 West Wheeling Street
Lancaster, Ohio
Submitted to:
Fairfield County
Board of Commissioners
210 East Main Street
Lancaster, Ohio 43130
Prepared by:Bennett & Williams Environmental Consultants, Inc.
98 County Line Road West, Suite C
Westerville, Ohio 43082
(614) 882-9122 July 7, 2014
i
RELIABILITY OF REPORT - DISCLAIMER
Conclusions reached in this report are based upon the objective data available to
the CONSULTANTS at the time of forming their opinions and as presented in the report.
The accuracy of the report depends upon the accuracy of these data. Every effort is made
to evaluate the information by the methods that generally are recognized to constitute the
state of the art at the time of rendering the report and conclusions, and the conclusions
reached herein represent our opinions. Subsurface conditions are known to vary both in
space and time, and there is inherent risk in the extrapolation of data.
THE CONSULTANTS are not responsible for actual conditions proved to be
materially at variance with the data that were available to them and upon which they
relied, as presented in the report.
The opinions, conclusions and recommendations shown in the report are put forth
for a specific and proposed purpose and for the specific site discussed. The
CONSULTANTS are not responsible for any other application, whether of purpose or
location, of our opinions, conclusions and recommendations other than as specifically
indicated in the report.
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DISCLAIMER i
LIST OF TABLES v
LIST OF FIGURES viii
LIST OF APPENDICES ix
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Documents Reviewed 2
1.3 Site Location 2
1.4 Historical Changes in the Site Vicinity 4
2. HISTORY OF THE SITE 7
2.1 Introduction 7
2.2 Review of Previous Property Ownership 7
2.3 Review of Historical Land Use 9
3. SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION 21
3.1 Introduction 21
3.2 Investigation Design 26
3.3 Drilling and Soil Sampling 28
3.4 Groundwater Sampling 34
3.5 Temporary Monitoring Well Abandonment 35
4. ANALYTICAL RESULTS 36
4.1 Introduction 36
4.2 Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure in Soils (TCLP) 37
4.2.1 Introduction 37
4.2.2 TCLP Metals Results 38
4.2.3 TCLP Volatile Organic Compounds Results 38
4.2.4 TCLP Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds Results 41
4.2.5 TCLP Summary 41
4.3 Characterization of Soils by Other Methods of Analysis 41
4.3.1 Introduction 41
4.3.2 Total Metals Results in Soil 44
4.3.3 Total VOC Results in Soil 48
iii
4.3.4 Total SVOC Results in Soil 48
4.3.5 GRO and DRO Results in Soil 55
4.3.6 Soil Results Summary 55
4.4 Characterization of Groundwater in the Fill Materials 56
4.4.1 Introduction 56
4.4.2 Total and Dissolved Metals Results in Groundwater
Within the Fill 57
4.4.3 VOC Results in Groundwater Within the Fill 60
4.4.4 Groundwater Within the Fill Results Summary 61
5. RISK ASSESSMENT 62
5.1 Introduction 62
5.2 Data Evaluation 62
5.3 Exposure Assessment 66
5.3.1 Characterization of Exposure Setting 66
5.3.2 Potential Receptors and Exposure Pathways 69
5.3.3 Quantification of Exposure 70
5.4 Dermal Exposure 75
5.4.1 Determination of Dermal Absorbed Dose 75
5.4.2 Non-Cancer Effects 76
5.4.3 Carcinogenic Effects 79
5.4.4 Uncertainty in the Dermal Risk Analysis 81
5.4.4.1 Csoil 81
5.4.4.2 Event Time (EV) 81
5.4.4.3 Surface Area 81
5.4.4.4 Frequency of Exposure 81
5.4.4.5 Adherence Factors 81
5.4.4.6 Absorption Factors 82
5.4.4.7 Toxicity Assessment 82
5.4.5 Risk from Multiple Chemicals 82
5.5 Inhalation of Outdoor Air – Volatile Compounds 83
5.5.1 Estimating Concentrations of Chemicals in Air 83
5.5.2 Non-Cancer Effects 85
5.5.3 Carcinogenic Effects 87
5.6 Inhalation of Outdoor Air – Particulates 88
5.6.1 Estimating Concentrations of Chemicals as Particulates
in Air 88
5.6.2 Non-Cancer Effects 88
5.6.3 Carcinogenic Effects 91
5.7 Uncertainty Associated with Inhalation Risk Analysis 93
5.7.1 Calculation of Concentrations in Air 93
5.7.2 Calculation of Exposure Concentrations 93
5.7.3 Toxicity Assessment 93
5.7.4 Estimating Carcinogenic Risks 93
5.7.5 Risk from Multiple Chemicals 93
5.7.5.1 Inhalation of Volatile Chemicals 94
iv
5.7.5.2 Inhalation of Particulate Chemicals 94
5.8 Summary of Total Risk to Construction and Excavation
Workers 95
5.8.1 Non-Cancer Risks (Dermal Plus Inhalation) 95
5.8.2 Carcinogenic Risks (Dermal Plus Inhalation) 97
5.8.3 Total Risk (Dermal Plus Inhalation) 97
5.9 Indoor Air Risk Assessment 97
5.9.1 Calculation of Exposure Concentrations 97
5.9.2 Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Risks 98
5.9.3 Uncertainty Associated with Indoor Risk Analysis 102
5.10 Risk Assessment for Lead 103
5.10.1 Adult Lead Methodology 103
5.10.2 Assumptions of Adult Lead Methodology 104
5.10.3 Managing Risks due to Lead Exposure 106
6. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 108
6.1 Introduction 108
6.2 Hazardous Waste 108
6.3 Solid Waste 109
6.4 Beneficial Use 111
6.5 Voluntary Action 111
6.6 Drinking and Ground Water 112
6.7 Surface Water 113
6.8 Air 113
7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 115
7.1 Conclusions 115
7.2 Recommendations 118
8. REFERENCES 120
v
LIST OF TABLES
1. Location and depth (in feet below ground) of analytes in soil samples 30
2. Summary of encountered subsurface conditions 32
3. Analytical results for TCLP of RCRA metals 39
4. Analytical results for TCLP VOCs 40
5. Analytical results for TCLP SVOCs 42
6. Analytical results for metals in soils compared to VAP generic direct contact
soil values for construction/excavation activities 45
7. Analytical results for metals in soils compared to VAP generic direct contact
soil values for residential exposure 46
8. Analytical results for metals in soils compared to VAP generic direct contact
soil values for commercial/industrial exposure 47
9. “Target compound list” of VOCs analyzed in soil 49
10. Analytical results for VOCs in soil compared to VAP generic direct contact
soil values for construction/excavation, residential, and commercial/industrial
exposures 50
11. “Target compound list” of SVOCs analyzed in soil 51
12. Analytical results for SVOCs in soil compared to VAP generic direct contact
soil values for construction/excavation activities 52
13. Analytical results for SVOCs in soil compared to VAP generic direct contact
soil values for residential exposure 53
14. Analytical results for SVOCs in soil compared to VAP generic direct contact
soil values for commercial/industrial exposure 54
15. Analytical results gasoline range organics (GRO) and diesel range
organics (DRO) in soil 55
16. Analytical results for total metals in groundwater in the fill 58
17. Analytical results for dissolved metals in groundwater in the fill 59
vi
18. Analytical results for VOCs in groundwater in the fill 61
19. Analytical results for metals in soil samples 63
20. Analytical results for VOCs in soil samples 64
21. Analytical results for SVOCs in soil samples 65
22. Toxicity values for chemicals of concern 67
23. Exposure pathways for risk assessment 69
24. Statistical summary of inorganic sampling results used in the dermal risk
assessment (0-8 feet) 71
25. Statistical summary of organic sampling results used in the dermal risk
assessment (0-8 feet) 72
26. Statistical summary of inorganic sampling results used in the inhalation risk
assessment (0-12 feet) 73
27. Statistical summary of organic sampling results used in the inhalation risk
assessment (0-12 feet) 74
28. Dermal absorption fraction from soil for chemicals in the dermal risk
assessment 77
29. Hazard quotients for chemicals of concern for the dermal exposure pathway 78
30. Toxic equivalency factors for PAHs and equivalent calculated concentrations 80
31. Dermal cancer risk for chemicals of concern 84
32. Calculation of concentrations of volatile COCs in air 85
33. Hazard quotients for volatile COCs – inhalation pathway 86
34. Cancer risks associated with the inhalation of volatilized COCs 88
35. Calculation of concentrations of particulate COCs in air 89
36. Hazard quotients for particulate COCs – inhalation pathway 91
37. Cancer risks associated with the inhalation of particulate COCs 92
vii
38. Total non-carcinogenic risks to construction and excavation workers 96
39. Total carcinogenic risks to construction and excavation workers 97
40. Input parameters for the Johnson and Ettinger model – soil parameters 99
41. Input parameters for the Johnson and Ettinger model – building parameters 100
42. Input parameters for the Johnson and Ettinger model – exposure scenarios 100
43. Results from the Johnson and Ettinger model 101
44. Statistical summary of lead concentration data in soil at the site (0-8 feet) 104
45. Calculations of blood lead concentrations (PbBs) using ALM 105
viii
LIST OF FIGURES
1. Site location map of proposed Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility 3
2. Historic physiographic features of the site (natural channel of Hocking River
and Ohio Canal) (Sanborn® Fire Insurance Map, April 1884) 5
3. Historic (1910) plat map of site (Fairfield County Auditor’s Office) 8
4. Historic land use (1899) showing limited site development in floodplain
except by Thimmes Brothers (Sanborn® Fire Insurance Map, December 1899) 10
5. Historic land use (1904) showing development and proximity of Alten’s
Iron and Steel Works to site (Sanborn® Fire Insurance Map, December 1904) 12
6. 2012 delineation of 100-year floodplain (blue hachures) and floodway
(red hachures) in the site vicinity (Fairfield County Auditor’s site) 14
7. 1938 aerial photograph of site showing remnant buildings (former meat packing
operation) used as foundry supply warehouse and suspected fill activities
(Fairfield County Soil and Water Conservation District) 15
8. Looking south at the tree (and commemorative plaque) in Miller Park Wellfield
planted in honor of General Sherman in 1928. Note the proximity of the
current Fairfield County Sheriff’s Office in the background 16
9. Looking south at the dead tree in Miller Park Wellfield. The tree was
originally planted in 1928 by the Woman’s Relief Corps. Note the proximity of
the current Fairfield County Sheriff’s Office in the background 18
10. Close-up of the Women’s Relief Corps plaque commemorating the planting
of the tree 18
11. Depression around the trunk of the General Sherman tree in the Miller Park
Wellfield showing the approximate original grade at the time of planting 19
12. Guardrail in Miller Park Wellfield (on left) delineating a change in grade
with Well 4 in the center of the photograph 19
13. Boring locations (Solar, 1999) 23
14. Boring locations and approximate location of Old Hocking River Channel
(Geotechnical Consultants, Inc., 2011) 25
15. Sampling locations with proposed building footprint 27
ix
LIST OF APPENDICES
A Photographs of project field activities
B Boring logs
C Monitoring well completion diagrams and driller logs filed with the Ohio
Department of Natural Resources (ODNR)
D Water well sealing reports filed with ODNR
E Soil analytical results for borings BW-1, BW-2, BW-3 and BW-4
F Soil analytical results for borings BW-5 and BW-6
G Soil analytical results for borings BW-7 and BW-8
H Soil analytical results for borings BW-9 and BW-10
I Soil analytical results for borings BW-7A, BW-8A, BW-9A and BW-10A and water
analytical results for temporary monitoring wells BW-1 and BW-2
J Statistical summary and UCL calculations for inorganic chemicals of concern for
dermal exposure (0-8 feet)
K Statistical summary and UCL calculations for organic chemicals of concern for
dermal exposure (0-8 feet)
L Statistical summary and UCL calculations for inorganic chemicals of concern for
inhalation exposure (0-12 feet)
M Statistical summary and UCL calculations for organic chemicals of concern for
inhalation exposure (0-12 feet)
N Outputs from the Johnson and Ettinger Model used to evaluate risks posed by
volatile compounds in indoor air
O Statistical summary and UCL calculations for lead (0-8 feet)
1
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
This report presents the results of a limited Phase II environmental site assessment that
was conducted on property located at 334 West Wheeling Street, Lancaster, Ohio where the
Board of Fairfield County Commissioners proposes to construct a new Fairfield County
Jail/Public Safety Facility. Based on preliminary geotechnical subsurface investigations on the
property conducted after acquisition of the property by the Commissioners in 1993, the site was
found to have approximately 6 to 18 feet of fill materials covering the site. The primary purpose
of this investigation was to conduct an initial subsurface environmental sampling and analysis
program to develop information about the chemical characteristics of the existing undocumented
fill materials underlying the proposed footprint of new structure. Specifically, the objective was
to evaluate the fill materials for the possible presence of hazardous substances that would
warrant environmental management of the material during future site redevelopment.
In addition, available information from the previous geotechnical reports indicated that
portions of the fill materials were saturated. Therefore, the secondary objective of the
investigation was to collect representative groundwater samples and analyze for the possible
presence of hazardous substances from existing saturated zones within the fill materials, where
encountered. Potential constituents in groundwater in the fill were deemed important because
the City of Lancaster operates a public wellfield in Miller Park, immediately north of the site, on
the north side of Wheeling Street. Further, documentation of geologic materials immediately
underlying the fill was also undertaken.
Due to the critical timetable imposed by the impending development of the site, the scope
was limited in order to evaluate more quickly the shallow subsurface soil immediately
underlying the proposed building footprint. It was recognized that based on the results of this
investigation (and depending on the final use of other portions of the site, including but not
limited to the current jail facility on the site and/or the former car wash and former auto
dealership areas), additional efforts may be necessary.
Upon receipt of the analytical results of the subsurface investigation, and the comparison
of the results to potential regulatory values, the scope of the environmental site assessment
investigation was amended to include risk analysis that would enable the Board of Fairfield
County Commissioners to exercise due care with respect to any future site development and
construction activities. Potential pathways of exposure were evaluated for completeness, and
potential risk was calculated for complete pathways.
As part of the efforts undertaken, we worked with and received information from
representatives of Fairfield County concerning past investigations, potential historical uses of the
sites, and potential concerns about environmental conditions as voiced by concerned citizenry.
We also worked with representatives from Wachtel & McAnally Architects to understand the
2
proposed location of the structure, potential subsurface disturbance, final land use disposition,
and anticipated timetables of construction activities.
1.2 Documents Reviewed
As part of the development of a site-specific investigation plan, portions of documents
provided by County staff relating to the site were preliminarily reviewed to gain background
information including:
• Phase 1 Environmental Property Assessment, Proposed County Minimum
Security Jail, 342 West Wheeling Street, Lancaster, Ohio, prepared by Beling
Consultants, March 1992;
• Environmental Assessment Report, 121 North Memorial Street, Lancaster, Ohio
43130, prepared by Lawhon & Associates, February 12, 1993;
• Wellhead Protection Plan, City of Lancaster, Ohio, Miller Park Wellfield,
prepared by URS, August 23, 1993;
• Preliminary Potential Contaminant Source Inventory, City of Lancaster, Miller
Park Wellfield, prepared by URS, August 23, 1993;
• Beling Consultants review of BBC&M Engineering Inc. report on subsurface
investigation for the Charley Horse and surrounding property, May 19, 1994;
• Geotechnical Investigation for 342 West Wheeling Street, 4.01 Acre Site,
Proposed Juvenile Detention Center, Lancaster, Ohio, prepared by Solar Testing
Laboratories, Inc., February 19, 1999;
• Site Analysis and Selection for the Fairfield County Public Safety Facility,
prepared by Shremshock Architects, Inc., September 11, 2007; and
• Subsurface Exploration and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report,
Proposed Fairfield County Justice Center-MSMJ Site, 342 West Wheeling Street,
Lancaster, Ohio, prepared by Geotechnical Consultants, Inc., June 10, 2011.
Additional documents and information were subsequently reviewed as part of our
investigation. The additional documentation is described further in this report. All referenced
documents are included in Section 8, References.
1.3 Site Location
The footprint of the proposed Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility is situated on
four irregular-shaped parcels (current tax parcel numbers 0536001800, 0536001700 (two), and
0536801700) totaling approximately 7.5 acres in size (Figure 1). The property is located within
the limits of the City of Lancaster. The site is bounded on the north by West Wheeling Street.
H ock ingRi v er
Fairfield CountyMaintenance Garage
Former Car WashKings Furniture
Roger Conrad Concrete
Billboard
Lancaster WaterTreatment Plant
Scotts Service Center
Miller ParkGuardrail
Well #4
Well #16
Dead Tree
General Sherman Tree
Fairfield CountySheriff's Office
Municipal Well
MW-4S and 4D
Municipal Well
0536801700
05360018000536001700
0536001700
LINCOLN AVE
W WHEELING ST
N MEMORIAL DR
THOM
AS AV
E
W MAIN ST
WHILEY AVE
N GE
ORGE
ST W MULBERRY ST
S MEMORIAL DR
W CHESTNUT ST
W MAIN ST
W MULBERRY ST
Hocking River
/0 100 200 30050
Feet
Figure 1.Site location map ofproposed Fairfield CountyJail/Public Safety Facility.
1 inch = 200 feet
4
Immediately north of Wheeling Street is the Lancaster Miller Park wellfield and water treatment
plant. On the west, the site is bounded by the channelized course of the Hocking River (that used
to flow through the current site). On the south, the parcels are bounded by the Fairfield County
Maintenance Garage (owned by the Fairfield County Commissioners), a former car wash (now
owned by the Fairfield County Commissioners), Kings Furniture (property owned by Mitch and
Ann D. Endick), Roger Conrad Concrete (property owned by Mary Margaret Kensler), and a
billboard (property owned by Jay Nauman), which all front on Lincoln Avenue (US Route 22).
On the east, the site is bounded by Memorial Drive (US Route 33), except for the corner of West
Wheeling Street and Memorial Drive, which is occupied by Scotts Service Center (an automotive
service station, property owned by the Fairfield Paint & Oil Company).
As shown in Figure 1, the current Fairfield County Sheriff’s office occupies the
northwest portion of the site. The remainder of the property is either paved or is a concrete slab
where another building was previously located (note light-colored rectangle just east of the
Sheriff’s office). Both the pavement and the concrete slab are currently used as parking lot.
South of the building, the Fairfield County Sheriff’s office has a small impound lot and a bin for
recycling. Small islands of grass and trees for landscaping are present primarily to the west of
the current building and along the Hocking River.
1.4 Historical Changes in the Site Vicinity
There have been numerous changes in the vicinity of the site since 1800. It was during
this year that Governor Arthur St. Clair first organized Fairfield County by proclamation
(although Fairfield County was much larger than it is today) (Scott, 1877). According to Scott
(1877), it did not take long for the development of the County to begin. In fact, by the fall of
1800, Ebenezer Zane first sold lots in the town of Lancaster. Understanding these events and
subsequent historical activities assists in reviewing maps through time for a better understanding
of land usage and historical geography.
A review of historic plat maps for Section 1 of Hocking Township in Fairfield County,
the City of Lancaster, and Sanborn® maps of the area reveal man-made physiographic and
developmental changes that have occurred at the site since 1880. Prior to the 1880s, the
Lancaster Lateral connector (completed in 1834) to the Ohio and Erie Canal formed the east
boundary of the site (present-day Memorial Drive). Also, Wheeling Street terminated at the east
side of the canal and, therefore, did not exist across the northern boundary of the site. The
Hocking River (prior to relocation to the west and channelization) crossed through the site,
entering from the north and then curving to the west (Figure 2). The approximate location of the
current-day parcel is shown in yellow for site orientation.
Site
/0 50 100 15025
Feet
Figure 2.Historic physiographicfeatures of site(natural channel ofHocking River andOhio Canal).
1 inch = 100 feet
Sanborn® Fire Insurance Map(April 1884)
6
Based on a review of Sanborn® maps, the Hocking River was straightened and realigned
to its present-day position along the west side of the site between 1884 and 1889. Soon after,
(between 1893 and 1899), the Lancaster Lateral of the Ohio Canal was abandoned and a roadway
was constructed over the abandoned canal. This roadway was known at the time as Front Street,
and later became Memorial Drive (US Route 33). Lastly, between 1899 and 1904, West
Wheeling Street was extended west of Front Street along the present day northern boundary of
the site. [It should also be noted that historic Sanborn® maps prior to 1919 designate today’s
Lincoln Avenue as “Main Avenue”; the western extension of (West) Main Street.]
7
SECTION 2
HISTORY OF THE SITE
2.1 Introduction
To establish the context for this subsurface environmental investigation, Bennett &
Williams reviewed publicly available deed records, historic plat maps, Phase I environmental site
assessment reports, geotechnical studies, and sanitary surveys for the land parcels comprising the
site as well as historic biographical records, texts and Sanborn® maps (1884 through 1929,
including revisions to the 1929 map in 1933, 1945 and 1949) of the area. These historical
reports, maps, studies and surveys provide further insight into previous land ownership as well as
commercial and industrial activities that may have involved the use or release of environmentally
regulated materials at the site. This historical background information is used as a basis for
identifying recognized environmental conditions at the site that are the focus of this subsurface
investigation.
2.2 Review of Previous Property Ownership
A review of publicly-available Phase I environmental site assessment reports for the
properties, a title search from June 2, 1948 through January 14, 2014 conducted by the Assistant
Prosecuting Attorney relating to easements (Porter, 2014a and 2014b), together with a
supplemental review of deed records and historic plat maps available at the Fairfield County
Auditor’s Office, was conducted to establish a chain-of-title ownership of the various tracts of
land that today comprise the site. Findings from this review show that on June 23, 1903 Louis J.
Snyder and Jacob Keller acquired the majority of the tracts of land (6.78 acres) that comprise the
site from Nina Rauch (recent widow of Francis Xavier Rauch) and other heirs. In addition, a
smaller tract of land (0.66 acres) that is included in the site was deeded to John Thimmes and his
brothers (Christian, Charles and William Thimmes) by Christena Nester (widow of Philip
Nester) and other heirs on April 16, 1891 along with a second tract that John Thimmes and his
brothers were deeded from their father Mathias Thimmes, on April 28, 1892, who purchased the
property from Philip Nester on November 11, 1877. A historic plat map from the Fairfield
County Auditor’s Office, dated January 1910, depicts the layout of the Snyder and Keller
property and the Thimmes brother’s property at that time (Figure 3).
Additional information on the chronology of the chain-of-title (ownership) of these two
properties is as follows. John Thimmes and his brothers sold their property September 24, 1919
to George M. Schmidt. A month later, the property was deeded to The Lancaster Packing
Company on November 29, 1919. George H. Alten was deeded the Snyder and Keller property,
acquiring Louis J. Snyder’s one-half interest on March 31, 1921 and Keller’s one-half interest (at
Sheriff’s sale) on November 28, 1921. Then, on September 23, 1935, George H. Alten
purchased the Lancaster Packing Company (the former Thimmes brother’s property). As a
result, by 1936 George H. Alten had complete ownership of the site.
West Wheeling Street
Main Avenue
Front Street W. MainStreet
/
Figure 3.Historic (1910) plat mapof site (Fairfield CountyAuditor's Office).
9
It remained this way until July 8, 1954 when George H. Alten sold off a 2.4 acre parcel in
the northwest corner of the site (comprising the current property tax parcel 0536001800) to
Herbert Welsh and Harry Lemley. Approximately two years later on July 6, 1956, Herbert
Welsh and Harry Lemley deeded the 2.4 acre parcel to Brown Gold Realty, who in turn, deeded
the parcel to C. Hart Manufacturing Company on January 16, 1961. On that same day in January
of 1961, C. Hart Manufacturing Company deeded the parcel to Anncor Company, Inc. who
maintained ownership of the parcel until deeding the property to the Fairfield County Board of
Commissioners on September 28, 1992.
The remaining approximate 4.8 acre portion of the site (comprising the current property
tax parcels 0536801700 and 0536001700) remained under the ownership of George H. Alten
(subject to lease and mortgage agreements starting in July of 1962), until his death on October
13, 1970. The Huntington Trust Company, as Trustee under The George H. Alten Trust, dated
February 25, 1969, was appointed co-executor of the estate on November 24, 1970 and Trustee
of the 4.8 acre parcel listed as Tract No. 30 on the Certificate for Transfer of Real Estate. The
Huntington Trust Company remained the Trustee of the parcel until deeding the property to the
Fairfield County Board of Commissioners on March 5, 1993.
2.3 Review of Historical Land Use
Findings from the historical land use review and previous property ownership reaffirmed
our general knowledge that the site is located in an area of commercial and industrial activity that
occurred over the past 130 years. Situated between the Hocking River and the Lancaster Lateral
of the Ohio Canal during the last quarter of the nineteenth century, this canal-river corridor
(along what were then the western and southern edges of Lancaster) served as the city’s
industrial district. As previously mentioned in the Site Location section of this report, a review
of historic Sanborn® maps of the area indicate that the Hocking River once meandered through
the site, until the river was straightened and realigned to its present day position sometime
between April 1884 and June 1889. Subsequent Sanborn® maps (June 1889 through December
1899) for the area continue to depict the “old channel” as it crossed the site.
Because the site was a low-lying area, much of it resting in a floodplain, the historic
Sanborn® maps reflect that very little building took place at the current site through the latter
part of the nineteenth century (1884 through 1899) and first half of the twentieth century (1900
through 1949), with the exception of John Thimmes and Brothers’ slaughter house and pork
packing business (Figure 4). Historic Sanborn® maps (April 1884 through June 1919) depict the
expansion of the Thimmes Brothers meat packing business during this timeframe showing cattle
and straw sheds, cribs, scale houses, and several buildings erected for packing, smoking and
curing of meats, including a sausage factory. There are also a number of cold storage buildings
(including an ice house) shown in connection with the slaughter house and meat packing
operation. No other commercial operations at the Thimmes Brothers property are noted on the
maps.
/
Figure 4.Historic land use (1899)showing limitedsite developmentin floodplanexcept byThimmes Brothers.Sanborn® Fire Insurance Map(December1899)
11
According to The Biographical Record of Fairfield County, Ohio (Multiple
Authors,1902), John H. Thimmes took over the family’s butchering and meat market business
from his father, Mathias Thimmes, in 1877 and three years later entered into partnership with his
brothers under the firm name of Thimmes Brothers. The historic biographical record further
indicates that the members of the firm were engaged in the wholesale and retail shipping and
pork packing business, and were also proprietors of two meat markets in the city of Lancaster.
In addition, as extensive buyers and shippers of hogs and cattle at the time, the members of the
firm handled annually “…about thirty thousand hogs and a large number of export cattle, which
they bought and shipped to Baltimore, Maryland, their principal hogs markets being Pittsburg,
(sic) Pennsylvania and Chicago, Illinois.” Although some slaughterhouses also performed
tanning of hides, there is no indication that such activities were part of the Thimmes Brothers
business.
Subsequent to June 1919, historic (June 1919 to February 1929) Sanborn® maps of the
area show that the Thimmes Brothers meat packing operation changed names to “The Lancaster
Packing Co.,” which continued to operate at the site through the 1920s. This name change is
corroborated by the chain-of-title search (previously detailed) that shows the Thimmes Brothers
sold the property in September 1919, and that the property was eventually deeded to The
Lancaster Packing Company in November 1919. Later revisions (1933, 1945 and 1945
collectively) to the 1929 Sanborn® map show that after February 1929, remnant buildings from
the former meat packing operations at the site were converted for use as a foundry supply
warehouse. Based upon the results of the chain-of-title search, it is suspected that this land use
change followed The Lancaster Packing Company deeding the property to George H. Alten on
September 23, 1935. Having previously purchased the undeveloped portions of the site (i.e., the
6.78 acre property owned by Louis J. Snyder and Jacob Keller) in 1921, George H. Alten held
ownership of the entire site by 1936.
Further review of the historic Sanborn® maps for the area (1889 through 1929, including
revisions to the 1929 map in 1933, 1945 and 1949) show the development of Alten’s Foundry
and Machine Shop over the last quarter of the nineteenth century and the first half of the
twentieth century. Located east of both the study site and present day Memorial Drive/US Route
33 (formerly named Front Street) at 226 West Wheeling Street, Henry F. Alten began a
blacksmith and machine shop in 1889, the same year that his son George H. Alten was born. By
December 1904, the business was known as Alten’s Iron and Steel Works and included
blacksmith and foundry operations with an onsite cupola (the primary method used for melting
operations in foundries) (Figure 5).
Between December 1910 and June 1919, the operation expanded south across West Bank
Alley (which ran parallel between West Wheeling Street and West Main Street) with the foundry
and machine works including a castings, cleaning and machine shop, coke pile and flask (the
frame for a mold of sand) yard. It was during this same time period that Henry F. Alten died
(August 1911) and his son George H. Alten became involved in managing the family business.
Alten’s Foundry and Machine Shop continued its expansion of operations on the east side of
Front Street throughout the 1920s, 30s and 40s. In a November 15, 1947 article in Forbes
Site
Alten's Iron &Steel Works
/
Figure 5.Historic land use (1904)showing developmentand proximity ofAlten's Iron andSteel Worksto site.Sanborn® Fire Insurance Map(December1904)
13
Magazine, Alten’s Foundry and Machine Shop was mentioned as one of Lancaster’s significant
industries.
Although the principal foundry operations continued to be confined to the east side of
Front Street during this time span (as well as until the foundry ceased operation in July 1983),
George H. Alten had acquired the mostly undeveloped, low-lying area west of Front Street and
east of the rechanneled Hocking River that today comprises the study site. With the expanding
foundry business and the concomitant increase in foundry sand spoils from the casting
operations, it is logical to assume that the lower elevation, flood-prone area was purchased, in
part, with the intent to fill the site as a means of dealing with the foundry sand spoils (with the
added benefit of raising the property above the floodplain for future potential use). Indeed, by
1933, the Sanborn® maps show that Alten’s Foundry has expanded to occupy the southeast
corner of the intersection between West Wheeling Street and Memorial Drive and that “sand
bins” occupy that corner. Further, the 2012 Flood Map on the Fairfield County Auditor’s site
shows that, with the exception of one small area along the channelized Hocking River (in the
parking lot west of the current Sheriff’s office), the site was successfully raised above the 100-
year floodplain (Figure 6). According to the map, only the very western portion of the site
remains located in the floodway (a strip approximately 33 feet wide), primarily in the wooded
and bermed area adjacent to the current river channel.
While no specific written records were found to document filling at the site, historic
aerial photographs of the study site and surrounding area were obtained from the Fairfield
County Soil and Water Conservation District to assist in determining land use during the
timeframe between 1920 and 1950. The only archival aerial photograph available for the site
during this time span is dated 1938. An enlargement of that photograph is shown in Figure 7.
Despite the limitations of the image resolution, the remnant buildings (from the former meat
packing business) being used as a foundry supply warehouse can be seen on the southeast corner
of the study site, and the remainder of the undeveloped site shows various degrees of land
disturbance with several paths transecting the site, suggestive of a fill operation.
Insight into possible dates for filling operations may be gained from observations made
relative to adjacent properties as well. As mentioned before, Lancaster’s Miller Park Wellfield is
located immediately north (across West Wheeling Street) from the proposed Fairfield County
Jail/Public Safety Facility. As early as April 1884, the “Lancaster Water Power House” is shown
as being located on the northwest corner of Wheeling Street and the Ohio Canal (present-day
Memorial Drive) on Sanborn® maps included in Lancaster’s Potential Contaminant Source
Inventory (URS, 1993b). The Lancaster Water Treatment Plant is present on the 1938 aerial
photograph (Figure 7) and still occupies the same location 130 years later.
A memorial plaque located adjacent to a tree approximately fifty feet north of West
Wheeling Street (and across the street from the Fairfield County Sheriff’s office) in the Miller
Park Wellfield indicates that the tree was planted in honor of General William T. Sherman and
was presented by the Department of Ohio Woman’s Relief Corps in 1928 (Figures 1 and 8). The
Woman’s Relief Corps is an Order of the Sons of Veterans of the United States of America that
was originally open only to Union soldiers and their heirs, but later expanded to include all those
who wished to honor such soldiers. Similarly a second plaque adjacent to a tree approximately
Figure 6. 2012 delineation of 100-year floodplain (blue hachures) and floodway (red hachures) in the site vicinity (Fairfield County
Auditor’s site).
Lincoln Ave.
Memorial Dr. (Front St.)
West Wheeling St.
Hocking River
Lancaster Water Treatment Plant
Gas Station
AltenFoundry
remnant buildings
suspected filling activety
Lancaster Miller Park Well Field
/
Figure 7.1938 aerial photographof site showing remnant buildings(former meat packingoperation) used as foundry supplywarehouse and suspected fill activites(Fairfield CountySoil and WaterConservation District).
Figure 8. Looking south at the tree (and commemorative plaque) in Miller Park Wellfield planted in
honor of General Sherman in 1928. Note the proximity of the current Fairfield County Sheriff’s Office
in the background.
17
100 feet to the northwest, indicates that another tree (now dead) was planted in 1928 to honor
Kate Brownlee Sherwood, Past President of the Woman’s Relief Corps (Figures 1, 9 and 10).
The significant feature about the trees in the Miller Park Wellfield is that they are surrounded by
a rock enclosure with the trunks of the trees being exposed several feet below grade (Figure 11).
Presumably, the trees were planted and then the area was filled. In order to prevent the trees
from being “girdled” and killed when the tree trunk was covered by soil, the rock enclosures
were built and a “depression” was left around the tree trunks. This indicates that the filling on
the Miller Park Wellfield Property took place after 1928.
Evidence of filling in the southwest portion of the wellfield, where wells 4 and 16 are
located, is similarly evident today by the presence of a guard rail denoting a change in elevation
that transects the wellfield from east to west approximately 400 feet north of West Wheeling
Street and west of the road that leads to the swimming pool (Figures 1 and 12). Also, it is
expected that filling of the old Hocking River channel took place on the Miller Park property
similar to the filling on the proposed Fairfield County Jail site. The presence of fill materials in
borings and wells in the Miller Park Wellfield is documented on publically-available well logs as
early as 1944 and as late as 1979, ranging in depth from four to 25 feet.
The 1938 aerial photograph shows one other land use of interest. A building can be seen
at the southwest corner of West Wheeling Street and Memorial Drive (aka Front Street). Based
upon historic (revisions to the 1929 map in 1933, 1945 and 1949, collectively) Sanborn® maps
for the area, this structure is identified as a gas station. As previously noted, this is still the site
of a service station. Of interest is the shape of the parcel that forms the property of the service
station. Figure 1 shows the odd-shaped semi-circle that forms the western boundary of the
property. This semi-circle seems to correspond with the wide portion of the old Ohio Canal
shown in Figure 2, but the projection of the parcel map show that it is offset to the southwest.
Figure 5 shows that by 1904, the canal has been filled in, but the shape of the property seems still
to reflect the former presence of the wide portion of the canal.
Further historic land use of the proposed Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility site
during the latter half of the twentieth century (1950 to 1999) was compiled based upon the chain-
of-title search, and a review of Phase I environmental site assessment reports, geotechnical
studies and sanitary surveys available for the parcels that comprise the study site. As previously
detailed in Section 2.2, Review of Previous Property Ownership, on July 8, 1954, George H.
Alten deeded a 2.4 acre tract of land in the northwest corner of the site (current property tax
parcel 0536001800) to Herbert Welsh and Harry Lemley who developed the site with a
commercial building that was leased to The Kroger Company for use as a grocery store.
Subsequent deeded transfers of the property to Brown Gold Realty on July 6, 1956, C. Hart
Manufacturing Company on January 16, 1961, and Anncor Company, Inc. on January 16, 1961
continue to acknowledge the lease agreement with The Kroger Company and the apparent
commercial use of the site as a grocery store until approximately1979. According to the Phase I
environmental site assessment report for the property (Beling Consultants, 1992), in 1980
American Electric Power (AEP) became a new tenant and remodeled the existing building for
use as administrative offices. AEP occupied the building until 1990 when they relocated into
their new offices on West Main Street and North Memorial Drive. The building remained
unoccupied until Anncor Company, Inc. deeded the property to the Fairfield Board of
Figure 9. Looking south at the dead tree in Miller Park Wellfield. The tree was originally
planted in 1928 by the Woman’s Relief Corps. Note the proximity of the current Fairfield
County Sheriff’s Office in the background.
Figure 10. Close-up of the Women’s Relief Corp plaque commemorating the planting of the tree.
Figure 11. Depression around the trunk of the General Sherman tree in the Miller Park Wellfield
showing the approximate original grade at the time of planting.
Figure 12. Guardrail in Miller Park Wellfield (on left) delineating a change in grade with Well 4 in the
center of the photograph.
Guardrail
Well #4
20
Commissioners on September 28, 1992 whereupon the building was remodeled for its current
use as a minimum security jail.
With regard to the remaining approximately 4.8 acre portion of the site (current property
tax parcels 0536801700 and 0536001700), this property remained deeded to George H. Alten,
subject to lease and mortgage agreements starting in July 1962. Based upon findings from the
Phase I environmental site assessment report (Lawhon and Associates, 1993), the site was
developed with a building that was used for retail and commercial purposes until the early 1980s
(Charley Horse Saloon) after which the building sat vacant for approximately ten years prior to
demolition in 1993. Our supplemental chain-of-title search for this property showed that
following George H. Alten’s death on October 13, 1970, The Huntington Trust Company, as
Trustee under The George H. Alten Trust, dated February 25, 1969, was appointed co-executor
of the estate on November 24, 1970 and Trustee of the 4.8 acre parcel listed as Tract No. 30 on
the Certificate for Transfer of Real Estate. The Huntington Trust Company remained the Trustee
of the parcel until deeded to the Fairfield County Board of Commissioners on March 5, 1993.
21
SECTION 3
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
3.1 Introduction
Based on our review of Phase 1 and geotechnical reports for the site, we developed a
preliminary understanding of the site. The following is a brief summary of the salient
information in the reports that focused our investigation.
The Phase 1 report for the current jail parcel (Beling Consultants, 1992) concluded that
“no environmental hazards were identified on the subject property”. Although no subsurface
investigation was conducted, it was noted during the site visit that borings had been placed
around the existing Charley Horse building (on the adjacent parcel). According to a telephone
conversation record in Appendix D of the report by Beling Consultants (1992), Glimsher
Company (a developer) had contracted the installation of borings, but no information on the
borings was made available by Glimsher (and we have not seen these borings).
The Environmental Assessment Report for the Charley Horse Property (Lawhon &
Associates, 1993) was performed when the vacant building was present on the property and
focused primarily on the environmental conditions within the building and review of
environmental databases. However, this report noted the presence of a Marathon Service Station
on the adjacent property with six underground tanks that were installed approximately two years
earlier. The report concluded that “There is currently no evidence to suggest that the existence
of USTs at this service station have adversely affected the subject property”. The report
contained no subsurface site-specific information.
The Wellhead Protection Plan for the City of Lancaster, Ohio Miller Park Wellfield
(URS, 1993a) provided general geologic and hydrogeologic data about the subsurface deposits
underlying the site. The report also contained a model of groundwater flow conditions indicating
that the site was modeled as an unconfined aquifer (having no confining layer between the
aquifer and the surface). This model was used to delineate the capture zone of the wells and to
identify one, two, three, four and five year time-of-travel zones to the wellfield. The site is
located (as expected) within the one-year time-of-travel to the wells. Although a location map of
wells in the wellfield by number was not available to us, a visual search for wells close to the site
was performed in the Miller Park Wellfield. Wells 4 and 16 are approximately 400 feet and 190
feet north of site, respectively (Figure 1). Two additional wells, located along Wheeling Street
(close to the water tower and maintenance building and inside the barbed wire fence), are closer
to the site and are approximately 60 and 95 feet north of the site (Figure 1). Although the
municipal wells are numbered, it was possible to discern only the first number of each well. The
well closest to the water tower is well 1_, while the well closest to the maintenance building is
well 2_.
The Preliminary Potential Contaminant Source Inventory for the City of Lancaster Miller
Park Wellfield (URS, 1993b) shows that the site is located within the one year time of travel for
the wellfield. This report also contained copies of Sanborn® maps for the years 1884, 1889,
22
1893, 1899, 1904, 1910, 1919, 1929 and 1929 revised in 1933, 1943 and 1949. Although the
report identified 47 potential pollution sources within the one-year time of travel and a total of
310 potential sources within the five year time of travel, neither current nor past site activities
were listed as a potential pollution source. The fill activities that took place on both the proposed
Fairfield County Jail site and on the southwest portion of the Miller Park Wellfield were not
mentioned in the report.
Although the information was not available to us at the time of project development, as a
follow-up to the potential pollution inventory, the City of Lancaster installed twelve (eight
shallow and four deep) groundwater monitoring wells within the five-year time-of-travel to
presumably monitor potential sources of contamination. Two monitoring wells, one shallow
(MW-4S) and one deep (MW-4D) were installed just north of the Fairfield County Maintenance
Garage on Parcel 0536801700 on September 29, 1995 and October 2, 1995, respectively (Figure
1). The well logs (ODNR Well log numbers 816585 and 816586, respectively) show five feet of
“Fill – Subase (sic) + Foundry Sand” was encountered at the surface. No special construction
or completion methods for these wells are noted in the logs. Once installed, these (and the other
ten groundwater monitoring wells) were sampled once each quarter for a year. According to
URS Greiner (1996) “No primary MCLs established by the OEPA were exceeded in any of the
samples” collected from any of the 12 monitoring wells.
On May 19, 1994, Beling Consultants reviewed what appears to be a geotechnical report
prepared by BBC&M Engineering, Inc. (Beling Consultants, 1994). The conclusions and
recommendations sections of the report were attached to Beling’s review. It appears as though at
least eight borings were drilled on the Charley Horse site in anticipation of a building addition
(although no borings or locations were available). According to the BBC&M report, “Seepage
was encountered during drilling at depths between 11.0 and 27.5 feet below the ground surface
in all Borings except B-11” and after drilling water levels ranged from 8.8 to 24.7 feet. The
report also noted a “noticeable sheen and a hydrocarbon odor” from 12 to 13.5 feet in boring B-
9 (location unknown) when water was encountered. The report concludes that “this site is
covered with up to 12.5 feet of fill which consists of both cohesive and granular soils mixed with
possible foundry sand, slag, brick fragments, glass, wire, wood and ash in varying proportions”.
Apparently two test pits were also excavated at the site as part of the BBC&M
investigation (Beling Consultants, 1994). In test pit 1 (location unknown), “a layer of dark-gray
fine to medium sand was encountered. It is possible that this material is foundry sand…[if] this
layer is removed from the ground, environmental regulations may require that this material be
disposed of in a landfill. An environmental analysis of this material is beyond the scope of this
project, however, it has been brought to our attention that the Environmental Protection Agency
prefers to classify foundry sand as a hazardous material”.
A geotechnical investigation was performed on the Charley Horse property in 1999 for
the Fairfield County Board of Commissioners relating to a proposed Juvenile Detention Center
(Solar, 1999). During this investigation, 14 borings were advanced from 10 to 60 feet, with a
concentration of deeper borings in the area of the existing concrete slab. Figure 13 shows the
locations of the borings. Similar to the BBC&M subsurface investigation, fill was encountered
in each of the borings at depths ranging from 6 to 18.5 feet below the surface. The fill was
Figure 13. Boring locations (Solar, 1999).
24
typically described as silty sand with glass, brick fragments, cinders, slag, shale and sandstone
fragments, and gravel. One boring encountered wood and rubber (B2) and another reported
metal and roofing material (B3). Water was encountered in five borings at depths of 10 to 13.5
feet (either slightly above or just at the fill/natural material interface. Similar to the BBC&M
investigation, two borings (B4 and B10) encountered water at 23.5 feet in the underlying sandy
organic silt and silty sand and gravel.
Solar (1999) identified “A preexisting marshy area evidenced by organic silt and clay
layers encountered in borings B1, B3, B4, B10, and B12”. Although Solar (1999) postulated that
“These deposits are probably largely resultant of decomposed vegetation and alluvial and
lacustrine deposits in former floodplains”, it is more likely that these borings are representative
of the former Hocking River trace before it was channelized (Figure 2). Similarly, descriptions
of materials immediately underlying the fill in borings B-6, B-8 (and in B-2 after one foot of
clay) indicate that the underlying deposits are “dirty” sands with gravels, as opposed to the silty
clays and organic deposits indicated on the rest of the site.
Also during this subsurface investigation, Solar (1999) screened all samples with a
photoionization detector (PID) in the field for the presence of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) after allowing the sample to offgas in a jar for approximately 20 minutes. According to
the report, “One collected sample (Boring B2, S2, 3.5’ – 5.0’), within the fills produced an
elevated VOC reading”. All other samples produced no reading on the PID. The sample with a
field detection was sent for laboratory analysis by EPA Methods 8015A (for gasoline range
organics) and EPA Method 418.1, which measures Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH),
including heavier petroleum fractions. While the analysis for Method 8015A was below
detection limits, the analysis using Method 418.1 “showed a hydrocarbon content of 224
mg/kg”. The report concluded that “The analytical results of this sample may warrant further
investigations, dependant (sic) on the intended use of the site. Particularly if proposed fills are
to be removed from the site, further characterization may be warranted”.
In 2007, Shremshock Architects completed an analysis of four sites for potential location
of the new Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility. The current site was discussed as Site #2
in the document. Shremshock (2007) did not perform additional subsurface investigations, but,
rather, quoted the 1992 Phase 1 Environmental Report on the existing jail parcel (Beling
Consultants, 1992) and the BBC&M report reviewed by Beling Consultants(1994) for
environmental information. They concluded that “As the project’s design evolves,
environmental authorities may require some degree of onsite environmental work”.
In 2011, Geotechnical Consultants, Inc. performed subsurface geotechnical exploration
for preliminary design of foundations for a conceptual design of the Fairfield County Jail
presented by Wachtel & McAnally Architects (Geotechnical Consultants, Inc., 2011). During
the investigation, six borings were installed to depths of 25 or 30 feet “at or near the suggested
locations within the proposed structure footprint”. Figure 14 shows the outline of the proposed
structure, the location of the borings and an approximate location of the Hocking River prior to
channelization between 1884 and 1889 (Geotechnical Consultants, Inc., 2011).
26
Similar to previous subsurface investigations, Geotechnical Consultants, Inc. (2011)
encountered fill in all borings ranging from 9 to 17.5 feet below grade. The fill was
characterized as primarily “dark brown/black foundry sand...with varying but generally minor
amounts of slag, glass, and brick. Occasional zones of slightly plastic silty, clayey sand (SC-SM)
or low plasticity clayey sand (SC) were encountered within the fill”. Water seepage was noted in
all six borings. Four borings (B-1, B-2, B-3, and B-6) had water levels that were above the base
of the fill materials. Boring B-5 had a depth to water of 12.5 feet in the natural dark organic clay
layer immediately underlying the fill and B-4 had a water level of 16.5 feet in the underlying
natural sand formation.
With regard to materials immediately underlying the fill, Geotechnical Consultants, Inc.
(2011) found “natural cohesive soils, varying from non-organic to organic and from moderate to
high plasticity, immediately below the fill in the (sic) five of the six boring locations”. Boring B-
3 was underlain by brown silty clayey sand with gravel “below the deep fill cover at 17.5 feet
below the surface”. The report makes preliminary recommendations relative to foundations for
the proposed structure.
3.2 Investigation Design
The reports described in Section 3.1 indicated that the site was underlain by 6 to 18.5 feet
of variable fill material that reportedly contained, among other things, foundry sands, slag,
cinders, brick and glass. With the exception of one reported TPH concentration of 224 mg/kg at
a depth of 3.5-5.0 feet by Solar (1999), the chemical characteristics of the underlying fill
materials, relative to the presence of environmentally regulated substances were undocumented
to date. Further, zones of saturation had been encountered in the fill materials. Historical site
usage included operation of a slaughterhouse, filling by possible foundry sands and other
materials as well as the presence of an automotive service station at the southwest corner of West
Wheeling Street and Memorial Drive since at least 1938.
Utilizing the preliminary architectural drawings for the new Fairfield County Jail/Public
Safety Facility, an initial drilling program was proposed to include 10 soil borings beneath the
footprint of the proposed facility. Figure 15 shows the location of the proposed jail (red outline),
possible expansion area (green outline), and Sheriff’s Office (light pink outline on the west side
of the site) as well as the location of the originally-conceived 10 borings (BW-1 through BW-
10).
The soil borings were restricted in depth to the bottom of the fill materials that were in
contact with underlying native soils. The borings were to be used to characterize the depth and
stratigraphy of the fill materials, collect fill material samples for environmental analysis, and
visually observe the fill materials for the possible presence of hazardous substances and
petroleum products. The layout of the borings was designed to provide uniform spatial coverage
beneath the proposed building and roughly coincide with the architect’s pattern of proposed
geotechnical borings for foundation design. When a saturated zone of adequate thickness for
groundwater sampling was encountered, a temporary monitoring well was to be installed and
completed.
BW9 BW8
BW7
BW6
BW5BW4
BW3
BW2BW1
BW9ABW8A
BW7A
BW10BW10A
/0 50 100 15025
Feet
Figure 15.Sampling locationswith proposedbuilding footprint.
1 inch = 100 feet
28
Due to the unknown character of the fill, soil samples were proposed to be submitted to a
laboratory for analysis for a broad range of potential contaminants. No attempt was made to
limit the analytes based on potential land use or types of historic activities. A minimum of one
sample per boring was proposed to be analyzed for the following parameters based on soil
volume, field screening, and visual observations:
1) toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) for metals, volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and semi-volatile organic compounds using EPA sample
extraction Method 1311 and analytical Methods 6010B/7470A/8260B/8260C;
2) total concentration of “target analyte list” metals using EPA analytical Methods
6010B/7471A;
3) total concentration of “target compound list” VOCs using EPA Methods 5035 and
5035A for sample collection, preservation, and handling in addition to EPA analytical
Method 8260B; and
4) total concentration of “target compound list” semi-volatile organics using EPA
analytical Method 8270C.
Soil samples from selected borings were also proposed to be submitted to the laboratory
if screening or observations indicated the presence of petroleum-contaminated soils. In this
instance, samples were proposed to be analyzed for both “gasoline range organics” (GROs) and
“diesel range organics” (DROs) using EPA analytical method 8015C in an attempt to
characterize the type of petroleum product encountered in the subsurface. Because known,
multiple types of petroleum products have been used and are currently used on contiguous
properties at the site, characterization of the petroleum hydrocarbons found in the ground was
contemplated.
Groundwater samples were also proposed to be collected when sufficient saturation for
the installation of a groundwater monitoring well was present. Each monitoring well was
proposed to be sampled for: the “target analyte list” of metals using EPA analytical Methods
6010B/7470B and the “target compound list” of VOCs using EPA Method 8260B.
3.3 Drilling and Soil Sampling
Prior to initiation of the subsurface investigation, ten preliminary boring locations were
identified within the footprint of the proposed Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility. The
preliminary locations were provided to Fairfield County on March 14, 2014. On March 17,
2014, we met with representatives from Fairfield County to mark the locations in the field and to
discuss potential underground obstacles when drilling. Once the locations were marked, the
Ohio Utilities Protection Service (OUPS) was called. OUPS must be called at least 48 hours but
no more than 10 working days (excluding weekends and legal holidays) before digging. OUPS
informed us that their network did not include Lancaster sewer or storm lines and provided a
telephone number to call.
Jason Westfall, the Industrial Pretreatment Coordinator for the City of Lancaster,
requested a map of the preliminary boring locations, which was provided on March 18, 2014.
29
Mr. Westfall forwarded a map of underground water and sewer lines on the property, none of
which coincided with the proposed boring locations. Similarly, OUPS did not notify us of
potential underground lines at the proposed boring locations.
The initial subsurface investigation was conducted on March 20 and 21, 2014. Ten
borings (BW-1 through BW-10) were installed by Wrights Drilling using a CME 75 drilling rig
and 4 ¼ inch inside diameter hollow stem augers. At the time of drilling, the borings were
located using GPS technology. The location of the borings is shown on Figure 15. Appendix A
contains pictures of field activities for the project (Figure A-1 shows the drilling rig and set-up
for drilling). Continuous split spoon samples were collected in accordance with ASTM Standard
D1586 (Figure A-2). Blow counts were recorded for all intervals. All drilling cuttings were
containerized in 55-gallon drums meeting ODOT specification 17H. The drums of soil were
labeled with date and locations where the soil was collected (Figure A-3). A total of four drums
were used. All drums were placed on pallets and moved into the Fairfield County Maintenance
Garage by County personnel for safe storage until receipt of analytical results (Figure A-4).
(Based on the analytical results, the soil will be disposed at a solid waste disposal facility.)
Split spoon samplers were washed with Alconox detergent and rinsed between each
sample. At the end of each boring, the augers and pilot bit were cleaned by pressure washing
with a hot water pressure washer (Figure A-5). All water used to clean the equipment was
containerized and placed in 55-gallon drums meeting ODOT specification 17H. The drums of
water were labeled with date and source of the water (Figure A-6). A total of two drums were
used. The drums were placed on pallets (Figure A-4) and moved into the Fairfield County
Maintenance Garage by County personnel for safe storage pending receipt of analytical results
from monitoring well sampling. (Based on the analytical results, the water will be disposed at the
Fairfield County wastewater treatment plant.)
Upon retrieval and opening of the split spoon sampler, the soil was field-screened using a
MiniRAE300 photoionization detector (PID) with an 11.7 volt lamp (Figure A-7). The detector
was passed slowly over the core and the reading was recorded in a field book. Selected intervals
(based on visual observations) in each boring were chosen for jar-headspace screening wherein a
sample was placed in a glass jar, the opening covered with aluminum foil, and stored in a heated
box for at least 20 minutes. The headspace was then screened using the PID.
Once the sample had been field screened with the PID, measurements of sample recovery
were made, and the sample was logged in a field notebook by a geologist (Figure A-8).
Appendix B contains the boring logs. Soil samples were concomitantly collected for laboratory
analysis. Due to soil sample volume limitations (e.g. the number of jars that needed to be filled
for analysis), soil samples were collected at different intervals in each boring for different
analytes. An effort was made to select different intervals for different analytes in borings, where
other observations did not dictate analyte selection. Table 1 shows the locations, intervals, and
analytes analyzed. Soil samples for analysis of “target compound list” VOCs were collected
using a Terra Core Sampler, which is designed to prevent loss of volatile compounds and
transferred to glass vials provided by the laboratory (Figures A-9 and A-10). All other samples
were collected by placing soil directly into glass jars provided by the laboratory (Figure A-11).
All samples were collected while wearing nitrile gloves, which were changed between samples.
Table 1. Location and depth (in feet below ground) of analytes in soil samples
BW-1 BW-2 BW-3 BW-4 BW-5 BW-6 BW-7 BW-7A BW-8 BW-8A BW-9 BW-9A BW-10 BW-10A
TCLP RCRA Metals 6-10 1-2, 4-8 2-6 2-6, 6-8 2-5, 6-9 4-6, 6-8 4-6, 6-8 .5-2, 2-4 4-8 0-2, 4-6
TCLP Mercury 6-10 1-2, 4-8 2-6 2-6, 6-8 2-5, 6-9 4-6, 6-8 4-6, 6-8 .5-2, 2-4 4-8 0-2, 4-6
TCLP Semivolatiles 6-10 1-2, 4-8 2-6 2-6, 6-8 2-5, 6-9 6-8 4-6, 6-8 .5-2, 2-4 4-8 0-2, 4-6
TCLP Volatiles 6-8 6-8 6-7.5 0.5-2 4-6 6-8 4-6 2-4 0-2 2-4
TAL ICP Metals 4-6, 10-12 2-4 1.5-2, 2-4 2-4, 8-10 1-2, 10-11 1-2, 4-6 2-4, 6-8 4-6, 6-8 2-4 2-4
TAL Metals Mercury 4-6, 10-12 2-4 1.5-2, 2-4 2-4, 8-10 1-2, 10-11 1-2, 4-6 2-4, 6-8 4-6, 6-8 2-4 2-4
TCL VOCs 4-6 2-4 2-4 2-4 4-6 1-2 2-4* 2-4 4-6* 4-6 0-2* 0-2 2-4* 2-4
TCL SVOCs 4-6, 10-12 2-4 1.5-2, 2-4 2-4, 8-10 1-2, 10-11 1-2, 4-6 2-4, 6-8 4-6, 6-8 2-4 2-4
GRO (C-6 to C-10) 8-9 6-8
DRO (C-10-C-28) 8-9 6-8
*Holding time compromised in sample. Re-collected in companion boring.
31
Samples were placed in a cooler with ice. At the end of each day, chain-of-custody forms
were completed, the coolers were sealed, and the samples were shipped via Federal Express to
Test America in North Canton, Ohio for next-day delivery. Because the second day of drilling
was on a Friday, these samples were shipped for Saturday delivery to the laboratory due to short
laboratory holding times for the “target compound list” VOC samples.
Borings were terminated in native materials at the bottom of the fill. Borings ranged in
depth from 8 feet (BW-3 and BW-10) to 14 feet (BW-6). Fill depths ranged from 7.5 feet (BW-
3) to 11 feet (BW-1). Table 2 shows the depth of fill, depth of the borings, depth to water during
drilling and a description of the materials immediately underlying the fill. Appendix B contains
logs for the borings.
In general, our investigation confirmed the presence of and characteristics of fill
materials that had been previously described by Solar (1999) and Geotechnical Consultants, Inc.,
(2011). The fill consisted primarily of foundry sand with occasional brick fragments, glass
pieces, coal, wood pieces, shale, limestone and sandstone fragments, slag, metal (wire), and
ceramic tile. Although there had been some anecdotal information about possible burial of
“trash” or “garbage” at the site, neither our investigation nor other previous subsurface
investigations indicated that such materials were found.
Our investigation similarly corroborated the types of materials immediately underlying
the fill. Similar to descriptions by Solar (1999) and Geotechnical Consultants, Inc. (2011),
materials within what appeared to be the former Hocking River channel were wetter and had a
higher organic content. Materials encountered within what was probably the floodplain area
consisted primarily of sandy, silty clays and clayey silts. Materials that were primarily further to
the east were characterized by silty and clayey sands (with or without gravel). Table 2 presents
the materials found to be immediately underlying the fill in the borings drilled as part of this
investigation.
Where water was not encountered during drilling (BW-2, BW-3, BW-5, BW-6, BW-7,
BW-8, BW-9, and BW-10), the borings were abandoned by mixing a slurry of bentonite and
emplacing it by pumping (Figure A-12). Borings were filled to approximately one foot below
grade (Figure A-13). Quickrete was mixed by hand and placed in the top of the boring (Figure
A-14).
Water was encountered during drilling in two borings (BW-1 and BW-4). During
drilling, there was approximately 1.5 feet of water in the bottom of the fill in BW-1 (10 feet
below grade) and wet at the interface between the fill and underlying clayey silt in B-4 (10 feet
below grade). Once again, our investigation confirmed the findings of previous investigations
with regard to the occasional presence of water within the fill materials, primarily at the interface
with the underlying in-situ deposits.
Temporary monitoring wells were completed in both borings (B-1 and B-4) by installing
2-inch PVC casing with five feet of 10-slot screen surrounded by a #4 Parry filter pack (Figure
A-15). The filter pack was extended two feet above the screen in monitoring well B-1. Due to
Table 2. Summary of encountered subsurface conditions.
Borehole Surface Layer
Depth of Fill
(feet)
Bottom of
Boring Depth
(feet)
Depth to Water
During Drilling
(feet )
Depth to Water in
Monitoring Well
(feet) Materials Under Fill
BW-1 Concrete 11 12 10 9.5 Damp, grayish brown organic SILT
BW-2 Asphalt 9 10 None Moist, brown SAND
BW-3 Asphalt 7.5 8 None Damp to moist, brown CLAYEY SILT
BW-4 Concrete 10 12 10 10 Moist to wet, dark gray CLAYEY SILT
BW-5 Concrete 10 12 None Damp to moist, gray CLAYEY SILT
BW-6 Asphalt 8 14 None Damp, gray SILT (2 feet), then brown SAND
BW-7 Asphalt 7.8 10 None
Damp to moist, light gray mottled with yellowish
brown SILTY CLAY
BW-8 Asphalt 8.5 10 None Damp to moist, dark gray CLAYEY SILT
BW-9 Asphalt 8.2 10 None Damp, brown CLAYEY SILT
BW-10 Asphalt 7.75 8 None Moist, brown CLAYEY SILT
33
vertical depth limitations, the filter pack was only extended one foot above the filter pack in
monitoring well B-4. The remaining annular space in both temporary monitoring wells was
filled with 3/8-inch Holeplug. The wells were completed at the surface with flush-mount
protectors with an inside locking cap (Figures A-16 and A-17). Appendix C contains the
completion diagrams for the temporary monitoring wells and the drillers logs submitted to the
Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR).
On Monday, March 24, 2014, we were notified by Test America that the soil samples that
had been shipped on Friday (for Saturday delivery) had not been delivered until Monday. The
laboratory informed us that while the temperature of the cooler had remained below 4oC,
analysis of the “target compound list” VOC samples would be outside the laboratory method
holding time. This affected the “target compound list” VOC samples from BW-7, BW-8, BW-9
and BW-10 only. Subsequent checking with Federal Express showed that the delivery person
had simply made a mistake and had missed the “Saturday delivery” notation. A decision was
made to analyze the “target compound list” VOC samples, but also to re-collect the samples for
“target compound list” VOCs.
On March 31, 2014, Wrights Drilling rig, a CME-75, was re-mobilized to the site.
Because no monitoring wells were to be installed, 2 ¼-inch inside diameter hollow stem augers
were used to drill the borings. Borings BW-7A, BW-8A, BW-9A, and BW-10A were each
drilled one foot west of the previous boring locations (Figure 15). In order to re-collect the
“target compound list” VOC samples that had been delivered late to the laboratory, it was
decided to drill without sampling to the top of the desired sampling interval. A split spoon
sample was then collected from the previously-sampled interval. Blow counts were recorded,
recovery was measured, and the sample was logged (Appendix B). A Terra Core Sampler was
used to collect samples and place them in glass bottles received from the laboratory. Samples
were collected from 0 to 2 feet (BW-9A), 2 to 4 feet (BW-7A and BW-10A), and 4 to 6 feet
(BW-8A). The samples were placed on ice, the chain-of-custody was prepared, the cooler was
sealed, and the samples were taken to Federal Express for shipment to Test America, North
Canton, Ohio.
As before, all split spoon samplers were washed between samples with Alconox and
rinsed. The augers and pilot bit were cleaned with a high pressure washer between borings. All
wash water was contained and placed in a separate 55 gallon drum meeting ODOT specification
17H. The drum was labeled with the date and the source of the water. Similarly, all drill
cuttings were containerized in a separate 55 gallon drum meeting ODOT specification 17H. The
drum was labeled with the boring numbers and the date. One new drum for water and one new
drum for soil were used during this field mobilization. The two drums were moved into the
Fairfield County Maintenance Garage by County personnel for safe storage pending receipt of
analytical results. (Based on the analytical results, the soil will be disposed at a solid waste
disposal facility).
Due to the shallowness of the borings, all borings were abandoned by filling with 3/8-
inch Holeplug to within six inches of the surface. The remainder of the borehole was filled with
Quickrete to be even with the surrounding asphalt.
34
3.4 Groundwater Sampling
As mentioned previously, two monitoring wells were installed in the only locations
where water was encountered during drilling (BW-1 and BW-4). The monitoring wells were
allowed to equilibrate for 10 days prior to sample collection. No attempt was made to develop
the wells due to the minimal amount of water in the wells and the high fines content in the
surrounding fill.
Sampling was conducted on March 31, 2014. Prior to sampling, the water level was
measured in each monitoring well with a Solinst Model 101 electric measuring tape (Figure A-
18). The water level was approximately 9.5 feet below the ground surface in BW-1 and almost
10 feet below grade in BW-4. While monitoring well BW-1 had 1.63 feet of water, monitoring
well BW-4 had only .5 feet. The monitoring wells were purged using disposable polyethylene
bailers that were gently lowered into the water column to minimize turbidity. Despite best
efforts to minimize turbidity, the water quickly became black due to the fines in the adjacent fill
(Figure A-19). A minimum of three times the volume of water in the well was removed prior to
sample collection. All water was containerized and added to the wash water drum that had been
used earlier in the day for drilling activities (Figure A-20). (Based on the analytical results, the
water will be disposed at the Fairfield County wastewater treatment plant.)
Samples were collected using disposable polyethylene bailers that were gently lowered
into the water column. Field parameters of pH, temperature, and conductivity were measured in
the field prior to sample collection with an Oakton PC-10. Measurements of pH indicated that
the groundwater was neutral, while temperature was approximately 55o F (a typical temperature
for groundwater year-round). During purging, the water had become black with fines and
turbidity was excessive. An attempt was made to measure turbidity with a Hach 2100P Turbidity
Meter, but an error reading indicated that the turbidity was in excess of 1000 NTUs. While
volatile samples are not affected by the presence of turbidity, “Purging and sampling in a
manner that produces low-turbidity water is particularly important when analyzing for total
metals, which may exhibit artificially elevated concentrations in high-turbidity samples (Gibbons
and Sara, 1993). When sampling for contaminants or parameters that may be biased by
turbidity, Ohio EPA recommends stabilizing the turbidity readings below 10 NTUs (Yeskis and
Zavala, 2002)” (Ohio EPA, 2012).
In these temporary wells, it was not possible to stabilize the turbidity. Therefore, an
alternate strategy was employed to collect representative samples. Samples were collected for
both total metals and dissolved metals. Dissolved metals samples were collected by passing the
sample through a 0.45 micron filter (thus, reducing the turbidity) prior to placing the sample in a
bottle preserved with nitric acid (Figure A-21). Total metals samples were collected without
filtration and with excessive turbidity. All samples were collected wearing latex gloves that
were changed between samples.
It should be noted that BW-4 was sampled first. After purging and collection of samples
for volatiles and total metals, the well was dry. Monitoring well BW-1 was sampled while
monitoring well BW-4 was allowed to recharge. After sampling was completed at BW-1,
enough water had recharged in BW-4 to collect samples for dissolved metals.
35
Samples were placed in bottles provided by the laboratory. A trip blank for VOCs was
included in the cooler when it arrived from the laboratory and was returned to the laboratory for
anlaysis. Samples were placed on ice, a chain-of-custody was prepared, the cooler was sealed,
and delivered to Federal Express for next day receipt at Test America in North Canton, Ohio.
Soil samples from borings BW-7A, BW-8A, BW-9A, and BW-10A were shipped in the same
cooler.
3.5 Temporary Monitoring Well Abandonment
On May 29, 2014, Wrights Drilling was mobilized to abandon the two temporary
monitoring wells, BW-1 and BW-4. The wells were abandoned by pulling the casing and screen
from the well with a CME-75 drilling rig (Figures A-22 and A-23). The void was filled with
Type I/II Portland cement by pouring from the surface (due to the minimal amount of water in
the void). The flush-mounted protector was left in place because it would have been necessary
to disturb a larger surface area of the parking lot (Figure A-24). The top 8 to 12 inches was filled
with Quickrete that was mixed by hand and finished to be level with the surrounding concrete
pad (Figure A-25). No soil or water was generated during the process. Appendix D contains the
Water Well Sealing Reports filed with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR) by
Wrights Drilling.
36
SECTION 4
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
4.1 Introduction
The scope of work of this project was to conduct an initial subsurface environmental
sampling and analysis program to develop information about the chemical characteristics of the
existing fill materials underlying the proposed footprint of the new Fairfield County Jail/Public
Safety Facility. Specifically, the objective of the investigation was to evaluate these fill
materials for the possible presence of hazardous substances that would warrant the need for
environmental management of the material during future site redevelopment. In addition, the
scope included collection of representative groundwater samples from existing saturated zones
within the fill materials for the possible presence of hazardous substances. At issue was the need
to environmentally characterize these materials so as to exercise due care with respect to any
future excavation or other disturbance of the fill materials during construction activities. Further,
the environmental characterization of the fill materials necessitates a high degree of confidence
in that the site of the proposed new Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility is located
immediately adjacent to and within the designated wellhead protection area for Lancaster’s
Miller Park Wellfield.
As previously described, soil samples were collected for:
1) toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) for metals, volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and semi-volatile organic compounds using EPA sample
extraction Method 1311 and analytical Methods 6010B/7470A/8260B/8260C;
2) total concentration of “target analyte list” metals using EPA analytical Methods
6010B/7471A;
3) total concentration of “target compound list” VOCs using EPA Methods 5035 and
5035A for sample collection, preservation, and handling in addition to EPA analytical
Method 8260B;
4) total concentration of “target compound list” semi-volatile organics using EPA
analytical Method 8270C; and
5) both “gasoline range organics” (GROs) and “diesel range organics” (DROs) using
EPA analytical method 8015C.
Groundwater samples were analyzed for:
1) total concentration of the “target analyte list” metals using EPA analytical Methods
6010B/7470B;
37
2) dissolved concentrations of “target analyte list” metals using EPA analytical Methods
6010B/7470B; and
3) the “target compound list” of VOCs using EPA Method 8260B.
The following sections present the analytical results, the regulatory framework under
which the results were interpreted, and the implications for future site development, soil use and
disposition.
4.2 Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure in Soils (TCLP)
4.2.1 Introduction
At the time the investigation was begun, the source and chemical characteristics of the fill
materials were not known to us. Therefore, the investigation was designed to characterize and
eliminate classifications of waste, as possible. Hazardous waste is considered the “worst” kind
of waste and has the most restrictive handling and disposal requirements. Therefore, tests were
performed to determine if hazardous wastes were present at the site.
Hazardous wastes are regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) and regulated by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA), Division of
Material and Waste Management. Wastes are considered hazardous by two different criteria:
definition and characteristics. Hazardous wastes that are hazardous by definition are included
into lists published by the Agency (OAC 3745-51-30 to 3745-51-35) and are organized into
categories, the F-list, the K-list, and the P-list and U-list. The F-list identifies wastes from
common manufacturing and industrial processes and is known as the “non-specific source
wastes” list. The K-list includes certain wastes from specific industries and is known as the
“source-specific waste” list. The P-list and U-list include specific commercial chemical products
and is known as the “discarded commercial chemical product” list. Because the fill materials
(foundry sand) are not listed wastes, this category was eliminated.
Wastes can also be hazardous when the waste exhibits one or more of the characteristics
of ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity (OAC 3745-51-20 to 3745-51-24). According
to OAC 3745-51-21(A)(2), a solid is considered ignitable if the material under standard
temperature and pressure is capable of “causing fire through friction, adsorption of moisture or
spontaneous chemical changes and, when ignited, burns so vigorously and persistently that it
creates a hazard”. According to OAC 3745-51-22, the characteristic of corrosivity is exhibited
only by liquids with a pH lower than 2 or higher than 12 or when the liquid corrodes steel “at a
rate greater than 6.35 mm (0.250 inch) per year”. According to OAC 3745-51-23(A), a
material exhibits reactivity when:
“(1) It is normally unstable and readily undergoes violent change without detonating.
(2) It reacts violently with water.
(3) It forms potentially explosive mixtures with water.
38
(4) When mixed with water, it generates toxic gases, vapors or fumes in a quantity
sufficient to present a danger to human health or the environment.
(5) It is a cyanide or sulfide bearing waste which, when exposed to pH conditions
between two and 12.5, can generate toxic gases, vapors or fumes in a quantity sufficient
to present a danger to human health or the environment.
(6) It is capable of detonation or explosive reaction if it is subjected to a strong initiating
source or if heated under confinement.
(7) It is readily capable of detonation or explosive decomposition or reaction at standard
temperature and pressure.”
Based on the definitions and characteristics of the observed fill materials, these
characteristics were determined not to be exhibited.
The remaining characteristic, toxicity by leaching potential, however, requires testing
using the TCLP, Method 1311, to determine an extract concentration and comparison of that
concentration to values in Table 1 of OAC 3745-51-24 to confirm the absence or presence of
constituents above the listed values.
4.2.2 TCLP Metals Results
Seventeen samples were collected from ten borings for the eight RCRA metals, arsenic,
barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver. Samples were collected in the
fill from intervals ranging from the ground surface to 10 feet below the surface. Samples were
extracted using Method 1311 and analyzed by Methods 6010B and/or 7470A. Table 3 shows the
analytical results, boring and depth from which the sample was collected, as well as the TCLP
regulatory levels from Table 1 of OAC 3745-51-24. Appendices E, F, G and H contain the
laboratory results. The results show that only two constituents, cadmium and lead, were detected
above the reporting limit and that all eight RCRA metals were below the prescribed regulatory
levels.
4.2.3 TCLP Volatile Organic Compounds Results
One sample was collected from each of the ten borings for the ten regulated volatile
organic compounds (VOCs). Samples were collected from intervals ranging from the ground
surface to 8 feet below the ground surface. Samples were extracted using Method 1311 and
analyzed by Method 8260B. Table 4 shows the analytical results, boring and depth from which
the sample was collected, as well as TCLP regulatory levels from Table 1 of OAC 3745-51-24.
Appendices E, F, G and H contain the laboratory results. The results show that no VOCs were
detected above the laboratory reporting limit and, therefore well below prescribed regulatory
levels.
Table 3. Analytical results for TCLP of RCRA metals
WELL NUMBER BW1 BW2 BW2 BW3 BW4 BW4 BW5 BW5 BW6 BW6 BW7 BW7 BW8 BW8 BW9 BW10 BW10 TCLP
Depth 6-10 Ft 1-2 Ft 4-8 Ft 2-6 Ft 2-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 2-5 Ft 6-9 Ft 4-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 4-6 Ft. 6-8 Ft 0.5-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 4-8 Ft 0-2 Ft 4-6 Ft Regulatory
Sample Date 03/20/201403/20/201403/20/201403/20/201403/20/201403/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 Levels
PARAMETER mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
Arsenic TCLP 0.017 J 0.0098 J 0.0095 J 0.0045 J 0.0065 J 0.0096 J 0.0078 J 0.012 J 0.0053J 0.0047 J 0.0044 J 0.0057 J 0.0033 J 0.0056 J 0.0043 J 0.0043 J 0.0046 J 5
Barium TCLP 1.1 J B 0.99 J B 1.0 J B 1.5 J B 0.41 J B 0.87 J B 1.3 J B 1.2 J B 0.22 J B 0.53 J B 0.85 J B 0.38 J B 0.66 J B 0.98 J B 0.63 J B 0.25 J B 0.18 J B 100
Cadmium TCLP 0.0074 J 0.54 0.0093 J 0.46 0.027 J 0.043 J 0.035 J 0.16 0.0075J 0.0020 J 0.014 J 0.0018J 0.024 J 0.015 J 0.0047 J 0.0027 J 0.0012 J 1
Chromium TCLP 0.0062 J 0.0043 J 0.0041 J 0.0033 J 0.0031 J 0.0034 J 0.0042 J 0.0067 J 0.0030 J 0.0026 J 0.0092 J <0.50 0.0040 J 0.0075 J 0.0053 J 0.0045 J 0.010 J 5
Lead TCLP 0.74 0.030 J 0.13 J 0.029 J 0.0024 J 0.12 J 2.8 0.71 <0.50 <0.50 2.2 0.0047 J 0.011 J 0.075 J 0.15 J <0.50 0.0064 J 5
Mercury TCLP <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 0.2
Selenium TCLP 0.0058 J 0.0099 J 0.0046 J 0.0050 J 0.0063 J 0.0053 J 0.0085 J 0.0081 J 0.0064 J 0.0069 J 0.0074 J B 0.0049 J B 0.0084 J B 0.0045 J B <0.25 0.0062 J B 0.0043 J B 1
Silver TCLP <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 5
Detection greater than Reporting Limit
Concentration between Reporting Limit and Method Detection Limit
Table 4. Analytical results for TCLP VOCs.
WELL NUMBER BW1 BW2 BW3 BW4 BW5 BW6 BW7 BW8 BW9 BW10 TCLP
Depth 6-8 Ft 6-8 Ft 6-7.5 Ft 0.5-2 Ft 4-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 4-6 Ft 2-4 Ft 0-2 Ft 2-4 Ft Regulatory
Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 Levels
PARAMETER mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
1,1-Dichloroethene TCLP <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 0.7
1,2-Dichloroethane TCLP <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 0.5
2-Butanone (MEK) TCLP <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 200
Benzene TCLP <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 0.5
Carbon tetrachloride TCLP <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 0.5
Chlorobenzene TCLP <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 100
Chloroform TCLP <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 6
Tetrachloroethene TCLP <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 0.7
Trichloroethene TCLP <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 0.5Vinyl chloride TCLP <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 0.2
41
4.2.4 TCLP Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds Results
Sixteen samples were collected from ten borings for the twelve regulated semi-volatile
organic compounds (SVOCs). Samples were collected from intervals ranging from the ground
surface to 10 feet below the ground surface. Samples were extracted using Method 1311 and
analyzed by Method 8270C. Table 5 shows the analytical results, boring and depth from which
the sample was collected, as well as TCLP regulatory levels from Table 1 of OAC 3745-51-24.
Appendices E, F, G and H contain the laboratory results. The results show that no SVOCs were
detected above the laboratory reporting limit and, therefore, were below prescribed regulatory
levels.
4.2.5 TCLP Summary
Based on the analytical results for TCLP analyses of all regulated metals, VOCs and
SVOCs, only two metals, cadmium and lead were detected above the laboratory reporting limit.
However, no regulated compounds were detected above the regulatory limits set for designation
of materials as hazardous waste in Table 1 of OAC 3745-51-24. Therefore, the fill materials at
the site are not considered to be hazardous wastes. Subsequent discussions with representatives
of Ohio EPA confirmed the conclusion.
4.3 Characterization of Soils by Other Methods of Analysis
4.3.1 Introduction
As mentioned above, at the time the investigation was begun, the source and chemical
characteristics of the fill materials were not known to us. Therefore, in addition to performing
analyses that would determine if the fill materials need to be handled as hazardous waste (which
they do not), samples for total concentrations of the “target analyte list” of metals and total
concentrations of the “target compound lists” for VOCs and SVOCs were also collected. In
addition, selected samples were collected and analyzed for gasoline range organics (GRO) and
diesel range organics (DRO) due to the proximity of the automotive service station. The purpose
in collecting these samples was to characterize the fill materials so as to be able to exercise due
care with respect to any future excavation or other disturbance of the fill materials during
construction activities.
As a preliminary indication of the magnitude of the concentrations of the individual
metals, VOCs, and SVOCs, the results were compared to soil standards found in OAC 3745-300-
08. Although this chapter of the Ohio Administrative Code, known as the Voluntary Action
Program (VAP), applies specifically to voluntary clean-up of sites, the generic standards
contained in the rules are often used to evaluate potential risks posed by concentrations of
constituents. The Appendix to OAC 3745-300-08 contains generic numerical standards for
hazardous substances and petroleum for complete exposure pathways for, among others, direct
contact with hazardous substances in soil. Of particular application to this site were values for
construction/excavation activities because of proposed construction activities at the site.
WELL NUMBER BW1 BW2 BW2 BW3 BW4 BW4 BW5 BW5 BW6 BW6 BW7 BW7 BW8 BW8 BW9 BW10 BW10 TCLP
Depth 6-10 Ft 1-2 Ft 4-8 Ft 2-6 Ft 2-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 2-5 Ft 6-9 Ft 4-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 4-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 0.5-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 4-8 Ft 0-2 Ft 4-6 Ft Regulatory
Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 Levels
PARAMETER mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene TCLP <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 7.5
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol TCLP <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 400
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol TCLP <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 2
2,4-Dinitrotoluene TCLP <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 0.13
2-Methylphenol TCLP <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 200
3 & 4 Methylphenol TCLP <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 400
Hexachlorobenzene TCLP <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 0.13
Hexachlorobutadiene TCLP <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 0.5
Hexachloroethane TCLP <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 3
Nitrobenzene TCLP <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 2
Pentachlorophenol TCLP <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 100
Pyridine TCLP <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 5
Table 5. Analytical results for TCLP SVOCs.
43
The Appendix to OAC 3745-300-08 contains calculations of standards for both non-
carcinogenic and carcinogenic effects (if applicable) of a particular constituent of concern. The
generic direct contact soil standard for a single chemical is then presented based on the lower
value of the two calculations and/or other factors as determined by Ohio EPA. In this evaluation,
generic direct contact soil standards for construction/excavation activities were referenced for
both the current regulations (effective March 2009) and the generic direct contact soil standards
for construction/excavation activities that have been adopted, but will not be effective until
August 1, 2014. The most conservative (lowest) number for each chemical from both of the
rules was used for comparison.
Although somewhat less applicable, generic direct contact soil standards for residential
use were also reviewed as a conservative estimate of potential chemicals of concern. Generic
direct contact soil standards for residential use assume that an individual will live at the site for
thirty years (6 years as a child and 24 years as an adult) and that the exposure will be 24 hours
per day. Further, the assumption is made that the individual will have direct contact with the soil
during this time period. In fact, according to Fairfield County personnel, the residents at the jail
spend an average of 14 days at the facility, even though misdemeanor sentences under ORC
2929.24 can add to 360 days. Apparently, if there is a felony 5 charge (which is rare in Fairfield
County), the time at the facility could exceed a year, depending on multiple factors, with the
longest recent duration resulting in a residence time of 18 months. Therefore, a residence time of
one year is conservative. Further, the proposed site design shows that the fill materials on site
will be either covered by a building or paved for a parking lot. Therefore, there will be no
contact with the soils. Again, this scenario was evaluated as a very conservative approach to
compare soil constituents that were potentially a concern.
Finally, also less applicable, generic direct contact soil standards for
commercial/industrial activities were also reviewed as another conservative estimate of potential
chemicals of concern. Generic direct contact soil standards for commercial/industrial land use
assume that a worker will be employed at the site for 25 years and that the exposure will be for 8
hours a day. The assumption is once again made that the individual will have direct contact with
the soil during this time period. As mentioned before, the proposed site design shows that the fill
materials on site will be either covered by a building or paved for a parking lot. Therefore, there
will be no contact with the soils. Again, this scenario was evaluated as a very conservative
approach to compare soil constituents that were potentially a concern.
The assumption when using these generic direct contact soil standards as a comparison is
that exposure to multiple chemicals may be greater than exposure to just one chemical.
Therefore, depending on the magnitude of the values, if there is a potential risk in a complete
exposure pathway, multiple chemical exposure adjustments may be necessary.
In addition to analyses for metals, VOCs, and SVOCs, selected soil samples were also
analyzed for gasoline range organics (GRO) and diesel range organics (DRO). Although it was
envisioned that these samples would be collected based primarily on field headspace screening
and to evaluate potential contamination from the service station on the adjacent property, the
field headspace screening produced minimal results and the sample volume of soil in the split
44
spoon sampler was very limited after the other samples were collected. In addition, many of the
constituents in DRO are included in the VOC and SVOC analyses, which better define the
individual constituents.
With regard to standards for petroleum, according to Ohio EPA (2005a), “OEPA’s
Voluntary Action Program (VAP) has developed cleanup standards based on land use and
ground water use for various hazardous substances and petroleum… However, Paragraph
(B)(1) of n3746.04 of the Ohio Revised Code (ORC) requires that the petroleum standards for
residential and commercial properties be the standards adopted under Division (B) of 3737.882
of the ORC, the standards developed by BUSTR and described in Chapter 1301:7-9-13 of the
Ohio Administrative Codes (OAC). The VAP developed direct contact soil standards for
petroleum releases at industrial properties”.
The Ohio EPA, Division of Remedial Response (DERR) has developed a guidance
document relating to petroleum releases from a non-BUSTR (Bureau of Underground Storage
Tank, State Fire Marshall’s Office) regulated source (Ohio EPA, 2005a). This document
presents a tiered approach to address petroleum contamination in soils. Petroleum action levels
are established based on Categories 1 through 4, which are loosely based on a scoring system of
vulnerability to contamination. Category 1 is the most vulnerable area, while Category 4 is the
least likely to be affected. The guidance contains “petroleum action levels” for soil TPH (total
petroleum hydrocarbons) (C-6 through C-10, also known as GRO) and soil TPH (Others) (C-10
through C-28, also known as DRO). Analytical results were compared to these guidance levels
to determine magnitude of concentrations and potential for regulation under DERR.
4.3.2 Total Metals Results in Soil
Seventeen samples were collected from ten borings for the 23 metals in the “target
analyte list”. Samples were collected in the fill from intervals ranging from 1.5 to 12 feet below
the ground surface. Samples were analyzed by Methods 6010B and/or 7471A. Table 6 shows
the analytical results, boring and depth from which the sample was collected, as well as the VAP
generic direct contact soil standard for a single chemical for construction/excavation activities
from the Appendix of OAC 3745-300-08 (both March 2009 and August 1, 2014). Note that the
generic direct contact soil standard for chromium is for chromium VI (the most toxic form of
chromium), even though the value for chromium represents total chromium. Appendices E, F, G
and H contain the laboratory results. The results show that three constituents: arsenic, lead, and
mercury exceed the generic direct contact soil standards for construction/excavation activities.
When results are compared to generic direct contact soil standards for residential use, the
results show that six constituents: antimony, arsenic chromium, copper, lead, and mercury are
exceeded in at least one interval in at least one boring (Table 7). Similarly, when results are
compared to generic direct contact soil standards for commercial/industrial use, the results show
that four constituents: arsenic, chromium, lead and mercury are exceeded in at least one interval
in at least one boring (Table 8).
BORING NUMBER BW1 BW1 BW2 BW3 BW3 BW4 BW4 BW5 BW5 BW6 BW6 BW7 BW7 BW8 BW8 BW9 BW10
Depth 4-6 Ft 10-12 Ft 2-4 Ft 1.5-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 8-10 Ft 1-2 Ft 10-11 Ft 1-2 Ft 4-6 Ft 2-4 Ft 6-8 Ft 4-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft
Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014
PARAMETER mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
Aluminum 7500 5800 5700 2600 6500 4500 6800 4000 11000 4700 4600 5700 4500 5600 5300 6100 1400 None None
Antimony 43 11 14 1.3 0.74 J 0.78 J <6.0 0.69 J 0.97 J <1.0 0.51 J 0.39 J 0.41 J 5.9 1.2 0.58 J <0.82 390 850
Arsenic 18 94 22 7.0 12 8.8 36 11 34 3.6 6.8 7.1 9.2 460 23 12 1.9 420 690
Barium 450 3300 500 27 68 B 61 920 32 220 22 27 57 B 44 B 170 B 160 B 120 B 11 J B 120,000 None
Beryllium 0.68 0.56 J 0.34 J 0.11 J 0.46 J 0.21 J 2.0 0.27 J 0.80 J 0.17 J 0.25 J 0.26 J 0.37 J 0.43 J 0.39 J 0.62 0.058 J 3,100 3,400
Cadmium 1.4 6.4 6.8 0.39 0.43 0.25 2.6 0.53 6.5 0.16 J 1.9 0.41 0.33 4.1 3.3 1.3 0.062 J 1,600 1,000
Calcium 58000 60000 57000 7800 15000 4700 21000 36000 19000 2600 28000 5800 9100 12000 7900 10000 1400 None None
Chromium 37 330 81 35 16 34 60 19 120 8.9 19 26 22 23 20 15 8.6 13,000 1,200
Cobalt 6.2 6.7 J 4.6 J 2.5 J 4.7 J 4.1 J 12 5.2 11 2.6 J 3.3 J 3.4 J 4.1 J 8.1 6.8 6.8 1.4 J 4,000 None
Copper 62 300 2300 61 36 58 360 40 77 10 21 96 74 56 41 31 8.7 None 21,000
Iron 24000 95000 45000 19000 22000 30000 150000 22000 91000 9900 15000 22000 28000 31000 22000 20000 8100 None None
Lead 1100 2000 1600 18 41 32 1400 25 260 9.2 14 44 55 260 230 150 5.9 750 400
Magnesium 7800 13000 9200 3100 4800 640 3100 11000 3700 970 6300 1600 3000 3500 2700 3200 510 None None
Manganese 470 860 680 170 400 620 790 370 760 150 220 450 380 440 380 560 91 None None
Mercury 0.29 57 8 0.044J 0.080 J <0.10 6.2 0.051 J 1.1 <0.12 0.017J 0.069 J 0.15 0.60 0.54 0.25 0.035 J 190 3.1
Nickel 24 34 14 25 27 37 56 44 36 7.7 14 34 37 26 28 43 10 21,000 23,000
Potassium 920 850 J 770 320 J 720 B 440 J 470 J 730 1700 650 660 530 B 490 J B 810 B 740 B 790 B 150 J B None None
Selenium 0.71 5.5 2.3 0.49 <0.51 0.54 2.3 <0.47 4.7 1.4 0.83 0.62 0.85 9.4 4.6 0.73 <0.41 9,700 11,000
Silver 1.0 3.7 0.23 J <0.45 <0.51 <0.47 <0.60 <0.47 0.96 J <0.50 <0.40 <0.45 <0.51 0.63 0.66 0.17 J <0.41 9,700 11,000
Sodium 510 J 960 J 190 J 130 J 290 J 94 J 180 J 77 J 210 J 350 J 490 810 610 110 J 81 J 210 J 100 J None None
Thallium <1.2 1.5 J <0.96 <0.90 <1.0 <0.93 1.6 <0.93 1.2 J <1.0 <0.80 <0.91 <1.0 <1.2 <0.87 <0.95 <0.82 1,600 None
Vanadium 20 24 19 8.5 17 14 23J 14 30 12 15 10 10 18 13 16 4.6 17,000 None
Zinc 390 4500 1300 26 92 46 1000 71 700 19 34 100 66 500 300 150 11 580,000 640,000
Detection greater than Reporting Limit
Concentration between Reporting Limit and Method Detection Limit
Concentration greater than VAP construction/excavation activities value for direct-contact with a single chemical (either March 2009 or August 1, 2014 values)
VAP standards contained in OAC 3745-300-08
* Chromium VAP Direct Contact Concentrations provided for Chromium VI
B = Method blank contamination
VAP
Construction/
Excavation
Generic Direct-
Contact Soil
Standard for a
Single Chemical
(Efffective
August 1, 2014)
VAP
Construction/
Excavation
Generic Direct-
Contact Soil
Standard for a
Single Chemical
(Efffective March
2009)
Table 6. Analytical results for metals in soils compared to VAP generic direct contact soil values for construction/excavation activities.
BORING NUMBER BW1 BW1 BW2 BW3 BW3 BW4 BW4 BW5 BW5 BW6 BW6 BW7 BW7 BW8 BW8 BW9 BW10
Depth 4-6 Ft 10-12 Ft 2-4 Ft 1.5-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 8-10 Ft 1-2 Ft 10-11 Ft 1-2 Ft 4-6 Ft 2-4 Ft 6-8 Ft 4-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft
Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014
PARAMETER mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
Aluminum 7500 5800 5700 2600 6500 4500 6800 4000 11000 4700 4600 5700 4500 5600 5300 6100 1400 None None
Antimony 43 11 14 1.3 0.74 J 0.78 J <6.0 0.69 J 0.97 J <1.0 0.51 J 0.39 J 0.41 J 5.9 1.2 0.58 J <0.82 30 63
Arsenic 18 94 22 7.0 12 8.8 36 11 34 3.6 6.8 7.1 9.2 460 23 12 1.9 6.7 12
Barium 450 3300 500 27 68 B 61 920 32 220 22 27 57 B 44 B 170 B 160 B 120 B 11 J B 15,000 None
Beryllium 0.68 0.56 J 0.34 J 0.11 J 0.46 J 0.21 J 2.0 0.27 J 0.80 J 0.17 J 0.25 J 0.26 J 0.37 J 0.43 J 0.39 J 0.62 0.058 J 150 310
Cadmium 1.4 6.4 6.8 0.39 0.43 0.25 2.6 0.53 6.5 0.16 J 1.9 0.41 0.33 4.1 3.3 1.3 0.062 J 72 140
Calcium 58000 60000 57000 7800 15000 4700 21000 36000 19000 2600 28000 5800 9100 12000 7900 10000 1400 None None
Chromium 37 330 81 35 16 34 60 19 120 8.9 19 26 22 23 20 15 8.6 230* 24
Cobalt 6.2 6.7 J 4.6 J 2.5 J 4.7 J 4.1 J 12 5.2 11 2.6 J 3.3 J 3.4 J 4.1 J 8.1 6.8 6.8 1.4 J 1,400 None
Copper 62 300 2300 61 36 58 360 40 77 10 21 96 74 56 41 31 8.7 None 6
Iron 24000 95000 45000 19000 22000 30000 150000 22000 91000 9900 15000 22000 28000 31000 22000 20000 8100 None None
Lead 1100 2000 1600 18 41 32 1400 25 260 9.2 14 44 55 260 230 150 5.9 400 400
Magnesium 7800 13000 9200 3100 4800 640 3100 11000 3700 970 6300 1600 3000 3500 2700 3200 510 None None
Manganese 470 860 680 170 400 620 790 370 760 150 220 450 380 440 380 560 91 None None
Mercury 0.29 57 8 0.044J 0.080 J <0.10 6.2 0.051 J 1.1 <0.12 0.017J 0.069 J 0.15 0.60 0.54 0.25 0.035 J 7.6 3.1
Nickel 24 34 14 25 27 37 56 44 36 7.7 14 34 37 26 28 43 10 1,500 3,100
Potassium 920 850 J 770 320 J 720 B 440 J 470 J 730 1700 650 660 530 B 490 J B 810 B 740 B 790 B 150 J B None None
Selenium 0.71 5.5 2.3 0.49 <0.51 0.54 2.3 <0.47 4.7 1.4 0.83 0.62 0.85 9.4 4.6 0.73 <0.41 380 780
Silver 1.0 3.7 0.23 J <0.45 <0.51 <0.47 <0.60 <0.47 0.96 J <0.50 <0.40 <0.45 <0.51 0.63 0.66 0.17 J <0.41 380 780
Sodium 510 J 960 J 190 J 130 J 290 J 94 J 180 J 77 J 210 J 350 J 490 810 610 110 J 81 J 210 J 100 J None None
Thallium <1.2 1.5 J <0.96 <0.90 <1.0 <0.93 1.6 <0.93 1.2 J <1.0 <0.80 <0.91 <1.0 <1.2 <0.87 <0.95 <0.82 6.1 None
Vanadium 20 24 19 8.5 17 14 23J 14 30 12 15 10 10 18 13 16 4.6 680 None
Zinc 390 4500 1300 26 92 46 1000 71 700 19 34 100 66 500 300 150 11 23,000 47,000
Detection greater than Reporting Limit
Concentration between Reporting Limit and Method Detection Limit
Concentration greater than VAP residential exposure value for direct-contact with a single chemical (either March 2009 or August 1, 2014 values)
VAP standards contained in OAC 3745-300-08
* Chromium VAP Direct Contact Concentrations provided for Chromium VI
B = Method blank contamination
VAP Residential
Generic Direct-
Contact Soil
Standard for a
Single Chemical
(Efffective
August 1, 2014)
VAP Residential
Generic Direct-
Contact Soil
Standard for a
Single Chemical
(Effective March
2009)
Table 7. Analytical results for metals in soils compared to VAP generic direct contact soil values for residential exposure .
BORING NUMBER BW1 BW1 BW2 BW3 BW3 BW4 BW4 BW5 BW5 BW6 BW6 BW7 BW7 BW8 BW8 BW9 BW10
Depth 4-6 Ft 10-12 Ft 2-4 Ft 1.5-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 8-10 Ft 1-2 Ft 10-11 Ft 1-2 Ft 4-6 Ft 2-4 Ft 6-8 Ft 4-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft
Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014
PARAMETER mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
Aluminum 7500 5800 5700 2600 6500 4500 6800 4000 11000 4700 4600 5700 4500 5600 5300 6100 1400 None None
Antimony 43 11 14 1.3 0.74 J 0.78 J <6.0 0.69 J 0.97 J <1.0 0.51 J 0.39 J 0.41 J 5.9 1.2 0.58 J <0.82 1,200 1,600
Arsenic 18 94 22 7.0 12 8.8 36 11 34 3.6 6.8 7.1 9.2 460 23 12 1.9 82 77
Barium 450 3300 500 27 68 B 61 920 32 220 22 27 57 B 44 B 170 B 160 B 120 B 11 J B 370,000 None
Beryllium 0.68 0.56 J 0.34 J 0.11 J 0.46 J 0.21 J 2.0 0.27 J 0.80 J 0.17 J 0.25 J 0.26 J 0.37 J 0.43 J 0.39 J 0.62 0.058 J 5,100 7,800
Cadmium 1.4 6.4 6.8 0.39 0.43 0.25 2.6 0.53 6.5 0.16 J 1.9 0.41 0.33 4.1 3.3 1.3 0.062 J 2,300 2,600
Calcium 58000 60000 57000 7800 15000 4700 21000 36000 19000 2600 28000 5800 9100 12000 7900 10000 1400 None None
Chromium 37 330 81 35 16 34 60 19 120 8.9 19 26 22 23 20 15 8.6 7,900* 210*
Cobalt 6.2 6.7 J 4.6 J 2.5 J 4.7 J 4.1 J 12 5.2 11 2.6 J 3.3 J 3.4 J 4.1 J 8.1 6.8 6.8 1.4 J 23,000 None
Copper 62 300 2300 61 36 58 360 40 77 10 21 96 74 56 41 31 8.7 None 160,000
Iron 24000 95000 45000 19000 22000 30000 150000 22000 91000 9900 15000 22000 28000 31000 22000 20000 8100 None None
Lead 1100 2000 1600 18 41 32 1400 25 260 9.2 14 44 55 260 230 150 5.9 None 800
Magnesium 7800 13000 9200 3100 4800 640 3100 11000 3700 970 6300 1600 3000 3500 2700 3200 510 None None
Manganese 470 860 680 170 400 620 790 370 760 150 220 450 380 440 380 560 91 None None
Mercury 0.29 57 8 0.044J 0.080 J <0.10 6.2 0.051 J 1.1 <0.12 0.017J 0.069 J 0.15 0.60 0.54 0.25 0.035 J 290 3.1
Nickel 24 34 14 25 27 37 56 44 36 7.7 14 34 37 26 28 43 10 44,000 74,000
Potassium 920 850 J 770 320 J 720 B 440 J 470 J 730 1700 650 660 530 B 490 J B 810 B 740 B 790 B 150 J B None None
Selenium 0.71 5.5 2.3 0.49 <0.51 0.54 2.3 <0.47 4.7 1.4 0.83 0.62 0.85 9.4 4.6 0.73 <0.41 15,000 20,000
Silver 1.0 3.7 0.23 J <0.45 <0.51 <0.47 <0.60 <0.47 0.96 J <0.50 <0.40 <0.45 <0.51 0.63 0.66 0.17 J <0.41 15,000 20,000
Sodium 510 J 960 J 190 J 130 J 290 J 94 J 180 J 77 J 210 J 350 J 490 810 610 110 J 81 J 210 J 100 J None None
Thallium <1.2 1.5 J <0.96 <0.90 <1.0 <0.93 1.6 <0.93 1.2 J <1.0 <0.80 <0.91 <1.0 <1.2 <0.87 <0.95 <0.82 230 None
Vanadium 20 24 19 8.5 17 14 23J 14 30 12 15 10 10 18 13 16 4.6 26,000 None
Zinc 390 4500 1300 26 92 46 1000 71 700 19 34 100 66 500 300 150 11 880,000 1,000,000
Detection greater than Reporting Limit
Concentration between Reporting Limit and Method Detection Limit
Concentration greater than VAP commercial/industrial exposure value for direct-contact with a single chemical (either March 2009 or August 1, 2014 values)
VAP standards contained in OAC 3745-300-08
* Chromium VAP Direct Contact Concentrations provided for Chromium VI
B = Method blank contamination
VAP
Commercial/I
ndustrial
Generic
Direct-
Contact Soil
Standard for
a Single
Chemical
(Efffective
August 1,
2014)
VAP
Commercial/
Industrial
Generic
Direct-
Contact Soil
Standard for
a Single
Chemical
(Effective
March 2009)
Table 8. Analytical results for metals in soils compared to VAP generic direct contact soil values for commercial/industrial exposure .
48
4.3.3 Total VOC Results in Soil
One sample was collected from each of the ten borings for the 48 VOCs in the “target
compound list”. Samples were collected from intervals ranging from the ground surface to 12
feet below the ground surface. Samples were analyzed by Method 8260B. Due to an oversight
by Federal Express, the samples collected on March 21, 2014 from borings BW-7, BW-8, BW-9
and BW-10 were delivered to the laboratory late and were past the method holding time. These
samples were analyzed, but additional samples were re-taken at the same intervals in companion
borings BW-7A, BW-8A, BW-9A and BW-10A on March 31, 2014. Therefore, a total of 14
samples were analyzed.
Table 9 shows the 48 VOCs in the “target compound list” that were analyzed. Table 10
shows the analytical results only for those VOCs that were detected. Boring number and depth
from which the sample was collected, as well as the generic direct contact soil values for a single
chemical for construction/excavation, residential, and commercial/industrial activities from the
Appendix of OAC 3745-300-08 (both March 2009 and August 1, 2014) are also shown on Table
10. Appendices E, F, G, H, and I contain the laboratory results. The results show that no VOCs
were detected above the laboratory reporting limit, thus no generic direct soil contact values
were exceeded. The table shows data from the four samples which were analyzed outside the
holding time and the re-collected samples that were analyzed within the method holding time.
The results are comparable.
4.3.4 Total SVOC Results in Soil
Seventeen samples were collected in the ten borings for the 65 SVOCs in the “target
compound list” (Table 11). Samples were collected in the fill from intervals ranging from 1.5 to
12 feet below the ground surface. Samples were analyzed by Method 8270C. Table 11 shows
the 65 SVOCs in the “target compound list” that were analyzed. Table 12 shows the analytical
results, boring and depth from which the sample was collected, as well as the VAP generic direct
contact soil standard for a single chemical for construction/excavation activities from the
Appendix of OAC 3745-300-08 (both March 2009 and August 1, 2014). Appendices E, F, G and
H contain the laboratory results. The results show that only one constituent, benzo[a]pyrene
exceeded the generic direct contact soil standards for construction/excavation activities in one
boring.
When results are compared to generic direct contact soil standards for residential use, the
results show that six constituents: benz[a]anthracene, benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene,
benzo[k]fluoranthene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene, and indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene are exceeded in at
least one interval in at least one boring (Table 13). Similarly, when results are compared to
generic direct contact soil standards for commercial/industrial use, the results show that five of
the same constituents: benz[a]anthracene, benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene,
dibenz(a,h)anthracene, and indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene are exceeded in at least one interval in one
boring (Table 14).
Table 9. “Target compound list” of VOCs analyzed in soil.
1,1,1-Trichloroethane Acetone Ethylbenzene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Benzene Ethylene Dibromide
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-
trifluoroethane
Bromoform Isopropylbenzene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane Bromomethane Methyl acetate
1,1-Dichloroethane Carbon disulfide Methyl tert-butyl ether
1,1-Dichloroethene Carbon tetrachloride Methylcyclohexane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Chlorobenzene Methylene Chloride
1,2-Dibromo-3-
Chloropropane
Chlorodibromomethane Styrene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene Chloroethane Tetrachloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane Chloroform Toluene
1,2-Dichloropropane Chloromethane trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene cis-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene
2-Butanone (MEK) Cyclohexane Trichlorofluoromethane
2-Hexanone Dichlorobromomethane Vinyl chloride
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
(MIBK)
Dichlorodifluoromethane Xylenes, Total
BORING NUMBER BW1 BW2 BW3 BW4 BW6 BW6 BW7 BW7A BW8 BW8A BW9 BW9A BW10 BW10A
Depth 10-12 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 4-6 Ft 1-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 4-6 Ft 4-6 Ft 0-2 Ft 0-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft
Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/31/2014 3/21/2014 3/31/2014 3/21/2014 3/31/2014 3/21/2014 3/31/2014
PARAMETER mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0037 0.00017 J B 0.00027 J B <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.0025 None 400 None 150 None 400
2-Butanone (MEK) 0.0014 J <0.011 <0.015 <0.013 <0.0097 <0.014 0.00085 J H <0.010 <0.014 <0.0093 <0.011 <0.012 <0.013 <0.010 15,000 28,000 37,000 28,000 100,000 28,000
Acetone 0.0057 J <0.011 <0.015 <0.013 0.0095 J <0.014 <0.011 <0.010 <0.014 <0.0093 <0.011 0.0070 J <0.013 <0.010 100,000 110,000 64,000 110,000 100,000 110,000
Isopropylbenzene <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0037 0.00060 J <0.0024 <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.0025 None None 260 None 260 None
Methyl acetate 0.0014 J <0.0057 <0.0073 <0.0064 <0.0048 <0.0069 <0.0057 <0.0051 <0.0069 <0.0046 <0.0055 <0.0060 <0.0066 <0.0051 None None None None None None
Methylene Chloride <0.0035 0.00053 J <0.0037 <0.0032 <0.0024 <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 0.00041 J <0.0033 <0.0025 1,500 3,300 250 750 570 3,300
Styrene <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0037 <0.0032 0.000093 J <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.0025 1,700 870 1,700 870 1,700 870
Toluene <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0037 0.00021 J <0.0024 <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.0025 520 820 520 820 520 820
Concentration between Reporting Limit and Method Detection Limit
B = Method blank contamination
VAP standards contained in OAC 3745-300-08
Table 10. Analytical results for VOCs detected in soil compared to VAP generic direct contact soil values construction/excavation, residential, and commercial/industrial exposures.
VAP
Construction/
Excavation
Generic Direct
Contact Soil
Standard for a
Single
Chemical
(Effective
March 2009)
VAP
Commercial/
IndustrialGe
neric Direct
Contact Soil
Standard for
a Single
Chemical
(Effective
August 1,
2014)
VAP
Commercial/I
ndustrial
Generic
Direct
Contact Soil
Standard for
a Single
Chemical
(Effective
March 2009)
VAP
Construction/
Excavation
Generic Direct
Contact Soil
Standard for a
Single
Chemical
(Effective
August 1,
2014)
VAP
Residential
Generic Direct
Contact Soil
Standard for a
Single
Chemical
(Effective
March 2009)
VAP
Residential
Generic Direct
Contact Soil
Standard for a
Single
Chemical
(Effective
August 1,
2014)
Table 11. “Target compound list” of SVOCs analyzed in soil.
1,1'-Biphenyl 4-Nitroaniline Dibenzofuran
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Diethyl phthalate
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol Acenaphthene Dimethyl phthalate
2,4-Dichlorophenol Acenaphthylene Di-n-butyl phthalate
2,4-Dimethylphenol Acetophenone Di-n-octyl phthalate
2,4-Dinitrophenol Anthracene Fluoranthene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene Atrazine Fluorene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene Benzaldehyde Hexachlorobenzene
2-Chloronaphthalene Benzo[a]anthracene Hexachlorobutadiene
2-Chlorophenol Benzo[a]pyrene Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2-Methylnaphthalene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Hexachloroethane
2-Methylphenol Benzo[g,h,i]perylene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
2-Nitroaniline Benzo[k]fluoranthene Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol bis (2-chloroisopropyl)
ether
Naphthalene
3 & 4 Methylphenol Bis(2-
chloroethoxy)methane
Nitrobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
3-Nitroaniline Bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
4,6-Dinitro-2-
methylphenol
Butyl benzyl phthalate Pentachlorophenol
4-Bromophenyl phenyl
ether
Caprolactam Phenanthrene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol Carbazole Phenol
4-Chloroaniline Chrysene Pyrene
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl
ether
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Dibenzofuran
BORING NUMBER BW1 BW1 BW2 BW3 BW3 BW4 BW4 BW5 BW5 BW6 BW6 BW7 BW7 BW8 BW8 BW9 BW10
Depth 4-6 Ft 10-12 Ft 2-4 Ft 1.5-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 8-10 Ft 1-2 Ft 10-11 Ft 1-2 Ft 4-6 Ft 2-4 Ft 6-8 Ft 4-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft
Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014
PARAMETER mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
1,1'-Biphenyl <0.250 <53 0.016 J 0.0093 J 0.0066 J 0.040 J <0.330 0.033 J <0.57 <0.056 0.0067 J 0.036 J 0.049 J 0.016 J 0.023 J 0.013 J 0.025 J None 190,000
2-Methylnaphthalene 0.033 3.7 J 0.047 0.045 0.038 0.19 0.1 0.091 0.096 0.028 0.033 0.12 0.55 0.09 0.13 0.057 0.12 None 5,200
Acenaphthene <0.033 19 0.12 0.024 0.021 0.043 0.1 0.039 0.055 J <0.0074 0.012 0.4 0.19 0.073 0.089 0.093 0.029 440,000 780,000
Acenaphthylene <0.033 75 0.057 <0.0072 0.0044 J <0.018 0.032 J 0.015 <0.076 <0.0074 <0.0073 0.016 0.024 0.036 0.039 0.013 <0.030 None None
Acetophenone <0.49 <110 <0.29 <0.11 <0.12 0.028 J <0.66 <0.22 <1.1 <0.11 <0.11 0.027 J 0.088 J <0.24 <0.3 0.012 J <0.450 850,000 2,500
Anthracene 0.027 J 170 0.3 0.017 0.014 0.063 0.21 0.084 0.3 <0.0074 0.021 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.18 0.047 0.09 1,000,000 1,000,000
Benzaldehyde 0.0240 J <110 0.063 J <0.11 <0.12 <0.27 0.19 J <0.22 <1.1 <0.11 <0.11 0.036 J 0.076 J 0.038 J <0.3 0.024 J <0.45 None None
Benz[a]anthracene 0.15 420 1 0.2 0.15 0.87 1.8 0.62 6.1 0.034 0.13 0.81 0.69 0.98 1.1 0.43 0.91 680 1,200
Benzo[a]pyrene 0.46 370 1 0.32 0.25 1.6 3.2 0.97 5.4 0.33 0.2 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.5 0.81 2.2 69 120
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.41 420 1.4 0.58 0.37 2.5 3.9 1.6 5 0.57 0.33 1.9 2.1 1.7 2.7 1.3 3.4 690 1,200
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.5 200 0.65 0.39 0.3 2.4 3 1.4 4.2 1.1 0.23 1.7 0.51 1.2 0.6 0.41 1.1 None None
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.087 180 0.49 0.17 0.14 0.76 1.6 0.48 0.92 0.15 0.082 0.74 0.54 0.66 0.61 0.32 0.93 6,900 12,000
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate <0.340 <75 <0.2 0.035 J B <0.083 <0.19 <0.47 <0.15 <0.8 0.027 J B 0.1 B 0.043 J 0.063 J B <0.17 0.064 J B 0.04 J B <0.31 190 71,000
Carbazole <0.25 <53 0.098 J <0.054 <0.059 <0.13 <0.33 <0.11 <0.57 <0.056 <0.055 <0.11 <0.11 0.11 J 0.12 J <0.057 <0.22 30,000 None
Chrysene 0.19 380 1.1 0.27 0.21 1.2 1.9 0.76 9.5 0.65 0.18 0.99 0.79 1.1 1.3 0.48 1.1 69,000 120,000
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.33 59 0.18 0.095 0.064 0.54 0.72 0.3 3.6 0.24 0.06 0.38 0.14 0.27 0.17 0.1 0.24 69 120
Dibenzofuran <0.25 27 J 0.071 J 0.017 J 0.013 J 0.066 J 0.061 J 0.037 J 0.050 J 0.016 J 0.012 J 0.084 J 0.14 0.039 J 0.065 J 0.026 J 0.044 J None None
Di-n-butyl phthalate <0.34 <75 <0.2 <0.075 <0.083 <0.19 <0.47 <0.15 <0.8 <0.078 20.01 J <0.16 <0.16 <0.17 <0.21 0.035 J B <0.31 110 None
Fluoranthene 0.2 980 2 0.22 0.18 0.79 1.7 0.8 1.7 0.016 0.22 0.82 0.75 1.6 1.8 0.48 0.94 290,000 160,000
Fluorene <0.033 67 0.1 0.0064 J 0.0061 J 0.021 0.056 0.021 0.1 <0.0074 <0.0073 0.08 0.056 0.039 0.057 0.017 0.043 290,000 520,000
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.26 180 0.53 0.29 0.22 1.7 2.4 1 2.2 0.78 0.16 1.2 0.44 0.91 0.51 0.33 0.85 690 1,200
Naphthalene <0.033 13 0.08 0.033 0.024 0.13 0.1 0.086 0.19 0.017 0.022 0.13 0.37 0.083 0.15 0.048 0.094 84 560
Pentachlorophenol <0.74 <160 <0.44 <0.16 <0.18 <0.4 0.3 J <0.33 <1.7 <0.17 <0.17 <0.34 <0.33 <0.36 <0.45 <0.17 <0.67 460 950
Phenanthrene 0.1 570 1.3 0.11 0.086 0.4 0.8 0.4 1.2 0.03 0.12 0.51 0.63 0.7 0.93 0.24 0.43 None None
Pyrene 0.16 800 1.8 0.19 0.18 0.73 1.6 0.69 2.3 0.014 0.19 0.87 0.81 1.5 1.8 0.47 1 220,000 390,000
Detection greater than Reporting Limit
Concentration between Reporting Limit and Method Detection Limit
Concentration greater than VAP construction/excavation activities value for direct-contact with a single chemical (either March 2009 or August 1, 2014)
B = Method blank contamination
VAP standards contained in 3745-300-08
* Chromium VAP Direct Contact Concentrations provided for Chromium VI
VAP
Construction/
Excavation
Generic
Direct-
Contact Soil
Standard for
a Single
Chemical
(Effective
March 2009)
VAP
Construction/
Excavation
Generic
Direct-
Contact Soil
Standard for a
Single
Chemical
(Effective
August 1,
2014)
Table 12. Analytical results for SVOCs detected in soil compared to VAP generic contact soil values for construction/excavation activities.
BORING NUMBER BW1 BW1 BW2 BW3 BW3 BW4 BW4 BW5 BW5 BW6 BW6 BW7 BW7 BW8 BW8 BW9 BW10
Depth 4-6 Ft 10-12 Ft 2-4 Ft 1.5-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 8-10 Ft 1-2 Ft 10-11 Ft 1-2 Ft 4-6 Ft 2-4 Ft 6-8 Ft 4-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft
Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014
PARAMETER mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
1,1'-Biphenyl <0.250 <53 0.016 J 0.0093 J 0.0066 J 0.040 J <0.330 0.033 J <0.57 <0.056 0.0067 J 0.036 J 0.049 J 0.016 J 0.023 J 0.013 J 0.025 J None 1,600
2-Methylnaphthalene 0.033 3.7 J 0.047 0.045 0.038 0.19 0.1 0.091 0.096 0.028 0.033 0.12 0.55 0.09 0.13 0.057 0.12 None 460
Acenaphthene <0.033 19 0.12 0.024 0.021 0.043 0.1 0.039 0.055 J <0.0074 0.012 0.4 0.19 0.073 0.089 0.093 0.029 3,500 6,900
Acenaphthylene <0.033 75 0.057 <0.0072 0.0044 J <0.018 0.032 J 0.015 <0.076 <0.0074 <0.0073 0.016 0.024 0.036 0.039 0.013 <0.030 None None
Acetophenone <0.49 <110 <0.29 <0.11 <0.12 0.028 J <0.66 <0.22 <1.1 <0.11 <0.11 0.027 J 0.088 J <0.24 <0.3 0.012 J <0.450 6,300 2,500
Anthracene 0.027 J 170 0.3 0.017 0.014 0.063 0.21 0.084 0.3 <0.0074 0.021 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.18 0.047 0.09 18,000 34,000
Benzaldehyde 0.0240 J <110 0.063 J <0.11 <0.12 <0.27 0.19 J <0.22 <1.1 <0.11 <0.11 0.036 J 0.076 J 0.038 J <0.3 0.024 J <0.45 None None
Benz[a]anthracene 0.15 420 1 0.2 0.15 0.87 1.8 0.62 6.1 0.034 0.13 0.81 0.69 0.98 1.1 0.43 0.91 11 12
Benzo[a]pyrene 0.46 370 1 0.32 0.25 1.6 3.2 0.97 5.4 0.33 0.2 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.5 0.81 2.2 1.1 1.2
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.41 420 1.4 0.58 0.37 2.5 3.9 1.6 5 0.57 0.33 1.9 2.1 1.7 2.7 1.3 3.4 11 12
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.5 200 0.65 0.39 0.3 2.4 3 1.4 4.2 1.1 0.23 1.7 0.51 1.2 0.6 0.41 1.1 None None
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.087 180 0.49 0.17 0.14 0.76 1.6 0.48 0.92 0.15 0.082 0.74 0.54 0.66 0.61 0.32 0.93 110 120
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate <0.340 <75 <0.2 0.035 J B <0.083 <0.19 <0.47 <0.15 <0.8 0.027 J B 0.1 B 0.043 J 0.063 J B <0.17 0.064 J B 0.04 J B <0.31 190 690
Carbazole <0.25 <53 0.098 J <0.054 <0.059 <0.13 <0.33 <0.11 <0.57 <0.056 <0.055 <0.11 <0.11 0.11 J 0.12 J <0.057 <0.22 430 None
Chrysene 0.19 380 1.1 0.27 0.21 1.2 1.9 0.76 9.5 0.65 0.18 0.99 0.79 1.1 1.3 0.48 1.1 1,100 1,200
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.33 59 0.18 0.095 0.064 0.54 0.72 0.3 3.6 0.24 0.06 0.38 0.14 0.27 0.17 0.1 0.24 1.1 1.2
Dibenzofuran <0.25 27 J 0.071 J 0.017 J 0.013 J 0.066 J 0.061 J 0.037 J 0.050 J 0.016 J 0.012 J 0.084 J 0.14 0.039 J 0.065 J 0.026 J 0.044 J None None
Di-n-butyl phthalate <0.34 <75 <0.2 <0.075 <0.083 <0.19 <0.47 <0.15 <0.8 <0.078 20.01 J <0.16 <0.16 <0.17 <0.21 0.035 J B <0.31 110 None
Fluoranthene 0.2 980 2 0.22 0.18 0.79 1.7 0.8 1.7 0.016 0.22 0.82 0.75 1.6 1.8 0.48 0.94 2,400 4,600
Fluorene <0.033 67 0.1 0.0064 J 0.0061 J 0.021 0.056 0.021 0.1 <0.0074 <0.0073 0.08 0.056 0.039 0.057 0.017 0.043 2,400 4,600
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.26 180 0.53 0.29 0.22 1.7 2.4 1 2.2 0.78 0.16 1.2 0.44 0.91 0.51 0.33 0.85 11 12
Naphthalene <0.033 13 0.08 0.033 0.024 0.13 0.1 0.086 0.19 0.017 0.022 0.13 0.37 0.083 0.15 0.048 0.094 69 90
Pentachlorophenol <0.74 <160 <0.44 <0.16 <0.18 <0.4 0.3 J <0.33 <1.7 <0.17 <0.17 <0.34 <0.33 <0.36 <0.45 <0.17 <0.67 55 18
Phenanthrene 0.1 570 1.3 0.11 0.086 0.4 0.8 0.4 1.2 0.03 0.12 0.51 0.63 0.7 0.93 0.24 0.43 None None
Pyrene 0.16 800 1.8 0.19 0.18 0.73 1.6 0.69 2.3 0.014 0.19 0.87 0.81 1.5 1.8 0.47 1 1,800 3,400
Detection greater than Reporting Limit
Concentration between Reporting Limit and Method Detection Limit
Concentration greater than VAP residential exposure value for direct-contact with a single chemical (either March 2009 or August 1, 2014 values)
B = Method blank contamination
VAP standards contained in 3745-300-08
* Chromium VAP Direct Contact Concentrations provided for Chromium VI
VAP
Residential
Generic
Direct-
Contact Soil
Standard for
a Single
Chemical
(Effective
March 2009)
VAP
Residential
Generic
Direct-
Contact Soil
Standard for a
Single
Chemical
(Effective
August 1,
2014)
Table 13. Analytical results for SVOCs detected in soil compared to VAP generic contact soil values for residential exposure.
BORING NUMBER BW1 BW1 BW2 BW3 BW3 BW4 BW4 BW5 BW5 BW6 BW6 BW7 BW7 BW8 BW8 BW9 BW10
Depth 4-6 Ft 10-12 Ft 2-4 Ft 1.5-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 8-10 Ft 1-2 Ft 10-11 Ft 1-2 Ft 4-6 Ft 2-4 Ft 6-8 Ft 4-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft
Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014
PARAMETER mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
1,1'-Biphenyl <0.250 <53 0.016 J 0.0093 J 0.0066 J 0.040 J <0.330 0.033 J <0.57 <0.056 0.0067 J 0.036 J 0.049 J 0.016 J 0.023 J 0.013 J 0.025 J None 14,000
2-Methylnaphthalene 0.033 3.7 J 0.047 0.045 0.038 0.19 0.1 0.091 0.096 0.028 0.033 0.12 0.55 0.09 0.13 0.057 0.12 360 6,000
Acenaphthene <0.033 19 0.12 0.024 0.021 0.043 0.1 0.039 0.055 J <0.0074 0.012 0.4 0.19 0.073 0.089 0.093 0.029 56,000 90,000
Acenaphthylene <0.033 75 0.057 <0.0072 0.0044 J <0.018 0.032 J 0.015 <0.076 <0.0074 <0.0073 0.016 0.024 0.036 0.039 0.013 <0.030 None None
Acetophenone <0.49 <110 <0.29 <0.11 <0.12 0.028 J <0.66 <0.22 <1.1 <0.11 <0.11 0.027 J 0.088 J <0.24 <0.3 0.012 J <0.450 110,000 2,500
Anthracene 0.027 J 170 0.3 0.017 0.014 0.063 0.21 0.084 0.3 <0.0074 0.021 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.18 0.047 0.09 280,000 450,000
Benzaldehyde 0.0240 J <110 0.063 J <0.11 <0.12 <0.27 0.19 J <0.22 <1.1 <0.11 <0.11 0.036 J 0.076 J 0.038 J <0.3 0.024 J <0.45 None None
Benz[a]anthracene 0.15 420 1 0.2 0.15 0.87 1.8 0.62 6.1 0.034 0.13 0.81 0.69 0.98 1.1 0.43 0.91 76 58
Benzo[a]pyrene 0.46 370 1 0.32 0.25 1.6 3.2 0.97 5.4 0.33 0.2 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.5 0.81 2.2 7.7 5.8
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.41 420 1.4 0.58 0.37 2.5 3.9 1.6 5 0.57 0.33 1.9 2.1 1.7 2.7 1.3 3.4 77 58
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.5 200 0.65 0.39 0.3 2.4 3 1.4 4.2 1.1 0.23 1.7 0.51 1.2 0.6 0.41 1.1 None None
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.087 180 0.49 0.17 0.14 0.76 1.6 0.48 0.92 0.15 0.082 0.74 0.54 0.66 0.61 0.32 0.93 770 580
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate <0.340 <75 <0.2 0.035 J B <0.083 <0.19 <0.47 <0.15 <0.8 0.027 J B 0.1 B 0.043 J 0.063 J B <0.17 0.064 J B 0.04 J B <0.31 190 3,500
Carbazole <0.25 <53 0.098 J <0.054 <0.059 <0.13 <0.33 <0.11 <0.57 <0.056 <0.055 <0.11 <0.11 0.11 J 0.12 J <0.057 <0.22 3,400 None
Chrysene 0.19 380 1.1 0.27 0.21 1.2 1.9 0.76 9.5 0.65 0.18 0.99 0.79 1.1 1.3 0.48 1.1 7,600 5,800
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.33 59 0.18 0.095 0.064 0.54 0.72 0.3 3.6 0.24 0.06 0.38 0.14 0.27 0.17 0.1 0.24 7.7 5.8
Dibenzofuran <0.25 27 J 0.071 J 0.017 J 0.013 J 0.066 J 0.061 J 0.037 J 0.050 J 0.016 J 0.012 J 0.084 J 0.14 0.039 J 0.065 J 0.026 J 0.044 J None None
Di-n-butyl phthalate <0.34 <75 <0.2 <0.075 <0.083 <0.19 <0.47 <0.15 <0.8 <0.078 20.01 J <0.16 <0.16 <0.17 <0.21 0.035 J B <0.31 110 None
Fluoranthene 0.2 980 2 0.22 0.18 0.79 1.7 0.8 1.7 0.016 0.22 0.82 0.75 1.6 1.8 0.48 0.94 37,000 60,000
Fluorene <0.033 67 0.1 0.0064 J 0.0061 J 0.021 0.056 0.021 0.1 <0.0074 <0.0073 0.08 0.056 0.039 0.057 0.017 0.043 37,000 60,000
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.26 180 0.53 0.29 0.22 1.7 2.4 1 2.2 0.78 0.16 1.2 0.44 0.91 0.51 0.33 0.85 77 58
Naphthalene <0.033 13 0.08 0.033 0.024 0.13 0.1 0.086 0.19 0.017 0.022 0.13 0.37 0.083 0.15 0.048 0.094 150 450
Pentachlorophenol <0.74 <160 <0.44 <0.16 <0.18 <0.4 0.3 J <0.33 <1.7 <0.17 <0.17 <0.34 <0.33 <0.36 <0.45 <0.17 <0.67 280 67
Phenanthrene 0.1 570 1.3 0.11 0.086 0.4 0.8 0.4 1.2 0.03 0.12 0.51 0.63 0.7 0.93 0.24 0.43 None None
Pyrene 0.16 800 1.8 0.19 0.18 0.73 1.6 0.69 2.3 0.014 0.19 0.87 0.81 1.5 1.8 0.47 1 28,000 45,000
Detection greater than Reporting Limit
Concentration between Reporting Limit and Method Detection Limit
Concentration greater than VAP commerecial/industrial exposure value for direct-contact with a single chemical (either March 2009 or August 1, 2014)
B = Method blank contamination
VAP standards contained in 3745-300-08
* Chromium VAP Direct Contact Concentrations provided for Chromium VI
VAP
Commercial/
Industrial
Generic
Direct-
Contact Soil
Standard for
a Single
Chemical
(Effective
March 2009)
VAP
Commercial/
Industrial
Generic
Direct-
Contact Soil
Standard for
a Single
Chemical
(Effective
August 1,
2014)
Table 14. Analytical results for SVOCs detected in soil compared to VAP generic contact soil values for commercial/industrial exposure.
55
4.3.5 GRO and DRO Results in Soil
Two samples were collected for GRO (C-6 to C-10) and DRO (C-10-C-28) from two
separate borings. Samples were collected from the fill from depths of 6 to 8 and 8 to 9 feet
below the ground surface. Samples were analyzed by Method 8015C. Table 15 shows the
analytical results, boring and depth from which the sample was collected, as well as the Ohio
EPA DERR petroleum action level for Category 1 (the most vulnerable category). Soil TPH
(GRO) petroleum action levels range from 105 ppm (Category 1) to 600 ppm (Category 4) (Ohio
EPA, 2005a). Soil TPH (DRO) petroleum action levels range from 380 ppm (Category 1) to
1156 ppm (Category 4) (Ohio EPA, 2005a). Appendices E and H contain the laboratory results.
The results show that no DERR petroleum action levels were exceeded.
Table 15. Analytical results for gasoline range organics (GRO) and diesel range
organics (GRO) in soil.
BORING NUMBER BW2 BW10 DERR
Petroleum
Action Levels
Depth 8-9 Ft 6-8 Ft
Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/21/2014
PARAMETER mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
Gasoline Range Organics [C6 - C10] <0.12 <0.11 105*
Diesel Range Organics [C10 - C28] 41 68 380*
* Action levels are for Category 1 (the most conservative)
4.3.6 Soil Results Summary
The VAP generic direct contact soil standards were used as a comparison for magnitude
of concentrations and to quickly ascertain whether or not excavation and handling of soils may
be a potential issue. First, because there were no VOCs detected above the laboratory reporting
limit, no issues relating to VOCs were identified in this investigation. However, analytical
results indicated that concentrations of three metals (arsenic, lead and mercury) in at least one
boring may pose a potential handling issue and need to be investigated further. Similarly,
concentrations of one SVOC (benzo[a]pyrene) were indicated as a potential contaminant of
concern.
Based on the results for a construction/excavation scenario, a more conservative approach
of comparing soil results to VAP residential exposure values was undertaken, even though the
assumptions of a 30-year exposure by residents were clearly not comparative to an average
tenure of 14 days at the facility and an anticipated maximum tenure of one year (based on the
fact that misdemeanor sentences under ORC 2929.29 can add to 360 days). Similarly, it was
anticipated that any residents would have direct contact with the soil inside a building or in a
paved parking lot. When this comparison was undertaken, concentrations of six metals
(antimony, arsenic, chromium, copper, lead, and mercury) exceeded VAP residential use values.
56
Similarly, six SVOCs (benz[a]anthracene, benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene,
benzo[k]fluoranthene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene, and indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene) also exceeded
residential use values.
Finally, results were compared to a commercial/industrial exposure scenario to evaluate
potential exposure of an employee at the facility. Again, the values for this scenario assume that
the worker would have direct contact with the soil for 25 years, when it is known that the worker
would not be directly exposed to soil within a building or a paved parking lot. Results of
comparison of measured analytical results to VAP values for commercial/industrial exposure
showed that four metals (arsenic, chromium, lead, and mercury) as well as five of the same
SVOCs (benz[a]anthracene, benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene, and
indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene) exceeded the VAP values.
Although analytical concentrations of VOCs, GRO, and DRO posed no site issues, based
on the results for selected metals and SVOCs at the site, it was determined that a site-specific
risk assessment should be undertaken to further evaluate potential pathways and potential
exposures that might need to be addressed during construction/excavation activities. Risk
assessment is addressed in Section 5.
4.4 Characterization of Groundwater in the Fill Materials
4.4.1 Introduction
At the time the investigation was begun, it was known that previous subsurface
investigations had encountered saturation within the fill materials. When this investigation was
conducted, saturation was encountered in only two of the borings (that seemed to loosely
correspond to the location of the abandoned Hocking River channel), and only with minimal
depth of water. However, temporary monitoring wells were installed at these two locations.
Groundwater samples were subsequently collected, even though it was not possible to reduce the
turbidity of the samples due to the shallowness of the water (one half foot in one well and 1.5
feet of water in the other well).
Samples were collected for analysis of total metals, but due to the excessive turbidity in
the samples (the water was black and opaque), it was anticipated that the metals concentrations
would be artificially high due to the “release” of metals sorbed to the fine particles when nitric
acid was added in the field to preserve the sample for laboratory transport (a typical and
necessary part of collection of water samples for metals analysis). In this situation, where metals
are released into suspension as part of the acidification process, the metals results are typically
artificially high and not representative of the groundwater quality. Typically, this situation is
remedied by developing a permanent well or by changing the sample collection method to
minimize the turbidity (such as low flow sampling). However, due to the small amount of water
in the well, minimizing the turbidity by changing sample collection methods was not possible.
In order to collect representative samples for metals in this situation, a second sample
was collected for dissolved metals. In this situation, the sample is filtered to reduce the turbidity
prior to adding the nitric acid for sample preservation and transport. If the results are widely
57
variable between the two samples, the dissolved sample is used as representative of groundwater
quality.
Results from water samples are compared to Primary and Secondary Drinking Water
Standards established by USEPA and incorporated in OAC 3745-81. Primary drinking water
standards are legally-enforceable standards that apply to public drinking water systems.
However, these standards are frequently used as default groundwater standards, particularly
where groundwater is used as a source of drinking water. Maximum Contaminant Levels
(MCLs) are established based on potential health effects from long-term exposure above the
MCL (unless exposure is specified as short-term).
Secondary drinking water standards (also established by USEPA are non-mandatory
water quality standards that are established only as for aesthetic considerations, such as taste,
color and odor. These contaminants are not considered to present a risk to human health at the
established standard.
4.4.2 Total and Dissolved Metals Results in Groundwater Within the Fill
Samples were collected from the two temporary monitoring wells and analyzed for the 23
metals in the “target analyte list”. Samples were analyzed by Methods 6010B/7470B. Tables 16
and 17 show the analytical results for total and dissolved metals, respectively, temporary
monitoring well number and method detection limit as well as the primary and secondary
drinking water standards from OAC 3745-81. It is important to note that lead and copper are
regulated by a treatment technique that requires systems to control the corrosiveness of their
water. Copper also has a secondary drinking water standard based on aesthetic conditions.
Appendix I contains the laboratory results.
The results for total metals in the samples (Table 16) show that ten metals (antimony,
arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury and selenium) exceed the
primary drinking water standards. Similarly, five metals (aluminum, iron, manganese, silver,
and zinc) exceed their respective secondary drinking water standards. However, Table 17 shows
that in the dissolved samples, only arsenic in one well exceeds the primary drinking water
standards. Similarly, in the dissolved metals samples, two secondary drinking water standards
(iron and manganese) are exceeded. Based on these results, it is clear that the total metals are
strongly influenced by the turbidity of the sample and that the dissolved results are representative
of the concentrations of metals in the groundwater in the fill.
It should be noted that both Table 16 and Table 17 have columns for the laboratory
reporting limit as well as the method detection limit. Although the laboratory can “detect” the
presence of the analyte at the listed concentration, the laboratory reporting limit represents the
limit at which the laboratory can reliably quantify the result. This is similar to an eye
examination wherein you can see letters on one line of the eye chart, but are not quite sure that
you can accurately identify all of them. This is similar to the detection limit. However, the next
larger line in the eye chart allows you not only to know the numbers are there, but also to
identify them with accuracy. This is similar to the laboratory reporting limit.
Table 16. Analytical results for total metals in groundwater in the fill.
WELL NUMBER BW1 BW4 Laboratory Method Primary Secondary
Sample Date 03/31/2014 03/31/2014 Reporting Detection Drinking Water Drinking Water
Water Water Limit Limit Standard Standard
Parameter mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
Aluminum 59 100 0.2 0.097 0.05-0.2
Antimony 0.020 0.035 0.010 0.0021 0.006
Arsenic 0.210 0.700 0.010 0.0032 0.010
Barium 6.3 B 4.9 B 0.2 0.00067 2.0
Beryllium 0.0045J 0.0099 0.005 0.00046 0.004
Cadmium 0.018 1.2 0.002 0.00066 0.005
Calcium 350 B 250 B 5 0.13
Chromium 0.8 1.3 0.005 0.0022 0.1
Cobalt 0.024 0.12 0.007 0.0017
Copper 0.77 3.1 0.025 0.0045 1.3 1.0
Iron 230 480 0.1 0.081 0.3
Lead 4.5 18 0.015 0.0095* 0.015
Magnesium 59 44 5 0.034
Manganese 2.8 6 0.015 0.00096 0.05
Mercury 0.046 0.016 0.002* 0.0012* 0.002
Nickel 0.11 0.69 0.04 0.0032
Potassium 26 19 5 0.072
Selenium 0.014 7 0.005 0.0041 0.05
Silver 0.0097 0.85 0.005 0.0022 0.1
Sodium 330 59 5 0.59
Thallium < 0.01 0.0077 J 0.01 0.0047 0.002
Vanadium 0.068 0.25 0.007 0.0024
Zinc 11 B 29 B 0.25 0.025 5
Detection greater than Reporting Limit
Concentration between Reporting Limit and Method Detection Limit
Concentration greater than Primary Drinking Water Standard
Concentration greater than Secondary Drinking Water Standard
*Metal has different method detection limits and reporting limits. The highest limit is shown.
B = Method blank contamination
Table 17. Analytical results for dissolved metals in groundwater in the fill.
WELL NUMBER BW1 BW4 Laboratory Method Primary Secondary
Sample Date 03/31/2014 03/31/2014 Reporting Detection Drinking Water Drinking Water
Water Water Limit Limit Standard Standard
Parameter mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
Aluminum <0.2 <0.2 0.2 0.097 0.05-0.2
Antimony <0.010 <0.010 0.010 0.0021 0.006
Arsenic 0.0078 J 0.043 0.010 0.0032 0.010
Barium 0.4 B 0.21 B 0.2 0.00067 2.0
Beryllium <0.005 <0.005 0.005 0.00046 0.004
Cadmium <0.002 <0.002 0.002 0.00066 0.005
Calcium 290 B 160 B 5 0.13
Chromium 0.0033 J <0.005 0.005 0.0022 0.1
Cobalt <0.007 0.0037 J 0.007 0.0017
Copper <0.025 <0.025 0.025 0.0045 1.3 1
Iron 15 5.1 0.1 0.081 0.3
Lead 0.0027 J <0.003 0.015 0.0019 0.015
Magnesium 45 23 5 0.034
Manganese 1 1.1 0.015 0.00096 0.05
Mercury <0.002 <0.002 0.0004 0.0012 0.002
Nickel 0.0049 J 0.0094 J 0.04 0.0032
Potassium 17 8.7 5 0.072
Selenium <5.0 4.9J 0.005 0.0041 0.05
Silver <0.005 <0.005 0.005 0.0022 0.1
Sodium 360 62 5 0.59
Thallium < 0.01 < 0.01 0.01 0.0047 0.002
Vanadium <0.007 <0.007 0.007 0.0024
Zinc 0.047 JB 0.13 B 0.25 0.024 5
Detection greater than Reporting Limit
Concentration between Reporting Limit and Method Detection Limit
Concentration greater than Primary Drinking Water Standard
Concentration greater than Secondary Drinking Water Standard
B = Method blank contamination
60
Where the laboratory “detects” concentrations below the reporting limit, the estimated
result is displayed and the concentration is flagged with a “J”. On Tables 16 and 17, these values
are shaded in gray as well. Although the laboratory reporting limits are sometimes greater than
the primary drinking water standard for Method 6010B, the detection limits are always below
primary drinking water standard (except for thallium, which is 0.0027 mg/L higher than the
primary drinking water standard). Therefore, this method is acceptable for use when performing
analyses for presence/absence of metals, where absolute concentrations are not required under a
regulatory program.
With regard to the levels of iron and manganese detected at the site, these levels are
typical of many natural formations in Ohio, particularly in sand and gravel deposits. Many
public water supply systems have concentrations similar to these in one of more of their wells
and employ treatment to remove or reduce these constituents in a water treatment plant.
Therefore, these constituents are not determined to be a potential issue at the site.
With regard to the concentration of arsenic (0.043 mg/L) in temporary monitoring well
BW-4, although this concentration exceeds the primary drinking water standard, the value of
arsenic is relatively low. No detections of arsenic are noted in the finished water in the 2009
through 2013 Consumer Confidence Reports for the City of Lancaster, Ohio Miller Park
Wellfield water treatment plant (available online at the City of Lancaster, Ohio website).
4.4.3 VOC Results in Groundwater Within the Fill
Samples were collected from the two temporary monitoring wells and analyzed for the 48
VOCs in the “target compound list”. Samples were analyzed by Method 8260B. Table 18
shows the analytical results for the detected VOCs and the temporary monitoring well from
which the sample was collected. Appendix I contains the laboratory results.
The results for VOCs in the samples (Table 18) show that only three VOCs were detected
above the detection limit. Two of these (acetone and methylene) were also found in laboratory
samples called “blanks” (noted as a “B” on Table 18). Laboratory blanks are analyzed as part of
a quality assurance/quality control process to assess the accuracy of the laboratory analyses.
Both acetone and methylene chloride are common laboratory contaminants. When the chemical
is found in both the sample and the blank in low concentrations, the result is usually attributed to
laboratory contamination and discarded. The results from the water samples compare favorably
with the soil samples in that VOCs were not detected above the reporting limit in either the soils
or the water samples form the site.
61
Table 18. Analytical results for VOCs detected in groundwater in the fill.
WELL NUMBER BW1 BW4
TRIP
BLANK Laboratory Method
Sample Date 03/31/2014 03/31/2014 03/31/2014 Reporting Detection
Water Water Water Limit Limit
PARAMETER ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L
2-Butanone (MEK) <10 0.61 J <10 10 0.57
Acetone 3.0 J B 4.0 J B <10 10 1.1
Methylene Chloride <1.0 <1.0 0.41 J B 1 0.33
Concentration between Reporting Limit and Method
Detection Limit
B = Method blank
contamination
4.4.4 Groundwater Within the Fill Summary
Groundwater samples were collected from two temporary monitoring wells installed in
the saturated fill materials. Only .5 to 1.5 feet of water was present in the monitoring wells when
they were sampled. Although efforts were taken to minimize turbidity during sampling, the
water was excessively turbid. The water was black and affected the results of the total metals
samples when metals were de-sorbed and placed into solution when the sample was acidified.
Therefore, the dissolved metals sample was representative of the water quality within the fill.
No VOCs were detected above the reporting limit. Only one sample for arsenic in one of
the wells exceeded the primary drinking water standard for arsenic.
62
SECTION 5
RISK ASSESSMENT
5.1 Introduction
As described in previous sections, a preliminary indication of the magnitude of the
concentrations of the individual metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and semi-volatile
organic compounds (SVOCs), was obtained by comparing soils results to generic direct contact
soil standards found in the Voluntary Action Program (VAP) OAC 3745-300-08. Initially, the
results were compared to the construction/excavation scenario, but residential exposure and
commercial/industrial activities were also reviewed. Based on this preliminary evaluation, it was
determined that a site-specific risk assessment should be undertaken to further evaluate potential
pathways and potential exposures that might need to be addressed during
construction/excavation activities and during future occupation of the building.
5.2 Data Evaluation
Soil samples taken at different depths during drilling were collected as described in
Section 3.3. Analytical data from these samples forms the basis of the risk analysis detailed
below. Tables 19, 20, and 21 list the metals, VOCs and SVOCs, respectively, detected in
borings at the site. The following metals were detected above the reporting limit: aluminum,
antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead,
magnesium, manganese, mercury, nickel, potassium, selenium, silver, sodium, thallium,
vanadium and zinc (Table 19). Calcium, magnesium, iron, potassium and sodium were omitted
as chemicals of concern due to a lack of information on possible negative health effects caused
by these metals. Cobalt, copper, nickel and silver were omitted due to the extremely limited
toxicological data available for these metals. Thallium was not included as a chemical of
concern because it was only detected above the reporting limit in one sample from boring BW-4.
Lead was evaluated separately from the other chemicals of concern (COC), as recommended by
USEPA (Section 5-10). Therefore, the metals evaluated during the quantitative risk assessment
were: aluminum, antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, manganese,
mercury, selenium, vanadium and zinc.
No VOCs were detected in any sample above the laboratory reporting limits (Table 20).
Therefore, no VOCs were examined during this risk assessment. Several SVOCs were reported
above the laboratory detection limits: 2-methyl naphthalene, acenaphthene, acenaphthylene,
anthracene, benz[a]anthracene, benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[g,h,i]perylene,
benzo[k]fluoranthene, chrysene, dibenz[a,h]anthracene, dibenzofuran, fluoranthene, fluorene,
indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, naphthalene, phenanthrene and pyrene (Table 21). Dibenzofuran was
omitted from the risk assessment because it was only detected above the reporting limit in one
sample from boring BW-7. The remaining detected SVOCs were designated as COCs in the risk
assessment.
BORING NUMBER BW1 BW1 BW2 BW3 BW3 BW4 BW4 BW5 BW5 BW6 BW6 BW7 BW7 BW8 BW8 BW9 BW10
Depth 4-6 Ft 10-12 Ft 2-4 Ft 1.5-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 8-10 Ft 1-2 Ft 10-11 Ft 1-2 Ft 4-6 Ft 2-4 Ft 6-8 Ft 4-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft
Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014
PARAMETER mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
Aluminum 7500 5800 5700 2600 6500 4500 6800 4000 11000 4700 4600 5700 4500 5600 5300 6100 1400
Antimony 43 11 14 1.3 0.74 J 0.78 J <6.0 0.69 J 0.97 J <1.0 0.51 J 0.39 J 0.41 J 5.9 1.2 0.58 J <0.82
Arsenic 18 94 22 7.0 12 8.8 36 11 34 3.6 6.8 7.1 9.2 460 23 12 1.9
Barium 450 3300 500 27 68 B 61 920 32 220 22 27 57 B 44 B 170 B 160 B 120 B 11 J B
Beryllium 0.68 0.56 J 0.34 J 0.11 J 0.46 J 0.21 J 2.0 0.27 J 0.80 J 0.17 J 0.25 J 0.26 J 0.37 J 0.43 J 0.39 J 0.62 0.058 J
Cadmium 1.4 6.4 6.8 0.39 0.43 0.25 2.6 0.53 6.5 0.16 J 1.9 0.41 0.33 4.1 3.3 1.3 0.062 J
Calcium 58000 60000 57000 7800 15000 4700 21000 36000 19000 2600 28000 5800 9100 12000 7900 10000 1400
Chromium 37 330 81 35 16 34 60 19 120 8.9 19 26 22 23 20 15 8.6
Cobalt 6.2 6.7 J 4.6 J 2.5 J 4.7 J 4.1 J 12 5.2 11 2.6 J 3.3 J 3.4 J 4.1 J 8.1 6.8 6.8 1.4 J
Copper 62 300 2300 61 36 58 360 40 77 10 21 96 74 56 41 31 8.7
Iron 24000 95000 45000 19000 22000 30000 150000 22000 91000 9900 15000 22000 28000 31000 22000 20000 8100
Lead 1100 2000 1600 18 41 32 1400 25 260 9.2 14 44 55 260 230 150 5.9
Magnesium 7800 13000 9200 3100 4800 640 3100 11000 3700 970 6300 1600 3000 3500 2700 3200 510
Manganese 470 860 680 170 400 620 790 370 760 150 220 450 380 440 380 560 91
Mercury 0.29 57 8 0.044J 0.080 J <0.10 6.2 0.051 J 1.1 <0.12 0.017J 0.069 J 0.15 0.60 0.54 0.25 0.035 J
Nickel 24 34 14 25 27 37 56 44 36 7.7 14 34 37 26 28 43 10
Potassium 920 850 J 770 320 J 720 B 440 J 470 J 730 1700 650 660 530 B 490 J B 810 B 740 B 790 B 150 J B
Selenium 0.71 5.5 2.3 0.49 <0.51 0.54 2.3 <0.47 4.7 1.4 0.83 0.62 0.85 9.4 4.6 0.73 <0.41
Silver 1.0 3.7 0.23 J <0.45 <0.51 <0.47 <0.60 <0.47 0.96 J <0.50 <0.40 <0.45 <0.51 0.63 0.66 0.17 J <0.41
Sodium 510 J 960 J 190 J 130 J 290 J 94 J 180 J 77 J 210 J 350 J 490 810 610 110 J 81 J 210 J 100 J
Thallium <1.2 1.5 J <0.96 <0.90 <1.0 <0.93 1.6 <0.93 1.2 J <1.0 <0.80 <0.91 <1.0 <1.2 <0.87 <0.95 <0.82
Vanadium 20 24 19 8.5 17 14 23J 14 30 12 15 10 10 18 13 16 4.6
Zinc 390 4500 1300 26 92 46 1000 71 700 19 34 100 66 500 300 150 11
B = Method blank contamination
J = concentration between method reporting limit and method detection limit
Table 19. Analytical results for metals in soil samples.
BORING NUMBER BW1 BW2 BW3 BW4 BW6 BW6 BW7 BW7A BW8 BW8A BW9 BW9A BW10 BW10A
Depth 10-12 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 4-6 Ft 1-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 4-6 Ft 4-6 Ft 0-2 Ft 0-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft
Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/31/2014 3/21/2014 3/31/2014 3/21/2014 3/31/2014 3/21/2014 3/31/2014
PARAMETER mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0037 0.00017 J B 0.00027 J B <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.0025
2-Butanone (MEK) 0.0014 J <0.011 <0.015 <0.013 <0.0097 <0.014 0.00085 J H <0.010 <0.014 <0.0093 <0.011 <0.012 <0.013 <0.010
Acetone 0.0057 J <0.011 <0.015 <0.013 0.0095 J <0.014 <0.011 <0.010 <0.014 <0.0093 <0.011 0.0070 J <0.013 <0.010
Isopropylbenzene <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0037 0.00060 J <0.0024 <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.0025
Methyl acetate 0.0014 J <0.0057 <0.0073 <0.0064 <0.0048 <0.0069 <0.0057 <0.0051 <0.0069 <0.0046 <0.0055 <0.0060 <0.0066 <0.0051
Methylene Chloride <0.0035 0.00053 J <0.0037 <0.0032 <0.0024 <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 0.00041 J <0.0033 <0.0025
Styrene <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0037 <0.0032 0.000093 J <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.0025
Toluene <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0037 0.00021 J <0.0024 <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.0025
B = Method blank contamination
J = concentration between method reporting limit and method detection limit
Table 20. Analytical results for VOCs in soil samples.
BORING NUMBER BW1 BW1 BW2 BW3 BW3 BW4 BW4 BW5 BW5 BW6 BW6 BW7 BW7 BW8 BW8 BW9 BW10
Depth 4-6 Ft 10-12 Ft 2-4 Ft 1.5-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 8-10 Ft 1-2 Ft 10-11 Ft 1-2 Ft 4-6 Ft 2-4 Ft 6-8 Ft 4-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft
Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014
PARAMETER mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
1,1'-Biphenyl <0.250 <53 0.016 J 0.0093 J 0.0066 J 0.040 J <0.330 0.033 J <0.57 <0.056 0.0067 J 0.036 J 0.049 J 0.016 J 0.023 J 0.013 J 0.025 J
2-Methylnaphthalene 0.033 3.7 J 0.047 0.045 0.038 0.19 0.1 0.091 0.096 0.028 0.033 0.12 0.55 0.09 0.13 0.057 0.12
Acenaphthene <0.033 19 0.12 0.024 0.021 0.043 0.1 0.039 0.055 J <0.0074 0.012 0.4 0.19 0.073 0.089 0.093 0.029
Acenaphthylene <0.033 75 0.057 <0.0072 0.0044 J <0.018 0.032 J 0.015 <0.076 <0.0074 <0.0073 0.016 0.024 0.036 0.039 0.013 <0.030
Acetophenone <0.49 <110 <0.29 <0.11 <0.12 0.028 J <0.66 <0.22 <1.1 <0.11 <0.11 0.027 J 0.088 J <0.24 <0.3 0.012 J <0.450
Anthracene 0.027 J 170 0.3 0.017 0.014 0.063 0.21 0.084 0.3 <0.0074 0.021 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.18 0.047 0.09
Benzaldehyde 0.0240 J <110 0.063 J <0.11 <0.12 <0.27 0.19 J <0.22 <1.1 <0.11 <0.11 0.036 J 0.076 J 0.038 J <0.3 0.024 J <0.45
Benz[a]anthracene 0.15 420 1 0.2 0.15 0.87 1.8 0.62 6.1 0.034 0.13 0.81 0.69 0.98 1.1 0.43 0.91
Benzo[a]pyrene 0.46 370 1 0.32 0.25 1.6 3.2 0.97 5.4 0.33 0.2 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.5 0.81 2.2
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.41 420 1.4 0.58 0.37 2.5 3.9 1.6 5 0.57 0.33 1.9 2.1 1.7 2.7 1.3 3.4
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.5 200 0.65 0.39 0.3 2.4 3 1.4 4.2 1.1 0.23 1.7 0.51 1.2 0.6 0.41 1.1
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.087 180 0.49 0.17 0.14 0.76 1.6 0.48 0.92 0.15 0.082 0.74 0.54 0.66 0.61 0.32 0.93
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate <0.340 <75 <0.2 0.035 J B <0.083 <0.19 <0.47 <0.15 <0.8 0.027 J B 0.1 B 0.043 J 0.063 J B <0.17 0.064 J B 0.04 J B <0.31
Carbazole <0.25 <53 0.098 J <0.054 <0.059 <0.13 <0.33 <0.11 <0.57 <0.056 <0.055 <0.11 <0.11 0.11 J 0.12 J <0.057 <0.22
Chrysene 0.19 380 1.1 0.27 0.21 1.2 1.9 0.76 9.5 0.65 0.18 0.99 0.79 1.1 1.3 0.48 1.1
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.33 59 0.18 0.095 0.064 0.54 0.72 0.3 3.6 0.24 0.06 0.38 0.14 0.27 0.17 0.1 0.24
Dibenzofuran <0.25 27 J 0.071 J 0.017 J 0.013 J 0.066 J 0.061 J 0.037 J 0.050 J 0.016 J 0.012 J 0.084 J 0.14 0.039 J 0.065 J 0.026 J 0.044 J
Di-n-butyl phthalate <0.34 <75 <0.2 <0.075 <0.083 <0.19 <0.47 <0.15 <0.8 <0.078 20.01 J <0.16 <0.16 <0.17 <0.21 0.035 J B <0.31
Fluoranthene 0.2 980 2 0.22 0.18 0.79 1.7 0.8 1.7 0.016 0.22 0.82 0.75 1.6 1.8 0.48 0.94
Fluorene <0.033 67 0.1 0.0064 J 0.0061 J 0.021 0.056 0.021 0.1 <0.0074 <0.0073 0.08 0.056 0.039 0.057 0.017 0.043
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.26 180 0.53 0.29 0.22 1.7 2.4 1 2.2 0.78 0.16 1.2 0.44 0.91 0.51 0.33 0.85
Naphthalene <0.033 13 0.08 0.033 0.024 0.13 0.1 0.086 0.19 0.017 0.022 0.13 0.37 0.083 0.15 0.048 0.094
Pentachlorophenol <0.74 <160 <0.44 <0.16 <0.18 <0.4 0.3 J <0.33 <1.7 <0.17 <0.17 <0.34 <0.33 <0.36 <0.45 <0.17 <0.67
Phenanthrene 0.1 570 1.3 0.11 0.086 0.4 0.8 0.4 1.2 0.03 0.12 0.51 0.63 0.7 0.93 0.24 0.43
Pyrene 0.16 800 1.8 0.19 0.18 0.73 1.6 0.69 2.3 0.014 0.19 0.87 0.81 1.5 1.8 0.47 1
B = Method blank contamination
J = concentration between method reporting limit and method detection limit
Table 21. Analytical results for SVOCs in soil samples.
66
Table 22 shows the toxicological information for each of the organic and inorganic
COCs. Where available, the reference dose (RfD), reference concentration (RfC), slope factor
(cancer) and inhalation unit risk (cancer) are provided for each COC. In addition, the source of
information is noted in the table. Per EPA guidance (USEPA, 2003a; Ohio EPA, 2010a), the
following sources of information were accessed (in order of priority):
• Tier I – Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS);
• Tier II – USEPA PPRTVs (provisional peer reviewed toxicity values); and
• Tier III – other sources of information including California EPA peer reviewed toxicity
values, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels, HEAST
values (for radionuclides).
5.3 Exposure Assessment
Exposure assessment is the estimation of the magnitude, frequency, duration and route of
exposure for current and future human exposures. Exposure assessment includes:
1) the characterization of the exposure setting with respect to potentially exposed human
populations and physical site characteristics;
2) identification of potential exposure pathways;
3) estimation of potential exposure concentrations; and
4) estimation of potential chemical intakes.
The first two sections are discussed below. The third and fourth sections have been
combined into discussions of dermal risk (Section 5.4), inhalation of volatile COCs (Section
5.5), inhalation of particulate COCs (Section 5.6), and inhalation of indoor air (Section 5.9).
5.3.1 Characterization of Exposure Setting
Characterizing the exposure setting consists of identifying the physical characteristics of
the site, human populations on or near the site, and current and potential future land uses. A
description of the history of the site is presented in Section 2.
The site is in an urban area, in downtown Lancaster, Ohio. The proposed future land use
is the proposed Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility. Currently, the site is a paved
parking lot adjacent to the existing Fairfield County Sheriff’s Office. Previously, the site had
been filled using foundry sand. The site is supplied by both sanitary sewers and municipal water.
Table 22. Toxicity values for chemicals of concern.
Chemical
Chronic RfD
(mg/kg-day)
Confidence level
of RfD
Chronic RfC
(ug/m3)
Confidence
level of RfC
Oral Cancer
Slope Factor (kg-
day/mg)
Inhalation Unit
Risk (m3/ug) Source Critical Effect (RfD)
Aluminum 1.0E+00 Low 5.0E+00 Low to Medium PPRTV Neurological impacts
Antimony 4.0E-04 Low IRIS
Longevity, blood glucose
and cholesterol
Arsenic 3.0E-04 Medium 1.50E+00 4.30E-03 IRIS
Hyperpigmentation,
keratosis, possible
vascular complications
Barium 2.0E-01 Medium IRIS Nephropathy
Beryllium 2.0E-03 Low to Medium 2.0E-02 Medium
Inadequate for
assessment of
carcinogenicity 2.40E-03 IRIS Small intestine lesions
Cadmium 5.0E-04 High
Inadequate
evidence of
carcinogenicity 1.80E-03 IRIS Proteinuria
Chromium^ 3.0E-03 Low 1.0E-04 Medium
Classification D -
not classifiable as
to human
carcinogenicity 1.20E-02 IRIS None reported
Manganese 1.4E-01 Medium 5.0E-05 Medium IRIS
Central nervous system
effects
Mercury 3.0E-04 Medium IRIS
Selenium 5.0E-03 High IRIS Clinical selenosis
Vanadium 9.0E-03 Low IRIS Decreased hair cysteine
Zinc 3.0E-01 Medium to High IRIS
Decreases in ESOD
activity
Acenaphthene 6.0E-02 Low IRIS Hepatotoxicity
Acenaphthylene IRIS
Anthracene 3.0E-01 Low IRIS No observed effects
Benz[a]anthracene Not available 1.1E-4 * IRIS
Benzo[a]pyrene 7.30E+00 1.1E-3 * IRIS
Benzo[b]fluoranthene Not available 1.1E-4 * IRIS
Carcinogenicity unknownNot available
Classification D - not classifiable
as to human carcinogenicity
Not available
Classification D - not classifiable
as to human carcinogenicity
Not available
Not available
Not available
Classification D - not classifiable
as to human carcinogenicityNot recommended
Not available
Classification D - not classifiable
as to human carcinogenicity
Carcinogenicity assessment not
completed
Not available
Inadequate for assessment of
carcinogenicity
Inadequate for assessment of
carcinogenicity
Not available Not available
Not available Not available
Classification D - not classifiable
as to human carcinogenicity
Not available
Classification D - not classifiable
as to human carcinogenicity
Not available Not available
Not available Not available
Not available Not available
Table 22. Toxicity values for chemicals of concern.
Chemical
Chronic RfD
(mg/kg-day)
Confidence level
of RfD
Chronic RfC
(ug/m3)
Confidence
level of RfC
Oral Cancer
Slope Factor (kg-
day/mg)
Inhalation Unit
Risk (m3/ug) Source Critical Effect (RfD)
Inadequate for assessment of
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene IRIS
Benzo[k]fluoranthene Not available 1.1E-4 * IRIS
Chrysene Not available 1.1E-5 * IRIS
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene Not available 1.1E-3 * IRIS
Fluoranthene 4.0E-02 Low IRIS
Nephropathy, liver
impacts, hematological
alterations
Fluorene 4.0E-02 Low IRIS
Decreased RBC, packed
cell volume and
hemoglobin
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Not available 1.1E-4 * IRIS
2-Methylnaphthalene 4.0E-03 Low IRIS
pulmonary alveolar
proteinosis
Naphthalene 2.0E-02 Low 3.0E+00 Low to Medium
Inadequate
studies available 3.4E-2 * IRIS
Decreased body weight in
males
Phenanthrene IRIS
Pyrene 3.0E-02 Low IRIS Kidney effects
^Values for Chromium(IV) were used to be conservative, RFC based on exposure to particulates
* values from US EPA Mid-Atlantic Risk Assessment Tables
Inadequate evidence of
carcinogenicityInadequate data
Not available
Classification D - not classifiable
as to human carcinogenicity
Not available Not available
Classification D - not classifiable
as to human carcinogenicity
Not available Not available
Not available Not available
Not available Not available
Not available
Classification D - not classifiable
as to human carcinogenicity
Not available
Classification D - not classifiable
as to human carcinogenicity
Not available Not available
Not available Not available
Classification D - not classifiable
as to human carcinogenicity
69
5.3.2 Potential Receptors and Exposure Pathways
Given the current and future land use envisioned at the site, the three populations with the
potential to be impacted are adult residents of the prison, adults working at the jail and onsite
workers involved in excavation and construction. The proposed prison facilities do not have
capacity for juvenile offenders and any child visitors can be expected to be onsite only for short
periods of time while visiting adult offenders.
Possible exposure routes for onsite excavation and construction workers include:
ingestion, inhalation and dermal contact. Ingestion of chemicals of concern is not a significant
concern because water at the site is not used as a drinking water source and the site is supplied
by municipal water. However, during excavation and construction, on-site workers may be
exposed to chemicals of concern through dermal contact and inhalation of outdoor air (Table 23).
Table 23. Exposure pathways for risk assessment
Land Use Potentially Exposed Population Exposure Route, Media and
Exposure Point
Future
Construction and
Excavation On-site Workers
Dermal contact with chemicals of
concern in soil during excavation
and construction
Construction and
Excavation On-site Workers Inhalation of chemicals of concern
during excavation and construction
Industrial On-site Workers Inhalation of chemicals of concern
in indoor air
Residential On-site Adult Residents Inhalation of chemicals of concern
in indoor air
Possible exposure routes for adult residents at the proposed Fairfield County Jail/Public
Safety Facility include: ingestion, inhalation and dermal contact. Ingestion of chemicals of
concern is not a significant concern because water at the site is not used as a drinking water
source and the site is supplied by municipal water. The dermal exposure route for residents will
not be a complete pathway because the plans for the proposed jail call for covering the soil with
asphalt. However, residents may be exposed to chemicals of concern through inhalation of
indoor air (Table 23).
Possible exposure routes for adult workers at the proposed Fairfield County Jail/Public
Safety Facility include: ingestion, inhalation and dermal contact. Ingestion of chemicals of
concern is not a significant concern because water at the site is not used as a drinking water
source and the site is supplied by municipal water. The dermal exposure route for workers will
not be a complete pathway because the plans for the proposed jail call for covering the soil with
70
asphalt. However, workers may be exposed to chemicals of concern through inhalation of indoor
air (Table 23).
5.3.3 Quantification of Exposure
The exposure assessment proceeded through several steps to quantify the intake of each
chemical for each pathway. The first step was to calculate an exposure concentration for each
COC. The second step was to determine the input parameters for the intake equation. Lastly, the
intake was calculated for each COC.
Soil samples were taken from discrete depths from ten borings on the site. The maximum
depth of excavation expected by the architects is six feet. Therefore, exposure to construction
and excavation workers will be limited to the top six feet of soil. To be conservative, the
analytical data for the top eight feet were used in the assessment of dermal exposure. Inhalation
exposure was calculated using all data collected at the site.
To obtain the concentration that best represents the reasonable maximum exposure
(RME) that is expected to occur at the site, either the 95 or 99 percent upper confidence limit
(UCL) on the mean was calculated for the chemicals of concern evaluated in the risk assessment
and compared to the largest detected concentration. The UCL or the largest detected
concentration, whichever is less, was used in the exposure calculations to represent the average
concentration of the chemicals of concern at the site. The 95 percent UCL is a conservative
estimate of the average concentration that equals or exceeds the true average 95 percent of the
time. Similarly, the 99 percent UCL is a conservative estimate of the average concentration that
equals or exceeds the true average 99 percent of the time.
Tables 24 and 25 present the minimum and maximum detected concentrations, and the
UCL for inorganic and organic contaminants used in the dermal risk assessment (0-8 feet),
respectively. Tables 26 and 27 present the minimum and maximum detected concentrations, and
the UCL for inorganic and organic contaminants used in the inhalation risk assessment (0-12
feet), respectively.
The USEPA software program ProUCL was used to calculate UCL values for each
dataset. Data was initially screened for normality using ProUCL. If data was not normally
distributed, UCLs were calculated using the most appropriate distribution (gamma, lognormal or
non-parametric). Outputs from the ProUCL software are provided in Appendix J through M.
The recommended UCL in the ProUCL software was used in the risk assessment. When
ProUCL recommended more than one possible UCL, the largest value was selected in order to be
as conservative as possible. The concentrations selected for use in the intake equations are
highlighted in Tables 24 through 27.
Table 24. Statistical summary of inorganic sampling results used in the dermal risk assessment (0-8 feet).
Number of
Data
points
Number of
Detects
Mean
(mg/kg)
Standard
Deviation
(mg/kg)
UCL usedUCL
(mg/kg)
Maximum
(mg/kg)
Minimum
(mg/kg)
Aluminum 14 14 4907 1556Normal - 95%
Student's t5644 7500 1400
Antimony 14 5 13.08 17.52Normal - 95% Kaplan
Meijer (t)20.83 43 1.2
Arsenic 14 14 43.03 120.2 Lognormal - 95%
Cherbyshev(mean, sd)
183 460 1.9
Barium 13 12 139.2 165.4Gamma - ROS
Adjusted Gamma 334.6 500 22
Beryllium 14 2 0.65 0.0424 Non-parametric - 95%
Kaplan Meijer (t)
0.281 0.68 0.62
Cadmium 14 12 1.762 2.021Normal - 95% Kaplan
Meijer (t)2.452 6.8 0.25
Chromium 14 14 26.04 18.12Normal - 95%
Student's t34.61 81 8.6
Manganese 14 14 384.4 176.1Normal - 95%
Student's t467.7 680 91
Mercury 14 6 1.638 3.121
Non-parametric - 95%
Kaplan Meijer
bootstrap t
8.259 8 0.15
Selenium 14 11 2.043 2.725 Non-parametric - 95%
Kaplan Meijer (BCA)
2.845 9.4 0.49
Vanadium 14 14 13.65 4.34Normal - 95%
Student's t15.7 20 4.6
Zinc 14 14 221.8 345.1Gamma - 95%
Adjusted Gamma480.2 1300 11
Table 25. Statistical summary of organic sampling results used in the dermal risk assessment (0-8 feet).
Number
of Data
points
Number of
Detects
Mean
(mg/kg)
Standard
Deviation
(mg/kg)
UCL usedUCL
(mg/kg)
Maximum
(mg/kg)
Minimum
(mg/kg)
Acenaphthene 14 12 0.0944 0.109
Normal -
95%Kaplan
Meijer (t)
0.133 0.4 0.012
Acenaphthylene 14 7 0.0286 0.0162
Normal -
95%Kaplan
Meijer (t)
0.025 0.057 0.013
Anthracene 14 12 0.0947 0.0807
Normal -
95%Kaplan
Meijer (t)
0.121 0.3 0.014
Benz[a]anthracene 14 14 0.577 0.383Normal - 95%
Student's t0.758 420 0.034
Benzo[a]pyrene 14 14 0.981 0.619Normal - 95%
Student's t1.274 2.2 0.2
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 14 14 1.49 0.969Normal - 95%
Student's t1.949 3.4 0.33
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 14 14 0.892 0.625Normal - 95%
Student's t1.188 2.4 0.23
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 14 14 0.44 0.283Normal - 95%
Student's t0.574 0.93 0.082
Chrysene 14 14 0.737 0.409Normal - 95%
Student's t0.931 1.3 0.18
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 14 14 0.222 0.136Normal - 95%
Student's t0.286 0.54 0.06
Fluoranthene 14 14 0.773 0.634Normal - 95%
Student's t1.073 2 0.016
Fluorene 14 9 0.0482 0.0283
Normal -
95%Kaplan
Meijer (t)
0.0482 0.1 0.017
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 14 14 0.656 0.442Normal - 95%
Student's t0.865 1.7 0.16
2-Methylnaphthalene 14 14 0.112 0.135
Gamma - 95%
Adjusted
Gamma0.189 0.55 0.028
Naphthalene 14 13 0.0975 0.0931
Normal -
95%Kaplan
Meijer (t)
0.136 0.37 0.017
Phenanthrene 14 14 0.428 0.3367Normal - 95%
Student's t0.865 1.3 0.03
Pyrene 14 14 0.743 0.606Normal -
Student's t1.03 1.8 0.014
Table 26. Statistical summary of inorganic sampling results used in the inhalation risk assessment (0-12 feet).
Number of
Data
points
Number of
Detects
Mean
(mg/kg)
Standard
Deviation
(mg/kg)
UCL usedUCL
(mg/kg)
Maximum
(mg/kg)
Minimum
(mg/kg)
Aluminum 17 17 5429 2067Normal - 95%
Student's t6305 11000 1400
Antimony 17 6 12.73 15.69Normal - 95% Kaplan
Meijer (t)9.582 43 1.2
Arsenic 17 17 45.08 109.1Lognormal - 95%
Herbyshev(mean, sd)160.4 460 1.9
Barium 17 17 364.1 793Gamma - 95%
Adjusted Gamma 796.3 3300 11
Beryllium 17 3 1.1 0.78Normal - 95% Kaplan
Meijer (t)0.497 2 0.62
Cadmium 17 15 2.443 2.429Normal - 95% Kaplan
Meijer (t)3.186 6.8 0.25
Chromium 17 17 51.44 77.33 Lognormal - 95% H 85.04 330 8.6
Manganese 17 17 458.3 229.4Normal - 95%
Student's t555.4 860 91
Mercury 17 9 8.237 18.52
Gamma - 95%
Adjusted Gamma
Kaplan Meijer
33.45 57 0.15
Selenium 17 14 2.498 2.637Lognormal - 95%
Cherbyshev4.806 9.4 0.49
Vanadium 17 16 15.32 6.19Normal - 95% Kaplan
Meijer (t)17.85 30 4.6
Zinc 17 17 547.4 1086Gamma - 95%
Adjusted Gamma1214 4500 11
Table 27. Statistical summary of organic sampling results used in the inhalation risk assessment (0-12 feet).
Number
of Data
points
Number of
Detects
Mean
(mg/kg)
Standard
Deviation
(mg/kg)
UCL usedUCL
(mg/kg)
Maximum
(mg/kg)
Minimum
(mg/kg)
Acenaphthene 17 14 1.445 5.054
Nonparametric -
99% Kaplan
Meijer
(Chebyshev)
12.34 19 0.012
Acenaphthylene 17 8 9.4 26.51
Nonparametric -
99% Kaplan
Meijer
(Chebyshev)
49.94 75 0.013
Anthracene 17 15 11.44 43.86
Nonparametric -
99% Kaplan
Meijer
(Chebyshev)
110 170 0.014
Benz[a]anthracene 17 17 25.65 101.6
Nonparametric -
99% Chebyshev
(mean, sd)
270.9 420 0.034
Benzo[a]pyrene 17 17 23.08 89.41
Nonparametric -
99% Chebyshev
(mean, sd)
238.8 370 0.2
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 17 17 26.46 101.4
Nonparametric -
99% Chebyshev
(mean, sd)
271.2 4240 0.33
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 17 17 12.92 48.22
Lognormal -
99% Chebyshev
(mean, sd)
129.3 200 0.23
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 17 17 11.1 43.53
Nonparametric -
99% Chebyshev
(mean, sd)
116.1 180 0.082
Chrysene 17 17 23.63 91.86
Nonparametric -
99% Chebyshev
(mean, sd)
245.3 380 0.18
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 17 17 3.908 14.22
Nonparametric -
99% Chebyshev
(mean, sd)
38.23 59 0.06
Fluoranthene 17 17 58.48 237.5
Nonparametric -
99% Chebyshev
(mean, sd)
631.5 980 0.016
Fluorene 17 12 5.633 19.33
Nonparametric -
99% Kaplan
Meijer
(Chebyshev)
43.69 67 0.017
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 17 17 11.4 43.45
Lognormal -
99% Chebyshev
(mean, sd)
116.3 180 0.16
2-Methylnaphthalene 17 16 0.111 0.126
Gamma - 95%
Kaplan Meijer
(Chebyshev)
0.247 0.55 0.028
Naphthalene 17 16 0.91 3.225
Nonparametric -
99% Kaplan
Meijer
(Chebyshev)
8.426 13 0.017
Phenanthrene 17 17 34 138.1
Nonparametric -
99% Chebyshev
(mean, sd)
367.3 570 0.03
Pyrene 17 17 47.9 193.8
Nonparametric -
99% Chebyshev
(mean, sd)515.6 800 0.014
75
5.4 Dermal Exposure
5.4.1 Determination of Dermal Absorbed Dose
According to USEPA (2004), the dermally absorbed dose per event (DAevent) is defined
as:
DAevent = Csoil x CF x AF x ABSd Equation 1
Where DAevent = absorbed dose per event (mg/cm2
event)
Csoil = chemical concentration in soil (mg/kg)
CF = conversion factor (10-6
kg/mg)
AF = adherence factor of soil to skin (mg/cm2-event)
ABSd = dermal absorption fraction
This dermal absorbed dose per event is then used to calculate the dermal absorbed dose:
DAD = DAevent x EF x ED x EV x SA Equation 2
BW x AT
Where DAD = dermal absorbed dose per event (mg/kg-day)
DAevent = absorbed dose per event (mg/cm2
event)
EF = exposure frequency (days/year)
ED = exposure duration (years)
EV = event frequency (events/day)
SA = skin surface area available for contact (cm2)
BW = body weight (kg)
AT = averaging time (days)
For dermal contact with chemicals in soil during excavation and construction, the only
skin surface areas available for dermal contact are the head, forearms and hands, because the
remainder of the skin is covered with clothing (i.e., pants, short-sleeved shirt). During colder
months (November through April), workers will likely be wearing coats, so this value is
conservative in that it uses the maximum probably exposed skin surface area as the contact area
throughout the year. The value that was used, representing the 50th percentile surface area for
the head, arms and hands of an adult, is 3,300 cm2
(USEPA, 2004).
The exposure used in the calculations was 250 days/year for one year with one contact
event (lasting 24 hours) occurring each day. Given that construction and excavation workers are
expected to work only 8 hours a day (and it is likely that will be removed at the end of the
working day when the employee showers), this exposure is conservative. This exposure
scenario, which assumes that a worker is exposed 50 weeks/year and 5 days per week, was
chosen in order to be conservative. The actual exposure frequency (according to the architect)
will probably be less than a year for any individual working on site. The length of time that the
site will be under excavation is expected to be less than a year with the rest of the two-year
construction estimate being used for construction and finishing. As excavation is completed and
76
areas of the site are paved, the dermal pathway will be removed for construction workers at the
site. An averaging time of one year was used for non-cancer effects and an averaging time of 70
years was used for cancerous effects (USEPA, 2004).
Other input parameters were defined using USEPA guidance (USEPA, 2004 and USEPA,
1992). Body weight of construction and excavation workers was defined to be 70 kg (the default
value used for adult weight in risk assessment calculations). The dermal absorption fraction
from soil was derived from USEPA (2004). These factors are summarized in Table 28. The
activity-specific surface area weighted soil adherence factor selected for construction and
excavation workers was the 95th
percentile value recommended in USEPA (2004) for
construction workers (0.3). All chemicals of concern were evaluated for dermal uptake except
mercury, which is very poorly absorbed through the skin (CDC, 2013).
5.4.2 Non-Cancerous Effects
The dermal absorbed dose (DAD) calculated for each COC was compared to an adjusted
oral RfD value. The adjustment is based on the percentage of absorption of the chemical in the
gastrointestinal system (ABSGI). For chemicals where no ABSGI is available, the default of one
was used per USEPA guidance (USEPA, 2004). The adjusted RfD for dermal exposure for each
COC was calculated as:
RfDabs = RfD / ABSGI Equation 3
Where RfDabs = absorbed reference dose (mg/kg-day)
RfD = oral reference dose (mg/kg-day)
ABSGI= percentage of chemical absorption in the gastrointestinal system
The hazard quotient for each COC was calculated as:
HQ = DAD / RfDabs Equation 4
Where HQ = Hazard quotient
DAD = dermal absorbed dose per event (mg/kg-day)
RfDabs = absorbed reference dose (mg/kg-day)
The hazard quotients for each individual COC were then summed to give the site hazard
index. In general, a hazard index greater than one (1) is considered to pose an unacceptable risk.
The non-cancer risks from dermal exposure to COCs at the site are summarized in Table 29. The
major component of the resultant hazard index of 2.08 is contributed by arsenic (highlighted in
yellow in the table). The risks from dermal exposure to this chemical can be mitigated by
limiting worker exposure to contaminated soil, wearing long sleeved shirts and wearing gloves.
Table 28. Dermal absorption fraction from soil for chemicals in the dermal risk assessment.
Chemicals of Concern
Dermal
Absorption
fraction Reference
Aluminum 0.2
Conservative value - dermally active chemicals are considered
those with an absorption fraction greater than 0.1
Antimony 0.2
Conservative value - dermally active chemicals are considered
those with an absorption fraction greater than 0.1
Arsenic 0.03 USEPA (2004)
Barium 0.2
Conservative value - dermally active chemicals are considered
those with an absorption fraction greater than 0.1
Beryllium 0.2
Conservative value - dermally active chemicals are considered
those with an absorption fraction greater than 0.1
Cadmium 0.001 USEPA (2004)
Chromium 0.2
Conservative value - dermally active chemicals are considered
those with an absorption fraction greater than 0.1
Manganese 0.2
Conservative value - dermally active chemicals are considered
those with an absorption fraction greater than 0.1
Selenium 0.2
Conservative value - dermally active chemicals are considered
those with an absorption fraction greater than 0.1
Vanadium 0.2
Conservative value - dermally active chemicals are considered
those with an absorption fraction greater than 0.1
Zinc 0.2
Conservative value - dermally active chemicals are considered
those with an absorption fraction greater than 0.1
Acenaphthene 0.13 USEPA (2004)
Acenaphthylene 0.13 USEPA (2004)
Anthracene 0.13 USEPA (2004)
Benz[a]anthracene 0.13 USEPA (2004)
Benzo[a]pyrene 0.13 USEPA (2004)
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.13 USEPA (2004)
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.13 USEPA (2004)
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.13 USEPA (2004)
Chrysene 0.13 USEPA (2004)
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.13 USEPA (2004)
Fluoranthene 0.13 USEPA (2004)
Fluorene 0.13 USEPA (2004)
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.13 USEPA (2004)
2-Methylnaphthalene 0.13 USEPA (2004)
Naphthalene 0.13 USEPA (2004)
Phenanthrene 0.13 USEPA (2004)
Pyrene 0.13 USEPA (2004)
Table 29. Hazard quotients for chemicals of concern for the dermal pathway.
Chemicals of Concern Csoil
Dermal
Absorption
fraction DAevent DAD Oral RfD ABSGI
Absorbed
RfD
Dermal
Hazard
Quotient
Aluminum 5644 0.2 0.00339 0.10935 1 1.1E-01
Antimony 20.83 0.2 1.2E-05 0.0004 0.0004 0.15 3.75E+02 1.1E-06
Arsenic 183 0.03 1.6E-05 0.00053 0.0003 1.8E+00
Barium 334.6 0.2 0.0002 0.00648 0.2 0.07 3.50E-01 1.9E-02
Beryllium 0.281 0.2 1.7E-07 5.4E-06 0.002 0.007 3.50E+00 1.6E-06
Cadmium 2.452 0.001 7.4E-09 2.4E-07 0.0005 0.0025 5.00E+00 4.8E-08
Chromium 34.61 0.2 2.1E-05 0.00067 0.003 0.013 8.67E-03 8.0E-02
Manganese 467.7 0.2 0.00028 0.00906 0.14 0.04 2.86E-01 3.0E-02
Selenium 2.845 0.2 1.7E-06 5.5E-05 0.005 0.026 5.20E+00 1.1E-05
Vanadium 15.7 0.2 9.4E-06 0.0003 0.005 6.1E-02
Zinc 480.2 0.2 0.00029 0.0093 0.3 3.1E-02
Acenaphthene 0.133 0.13 5.2E-08 1.7E-06 0.06 2.8E-05
Acenaphthylene 0.025 0.13 9.8E-09 3.1E-07 no RfD available
Anthracene 0.121 0.13 4.7E-08 1.5E-06 0.3 5.1E-06
Benz[a]anthracene 0.758 0.13 3E-07 9.5E-06 no RfD available
Benzo[a]pyrene 1.274 0.13 5E-07 1.6E-05 no RfD available
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.949 0.13 7.6E-07 2.5E-05 no RfD available
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1.188 0.13 4.6E-07 1.5E-05 no RfD available
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.574 0.13 2.2E-07 7.2E-06 no RfD available
Chrysene 0.931 0.13 3.6E-07 1.2E-05 no RfD available
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.286 0.13 1.1E-07 3.6E-06 no RfD available
Fluoranthene 1.073 0.13 4.2E-07 1.4E-05 0.04 3.4E-04
Fluorene 0.0482 0.13 1.9E-08 6.1E-07 0.04 1.5E-05
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.865 0.13 3.4E-07 1.1E-05 no RfD available
2-Methylnaphthalene 0.189 0.13 7.4E-08 2.4E-06 0.004 6.0E-04
Naphthalene 0.136 0.13 5.3E-08 1.7E-06 0.02 8.6E-05
Phenanthrene 0.865 0.13 3.4E-07 1.1E-05 no RfD available
Pyrene 1.03 0.13 4E-07 1.3E-05 0.03 4.3E-04
2.10Hazard Index
79
5.4.3 Carcinogenic Effects
Not all COCs are known to cause carcinogenic effects. These include:
• Aluminum – inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity;
• Antimony – carcinogenicity unknown;
• Barium – not classified as a human carcinogen;
• Manganese – not classified as a human carcinogen;
• Selenium – not classified as a human carcinogen;
• Vanadium – inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity via dermal contact;
• Zinc – inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity via dermal contact;
• Acenapthylene – not classified as a human carcinogen;
• Fluorene – not classified as a human carcinogen;
• 2-Methylnaphthalene – not classified as a human carcinogen;
• Naphthalene – not classified as a human carcinogen;
• Phenanthrene – not classified as a human carcinogen; and
• Pyrene – not classified as a human carcinogen.
No oral slope factors are available for beryllium, cadmium and chromium due to
insufficient evidence of carcinogenicity via dermal and oral exposure or due to insufficient data.
These COCs were, therefore, omitted from this analysis.
The toxic equivalency methodology (USEPA, 1993) was used to assess the relative
carcinogenicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) as compared to benzo[a]pyrene.
Toxic equivalency factors and the resultant equivalent concentrations of carcinogenic PAHs are
shown in Table 30.
80
Table 30. Toxic equivalency factors for PAHs and equivalent calculated concentrations.
Csoil
(mg/kg)
Toxic Equivalency
Factor
Equivalent
Concentration (mg/kg)
Acenaphthene 0.133 1 0.133
Anthracene 0.121 0.4 0.048
Benz[a]anthracene 0.758 0.2 0.152
Benzo[a]pyrene 1.274 1 1.274
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.949 0.8 1.559
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1.188 0.009 0.011
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.574 0.03 0.017
Chrysene 0.931 0.1 0.093
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.286 10 2.860
Fluoranthene 1.073 0.08 0.086
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.865 0.07 0.061
Similar to dermal, non-cancerous risks, the oral slope factor was adjusted by the
percentage of chemical absorption in the gastrointestinal system (if known) to estimate dermal
slope factors for the COCs. For chemicals where no ABSGI is available, the default of one was
used per USEPA guidance (USEPA, 2004). The adjusted slope factor for dermal exposure for
each COC was calculated as:
SFabs = SFo x ABSGI Equation 5
Where SFabs = absorbed slope factor (mg/kg-day)-1
SFo = slope factor (mg/kg-day)-1
ABSGI= percentage of chemical absorption in the gastrointestinal system
The dermal cancer risk for each carcinogenic COC was calculated as:
Dermal Cancer Risk = DAD x SFabs Equation 6
Where DAD = dermal absorbed dose per event (mg/kg-day)
SFabs = absorbed slope factor (mg/kg-day)-1
The dermal cancer risks for each individual COC were then summed to give the site
dermal cancer risk. In general, a dermal cancer risk of greater than 10-4
is considered to pose an
unacceptable risk. The cancer risks from dermal exposure to COCs at the site are summarized in
Table 31. The total dermal cancer risk for inorganics and PAHs at the site is 8.5 x 10-6
.
Therefore, there is no carcinogenic risk via the dermal exposure pathway.
81
5.4.4 Uncertainty in the Dermal Risk Analysis
5.4.4.1 Csoil
Fourteen samples were analyzed for COCs. These samples were at depths ranging from
0 to 8 feet below grade. This is sufficient samples to allow for statistical analysis, including the
derivation of UCL values for use in Equation 1.
5.4.4.2 Event Time (EV)
USEPA recommends that the default event time be used. This assumes that no washing
occurs and soil remains in contact with the skin for 24 hours. This assumption overestimates the
expected exposure at this facility. In reality, construction and excavation workers will be onsite
for eight hours and soil will remain in contact with their skin for no more than 12 hours,
assuming workers shower each evening after completing work for the day. In the absence of
detailed information about chemical absorption, it is not possible to assess the degree to which
the exposure is overestimated.
5.4.4.3 Surface Area
USEPA recommends using default skin surface areas based on the assumption that
workers will be wearing pants, boots and a short sleeved shirt during construction and
excavation. During the winter, workers will presumably wearing long sleeved shirts and/or
coats, reducing the exposed skin surface area.
5.4.4.4 Frequency of Exposure
Discussions with the architect led to the conservative assumption that workers would be
exposed to the soil for no more than a year. In reality, the expected exposure is likely to be less
than a year for any individual contractor. Contractors involved with the installation of utilities
(and therefore in close contact with the soil) are expected to be onsite for less than three months.
The foundation to support the building is expected to take approximately four months to install.
Other contractors are expected to have much less exposure to the soil (for example; plumbers,
electricians). Once the site has utilities and the base of construction completed, the area of the
site outside the footprint of the building is to be paved, removing this exposure pathway.
Similarly, once the building slab is poured, the dermal exposure pathway will be interrupted.
The hazard index calculated for workers on site for 90 days during a one year exposure
duration, is 0.75 (skin surface area exposed 3,300 cm2). Therefore, dermal risks to
construction/excavation employees can be managed by reducing the frequency of exposure to 90
days or fewer.
5.4.4.5 Adherence Factors
There is uncertainty associated with the degree with which soil particles absorb to the
skin. The default value suggested by USEPA (2004) of 0.3 was used for construction and
82
excavation workers at the site. If excavation is accomplished mostly using equipment, thereby
minimizing the worker’s contact with the soil, this value could be too high. However, for
workers excavating by hand, this value could be too low. Assuming that any one worker will not
be continuously excavating by hand, this default value was used to characterize average
adherence.
5.4.4.6 Absorption Factors
The amount of the chemical absorbed through the skin from soil particles is dependent on
many physical, chemical and biological factors. USEPA (2004) recommends acknowledging
these sources of uncertainty, but not adjusting the default values provided by USEPA because
there is insufficient quantitative understanding of the impact of these factors of the absorption
factors. For chemicals with no identified absorption factors, the default of 0.2 was used. This
may over or underestimate the risk associated with individual COCs.
5.4.4.7 Toxicity Assessment
Dermal reference doses and dermal slope factors have not been developed by USEPA.
The extrapolation of oral reference doses and oral slope factors to assess dermal exposure
introduces uncertainty into the toxicity assessment. The extrapolation from oral toxicity values
does not account for different patterns of distribution, metabolism and excretion in the dermal
exposure route. Differences between the oral and dermal exposure routes will be different for
different COCs. It is expected that some dermal risks will be overestimated and others
underestimated.
The extrapolation of the oral slope factor to a dermal slope factor for PAHs does not
account for the direct carcinogenic activity at the point of contact. The oral slope factor takes
into account systemic effects at locations separated from the point of contact. However,
carcinogenic PAHs (including benzo[a]pyrene), may cause skin cancer when in contact with the
skin (animal studies show skin tumors developing in mice after exposure to benzo[a]pyrene).
The cancer risks calculated above (i.e., systemic effects), therefore, will underestimate the cancer
risk posed by PAHs at the site (i.e., systemic and direct effects). The health and safety plan at
the site should, therefore, include provisions to minimize contact of workers with soil.
5.4.5 Risk from Multiple Chemicals
Assessing risk from mixtures of chemicals is the subject of several USEPA guidance
documents (USEPA, 1989 and USEPA, 2000). In general, there are three quantitative methods
for assessing risk from chemical mixtures:
• If there is data on a “sufficiently similar” mixture, use toxicologic data on the
characterized mixture;
• If chemicals have similar methods of toxicity and target organs, dose addition may be
used; and
83
• If chemicals have dissimilar methods of toxicity and target different organs, response
addition may be used.
There is no readily-available information on toxicological responses of a “sufficiently
similar mixture”. In this situation, dose addition or response addition may be used. USEPA
(2000) also allows for the performance of a qualitative risk assessment on the impact from
multiple chemicals if there is insufficient data to complete a quantitative risk assessment.
For non-carcinogenic effects of PAHs, a response addition approach was used. In
general, there are two broad approaches to generating an overall hazard index: sum all individual
hazard quotients irrespective of target organ, or sum individual hazard indices for chemicals that
have the same target organ. Given that the hazard quotient for dermal contact with arsenic
(without considering any other compounds) is greater than one (1), in order to be conservative,
hazard indices for inorganic and organic COCs were summed without considering the target
organ.
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a group of similar compounds, many of
which are carcinogenic. For this reason, a dose addition methodology was used to assess
carcinogenic risk posed by this group of compounds. This was done using the recommended
USEPA method of toxicologic equivalency factors (TEF), wherein the toxicity of each PAH is
compared to benzo[a]pyrene and the slope factor for benzo[a]pyrene is used as the toxicologic
standard. However, USEPA (1993) recommends only using the TEF methodology for
carcinogenic effects due to the lack of studies examining non-carcinogenic effects of PAHs. As
can be seen in Table 31, using this methodology for PAHs results in a carcinogenic risk of 8.44 x
10-6 (less than an unacceptable incremental cancer risk of 10
-4). Given that the cancer risk for
dermal contact with PAHs is two orders of magnitude greater than the cancer risk associated
with arsenic, in order to be conservative, cancer risks for inorganic and organic COCs were
summed without considering the target organ.
5.5 Inhalation of Outdoor Air – Volatile Compounds
5.5.1 Estimating Concentration of Chemicals in Air
The sampling program at the site analyzed the concentration of COCs in the soil. In
order to estimate the concentration of each volatile COC in the air, the volatilization factor is
used. The volatilization factor is the relationship between the concentration of a chemical in the
soil and the flux of the chemical into the air. Of the identified COCs, the following are
considered to pose a potential risk due to volatilization: mercury, acenaphthene, acenaphthylene,
anthracene, fluorene, 2-methylnaphthalene, naphthalene, phenanthrene and pyrene. Table 32
lists the volatile compounds examined during this portion of the risk assessment, the
volatilization factor (USEPA Mid Atlantic Risk Assessment, 2014) and the estimated
concentration of the COCs in the air.
Table 31. Dermal cancer risk for chemicals of concern.
Csoil or equivalent
concentration
(mg/kg)
Dermal
Absorption
fraction DAeventDAD
Slope
Factor
(Oral) ABSGI
Absorbed
slope factor
Dermal Cancer
Risk
Arsenic 183 0.03 1.65E-05 7.60E-06 0.0043 1 0.0043 3.27E-08
3.27E-08
Acenaphthene 0.133 0.13 5.19E-08 2.39E-08 7.3 1 7.3 1.75E-07
Anthracene 0.048 0.13 1.89E-08 8.71E-09 7.3 1 7.3 6.36E-08
Benz[a]anthracene 0.152 0.13 5.91E-08 2.73E-08 7.3 1 7.3 1.99E-07
Benzo[a]pyrene 1.274 0.13 4.97E-07 2.29E-07 7.3 1 7.3 1.67E-06
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.559 0.13 6.08E-07 2.80E-07 7.3 1 7.3 2.05E-06
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.011 0.13 4.17E-09 1.92E-09 7.3 1 7.3 1.40E-08
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.017 0.13 6.72E-09 3.10E-09 7.3 1 7.3 2.26E-08
Chrysene 0.093 0.13 3.63E-08 1.67E-08 7.3 1 7.3 1.22E-07
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2.860 0.13 1.12E-06 5.15E-07 7.3 1 7.3 3.76E-06
Fluoranthene 0.086 0.13 3.35E-08 1.54E-08 7.3 1 7.3 1.13E-07
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.061 0.13 2.36E-08 1.09E-08 7.3 1 7.3 7.95E-08
8.44E-06
8.48E-06
Dermal Cancer Risk (inorganic)
Dermal Cancer Risk (organic)
Total Dermal Cancer Risk
85
Table 32. Calculation of concentrations of volatile COCs in air.
Csoil
(mg/kg) Volatilization Factor (m3/kg) Cair (mg/m
3)
Mercury 33.45 2.56E+04 1.31E-03
Acenaphthene 12.34 1.20E+05 1.03E-04
Acenaphthylene 49.94 1.61E+05 3.10E-04
Anthracene 11.40 4.45E+05 2.56E-05
Fluorene 43.69 2.39E+05 1.83E-04
2-Methylnaphthalene 0.247 4.93E+04 5.01E-06
Naphthalene 8.426 3.94E+04 2.14E-04
Phenanthrene 367.3 5.48E+05 6.70E-04
Pyrene 515.6 2.02E+06 2.55E-04
5.5.2 Non-Cancer Effects
According to USEPA (2009a), the steps in estimating exposure concentration include
assessing exposure duration, exposure pattern, and exposure concentration. Exposure duration
for construction and excavation workers on the site will be sub-chronic. In the guidance, acute
exposure is defined as lasting 24 hours or less. Sub-chronic exposure is defined as repeated
exposures for more than 30 days up to approximately 10 percent of a human lifespan
(approximately 7 years). Chronic exposures are repeated exposures for more than 10 percent of
the human lifespan. The decision flow chart (Figure 2 in USEPA, 2009a), requires that sub-
chronic exposure concentrations are calculated if the repeated periods of exposure are at least as
frequent as a sub-chronic toxicity test (6 to 8 hours a day, 5 days/week). If the exposure
frequency is at least as frequent as a chronic toxicity test or an occupational study (6 to 8 hours a
day, 5 days a week, 50 weeks a year), then a chronic exposure concentration should be
calculated.
The exposure of construction and excavation workers at the site could be defined
(according to Figure 2, USEPA, 2009a) as either sub-chronic or chronic. The equation used to
calculate the exposure concentration for both these situations is the same (Equation 7).
EC = CA x ET x EF x ED Equation 7
AT
Where: EC = Exposure concentration (mg/m3)
CA = Contaminant concentration in air (mg/m3)
ET = Exposure time (hours/day)
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
ED = Exposure duration (years)
AT = Averaging time (days)
86
Concentration in air was calculated using volatilization factors (Section 5.5.1). The
exposure used in the calculations was 250 days per year for one year for eight hours a day. This
exposure scenario, which assumes that a worker is exposed 50 weeks/year and 5 days per week,
was chosen in order to be conservative; the actual exposure frequency (according to the
architect) will probably be less than a year for any individual working on site. The length of
time that the site will be under excavation is expected to be less than a year with the rest of the
two-year construction estimate being used for construction and finishing. As excavation is
completed and areas of the site are paved, the volatilization of volatile COCs would be reduced.
An averaging time of one year was used (USEPA, 2004).
The exposure concentration (EC) calculated for each volatile COC was compared to an
RfC value. For SVOCs with no defined RfC value, it is recommended that an RfC for a similar
PAH be used, therefore, the RfC value for naphthalene was used.
The hazard quotient for each volatile COC was calculated as:
HQ = EC / RfC Equation 8
Where HQ = Hazard quotient
EC = Exposure concentration (mg/m3)
RfC = Reference concentration (mg/m3)
In general, a hazard index greater than one (1) is considered to pose an unacceptable risk.
The non-cancer risks from inhalation exposure to COCs at the site are summarized in Table 33.
The COC with the highest calculated hazard quotient is mercury (hazard quotient 0.996).
Further discussion about the hazard indices calculated for the inhalation of volatile compounds is
in Section 5.8.1.
Table 33. Hazard quotients for volatile COCs - inhalation pathway.
CA
(mg/m3)
Exposure
Concentration (mg/m3)
Reference
Concentration
(mg/m3)
Hazard
quotient
Mercury 1.31E-03 2.98E-04 3.00E-04 9.96E-01
Hazard Index due to mercury 0.996
Acenaphthene 1.03E-04 2.35E-05 3.00E-03 7.83E-03
Acenaphthylene 3.10E-04 7.08E-05 3.00E-03 2.36E-02
Anthracene 2.47E-04 5.64E-05 3.00E-03 1.88E-02
Fluorene 1.83E-04 4.17E-05 3.00E-03 1.39E-02
2-Methylnaphthalene 5.01E-06 1.14E-06 3.00E-03 3.81E-04
Naphthalene 2.14E-04 4.88E-05 3.00E-03 1.63E-02
Phenanthrene 6.70E-04 1.53E-04 3.00E-03 5.10E-02
Pyrene 2.55E-04 5.83E-05 3.00E-03 1.94E-02
Hazard Index due to volatile SVOCs 0.15
87
5.5.3 Carcinogenic Effects
According to USEPA (2009a), Equation 9 should be used to estimate the exposure
concentration for inhaled carcinogenic volatile COCs. Mercury was omitted from the estimation
of cancerous risks because it is not considered to be a human carcinogen.
EC = CA x ET x EF x ED Equation 9
AT
Where: EC = Exposure concentration (mg/m3)
CA = Contaminant concentration in air (mg/m3)
ET = Exposure time (hours/day)
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
ED = Exposure duration (years)
AT = Averaging time (days)
Concentration in air was calculated using volatilization factors (Section 5.5.1). The
exposure used in the calculations was 250 days per year for one year for eight hours a day. This
exposure scenario, which assumes that a worker is exposed 50 weeks/year and 5 days per week,
was chosen in order to be conservative; the actual exposure frequency (according to the
architect) will probably be less than a year for any individual working on site. The length of
time that the site will be under excavation is expected to be less than a year with the rest of the
two-year construction estimate being used for construction and finishing. As excavation is
completed and areas of the site are paved, the volatilization of volatile COCs would be reduced.
A default averaging time of seventy years was used to assess cancer risks (USEPA, 2009a).
The inhalation cancer risk is calculated using the Inhalation Unit Risk (IUR) provided by
IRIS. As in Section 6.5.2, the IUR for naphthalene was used as the IUR for other volatile PAHs
due to the lack of derived IURs for these other chemicals. The inhalation cancer risk for each
carcinogenic COC was calculated as:
Inhalation Cancer Risk = EC x IUR Equation 10
Where EC = exposure concentration (mg/m3)
IUR = inhalation unit risk (mg/m3)-1
The inhalation cancer risks for each individual COC were then summed to give the site
inhalation cancer risk due to volatile compounds. In general, a cancer risk of greater than 10-4
is
considered to pose an unacceptable risk. The cancer risks from inhalation exposure to volatile
COCs at the site are summarized in Table 34. The total inhalation cancer risk for PAHs at the
site is 7.7 x 10-6
. Therefore, there is no carcinogenic risk due to inhalation of volatile COCs in
outdoor air.
88
Table 34. Cancer risks associated with the inhalation of volatilized COCs.
Cair
(mg/m3)
Exposure
Concentration
(mg/m3)
Inhalation
Unit Risk
(ug/m3)
Inhalation
Unit Risk
(mg/m3)
Inhalation
Cancer
Risk
Acenaphthene 1.03E-04 1.17E-05 3.40E-05 3.40E-02 3.99E-07
Acenaphthylene 3.10E-04 3.54E-05 3.40E-05 3.40E-02 1.20E-06
Anthracene 2.47E-04 2.82E-05 3.40E-05 3.40E-02 9.59E-07
Fluorene 1.83E-04 2.09E-05 3.40E-05 3.40E-02 7.10E-07
2-Methylnaphthalene 5.01E-06 1.14E-06 3.40E-05 3.40E-02 3.89E-08
Naphthalene 2.14E-04 2.44E-05 3.40E-05 3.40E-02 8.30E-07
Phenanthrene 6.70E-04 7.65E-05 3.40E-05 3.40E-02 2.60E-06
Pyrene 2.55E-04 2.91E-05 3.40E-05 3.40E-02 9.91E-07
Cancer Risk 7.73E-06
5.6 Inhalation of Outdoor Air – Particulates
5.6.1 Estimating Concentration of Chemicals as Particulates in Air
The sampling program at the site, analyzed the concentration of COCs in the soil. In order to
estimate the concentration of each COC in the air as particulates, the particulate emission factor
was used. The particulate emission factor was estimated to be 6.44 x 108, based on tables from
USEPA Mid Atlantic Risk Assessment (2014) (data from Cleveland, Ohio for a 5-acre site was
used). The estimated concentrations of particulates in fugitive dust from the site are provided in
Table 35. All COCs at the site were considered to be part of dust emissions from the site.
5.6.2 Non-Cancer Effects
According to USEPA (2009a), the steps in estimating exposure concentration include
assessing exposure duration, exposure pattern, and exposure concentration. Exposure duration
for construction and excavation workers on the site will be sub-chronic. In the guidance, acute
exposure is defined as lasting 24 hours or less; sub-chronic is defined as repeated exposures for
more than 30 days up to approximately 10 percent of a human lifespan (approximately 7 years),
and chronic exposures are repeated exposures for more than 10 percent of the human lifespan.
The decision flow chart (Figure 2 in USEPA, 2009a), requires that sub-chronic exposure
concentrations are calculated if the repeated periods of exposure are at least as frequent as a sub-
chronic toxicity test (6 to 8 hours a day, 5 days/week). If the exposure frequency is at least as
frequent as a chronic toxicity test or an occupational study (6 to 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, 50
weeks a year), then a chronic exposure concentration should be calculated.
89
Table 35. Calculation of concentrations of particulate COCs in air.
Csoil (mg/kg)
Particulate
Emission Factor
(m3/kg) CA (mg/m
3)
Aluminum 6305 6.44E+08 9.79E-06
Antimony 9.582 6.44E+08 1.49E-08
Arsenic 160.4 6.44E+08 2.49E-07
Barium 796.3 6.44E+08 1.24E-06
Beryllium 0.497 6.44E+08 7.72E-10
Cadmium 3.186 6.44E+08 4.95E-09
Chromium 85.04 6.44E+08 1.32E-07
Lead 989.9 6.44E+08 1.54E-06
Manganese 555.4 6.44E+08 8.62E-07
Mercury 33.45 6.44E+08 5.19E-08
Selenium 4.806 6.44E+08 7.46E-09
Vanadium 17.85 6.44E+08 2.77E-08
Zinc 1214 6.44E+08 1.89E-06
Acenaphthene 12.34 6.44E+08 1.92E-08
Acenaphthylene 49.94 6.44E+08 7.75E-08
Anthracene 110 6.44E+08 1.71E-07
Benz[a]anthracene 270.9 6.44E+08 4.21E-07
Benzo[a]pyrene 238.8 6.44E+08 3.71E-07
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 271.2 6.44E+08 4.21E-07
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 129.3 6.44E+08 2.01E-07
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 116.1 6.44E+08 1.80E-07
Chrysene 245.3 6.44E+08 3.81E-07
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 38.23 6.44E+08 5.94E-08
Fluoranthene 631.5 6.44E+08 9.81E-07
Fluorene 43.69 6.44E+08 6.78E-08
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 116.3 6.44E+08 1.81E-07
2-Methylnaphthalene 0.247 6.44E+08 3.84E-10
Naphthalene 8.426 6.44E+08 1.31E-08
Phenanthrene 367.3 6.44E+08 5.70E-07
Pyrene 515.6 6.44E+08 8.01E-07
90
The exposure of construction and excavation workers at the site could be defined
(according to Figure 2, USEPA, 2009a) as either sub-chronic or chronic. The equation used to
calculate the exposure concentration for both these situations is the same (Equation 7).
Concentration in air was calculated using particulate emission factors (Section 5.6.1).
The exposure used in the calculations was 250 days per year for one year for eight hours a day.
An averaging time of one year was used (USEPA, 2004). This exposure scenario, which
assumes that a worker is exposed 50 weeks/year and 5 days per week, was chosen in order to be
conservative; the actual exposure frequency (according to the architect) will probably be less
than a year for any individual working on site. The length of time that the site will be under
excavation is expected to be less than a year with the rest of the two-year construction estimate
being used for construction and finishing. As excavation is completed and areas of the site are
paved, the emission of particulate COCs as dust would be reduced. Additionally, dust mitigation
during construction and excavation will further reduce the emission of COCs as particulates.
The exposure concentration (EC) calculated for each COC was compared to an RfC
value. For volatile SVOCs with no defined RfC value, the RfC value for naphthalene was used
(acenaphthene, acenaphthylene, anthracene, fluorene, 3-methylnaphthalene, phenanthrene and
pyrene). A proposed RfC of 2x10-6
(USEPA, 2012-Draft Guidance) was used for
benzo[a]pyrene and the remainder of the PAH compounds in this risk assessment. USEPA does
not recommend a RfC for arsenic, barium and vanadium, so arsenic, barium and vanadium were
excluded from this risk assessment. OSHA set the safe limit for aluminum dusts at 5 mg/m3,
however, there is no RfC for aluminum. The estimated exposure concentration for aluminum
dusts is 9.8 x 10-6
mg/m3, therefore, aluminum was therefore omitted from this portion of the risk
assessment because the concentration in the air at the site is six orders of magnitudes less than
the OSHA limit for exposure (Table 35). Similarly, zinc was omitted from the calculation – the
OSHA PEL for zinc is 1 mg/m3, and the concentration estimated at the site is 1.9 x 10
-6 mg/m
3
(Table 35). The RfC for antimony trioxide was used to approximate exposure risks from
antimony. A draft RfC, proposed by USEPA in 1999 was used as a comparison point for
particulate cadmium concentrations, even though IRIS does not currently provide an RfC for
cadmiuim. For selenium, the California EPA chronic reference exposure level of 0.02 mg/m3
was used as an RfC value. The lines in Table 36 for cadmium and selenium are highlighted in
gray because of the additional uncertainty associated with these values.
The hazard quotient for each volatile COC was calculated as:
HQ = EC / RfC Equation 11
Where HQ = Hazard quotient
EC = Exposure concentration (mg/m3)
RfC = Reference concentration (mg/m3)
The hazard quotients for each individual COC were then summed to give the site hazard
index. In general, a hazard index greater than one (1) is considered to pose an unacceptable risk.
The non-cancer risks from inhalation exposure to COCs at the site are summarized in Table 36.
91
The hazard index for the inhalation of non-carcinogenic particulates is 0.373, below the
recommended hazard index of one (1).
Table 36. Hazard quotients for particulate COCs - inhalation pathway.
Cair
(mg/m3)
Exposure
Concentration
(mg/m3)
Reference
Concentration
(mg/m3) Hazard Quotient
Antimony 1.49E-08 3.40E-09 2.00E-04 1.70E-05
Beryllium 7.72E-10 1.76E-10 2.00E-05 8.81E-06
Cadmium 4.95E-09 1.13E-09 7.00E-04 1.61E-06
Chromium 1.32E-07 3.01E-08 3.00E-04 3.76E-06
Manganese 8.62E-07 1.97E-07 5.00E-05 3.94E-03
Mercury 5.19E-08 1.19E-08 3.00E-04 3.95E-05
Selenium 7.46E-09 1.70E-09 2.00E-02 8.52E-08
Acenaphthene 1.92E-08 4.37E-09 3.00E-03 1.46E-06
Acenaphthylene 7.75E-08 1.77E-08 3.00E-03 5.90E-06
Anthracene 1.71E-07 3.90E-08 3.00E-03 1.30E-05
Benz[a]anthracene 4.21E-07 9.60E-08 2.00E-06 4.80E-02
Benzo[a]pyrene 3.71E-07 8.47E-08 2.00E-06 4.23E-02
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 4.21E-07 9.61E-08 2.00E-06 4.81E-02
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 2.01E-07 4.58E-08 2.00E-06 2.29E-02
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 1.80E-07 4.12E-08 2.00E-06 2.06E-02
Chrysene 3.81E-07 8.70E-08 2.00E-06 4.35E-02
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 5.94E-08 1.36E-08 2.00E-06 6.78E-03
Fluoranthene 9.81E-07 2.24E-07 2.00E-06 1.12E-01
Fluorene 6.78E-08 1.55E-08 3.00E-03 5.16E-06
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 1.81E-07 4.12E-08 2.00E-06 2.06E-02
2-Methylnaphthalene 3.84E-10 8.76E-11 3.00E-03 2.92E-08
Naphthalene 1.31E-08 2.99E-09 3.00E-03 9.96E-07
Phenanthrene 5.70E-07 1.30E-07 3.00E-03 4.34E-05
Pyrene 8.01E-07 1.83E-07 3.00E-03 6.09E-05
Hazard Index 0.369
5.6.3 Carcinogenic Effects
According to USEPA (2009a), Equation 9 should be used to estimate the exposure
concentration for inhaled carcinogenic particulate COCs. Aluminum, antimony, barium,
manganese, mercury, selenium, vanadium, zinc, acenaphthene, acenaphthylene, anthracene,
benzo[g,h,i]perylene, fluoranthene, fluorene, 2-methylnaphthalene, phenanthrene and pyrene
92
were omitted from the estimation of cancerous risks because these chemicals are not considered
to be human carcinogens when inhaled.
Concentration in air was calculated using particulate emission factors (Section 5.6.1).
The exposure used in the calculations was 250 days per year for one year for eight hours a day.
A default averaging time of seventy years was used to assess cancer risks (USEPA, 2009a). This
exposure scenario, which assumes that a worker is exposed 50 weeks/year and 5 days per week,
was chosen in order to be conservative; the actual exposure frequency (according to the
architect) will probably be less than a year for any individual working on site. The length of
time that the site will be under excavation is expected to be less than a year with the rest of the
two-year construction estimate being used for construction and finishing. As excavation is
completed and areas of the site are paved, the emission of particulate COCs would be reduced.
The inhalation cancer risk was calculated using the Inhalation Unit Risk (IUR) provided
by IRIS, where available. When data from IRIS was not available for the IUR, the values from
USEPA Mid Atlantic Risk Assessment (2014) tables were used (Table 22). The inhalation
cancer risk for each carcinogenic COC was calculated using Equation 10.
The inhalation cancer risks for each individual COC were then summed to give the site
inhalation cancer risk due to volatile compounds. In general, a cancer risk of greater than 10-4
is
considered to pose an unacceptable risk. The cancer risks from inhalation exposure to volatile
COCs at the site are summarized in Table 37. The total inhalation cancer risk for particulates at
the site is 3.75 x 10-7
. Therefore, there is no carcinogenic risk due to inhalation of particulate
COCs in outdoor air.
Table 37. Cancer risks associated with the inhalation of particulate COCs.
Cair
(mg/m3)
Exposure
Concentration
(mg/m3)
Inhalation
Unit Risk
(ug/m3)-1
Inhalation
Unit Risk
(mg/m3)-1
Inhalation
Cancer Risk
Arsenic 2.49E-07 2.84E-08 4.30E-03 4.30E+00 1.22E-07
Beryllium 7.72E-10 8.81E-11 2.40E-03 2.40E+00 2.11E-10
Cadmium 4.95E-09 5.65E-10 1.80E-03 1.80E+00 1.02E-09
Chromium 1.32E-07 1.51E-08 1.20E-02 1.20E+01 1.81E-07
Benz[a]anthracene 4.21E-07 4.80E-08 1.10E-04 1.10E-01 5.28E-09
Benzo[a]pyrene 3.71E-07 4.23E-08 1.10E-03 1.10E+00 4.66E-08
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 4.21E-07 4.81E-08 1.10E-04 1.10E-01 5.29E-09
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 1.80E-07 2.06E-08 1.10E-04 1.10E-01 2.26E-09
Chrysene 3.81E-07 4.35E-08 1.10E-05 1.10E-02 4.78E-10
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 5.94E-08 6.78E-09 1.20E-03 1.20E+00 8.13E-09
Indeno[1,2,3-
cd]pyrene 1.81E-07 2.06E-08 1.10E-04 1.10E-01 2.27E-09
Naphthalene 1.31E-08 1.49E-09 3.40E-05 3.40E-02 5.08E-11
3.75E-07
93
5.7 Uncertainty Associated with Inhalation Risk Analysis
5.7.1 Calculation of Concentrations in Air
Extrapolating from soil concentrations introduces uncertainty into the calculations.
Volatilization from soil into air was estimated using volatilization factors, which are not always
readily available. There is also uncertainty in the estimation of the particulate emission factor.
The inhalation risk assessment could be refined (and uncertainty reduced) by measuring ambient
concentrations of COCs during construction and excavation.
5.7.2 Calculation of Exposure Concentrations
The exposure concentrations calculated for chronic and sub-chronic exposure do not
account for short time periods during which workers may be exposed to elevated concentrations
of COCs (for example, during the excavation of a “hot spot”). Exposure concentrations are also
dependent on the exposure time. Discussions with the architect led to the conservative
assumption that workers would be exposed to the soil for no more than a year. In reality, the
expected exposure is likely to be less than a year for any individual contractor. Contractors
involved with the installation of utilities are expected to be onsite for less than three months.
The foundations to support the building are expected to take approximately four months to
install. Once the site has utilities and the base of construction completed, the area of the site
outside the footprint of the building is to be paved, limiting worker’s exposure to inhaled
volatiles and particulates. If adequate dust mitigation methods are incorporated into the site’s
health and safety plan, the concentration of particulates in the air would be further reduced.
5.7.3 Toxicity Assessment
Inhalation reference concentrations have not been developed by USEPA for all COCs at
this site. The use of OSHA standards and draft USEPA RfCs to assess dermal exposure
introduces uncertainty into the toxicity assessment.
5.7.4 Estimating Carcinogenic Risks
For high exposures (those which have risks greater than 10-2
), the inhalation unit risk is
not appropriate to use. However, the greatest risks documented during this risk assessment were
on the order of 10-7
(for arsenic and chromium), so use of the IUR does not introduce excess
uncertainty.
5.7.5 Risk from Multiple Chemicals
Assessing risk from mixtures of chemicals is the subject of several USEPA guidance
documents (USEPA, 1989 and USEPA 2000). In general, there are three quantitative methods
for assessing risk from chemical mixtures:
94
• If there is data on a “sufficiently similar” mixture, use toxicologic data on the
characterized mixture;
• If chemicals have similar methods of toxicity and target organs, dose addition may be
used; and
• If chemicals have dissimilar methods of toxicity and target different organs, response
addition may be used.
There is no readily available information on toxicological responses of a “sufficiently
similar mixture”. In this situation, dose addition or response addition may be used. USEPA
(2000) also allows for the performance of a qualitative risk assessment on the impact from
multiple chemicals if there is insufficient data to complete a quantitative risk assessment.
5.7.5.1 Inhalation of Volatile Chemicals
Two distinct groups of chemicals contribute hazard quotients to the total risk posed by
the inhalation of volatile compounds: mercury and volatile PAHs. All volatile PAHs were
assumed to have the same mode of action and potency at naphthalene. The critical effects
caused by naphthalene (according to IRIS) are nasal effects, including “hyperplasia and
metaphasia in respiratory and olfactory epithelium, respectively”. However, the critical effects
of the inhalation of mercury are “hand tremor, increases in memory disturbance, slight
subjective and objective evidence of autonomic dysfunction”. Therefore, volatile PAHs impact
the lungs and nose, while mercury impacts the nervous system. Given these two distinct modes
of action, it is not necessarily appropriate to sum the hazard indices across the target organs.
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a group of similar compounds, many of
which are carcinogenic. While an explicit dose addition methodology (using TEFs) was used in
Section 5.4.3 for assessing the carcinogenic risk associated with dermal exposure to PAHs,
inhalation exposure to volatile PAHs used an implicit dose addition methodology. That is, the
inhalation unit risks provided for the PAHs were scaled from the IUR for benzo[a]pyrene. As
can be seen in Table 34, using this methodology for PAHs results in a carcinogenic risk of 7.73 x
10-6
(less than the target incremental cancer risk of 10-4
).
5.7.5.2 Inhalation of Particulate Chemicals
The total hazard index posed by exposure to particulate COCs is 0.369, regardless of
target organ. This is less than the target hazard index of one (1). Therefore, no risk is posed to
construction and excavation workers by particulate COCs.
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a group of similar compounds, many of
which are carcinogenic. While an explicit dose addition methodology (using TEFs) was used in
Section 5.4.3 for assessing the carcinogenic risk associated with dermal exposure to PAHs,
inhalation exposure to volatile PAHs used an implicit dose addition methodology. That is, the
inhalation unit risks provided for the PAHs were scaled from the IUR for benzo[a]pyrene. As
can be seen in Table 37, using this methodology for PAHs results in a carcinogenic risk of 7.03 x
95
10-8
(less than an unacceptable incremental cancer risk of 10-4
). In order to be conservative, total
cancer risk to particulates were summed without considering the target organ. This resulted in a
total incremental cancer risk of 3.75 x 10-7 (less than an unacceptable incremental cancer risk of
10-4
). Therefore, there is no carcinogenic risk due to inhalation of particulate COCs in outdoor
air.
5.8 Summary of Total Risk to Construction and Excavation Workers
5.8.1 Non-Cancer Risks (Dermal Plus Inhalation)
Table 38 shows the non-carcinogenic risks posed to construction and excavation workers,
separated by target organ. The target hazard index of one (1) is exceeded for the nervous system
and blood.
The COCs that target the nervous system include mercury, aluminum and manganese.
Inhalation of volatile mercury and dermal contact with aluminum contribute over 97 percent of
the risk posed to the nervous system. The dermal risk can be reduced by wearing gloves and
long sleeves. The dermal risk can be further reduced if employees shower immediately on
finishing work each day because the dermal risk assessment process considers that soil is in
contact with the skin for 24 hours each day. Even protective dermal measures may not reduce
the hazard index below the USEPA threshold of one (1) due to the risk posed by the inhalation of
mercury.
It is important to note that the inhalation risk assessment was conducted using
concentrations of mercury reported in the soil (as opposed to soil gas) (Section 5.7.1). Risk
assessment performed using soil gas measurements (as opposed to the soil values used here)
would provide more certainty as to whether this pathway is of concern. Alternatively,
administrative controls could be used to reduce the exposure to mercury vapor, including rotating
workers to reduce the time of exposure at the site. Preliminary calculations indicate that total
exposure for an adult worker should not exceed 200 days. Given that the architect did not
expect individual construction teams to be onsite for more than six months, this exposure period
should not negatively affect construction at the site.
The COCs that target blood include antimony, arsenic, zinc and fluorene. Dermal contact
with arsenic contributes over 98 percent of the risk to the blood. This risk can be reduced to
acceptable levels by providing employees with gloves and having workers wear long sleeves.
This risk can be further reduced if employees shower immediately on finishing work each day
because the dermal risk assessment process considers that soil is in contact with the skin for 24
hours each day.
96
Table 38. Total non-carcinogenic risks to construction and excavation workers.
Target Organ Chemical of Concern Pathway Hazard Quotient
Nervous System Mercury Inhalation-volatile 9.96E-01
Aluminum Dermal 1.10E-01
Manganese Dermal 3.00E-02
Manganese Inhalation-particulate 3.94E-03
Mercury Inhalation-particulate 3.95E-05
Hazard Index - Nervous System 1.14
Nose and Lungs Volatile PAHs Inhalation-volatile 1.50E-01
2-Methylnaphthalene Dermal 6.00E-04
Volatile PAHs Inhalation-particulate 1.31E-04
Antimony Inhalation-particulate 1.70E-05
Beryllium Inhalation-particulate 8.81E-06
Chromium Inhalation-particulate 3.76E-06
Hazard Index - Nose and Lungs 0.15
Blood Antimony Dermal 1.10E-06
Arsenic Dermal 1.80E+00
Zinc Dermal 3.10E-02
Fluorene Dermal 1.50E-05
Hazard Index – Blood 1.83
Kidneys Barium Dermal 1.90E-02
Cadmium Dermal 4.80E-08
Pyrene Dermal 4.40E-05
Cadmium Inhalation-particulate 1.61E-06
Hazard index - Kidneys 0.02
Liver Selenium Dermal 1.10E-05
Acenaphthene Dermal 5.10E-06
Selenium Inhalation-particulate 8.52E-08
Fluoranthene Dermal 3.40E-04
Hazard Index – Liver 3.56E-04
Intestines Beryllium Dermal 1.60E-06
Hair Vanadium Dermal 0.03
Weight loss Naphthalene Dermal 8.50E-05
Reproductive System Non-volatile PAHs Inhalation-particulate 0.37
Total Hazard Index-all target organs 3.54
97
5.8.2 Carcinogenic Risk (Dermal and Inhalation)
The total carcinogenic risk across all pathways (regardless of target organ) is 1.66 x 10-5
(Table 39). This value is less than the acceptable incremental carcinogenic risk of 10-4
recommended by USEPA. Therefore, no carcinogenic risks are posed to construction and
excavation workers at the site.
Table 39. Total carcinogenic risks to construction and excavation workers.
Incremental Carcinogenic Risk
Dermal 8.48E-06
Inhalation volatile 7.73E-06
Inhalation particulate 3.75E-07
Total Risk 1.66E-05
5.8.3 Total Risk (Dermal and Inhalation)
Based on the concentrations of COCs in the soil, construction/excavation workers are
expected to have an increased dermal risk due to arsenic. This risk can be managed by requiring
workers (as part of a health and safety plan) to wear gloves and long sleeves. Workers should
also be reminded that showering after work will further reduce their exposure risk.
In addition, construction/excavation workers are expected to have an unacceptable
increased inhalation risk due to mercury if they are onsite fulltime more than 200 days. This risk
can be managed (as part of a health and safety plan) by limiting either the number of hours
and/or the number of days of exposure for the worker.
5.9 Indoor Air Risk Assessment
5.9.1 Calculating Exposure Concentrations
Concentrations of COCs in indoor air in the proposed jail, proposed jail and possible
expansion, and proposed Sheriff’s Office were estimated using the Johnson and Ettinger (1991)
model. Version 3.1 of the model was used (Environmental Quality Management, 2004). COCs
that are considered to be “sufficiently toxic” and “sufficiently volatile” were included in this
portion of the risk assessment. Chemicals are considered to be “sufficiently toxic” if the non-
cancer hazard index of the vapor concentration of the pure chemical is greater than one (1) or if
the vapor concentration of the pure chemical creates an incremental life time cancer risk of more
than 1 x 10-6
. Chemicals with a Henry’s law constant of greater than 1 x 10-5
atm-m3/mole were
considered to be “sufficiently volatile” (Environmental Quality Management, 2004). Therefore,
the COCs included in this portion of the risk assessment were acenaphthene,
benzo[b]fluoranthene, chrysene, fluorene, mercury, 2-methylnaphthalene, naphthalene and
pyrene.
98
Inputs to the Johnson and Ettinger model can be grouped as chemical-specific, soil,
building, and exposure scenarios. Default chemical input parameters were used as provided in
the look-up tables within the Johnson and Ettinger model and concentrations of COC were used
from Tables 26 and 27. Input values used for all model runs pertaining to soil conditions at the
site are listed in Table 40. Parameters describing the proposed buildings are provided in Table
41. The three scenarios investigated were for the proposed jail; the proposed jail and possible
expansion; and the Sheriff’s Office. Figure 15 shows the location of the proposed jail (red
outline), possible expansion area (green outline), and Sheriff’s Office (light pink outline on the
west side of the site).
Exposure scenarios were investigated for jail inmates and adults working at the facilities
(Table 42). For the purposes of this assessment, residents were assumed to be exposed to the air
inside the building for one year with continuous exposure 365 days a year. (According to
Fairfield County personnel, the average stay in the Fairfield County jail is 14 days. However, for
misdemeanors under ORC 2929.24, there are times when sentences can add to 360 days.
Further, if there is a felony 5 charge, which is rare in Fairfield County, the time could exceed a
year depending on multiple factors. Reportedly, the longest duration recently has been 18
months.) For adult workers in the proposed jail and Sheriff’s office, the exposure time was 25
years (USEPA recommended value for commercial/industrial exposure scenarios) with exposure
250 days a year (50 weeks a year, 5 days a week).
5.9.2 Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Risks
Results from the Johnson and Ettinger model are summarized in Table 43. Scenarios
with a hazard quotient greater than 0.1 are highlighted in orange and those with a hazard quotient
greater than 1 are highlighted in yellow. Full result outputs are provided in Appendix N.
99
Table 40. Input parameters for the Johnson and Ettinger model - soil parameters.
Parameter Input Value Units Rationale
Average soil temperature 10 oC Default
Depth below grade to bottom
of enclosed floor space 15 cm
Model setting for slab on grade
scenario
Depth below bottom of grade
to top of contamination 20 cm
Must be greater than Depth below
grade to bottom of enclosed floor
space
Depth below bottom of grade
to bottom of contamination 360 cm Based on depth of fill in borings
Thickness of soil stratum A 20 cm
soil stratum total depth must
equal depth below grade to top of
contamination
Soil stratum A SCS soil type LS Based on data from borings
Stratum A soil dry bulk density 1.62 g/cm3 Model default for LS soil type
Stratum A soil total porosity 0.39 Model default for LS soil type
Stratum A soil water filled
porosity 0.076 cm3/cm
3 Model default for LS soil type
Stratum A soil organic carbon
fraction 0.002 Model default for LS soil type
100
Table 41. Input parameters for the Johnson and Ettinger model - building parameters.
Parameter Scenario
Input
Value Units Rationale
Enclosed space floor
thickness 10 cm Model default
Soil-building
pressure differential 40 g/cm-s
2 Model default
Enclosed floor space
length
Proposed jail 7161 cm Based on area weighted
average of one story and
two story areas of the
proposed building
Proposed jail and expansion 8258 cm
Proposed Sheriff's Office 4838 cm
Enclosed floor space
width
Proposed jail 7161 cm Based on area weighted
average of one story and
two story areas of the
proposed building
Proposed jail and expansion 8258 cm
Proposed Sheriff's office 4838 cm
Enclosed space
height
Proposed jail 538 cm Based on the area of the
proposed building Proposed jail and expansion 555 cm
Proposed Sheriff's office 305 cm
Floor-wall seam
crack width 0.1 cm Model default
Indoor air exchange
rate 1 1/hr
Data from consultant
engineers designing the
HVAC system
Table 42. Input parameters for the Johnson and Ettinger model - exposure scenarios.
Parameter Scenario Input Value Units Rationale
Averaging
time for
carcinogens
70 years US EPA default
Averaging
time for non-
carcinogens
Adult resident 1 years Averaging time equals
exposure duration for non-
carcinogens Adult worker 25 years
Exposure
duration
Adult resident 1 years See text
Adult worker 25 years
Exposure
frequency
Adult resident 365 days/year See text
Adult worker 250 days/year
Table 43. Results from the Johnson and Ettinger Model.
Parameter Scenario
Incremental risk
from vapor
intrusion to
indoor air
(carcinogen)
Hazard quotient
from vapor
intrusion to
indoor air (non-
carcinogenic)
Acenaphthene Residential proposed jail 9.48E-05
Residential proposed jail and expansion 7.97E-05
Worker proposed jail 6.49E-05
Worker proposed jail and expansion 5.46E-05
Worker proposed Sheriff's office 1.69E-04
Benzo[b]fluoranthene Residential proposed jail 3.15E-11
Residential proposed jail and expansion 2.65E-11
Worker proposed jail 5.40E-10
Worker proposed jail and expansion 4.54E-10Worker proposed Sheriff's office 1.41E-09
Chrysene Residential proposed jail 1.25E-12
Residential proposed jail and expansion 1.05E-12
Worker proposed jail 2.13E-11
Worker proposed jail and expansion 1.80E-11Worker proposed Sheriff's office 5.57E-11
Fluorene Residential proposed jail 1.05E-04
Residential proposed jail and expansion 8.84E-05
Worker proposed jail 7.20E-05
Worker proposed jail and expansion 6.05E-05
Worker proposed Sheriff's office 1.88E-04
Mercury Residential proposed jail 3.66
Residential proposed jail and expansion 3.08
Worker proposed jail 2.51
Worker proposed jail and expansion 2.11
Worker proposed Sheriff's office 6.53
2-Methylnaphthalene Residential proposed jail 4.72E-05
Residential proposed jail and expansion 3.97E-05
Worker proposed jail 3.23E-05
Worker proposed jail and expansion 2.72E-05
Worker proposed Sheriff's office 8.43E-05
Naphthalene Residential proposed jail 6.61E-02
Residential proposed jail and expansion 5.56E-02
Worker proposed jail 4.53E-02
Worker proposed jail and expansion 3.81E-02
Worker proposed Sheriff's office 1.18E-01
Pyrene Residential proposed jail 1.39E-05
Residential proposed jail and expansion 1.19E-05
Worker proposed jail 9.51E-06
Worker proposed jail and expansion 7.99E-06
Worker proposed Sheriff's office 2.48E-05
102
As shown in Table 43, naphthalene has a hazard quotient of 0.118 for workers in the
proposed Sheriff’s office. However, the hazard quotient for mercury is an order of magnitude
higher. In all five scenarios investigated, the hazard quotient for mercury exceeded one (1).
These calculations are based on the analysis of bulk soil, which introduces increased uncertainty
in the risk analysis. Ohio EPA (2010b) recommends further data collection (including soil gas
sampling and analysis) prior to a definitive determination of risk.
Based on preliminary evaluation of concentrations of mercury and naphthalene in the
soil, measurements of concentrations of these chemicals of concern in soil gas have been
initiated to determine if vapor intrusion into the new building will pose an increased health risk
for workers and residents. If soil gas measurements show no increased exposure, then no
measures are needed to protect the residents and workers. If soil gas measurements indicate an
increased exposure, then measures to interrupt the pathway must be employed (e.g. installation
of a physical barrier below the slab with passive or active air removal).
5.9.3 Uncertainty Associated with Indoor Air Risk Analysis
The Johnson and Ettinger model is a screening model that takes into account both
convective and diffusive mechanisms and estimates the transport of contaminant vapors from
soils into buildings located immediately above the contaminated soil. The Johnson and Ettinger
model is a one-dimensional analytical model that takes into account contaminant attenuation as
contaminants move from soil into soil gas into buildings. There is limited experimental data to
assist in the definition of input parameters. Therefore, unless site-specific data were available,
recommended model defaults were used to create a conservative estimate of vapor concentration.
There is greater uncertainty associated with calculating indoor air concentrations of contaminants
when starting from soil analytical data than when using soil gas data. To account for this
increased uncertainty, the hazard quotient was compared to 0.1 [instead of the usual value of one
(1)], as recommended by Ohio EPA (2010b).
In addition to the uncertainty associated with soil analytical information, the Johnson and
Ettinger model has the following assumptions/limitations (according to Environmental Quality
Management, 2004):
1. “Contaminant vapors enter the structure primarily through cracks and openings in the
walls and foundation.
2. Convective transport occurs primarily within the building zone of influence and vapor
velocities decrease rapidly with increasing distance from the structure.
3. Diffusion dominates vapor transport between the source of contamination and the
building zone of influence.
4. All vapors originating from below the building will enter the building unless the floor and
walls are perfect vapor barriers.
103
5. All soil properties in any horizontal plane are homogenous.
6. The contaminant is homogenously distributed within the zone of contamination.
7. The areal extent of contamination is greater than that of the building floor in contact with
the soil.
8. Vapor transport occurs in the absence of convective water movement within the soil
column (i.e., evaporation of infiltration), and in the absence of mechanical dispersion.
9. The model does not account for transformation processes (e.g., biodegradation,
hydrolysis, etc.).
10. The soil layer in contact with the structure floor and walls is isotropic with respect to
permeability.
11. Both the building ventilation rate and the difference in dynamic pressure between the
interior of the structure and the soil surface are constant values.”
Despite these assumptions and inherent limitations of the Johnson and Ettinger model,
the model results have compared favorably to experimental case histories and three-dimensional
numerical modeling of radon transport into homes (Ohio EPA, 2010b). The recommended use
of the Johnson and Ettinger model is to identify sites that may require further assessment with
respect to the indoor air pathway. The model should be used only to assess whether a risk-
exposure level may be exceeded at the site. It should not be used to predict the exact
concentrations of contaminants in indoor air at a facility.
5.10 Risk Assessment for Lead
5.10.1 Adult Lead Methodology
Risks due to exposure to lead are not modeled in the same manner as other chemicals
because it does not appear to have a threshold exposure level (i.e., the USEPA does not consider
the use of RfD or RfC values to be appropriate). The generally-accepted methodology for
assessing exposure to lead is the comparison of estimated blood lead concentrations to a
reference level of 10 µg/dl.
The USEPA’s recommended model for evaluating blood lead concentrations in non-
residential adult exposure scenarios is the Adult Lead Methodology (ALM). The ALM model is
a tool to estimate the concentration of lead in the blood of non-residential adults exposed to lead
in the environment. ProUCL was used to calculate the most appropriate UCL for the site data
(Appendix O).
The maximum depth of excavation expected by the architects is six feet. Therefore,
exposure to construction and excavation workers will be limited to the top six feet of soil. To be
conservative, the analytical data for the top eight feet were used in the risk assessment for lead
104
exposure. Summary statistics for lead in the top eight feet of the soil are provided in Table 44.
Lead does not volatilize readily, and, therefore, exposure to particulate matter containing lead is
the major exposure pathway at the site.
Table 44. Statistical summary of lead concentration data in soils at the site (0-8 feet).
Number of Data points 14
Number of Detects 14
Mean (mg/kg) 256
Standard Deviation (mg/kg) 480.7
UCL used Lognormal - 99% Chebyshev (mean, sd)
UCL (mg/kg) 1534
Maximum (mg/kg) 1600
Minimum (mg/kg) 5.9
Recommended defaults were used for input parameters into the ALM (Table 45) and
defaults were only adjusted when site-specific data was available, as recommended by USEPA
(2003b). The “ingestion rate” of soil containing lead is defaulted to 0.05 g/day, but this default
represents occupational exposure indoors. For this assessment, the Ohio EPA Voluntary Action
Program-recommended ingestion rate for construction workers was used (0.2 g/day). To retain
consistency with other occupational risk assessment performed at this site (see previous
sections), an exposure frequency of 250 days was used. Parameters that were altered based on
data from the site are highlighted in orange. NHANES III input data (for geometric standard
deviation and baseline lead blood concentrations) were used (USEPA 2009b).
The ALM calculated a geometric mean blood lead concentration of 11.6 µg/dl. This
result is higher than the target blood lead concentration level of 10 µg/dl. When this situation
occurs, construction worker exposure is subject to 29CFR 1926.62 (Section 5.10.3).
5.10.2 Assumptions of the Adult Lead Methodology
Like any model, the ALM makes certain assumptions. It assumes that blood
concentrations of lead for an exposed adult are the sum of starting blood lead concentration and
an expected increase in blood lead concentration due to the site. The methodology relates lead
uptake at a site to the concentration of lead in the top layers of soil (i.e., exposure to dusts). It
assumes that uptake through volatilization is minimal. The distribution of blood lead
concentrations can be approximated using a log-normal model (USEPA, 2003b). The
methodology predicts the concentration of lead in the blood of pregnant women and a developing
fetus. However, this methodology is also considered to be protective of adult male workers at
the site.
Table 45. Calculations of blood lead concentrations (PbBs) using ALM.
U.S. EPA Technical Review Workgroup for Lead, Adult Lead Committee
Version date 6/21/09
Variable Units
GSDi and PbBo from Analysis of NHANES
1999-2004
PbS ug/g or ppm 1534
Rfetal/maternal -- 0.9
BKSF ug/dL per
ug/day0.4
GSDi -- 2.1
PbB0 ug/dL 1.5
IRS g/day 0.200
IRS+D g/day --
WS -- --
KSD -- --
AFS, D -- 0.12
EFS, D days/yr 250
ATS, D days/yr 365
PbBadult PbB of adult worker, geometric mean ug/dL 11.6
PbBfetal, 0.95 95th percentile PbB among fetuses of adult workers ug/dL 35.3
PbBt Target PbB level of concern (e.g., 10 ug/dL) ug/dL 10.0
P(PbBfetal > PbBt) Probability that fetal PbB > PbBt, assuming lognormal distribution % 52.3%
Description of Variable
Soil lead concentration
Fetal/maternal PbB ratio
Biokinetic Slope Factor
Geometric standard deviation PbB
Baseline PbB
Averaging time (same for soil and dust)
Soil ingestion rate (including soil-derived indoor dust)
Total ingestion rate of outdoor soil and indoor dust
Weighting factor; fraction of IRS+D ingested as outdoor soil
Mass fraction of soil in dust
Absorption fraction (same for soil and dust)
Exposure frequency (same for soil and dust)
106
5.10.3 Managing Risks Due to Lead Exposure
Because the ALM predicts a mean blood concentration of greater than 10 µg/dl, worker
exposure is subject to 29 CFR 1926.62. 29 CFR 1926.62 states:
“1926.62(a) Scope. This section applies to all construction work where an employee may
be occupationally exposed to lead. All construction work excluded from coverage in the general
industry standard for lead by 29 CFR 1910.1025(a)(2) is covered by this standard. Construction
work is defined as work for construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and
decorating. It includes but is not limited to the following:
1926.62(a)(1) Demolition or salvage of structures where lead or materials containing
lead are present;
1926.62(a)(2) Removal or encapsulation of materials containing lead;
1926.62(a)(3) New construction, alteration, repair, or renovation of structures,
substrates, or portions thereof, that contain lead, or materials containing lead;
1926.62(a)(4) Installation of products containing lead;
1926.62(a)(5) Lead contamination/emergency cleanup;
1926.62(a)(6) Transportation, disposal, storage, or containment of lead or materials
containing lead on the site or location at which construction activities are
performed, and
1926.62(a)(7) Maintenance operations associated with the construction activities
described in this paragraph.”
These OSHA regulations require that employers with workers who will be occupationally
exposed to lead must determine whether an employee is exposed to levels of lead above the
action level of 30 µg/m3. The initial determination must be made using onsite air monitoring as
if the employee is not wearing a respirator. If initial monitoring shows that the action is not
exceeded, then no further air monitoring is necessary. If this initial monitoring shows that an
employee may be exposed to levels of lead above the action level, then an air monitoring
program must be established.
Regardless of the initial onsite monitoring, because the model indicates an increased
worker risk onsite, employers are required to develop a written compliance plan under OSHA.
This plan includes engineering, administrative and work practice controls to minimize the
exposure of employees to lead. Employees exposed to lead in the work place are also required to
participate in a medical surveillance program. Blood concentrations of lead above 50 µg/dl
warrant increased monitoring and temporary medical removal with economic protection.
107
However, this plan only needs to be implemented if the initial onsite air monitoring exceeds the
action level.
Lead is not readily volatile and the major risk at this site is from airborne particulates
from the subsurface fill. Measures to reduce dust should reduce the risk posed by lead at the site.
Lead exposure at this site will be of concern after removal of the existing asphalt and continue
until the site is covered with new asphalt. During this phase of construction, initial lead
concentrations in the air should be determined to ensure workers are not exposed to levels in
excess of 30 µg/m3. If levels exceed 30 µg/m
3, then contractors must take steps to safeguard
employees on the site.
108
SECTION 6
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
6.1 Introduction
As part of this project, it was necessary to determine what, if any, regulations were
applicable to future site activities based on the presence and characteristics of the fill materials.
These regulations would then inform future actions and activities at the site with regard to soil
management. As part of this process, we evaluated regulations primarily enforced by many
divisions of Ohio EPA. Our evaluation was based on conditions encountered during our
investigation and other site-specific geotechnical and Phase 1 investigations for the site. If
different conditions are encountered during excavation and construction activities, then
additional regulatory responsibilities will need to be evaluated. Among the regulations that were
reviewed for possible application were:
1) hazardous waste;
2) solid waste;
3) beneficial use;
4) voluntary action;
5) drinking and ground water;
6) surface water; and
7) air.
As part of this process, we held discussions with representatives of the Ohio EPA in order to
discuss potential problems and analytical results and to confirm our interpretations relating to
regulatory applicability. A brief discussion of each of these evaluations is found in the following
sections.
6.2 Hazardous Waste
As discussed in Section 4.2, materials at a site can be considered to be a hazardous waste
based on their presence on a list prepared by USEPA or based on specific characteristics of the
waste. If the fill materials were determined to be hazardous waste, the materials would require
special handling and disposal at a hazardous waste disposal site. If hazardous wastes were
determined to be present, excavation may have been determined to be cumbersome and cost
prohibitive. Therefore, it was necessary to quickly determine if the materials were classified as
hazardous waste and the soil would need to be managed as a waste.
109
Although it was determined that the fill material was not “listed” hazardous waste, it was
necessary to collect samples of the fill materials to determine if they were considered hazardous
waste based on the characteristic of toxicity. Tests to measure toxicity were performed using the
toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP). Materials may be classified as hazardous
waste due to their leaching potential of metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and/or semi-
volatile organic compounds (SVOCs). A sufficient number of samples (17 for metals, 10 for
VOCs, and 16 for SVOCs) from a full range of depth of the fill were collected and analyzed.
When the analytical results were received, the results were compared to Table 1 of OAC
3745-51-24. No concentrations of metals, VOCs or SVOCs were determined to have toxicity
characteristics that would cause the fill materials to be classified as hazardous waste.
Discussions with individuals at the Ohio EPA were held to confirm that the number of samples
were sufficient to make the determination. Therefore, the fill materials were determined not to
be classified as hazardous waste and subject to the hazardous waste rules.
6.3 Solid Waste
It was necessary to determine if the fill materials were considered solid waste because, if
they were, the site would be subject to OAC 3745-27-13, also known as “Rule 13”. According
to Ohio EPA (2005b), “Rule 13 establishes the procedure for obtaining authorization from the
director to fill, grade, excavate, build, drill or mine on land where a hazardous waste or solid
waste facility was operated”. The practical ramifications would be that authorization would
need to be obtained prior to any of these activities and that materials handled outside the area of
fill would need to be managed as a solid waste in accordance with solid waste laws.
Based on the review of multiple sources of historic information (including ownership of
the site by Alten Foundry owner George Alten for many years) as well as confirmation of the
presence of primarily foundry sand with inclusions of slag, glass, brick, sandstone, limestone and
shale fragments, wood, ceramic pieces, and gravel, the fill materials were determined to be
primarily foundry sand. These materials were used to fill in the old Hocking River Channel that
was relocated to the west of the site, just before the turn of the 20th
century as well as to raise the
elevation of the majority of the property above the current 100-year floodplain. It was postulated
that the pieces of brick, glass and natural stone were most likely from the demolition of onsite or
other buildings and were ancillary to the filling of the site with up to 18.5 feet of foundry sand.
In order to determine if foundry sand was considered a solid waste, the definition of solid
waste was reviewed. According to OAC 3745-27-01(S)(23), "Solid waste" means such
unwanted residual solid or semisolid material, including but not limited to garbage, scrap tires,
combustible and noncombustible material, street dirt and debris, as results from industrial,
commercial, agricultural, and community operations, excluding earth or material from
construction, mining, or demolition operations, or other waste materials of the type that
normally would be included in demolition debris, nontoxic fly ash and bottom ash, including at
least ash that results from combustion of coal, biomass fuels, and ash that results from the
combustion of coal in combination with scrap tires where scrap tires comprise not more than
fifty per cent of heat input in any month, spent nontoxic foundry sand, and slag and other
substances that are not harmful or inimical to public health, and includes but is not limited to
110
garbage, scrap tires, combustible and noncombustible material, street dirt, and debris. Solid
waste does not include any material that is an infectious waste or a hazardous waste.” (emphasis
added).
Although the regulatory definition of solid waste specifically excludes “spent nontoxic
foundry sand”, according to conversations with Ohio EPA personnel, the rules do not contain a
definition for nontoxic versus toxic. As will be discussed further in the section on Beneficial
Use, a guidance document once had a working definition, but the document was revoked in legal
proceedings and can no longer be “formally” referenced. According to some Ohio EPA
personnel, the decision on whether or not a permit under Rule 13 is needed is made on a district
by district basis (and, anecdotally, the interpretation varies by district). Conversations with
Central District Office personnel in the Division of Materials and Waste Management (the
district in which the site is located) confirmed that, based on the analytical results of the soils and
water and the characteristics of the fill, the site would not be subject to Rule 13. Therefore, the
fill materials were not directly considered to be included in the definition of solid waste.
Although spent nontoxic foundry sand is not included in the strict definition of solid
waste, the concentrations of metals and SVOCs in the fill are elevated. The Ohio EPA Fact
Sheet, Frequently Asked Questions About the Management of Soils (Ohio EPA, 1998) was
prepared because Ohio EPA received many questions about soil management. Ohio EPA (1998)
cautions that “If the movement of soil results in water pollution (e.g. silting up a stream) or air
pollution (dust), then there may be an obligation to comply with Ohio EPA regulations intended
to minimize such impacts.” The document further clarifies “If the soil is contaminated, there is
an increased potential of adverse impact to human health or the environment. If the soil is
contaminated and is located or relocated near surface waters (streams, lakes, wetlands), near an
aquifer, or near a drinking water supply well, then the likelihood of there being an obligation to
comply with Ohio EPA regulations is also increased”.
The interpretation that the foundry sand onsite is an exempt waste is made based on the
results of the subsurface investigation to date. However, if industrial solid waste, residual solid
waste, or municipal waste is found to have been disposed with the foundry sand during
construction/excavation activities, the fill may be re-classified as solid waste and subject to Rule
13. Therefore, a qualified environmental professional should be present onsite during excavation
activities to confirm that the fill is not considered a solid waste and subject to additional
regulation.
Although technically the fill can be taken to another site without environmental handling
and disposal restrictions, based on the analytical results, it is highly recommended that the fill
onsite be managed within the footprint of the current fill area (the whole site) or disposed offsite
at a landfill as solid waste. This would minimize any future liabilities associated with the
removal of the fill materials from the site, if it cannot be incorporated into the design and grading
plan onsite.
111
6.4 Beneficial Use
In 1988, Ohio EPA published a document relating to the beneficial use of nontoxic
bottom ash, fly ash and spent foundry sand and other exempt wastes. This document was
subsequently revised in 1994 (Ohio EPA, 1994) and “was developed to facilitate the beneficial
use of nontoxic bottom ash, fly ash and spent foundry sand and other exempt wastes, and to
assure that such uses do not cause water pollution”. Among other things, this document
established “nontoxic criteria” for the use of these exempt wastes, specified allowed uses based
on preferred beneficial uses and concentrations of certain metals, and required approval for
alternate beneficial uses not listed in the document. The document allowed use of foundry sand
without prior notification as long as the leachate thresholds of 30 times the drinking water
standards were met (based on TCLP results).
Based on the existence of this document since 1988, we could find no evidence to support
the allegation in the BBC&M report reviewed by Beling Consultants (1994) that “the
Environmental Protection Agency prefers to classify foundry sand as a hazardous material”.
Similarly, the reliance by Shremshock (2007) on this information was subsequently unfounded.
According to Koncelik (2012), “The policy was revoked after legal challenge was raised
to EPA’s authority to regulate through policy”. Since the revocation in 2003, “Some industry
representatives take the position that the industrial materials are unregulated because Ohio EPA
has not established rules. Ohio EPA takes the legal position that this material is regulated as a
waste under R.C. 6111. Ohio EPA asserts that companies need authorizations from the Division
of Surface Water in order to be deemed protective of water resources” (Koncelik, 2012).
In 2006, Ohio EPA proposed efforts to develop beneficial use rules to fill the regulatory
vacuum created by the revocation of the Beneficial Use guidance document. However, the
process was controversial and no regulations were adopted. In June 2012, Ohio EPA again
issued a public notice for involvement in the development of beneficial use of industrial
byproducts (including foundry sand). Conversations with individuals at Ohio EPA indicated
that, as of this time, no progress has been made on adopting rules relating to the beneficial use of
foundry sand. Therefore, there are currently no beneficial use requirements that apply to the site.
6.5 Voluntary Action
The Ohio Voluntary Action Program was created in 1994 under Ohio Revised Code
(ORC) 3746. OAC 3745-300 became effective in 1996 and have been subsequently revised.
The Voluntary Action Program (VAP) allows a volunteer to clean up hazardous substances and
petroleum on a property and to receive a release of liability for clean-up from both the Ohio EPA
and the USEPA if certain criteria are followed. The VAP is a voluntary program that relies upon
private parties to investigate and clean up a property without traditional regulatory entanglement.
The clean-up must be performed under the direction of a Certified VAP Professional using a
Certified VAP Laboratory and specific standards.
112
Because foundry sand is not a regulated substance, in conversations with representatives
from Ohio EPA, it was discussed that perhaps resources and/or technical assistance could be
used from the VAP program, but that the VAP program might not be the preferred option for the
County at this point. It should be noted, however, that the generic standards developed for VAP
sites have been used to gage the magnitude of concentrations of constituents and to assist in the
determination of the need for a site-specific risk assessment for complete pathways at the site. It
is not uncommon for other EPA regulatory programs to either reference or use VAP standards as
part of assessment or clean-up activities, even though the site is not entered into the VAP
program.
6.6 Drinking and Ground Water
The primary function of the Division of Drinking and Ground Water is to enforce the
regulations that govern public water supplies (typically relating to operation of public water
systems, testing and reporting of water quality, and source water protection). The Division of
Drinking and Ground Water also functions as a “consultant” to other divisions within the agency
to advise on issues relating to groundwater quality (e.g. landfills, industrial contamination, VAP,
etc.). According to representatives of Ohio EPA, the Central District Office of the Division of
Drinking and Ground Water prefers to answer questions only relating to sites for which a request
for review has been initiated by another Division within the Ohio EPA. The Central District
Office, Division of Drinking and Ground Water respectfully declined to even listen to any facts
relating to the site, or to discuss the site at all.
Based on our investigation, the Division of Drinking and Ground Water has no specific
regulations that apply to the site. That said, the proximity of the Miller Park Wellfield to the site
(the nearest municipal well is 60 feet from the site) does require professional judgment when
evaluating potential site activities in the fill materials adjacent to the wellfield.
As indicated by the initial historical site evaluation, the Miller Park Water Treatment
Plant has been located just north of the site since at least April 1884. The foundry sand on the
site was deposited sometime after 1921 and was probably being filled in 1938 as evidenced by
the historical aerial photograph. Therefore, at least a portion of the fill materials have probably
been on the site for over 75 years. Fill was also deposited in the southwest portion of the Miller
Park Wellfield as evidenced by the historical trees and the present-day guardrail, although the
character of the fill is not known to us. The materials encountered immediately below the fill in
our investigation consisted of organic silts, clayey silts and sand. The shallow deposits indicate
that a continuous “protective layer” is not present in all places immediately underlying the fill.
An evaluation of the deeper geologic deposits at the site was not undertaken as part of this
evaluation. Although an in-depth evaluation of the flow paths to the wellfield as well as
evaluation of subsurface conditions affecting fate and transport of potential contaminants is
beyond the scope of this investigation, we are not aware of reported impacts to any of the
municipal wells that are attributed to the presence of the fill materials on the current site.
Due to the proximity of the wellfield, coupled with the soil analytical results obtained
from this investigation, it is strongly recommended that in order to continue to protect the
wellfield that the methods of constructing building subsurface foundations during site
113
redevelopment minimize the direct transport of fill materials downward into underlying natural
materials. When constructing deeper foundations, it is recommended that the fill materials be
“cased off” prior to deeper subsurface penetration. Alternately, if appropriate, shallow
foundations completed within the fill materials (wherein the underlying materials are not
penetrated) would be an acceptable option. We recognize that there may also be other methods
of foundation construction that would achieve the stated objective of minimizing any downward
transport of the fill materials into the underlying in-situ materials.
6.7 Surface Water
As discussed in the beneficial use section, according to Koncelik (2012), “Ohio EPA has
taken the position that [foundry sand] is regulated as a waste under R.C. 6111”. According to
conversations with representatives of Ohio EPA, the presence of the foundry sand will need to be
addressed as part of the general stormwater permit for construction activities. If the stormwater
from the site that has contacted the fill is routed to a combined sewer, then no permit is needed.
If, however, the stormwater that has come into contact with the fill will discharge to the
river (either directly or through transport via a storm sewer), then the Central District Office,
Division of Surface Water will need to review both the proposed stormwater plan as well as the
analytical results from the subsurface investigation of the fill materials as part of the permit
process. The Ohio EPA representative indicated that, based on analytical results and the
proposed stormwater plan, worst case scenario, the stormwater from the site might need to be
contained and appropriately disposed. Best case scenario, no additional permit conditions would
be required. However, without formally reviewing the analytical results in context with the plan,
no further guidance could be obtained from the Agency.
6.8 Air
According to Ohio EPA (1998) “If the movement of soil results in…air pollution (dust),
then there may be an obligation to comply with Ohio EPA regulations intended to minimize such
impacts”. Conversations with representatives of Ohio EPA confirmed that no air permit is
needed for construction activities at the site. However, construction activities will need to
employ measures to minimize dust emission.
Based on the soil concentrations of mercury in the fill materials (and, secondarily, semi-
volatile compounds), a conservative interpretation of risk is that there may be an unacceptable
indoor air risk to inmates and workers once the building is complete. Further discussion of the
potential for risk via indoor air is found in Section 5.9. This conservative interpretation is based
on extrapolation of soil concentrations as opposed to measurements of soil gas (which are more
accurate and recommended to be collected if soil concentrations indicate a potential problem). If
no soil gas concentrations are measured, then a protective mechanism to interrupt the indoor air
pathway must be employed. Similarly, if soil gas concentrations are measured and still found to
present a risk, the indoor air pathway must be interrupted. If, however, soil gas concentrations
are determined to present no risk, then no further actions relating to indoor air are needed.
114
Potential options, if needed, for interrupting the soil to indoor air pathway include the
installation of a barrier between the fill and the building slab. Although designs vary, typically a
barrier will be installed with either a passive or active venting system consisting of one or more
venting pipes to convey air away from the building. In this situation, if a venting system is
necessary and chosen, the venting system will require an air permit from Ohio EPA (or the local
air authority to whom Ohio EPA has delegated responsibility).
Based on the concentration of lead in the fill materials, it may be necessary to address
potential human health impacts from lead during construction. Further discussion of lead and
health risks in outside air is found in Section 5.10. According to 29CFR 1926.62, an initial air
monitoring program to determine whether lead concentrations exceed the OSHA lead action
level of 30 µg/m3 for onsite workers during construction is required. If the action level is not
exceeded, no further air exposure monitoring is needed. If the action level is exceeded,
administrative and/or engineering controls must be implemented to minimize worker exposure to
lead. A medical surveillance program must also be implemented to assure that worker’s lead
blood concentrations do not exceed 50 ug/dl.
115
SECTION 7
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
7.1 Conclusions
The primary purpose of this investigation was to conduct an initial subsurface
environmental sampling and analysis program to develop information about the chemical
characteristics of the existing undocumented fill materials underlying the proposed footprint of
the new Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility at the West Wheeling Street location.
Specifically, the objective was to environmentally characterize these materials so as to exercise
due care with respect to excavation or other disturbance of the fill materials during construction
activities. The following conclusions summarize the salient points that impact recommendations
for activities related to the onsite fill materials.
1) Evaluation of available historical records and property ownership show that George
Alten (also owner of Alten’s Foundry formerly located on the east side of Memorial
Drive until closure in 1983) purchased the majority of the site property in 1921 and
likely used foundry sand from his business to raise the majority of the site above the
current 100-year floodplain.
2) Prior to purchase of another small portion of the site by George Alten in 1935, the site
was also historically used as a slaughterhouse and meat packing facility by the
Thimmes Brothers and Lancaster Packing Company. Although many of these types
of operations also performed tanning of hides, there is no indication that such
activities were part of these businesses.
3) The proposed footprint of the Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility is partially
located over the former channel of the Hocking River (which was channelized and
relocated to its present location just prior to the turn of the 20th
century).
4) The investigation confirmed that between 8 to 11 feet of fill (consisting primarily of
foundry sand with varying quantities of glass, brick, ceramic, slag, wire, and
fragments of sandstone, limestone and shale) are present under the proposed building
footprint. Previous subsurface borings have indicated that the fill overlies the entire
site in depths ranging from 5 to 18.5 feet.
5) The investigation confirmed that portions of the fill materials are partially saturated at
the base of the fill in some locations (between 9 and 10 feet below grade), particularly
in the vicinity of the former Hocking River Channel. Previous subsurface
investigations have also indicated saturation at similar depths.
116
6) Analytical results performed using the Toxicity Characterization Leaching Procedure
(TCLP) for metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and semi-volatile organic
compounds (SVOCs) show that the fill materials are not classified as hazardous
waste.
7) Measurable concentrations of VOCs, gasoline range organics (GRO) and diesel range
organics (DRO) in soils are either not present or below appropriate action levels.
8) Three complete potential human exposure pathways exist at the site, including dermal
exposure for construction/excavation workers, outdoor air (inhalation) for
construction workers, and indoor air (inhalation) for residents and workers at the
proposed Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility.
9) With regard to construction/excavation workers, the potential for an increased health
risk exists when onsite more than 90 days (dermal exposure) or 200 days (inhalation
exposure). However, the potential for increased health risk can be reduced by using
administrative controls such as limiting time on site and job rotation, and/or reducing
direct contact with the soil (gloves and long sleeves).
10) Based on the concentrations of chemicals of concern (COCs) in the soil,
construction/excavation workers onsite for greater than 90 days are expected to have
an increased dermal risk due to arsenic. For construction/excavation workers, this
risk can be managed by requiring workers (as part of a health and safety plan) to wear
gloves and long sleeves. Workers should also be reminded that showering after work
will further reduce their exposure.
11) Based on the concentrations of COCs in the soil, construction/excavation workers are
expected to have an increased inhalation risk due to mercury if they are onsite
fulltime more than 200 days. This risk can be managed (as part of a health and safety
plan) by limiting either the number of hours and/or the number of days of exposure
for the worker.
12) Based on presence of lead in the soil, OSHA requires that initial onsite air monitoring
be performed to confirm that lead concentrations in the air are less than 30 µg/m3. If
this level is not exceeded, no further air exposure monitoring is needed. If this level
is exceeded, OSHA requires that administrative and/or engineering controls must be
implemented to minimize worker exposure to lead. Also, if this level is exceeded, a
medical surveillance program must also be implemented to assure that worker’s lead
blood concentrations do not exceed 50 ug/dl.
13) With regard to residents (assuming a one-year exposure, 24 hours per day) and
workers (assuming a 25-year exposure, 8 hours per day) in the proposed new
building, preliminary calculations using soil concentrations indicate that further
analysis (currently underway) of the vapor intrusion pathway is needed to confirm or
deny if a potential for exposure will exist.
117
14) Based on preliminary evaluation of concentrations of mercury and naphthalene in the
soil, measurements of concentrations of these chemicals of concern in soil gas have
been initiated to determine if vapor intrusion into the new building will pose an
increased health risk for workers and residents. If soil gas measurements show no
increased exposure, then no measures are needed to protect the residents and workers.
If soil gas measurements indicate an increased exposure, then measures to interrupt
the pathway must be employed (e.g. installation of a physical barrier below the slab
with passive or active air removal).
15) The City of Lancaster Miller Park Wellfield (located immediately north of the site)
has been pumping water continuously from this location for at least 130 years. The
closest municipal well is approximately 60 feet north of the site property boundary.
The City has two monitoring wells (one deep and one shallow) on the southern
portion of this site.
16) The site is located within the designated one-year time of travel zone for the Miller
Park Wellfield wellhead protection plan that was modeled using parameters for an
unconfined aquifer (no layer protecting the wellfield from surface sources of
contamination). No mention of either the fill activities at the southwestern corner of
the wellfield (on the City property) or on the proposed Fairfield County Jail/Public
Safety Facility site property as a potential source of contamination are included
among the 310 potential sources of contamination within the 5-year time of travel for
the wellfield.
17) Due to the proximity of the wellfield to the site, coupled with the analytical results of
metals and SVOCs in soils obtained during this investigation, care should be taken to
avoid carrying fill materials downward into the underlying in situ aquifer materials.
18) Concentrations of dissolved metals and VOCs measured in groundwater within the
fill do not exceed primary drinking water standards, except for one detection of
arsenic in one of the two temporary monitoring wells. Consumer Confidence Reports
for 2009 through 2013 for the City of Lancaster Miller Park Wellfield do not indicate
any exceedances of the primary drinking water standard for arsenic in this wellfield.
19) Site investigations indicate that the fill materials are primarily foundry sand that has
not been co-disposed with industrial solid waste, residual solid waste, or municipal
solid waste. Spent non-toxic foundry sand is exempt from the definition of solid
waste. Therefore, no permit under OAC 3745-27-13 (Rule 13) is needed to excavate
the onsite fill materials.
20) Although foundry sand was once regulated by Ohio EPA under a beneficial use
policy, that policy was rescinded in 2003. Subsequent (and current) efforts to adopt
rules relating to the beneficial use of foundry sand have not resulted in adoption of
rules. Therefore, this site is not subject to beneficial use policy or rules.
118
21) Ohio EPA has taken the position that foundry sand is regulated as a waste under R.C.
6111. Therefore, if the stormwater from the site is not disposed in a combined sewer,
stormwater that has come in contact with the fill materials will need to be managed as
part of the construction general stormwater permit process. Specific permit
determinations will be made by Ohio EPA on a site- and chemical-specific basis as
part of the stormwater permit process.
22) No air permit is needed from Ohio EPA for onsite construction activities. However,
if either a passive or active air removal system is installed below the slab of the new
facility, an air permit for the venting system will be needed.
7.2 Recommendations
1) Due to the concentrations of constituents in the fill and the proximity of the Miller Park
Wellfield, the direct transport of fill materials downward into underlying natural
materials should be minimized. If foundation depths exceed the depth of the fill, it is
recommended that the fill materials be “cased off” prior to deeper subsurface penetration.
2) A qualified environmental professional should be present onsite during excavation
activities to confirm that the fill does not contain industrial waste, residual waste, or
municipal waste that may make the fill subject to additional regulation.
3) In order to minimize future liabilities, onsite soils should be managed within the footprint
of the current filled area (the whole site). If soils must be disposed offsite, the soils
should be disposed at a solid waste landfill.
4) Because Ohio EPA has taken the position that spent nontoxic foundry sand is regulated as
a waste under R.C. 6111, it is recommended that unless all stormwater from the site will
enter a combined sewer, the general stormwater permit for construction activities address
the management of stormwater that has come into contact with the fill materials.
5) Due to the calculation of an increased risk for workers due to dermal exposure to arsenic
and inhalation exposure to mercury, bid specifications should require contractors to
develop a health and safety plan that addresses mitigation of the risks where workers are
anticipated to be onsite for more than 90 days. (According to the risk assessment,
acceptable mitigation of dermal exposure can be accomplished by wearing gloves and
long sleeves and by encouraging workers to shower. Similarly, acceptable mitigation of
inhalation exposure can be accomplished by limiting the number of fulltime days on site
to less than 200.)
6) Bid specifications should require contractors to develop an OSHA compliance plan for
protection of workers from lead exposure during construction/excavation.
7) Bid specifications should require contractors to conduct an initial air monitoring program
to determine whether lead concentrations in onsite air exceed the OSHA lead action level
of 30 µg/m3 for onsite workers during construction. If the action level is not exceeded,
120
SECTION 8
REFERENCES
Beling Consultants, 1992. Phase 1 Environmental Property Assessment, Proposed County
Minimum Security Jail, 342 West Wheeling Street, Lancaster, Ohio (stamped
“preliminary”, prepared for the Fairfield County Commissioners, Lancaster, Ohio, dated
March 1992, 77 pp.
Beling Consultants, 1994. Letter to Fairfield County Board of Commissioners regarding the
subsurface boring report prepared by BBC&M for the Charley Horse and surrounding
property, dated May 19, 1994 and authored by Marvin L. VanMeter, with pages 6
through 12 of the BBC&M report attached, 10 pp.
CDC, 2013. Mercury (Elemental) – Lung damaging agent.
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ershdb/EmergencyresponseCard_29750021.html, accessed
June 19, 2014.
Environmental Quality Management, 2004. User’s guide for evaluating subsurface vapor
intrusion into buildings. Report prepared for Industrial Economic Incorporated. EPA
contract number 68-W-02-33, work assignment 004, PN 030224.0002, 133 pp.
Geotechnical Consultants, Inc., 2011. Subsurface Exploration and Preliminary Geotechnical
Engineering Report, Proposed Fairfield County Justice Center-MSMJ Site, 342 West
Wheeling Street, Lancaster, Ohio, prepared for the Fairfield County Commissioners and
Wachtel & McAnally Architects/Planners, dated June 10, 2011, 34 pp.
Koncelik, Joe, 2012. Ohio EPA Attempts Second Effort to Develop Beneficial Use Rules, Ohio
Environmental Law Blog, posted at 1:37 on July 11, 2012,
http://www.ohioenvironmentallawblog.com/2012/07/articles/federal-and-state-
developments/ohio-epa-attempts-second-effort-to-develop-beneficial-use-rules/, accessed
June 24, 2014.
Lawhon & Associates, 1993. Environmental Assessment Report, 121 North Memorial Street,
Lancaster, Ohio 43130, prepared for Mr. John L. Shockley, The Huntington Trust
Company, N.A., 41 South High Street, 10th
Floor, Columbus, Ohio 43216, regarding the
Charley Horse property, dated February 12, 1993,
Multiple Authors, 1902. Biographical for Fairfield County, Ohio, The S. J. Clarke Publishing
Company, New York and Chicago, Biography of John H. Thimmes, pp. 214-216.
121
Ohio EPA, 1994. Beneficial Use of Nontoxic Bottom Ash, Fly Ash and Spent Foundry Sand,
and Other Exempt Waste, Policy DSW-0400-007, Ohio Division of Surface Water,
Revision 0, October 1, 1988, Revision 1, November 7, 1994, Removed, April 30, 2003,
14 pp.
Ohio EPA, 1998. Frequently Asked Questions about the Management of Soils, Fact Sheet
Number 0610, Division of Solid & Infectious Waste Management, dated February 1998,
2 pp.
Ohio EPA, 2005a. Petroleum Contaminated Sites Guidance Document for Emergency Response
Actions, Ohio EPA Division of Emergency and Remedial Response, Emergency
Response and Special Investigations Section, DERR-00-ER-013, dated March 2005, 34
pp.
Ohio EPA, 2005b. Implementation of “Rule 13” [OAC 3745-27-13], Guidance Document
#0631, Division of Solid and Infectious Waste management, dated May 12, 2005, 5 pp.
Ohio EPA, 2010a. Assessing compounds without formal toxicity values available for use in
human health risk assessment. Division of Environmental Response and Revitalization,
Technical Decision Compendium, 4 pp.
Ohio EPA, 2010b. Sample collection and evaluation of vapor intrusion to indoor air for remedial
response and voluntary action programs, guidance document. Division of Environmental
Response and Revitalization, 114 pp.
Ohio EPA, 2012. Technical Guidance Manual for Ground Water Investigations, Chapter 10,
Ground Water Sampling, Revision 2, Division of Drinking and Ground Waters, 50 West
Town Street, Suite 700, Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049, dated May 2012, 73 pp.
Porter, 2014a. Title Reports 4 and 6 relating to Parcel Nos. 0536801700 (4.8 acres and Lot 9W
M. A. Daugherty’s Addition) and 0536001700 (0.107 acres), prepared for Jeffrey D.
Porter, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney of Fairfield County, Ohio, 239 W. Main Street,
Suite 101, Lancaster, Ohio and attachments, 10 pp.
Porter, 2014b. Title Report 5 relating to Parcel No. 0536001800, prepared for Jeffrey D. Porter,
Assistant Prosecuting Attorney of Fairfield County, Ohio, 239 W. Main Street, Suite 101,
Lancaster, Ohio and attachments, 13 pp.
Scott, 1877. A Complete History of Fairfield County, Ohio, 1795 – 1876, Siebert & Lilley,
Printers and Binders, Columbus, Ohio, 338 pp.
Shremschock Architects, Inc., 2007. Site Analysis and Selection for the Fairfield County Public
Safety Facility, prepared for the Fairfield County Commissioners, dated September 11,
2007, 45 pp.
122
Solar Testing Laboratories, Inc., 1999. Geotechnical Investigation for 342 West Wheeling
Street, 4.01 Acre Site, Proposed Juvenile Detention Center, Lancaster, Ohio, prepared for
the Fairfield County Board of Commissioners, c/o Fairfield County Sanitary Engineer,
dated February 19, 1999, 59 pp.
URS Consultants, 1993a. Wellhead Protection Plan, City of Lancaster, Ohio, Miller Park
Wellfield, dated August 23, 1993, 47 pp.
URS Consultants, 1993b. Preliminary Potential Contaminant Source Inventory, City of
Lancaster, Miller Park Wellfield (including Appendix D), dated August 23, 1993, 117 pp.
URS Greiner, Monitoring Well Program: First Year of Quarterly Analytical Results for the City
of Lancaster, Miller Park Wellfield, Wellhead Protection Program, dated December 5,
1996, 10 pp.
USEPA, 1993. Provisional guidance for quantitative risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons. Office of Research and Development, EPA/600/R-93/089, 28 pp.
USEPA, 1999. Reference concentration for chronic inhalation – cadmium and cadmium
compounds, external review draft. 13 pp.
USEPA, 2003a. Human health toxicity values in Superfund risk assessments. Memorandum
from Michael B. Cook, Director, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology
Innovation. OSWER directive 9285.7-53, 4 pp.
USEPA, 2003b. Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an
approach to assessing risks associated with adult exposures to lead in soil. Technical
Review Workgroup for Lead, EPA-540-R-03-001, 62 pp.
USEPA, 2004. Risk assessment guidance for Superfund Volume I: Human Health Evaluation
Manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for dermal risk assessment). Office of
Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, EPA/540/R/99/005, 156 pp.
USEPA, 2009a. Risk assessment guidance for Superfund Volume I: Human Health Evaluation
Manual (Part F, Supplemental Guidance for inhalation risk assessment). Office of
Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, EPA/540/R/070/002, 68 pp.
USEPA, 2009b. Transmittal of Update of Adult Lead Methodology’s default baseline blood lead
concentration and geometric standard deviation parameters. Memorandum from James
E. Woolford, Directorm Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation,
OSWER 9200.2-82, 15 pp.
USEPA, 2012. Toxicological review of benzo[a]pyrene (CASRN 50-32-8) in support of
summary information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). National Center
for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development. EPA/635/R-
10/006C, 179 pp.
123
USEPA, 2014. Human health and lead, addressing lead at Superfund sites.
http://aaa.epa.gov/superfund/lead/health.htm, accessed June 24, 2014.
USEPA Mid-Atlantic Risk Assessment, 2014. Regional screening table.
http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/risk/human/rb-concentration_table/, accessed June 23,
2014.
Appendix A
Photographs of project field activities
Figure A-1. Marked boring location and CME 75 drilling rig ready to start drilling with 55
gallon drum to contain drill cuttings and buckets of wash and rinse water to clean split spoon
samplers.
Figure A-2. Collection of split spoon sample for 0 to 2 feet with automatic hammer. Note pilot
bit inside 4 ¼-inch hollow stem augers ready to drill after collection of sample.
Figure A-3. Soil containerized in drum labeled with date and source of drilling cuttings.
Figure A-4. Drums on palates ready to be moved to the Fairfield County Maintenance Building
for temporary storage pending analytical results.
Figure A-5. Cleaning drilling equipment with high pressure cleaner.
Figure A-6. Drum with drilling equipment wash water labeled and ready to close.
Figure A7. Screening of a sample in a split spoon sampler upon opening of the split spoon.
Figure A-8. Logging samples.
Figure A-9. Collecting samples for VOCs with a Terra Core Sampler.
Figure A-10. Placing the Terra Core sample in laboratory jar for analysis.
Figure A-11. Samples being collected and placed in laboratory jar for analysis.
Figure A-12. Abandoning boring where no water was encountered by pumping bentonite slurry
into borehole.
Figure A-13. Bentonite slurry in abandoned borehole.
Figure A-14. Abandoned borehole topped off with Quickrete.
Figure A-15. Installation of 2-inch PVC temporary monitoring well inside 4 ¼-inch hollow stem
augers.
Figure A-16. Locking cap of temporary monitoring well BW-4.
Figure A-17. Flush mount completion of temporary monitoring well BW-1.
Figure A-18. Measuring the water level in temporary monitoring well BW-4 with an electric
water level tape.
Figure A-19. Polyethylene bailer with purged water (notice black color) in bucket.
Figure A-20. Containerized and labeled wash water form drilling activities and purge water
from sampling the two temporary groundwater monitoring wells.
Figure A-21. Collecting filtered water sample for metals from temporary monitoring well BW-1.
Figure A-22. Removing casing from temporary monitoring well BW-4.
Figure A-23. Void where casing has been removed form temporary monitoring well BW-1.
Figure A-24. Temporary monitoring well BW-4 filled with Portland cement.
Figure A-25. Location of abandoned temporary monitoring well BW-1 after it was topped off
with Quickrete.
Appendix B
Boring logs
Appendix C
Monitoring well completion diagrams and
driller logs filed with the Ohio Department
of Natural Resources (ODNR)
Appendix D
Water well sealing reports filed with ODNR
Appendix E
Soil analytical results for borings BW-1, BW-2,
BW-3 and BW-4
ANALYTICAL REPORTTestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.TestAmerica Canton4101 Shuffel Street NWNorth Canton, OH 44720Tel: (330)497-9396
TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
For:Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.98 County Line Road WestSuite CWesterville, Ohio 43082
Attn: Ms. Linda Aller
Authorized for release by:4/4/2014 5:28:18 PM
Mark Loeb, Project Manager II(330)[email protected]
This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature isintended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.
Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Table of Contents
Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1
Page 2 of 93TestAmerica Canton
4/4/2014
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Definitions/Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Detection Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Surrogate Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
QC Association Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Definitions/GlossaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Qualifiers
GC/MS VOA
Qualifier Description
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
Qualifier
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
* ISTD response or retention time outside acceptable limits
B Compound was found in the blank and sample.
* LCS or LCSD exceeds the control limits
GC/MS Semi VOA
Qualifier Description
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
Qualifier
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
B Compound was found in the blank and sample.
X Surrogate is outside control limits
GC VOA
Qualifier Description
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
Qualifier
GC Semi VOA
Qualifier Description
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
Qualifier
Metals
Qualifier Description
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
Qualifier
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
B Compound was found in the blank and sample.
Glossary
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
¤ Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
Abbreviation
%R Percent Recovery
CNF Contains no Free Liquid
DER Duplicate error ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dil Fac Dilution Factor
DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
DLC Decision level concentration
MDA Minimum detectable activity
EDL Estimated Detection Limit
MDC Minimum detectable concentration
MDL Method Detection Limit
ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)
NC Not Calculated
ND Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit
QC Quality Control
RER Relative error ratio
RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
TestAmerica Canton
Page 3 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case NarrativeClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Job ID: 240-35317-1
Laboratory: TestAmerica Canton
Narrative
CASE NARRATIVE
Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project: Lancaster Ohio
Report Number: 240-35317-1
With the exceptions noted as flags or footnotes, standard analytical protocols were followed in the analysis of the samples and no
problems were encountered or anomalies observed. In addition all laboratory quality control samples were within established control
limits, with any exceptions noted below. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of
the method. In some cases, due to interference or analytes present at high concentrations, samples were diluted. For diluted samples,
the reporting limits are adjusted relative to the dilution required.
TestAmerica Canton attests to the validity of the laboratory data generated by TestAmerica facilities reported herein. All analyses
performed by TestAmerica facilities were done using established laboratory SOPs that incorporate QA/QC procedures described in the
application methods. TestAmerica’s operations groups have reviewed the data for compliance with the laboratory QA/QC plan, and data
have been found to be compliant with laboratory protocols unless otherwise noted below.
The test results in this report meet all NELAP requirements for parameters for which accreditation is required or available. Any exceptions
to NELAP requirements are noted in this report. Pursuant to NELAP, this report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written
approval of the laboratory.
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.
All holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these samples, unless otherwise detailed in the
individual sections below.
All solid sample results are reported on an "as received" basis unless otherwise indicated by the presence of a % solids value in the
method header.
This laboratory report is confidential and is intended for the sole use of TestAmerica and its client.
RECEIPT
The samples were received on 3/21/2014 9:45 AM; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice.
The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 4.8º C.
TCLP VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)
Samples BW1 6-8 (240-35317-2), BW2 6-8 (240-35317-8), BW3 6-7.5 (240-35317-13) and BW4 0.5-2 (240-35317-14) were analyzed for
TCLP volatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/8260B. The samples were leached on
03/30/2014 and analyzed on 03/31/2014.
No difficulties were encountered during the VOCs analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)
Samples BW1 4-6 (240-35317-1), BW2 2-4 (240-35317-6), BW3 2-4 (240-35317-11) and BW4-2-4 (240-35317-15) were analyzed for
volatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 8260B. The samples were prepared on 03/21/2014 and
analyzed on 03/26/2014 and 03/27/2014.
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene was detected in method blank MB 240-124052/6 at a level that was above the method detection limit but below the
reporting limit. The value should be considered an estimate, and has been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above the
TestAmerica CantonPage 4 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case NarrativeClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Job ID: 240-35317-1 (Continued)
Laboratory: TestAmerica Canton (Continued)
MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.
Tetrachloroethene and trans-1,2-Dichloroethene failed the recovery criteria high for LCS 240-124125/8. These analytes were biased high
in the LCS and were not detected in the associated samples; therefore, the data have been reported.
Internal standard (ISTD) response for the following sample(s) was outside control limits: BW4-2-4 (240-35317-15). The sample(s) was
re-extracted and/or re-analyzed with concurring results, and the original set of data has been reported.
Insufficient sample volume was available to perform a matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate/sample duplicate (MS/MSD/DUP) associated
with batch 124125.
No other difficulties were encountered during the VOCs analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TCLP SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)
Samples BW1 6-10 (240-35317-3), BW2 1-2 (240-35317-5), BW2 4-8 (240-35317-7), BW3 2-6 (240-35317-12), BW4-2-6 (240-35317-16)
and BW4-6-8 (240-35317-17) were analyzed for TCLP semivolatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods
1311/8270C. The samples were leached on 03/28/2014, prepared on 03/28/2014 and 04/02/2014 and analyzed on 04/01/2014 and
04/03/2014.
Surrogates are added during the extraction process prior to dilution. When the sample is diluted, surrogate recoveries are diluted out and
no corrective action is required.
No difficulties were encountered during the SVOCs analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)
Samples BW1 4-6 (240-35317-1), BW1 10-12 (240-35317-4), BW2 2-4 (240-35317-6), BW3 1.5-2 (240-35317-10), BW3 2-4
(240-35317-11), BW4-2-4 (240-35317-15) and BW4-8-10 (240-35317-18) were analyzed for semivolatile organic compounds (GCMS) in
accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 8270C. The samples were prepared on 03/25/2014 and 03/26/2014 and analyzed on 03/28/2014,
03/31/2014 and 04/01/2014.
Surrogates are added during the extraction process prior to dilution. When the sample is diluted, surrogate recoveries are diluted out and
no corrective action is required.
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was detected in method blank MB 240-123851/23-A at a level that was above the method detection limit but
below the reporting limit. The value should be considered an estimate, and has been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result
above the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged.
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and Di-n-butyl phthalate were detected in method blank MB 240-124042/19-A at levels that were above the
method detection limit but below the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged. If the
associated sample reported a result above the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged.
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr), 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr), 2-Fluorophenol (Surr), Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr), Phenol-d5 (Surr) and Terphenyl-d14
(Surr) failed the surrogate recovery criteria low for BW1 10-12 (240-35317-4).
Samples BW1 4-6 (240-35317-1)[4X], BW1 10-12 (240-35317-4)[400X], BW2 2-4 (240-35317-6)[2.5X], BW4-2-4 (240-35317-15)[2.5X] and
BW4-8-10 (240-35317-18)[5X] required dilution prior to analysis. The reporting limits have been adjusted accordingly.
The following sample was diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: BW1 4-6 (240-35317-1). Elevated reporting limits (RLs) are
provided.
No other difficulties were encountered during the SVOCs analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS
Sample BW2 8-9 (240-35317-9) was analyzed for gasoline range organics in accordance with SW846 Method 8015C. The samples were
prepared and analyzed on 03/25/2014.
TestAmerica CantonPage 5 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case NarrativeClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Job ID: 240-35317-1 (Continued)
Laboratory: TestAmerica Canton (Continued)
No difficulties were encountered during the GrOain size analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS (DRO)
Sample BW2 8-9 (240-35317-9) was analyzed for diesel range organics (DRO) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 8015C - DRO.
The samples were prepared on 03/25/2014 and analyzed on 03/31/2014.
No difficulties were encountered during the DRO analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TCLP METALS (ICP)
Samples BW1 6-10 (240-35317-3), BW2 1-2 (240-35317-5), BW2 4-8 (240-35317-7), BW3 2-6 (240-35317-12), BW4-2-6 (240-35317-16)
and BW4-6-8 (240-35317-17) were analyzed for TCLP metals (ICP) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/6010B. The samples
were leached on 03/28/2014, prepared on 03/28/2014 and analyzed on 03/31/2014.
Barium was detected in method blanks LB 240-124371/1-C and MB 240-124402/2-A at levels that were above the method detection limit
but below the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged. If the associated sample reported a
result above the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.
No other difficulties were encountered during the metals analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TOTAL METALS (ICP)
Samples BW1 4-6 (240-35317-1), BW1 10-12 (240-35317-4), BW2 2-4 (240-35317-6), BW3 1.5-2 (240-35317-10), BW3 2-4
(240-35317-11), BW4-2-4 (240-35317-15) and BW4-8-10 (240-35317-18) were analyzed for total metals (ICP) in accordance with EPA
SW-846 Method 6010B. The samples were prepared on 03/24/2014 and 03/26/2014 and analyzed on 03/25/2014, 03/26/2014, 03/27/2014
and 03/28/2014.
Barium and Potassium were detected in method blank MB 240-124048/1-A at levels that were above the method detection limit but below
the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above
the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.
Samples BW1 4-6 (240-35317-1)[2X], BW1 10-12 (240-35317-4)[5X], BW2 2-4 (240-35317-6)[2X] and BW4-8-10 (240-35317-18)[5X]
required dilution prior to analysis. The reporting limits have been adjusted accordingly.
The following sample(s) was diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: BW4-8-10 (240-35317-18). Elevated reporting limits (RLs)
are provided.
No other difficulties were encountered during the metals analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TCLP MERCURY
Samples BW1 6-10 (240-35317-3), BW2 1-2 (240-35317-5), BW2 4-8 (240-35317-7), BW3 2-6 (240-35317-12), BW4-2-6 (240-35317-16)
and BW4-6-8 (240-35317-17) were analyzed for TCLP mercury in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/7470A. The samples were
leached on 03/28/2014, prepared on 03/28/2014 and analyzed on 03/31/2014.
No difficulties were encountered during the mercury analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TOTAL MERCURY
Samples BW1 4-6 (240-35317-1), BW1 10-12 (240-35317-4), BW2 2-4 (240-35317-6), BW3 1.5-2 (240-35317-10), BW3 2-4
(240-35317-11), BW4-2-4 (240-35317-15) and BW4-8-10 (240-35317-18) were analyzed for total mercury in accordance with EPA SW-846
Method 7471A. The samples were prepared on 03/24/2014 and 03/26/2014 and analyzed on 03/25/2014 and 03/27/2014.
Samples BW1 10-12 (240-35317-4)[20X], BW2 2-4 (240-35317-6)[5X] and BW4-8-10 (240-35317-18)[5X] required dilution prior to
analysis. The reporting limits have been adjusted accordingly.
No difficulties were encountered during the mercury analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TestAmerica CantonPage 6 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case NarrativeClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Job ID: 240-35317-1 (Continued)
Laboratory: TestAmerica Canton (Continued)
PERCENT SOLIDS
Samples BW1 4-6 (240-35317-1), BW1 10-12 (240-35317-4), BW2 2-4 (240-35317-6), BW2 8-9 (240-35317-9), BW3 1.5-2
(240-35317-10), BW3 2-4 (240-35317-11), BW4-2-4 (240-35317-15) and BW4-8-10 (240-35317-18) were analyzed for percent solids in
accordance with EPA Method 160.3 MOD. The samples were analyzed on 03/22/2014.
No difficulties were encountered during the % solids analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TestAmerica CantonPage 7 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Method SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol
SW8468260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) TAL CAN
SW8468270C Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) TAL CAN
SW8468015C Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Gasoline Range Organics) TAL CAN
SW8468015C Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Diesel Range Organics) TAL CAN
SW8466010B Metals (ICP) TAL CAN
SW8467470A Mercury (CVAA) TAL CAN
SW8467471A Mercury (CVAA) TAL CAN
EPAMoisture Percent Moisture TAL CAN
Protocol References:
EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
Laboratory References:
TAL CAN = TestAmerica Canton, 4101 Shuffel Street NW, North Canton, OH 44720, TEL (330)497-9396
TestAmerica Canton
Page 8 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Sample SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix
240-35317-1 BW1 4-6 Solid 03/20/14 08:00 03/21/14 09:45
240-35317-2 BW1 6-8 Solid 03/20/14 08:05 03/21/14 09:45
240-35317-3 BW1 6-10 Solid 03/20/14 08:05 03/21/14 09:45
240-35317-4 BW1 10-12 Solid 03/20/14 08:10 03/21/14 09:45
240-35317-5 BW2 1-2 Solid 03/20/14 09:30 03/21/14 09:45
240-35317-6 BW2 2-4 Solid 03/20/14 09:30 03/21/14 09:45
240-35317-7 BW2 4-8 Solid 03/20/14 09:35 03/21/14 09:45
240-35317-8 BW2 6-8 Solid 03/20/14 09:35 03/21/14 09:45
240-35317-9 BW2 8-9 Solid 03/20/14 09:41 03/21/14 09:45
240-35317-10 BW3 1.5-2 Solid 03/20/14 10:45 03/21/14 09:45
240-35317-11 BW3 2-4 Solid 03/20/14 10:47 03/21/14 09:45
240-35317-12 BW3 2-6 Solid 03/20/14 10:52 03/21/14 09:45
240-35317-13 BW3 6-7.5 Solid 03/20/14 10:55 03/21/14 09:45
240-35317-14 BW4 0.5-2 Solid 03/20/14 13:00 03/21/14 09:45
240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Solid 03/20/14 13:05 03/21/14 09:45
240-35317-16 BW4-2-6 Solid 03/20/14 13:08 03/21/14 09:45
240-35317-17 BW4-6-8 Solid 03/20/14 03:12 03/21/14 09:45
240-35317-18 BW4-8-10 Solid 03/20/14 13:15 03/21/14 09:45
TestAmerica Canton
Page 9 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW1 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-1
☼2-Butanone (MEK)
RL
14 ug/Kg
MDL
0.98
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA1J1.4 8260B
☼Acetone 14 ug/Kg4.4 Total/NA15.7 J 8260B
☼Methyl acetate 7.0 ug/Kg0.98 Total/NA11.4 J 8260B
☼2-Methylnaphthalene 33 ug/Kg2.5 Total/NA433 8270C
☼Anthracene 33 ug/Kg3.8 Total/NA427 J 8270C
☼Benzaldehyde 490 ug/Kg59 Total/NA4240 J 8270C
☼Benzo[a]anthracene 33 ug/Kg3.1 Total/NA4150 8270C
☼Benzo[a]pyrene 33 ug/Kg3.1 Total/NA4460 8270C
☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 33 ug/Kg2.9 Total/NA4410 8270C
☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 33 ug/Kg1.7 Total/NA4500 8270C
☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 33 ug/Kg3.3 Total/NA487 8270C
☼Chrysene 33 ug/Kg5.4 Total/NA4190 8270C
☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 33 ug/Kg3.2 Total/NA4330 8270C
☼Fluoranthene 33 ug/Kg2.7 Total/NA4200 8270C
☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 33 ug/Kg1.7 Total/NA4260 8270C
☼Phenanthrene 33 ug/Kg3.6 Total/NA4100 8270C
☼Pyrene 33 ug/Kg2.2 Total/NA4160 8270C
☼Aluminum 23 mg/Kg11 Total/NA17500 6010B
☼Antimony 1.2 mg/Kg0.45 Total/NA143 6010B
☼Arsenic 1.2 mg/Kg0.35 Total/NA118 6010B
☼Barium 23 mg/Kg0.14 Total/NA1450 6010B
☼Beryllium 0.58 mg/Kg0.050 Total/NA10.68 6010B
☼Cadmium 0.23 mg/Kg0.042 Total/NA11.4 6010B
☼Calcium 580 mg/Kg34 Total/NA158000 6010B
☼Chromium 0.58 mg/Kg0.23 Total/NA137 6010B
☼Cobalt 5.8 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA16.2 6010B
☼Copper 2.9 mg/Kg0.86 Total/NA162 6010B
☼Iron 12 mg/Kg5.7 Total/NA124000 6010B
☼Lead 0.70 mg/Kg0.44 Total/NA21100 6010B
☼Magnesium 580 mg/Kg7.5 Total/NA17800 6010B
☼Manganese 1.7 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA1470 6010B
☼Nickel 4.6 mg/Kg0.63 Total/NA124 6010B
☼Potassium 580 mg/Kg7.2 Total/NA1920 6010B
☼Selenium 0.58 mg/Kg0.52 Total/NA10.71 6010B
☼Silver 0.58 mg/Kg0.12 Total/NA11.0 6010B
☼Sodium 580 mg/Kg77 Total/NA1510 J 6010B
☼Vanadium 5.8 mg/Kg0.24 Total/NA120 6010B
☼Zinc 2.3 mg/Kg1.2 Total/NA1390 6010B
☼Mercury 0.13 mg/Kg0.020 Total/NA10.29 7471A
Client Sample ID: BW1 6-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-2
No Detections.
Client Sample ID: BW1 6-10 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-3
Arsenic
RL
0.50 mg/L
MDL
0.0032
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
TCLP1J0.017 6010B
Barium 10 mg/L0.00067 TCLP11.1 J B 6010B
Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.0074 J 6010B
Chromium 0.50 mg/L0.0022 TCLP10.0062 J 6010B
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 10 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW1 6-10 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-3
Lead
RL
0.50 mg/L
MDL
0.0019
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
TCLP10.74 6010B
Selenium 0.25 mg/L0.0041 TCLP10.0058 J 6010B
Client Sample ID: BW1 10-12 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-4
☼2-Methylnaphthalene
RL
7100 ug/Kg
MDL
530
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA400J3700 8270C
☼Acenaphthene 7100 ug/Kg810 Total/NA40019000 8270C
☼Acenaphthylene 7100 ug/Kg370 Total/NA40075000 8270C
☼Anthracene 7100 ug/Kg830 Total/NA400170000 8270C
☼Benzo[a]anthracene 7100 ug/Kg670 Total/NA400420000 8270C
☼Benzo[a]pyrene 7100 ug/Kg680 Total/NA400370000 8270C
☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 7100 ug/Kg630 Total/NA400420000 8270C
☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 7100 ug/Kg370 Total/NA400200000 8270C
☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 7100 ug/Kg730 Total/NA400180000 8270C
☼Chrysene 7100 ug/Kg1200 Total/NA400380000 8270C
☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 7100 ug/Kg710 Total/NA40059000 8270C
☼Dibenzofuran 53000 ug/Kg710 Total/NA40027000 J 8270C
☼Fluoranthene 7100 ug/Kg590 Total/NA400980000 8270C
☼Fluorene 7100 ug/Kg570 Total/NA40067000 8270C
☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 7100 ug/Kg370 Total/NA400180000 8270C
☼Naphthalene 7100 ug/Kg880 Total/NA40013000 8270C
☼Phenanthrene 7100 ug/Kg780 Total/NA400570000 8270C
☼Pyrene 7100 ug/Kg470 Total/NA400800000 8270C
☼Aluminum 50 mg/Kg24 Total/NA15800 6010B
☼Antimony 2.5 mg/Kg0.97 Total/NA111 6010B
☼Arsenic 2.5 mg/Kg0.75 Total/NA194 6010B
☼Barium 50 mg/Kg0.30 Total/NA13300 6010B
☼Beryllium 1.2 mg/Kg0.11 Total/NA10.56 J 6010B
☼Cadmium 0.50 mg/Kg0.090 Total/NA16.4 6010B
☼Calcium 1200 mg/Kg72 Total/NA160000 6010B
☼Chromium 1.2 mg/Kg0.50 Total/NA1330 6010B
☼Cobalt 12 mg/Kg0.40 Total/NA16.7 J 6010B
☼Copper 6.2 mg/Kg1.8 Total/NA1300 6010B
☼Iron 25 mg/Kg12 Total/NA195000 6010B
☼Lead 0.75 mg/Kg0.47 Total/NA12000 6010B
☼Magnesium 1200 mg/Kg16 Total/NA113000 6010B
☼Manganese 3.7 mg/Kg0.40 Total/NA1860 6010B
☼Nickel 10 mg/Kg1.3 Total/NA134 6010B
☼Potassium 1200 mg/Kg15 Total/NA1850 J 6010B
☼Selenium 1.2 mg/Kg1.1 Total/NA15.5 6010B
☼Silver 1.2 mg/Kg0.25 Total/NA13.7 6010B
☼Sodium 1200 mg/Kg160 Total/NA1960 J 6010B
☼Thallium 2.5 mg/Kg1.4 Total/NA11.5 J 6010B
☼Vanadium 12 mg/Kg0.52 Total/NA124 6010B
☼Zinc 25 mg/Kg12 Total/NA54500 6010B
☼Mercury 5.8 mg/Kg0.87 Total/NA2057 7471A
Client Sample ID: BW2 1-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-5
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 11 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW2 1-2 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-5
Arsenic
RL
0.50 mg/L
MDL
0.0032
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
TCLP1J0.0098 6010B
Barium 10 mg/L0.00067 TCLP10.99 J B 6010B
Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.54 6010B
Chromium 0.50 mg/L0.0022 TCLP10.0043 J 6010B
Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.030 J 6010B
Selenium 0.25 mg/L0.0041 TCLP10.0099 J 6010B
Client Sample ID: BW2 2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-6
☼Methylene Chloride
RL
2.9 ug/Kg
MDL
0.38
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA1J0.53 8260B
☼1,1'-Biphenyl 150 ug/Kg10 Total/NA2.516 J 8270C
☼2-Methylnaphthalene 19 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA2.547 8270C
☼Acenaphthene 19 ug/Kg2.2 Total/NA2.5120 8270C
☼Acenaphthylene 19 ug/Kg1.0 Total/NA2.557 8270C
☼Anthracene 19 ug/Kg2.3 Total/NA2.5300 8270C
☼Benzaldehyde 290 ug/Kg35 Total/NA2.563 J 8270C
☼Benzo[a]anthracene 19 ug/Kg1.8 Total/NA2.51000 8270C
☼Benzo[a]pyrene 19 ug/Kg1.9 Total/NA2.51000 8270C
☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 19 ug/Kg1.7 Total/NA2.51400 8270C
☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 19 ug/Kg1.0 Total/NA2.5650 8270C
☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 19 ug/Kg2.0 Total/NA2.5490 8270C
☼Carbazole 150 ug/Kg78 Total/NA2.598 J 8270C
☼Chrysene 19 ug/Kg3.2 Total/NA2.51100 8270C
☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 19 ug/Kg1.9 Total/NA2.5180 8270C
☼Dibenzofuran 150 ug/Kg1.9 Total/NA2.571 J 8270C
☼Fluoranthene 19 ug/Kg1.6 Total/NA2.52000 8270C
☼Fluorene 19 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA2.5100 8270C
☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 19 ug/Kg1.0 Total/NA2.5530 8270C
☼Naphthalene 19 ug/Kg2.4 Total/NA2.580 8270C
☼Phenanthrene 19 ug/Kg2.1 Total/NA2.51300 8270C
☼Pyrene 19 ug/Kg1.3 Total/NA2.51800 8270C
☼Aluminum 19 mg/Kg9.3 Total/NA15700 6010B
☼Antimony 0.96 mg/Kg0.38 Total/NA114 6010B
☼Arsenic 0.96 mg/Kg0.29 Total/NA122 6010B
☼Barium 19 mg/Kg0.12 Total/NA1500 6010B
☼Beryllium 0.48 mg/Kg0.041 Total/NA10.34 J 6010B
☼Cadmium 0.19 mg/Kg0.035 Total/NA16.8 6010B
☼Calcium 960 mg/Kg56 Total/NA257000 6010B
☼Chromium 0.48 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA181 6010B
☼Cobalt 4.8 mg/Kg0.15 Total/NA14.6 J 6010B
☼Copper 4.8 mg/Kg1.4 Total/NA2230 6010B
☼Iron 9.6 mg/Kg4.7 Total/NA145000 6010B
☼Lead 0.58 mg/Kg0.37 Total/NA21600 6010B
☼Magnesium 480 mg/Kg6.3 Total/NA19200 6010B
☼Manganese 1.4 mg/Kg0.15 Total/NA1680 6010B
☼Nickel 3.9 mg/Kg0.52 Total/NA114 6010B
☼Potassium 480 mg/Kg6.0 Total/NA1770 6010B
☼Selenium 0.48 mg/Kg0.43 Total/NA12.3 6010B
☼Silver 0.48 mg/Kg0.096 Total/NA10.23 J 6010B
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 12 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW2 2-4 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-6
☼Sodium
RL
480 mg/Kg
MDL
64
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA1J190 6010B
☼Vanadium 4.8 mg/Kg0.20 Total/NA119 6010B
☼Zinc 3.9 mg/Kg1.9 Total/NA21300 6010B
☼Mercury 0.65 mg/Kg0.097 Total/NA58.0 7471A
Client Sample ID: BW2 4-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-7
Arsenic
RL
0.50 mg/L
MDL
0.0032
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
TCLP1J0.0095 6010B
Barium 10 mg/L0.00067 TCLP11.0 J B 6010B
Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.0093 J 6010B
Chromium 0.50 mg/L0.0022 TCLP10.0041 J 6010B
Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.13 J 6010B
Selenium 0.25 mg/L0.0041 TCLP10.0046 J 6010B
Client Sample ID: BW2 6-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-8
No Detections.
Client Sample ID: BW2 8-9 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-9
☼Diesel Range Organics [C10 - C28]
RL
20 mg/Kg
MDL
11
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA141 8015C
Client Sample ID: BW3 1.5-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-10
☼1,1'-Biphenyl
RL
54 ug/Kg
MDL
3.8
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA1J9.3 8270C
☼2-Methylnaphthalene 7.2 ug/Kg0.54 Total/NA145 8270C
☼Acenaphthene 7.2 ug/Kg0.82 Total/NA124 8270C
☼Anthracene 7.2 ug/Kg0.84 Total/NA117 8270C
☼Benzo[a]anthracene 7.2 ug/Kg0.68 Total/NA1200 8270C
☼Benzo[a]pyrene 7.2 ug/Kg0.69 Total/NA1320 8270C
☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 7.2 ug/Kg0.64 Total/NA1580 8270C
☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 7.2 ug/Kg0.38 Total/NA1390 8270C
☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 7.2 ug/Kg0.73 Total/NA1170 8270C
☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 75 ug/Kg20 Total/NA135 J B 8270C
☼Chrysene 7.2 ug/Kg1.2 Total/NA1270 8270C
☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 7.2 ug/Kg0.71 Total/NA195 8270C
☼Dibenzofuran 54 ug/Kg0.71 Total/NA117 J 8270C
☼Fluoranthene 7.2 ug/Kg0.59 Total/NA1220 8270C
☼Fluorene 7.2 ug/Kg0.57 Total/NA16.4 J 8270C
☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 7.2 ug/Kg0.38 Total/NA1290 8270C
☼Naphthalene 7.2 ug/Kg0.88 Total/NA133 8270C
☼Phenanthrene 7.2 ug/Kg0.79 Total/NA1110 8270C
☼Pyrene 7.2 ug/Kg0.47 Total/NA1190 8270C
☼Aluminum 18 mg/Kg8.6 Total/NA12600 6010B
☼Antimony 0.90 mg/Kg0.35 Total/NA11.3 6010B
☼Arsenic 0.90 mg/Kg0.27 Total/NA17.0 6010B
☼Barium 18 mg/Kg0.11 Total/NA127 6010B
☼Beryllium 0.45 mg/Kg0.039 Total/NA10.11 J 6010B
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 13 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW3 1.5-2 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-10
☼Cadmium
RL
0.18 mg/Kg
MDL
0.032
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA10.39 6010B
☼Calcium 450 mg/Kg26 Total/NA17800 6010B
☼Chromium 0.45 mg/Kg0.18 Total/NA135 6010B
☼Cobalt 4.5 mg/Kg0.14 Total/NA12.5 J 6010B
☼Copper 2.2 mg/Kg0.67 Total/NA161 6010B
☼Iron 9.0 mg/Kg4.4 Total/NA119000 6010B
☼Lead 0.27 mg/Kg0.17 Total/NA118 6010B
☼Magnesium 450 mg/Kg5.8 Total/NA13100 6010B
☼Manganese 1.3 mg/Kg0.14 Total/NA1170 6010B
☼Nickel 3.6 mg/Kg0.49 Total/NA125 6010B
☼Potassium 450 mg/Kg5.6 Total/NA1320 J 6010B
☼Selenium 0.45 mg/Kg0.40 Total/NA10.49 6010B
☼Sodium 450 mg/Kg59 Total/NA1130 J 6010B
☼Vanadium 4.5 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA18.5 6010B
☼Zinc 1.8 mg/Kg0.90 Total/NA126 6010B
☼Mercury 0.098 mg/Kg0.015 Total/NA10.044 J 7471A
Client Sample ID: BW3 2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-11
☼1,1'-Biphenyl
RL
59 ug/Kg
MDL
4.1
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA1J6.6 8270C
☼2-Methylnaphthalene 7.9 ug/Kg0.59 Total/NA138 8270C
☼Acenaphthene 7.9 ug/Kg0.90 Total/NA121 8270C
☼Acenaphthylene 7.9 ug/Kg0.41 Total/NA14.4 J 8270C
☼Anthracene 7.9 ug/Kg0.92 Total/NA114 8270C
☼Benzo[a]anthracene 7.9 ug/Kg0.75 Total/NA1150 8270C
☼Benzo[a]pyrene 7.9 ug/Kg0.76 Total/NA1250 8270C
☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 7.9 ug/Kg0.70 Total/NA1370 8270C
☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 7.9 ug/Kg0.41 Total/NA1300 8270C
☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 7.9 ug/Kg0.81 Total/NA1140 8270C
☼Chrysene 7.9 ug/Kg1.3 Total/NA1210 8270C
☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 7.9 ug/Kg0.78 Total/NA164 8270C
☼Dibenzofuran 59 ug/Kg0.78 Total/NA113 J 8270C
☼Fluoranthene 7.9 ug/Kg0.65 Total/NA1180 8270C
☼Fluorene 7.9 ug/Kg0.63 Total/NA16.1 J 8270C
☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 7.9 ug/Kg0.41 Total/NA1220 8270C
☼Naphthalene 7.9 ug/Kg0.97 Total/NA124 8270C
☼Phenanthrene 7.9 ug/Kg0.86 Total/NA186 8270C
☼Pyrene 7.9 ug/Kg0.52 Total/NA1180 8270C
☼Aluminum 20 mg/Kg9.8 Total/NA16500 6010B
☼Antimony 1.0 mg/Kg0.40 Total/NA10.74 J 6010B
☼Arsenic 1.0 mg/Kg0.31 Total/NA112 6010B
☼Barium 20 mg/Kg0.12 Total/NA168 B 6010B
☼Beryllium 0.51 mg/Kg0.044 Total/NA10.46 J 6010B
☼Cadmium 0.20 mg/Kg0.037 Total/NA10.43 6010B
☼Calcium 510 mg/Kg30 Total/NA115000 6010B
☼Chromium 0.51 mg/Kg0.20 Total/NA116 6010B
☼Cobalt 5.1 mg/Kg0.16 Total/NA14.7 J 6010B
☼Copper 2.6 mg/Kg0.76 Total/NA136 6010B
☼Iron 10 mg/Kg5.0 Total/NA122000 6010B
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 14 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW3 2-4 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-11
☼Lead
RL
0.31 mg/Kg
MDL
0.19
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA141 6010B
☼Magnesium 510 mg/Kg6.6 Total/NA14800 6010B
☼Manganese 1.5 mg/Kg0.16 Total/NA1400 6010B
☼Nickel 4.1 mg/Kg0.55 Total/NA127 6010B
☼Potassium 510 mg/Kg6.3 Total/NA1720 B 6010B
☼Sodium 510 mg/Kg67 Total/NA1290 J 6010B
☼Vanadium 5.1 mg/Kg0.21 Total/NA117 6010B
☼Zinc 2.0 mg/Kg1.0 Total/NA192 6010B
☼Mercury 0.12 mg/Kg0.018 Total/NA10.080 J 7471A
Client Sample ID: BW3 2-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-12
Arsenic
RL
0.50 mg/L
MDL
0.0032
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
TCLP1J0.0045 6010B
Barium 10 mg/L0.00067 TCLP11.5 J B 6010B
Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.46 6010B
Chromium 0.50 mg/L0.0022 TCLP10.0033 J 6010B
Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.029 J 6010B
Selenium 0.25 mg/L0.0041 TCLP10.0050 J 6010B
Client Sample ID: BW3 6-7.5 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-13
No Detections.
Client Sample ID: BW4 0.5-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-14
No Detections.
Client Sample ID: BW4-2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-15
☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
RL
3.2 ug/Kg
MDL
0.17
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA1J B *0.17 8260B
☼Isopropylbenzene 3.2 ug/Kg0.10 Total/NA10.60 J 8260B
☼Toluene 3.2 ug/Kg0.17 Total/NA10.21 J 8260B
☼1,1'-Biphenyl 130 ug/Kg9.4 Total/NA2.540 J 8270C
☼2-Methylnaphthalene 18 ug/Kg1.3 Total/NA2.5190 8270C
☼Acenaphthene 18 ug/Kg2.0 Total/NA2.543 8270C
☼Acetophenone 270 ug/Kg25 Total/NA2.528 J 8270C
☼Anthracene 18 ug/Kg2.1 Total/NA2.563 8270C
☼Benzo[a]anthracene 18 ug/Kg1.7 Total/NA2.5870 8270C
☼Benzo[a]pyrene 18 ug/Kg1.7 Total/NA2.51600 8270C
☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 18 ug/Kg1.6 Total/NA2.52500 8270C
☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 18 ug/Kg0.94 Total/NA2.52400 8270C
☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 18 ug/Kg1.8 Total/NA2.5760 8270C
☼Chrysene 18 ug/Kg3.0 Total/NA2.51200 8270C
☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 18 ug/Kg1.8 Total/NA2.5540 8270C
☼Dibenzofuran 130 ug/Kg1.8 Total/NA2.566 J 8270C
☼Fluoranthene 18 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA2.5790 8270C
☼Fluorene 18 ug/Kg1.4 Total/NA2.521 8270C
☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 18 ug/Kg0.94 Total/NA2.51700 8270C
☼Naphthalene 18 ug/Kg2.2 Total/NA2.5130 8270C
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 15 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW4-2-4 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-15
☼Phenanthrene
RL
18 ug/Kg
MDL
2.0
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA2.5400 8270C
☼Pyrene 18 ug/Kg1.2 Total/NA2.5730 8270C
☼Aluminum 19 mg/Kg8.9 Total/NA14500 6010B
☼Antimony 0.93 mg/Kg0.36 Total/NA10.78 J 6010B
☼Arsenic 0.93 mg/Kg0.28 Total/NA18.8 6010B
☼Barium 19 mg/Kg0.11 Total/NA161 6010B
☼Beryllium 0.47 mg/Kg0.040 Total/NA10.21 J 6010B
☼Cadmium 0.19 mg/Kg0.033 Total/NA10.25 6010B
☼Calcium 470 mg/Kg27 Total/NA14700 6010B
☼Chromium 0.47 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA134 6010B
☼Cobalt 4.7 mg/Kg0.15 Total/NA14.1 J 6010B
☼Copper 2.3 mg/Kg0.69 Total/NA158 6010B
☼Iron 9.3 mg/Kg4.6 Total/NA130000 6010B
☼Lead 0.28 mg/Kg0.18 Total/NA132 6010B
☼Magnesium 470 mg/Kg6.0 Total/NA1640 6010B
☼Manganese 1.4 mg/Kg0.15 Total/NA1620 6010B
☼Nickel 3.7 mg/Kg0.50 Total/NA137 6010B
☼Potassium 470 mg/Kg5.8 Total/NA1440 J 6010B
☼Selenium 0.47 mg/Kg0.42 Total/NA10.54 6010B
☼Sodium 470 mg/Kg61 Total/NA194 J 6010B
☼Vanadium 4.7 mg/Kg0.20 Total/NA114 6010B
☼Zinc 1.9 mg/Kg0.93 Total/NA146 6010B
Client Sample ID: BW4-2-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-16
Arsenic
RL
0.50 mg/L
MDL
0.0032
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
TCLP1J0.0065 6010B
Barium 10 mg/L0.00067 TCLP10.41 J B 6010B
Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.027 J 6010B
Chromium 0.50 mg/L0.0022 TCLP10.0031 J 6010B
Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.0024 J 6010B
Selenium 0.25 mg/L0.0041 TCLP10.0063 J 6010B
Client Sample ID: BW4-6-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-17
Arsenic
RL
0.50 mg/L
MDL
0.0032
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
TCLP1J0.0096 6010B
Barium 10 mg/L0.00067 TCLP10.87 J B 6010B
Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.043 J 6010B
Chromium 0.50 mg/L0.0022 TCLP10.0034 J 6010B
Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.12 J 6010B
Selenium 0.25 mg/L0.0041 TCLP10.0053 J 6010B
Client Sample ID: BW4-8-10 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-18
☼2-Methylnaphthalene
RL
44 ug/Kg
MDL
3.3
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA5100 8270C
☼Acenaphthene 44 ug/Kg5.0 Total/NA5100 8270C
☼Acenaphthylene 44 ug/Kg2.3 Total/NA532 J 8270C
☼Anthracene 44 ug/Kg5.2 Total/NA5210 8270C
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 16 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW4-8-10 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-18
☼Benzaldehyde
RL
660 ug/Kg
MDL
80
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA5J190 8270C
☼Benzo[a]anthracene 44 ug/Kg4.2 Total/NA51800 8270C
☼Benzo[a]pyrene 44 ug/Kg4.3 Total/NA53200 8270C
☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 44 ug/Kg3.9 Total/NA53900 8270C
☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 44 ug/Kg2.3 Total/NA53000 8270C
☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 44 ug/Kg4.5 Total/NA51600 8270C
☼Chrysene 44 ug/Kg7.3 Total/NA51900 8270C
☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 44 ug/Kg4.4 Total/NA5720 8270C
☼Dibenzofuran 330 ug/Kg4.4 Total/NA561 J 8270C
☼Fluoranthene 44 ug/Kg3.7 Total/NA51700 8270C
☼Fluorene 44 ug/Kg3.5 Total/NA556 8270C
☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 44 ug/Kg2.3 Total/NA52400 8270C
☼Naphthalene 44 ug/Kg5.4 Total/NA5100 8270C
☼Pentachlorophenol 1000 ug/Kg60 Total/NA5300 J 8270C
☼Phenanthrene 44 ug/Kg4.8 Total/NA5800 8270C
☼Pyrene 44 ug/Kg2.9 Total/NA51600 8270C
☼Aluminum 24 mg/Kg11 Total/NA16800 6010B
☼Arsenic 1.2 mg/Kg0.36 Total/NA136 6010B
☼Barium 24 mg/Kg0.14 Total/NA1920 6010B
☼Beryllium 0.60 mg/Kg0.051 Total/NA12.0 6010B
☼Cadmium 1.2 mg/Kg0.22 Total/NA52.6 6010B
☼Calcium 600 mg/Kg35 Total/NA121000 6010B
☼Chromium 0.60 mg/Kg0.24 Total/NA160 6010B
☼Cobalt 6.0 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA112 6010B
☼Copper 15 mg/Kg4.4 Total/NA5360 6010B
☼Iron 60 mg/Kg29 Total/NA5150000 6010B
☼Lead 1.8 mg/Kg1.1 Total/NA51400 6010B
☼Magnesium 600 mg/Kg7.8 Total/NA13100 6010B
☼Manganese 1.8 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA1790 6010B
☼Nickel 24 mg/Kg3.2 Total/NA556 6010B
☼Potassium 600 mg/Kg7.4 Total/NA1470 J 6010B
☼Selenium 0.60 mg/Kg0.54 Total/NA12.3 6010B
☼Sodium 600 mg/Kg79 Total/NA1180 J 6010B
☼Thallium 1.2 mg/Kg0.66 Total/NA11.6 6010B
☼Vanadium 30 mg/Kg1.3 Total/NA523 J 6010B
☼Zinc 2.4 mg/Kg1.2 Total/NA11000 6010B
☼Mercury 0.73 mg/Kg0.11 Total/NA56.2 7471A
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 17 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-1Client Sample ID: BW1 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 08:00
Percent Solids: 80.6Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.5 U 3.5 0.39 ug/Kg ☼ 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
3.5 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.91 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.27 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,1-Dichloroethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.36 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,1-Dichloroethene 3.5 U
3.5 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 3.5 U
7.0 0.91 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 7.0 U
3.5 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene 3.5 U
3.5 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,2-Dichloroethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.48 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,2-Dichloropropane 3.5 U
3.5 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene 3.5 U
3.5 0.46 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene 3.5 U
14 0.98 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 1.4 J
14 0.44 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼2-Hexanone 14 U
14 0.38 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 14 U
14 4.4 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Acetone 5.7 J
3.5 0.16 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Benzene 3.5 U
3.5 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Bromoform 3.5 U
3.5 0.38 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Bromomethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.31 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Carbon disulfide 3.5 U
3.5 0.26 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Carbon tetrachloride 3.5 U
3.5 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Chlorobenzene 3.5 U
3.5 0.38 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Chlorodibromomethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.60 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Chloroethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.20 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Chloroform 3.5 U
3.5 0.29 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Chloromethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.5 U
3.5 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.5 U
7.0 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Cyclohexane 7.0 U
3.5 0.20 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Dichlorobromomethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.35 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Dichlorodifluoromethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.18 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Ethylbenzene 3.5 U
3.5 0.35 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Ethylene Dibromide 3.5 U
3.5 0.11 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Isopropylbenzene 3.5 U
7.0 0.98 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Methyl acetate 1.4 J
3.5 0.30 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Methyl tert-butyl ether 3.5 U
7.0 0.22 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Methylcyclohexane 7.0 U
3.5 0.47 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Methylene Chloride 3.5 U
3.5 0.10 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Styrene 3.5 U
3.5 0.36 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Tetrachloroethene 3.5 U
3.5 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Toluene 3.5 U
3.5 0.29 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.5 U
3.5 0.38 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.5 U
3.5 0.29 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Trichloroethene 3.5 U
3.5 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Trichlorofluoromethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.27 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Vinyl chloride 3.5 U
7.0 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Xylenes, Total 7.0 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 18 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-1Client Sample ID: BW1 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 08:00
Percent Solids: 80.6Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 98 58 - 123 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 91 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 152 - 136
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 88 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 137 - 132
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 91 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 167 - 125
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 250 U 250 17 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
740 120 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 740 U
740 44 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 740 U
740 98 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 740 U
740 98 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 740 U
1600 100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 1600 U
980 83 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 980 U
980 100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2,6-Dinitrotoluene 980 U
250 2.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2-Chloronaphthalene 250 U
250 40 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2-Chlorophenol 250 U
33 2.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2-Methylnaphthalene 33
980 54 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2-Methylphenol 980 U
980 45 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2-Nitroaniline 980 U
250 41 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2-Nitrophenol 250 U
2000 98 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 2000 U
490 88 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 490 U
980 79 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼3-Nitroaniline 980 U
740 45 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 740 U
250 64 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 250 U
740 100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 740 U
740 83 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼4-Chloroaniline 740 U
250 64 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 250 U
980 130 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼4-Nitroaniline 980 U
1600 83 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼4-Nitrophenol 1600 U
33 3.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Acenaphthene 33 U
33 1.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Acenaphthylene 33 U
490 45 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Acetophenone 490 U
33 3.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Anthracene 27 J
980 45 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Atrazine 980 U
490 59 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Benzaldehyde 240 J
33 3.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Benzo[a]anthracene 150
33 3.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Benzo[a]pyrene 460
33 2.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 410
33 1.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 500
33 3.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 87
490 47 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 490 U
490 110 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 490 U
490 9.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 490 U
340 93 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 340 U
340 49 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 340 U
1600 180 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Caprolactam 1600 U
250 130 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Carbazole 250 U
33 5.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Chrysene 190
TestAmerica Canton
Page 19 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-1Client Sample ID: BW1 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 08:00
Percent Solids: 80.6Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)RL MDL
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 330 33 3.2 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
250 3.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Dibenzofuran 250 U
340 79 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Diethyl phthalate 340 U
340 83 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Dimethyl phthalate 340 U
340 74 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 340 U
340 39 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 340 U
33 2.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Fluoranthene 200
33 2.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Fluorene 33 U
33 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Hexachlorobenzene 33 U
250 27 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Hexachlorobutadiene 250 U
1600 40 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 1600 U
250 44 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Hexachloroethane 250 U
33 1.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 260
250 64 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Isophorone 250 U
33 4.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Naphthalene 33 U
490 11 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Nitrobenzene 490 U
250 31 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 250 U
250 100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 250 U
740 45 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Pentachlorophenol 740 U
33 3.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Phenanthrene 100
250 36 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Phenol 250 U
33 2.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Pyrene 160
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 75 10 - 110 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 76 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 424 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 78 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 424 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 73 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 420 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 77 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 426 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 80 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 436 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)RL MDL
Aluminum 7500 23 11 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
1.2 0.45 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Antimony 43
1.2 0.35 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Arsenic 18
23 0.14 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Barium 450
0.58 0.050 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Beryllium 0.68
0.23 0.042 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Cadmium 1.4
580 34 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Calcium 58000
0.58 0.23 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Chromium 37
5.8 0.19 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Cobalt 6.2
2.9 0.86 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Copper 62
12 5.7 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Iron 24000
0.70 0.44 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:21 2☼Lead 1100
580 7.5 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Magnesium 7800
1.7 0.19 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Manganese 470
4.6 0.63 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Nickel 24
580 7.2 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Potassium 920
0.58 0.52 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Selenium 0.71
TestAmerica Canton
Page 20 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-1Client Sample ID: BW1 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 08:00
Percent Solids: 80.6Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)RL MDL
Silver 1.0 0.58 0.12 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
580 77 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Sodium 510 J
1.2 0.64 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Thallium 1.2 U
5.8 0.24 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Vanadium 20
2.3 1.2 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Zinc 390
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 0.29 0.13 0.020 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 15:32 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 21 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-2Client Sample ID: BW1 6-8Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 08:05
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.025 U 0.025 0.0095 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 11,2-Dichloroethane 0.025 U
0.25 0.029 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 12-Butanone (MEK) 0.25 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 1Benzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 1Carbon tetrachloride 0.025 U
0.025 0.0075 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 1Chlorobenzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 1Chloroform 0.025 U
0.025 0.015 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 1Tetrachloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0085 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 1Trichloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 1Vinyl chloride 0.025 U
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 90 80 - 121 03/31/14 19:41 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 88 03/31/14 19:41 170 - 124
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 92 03/31/14 19:41 180 - 128
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 101 03/31/14 19:41 180 - 120
TestAmerica Canton
Page 22 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-3Client Sample ID: BW1 6-10Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 08:05
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.020 0.00030 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00024 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00025 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 12,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U
0.0040 0.00017 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 12-Methylphenol 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00080 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 13 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.000085 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 1Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00027 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 1Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00019 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 1Hexachloroethane 0.020 U
0.0040 0.000040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 1Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00027 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 1Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 1Pyridine 0.020 U
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 90 15 - 110 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 81 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 127 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 35 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 110 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 85 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 127 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 72 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 120 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 95 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 138 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPRL MDL
Arsenic 0.017 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:31 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:31 1Barium 1.1 J B
0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:31 1Cadmium 0.0074 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:31 1Chromium 0.0062 J
0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:31 1Lead 0.74
0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:31 1Selenium 0.0058 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:31 1Silver 0.50 U
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPRL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:38 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 23 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-4Client Sample ID: BW1 10-12Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 08:10
Percent Solids: 37.1Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 53000 U 53000 3700 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
160000 27000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 160000 U
160000 9500 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 160000 U
160000 21000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 160000 U
160000 21000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 160000 U
350000 22000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 350000 U
210000 18000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 210000 U
210000 22000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼2,6-Dinitrotoluene 210000 U
53000 480 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼2-Chloronaphthalene 53000 U
53000 8800 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼2-Chlorophenol 53000 U
7100 530 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼2-Methylnaphthalene 3700 J
210000 12000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼2-Methylphenol 210000 U
210000 9700 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼2-Nitroaniline 210000 U
53000 8900 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼2-Nitrophenol 53000 U
430000 21000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 430000 U
110000 19000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 110000 U
210000 17000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼3-Nitroaniline 210000 U
160000 9800 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 160000 U
53000 14000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 53000 U
160000 22000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 160000 U
160000 18000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼4-Chloroaniline 160000 U
53000 14000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 53000 U
210000 28000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼4-Nitroaniline 210000 U
350000 18000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼4-Nitrophenol 350000 U
7100 810 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Acenaphthene 19000
7100 370 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Acenaphthylene 75000
110000 9800 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Acetophenone 110000 U
7100 830 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Anthracene 170000
210000 9700 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Atrazine 210000 U
110000 13000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Benzaldehyde 110000 U
7100 670 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Benzo[a]anthracene 420000
7100 680 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Benzo[a]pyrene 370000
7100 630 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 420000
7100 370 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 200000
7100 730 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 180000
110000 10000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 110000 U
110000 24000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 110000 U
110000 2100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 110000 U
75000 20000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 75000 U
75000 11000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 75000 U
350000 40000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Caprolactam 350000 U
53000 29000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Carbazole 53000 U
7100 1200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Chrysene 380000
7100 710 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 59000
53000 710 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Dibenzofuran 27000 J
75000 17000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Diethyl phthalate 75000 U
75000 18000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Dimethyl phthalate 75000 U
75000 16000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 75000 U
75000 8500 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 75000 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 24 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-4Client Sample ID: BW1 10-12Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 08:10
Percent Solids: 37.1Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)RL MDL
Fluoranthene 980000 7100 590 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
7100 570 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Fluorene 67000
7100 2200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Hexachlorobenzene 7100 U
53000 6000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Hexachlorobutadiene 53000 U
350000 8700 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 350000 U
53000 9600 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Hexachloroethane 53000 U
7100 370 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 180000
53000 14000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Isophorone 53000 U
7100 880 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Naphthalene 13000
110000 2400 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Nitrobenzene 110000 U
53000 6700 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 53000 U
53000 22000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 53000 U
160000 9700 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Pentachlorophenol 160000 U
7100 780 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Phenanthrene 570000
53000 7800 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Phenol 53000 U
7100 470 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Pyrene 800000
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 0 X 10 - 110 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 0 X 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 40024 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 0 X 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 40024 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 0 X 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 40020 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 0 X 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 40026 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 0 X 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 40036 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)RL MDL
Aluminum 5800 50 24 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
2.5 0.97 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Antimony 11
2.5 0.75 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Arsenic 94
50 0.30 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Barium 3300
1.2 0.11 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Beryllium 0.56 J
0.50 0.090 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Cadmium 6.4
1200 72 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Calcium 60000
1.2 0.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Chromium 330
12 0.40 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Cobalt 6.7 J
6.2 1.8 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Copper 300
25 12 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Iron 95000
0.75 0.47 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Lead 2000
1200 16 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Magnesium 13000
3.7 0.40 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Manganese 860
10 1.3 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Nickel 34
1200 15 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Potassium 850 J
1.2 1.1 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Selenium 5.5
1.2 0.25 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Silver 3.7
1200 160 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Sodium 960 J
2.5 1.4 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Thallium 1.5 J
12 0.52 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Vanadium 24
25 12 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:25 5☼Zinc 4500
TestAmerica Canton
Page 25 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-4Client Sample ID: BW1 10-12Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 08:10
Percent Solids: 37.1Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 57 5.8 0.87 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 17:30 20
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 26 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-5Client Sample ID: BW2 1-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 09:30
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.020 0.00030 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00024 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00025 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 12,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U
0.0040 0.00017 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 12-Methylphenol 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00080 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 13 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.000085 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 1Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00027 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 1Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00019 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 1Hexachloroethane 0.020 U
0.0040 0.000040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 1Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00027 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 1Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 1Pyridine 0.020 U
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 77 15 - 110 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 68 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 127 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 39 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 110 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 73 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 127 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 62 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 120 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 83 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 138 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPRL MDL
Arsenic 0.0098 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:35 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:35 1Barium 0.99 J B
0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:35 1Cadmium 0.54
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:35 1Chromium 0.0043 J
0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:35 1Lead 0.030 J
0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:35 1Selenium 0.0099 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:35 1Silver 0.50 U
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPRL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:40 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 27 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-6Client Sample ID: BW2 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 09:30
Percent Solids: 85.7Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.9 U 2.9 0.32 ug/Kg ☼ 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
2.9 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.9 U
2.9 0.74 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 2.9 U
2.9 0.22 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2.9 U
2.9 0.21 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼1,1-Dichloroethane 2.9 U
2.9 0.30 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼1,1-Dichloroethene 2.9 U
2.9 0.15 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2.9 U
5.7 0.74 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 5.7 U
2.9 0.21 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2.9 U
2.9 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼1,2-Dichloroethane 2.9 U
2.9 0.39 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼1,2-Dichloropropane 2.9 U
2.9 0.20 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2.9 U
2.9 0.38 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.9 U
11 0.80 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 11 U
11 0.36 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼2-Hexanone 11 U
11 0.31 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 11 U
11 3.6 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Acetone 11 U
2.9 0.13 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Benzene 2.9 U
2.9 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Bromoform 2.9 U
2.9 0.31 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Bromomethane 2.9 U
2.9 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Carbon disulfide 2.9 U
2.9 0.21 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Carbon tetrachloride 2.9 U
2.9 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Chlorobenzene 2.9 U
2.9 0.31 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Chlorodibromomethane 2.9 U
2.9 0.49 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Chloroethane 2.9 U
2.9 0.17 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Chloroform 2.9 U
2.9 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Chloromethane 2.9 U
2.9 0.21 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.9 U
2.9 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.9 U
5.7 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Cyclohexane 5.7 U
2.9 0.16 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Dichlorobromomethane 2.9 U
2.9 0.29 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.9 U
2.9 0.15 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Ethylbenzene 2.9 U
2.9 0.29 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Ethylene Dibromide 2.9 U
2.9 0.091 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Isopropylbenzene 2.9 U
5.7 0.80 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Methyl acetate 5.7 U
2.9 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Methyl tert-butyl ether 2.9 U
5.7 0.18 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Methylcyclohexane 5.7 U
2.9 0.38 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Methylene Chloride 0.53 J
2.9 0.086 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Styrene 2.9 U
2.9 0.30 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Tetrachloroethene 2.9 U *
2.9 0.15 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Toluene 2.9 U
2.9 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.9 U *
2.9 0.31 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.9 U
2.9 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Trichloroethene 2.9 U
2.9 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Trichlorofluoromethane 2.9 U
2.9 0.22 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Vinyl chloride 2.9 U
5.7 0.20 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Xylenes, Total 5.7 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 28 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-6Client Sample ID: BW2 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 09:30
Percent Solids: 85.7Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 92 58 - 123 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 79 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 152 - 136
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 111 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 137 - 132
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 96 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 167 - 125
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 16 J 150 10 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
440 73 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 440 U
440 26 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 440 U
440 58 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 440 U
440 58 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 440 U
960 61 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 960 U
580 49 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 580 U
580 61 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2,6-Dinitrotoluene 580 U
150 1.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2-Chloronaphthalene 150 U
150 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2-Chlorophenol 150 U
19 1.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2-Methylnaphthalene 47
580 32 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2-Methylphenol 580 U
580 26 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2-Nitroaniline 580 U
150 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2-Nitrophenol 150 U
1200 58 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 1200 U
290 52 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 290 U
580 46 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼3-Nitroaniline 580 U
440 27 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 440 U
150 38 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 150 U
440 61 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 440 U
440 49 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼4-Chloroaniline 440 U
150 38 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 150 U
580 75 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼4-Nitroaniline 580 U
960 49 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼4-Nitrophenol 960 U
19 2.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Acenaphthene 120
19 1.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Acenaphthylene 57
290 27 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Acetophenone 290 U
19 2.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Anthracene 300
580 26 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Atrazine 580 U
290 35 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Benzaldehyde 63 J
19 1.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Benzo[a]anthracene 1000
19 1.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Benzo[a]pyrene 1000
19 1.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1400
19 1.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 650
19 2.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 490
290 28 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 290 U
290 64 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 290 U
290 5.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 290 U
200 55 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 200 U
200 29 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 200 U
960 110 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Caprolactam 960 U
150 78 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Carbazole 98 J
19 3.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Chrysene 1100
TestAmerica Canton
Page 29 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-6Client Sample ID: BW2 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 09:30
Percent Solids: 85.7Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)RL MDL
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 180 19 1.9 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
150 1.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Dibenzofuran 71 J
200 46 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Diethyl phthalate 200 U
200 49 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Dimethyl phthalate 200 U
200 44 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 200 U
200 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 200 U
19 1.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Fluoranthene 2000
19 1.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Fluorene 100
19 6.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Hexachlorobenzene 19 U
150 16 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Hexachlorobutadiene 150 U
960 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 960 U
150 26 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Hexachloroethane 150 U
19 1.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 530
150 38 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Isophorone 150 U
19 2.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Naphthalene 80
290 6.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Nitrobenzene 290 U
150 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 150 U
150 61 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 150 U
440 26 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Pentachlorophenol 440 U
19 2.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Phenanthrene 1300
150 21 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Phenol 150 U
19 1.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Pyrene 1800
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 86 10 - 110 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 77 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.524 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 79 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.524 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 75 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.520 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 79 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.526 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 86 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.536 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)RL MDL
Aluminum 5700 19 9.3 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.96 0.38 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Antimony 14
0.96 0.29 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Arsenic 22
19 0.12 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Barium 500
0.48 0.041 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Beryllium 0.34 J
0.19 0.035 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Cadmium 6.8
960 56 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:29 2☼Calcium 57000
0.48 0.19 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Chromium 81
4.8 0.15 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Cobalt 4.6 J
4.8 1.4 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:29 2☼Copper 230
9.6 4.7 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Iron 45000
0.58 0.37 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:29 2☼Lead 1600
480 6.3 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Magnesium 9200
1.4 0.15 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Manganese 680
3.9 0.52 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Nickel 14
480 6.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Potassium 770
0.48 0.43 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Selenium 2.3
TestAmerica Canton
Page 30 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-6Client Sample ID: BW2 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 09:30
Percent Solids: 85.7Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)RL MDL
Silver 0.23 J 0.48 0.096 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
480 64 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Sodium 190 J
0.96 0.53 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Thallium 0.96 U
4.8 0.20 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Vanadium 19
3.9 1.9 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:29 2☼Zinc 1300
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 8.0 0.65 0.097 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 17:33 5
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 31 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-7Client Sample ID: BW2 4-8Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 09:35
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.020 0.00030 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00024 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00025 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 12,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U
0.0040 0.00017 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 12-Methylphenol 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00080 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 13 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.000085 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 1Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00027 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 1Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00019 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 1Hexachloroethane 0.020 U
0.0040 0.000040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 1Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00027 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 1Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 1Pyridine 0.020 U
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 76 15 - 110 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 73 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 127 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 33 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 110 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 80 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 127 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 69 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 120 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 88 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 138 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPRL MDL
Arsenic 0.0095 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:40 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:40 1Barium 1.0 J B
0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:40 1Cadmium 0.0093 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:40 1Chromium 0.0041 J
0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:40 1Lead 0.13 J
0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:40 1Selenium 0.0046 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:40 1Silver 0.50 U
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPRL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:41 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 32 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-8Client Sample ID: BW2 6-8Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 09:35
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.025 U 0.025 0.0095 mg/L 03/31/14 20:04 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 20:04 11,2-Dichloroethane 0.025 U
0.25 0.029 mg/L 03/31/14 20:04 12-Butanone (MEK) 0.25 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 20:04 1Benzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 20:04 1Carbon tetrachloride 0.025 U
0.025 0.0075 mg/L 03/31/14 20:04 1Chlorobenzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 20:04 1Chloroform 0.025 U
0.025 0.015 mg/L 03/31/14 20:04 1Tetrachloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0085 mg/L 03/31/14 20:04 1Trichloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 20:04 1Vinyl chloride 0.025 U
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 88 80 - 121 03/31/14 20:04 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 86 03/31/14 20:04 170 - 124
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 84 03/31/14 20:04 180 - 128
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 99 03/31/14 20:04 180 - 120
TestAmerica Canton
Page 33 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-9Client Sample ID: BW2 8-9Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 09:41
Percent Solids: 84.6Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Gasoline Range Organics)RL MDL
C6-C10 120 U 120 55 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:28 03/25/14 16:04 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
Trifluorotoluene (Surr) 61 40 - 139 03/25/14 08:28 03/25/14 16:04 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Diesel Range Organics)RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics [C10 - C28] 41 20 11 mg/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 13:12 03/31/14 17:11 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
o-Terphenyl (Surr) 82 40 - 160 03/25/14 13:12 03/31/14 17:11 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
TestAmerica Canton
Page 34 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-10Client Sample ID: BW3 1.5-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 10:45
Percent Solids: 92.6Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 9.3 J 54 3.8 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
160 27 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 160 U
160 9.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 160 U
160 22 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 160 U
160 22 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 160 U
360 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 360 U
220 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 220 U
220 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼2,6-Dinitrotoluene 220 U
54 0.48 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼2-Chloronaphthalene 54 U
54 8.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼2-Chlorophenol 54 U
7.2 0.54 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼2-Methylnaphthalene 45
220 12 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼2-Methylphenol 220 U
220 9.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼2-Nitroaniline 220 U
54 8.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼2-Nitrophenol 54 U
430 22 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 430 U
110 19 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 110 U
220 17 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼3-Nitroaniline 220 U
160 9.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 160 U
54 14 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 54 U
160 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 160 U
160 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼4-Chloroaniline 160 U
54 14 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 54 U
220 28 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼4-Nitroaniline 220 U
360 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼4-Nitrophenol 360 U
7.2 0.82 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Acenaphthene 24
7.2 0.38 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Acenaphthylene 7.2 U
110 9.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Acetophenone 110 U
7.2 0.84 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Anthracene 17
220 9.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Atrazine 220 U
110 13 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Benzaldehyde 110 U
7.2 0.68 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Benzo[a]anthracene 200
7.2 0.69 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Benzo[a]pyrene 320
7.2 0.64 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 580
7.2 0.38 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 390
7.2 0.73 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 170
110 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 110 U
110 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 110 U
110 2.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 110 U
75 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 35 J B
75 11 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 75 U
360 40 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Caprolactam 360 U
54 29 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Carbazole 54 U
7.2 1.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Chrysene 270
7.2 0.71 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 95
54 0.71 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Dibenzofuran 17 J
75 17 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Diethyl phthalate 75 U
75 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Dimethyl phthalate 75 U
75 16 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 75 U
75 8.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 75 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 35 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-10Client Sample ID: BW3 1.5-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 10:45
Percent Solids: 92.6Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)RL MDL
Fluoranthene 220 7.2 0.59 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
7.2 0.57 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Fluorene 6.4 J
7.2 2.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Hexachlorobenzene 7.2 U
54 6.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Hexachlorobutadiene 54 U
360 8.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 360 U
54 9.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Hexachloroethane 54 U
7.2 0.38 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 290
54 14 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Isophorone 54 U
7.2 0.88 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Naphthalene 33
110 2.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Nitrobenzene 110 U
54 6.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 54 U
54 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 54 U
160 9.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Pentachlorophenol 160 U
7.2 0.79 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Phenanthrene 110
54 7.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Phenol 54 U
7.2 0.47 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Pyrene 190
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 82 10 - 110 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 74 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 124 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 64 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 124 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 63 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 120 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 68 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 126 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 87 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 136 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)RL MDL
Aluminum 2600 18 8.6 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.90 0.35 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Antimony 1.3
0.90 0.27 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Arsenic 7.0
18 0.11 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Barium 27
0.45 0.039 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Beryllium 0.11 J
0.18 0.032 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Cadmium 0.39
450 26 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Calcium 7800
0.45 0.18 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Chromium 35
4.5 0.14 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Cobalt 2.5 J
2.2 0.67 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Copper 61
9.0 4.4 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Iron 19000
0.27 0.17 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Lead 18
450 5.8 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Magnesium 3100
1.3 0.14 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Manganese 170
3.6 0.49 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Nickel 25
450 5.6 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Potassium 320 J
0.45 0.40 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Selenium 0.49
0.45 0.090 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Silver 0.45 U
450 59 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Sodium 130 J
0.90 0.49 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Thallium 0.90 U
4.5 0.19 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Vanadium 8.5
1.8 0.90 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Zinc 26
TestAmerica Canton
Page 36 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-10Client Sample ID: BW3 1.5-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 10:45
Percent Solids: 92.6Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 0.044 J 0.098 0.015 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 17:35 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 37 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-11Client Sample ID: BW3 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 10:47
Percent Solids: 83.7Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.7 U 3.7 0.41 ug/Kg ☼ 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
3.7 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.7 U
3.7 0.96 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 3.7 U
3.7 0.29 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane 3.7 U
3.7 0.26 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼1,1-Dichloroethane 3.7 U
3.7 0.38 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼1,1-Dichloroethene 3.7 U
3.7 0.20 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 3.7 U
7.3 0.96 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 7.3 U
3.7 0.26 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene 3.7 U
3.7 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼1,2-Dichloroethane 3.7 U
3.7 0.51 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼1,2-Dichloropropane 3.7 U
3.7 0.26 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene 3.7 U
3.7 0.48 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene 3.7 U
15 1.0 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 15 U
15 0.46 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼2-Hexanone 15 U
15 0.40 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 15 U
15 4.6 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Acetone 15 U
3.7 0.17 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Benzene 3.7 U
3.7 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Bromoform 3.7 U
3.7 0.40 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Bromomethane 3.7 U
3.7 0.32 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Carbon disulfide 3.7 U
3.7 0.27 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Carbon tetrachloride 3.7 U
3.7 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Chlorobenzene 3.7 U
3.7 0.40 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Chlorodibromomethane 3.7 U
3.7 0.63 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Chloroethane 3.7 U
3.7 0.21 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Chloroform 3.7 U
3.7 0.30 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Chloromethane 3.7 U
3.7 0.26 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.7 U
3.7 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.7 U
7.3 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Cyclohexane 7.3 U
3.7 0.21 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Dichlorobromomethane 3.7 U
3.7 0.37 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Dichlorodifluoromethane 3.7 U
3.7 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Ethylbenzene 3.7 U
3.7 0.37 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Ethylene Dibromide 3.7 U
3.7 0.12 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Isopropylbenzene 3.7 U
7.3 1.0 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Methyl acetate 7.3 U
3.7 0.32 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Methyl tert-butyl ether 3.7 U
7.3 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Methylcyclohexane 7.3 U
3.7 0.49 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Methylene Chloride 3.7 U
3.7 0.11 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Styrene 3.7 U
3.7 0.38 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Tetrachloroethene 3.7 U
3.7 0.20 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Toluene 3.7 U
3.7 0.30 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.7 U
3.7 0.40 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.7 U
3.7 0.31 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Trichloroethene 3.7 U
3.7 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Trichlorofluoromethane 3.7 U
3.7 0.29 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Vinyl chloride 3.7 U
7.3 0.26 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Xylenes, Total 7.3 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 38 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-11Client Sample ID: BW3 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 10:47
Percent Solids: 83.7Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 101 58 - 123 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 82 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 152 - 136
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 86 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 137 - 132
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 88 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 167 - 125
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 6.6 J 59 4.1 ug/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
180 30 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 180 U
180 11 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 180 U
180 24 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 180 U
180 24 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 180 U
390 25 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 390 U
240 20 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 240 U
240 25 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼2,6-Dinitrotoluene 240 U
59 0.53 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼2-Chloronaphthalene 59 U
59 9.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼2-Chlorophenol 59 U
7.9 0.59 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼2-Methylnaphthalene 38
240 13 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼2-Methylphenol 240 U
240 11 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼2-Nitroaniline 240 U
59 9.8 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼2-Nitrophenol 59 U
470 24 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 470 U
120 21 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 120 U
240 19 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼3-Nitroaniline 240 U
180 11 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 180 U
59 15 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 59 U
180 25 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 180 U
180 20 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼4-Chloroaniline 180 U
59 15 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 59 U
240 31 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼4-Nitroaniline 240 U
390 20 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼4-Nitrophenol 390 U
7.9 0.90 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Acenaphthene 21
7.9 0.41 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Acenaphthylene 4.4 J
120 11 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Acetophenone 120 U
7.9 0.92 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Anthracene 14
240 11 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Atrazine 240 U
120 14 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Benzaldehyde 120 U
7.9 0.75 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Benzo[a]anthracene 150
7.9 0.76 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Benzo[a]pyrene 250
7.9 0.70 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 370
7.9 0.41 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 300
7.9 0.81 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 140
120 11 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 120 U
120 26 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 120 U
120 2.4 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 120 U
83 23 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 83 U
83 12 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 83 U
390 44 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Caprolactam 390 U
59 32 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Carbazole 59 U
7.9 1.3 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Chrysene 210
TestAmerica Canton
Page 39 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-11Client Sample ID: BW3 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 10:47
Percent Solids: 83.7Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)RL MDL
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 64 7.9 0.78 ug/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
59 0.78 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Dibenzofuran 13 J
83 19 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Diethyl phthalate 83 U
83 20 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Dimethyl phthalate 83 U
83 18 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 83 U
83 9.4 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 83 U
7.9 0.65 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Fluoranthene 180
7.9 0.63 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Fluorene 6.1 J
7.9 2.5 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Hexachlorobenzene 7.9 U
59 6.6 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Hexachlorobutadiene 59 U
390 9.6 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 390 U
59 11 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Hexachloroethane 59 U
7.9 0.41 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 220
59 15 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Isophorone 59 U
7.9 0.97 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Naphthalene 24
120 2.6 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Nitrobenzene 120 U
59 7.5 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 59 U
59 25 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 59 U
180 11 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Pentachlorophenol 180 U
7.9 0.86 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Phenanthrene 86
59 8.6 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Phenol 59 U
7.9 0.52 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Pyrene 180
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 62 10 - 110 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 71 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 124 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 66 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 124 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 67 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 120 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 68 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 126 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 75 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 136 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)RL MDL
Aluminum 6500 20 9.8 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
1.0 0.40 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Antimony 0.74 J
1.0 0.31 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Arsenic 12
20 0.12 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Barium 68 B
0.51 0.044 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Beryllium 0.46 J
0.20 0.037 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Cadmium 0.43
510 30 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Calcium 15000
0.51 0.20 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Chromium 16
5.1 0.16 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Cobalt 4.7 J
2.6 0.76 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Copper 36
10 5.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Iron 22000
0.31 0.19 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Lead 41
510 6.6 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Magnesium 4800
1.5 0.16 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Manganese 400
4.1 0.55 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Nickel 27
510 6.3 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Potassium 720 B
0.51 0.46 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/28/14 13:58 1☼Selenium 0.51 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 40 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-11Client Sample ID: BW3 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 10:47
Percent Solids: 83.7Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)RL MDL
Silver 0.51 U 0.51 0.10 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
510 67 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Sodium 290 J
1.0 0.56 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Thallium 1.0 U
5.1 0.21 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Vanadium 17
2.0 1.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Zinc 92
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 0.080 J 0.12 0.018 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 09:44 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 41 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-12Client Sample ID: BW3 2-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 10:52
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.020 0.00030 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00024 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00025 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 12,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U
0.0040 0.00017 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 12-Methylphenol 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00080 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 13 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.000085 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 1Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00027 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 1Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00019 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 1Hexachloroethane 0.020 U
0.0040 0.000040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 1Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00027 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 1Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 1Pyridine 0.020 U
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 71 15 - 110 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 60 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 127 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 25 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 110 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 64 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 127 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 52 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 120 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 82 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 138 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPRL MDL
Arsenic 0.0045 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:44 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:44 1Barium 1.5 J B
0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:44 1Cadmium 0.46
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:44 1Chromium 0.0033 J
0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:44 1Lead 0.029 J
0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:44 1Selenium 0.0050 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:44 1Silver 0.50 U
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPRL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:43 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 42 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-13Client Sample ID: BW3 6-7.5Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 10:55
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.025 U 0.025 0.0095 mg/L 03/31/14 20:27 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 20:27 11,2-Dichloroethane 0.025 U
0.25 0.029 mg/L 03/31/14 20:27 12-Butanone (MEK) 0.25 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 20:27 1Benzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 20:27 1Carbon tetrachloride 0.025 U
0.025 0.0075 mg/L 03/31/14 20:27 1Chlorobenzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 20:27 1Chloroform 0.025 U
0.025 0.015 mg/L 03/31/14 20:27 1Tetrachloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0085 mg/L 03/31/14 20:27 1Trichloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 20:27 1Vinyl chloride 0.025 U
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 88 80 - 121 03/31/14 20:27 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 86 03/31/14 20:27 170 - 124
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 90 03/31/14 20:27 180 - 128
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 97 03/31/14 20:27 180 - 120
TestAmerica Canton
Page 43 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-14Client Sample ID: BW4 0.5-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 13:00
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.025 U 0.025 0.0095 mg/L 03/31/14 20:50 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 20:50 11,2-Dichloroethane 0.025 U
0.25 0.029 mg/L 03/31/14 20:50 12-Butanone (MEK) 0.25 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 20:50 1Benzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 20:50 1Carbon tetrachloride 0.025 U
0.025 0.0075 mg/L 03/31/14 20:50 1Chlorobenzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 20:50 1Chloroform 0.025 U
0.025 0.015 mg/L 03/31/14 20:50 1Tetrachloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0085 mg/L 03/31/14 20:50 1Trichloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 20:50 1Vinyl chloride 0.025 U
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 88 80 - 121 03/31/14 20:50 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 86 03/31/14 20:50 170 - 124
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 87 03/31/14 20:50 180 - 128
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 97 03/31/14 20:50 180 - 120
TestAmerica Canton
Page 44 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-15Client Sample ID: BW4-2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 13:05
Percent Solids: 91.8Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.2 U 3.2 0.36 ug/Kg ☼ 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
3.2 0.22 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.2 U *
3.2 0.84 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 3.2 U
3.2 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane 3.2 U
3.2 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼1,1-Dichloroethane 3.2 U
3.2 0.33 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼1,1-Dichloroethene 3.2 U
3.2 0.17 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.17 J B *
6.4 0.84 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 6.4 U *
3.2 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene 3.2 U *
3.2 0.22 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼1,2-Dichloroethane 3.2 U
3.2 0.44 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼1,2-Dichloropropane 3.2 U
3.2 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene 3.2 U *
3.2 0.43 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene 3.2 U *
13 0.90 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 13 U
13 0.41 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼2-Hexanone 13 U
13 0.35 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 13 U
13 4.1 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Acetone 13 U
3.2 0.15 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Benzene 3.2 U
3.2 0.21 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Bromoform 3.2 U
3.2 0.35 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Bromomethane 3.2 U
3.2 0.28 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Carbon disulfide 3.2 U
3.2 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Carbon tetrachloride 3.2 U
3.2 0.21 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Chlorobenzene 3.2 U
3.2 0.35 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Chlorodibromomethane 3.2 U
3.2 0.55 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Chloroethane 3.2 U
3.2 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Chloroform 3.2 U
3.2 0.26 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Chloromethane 3.2 U
3.2 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.2 U
3.2 0.22 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.2 U
6.4 0.21 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Cyclohexane 6.4 U
3.2 0.18 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Dichlorobromomethane 3.2 U
3.2 0.32 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Dichlorodifluoromethane 3.2 U
3.2 0.17 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Ethylbenzene 3.2 U
3.2 0.32 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Ethylene Dibromide 3.2 U
3.2 0.10 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Isopropylbenzene 0.60 J
6.4 0.90 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Methyl acetate 6.4 U
3.2 0.28 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Methyl tert-butyl ether 3.2 U
6.4 0.20 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Methylcyclohexane 6.4 U
3.2 0.43 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Methylene Chloride 3.2 U
3.2 0.097 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Styrene 3.2 U
3.2 0.33 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Tetrachloroethene 3.2 U
3.2 0.17 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Toluene 0.21 J
3.2 0.26 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.2 U
3.2 0.35 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.2 U
3.2 0.27 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Trichloroethene 3.2 U
3.2 0.22 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Trichlorofluoromethane 3.2 U
3.2 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Vinyl chloride 3.2 U
6.4 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Xylenes, Total 6.4 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 45 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-15Client Sample ID: BW4-2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 13:05
Percent Solids: 91.8Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 109 58 - 123 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 120 * 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 152 - 136
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 94 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 137 - 132
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 115 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 167 - 125
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 40 J 130 9.4 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
400 67 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 400 U
400 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 400 U
400 54 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 400 U
400 54 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 400 U
890 56 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 890 U
540 46 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 540 U
540 56 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼2,6-Dinitrotoluene 540 U
130 1.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼2-Chloronaphthalene 130 U
130 22 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼2-Chlorophenol 130 U
18 1.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼2-Methylnaphthalene 190
540 30 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼2-Methylphenol 540 U
540 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼2-Nitroaniline 540 U
130 22 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼2-Nitrophenol 130 U
1100 54 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 1100 U
270 48 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 270 U
540 43 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼3-Nitroaniline 540 U
400 25 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 400 U
130 35 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 130 U
400 56 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 400 U
400 46 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼4-Chloroaniline 400 U
130 35 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 130 U
540 70 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼4-Nitroaniline 540 U
890 46 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼4-Nitrophenol 890 U
18 2.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Acenaphthene 43
18 0.94 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Acenaphthylene 18 U
270 25 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Acetophenone 28 J
18 2.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Anthracene 63
540 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Atrazine 540 U
270 32 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Benzaldehyde 270 U
18 1.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Benzo[a]anthracene 870
18 1.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Benzo[a]pyrene 1600
18 1.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 2500
18 0.94 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 2400
18 1.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 760
270 25 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 270 U
270 59 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 270 U
270 5.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 270 U
190 51 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 190 U
190 27 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 190 U
890 99 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Caprolactam 890 U
130 72 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Carbazole 130 U
18 3.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Chrysene 1200
TestAmerica Canton
Page 46 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-15Client Sample ID: BW4-2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 13:05
Percent Solids: 91.8Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)RL MDL
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 540 18 1.8 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
130 1.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Dibenzofuran 66 J
190 43 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Diethyl phthalate 190 U
190 46 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Dimethyl phthalate 190 U
190 40 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 190 U
190 21 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 190 U
18 1.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Fluoranthene 790
18 1.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Fluorene 21
18 5.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Hexachlorobenzene 18 U
130 15 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Hexachlorobutadiene 130 U
890 22 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 890 U
130 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Hexachloroethane 130 U
18 0.94 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 1700
130 35 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Isophorone 130 U
18 2.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Naphthalene 130
270 5.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Nitrobenzene 270 U
130 17 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 130 U
130 56 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 130 U
400 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Pentachlorophenol 400 U
18 2.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Phenanthrene 400
130 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Phenol 130 U
18 1.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Pyrene 730
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 67 10 - 110 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 74 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.524 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 59 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.524 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 62 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.520 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 63 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.526 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 87 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.536 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)RL MDL
Aluminum 4500 19 8.9 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.93 0.36 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Antimony 0.78 J
0.93 0.28 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Arsenic 8.8
19 0.11 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Barium 61
0.47 0.040 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Beryllium 0.21 J
0.19 0.033 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Cadmium 0.25
470 27 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Calcium 4700
0.47 0.19 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Chromium 34
4.7 0.15 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Cobalt 4.1 J
2.3 0.69 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Copper 58
9.3 4.6 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Iron 30000
0.28 0.18 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Lead 32
470 6.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Magnesium 640
1.4 0.15 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Manganese 620
3.7 0.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Nickel 37
470 5.8 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Potassium 440 J
0.47 0.42 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Selenium 0.54
TestAmerica Canton
Page 47 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-15Client Sample ID: BW4-2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 13:05
Percent Solids: 91.8Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)RL MDL
Silver 0.47 U 0.47 0.093 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
470 61 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Sodium 94 J
0.93 0.51 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Thallium 0.93 U
4.7 0.20 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Vanadium 14
1.9 0.93 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Zinc 46
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 0.10 U 0.10 0.016 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 15:42 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 48 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-16Client Sample ID: BW4-2-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 13:08
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.020 0.00030 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00024 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00025 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 12,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U
0.0040 0.00017 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 12-Methylphenol 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00080 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 13 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.000085 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 1Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00027 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 1Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00019 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 1Hexachloroethane 0.020 U
0.0040 0.000040 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 1Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00027 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 1Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.00035 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 1Pyridine 0.020 U
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 95 15 - 110 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 72 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 127 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 59 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 110 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 70 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 127 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 52 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 120 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 105 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 138 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPRL MDL
Arsenic 0.0065 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:48 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:48 1Barium 0.41 J B
0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:48 1Cadmium 0.027 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:48 1Chromium 0.0031 J
0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:48 1Lead 0.0024 J
0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:48 1Selenium 0.0063 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:48 1Silver 0.50 U
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPRL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:48 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 49 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-17Client Sample ID: BW4-6-8Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 03:12
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.020 0.00030 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00024 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00025 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 12,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U
0.0040 0.00017 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 12-Methylphenol 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00080 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 13 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.000085 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 1Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00027 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 1Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00019 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 1Hexachloroethane 0.020 U
0.0040 0.000040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 1Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00027 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 1Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 1Pyridine 0.020 U
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 76 15 - 110 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 73 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 127 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 21 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 110 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 81 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 127 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 61 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 120 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 89 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 138 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPRL MDL
Arsenic 0.0096 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:52 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:52 1Barium 0.87 J B
0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:52 1Cadmium 0.043 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:52 1Chromium 0.0034 J
0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:52 1Lead 0.12 J
0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:52 1Selenium 0.0053 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:52 1Silver 0.50 U
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPRL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:49 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 50 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-18Client Sample ID: BW4-8-10Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 13:15
Percent Solids: 75.2Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 330 U 330 23 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
1000 170 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 1000 U
1000 59 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 1000 U
1000 130 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 1000 U
1000 130 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 1000 U
2200 140 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 2200 U
1300 110 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 1300 U
1300 140 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼2,6-Dinitrotoluene 1300 U
330 3.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼2-Chloronaphthalene 330 U
330 54 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼2-Chlorophenol 330 U
44 3.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼2-Methylnaphthalene 100
1300 73 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼2-Methylphenol 1300 U
1300 60 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼2-Nitroaniline 1300 U
330 55 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼2-Nitrophenol 330 U
2700 130 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 2700 U
660 120 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 660 U
1300 110 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼3-Nitroaniline 1300 U
1000 61 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1000 U
330 86 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 330 U
1000 140 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 1000 U
1000 110 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼4-Chloroaniline 1000 U
330 86 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 330 U
1300 170 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼4-Nitroaniline 1300 U
2200 110 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼4-Nitrophenol 2200 U
44 5.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Acenaphthene 100
44 2.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Acenaphthylene 32 J
660 61 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Acetophenone 660 U
44 5.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Anthracene 210
1300 60 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Atrazine 1300 U
660 80 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Benzaldehyde 190 J
44 4.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Benzo[a]anthracene 1800
44 4.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Benzo[a]pyrene 3200
44 3.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 3900
44 2.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 3000
44 4.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 1600
660 63 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 660 U
660 150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 660 U
660 13 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 660 U
470 130 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 470 U
470 66 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 470 U
2200 250 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Caprolactam 2200 U
330 180 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Carbazole 330 U
44 7.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Chrysene 1900
44 4.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 720
330 4.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Dibenzofuran 61 J
470 110 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Diethyl phthalate 470 U
470 110 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Dimethyl phthalate 470 U
470 100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 470 U
470 52 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 470 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 51 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-18Client Sample ID: BW4-8-10Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 13:15
Percent Solids: 75.2Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)RL MDL
Fluoranthene 1700 44 3.7 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
44 3.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Fluorene 56
44 14 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Hexachlorobenzene 44 U
330 37 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Hexachlorobutadiene 330 U
2200 54 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2200 U
330 60 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Hexachloroethane 330 U
44 2.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 2400
330 86 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Isophorone 330 U
44 5.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Naphthalene 100
660 15 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Nitrobenzene 660 U
330 42 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 330 U
330 140 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 330 U
1000 60 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Pentachlorophenol 300 J
44 4.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Phenanthrene 800
330 48 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Phenol 330 U
44 2.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Pyrene 1600
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 77 10 - 110 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 64 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 524 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 68 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 524 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 59 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 520 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 68 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 526 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 76 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 536 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)RL MDL
Aluminum 6800 24 11 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
6.0 2.3 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:33 5☼Antimony 6.0 U
1.2 0.36 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Arsenic 36
24 0.14 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Barium 920
0.60 0.051 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Beryllium 2.0
1.2 0.22 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:33 5☼Cadmium 2.6
600 35 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Calcium 21000
0.60 0.24 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Chromium 60
6.0 0.19 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Cobalt 12
15 4.4 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:33 5☼Copper 360
60 29 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:33 5☼Iron 150000
1.8 1.1 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:33 5☼Lead 1400
600 7.8 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Magnesium 3100
1.8 0.19 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Manganese 790
24 3.2 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:33 5☼Nickel 56
600 7.4 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Potassium 470 J
0.60 0.54 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Selenium 2.3
0.60 0.12 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Silver 0.60 U
600 79 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Sodium 180 J
1.2 0.66 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Thallium 1.6
30 1.3 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:33 5☼Vanadium 23 J
2.4 1.2 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Zinc 1000
TestAmerica Canton
Page 52 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-18Client Sample ID: BW4-8-10Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 13:15
Percent Solids: 75.2Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 6.2 0.73 0.11 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 17:38 5
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 53 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Surrogate SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (58-123) (52-136) (37-132) (67-125)
12DCE BFB DBFM TOL
98 91 88 91240-35317-1
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW1 4-6
92 79 111 96240-35317-6 BW2 2-4
101 82 86 88240-35317-11 BW3 2-4
109 120 * 94 115240-35317-15 BW4-2-4
91 83 94 90LCS 240-124052/5 Lab Control Sample
79 87 100 98LCS 240-124125/8 Lab Control Sample
83 81 106 92MB 240-123823/3-A Method Blank
96 81 91 90MB 240-124052/6 Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-121) (70-124) (80-128) (80-120)
12DCE BFB DBFM TOL
84 90 91 100LCS 240-124658/4
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
Lab Control Sample
Surrogate Legend
12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: TCLPMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-121) (70-124) (80-128) (80-120)
12DCE BFB DBFM TOL
90 88 92 101240-35317-2
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW1 6-8
88 86 84 99240-35317-8 BW2 6-8
88 86 90 97240-35317-13 BW3 6-7.5
88 86 87 97240-35317-14 BW4 0.5-2
84 85 89 97LB 240-124562/1-A MB Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
TestAmerica Canton
Page 54 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Surrogate SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (10-110) (24-110) (24-110) (20-110) (26-110) (36-110)
TBP FBP 2FP NBZ PHL TPH
75 76 78 73 77 80240-35317-1
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW1 4-6
0 X 0 X 0 X 0 X0 X 0 X240-35317-4 BW1 10-12
86 77 79 7975 86240-35317-6 BW2 2-4
82 74 64 6863 87240-35317-10 BW3 1.5-2
62 71 66 6867 75240-35317-11 BW3 2-4
67 74 59 6362 87240-35317-15 BW4-2-4
77 64 68 6859 76240-35317-18 BW4-8-10
85 75 73 7471 93LCS 240-123851/24-A Lab Control Sample
79 76 76 7684 84LCS 240-124042/20-A Lab Control Sample
75 74 74 7671 93MB 240-123851/23-A Method Blank
87 87 83 8588 92MB 240-124042/19-A Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
TBP = 2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr)
FBP = 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
2FP = 2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
NBZ = Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
PHL = Phenol-d5 (Surr)
TPH = Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (15-110) (27-110) (10-110) (27-110) (20-110) (38-110)
TBP FBP 2FP NBZ PHL TPH
86 80 32 85 66 88LCS 240-124411/21-A
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
Lab Control Sample
95 78 61 5273 100LCS 240-124983/7-A Lab Control Sample
77 74 32 6882 89MB 240-124411/20-A Method Blank
77 66 54 4663 92MB 240-124983/6-A Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
TBP = 2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr)
FBP = 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
2FP = 2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
NBZ = Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
PHL = Phenol-d5 (Surr)
TPH = Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: TCLPMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (15-110) (27-110) (10-110) (27-110) (20-110) (38-110)
TBP FBP 2FP NBZ PHL TPH
90 81 35 85 72 95240-35317-3
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW1 6-10
77 68 39 6273 83240-35317-5 BW2 1-2
76 73 33 6980 88240-35317-7 BW2 4-8
71 60 25 5264 82240-35317-12 BW3 2-6
95 72 59 5270 105240-35317-16 BW4-2-6
TestAmerica Canton
Page 55 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Surrogate SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)Prep Type: TCLPMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (15-110) (27-110) (10-110) (27-110) (20-110) (38-110)
TBP FBP 2FP NBZ PHL TPH
76 73 21 81 61 89240-35317-17
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW4-6-8
Surrogate Legend
TBP = 2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr)
FBP = 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
2FP = 2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
NBZ = Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
PHL = Phenol-d5 (Surr)
TPH = Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Gasoline Range Organics)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (40-139)
TFT2
61240-35317-9
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW2 8-9
84LCS 240-123843/2-A Lab Control Sample
72MB 240-123843/1-A Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
TFT = Trifluorotoluene (Surr)
Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Diesel Range Organics)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (40-160)
OTPH1
82240-35317-9
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW2 8-9
91LCS 240-123937/14-A Lab Control Sample
72MB 240-123937/13-A Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
OTPH = o-Terphenyl (Surr)
TestAmerica Canton
Page 56 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123823/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124125 Prep Batch: 123823
RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.0 U 5.0 0.56 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
5.0 U 1.35.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
5.0 U 0.395.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1,2-Trichloroethane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1-Dichloroethane
5.0 U 0.525.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1-Dichloroethene
5.0 U 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
10 U 1.310 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2-Dichlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2-Dichloroethane
5.0 U 0.695.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2-Dichloropropane
5.0 U 0.355.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,3-Dichlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.665.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,4-Dichlorobenzene
20 U 1.420 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 12-Butanone (MEK)
20 U 0.6320 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 12-Hexanone
20 U 0.5420 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
20 U 6.320 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Acetone
5.0 U 0.235.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Benzene
5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Bromoform
5.0 U 0.545.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Bromomethane
5.0 U 0.445.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Carbon disulfide
5.0 U 0.375.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Carbon tetrachloride
5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.555.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chlorodibromomethane
5.0 U 0.865.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chloroethane
5.0 U 0.295.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chloroform
5.0 U 0.415.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chloromethane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10 U 0.3310 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Cyclohexane
5.0 U 0.285.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Dichlorobromomethane
5.0 U 0.505.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Dichlorodifluoromethane
5.0 U 0.265.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Ethylbenzene
5.0 U 0.505.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Ethylene Dibromide
5.0 U 0.165.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Isopropylbenzene
10 U 1.410 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Methyl acetate
5.0 U 0.435.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Methyl tert-butyl ether
10 U 0.3110 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Methylcyclohexane
5.0 U 0.675.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Methylene Chloride
5.0 U 0.155.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Styrene
5.0 U 0.525.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Tetrachloroethene
5.0 U 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Toluene
5.0 U 0.415.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.0 U 0.545.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
5.0 U 0.425.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Trichloroethene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Trichlorofluoromethane
5.0 U 0.395.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Vinyl chloride
10 U 0.3510 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Xylenes, Total
TestAmerica Canton
Page 57 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123823/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124125 Prep Batch: 123823
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 83 58 - 123 03/27/14 04:38 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/25/14 04:01
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
81 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 52 - 136
106 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 37 - 132
92 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124052/6
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124052
RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.0 U 5.0 0.56 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
5.0 U 1.35.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
5.0 U 0.395.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1,2-Trichloroethane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1-Dichloroethane
5.0 U 0.525.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1-Dichloroethene
0.509 J 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
10 U 1.310 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2-Dichlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2-Dichloroethane
5.0 U 0.695.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2-Dichloropropane
5.0 U 0.355.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,3-Dichlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.665.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,4-Dichlorobenzene
20 U 1.420 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 12-Butanone (MEK)
20 U 0.6320 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 12-Hexanone
20 U 0.5420 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
20 U 6.320 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Acetone
5.0 U 0.235.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Benzene
5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Bromoform
5.0 U 0.545.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Bromomethane
5.0 U 0.445.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Carbon disulfide
5.0 U 0.375.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Carbon tetrachloride
5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.555.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chlorodibromomethane
5.0 U 0.865.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chloroethane
5.0 U 0.295.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chloroform
5.0 U 0.415.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chloromethane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10 U 0.3310 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Cyclohexane
5.0 U 0.285.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Dichlorobromomethane
5.0 U 0.505.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Dichlorodifluoromethane
5.0 U 0.265.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Ethylbenzene
5.0 U 0.505.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Ethylene Dibromide
5.0 U 0.165.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Isopropylbenzene
10 U 1.410 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Methyl acetate
5.0 U 0.435.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Methyl tert-butyl ether
10 U 0.3110 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Methylcyclohexane
TestAmerica Canton
Page 58 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124052/6
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124052
RL MDL
Methylene Chloride 5.0 U 5.0 0.67 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
5.0 U 0.155.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Styrene
5.0 U 0.525.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Tetrachloroethene
5.0 U 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Toluene
5.0 U 0.415.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.0 U 0.545.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
5.0 U 0.425.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Trichloroethene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Trichlorofluoromethane
5.0 U 0.395.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Vinyl chloride
10 U 0.3510 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Xylenes, Total
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 96 58 - 123 03/26/14 13:00 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
81 03/26/14 13:00 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 52 - 136
91 03/26/14 13:00 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 37 - 132
90 03/26/14 13:00 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124052/5
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124052
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 50.0 55.3 ug/Kg 111 77 - 126
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.0 50.5 ug/Kg 101 77 - 123
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroetha
ne
50.0 51.7 ug/Kg 103 80 - 138
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 50.0 49.7 ug/Kg 99 80 - 120
1,1-Dichloroethane 50.0 53.2 ug/Kg 106 76 - 120
1,1-Dichloroethene 50.0 52.2 ug/Kg 104 75 - 135
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 50.0 49.7 ug/Kg 99 64 - 124
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 50.0 51.2 ug/Kg 102 61 - 132
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 48.6 ug/Kg 97 76 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane 50.0 47.7 ug/Kg 95 72 - 120
1,2-Dichloropropane 50.0 48.4 ug/Kg 97 80 - 120
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 49.6 ug/Kg 99 78 - 120
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 47.5 ug/Kg 95 75 - 120
2-Butanone (MEK) 100 91.0 ug/Kg 91 52 - 131
2-Hexanone 100 89.1 ug/Kg 89 64 - 136
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 100 96.0 ug/Kg 96 67 - 135
Acetone 100 98.3 ug/Kg 98 41 - 137
Benzene 50.0 50.4 ug/Kg 101 79 - 120
Bromoform 50.0 48.6 ug/Kg 97 62 - 133
Bromomethane 50.0 62.1 ug/Kg 124 42 - 136
Carbon disulfide 50.0 55.2 ug/Kg 110 62 - 146
Carbon tetrachloride 50.0 60.8 ug/Kg 122 71 - 129
Chlorobenzene 50.0 49.3 ug/Kg 99 78 - 120
Chloroethane 50.0 45.4 ug/Kg 91 58 - 120
Chloroform 50.0 52.4 ug/Kg 105 77 - 120
TestAmerica Canton
Page 59 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124052/5
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124052
Chloromethane 50.0 42.6 ug/Kg 85 50 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.0 50.8 ug/Kg 102 76 - 120
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.0 51.3 ug/Kg 103 74 - 128
Cyclohexane 50.0 54.5 ug/Kg 109 66 - 120
Dichlorobromomethane 50.0 51.4 ug/Kg 103 80 - 122
Dichlorodifluoromethane 50.0 36.6 ug/Kg 73 26 - 120
Ethylbenzene 50.0 52.5 ug/Kg 105 79 - 120
Ethylene Dibromide 50.0 49.0 ug/Kg 98 80 - 120
Isopropylbenzene 50.0 55.8 ug/Kg 112 76 - 122
Methyl acetate 250 244 ug/Kg 97 57 - 130
Methyl tert-butyl ether 50.0 49.0 ug/Kg 98 49 - 165
Methylcyclohexane 50.0 51.6 ug/Kg 103 70 - 126
Methylene Chloride 50.0 56.1 ug/Kg 112 75 - 120
m-Xylene & p-Xylene 50.0 51.6 ug/Kg 103 80 - 120
o-Xylene 50.0 52.7 ug/Kg 105 80 - 120
Styrene 50.0 49.3 ug/Kg 99 80 - 120
Tetrachloroethene 50.0 54.2 ug/Kg 108 79 - 120
Toluene 50.0 48.7 ug/Kg 97 75 - 120
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.0 54.2 ug/Kg 108 78 - 120
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.0 52.3 ug/Kg 105 73 - 131
Trichloroethene 50.0 57.1 ug/Kg 114 79 - 120
Trichlorofluoromethane 50.0 43.2 ug/Kg 86 57 - 146
Vinyl chloride 50.0 44.4 ug/Kg 89 57 - 120
Xylenes, Total 100 104 ug/Kg 104 80 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 58 - 123
Surrogate
91
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
834-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 52 - 136
94Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 37 - 132
90Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124125/8
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124125
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 25.0 26.8 ug/Kg 107 77 - 126
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 25.0 22.5 ug/Kg 90 77 - 123
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroetha
ne
25.0 31.6 ug/Kg 127 80 - 138
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 25.0 25.5 ug/Kg 102 80 - 120
1,1-Dichloroethane 25.0 23.7 ug/Kg 95 76 - 120
1,1-Dichloroethene 25.0 29.1 ug/Kg 116 75 - 135
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 25.0 23.7 ug/Kg 95 64 - 124
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 25.0 25.6 ug/Kg 102 61 - 132
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 25.0 25.1 ug/Kg 101 76 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane 25.0 21.0 ug/Kg 84 72 - 120
1,2-Dichloropropane 25.0 23.5 ug/Kg 94 80 - 120
TestAmerica Canton
Page 60 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124125/8
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124125
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 25.0 25.9 ug/Kg 104 78 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 25.0 24.5 ug/Kg 98 75 - 120
2-Butanone (MEK) 50.0 43.2 ug/Kg 86 52 - 131
2-Hexanone 50.0 42.8 ug/Kg 86 64 - 136
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 50.0 44.4 ug/Kg 89 67 - 135
Acetone 50.0 41.2 ug/Kg 82 41 - 137
Benzene 25.0 25.8 ug/Kg 103 79 - 120
Bromoform 25.0 26.4 ug/Kg 106 62 - 133
Bromomethane 25.0 23.8 ug/Kg 95 42 - 136
Carbon disulfide 25.0 27.0 ug/Kg 108 62 - 146
Carbon tetrachloride 25.0 29.1 ug/Kg 116 71 - 129
Chlorobenzene 25.0 26.2 ug/Kg 105 78 - 120
Chloroethane 25.0 21.4 ug/Kg 86 58 - 120
Chloroform 25.0 24.1 ug/Kg 96 77 - 120
Chloromethane 25.0 18.1 ug/Kg 73 50 - 120
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 25.0 26.2 ug/Kg 105 76 - 120
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 25.0 24.4 ug/Kg 98 74 - 128
Cyclohexane 25.0 25.4 ug/Kg 101 66 - 120
Dichlorobromomethane 25.0 24.8 ug/Kg 99 80 - 122
Dichlorodifluoromethane 25.0 15.2 ug/Kg 61 26 - 120
Ethylbenzene 25.0 28.3 ug/Kg 113 79 - 120
Ethylene Dibromide 25.0 26.9 ug/Kg 108 80 - 120
Isopropylbenzene 25.0 28.6 ug/Kg 115 76 - 122
Methyl acetate 125 97.1 ug/Kg 78 57 - 130
Methyl tert-butyl ether 25.0 24.0 ug/Kg 96 49 - 165
Methylcyclohexane 25.0 26.5 ug/Kg 106 70 - 126
Methylene Chloride 25.0 25.2 ug/Kg 101 75 - 120
m-Xylene & p-Xylene 25.0 29.2 ug/Kg 117 80 - 120
o-Xylene 25.0 29.3 ug/Kg 117 80 - 120
Styrene 25.0 26.9 ug/Kg 108 80 - 120
Tetrachloroethene 25.0 30.8 * ug/Kg 123 79 - 120
Toluene 25.0 27.5 ug/Kg 110 75 - 120
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 25.0 30.2 * ug/Kg 121 78 - 120
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 25.0 25.9 ug/Kg 103 73 - 131
Trichloroethene 25.0 29.1 ug/Kg 116 79 - 120
Trichlorofluoromethane 25.0 27.1 ug/Kg 108 57 - 146
Vinyl chloride 25.0 19.7 ug/Kg 79 57 - 120
Xylenes, Total 50.0 58.5 ug/Kg 117 80 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 58 - 123
Surrogate
79
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
874-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 52 - 136
100Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 37 - 132
98Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125
TestAmerica Canton
Page 61 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124658/4
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124658
1,1-Dichloroethene 1.00 0.886 mg/L 89 71 - 133
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane 1.00 0.976 mg/L 98 80 - 120
2-Butanone (MEK) 2.00 1.93 mg/L 96 49 - 120
Benzene 1.00 0.969 mg/L 97 80 - 120
Carbon tetrachloride 1.00 0.988 mg/L 99 54 - 122
Chlorobenzene 1.00 0.970 mg/L 97 80 - 120
Chloroform 1.00 0.908 mg/L 91 80 - 123
Tetrachloroethene 1.00 0.940 mg/L 94 79 - 134
Trichloroethene 1.00 0.962 mg/L 96 78 - 130
Vinyl chloride 1.00 0.792 mg/L 79 56 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 80 - 121
Surrogate
84
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
904-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 70 - 124
91Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 80 - 128
100Toluene-d8 (Surr) 80 - 120
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124562/1-A MB
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124658
RL MDL
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.025 U 0.025 0.0095 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.025 U 0.0110.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 11,2-Dichloroethane
0.25 U 0.0290.25 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 12-Butanone (MEK)
0.025 U 0.00650.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Benzene
0.025 U 0.00650.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Carbon tetrachloride
0.025 U 0.00750.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Chlorobenzene
0.025 U 0.00800.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Chloroform
0.025 U 0.0150.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Tetrachloroethene
0.025 U 0.00850.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Trichloroethene
0.025 U 0.0110.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Vinyl chloride
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 84 80 - 121 03/31/14 16:13 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
85 03/31/14 16:13 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 70 - 124
89 03/31/14 16:13 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 80 - 128
97 03/31/14 16:13 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 80 - 120
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123851/23-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124190 Prep Batch: 123851
RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 50 U 50 3.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 62 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123851/23-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124190 Prep Batch: 123851
RL MDL
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 150 U 150 25 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
150 U 8.9150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol
150 U 20150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12,4-Dichlorophenol
150 U 20150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12,4-Dimethylphenol
330 U 21330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12,4-Dinitrophenol
200 U 17200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12,4-Dinitrotoluene
200 U 21200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12,6-Dinitrotoluene
50 U 0.4550 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Chloronaphthalene
50 U 8.250 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Chlorophenol
6.7 U 0.506.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Methylnaphthalene
200 U 11200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Methylphenol
200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Nitroaniline
50 U 8.350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Nitrophenol
400 U 20400 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 13 & 4 Methylphenol
100 U 18100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 13,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
200 U 16200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 13-Nitroaniline
150 U 9.2150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
150 U 21150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14-Chloro-3-methylphenol
150 U 17150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14-Chloroaniline
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
200 U 26200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14-Nitroaniline
330 U 17330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14-Nitrophenol
6.7 U 0.766.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Acenaphthene
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Acenaphthylene
100 U 9.2100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Acetophenone
6.7 U 0.786.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Anthracene
200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Atrazine
100 U 12100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Benzaldehyde
6.7 U 0.636.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Benzo[a]anthracene
6.7 U 0.646.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Benzo[a]pyrene
6.7 U 0.596.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Benzo[b]fluoranthene
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
6.7 U 0.686.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Benzo[k]fluoranthene
100 U 9.5100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
100 U 22100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
100 U 2.0100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
23.3 J 1970 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
70 U 1070 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Butyl benzyl phthalate
330 U 37330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Caprolactam
50 U 2750 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Carbazole
6.7 U 1.16.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Chrysene
6.7 U 0.666.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
50 U 0.6650 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Dibenzofuran
70 U 1670 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Diethyl phthalate
70 U 1770 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Dimethyl phthalate
70 U 1570 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Di-n-butyl phthalate
70 U 7.970 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Di-n-octyl phthalate
TestAmerica Canton
Page 63 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123851/23-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124190 Prep Batch: 123851
RL MDL
Fluoranthene 6.7 U 6.7 0.55 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
6.7 U 0.536.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Fluorene
6.7 U 2.16.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Hexachlorobenzene
50 U 5.650 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Hexachlorobutadiene
330 U 8.1330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
50 U 9.050 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Hexachloroethane
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Isophorone
6.7 U 0.826.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Naphthalene
100 U 2.2100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Nitrobenzene
50 U 6.350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
50 U 2150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
150 U 9.1150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Pentachlorophenol
6.7 U 0.736.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Phenanthrene
50 U 7.350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Phenol
6.7 U 0.446.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Pyrene
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 75 10 - 110 03/27/14 11:09 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/25/14 08:44
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
74 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 24 - 110
74 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Fluorophenol (Surr) 24 - 110
71 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
76 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110
93 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123851/24-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124190 Prep Batch: 123851
1,1'-Biphenyl 667 511 ug/Kg 77 35 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 667 564 ug/Kg 85 25 - 110
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 667 555 ug/Kg 83 12 - 110
2,4-Dichlorophenol 667 515 ug/Kg 77 39 - 110
2,4-Dimethylphenol 667 522 ug/Kg 78 29 - 110
2,4-Dinitrophenol 1330 515 ug/Kg 39 10 - 110
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 667 580 ug/Kg 87 48 - 110
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 667 560 ug/Kg 84 45 - 110
2-Chloronaphthalene 667 501 ug/Kg 75 32 - 110
2-Chlorophenol 667 500 ug/Kg 75 37 - 110
2-Methylnaphthalene 667 504 ug/Kg 76 36 - 110
2-Methylphenol 667 494 ug/Kg 74 41 - 110
2-Nitroaniline 667 582 ug/Kg 87 45 - 110
2-Nitrophenol 667 528 ug/Kg 79 34 - 110
3 & 4 Methylphenol 667 523 ug/Kg 78 40 - 110
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1330 939 ug/Kg 70 28 - 110
3-Nitroaniline 667 512 ug/Kg 77 44 - 110
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1330 724 ug/Kg 54 10 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 64 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123851/24-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124190 Prep Batch: 123851
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 667 524 ug/Kg 79 39 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 667 553 ug/Kg 83 48 - 110
4-Chloroaniline 667 400 ug/Kg 60 30 - 110
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 667 547 ug/Kg 82 40 - 110
4-Nitroaniline 667 559 ug/Kg 84 48 - 110
4-Nitrophenol 1330 1230 ug/Kg 92 28 - 110
Acenaphthene 667 517 ug/Kg 78 38 - 110
Acenaphthylene 667 500 ug/Kg 75 40 - 110
Acetophenone 667 483 ug/Kg 72 40 - 110
Anthracene 667 550 ug/Kg 82 48 - 110
Atrazine 1330 1240 ug/Kg 93 66 - 127
Benzaldehyde 1330 1080 ug/Kg 81 32 - 110
Benzo[a]anthracene 667 547 ug/Kg 82 50 - 110
Benzo[a]pyrene 667 528 ug/Kg 79 44 - 110
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 667 543 ug/Kg 81 43 - 110
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 667 566 ug/Kg 85 51 - 110
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 667 528 ug/Kg 79 38 - 105
bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 667 515 ug/Kg 77 29 - 110
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 667 500 ug/Kg 75 32 - 110
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 667 483 ug/Kg 72 34 - 110
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 667 534 ug/Kg 80 50 - 110
Butyl benzyl phthalate 667 569 ug/Kg 85 51 - 110
Caprolactam 1330 1130 ug/Kg 85 44 - 114
Carbazole 667 548 ug/Kg 82 50 - 110
Chrysene 667 510 ug/Kg 77 50 - 110
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 667 521 ug/Kg 78 51 - 110
Dibenzofuran 667 524 ug/Kg 79 43 - 110
Diethyl phthalate 667 566 ug/Kg 85 52 - 110
Dimethyl phthalate 667 552 ug/Kg 83 50 - 110
Di-n-butyl phthalate 667 612 ug/Kg 92 51 - 110
Di-n-octyl phthalate 667 498 ug/Kg 75 48 - 110
Fluoranthene 667 569 ug/Kg 85 51 - 110
Fluorene 667 538 ug/Kg 81 46 - 110
Hexachlorobenzene 667 529 ug/Kg 79 43 - 110
Hexachlorobutadiene 667 490 ug/Kg 73 29 - 110
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 667 399 ug/Kg 60 12 - 110
Hexachloroethane 667 494 ug/Kg 74 30 - 110
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 667 511 ug/Kg 77 50 - 110
Isophorone 667 495 ug/Kg 74 36 - 110
Naphthalene 667 490 ug/Kg 73 36 - 110
Nitrobenzene 667 504 ug/Kg 76 32 - 110
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 667 516 ug/Kg 77 38 - 110
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1330 1070 ug/Kg 80 46 - 110
Pentachlorophenol 1330 837 ug/Kg 63 10 - 110
Phenanthrene 667 539 ug/Kg 81 49 - 110
Phenol 667 510 ug/Kg 77 38 - 110
Pyrene 667 544 ug/Kg 82 49 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 65 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123851/24-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124190 Prep Batch: 123851
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
Surrogate
85
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
752-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 24 - 110
732-Fluorophenol (Surr) 24 - 110
71Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
74Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110
93Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124042/19-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124330 Prep Batch: 124042
RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 50 U 50 3.5 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
150 U 25150 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol
150 U 8.9150 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol
150 U 20150 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12,4-Dichlorophenol
150 U 20150 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12,4-Dimethylphenol
330 U 21330 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12,4-Dinitrophenol
200 U 17200 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12,4-Dinitrotoluene
200 U 21200 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12,6-Dinitrotoluene
50 U 0.4550 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12-Chloronaphthalene
50 U 8.250 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12-Chlorophenol
6.7 U 0.506.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12-Methylnaphthalene
200 U 11200 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12-Methylphenol
200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12-Nitroaniline
50 U 8.350 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12-Nitrophenol
400 U 20400 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 13 & 4 Methylphenol
100 U 18100 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 13,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
200 U 16200 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 13-Nitroaniline
150 U 9.2150 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 14,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 14-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
150 U 21150 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 14-Chloro-3-methylphenol
150 U 17150 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 14-Chloroaniline
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 14-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
200 U 26200 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 14-Nitroaniline
330 U 17330 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 14-Nitrophenol
6.7 U 0.766.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Acenaphthene
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Acenaphthylene
100 U 9.2100 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Acetophenone
6.7 U 0.786.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Anthracene
200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Atrazine
100 U 12100 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Benzaldehyde
6.7 U 0.636.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Benzo[a]anthracene
6.7 U 0.646.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Benzo[a]pyrene
6.7 U 0.596.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Benzo[b]fluoranthene
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
6.7 U 0.686.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Benzo[k]fluoranthene
100 U 9.5100 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
TestAmerica Canton
Page 66 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124042/19-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124330 Prep Batch: 124042
RL MDL
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 100 U 100 22 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
100 U 2.0100 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
19.5 J 1970 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
70 U 1070 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Butyl benzyl phthalate
330 U 37330 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Caprolactam
50 U 2750 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Carbazole
6.7 U 1.16.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Chrysene
6.7 U 0.666.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
50 U 0.6650 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Dibenzofuran
70 U 1670 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Diethyl phthalate
70 U 1770 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Dimethyl phthalate
16.2 J 1570 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Di-n-butyl phthalate
70 U 7.970 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Di-n-octyl phthalate
6.7 U 0.556.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Fluoranthene
6.7 U 0.536.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Fluorene
6.7 U 2.16.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Hexachlorobenzene
50 U 5.650 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Hexachlorobutadiene
330 U 8.1330 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
50 U 9.050 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Hexachloroethane
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Isophorone
6.7 U 0.826.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Naphthalene
100 U 2.2100 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Nitrobenzene
50 U 6.350 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
50 U 2150 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
150 U 9.1150 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Pentachlorophenol
6.7 U 0.736.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Phenanthrene
50 U 7.350 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Phenol
6.7 U 0.446.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Pyrene
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 87 10 - 110 03/28/14 08:35 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/26/14 10:35
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
87 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 24 - 110
83 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12-Fluorophenol (Surr) 24 - 110
88 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
85 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110
92 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124042/20-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124330 Prep Batch: 124042
1,1'-Biphenyl 667 507 ug/Kg 76 35 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 667 491 ug/Kg 74 25 - 110
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 667 499 ug/Kg 75 12 - 110
2,4-Dichlorophenol 667 538 ug/Kg 81 39 - 110
2,4-Dimethylphenol 667 517 ug/Kg 78 29 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 67 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124042/20-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124330 Prep Batch: 124042
2,4-Dinitrophenol 1330 395 ug/Kg 30 10 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 667 560 ug/Kg 84 48 - 110
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 667 548 ug/Kg 82 45 - 110
2-Chloronaphthalene 667 506 ug/Kg 76 32 - 110
2-Chlorophenol 667 526 ug/Kg 79 37 - 110
2-Methylnaphthalene 667 532 ug/Kg 80 36 - 110
2-Methylphenol 667 505 ug/Kg 76 41 - 110
2-Nitroaniline 667 594 ug/Kg 89 45 - 110
2-Nitrophenol 667 551 ug/Kg 83 34 - 110
3 & 4 Methylphenol 667 514 ug/Kg 77 40 - 110
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1330 916 ug/Kg 69 28 - 110
3-Nitroaniline 667 538 ug/Kg 81 44 - 110
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1330 677 ug/Kg 51 10 - 110
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 667 462 ug/Kg 69 39 - 110
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 667 570 ug/Kg 86 48 - 110
4-Chloroaniline 667 447 ug/Kg 67 30 - 110
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 667 516 ug/Kg 77 40 - 110
4-Nitroaniline 667 534 ug/Kg 80 48 - 110
4-Nitrophenol 1330 1220 ug/Kg 91 28 - 110
Acenaphthene 667 512 ug/Kg 77 38 - 110
Acenaphthylene 667 485 ug/Kg 73 40 - 110
Acetophenone 667 532 ug/Kg 80 40 - 110
Anthracene 667 469 ug/Kg 70 48 - 110
Atrazine 1330 1100 ug/Kg 82 66 - 127
Benzaldehyde 1330 1250 ug/Kg 94 32 - 110
Benzo[a]anthracene 667 488 ug/Kg 73 50 - 110
Benzo[a]pyrene 667 485 ug/Kg 73 44 - 110
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 667 485 ug/Kg 73 43 - 110
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 667 504 ug/Kg 76 51 - 110
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 667 504 ug/Kg 76 38 - 105
bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 667 589 ug/Kg 88 29 - 110
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 667 567 ug/Kg 85 32 - 110
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 667 555 ug/Kg 83 34 - 110
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 667 564 ug/Kg 85 50 - 110
Butyl benzyl phthalate 667 529 ug/Kg 79 51 - 110
Caprolactam 1330 1100 ug/Kg 82 44 - 114
Carbazole 667 485 ug/Kg 73 50 - 110
Chrysene 667 477 ug/Kg 72 50 - 110
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 667 507 ug/Kg 76 51 - 110
Dibenzofuran 667 500 ug/Kg 75 43 - 110
Diethyl phthalate 667 560 ug/Kg 84 52 - 110
Dimethyl phthalate 667 555 ug/Kg 83 50 - 110
Di-n-butyl phthalate 667 539 ug/Kg 81 51 - 110
Di-n-octyl phthalate 667 531 ug/Kg 80 48 - 110
Fluoranthene 667 486 ug/Kg 73 51 - 110
Fluorene 667 507 ug/Kg 76 46 - 110
Hexachlorobenzene 667 491 ug/Kg 74 43 - 110
Hexachlorobutadiene 667 588 ug/Kg 88 29 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 68 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124042/20-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124330 Prep Batch: 124042
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 667 360 ug/Kg 54 12 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Hexachloroethane 667 547 ug/Kg 82 30 - 110
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 667 497 ug/Kg 75 50 - 110
Isophorone 667 562 ug/Kg 84 36 - 110
Naphthalene 667 519 ug/Kg 78 36 - 110
Nitrobenzene 667 579 ug/Kg 87 32 - 110
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 667 573 ug/Kg 86 38 - 110
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1330 959 ug/Kg 72 46 - 110
Pentachlorophenol 1330 783 ug/Kg 59 10 - 110
Phenanthrene 667 469 ug/Kg 70 49 - 110
Phenol 667 542 ug/Kg 81 38 - 110
Pyrene 667 494 ug/Kg 74 49 - 110
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
Surrogate
79
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
762-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 24 - 110
762-Fluorophenol (Surr) 24 - 110
84Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
76Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110
84Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124411/20-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124718 Prep Batch: 124411
RL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.020 U 0.000300.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0.020 U 0.000240.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0.020 U 0.000250.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 12,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.0040 U 0.000170.0040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 12-Methylphenol
0.020 U 0.000350.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Pyridine
0.040 U 0.000800.040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 13 & 4 Methylphenol
0.020 U 0.0000850.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Hexachlorobenzene
0.020 U 0.000270.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Hexachlorobutadiene
0.020 U 0.000190.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Hexachloroethane
0.0040 U 0.0000400.0040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Nitrobenzene
0.040 U 0.000270.040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 77 15 - 110 04/01/14 09:45 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/28/14 11:03
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
74 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 12-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 27 - 110
32 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 12-Fluorophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
82 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 27 - 110
68 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
89 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 69 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124411/21-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124718 Prep Batch: 124411
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0800 0.0506 mg/L 63 16 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.0800 0.0654 mg/L 82 35 - 110
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.0800 0.0649 mg/L 81 36 - 110
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.0800 0.0734 mg/L 92 49 - 110
2-Methylphenol 0.0800 0.0641 mg/L 80 36 - 114
Pyridine 0.0800 0.0616 mg/L 77 34 - 110
3 & 4 Methylphenol 0.0800 0.0651 mg/L 81 38 - 110
Hexachlorobenzene 0.0800 0.0599 mg/L 75 44 - 110
Hexachlorobutadiene 0.0800 0.0537 mg/L 67 35 - 110
Hexachloroethane 0.0800 0.0506 mg/L 63 34 - 110
Nitrobenzene 0.0800 0.0708 mg/L 89 43 - 110
Pentachlorophenol 0.160 0.110 mg/L 69 10 - 122
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 15 - 110
Surrogate
86
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
802-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 27 - 110
322-Fluorophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
85Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 27 - 110
66Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
88Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124983/6-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125096 Prep Batch: 124983
RL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.020 U 0.000300.020 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0.020 U 0.000240.020 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0.020 U 0.000250.020 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 12,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.0040 U 0.000170.0040 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 12-Methylphenol
0.020 U 0.000350.020 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Pyridine
0.040 U 0.000800.040 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 13 & 4 Methylphenol
0.020 U 0.0000850.020 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Hexachlorobenzene
0.020 U 0.000270.020 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Hexachlorobutadiene
0.020 U 0.000190.020 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Hexachloroethane
0.0040 U 0.0000400.0040 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Nitrobenzene
0.040 U 0.000270.040 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 77 15 - 110 04/03/14 14:14 1
MB MB
Surrogate
04/02/14 13:47
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
66 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 12-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 27 - 110
54 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 12-Fluorophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
63 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 27 - 110
46 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
92 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 70 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124983/7-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125096 Prep Batch: 124983
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0800 0.0581 mg/L 73 16 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.0800 0.0732 mg/L 92 35 - 110
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.0800 0.0733 mg/L 92 36 - 110
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.0800 0.0795 mg/L 99 49 - 110
2-Methylphenol 0.0800 0.0573 mg/L 72 36 - 114
Pyridine 0.0800 0.0541 mg/L 68 34 - 110
3 & 4 Methylphenol 0.0800 0.0577 mg/L 72 38 - 110
Hexachlorobenzene 0.0800 0.0695 mg/L 87 44 - 110
Hexachlorobutadiene 0.0800 0.0620 mg/L 78 35 - 110
Hexachloroethane 0.0800 0.0593 mg/L 74 34 - 110
Nitrobenzene 0.0800 0.0626 mg/L 78 43 - 110
Pentachlorophenol 0.160 0.142 mg/L 89 10 - 122
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 15 - 110
Surrogate
95
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
782-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 27 - 110
612-Fluorophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
73Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 27 - 110
52Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
100Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110
Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Gasoline Range Organics)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123843/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 123857 Prep Batch: 123843
RL MDL
C6-C10 100 U 100 46 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:28 03/25/14 12:18 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
Trifluorotoluene (Surr) 72 40 - 139 03/25/14 12:18 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/25/14 08:28
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123843/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 123857 Prep Batch: 123843
Trifluorotoluene (Surr) 40 - 139
Surrogate
84
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
TestAmerica Canton
Page 71 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Diesel Range Organics)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123937/13-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124637 Prep Batch: 123937
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics [C10 - C28] 17 U 17 9.3 mg/Kg 03/25/14 13:12 03/31/14 15:06 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
o-Terphenyl (Surr) 72 40 - 160 03/31/14 15:06 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/25/14 13:12
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123937/14-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124637 Prep Batch: 123937
Diesel Range Organics [C10 -
C28]
83.3 77.0 mg/Kg 92 52 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
o-Terphenyl (Surr) 40 - 160
Surrogate
91
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123759/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124034 Prep Batch: 123759
RL MDL
Aluminum 20 U 20 9.6 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
1.0 U 0.391.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Antimony
1.0 U 0.301.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Arsenic
20 U 0.1220 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Barium
0.50 U 0.0430.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Beryllium
0.20 U 0.0360.20 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Cadmium
500 U 29500 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Calcium
0.50 U 0.200.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Chromium
5.0 U 0.165.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Cobalt
2.5 U 0.742.5 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Copper
10 U 4.910 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Iron
0.30 U 0.190.30 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Lead
500 U 6.5500 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Magnesium
1.5 U 0.161.5 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Manganese
4.0 U 0.544.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Nickel
500 U 6.2500 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Potassium
0.50 U 0.450.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Selenium
0.50 U 0.100.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Silver
500 U 66500 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Sodium
1.0 U 0.551.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Thallium
5.0 U 0.215.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Vanadium
2.0 U 1.02.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Zinc
TestAmerica Canton
Page 72 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123759/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124034 Prep Batch: 123759
Aluminum 200 191 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Antimony 50.0 42.8 mg/Kg 86 80 - 120
Arsenic 200 177 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120
Barium 200 184 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Beryllium 5.00 4.39 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120
Cadmium 5.00 4.43 mg/Kg 89 80 - 120
Calcium 5000 4400 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120
Chromium 20.0 18.2 mg/Kg 91 80 - 120
Cobalt 50.0 44.1 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120
Copper 25.0 22.7 mg/Kg 91 80 - 120
Iron 100 109 mg/Kg 109 80 - 120
Lead 50.0 43.6 mg/Kg 87 80 - 120
Magnesium 5000 4330 mg/Kg 87 80 - 120
Manganese 50.0 46.1 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Nickel 50.0 44.3 mg/Kg 89 80 - 120
Potassium 5000 4440 mg/Kg 89 80 - 120
Selenium 200 179 mg/Kg 89 80 - 120
Silver 5.00 4.74 mg/Kg 95 80 - 120
Sodium 5000 4480 mg/Kg 90 80 - 120
Thallium 200 180 mg/Kg 90 80 - 120
Vanadium 50.0 43.9 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120
Zinc 50.0 46.9 mg/Kg 94 80 - 120
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124048/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124359 Prep Batch: 124048
RL MDL
Aluminum 20 U 20 9.6 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
1.0 U 0.391.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Antimony
1.0 U 0.301.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Arsenic
0.170 J 0.1220 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Barium
0.50 U 0.0430.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Beryllium
0.20 U 0.0360.20 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Cadmium
500 U 29500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Calcium
0.50 U 0.200.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Chromium
5.0 U 0.165.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Cobalt
2.5 U 0.742.5 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Copper
10 U 4.910 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Iron
0.30 U 0.190.30 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Lead
500 U 6.5500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Magnesium
1.5 U 0.161.5 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Manganese
4.0 U 0.544.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Nickel
12.8 J 6.2500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Potassium
0.50 U 0.450.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Selenium
0.50 U 0.100.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Silver
500 U 66500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Sodium
1.0 U 0.551.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Thallium
TestAmerica Canton
Page 73 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124048/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124359 Prep Batch: 124048
RL MDL
Vanadium 5.0 U 5.0 0.21 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
2.0 U 1.02.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Zinc
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124048/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124359 Prep Batch: 124048
Aluminum 200 191 mg/Kg 95 80 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Antimony 50.0 46.7 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120
Arsenic 200 188 mg/Kg 94 80 - 120
Barium 200 192 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120
Beryllium 5.00 4.52 mg/Kg 90 80 - 120
Cadmium 5.00 4.76 mg/Kg 95 80 - 120
Calcium 5000 4660 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120
Chromium 20.0 19.3 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120
Cobalt 50.0 46.0 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Copper 25.0 23.3 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120
Iron 100 106 mg/Kg 106 80 - 120
Lead 50.0 46.2 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Magnesium 5000 4600 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Manganese 50.0 48.0 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120
Nickel 50.0 46.2 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Potassium 5000 4650 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120
Selenium 200 183 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Silver 5.00 4.92 mg/Kg 98 80 - 120
Sodium 5000 4670 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120
Thallium 200 185 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Vanadium 50.0 46.7 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120
Zinc 50.0 46.1 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124402/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124634 Prep Batch: 124402
RL MDL
Arsenic 0.50 U 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.000947 J 0.0006710 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Barium
0.10 U 0.000660.10 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Cadmium
0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Chromium
0.50 U 0.00190.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Lead
0.25 U 0.00410.25 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Selenium
0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Silver
TestAmerica Canton
Page 74 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124402/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124634 Prep Batch: 124402
Arsenic 2.00 1.97 mg/L 98 50 - 150
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Barium 2.00 1.86 J mg/L 93 50 - 150
Cadmium 0.0500 0.0499 J mg/L 100 50 - 150
Chromium 0.200 0.183 J mg/L 91 50 - 150
Lead 0.500 0.423 J mg/L 85 50 - 150
Selenium 2.00 2.13 mg/L 106 50 - 150
Silver 0.0500 0.0517 J mg/L 103 50 - 150
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124371/1-C
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124634 Prep Batch: 124402
RL MDL
Arsenic 0.50 U 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1
LB LB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.00176 J 0.0006710 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Barium
0.10 U 0.000660.10 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Cadmium
0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Chromium
0.50 U 0.00190.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Lead
0.25 U 0.00410.25 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Selenium
0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Silver
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124406/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124650 Prep Batch: 124406
RL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:12 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124406/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124650 Prep Batch: 124406
Mercury 0.00500 0.00472 mg/L 94 50 - 150
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124371/1-D
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124650 Prep Batch: 124406
RL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:11 1
LB LB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 75 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123765/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 123972 Prep Batch: 123765
RL MDL
Mercury 0.10 U 0.10 0.015 mg/Kg 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 15:07 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123765/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 123972 Prep Batch: 123765
Mercury 0.833 0.855 mg/Kg 103 73 - 121
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124076/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124236 Prep Batch: 124076
RL MDL
Mercury 0.10 U 0.10 0.015 mg/Kg 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 08:54 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124076/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124236 Prep Batch: 124076
Mercury 0.833 0.856 mg/Kg 103 73 - 121
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
TestAmerica Canton
Page 76 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
GC/MS VOA
Prep Batch: 123823
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 5035240-35317-1 BW1 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 5035240-35317-6 BW2 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 5035240-35317-11 BW3 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 5035240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Total/NA
Solid 5035MB 240-123823/3-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124052
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8260B 123823240-35317-1 BW1 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 8260B 123823240-35317-11 BW3 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 8260B 123823240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Total/NA
Solid 8260BLCS 240-124052/5 Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8260BMB 240-124052/6 Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124125
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8260B 123823240-35317-6 BW2 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 8260BLCS 240-124125/8 Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8260B 123823MB 240-123823/3-A Method Blank Total/NA
Leach Batch: 124562
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 1311240-35317-2 BW1 6-8 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35317-8 BW2 6-8 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35317-13 BW3 6-7.5 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35317-14 BW4 0.5-2 TCLP
Solid 1311LB 240-124562/1-A MB Method Blank TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124658
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8260B 124562240-35317-2 BW1 6-8 TCLP
Solid 8260B 124562240-35317-8 BW2 6-8 TCLP
Solid 8260B 124562240-35317-13 BW3 6-7.5 TCLP
Solid 8260B 124562240-35317-14 BW4 0.5-2 TCLP
Solid 8260B 124562LB 240-124562/1-A MB Method Blank TCLP
Solid 8260BLCS 240-124658/4 Lab Control Sample Total/NA
GC/MS Semi VOA
Prep Batch: 123851
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3540C240-35317-1 BW1 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 3540C240-35317-4 BW1 10-12 Total/NA
Solid 3540C240-35317-6 BW2 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 3540C240-35317-10 BW3 1.5-2 Total/NA
Solid 3540C240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Total/NA
Solid 3540C240-35317-18 BW4-8-10 Total/NA
Solid 3540CLCS 240-123851/24-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3540CMB 240-123851/23-A Method Blank Total/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 77 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
GC/MS Semi VOA (Continued)
Prep Batch: 124042
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3540C240-35317-11 BW3 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 3540CLCS 240-124042/20-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3540CMB 240-124042/19-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124190
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 123851LCS 240-123851/24-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8270C 123851MB 240-123851/23-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124330
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 124042240-35317-11 BW3 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 8270C 124042LCS 240-124042/20-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8270C 124042MB 240-124042/19-A Method Blank Total/NA
Leach Batch: 124371
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 1311240-35317-3 BW1 6-10 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35317-5 BW2 1-2 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35317-7 BW2 4-8 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35317-12 BW3 2-6 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35317-16 BW4-2-6 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35317-17 BW4-6-8 TCLP
Prep Batch: 124411
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3520C 124371240-35317-3 BW1 6-10 TCLP
Solid 3520C 124371240-35317-5 BW2 1-2 TCLP
Solid 3520C 124371240-35317-7 BW2 4-8 TCLP
Solid 3520C 124371240-35317-12 BW3 2-6 TCLP
Solid 3520C 124371240-35317-17 BW4-6-8 TCLP
Solid 3520CLCS 240-124411/21-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3520CMB 240-124411/20-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124557
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 123851240-35317-1 BW1 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 8270C 123851240-35317-4 BW1 10-12 Total/NA
Solid 8270C 123851240-35317-6 BW2 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 8270C 123851240-35317-10 BW3 1.5-2 Total/NA
Solid 8270C 123851240-35317-18 BW4-8-10 Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124718
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 124411240-35317-3 BW1 6-10 TCLP
Solid 8270C 124411240-35317-5 BW2 1-2 TCLP
Solid 8270C 124411240-35317-7 BW2 4-8 TCLP
Solid 8270C 124411240-35317-12 BW3 2-6 TCLP
Solid 8270C 124411240-35317-17 BW4-6-8 TCLP
Solid 8270C 124411LCS 240-124411/21-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8270C 124411MB 240-124411/20-A Method Blank Total/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 78 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
GC/MS Semi VOA (Continued)
Analysis Batch: 124761
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 123851240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Total/NA
Prep Batch: 124983
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3520C 124371240-35317-16 BW4-2-6 TCLP
Solid 3520CLCS 240-124983/7-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3520CMB 240-124983/6-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125096
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 124983240-35317-16 BW4-2-6 TCLP
Solid 8270C 124983LCS 240-124983/7-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8270C 124983MB 240-124983/6-A Method Blank Total/NA
GC VOA
Prep Batch: 123843
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 5030A240-35317-9 BW2 8-9 Total/NA
Solid 5030ALCS 240-123843/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 5030AMB 240-123843/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 123857
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8015C 123843240-35317-9 BW2 8-9 Total/NA
Solid 8015C 123843LCS 240-123843/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8015C 123843MB 240-123843/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
GC Semi VOA
Prep Batch: 123937
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3540C240-35317-9 BW2 8-9 Total/NA
Solid 3540CLCS 240-123937/14-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3540CMB 240-123937/13-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124637
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8015C 123937240-35317-9 BW2 8-9 Total/NA
Solid 8015C 123937LCS 240-123937/14-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8015C 123937MB 240-123937/13-A Method Blank Total/NA
Metals
Prep Batch: 123759
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3050B240-35317-1 BW1 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 3050B240-35317-4 BW1 10-12 Total/NA
Solid 3050B240-35317-6 BW2 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 3050B240-35317-10 BW3 1.5-2 Total/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 79 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Metals (Continued)
Prep Batch: 123759 (Continued)
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3050B240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Total/NA
Solid 3050B240-35317-18 BW4-8-10 Total/NA
Solid 3050BLCS 240-123759/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3050BMB 240-123759/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Prep Batch: 123765
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7471A240-35317-1 BW1 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 7471A240-35317-4 BW1 10-12 Total/NA
Solid 7471A240-35317-6 BW2 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 7471A240-35317-10 BW3 1.5-2 Total/NA
Solid 7471A240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Total/NA
Solid 7471A240-35317-18 BW4-8-10 Total/NA
Solid 7471ALCS 240-123765/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 7471AMB 240-123765/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 123972
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7471A 123765240-35317-1 BW1 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 123765240-35317-4 BW1 10-12 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 123765240-35317-6 BW2 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 123765240-35317-10 BW3 1.5-2 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 123765240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 123765240-35317-18 BW4-8-10 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 123765LCS 240-123765/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 7471A 123765MB 240-123765/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124034
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 6010B 123759240-35317-1 BW1 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 123759240-35317-4 BW1 10-12 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 123759240-35317-6 BW2 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 123759240-35317-18 BW4-8-10 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 123759LCS 240-123759/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 6010B 123759MB 240-123759/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Prep Batch: 124048
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3050B240-35317-11 BW3 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 3050BLCS 240-124048/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3050BMB 240-124048/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Prep Batch: 124076
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7471A240-35317-11 BW3 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 7471ALCS 240-124076/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 7471AMB 240-124076/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124159
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 6010B 123759240-35317-1 BW1 4-6 Total/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 80 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Metals (Continued)
Analysis Batch: 124159 (Continued)
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 6010B 123759240-35317-4 BW1 10-12 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 123759240-35317-6 BW2 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 123759240-35317-10 BW3 1.5-2 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 123759240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 123759240-35317-18 BW4-8-10 Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124236
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7471A 124076240-35317-11 BW3 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 124076LCS 240-124076/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 7471A 124076MB 240-124076/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124359
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 6010B 124048240-35317-11 BW3 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 124048LCS 240-124048/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 6010B 124048MB 240-124048/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Leach Batch: 124371
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 1311240-35317-3 BW1 6-10 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35317-5 BW2 1-2 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35317-7 BW2 4-8 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35317-12 BW3 2-6 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35317-16 BW4-2-6 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35317-17 BW4-6-8 TCLP
Solid 1311LB 240-124371/1-C Method Blank TCLP
Solid 1311LB 240-124371/1-D Method Blank TCLP
Prep Batch: 124402
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3010A 124371240-35317-3 BW1 6-10 TCLP
Solid 3010A 124371240-35317-5 BW2 1-2 TCLP
Solid 3010A 124371240-35317-7 BW2 4-8 TCLP
Solid 3010A 124371240-35317-12 BW3 2-6 TCLP
Solid 3010A 124371240-35317-16 BW4-2-6 TCLP
Solid 3010A 124371240-35317-17 BW4-6-8 TCLP
Solid 3010A 124371LB 240-124371/1-C Method Blank TCLP
Solid 3010ALCS 240-124402/3-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3010AMB 240-124402/2-A Method Blank Total/NA
Prep Batch: 124406
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7470A 124371240-35317-3 BW1 6-10 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124371240-35317-5 BW2 1-2 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124371240-35317-7 BW2 4-8 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124371240-35317-12 BW3 2-6 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124371240-35317-16 BW4-2-6 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124371240-35317-17 BW4-6-8 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124371LB 240-124371/1-D Method Blank TCLP
Solid 7470ALCS 240-124406/3-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 81 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Metals (Continued)
Prep Batch: 124406 (Continued)
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7470AMB 240-124406/2-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124432
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 6010B 124048240-35317-11 BW3 2-4 Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124634
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 6010B 124402240-35317-3 BW1 6-10 TCLP
Solid 6010B 124402240-35317-5 BW2 1-2 TCLP
Solid 6010B 124402240-35317-7 BW2 4-8 TCLP
Solid 6010B 124402240-35317-12 BW3 2-6 TCLP
Solid 6010B 124402240-35317-16 BW4-2-6 TCLP
Solid 6010B 124402240-35317-17 BW4-6-8 TCLP
Solid 6010B 124402LB 240-124371/1-C Method Blank TCLP
Solid 6010B 124402LCS 240-124402/3-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 6010B 124402MB 240-124402/2-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124650
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7470A 124406240-35317-3 BW1 6-10 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124406240-35317-5 BW2 1-2 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124406240-35317-7 BW2 4-8 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124406240-35317-12 BW3 2-6 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124406240-35317-16 BW4-2-6 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124406240-35317-17 BW4-6-8 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124406LB 240-124371/1-D Method Blank TCLP
Solid 7470A 124406LCS 240-124406/3-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 7470A 124406MB 240-124406/2-A Method Blank Total/NA
General Chemistry
Analysis Batch: 123573
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid Moisture240-35317-1 BW1 4-6 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35317-4 BW1 10-12 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35317-6 BW2 2-4 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35317-9 BW2 8-9 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35317-10 BW3 1.5-2 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35317-11 BW3 2-4 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35317-18 BW4-8-10 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35317-18 DU BW4-8-10 Total/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 82 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Lab ChronicleClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW1 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-1Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 08:00
Percent Solids: 80.6Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Prep 5035 03/21/14 17:00 TJL2123823 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8260B 1 124052 03/26/14 18:01 SAM TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3540C 123851 03/25/14 08:44 MPM TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 8270C 4 124557 03/31/14 18:49 JMG TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 123759 03/24/14 13:34 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 2 124034 03/25/14 16:21 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 123759 03/24/14 13:34 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124159 03/26/14 18:55 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 7471A 123765 03/24/14 16:00 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 7471A 1 123972 03/25/14 15:32 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123573 03/22/14 14:42 BLW TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW1 6-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 08:05
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Analysis 8260B 1 124658 03/31/14 19:41 RJQ TAL CANTCLP
Client Sample ID: BW1 6-10 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-3Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 08:05
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ124371 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Prep 3520C 124411 03/28/14 11:03 RTR TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 8270C 1 124718 04/01/14 13:49 MRU TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124371 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 3010A 124402 03/28/14 10:27 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 6010B 1 124634 03/31/14 11:31 KLC TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124371 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7470A 124406 03/28/14 14:45 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 7470A 1 124650 03/31/14 12:38 AMM2 TAL CANTCLP
Client Sample ID: BW1 10-12 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 08:10
Percent Solids: 37.1Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Prep 3540C 03/25/14 08:44 MPM123851 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8270C 400 124557 03/31/14 20:32 JMG TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 123759 03/24/14 13:34 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 83 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Lab ChronicleClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW1 10-12 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 08:10
Percent Solids: 37.1Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Analysis 6010B 03/25/14 16:25 RKT5 124034 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Prep 3050B 123759 03/24/14 13:34 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124159 03/26/14 18:59 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 7471A 123765 03/24/14 16:00 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 7471A 20 123972 03/25/14 17:30 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123573 03/22/14 14:42 BLW TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW2 1-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-5Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 09:30
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ124371 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Prep 3520C 124411 03/28/14 11:03 RTR TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 8270C 1 124718 04/01/14 14:14 MRU TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124371 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 3010A 124402 03/28/14 10:27 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 6010B 1 124634 03/31/14 11:35 KLC TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124371 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7470A 124406 03/28/14 14:45 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 7470A 1 124650 03/31/14 12:40 AMM2 TAL CANTCLP
Client Sample ID: BW2 2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 09:30
Percent Solids: 85.7Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Prep 5035 03/21/14 17:00 TJL2123823 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8260B 1 124125 03/27/14 05:21 TJL2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3540C 123851 03/25/14 08:44 MPM TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 8270C 2.5 124557 03/31/14 20:06 JMG TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 123759 03/24/14 13:34 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 2 124034 03/25/14 16:29 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 123759 03/24/14 13:34 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124159 03/26/14 19:03 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 7471A 123765 03/24/14 16:00 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 7471A 5 123972 03/25/14 17:33 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123573 03/22/14 14:42 BLW TAL CANTotal/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 84 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Lab ChronicleClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW2 4-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-7Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 09:35
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ124371 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Prep 3520C 124411 03/28/14 11:03 RTR TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 8270C 1 124718 04/01/14 14:38 MRU TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124371 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 3010A 124402 03/28/14 10:27 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 6010B 1 124634 03/31/14 11:40 KLC TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124371 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7470A 124406 03/28/14 14:45 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 7470A 1 124650 03/31/14 12:41 AMM2 TAL CANTCLP
Client Sample ID: BW2 6-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-8Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 09:35
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Analysis 8260B 1 124658 03/31/14 20:04 RJQ TAL CANTCLP
Client Sample ID: BW2 8-9 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-9Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 09:41
Percent Solids: 84.6Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Prep 5030A 03/25/14 08:28 KMG123843 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8015C 1 123857 03/25/14 16:04 KMG TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3540C 123937 03/25/14 13:12 MPM TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 8015C 1 124637 03/31/14 17:11 DEB TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123573 03/22/14 14:42 BLW TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW3 1.5-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-10Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 10:45
Percent Solids: 92.6Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Prep 3540C 03/25/14 08:44 MPM123851 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8270C 1 124557 03/31/14 18:24 JMG TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 123759 03/24/14 13:34 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124159 03/26/14 19:07 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 7471A 123765 03/24/14 16:00 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 7471A 1 123972 03/25/14 17:35 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123573 03/22/14 14:42 BLW TAL CANTotal/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 85 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Lab ChronicleClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW3 2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-11Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 10:47
Percent Solids: 83.7Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Prep 5035 03/21/14 17:00 TJL2123823 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8260B 1 124052 03/26/14 18:44 SAM TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3540C 124042 03/26/14 10:35 MPM TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 8270C 1 124330 03/28/14 17:19 MRU TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 124048 03/26/14 10:45 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124359 03/27/14 14:31 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 124048 03/26/14 10:45 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124432 03/28/14 13:58 KLC TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 7471A 124076 03/26/14 14:45 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 7471A 1 124236 03/27/14 09:44 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123573 03/22/14 14:42 BLW TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW3 2-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-12Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 10:52
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ124371 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Prep 3520C 124411 03/28/14 11:03 RTR TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 8270C 1 124718 04/01/14 15:03 MRU TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124371 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 3010A 124402 03/28/14 10:27 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 6010B 1 124634 03/31/14 11:44 KLC TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124371 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7470A 124406 03/28/14 14:45 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 7470A 1 124650 03/31/14 12:43 AMM2 TAL CANTCLP
Client Sample ID: BW3 6-7.5 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-13Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 10:55
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Analysis 8260B 1 124658 03/31/14 20:27 RJQ TAL CANTCLP
Client Sample ID: BW4 0.5-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-14Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 13:00
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Analysis 8260B 1 124658 03/31/14 20:50 RJQ TAL CANTCLP
TestAmerica Canton
Page 86 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Lab ChronicleClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW4-2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-15Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 13:05
Percent Solids: 91.8Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Prep 5035 03/21/14 17:00 TJL2123823 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8260B 1 124052 03/26/14 19:05 SAM TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3540C 123851 03/25/14 08:44 MPM TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 8270C 2.5 124761 04/01/14 14:58 JMG TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 123759 03/24/14 13:34 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124159 03/26/14 19:11 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 7471A 123765 03/24/14 16:00 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 7471A 1 123972 03/25/14 15:42 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123573 03/22/14 14:42 BLW TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW4-2-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-16Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 13:08
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ124371 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Prep 3520C 124983 04/02/14 13:47 CSC TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 8270C 1 125096 04/03/14 17:35 JMG TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124371 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 3010A 124402 03/28/14 10:27 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 6010B 1 124634 03/31/14 11:48 KLC TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124371 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7470A 124406 03/28/14 14:45 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 7470A 1 124650 03/31/14 12:48 AMM2 TAL CANTCLP
Client Sample ID: BW4-6-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-17Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 03:12
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ124371 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Prep 3520C 124411 03/28/14 11:03 RTR TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 8270C 1 124718 04/01/14 15:51 MRU TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124371 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 3010A 124402 03/28/14 10:27 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 6010B 1 124634 03/31/14 11:52 KLC TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124371 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7470A 124406 03/28/14 14:45 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 7470A 1 124650 03/31/14 12:49 AMM2 TAL CANTCLP
TestAmerica Canton
Page 87 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Lab ChronicleClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW4-8-10 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-18Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 13:15
Percent Solids: 75.2Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Prep 3540C 03/25/14 08:44 MPM123851 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8270C 5 124557 03/31/14 19:41 JMG TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 123759 03/24/14 13:34 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 5 124034 03/25/14 16:33 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 123759 03/24/14 13:34 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124159 03/26/14 19:15 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 7471A 123765 03/24/14 16:00 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 7471A 5 123972 03/25/14 17:38 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123573 03/22/14 14:42 BLW TAL CANTotal/NA
Laboratory References:
TAL CAN = TestAmerica Canton, 4101 Shuffel Street NW, North Canton, OH 44720, TEL (330)497-9396
TestAmerica Canton
Page 88 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Certification SummaryClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Laboratory: TestAmerica CantonAll certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all certifications are applicable to this report.
Authority Program EPA Region Certification ID Expiration Date
California 01144CA9NELAP 06-30-14
Connecticut State Program 1 PH-0590 12-31-14
Florida NELAP 4 E87225 06-30-14
Georgia State Program 4 N/A 06-30-14
Illinois NELAP 5 200004 07-31-14
Kansas NELAP 7 E-10336 03-31-14 *
Kentucky (UST) State Program 4 58 06-30-14
L-A-B DoD ELAP L2315 07-18-16
Minnesota NELAP 5 039-999-348 12-31-14
Nevada State Program 9 OH-000482008A 07-31-14
New Jersey NELAP 2 OH001 06-30-14
New York NELAP 2 10975 03-31-14 *
Ohio VAP State Program 5 CL0024 10-31-15
Pennsylvania NELAP 3 68-00340 08-31-14
Texas NELAP 6 08-31-14
USDA Federal P330-13-00319 11-26-16
Virginia NELAP 3 460175 09-14-14
Washington State Program 10 C971 01-12-15
West Virginia DEP State Program 3 210 12-31-14
Wisconsin State Program 5 999518190 08-31-14
TestAmerica Canton
* Expired certification is currently pending renewal and is considered valid.
Page 89 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Page 90 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Page 91 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Page 92 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Page 93 of 93 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Appendix F
Soil analytical results for borings BW-5 and BW-6
ANALYTICAL REPORTTestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.TestAmerica Canton4101 Shuffel Street NWNorth Canton, OH 44720Tel: (330)497-9396
TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
For:Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.98 County Line Road WestSuite CWesterville, Ohio 43082
Attn: Ms. Linda Aller
Authorized for release by:4/4/2014 5:17:10 PM
Mark Loeb, Project Manager II(330)[email protected]
This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature isintended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.
Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Table of Contents
Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1
Page 2 of 62TestAmerica Canton
4/4/2014
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Definitions/Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Detection Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Surrogate Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
QC Association Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Definitions/GlossaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Qualifiers
GC/MS VOA
Qualifier Description
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
Qualifier
B Compound was found in the blank and sample.
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
* LCS or LCSD exceeds the control limits
GC/MS Semi VOA
Qualifier Description
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
Qualifier
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
X Surrogate is outside control limits
B Compound was found in the blank and sample.
Metals
Qualifier Description
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
Qualifier
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
4 MS, MSD: The analyte present in the original sample is greater than 4 times the matrix spike concentration; therefore, control limits are not
applicable.
F1 MS and/or MSD Recovery exceeds the control limits
F2 MS/MSD RPD exceeds control limits
B Compound was found in the blank and sample.
Glossary
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
¤ Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
Abbreviation
%R Percent Recovery
CNF Contains no Free Liquid
DER Duplicate error ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dil Fac Dilution Factor
DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
DLC Decision level concentration
MDA Minimum detectable activity
EDL Estimated Detection Limit
MDC Minimum detectable concentration
MDL Method Detection Limit
ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)
NC Not Calculated
ND Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit
QC Quality Control
RER Relative error ratio
RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
TestAmerica Canton
Page 3 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case NarrativeClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Job ID: 240-35316-1
Laboratory: TestAmerica Canton
Narrative
CASE NARRATIVE
Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project: Lancaster Ohio
Report Number: 240-35316-1
With the exceptions noted as flags or footnotes, standard analytical protocols were followed in the analysis of the samples and no
problems were encountered or anomalies observed. In addition all laboratory quality control samples were within established control
limits, with any exceptions noted below. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of
the method. In some cases, due to interference or analytes present at high concentrations, samples were diluted. For diluted samples,
the reporting limits are adjusted relative to the dilution required.
TestAmerica Canton attests to the validity of the laboratory data generated by TestAmerica facilities reported herein. All analyses
performed by TestAmerica facilities were done using established laboratory SOPs that incorporate QA/QC procedures described in the
application methods. TestAmerica’s operations groups have reviewed the data for compliance with the laboratory QA/QC plan, and data
have been found to be compliant with laboratory protocols unless otherwise noted below.
The test results in this report meet all NELAP requirements for parameters for which accreditation is required or available. Any exceptions
to NELAP requirements are noted in this report. Pursuant to NELAP, this report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written
approval of the laboratory.
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.
All holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these samples, unless otherwise detailed in the
individual sections below.
All solid sample results are reported on an "as received" basis unless otherwise indicated by the presence of a % solids value in the
method header.
This laboratory report is confidential and is intended for the sole use of TestAmerica and its client.
RECEIPT
The samples were received on 3/21/2014 9:45 AM; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice.
The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 3.6º C.
TCLP VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)
Samples BW5 4-6 (240-35316-3) and BW6 6-8 (240-35316-8) were analyzed for TCLP volatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance
with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/8260B. The samples were leached on 03/30/2014 and analyzed on 03/31/2014.
No difficulties were encountered during the VOCs analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)
Samples BW5 4-6 (240-35316-3) and BW6 1-2 (240-35316-6) were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with
EPA SW-846 Method 8260B. The samples were prepared on 03/21/2014 and analyzed on 03/26/2014 and 03/27/2014.
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene was detected in method blank MB 240-124052/6 at a level that was above the method detection limit but below the
reporting limit. The value should be considered an estimate, and has been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above the
MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.
TestAmerica CantonPage 4 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case NarrativeClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Job ID: 240-35316-1 (Continued)
Laboratory: TestAmerica Canton (Continued)
Tetrachloroethene and trans-1,2-Dichloroethene failed the recovery criteria high for LCS 240-124125/8. These analytes were biased high
in the LCS and were not detected in the associated samples; therefore, the data have been reported.
Insufficient sample volume was available to perform a matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate/sample duplicate (MS/MSD/DUP) associated
with batch 124125.
No other difficulties were encountered during the VOCs analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TCLP SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)
Samples BW5 2-5 (240-35316-2), BW5 6-9 (240-35316-4), BW6 4-6 (240-35316-7) and BW6 6-8 (240-35316-9) were analyzed for TCLP
semivolatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/8270C. The samples were leached on
03/27/2014, prepared on 03/28/2014 and 04/02/2014 and analyzed on 04/01/2014 and 04/03/2014.
Surrogates are added during the extraction process prior to dilution. When the sample is diluted, surrogate recoveries are diluted out and
no corrective action is required.
No difficulties were encountered during the SVOCs analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)
Samples BW5 1-2 (240-35316-1), BW5 10-11 (240-35316-5), BW6 1-2 (240-35316-6) and BW6 4-6 (240-35316-7) were analyzed for
semivolatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 8270C. The samples were prepared on 03/25/2014
and analyzed on 03/27/2014 and 03/31/2014.
Surrogates are added during the extraction process prior to dilution. When the sample is diluted, surrogate recoveries are diluted out and
no corrective action is required.
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was detected in method blank MB 240-123851/23-A at a level that was above the method detection limit but
below the reporting limit. The value should be considered an estimate, and has been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result
above the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr), Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr), Phenol-d5 (Surr) and Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) failed the surrogate recovery criteria low for
BW5 10-11 (240-35316-5). Refer to the QC report for details.
Samples BW5 1-2 (240-35316-1)[2X] and BW5 10-11 (240-35316-5)[5X] required dilution prior to analysis. The reporting limits have been
adjusted accordingly.
No other difficulties were encountered during the SVOCs analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TCLP METALS (ICP)
Samples BW5 2-5 (240-35316-2), BW5 6-9 (240-35316-4), BW6 4-6 (240-35316-7) and BW6 6-8 (240-35316-9) were analyzed for TCLP
metals (ICP) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/6010B. The samples were leached on 03/27/2014, prepared on 03/28/2014
and analyzed on 03/31/2014.
Barium was detected in method blanks LB 240-124371/1-C and MB 240-124402/2-A at levels that were above the method detection limit
but below the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged. If the associated sample reported a
result above the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged.
No other difficulties were encountered during the metals analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TOTAL METALS (ICP)
Samples BW5 1-2 (240-35316-1), BW5 10-11 (240-35316-5), BW6 1-2 (240-35316-6) and BW6 4-6 (240-35316-7) were analyzed for total
metals (ICP) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 6010B. The samples were prepared on 03/24/2014 and analyzed on 03/25/2014,
03/26/2014 and 03/27/2014.
Antimony, Calcium, Magnesium and Manganese failed the recovery criteria low for the MS of sample BW5 1-2MS (240-35316-1) in batch
TestAmerica CantonPage 5 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case NarrativeClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Job ID: 240-35316-1 (Continued)
Laboratory: TestAmerica Canton (Continued)
240-124034. Aluminum and Iron failed the recovery criteria high.
For the MSD of sample BW5 1-2MSD (240-35316-1) in batch 240-124034, Several analytes failed the recovery criteria low. Aluminum
failed the recovery criteria high. Also, Calcium, Lead and Magnesium exceeded the RPD limit.
No other difficulties were encountered during the metals analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TCLP MERCURY
Samples BW5 2-5 (240-35316-2), BW5 6-9 (240-35316-4), BW6 4-6 (240-35316-7) and BW6 6-8 (240-35316-9) were analyzed for TCLP
mercury in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/7470A. The samples were leached on 03/27/2014, prepared on 03/28/2014 and
analyzed on 03/31/2014.
No difficulties were encountered during the mercury analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TOTAL MERCURY
Samples BW5 1-2 (240-35316-1), BW5 10-11 (240-35316-5), BW6 1-2 (240-35316-6) and BW6 4-6 (240-35316-7) were analyzed for total
mercury in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 7471A. The samples were prepared on 03/24/2014 and analyzed on 03/25/2014.
No difficulties were encountered during the mercury analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
PERCENT SOLIDS
Samples BW5 1-2 (240-35316-1), BW5 4-6 (240-35316-3), BW5 10-11 (240-35316-5), BW6 1-2 (240-35316-6) and BW6 4-6
(240-35316-7) were analyzed for percent solids in accordance with EPA Method 160.3 MOD. The samples were analyzed on 03/22/2014.
No difficulties were encountered during the % solids analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TestAmerica CantonPage 6 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Method SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol
SW8468260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) TAL CAN
SW8468270C Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) TAL CAN
SW8466010B Metals (ICP) TAL CAN
SW8467470A Mercury (CVAA) TAL CAN
SW8467471A Mercury (CVAA) TAL CAN
EPAMoisture Percent Moisture TAL CAN
Protocol References:
EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
Laboratory References:
TAL CAN = TestAmerica Canton, 4101 Shuffel Street NW, North Canton, OH 44720, TEL (330)497-9396
TestAmerica Canton
Page 7 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Sample SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix
240-35316-1 BW5 1-2 Solid 03/20/14 14:15 03/21/14 09:45
240-35316-2 BW5 2-5 Solid 03/20/14 14:18 03/21/14 09:45
240-35316-3 BW5 4-6 Solid 03/20/14 14:20 03/21/14 09:45
240-35316-4 BW5 6-9 Solid 03/20/14 14:25 03/21/14 09:45
240-35316-5 BW5 10-11 Solid 03/20/14 14:30 03/21/14 09:45
240-35316-6 BW6 1-2 Solid 03/20/14 15:15 03/21/14 09:45
240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 Solid 03/20/14 15:22 03/21/14 09:45
240-35316-8 BW6 6-8 Solid 03/20/14 15:40 03/21/14 09:45
240-35316-9 BW6 6-8 Solid 03/20/14 15:42 03/21/14 09:45
TestAmerica Canton
Page 8 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW5 1-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-1
☼1,1'-Biphenyl
RL
110 ug/Kg
MDL
7.7
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA2J33 8270C
☼2-Methylnaphthalene 15 ug/Kg1.1 Total/NA291 8270C
☼Acenaphthene 15 ug/Kg1.7 Total/NA239 8270C
☼Acenaphthylene 15 ug/Kg0.77 Total/NA215 8270C
☼Anthracene 15 ug/Kg1.7 Total/NA284 8270C
☼Benzo[a]anthracene 15 ug/Kg1.4 Total/NA2620 8270C
☼Benzo[a]pyrene 15 ug/Kg1.4 Total/NA2970 8270C
☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 15 ug/Kg1.3 Total/NA21600 8270C
☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 15 ug/Kg0.77 Total/NA21400 8270C
☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 15 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA2480 8270C
☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 220 ug/Kg4.4 Total/NA225 J 8270C
☼Chrysene 15 ug/Kg2.4 Total/NA2760 8270C
☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 15 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA2300 8270C
☼Dibenzofuran 110 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA237 J 8270C
☼Fluoranthene 15 ug/Kg1.2 Total/NA2800 8270C
☼Fluorene 15 ug/Kg1.2 Total/NA221 8270C
☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 15 ug/Kg0.77 Total/NA21000 8270C
☼Naphthalene 15 ug/Kg1.8 Total/NA286 8270C
☼Phenanthrene 15 ug/Kg1.6 Total/NA2400 8270C
☼Pyrene 15 ug/Kg0.97 Total/NA2690 8270C
☼Aluminum 19 mg/Kg9.0 Total/NA14000 6010B
☼Antimony 0.93 mg/Kg0.36 Total/NA10.69 J 6010B
☼Arsenic 0.93 mg/Kg0.28 Total/NA111 6010B
☼Barium 19 mg/Kg0.11 Total/NA132 6010B
☼Beryllium 0.47 mg/Kg0.040 Total/NA10.27 J 6010B
☼Cadmium 0.19 mg/Kg0.034 Total/NA10.53 6010B
☼Calcium 470 mg/Kg27 Total/NA136000 6010B
☼Chromium 0.47 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA119 6010B
☼Cobalt 4.7 mg/Kg0.15 Total/NA15.2 6010B
☼Copper 2.3 mg/Kg0.69 Total/NA140 6010B
☼Iron 9.3 mg/Kg4.6 Total/NA122000 6010B
☼Lead 0.28 mg/Kg0.18 Total/NA125 6010B
☼Magnesium 470 mg/Kg6.1 Total/NA111000 6010B
☼Manganese 1.4 mg/Kg0.15 Total/NA1370 6010B
☼Nickel 3.7 mg/Kg0.50 Total/NA144 6010B
☼Potassium 470 mg/Kg5.8 Total/NA1730 6010B
☼Sodium 470 mg/Kg62 Total/NA177 J 6010B
☼Vanadium 4.7 mg/Kg0.20 Total/NA114 6010B
☼Zinc 1.9 mg/Kg0.93 Total/NA171 6010B
☼Mercury 0.11 mg/Kg0.017 Total/NA10.051 J 7471A
Client Sample ID: BW5 2-5 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-2
Arsenic
RL
0.50 mg/L
MDL
0.0032
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
TCLP1J0.0078 6010B
Barium 10 mg/L0.00067 TCLP11.3 J B 6010B
Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.035 J 6010B
Chromium 0.50 mg/L0.0022 TCLP10.0042 J 6010B
Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP12.8 6010B
Selenium 0.25 mg/L0.0041 TCLP10.0085 J 6010B
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 9 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW5 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-3
☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
RL
2.4 ug/Kg
MDL
0.13
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA1J B0.27 8260B
☼Acetone 9.7 ug/Kg3.0 Total/NA19.5 J 8260B
☼Styrene 2.4 ug/Kg0.072 Total/NA10.093 J 8260B
Client Sample ID: BW5 6-9 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-4
Arsenic
RL
0.50 mg/L
MDL
0.0032
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
TCLP1J0.012 6010B
Barium 10 mg/L0.00067 TCLP11.2 J B 6010B
Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.16 6010B
Chromium 0.50 mg/L0.0022 TCLP10.0067 J 6010B
Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.71 6010B
Selenium 0.25 mg/L0.0041 TCLP10.0081 J 6010B
Client Sample ID: BW5 10-11 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-5
☼2-Methylnaphthalene
RL
76 ug/Kg
MDL
5.7
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA596 8270C
☼Acenaphthene 76 ug/Kg8.7 Total/NA555 J 8270C
☼Anthracene 76 ug/Kg8.9 Total/NA5300 8270C
☼Benzo[a]anthracene 76 ug/Kg7.2 Total/NA56100 8270C
☼Benzo[a]pyrene 76 ug/Kg7.3 Total/NA55400 8270C
☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 76 ug/Kg6.7 Total/NA55000 8270C
☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 76 ug/Kg4.0 Total/NA54200 8270C
☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 76 ug/Kg7.8 Total/NA5920 8270C
☼Chrysene 76 ug/Kg13 Total/NA59500 8270C
☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 76 ug/Kg7.5 Total/NA53600 8270C
☼Dibenzofuran 570 ug/Kg7.5 Total/NA550 J 8270C
☼Fluoranthene 76 ug/Kg6.3 Total/NA51700 8270C
☼Fluorene 76 ug/Kg6.0 Total/NA5100 8270C
☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 76 ug/Kg4.0 Total/NA52200 8270C
☼Naphthalene 76 ug/Kg9.3 Total/NA5190 8270C
☼Phenanthrene 76 ug/Kg8.3 Total/NA51200 8270C
☼Pyrene 76 ug/Kg5.0 Total/NA52300 8270C
☼Aluminum 44 mg/Kg21 Total/NA111000 6010B
☼Antimony 2.2 mg/Kg0.87 Total/NA10.97 J 6010B
☼Arsenic 2.2 mg/Kg0.67 Total/NA134 6010B
☼Barium 44 mg/Kg0.27 Total/NA1220 6010B
☼Beryllium 1.1 mg/Kg0.096 Total/NA10.80 J 6010B
☼Cadmium 0.44 mg/Kg0.080 Total/NA16.5 6010B
☼Calcium 1100 mg/Kg65 Total/NA119000 6010B
☼Chromium 1.1 mg/Kg0.44 Total/NA1120 6010B
☼Cobalt 11 mg/Kg0.36 Total/NA111 6010B
☼Copper 5.6 mg/Kg1.6 Total/NA177 6010B
☼Iron 22 mg/Kg11 Total/NA191000 6010B
☼Lead 0.67 mg/Kg0.42 Total/NA1260 6010B
☼Magnesium 1100 mg/Kg14 Total/NA13700 6010B
☼Manganese 3.3 mg/Kg0.36 Total/NA1760 6010B
☼Nickel 8.9 mg/Kg1.2 Total/NA136 6010B
☼Potassium 1100 mg/Kg14 Total/NA11700 6010B
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 10 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW5 10-11 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-5
☼Selenium
RL
1.1 mg/Kg
MDL
1.0
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA14.7 6010B
☼Silver 1.1 mg/Kg0.22 Total/NA10.96 J 6010B
☼Sodium 1100 mg/Kg150 Total/NA1210 J 6010B
☼Thallium 2.2 mg/Kg1.2 Total/NA11.2 J 6010B
☼Vanadium 11 mg/Kg0.47 Total/NA130 6010B
☼Zinc 4.4 mg/Kg2.2 Total/NA1700 6010B
☼Mercury 0.24 mg/Kg0.036 Total/NA11.1 7471A
Client Sample ID: BW6 1-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-6
☼2-Methylnaphthalene
RL
7.4 ug/Kg
MDL
0.56
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA128 8270C
☼Benzo[a]anthracene 7.4 ug/Kg0.70 Total/NA134 8270C
☼Benzo[a]pyrene 7.4 ug/Kg0.71 Total/NA1330 8270C
☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 7.4 ug/Kg0.66 Total/NA1570 8270C
☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 7.4 ug/Kg0.39 Total/NA11100 8270C
☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 7.4 ug/Kg0.76 Total/NA1150 8270C
☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 78 ug/Kg21 Total/NA127 J B 8270C
☼Chrysene 7.4 ug/Kg1.2 Total/NA165 8270C
☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 7.4 ug/Kg0.73 Total/NA1240 8270C
☼Dibenzofuran 56 ug/Kg0.73 Total/NA116 J 8270C
☼Fluoranthene 7.4 ug/Kg0.61 Total/NA116 8270C
☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 7.4 ug/Kg0.39 Total/NA1780 8270C
☼Naphthalene 7.4 ug/Kg0.91 Total/NA117 8270C
☼Phenanthrene 7.4 ug/Kg0.81 Total/NA130 8270C
☼Pyrene 7.4 ug/Kg0.49 Total/NA114 8270C
☼Aluminum 20 mg/Kg9.7 Total/NA14700 6010B
☼Arsenic 1.0 mg/Kg0.30 Total/NA13.6 6010B
☼Barium 20 mg/Kg0.12 Total/NA122 6010B
☼Beryllium 0.50 mg/Kg0.043 Total/NA10.17 J 6010B
☼Cadmium 0.20 mg/Kg0.036 Total/NA10.16 J 6010B
☼Calcium 500 mg/Kg29 Total/NA12600 6010B
☼Chromium 0.50 mg/Kg0.20 Total/NA18.9 6010B
☼Cobalt 5.0 mg/Kg0.16 Total/NA12.6 J 6010B
☼Copper 2.5 mg/Kg0.74 Total/NA110 6010B
☼Iron 10 mg/Kg4.9 Total/NA19900 6010B
☼Lead 0.30 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA19.2 6010B
☼Magnesium 500 mg/Kg6.5 Total/NA1970 6010B
☼Manganese 1.5 mg/Kg0.16 Total/NA1150 6010B
☼Nickel 4.0 mg/Kg0.54 Total/NA17.7 6010B
☼Potassium 500 mg/Kg6.2 Total/NA1650 6010B
☼Selenium 0.50 mg/Kg0.45 Total/NA11.4 6010B
☼Sodium 500 mg/Kg66 Total/NA1350 J 6010B
☼Vanadium 5.0 mg/Kg0.21 Total/NA112 6010B
☼Zinc 2.0 mg/Kg1.0 Total/NA119 6010B
Client Sample ID: BW6 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-7
☼1,1'-Biphenyl
RL
55 ug/Kg
MDL
3.9
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA1J6.7 8270C
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 11 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW6 4-6 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-7
☼2-Methylnaphthalene
RL
7.3 ug/Kg
MDL
0.55
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA133 8270C
☼Acenaphthene 7.3 ug/Kg0.84 Total/NA112 8270C
☼Anthracene 7.3 ug/Kg0.86 Total/NA121 8270C
☼Benzo[a]anthracene 7.3 ug/Kg0.69 Total/NA1130 8270C
☼Benzo[a]pyrene 7.3 ug/Kg0.70 Total/NA1200 8270C
☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 7.3 ug/Kg0.65 Total/NA1330 8270C
☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 7.3 ug/Kg0.39 Total/NA1230 8270C
☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 7.3 ug/Kg0.75 Total/NA182 8270C
☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 77 ug/Kg21 Total/NA1100 B 8270C
☼Chrysene 7.3 ug/Kg1.2 Total/NA1180 8270C
☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 7.3 ug/Kg0.73 Total/NA160 8270C
☼Dibenzofuran 55 ug/Kg0.73 Total/NA112 J 8270C
☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 77 ug/Kg17 Total/NA121 J 8270C
☼Fluoranthene 7.3 ug/Kg0.61 Total/NA1220 8270C
☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 7.3 ug/Kg0.39 Total/NA1160 8270C
☼Naphthalene 7.3 ug/Kg0.90 Total/NA122 8270C
☼Phenanthrene 7.3 ug/Kg0.80 Total/NA1120 8270C
☼Pyrene 7.3 ug/Kg0.48 Total/NA1190 8270C
☼Aluminum 16 mg/Kg7.7 Total/NA14600 6010B
☼Antimony 0.80 mg/Kg0.31 Total/NA10.51 J 6010B
☼Arsenic 0.80 mg/Kg0.24 Total/NA16.8 6010B
☼Barium 16 mg/Kg0.096 Total/NA127 6010B
☼Beryllium 0.40 mg/Kg0.034 Total/NA10.25 J 6010B
☼Cadmium 0.16 mg/Kg0.029 Total/NA11.9 6010B
☼Calcium 400 mg/Kg23 Total/NA128000 6010B
☼Chromium 0.40 mg/Kg0.16 Total/NA119 6010B
☼Cobalt 4.0 mg/Kg0.13 Total/NA13.3 J 6010B
☼Copper 2.0 mg/Kg0.59 Total/NA121 6010B
☼Iron 8.0 mg/Kg3.9 Total/NA115000 6010B
☼Lead 0.24 mg/Kg0.15 Total/NA114 6010B
☼Magnesium 400 mg/Kg5.2 Total/NA16300 6010B
☼Manganese 1.2 mg/Kg0.13 Total/NA1220 6010B
☼Nickel 3.2 mg/Kg0.43 Total/NA114 6010B
☼Potassium 400 mg/Kg5.0 Total/NA1660 6010B
☼Selenium 0.40 mg/Kg0.36 Total/NA10.83 6010B
☼Sodium 400 mg/Kg53 Total/NA1490 6010B
☼Vanadium 4.0 mg/Kg0.17 Total/NA115 6010B
☼Zinc 1.6 mg/Kg0.80 Total/NA134 6010B
Arsenic 0.50 mg/L0.0032 TCLP10.0053 J 6010B
Barium 10 mg/L0.00067 TCLP10.22 J B 6010B
Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.0075 J 6010B
Chromium 0.50 mg/L0.0022 TCLP10.0030 J 6010B
Selenium 0.25 mg/L0.0041 TCLP10.0064 J 6010B
☼Mercury 0.11 mg/Kg0.016 Total/NA10.017 J 7471A
Client Sample ID: BW6 6-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-8
No Detections.
Client Sample ID: BW6 6-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-9
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 12 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW6 6-8 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-9
Arsenic
RL
0.50 mg/L
MDL
0.0032
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
TCLP1J0.0047 6010B
Barium 10 mg/L0.00067 TCLP10.53 J B 6010B
Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.0020 J 6010B
Chromium 0.50 mg/L0.0022 TCLP10.0026 J 6010B
Selenium 0.25 mg/L0.0041 TCLP10.0069 J 6010B
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 13 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-1Client Sample ID: BW5 1-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 14:15
Percent Solids: 90.7Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 33 J 110 7.7 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
330 55 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 330 U
330 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 330 U
330 44 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 330 U
330 44 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 330 U
730 46 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 730 U
440 37 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 440 U
440 46 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼2,6-Dinitrotoluene 440 U
110 0.99 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼2-Chloronaphthalene 110 U
110 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼2-Chlorophenol 110 U
15 1.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼2-Methylnaphthalene 91
440 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼2-Methylphenol 440 U
440 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼2-Nitroaniline 440 U
110 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼2-Nitrophenol 110 U
880 44 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 880 U
220 40 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 220 U
440 35 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼3-Nitroaniline 440 U
330 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 330 U
110 29 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 110 U
330 46 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 330 U
330 37 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼4-Chloroaniline 330 U
110 29 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 110 U
440 57 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼4-Nitroaniline 440 U
730 37 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼4-Nitrophenol 730 U
15 1.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Acenaphthene 39
15 0.77 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Acenaphthylene 15
220 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Acetophenone 220 U
15 1.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Anthracene 84
440 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Atrazine 440 U
220 26 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Benzaldehyde 220 U
15 1.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Benzo[a]anthracene 620
15 1.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Benzo[a]pyrene 970
15 1.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1600
15 0.77 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1400
15 1.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 480
220 21 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 220 U
220 48 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 220 U
220 4.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 25 J
150 42 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 150 U
150 22 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 150 U
730 81 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Caprolactam 730 U
110 59 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Carbazole 110 U
15 2.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Chrysene 760
15 1.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 300
110 1.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Dibenzofuran 37 J
150 35 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Diethyl phthalate 150 U
150 37 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Dimethyl phthalate 150 U
150 33 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 150 U
150 17 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 150 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 14 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-1Client Sample ID: BW5 1-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 14:15
Percent Solids: 90.7Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)RL MDL
Fluoranthene 800 15 1.2 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
15 1.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Fluorene 21
15 4.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Hexachlorobenzene 15 U
110 12 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Hexachlorobutadiene 110 U
730 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 730 U
110 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Hexachloroethane 110 U
15 0.77 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 1000
110 29 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Isophorone 110 U
15 1.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Naphthalene 86
220 4.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Nitrobenzene 220 U
110 14 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 110 U
110 46 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 110 U
330 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Pentachlorophenol 330 U
15 1.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Phenanthrene 400
110 16 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Phenol 110 U
15 0.97 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Pyrene 690
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 70 10 - 110 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 74 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 224 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 72 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 224 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 70 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 220 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 74 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 226 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 83 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 236 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)RL MDL
Aluminum 4000 19 9.0 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.93 0.36 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Antimony 0.69 J
0.93 0.28 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Arsenic 11
19 0.11 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Barium 32
0.47 0.040 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Beryllium 0.27 J
0.19 0.034 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Cadmium 0.53
470 27 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Calcium 36000
0.47 0.19 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Chromium 19
4.7 0.15 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Cobalt 5.2
2.3 0.69 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Copper 40
9.3 4.6 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Iron 22000
0.28 0.18 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Lead 25
470 6.1 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Magnesium 11000
1.4 0.15 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Manganese 370
3.7 0.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Nickel 44
470 5.8 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Potassium 730
0.47 0.42 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Selenium 0.47 U
0.47 0.093 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Silver 0.47 U
470 62 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Sodium 77 J
0.93 0.51 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Thallium 0.93 U
4.7 0.20 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Vanadium 14
1.9 0.93 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Zinc 71
TestAmerica Canton
Page 15 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-1Client Sample ID: BW5 1-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 14:15
Percent Solids: 90.7Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 0.051 J 0.11 0.017 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 15:11 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 16 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-2Client Sample ID: BW5 2-5Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 14:18
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.020 0.00030 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00024 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00025 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 12,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U
0.0040 0.00017 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 12-Methylphenol 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00080 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 13 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.000085 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 1Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00027 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 1Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00019 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 1Hexachloroethane 0.020 U
0.0040 0.000040 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 1Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00027 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 1Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.00035 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 1Pyridine 0.020 U
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 92 15 - 110 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 81 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 127 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 70 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 110 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 77 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 127 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 60 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 120 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 102 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 138 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPRL MDL
Arsenic 0.0078 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:14 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:14 1Barium 1.3 J B
0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:14 1Cadmium 0.035 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:14 1Chromium 0.0042 J
0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:14 1Lead 2.8
0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:14 1Selenium 0.0085 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:14 1Silver 0.50 U
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPRL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:52 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 17 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-3Client Sample ID: BW5 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 14:20
Percent Solids: 88.3Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.4 U 2.4 0.27 ug/Kg ☼ 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
2.4 0.16 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.4 U
2.4 0.63 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 2.4 U
2.4 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2.4 U
2.4 0.17 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼1,1-Dichloroethane 2.4 U
2.4 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼1,1-Dichloroethene 2.4 U
2.4 0.13 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.27 J B
4.8 0.63 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 4.8 U
2.4 0.17 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2.4 U
2.4 0.16 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼1,2-Dichloroethane 2.4 U
2.4 0.33 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼1,2-Dichloropropane 2.4 U
2.4 0.17 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2.4 U
2.4 0.32 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.4 U
9.7 0.68 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 9.7 U
9.7 0.30 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼2-Hexanone 9.7 U
9.7 0.26 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 9.7 U
9.7 3.0 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Acetone 9.5 J
2.4 0.11 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Benzene 2.4 U
2.4 0.16 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Bromoform 2.4 U
2.4 0.26 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Bromomethane 2.4 U
2.4 0.21 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Carbon disulfide 2.4 U
2.4 0.18 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Carbon tetrachloride 2.4 U
2.4 0.16 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Chlorobenzene 2.4 U
2.4 0.27 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Chlorodibromomethane 2.4 U
2.4 0.42 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Chloroethane 2.4 U
2.4 0.14 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Chloroform 2.4 U
2.4 0.20 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Chloromethane 2.4 U
2.4 0.17 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.4 U
2.4 0.16 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.4 U
4.8 0.16 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Cyclohexane 4.8 U
2.4 0.14 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Dichlorobromomethane 2.4 U
2.4 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.4 U
2.4 0.13 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Ethylbenzene 2.4 U
2.4 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Ethylene Dibromide 2.4 U
2.4 0.077 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Isopropylbenzene 2.4 U
4.8 0.68 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Methyl acetate 4.8 U
2.4 0.21 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Methyl tert-butyl ether 2.4 U
4.8 0.15 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Methylcyclohexane 4.8 U
2.4 0.32 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Methylene Chloride 2.4 U
2.4 0.072 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Styrene 0.093 J
2.4 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Tetrachloroethene 2.4 U
2.4 0.13 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Toluene 2.4 U
2.4 0.20 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.4 U
2.4 0.26 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.4 U
2.4 0.20 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Trichloroethene 2.4 U
2.4 0.16 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Trichlorofluoromethane 2.4 U
2.4 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Vinyl chloride 2.4 U
4.8 0.17 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Xylenes, Total 4.8 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 18 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-3Client Sample ID: BW5 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 14:20
Percent Solids: 88.3Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 111 58 - 123 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 80 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 152 - 136
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 95 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 137 - 132
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 90 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 167 - 125
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.025 U 0.025 0.0095 mg/L 03/31/14 18:54 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 18:54 11,2-Dichloroethane 0.025 U
0.25 0.029 mg/L 03/31/14 18:54 12-Butanone (MEK) 0.25 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 18:54 1Benzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 18:54 1Carbon tetrachloride 0.025 U
0.025 0.0075 mg/L 03/31/14 18:54 1Chlorobenzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 18:54 1Chloroform 0.025 U
0.025 0.015 mg/L 03/31/14 18:54 1Tetrachloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0085 mg/L 03/31/14 18:54 1Trichloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 18:54 1Vinyl chloride 0.025 U
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 88 80 - 121 03/31/14 18:54 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 85 03/31/14 18:54 170 - 124
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 88 03/31/14 18:54 180 - 128
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 99 03/31/14 18:54 180 - 120
TestAmerica Canton
Page 19 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-4Client Sample ID: BW5 6-9Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 14:25
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.020 0.00030 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00024 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00025 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 12,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U
0.0040 0.00017 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 12-Methylphenol 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00080 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 13 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.000085 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 1Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00027 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 1Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00019 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 1Hexachloroethane 0.020 U
0.0040 0.000040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 1Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00027 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 1Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 1Pyridine 0.020 U
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 57 15 - 110 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 72 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 127 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 43 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 110 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 79 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 127 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 67 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 120 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 81 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 138 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPRL MDL
Arsenic 0.012 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:18 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:18 1Barium 1.2 J B
0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:18 1Cadmium 0.16
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:18 1Chromium 0.0067 J
0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:18 1Lead 0.71
0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:18 1Selenium 0.0081 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:18 1Silver 0.50 U
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPRL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:33 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 20 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-5Client Sample ID: BW5 10-11Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 14:30
Percent Solids: 43.6Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 570 U 570 40 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
1700 280 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 1700 U
1700 100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 1700 U
1700 230 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 1700 U
1700 230 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 1700 U
3800 240 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 3800 U
2300 190 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2300 U
2300 240 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼2,6-Dinitrotoluene 2300 U
570 5.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼2-Chloronaphthalene 570 U
570 93 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼2-Chlorophenol 570 U
76 5.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼2-Methylnaphthalene 96
2300 130 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼2-Methylphenol 2300 U
2300 100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼2-Nitroaniline 2300 U
570 95 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼2-Nitrophenol 570 U
4600 230 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 4600 U
1100 210 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1100 U
2300 180 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼3-Nitroaniline 2300 U
1700 100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1700 U
570 150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 570 U
1700 240 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 1700 U
1700 190 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼4-Chloroaniline 1700 U
570 150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 570 U
2300 300 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼4-Nitroaniline 2300 U
3800 190 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼4-Nitrophenol 3800 U
76 8.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Acenaphthene 55 J
76 4.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Acenaphthylene 76 U
1100 100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Acetophenone 1100 U
76 8.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Anthracene 300
2300 100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Atrazine 2300 U
1100 140 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Benzaldehyde 1100 U
76 7.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Benzo[a]anthracene 6100
76 7.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Benzo[a]pyrene 5400
76 6.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 5000
76 4.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 4200
76 7.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 920
1100 110 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 1100 U
1100 250 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 1100 U
1100 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 1100 U
800 220 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 800 U
800 110 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 800 U
3800 420 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Caprolactam 3800 U
570 310 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Carbazole 570 U
76 13 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Chrysene 9500
76 7.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 3600
570 7.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Dibenzofuran 50 J
800 180 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Diethyl phthalate 800 U
800 190 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Dimethyl phthalate 800 U
800 170 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 800 U
800 90 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 800 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 21 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-5Client Sample ID: BW5 10-11Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 14:30
Percent Solids: 43.6Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)RL MDL
Fluoranthene 1700 76 6.3 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
76 6.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Fluorene 100
76 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Hexachlorobenzene 76 U
570 64 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Hexachlorobutadiene 570 U
3800 92 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 3800 U
570 100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Hexachloroethane 570 U
76 4.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 2200
570 150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Isophorone 570 U
76 9.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Naphthalene 190
1100 25 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Nitrobenzene 1100 U
570 72 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 570 U
570 240 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 570 U
1700 100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Pentachlorophenol 1700 U
76 8.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Phenanthrene 1200
570 83 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Phenol 570 U
76 5.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Pyrene 2300
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 22 10 - 110 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 17 X 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 524 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 26 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 524 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 19 X 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 520 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 24 X 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 526 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 18 X 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 536 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)RL MDL
Aluminum 11000 44 21 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
2.2 0.87 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Antimony 0.97 J
2.2 0.67 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Arsenic 34
44 0.27 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Barium 220
1.1 0.096 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Beryllium 0.80 J
0.44 0.080 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Cadmium 6.5
1100 65 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Calcium 19000
1.1 0.44 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Chromium 120
11 0.36 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Cobalt 11
5.6 1.6 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Copper 77
22 11 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Iron 91000
0.67 0.42 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Lead 260
1100 14 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Magnesium 3700
3.3 0.36 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Manganese 760
8.9 1.2 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Nickel 36
1100 14 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Potassium 1700
1.1 1.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Selenium 4.7
1.1 0.22 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Silver 0.96 J
1100 150 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Sodium 210 J
2.2 1.2 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Thallium 1.2 J
11 0.47 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Vanadium 30
4.4 2.2 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Zinc 700
TestAmerica Canton
Page 22 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-5Client Sample ID: BW5 10-11Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 14:30
Percent Solids: 43.6Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 1.1 0.24 0.036 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 15:24 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 23 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-6Client Sample ID: BW6 1-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 15:15
Percent Solids: 89.5Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.5 U 3.5 0.39 ug/Kg ☼ 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
3.5 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.90 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.27 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼1,1-Dichloroethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.36 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼1,1-Dichloroethene 3.5 U
3.5 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 3.5 U
6.9 0.90 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 6.9 U
3.5 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene 3.5 U
3.5 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼1,2-Dichloroethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.48 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼1,2-Dichloropropane 3.5 U
3.5 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene 3.5 U
3.5 0.46 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene 3.5 U
14 0.97 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 14 U
14 0.44 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼2-Hexanone 14 U
14 0.37 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 14 U
14 4.4 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Acetone 14 U
3.5 0.16 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Benzene 3.5 U
3.5 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Bromoform 3.5 U
3.5 0.37 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Bromomethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.31 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Carbon disulfide 3.5 U
3.5 0.26 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Carbon tetrachloride 3.5 U
3.5 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Chlorobenzene 3.5 U
3.5 0.38 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Chlorodibromomethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.60 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Chloroethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.20 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Chloroform 3.5 U
3.5 0.28 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Chloromethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.5 U
3.5 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.5 U
6.9 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Cyclohexane 6.9 U
3.5 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Dichlorobromomethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.35 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Dichlorodifluoromethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.18 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Ethylbenzene 3.5 U
3.5 0.35 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Ethylene Dibromide 3.5 U
3.5 0.11 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Isopropylbenzene 3.5 U
6.9 0.97 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Methyl acetate 6.9 U
3.5 0.30 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Methyl tert-butyl ether 3.5 U
6.9 0.21 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Methylcyclohexane 6.9 U
3.5 0.46 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Methylene Chloride 3.5 U
3.5 0.10 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Styrene 3.5 U
3.5 0.36 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Tetrachloroethene 3.5 U *
3.5 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Toluene 3.5 U
3.5 0.28 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.5 U *
3.5 0.37 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.5 U
3.5 0.29 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Trichloroethene 3.5 U
3.5 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Trichlorofluoromethane 3.5 U
3.5 0.27 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Vinyl chloride 3.5 U
6.9 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Xylenes, Total 6.9 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 24 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-6Client Sample ID: BW6 1-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 15:15
Percent Solids: 89.5Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 88 58 - 123 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 80 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 152 - 136
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 107 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 137 - 132
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 95 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 167 - 125
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 56 U 56 3.9 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
170 28 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 170 U
170 9.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 170 U
170 22 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 170 U
170 22 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 170 U
370 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 370 U
220 19 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 220 U
220 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼2,6-Dinitrotoluene 220 U
56 0.50 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼2-Chloronaphthalene 56 U
56 9.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼2-Chlorophenol 56 U
7.4 0.56 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼2-Methylnaphthalene 28
220 12 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼2-Methylphenol 220 U
220 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼2-Nitroaniline 220 U
56 9.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼2-Nitrophenol 56 U
440 22 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 440 U
110 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 110 U
220 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼3-Nitroaniline 220 U
170 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 170 U
56 14 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 56 U
170 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 170 U
170 19 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼4-Chloroaniline 170 U
56 14 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 56 U
220 29 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼4-Nitroaniline 220 U
370 19 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼4-Nitrophenol 370 U
7.4 0.85 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Acenaphthene 7.4 U
7.4 0.39 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Acenaphthylene 7.4 U
110 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Acetophenone 110 U
7.4 0.87 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Anthracene 7.4 U
220 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Atrazine 220 U
110 13 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Benzaldehyde 110 U
7.4 0.70 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Benzo[a]anthracene 34
7.4 0.71 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Benzo[a]pyrene 330
7.4 0.66 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 570
7.4 0.39 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1100
7.4 0.76 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 150
110 11 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 110 U
110 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 110 U
110 2.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 110 U
78 21 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 27 J B
78 11 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 78 U
370 41 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Caprolactam 370 U
56 30 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Carbazole 56 U
7.4 1.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Chrysene 65
TestAmerica Canton
Page 25 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-6Client Sample ID: BW6 1-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 15:15
Percent Solids: 89.5Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)RL MDL
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 240 7.4 0.73 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
56 0.73 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Dibenzofuran 16 J
78 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Diethyl phthalate 78 U
78 19 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Dimethyl phthalate 78 U
78 17 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 78 U
78 8.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 78 U
7.4 0.61 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Fluoranthene 16
7.4 0.59 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Fluorene 7.4 U
7.4 2.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Hexachlorobenzene 7.4 U
56 6.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Hexachlorobutadiene 56 U
370 9.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 370 U
56 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Hexachloroethane 56 U
7.4 0.39 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 780
56 14 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Isophorone 56 U
7.4 0.91 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Naphthalene 17
110 2.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Nitrobenzene 110 U
56 7.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 56 U
56 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 56 U
170 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Pentachlorophenol 170 U
7.4 0.81 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Phenanthrene 30
56 8.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Phenol 56 U
7.4 0.49 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Pyrene 14
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 66 10 - 110 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 67 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 124 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 57 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 124 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 59 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 120 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 62 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 126 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 83 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 136 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)RL MDL
Aluminum 4700 20 9.7 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
1.0 0.39 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Antimony 1.0 U
1.0 0.30 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Arsenic 3.6
20 0.12 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Barium 22
0.50 0.043 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Beryllium 0.17 J
0.20 0.036 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Cadmium 0.16 J
500 29 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Calcium 2600
0.50 0.20 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Chromium 8.9
5.0 0.16 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Cobalt 2.6 J
2.5 0.74 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Copper 10
10 4.9 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Iron 9900
0.30 0.19 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Lead 9.2
500 6.5 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Magnesium 970
1.5 0.16 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Manganese 150
4.0 0.54 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Nickel 7.7
500 6.2 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Potassium 650
0.50 0.45 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/27/14 15:15 1☼Selenium 1.4
TestAmerica Canton
Page 26 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-6Client Sample ID: BW6 1-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 15:15
Percent Solids: 89.5Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)RL MDL
Silver 0.50 U 0.50 0.10 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
500 66 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Sodium 350 J
1.0 0.55 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Thallium 1.0 U
5.0 0.21 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Vanadium 12
2.0 1.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Zinc 19
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 0.12 U 0.12 0.018 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 15:27 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 27 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-7Client Sample ID: BW6 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 15:22
Percent Solids: 89.8Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 6.7 J 55 3.9 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
170 28 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 170 U
170 9.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 170 U
170 22 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 170 U
170 22 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 170 U
360 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 360 U
220 19 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 220 U
220 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼2,6-Dinitrotoluene 220 U
55 0.50 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼2-Chloronaphthalene 55 U
55 9.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼2-Chlorophenol 55 U
7.3 0.55 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼2-Methylnaphthalene 33
220 12 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼2-Methylphenol 220 U
220 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼2-Nitroaniline 220 U
55 9.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼2-Nitrophenol 55 U
440 22 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 440 U
110 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 110 U
220 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼3-Nitroaniline 220 U
170 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 170 U
55 14 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 55 U
170 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 170 U
170 19 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼4-Chloroaniline 170 U
55 14 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 55 U
220 29 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼4-Nitroaniline 220 U
360 19 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼4-Nitrophenol 360 U
7.3 0.84 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Acenaphthene 12
7.3 0.39 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Acenaphthylene 7.3 U
110 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Acetophenone 110 U
7.3 0.86 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Anthracene 21
220 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Atrazine 220 U
110 13 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Benzaldehyde 110 U
7.3 0.69 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Benzo[a]anthracene 130
7.3 0.70 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Benzo[a]pyrene 200
7.3 0.65 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 330
7.3 0.39 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 230
7.3 0.75 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 82
110 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 110 U
110 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 110 U
110 2.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 110 U
77 21 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 100 B
77 11 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 77 U
360 41 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Caprolactam 360 U
55 30 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Carbazole 55 U
7.3 1.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Chrysene 180
7.3 0.73 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 60
55 0.73 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Dibenzofuran 12 J
77 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Diethyl phthalate 77 U
77 19 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Dimethyl phthalate 77 U
77 17 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 21 J
77 8.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 77 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 28 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-7Client Sample ID: BW6 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 15:22
Percent Solids: 89.8Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)RL MDL
Fluoranthene 220 7.3 0.61 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
7.3 0.58 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Fluorene 7.3 U
7.3 2.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Hexachlorobenzene 7.3 U
55 6.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Hexachlorobutadiene 55 U
360 8.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 360 U
55 9.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Hexachloroethane 55 U
7.3 0.39 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 160
55 14 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Isophorone 55 U
7.3 0.90 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Naphthalene 22
110 2.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Nitrobenzene 110 U
55 6.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 55 U
55 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 55 U
170 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Pentachlorophenol 170 U
7.3 0.80 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Phenanthrene 120
55 8.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Phenol 55 U
7.3 0.48 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Pyrene 190
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 80 10 - 110 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 81 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 124 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 75 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 124 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 74 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 120 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 78 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 126 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 87 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 136 - 110
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.020 0.00030 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00024 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00025 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 12,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U
0.0040 0.00017 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 12-Methylphenol 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00080 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 13 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.000085 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 1Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00027 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 1Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00019 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 1Hexachloroethane 0.020 U
0.0040 0.000040 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 1Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00027 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 1Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.00035 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 1Pyridine 0.020 U
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 98 15 - 110 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 76 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 127 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 61 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 110 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 73 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 127 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 60 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 120 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 105 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 138 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 29 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-7Client Sample ID: BW6 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 15:22
Percent Solids: 89.8Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)RL MDL
Aluminum 4600 16 7.7 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.80 0.31 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Antimony 0.51 J
0.80 0.24 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Arsenic 6.8
16 0.096 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Barium 27
0.40 0.034 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Beryllium 0.25 J
0.16 0.029 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Cadmium 1.9
400 23 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Calcium 28000
0.40 0.16 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Chromium 19
4.0 0.13 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Cobalt 3.3 J
2.0 0.59 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Copper 21
8.0 3.9 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Iron 15000
0.24 0.15 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Lead 14
400 5.2 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Magnesium 6300
1.2 0.13 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Manganese 220
3.2 0.43 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Nickel 14
400 5.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Potassium 660
0.40 0.36 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Selenium 0.83
0.40 0.080 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Silver 0.40 U
400 53 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Sodium 490
0.80 0.44 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Thallium 0.80 U
4.0 0.17 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Vanadium 15
1.6 0.80 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Zinc 34
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPRL MDL
Arsenic 0.0053 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:22 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:22 1Barium 0.22 J B
0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:22 1Cadmium 0.0075 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:22 1Chromium 0.0030 J
0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:22 1Lead 0.50 U
0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:22 1Selenium 0.0064 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:22 1Silver 0.50 U
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPRL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:35 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 0.017 J 0.11 0.016 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 15:29 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 30 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-8Client Sample ID: BW6 6-8Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 15:40
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.025 U 0.025 0.0095 mg/L 03/31/14 19:17 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 19:17 11,2-Dichloroethane 0.025 U
0.25 0.029 mg/L 03/31/14 19:17 12-Butanone (MEK) 0.25 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 19:17 1Benzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 19:17 1Carbon tetrachloride 0.025 U
0.025 0.0075 mg/L 03/31/14 19:17 1Chlorobenzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 19:17 1Chloroform 0.025 U
0.025 0.015 mg/L 03/31/14 19:17 1Tetrachloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0085 mg/L 03/31/14 19:17 1Trichloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 19:17 1Vinyl chloride 0.025 U
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 90 80 - 121 03/31/14 19:17 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 88 03/31/14 19:17 170 - 124
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 91 03/31/14 19:17 180 - 128
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 99 03/31/14 19:17 180 - 120
TestAmerica Canton
Page 31 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-9Client Sample ID: BW6 6-8Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 15:42
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.020 0.00030 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00024 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00025 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 12,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U
0.0040 0.00017 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 12-Methylphenol 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00080 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 13 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.000085 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 1Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00027 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 1Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00019 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 1Hexachloroethane 0.020 U
0.0040 0.000040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 1Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00027 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 1Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 1Pyridine 0.020 U
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 83 15 - 110 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 74 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 127 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 18 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 110 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 77 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 127 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 64 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 120 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 90 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 138 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPRL MDL
Arsenic 0.0047 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:27 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:27 1Barium 0.53 J B
0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:27 1Cadmium 0.0020 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:27 1Chromium 0.0026 J
0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:27 1Lead 0.50 U
0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:27 1Selenium 0.0069 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:27 1Silver 0.50 U
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPRL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:36 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 32 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Surrogate SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (58-123) (52-136) (37-132) (67-125)
12DCE BFB DBFM TOL
111 80 95 90240-35316-3
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW5 4-6
88 80 107 95240-35316-6 BW6 1-2
91 83 94 90LCS 240-124052/5 Lab Control Sample
79 87 100 98LCS 240-124125/8 Lab Control Sample
83 81 106 92MB 240-123823/3-A Method Blank
96 81 91 90MB 240-124052/6 Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-121) (70-124) (80-128) (80-120)
12DCE BFB DBFM TOL
84 90 91 100LCS 240-124658/4
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
Lab Control Sample
Surrogate Legend
12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: TCLPMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-121) (70-124) (80-128) (80-120)
12DCE BFB DBFM TOL
88 85 88 99240-35316-3
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW5 4-6
90 88 91 99240-35316-8 BW6 6-8
84 85 89 97LB 240-124562/1-A MB Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (10-110) (24-110) (24-110) (20-110) (26-110) (36-110)
TBP FBP 2FP NBZ PHL TPH
70 74 72 70 74 83240-35316-1
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW5 1-2
TestAmerica Canton
Page 33 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Surrogate SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (10-110) (24-110) (24-110) (20-110) (26-110) (36-110)
TBP FBP 2FP NBZ PHL TPH
22 17 X 26 19 X 24 X 18 X240-35316-5
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW5 10-11
66 67 57 6259 83240-35316-6 BW6 1-2
80 81 75 7874 87240-35316-7 BW6 4-6
85 75 73 7471 93LCS 240-123851/24-A Lab Control Sample
75 74 74 7671 93MB 240-123851/23-A Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
TBP = 2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr)
FBP = 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
2FP = 2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
NBZ = Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
PHL = Phenol-d5 (Surr)
TPH = Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (15-110) (27-110) (10-110) (27-110) (20-110) (38-110)
TBP FBP 2FP NBZ PHL TPH
86 80 32 85 66 88LCS 240-124411/21-A
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
Lab Control Sample
95 78 61 5273 100LCS 240-124983/7-A Lab Control Sample
77 74 32 6882 89MB 240-124411/20-A Method Blank
77 66 54 4663 92MB 240-124983/6-A Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
TBP = 2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr)
FBP = 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
2FP = 2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
NBZ = Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
PHL = Phenol-d5 (Surr)
TPH = Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: TCLPMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (15-110) (27-110) (10-110) (27-110) (20-110) (38-110)
TBP FBP 2FP NBZ PHL TPH
92 81 70 77 60 102240-35316-2
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW5 2-5
103 89 70 5885 106240-35316-2 MS BW5 2-5
57 72 43 6779 81240-35316-4 BW5 6-9
98 76 61 6073 105240-35316-7 BW6 4-6
83 74 18 6477 90240-35316-9 BW6 6-8
Surrogate Legend
TBP = 2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr)
FBP = 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
2FP = 2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
NBZ = Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
TestAmerica Canton
Page 34 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Surrogate SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
PHL = Phenol-d5 (Surr)
TPH = Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
TestAmerica Canton
Page 35 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123823/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124125 Prep Batch: 123823
RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.0 U 5.0 0.56 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
5.0 U 1.35.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
5.0 U 0.395.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1,2-Trichloroethane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1-Dichloroethane
5.0 U 0.525.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1-Dichloroethene
5.0 U 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
10 U 1.310 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2-Dichlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2-Dichloroethane
5.0 U 0.695.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2-Dichloropropane
5.0 U 0.355.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,3-Dichlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.665.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,4-Dichlorobenzene
20 U 1.420 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 12-Butanone (MEK)
20 U 0.6320 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 12-Hexanone
20 U 0.5420 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
20 U 6.320 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Acetone
5.0 U 0.235.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Benzene
5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Bromoform
5.0 U 0.545.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Bromomethane
5.0 U 0.445.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Carbon disulfide
5.0 U 0.375.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Carbon tetrachloride
5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.555.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chlorodibromomethane
5.0 U 0.865.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chloroethane
5.0 U 0.295.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chloroform
5.0 U 0.415.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chloromethane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10 U 0.3310 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Cyclohexane
5.0 U 0.285.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Dichlorobromomethane
5.0 U 0.505.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Dichlorodifluoromethane
5.0 U 0.265.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Ethylbenzene
5.0 U 0.505.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Ethylene Dibromide
5.0 U 0.165.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Isopropylbenzene
10 U 1.410 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Methyl acetate
5.0 U 0.435.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Methyl tert-butyl ether
10 U 0.3110 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Methylcyclohexane
5.0 U 0.675.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Methylene Chloride
5.0 U 0.155.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Styrene
5.0 U 0.525.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Tetrachloroethene
5.0 U 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Toluene
5.0 U 0.415.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.0 U 0.545.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
5.0 U 0.425.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Trichloroethene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Trichlorofluoromethane
5.0 U 0.395.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Vinyl chloride
10 U 0.3510 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Xylenes, Total
TestAmerica Canton
Page 36 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123823/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124125 Prep Batch: 123823
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 83 58 - 123 03/27/14 04:38 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/25/14 04:01
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
81 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 52 - 136
106 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 37 - 132
92 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124052/6
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124052
RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.0 U 5.0 0.56 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
5.0 U 1.35.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
5.0 U 0.395.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1,2-Trichloroethane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1-Dichloroethane
5.0 U 0.525.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1-Dichloroethene
0.509 J 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
10 U 1.310 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2-Dichlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2-Dichloroethane
5.0 U 0.695.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2-Dichloropropane
5.0 U 0.355.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,3-Dichlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.665.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,4-Dichlorobenzene
20 U 1.420 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 12-Butanone (MEK)
20 U 0.6320 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 12-Hexanone
20 U 0.5420 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
20 U 6.320 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Acetone
5.0 U 0.235.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Benzene
5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Bromoform
5.0 U 0.545.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Bromomethane
5.0 U 0.445.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Carbon disulfide
5.0 U 0.375.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Carbon tetrachloride
5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.555.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chlorodibromomethane
5.0 U 0.865.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chloroethane
5.0 U 0.295.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chloroform
5.0 U 0.415.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chloromethane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10 U 0.3310 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Cyclohexane
5.0 U 0.285.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Dichlorobromomethane
5.0 U 0.505.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Dichlorodifluoromethane
5.0 U 0.265.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Ethylbenzene
5.0 U 0.505.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Ethylene Dibromide
5.0 U 0.165.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Isopropylbenzene
10 U 1.410 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Methyl acetate
5.0 U 0.435.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Methyl tert-butyl ether
10 U 0.3110 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Methylcyclohexane
TestAmerica Canton
Page 37 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124052/6
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124052
RL MDL
Methylene Chloride 5.0 U 5.0 0.67 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
5.0 U 0.155.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Styrene
5.0 U 0.525.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Tetrachloroethene
5.0 U 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Toluene
5.0 U 0.415.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.0 U 0.545.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
5.0 U 0.425.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Trichloroethene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Trichlorofluoromethane
5.0 U 0.395.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Vinyl chloride
10 U 0.3510 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Xylenes, Total
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 96 58 - 123 03/26/14 13:00 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
81 03/26/14 13:00 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 52 - 136
91 03/26/14 13:00 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 37 - 132
90 03/26/14 13:00 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124052/5
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124052
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 50.0 55.3 ug/Kg 111 77 - 126
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.0 50.5 ug/Kg 101 77 - 123
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroetha
ne
50.0 51.7 ug/Kg 103 80 - 138
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 50.0 49.7 ug/Kg 99 80 - 120
1,1-Dichloroethane 50.0 53.2 ug/Kg 106 76 - 120
1,1-Dichloroethene 50.0 52.2 ug/Kg 104 75 - 135
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 50.0 49.7 ug/Kg 99 64 - 124
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 50.0 51.2 ug/Kg 102 61 - 132
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 48.6 ug/Kg 97 76 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane 50.0 47.7 ug/Kg 95 72 - 120
1,2-Dichloropropane 50.0 48.4 ug/Kg 97 80 - 120
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 49.6 ug/Kg 99 78 - 120
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 47.5 ug/Kg 95 75 - 120
2-Butanone (MEK) 100 91.0 ug/Kg 91 52 - 131
2-Hexanone 100 89.1 ug/Kg 89 64 - 136
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 100 96.0 ug/Kg 96 67 - 135
Acetone 100 98.3 ug/Kg 98 41 - 137
Benzene 50.0 50.4 ug/Kg 101 79 - 120
Bromoform 50.0 48.6 ug/Kg 97 62 - 133
Bromomethane 50.0 62.1 ug/Kg 124 42 - 136
Carbon disulfide 50.0 55.2 ug/Kg 110 62 - 146
Carbon tetrachloride 50.0 60.8 ug/Kg 122 71 - 129
Chlorobenzene 50.0 49.3 ug/Kg 99 78 - 120
Chloroethane 50.0 45.4 ug/Kg 91 58 - 120
Chloroform 50.0 52.4 ug/Kg 105 77 - 120
TestAmerica Canton
Page 38 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124052/5
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124052
Chloromethane 50.0 42.6 ug/Kg 85 50 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.0 50.8 ug/Kg 102 76 - 120
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.0 51.3 ug/Kg 103 74 - 128
Cyclohexane 50.0 54.5 ug/Kg 109 66 - 120
Dichlorobromomethane 50.0 51.4 ug/Kg 103 80 - 122
Dichlorodifluoromethane 50.0 36.6 ug/Kg 73 26 - 120
Ethylbenzene 50.0 52.5 ug/Kg 105 79 - 120
Ethylene Dibromide 50.0 49.0 ug/Kg 98 80 - 120
Isopropylbenzene 50.0 55.8 ug/Kg 112 76 - 122
Methyl acetate 250 244 ug/Kg 97 57 - 130
Methyl tert-butyl ether 50.0 49.0 ug/Kg 98 49 - 165
Methylcyclohexane 50.0 51.6 ug/Kg 103 70 - 126
Methylene Chloride 50.0 56.1 ug/Kg 112 75 - 120
m-Xylene & p-Xylene 50.0 51.6 ug/Kg 103 80 - 120
o-Xylene 50.0 52.7 ug/Kg 105 80 - 120
Styrene 50.0 49.3 ug/Kg 99 80 - 120
Tetrachloroethene 50.0 54.2 ug/Kg 108 79 - 120
Toluene 50.0 48.7 ug/Kg 97 75 - 120
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.0 54.2 ug/Kg 108 78 - 120
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.0 52.3 ug/Kg 105 73 - 131
Trichloroethene 50.0 57.1 ug/Kg 114 79 - 120
Trichlorofluoromethane 50.0 43.2 ug/Kg 86 57 - 146
Vinyl chloride 50.0 44.4 ug/Kg 89 57 - 120
Xylenes, Total 100 104 ug/Kg 104 80 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 58 - 123
Surrogate
91
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
834-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 52 - 136
94Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 37 - 132
90Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124125/8
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124125
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 25.0 26.8 ug/Kg 107 77 - 126
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 25.0 22.5 ug/Kg 90 77 - 123
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroetha
ne
25.0 31.6 ug/Kg 127 80 - 138
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 25.0 25.5 ug/Kg 102 80 - 120
1,1-Dichloroethane 25.0 23.7 ug/Kg 95 76 - 120
1,1-Dichloroethene 25.0 29.1 ug/Kg 116 75 - 135
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 25.0 23.7 ug/Kg 95 64 - 124
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 25.0 25.6 ug/Kg 102 61 - 132
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 25.0 25.1 ug/Kg 101 76 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane 25.0 21.0 ug/Kg 84 72 - 120
1,2-Dichloropropane 25.0 23.5 ug/Kg 94 80 - 120
TestAmerica Canton
Page 39 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124125/8
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124125
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 25.0 25.9 ug/Kg 104 78 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 25.0 24.5 ug/Kg 98 75 - 120
2-Butanone (MEK) 50.0 43.2 ug/Kg 86 52 - 131
2-Hexanone 50.0 42.8 ug/Kg 86 64 - 136
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 50.0 44.4 ug/Kg 89 67 - 135
Acetone 50.0 41.2 ug/Kg 82 41 - 137
Benzene 25.0 25.8 ug/Kg 103 79 - 120
Bromoform 25.0 26.4 ug/Kg 106 62 - 133
Bromomethane 25.0 23.8 ug/Kg 95 42 - 136
Carbon disulfide 25.0 27.0 ug/Kg 108 62 - 146
Carbon tetrachloride 25.0 29.1 ug/Kg 116 71 - 129
Chlorobenzene 25.0 26.2 ug/Kg 105 78 - 120
Chloroethane 25.0 21.4 ug/Kg 86 58 - 120
Chloroform 25.0 24.1 ug/Kg 96 77 - 120
Chloromethane 25.0 18.1 ug/Kg 73 50 - 120
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 25.0 26.2 ug/Kg 105 76 - 120
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 25.0 24.4 ug/Kg 98 74 - 128
Cyclohexane 25.0 25.4 ug/Kg 101 66 - 120
Dichlorobromomethane 25.0 24.8 ug/Kg 99 80 - 122
Dichlorodifluoromethane 25.0 15.2 ug/Kg 61 26 - 120
Ethylbenzene 25.0 28.3 ug/Kg 113 79 - 120
Ethylene Dibromide 25.0 26.9 ug/Kg 108 80 - 120
Isopropylbenzene 25.0 28.6 ug/Kg 115 76 - 122
Methyl acetate 125 97.1 ug/Kg 78 57 - 130
Methyl tert-butyl ether 25.0 24.0 ug/Kg 96 49 - 165
Methylcyclohexane 25.0 26.5 ug/Kg 106 70 - 126
Methylene Chloride 25.0 25.2 ug/Kg 101 75 - 120
m-Xylene & p-Xylene 25.0 29.2 ug/Kg 117 80 - 120
o-Xylene 25.0 29.3 ug/Kg 117 80 - 120
Styrene 25.0 26.9 ug/Kg 108 80 - 120
Tetrachloroethene 25.0 30.8 * ug/Kg 123 79 - 120
Toluene 25.0 27.5 ug/Kg 110 75 - 120
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 25.0 30.2 * ug/Kg 121 78 - 120
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 25.0 25.9 ug/Kg 103 73 - 131
Trichloroethene 25.0 29.1 ug/Kg 116 79 - 120
Trichlorofluoromethane 25.0 27.1 ug/Kg 108 57 - 146
Vinyl chloride 25.0 19.7 ug/Kg 79 57 - 120
Xylenes, Total 50.0 58.5 ug/Kg 117 80 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 58 - 123
Surrogate
79
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
874-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 52 - 136
100Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 37 - 132
98Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125
TestAmerica Canton
Page 40 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124658/4
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124658
1,1-Dichloroethene 1.00 0.886 mg/L 89 71 - 133
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane 1.00 0.976 mg/L 98 80 - 120
2-Butanone (MEK) 2.00 1.93 mg/L 96 49 - 120
Benzene 1.00 0.969 mg/L 97 80 - 120
Carbon tetrachloride 1.00 0.988 mg/L 99 54 - 122
Chlorobenzene 1.00 0.970 mg/L 97 80 - 120
Chloroform 1.00 0.908 mg/L 91 80 - 123
Tetrachloroethene 1.00 0.940 mg/L 94 79 - 134
Trichloroethene 1.00 0.962 mg/L 96 78 - 130
Vinyl chloride 1.00 0.792 mg/L 79 56 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 80 - 121
Surrogate
84
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
904-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 70 - 124
91Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 80 - 128
100Toluene-d8 (Surr) 80 - 120
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124562/1-A MB
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124658
RL MDL
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.025 U 0.025 0.0095 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.025 U 0.0110.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 11,2-Dichloroethane
0.25 U 0.0290.25 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 12-Butanone (MEK)
0.025 U 0.00650.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Benzene
0.025 U 0.00650.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Carbon tetrachloride
0.025 U 0.00750.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Chlorobenzene
0.025 U 0.00800.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Chloroform
0.025 U 0.0150.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Tetrachloroethene
0.025 U 0.00850.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Trichloroethene
0.025 U 0.0110.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Vinyl chloride
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 84 80 - 121 03/31/14 16:13 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
85 03/31/14 16:13 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 70 - 124
89 03/31/14 16:13 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 80 - 128
97 03/31/14 16:13 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 80 - 120
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123851/23-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124190 Prep Batch: 123851
RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 50 U 50 3.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 41 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123851/23-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124190 Prep Batch: 123851
RL MDL
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 150 U 150 25 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
150 U 8.9150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol
150 U 20150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12,4-Dichlorophenol
150 U 20150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12,4-Dimethylphenol
330 U 21330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12,4-Dinitrophenol
200 U 17200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12,4-Dinitrotoluene
200 U 21200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12,6-Dinitrotoluene
50 U 0.4550 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Chloronaphthalene
50 U 8.250 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Chlorophenol
6.7 U 0.506.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Methylnaphthalene
200 U 11200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Methylphenol
200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Nitroaniline
50 U 8.350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Nitrophenol
400 U 20400 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 13 & 4 Methylphenol
100 U 18100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 13,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
200 U 16200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 13-Nitroaniline
150 U 9.2150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
150 U 21150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14-Chloro-3-methylphenol
150 U 17150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14-Chloroaniline
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
200 U 26200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14-Nitroaniline
330 U 17330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14-Nitrophenol
6.7 U 0.766.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Acenaphthene
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Acenaphthylene
100 U 9.2100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Acetophenone
6.7 U 0.786.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Anthracene
200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Atrazine
100 U 12100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Benzaldehyde
6.7 U 0.636.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Benzo[a]anthracene
6.7 U 0.646.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Benzo[a]pyrene
6.7 U 0.596.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Benzo[b]fluoranthene
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
6.7 U 0.686.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Benzo[k]fluoranthene
100 U 9.5100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
100 U 22100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
100 U 2.0100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
23.3 J 1970 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
70 U 1070 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Butyl benzyl phthalate
330 U 37330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Caprolactam
50 U 2750 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Carbazole
6.7 U 1.16.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Chrysene
6.7 U 0.666.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
50 U 0.6650 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Dibenzofuran
70 U 1670 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Diethyl phthalate
70 U 1770 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Dimethyl phthalate
70 U 1570 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Di-n-butyl phthalate
70 U 7.970 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Di-n-octyl phthalate
TestAmerica Canton
Page 42 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123851/23-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124190 Prep Batch: 123851
RL MDL
Fluoranthene 6.7 U 6.7 0.55 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
6.7 U 0.536.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Fluorene
6.7 U 2.16.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Hexachlorobenzene
50 U 5.650 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Hexachlorobutadiene
330 U 8.1330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
50 U 9.050 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Hexachloroethane
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Isophorone
6.7 U 0.826.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Naphthalene
100 U 2.2100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Nitrobenzene
50 U 6.350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
50 U 2150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
150 U 9.1150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Pentachlorophenol
6.7 U 0.736.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Phenanthrene
50 U 7.350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Phenol
6.7 U 0.446.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Pyrene
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 75 10 - 110 03/27/14 11:09 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/25/14 08:44
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
74 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 24 - 110
74 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Fluorophenol (Surr) 24 - 110
71 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
76 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110
93 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123851/24-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124190 Prep Batch: 123851
1,1'-Biphenyl 667 511 ug/Kg 77 35 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 667 564 ug/Kg 85 25 - 110
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 667 555 ug/Kg 83 12 - 110
2,4-Dichlorophenol 667 515 ug/Kg 77 39 - 110
2,4-Dimethylphenol 667 522 ug/Kg 78 29 - 110
2,4-Dinitrophenol 1330 515 ug/Kg 39 10 - 110
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 667 580 ug/Kg 87 48 - 110
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 667 560 ug/Kg 84 45 - 110
2-Chloronaphthalene 667 501 ug/Kg 75 32 - 110
2-Chlorophenol 667 500 ug/Kg 75 37 - 110
2-Methylnaphthalene 667 504 ug/Kg 76 36 - 110
2-Methylphenol 667 494 ug/Kg 74 41 - 110
2-Nitroaniline 667 582 ug/Kg 87 45 - 110
2-Nitrophenol 667 528 ug/Kg 79 34 - 110
3 & 4 Methylphenol 667 523 ug/Kg 78 40 - 110
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1330 939 ug/Kg 70 28 - 110
3-Nitroaniline 667 512 ug/Kg 77 44 - 110
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1330 724 ug/Kg 54 10 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 43 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123851/24-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124190 Prep Batch: 123851
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 667 524 ug/Kg 79 39 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 667 553 ug/Kg 83 48 - 110
4-Chloroaniline 667 400 ug/Kg 60 30 - 110
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 667 547 ug/Kg 82 40 - 110
4-Nitroaniline 667 559 ug/Kg 84 48 - 110
4-Nitrophenol 1330 1230 ug/Kg 92 28 - 110
Acenaphthene 667 517 ug/Kg 78 38 - 110
Acenaphthylene 667 500 ug/Kg 75 40 - 110
Acetophenone 667 483 ug/Kg 72 40 - 110
Anthracene 667 550 ug/Kg 82 48 - 110
Atrazine 1330 1240 ug/Kg 93 66 - 127
Benzaldehyde 1330 1080 ug/Kg 81 32 - 110
Benzo[a]anthracene 667 547 ug/Kg 82 50 - 110
Benzo[a]pyrene 667 528 ug/Kg 79 44 - 110
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 667 543 ug/Kg 81 43 - 110
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 667 566 ug/Kg 85 51 - 110
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 667 528 ug/Kg 79 38 - 105
bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 667 515 ug/Kg 77 29 - 110
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 667 500 ug/Kg 75 32 - 110
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 667 483 ug/Kg 72 34 - 110
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 667 534 ug/Kg 80 50 - 110
Butyl benzyl phthalate 667 569 ug/Kg 85 51 - 110
Caprolactam 1330 1130 ug/Kg 85 44 - 114
Carbazole 667 548 ug/Kg 82 50 - 110
Chrysene 667 510 ug/Kg 77 50 - 110
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 667 521 ug/Kg 78 51 - 110
Dibenzofuran 667 524 ug/Kg 79 43 - 110
Diethyl phthalate 667 566 ug/Kg 85 52 - 110
Dimethyl phthalate 667 552 ug/Kg 83 50 - 110
Di-n-butyl phthalate 667 612 ug/Kg 92 51 - 110
Di-n-octyl phthalate 667 498 ug/Kg 75 48 - 110
Fluoranthene 667 569 ug/Kg 85 51 - 110
Fluorene 667 538 ug/Kg 81 46 - 110
Hexachlorobenzene 667 529 ug/Kg 79 43 - 110
Hexachlorobutadiene 667 490 ug/Kg 73 29 - 110
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 667 399 ug/Kg 60 12 - 110
Hexachloroethane 667 494 ug/Kg 74 30 - 110
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 667 511 ug/Kg 77 50 - 110
Isophorone 667 495 ug/Kg 74 36 - 110
Naphthalene 667 490 ug/Kg 73 36 - 110
Nitrobenzene 667 504 ug/Kg 76 32 - 110
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 667 516 ug/Kg 77 38 - 110
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1330 1070 ug/Kg 80 46 - 110
Pentachlorophenol 1330 837 ug/Kg 63 10 - 110
Phenanthrene 667 539 ug/Kg 81 49 - 110
Phenol 667 510 ug/Kg 77 38 - 110
Pyrene 667 544 ug/Kg 82 49 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 44 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123851/24-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124190 Prep Batch: 123851
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
Surrogate
85
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
752-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 24 - 110
732-Fluorophenol (Surr) 24 - 110
71Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
74Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110
93Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124411/20-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124718 Prep Batch: 124411
RL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.020 U 0.000300.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0.020 U 0.000240.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0.020 U 0.000250.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 12,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.0040 U 0.000170.0040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 12-Methylphenol
0.020 U 0.000350.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Pyridine
0.040 U 0.000800.040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 13 & 4 Methylphenol
0.020 U 0.0000850.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Hexachlorobenzene
0.020 U 0.000270.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Hexachlorobutadiene
0.020 U 0.000190.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Hexachloroethane
0.0040 U 0.0000400.0040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Nitrobenzene
0.040 U 0.000270.040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 77 15 - 110 04/01/14 09:45 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/28/14 11:03
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
74 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 12-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 27 - 110
32 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 12-Fluorophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
82 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 27 - 110
68 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
89 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124411/21-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124718 Prep Batch: 124411
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0800 0.0506 mg/L 63 16 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.0800 0.0654 mg/L 82 35 - 110
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.0800 0.0649 mg/L 81 36 - 110
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.0800 0.0734 mg/L 92 49 - 110
2-Methylphenol 0.0800 0.0641 mg/L 80 36 - 114
Pyridine 0.0800 0.0616 mg/L 77 34 - 110
3 & 4 Methylphenol 0.0800 0.0651 mg/L 81 38 - 110
Hexachlorobenzene 0.0800 0.0599 mg/L 75 44 - 110
Hexachlorobutadiene 0.0800 0.0537 mg/L 67 35 - 110
Hexachloroethane 0.0800 0.0506 mg/L 63 34 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 45 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124411/21-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124718 Prep Batch: 124411
Nitrobenzene 0.0800 0.0708 mg/L 89 43 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Pentachlorophenol 0.160 0.110 mg/L 69 10 - 122
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 15 - 110
Surrogate
86
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
802-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 27 - 110
322-Fluorophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
85Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 27 - 110
66Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
88Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124983/6-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125096 Prep Batch: 124983
RL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.020 U 0.000300.020 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0.020 U 0.000240.020 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0.020 U 0.000250.020 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 12,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.0040 U 0.000170.0040 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 12-Methylphenol
0.020 U 0.000350.020 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Pyridine
0.040 U 0.000800.040 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 13 & 4 Methylphenol
0.020 U 0.0000850.020 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Hexachlorobenzene
0.020 U 0.000270.020 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Hexachlorobutadiene
0.020 U 0.000190.020 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Hexachloroethane
0.0040 U 0.0000400.0040 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Nitrobenzene
0.040 U 0.000270.040 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 77 15 - 110 04/03/14 14:14 1
MB MB
Surrogate
04/02/14 13:47
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
66 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 12-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 27 - 110
54 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 12-Fluorophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
63 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 27 - 110
46 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
92 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124983/7-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125096 Prep Batch: 124983
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0800 0.0581 mg/L 73 16 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.0800 0.0732 mg/L 92 35 - 110
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.0800 0.0733 mg/L 92 36 - 110
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.0800 0.0795 mg/L 99 49 - 110
2-Methylphenol 0.0800 0.0573 mg/L 72 36 - 114
Pyridine 0.0800 0.0541 mg/L 68 34 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 46 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124983/7-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125096 Prep Batch: 124983
3 & 4 Methylphenol 0.0800 0.0577 mg/L 72 38 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Hexachlorobenzene 0.0800 0.0695 mg/L 87 44 - 110
Hexachlorobutadiene 0.0800 0.0620 mg/L 78 35 - 110
Hexachloroethane 0.0800 0.0593 mg/L 74 34 - 110
Nitrobenzene 0.0800 0.0626 mg/L 78 43 - 110
Pentachlorophenol 0.160 0.142 mg/L 89 10 - 122
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 15 - 110
Surrogate
95
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
782-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 27 - 110
612-Fluorophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
73Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 27 - 110
52Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
100Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110
Client Sample ID: BW5 2-5Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-2 MS
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 125096 Prep Batch: 124983
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0800 0.0691 mg/L 86 18 - 110
Analyte
MS MS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
%Rec.
Limits
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U 0.0800 0.0791 mg/L 99 26 - 110
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U 0.0800 0.0810 mg/L 101 16 - 110
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U 0.0800 0.0828 mg/L 104 26 - 110
2-Methylphenol 0.0040 U 0.0800 0.0678 mg/L 85 29 - 110
Pyridine 0.020 U 0.0800 0.0642 mg/L 80 15 - 110
3 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U 0.0800 0.0674 mg/L 84 27 - 110
Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U 0.0800 0.0729 mg/L 91 34 - 110
Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U 0.0800 0.0746 mg/L 93 26 - 110
Hexachloroethane 0.020 U 0.0800 0.0690 mg/L 86 20 - 110
Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0800 0.0735 mg/L 92 33 - 110
Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U 0.160 0.150 mg/L 94 10 - 131
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 15 - 110
Surrogate
103
MS MS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
892-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 27 - 110
702-Fluorophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
85Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 27 - 110
58Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
106Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 47 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123759/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124034 Prep Batch: 123759
RL MDL
Aluminum 20 U 20 9.6 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
1.0 U 0.391.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Antimony
1.0 U 0.301.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Arsenic
20 U 0.1220 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Barium
0.50 U 0.0430.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Beryllium
0.20 U 0.0360.20 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Cadmium
500 U 29500 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Calcium
0.50 U 0.200.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Chromium
5.0 U 0.165.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Cobalt
2.5 U 0.742.5 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Copper
10 U 4.910 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Iron
0.30 U 0.190.30 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Lead
500 U 6.5500 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Magnesium
1.5 U 0.161.5 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Manganese
4.0 U 0.544.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Nickel
500 U 6.2500 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Potassium
0.50 U 0.450.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Selenium
0.50 U 0.100.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Silver
500 U 66500 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Sodium
1.0 U 0.551.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Thallium
5.0 U 0.215.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Vanadium
2.0 U 1.02.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Zinc
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123759/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124034 Prep Batch: 123759
Aluminum 200 191 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Antimony 50.0 42.8 mg/Kg 86 80 - 120
Arsenic 200 177 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120
Barium 200 184 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Beryllium 5.00 4.39 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120
Cadmium 5.00 4.43 mg/Kg 89 80 - 120
Calcium 5000 4400 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120
Chromium 20.0 18.2 mg/Kg 91 80 - 120
Cobalt 50.0 44.1 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120
Copper 25.0 22.7 mg/Kg 91 80 - 120
Iron 100 109 mg/Kg 109 80 - 120
Lead 50.0 43.6 mg/Kg 87 80 - 120
Magnesium 5000 4330 mg/Kg 87 80 - 120
Manganese 50.0 46.1 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Nickel 50.0 44.3 mg/Kg 89 80 - 120
Potassium 5000 4440 mg/Kg 89 80 - 120
Selenium 200 179 mg/Kg 89 80 - 120
Silver 5.00 4.74 mg/Kg 95 80 - 120
Sodium 5000 4480 mg/Kg 90 80 - 120
Thallium 200 180 mg/Kg 90 80 - 120
TestAmerica Canton
Page 48 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123759/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124034 Prep Batch: 123759
Vanadium 50.0 43.9 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Zinc 50.0 46.9 mg/Kg 94 80 - 120
Client Sample ID: BW5 1-2Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-1 MS
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124034 Prep Batch: 123759
Aluminum 4000 187 5280 4 mg/Kg 707 75 - 125☼
Analyte
MS MS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
%Rec.
Limits
Antimony 0.69 J 46.7 26.3 F1 mg/Kg 55 75 - 125☼
Arsenic 11 187 190 mg/Kg 96 75 - 125☼
Barium 32 187 210 mg/Kg 95 75 - 125☼
Beryllium 0.27 J 4.67 4.30 mg/Kg 86 75 - 125☼
Cadmium 0.53 4.67 4.94 mg/Kg 94 75 - 125☼
Calcium 36000 4670 26400 4 mg/Kg -205 75 - 125☼
Chromium 19 18.7 34.2 mg/Kg 80 75 - 125☼
Cobalt 5.2 46.7 49.9 mg/Kg 96 75 - 125☼
Copper 40 23.4 68.7 mg/Kg 123 75 - 125☼
Iron 22000 93.5 23300 4 mg/Kg 1160 75 - 125☼
Lead 25 46.7 78.6 mg/Kg 114 75 - 125☼
Magnesium 11000 4670 12300 F1 mg/Kg 17 75 - 125☼
Manganese 370 46.7 365 4 mg/Kg -3 75 - 125☼
Nickel 44 46.7 84.4 mg/Kg 86 75 - 125☼
Potassium 730 4670 4950 mg/Kg 90 75 - 125☼
Selenium 0.47 U 187 173 mg/Kg 92 75 - 125☼
Silver 0.47 U 4.67 4.43 mg/Kg 95 75 - 125☼
Sodium 77 J 4670 4430 mg/Kg 93 75 - 125☼
Thallium 0.93 U 187 172 mg/Kg 92 75 - 125☼
Vanadium 14 46.7 55.4 mg/Kg 88 75 - 125☼
Zinc 71 46.7 125 mg/Kg 117 75 - 125☼
Client Sample ID: BW5 1-2Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-1 MSD
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124034 Prep Batch: 123759
Aluminum 4000 187 5320 4 mg/Kg 729 75 - 125 1 20☼
Analyte
MSD MSD
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
%Rec.
Limits LimitRPD
RPD
Antimony 0.69 J 46.7 22.8 F1 mg/Kg 47 75 - 125 14 20☼
Arsenic 11 187 171 mg/Kg 86 75 - 125 11 20☼
Barium 32 187 194 mg/Kg 87 75 - 125 8 20☼
Beryllium 0.27 J 4.67 4.05 mg/Kg 81 75 - 125 6 20☼
Cadmium 0.53 4.67 4.50 mg/Kg 85 75 - 125 9 20☼
Calcium 36000 4670 36300 4 F2 mg/Kg 6 75 - 125 32 20☼
Chromium 19 18.7 30.7 F1 mg/Kg 61 75 - 125 11 20☼
Cobalt 5.2 46.7 48.2 mg/Kg 92 75 - 125 4 20☼
Copper 40 23.4 60.6 mg/Kg 88 75 - 125 13 20☼
Iron 22000 93.5 21700 4 mg/Kg -533 75 - 125 7 20☼
Lead 25 46.7 59.7 F1 F2 mg/Kg 73 75 - 125 27 20☼
Magnesium 11000 4670 16200 F2 mg/Kg 101 75 - 125 28 20☼
TestAmerica Canton
Page 49 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: BW5 1-2Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-1 MSD
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124034 Prep Batch: 123759
Manganese 370 46.7 380 4 mg/Kg 29 75 - 125 4 20☼
Analyte
MSD MSD
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
%Rec.
Limits LimitRPD
RPD
Nickel 44 46.7 76.7 F1 mg/Kg 69 75 - 125 10 20☼
Potassium 730 4670 4870 mg/Kg 89 75 - 125 2 20☼
Selenium 0.47 U 187 160 mg/Kg 85 75 - 125 8 20☼
Silver 0.47 U 4.67 4.13 mg/Kg 88 75 - 125 7 20☼
Sodium 77 J 4670 4090 mg/Kg 86 75 - 125 8 20☼
Thallium 0.93 U 187 164 mg/Kg 88 75 - 125 4 20☼
Vanadium 14 46.7 53.9 mg/Kg 85 75 - 125 3 20☼
Zinc 71 46.7 121 mg/Kg 107 75 - 125 4 20☼
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124402/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124634 Prep Batch: 124402
RL MDL
Arsenic 0.50 U 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.000947 J 0.0006710 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Barium
0.10 U 0.000660.10 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Cadmium
0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Chromium
0.50 U 0.00190.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Lead
0.25 U 0.00410.25 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Selenium
0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Silver
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124402/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124634 Prep Batch: 124402
Arsenic 2.00 1.97 mg/L 98 50 - 150
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Barium 2.00 1.86 J mg/L 93 50 - 150
Cadmium 0.0500 0.0499 J mg/L 100 50 - 150
Chromium 0.200 0.183 J mg/L 91 50 - 150
Lead 0.500 0.423 J mg/L 85 50 - 150
Selenium 2.00 2.13 mg/L 106 50 - 150
Silver 0.0500 0.0517 J mg/L 103 50 - 150
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124371/1-C
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124634 Prep Batch: 124402
RL MDL
Arsenic 0.50 U 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1
LB LB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.00176 J 0.0006710 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Barium
0.10 U 0.000660.10 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Cadmium
0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Chromium
0.50 U 0.00190.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Lead
0.25 U 0.00410.25 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Selenium
0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Silver
TestAmerica Canton
Page 50 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124406/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124650 Prep Batch: 124406
RL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:12 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124406/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124650 Prep Batch: 124406
Mercury 0.00500 0.00472 mg/L 94 50 - 150
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124371/1-D
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124650 Prep Batch: 124406
RL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:11 1
LB LB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123765/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 123972 Prep Batch: 123765
RL MDL
Mercury 0.10 U 0.10 0.015 mg/Kg 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 15:07 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123765/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 123972 Prep Batch: 123765
Mercury 0.833 0.855 mg/Kg 103 73 - 121
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Client Sample ID: BW5 1-2Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-1 MS
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 123972 Prep Batch: 123765
Mercury 0.051 J 0.193 0.283 mg/Kg 120 11 - 192☼
Analyte
MS MS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
%Rec.
Limits
Client Sample ID: BW5 1-2Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-1 MSD
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 123972 Prep Batch: 123765
Mercury 0.051 J 0.193 0.278 mg/Kg 118 11 - 192 2 20☼
Analyte
MSD MSD
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
%Rec.
Limits LimitRPD
RPD
TestAmerica Canton
Page 51 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
GC/MS VOA
Prep Batch: 123823
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 5035240-35316-3 BW5 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 5035240-35316-6 BW6 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 5035MB 240-123823/3-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124052
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8260B 123823240-35316-3 BW5 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 8260BLCS 240-124052/5 Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8260BMB 240-124052/6 Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124125
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8260B 123823240-35316-6 BW6 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 8260BLCS 240-124125/8 Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8260B 123823MB 240-123823/3-A Method Blank Total/NA
Leach Batch: 124562
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 1311240-35316-3 BW5 4-6 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35316-8 BW6 6-8 TCLP
Solid 1311LB 240-124562/1-A MB Method Blank TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124658
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8260B 124562240-35316-3 BW5 4-6 TCLP
Solid 8260B 124562240-35316-8 BW6 6-8 TCLP
Solid 8260B 124562LB 240-124562/1-A MB Method Blank TCLP
Solid 8260BLCS 240-124658/4 Lab Control Sample Total/NA
GC/MS Semi VOA
Prep Batch: 123851
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3540C240-35316-1 BW5 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 3540C240-35316-5 BW5 10-11 Total/NA
Solid 3540C240-35316-6 BW6 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 3540C240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 3540CLCS 240-123851/24-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3540CMB 240-123851/23-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124190
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 123851240-35316-1 BW5 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 8270C 123851240-35316-5 BW5 10-11 Total/NA
Solid 8270C 123851240-35316-6 BW6 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 8270C 123851LCS 240-123851/24-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8270C 123851MB 240-123851/23-A Method Blank Total/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 52 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
GC/MS Semi VOA (Continued)
Leach Batch: 124371
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 1311240-35316-2 BW5 2-5 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35316-2 MS BW5 2-5 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35316-4 BW5 6-9 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35316-9 BW6 6-8 TCLP
Prep Batch: 124411
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3520C 124371240-35316-4 BW5 6-9 TCLP
Solid 3520C 124371240-35316-9 BW6 6-8 TCLP
Solid 3520CLCS 240-124411/21-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3520CMB 240-124411/20-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124557
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 123851240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124718
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 124411240-35316-4 BW5 6-9 TCLP
Solid 8270C 124411240-35316-9 BW6 6-8 TCLP
Solid 8270C 124411LCS 240-124411/21-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8270C 124411MB 240-124411/20-A Method Blank Total/NA
Prep Batch: 124983
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3520C 124371240-35316-2 BW5 2-5 TCLP
Solid 3520C 124371240-35316-2 MS BW5 2-5 TCLP
Solid 3520C 124371240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 TCLP
Solid 3520CLCS 240-124983/7-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3520CMB 240-124983/6-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125096
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 124983240-35316-2 BW5 2-5 TCLP
Solid 8270C 124983240-35316-2 MS BW5 2-5 TCLP
Solid 8270C 124983240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 TCLP
Solid 8270C 124983LCS 240-124983/7-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8270C 124983MB 240-124983/6-A Method Blank Total/NA
Metals
Prep Batch: 123759
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3050B240-35316-1 BW5 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 3050B240-35316-1 MS BW5 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 3050B240-35316-1 MSD BW5 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 3050B240-35316-5 BW5 10-11 Total/NA
Solid 3050B240-35316-6 BW6 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 3050B240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 Total/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 53 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Metals (Continued)
Prep Batch: 123759 (Continued)
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3050BLCS 240-123759/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3050BMB 240-123759/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Prep Batch: 123765
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7471A240-35316-1 BW5 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 7471A240-35316-1 MS BW5 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 7471A240-35316-1 MSD BW5 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 7471A240-35316-5 BW5 10-11 Total/NA
Solid 7471A240-35316-6 BW6 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 7471A240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 7471ALCS 240-123765/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 7471AMB 240-123765/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 123972
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7471A 123765240-35316-1 BW5 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 123765240-35316-1 MS BW5 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 123765240-35316-1 MSD BW5 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 123765240-35316-5 BW5 10-11 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 123765240-35316-6 BW6 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 123765240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 123765LCS 240-123765/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 7471A 123765MB 240-123765/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124034
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 6010B 123759240-35316-1 BW5 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 123759240-35316-1 MS BW5 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 123759240-35316-1 MSD BW5 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 123759LCS 240-123759/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 6010B 123759MB 240-123759/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124159
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 6010B 123759240-35316-5 BW5 10-11 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 123759240-35316-6 BW6 1-2 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 123759240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124359
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 6010B 123759240-35316-6 BW6 1-2 Total/NA
Leach Batch: 124371
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 1311240-35316-2 BW5 2-5 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35316-4 BW5 6-9 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35316-9 BW6 6-8 TCLP
Solid 1311LB 240-124371/1-C Method Blank TCLP
Solid 1311LB 240-124371/1-D Method Blank TCLP
TestAmerica Canton
Page 54 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Metals (Continued)
Prep Batch: 124402
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3010A 124371240-35316-2 BW5 2-5 TCLP
Solid 3010A 124371240-35316-4 BW5 6-9 TCLP
Solid 3010A 124371240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 TCLP
Solid 3010A 124371240-35316-9 BW6 6-8 TCLP
Solid 3010A 124371LB 240-124371/1-C Method Blank TCLP
Solid 3010ALCS 240-124402/3-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3010AMB 240-124402/2-A Method Blank Total/NA
Prep Batch: 124406
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7470A 124371240-35316-2 BW5 2-5 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124371240-35316-4 BW5 6-9 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124371240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124371240-35316-9 BW6 6-8 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124371LB 240-124371/1-D Method Blank TCLP
Solid 7470ALCS 240-124406/3-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 7470AMB 240-124406/2-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124634
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 6010B 124402240-35316-2 BW5 2-5 TCLP
Solid 6010B 124402240-35316-4 BW5 6-9 TCLP
Solid 6010B 124402240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 TCLP
Solid 6010B 124402240-35316-9 BW6 6-8 TCLP
Solid 6010B 124402LB 240-124371/1-C Method Blank TCLP
Solid 6010B 124402LCS 240-124402/3-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 6010B 124402MB 240-124402/2-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124650
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7470A 124406240-35316-2 BW5 2-5 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124406240-35316-4 BW5 6-9 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124406240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124406240-35316-9 BW6 6-8 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124406LB 240-124371/1-D Method Blank TCLP
Solid 7470A 124406LCS 240-124406/3-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 7470A 124406MB 240-124406/2-A Method Blank Total/NA
General Chemistry
Analysis Batch: 123573
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid Moisture240-35316-1 BW5 1-2 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35316-3 BW5 4-6 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35316-5 BW5 10-11 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35316-6 BW6 1-2 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35316-6 DU BW6 1-2 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 Total/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 55 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Lab ChronicleClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW5 1-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-1Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 14:15
Percent Solids: 90.7Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Prep 3540C 03/25/14 08:44 MPM123851 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8270C 2 124190 03/27/14 20:54 JMG TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 123759 03/24/14 13:34 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124034 03/25/14 14:03 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 7471A 123765 03/24/14 16:00 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 7471A 1 123972 03/25/14 15:11 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123573 03/22/14 14:46 BLW TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW5 2-5 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 14:18
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/27/14 16:55 DRJ124371 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Prep 3520C 124983 04/02/14 13:47 CSC TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 8270C 1 125096 04/03/14 16:20 JMG TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124371 03/27/14 16:55 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 3010A 124402 03/28/14 10:27 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 6010B 1 124634 03/31/14 11:14 KLC TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124371 03/27/14 16:55 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7470A 124406 03/28/14 14:45 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 7470A 1 124650 03/31/14 12:52 AMM2 TAL CANTCLP
Client Sample ID: BW5 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-3Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 14:20
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Analysis 8260B 1 124658 03/31/14 18:54 RJQ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 5035 123823 03/21/14 17:00 TJL2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 8260B 1 124052 03/26/14 17:18 SAM TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123573 03/22/14 14:46 BLW TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW5 6-9 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 14:25
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/27/14 16:55 DRJ124371 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Prep 3520C 124411 03/28/14 11:03 RTR TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 8270C 1 124718 04/01/14 12:36 MRU TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124371 03/27/14 16:55 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
TestAmerica Canton
Page 56 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Lab ChronicleClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW5 6-9 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 14:25
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Prep 3010A 03/28/14 10:27 LPM124402 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Analysis 6010B 1 124634 03/31/14 11:18 KLC TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124371 03/27/14 16:55 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7470A 124406 03/28/14 14:45 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 7470A 1 124650 03/31/14 12:33 AMM2 TAL CANTCLP
Client Sample ID: BW5 10-11 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-5Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 14:30
Percent Solids: 43.6Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Prep 3540C 03/25/14 08:44 MPM123851 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8270C 5 124190 03/27/14 20:29 JMG TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 123759 03/24/14 13:34 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124159 03/26/14 18:35 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 7471A 123765 03/24/14 16:00 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 7471A 1 123972 03/25/14 15:24 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123573 03/22/14 14:46 BLW TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW6 1-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 15:15
Percent Solids: 89.5Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Prep 5035 03/21/14 17:00 TJL2123823 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8260B 1 124125 03/27/14 05:00 TJL2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3540C 123851 03/25/14 08:44 MPM TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 8270C 1 124190 03/27/14 20:03 JMG TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 123759 03/24/14 13:34 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124159 03/26/14 18:39 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 123759 03/24/14 13:34 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124359 03/27/14 15:15 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 7471A 123765 03/24/14 16:00 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 7471A 1 123972 03/25/14 15:27 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123573 03/22/14 14:46 BLW TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW6 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-7Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 15:22
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/27/14 16:55 DRJ124371 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Prep 3520C 124983 04/02/14 13:47 CSC TAL CANTCLP
TestAmerica Canton
Page 57 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Lab ChronicleClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW6 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-7Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 15:22
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Analysis 8270C 04/03/14 17:10 JMG1 125096 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Prep 3540C 123851 03/25/14 08:44 MPM TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 8270C 1 124557 03/31/14 17:58 JMG TAL CANTotal/NA
Leach 1311 124371 03/27/14 16:55 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 3010A 124402 03/28/14 10:27 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 6010B 1 124634 03/31/14 11:22 KLC TAL CANTCLP
Prep 3050B 123759 03/24/14 13:34 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124159 03/26/14 18:51 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Leach 1311 124371 03/27/14 16:55 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7470A 124406 03/28/14 14:45 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 7470A 1 124650 03/31/14 12:35 AMM2 TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7471A 123765 03/24/14 16:00 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 7471A 1 123972 03/25/14 15:29 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123573 03/22/14 14:46 BLW TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW6 6-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-8Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 15:40
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Analysis 8260B 1 124658 03/31/14 19:17 RJQ TAL CANTCLP
Client Sample ID: BW6 6-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-9Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 15:42
Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/27/14 16:55 DRJ124371 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Prep 3520C 124411 03/28/14 11:03 RTR TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 8270C 1 124718 04/01/14 13:25 MRU TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124371 03/27/14 16:55 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 3010A 124402 03/28/14 10:27 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 6010B 1 124634 03/31/14 11:27 KLC TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124371 03/27/14 16:55 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7470A 124406 03/28/14 14:45 LPM TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 7470A 1 124650 03/31/14 12:36 AMM2 TAL CANTCLP
Laboratory References:
TAL CAN = TestAmerica Canton, 4101 Shuffel Street NW, North Canton, OH 44720, TEL (330)497-9396
TestAmerica Canton
Page 58 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Certification SummaryClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35316-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Laboratory: TestAmerica CantonAll certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all certifications are applicable to this report.
Authority Program EPA Region Certification ID Expiration Date
California 01144CA9NELAP 06-30-14
Connecticut State Program 1 PH-0590 12-31-14
Florida NELAP 4 E87225 06-30-14
Georgia State Program 4 N/A 06-30-14
Illinois NELAP 5 200004 07-31-14
Kansas NELAP 7 E-10336 03-31-14 *
Kentucky (UST) State Program 4 58 06-30-14
L-A-B DoD ELAP L2315 07-18-16
Minnesota NELAP 5 039-999-348 12-31-14
Nevada State Program 9 OH-000482008A 07-31-14
New Jersey NELAP 2 OH001 06-30-14
New York NELAP 2 10975 03-31-14 *
Ohio VAP State Program 5 CL0024 10-31-15
Pennsylvania NELAP 3 68-00340 08-31-14
Texas NELAP 6 08-31-14
USDA Federal P330-13-00319 11-26-16
Virginia NELAP 3 460175 09-14-14
Washington State Program 10 C971 01-12-15
West Virginia DEP State Program 3 210 12-31-14
Wisconsin State Program 5 999518190 08-31-14
TestAmerica Canton
* Expired certification is currently pending renewal and is considered valid.
Page 59 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Page 60 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Page 61 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Page 62 of 62 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Appendix G
Soil analytical results for borings BW-7 and BW-8
ANALYTICAL REPORTTestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.TestAmerica Canton4101 Shuffel Street NWNorth Canton, OH 44720Tel: (330)497-9396
TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
For:Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.98 County Line Road WestSuite CWesterville, Ohio 43082
Attn: Ms. Linda Aller
Authorized for release by:4/4/2014 10:46:30 AM
Mark Loeb, Project Manager II(330)[email protected]
This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature isintended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.
Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Table of Contents
Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1
Page 2 of 63TestAmerica Canton
4/4/2014
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Definitions/Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Detection Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Surrogate Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
QC Association Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Definitions/GlossaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Qualifiers
GC/MS VOA
Qualifier Description
H Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
Qualifier
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
GC/MS Semi VOA
Qualifier Description
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
Qualifier
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
X Surrogate is outside control limits
B Compound was found in the blank and sample.
Metals
Qualifier Description
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
Qualifier
B Compound was found in the blank and sample.
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
Glossary
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
¤ Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
Abbreviation
%R Percent Recovery
CNF Contains no Free Liquid
DER Duplicate error ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dil Fac Dilution Factor
DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
DLC Decision level concentration
MDA Minimum detectable activity
EDL Estimated Detection Limit
MDC Minimum detectable concentration
MDL Method Detection Limit
ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)
NC Not Calculated
ND Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit
QC Quality Control
RER Relative error ratio
RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
TestAmerica Canton
Page 3 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case NarrativeClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Job ID: 240-35338-1
Laboratory: TestAmerica Canton
Narrative
CASE NARRATIVE
Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project: Lancaster Ohio
Report Number: 240-35338-1
With the exceptions noted as flags or footnotes, standard analytical protocols were followed in the analysis of the samples and no
problems were encountered or anomalies observed. In addition all laboratory quality control samples were within established control
limits, with any exceptions noted below. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of
the method. In some cases, due to interference or analytes present at high concentrations, samples were diluted. For diluted samples,
the reporting limits are adjusted relative to the dilution required.
TestAmerica Canton attests to the validity of the laboratory data generated by TestAmerica facilities reported herein. All analyses
performed by TestAmerica facilities were done using established laboratory SOPs that incorporate QA/QC procedures described in the
application methods. TestAmerica’s operations groups have reviewed the data for compliance with the laboratory QA/QC plan, and data
have been found to be compliant with laboratory protocols unless otherwise noted below.
The test results in this report meet all NELAP requirements for parameters for which accreditation is required or available. Any exceptions
to NELAP requirements are noted in this report. Pursuant to NELAP, this report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written
approval of the laboratory.
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.
All holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these samples, unless otherwise detailed in the
individual sections below.
All solid sample results are reported on an "as received" basis unless otherwise indicated by the presence of a % solids value in the
method header.
This laboratory report is confidential and is intended for the sole use of TestAmerica and its client.
RECEIPT
The samples were received on 3/24/2014 9:45 AM; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice.
The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 3.8º C.
TCLP VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)
Samples BW7 4-6 (240-35338-3) and BW8 2-4 (240-35338-6) were analyzed for TCLP volatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance
with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/8260B. The samples were leached on 03/30/2014 and analyzed on 03/31/2014.
No difficulties were encountered during the VOCs analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)
Samples BW7 2-4 (240-35338-1) and BW8 4-6 (240-35338-7) were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with
EPA SW-846 Method 8260B. The samples were prepared on 03/24/2014 and analyzed on 03/26/2014.
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene was detected in method blank MB 240-124052/6 at a level that was above the method detection limit but below the
reporting limit. The value should be considered an estimate, and has been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above the
MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.
The following samples were received with insufficient time remaining to freeze within 48 hours, as required for samples collected in water
preserved TerraCores: BW7 2-4 (240-35338-1), BW8 4-6 (240-35338-7). Samples were received on 3/24/14 and placed in the freezer at
TestAmerica CantonPage 4 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case NarrativeClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Job ID: 240-35338-1 (Continued)
Laboratory: TestAmerica Canton (Continued)
13:45.
No other difficulties were encountered during the VOCs analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TCLP SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)
Samples BW7 4-6 (240-35338-2), BW7 6-8 (240-35338-4), BW8 0.5 -2 (240-35338-5) and BW8 2-4 (240-35338-6) were analyzed for
TCLP semivolatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/8270C. The samples were leached on
03/30/2014, prepared on 03/31/2014 and analyzed on 04/02/2014.
Surrogates are added during the extraction process prior to dilution. When the sample is diluted, surrogate recoveries are diluted out and
no corrective action is required.
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) failed the surrogate recovery criteria high for BW7 4-6 (240-35338-2) and BW8 2-4 (240-35338-6).
6 surrogates are used for this analysis. The laboratory's SOP allows 1 of these surrogates to be outside acceptance criteria without
performing re-extraction/re-analysis. The following sample(s) contained an allowable number of surrogate compounds outside limits:
BW7 4-6 (240-35338-2), BW8 2-4 (240-35338-6). These results have been reported and qualified.
Insufficient sample volume was available to perform a matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate/sample duplicate (MS/MSD/DUP) associated
with batch 124303.
No other difficulties were encountered during the SVOCs analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)
Samples BW7 2-4 (240-35338-1), BW7 6-8 (240-35338-4), BW8 4-6 (240-35338-7) and BW8 6-8 (240-35338-8) were analyzed for
semivolatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 8270C. The samples were prepared on 03/25/2014,
03/26/2014 and 03/27/2014 and analyzed on 03/27/2014, 03/28/2014 and 03/30/2014.
Surrogates are added during the extraction process prior to dilution. When the sample is diluted, surrogate recoveries are diluted out and
no corrective action is required.
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, Diethyl phthalate and Di-n-butyl phthalate were detected in method blank MB 240-123875/23-A at levels that
were above the method detection limit but below the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged.
If the associated sample reported a result above the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged.
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and Di-n-butyl phthalate were detected in method blank MB 240-124042/19-A at levels that were above the
method detection limit but below the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged. If the
associated sample reported a result above the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged.
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) failed the surrogate recovery criteria high for BW7 6-8 (240-35338-4). Refer to the QC report for details.
Samples BW7 2-4 (240-35338-1)[2X], BW7 6-8 (240-35338-4)[2X], BW8 4-6 (240-35338-7)[2X] and BW8 6-8 (240-35338-8)[2.5X] required
dilution prior to analysis. The reporting limits have been adjusted accordingly.
No other difficulties were encountered during the SVOCs analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TCLP METALS (ICP)
Samples BW7 4-6 (240-35338-2), BW7 6-8 (240-35338-4), BW8 0.5 -2 (240-35338-5) and BW8 2-4 (240-35338-6) were analyzed for
TCLP metals (ICP) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/6010B. The samples were leached on 03/30/2014, prepared on
03/31/2014 and analyzed on 04/01/2014.
Barium and Selenium were detected in method blank LB 240-124505/1-D at levels that were above the method detection limit but below
the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above
the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.
TestAmerica CantonPage 5 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case NarrativeClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Job ID: 240-35338-1 (Continued)
Laboratory: TestAmerica Canton (Continued)
Barium was detected in method blank MB 240-124584/2-A at a level that was above the method detection limit but below the reporting
limit. The value should be considered an estimate, and has been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above the MDL
and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.
No other difficulties were encountered during the metals analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TOTAL METALS (ICP)
Samples BW7 2-4 (240-35338-1), BW7 6-8 (240-35338-4), BW8 4-6 (240-35338-7) and BW8 6-8 (240-35338-8) were analyzed for total
metals (ICP) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 6010B. The samples were prepared on 03/26/2014 and analyzed on 03/27/2014.
Barium and Potassium were detected in method blank MB 240-124048/1-A at levels that were above the method detection limit but below
the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above
the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.
No other difficulties were encountered during the metals analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TCLP MERCURY
Samples BW7 4-6 (240-35338-2), BW7 6-8 (240-35338-4), BW8 0.5 -2 (240-35338-5) and BW8 2-4 (240-35338-6) were analyzed for
TCLP mercury in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/7470A. The samples were leached on 03/30/2014, prepared on 03/31/2014
and analyzed on 04/01/2014.
No difficulties were encountered during the mercury analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TOTAL MERCURY
Samples BW7 2-4 (240-35338-1), BW7 6-8 (240-35338-4), BW8 4-6 (240-35338-7) and BW8 6-8 (240-35338-8) were analyzed for total
mercury in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 7471A. The samples were prepared on 03/26/2014 and analyzed on 03/27/2014.
No difficulties were encountered during the mercury analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
PERCENT SOLIDS
Samples BW7 2-4 (240-35338-1), BW7 6-8 (240-35338-4), BW8 4-6 (240-35338-7) and BW8 6-8 (240-35338-8) were analyzed for percent
solids in accordance with EPA Method 160.3 MOD. The samples were analyzed on 03/24/2014.
No difficulties were encountered during the % solids analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TestAmerica CantonPage 6 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Method SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol
SW8468260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) TAL CAN
SW8468270C Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) TAL CAN
SW8466010B Metals (ICP) TAL CAN
SW8467470A Mercury (CVAA) TAL CAN
SW8467471A Mercury (CVAA) TAL CAN
EPAMoisture Percent Moisture TAL CAN
Protocol References:
EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
Laboratory References:
TAL CAN = TestAmerica Canton, 4101 Shuffel Street NW, North Canton, OH 44720, TEL (330)497-9396
TestAmerica Canton
Page 7 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Sample SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix
240-35338-1 BW7 2-4 Solid 03/21/14 08:15 03/24/14 09:45
240-35338-2 BW7 4-6 Solid 03/21/14 08:17 03/24/14 09:45
240-35338-3 BW7 4-6 Solid 03/21/14 08:19 03/24/14 09:45
240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 Solid 03/21/14 08:20 03/24/14 09:45
240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2 Solid 03/21/14 09:00 03/24/14 09:45
240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 Solid 03/21/14 09:04 03/24/14 09:45
240-35338-7 BW8 4-6 Solid 03/21/14 09:07 03/24/14 09:45
240-35338-8 BW8 6-8 Solid 03/21/14 09:10 03/24/14 09:45
TestAmerica Canton
Page 8 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW7 2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-1
☼2-Butanone (MEK)
RL
11 ug/Kg
MDL
0.80
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA1J H0.85 8260B
☼1,1'-Biphenyl 110 ug/Kg7.9 Total/NA236 J 8270C
☼2-Methylnaphthalene 15 ug/Kg1.1 Total/NA2120 8270C
☼Acenaphthene 15 ug/Kg1.7 Total/NA2400 8270C
☼Acenaphthylene 15 ug/Kg0.79 Total/NA216 8270C
☼Acetophenone 230 ug/Kg21 Total/NA227 J 8270C
☼Anthracene 15 ug/Kg1.8 Total/NA290 8270C
☼Benzaldehyde 230 ug/Kg27 Total/NA236 J 8270C
☼Benzo[a]anthracene 15 ug/Kg1.4 Total/NA2810 8270C
☼Benzo[a]pyrene 15 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA21600 8270C
☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 15 ug/Kg1.3 Total/NA21900 8270C
☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 15 ug/Kg0.79 Total/NA21700 8270C
☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 15 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA2740 8270C
☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 160 ug/Kg43 Total/NA243 J 8270C
☼Chrysene 15 ug/Kg2.5 Total/NA2990 8270C
☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 15 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA2380 8270C
☼Dibenzofuran 110 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA284 J 8270C
☼Fluoranthene 15 ug/Kg1.2 Total/NA2820 8270C
☼Fluorene 15 ug/Kg1.2 Total/NA280 8270C
☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 15 ug/Kg0.79 Total/NA21200 8270C
☼Naphthalene 15 ug/Kg1.9 Total/NA2130 8270C
☼Phenanthrene 15 ug/Kg1.7 Total/NA2510 8270C
☼Phenol 110 ug/Kg17 Total/NA260 J 8270C
☼Pyrene 15 ug/Kg1.0 Total/NA2870 8270C
☼Aluminum 18 mg/Kg8.7 Total/NA15700 6010B
☼Antimony 0.91 mg/Kg0.35 Total/NA10.39 J 6010B
☼Arsenic 0.91 mg/Kg0.27 Total/NA17.1 6010B
☼Barium 18 mg/Kg0.11 Total/NA157 B 6010B
☼Beryllium 0.45 mg/Kg0.039 Total/NA10.26 J 6010B
☼Cadmium 0.18 mg/Kg0.033 Total/NA10.41 6010B
☼Calcium 450 mg/Kg26 Total/NA15800 6010B
☼Chromium 0.45 mg/Kg0.18 Total/NA126 6010B
☼Cobalt 4.5 mg/Kg0.15 Total/NA13.4 J 6010B
☼Copper 2.3 mg/Kg0.67 Total/NA196 6010B
☼Iron 9.1 mg/Kg4.5 Total/NA122000 6010B
☼Lead 0.27 mg/Kg0.17 Total/NA144 6010B
☼Magnesium 450 mg/Kg5.9 Total/NA11600 6010B
☼Manganese 1.4 mg/Kg0.15 Total/NA1450 6010B
☼Nickel 3.6 mg/Kg0.49 Total/NA134 6010B
☼Potassium 450 mg/Kg5.6 Total/NA1530 B 6010B
☼Selenium 0.45 mg/Kg0.41 Total/NA10.62 6010B
☼Sodium 450 mg/Kg60 Total/NA1810 6010B
☼Vanadium 4.5 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA110 6010B
☼Zinc 1.8 mg/Kg0.91 Total/NA1100 6010B
☼Mercury 0.11 mg/Kg0.017 Total/NA10.069 J 7471A
Client Sample ID: BW7 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-2
Arsenic
RL
0.50 mg/L
MDL
0.0032
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
TCLP1J0.0044 6010B
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 9 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW7 4-6 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-2
Barium
RL
10 mg/L
MDL
0.00067
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
TCLP1J B0.85 6010B
Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.014 J 6010B
Chromium 0.50 mg/L0.0022 TCLP10.0092 J 6010B
Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP12.2 6010B
Selenium 0.25 mg/L0.0041 TCLP10.0074 J B 6010B
Client Sample ID: BW7 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-3
No Detections.
Client Sample ID: BW7 6-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-4
☼1,1'-Biphenyl
RL
110 ug/Kg
MDL
7.8
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA2J49 8270C
☼2-Methylnaphthalene 15 ug/Kg1.1 Total/NA2550 8270C
☼Acenaphthene 15 ug/Kg1.7 Total/NA2190 8270C
☼Acenaphthylene 15 ug/Kg0.78 Total/NA224 8270C
☼Acetophenone 220 ug/Kg21 Total/NA288 J 8270C
☼Anthracene 15 ug/Kg1.7 Total/NA2110 8270C
☼Benzaldehyde 220 ug/Kg27 Total/NA276 J 8270C
☼Benzo[a]anthracene 15 ug/Kg1.4 Total/NA2690 8270C
☼Benzo[a]pyrene 15 ug/Kg1.4 Total/NA21300 8270C
☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 15 ug/Kg1.3 Total/NA22100 8270C
☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 15 ug/Kg0.78 Total/NA2510 8270C
☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 15 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA2540 8270C
☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 160 ug/Kg42 Total/NA263 J B 8270C
☼Chrysene 15 ug/Kg2.5 Total/NA2790 8270C
☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 15 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA2140 8270C
☼Dibenzofuran 110 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA2140 8270C
☼Fluoranthene 15 ug/Kg1.2 Total/NA2750 8270C
☼Fluorene 15 ug/Kg1.2 Total/NA256 8270C
☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 15 ug/Kg0.78 Total/NA2440 8270C
☼Naphthalene 15 ug/Kg1.8 Total/NA2370 8270C
☼Phenanthrene 15 ug/Kg1.6 Total/NA2630 8270C
☼Pyrene 15 ug/Kg0.98 Total/NA2810 8270C
☼Aluminum 20 mg/Kg9.7 Total/NA14500 6010B
☼Antimony 1.0 mg/Kg0.40 Total/NA10.41 J 6010B
☼Arsenic 1.0 mg/Kg0.30 Total/NA19.2 6010B
☼Barium 20 mg/Kg0.12 Total/NA144 B 6010B
☼Beryllium 0.51 mg/Kg0.044 Total/NA10.37 J 6010B
☼Cadmium 0.20 mg/Kg0.036 Total/NA10.33 6010B
☼Calcium 510 mg/Kg29 Total/NA19100 6010B
☼Chromium 0.51 mg/Kg0.20 Total/NA122 6010B
☼Cobalt 5.1 mg/Kg0.16 Total/NA14.1 J 6010B
☼Copper 2.5 mg/Kg0.75 Total/NA174 6010B
☼Iron 10 mg/Kg5.0 Total/NA128000 6010B
☼Lead 0.30 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA155 6010B
☼Magnesium 510 mg/Kg6.6 Total/NA13000 6010B
☼Manganese 1.5 mg/Kg0.16 Total/NA1380 6010B
☼Nickel 4.1 mg/Kg0.55 Total/NA137 6010B
☼Potassium 510 mg/Kg6.3 Total/NA1490 J B 6010B
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 10 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW7 6-8 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-4
☼Selenium
RL
0.51 mg/Kg
MDL
0.46
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA10.85 6010B
☼Sodium 510 mg/Kg67 Total/NA1610 6010B
☼Vanadium 5.1 mg/Kg0.21 Total/NA110 6010B
☼Zinc 2.0 mg/Kg1.0 Total/NA166 6010B
Arsenic 0.50 mg/L0.0032 TCLP10.0057 J 6010B
Barium 10 mg/L0.00067 TCLP10.38 J B 6010B
Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.0018 J 6010B
Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.0047 J 6010B
Selenium 0.25 mg/L0.0041 TCLP10.0049 J B 6010B
☼Mercury 0.11 mg/Kg0.017 Total/NA10.15 7471A
Client Sample ID: BW8 0.5 -2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-5
Arsenic
RL
0.50 mg/L
MDL
0.0032
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
TCLP1J0.0033 6010B
Barium 10 mg/L0.00067 TCLP10.66 J B 6010B
Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.024 J 6010B
Chromium 0.50 mg/L0.0022 TCLP10.0040 J 6010B
Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.011 J 6010B
Selenium 0.25 mg/L0.0041 TCLP10.0084 J B 6010B
Client Sample ID: BW8 2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-6
Arsenic
RL
0.50 mg/L
MDL
0.0032
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
TCLP1J0.0056 6010B
Barium 10 mg/L0.00067 TCLP10.98 J B 6010B
Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.015 J 6010B
Chromium 0.50 mg/L0.0022 TCLP10.0075 J 6010B
Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.075 J 6010B
Selenium 0.25 mg/L0.0041 TCLP10.0045 J B 6010B
Client Sample ID: BW8 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-7
☼1,1'-Biphenyl
RL
120 ug/Kg
MDL
8.3
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA2J16 8270C
☼2-Methylnaphthalene 16 ug/Kg1.2 Total/NA290 8270C
☼Acenaphthene 16 ug/Kg1.8 Total/NA273 8270C
☼Acenaphthylene 16 ug/Kg0.83 Total/NA236 8270C
☼Anthracene 16 ug/Kg1.8 Total/NA2120 8270C
☼Benzaldehyde 240 ug/Kg28 Total/NA238 J 8270C
☼Benzo[a]anthracene 16 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA2980 8270C
☼Benzo[a]pyrene 16 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA21200 8270C
☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 16 ug/Kg1.4 Total/NA21700 8270C
☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 16 ug/Kg0.83 Total/NA21200 8270C
☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 16 ug/Kg1.6 Total/NA2660 8270C
☼Carbazole 120 ug/Kg64 Total/NA2110 J 8270C
☼Chrysene 16 ug/Kg2.6 Total/NA21100 8270C
☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 16 ug/Kg1.6 Total/NA2270 8270C
☼Dibenzofuran 120 ug/Kg1.6 Total/NA239 J 8270C
☼Fluoranthene 16 ug/Kg1.3 Total/NA21600 8270C
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 11 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW8 4-6 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-7
☼Fluorene
RL
16 ug/Kg
MDL
1.3
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA239 8270C
☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 16 ug/Kg0.83 Total/NA2910 8270C
☼Naphthalene 16 ug/Kg1.9 Total/NA283 8270C
☼Phenanthrene 16 ug/Kg1.7 Total/NA2700 8270C
☼Pyrene 16 ug/Kg1.0 Total/NA21500 8270C
☼Aluminum 23 mg/Kg11 Total/NA15600 6010B
☼Antimony 1.2 mg/Kg0.45 Total/NA15.9 6010B
☼Arsenic 1.2 mg/Kg0.35 Total/NA1460 6010B
☼Barium 23 mg/Kg0.14 Total/NA1170 B 6010B
☼Beryllium 0.58 mg/Kg0.050 Total/NA10.43 J 6010B
☼Cadmium 0.23 mg/Kg0.042 Total/NA14.1 6010B
☼Calcium 580 mg/Kg34 Total/NA112000 6010B
☼Chromium 0.58 mg/Kg0.23 Total/NA123 6010B
☼Cobalt 5.8 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA18.1 6010B
☼Copper 2.9 mg/Kg0.86 Total/NA156 6010B
☼Iron 12 mg/Kg5.7 Total/NA131000 6010B
☼Lead 0.35 mg/Kg0.22 Total/NA1260 6010B
☼Magnesium 580 mg/Kg7.5 Total/NA13500 6010B
☼Manganese 1.7 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA1440 6010B
☼Nickel 4.6 mg/Kg0.63 Total/NA126 6010B
☼Potassium 580 mg/Kg7.2 Total/NA1810 B 6010B
☼Selenium 0.58 mg/Kg0.52 Total/NA19.4 6010B
☼Silver 0.58 mg/Kg0.12 Total/NA10.63 6010B
☼Sodium 580 mg/Kg77 Total/NA1110 J 6010B
☼Vanadium 5.8 mg/Kg0.24 Total/NA118 6010B
☼Zinc 2.3 mg/Kg1.2 Total/NA1500 6010B
☼Mercury 0.12 mg/Kg0.017 Total/NA10.60 7471A
Client Sample ID: BW8 6-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-8
☼1,1'-Biphenyl
RL
150 ug/Kg
MDL
10
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA2.5J23 8270C
☼2-Methylnaphthalene 20 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA2.5130 8270C
☼Acenaphthene 20 ug/Kg2.3 Total/NA2.589 8270C
☼Acenaphthylene 20 ug/Kg1.0 Total/NA2.539 8270C
☼Anthracene 20 ug/Kg2.3 Total/NA2.5180 8270C
☼Benzo[a]anthracene 20 ug/Kg1.9 Total/NA2.51100 8270C
☼Benzo[a]pyrene 20 ug/Kg1.9 Total/NA2.51500 8270C
☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 20 ug/Kg1.8 Total/NA2.52700 8270C
☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 20 ug/Kg1.0 Total/NA2.5600 8270C
☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 20 ug/Kg2.0 Total/NA2.5610 8270C
☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 210 ug/Kg56 Total/NA2.564 J B 8270C
☼Carbazole 150 ug/Kg80 Total/NA2.5120 J 8270C
☼Chrysene 20 ug/Kg3.3 Total/NA2.51300 8270C
☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 20 ug/Kg2.0 Total/NA2.5170 8270C
☼Dibenzofuran 150 ug/Kg2.0 Total/NA2.565 J 8270C
☼Fluoranthene 20 ug/Kg1.6 Total/NA2.51800 8270C
☼Fluorene 20 ug/Kg1.6 Total/NA2.557 8270C
☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 20 ug/Kg1.0 Total/NA2.5510 8270C
☼Naphthalene 20 ug/Kg2.4 Total/NA2.5150 8270C
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 12 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW8 6-8 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-8
☼Phenanthrene
RL
20 ug/Kg
MDL
2.2
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA2.5930 8270C
☼Pyrene 20 ug/Kg1.3 Total/NA2.51800 8270C
☼Aluminum 17 mg/Kg8.4 Total/NA15300 6010B
☼Antimony 0.87 mg/Kg0.34 Total/NA11.2 6010B
☼Arsenic 0.87 mg/Kg0.26 Total/NA123 6010B
☼Barium 17 mg/Kg0.10 Total/NA1160 B 6010B
☼Beryllium 0.44 mg/Kg0.038 Total/NA10.39 J 6010B
☼Cadmium 0.17 mg/Kg0.031 Total/NA13.3 6010B
☼Calcium 440 mg/Kg25 Total/NA17900 6010B
☼Chromium 0.44 mg/Kg0.17 Total/NA120 6010B
☼Cobalt 4.4 mg/Kg0.14 Total/NA16.8 6010B
☼Copper 2.2 mg/Kg0.65 Total/NA141 6010B
☼Iron 8.7 mg/Kg4.3 Total/NA122000 6010B
☼Lead 0.26 mg/Kg0.17 Total/NA1230 6010B
☼Magnesium 440 mg/Kg5.7 Total/NA12700 6010B
☼Manganese 1.3 mg/Kg0.14 Total/NA1380 6010B
☼Nickel 3.5 mg/Kg0.47 Total/NA128 6010B
☼Potassium 440 mg/Kg5.4 Total/NA1740 B 6010B
☼Selenium 0.44 mg/Kg0.39 Total/NA14.6 6010B
☼Silver 0.44 mg/Kg0.087 Total/NA10.66 6010B
☼Sodium 440 mg/Kg58 Total/NA181 J 6010B
☼Vanadium 4.4 mg/Kg0.18 Total/NA113 6010B
☼Zinc 1.7 mg/Kg0.87 Total/NA1300 6010B
☼Mercury 0.13 mg/Kg0.020 Total/NA10.54 7471A
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 13 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-1Client Sample ID: BW7 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 08:15
Percent Solids: 87.2Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.9 U H 2.9 0.32 ug/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
2.9 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.9 U H
2.9 0.74 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 2.9 U H
2.9 0.22 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2.9 U H
2.9 0.21 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,1-Dichloroethane 2.9 U H
2.9 0.30 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,1-Dichloroethene 2.9 U H
2.9 0.15 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2.9 U H
5.7 0.74 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 5.7 U H
2.9 0.21 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2.9 U H
2.9 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,2-Dichloroethane 2.9 U H
2.9 0.39 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,2-Dichloropropane 2.9 U H
2.9 0.20 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2.9 U H
2.9 0.38 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.9 U H
11 0.80 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 0.85 J H
11 0.36 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼2-Hexanone 11 U H
11 0.31 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 11 U H
11 3.6 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Acetone 11 U H
2.9 0.13 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Benzene 2.9 U H
2.9 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Bromoform 2.9 U H
2.9 0.31 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Bromomethane 2.9 U H
2.9 0.25 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Carbon disulfide 2.9 U H
2.9 0.21 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Carbon tetrachloride 2.9 U H
2.9 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Chlorobenzene 2.9 U H
2.9 0.31 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Chlorodibromomethane 2.9 U H
2.9 0.49 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Chloroethane 2.9 U H
2.9 0.17 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Chloroform 2.9 U H
2.9 0.23 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Chloromethane 2.9 U H
2.9 0.21 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.9 U H
2.9 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.9 U H
5.7 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Cyclohexane 5.7 U H
2.9 0.16 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Dichlorobromomethane 2.9 U H
2.9 0.29 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.9 U H
2.9 0.15 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Ethylbenzene 2.9 U H
2.9 0.29 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Ethylene Dibromide 2.9 U H
2.9 0.091 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Isopropylbenzene 2.9 U H
5.7 0.80 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Methyl acetate 5.7 U H
2.9 0.25 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Methyl tert-butyl ether 2.9 U H
5.7 0.18 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Methylcyclohexane 5.7 U H
2.9 0.38 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Methylene Chloride 2.9 U H
2.9 0.086 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Styrene 2.9 U H
2.9 0.30 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Tetrachloroethene 2.9 U H
2.9 0.15 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Toluene 2.9 U H
2.9 0.23 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.9 U H
2.9 0.31 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.9 U H
2.9 0.24 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Trichloroethene 2.9 U H
2.9 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Trichlorofluoromethane 2.9 U H
2.9 0.22 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Vinyl chloride 2.9 U H
5.7 0.20 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Xylenes, Total 5.7 U H
TestAmerica Canton
Page 14 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-1Client Sample ID: BW7 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 08:15
Percent Solids: 87.2Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 104 58 - 123 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 94 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 152 - 136
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 86 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 137 - 132
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 93 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 167 - 125
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 36 J 110 7.9 ug/Kg ☼ 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
340 57 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 340 U
340 20 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 340 U
340 45 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 340 U
340 45 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 340 U
750 48 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 750 U
450 39 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 450 U
450 48 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼2,6-Dinitrotoluene 450 U
110 1.0 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼2-Chloronaphthalene 110 U
110 19 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼2-Chlorophenol 110 U
15 1.1 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼2-Methylnaphthalene 120
450 25 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼2-Methylphenol 450 U
450 21 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼2-Nitroaniline 450 U
110 19 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼2-Nitrophenol 110 U
910 45 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 910 U
230 41 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 230 U
450 36 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼3-Nitroaniline 450 U
340 21 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 340 U
110 29 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 110 U
340 48 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 340 U
340 39 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼4-Chloroaniline 340 U
110 29 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 110 U
450 59 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼4-Nitroaniline 450 U
750 39 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼4-Nitrophenol 750 U
15 1.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Acenaphthene 400
15 0.79 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Acenaphthylene 16
230 21 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Acetophenone 27 J
15 1.8 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Anthracene 90
450 21 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Atrazine 450 U
230 27 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Benzaldehyde 36 J
15 1.4 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Benzo[a]anthracene 810
15 1.5 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Benzo[a]pyrene 1600
15 1.3 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1900
15 0.79 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1700
15 1.5 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 740
230 22 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 230 U
230 50 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 230 U
230 4.5 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 230 U
160 43 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 43 J
160 23 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 160 U
750 84 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Caprolactam 750 U
110 61 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Carbazole 110 U
15 2.5 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Chrysene 990
TestAmerica Canton
Page 15 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-1Client Sample ID: BW7 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 08:15
Percent Solids: 87.2Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)RL MDL
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 380 15 1.5 ug/Kg ☼ 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
110 1.5 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Dibenzofuran 84 J
160 36 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Diethyl phthalate 160 U
160 39 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Dimethyl phthalate 160 U
160 34 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 160 U
160 18 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 160 U
15 1.2 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Fluoranthene 820
15 1.2 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Fluorene 80
15 4.8 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Hexachlorobenzene 15 U
110 13 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Hexachlorobutadiene 110 U
750 18 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 750 U
110 20 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Hexachloroethane 110 U
15 0.79 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 1200
110 29 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Isophorone 110 U
15 1.9 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Naphthalene 130
230 5.0 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Nitrobenzene 230 U
110 14 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 110 U
110 48 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 110 U
340 21 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Pentachlorophenol 340 U
15 1.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Phenanthrene 510
110 17 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Phenol 60 J
15 1.0 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Pyrene 870
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 80 10 - 110 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 79 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 224 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 70 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 224 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 71 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 220 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 77 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 226 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 96 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 236 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)RL MDL
Aluminum 5700 18 8.7 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.91 0.35 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Antimony 0.39 J
0.91 0.27 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Arsenic 7.1
18 0.11 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Barium 57 B
0.45 0.039 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Beryllium 0.26 J
0.18 0.033 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Cadmium 0.41
450 26 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Calcium 5800
0.45 0.18 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Chromium 26
4.5 0.15 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Cobalt 3.4 J
2.3 0.67 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Copper 96
9.1 4.5 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Iron 22000
0.27 0.17 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Lead 44
450 5.9 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Magnesium 1600
1.4 0.15 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Manganese 450
3.6 0.49 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Nickel 34
450 5.6 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Potassium 530 B
0.45 0.41 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Selenium 0.62
TestAmerica Canton
Page 16 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-1Client Sample ID: BW7 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 08:15
Percent Solids: 87.2Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)RL MDL
Silver 0.45 U 0.45 0.091 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
450 60 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Sodium 810
0.91 0.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Thallium 0.91 U
4.5 0.19 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Vanadium 10
1.8 0.91 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Zinc 100
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 0.069 J 0.11 0.017 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 09:30 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 17 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-2Client Sample ID: BW7 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 08:17
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.020 0.00030 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00024 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00025 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 12,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U
0.0040 0.00017 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 12-Methylphenol 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00080 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 13 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.000085 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 1Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00027 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 1Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00019 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 1Hexachloroethane 0.020 U
0.0040 0.000040 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 1Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00027 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 1Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 1Pyridine 0.020 U
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 107 15 - 110 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 87 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 127 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 69 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 110 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 84 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 127 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 85 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 120 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 113 X 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 138 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPRL MDL
Arsenic 0.0044 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:37 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 0.00067 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:37 1Barium 0.85 J B
0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:37 1Cadmium 0.014 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:37 1Chromium 0.0092 J
0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:37 1Lead 2.2
0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:37 1Selenium 0.0074 J B
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:37 1Silver 0.50 U
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPRL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 09:17 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 18 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-3Client Sample ID: BW7 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 08:19
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.025 U 0.025 0.0095 mg/L 03/31/14 21:13 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 21:13 11,2-Dichloroethane 0.025 U
0.25 0.029 mg/L 03/31/14 21:13 12-Butanone (MEK) 0.25 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 21:13 1Benzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 21:13 1Carbon tetrachloride 0.025 U
0.025 0.0075 mg/L 03/31/14 21:13 1Chlorobenzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 21:13 1Chloroform 0.025 U
0.025 0.015 mg/L 03/31/14 21:13 1Tetrachloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0085 mg/L 03/31/14 21:13 1Trichloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 21:13 1Vinyl chloride 0.025 U
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 90 80 - 121 03/31/14 21:13 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 89 03/31/14 21:13 170 - 124
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 90 03/31/14 21:13 180 - 128
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 101 03/31/14 21:13 180 - 120
TestAmerica Canton
Page 19 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-4Client Sample ID: BW7 6-8Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 08:20
Percent Solids: 88.9Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 49 J 110 7.8 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
330 56 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 330 U
330 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 330 U
330 45 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 330 U
330 45 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 330 U
740 47 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 740 U
450 38 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 450 U
450 47 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼2,6-Dinitrotoluene 450 U
110 1.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼2-Chloronaphthalene 110 U
110 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼2-Chlorophenol 110 U
15 1.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼2-Methylnaphthalene 550
450 25 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼2-Methylphenol 450 U
450 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼2-Nitroaniline 450 U
110 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼2-Nitrophenol 110 U
890 45 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 890 U
220 40 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 220 U
450 36 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼3-Nitroaniline 450 U
330 21 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 330 U
110 29 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 110 U
330 47 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 330 U
330 38 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼4-Chloroaniline 330 U
110 29 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 110 U
450 58 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼4-Nitroaniline 450 U
740 38 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼4-Nitrophenol 740 U
15 1.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Acenaphthene 190
15 0.78 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Acenaphthylene 24
220 21 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Acetophenone 88 J
15 1.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Anthracene 110
450 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Atrazine 450 U
220 27 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Benzaldehyde 76 J
15 1.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Benzo[a]anthracene 690
15 1.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Benzo[a]pyrene 1300
15 1.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 2100
15 0.78 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 510
15 1.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 540
220 21 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 220 U
220 49 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 220 U
220 4.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 220 U
160 42 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 63 J B
160 22 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 160 U
740 82 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Caprolactam 740 U
110 60 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Carbazole 110 U
15 2.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Chrysene 790
15 1.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 140
110 1.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Dibenzofuran 140
160 36 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Diethyl phthalate 160 U
160 38 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Dimethyl phthalate 160 U
160 33 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 160 U
160 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 160 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 20 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-4Client Sample ID: BW7 6-8Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 08:20
Percent Solids: 88.9Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)RL MDL
Fluoranthene 750 15 1.2 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
15 1.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Fluorene 56
15 4.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Hexachlorobenzene 15 U
110 12 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Hexachlorobutadiene 110 U
740 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 740 U
110 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Hexachloroethane 110 U
15 0.78 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 440
110 29 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Isophorone 110 U
15 1.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Naphthalene 370
220 4.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Nitrobenzene 220 U
110 14 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 110 U
110 47 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 110 U
330 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Pentachlorophenol 330 U
15 1.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Phenanthrene 630
110 16 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Phenol 110 U
15 0.98 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Pyrene 810
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 83 10 - 110 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 83 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 224 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 82 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 224 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 76 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 220 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 88 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 226 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 111 X 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 236 - 110
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.020 0.00030 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00024 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00025 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 12,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U
0.0040 0.00017 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 12-Methylphenol 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00080 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 13 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.000085 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 1Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00027 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 1Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00019 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 1Hexachloroethane 0.020 U
0.0040 0.000040 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 1Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00027 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 1Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 1Pyridine 0.020 U
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 100 15 - 110 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 83 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 127 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 24 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 110 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 82 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 127 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 72 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 120 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 104 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 138 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 21 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-4Client Sample ID: BW7 6-8Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 08:20
Percent Solids: 88.9Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)RL MDL
Aluminum 4500 20 9.7 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
1.0 0.40 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Antimony 0.41 J
1.0 0.30 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Arsenic 9.2
20 0.12 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Barium 44 B
0.51 0.044 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Beryllium 0.37 J
0.20 0.036 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Cadmium 0.33
510 29 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Calcium 9100
0.51 0.20 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Chromium 22
5.1 0.16 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Cobalt 4.1 J
2.5 0.75 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Copper 74
10 5.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Iron 28000
0.30 0.19 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Lead 55
510 6.6 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Magnesium 3000
1.5 0.16 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Manganese 380
4.1 0.55 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Nickel 37
510 6.3 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Potassium 490 J B
0.51 0.46 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Selenium 0.85
0.51 0.10 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Silver 0.51 U
510 67 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Sodium 610
1.0 0.56 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Thallium 1.0 U
5.1 0.21 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Vanadium 10
2.0 1.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Zinc 66
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPRL MDL
Arsenic 0.0057 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:41 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 0.00067 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:41 1Barium 0.38 J B
0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:41 1Cadmium 0.0018 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:41 1Chromium 0.50 U
0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:41 1Lead 0.0047 J
0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:41 1Selenium 0.0049 J B
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:41 1Silver 0.50 U
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPRL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 09:19 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 0.15 0.11 0.017 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 09:37 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 22 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-5Client Sample ID: BW8 0.5 -2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:00
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.020 0.00030 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00024 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00025 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 12,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U
0.0040 0.00017 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 12-Methylphenol 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00080 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 13 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.000085 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 1Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00027 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 1Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00019 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 1Hexachloroethane 0.020 U
0.0040 0.000040 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 1Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00027 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 1Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 1Pyridine 0.020 U
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 97 15 - 110 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 75 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 127 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 27 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 110 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 73 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 127 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 69 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 120 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 105 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 138 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPRL MDL
Arsenic 0.0033 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:45 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 0.00067 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:45 1Barium 0.66 J B
0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:45 1Cadmium 0.024 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:45 1Chromium 0.0040 J
0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:45 1Lead 0.011 J
0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:45 1Selenium 0.0084 J B
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:45 1Silver 0.50 U
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPRL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 09:23 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 23 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-6Client Sample ID: BW8 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:04
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.025 U 0.025 0.0095 mg/L 03/31/14 21:36 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 21:36 11,2-Dichloroethane 0.025 U
0.25 0.029 mg/L 03/31/14 21:36 12-Butanone (MEK) 0.25 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 21:36 1Benzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 21:36 1Carbon tetrachloride 0.025 U
0.025 0.0075 mg/L 03/31/14 21:36 1Chlorobenzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 21:36 1Chloroform 0.025 U
0.025 0.015 mg/L 03/31/14 21:36 1Tetrachloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0085 mg/L 03/31/14 21:36 1Trichloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 21:36 1Vinyl chloride 0.025 U
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 90 80 - 121 03/31/14 21:36 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 89 03/31/14 21:36 170 - 124
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 83 03/31/14 21:36 180 - 128
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 98 03/31/14 21:36 180 - 120
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.020 0.00030 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00024 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00025 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 12,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U
0.0040 0.00017 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 12-Methylphenol 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00080 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 13 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.000085 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 1Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00027 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 1Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00019 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 1Hexachloroethane 0.020 U
0.0040 0.000040 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 1Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00027 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 1Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 1Pyridine 0.020 U
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 82 15 - 110 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 83 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 127 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 36 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 110 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 79 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 127 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 73 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 120 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 112 X 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 138 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPRL MDL
Arsenic 0.0056 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:50 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 0.00067 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:50 1Barium 0.98 J B
0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:50 1Cadmium 0.015 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:50 1Chromium 0.0075 J
0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:50 1Lead 0.075 J
0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:50 1Selenium 0.0045 J B
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:50 1Silver 0.50 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 24 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-6Client Sample ID: BW8 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:04
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPRL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 09:25 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 25 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-7Client Sample ID: BW8 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:07
Percent Solids: 83.7Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.5 U H 3.5 0.39 ug/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
3.5 0.24 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.5 U H
3.5 0.90 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 3.5 U H
3.5 0.27 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane 3.5 U H
3.5 0.25 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼1,1-Dichloroethane 3.5 U H
3.5 0.36 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼1,1-Dichloroethene 3.5 U H
3.5 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 3.5 U H
6.9 0.90 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 6.9 U H
3.5 0.25 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene 3.5 U H
3.5 0.24 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼1,2-Dichloroethane 3.5 U H
3.5 0.48 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼1,2-Dichloropropane 3.5 U H
3.5 0.24 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene 3.5 U H
3.5 0.46 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene 3.5 U H
14 0.97 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 14 U H
14 0.44 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼2-Hexanone 14 U H
14 0.37 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 14 U H
14 4.4 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Acetone 14 U H
3.5 0.16 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Benzene 3.5 U H
3.5 0.23 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Bromoform 3.5 U H
3.5 0.37 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Bromomethane 3.5 U H
3.5 0.30 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Carbon disulfide 3.5 U H
3.5 0.26 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Carbon tetrachloride 3.5 U H
3.5 0.23 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Chlorobenzene 3.5 U H
3.5 0.38 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Chlorodibromomethane 3.5 U H
3.5 0.60 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Chloroethane 3.5 U H
3.5 0.20 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Chloroform 3.5 U H
3.5 0.28 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Chloromethane 3.5 U H
3.5 0.25 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.5 U H
3.5 0.24 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.5 U H
6.9 0.23 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Cyclohexane 6.9 U H
3.5 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Dichlorobromomethane 3.5 U H
3.5 0.35 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Dichlorodifluoromethane 3.5 U H
3.5 0.18 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Ethylbenzene 3.5 U H
3.5 0.35 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Ethylene Dibromide 3.5 U H
3.5 0.11 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Isopropylbenzene 3.5 U H
6.9 0.97 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Methyl acetate 6.9 U H
3.5 0.30 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Methyl tert-butyl ether 3.5 U H
6.9 0.21 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Methylcyclohexane 6.9 U H
3.5 0.46 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Methylene Chloride 3.5 U H
3.5 0.10 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Styrene 3.5 U H
3.5 0.36 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Tetrachloroethene 3.5 U H
3.5 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Toluene 3.5 U H
3.5 0.28 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.5 U H
3.5 0.37 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.5 U H
3.5 0.29 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Trichloroethene 3.5 U H
3.5 0.24 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Trichlorofluoromethane 3.5 U H
3.5 0.27 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Vinyl chloride 3.5 U H
6.9 0.24 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Xylenes, Total 6.9 U H
TestAmerica Canton
Page 26 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-7Client Sample ID: BW8 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:07
Percent Solids: 83.7Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 103 58 - 123 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 82 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 152 - 136
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 87 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 137 - 132
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 87 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 167 - 125
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 16 J 120 8.3 ug/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
360 59 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 360 U
360 21 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 360 U
360 47 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 360 U
360 47 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 360 U
780 50 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 780 U
470 40 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 470 U
470 50 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼2,6-Dinitrotoluene 470 U
120 1.1 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼2-Chloronaphthalene 120 U
120 19 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼2-Chlorophenol 120 U
16 1.2 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼2-Methylnaphthalene 90
470 26 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼2-Methylphenol 470 U
470 22 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼2-Nitroaniline 470 U
120 20 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼2-Nitrophenol 120 U
950 47 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 950 U
240 43 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 240 U
470 38 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼3-Nitroaniline 470 U
360 22 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 360 U
120 31 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 120 U
360 50 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 360 U
360 40 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼4-Chloroaniline 360 U
120 31 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 120 U
470 62 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼4-Nitroaniline 470 U
780 40 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼4-Nitrophenol 780 U
16 1.8 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Acenaphthene 73
16 0.83 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Acenaphthylene 36
240 22 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Acetophenone 240 U
16 1.8 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Anthracene 120
470 22 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Atrazine 470 U
240 28 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Benzaldehyde 38 J
16 1.5 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Benzo[a]anthracene 980
16 1.5 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Benzo[a]pyrene 1200
16 1.4 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1700
16 0.83 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1200
16 1.6 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 660
240 23 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 240 U
240 52 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 240 U
240 4.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 240 U
170 45 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 170 U
170 24 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 170 U
780 88 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Caprolactam 780 U
120 64 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Carbazole 110 J
16 2.6 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Chrysene 1100
TestAmerica Canton
Page 27 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-7Client Sample ID: BW8 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:07
Percent Solids: 83.7Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)RL MDL
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 270 16 1.6 ug/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
120 1.6 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Dibenzofuran 39 J
170 38 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Diethyl phthalate 170 U
170 40 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Dimethyl phthalate 170 U
170 36 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 170 U
170 19 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 170 U
16 1.3 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Fluoranthene 1600
16 1.3 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Fluorene 39
16 5.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Hexachlorobenzene 16 U
120 13 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Hexachlorobutadiene 120 U
780 19 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 780 U
120 21 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Hexachloroethane 120 U
16 0.83 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 910
120 31 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Isophorone 120 U
16 1.9 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Naphthalene 83
240 5.2 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Nitrobenzene 240 U
120 15 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 120 U
120 50 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 120 U
360 22 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Pentachlorophenol 360 U
16 1.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Phenanthrene 700
120 17 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Phenol 120 U
16 1.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Pyrene 1500
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 56 10 - 110 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 74 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 224 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 69 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 224 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 70 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 220 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 73 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 226 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 82 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 236 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)RL MDL
Aluminum 5600 23 11 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
1.2 0.45 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Antimony 5.9
1.2 0.35 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Arsenic 460
23 0.14 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Barium 170 B
0.58 0.050 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Beryllium 0.43 J
0.23 0.042 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Cadmium 4.1
580 34 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Calcium 12000
0.58 0.23 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Chromium 23
5.8 0.19 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Cobalt 8.1
2.9 0.86 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Copper 56
12 5.7 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Iron 31000
0.35 0.22 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Lead 260
580 7.5 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Magnesium 3500
1.7 0.19 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Manganese 440
4.6 0.63 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Nickel 26
580 7.2 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Potassium 810 B
0.58 0.52 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Selenium 9.4
TestAmerica Canton
Page 28 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-7Client Sample ID: BW8 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:07
Percent Solids: 83.7Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)RL MDL
Silver 0.63 0.58 0.12 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
580 77 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Sodium 110 J
1.2 0.64 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Thallium 1.2 U
5.8 0.24 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Vanadium 18
2.3 1.2 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Zinc 500
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 0.60 0.12 0.017 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 09:40 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 29 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-8Client Sample ID: BW8 6-8Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:10
Percent Solids: 83.6Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 23 J 150 10 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
450 74 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 450 U
450 26 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 450 U
450 59 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 450 U
450 59 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 450 U
980 62 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 980 U
590 51 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 590 U
590 62 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼2,6-Dinitrotoluene 590 U
150 1.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼2-Chloronaphthalene 150 U
150 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼2-Chlorophenol 150 U
20 1.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼2-Methylnaphthalene 130
590 33 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼2-Methylphenol 590 U
590 27 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼2-Nitroaniline 590 U
150 25 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼2-Nitrophenol 150 U
1200 59 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 1200 U
300 54 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 300 U
590 48 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼3-Nitroaniline 590 U
450 27 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 450 U
150 39 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 150 U
450 62 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 450 U
450 51 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼4-Chloroaniline 450 U
150 39 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 150 U
590 77 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼4-Nitroaniline 590 U
980 51 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼4-Nitrophenol 980 U
20 2.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Acenaphthene 89
20 1.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Acenaphthylene 39
300 27 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Acetophenone 300 U
20 2.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Anthracene 180
590 27 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Atrazine 590 U
300 36 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Benzaldehyde 300 U
20 1.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Benzo[a]anthracene 1100
20 1.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Benzo[a]pyrene 1500
20 1.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 2700
20 1.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 600
20 2.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 610
300 28 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 300 U
300 65 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 300 U
300 5.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 300 U
210 56 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 64 J B
210 30 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 210 U
980 110 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Caprolactam 980 U
150 80 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Carbazole 120 J
20 3.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Chrysene 1300
20 2.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 170
150 2.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Dibenzofuran 65 J
210 48 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Diethyl phthalate 210 U
210 51 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Dimethyl phthalate 210 U
210 45 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 210 U
210 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 210 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 30 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-8Client Sample ID: BW8 6-8Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:10
Percent Solids: 83.6Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)RL MDL
Fluoranthene 1800 20 1.6 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
20 1.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Fluorene 57
20 6.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Hexachlorobenzene 20 U
150 17 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Hexachlorobutadiene 150 U
980 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 980 U
150 27 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Hexachloroethane 150 U
20 1.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 510
150 39 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Isophorone 150 U
20 2.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Naphthalene 150
300 6.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Nitrobenzene 300 U
150 19 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 150 U
150 62 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 150 U
450 27 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Pentachlorophenol 450 U
20 2.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Phenanthrene 930
150 22 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Phenol 150 U
20 1.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Pyrene 1800
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 59 10 - 110 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 61 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.524 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 61 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.524 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 59 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.520 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 61 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.526 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 81 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.536 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)RL MDL
Aluminum 5300 17 8.4 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.87 0.34 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Antimony 1.2
0.87 0.26 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Arsenic 23
17 0.10 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Barium 160 B
0.44 0.038 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Beryllium 0.39 J
0.17 0.031 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Cadmium 3.3
440 25 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Calcium 7900
0.44 0.17 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Chromium 20
4.4 0.14 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Cobalt 6.8
2.2 0.65 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Copper 41
8.7 4.3 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Iron 22000
0.26 0.17 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Lead 230
440 5.7 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Magnesium 2700
1.3 0.14 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Manganese 380
3.5 0.47 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Nickel 28
440 5.4 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Potassium 740 B
0.44 0.39 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Selenium 4.6
0.44 0.087 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Silver 0.66
440 58 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Sodium 81 J
0.87 0.48 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Thallium 0.87 U
4.4 0.18 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Vanadium 13
1.7 0.87 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Zinc 300
TestAmerica Canton
Page 31 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-8Client Sample ID: BW8 6-8Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:10
Percent Solids: 83.6Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 0.54 0.13 0.020 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 09:42 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 32 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Surrogate SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (58-123) (52-136) (37-132) (67-125)
12DCE BFB DBFM TOL
104 94 86 93240-35338-1
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW7 2-4
103 82 87 87240-35338-7 BW8 4-6
91 83 94 90LCS 240-124052/5 Lab Control Sample
96 81 91 90MB 240-124052/6 Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-121) (70-124) (80-128) (80-120)
12DCE BFB DBFM TOL
84 90 91 100LCS 240-124658/4
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
Lab Control Sample
Surrogate Legend
12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: TCLPMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-121) (70-124) (80-128) (80-120)
12DCE BFB DBFM TOL
90 89 90 101240-35338-3
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW7 4-6
90 89 83 98240-35338-6 BW8 2-4
84 85 89 97LB 240-124562/1-A MB Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (10-110) (24-110) (24-110) (20-110) (26-110) (36-110)
TBP FBP 2FP NBZ PHL TPH
80 79 70 71 77 96240-35338-1
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW7 2-4
83 83 82 8876 111 X240-35338-4 BW7 6-8
56 74 69 7370 82240-35338-7 BW8 4-6
TestAmerica Canton
Page 33 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Surrogate SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (10-110) (24-110) (24-110) (20-110) (26-110) (36-110)
TBP FBP 2FP NBZ PHL TPH
59 61 61 59 61 81240-35338-8
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW8 6-8
82 76 80 8075 94LCS 240-123875/24-A Lab Control Sample
79 76 76 7684 84LCS 240-124042/20-A Lab Control Sample
87 88 85 8693 95LCS 240-124303/3-A Lab Control Sample
55 79 79 8077 108MB 240-123875/23-A Method Blank
87 87 83 8588 92MB 240-124042/19-A Method Blank
65 80 74 7683 88MB 240-124303/2-A Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
TBP = 2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr)
FBP = 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
2FP = 2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
NBZ = Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
PHL = Phenol-d5 (Surr)
TPH = Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (15-110) (27-110) (10-110) (27-110) (20-110) (38-110)
TBP FBP 2FP NBZ PHL TPH
95 78 31 72 67 100LCS 240-124527/14-A
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
Lab Control Sample
80 71 52 6668 98MB 240-124527/13-A Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
TBP = 2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr)
FBP = 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
2FP = 2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
NBZ = Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
PHL = Phenol-d5 (Surr)
TPH = Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: TCLPMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (15-110) (27-110) (10-110) (27-110) (20-110) (38-110)
TBP FBP 2FP NBZ PHL TPH
107 87 69 84 85 113 X240-35338-2
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW7 4-6
100 83 24 7282 104240-35338-4 BW7 6-8
97 75 27 6973 105240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2
82 83 36 7379 112 X240-35338-6 BW8 2-4
Surrogate Legend
TBP = 2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr)
FBP = 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
2FP = 2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
NBZ = Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
PHL = Phenol-d5 (Surr)
TestAmerica Canton
Page 34 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Surrogate SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
TPH = Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
TestAmerica Canton
Page 35 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124052/6
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124052
RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.0 U 5.0 0.56 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
5.0 U 1.35.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
5.0 U 0.395.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1,2-Trichloroethane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1-Dichloroethane
5.0 U 0.525.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1-Dichloroethene
0.509 J 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
10 U 1.310 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2-Dichlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2-Dichloroethane
5.0 U 0.695.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2-Dichloropropane
5.0 U 0.355.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,3-Dichlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.665.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,4-Dichlorobenzene
20 U 1.420 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 12-Butanone (MEK)
20 U 0.6320 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 12-Hexanone
20 U 0.5420 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
20 U 6.320 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Acetone
5.0 U 0.235.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Benzene
5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Bromoform
5.0 U 0.545.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Bromomethane
5.0 U 0.445.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Carbon disulfide
5.0 U 0.375.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Carbon tetrachloride
5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.555.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chlorodibromomethane
5.0 U 0.865.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chloroethane
5.0 U 0.295.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chloroform
5.0 U 0.415.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chloromethane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10 U 0.3310 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Cyclohexane
5.0 U 0.285.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Dichlorobromomethane
5.0 U 0.505.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Dichlorodifluoromethane
5.0 U 0.265.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Ethylbenzene
5.0 U 0.505.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Ethylene Dibromide
5.0 U 0.165.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Isopropylbenzene
10 U 1.410 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Methyl acetate
5.0 U 0.435.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Methyl tert-butyl ether
10 U 0.3110 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Methylcyclohexane
5.0 U 0.675.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Methylene Chloride
5.0 U 0.155.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Styrene
5.0 U 0.525.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Tetrachloroethene
5.0 U 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Toluene
5.0 U 0.415.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.0 U 0.545.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
5.0 U 0.425.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Trichloroethene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Trichlorofluoromethane
5.0 U 0.395.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Vinyl chloride
10 U 0.3510 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Xylenes, Total
TestAmerica Canton
Page 36 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124052/6
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124052
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 96 58 - 123 03/26/14 13:00 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
81 03/26/14 13:00 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 52 - 136
91 03/26/14 13:00 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 37 - 132
90 03/26/14 13:00 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124052/5
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124052
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 50.0 55.3 ug/Kg 111 77 - 126
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.0 50.5 ug/Kg 101 77 - 123
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroetha
ne
50.0 51.7 ug/Kg 103 80 - 138
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 50.0 49.7 ug/Kg 99 80 - 120
1,1-Dichloroethane 50.0 53.2 ug/Kg 106 76 - 120
1,1-Dichloroethene 50.0 52.2 ug/Kg 104 75 - 135
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 50.0 49.7 ug/Kg 99 64 - 124
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 50.0 51.2 ug/Kg 102 61 - 132
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 48.6 ug/Kg 97 76 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane 50.0 47.7 ug/Kg 95 72 - 120
1,2-Dichloropropane 50.0 48.4 ug/Kg 97 80 - 120
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 49.6 ug/Kg 99 78 - 120
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 47.5 ug/Kg 95 75 - 120
2-Butanone (MEK) 100 91.0 ug/Kg 91 52 - 131
2-Hexanone 100 89.1 ug/Kg 89 64 - 136
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 100 96.0 ug/Kg 96 67 - 135
Acetone 100 98.3 ug/Kg 98 41 - 137
Benzene 50.0 50.4 ug/Kg 101 79 - 120
Bromoform 50.0 48.6 ug/Kg 97 62 - 133
Bromomethane 50.0 62.1 ug/Kg 124 42 - 136
Carbon disulfide 50.0 55.2 ug/Kg 110 62 - 146
Carbon tetrachloride 50.0 60.8 ug/Kg 122 71 - 129
Chlorobenzene 50.0 49.3 ug/Kg 99 78 - 120
Chloroethane 50.0 45.4 ug/Kg 91 58 - 120
Chloroform 50.0 52.4 ug/Kg 105 77 - 120
Chloromethane 50.0 42.6 ug/Kg 85 50 - 120
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.0 50.8 ug/Kg 102 76 - 120
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.0 51.3 ug/Kg 103 74 - 128
Cyclohexane 50.0 54.5 ug/Kg 109 66 - 120
Dichlorobromomethane 50.0 51.4 ug/Kg 103 80 - 122
Dichlorodifluoromethane 50.0 36.6 ug/Kg 73 26 - 120
Ethylbenzene 50.0 52.5 ug/Kg 105 79 - 120
Ethylene Dibromide 50.0 49.0 ug/Kg 98 80 - 120
Isopropylbenzene 50.0 55.8 ug/Kg 112 76 - 122
Methyl acetate 250 244 ug/Kg 97 57 - 130
Methyl tert-butyl ether 50.0 49.0 ug/Kg 98 49 - 165
Methylcyclohexane 50.0 51.6 ug/Kg 103 70 - 126
TestAmerica Canton
Page 37 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124052/5
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124052
Methylene Chloride 50.0 56.1 ug/Kg 112 75 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
m-Xylene & p-Xylene 50.0 51.6 ug/Kg 103 80 - 120
o-Xylene 50.0 52.7 ug/Kg 105 80 - 120
Styrene 50.0 49.3 ug/Kg 99 80 - 120
Tetrachloroethene 50.0 54.2 ug/Kg 108 79 - 120
Toluene 50.0 48.7 ug/Kg 97 75 - 120
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.0 54.2 ug/Kg 108 78 - 120
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.0 52.3 ug/Kg 105 73 - 131
Trichloroethene 50.0 57.1 ug/Kg 114 79 - 120
Trichlorofluoromethane 50.0 43.2 ug/Kg 86 57 - 146
Vinyl chloride 50.0 44.4 ug/Kg 89 57 - 120
Xylenes, Total 100 104 ug/Kg 104 80 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 58 - 123
Surrogate
91
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
834-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 52 - 136
94Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 37 - 132
90Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124658/4
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124658
1,1-Dichloroethene 1.00 0.886 mg/L 89 71 - 133
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane 1.00 0.976 mg/L 98 80 - 120
2-Butanone (MEK) 2.00 1.93 mg/L 96 49 - 120
Benzene 1.00 0.969 mg/L 97 80 - 120
Carbon tetrachloride 1.00 0.988 mg/L 99 54 - 122
Chlorobenzene 1.00 0.970 mg/L 97 80 - 120
Chloroform 1.00 0.908 mg/L 91 80 - 123
Tetrachloroethene 1.00 0.940 mg/L 94 79 - 134
Trichloroethene 1.00 0.962 mg/L 96 78 - 130
Vinyl chloride 1.00 0.792 mg/L 79 56 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 80 - 121
Surrogate
84
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
904-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 70 - 124
91Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 80 - 128
100Toluene-d8 (Surr) 80 - 120
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124562/1-A MB
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124658
RL MDL
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.025 U 0.025 0.0095 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.025 U 0.0110.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 11,2-Dichloroethane
TestAmerica Canton
Page 38 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124562/1-A MB
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124658
RL MDL
2-Butanone (MEK) 0.25 U 0.25 0.029 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.025 U 0.00650.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Benzene
0.025 U 0.00650.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Carbon tetrachloride
0.025 U 0.00750.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Chlorobenzene
0.025 U 0.00800.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Chloroform
0.025 U 0.0150.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Tetrachloroethene
0.025 U 0.00850.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Trichloroethene
0.025 U 0.0110.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Vinyl chloride
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 84 80 - 121 03/31/14 16:13 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
85 03/31/14 16:13 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 70 - 124
89 03/31/14 16:13 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 80 - 128
97 03/31/14 16:13 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 80 - 120
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123875/23-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124196 Prep Batch: 123875
RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 50 U 50 3.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
150 U 25150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol
150 U 8.9150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol
150 U 20150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12,4-Dichlorophenol
150 U 20150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12,4-Dimethylphenol
330 U 21330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12,4-Dinitrophenol
200 U 17200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12,4-Dinitrotoluene
200 U 21200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12,6-Dinitrotoluene
50 U 0.4550 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12-Chloronaphthalene
50 U 8.250 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12-Chlorophenol
6.7 U 0.506.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12-Methylnaphthalene
200 U 11200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12-Methylphenol
200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12-Nitroaniline
50 U 8.350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12-Nitrophenol
400 U 20400 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 13 & 4 Methylphenol
100 U 18100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 13,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
200 U 16200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 13-Nitroaniline
150 U 9.2150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 14,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 14-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
150 U 21150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 14-Chloro-3-methylphenol
150 U 17150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 14-Chloroaniline
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 14-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
200 U 26200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 14-Nitroaniline
330 U 17330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 14-Nitrophenol
6.7 U 0.766.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Acenaphthene
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Acenaphthylene
TestAmerica Canton
Page 39 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123875/23-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124196 Prep Batch: 123875
RL MDL
Acetophenone 100 U 100 9.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
6.7 U 0.786.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Anthracene
200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Atrazine
100 U 12100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Benzaldehyde
6.7 U 0.636.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Benzo[a]anthracene
6.7 U 0.646.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Benzo[a]pyrene
6.7 U 0.596.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Benzo[b]fluoranthene
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
6.7 U 0.686.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Benzo[k]fluoranthene
100 U 9.5100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
100 U 22100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
100 U 2.0100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
26.8 J 1970 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
70 U 1070 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Butyl benzyl phthalate
330 U 37330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Caprolactam
50 U 2750 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Carbazole
6.7 U 1.16.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Chrysene
6.7 U 0.666.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
50 U 0.6650 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Dibenzofuran
16.5 J 1670 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Diethyl phthalate
70 U 1770 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Dimethyl phthalate
17.3 J 1570 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Di-n-butyl phthalate
70 U 7.970 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Di-n-octyl phthalate
6.7 U 0.556.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Fluoranthene
6.7 U 0.536.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Fluorene
6.7 U 2.16.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Hexachlorobenzene
50 U 5.650 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Hexachlorobutadiene
330 U 8.1330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
50 U 9.050 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Hexachloroethane
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Isophorone
6.7 U 0.826.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Naphthalene
100 U 2.2100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Nitrobenzene
50 U 6.350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
50 U 2150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
150 U 9.1150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Pentachlorophenol
6.7 U 0.736.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Phenanthrene
50 U 7.350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Phenol
6.7 U 0.446.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Pyrene
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 55 10 - 110 03/27/14 11:05 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/25/14 09:59
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
79 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 24 - 110
79 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12-Fluorophenol (Surr) 24 - 110
77 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
80 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110
108 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 40 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123875/24-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124196 Prep Batch: 123875
1,1'-Biphenyl 667 518 ug/Kg 78 35 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 667 563 ug/Kg 84 25 - 110
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 667 553 ug/Kg 83 12 - 110
2,4-Dichlorophenol 667 540 ug/Kg 81 39 - 110
2,4-Dimethylphenol 667 613 ug/Kg 92 29 - 110
2,4-Dinitrophenol 1330 404 ug/Kg 30 10 - 110
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 667 580 ug/Kg 87 48 - 110
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 667 571 ug/Kg 86 45 - 110
2-Chloronaphthalene 667 522 ug/Kg 78 32 - 110
2-Chlorophenol 667 537 ug/Kg 81 37 - 110
2-Methylnaphthalene 667 527 ug/Kg 79 36 - 110
2-Methylphenol 667 534 ug/Kg 80 41 - 110
2-Nitroaniline 667 561 ug/Kg 84 45 - 110
2-Nitrophenol 667 515 ug/Kg 77 34 - 110
3 & 4 Methylphenol 667 555 ug/Kg 83 40 - 110
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1330 967 ug/Kg 73 28 - 110
3-Nitroaniline 667 494 ug/Kg 74 44 - 110
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1330 583 ug/Kg 44 10 - 110
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 667 529 ug/Kg 79 39 - 110
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 667 570 ug/Kg 85 48 - 110
4-Chloroaniline 667 442 ug/Kg 66 30 - 110
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 667 548 ug/Kg 82 40 - 110
4-Nitroaniline 667 566 ug/Kg 85 48 - 110
4-Nitrophenol 1330 1230 ug/Kg 92 28 - 110
Acenaphthene 667 542 ug/Kg 81 38 - 110
Acenaphthylene 667 514 ug/Kg 77 40 - 110
Acetophenone 667 530 ug/Kg 79 40 - 110
Anthracene 667 571 ug/Kg 86 48 - 110
Atrazine 1330 1300 ug/Kg 97 66 - 127
Benzaldehyde 1330 1140 ug/Kg 86 32 - 110
Benzo[a]anthracene 667 548 ug/Kg 82 50 - 110
Benzo[a]pyrene 667 590 ug/Kg 88 44 - 110
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 667 595 ug/Kg 89 43 - 110
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 667 511 ug/Kg 77 51 - 110
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 667 572 ug/Kg 86 38 - 105
bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 667 523 ug/Kg 78 29 - 110
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 667 536 ug/Kg 80 32 - 110
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 667 529 ug/Kg 79 34 - 110
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 667 627 ug/Kg 94 50 - 110
Butyl benzyl phthalate 667 609 ug/Kg 91 51 - 110
Caprolactam 1330 1180 ug/Kg 89 44 - 114
Carbazole 667 563 ug/Kg 84 50 - 110
Chrysene 667 553 ug/Kg 83 50 - 110
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 667 451 ug/Kg 68 51 - 110
Dibenzofuran 667 529 ug/Kg 79 43 - 110
Diethyl phthalate 667 588 ug/Kg 88 52 - 110
Dimethyl phthalate 667 564 ug/Kg 85 50 - 110
Di-n-butyl phthalate 667 584 ug/Kg 88 51 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 41 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123875/24-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124196 Prep Batch: 123875
Di-n-octyl phthalate 667 553 ug/Kg 83 48 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Fluoranthene 667 555 ug/Kg 83 51 - 110
Fluorene 667 552 ug/Kg 83 46 - 110
Hexachlorobenzene 667 506 ug/Kg 76 43 - 110
Hexachlorobutadiene 667 522 ug/Kg 78 29 - 110
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 667 315 J ug/Kg 47 12 - 110
Hexachloroethane 667 514 ug/Kg 77 30 - 110
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 667 466 ug/Kg 70 50 - 110
Isophorone 667 511 ug/Kg 77 36 - 110
Naphthalene 667 522 ug/Kg 78 36 - 110
Nitrobenzene 667 529 ug/Kg 79 32 - 110
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 667 546 ug/Kg 82 38 - 110
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1330 1080 ug/Kg 81 46 - 110
Pentachlorophenol 1330 938 ug/Kg 70 10 - 110
Phenanthrene 667 538 ug/Kg 81 49 - 110
Phenol 667 545 ug/Kg 82 38 - 110
Pyrene 667 585 ug/Kg 88 49 - 110
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
Surrogate
82
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
762-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 24 - 110
802-Fluorophenol (Surr) 24 - 110
75Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
80Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110
94Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124042/19-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124330 Prep Batch: 124042
RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 50 U 50 3.5 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
150 U 25150 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol
150 U 8.9150 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol
150 U 20150 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12,4-Dichlorophenol
150 U 20150 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12,4-Dimethylphenol
330 U 21330 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12,4-Dinitrophenol
200 U 17200 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12,4-Dinitrotoluene
200 U 21200 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12,6-Dinitrotoluene
50 U 0.4550 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12-Chloronaphthalene
50 U 8.250 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12-Chlorophenol
6.7 U 0.506.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12-Methylnaphthalene
200 U 11200 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12-Methylphenol
200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12-Nitroaniline
50 U 8.350 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12-Nitrophenol
400 U 20400 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 13 & 4 Methylphenol
100 U 18100 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 13,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
200 U 16200 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 13-Nitroaniline
TestAmerica Canton
Page 42 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124042/19-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124330 Prep Batch: 124042
RL MDL
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 150 U 150 9.2 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 14-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
150 U 21150 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 14-Chloro-3-methylphenol
150 U 17150 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 14-Chloroaniline
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 14-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
200 U 26200 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 14-Nitroaniline
330 U 17330 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 14-Nitrophenol
6.7 U 0.766.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Acenaphthene
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Acenaphthylene
100 U 9.2100 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Acetophenone
6.7 U 0.786.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Anthracene
200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Atrazine
100 U 12100 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Benzaldehyde
6.7 U 0.636.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Benzo[a]anthracene
6.7 U 0.646.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Benzo[a]pyrene
6.7 U 0.596.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Benzo[b]fluoranthene
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
6.7 U 0.686.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Benzo[k]fluoranthene
100 U 9.5100 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
100 U 22100 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
100 U 2.0100 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
19.5 J 1970 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
70 U 1070 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Butyl benzyl phthalate
330 U 37330 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Caprolactam
50 U 2750 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Carbazole
6.7 U 1.16.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Chrysene
6.7 U 0.666.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
50 U 0.6650 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Dibenzofuran
70 U 1670 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Diethyl phthalate
70 U 1770 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Dimethyl phthalate
16.2 J 1570 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Di-n-butyl phthalate
70 U 7.970 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Di-n-octyl phthalate
6.7 U 0.556.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Fluoranthene
6.7 U 0.536.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Fluorene
6.7 U 2.16.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Hexachlorobenzene
50 U 5.650 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Hexachlorobutadiene
330 U 8.1330 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
50 U 9.050 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Hexachloroethane
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Isophorone
6.7 U 0.826.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Naphthalene
100 U 2.2100 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Nitrobenzene
50 U 6.350 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
50 U 2150 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
150 U 9.1150 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Pentachlorophenol
6.7 U 0.736.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Phenanthrene
50 U 7.350 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Phenol
6.7 U 0.446.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Pyrene
TestAmerica Canton
Page 43 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124042/19-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124330 Prep Batch: 124042
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 87 10 - 110 03/28/14 08:35 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/26/14 10:35
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
87 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 24 - 110
83 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12-Fluorophenol (Surr) 24 - 110
88 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
85 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110
92 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124042/20-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124330 Prep Batch: 124042
1,1'-Biphenyl 667 507 ug/Kg 76 35 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 667 491 ug/Kg 74 25 - 110
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 667 499 ug/Kg 75 12 - 110
2,4-Dichlorophenol 667 538 ug/Kg 81 39 - 110
2,4-Dimethylphenol 667 517 ug/Kg 78 29 - 110
2,4-Dinitrophenol 1330 395 ug/Kg 30 10 - 110
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 667 560 ug/Kg 84 48 - 110
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 667 548 ug/Kg 82 45 - 110
2-Chloronaphthalene 667 506 ug/Kg 76 32 - 110
2-Chlorophenol 667 526 ug/Kg 79 37 - 110
2-Methylnaphthalene 667 532 ug/Kg 80 36 - 110
2-Methylphenol 667 505 ug/Kg 76 41 - 110
2-Nitroaniline 667 594 ug/Kg 89 45 - 110
2-Nitrophenol 667 551 ug/Kg 83 34 - 110
3 & 4 Methylphenol 667 514 ug/Kg 77 40 - 110
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1330 916 ug/Kg 69 28 - 110
3-Nitroaniline 667 538 ug/Kg 81 44 - 110
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1330 677 ug/Kg 51 10 - 110
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 667 462 ug/Kg 69 39 - 110
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 667 570 ug/Kg 86 48 - 110
4-Chloroaniline 667 447 ug/Kg 67 30 - 110
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 667 516 ug/Kg 77 40 - 110
4-Nitroaniline 667 534 ug/Kg 80 48 - 110
4-Nitrophenol 1330 1220 ug/Kg 91 28 - 110
Acenaphthene 667 512 ug/Kg 77 38 - 110
Acenaphthylene 667 485 ug/Kg 73 40 - 110
Acetophenone 667 532 ug/Kg 80 40 - 110
Anthracene 667 469 ug/Kg 70 48 - 110
Atrazine 1330 1100 ug/Kg 82 66 - 127
Benzaldehyde 1330 1250 ug/Kg 94 32 - 110
Benzo[a]anthracene 667 488 ug/Kg 73 50 - 110
Benzo[a]pyrene 667 485 ug/Kg 73 44 - 110
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 667 485 ug/Kg 73 43 - 110
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 667 504 ug/Kg 76 51 - 110
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 667 504 ug/Kg 76 38 - 105
bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 667 589 ug/Kg 88 29 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 44 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124042/20-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124330 Prep Batch: 124042
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 667 567 ug/Kg 85 32 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 667 555 ug/Kg 83 34 - 110
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 667 564 ug/Kg 85 50 - 110
Butyl benzyl phthalate 667 529 ug/Kg 79 51 - 110
Caprolactam 1330 1100 ug/Kg 82 44 - 114
Carbazole 667 485 ug/Kg 73 50 - 110
Chrysene 667 477 ug/Kg 72 50 - 110
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 667 507 ug/Kg 76 51 - 110
Dibenzofuran 667 500 ug/Kg 75 43 - 110
Diethyl phthalate 667 560 ug/Kg 84 52 - 110
Dimethyl phthalate 667 555 ug/Kg 83 50 - 110
Di-n-butyl phthalate 667 539 ug/Kg 81 51 - 110
Di-n-octyl phthalate 667 531 ug/Kg 80 48 - 110
Fluoranthene 667 486 ug/Kg 73 51 - 110
Fluorene 667 507 ug/Kg 76 46 - 110
Hexachlorobenzene 667 491 ug/Kg 74 43 - 110
Hexachlorobutadiene 667 588 ug/Kg 88 29 - 110
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 667 360 ug/Kg 54 12 - 110
Hexachloroethane 667 547 ug/Kg 82 30 - 110
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 667 497 ug/Kg 75 50 - 110
Isophorone 667 562 ug/Kg 84 36 - 110
Naphthalene 667 519 ug/Kg 78 36 - 110
Nitrobenzene 667 579 ug/Kg 87 32 - 110
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 667 573 ug/Kg 86 38 - 110
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1330 959 ug/Kg 72 46 - 110
Pentachlorophenol 1330 783 ug/Kg 59 10 - 110
Phenanthrene 667 469 ug/Kg 70 49 - 110
Phenol 667 542 ug/Kg 81 38 - 110
Pyrene 667 494 ug/Kg 74 49 - 110
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
Surrogate
79
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
762-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 24 - 110
762-Fluorophenol (Surr) 24 - 110
84Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
76Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110
84Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124303/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124491 Prep Batch: 124303
RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 50 U 50 3.5 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
150 U 25150 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol
150 U 8.9150 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol
150 U 20150 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 12,4-Dichlorophenol
150 U 20150 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 12,4-Dimethylphenol
TestAmerica Canton
Page 45 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124303/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124491 Prep Batch: 124303
RL MDL
2,4-Dinitrophenol 330 U 330 21 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
200 U 17200 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 12,4-Dinitrotoluene
200 U 21200 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 12,6-Dinitrotoluene
50 U 0.4550 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 12-Chloronaphthalene
50 U 8.250 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 12-Chlorophenol
6.7 U 0.506.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 12-Methylnaphthalene
200 U 11200 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 12-Methylphenol
200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 12-Nitroaniline
50 U 8.350 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 12-Nitrophenol
400 U 20400 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 13 & 4 Methylphenol
100 U 18100 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 13,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
200 U 16200 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 13-Nitroaniline
150 U 9.2150 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 14,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 14-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
150 U 21150 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 14-Chloro-3-methylphenol
150 U 17150 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 14-Chloroaniline
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 14-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
200 U 26200 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 14-Nitroaniline
330 U 17330 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 14-Nitrophenol
6.7 U 0.766.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Acenaphthene
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Acenaphthylene
100 U 9.2100 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Acetophenone
6.7 U 0.786.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Anthracene
200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Atrazine
100 U 12100 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Benzaldehyde
6.7 U 0.636.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Benzo[a]anthracene
6.7 U 0.646.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Benzo[a]pyrene
6.7 U 0.596.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Benzo[b]fluoranthene
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
6.7 U 0.686.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Benzo[k]fluoranthene
100 U 9.5100 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
100 U 22100 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
100 U 2.0100 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
70 U 1970 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
70 U 1070 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Butyl benzyl phthalate
330 U 37330 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Caprolactam
50 U 2750 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Carbazole
6.7 U 1.16.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Chrysene
6.7 U 0.666.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
50 U 0.6650 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Dibenzofuran
70 U 1670 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Diethyl phthalate
70 U 1770 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Dimethyl phthalate
70 U 1570 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Di-n-butyl phthalate
70 U 7.970 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Di-n-octyl phthalate
6.7 U 0.556.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Fluoranthene
6.7 U 0.536.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Fluorene
6.7 U 2.16.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Hexachlorobenzene
50 U 5.650 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Hexachlorobutadiene
TestAmerica Canton
Page 46 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124303/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124491 Prep Batch: 124303
RL MDL
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 330 U 330 8.1 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
50 U 9.050 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Hexachloroethane
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Isophorone
6.7 U 0.826.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Naphthalene
100 U 2.2100 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Nitrobenzene
50 U 6.350 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
50 U 2150 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
150 U 9.1150 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Pentachlorophenol
6.7 U 0.736.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Phenanthrene
50 U 7.350 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Phenol
6.7 U 0.446.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Pyrene
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 65 10 - 110 03/30/14 11:32 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/27/14 15:55
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
80 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 12-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 24 - 110
74 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 12-Fluorophenol (Surr) 24 - 110
83 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
76 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110
88 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124303/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124491 Prep Batch: 124303
1,1'-Biphenyl 667 575 ug/Kg 86 35 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 667 577 ug/Kg 87 25 - 110
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 667 564 ug/Kg 85 12 - 110
2,4-Dichlorophenol 667 582 ug/Kg 87 39 - 110
2,4-Dimethylphenol 667 586 ug/Kg 88 29 - 110
2,4-Dinitrophenol 1330 425 ug/Kg 32 10 - 110
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 667 626 ug/Kg 94 48 - 110
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 667 619 ug/Kg 93 45 - 110
2-Chloronaphthalene 667 563 ug/Kg 84 32 - 110
2-Chlorophenol 667 574 ug/Kg 86 37 - 110
2-Methylnaphthalene 667 574 ug/Kg 86 36 - 110
2-Methylphenol 667 568 ug/Kg 85 41 - 110
2-Nitroaniline 667 696 ug/Kg 104 45 - 110
2-Nitrophenol 667 583 ug/Kg 87 34 - 110
3 & 4 Methylphenol 667 569 ug/Kg 85 40 - 110
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1330 1000 ug/Kg 75 28 - 110
3-Nitroaniline 667 589 ug/Kg 88 44 - 110
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1330 728 ug/Kg 55 10 - 110
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 667 507 ug/Kg 76 39 - 110
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 667 622 ug/Kg 93 48 - 110
4-Chloroaniline 667 472 ug/Kg 71 30 - 110
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 667 556 ug/Kg 83 40 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 47 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124303/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124491 Prep Batch: 124303
4-Nitroaniline 667 614 ug/Kg 92 48 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
4-Nitrophenol 1330 1420 ug/Kg 107 28 - 110
Acenaphthene 667 575 ug/Kg 86 38 - 110
Acenaphthylene 667 546 ug/Kg 82 40 - 110
Acetophenone 667 588 ug/Kg 88 40 - 110
Anthracene 667 512 ug/Kg 77 48 - 110
Atrazine 1330 1200 ug/Kg 90 66 - 127
Benzaldehyde 1330 1410 ug/Kg 106 32 - 110
Benzo[a]anthracene 667 540 ug/Kg 81 50 - 110
Benzo[a]pyrene 667 540 ug/Kg 81 44 - 110
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 667 535 ug/Kg 80 43 - 110
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 667 550 ug/Kg 83 51 - 110
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 667 554 ug/Kg 83 38 - 105
bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 667 676 ug/Kg 101 29 - 110
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 667 615 ug/Kg 92 32 - 110
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 667 615 ug/Kg 92 34 - 110
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 667 585 ug/Kg 88 50 - 110
Butyl benzyl phthalate 667 573 ug/Kg 86 51 - 110
Caprolactam 1330 1210 ug/Kg 91 44 - 114
Carbazole 667 535 ug/Kg 80 50 - 110
Chrysene 667 531 ug/Kg 80 50 - 110
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 667 559 ug/Kg 84 51 - 110
Dibenzofuran 667 559 ug/Kg 84 43 - 110
Diethyl phthalate 667 634 ug/Kg 95 52 - 110
Dimethyl phthalate 667 619 ug/Kg 93 50 - 110
Di-n-butyl phthalate 667 585 ug/Kg 88 51 - 110
Di-n-octyl phthalate 667 573 ug/Kg 86 48 - 110
Fluoranthene 667 530 ug/Kg 79 51 - 110
Fluorene 667 568 ug/Kg 85 46 - 110
Hexachlorobenzene 667 531 ug/Kg 80 43 - 110
Hexachlorobutadiene 667 618 ug/Kg 93 29 - 110
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 667 410 ug/Kg 62 12 - 110
Hexachloroethane 667 611 ug/Kg 92 30 - 110
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 667 546 ug/Kg 82 50 - 110
Isophorone 667 615 ug/Kg 92 36 - 110
Naphthalene 667 556 ug/Kg 83 36 - 110
Nitrobenzene 667 662 ug/Kg 99 32 - 110
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 667 643 ug/Kg 96 38 - 110
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1330 1030 ug/Kg 77 46 - 110
Pentachlorophenol 1330 787 ug/Kg 59 10 - 110
Phenanthrene 667 500 ug/Kg 75 49 - 110
Phenol 667 607 ug/Kg 91 38 - 110
Pyrene 667 556 ug/Kg 83 49 - 110
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
Surrogate
87
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
882-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 24 - 110
852-Fluorophenol (Surr) 24 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 48 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124303/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124491 Prep Batch: 124303
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
Surrogate
93
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
86Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110
95Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124527/13-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125096 Prep Batch: 124527
RL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.020 U 0.000300.020 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0.020 U 0.000240.020 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0.020 U 0.000250.020 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 12,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.0040 U 0.000170.0040 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 12-Methylphenol
0.020 U 0.000350.020 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Pyridine
0.040 U 0.000800.040 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 13 & 4 Methylphenol
0.020 U 0.0000850.020 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Hexachlorobenzene
0.020 U 0.000270.020 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Hexachlorobutadiene
0.020 U 0.000190.020 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Hexachloroethane
0.0040 U 0.0000400.0040 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Nitrobenzene
0.040 U 0.000270.040 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 80 15 - 110 04/03/14 13:17 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/31/14 07:11
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
71 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 12-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 27 - 110
52 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 12-Fluorophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
68 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 27 - 110
66 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
98 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124527/14-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125096 Prep Batch: 124527
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0800 0.0563 mg/L 70 16 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.0800 0.0705 mg/L 88 35 - 110
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.0800 0.0683 mg/L 85 36 - 110
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.0800 0.0797 mg/L 100 49 - 110
2-Methylphenol 0.0800 0.0587 mg/L 73 36 - 114
Pyridine 0.0800 0.0557 mg/L 70 34 - 110
3 & 4 Methylphenol 0.0800 0.0600 mg/L 75 38 - 110
Hexachlorobenzene 0.0800 0.0679 mg/L 85 44 - 110
Hexachlorobutadiene 0.0800 0.0578 mg/L 72 35 - 110
Hexachloroethane 0.0800 0.0552 mg/L 69 34 - 110
Nitrobenzene 0.0800 0.0625 mg/L 78 43 - 110
Pentachlorophenol 0.160 0.123 mg/L 77 10 - 122
TestAmerica Canton
Page 49 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124527/14-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125096 Prep Batch: 124527
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 15 - 110
Surrogate
95
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
782-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 27 - 110
312-Fluorophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
72Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 27 - 110
67Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
100Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124048/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124359 Prep Batch: 124048
RL MDL
Aluminum 20 U 20 9.6 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
1.0 U 0.391.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Antimony
1.0 U 0.301.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Arsenic
0.170 J 0.1220 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Barium
0.50 U 0.0430.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Beryllium
0.20 U 0.0360.20 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Cadmium
500 U 29500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Calcium
0.50 U 0.200.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Chromium
5.0 U 0.165.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Cobalt
2.5 U 0.742.5 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Copper
10 U 4.910 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Iron
0.30 U 0.190.30 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Lead
500 U 6.5500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Magnesium
1.5 U 0.161.5 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Manganese
4.0 U 0.544.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Nickel
12.8 J 6.2500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Potassium
0.50 U 0.450.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Selenium
0.50 U 0.100.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Silver
500 U 66500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Sodium
1.0 U 0.551.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Thallium
5.0 U 0.215.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Vanadium
2.0 U 1.02.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Zinc
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124048/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124359 Prep Batch: 124048
Aluminum 200 191 mg/Kg 95 80 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Antimony 50.0 46.7 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120
Arsenic 200 188 mg/Kg 94 80 - 120
Barium 200 192 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120
Beryllium 5.00 4.52 mg/Kg 90 80 - 120
Cadmium 5.00 4.76 mg/Kg 95 80 - 120
TestAmerica Canton
Page 50 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124048/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124359 Prep Batch: 124048
Calcium 5000 4660 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Chromium 20.0 19.3 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120
Cobalt 50.0 46.0 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Copper 25.0 23.3 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120
Iron 100 106 mg/Kg 106 80 - 120
Lead 50.0 46.2 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Magnesium 5000 4600 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Manganese 50.0 48.0 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120
Nickel 50.0 46.2 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Potassium 5000 4650 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120
Selenium 200 183 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Silver 5.00 4.92 mg/Kg 98 80 - 120
Sodium 5000 4670 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120
Thallium 200 185 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Vanadium 50.0 46.7 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120
Zinc 50.0 46.1 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124584/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124741 Prep Batch: 124584
RL MDL
Arsenic 0.50 U 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.00102 J 0.0006710 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Barium
0.10 U 0.000660.10 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Cadmium
0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Chromium
0.50 U 0.00190.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Lead
0.25 U 0.00410.25 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Selenium
0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Silver
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124584/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124741 Prep Batch: 124584
Arsenic 2.00 2.02 mg/L 101 50 - 150
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Barium 2.00 1.85 J mg/L 93 50 - 150
Cadmium 0.0500 0.0499 J mg/L 100 50 - 150
Chromium 0.200 0.193 J mg/L 96 50 - 150
Lead 0.500 0.447 J mg/L 89 50 - 150
Selenium 2.00 2.09 mg/L 105 50 - 150
Silver 0.0500 0.0529 J mg/L 106 50 - 150
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124505/1-D
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124741 Prep Batch: 124584
RL MDL
Arsenic 0.50 U 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1
LB LB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 51 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124505/1-D
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124741 Prep Batch: 124584
RL MDL
Barium 0.00218 J 10 0.00067 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1
LB LB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.10 U 0.000660.10 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Cadmium
0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Chromium
0.50 U 0.00190.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Lead
0.00562 J 0.00410.25 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Selenium
0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Silver
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124593/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124820 Prep Batch: 124593
RL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 08:58 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124593/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124820 Prep Batch: 124593
Mercury 0.00500 0.00485 mg/L 97 50 - 150
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124505/1-E
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124820 Prep Batch: 124593
RL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 08:56 1
LB LB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124076/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124236 Prep Batch: 124076
RL MDL
Mercury 0.10 U 0.10 0.015 mg/Kg 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 08:54 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124076/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124236 Prep Batch: 124076
Mercury 0.833 0.856 mg/Kg 103 73 - 121
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
TestAmerica Canton
Page 52 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
GC/MS VOA
Prep Batch: 123823
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 5035240-35338-1 BW7 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 5035240-35338-7 BW8 4-6 Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124052
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8260B 123823240-35338-1 BW7 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 8260B 123823240-35338-7 BW8 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 8260BLCS 240-124052/5 Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8260BMB 240-124052/6 Method Blank Total/NA
Leach Batch: 124562
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 1311240-35338-3 BW7 4-6 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP
Solid 1311LB 240-124562/1-A MB Method Blank TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124658
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8260B 124562240-35338-3 BW7 4-6 TCLP
Solid 8260B 124562240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP
Solid 8260B 124562LB 240-124562/1-A MB Method Blank TCLP
Solid 8260BLCS 240-124658/4 Lab Control Sample Total/NA
GC/MS Semi VOA
Prep Batch: 123875
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3540C240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 Total/NA
Solid 3540C240-35338-8 BW8 6-8 Total/NA
Solid 3540CLCS 240-123875/24-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3540CMB 240-123875/23-A Method Blank Total/NA
Prep Batch: 124042
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3540C240-35338-7 BW8 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 3540CLCS 240-124042/20-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3540CMB 240-124042/19-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124196
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 123875240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 Total/NA
Solid 8270C 123875240-35338-8 BW8 6-8 Total/NA
Solid 8270C 123875LCS 240-123875/24-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8270C 123875MB 240-123875/23-A Method Blank Total/NA
Prep Batch: 124303
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3540C240-35338-1 BW7 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 3540CLCS 240-124303/3-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3540CMB 240-124303/2-A Method Blank Total/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 53 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
GC/MS Semi VOA (Continued)
Analysis Batch: 124330
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 124042240-35338-7 BW8 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 8270C 124042LCS 240-124042/20-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8270C 124042MB 240-124042/19-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124491
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 124303240-35338-1 BW7 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 8270C 124303LCS 240-124303/3-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8270C 124303MB 240-124303/2-A Method Blank Total/NA
Leach Batch: 124505
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 1311240-35338-2 BW7 4-6 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP
Prep Batch: 124527
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3520C 124505240-35338-2 BW7 4-6 TCLP
Solid 3520C 124505240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 TCLP
Solid 3520C 124505240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2 TCLP
Solid 3520C 124505240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP
Solid 3520CLCS 240-124527/14-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3520CMB 240-124527/13-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124918
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 124527240-35338-2 BW7 4-6 TCLP
Solid 8270C 124527240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 TCLP
Solid 8270C 124527240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2 TCLP
Solid 8270C 124527240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP
Analysis Batch: 125096
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 124527LCS 240-124527/14-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8270C 124527MB 240-124527/13-A Method Blank Total/NA
Metals
Prep Batch: 124048
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3050B240-35338-1 BW7 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 3050B240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 Total/NA
Solid 3050B240-35338-7 BW8 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 3050B240-35338-8 BW8 6-8 Total/NA
Solid 3050BLCS 240-124048/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3050BMB 240-124048/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 54 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Metals (Continued)
Prep Batch: 124076
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7471A240-35338-1 BW7 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 7471A240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 Total/NA
Solid 7471A240-35338-7 BW8 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 7471A240-35338-8 BW8 6-8 Total/NA
Solid 7471ALCS 240-124076/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 7471AMB 240-124076/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124236
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7471A 124076240-35338-1 BW7 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 124076240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 124076240-35338-7 BW8 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 124076240-35338-8 BW8 6-8 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 124076LCS 240-124076/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 7471A 124076MB 240-124076/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124359
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 6010B 124048240-35338-1 BW7 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 124048240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 124048240-35338-7 BW8 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 124048240-35338-8 BW8 6-8 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 124048LCS 240-124048/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 6010B 124048MB 240-124048/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Leach Batch: 124505
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 1311240-35338-2 BW7 4-6 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP
Solid 1311LB 240-124505/1-D Method Blank TCLP
Solid 1311LB 240-124505/1-E Method Blank TCLP
Prep Batch: 124584
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3010A 124505240-35338-2 BW7 4-6 TCLP
Solid 3010A 124505240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 TCLP
Solid 3010A 124505240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2 TCLP
Solid 3010A 124505240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP
Solid 3010A 124505LB 240-124505/1-D Method Blank TCLP
Solid 3010ALCS 240-124584/3-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3010AMB 240-124584/2-A Method Blank Total/NA
Prep Batch: 124593
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7470A 124505240-35338-2 BW7 4-6 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124505240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124505240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124505240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124505LB 240-124505/1-E Method Blank TCLP
TestAmerica Canton
Page 55 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Metals (Continued)
Prep Batch: 124593 (Continued)
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7470ALCS 240-124593/3-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 7470AMB 240-124593/2-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124741
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 6010B 124584240-35338-2 BW7 4-6 TCLP
Solid 6010B 124584240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 TCLP
Solid 6010B 124584240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2 TCLP
Solid 6010B 124584240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP
Solid 6010B 124584LB 240-124505/1-D Method Blank TCLP
Solid 6010B 124584LCS 240-124584/3-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 6010B 124584MB 240-124584/2-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124820
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7470A 124593240-35338-2 BW7 4-6 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124593240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124593240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124593240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124593LB 240-124505/1-E Method Blank TCLP
Solid 7470A 124593LCS 240-124593/3-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 7470A 124593MB 240-124593/2-A Method Blank Total/NA
General Chemistry
Analysis Batch: 123764
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid Moisture240-35338-1 BW7 2-4 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35338-1 DU BW7 2-4 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35338-7 BW8 4-6 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35338-8 BW8 6-8 Total/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 56 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Lab ChronicleClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW7 2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-1Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 08:15
Percent Solids: 87.2Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Prep 5035 03/24/14 13:45 TJL2123823 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8260B 1 124052 03/26/14 22:40 SAM TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3540C 124303 03/27/14 15:55 KEC TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 8270C 2 124491 03/30/14 14:18 MRU TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 124048 03/26/14 10:45 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124359 03/27/14 14:15 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 7471A 124076 03/26/14 14:45 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 7471A 1 124236 03/27/14 09:30 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123764 03/24/14 15:29 NJE TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW7 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 08:17
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ124505 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Prep 3520C 124527 03/31/14 07:11 CSC TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 8270C 1 124918 04/02/14 18:36 JMG TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124505 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 3010A 124584 03/31/14 09:48 DEE TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 6010B 1 124741 04/01/14 09:37 KLC TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124505 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7470A 124593 03/31/14 15:25 DEE TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 7470A 1 124820 04/01/14 09:17 AMM2 TAL CANTCLP
Client Sample ID: BW7 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-3Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 08:19
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Analysis 8260B 1 124658 03/31/14 21:13 RJQ TAL CANTCLP
Client Sample ID: BW7 6-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 08:20
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ124505 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Prep 3520C 124527 03/31/14 07:11 CSC TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 8270C 1 124918 04/02/14 19:01 JMG TAL CANTCLP
Prep 3540C 123875 03/25/14 09:59 MPM TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 8270C 2 124196 03/27/14 19:34 JMG TAL CANTotal/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 57 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Lab ChronicleClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW7 6-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 08:20
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ124505 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Prep 3010A 124584 03/31/14 09:48 DEE TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 6010B 1 124741 04/01/14 09:41 KLC TAL CANTCLP
Prep 3050B 124048 03/26/14 10:45 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124359 03/27/14 14:19 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Leach 1311 124505 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7470A 124593 03/31/14 15:25 DEE TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 7470A 1 124820 04/01/14 09:19 AMM2 TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7471A 124076 03/26/14 14:45 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 7471A 1 124236 03/27/14 09:37 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123764 03/24/14 15:29 NJE TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW8 0.5 -2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-5Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:00
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ124505 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Prep 3520C 124527 03/31/14 07:11 CSC TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 8270C 1 124918 04/02/14 19:27 JMG TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124505 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 3010A 124584 03/31/14 09:48 DEE TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 6010B 1 124741 04/01/14 09:45 KLC TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124505 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7470A 124593 03/31/14 15:25 DEE TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 7470A 1 124820 04/01/14 09:23 AMM2 TAL CANTCLP
Client Sample ID: BW8 2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:04
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Analysis 8260B 1 124658 03/31/14 21:36 RJQ TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124505 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 3520C 124527 03/31/14 07:11 CSC TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 8270C 1 124918 04/02/14 19:52 JMG TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124505 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 3010A 124584 03/31/14 09:48 DEE TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 6010B 1 124741 04/01/14 09:50 KLC TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124505 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7470A 124593 03/31/14 15:25 DEE TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 7470A 1 124820 04/01/14 09:25 AMM2 TAL CANTCLP
TestAmerica Canton
Page 58 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Lab ChronicleClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW8 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-7Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:07
Percent Solids: 83.7Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Prep 5035 03/24/14 13:45 TJL2123823 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8260B 1 124052 03/26/14 23:01 SAM TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3540C 124042 03/26/14 10:35 MPM TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 8270C 2 124330 03/28/14 17:44 MRU TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 124048 03/26/14 10:45 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124359 03/27/14 14:23 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 7471A 124076 03/26/14 14:45 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 7471A 1 124236 03/27/14 09:40 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123764 03/24/14 15:29 NJE TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW8 6-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-8Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:10
Percent Solids: 83.6Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Prep 3540C 03/25/14 09:59 MPM123875 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8270C 2.5 124196 03/27/14 19:56 JMG TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 124048 03/26/14 10:45 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124359 03/27/14 14:27 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 7471A 124076 03/26/14 14:45 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 7471A 1 124236 03/27/14 09:42 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123764 03/24/14 15:29 NJE TAL CANTotal/NA
Laboratory References:
TAL CAN = TestAmerica Canton, 4101 Shuffel Street NW, North Canton, OH 44720, TEL (330)497-9396
TestAmerica Canton
Page 59 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Certification SummaryClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35338-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Laboratory: TestAmerica CantonAll certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all certifications are applicable to this report.
Authority Program EPA Region Certification ID Expiration Date
California 01144CA9NELAP 06-30-14
Connecticut State Program 1 PH-0590 12-31-14
Florida NELAP 4 E87225 06-30-14
Georgia State Program 4 N/A 06-30-14
Illinois NELAP 5 200004 07-31-14
Kansas NELAP 7 E-10336 03-31-14 *
Kentucky (UST) State Program 4 58 06-30-14
L-A-B DoD ELAP L2315 07-18-16
Minnesota NELAP 5 039-999-348 12-31-14
Nevada State Program 9 OH-000482008A 07-31-14
New Jersey NELAP 2 OH001 06-30-14
New York NELAP 2 10975 03-31-14 *
Ohio VAP State Program 5 CL0024 10-31-15
Pennsylvania NELAP 3 68-00340 08-31-14
Texas NELAP 6 08-31-14
USDA Federal P330-13-00319 11-26-16
Virginia NELAP 3 460175 09-14-14
Washington State Program 10 C971 01-12-15
West Virginia DEP State Program 3 210 12-31-14
Wisconsin State Program 5 999518190 08-31-14
TestAmerica Canton
* Expired certification is currently pending renewal and is considered valid.
Page 60 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Page 61 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Page 62 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Page 63 of 63 4/4/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Appendix H
Soil analytical results for borings BW-9 and BW-10
ANALYTICAL REPORTTestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.TestAmerica Canton4101 Shuffel Street NWNorth Canton, OH 44720Tel: (330)497-9396
TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
For:Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.98 County Line Road WestSuite CWesterville, Ohio 43082
Attn: Ms. Linda Aller
Authorized for release by:4/9/2014 10:23:17 AM
Mark Loeb, Project Manager II(330)[email protected]
This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature isintended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.
Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Table of Contents
Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1
Page 2 of 51TestAmerica Canton
4/9/2014
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Definitions/Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Detection Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Surrogate Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
QC Association Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Definitions/GlossaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Qualifiers
GC/MS VOA
Qualifier Description
H Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
Qualifier
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
* LCS or LCSD exceeds the control limits
GC/MS Semi VOA
Qualifier Description
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
Qualifier
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
B Compound was found in the blank and sample.
GC VOA
Qualifier Description
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
Qualifier
GC Semi VOA
Qualifier Description
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
Qualifier
Metals
Qualifier Description
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
Qualifier
B Compound was found in the blank and sample.
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
Glossary
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
¤ Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
Abbreviation
%R Percent Recovery
CNF Contains no Free Liquid
DER Duplicate error ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dil Fac Dilution Factor
DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
DLC Decision level concentration
MDA Minimum detectable activity
EDL Estimated Detection Limit
MDC Minimum detectable concentration
MDL Method Detection Limit
ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)
NC Not Calculated
ND Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit
QC Quality Control
RER Relative error ratio
RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
TestAmerica Canton
Page 3 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case NarrativeClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Job ID: 240-35339-1
Laboratory: TestAmerica Canton
Narrative
CASE NARRATIVE
Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project: Lancaster Ohio
Report Number: 240-35339-1
With the exceptions noted as flags or footnotes, standard analytical protocols were followed in the analysis of the samples and no
problems were encountered or anomalies observed. In addition all laboratory quality control samples were within established control
limits, with any exceptions noted below. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of
the method. In some cases, due to interference or analytes present at high concentrations, samples were diluted. For diluted samples,
the reporting limits are adjusted relative to the dilution required.
TestAmerica Canton attests to the validity of the laboratory data generated by TestAmerica facilities reported herein. All analyses
performed by TestAmerica facilities were done using established laboratory SOPs that incorporate QA/QC procedures described in the
application methods. TestAmerica’s operations groups have reviewed the data for compliance with the laboratory QA/QC plan, and data
have been found to be compliant with laboratory protocols unless otherwise noted below.
The test results in this report meet all NELAP requirements for parameters for which accreditation is required or available. Any exceptions
to NELAP requirements are noted in this report. Pursuant to NELAP, this report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written
approval of the laboratory.
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.
All holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these samples, unless otherwise detailed in the
individual sections below.
All solid sample results are reported on an "as received" basis unless otherwise indicated by the presence of a % solids value in the
method header.
This laboratory report is confidential and is intended for the sole use of TestAmerica and its client.
RECEIPT
The samples were received on 3/24/2014 9:45 AM; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice.
The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 3.6º C.
Except:
Method(s) 5035, 8260B: The following sample(s) was received with insufficient time remaining to freeze within 48 hours, as required for
samples collected in water preserved TerraCores: BW10 2-4 (240-35339-5), BW9 0-2 (240-35339-1). Sample 1 was sampled on 3/21/14
at 9:45am and received 3/24/14 and placed in the freezer at 13:45 sample 5 was sampled on 3/21/14 at 10:35am and received on 3/24/14
and placed in the freezer at 13:45.
TCLP VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)
Samples BW9 0-2 (240-35339-1) and BW10 2-4 (240-35339-5) were analyzed for TCLP volatile organic compounds (GCMS) in
accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/8260B. The samples were leached on 03/30/2014 and analyzed on 03/31/2014.
Method(s) 8260B: The following samples were received outside of holding time: BW10 2-4 (240-35339-5), BW9 0-2 (240-35339-1).
No other difficulties were encountered during the VOCs analysis.
TestAmerica CantonPage 4 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case NarrativeClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Job ID: 240-35339-1 (Continued)
Laboratory: TestAmerica Canton (Continued)
All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)
Samples BW9 0-2 (240-35339-1) and BW10 2-4 (240-35339-5) were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with
EPA SW-846 Method 8260B. The samples were prepared on 03/24/2014 and analyzed on 03/27/2014.
Tetrachloroethene and trans-1,2-Dichloroethene failed the recovery criteria high for LCS 240-124125/8. These analytes were biased high
in the LCS and were not detected in the associated samples; therefore, the data have been reported.
The following samples were received outside of holding time: BW10 2-4 (240-35339-5), BW9 0-2 (240-35339-1).
Insufficient sample volume was available to perform a matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate/sample duplicate (MS/MSD/DUP) associated
with batch 124125.
No other difficulties were encountered during the VOCs analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TCLP SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)
Samples BW9 4-8 (240-35339-3), BW10 0-2 (240-35339-4) and BW10 4-6 (240-35339-6) were analyzed for TCLP semivolatile organic
compounds (GCMS) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/8270C. The samples were leached on 03/30/2014, prepared on
03/31/2014 and 04/04/2014 and analyzed on 04/02/2014 and 04/08/2014.
Surrogates are added during the extraction process prior to dilution. When the sample is diluted, surrogate recoveries are diluted out and
no corrective action is required.
Method(s) 3520C: Insufficient sample volume was available to perform a matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate/sample duplicate
(MS/MSD/DUP) associated with batch 125270.
No other difficulties were encountered during the SVOCs analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)
Samples BW9 2-4 (240-35339-2) and BW10 2-4 (240-35339-5) were analyzed for semivolatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance
with EPA SW-846 Method 8270C. The samples were prepared on 03/25/2014 and analyzed on 03/27/2014.
Surrogates are added during the extraction process prior to dilution. When the sample is diluted, surrogate recoveries are diluted out and
no corrective action is required.
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, Diethyl phthalate and Di-n-butyl phthalate were detected in method blank MB 240-123875/23-A at levels that
were above the method detection limit but below the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged.
If the associated sample reported a result above the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.
Sample BW10 2-4 (240-35339-5)[4X] required dilution prior to analysis. The reporting limits have been adjusted accordingly.
No other difficulties were encountered during the SVOCs analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS
Sample BW10 6-8 (240-35339-7) was analyzed for gasoline range organics in accordance with SW846 Method 8015C. The samples
were prepared and analyzed on 03/26/2014.
No difficulties were encountered during the GrOain size analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS (DRO)
Sample BW10 6-8 (240-35339-7) was analyzed for diesel range organics (DRO) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 8015C - DRO.
The samples were prepared on 03/25/2014 and analyzed on 04/01/2014.
TestAmerica CantonPage 5 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case NarrativeClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Job ID: 240-35339-1 (Continued)
Laboratory: TestAmerica Canton (Continued)
No difficulties were encountered during the DRO analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TCLP METALS (ICP)
Samples BW9 4-8 (240-35339-3), BW10 0-2 (240-35339-4) and BW10 4-6 (240-35339-6) were analyzed for TCLP metals (ICP) in
accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/6010B. The samples were leached on 03/30/2014, prepared on 03/31/2014 and analyzed on
04/01/2014.
Barium and Selenium were detected in method blank LB 240-124505/1-D at levels that were above the method detection limit but below
the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above
the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.
Barium was detected in method blank MB 240-124584/2-A at a level that was above the method detection limit but below the reporting
limit. The value should be considered an estimate, and has been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above the MDL
and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.
No other difficulties were encountered during the metals analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TOTAL METALS (ICP)
Samples BW9 2-4 (240-35339-2) and BW10 2-4 (240-35339-5) were analyzed for total metals (ICP) in accordance with EPA SW-846
Method 6010B. The samples were prepared on 03/26/2014 and analyzed on 03/27/2014.
Barium and Potassium were detected in method blank MB 240-124048/1-A at levels that were above the method detection limit but below
the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above
the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.
No other difficulties were encountered during the metals analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TCLP MERCURY
Samples BW9 4-8 (240-35339-3), BW10 0-2 (240-35339-4) and BW10 4-6 (240-35339-6) were analyzed for TCLP mercury in accordance
with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/7470A. The samples were leached on 03/30/2014, prepared on 03/31/2014 and analyzed on 04/01/2014.
No difficulties were encountered during the mercury analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TOTAL MERCURY
Samples BW9 2-4 (240-35339-2) and BW10 2-4 (240-35339-5) were analyzed for total mercury in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method
7471A. The samples were prepared on 03/26/2014 and analyzed on 03/27/2014.
No difficulties were encountered during the mercury analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
PERCENT SOLIDS
Samples BW9 0-2 (240-35339-1), BW9 2-4 (240-35339-2), BW10 2-4 (240-35339-5) and BW10 6-8 (240-35339-7) were analyzed for
percent solids in accordance with EPA Method 160.3 MOD. The samples were analyzed on 03/24/2014.
No difficulties were encountered during the % solids analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TestAmerica CantonPage 6 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Method SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol
SW8468260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) TAL CAN
SW8468270C Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) TAL CAN
SW8468015C Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Gasoline Range Organics) TAL CAN
SW8468015C Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Diesel Range Organics) TAL CAN
SW8466010B Metals (ICP) TAL CAN
SW8467470A Mercury (CVAA) TAL CAN
SW8467471A Mercury (CVAA) TAL CAN
EPAMoisture Percent Moisture TAL CAN
Protocol References:
EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
Laboratory References:
TAL CAN = TestAmerica Canton, 4101 Shuffel Street NW, North Canton, OH 44720, TEL (330)497-9396
TestAmerica Canton
Page 7 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Sample SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix
240-35339-1 BW9 0-2 Solid 03/21/14 09:45 03/24/14 09:45
240-35339-2 BW9 2-4 Solid 03/21/14 09:50 03/24/14 09:45
240-35339-3 BW9 4-8 Solid 03/21/14 09:52 03/24/14 09:45
240-35339-4 BW10 0-2 Solid 03/21/14 10:30 03/24/14 09:45
240-35339-5 BW10 2-4 Solid 03/21/14 10:35 03/24/14 09:45
240-35339-6 BW10 4-6 Solid 03/21/14 10:37 03/24/14 09:45
240-35339-7 BW10 6-8 Solid 03/21/14 10:40 03/24/14 09:45
TestAmerica Canton
Page 8 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW9 0-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-1
No Detections.
Client Sample ID: BW9 2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-2
☼1,1'-Biphenyl
RL
57 ug/Kg
MDL
4.0
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA1J13 8270C
☼2-Methylnaphthalene 7.6 ug/Kg0.57 Total/NA157 8270C
☼Acenaphthene 7.6 ug/Kg0.86 Total/NA193 8270C
☼Acenaphthylene 7.6 ug/Kg0.40 Total/NA113 8270C
☼Acetophenone 110 ug/Kg10 Total/NA112 J 8270C
☼Anthracene 7.6 ug/Kg0.89 Total/NA147 8270C
☼Benzaldehyde 110 ug/Kg14 Total/NA124 J 8270C
☼Benzo[a]anthracene 7.6 ug/Kg0.71 Total/NA1430 8270C
☼Benzo[a]pyrene 7.6 ug/Kg0.73 Total/NA1810 8270C
☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 7.6 ug/Kg0.67 Total/NA11300 8270C
☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 7.6 ug/Kg0.40 Total/NA1410 8270C
☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 7.6 ug/Kg0.77 Total/NA1320 8270C
☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 79 ug/Kg22 Total/NA140 J B 8270C
☼Chrysene 7.6 ug/Kg1.2 Total/NA1480 8270C
☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 7.6 ug/Kg0.75 Total/NA1100 8270C
☼Dibenzofuran 57 ug/Kg0.75 Total/NA126 J 8270C
☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 79 ug/Kg17 Total/NA135 J B 8270C
☼Fluoranthene 7.6 ug/Kg0.62 Total/NA1480 8270C
☼Fluorene 7.6 ug/Kg0.60 Total/NA117 8270C
☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 7.6 ug/Kg0.40 Total/NA1330 8270C
☼Naphthalene 7.6 ug/Kg0.93 Total/NA148 8270C
☼Phenanthrene 7.6 ug/Kg0.83 Total/NA1240 8270C
☼Phenol 57 ug/Kg8.3 Total/NA116 J 8270C
☼Pyrene 7.6 ug/Kg0.50 Total/NA1470 8270C
☼Aluminum 19 mg/Kg9.1 Total/NA16100 6010B
☼Antimony 0.95 mg/Kg0.37 Total/NA10.58 J 6010B
☼Arsenic 0.95 mg/Kg0.28 Total/NA112 6010B
☼Barium 19 mg/Kg0.11 Total/NA1120 B 6010B
☼Beryllium 0.47 mg/Kg0.041 Total/NA10.62 6010B
☼Cadmium 0.19 mg/Kg0.034 Total/NA11.3 6010B
☼Calcium 470 mg/Kg27 Total/NA110000 6010B
☼Chromium 0.47 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA115 6010B
☼Cobalt 4.7 mg/Kg0.15 Total/NA16.8 6010B
☼Copper 2.4 mg/Kg0.70 Total/NA131 6010B
☼Iron 9.5 mg/Kg4.6 Total/NA120000 6010B
☼Lead 0.28 mg/Kg0.18 Total/NA1150 6010B
☼Magnesium 470 mg/Kg6.2 Total/NA13200 6010B
☼Manganese 1.4 mg/Kg0.15 Total/NA1560 6010B
☼Nickel 3.8 mg/Kg0.51 Total/NA143 6010B
☼Potassium 470 mg/Kg5.9 Total/NA1790 B 6010B
☼Selenium 0.47 mg/Kg0.43 Total/NA10.73 6010B
☼Silver 0.47 mg/Kg0.095 Total/NA10.17 J 6010B
☼Sodium 470 mg/Kg62 Total/NA1210 J 6010B
☼Vanadium 4.7 mg/Kg0.20 Total/NA116 6010B
☼Zinc 1.9 mg/Kg0.95 Total/NA1150 6010B
☼Mercury 0.13 mg/Kg0.019 Total/NA10.25 7471A
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 9 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW9 4-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-3
Arsenic
RL
0.50 mg/L
MDL
0.0032
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
TCLP1J0.0043 6010B
Barium 10 mg/L0.00067 TCLP10.63 J B 6010B
Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.0047 J 6010B
Chromium 0.50 mg/L0.0022 TCLP10.0053 J 6010B
Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.15 J 6010B
Client Sample ID: BW10 0-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-4
Arsenic
RL
0.50 mg/L
MDL
0.0032
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
TCLP1J0.0043 6010B
Barium 10 mg/L0.00067 TCLP10.25 J B 6010B
Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.0027 J 6010B
Chromium 0.50 mg/L0.0022 TCLP10.0045 J 6010B
Selenium 0.25 mg/L0.0041 TCLP10.0062 J B 6010B
Client Sample ID: BW10 2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-5
☼1,1'-Biphenyl
RL
220 ug/Kg
MDL
16
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA4J25 8270C
☼2-Methylnaphthalene 30 ug/Kg2.2 Total/NA4120 8270C
☼Acenaphthene 30 ug/Kg3.4 Total/NA4290 8270C
☼Anthracene 30 ug/Kg3.5 Total/NA490 8270C
☼Benzo[a]anthracene 30 ug/Kg2.8 Total/NA4910 8270C
☼Benzo[a]pyrene 30 ug/Kg2.9 Total/NA42200 8270C
☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 30 ug/Kg2.6 Total/NA43400 8270C
☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 30 ug/Kg1.6 Total/NA41100 8270C
☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 30 ug/Kg3.1 Total/NA4930 8270C
☼Chrysene 30 ug/Kg4.9 Total/NA41100 8270C
☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 30 ug/Kg3.0 Total/NA4240 8270C
☼Dibenzofuran 220 ug/Kg3.0 Total/NA444 J 8270C
☼Fluoranthene 30 ug/Kg2.5 Total/NA4940 8270C
☼Fluorene 30 ug/Kg2.4 Total/NA443 8270C
☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 30 ug/Kg1.6 Total/NA4850 8270C
☼Naphthalene 30 ug/Kg3.7 Total/NA494 8270C
☼Phenanthrene 30 ug/Kg3.3 Total/NA4430 8270C
☼Pyrene 30 ug/Kg2.0 Total/NA41000 8270C
☼Aluminum 16 mg/Kg7.9 Total/NA11400 6010B
☼Arsenic 0.82 mg/Kg0.25 Total/NA11.9 6010B
☼Barium 16 mg/Kg0.098 Total/NA111 J B 6010B
☼Beryllium 0.41 mg/Kg0.035 Total/NA10.058 J 6010B
☼Cadmium 0.16 mg/Kg0.029 Total/NA10.062 J 6010B
☼Calcium 410 mg/Kg24 Total/NA11400 6010B
☼Chromium 0.41 mg/Kg0.16 Total/NA18.6 6010B
☼Cobalt 4.1 mg/Kg0.13 Total/NA11.4 J 6010B
☼Copper 2.0 mg/Kg0.61 Total/NA18.7 6010B
☼Iron 8.2 mg/Kg4.0 Total/NA18100 6010B
☼Lead 0.25 mg/Kg0.16 Total/NA15.9 6010B
☼Magnesium 410 mg/Kg5.3 Total/NA1510 6010B
☼Manganese 1.2 mg/Kg0.13 Total/NA191 6010B
☼Nickel 3.3 mg/Kg0.44 Total/NA110 6010B
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 10 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW10 2-4 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-5
☼Potassium
RL
410 mg/Kg
MDL
5.1
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA1J B150 6010B
☼Sodium 410 mg/Kg54 Total/NA1100 J 6010B
☼Vanadium 4.1 mg/Kg0.17 Total/NA14.6 6010B
☼Zinc 1.6 mg/Kg0.82 Total/NA111 6010B
☼Mercury 0.11 mg/Kg0.017 Total/NA10.035 J 7471A
Client Sample ID: BW10 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-6
Arsenic
RL
0.50 mg/L
MDL
0.0032
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
TCLP1J0.0046 6010B
Barium 10 mg/L0.00067 TCLP10.18 J B 6010B
Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.0012 J 6010B
Chromium 0.50 mg/L0.0022 TCLP10.010 J 6010B
Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.0064 J 6010B
Selenium 0.25 mg/L0.0041 TCLP10.0043 J B 6010B
Client Sample ID: BW10 6-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-7
☼Diesel Range Organics [C10 - C28]
RL
18 mg/Kg
MDL
10
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA168 8015C
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 11 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-1Client Sample ID: BW9 0-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:45
Percent Solids: 90.9Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.8 U H 2.8 0.31 ug/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
2.8 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.8 U H
2.8 0.72 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 2.8 U H
2.8 0.22 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2.8 U H
2.8 0.20 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼1,1-Dichloroethane 2.8 U H
2.8 0.29 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼1,1-Dichloroethene 2.8 U H
2.8 0.15 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2.8 U H
5.5 0.72 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 5.5 U H
2.8 0.20 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2.8 U H
2.8 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼1,2-Dichloroethane 2.8 U H
2.8 0.38 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼1,2-Dichloropropane 2.8 U H
2.8 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2.8 U H
2.8 0.37 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.8 U H
11 0.77 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 11 U H
11 0.35 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼2-Hexanone 11 U H
11 0.30 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 11 U H
11 3.5 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Acetone 11 U H
2.8 0.13 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Benzene 2.8 U H
2.8 0.18 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Bromoform 2.8 U H
2.8 0.30 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Bromomethane 2.8 U H
2.8 0.24 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Carbon disulfide 2.8 U H
2.8 0.20 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Carbon tetrachloride 2.8 U H
2.8 0.18 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Chlorobenzene 2.8 U H
2.8 0.30 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Chlorodibromomethane 2.8 U H
2.8 0.48 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Chloroethane 2.8 U H
2.8 0.16 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Chloroform 2.8 U H
2.8 0.23 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Chloromethane 2.8 U H
2.8 0.20 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.8 U H
2.8 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.8 U H
5.5 0.18 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Cyclohexane 5.5 U H
2.8 0.15 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Dichlorobromomethane 2.8 U H
2.8 0.28 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.8 U H
2.8 0.14 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Ethylbenzene 2.8 U H
2.8 0.28 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Ethylene Dibromide 2.8 U H
2.8 0.088 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Isopropylbenzene 2.8 U H
5.5 0.77 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Methyl acetate 5.5 U H
2.8 0.24 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Methyl tert-butyl ether 2.8 U H
5.5 0.17 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Methylcyclohexane 5.5 U H
2.8 0.37 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Methylene Chloride 2.8 U H
2.8 0.083 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Styrene 2.8 U H
2.8 0.29 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Tetrachloroethene 2.8 U H *
2.8 0.15 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Toluene 2.8 U H
2.8 0.23 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.8 U H *
2.8 0.30 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.8 U H
2.8 0.23 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Trichloroethene 2.8 U H
2.8 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Trichlorofluoromethane 2.8 U H
2.8 0.22 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Vinyl chloride 2.8 U H
5.5 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Xylenes, Total 5.5 U H
TestAmerica Canton
Page 12 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-1Client Sample ID: BW9 0-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:45
Percent Solids: 90.9Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 91 58 - 123 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 80 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 152 - 136
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 108 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 137 - 132
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 96 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 167 - 125
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.025 U 0.025 0.0095 mg/L 03/31/14 21:59 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 21:59 11,2-Dichloroethane 0.025 U
0.25 0.029 mg/L 03/31/14 21:59 12-Butanone (MEK) 0.25 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 21:59 1Benzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 21:59 1Carbon tetrachloride 0.025 U
0.025 0.0075 mg/L 03/31/14 21:59 1Chlorobenzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 21:59 1Chloroform 0.025 U
0.025 0.015 mg/L 03/31/14 21:59 1Tetrachloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0085 mg/L 03/31/14 21:59 1Trichloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 21:59 1Vinyl chloride 0.025 U
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 87 80 - 121 03/31/14 21:59 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 88 03/31/14 21:59 170 - 124
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 87 03/31/14 21:59 180 - 128
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 97 03/31/14 21:59 180 - 120
TestAmerica Canton
Page 13 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-2Client Sample ID: BW9 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:50
Percent Solids: 87.3Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 13 J 57 4.0 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
170 28 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 170 U
170 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 170 U
170 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 170 U
170 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 170 U
370 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 370 U
230 19 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 230 U
230 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼2,6-Dinitrotoluene 230 U
57 0.51 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼2-Chloronaphthalene 57 U
57 9.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼2-Chlorophenol 57 U
7.6 0.57 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼2-Methylnaphthalene 57
230 12 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼2-Methylphenol 230 U
230 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼2-Nitroaniline 230 U
57 9.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼2-Nitrophenol 57 U
450 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 450 U
110 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 110 U
230 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼3-Nitroaniline 230 U
170 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 170 U
57 15 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 57 U
170 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 170 U
170 19 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼4-Chloroaniline 170 U
57 15 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 57 U
230 30 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼4-Nitroaniline 230 U
370 19 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼4-Nitrophenol 370 U
7.6 0.86 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Acenaphthene 93
7.6 0.40 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Acenaphthylene 13
110 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Acetophenone 12 J
7.6 0.89 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Anthracene 47
230 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Atrazine 230 U
110 14 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Benzaldehyde 24 J
7.6 0.71 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Benzo[a]anthracene 430
7.6 0.73 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Benzo[a]pyrene 810
7.6 0.67 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1300
7.6 0.40 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 410
7.6 0.77 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 320
110 11 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 110 U
110 25 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 110 U
110 2.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 110 U
79 22 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 40 J B
79 11 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 79 U
370 42 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Caprolactam 370 U
57 31 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Carbazole 57 U
7.6 1.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Chrysene 480
7.6 0.75 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 100
57 0.75 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Dibenzofuran 26 J
79 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Diethyl phthalate 79 U
79 19 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Dimethyl phthalate 79 U
79 17 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 35 J B
79 9.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 79 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 14 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-2Client Sample ID: BW9 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:50
Percent Solids: 87.3Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)RL MDL
Fluoranthene 480 7.6 0.62 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
7.6 0.60 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Fluorene 17
7.6 2.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Hexachlorobenzene 7.6 U
57 6.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Hexachlorobutadiene 57 U
370 9.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 370 U
57 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Hexachloroethane 57 U
7.6 0.40 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 330
57 15 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Isophorone 57 U
7.6 0.93 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Naphthalene 48
110 2.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Nitrobenzene 110 U
57 7.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 57 U
57 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 57 U
170 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Pentachlorophenol 170 U
7.6 0.83 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Phenanthrene 240
57 8.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Phenol 16 J
7.6 0.50 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Pyrene 470
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 63 10 - 110 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 69 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 124 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 67 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 124 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 65 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 120 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 69 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 126 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 85 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 136 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)RL MDL
Aluminum 6100 19 9.1 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.95 0.37 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Antimony 0.58 J
0.95 0.28 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Arsenic 12
19 0.11 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Barium 120 B
0.47 0.041 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Beryllium 0.62
0.19 0.034 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Cadmium 1.3
470 27 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Calcium 10000
0.47 0.19 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Chromium 15
4.7 0.15 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Cobalt 6.8
2.4 0.70 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Copper 31
9.5 4.6 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Iron 20000
0.28 0.18 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Lead 150
470 6.2 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Magnesium 3200
1.4 0.15 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Manganese 560
3.8 0.51 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Nickel 43
470 5.9 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Potassium 790 B
0.47 0.43 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Selenium 0.73
0.47 0.095 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Silver 0.17 J
470 62 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Sodium 210 J
0.95 0.52 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Thallium 0.95 U
4.7 0.20 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Vanadium 16
1.9 0.95 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Zinc 150
TestAmerica Canton
Page 15 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-2Client Sample ID: BW9 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:50
Percent Solids: 87.3Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 0.25 0.13 0.019 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 09:47 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 16 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-3Client Sample ID: BW9 4-8Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:52
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.020 0.00030 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00024 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00025 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 12,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U
0.0040 0.00017 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 12-Methylphenol 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00080 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 13 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.000085 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 1Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00027 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 1Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00019 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 1Hexachloroethane 0.020 U
0.0040 0.000040 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 1Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00027 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 1Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.00035 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 1Pyridine 0.020 U
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 57 15 - 110 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 53 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 127 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 11 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 110 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 54 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 127 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 46 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 120 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 72 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 138 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPRL MDL
Arsenic 0.0043 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:54 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 0.00067 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:54 1Barium 0.63 J B
0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:54 1Cadmium 0.0047 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:54 1Chromium 0.0053 J
0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:54 1Lead 0.15 J
0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:54 1Selenium 0.25 U
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:54 1Silver 0.50 U
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPRL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 09:26 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 17 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-4Client Sample ID: BW10 0-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 10:30
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.020 0.00030 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00024 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00025 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 12,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U
0.0040 0.00017 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 12-Methylphenol 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00080 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 13 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.000085 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 1Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00027 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 1Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00019 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 1Hexachloroethane 0.020 U
0.0040 0.000040 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 1Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00027 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 1Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 1Pyridine 0.020 U
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 93 15 - 110 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 71 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 127 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 37 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 110 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 69 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 127 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 64 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 120 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 97 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 138 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPRL MDL
Arsenic 0.0043 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:58 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 0.00067 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:58 1Barium 0.25 J B
0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:58 1Cadmium 0.0027 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:58 1Chromium 0.0045 J
0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:58 1Lead 0.50 U
0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:58 1Selenium 0.0062 J B
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:58 1Silver 0.50 U
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPRL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 09:28 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 18 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-5Client Sample ID: BW10 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 10:35
Percent Solids: 87.9Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.3 U H 3.3 0.37 ug/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
3.3 0.22 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.3 U H
3.3 0.85 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 3.3 U H
3.3 0.26 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane 3.3 U H
3.3 0.24 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼1,1-Dichloroethane 3.3 U H
3.3 0.34 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼1,1-Dichloroethene 3.3 U H
3.3 0.18 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 3.3 U H
6.6 0.85 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 6.6 U H
3.3 0.24 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene 3.3 U H
3.3 0.22 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼1,2-Dichloroethane 3.3 U H
3.3 0.45 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼1,2-Dichloropropane 3.3 U H
3.3 0.23 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene 3.3 U H
3.3 0.43 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene 3.3 U H
13 0.92 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 13 U H
13 0.41 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼2-Hexanone 13 U H
13 0.35 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 13 U H
13 4.1 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Acetone 13 U H
3.3 0.15 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Benzene 3.3 U H
3.3 0.22 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Bromoform 3.3 U H
3.3 0.35 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Bromomethane 3.3 U H
3.3 0.29 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Carbon disulfide 3.3 U H
3.3 0.24 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Carbon tetrachloride 3.3 U H
3.3 0.22 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Chlorobenzene 3.3 U H
3.3 0.36 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Chlorodibromomethane 3.3 U H
3.3 0.56 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Chloroethane 3.3 U H
3.3 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Chloroform 3.3 U H
3.3 0.27 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Chloromethane 3.3 U H
3.3 0.24 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.3 U H
3.3 0.22 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.3 U H
6.6 0.22 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Cyclohexane 6.6 U H
3.3 0.18 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Dichlorobromomethane 3.3 U H
3.3 0.33 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Dichlorodifluoromethane 3.3 U H
3.3 0.17 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Ethylbenzene 3.3 U H
3.3 0.33 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Ethylene Dibromide 3.3 U H
3.3 0.10 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Isopropylbenzene 3.3 U H
6.6 0.92 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Methyl acetate 6.6 U H
3.3 0.28 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Methyl tert-butyl ether 3.3 U H
6.6 0.20 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Methylcyclohexane 6.6 U H
3.3 0.44 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Methylene Chloride 3.3 U H
3.3 0.098 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Styrene 3.3 U H
3.3 0.34 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Tetrachloroethene 3.3 U H *
3.3 0.18 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Toluene 3.3 U H
3.3 0.27 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.3 U H *
3.3 0.35 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.3 U H
3.3 0.28 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Trichloroethene 3.3 U H
3.3 0.22 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Trichlorofluoromethane 3.3 U H
3.3 0.26 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Vinyl chloride 3.3 U H
6.6 0.23 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Xylenes, Total 6.6 U H
TestAmerica Canton
Page 19 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-5Client Sample ID: BW10 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 10:35
Percent Solids: 87.9Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 88 58 - 123 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 78 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 152 - 136
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 109 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 137 - 132
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 99 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 167 - 125
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.025 U 0.025 0.0095 mg/L 03/31/14 22:22 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 22:22 11,2-Dichloroethane 0.025 U
0.25 0.029 mg/L 03/31/14 22:22 12-Butanone (MEK) 0.25 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 22:22 1Benzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 22:22 1Carbon tetrachloride 0.025 U
0.025 0.0075 mg/L 03/31/14 22:22 1Chlorobenzene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 22:22 1Chloroform 0.025 U
0.025 0.015 mg/L 03/31/14 22:22 1Tetrachloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.0085 mg/L 03/31/14 22:22 1Trichloroethene 0.025 U
0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 22:22 1Vinyl chloride 0.025 U
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 89 80 - 121 03/31/14 22:22 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 87 03/31/14 22:22 170 - 124
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 92 03/31/14 22:22 180 - 128
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 97 03/31/14 22:22 180 - 120
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 25 J 220 16 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
670 110 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 670 U
670 40 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 670 U
670 90 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 670 U
670 90 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 670 U
1500 94 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 1500 U
900 76 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 900 U
900 94 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼2,6-Dinitrotoluene 900 U
220 2.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼2-Chloronaphthalene 220 U
220 37 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼2-Chlorophenol 220 U
30 2.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼2-Methylnaphthalene 120
900 49 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼2-Methylphenol 900 U
900 41 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼2-Nitroaniline 900 U
220 37 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼2-Nitrophenol 220 U
1800 90 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 1800 U
450 81 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 450 U
900 72 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼3-Nitroaniline 900 U
670 41 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 670 U
220 58 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 220 U
670 94 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 670 U
670 76 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼4-Chloroaniline 670 U
220 58 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 220 U
900 120 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼4-Nitroaniline 900 U
1500 76 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼4-Nitrophenol 1500 U
30 3.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Acenaphthene 290
TestAmerica Canton
Page 20 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-5Client Sample ID: BW10 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 10:35
Percent Solids: 87.9Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)RL MDL
Acenaphthylene 30 U 30 1.6 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
450 41 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Acetophenone 450 U
30 3.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Anthracene 90
900 41 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Atrazine 900 U
450 54 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Benzaldehyde 450 U
30 2.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Benzo[a]anthracene 910
30 2.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Benzo[a]pyrene 2200
30 2.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 3400
30 1.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1100
30 3.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 930
450 43 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 450 U
450 99 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 450 U
450 9.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 450 U
310 85 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 310 U
310 45 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 310 U
1500 170 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Caprolactam 1500 U
220 120 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Carbazole 220 U
30 4.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Chrysene 1100
30 3.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 240
220 3.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Dibenzofuran 44 J
310 72 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Diethyl phthalate 310 U
310 76 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Dimethyl phthalate 310 U
310 67 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 310 U
310 35 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 310 U
30 2.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Fluoranthene 940
30 2.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Fluorene 43
30 9.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Hexachlorobenzene 30 U
220 25 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Hexachlorobutadiene 220 U
1500 36 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 1500 U
220 40 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Hexachloroethane 220 U
30 1.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 850
220 58 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Isophorone 220 U
30 3.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Naphthalene 94
450 9.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Nitrobenzene 450 U
220 28 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 220 U
220 94 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 220 U
670 41 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Pentachlorophenol 670 U
30 3.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Phenanthrene 430
220 33 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Phenol 220 U
30 2.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Pyrene 1000
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 54 10 - 110 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 63 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 424 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 66 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 424 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 62 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 420 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 65 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 426 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 82 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 436 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 21 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-5Client Sample ID: BW10 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 10:35
Percent Solids: 87.9Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)RL MDL
Aluminum 1400 16 7.9 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.82 0.32 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Antimony 0.82 U
0.82 0.25 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Arsenic 1.9
16 0.098 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Barium 11 J B
0.41 0.035 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Beryllium 0.058 J
0.16 0.029 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Cadmium 0.062 J
410 24 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Calcium 1400
0.41 0.16 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Chromium 8.6
4.1 0.13 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Cobalt 1.4 J
2.0 0.61 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Copper 8.7
8.2 4.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Iron 8100
0.25 0.16 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Lead 5.9
410 5.3 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Magnesium 510
1.2 0.13 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Manganese 91
3.3 0.44 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Nickel 10
410 5.1 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Potassium 150 J B
0.41 0.37 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Selenium 0.41 U
0.41 0.082 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Silver 0.41 U
410 54 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Sodium 100 J
0.82 0.45 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Thallium 0.82 U
4.1 0.17 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Vanadium 4.6
1.6 0.82 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Zinc 11
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 0.035 J 0.11 0.017 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 09:50 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 22 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-6Client Sample ID: BW10 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 10:37
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
0.020 0.00030 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00024 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U
0.020 0.00025 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 12,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U
0.0040 0.00017 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 12-Methylphenol 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00080 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 13 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.000085 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 1Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00027 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 1Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U
0.020 0.00019 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 1Hexachloroethane 0.020 U
0.0040 0.000040 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 1Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U
0.040 0.00027 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 1Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U
0.020 0.00035 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 1Pyridine 0.020 U
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 55 15 - 110 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 61 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 127 - 110
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 37 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 110 - 110
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 67 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 127 - 110
Phenol-d5 (Surr) 62 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 120 - 110
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 85 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 138 - 110
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPRL MDL
Arsenic 0.0046 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 10:03 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 0.00067 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 10:03 1Barium 0.18 J B
0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 10:03 1Cadmium 0.0012 J
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 10:03 1Chromium 0.010 J
0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 10:03 1Lead 0.0064 J
0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 10:03 1Selenium 0.0043 J B
0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 10:03 1Silver 0.50 U
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPRL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 09:29 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 23 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-7Client Sample ID: BW10 6-8Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 10:40
Percent Solids: 90.5Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Gasoline Range Organics)RL MDL
C6-C10 110 U 110 51 ug/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 11:00 03/26/14 18:56 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
Trifluorotoluene (Surr) 60 40 - 139 03/26/14 11:00 03/26/14 18:56 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Diesel Range Organics)RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics [C10 - C28] 68 18 10 mg/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 13:12 04/01/14 13:40 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
o-Terphenyl (Surr) 75 40 - 160 03/25/14 13:12 04/01/14 13:40 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
TestAmerica Canton
Page 24 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Surrogate SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (58-123) (52-136) (37-132) (67-125)
12DCE BFB DBFM TOL
91 80 108 96240-35339-1
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW9 0-2
88 78 109 99240-35339-5 BW10 2-4
79 87 100 98LCS 240-124125/8 Lab Control Sample
83 81 106 92MB 240-123823/3-A Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-121) (70-124) (80-128) (80-120)
12DCE BFB DBFM TOL
84 90 91 100LCS 240-124658/4
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
Lab Control Sample
Surrogate Legend
12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: TCLPMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-121) (70-124) (80-128) (80-120)
12DCE BFB DBFM TOL
87 88 87 97240-35339-1
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW9 0-2
89 87 92 97240-35339-5 BW10 2-4
84 85 89 97LB 240-124562/1-A MB Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (10-110) (24-110) (24-110) (20-110) (26-110) (36-110)
TBP FBP 2FP NBZ PHL TPH
63 69 67 65 69 85240-35339-2
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW9 2-4
54 63 66 6562 82240-35339-5 BW10 2-4
82 76 80 8075 94LCS 240-123875/24-A Lab Control Sample
TestAmerica Canton
Page 25 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Surrogate SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (10-110) (24-110) (24-110) (20-110) (26-110) (36-110)
TBP FBP 2FP NBZ PHL TPH
55 79 79 77 80 108MB 240-123875/23-A
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
TBP = 2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr)
FBP = 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
2FP = 2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
NBZ = Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
PHL = Phenol-d5 (Surr)
TPH = Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (15-110) (27-110) (10-110) (27-110) (20-110) (38-110)
TBP FBP 2FP NBZ PHL TPH
95 78 31 72 67 100LCS 240-124527/14-A
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
Lab Control Sample
73 62 53 5966 82LCS 240-125270/4-A Lab Control Sample
80 71 52 6668 98MB 240-124527/13-A Method Blank
67 70 11 4573 98MB 240-125270/3-A Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
TBP = 2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr)
FBP = 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
2FP = 2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
NBZ = Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
PHL = Phenol-d5 (Surr)
TPH = Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: TCLPMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (15-110) (27-110) (10-110) (27-110) (20-110) (38-110)
TBP FBP 2FP NBZ PHL TPH
57 53 11 54 46 72240-35339-3
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW9 4-8
93 71 37 6469 97240-35339-4 BW10 0-2
55 61 37 6267 85240-35339-6 BW10 4-6
Surrogate Legend
TBP = 2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr)
FBP = 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
2FP = 2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
NBZ = Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
PHL = Phenol-d5 (Surr)
TPH = Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
TestAmerica Canton
Page 26 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Surrogate SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Gasoline Range Organics)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (40-139) (40-139)
TFT2 TFT2
60 60240-35339-7
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW10 6-8
91 91LCS 240-124056/2-A Lab Control Sample
74 74MB 240-124056/1-A Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
TFT = Trifluorotoluene (Surr)
Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Diesel Range Organics)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (40-160)
OTPH1
75240-35339-7
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW10 6-8
91LCS 240-123937/14-A Lab Control Sample
72MB 240-123937/13-A Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
OTPH = o-Terphenyl (Surr)
TestAmerica Canton
Page 27 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123823/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124125 Prep Batch: 123823
RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.0 U 5.0 0.56 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
5.0 U 1.35.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
5.0 U 0.395.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1,2-Trichloroethane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1-Dichloroethane
5.0 U 0.525.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1-Dichloroethene
5.0 U 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
10 U 1.310 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2-Dichlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2-Dichloroethane
5.0 U 0.695.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2-Dichloropropane
5.0 U 0.355.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,3-Dichlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.665.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,4-Dichlorobenzene
20 U 1.420 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 12-Butanone (MEK)
20 U 0.6320 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 12-Hexanone
20 U 0.5420 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
20 U 6.320 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Acetone
5.0 U 0.235.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Benzene
5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Bromoform
5.0 U 0.545.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Bromomethane
5.0 U 0.445.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Carbon disulfide
5.0 U 0.375.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Carbon tetrachloride
5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.555.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chlorodibromomethane
5.0 U 0.865.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chloroethane
5.0 U 0.295.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chloroform
5.0 U 0.415.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chloromethane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10 U 0.3310 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Cyclohexane
5.0 U 0.285.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Dichlorobromomethane
5.0 U 0.505.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Dichlorodifluoromethane
5.0 U 0.265.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Ethylbenzene
5.0 U 0.505.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Ethylene Dibromide
5.0 U 0.165.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Isopropylbenzene
10 U 1.410 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Methyl acetate
5.0 U 0.435.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Methyl tert-butyl ether
10 U 0.3110 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Methylcyclohexane
5.0 U 0.675.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Methylene Chloride
5.0 U 0.155.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Styrene
5.0 U 0.525.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Tetrachloroethene
5.0 U 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Toluene
5.0 U 0.415.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.0 U 0.545.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
5.0 U 0.425.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Trichloroethene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Trichlorofluoromethane
5.0 U 0.395.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Vinyl chloride
10 U 0.3510 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Xylenes, Total
TestAmerica Canton
Page 28 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123823/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124125 Prep Batch: 123823
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 83 58 - 123 03/27/14 04:38 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/25/14 04:01
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
81 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 52 - 136
106 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 37 - 132
92 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124125/8
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124125
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 25.0 26.8 ug/Kg 107 77 - 126
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 25.0 22.5 ug/Kg 90 77 - 123
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroetha
ne
25.0 31.6 ug/Kg 127 80 - 138
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 25.0 25.5 ug/Kg 102 80 - 120
1,1-Dichloroethane 25.0 23.7 ug/Kg 95 76 - 120
1,1-Dichloroethene 25.0 29.1 ug/Kg 116 75 - 135
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 25.0 23.7 ug/Kg 95 64 - 124
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 25.0 25.6 ug/Kg 102 61 - 132
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 25.0 25.1 ug/Kg 101 76 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane 25.0 21.0 ug/Kg 84 72 - 120
1,2-Dichloropropane 25.0 23.5 ug/Kg 94 80 - 120
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 25.0 25.9 ug/Kg 104 78 - 120
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 25.0 24.5 ug/Kg 98 75 - 120
2-Butanone (MEK) 50.0 43.2 ug/Kg 86 52 - 131
2-Hexanone 50.0 42.8 ug/Kg 86 64 - 136
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 50.0 44.4 ug/Kg 89 67 - 135
Acetone 50.0 41.2 ug/Kg 82 41 - 137
Benzene 25.0 25.8 ug/Kg 103 79 - 120
Bromoform 25.0 26.4 ug/Kg 106 62 - 133
Bromomethane 25.0 23.8 ug/Kg 95 42 - 136
Carbon disulfide 25.0 27.0 ug/Kg 108 62 - 146
Carbon tetrachloride 25.0 29.1 ug/Kg 116 71 - 129
Chlorobenzene 25.0 26.2 ug/Kg 105 78 - 120
Chloroethane 25.0 21.4 ug/Kg 86 58 - 120
Chloroform 25.0 24.1 ug/Kg 96 77 - 120
Chloromethane 25.0 18.1 ug/Kg 73 50 - 120
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 25.0 26.2 ug/Kg 105 76 - 120
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 25.0 24.4 ug/Kg 98 74 - 128
Cyclohexane 25.0 25.4 ug/Kg 101 66 - 120
Dichlorobromomethane 25.0 24.8 ug/Kg 99 80 - 122
Dichlorodifluoromethane 25.0 15.2 ug/Kg 61 26 - 120
Ethylbenzene 25.0 28.3 ug/Kg 113 79 - 120
Ethylene Dibromide 25.0 26.9 ug/Kg 108 80 - 120
Isopropylbenzene 25.0 28.6 ug/Kg 115 76 - 122
Methyl acetate 125 97.1 ug/Kg 78 57 - 130
Methyl tert-butyl ether 25.0 24.0 ug/Kg 96 49 - 165
Methylcyclohexane 25.0 26.5 ug/Kg 106 70 - 126
TestAmerica Canton
Page 29 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124125/8
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124125
Methylene Chloride 25.0 25.2 ug/Kg 101 75 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
m-Xylene & p-Xylene 25.0 29.2 ug/Kg 117 80 - 120
o-Xylene 25.0 29.3 ug/Kg 117 80 - 120
Styrene 25.0 26.9 ug/Kg 108 80 - 120
Tetrachloroethene 25.0 30.8 * ug/Kg 123 79 - 120
Toluene 25.0 27.5 ug/Kg 110 75 - 120
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 25.0 30.2 * ug/Kg 121 78 - 120
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 25.0 25.9 ug/Kg 103 73 - 131
Trichloroethene 25.0 29.1 ug/Kg 116 79 - 120
Trichlorofluoromethane 25.0 27.1 ug/Kg 108 57 - 146
Vinyl chloride 25.0 19.7 ug/Kg 79 57 - 120
Xylenes, Total 50.0 58.5 ug/Kg 117 80 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 58 - 123
Surrogate
79
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
874-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 52 - 136
100Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 37 - 132
98Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124658/4
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124658
1,1-Dichloroethene 1.00 0.886 mg/L 89 71 - 133
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane 1.00 0.976 mg/L 98 80 - 120
2-Butanone (MEK) 2.00 1.93 mg/L 96 49 - 120
Benzene 1.00 0.969 mg/L 97 80 - 120
Carbon tetrachloride 1.00 0.988 mg/L 99 54 - 122
Chlorobenzene 1.00 0.970 mg/L 97 80 - 120
Chloroform 1.00 0.908 mg/L 91 80 - 123
Tetrachloroethene 1.00 0.940 mg/L 94 79 - 134
Trichloroethene 1.00 0.962 mg/L 96 78 - 130
Vinyl chloride 1.00 0.792 mg/L 79 56 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 80 - 121
Surrogate
84
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
904-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 70 - 124
91Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 80 - 128
100Toluene-d8 (Surr) 80 - 120
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124562/1-A MB
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124658
RL MDL
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.025 U 0.025 0.0095 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.025 U 0.0110.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 11,2-Dichloroethane
TestAmerica Canton
Page 30 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124562/1-A MB
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124658
RL MDL
2-Butanone (MEK) 0.25 U 0.25 0.029 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.025 U 0.00650.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Benzene
0.025 U 0.00650.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Carbon tetrachloride
0.025 U 0.00750.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Chlorobenzene
0.025 U 0.00800.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Chloroform
0.025 U 0.0150.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Tetrachloroethene
0.025 U 0.00850.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Trichloroethene
0.025 U 0.0110.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Vinyl chloride
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 84 80 - 121 03/31/14 16:13 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
85 03/31/14 16:13 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 70 - 124
89 03/31/14 16:13 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 80 - 128
97 03/31/14 16:13 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 80 - 120
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123875/23-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124196 Prep Batch: 123875
RL MDL
1,1'-Biphenyl 50 U 50 3.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
150 U 25150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol
150 U 8.9150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol
150 U 20150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12,4-Dichlorophenol
150 U 20150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12,4-Dimethylphenol
330 U 21330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12,4-Dinitrophenol
200 U 17200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12,4-Dinitrotoluene
200 U 21200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12,6-Dinitrotoluene
50 U 0.4550 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12-Chloronaphthalene
50 U 8.250 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12-Chlorophenol
6.7 U 0.506.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12-Methylnaphthalene
200 U 11200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12-Methylphenol
200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12-Nitroaniline
50 U 8.350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12-Nitrophenol
400 U 20400 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 13 & 4 Methylphenol
100 U 18100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 13,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
200 U 16200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 13-Nitroaniline
150 U 9.2150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 14,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 14-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
150 U 21150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 14-Chloro-3-methylphenol
150 U 17150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 14-Chloroaniline
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 14-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
200 U 26200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 14-Nitroaniline
330 U 17330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 14-Nitrophenol
6.7 U 0.766.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Acenaphthene
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Acenaphthylene
TestAmerica Canton
Page 31 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123875/23-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124196 Prep Batch: 123875
RL MDL
Acetophenone 100 U 100 9.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
6.7 U 0.786.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Anthracene
200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Atrazine
100 U 12100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Benzaldehyde
6.7 U 0.636.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Benzo[a]anthracene
6.7 U 0.646.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Benzo[a]pyrene
6.7 U 0.596.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Benzo[b]fluoranthene
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
6.7 U 0.686.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Benzo[k]fluoranthene
100 U 9.5100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
100 U 22100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
100 U 2.0100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
26.8 J 1970 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
70 U 1070 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Butyl benzyl phthalate
330 U 37330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Caprolactam
50 U 2750 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Carbazole
6.7 U 1.16.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Chrysene
6.7 U 0.666.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
50 U 0.6650 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Dibenzofuran
16.5 J 1670 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Diethyl phthalate
70 U 1770 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Dimethyl phthalate
17.3 J 1570 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Di-n-butyl phthalate
70 U 7.970 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Di-n-octyl phthalate
6.7 U 0.556.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Fluoranthene
6.7 U 0.536.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Fluorene
6.7 U 2.16.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Hexachlorobenzene
50 U 5.650 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Hexachlorobutadiene
330 U 8.1330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
50 U 9.050 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Hexachloroethane
6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Isophorone
6.7 U 0.826.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Naphthalene
100 U 2.2100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Nitrobenzene
50 U 6.350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
50 U 2150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
150 U 9.1150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Pentachlorophenol
6.7 U 0.736.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Phenanthrene
50 U 7.350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Phenol
6.7 U 0.446.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Pyrene
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 55 10 - 110 03/27/14 11:05 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/25/14 09:59
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
79 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 24 - 110
79 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 12-Fluorophenol (Surr) 24 - 110
77 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
80 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110
108 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 32 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123875/24-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124196 Prep Batch: 123875
1,1'-Biphenyl 667 518 ug/Kg 78 35 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 667 563 ug/Kg 84 25 - 110
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 667 553 ug/Kg 83 12 - 110
2,4-Dichlorophenol 667 540 ug/Kg 81 39 - 110
2,4-Dimethylphenol 667 613 ug/Kg 92 29 - 110
2,4-Dinitrophenol 1330 404 ug/Kg 30 10 - 110
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 667 580 ug/Kg 87 48 - 110
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 667 571 ug/Kg 86 45 - 110
2-Chloronaphthalene 667 522 ug/Kg 78 32 - 110
2-Chlorophenol 667 537 ug/Kg 81 37 - 110
2-Methylnaphthalene 667 527 ug/Kg 79 36 - 110
2-Methylphenol 667 534 ug/Kg 80 41 - 110
2-Nitroaniline 667 561 ug/Kg 84 45 - 110
2-Nitrophenol 667 515 ug/Kg 77 34 - 110
3 & 4 Methylphenol 667 555 ug/Kg 83 40 - 110
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1330 967 ug/Kg 73 28 - 110
3-Nitroaniline 667 494 ug/Kg 74 44 - 110
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1330 583 ug/Kg 44 10 - 110
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 667 529 ug/Kg 79 39 - 110
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 667 570 ug/Kg 85 48 - 110
4-Chloroaniline 667 442 ug/Kg 66 30 - 110
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 667 548 ug/Kg 82 40 - 110
4-Nitroaniline 667 566 ug/Kg 85 48 - 110
4-Nitrophenol 1330 1230 ug/Kg 92 28 - 110
Acenaphthene 667 542 ug/Kg 81 38 - 110
Acenaphthylene 667 514 ug/Kg 77 40 - 110
Acetophenone 667 530 ug/Kg 79 40 - 110
Anthracene 667 571 ug/Kg 86 48 - 110
Atrazine 1330 1300 ug/Kg 97 66 - 127
Benzaldehyde 1330 1140 ug/Kg 86 32 - 110
Benzo[a]anthracene 667 548 ug/Kg 82 50 - 110
Benzo[a]pyrene 667 590 ug/Kg 88 44 - 110
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 667 595 ug/Kg 89 43 - 110
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 667 511 ug/Kg 77 51 - 110
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 667 572 ug/Kg 86 38 - 105
bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 667 523 ug/Kg 78 29 - 110
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 667 536 ug/Kg 80 32 - 110
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 667 529 ug/Kg 79 34 - 110
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 667 627 ug/Kg 94 50 - 110
Butyl benzyl phthalate 667 609 ug/Kg 91 51 - 110
Caprolactam 1330 1180 ug/Kg 89 44 - 114
Carbazole 667 563 ug/Kg 84 50 - 110
Chrysene 667 553 ug/Kg 83 50 - 110
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 667 451 ug/Kg 68 51 - 110
Dibenzofuran 667 529 ug/Kg 79 43 - 110
Diethyl phthalate 667 588 ug/Kg 88 52 - 110
Dimethyl phthalate 667 564 ug/Kg 85 50 - 110
Di-n-butyl phthalate 667 584 ug/Kg 88 51 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 33 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123875/24-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124196 Prep Batch: 123875
Di-n-octyl phthalate 667 553 ug/Kg 83 48 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Fluoranthene 667 555 ug/Kg 83 51 - 110
Fluorene 667 552 ug/Kg 83 46 - 110
Hexachlorobenzene 667 506 ug/Kg 76 43 - 110
Hexachlorobutadiene 667 522 ug/Kg 78 29 - 110
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 667 315 J ug/Kg 47 12 - 110
Hexachloroethane 667 514 ug/Kg 77 30 - 110
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 667 466 ug/Kg 70 50 - 110
Isophorone 667 511 ug/Kg 77 36 - 110
Naphthalene 667 522 ug/Kg 78 36 - 110
Nitrobenzene 667 529 ug/Kg 79 32 - 110
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 667 546 ug/Kg 82 38 - 110
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1330 1080 ug/Kg 81 46 - 110
Pentachlorophenol 1330 938 ug/Kg 70 10 - 110
Phenanthrene 667 538 ug/Kg 81 49 - 110
Phenol 667 545 ug/Kg 82 38 - 110
Pyrene 667 585 ug/Kg 88 49 - 110
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
Surrogate
82
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
762-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 24 - 110
802-Fluorophenol (Surr) 24 - 110
75Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
80Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110
94Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124527/13-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125096 Prep Batch: 124527
RL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.020 U 0.000300.020 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0.020 U 0.000240.020 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0.020 U 0.000250.020 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 12,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.0040 U 0.000170.0040 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 12-Methylphenol
0.020 U 0.000350.020 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Pyridine
0.040 U 0.000800.040 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 13 & 4 Methylphenol
0.020 U 0.0000850.020 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Hexachlorobenzene
0.020 U 0.000270.020 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Hexachlorobutadiene
0.020 U 0.000190.020 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Hexachloroethane
0.0040 U 0.0000400.0040 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Nitrobenzene
0.040 U 0.000270.040 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 80 15 - 110 04/03/14 13:17 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/31/14 07:11
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
71 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 12-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 27 - 110
TestAmerica Canton
Page 34 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124527/13-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125096 Prep Batch: 124527
2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 52 10 - 110 04/03/14 13:17 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/31/14 07:11
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
68 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 27 - 110
66 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
98 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124527/14-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125096 Prep Batch: 124527
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0800 0.0563 mg/L 70 16 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.0800 0.0705 mg/L 88 35 - 110
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.0800 0.0683 mg/L 85 36 - 110
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.0800 0.0797 mg/L 100 49 - 110
2-Methylphenol 0.0800 0.0587 mg/L 73 36 - 114
Pyridine 0.0800 0.0557 mg/L 70 34 - 110
3 & 4 Methylphenol 0.0800 0.0600 mg/L 75 38 - 110
Hexachlorobenzene 0.0800 0.0679 mg/L 85 44 - 110
Hexachlorobutadiene 0.0800 0.0578 mg/L 72 35 - 110
Hexachloroethane 0.0800 0.0552 mg/L 69 34 - 110
Nitrobenzene 0.0800 0.0625 mg/L 78 43 - 110
Pentachlorophenol 0.160 0.123 mg/L 77 10 - 122
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 15 - 110
Surrogate
95
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
782-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 27 - 110
312-Fluorophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
72Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 27 - 110
67Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
100Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-125270/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125604 Prep Batch: 125270
RL MDL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.020 U 0.000300.020 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0.020 U 0.000240.020 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0.020 U 0.000250.020 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 12,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.0040 U 0.000170.0040 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 12-Methylphenol
0.020 U 0.000350.020 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 1Pyridine
0.040 U 0.000800.040 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 13 & 4 Methylphenol
0.020 U 0.0000850.020 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 1Hexachlorobenzene
0.020 U 0.000270.020 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 1Hexachlorobutadiene
0.020 U 0.000190.020 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 1Hexachloroethane
0.0040 U 0.0000400.0040 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 1Nitrobenzene
0.040 U 0.000270.040 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 1Pentachlorophenol
TestAmerica Canton
Page 35 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-125270/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125604 Prep Batch: 125270
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 67 15 - 110 04/08/14 11:08 1
MB MB
Surrogate
04/04/14 10:04
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
70 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 12-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 27 - 110
11 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 12-Fluorophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
73 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 1Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 27 - 110
45 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
98 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-125270/4-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125604 Prep Batch: 125270
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0800 0.0398 mg/L 50 16 - 110
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.0800 0.0512 mg/L 64 35 - 110
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.0800 0.0482 mg/L 60 36 - 110
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.0800 0.0594 mg/L 74 49 - 110
2-Methylphenol 0.0800 0.0478 mg/L 60 36 - 114
Pyridine 0.0800 0.0522 mg/L 65 34 - 110
3 & 4 Methylphenol 0.0800 0.0467 mg/L 58 38 - 110
Hexachlorobenzene 0.0800 0.0508 mg/L 64 44 - 110
Hexachlorobutadiene 0.0800 0.0414 mg/L 52 35 - 110
Hexachloroethane 0.0800 0.0374 mg/L 47 34 - 110
Nitrobenzene 0.0800 0.0514 mg/L 64 43 - 110
Pentachlorophenol 0.160 0.0988 mg/L 62 10 - 122
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 15 - 110
Surrogate
73
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
622-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 27 - 110
532-Fluorophenol (Surr) 10 - 110
66Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 27 - 110
59Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110
82Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110
Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Gasoline Range Organics)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124056/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124029 Prep Batch: 124056
RL MDL
C6-C10 100 U 100 46 ug/Kg 03/26/14 11:00 03/26/14 12:51 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
100 U 46100 ug/Kg 03/26/14 11:00 03/26/14 12:51 1C6-C10
Trifluorotoluene (Surr) 74 40 - 139 03/26/14 12:51 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/26/14 11:00
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
74 03/26/14 11:00 03/26/14 12:51 1Trifluorotoluene (Surr) 40 - 139
TestAmerica Canton
Page 36 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Gasoline Range Organics)
(Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124056/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124029 Prep Batch: 124056
Trifluorotoluene (Surr) 40 - 139
Surrogate
91
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
91Trifluorotoluene (Surr) 40 - 139
Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Diesel Range Organics)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123937/13-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124637 Prep Batch: 123937
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics [C10 - C28] 17 U 17 9.3 mg/Kg 03/25/14 13:12 03/31/14 15:06 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
o-Terphenyl (Surr) 72 40 - 160 03/31/14 15:06 1
MB MB
Surrogate
03/25/14 13:12
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123937/14-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124637 Prep Batch: 123937
Diesel Range Organics [C10 -
C28]
83.3 77.0 mg/Kg 92 52 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
o-Terphenyl (Surr) 40 - 160
Surrogate
91
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124048/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124359 Prep Batch: 124048
RL MDL
Aluminum 20 U 20 9.6 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
1.0 U 0.391.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Antimony
1.0 U 0.301.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Arsenic
0.170 J 0.1220 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Barium
0.50 U 0.0430.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Beryllium
0.20 U 0.0360.20 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Cadmium
500 U 29500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Calcium
0.50 U 0.200.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Chromium
5.0 U 0.165.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Cobalt
2.5 U 0.742.5 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Copper
10 U 4.910 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Iron
0.30 U 0.190.30 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Lead
500 U 6.5500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Magnesium
TestAmerica Canton
Page 37 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124048/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124359 Prep Batch: 124048
RL MDL
Manganese 1.5 U 1.5 0.16 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
4.0 U 0.544.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Nickel
12.8 J 6.2500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Potassium
0.50 U 0.450.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Selenium
0.50 U 0.100.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Silver
500 U 66500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Sodium
1.0 U 0.551.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Thallium
5.0 U 0.215.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Vanadium
2.0 U 1.02.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Zinc
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124048/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124359 Prep Batch: 124048
Aluminum 200 191 mg/Kg 95 80 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Antimony 50.0 46.7 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120
Arsenic 200 188 mg/Kg 94 80 - 120
Barium 200 192 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120
Beryllium 5.00 4.52 mg/Kg 90 80 - 120
Cadmium 5.00 4.76 mg/Kg 95 80 - 120
Calcium 5000 4660 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120
Chromium 20.0 19.3 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120
Cobalt 50.0 46.0 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Copper 25.0 23.3 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120
Iron 100 106 mg/Kg 106 80 - 120
Lead 50.0 46.2 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Magnesium 5000 4600 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Manganese 50.0 48.0 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120
Nickel 50.0 46.2 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Potassium 5000 4650 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120
Selenium 200 183 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Silver 5.00 4.92 mg/Kg 98 80 - 120
Sodium 5000 4670 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120
Thallium 200 185 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Vanadium 50.0 46.7 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120
Zinc 50.0 46.1 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124584/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124741 Prep Batch: 124584
RL MDL
Arsenic 0.50 U 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.00102 J 0.0006710 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Barium
0.10 U 0.000660.10 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Cadmium
0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Chromium
0.50 U 0.00190.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Lead
0.25 U 0.00410.25 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Selenium
TestAmerica Canton
Page 38 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124584/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124741 Prep Batch: 124584
RL MDL
Silver 0.50 U 0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124584/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124741 Prep Batch: 124584
Arsenic 2.00 2.02 mg/L 101 50 - 150
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Barium 2.00 1.85 J mg/L 93 50 - 150
Cadmium 0.0500 0.0499 J mg/L 100 50 - 150
Chromium 0.200 0.193 J mg/L 96 50 - 150
Lead 0.500 0.447 J mg/L 89 50 - 150
Selenium 2.00 2.09 mg/L 105 50 - 150
Silver 0.0500 0.0529 J mg/L 106 50 - 150
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124505/1-D
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124741 Prep Batch: 124584
RL MDL
Arsenic 0.50 U 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1
LB LB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
0.00218 J 0.0006710 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Barium
0.10 U 0.000660.10 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Cadmium
0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Chromium
0.50 U 0.00190.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Lead
0.00562 J 0.00410.25 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Selenium
0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Silver
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124593/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124820 Prep Batch: 124593
RL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 08:58 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124593/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124820 Prep Batch: 124593
Mercury 0.00500 0.00485 mg/L 97 50 - 150
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
TestAmerica Canton
Page 39 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124505/1-E
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124820 Prep Batch: 124593
RL MDL
Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 08:56 1
LB LB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124076/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124236 Prep Batch: 124076
RL MDL
Mercury 0.10 U 0.10 0.015 mg/Kg 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 08:54 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124076/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124236 Prep Batch: 124076
Mercury 0.833 0.856 mg/Kg 103 73 - 121
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
TestAmerica Canton
Page 40 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
GC/MS VOA
Prep Batch: 123823
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 5035240-35339-1 BW9 0-2 Total/NA
Solid 5035240-35339-5 BW10 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 5035MB 240-123823/3-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124125
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8260B 123823240-35339-1 BW9 0-2 Total/NA
Solid 8260B 123823240-35339-5 BW10 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 8260BLCS 240-124125/8 Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8260B 123823MB 240-123823/3-A Method Blank Total/NA
Leach Batch: 124562
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 1311240-35339-1 BW9 0-2 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35339-5 BW10 2-4 TCLP
Solid 1311LB 240-124562/1-A MB Method Blank TCLP
Analysis Batch: 124658
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8260B 124562240-35339-1 BW9 0-2 TCLP
Solid 8260B 124562240-35339-5 BW10 2-4 TCLP
Solid 8260B 124562LB 240-124562/1-A MB Method Blank TCLP
Solid 8260BLCS 240-124658/4 Lab Control Sample Total/NA
GC/MS Semi VOA
Prep Batch: 123875
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3540C240-35339-2 BW9 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 3540C240-35339-5 BW10 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 3540CLCS 240-123875/24-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3540CMB 240-123875/23-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124196
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 123875240-35339-2 BW9 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 8270C 123875240-35339-5 BW10 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 8270C 123875LCS 240-123875/24-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8270C 123875MB 240-123875/23-A Method Blank Total/NA
Leach Batch: 124505
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 1311240-35339-3 BW9 4-8 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35339-4 BW10 0-2 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35339-6 BW10 4-6 TCLP
Prep Batch: 124527
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3520C 124505240-35339-4 BW10 0-2 TCLP
Solid 3520CLCS 240-124527/14-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 41 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
GC/MS Semi VOA (Continued)
Prep Batch: 124527 (Continued)
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3520CMB 240-124527/13-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124918
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 124527240-35339-4 BW10 0-2 TCLP
Analysis Batch: 125096
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 124527LCS 240-124527/14-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8270C 124527MB 240-124527/13-A Method Blank Total/NA
Prep Batch: 125270
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3520C 124505240-35339-3 BW9 4-8 TCLP
Solid 3520C 124505240-35339-6 BW10 4-6 TCLP
Solid 3520CLCS 240-125270/4-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3520CMB 240-125270/3-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125604
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8270C 125270240-35339-3 BW9 4-8 TCLP
Solid 8270C 125270240-35339-6 BW10 4-6 TCLP
Solid 8270C 125270LCS 240-125270/4-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8270C 125270MB 240-125270/3-A Method Blank Total/NA
GC VOA
Analysis Batch: 124029
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8015C 124056LCS 240-124056/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8015C 124056MB 240-124056/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Prep Batch: 124056
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 5030A240-35339-7 BW10 6-8 Total/NA
Solid 5030ALCS 240-124056/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 5030AMB 240-124056/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124065
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8015C 124056240-35339-7 BW10 6-8 Total/NA
Solid 8015C 124056LCS 240-124056/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8015C 124056MB 240-124056/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
GC Semi VOA
Prep Batch: 123937
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3540C240-35339-7 BW10 6-8 Total/NA
Solid 3540CLCS 240-123937/14-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 42 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
GC Semi VOA (Continued)
Prep Batch: 123937 (Continued)
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3540CMB 240-123937/13-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124637
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8015C 123937LCS 240-123937/14-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8015C 123937MB 240-123937/13-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124784
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8015C 123937240-35339-7 BW10 6-8 Total/NA
Metals
Prep Batch: 124048
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3050B240-35339-2 BW9 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 3050B240-35339-5 BW10 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 3050BLCS 240-124048/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3050BMB 240-124048/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Prep Batch: 124076
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7471A240-35339-2 BW9 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 7471A240-35339-5 BW10 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 7471ALCS 240-124076/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 7471AMB 240-124076/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124236
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7471A 124076240-35339-2 BW9 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 124076240-35339-5 BW10 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 7471A 124076LCS 240-124076/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 7471A 124076MB 240-124076/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124359
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 6010B 124048240-35339-2 BW9 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 124048240-35339-5 BW10 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 6010B 124048LCS 240-124048/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 6010B 124048MB 240-124048/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
Leach Batch: 124505
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 1311240-35339-3 BW9 4-8 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35339-4 BW10 0-2 TCLP
Solid 1311240-35339-6 BW10 4-6 TCLP
Solid 1311LB 240-124505/1-D Method Blank TCLP
Solid 1311LB 240-124505/1-E Method Blank TCLP
TestAmerica Canton
Page 43 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Metals (Continued)
Prep Batch: 124584
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 3010A 124505240-35339-3 BW9 4-8 TCLP
Solid 3010A 124505240-35339-4 BW10 0-2 TCLP
Solid 3010A 124505240-35339-6 BW10 4-6 TCLP
Solid 3010A 124505LB 240-124505/1-D Method Blank TCLP
Solid 3010ALCS 240-124584/3-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 3010AMB 240-124584/2-A Method Blank Total/NA
Prep Batch: 124593
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7470A 124505240-35339-3 BW9 4-8 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124505240-35339-4 BW10 0-2 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124505240-35339-6 BW10 4-6 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124505LB 240-124505/1-E Method Blank TCLP
Solid 7470ALCS 240-124593/3-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 7470AMB 240-124593/2-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124741
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 6010B 124584240-35339-3 BW9 4-8 TCLP
Solid 6010B 124584240-35339-4 BW10 0-2 TCLP
Solid 6010B 124584240-35339-6 BW10 4-6 TCLP
Solid 6010B 124584LB 240-124505/1-D Method Blank TCLP
Solid 6010B 124584LCS 240-124584/3-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 6010B 124584MB 240-124584/2-A Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124820
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 7470A 124593240-35339-3 BW9 4-8 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124593240-35339-4 BW10 0-2 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124593240-35339-6 BW10 4-6 TCLP
Solid 7470A 124593LB 240-124505/1-E Method Blank TCLP
Solid 7470A 124593LCS 240-124593/3-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 7470A 124593MB 240-124593/2-A Method Blank Total/NA
General Chemistry
Analysis Batch: 123764
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid Moisture240-35339-1 BW9 0-2 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35339-1 DU BW9 0-2 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35339-2 BW9 2-4 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35339-5 BW10 2-4 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35339-7 BW10 6-8 Total/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 44 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Lab ChronicleClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW9 0-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-1Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:45
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Analysis 8260B 1 124658 03/31/14 21:59 RJQ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 5035 123823 03/24/14 13:45 TJL2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 8260B 1 124125 03/27/14 06:03 TJL2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123764 03/24/14 15:29 NJE TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW9 2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:50
Percent Solids: 87.3Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Prep 3540C 03/25/14 09:59 MPM123875 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8270C 1 124196 03/27/14 19:12 JMG TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 124048 03/26/14 10:45 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124359 03/27/14 14:35 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 7471A 124076 03/26/14 14:45 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 7471A 1 124236 03/27/14 09:47 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123764 03/24/14 15:29 NJE TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW9 4-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-3Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:52
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ124505 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Prep 3520C 125270 04/04/14 10:04 RTR TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 8270C 1 125604 04/08/14 11:57 MRU TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124505 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 3010A 124584 03/31/14 09:48 DEE TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 6010B 1 124741 04/01/14 09:54 KLC TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124505 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7470A 124593 03/31/14 15:25 DEE TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 7470A 1 124820 04/01/14 09:26 AMM2 TAL CANTCLP
Client Sample ID: BW10 0-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 10:30
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ124505 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Prep 3520C 124527 03/31/14 07:11 CSC TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 8270C 1 124918 04/02/14 20:43 JMG TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124505 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
TestAmerica Canton
Page 45 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Lab ChronicleClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW10 0-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 10:30
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Prep 3010A 03/31/14 09:48 DEE124584 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Analysis 6010B 1 124741 04/01/14 09:58 KLC TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124505 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7470A 124593 03/31/14 15:25 DEE TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 7470A 1 124820 04/01/14 09:28 AMM2 TAL CANTCLP
Client Sample ID: BW10 2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-5Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 10:35
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Analysis 8260B 1 124658 03/31/14 22:22 RJQ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 5035 123823 03/24/14 13:45 TJL2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 8260B 1 124125 03/27/14 06:46 TJL2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3540C 123875 03/25/14 09:59 MPM TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 8270C 4 124196 03/27/14 20:18 JMG TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3050B 124048 03/26/14 10:45 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 6010B 1 124359 03/27/14 14:39 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 7471A 124076 03/26/14 14:45 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 7471A 1 124236 03/27/14 09:50 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123764 03/24/14 15:29 NJE TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW10 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 10:37
Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Leach 1311 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ124505 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
TCLP
Prep 3520C 125270 04/04/14 10:04 RTR TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 8270C 1 125604 04/08/14 12:21 MRU TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124505 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 3010A 124584 03/31/14 09:48 DEE TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 6010B 1 124741 04/01/14 10:03 KLC TAL CANTCLP
Leach 1311 124505 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ TAL CANTCLP
Prep 7470A 124593 03/31/14 15:25 DEE TAL CANTCLP
Analysis 7470A 1 124820 04/01/14 09:29 AMM2 TAL CANTCLP
TestAmerica Canton
Page 46 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Lab ChronicleClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW10 6-8 Lab Sample ID: 240-35339-7Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 10:40
Percent Solids: 90.5Date Received: 03/24/14 09:45
Prep 5030A 03/26/14 11:00 KMG124056 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8015C 1 124065 03/26/14 18:56 KMG TAL CANTotal/NA
Prep 3540C 123937 03/25/14 13:12 MPM TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 8015C 1 124784 04/01/14 13:40 DEB TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 123764 03/24/14 15:29 NJE TAL CANTotal/NA
Laboratory References:
TAL CAN = TestAmerica Canton, 4101 Shuffel Street NW, North Canton, OH 44720, TEL (330)497-9396
TestAmerica Canton
Page 47 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Certification SummaryClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35339-1
Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio
Laboratory: TestAmerica CantonAll certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all certifications are applicable to this report.
Authority Program EPA Region Certification ID Expiration Date
California 01144CA9NELAP 06-30-14
Connecticut State Program 1 PH-0590 12-31-14
Florida NELAP 4 E87225 06-30-14
Georgia State Program 4 N/A 06-30-14
Illinois NELAP 5 200004 07-31-14
Kansas NELAP 7 E-10336 03-31-14 *
Kentucky (UST) State Program 4 58 06-30-14
L-A-B DoD ELAP L2315 07-18-16
Minnesota NELAP 5 039-999-348 12-31-14
Nevada State Program 9 OH-000482008A 07-31-14
New Jersey NELAP 2 OH001 06-30-14
New York NELAP 2 10975 03-31-14 *
Ohio VAP State Program 5 CL0024 10-31-15
Pennsylvania NELAP 3 68-00340 08-31-14
Texas NELAP 6 08-31-14
USDA Federal P330-13-00319 11-26-16
Virginia NELAP 3 460175 09-14-14
Washington State Program 10 C971 01-12-15
West Virginia DEP State Program 3 210 12-31-14
Wisconsin State Program 5 999518190 08-31-14
TestAmerica Canton
* Expired certification is currently pending renewal and is considered valid.
Page 48 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Page 49 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Page 50 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Page 51 of 51 4/9/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Appendix I
Soil analytical results for borings BW-7A,
BW-8A, BW-9A and BW-10A and water
analytical results for temporary
monitoring wells BW-1 and BW-2
ANALYTICAL REPORTTestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.TestAmerica Canton4101 Shuffel Street NWNorth Canton, OH 44720Tel: (330)497-9396
TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
For:Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.98 County Line Road WestSuite CWesterville, Ohio 43082
Attn: Ms. Linda Aller
Authorized for release by:4/14/2014 3:59:37 PM
Mark Loeb, Project Manager II(330)[email protected]
This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature isintended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.
Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Table of Contents
Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1
Page 2 of 48TestAmerica Canton
4/14/2014
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Definitions/Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Detection Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Surrogate Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
QC Association Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Definitions/GlossaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Qualifiers
GC/MS VOA
Qualifier Description
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
Qualifier
* LCS or LCSD exceeds the control limits
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
B Compound was found in the blank and sample.
Metals
Qualifier Description
B Compound was found in the blank and sample.
Qualifier
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
4 MS, MSD: The analyte present in the original sample is greater than 4 times the matrix spike concentration; therefore, control limits are not
applicable.
F1 MS and/or MSD Recovery exceeds the control limits
Glossary
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
¤ Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
Abbreviation
%R Percent Recovery
CNF Contains no Free Liquid
DER Duplicate error ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dil Fac Dilution Factor
DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
DLC Decision level concentration
MDA Minimum detectable activity
EDL Estimated Detection Limit
MDC Minimum detectable concentration
MDL Method Detection Limit
ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)
NC Not Calculated
ND Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit
QC Quality Control
RER Relative error ratio
RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
TestAmerica Canton
Page 3 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case NarrativeClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Job ID: 240-35621-1
Laboratory: TestAmerica Canton
Narrative
CASE NARRATIVE
Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project: Lancaster, Ohio
Report Number: 240-35621-1
With the exceptions noted as flags or footnotes, standard analytical protocols were followed in the analysis of the samples and no
problems were encountered or anomalies observed. In addition all laboratory quality control samples were within established control
limits, with any exceptions noted below. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of
the method. In some cases, due to interference or analytes present at high concentrations, samples were diluted. For diluted samples,
the reporting limits are adjusted relative to the dilution required.
TestAmerica Canton attests to the validity of the laboratory data generated by TestAmerica facilities reported herein. All analyses
performed by TestAmerica facilities were done using established laboratory SOPs that incorporate QA/QC procedures described in the
application methods. TestAmerica’s operations groups have reviewed the data for compliance with the laboratory QA/QC plan, and data
have been found to be compliant with laboratory protocols unless otherwise noted below.
The test results in this report meet all NELAP requirements for parameters for which accreditation is required or available. Any exceptions
to NELAP requirements are noted in this report. Pursuant to NELAP, this report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written
approval of the laboratory.
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.
All holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these samples, unless otherwise detailed in the
individual sections below.
All solid sample results are reported on an "as received" basis unless otherwise indicated by the presence of a % solids value in the
method header.
This laboratory report is confidential and is intended for the sole use of TestAmerica and its client.
RECEIPT
The samples were received on 4/1/2014 9:40 AM; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice.
The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 1.6º C.
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)
Samples BW7A 2-4 (240-35621-1), BW8A 4-6 (240-35621-2), BW9A 0-2 (240-35621-3) and BW10A 2-4 (240-35621-4) were analyzed for
volatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 8260B. The samples were prepared on 04/01/2014 and
analyzed on 04/02/2014.
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene was detected in method blank MB 240-124999/6 at a level that was above the method detection limit but below the
reporting limit. The value should be considered an estimate, and has been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above the
MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.
Bromomethane failed the recovery criteria high for LCS 240-124999/5. This compound has been identified as a poor performing analyte
when analyzed using this method; therefore, re-extraction/re-analysis was not performed. These results have been reported and qualified.
An additional 5 mls of methanol was added to these samples, due to heavy sample weights.
TestAmerica CantonPage 4 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case NarrativeClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Job ID: 240-35621-1 (Continued)
Laboratory: TestAmerica Canton (Continued)
Insufficient sample volume was available to perform a matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate/sample duplicate (MS/MSD/DUP) associated
with batch 124999 on these samples BW10A 2-4 (240-35621-4), BW7A 2-4 (240-35621-1), BW8A 4-6 (240-35621-2), BW9A 0-2
(240-35621-3).
No other difficulties were encountered during the VOCs analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)
Samples BW4 (240-35621-5), BW1 (240-35621-6) and TRIP BLANK (240-35621-8) were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (GCMS)
in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 8260B. The samples were analyzed on 04/07/2014 and 04/09/2014.
Acetone was detected in method blank MB 240-125462/5 at a level that was above the method detection limit but below the reporting limit.
The value should be considered an estimate, and has been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above the MDL and/or RL,
the result has been flagged.
Methylene Chloride was detected in method blank MB 240-125725/6 at a level that was above the method detection limit but below the
reporting limit. The value should be considered an estimate, and has been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above the
MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged.
Chloroethane and Trichlorofluoromethane failed the recovery criteria high for LCS 240-125462/4. These analytes have been identified as
a poor performing analytes when analyzed using this method; therefore, re-extraction/re-analysis was not performed.
2-Butanone (MEK) failed the recovery criteria high for LCS 240-125725/4. This analyte was biased high in the LCS and was not detected
in the associated samples; therefore, the data has been reported.
No other difficulties were encountered during the VOCs analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
DISSOLVED METALS (ICP)
Samples BW1 (240-35621-6) and BW4 (240-35621-7) were analyzed for dissolved metals (ICP) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method
6010B. The samples were prepared on 04/02/2014 and analyzed on 04/03/2014.
Calcium and Iron failed the recovery criteria high for the MSD of sample BW4MSD (240-35621-7) in batch 240-125100.
No other difficulties were encountered during the metals analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS (ICP)
Samples BW4 (240-35621-5) and BW1 (240-35621-6) were analyzed for total recoverable metals (ICP) in accordance with EPA SW-846
Method 6010B. The samples were prepared on 04/02/2014 and analyzed on 04/03/2014.
Barium, Calcium and Zinc were detected in method blank MB 240-124891/1-A at levels that were above the method detection limit but
below the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result
above the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.
Samples BW4 (240-35621-5)[5X] and BW1 (240-35621-6)[5X] required dilution prior to analysis. The reporting limits have been adjusted
accordingly.
No other difficulties were encountered during the metals analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
DISSOLVED MERCURY (CVAA)
Samples BW1 (240-35621-6) and BW4 (240-35621-7) were analyzed for dissolved mercury (CVAA) in accordance with EPA SW-846
Methods 7470A. The samples were prepared on 04/02/2014 and analyzed on 04/03/2014.
No difficulties were encountered during the mercury analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TOTAL MERCURY
Samples BW4 (240-35621-5) and BW1 (240-35621-6) were analyzed for total mercury in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 7470A.
TestAmerica CantonPage 5 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case NarrativeClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Job ID: 240-35621-1 (Continued)
Laboratory: TestAmerica Canton (Continued)
The samples were prepared on 04/02/2014 and analyzed on 04/03/2014.
Samples BW4 (240-35621-5)[2X] and BW1 (240-35621-6)[10X] required dilution prior to analysis. The reporting limits have been adjusted
accordingly.
No difficulties were encountered during the mercury analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
PERCENT SOLIDS
Samples BW7A 2-4 (240-35621-1), BW8A 4-6 (240-35621-2), BW9A 0-2 (240-35621-3) and BW10A 2-4 (240-35621-4) were analyzed for
percent solids in accordance with EPA Method 160.3 MOD. The samples were analyzed on 04/01/2014.
No difficulties were encountered during the % solids analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TestAmerica CantonPage 6 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Method SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol
SW8468260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) TAL CAN
SW8466010B Metals (ICP) TAL CAN
SW8467470A Mercury (CVAA) TAL CAN
EPAMoisture Percent Moisture TAL CAN
Protocol References:
EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
Laboratory References:
TAL CAN = TestAmerica Canton, 4101 Shuffel Street NW, North Canton, OH 44720, TEL (330)497-9396
TestAmerica Canton
Page 7 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Sample SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix
240-35621-1 BW7A 2-4 Solid 03/31/14 07:20 04/01/14 09:40
240-35621-2 BW8A 4-6 Solid 03/31/14 07:35 04/01/14 09:40
240-35621-3 BW9A 0-2 Solid 03/31/14 07:50 04/01/14 09:40
240-35621-4 BW10A 2-4 Solid 03/31/14 08:00 04/01/14 09:40
240-35621-5 BW4 Water 03/31/14 09:30 04/01/14 09:40
240-35621-6 BW1 Water 03/31/14 10:10 04/01/14 09:40
240-35621-7 BW4 Water 03/31/14 10:55 04/01/14 09:40
240-35621-8 TRIP BLANK Water 03/31/14 00:00 04/01/14 09:40
TestAmerica Canton
Page 8 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW7A 2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-1
No Detections.
Client Sample ID: BW8A 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-2
No Detections.
Client Sample ID: BW9A 0-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-3
☼Acetone
RL
12 ug/Kg
MDL
3.8
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA1J7.0 8260B
☼Methylene Chloride 3.0 ug/Kg0.40 Total/NA10.41 J 8260B
Client Sample ID: BW10A 2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-4
No Detections.
Client Sample ID: BW4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-5
2-Butanone (MEK)
RL
10 ug/L
MDL
0.57
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA1J0.61 8260B
Acetone 10 ug/L1.1 Total/NA14.0 J B 8260B
Aluminum 200 ug/L97 Total
Recoverable
1100000 6010B
Antimony 10 ug/L2.1 Total
Recoverable
135 6010B
Arsenic 10 ug/L3.2 Total
Recoverable
1700 6010B
Barium 200 ug/L0.67 Total
Recoverable
14900 B 6010B
Beryllium 5.0 ug/L0.46 Total
Recoverable
19.9 6010B
Cadmium 2.0 ug/L0.66 Total
Recoverable
11200 6010B
Calcium 5000 ug/L130 Total
Recoverable
1250000 B 6010B
Chromium 5.0 ug/L2.2 Total
Recoverable
11300 6010B
Cobalt 7.0 ug/L1.7 Total
Recoverable
1120 6010B
Copper 25 ug/L4.5 Total
Recoverable
13100 6010B
Iron 100 ug/L81 Total
Recoverable
1480000 6010B
Lead 15 ug/L9.5 Total
Recoverable
518000 6010B
Magnesium 5000 ug/L34 Total
Recoverable
144000 6010B
Manganese 15 ug/L0.96 Total
Recoverable
16000 6010B
Nickel 40 ug/L3.2 Total
Recoverable
1690 6010B
Potassium 5000 ug/L72 Total
Recoverable
119000 6010B
Selenium 5.0 ug/L4.1 Total
Recoverable
17000 6010B
Silver 5.0 ug/L2.2 Total
Recoverable
1850 6010B
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 9 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW4 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-5
Sodium
RL
5000 ug/L
MDL
590
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total
Recoverable
159000 6010B
Thallium 10 ug/L4.7 Total
Recoverable
17.7 J 6010B
Vanadium 7.0 ug/L2.4 Total
Recoverable
1250 6010B
Zinc 250 ug/L25 Total
Recoverable
529000 B 6010B
Mercury 0.40 ug/L0.24 Total/NA216 7470A
Client Sample ID: BW1 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-6
Acetone
RL
10 ug/L
MDL
1.1
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA1J B3.0 8260B
Carbon disulfide 1.0 ug/L0.13 Total/NA10.69 J 8260B
Aluminum 200 ug/L97 Total
Recoverable
159000 6010B
Antimony 10 ug/L2.1 Total
Recoverable
120 6010B
Arsenic 10 ug/L3.2 Total
Recoverable
1210 6010B
Barium 200 ug/L0.67 Total
Recoverable
16300 B 6010B
Beryllium 5.0 ug/L0.46 Total
Recoverable
14.5 J 6010B
Cadmium 2.0 ug/L0.66 Total
Recoverable
118 6010B
Calcium 5000 ug/L130 Total
Recoverable
1350000 B 6010B
Chromium 5.0 ug/L2.2 Total
Recoverable
1800 6010B
Cobalt 7.0 ug/L1.7 Total
Recoverable
124 6010B
Copper 25 ug/L4.5 Total
Recoverable
1770 6010B
Iron 100 ug/L81 Total
Recoverable
1230000 6010B
Lead 3.0 ug/L1.9 Total
Recoverable
14500 6010B
Magnesium 5000 ug/L34 Total
Recoverable
159000 6010B
Manganese 15 ug/L0.96 Total
Recoverable
12800 6010B
Nickel 40 ug/L3.2 Total
Recoverable
1110 6010B
Potassium 5000 ug/L72 Total
Recoverable
126000 6010B
Selenium 5.0 ug/L4.1 Total
Recoverable
114 6010B
Silver 5.0 ug/L2.2 Total
Recoverable
19.7 6010B
Sodium 5000 ug/L590 Total
Recoverable
1330000 6010B
Vanadium 7.0 ug/L2.4 Total
Recoverable
168 6010B
Zinc 250 ug/L25 Total
Recoverable
511000 B 6010B
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 10 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW1 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-6
Arsenic
RL
10 ug/L
MDL
3.2
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Dissolved1J7.8 6010B
Barium 200 ug/L0.67 Dissolved1400 B 6010B
Calcium 5000 ug/L130 Dissolved1290000 B 6010B
Chromium 5.0 ug/L2.2 Dissolved13.3 J 6010B
Iron 100 ug/L81 Dissolved115000 6010B
Lead 3.0 ug/L1.9 Dissolved12.7 J 6010B
Magnesium 5000 ug/L34 Dissolved145000 6010B
Manganese 15 ug/L0.96 Dissolved11000 6010B
Nickel 40 ug/L3.2 Dissolved14.9 J 6010B
Potassium 5000 ug/L72 Dissolved117000 6010B
Sodium 5000 ug/L590 Dissolved1360000 6010B
Zinc 50 ug/L5.0 Dissolved147 J B 6010B
Mercury 2.0 ug/L1.2 Total/NA1046 7470A
Client Sample ID: BW4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-7
Arsenic
RL
10 ug/L
MDL
3.2
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Dissolved143 6010B
Barium 200 ug/L0.67 Dissolved1210 B 6010B
Calcium 5000 ug/L130 Dissolved1160000 B 6010B
Cobalt 7.0 ug/L1.7 Dissolved13.7 J 6010B
Iron 100 ug/L81 Dissolved15100 6010B
Magnesium 5000 ug/L34 Dissolved123000 6010B
Manganese 15 ug/L0.96 Dissolved11100 6010B
Nickel 40 ug/L3.2 Dissolved19.4 J 6010B
Potassium 5000 ug/L72 Dissolved18700 6010B
Selenium 5.0 ug/L4.1 Dissolved14.9 J 6010B
Sodium 5000 ug/L590 Dissolved162000 6010B
Zinc 50 ug/L5.0 Dissolved1130 B 6010B
Client Sample ID: TRIP BLANK Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-8
Methylene Chloride
RL
1.0 ug/L
MDL
0.33
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA1J B0.41 8260B
TestAmerica Canton
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 11 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-1Client Sample ID: BW7A 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/31/14 07:20
Percent Solids: 88.3Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.8 U 2.8 0.31 ug/Kg ☼ 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
2.8 0.19 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.8 U
2.8 0.72 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 2.8 U
2.8 0.22 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2.8 U
2.8 0.20 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼1,1-Dichloroethane 2.8 U
2.8 0.29 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼1,1-Dichloroethene 2.8 U
2.8 0.15 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2.8 U
5.6 0.72 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 5.6 U
2.8 0.20 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2.8 U
2.8 0.19 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼1,2-Dichloroethane 2.8 U
2.8 0.38 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼1,2-Dichloropropane 2.8 U
2.8 0.19 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2.8 U
2.8 0.37 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.8 U
11 0.78 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 11 U
11 0.35 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼2-Hexanone 11 U
11 0.30 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 11 U
11 3.5 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Acetone 11 U
2.8 0.13 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Benzene 2.8 U
2.8 0.18 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Bromoform 2.8 U
2.8 0.30 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Bromomethane 2.8 U *
2.8 0.24 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Carbon disulfide 2.8 U
2.8 0.21 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Carbon tetrachloride 2.8 U
2.8 0.18 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Chlorobenzene 2.8 U
2.8 0.31 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Chlorodibromomethane 2.8 U
2.8 0.48 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Chloroethane 2.8 U
2.8 0.16 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Chloroform 2.8 U
2.8 0.23 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Chloromethane 2.8 U
2.8 0.20 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.8 U
2.8 0.19 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.8 U
5.6 0.18 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Cyclohexane 5.6 U
2.8 0.16 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Dichlorobromomethane 2.8 U
2.8 0.28 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.8 U
2.8 0.14 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Ethylbenzene 2.8 U
2.8 0.28 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Ethylene Dibromide 2.8 U
2.8 0.089 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Isopropylbenzene 2.8 U
5.6 0.78 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Methyl acetate 5.6 U
2.8 0.24 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Methyl tert-butyl ether 2.8 U
5.6 0.17 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Methylcyclohexane 5.6 U
2.8 0.37 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Methylene Chloride 2.8 U
2.8 0.084 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Styrene 2.8 U
2.8 0.29 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Tetrachloroethene 2.8 U
2.8 0.15 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Toluene 2.8 U
2.8 0.23 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.8 U
2.8 0.30 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.8 U
2.8 0.23 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Trichloroethene 2.8 U
2.8 0.19 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Trichlorofluoromethane 2.8 U
2.8 0.22 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Vinyl chloride 2.8 U
5.6 0.19 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Xylenes, Total 5.6 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 12 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-1Client Sample ID: BW7A 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/31/14 07:20
Percent Solids: 88.3Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 111 58 - 123 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 100 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 152 - 136
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 87 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 137 - 132
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 95 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 167 - 125
TestAmerica Canton
Page 13 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-2Client Sample ID: BW8A 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/31/14 07:35
Percent Solids: 85.0Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.3 U 2.3 0.26 ug/Kg ☼ 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
2.3 0.16 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.3 U
2.3 0.60 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 2.3 U
2.3 0.18 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2.3 U
2.3 0.17 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼1,1-Dichloroethane 2.3 U
2.3 0.24 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼1,1-Dichloroethene 2.3 U
2.3 0.13 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2.3 U
4.6 0.60 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 4.6 U
2.3 0.17 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2.3 U
2.3 0.16 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼1,2-Dichloroethane 2.3 U
2.3 0.32 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼1,2-Dichloropropane 2.3 U
2.3 0.16 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2.3 U
2.3 0.31 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.3 U
9.3 0.65 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 9.3 U
9.3 0.29 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼2-Hexanone 9.3 U
9.3 0.25 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 9.3 U
9.3 2.9 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Acetone 9.3 U
2.3 0.11 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Benzene 2.3 U
2.3 0.15 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Bromoform 2.3 U
2.3 0.25 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Bromomethane 2.3 U *
2.3 0.20 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Carbon disulfide 2.3 U
2.3 0.17 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Carbon tetrachloride 2.3 U
2.3 0.15 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Chlorobenzene 2.3 U
2.3 0.26 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Chlorodibromomethane 2.3 U
2.3 0.40 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Chloroethane 2.3 U
2.3 0.13 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Chloroform 2.3 U
2.3 0.19 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Chloromethane 2.3 U
2.3 0.17 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.3 U
2.3 0.16 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.3 U
4.6 0.15 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Cyclohexane 4.6 U
2.3 0.13 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Dichlorobromomethane 2.3 U
2.3 0.23 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.3 U
2.3 0.12 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Ethylbenzene 2.3 U
2.3 0.23 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Ethylene Dibromide 2.3 U
2.3 0.074 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Isopropylbenzene 2.3 U
4.6 0.65 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Methyl acetate 4.6 U
2.3 0.20 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Methyl tert-butyl ether 2.3 U
4.6 0.14 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Methylcyclohexane 4.6 U
2.3 0.31 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Methylene Chloride 2.3 U
2.3 0.070 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Styrene 2.3 U
2.3 0.24 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Tetrachloroethene 2.3 U
2.3 0.13 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Toluene 2.3 U
2.3 0.19 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.3 U
2.3 0.25 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.3 U
2.3 0.20 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Trichloroethene 2.3 U
2.3 0.16 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Trichlorofluoromethane 2.3 U
2.3 0.18 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Vinyl chloride 2.3 U
4.6 0.16 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Xylenes, Total 4.6 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 14 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-2Client Sample ID: BW8A 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/31/14 07:35
Percent Solids: 85.0Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 105 58 - 123 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 91 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 152 - 136
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 86 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 137 - 132
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 95 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 167 - 125
TestAmerica Canton
Page 15 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-3Client Sample ID: BW9A 0-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/31/14 07:50
Percent Solids: 89.0Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.0 U 3.0 0.33 ug/Kg ☼ 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
3.0 0.20 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.0 U
3.0 0.78 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 3.0 U
3.0 0.23 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane 3.0 U
3.0 0.22 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼1,1-Dichloroethane 3.0 U
3.0 0.31 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼1,1-Dichloroethene 3.0 U
3.0 0.16 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 3.0 U
6.0 0.78 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 6.0 U
3.0 0.22 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene 3.0 U
3.0 0.20 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼1,2-Dichloroethane 3.0 U
3.0 0.41 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼1,2-Dichloropropane 3.0 U
3.0 0.21 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene 3.0 U
3.0 0.39 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene 3.0 U
12 0.84 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 12 U
12 0.38 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼2-Hexanone 12 U
12 0.32 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 12 U
12 3.8 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Acetone 7.0 J
3.0 0.14 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Benzene 3.0 U
3.0 0.20 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Bromoform 3.0 U
3.0 0.32 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Bromomethane 3.0 U *
3.0 0.26 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Carbon disulfide 3.0 U
3.0 0.22 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Carbon tetrachloride 3.0 U
3.0 0.20 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Chlorobenzene 3.0 U
3.0 0.33 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Chlorodibromomethane 3.0 U
3.0 0.51 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Chloroethane 3.0 U
3.0 0.17 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Chloroform 3.0 U
3.0 0.25 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Chloromethane 3.0 U
3.0 0.22 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.0 U
3.0 0.20 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.0 U
6.0 0.20 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Cyclohexane 6.0 U
3.0 0.17 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Dichlorobromomethane 3.0 U
3.0 0.30 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Dichlorodifluoromethane 3.0 U
3.0 0.16 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Ethylbenzene 3.0 U
3.0 0.30 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Ethylene Dibromide 3.0 U
3.0 0.096 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Isopropylbenzene 3.0 U
6.0 0.84 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Methyl acetate 6.0 U
3.0 0.26 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Methyl tert-butyl ether 3.0 U
6.0 0.19 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Methylcyclohexane 6.0 U
3.0 0.40 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Methylene Chloride 0.41 J
3.0 0.090 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Styrene 3.0 U
3.0 0.31 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Tetrachloroethene 3.0 U
3.0 0.16 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Toluene 3.0 U
3.0 0.25 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.0 U
3.0 0.32 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.0 U
3.0 0.25 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Trichloroethene 3.0 U
3.0 0.20 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Trichlorofluoromethane 3.0 U
3.0 0.23 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Vinyl chloride 3.0 U
6.0 0.21 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Xylenes, Total 6.0 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 16 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-3Client Sample ID: BW9A 0-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/31/14 07:50
Percent Solids: 89.0Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 104 58 - 123 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 97 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 152 - 136
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 87 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 137 - 132
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 99 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 167 - 125
TestAmerica Canton
Page 17 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-4Client Sample ID: BW10A 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/31/14 08:00
Percent Solids: 91.8Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.5 U 2.5 0.29 ug/Kg ☼ 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
2.5 0.17 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.5 U
2.5 0.66 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 2.5 U
2.5 0.20 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2.5 U
2.5 0.18 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼1,1-Dichloroethane 2.5 U
2.5 0.26 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼1,1-Dichloroethene 2.5 U
2.5 0.14 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2.5 U
5.1 0.66 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 5.1 U
2.5 0.18 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2.5 U
2.5 0.17 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼1,2-Dichloroethane 2.5 U
2.5 0.35 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼1,2-Dichloropropane 2.5 U
2.5 0.18 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2.5 U
2.5 0.34 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.5 U
10 0.71 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 10 U
10 0.32 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼2-Hexanone 10 U
10 0.28 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 10 U
10 3.2 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Acetone 10 U
2.5 0.12 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Benzene 2.5 U
2.5 0.17 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Bromoform 2.5 U
2.5 0.28 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Bromomethane 2.5 U *
2.5 0.22 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Carbon disulfide 2.5 U
2.5 0.19 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Carbon tetrachloride 2.5 U
2.5 0.17 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Chlorobenzene 2.5 U
2.5 0.28 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Chlorodibromomethane 2.5 U
2.5 0.44 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Chloroethane 2.5 U
2.5 0.15 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Chloroform 2.5 U
2.5 0.21 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Chloromethane 2.5 U
2.5 0.18 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.5 U
2.5 0.17 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.5 U
5.1 0.17 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Cyclohexane 5.1 U
2.5 0.14 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Dichlorobromomethane 2.5 U
2.5 0.25 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.5 U
2.5 0.13 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Ethylbenzene 2.5 U
2.5 0.25 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Ethylene Dibromide 2.5 U
2.5 0.081 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Isopropylbenzene 2.5 U
5.1 0.71 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Methyl acetate 5.1 U
2.5 0.22 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Methyl tert-butyl ether 2.5 U
5.1 0.16 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Methylcyclohexane 5.1 U
2.5 0.34 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Methylene Chloride 2.5 U
2.5 0.076 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Styrene 2.5 U
2.5 0.26 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Tetrachloroethene 2.5 U
2.5 0.14 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Toluene 2.5 U
2.5 0.21 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.5 U
2.5 0.28 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.5 U
2.5 0.21 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Trichloroethene 2.5 U
2.5 0.17 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Trichlorofluoromethane 2.5 U
2.5 0.20 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Vinyl chloride 2.5 U
5.1 0.18 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Xylenes, Total 5.1 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 18 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-4Client Sample ID: BW10A 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/31/14 08:00
Percent Solids: 91.8Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 114 58 - 123 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 108 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 152 - 136
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 85 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 137 - 132
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 98 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 167 - 125
TestAmerica Canton
Page 19 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-5Client Sample ID: BW4Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/31/14 09:30
Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0 U 1.0 0.22 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
1.0 0.18 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.28 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.27 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.15 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,1-Dichloroethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.19 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,1-Dichloroethene 1.0 U
1.0 0.15 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 U
2.0 0.67 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 2.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 U
1.0 0.22 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,2-Dichloroethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.18 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 U
1.0 0.14 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 U
10 0.57 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 12-Butanone (MEK) 0.61 J
10 0.41 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 12-Hexanone 10 U
10 0.32 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 10 U
10 1.1 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Acetone 4.0 J B
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Benzene 1.0 U
1.0 0.64 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Bromoform 1.0 U
1.0 0.41 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Bromomethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Carbon disulfide 1.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Carbon tetrachloride 1.0 U
1.0 0.15 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Chlorobenzene 1.0 U
1.0 0.18 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Chlorodibromomethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.29 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Chloroethane 1.0 U *
1.0 0.16 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Chloroform 1.0 U
1.0 0.30 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Chloromethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.17 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 U
1.0 0.14 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 U
1.0 0.12 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Cyclohexane 1.0 U
1.0 0.15 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Dichlorobromomethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.31 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.17 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Ethylbenzene 1.0 U
1.0 0.24 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Ethylene Dibromide 1.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Isopropylbenzene 1.0 U
10 0.38 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Methyl acetate 10 U
1.0 0.17 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Methyl tert-butyl ether 1.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Methylcyclohexane 1.0 U
1.0 0.33 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Methylene Chloride 1.0 U
1.0 0.11 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Styrene 1.0 U
1.0 0.29 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Tetrachloroethene 1.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Toluene 1.0 U
1.0 0.19 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 U
1.0 0.19 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 U
1.0 0.17 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Trichloroethene 1.0 U
1.0 0.21 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 U *
1.0 0.22 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Vinyl chloride 1.0 U
2.0 0.14 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Xylenes, Total 2.0 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 20 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-5Client Sample ID: BW4Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/31/14 09:30
Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 114 63 - 129 04/07/14 17:34 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 82 04/07/14 17:34 166 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 99 04/07/14 17:34 175 - 121
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 91 04/07/14 17:34 174 - 120
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Total RecoverableRL MDL
Aluminum 100000 200 97 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 2.1 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Antimony 35
10 3.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Arsenic 700
200 0.67 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Barium 4900 B
5.0 0.46 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Beryllium 9.9
2.0 0.66 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Cadmium 1200
5000 130 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Calcium 250000 B
5.0 2.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Chromium 1300
7.0 1.7 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Cobalt 120
25 4.5 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Copper 3100
100 81 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Iron 480000
15 9.5 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:05 5Lead 18000
5000 34 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Magnesium 44000
15 0.96 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Manganese 6000
40 3.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Nickel 690
5000 72 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Potassium 19000
5.0 4.1 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Selenium 7000
5.0 2.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Silver 850
5000 590 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Sodium 59000
10 4.7 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Thallium 7.7 J
7.0 2.4 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Vanadium 250
250 25 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:05 5Zinc 29000 B
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 16 0.40 0.24 ug/L 04/02/14 13:00 04/03/14 13:12 2
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 21 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-6Client Sample ID: BW1Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/31/14 10:10
Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0 U 1.0 0.22 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
1.0 0.18 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.28 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.27 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 11,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.15 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 11,1-Dichloroethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.19 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 11,1-Dichloroethene 1.0 U
1.0 0.15 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 U
2.0 0.67 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 11,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 2.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 11,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 U
1.0 0.22 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 11,2-Dichloroethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.18 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 11,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 U
1.0 0.14 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 11,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 11,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 U
10 0.57 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 12-Butanone (MEK) 10 U
10 0.41 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 12-Hexanone 10 U
10 0.32 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 10 U
10 1.1 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Acetone 3.0 J B
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Benzene 1.0 U
1.0 0.64 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Bromoform 1.0 U
1.0 0.41 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Bromomethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Carbon disulfide 0.69 J
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Carbon tetrachloride 1.0 U
1.0 0.15 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Chlorobenzene 1.0 U
1.0 0.18 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Chlorodibromomethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.29 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Chloroethane 1.0 U *
1.0 0.16 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Chloroform 1.0 U
1.0 0.30 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Chloromethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.17 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 U
1.0 0.14 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 U
1.0 0.12 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Cyclohexane 1.0 U
1.0 0.15 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Dichlorobromomethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.31 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.17 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Ethylbenzene 1.0 U
1.0 0.24 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Ethylene Dibromide 1.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Isopropylbenzene 1.0 U
10 0.38 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Methyl acetate 10 U
1.0 0.17 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Methyl tert-butyl ether 1.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Methylcyclohexane 1.0 U
1.0 0.33 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Methylene Chloride 1.0 U
1.0 0.11 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Styrene 1.0 U
1.0 0.29 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Tetrachloroethene 1.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Toluene 1.0 U
1.0 0.19 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 U
1.0 0.19 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 U
1.0 0.17 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Trichloroethene 1.0 U
1.0 0.21 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 U *
1.0 0.22 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Vinyl chloride 1.0 U
2.0 0.14 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Xylenes, Total 2.0 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 22 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-6Client Sample ID: BW1Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/31/14 10:10
Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 112 63 - 129 04/07/14 17:56 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 84 04/07/14 17:56 166 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 103 04/07/14 17:56 175 - 121
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 90 04/07/14 17:56 174 - 120
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Total RecoverableRL MDL
Aluminum 59000 200 97 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 2.1 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Antimony 20
10 3.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Arsenic 210
200 0.67 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Barium 6300 B
5.0 0.46 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Beryllium 4.5 J
2.0 0.66 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Cadmium 18
5000 130 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Calcium 350000 B
5.0 2.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Chromium 800
7.0 1.7 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Cobalt 24
25 4.5 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Copper 770
100 81 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Iron 230000
3.0 1.9 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Lead 4500
5000 34 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Magnesium 59000
15 0.96 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Manganese 2800
40 3.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Nickel 110
5000 72 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Potassium 26000
5.0 4.1 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Selenium 14
5.0 2.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Silver 9.7
5000 590 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Sodium 330000
10 4.7 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Thallium 10 U
7.0 2.4 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Vanadium 68
250 25 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:14 5Zinc 11000 B
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - DissolvedRL MDL
Aluminum 200 U 200 97 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 2.1 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Antimony 10 U
10 3.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Arsenic 7.8 J
200 0.67 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Barium 400 B
5.0 0.46 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Beryllium 5.0 U
2.0 0.66 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Cadmium 2.0 U
5000 130 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Calcium 290000 B
5.0 2.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Chromium 3.3 J
7.0 1.7 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Cobalt 7.0 U
25 4.5 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Copper 25 U
100 81 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Iron 15000
3.0 1.9 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Lead 2.7 J
5000 34 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Magnesium 45000
15 0.96 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Manganese 1000
40 3.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Nickel 4.9 J
5000 72 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Potassium 17000
5.0 4.1 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Selenium 5.0 U
5.0 2.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Silver 5.0 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 23 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-6Client Sample ID: BW1Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/31/14 10:10
Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Dissolved (Continued)RL MDL
Sodium 360000 5000 590 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 4.7 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Thallium 10 U
7.0 2.4 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Vanadium 7.0 U
50 5.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Zinc 47 J B
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL
Mercury 46 2.0 1.2 ug/L 04/02/14 13:00 04/03/14 13:14 10
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - DissolvedRL MDL
Mercury 0.20 U 0.20 0.12 ug/L 04/02/14 13:00 04/03/14 11:59 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 24 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-7Client Sample ID: BW4Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/31/14 10:55
Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - DissolvedRL MDL
Aluminum 200 U 200 97 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
10 2.1 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Antimony 10 U
10 3.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Arsenic 43
200 0.67 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Barium 210 B
5.0 0.46 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Beryllium 5.0 U
2.0 0.66 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Cadmium 2.0 U
5000 130 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Calcium 160000 B
5.0 2.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Chromium 5.0 U
7.0 1.7 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Cobalt 3.7 J
25 4.5 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Copper 25 U
100 81 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Iron 5100
3.0 1.9 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Lead 3.0 U
5000 34 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Magnesium 23000
15 0.96 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Manganese 1100
40 3.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Nickel 9.4 J
5000 72 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Potassium 8700
5.0 4.1 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Selenium 4.9 J
5.0 2.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Silver 5.0 U
5000 590 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Sodium 62000
10 4.7 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Thallium 10 U
7.0 2.4 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Vanadium 7.0 U
50 5.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Zinc 130 B
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - DissolvedRL MDL
Mercury 0.20 U 0.20 0.12 ug/L 04/02/14 13:00 04/03/14 11:49 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Canton
Page 25 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-8Client Sample ID: TRIP BLANKMatrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/31/14 00:00
Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0 U 1.0 0.22 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
1.0 0.18 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.28 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.27 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 11,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.15 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 11,1-Dichloroethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.19 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 11,1-Dichloroethene 1.0 U
1.0 0.15 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 U
2.0 0.67 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 11,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 2.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 11,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 U
1.0 0.22 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 11,2-Dichloroethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.18 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 11,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 U
1.0 0.14 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 11,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 11,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 U
10 0.57 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 12-Butanone (MEK) 10 U *
10 0.41 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 12-Hexanone 10 U
10 0.32 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 10 U
10 1.1 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Acetone 10 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Benzene 1.0 U
1.0 0.64 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Bromoform 1.0 U
1.0 0.41 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Bromomethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Carbon disulfide 1.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Carbon tetrachloride 1.0 U
1.0 0.15 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Chlorobenzene 1.0 U
1.0 0.18 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Chlorodibromomethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.29 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Chloroethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.16 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Chloroform 1.0 U
1.0 0.30 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Chloromethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.17 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 U
1.0 0.14 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 U
1.0 0.12 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Cyclohexane 1.0 U
1.0 0.15 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Dichlorobromomethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.31 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.17 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Ethylbenzene 1.0 U
1.0 0.24 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Ethylene Dibromide 1.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Isopropylbenzene 1.0 U
10 0.38 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Methyl acetate 10 U
1.0 0.17 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Methyl tert-butyl ether 1.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Methylcyclohexane 1.0 U
1.0 0.33 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Methylene Chloride 0.41 J B
1.0 0.11 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Styrene 1.0 U
1.0 0.29 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Tetrachloroethene 1.0 U
1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Toluene 1.0 U
1.0 0.19 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 U
1.0 0.19 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 U
1.0 0.17 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Trichloroethene 1.0 U
1.0 0.21 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 U
1.0 0.22 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Vinyl chloride 1.0 U
2.0 0.14 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Xylenes, Total 2.0 U
TestAmerica Canton
Page 26 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-8Client Sample ID: TRIP BLANKMatrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/31/14 00:00
Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 93 63 - 129 04/09/14 01:26 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 86 04/09/14 01:26 166 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 89 04/09/14 01:26 175 - 121
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 91 04/09/14 01:26 174 - 120
TestAmerica Canton
Page 27 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Surrogate SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (58-123) (52-136) (37-132) (67-125)
12DCE BFB DBFM TOL
111 100 87 95240-35621-1
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW7A 2-4
105 91 86 95240-35621-2 BW8A 4-6
104 97 87 99240-35621-3 BW9A 0-2
114 108 85 98240-35621-4 BW10A 2-4
99 91 94 95LCS 240-124999/5 Lab Control Sample
101 90 86 91MB 240-124999/6 Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Water
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (63-129) (66-120) (75-121) (74-120)
12DCE BFB DBFM TOL
114 82 99 91240-35621-5
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BW4
112 84 103 90240-35621-6 BW1
93 86 89 91240-35621-8 TRIP BLANK
105 95 96 92LCS 240-125462/4 Lab Control Sample
84 94 87 95LCS 240-125725/4 Lab Control Sample
116 86 99 87MB 240-125462/5 Method Blank
91 84 89 88MB 240-125725/6 Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
TestAmerica Canton
Page 28 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124999/6
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124999
RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.0 U 5.0 0.56 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
5.0 U 1.35.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
5.0 U 0.395.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 11,1,2-Trichloroethane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 11,1-Dichloroethane
5.0 U 0.525.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 11,1-Dichloroethene
0.393 J 0.275.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
10 U 1.310 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 11,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 11,2-Dichlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 11,2-Dichloroethane
5.0 U 0.695.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 11,2-Dichloropropane
5.0 U 0.355.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 11,3-Dichlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.665.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 11,4-Dichlorobenzene
20 U 1.420 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 12-Butanone (MEK)
20 U 0.6320 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 12-Hexanone
20 U 0.5420 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
20 U 6.320 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Acetone
5.0 U 0.235.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Benzene
5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Bromoform
5.0 U 0.545.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Bromomethane
5.0 U 0.445.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Carbon disulfide
5.0 U 0.375.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Carbon tetrachloride
5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Chlorobenzene
5.0 U 0.555.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Chlorodibromomethane
5.0 U 0.865.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Chloroethane
5.0 U 0.295.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Chloroform
5.0 U 0.415.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Chloromethane
5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10 U 0.3310 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Cyclohexane
5.0 U 0.285.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Dichlorobromomethane
5.0 U 0.505.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Dichlorodifluoromethane
5.0 U 0.265.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Ethylbenzene
5.0 U 0.505.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Ethylene Dibromide
5.0 U 0.165.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Isopropylbenzene
10 U 1.410 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Methyl acetate
5.0 U 0.435.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Methyl tert-butyl ether
10 U 0.3110 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Methylcyclohexane
5.0 U 0.675.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Methylene Chloride
5.0 U 0.155.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Styrene
5.0 U 0.525.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Tetrachloroethene
5.0 U 0.275.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Toluene
5.0 U 0.415.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.0 U 0.545.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
5.0 U 0.425.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Trichloroethene
5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Trichlorofluoromethane
5.0 U 0.395.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Vinyl chloride
10 U 0.3510 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Xylenes, Total
TestAmerica Canton
Page 29 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124999/6
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124999
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 101 58 - 123 04/02/14 17:31 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
90 04/02/14 17:31 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 52 - 136
86 04/02/14 17:31 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 37 - 132
91 04/02/14 17:31 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124999/5
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124999
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 50.0 53.3 ug/Kg 107 77 - 126
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.0 57.1 ug/Kg 114 77 - 123
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroetha
ne
50.0 49.7 ug/Kg 99 80 - 138
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 50.0 53.9 ug/Kg 108 80 - 120
1,1-Dichloroethane 50.0 55.8 ug/Kg 112 76 - 120
1,1-Dichloroethene 50.0 52.6 ug/Kg 105 75 - 135
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 50.0 46.1 ug/Kg 92 64 - 124
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 50.0 54.6 ug/Kg 109 61 - 132
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 46.7 ug/Kg 93 76 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane 50.0 51.8 ug/Kg 104 72 - 120
1,2-Dichloropropane 50.0 52.5 ug/Kg 105 80 - 120
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 46.8 ug/Kg 94 78 - 120
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 46.4 ug/Kg 93 75 - 120
2-Butanone (MEK) 100 109 ug/Kg 109 52 - 131
2-Hexanone 100 113 ug/Kg 113 64 - 136
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 100 121 ug/Kg 121 67 - 135
Acetone 100 121 ug/Kg 121 41 - 137
Benzene 50.0 51.0 ug/Kg 102 79 - 120
Bromoform 50.0 51.1 ug/Kg 102 62 - 133
Bromomethane 50.0 72.8 * ug/Kg 146 42 - 136
Carbon disulfide 50.0 54.7 ug/Kg 109 62 - 146
Carbon tetrachloride 50.0 58.1 ug/Kg 116 71 - 129
Chlorobenzene 50.0 50.6 ug/Kg 101 78 - 120
Chloroethane 50.0 43.8 ug/Kg 88 58 - 120
Chloroform 50.0 52.1 ug/Kg 104 77 - 120
Chloromethane 50.0 40.0 ug/Kg 80 50 - 120
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.0 50.6 ug/Kg 101 76 - 120
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.0 56.6 ug/Kg 113 74 - 128
Cyclohexane 50.0 55.3 ug/Kg 111 66 - 120
Dichlorobromomethane 50.0 54.7 ug/Kg 109 80 - 122
Dichlorodifluoromethane 50.0 26.0 ug/Kg 52 26 - 120
Ethylbenzene 50.0 51.0 ug/Kg 102 79 - 120
Ethylene Dibromide 50.0 55.2 ug/Kg 110 80 - 120
Isopropylbenzene 50.0 52.8 ug/Kg 106 76 - 122
Methyl acetate 250 287 ug/Kg 115 57 - 130
Methyl tert-butyl ether 50.0 50.5 ug/Kg 101 49 - 165
Methylcyclohexane 50.0 50.3 ug/Kg 101 70 - 126
TestAmerica Canton
Page 30 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124999/5
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124999
Methylene Chloride 50.0 57.0 ug/Kg 114 75 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
m-Xylene & p-Xylene 50.0 49.9 ug/Kg 100 80 - 120
o-Xylene 50.0 51.1 ug/Kg 102 80 - 120
Styrene 50.0 48.8 ug/Kg 98 80 - 120
Tetrachloroethene 50.0 51.1 ug/Kg 102 79 - 120
Toluene 50.0 51.3 ug/Kg 103 75 - 120
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.0 54.4 ug/Kg 109 78 - 120
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.0 61.6 ug/Kg 123 73 - 131
Trichloroethene 50.0 55.1 ug/Kg 110 79 - 120
Trichlorofluoromethane 50.0 43.3 ug/Kg 87 57 - 146
Vinyl chloride 50.0 41.2 ug/Kg 82 57 - 120
Xylenes, Total 100 101 ug/Kg 101 80 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 58 - 123
Surrogate
99
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
914-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 52 - 136
94Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 37 - 132
95Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-125462/5
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125462
RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0 U 1.0 0.22 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
1.0 U 0.181.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1.0 U 0.281.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
1.0 U 0.271.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,1,2-Trichloroethane
1.0 U 0.151.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,1-Dichloroethane
1.0 U 0.191.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,1-Dichloroethene
1.0 U 0.151.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2.0 U 0.672.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,2-Dichlorobenzene
1.0 U 0.221.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,2-Dichloroethane
1.0 U 0.181.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,2-Dichloropropane
1.0 U 0.141.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,3-Dichlorobenzene
1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,4-Dichlorobenzene
10 U 0.5710 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 12-Butanone (MEK)
10 U 0.4110 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 12-Hexanone
10 U 0.3210 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1.67 J 1.110 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Acetone
1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Benzene
1.0 U 0.641.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Bromoform
1.0 U 0.411.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Bromomethane
1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Carbon disulfide
1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Carbon tetrachloride
1.0 U 0.151.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Chlorobenzene
1.0 U 0.181.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Chlorodibromomethane
TestAmerica Canton
Page 31 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-125462/5
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125462
RL MDL
Chloroethane 1.0 U 1.0 0.29 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
1.0 U 0.161.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Chloroform
1.0 U 0.301.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Chloromethane
1.0 U 0.171.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
1.0 U 0.141.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
1.0 U 0.121.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Cyclohexane
1.0 U 0.151.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Dichlorobromomethane
1.0 U 0.311.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Dichlorodifluoromethane
1.0 U 0.171.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Ethylbenzene
1.0 U 0.241.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Ethylene Dibromide
1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Isopropylbenzene
10 U 0.3810 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Methyl acetate
1.0 U 0.171.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Methyl tert-butyl ether
1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Methylcyclohexane
1.0 U 0.331.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Methylene Chloride
1.0 U 0.111.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Styrene
1.0 U 0.291.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Tetrachloroethene
1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Toluene
1.0 U 0.191.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1.0 U 0.191.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1.0 U 0.171.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Trichloroethene
1.0 U 0.211.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Trichlorofluoromethane
1.0 U 0.221.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Vinyl chloride
2.0 U 0.142.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Xylenes, Total
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 116 63 - 129 04/07/14 10:49 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
86 04/07/14 10:49 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 66 - 120
99 04/07/14 10:49 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 75 - 121
87 04/07/14 10:49 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 74 - 120
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-125462/4
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125462
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 10.0 10.1 ug/L 101 74 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 10.0 9.10 ug/L 91 68 - 120
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroetha
ne
10.0 10.8 ug/L 108 74 - 151
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 10.0 10.5 ug/L 105 80 - 120
1,1-Dichloroethane 10.0 10.8 ug/L 108 80 - 120
1,1-Dichloroethene 10.0 9.37 ug/L 94 78 - 131
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 10.0 9.31 ug/L 93 48 - 135
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 10.0 8.01 ug/L 80 42 - 136
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10.0 9.98 ug/L 100 80 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane 10.0 12.4 ug/L 124 71 - 127
1,2-Dichloropropane 10.0 11.7 ug/L 117 80 - 120
TestAmerica Canton
Page 32 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-125462/4
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125462
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 10.0 9.67 ug/L 97 80 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10.0 9.86 ug/L 99 80 - 120
2-Butanone (MEK) 20.0 22.4 ug/L 112 60 - 126
2-Hexanone 20.0 23.2 ug/L 116 55 - 133
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 20.0 23.2 ug/L 116 63 - 128
Acetone 20.0 19.7 ug/L 98 43 - 136
Benzene 10.0 10.8 ug/L 108 80 - 120
Bromoform 10.0 9.99 ug/L 100 40 - 131
Bromomethane 10.0 14.9 ug/L 149 11 - 185
Carbon disulfide 10.0 9.76 ug/L 98 62 - 142
Carbon tetrachloride 10.0 11.0 ug/L 110 66 - 128
Chlorobenzene 10.0 10.3 ug/L 103 80 - 120
Chloroethane 10.0 16.4 * ug/L 164 25 - 153
Chloroform 10.0 10.9 ug/L 109 79 - 120
Chloromethane 10.0 11.0 ug/L 110 44 - 126
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 10.0 10.6 ug/L 106 80 - 120
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10.0 11.0 ug/L 110 61 - 120
Cyclohexane 10.0 10.6 ug/L 106 54 - 121
Dichlorobromomethane 10.0 11.8 ug/L 118 72 - 121
Dichlorodifluoromethane 10.0 7.61 ug/L 76 19 - 129
Ethylbenzene 10.0 10.5 ug/L 105 80 - 120
Ethylene Dibromide 10.0 10.6 ug/L 106 79 - 120
Isopropylbenzene 10.0 10.1 ug/L 101 75 - 120
Methyl acetate 50.0 52.3 ug/L 105 58 - 131
Methyl tert-butyl ether 10.0 10.3 ug/L 103 52 - 144
Methylcyclohexane 10.0 10.0 ug/L 100 56 - 127
Methylene Chloride 10.0 10.6 ug/L 106 66 - 131
m-Xylene & p-Xylene 10.0 10.8 ug/L 108 80 - 120
o-Xylene 10.0 10.4 ug/L 104 80 - 120
Styrene 10.0 11.1 ug/L 111 79 - 120
Tetrachloroethene 10.0 9.50 ug/L 95 79 - 120
Toluene 10.0 10.7 ug/L 107 80 - 120
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 10.0 10.4 ug/L 104 80 - 120
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10.0 11.4 ug/L 114 58 - 120
Trichloroethene 10.0 11.0 ug/L 110 76 - 120
Trichlorofluoromethane 10.0 16.0 * ug/L 160 49 - 157
Vinyl chloride 10.0 10.7 ug/L 107 53 - 127
Xylenes, Total 20.0 21.2 ug/L 106 80 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 63 - 129
Surrogate
105
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
954-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 66 - 120
96Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 75 - 121
92Toluene-d8 (Surr) 74 - 120
TestAmerica Canton
Page 33 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-125725/6
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125725
RL MDL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0 U 1.0 0.22 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
1.0 U 0.181.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1.0 U 0.281.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
1.0 U 0.271.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,1,2-Trichloroethane
1.0 U 0.151.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,1-Dichloroethane
1.0 U 0.191.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,1-Dichloroethene
1.0 U 0.151.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2.0 U 0.672.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,2-Dichlorobenzene
1.0 U 0.221.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,2-Dichloroethane
1.0 U 0.181.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,2-Dichloropropane
1.0 U 0.141.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,3-Dichlorobenzene
1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,4-Dichlorobenzene
10 U 0.5710 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 12-Butanone (MEK)
10 U 0.4110 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 12-Hexanone
10 U 0.3210 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
10 U 1.110 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Acetone
1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Benzene
1.0 U 0.641.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Bromoform
1.0 U 0.411.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Bromomethane
1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Carbon disulfide
1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Carbon tetrachloride
1.0 U 0.151.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Chlorobenzene
1.0 U 0.181.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Chlorodibromomethane
1.0 U 0.291.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Chloroethane
1.0 U 0.161.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Chloroform
1.0 U 0.301.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Chloromethane
1.0 U 0.171.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
1.0 U 0.141.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
1.0 U 0.121.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Cyclohexane
1.0 U 0.151.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Dichlorobromomethane
1.0 U 0.311.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Dichlorodifluoromethane
1.0 U 0.171.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Ethylbenzene
1.0 U 0.241.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Ethylene Dibromide
1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Isopropylbenzene
10 U 0.3810 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Methyl acetate
1.0 U 0.171.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Methyl tert-butyl ether
1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Methylcyclohexane
0.374 J 0.331.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Methylene Chloride
1.0 U 0.111.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Styrene
1.0 U 0.291.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Tetrachloroethene
1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Toluene
1.0 U 0.191.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1.0 U 0.191.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1.0 U 0.171.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Trichloroethene
1.0 U 0.211.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Trichlorofluoromethane
1.0 U 0.221.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Vinyl chloride
2.0 U 0.142.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Xylenes, Total
TestAmerica Canton
Page 34 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-125725/6
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125725
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 91 63 - 129 04/09/14 01:04 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
84 04/09/14 01:04 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 66 - 120
89 04/09/14 01:04 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 75 - 121
88 04/09/14 01:04 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 74 - 120
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-125725/4
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125725
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 10.0 10.1 ug/L 101 74 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 10.0 11.4 ug/L 114 68 - 120
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroetha
ne
10.0 9.74 ug/L 97 74 - 151
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 10.0 10.7 ug/L 107 80 - 120
1,1-Dichloroethane 10.0 10.5 ug/L 105 80 - 120
1,1-Dichloroethene 10.0 10.7 ug/L 107 78 - 131
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 10.0 9.40 ug/L 94 48 - 135
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 10.0 10.3 ug/L 103 42 - 136
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10.0 9.95 ug/L 100 80 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane 10.0 10.2 ug/L 102 71 - 127
1,2-Dichloropropane 10.0 10.8 ug/L 108 80 - 120
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 10.0 9.83 ug/L 98 80 - 120
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10.0 9.86 ug/L 99 80 - 120
2-Butanone (MEK) 20.0 25.4 * ug/L 127 60 - 126
2-Hexanone 20.0 25.6 ug/L 128 55 - 133
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 20.0 25.1 ug/L 125 63 - 128
Acetone 20.0 24.6 ug/L 123 43 - 136
Benzene 10.0 10.0 ug/L 100 80 - 120
Bromoform 10.0 9.81 ug/L 98 40 - 131
Bromomethane 10.0 7.26 ug/L 73 11 - 185
Carbon disulfide 10.0 11.5 ug/L 115 62 - 142
Carbon tetrachloride 10.0 9.71 ug/L 97 66 - 128
Chlorobenzene 10.0 9.85 ug/L 98 80 - 120
Chloroethane 10.0 9.48 ug/L 95 25 - 153
Chloroform 10.0 10.0 ug/L 100 79 - 120
Chloromethane 10.0 9.22 ug/L 92 44 - 126
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 10.0 9.94 ug/L 99 80 - 120
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10.0 11.0 ug/L 110 61 - 120
Cyclohexane 10.0 11.0 ug/L 110 54 - 121
Dichlorobromomethane 10.0 10.2 ug/L 102 72 - 121
Dichlorodifluoromethane 10.0 6.24 ug/L 62 19 - 129
Ethylbenzene 10.0 10.2 ug/L 102 80 - 120
Ethylene Dibromide 10.0 11.0 ug/L 110 79 - 120
Isopropylbenzene 10.0 10.1 ug/L 101 75 - 120
Methyl acetate 50.0 58.2 ug/L 116 58 - 131
Methyl tert-butyl ether 10.0 10.8 ug/L 108 52 - 144
Methylcyclohexane 10.0 9.75 ug/L 97 56 - 127
TestAmerica Canton
Page 35 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-125725/4
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125725
Methylene Chloride 10.0 10.4 ug/L 104 66 - 131
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
m-Xylene & p-Xylene 10.0 10.0 ug/L 100 80 - 120
o-Xylene 10.0 10.2 ug/L 102 80 - 120
Styrene 10.0 10.2 ug/L 102 79 - 120
Tetrachloroethene 10.0 9.63 ug/L 96 79 - 120
Toluene 10.0 10.7 ug/L 107 80 - 120
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 10.0 10.3 ug/L 103 80 - 120
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10.0 11.2 ug/L 112 58 - 120
Trichloroethene 10.0 9.70 ug/L 97 76 - 120
Trichlorofluoromethane 10.0 7.89 ug/L 79 49 - 157
Vinyl chloride 10.0 8.75 ug/L 88 53 - 127
Xylenes, Total 20.0 20.2 ug/L 101 80 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 63 - 129
Surrogate
84
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
944-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 66 - 120
87Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 75 - 121
95Toluene-d8 (Surr) 74 - 120
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124891/1-A
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total Recoverable
Analysis Batch: 125100 Prep Batch: 124891
RL MDL
Aluminum 200 U 200 97 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
10 U 2.110 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Antimony
10 U 3.210 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Arsenic
1.48 J 0.67200 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Barium
5.0 U 0.465.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Beryllium
2.0 U 0.662.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Cadmium
332 J 1305000 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Calcium
5.0 U 2.25.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Chromium
7.0 U 1.77.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Cobalt
25 U 4.525 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Copper
100 U 81100 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Iron
3.0 U 1.93.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Lead
5000 U 345000 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Magnesium
15 U 0.9615 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Manganese
40 U 3.240 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Nickel
5000 U 725000 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Potassium
5.0 U 4.15.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Selenium
5.0 U 2.25.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Silver
5000 U 5905000 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Sodium
10 U 4.710 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Thallium
7.0 U 2.47.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Vanadium
17.2 J 5.050 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Zinc
TestAmerica Canton
Page 36 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124891/2-A
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total Recoverable
Analysis Batch: 125100 Prep Batch: 124891
Aluminum 2000 1830 ug/L 91 80 - 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Antimony 500 471 ug/L 94 80 - 120
Arsenic 2000 1830 ug/L 91 80 - 120
Barium 2000 1750 ug/L 87 80 - 120
Beryllium 50.0 43.4 ug/L 87 80 - 120
Cadmium 50.0 45.5 ug/L 91 80 - 120
Calcium 50000 46300 ug/L 93 80 - 120
Chromium 200 174 ug/L 87 80 - 120
Cobalt 500 446 ug/L 89 80 - 120
Copper 250 222 ug/L 89 80 - 120
Iron 1000 900 ug/L 90 80 - 120
Lead 500 445 ug/L 89 80 - 120
Magnesium 50000 45200 ug/L 90 80 - 120
Manganese 500 441 ug/L 88 80 - 120
Nickel 500 455 ug/L 91 80 - 120
Potassium 50000 49100 ug/L 98 80 - 120
Selenium 2000 1870 ug/L 94 80 - 120
Silver 50.0 47.0 ug/L 94 80 - 120
Sodium 50000 48800 ug/L 98 80 - 120
Thallium 2000 1750 ug/L 88 80 - 120
Vanadium 500 431 ug/L 86 80 - 120
Zinc 500 469 ug/L 94 80 - 120
Client Sample ID: BW4Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-7 MS
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 125100 Prep Batch: 124891
Aluminum 200 U 2000 1880 ug/L 94 75 - 125
Analyte
MS MS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
%Rec.
Limits
Antimony 10 U 500 501 ug/L 100 75 - 125
Arsenic 43 2000 2030 ug/L 100 75 - 125
Barium 210 B 2000 2020 ug/L 90 75 - 125
Beryllium 5.0 U 50.0 44.6 ug/L 89 75 - 125
Cadmium 2.0 U 50.0 49.1 ug/L 98 75 - 125
Calcium 160000 B 50000 216000 ug/L 101 75 - 125
Chromium 5.0 U 200 182 ug/L 91 75 - 125
Cobalt 3.7 J 500 490 ug/L 97 75 - 125
Copper 25 U 250 234 ug/L 94 75 - 125
Iron 5100 1000 6010 4 ug/L 90 75 - 125
Lead 3.0 U 500 465 ug/L 93 75 - 125
Magnesium 23000 50000 70500 ug/L 95 75 - 125
Manganese 1100 500 1570 ug/L 101 75 - 125
Nickel 9.4 J 500 505 ug/L 99 75 - 125
Potassium 8700 50000 61400 ug/L 105 75 - 125
Selenium 4.9 J 2000 1990 ug/L 99 75 - 125
Silver 5.0 U 50.0 50.5 ug/L 101 75 - 125
Sodium 62000 50000 114000 ug/L 104 75 - 125
Thallium 10 U 2000 1830 ug/L 92 75 - 125
TestAmerica Canton
Page 37 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: BW4Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-7 MS
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 125100 Prep Batch: 124891
Vanadium 7.0 U 500 436 ug/L 87 75 - 125
Analyte
MS MS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
%Rec.
Limits
Zinc 130 B 500 690 ug/L 111 75 - 125
Client Sample ID: BW4Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-7 MSD
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 125100 Prep Batch: 124891
Aluminum 200 U 2000 1960 ug/L 98 75 - 125 4 20
Analyte
MSD MSD
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
%Rec.
Limits LimitRPD
RPD
Antimony 10 U 500 504 ug/L 101 75 - 125 1 20
Arsenic 43 2000 2030 ug/L 99 75 - 125 0 20
Barium 210 B 2000 2120 ug/L 95 75 - 125 5 20
Beryllium 5.0 U 50.0 46.8 ug/L 94 75 - 125 5 20
Cadmium 2.0 U 50.0 49.0 ug/L 98 75 - 125 0 20
Calcium 160000 B 50000 230000 F1 ug/L 130 75 - 125 6 20
Chromium 5.0 U 200 187 ug/L 94 75 - 125 3 20
Cobalt 3.7 J 500 487 ug/L 97 75 - 125 1 20
Copper 25 U 250 242 ug/L 97 75 - 125 3 20
Iron 5100 1000 6500 4 ug/L 140 75 - 125 8 20
Lead 3.0 U 500 460 ug/L 92 75 - 125 1 20
Magnesium 23000 50000 74100 ug/L 102 75 - 125 5 20
Manganese 1100 500 1660 ug/L 119 75 - 125 6 20
Nickel 9.4 J 500 502 ug/L 99 75 - 125 1 20
Potassium 8700 50000 64100 ug/L 111 75 - 125 4 20
Selenium 4.9 J 2000 1990 ug/L 99 75 - 125 0 20
Silver 5.0 U 50.0 51.6 ug/L 103 75 - 125 2 20
Sodium 62000 50000 121000 ug/L 118 75 - 125 6 20
Thallium 10 U 2000 1830 ug/L 91 75 - 125 0 20
Vanadium 7.0 U 500 456 ug/L 91 75 - 125 4 20
Zinc 130 B 500 685 ug/L 110 75 - 125 1 20
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124892/1-A
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125190 Prep Batch: 124892
RL MDL
Mercury 0.20 U 0.20 0.12 ug/L 04/02/14 13:00 04/03/14 11:45 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124892/2-A
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125190 Prep Batch: 124892
Mercury 5.00 4.68 ug/L 94 81 - 123
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
TestAmerica Canton
Page 38 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: BW4Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-7 MS
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 125190 Prep Batch: 124892
Mercury 0.20 U 1.00 0.960 ug/L 96 69 - 134
Analyte
MS MS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
%Rec.
Limits
Client Sample ID: BW4Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-7 MSD
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 125190 Prep Batch: 124892
Mercury 0.20 U 1.00 0.955 ug/L 96 69 - 134 0 20
Analyte
MSD MSD
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
%Rec.
Limits LimitRPD
RPD
TestAmerica Canton
Page 39 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
GC/MS VOA
Prep Batch: 124981
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 5035240-35621-1 BW7A 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 5035240-35621-2 BW8A 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 5035240-35621-3 BW9A 0-2 Total/NA
Solid 5035240-35621-4 BW10A 2-4 Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 124999
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 8260B 124981240-35621-1 BW7A 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 8260B 124981240-35621-2 BW8A 4-6 Total/NA
Solid 8260B 124981240-35621-3 BW9A 0-2 Total/NA
Solid 8260B 124981240-35621-4 BW10A 2-4 Total/NA
Solid 8260BLCS 240-124999/5 Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Solid 8260BMB 240-124999/6 Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125462
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Water 8260B240-35621-5 BW4 Total/NA
Water 8260B240-35621-6 BW1 Total/NA
Water 8260BLCS 240-125462/4 Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Water 8260BMB 240-125462/5 Method Blank Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 125725
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Water 8260B240-35621-8 TRIP BLANK Total/NA
Water 8260BLCS 240-125725/4 Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Water 8260BMB 240-125725/6 Method Blank Total/NA
Metals
Prep Batch: 124891
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Water 3005A240-35621-5 BW4 Total Recoverable
Water 3005A240-35621-6 BW1 Dissolved
Water 3005A240-35621-6 BW1 Total Recoverable
Water 3005A240-35621-7 BW4 Dissolved
Water 3005A240-35621-7 MS BW4 Dissolved
Water 3005A240-35621-7 MSD BW4 Dissolved
Water 3005ALCS 240-124891/2-A Lab Control Sample Total Recoverable
Water 3005AMB 240-124891/1-A Method Blank Total Recoverable
Prep Batch: 124892
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Water 7470A240-35621-5 BW4 Total/NA
Water 7470A240-35621-6 BW1 Dissolved
Water 7470A240-35621-6 BW1 Total/NA
Water 7470A240-35621-7 BW4 Dissolved
Water 7470A240-35621-7 MS BW4 Dissolved
Water 7470A240-35621-7 MSD BW4 Dissolved
Water 7470ALCS 240-124892/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Water 7470AMB 240-124892/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 40 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Metals (Continued)
Analysis Batch: 125100
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Water 6010B 124891240-35621-5 BW4 Total Recoverable
Water 6010B 124891240-35621-5 BW4 Total Recoverable
Water 6010B 124891240-35621-6 BW1 Dissolved
Water 6010B 124891240-35621-6 BW1 Total Recoverable
Water 6010B 124891240-35621-6 BW1 Total Recoverable
Water 6010B 124891240-35621-7 BW4 Dissolved
Water 6010B 124891240-35621-7 MS BW4 Dissolved
Water 6010B 124891240-35621-7 MSD BW4 Dissolved
Water 6010B 124891LCS 240-124891/2-A Lab Control Sample Total Recoverable
Water 6010B 124891MB 240-124891/1-A Method Blank Total Recoverable
Analysis Batch: 125190
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Water 7470A 124892240-35621-5 BW4 Total/NA
Water 7470A 124892240-35621-6 BW1 Dissolved
Water 7470A 124892240-35621-6 BW1 Total/NA
Water 7470A 124892240-35621-7 BW4 Dissolved
Water 7470A 124892240-35621-7 MS BW4 Dissolved
Water 7470A 124892240-35621-7 MSD BW4 Dissolved
Water 7470A 124892LCS 240-124892/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Water 7470A 124892MB 240-124892/1-A Method Blank Total/NA
General Chemistry
Analysis Batch: 124856
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid Moisture240-35621-1 BW7A 2-4 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35621-2 BW8A 4-6 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35621-2 DU BW8A 4-6 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35621-3 BW9A 0-2 Total/NA
Solid Moisture240-35621-4 BW10A 2-4 Total/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 41 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Lab ChronicleClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW7A 2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-1Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/31/14 07:20
Percent Solids: 88.3Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
Prep 5035 04/01/14 17:00 LAM124981 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8260B 1 124999 04/02/14 22:21 SAM TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 124856 04/01/14 15:42 BLW TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW8A 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/31/14 07:35
Percent Solids: 85.0Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
Prep 5035 04/01/14 17:00 LAM124981 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8260B 1 124999 04/02/14 22:42 SAM TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 124856 04/01/14 15:42 BLW TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW9A 0-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-3Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/31/14 07:50
Percent Solids: 89.0Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
Prep 5035 04/01/14 17:00 LAM124981 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8260B 1 124999 04/02/14 23:04 SAM TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 124856 04/01/14 15:42 BLW TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW10A 2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/31/14 08:00
Percent Solids: 91.8Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
Prep 5035 04/01/14 17:00 LAM124981 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Analysis 8260B 1 124999 04/02/14 23:27 SAM TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis Moisture 1 124856 04/01/14 15:42 BLW TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-5Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/31/14 09:30
Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
Analysis 8260B 04/07/14 17:34 LEE1 125462 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Prep 3005A 124891 04/02/14 07:49 LPM TAL CANTotal Recoverable
Analysis 6010B 1 125100 04/03/14 12:01 KLC TAL CANTotal Recoverable
Prep 3005A 124891 04/02/14 07:49 LPM TAL CANTotal Recoverable
Analysis 6010B 5 125100 04/03/14 12:05 KLC TAL CANTotal Recoverable
Prep 7470A 124892 04/02/14 13:00 LPM TAL CANTotal/NA
TestAmerica Canton
Page 42 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Lab ChronicleClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Client Sample ID: BW4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-5Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/31/14 09:30
Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
Analysis 7470A 04/03/14 13:12 AMM22 125190 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Client Sample ID: BW1 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-6Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/31/14 10:10
Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
Analysis 8260B 04/07/14 17:56 LEE1 125462 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Prep 3005A 124891 04/02/14 07:49 LPM TAL CANDissolved
Analysis 6010B 1 125100 04/03/14 12:17 KLC TAL CANDissolved
Prep 3005A 124891 04/02/14 07:49 LPM TAL CANTotal Recoverable
Analysis 6010B 1 125100 04/03/14 12:09 KLC TAL CANTotal Recoverable
Prep 3005A 124891 04/02/14 07:49 LPM TAL CANTotal Recoverable
Analysis 6010B 5 125100 04/03/14 12:14 KLC TAL CANTotal Recoverable
Prep 7470A 124892 04/02/14 13:00 LPM TAL CANDissolved
Analysis 7470A 1 125190 04/03/14 11:59 AMM2 TAL CANDissolved
Prep 7470A 124892 04/02/14 13:00 LPM TAL CANTotal/NA
Analysis 7470A 10 125190 04/03/14 13:14 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: BW4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-7Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/31/14 10:55
Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
Prep 3005A 04/02/14 07:49 LPM124891 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Dissolved
Analysis 6010B 1 125100 04/03/14 11:29 KLC TAL CANDissolved
Prep 7470A 124892 04/02/14 13:00 LPM TAL CANDissolved
Analysis 7470A 1 125190 04/03/14 11:49 AMM2 TAL CANDissolved
Client Sample ID: TRIP BLANK Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-8Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/31/14 00:00
Date Received: 04/01/14 09:40
Analysis 8260B 04/09/14 01:26 LRW1 125725 TAL CAN
Type
Batch Batch
MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Batch
Number
Dilution
Factor
Total/NA
Laboratory References:
TAL CAN = TestAmerica Canton, 4101 Shuffel Street NW, North Canton, OH 44720, TEL (330)497-9396
TestAmerica Canton
Page 43 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Certification SummaryClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1
Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio
Laboratory: TestAmerica CantonAll certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all certifications are applicable to this report.
Authority Program EPA Region Certification ID Expiration Date
California 01144CA9NELAP 06-30-14
Connecticut State Program 1 PH-0590 12-31-14
Florida NELAP 4 E87225 06-30-14 *
Georgia State Program 4 N/A 06-30-14 *
Illinois NELAP 5 200004 07-31-14
Kansas NELAP 7 E-10336 03-31-14 *
Kentucky (UST) State Program 4 58 06-30-14 *
L-A-B DoD ELAP L2315 07-18-16
Minnesota NELAP 5 039-999-348 12-31-14
Nevada State Program 9 OH-000482008A 07-31-14
New Jersey NELAP 2 OH001 06-30-14 *
New York NELAP 2 10975 03-31-14 *
Ohio VAP State Program 5 CL0024 10-31-15
Pennsylvania NELAP 3 68-00340 08-31-14
Texas NELAP 6 08-31-14
USDA Federal P330-13-00319 11-26-16
Virginia NELAP 3 460175 09-14-14
Washington State Program 10 C971 01-12-15
West Virginia DEP State Program 3 210 12-31-14
Wisconsin State Program 5 999518190 08-31-14
TestAmerica Canton
* Expired certification is currently pending renewal and is considered valid.
Page 44 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Page 45 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Page 46 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Page 47 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Page 48 of 48 4/14/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Appendix J
Statistical summary and UCL calculations
for inorganic chemicals of concern for
dermal exposure (0-8 feet)
Appendix K
Statistical summary and UCL calculations
for organic chemicals of concern for
dermal exposure (0-8 feet)
Appendix L
Statistical summary and UCL calculations
for inorganic chemicals of concern
for inhalation exposure (0-12 feet)
Appendix M
Statistical summary and UCL calculations
for organic chemicals of concern for
inhalation exposure (0-12 feet)
Appendix N
Outputs from the Johnson and Ettinger Model
used to evaluate risks posed by volatile
compounds in indoor air
Acenaphthene - residential proposed jail
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 50719.7707 NA NA 9.48E-05
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Acenaphthene - residential proposed jail and expansion
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 50719.7707 NA NA 7.97E-05
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Acenaphthene - worker proposed jail
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 50719.7707 NA NA 6.49E-05
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Acenaphthene - worker proposed jail and expansion
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 50719.7707 NA NA 5.46E-05
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Acenaphthene - worker Sheriffs Office
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 50719.7707 NA NA 1.69E-04
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Benzo(b)fluoranthene- residential proposed jail
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 3690.070511 NA 3.15259E-11 NA
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Benzo(b)fluoranthene- residential proposed jail and expansion
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 3690.070511 NA 2.65125E-11 NA
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Benzo(b)fluoranthene- worker proposed jail
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 3690.070511 NA 5.39827E-10 NA
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Benzo(b)fluoranthene- worker proposed jail and expansion
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 3690.070511 NA 4.53982E-10 NA
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Benzo(b)fluoranthene- worker Sheriffs Office
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 3690.070511 NA 1.40715E-09 NA
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Chrysene - residential proposed jail
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 5015.096113 NA 1.24824E-12 NA
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Chrysene - residential proposed jail and expansion
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 5015.096113 NA 1.0497E-12 NA
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Chrysene - worker proposed jail
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 5015.096113 NA 2.1374E-11 NA
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Chrysene - worker proposed jail and expansion
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 5015.096113 NA 1.79743E-11 NA
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Chrysene - worker Sheriffs Office
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 5015.096113 NA 5.5723E-11 NA
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Fluorene - residential proposed jail
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 54741.13428 NA NA 1.05E-04
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Fluorene - residential proposed jail and expansion
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 54741.13428 NA NA 8.84E-05
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Fluorene - worker proposed jail
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 54741.13428 NA NA 7.20E-05
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Fluorene - worker proposed jail and expansion
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 54741.13428 NA NA 6.05E-05
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Fluorene - worker Sheriffs Office
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 54741.13428 NA NA 1.88E-04
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Mercury- residential proposed jail
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 1041393.209 NA NA 3.66E+00
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
Mercury- residential proposed jail and expansion
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 1041393.209 NA NA 3.08E+00
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
Mercury- worker proposed jail
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 1041393.209 NA NA 2.51E+00
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
Mercury- worker proposed jail and expansion
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 1041393.209 NA NA 2.11E+00
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
Mercury- worker Sheriff's office
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 1041393.209 NA NA 6.53E+00
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
Naphthalene- residential proposed jail
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 125493.5915 NA NA 6.61E-02
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
Naphthalene- residential proposed jail and expansion
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 125493.5915 NA NA 5.56E-02
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
Naphthalene- worker proposed jail
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 125493.5915 NA NA 4.53E-02
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
Naphthalene- worker proposed jail and expansion
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 125493.5915 NA NA 3.81E-02
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
Naphthalene- worker Sheriffs Office
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 125493.5915 NA NA 1.18E-01
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
Pyrene - residential proposed jail
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 283563.3527 NA NA 1.39E-05
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Pyrene - residential proposed jail and expansion
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 283558.5244 NA NA 1.19E-05
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Pyrene - worker proposed jail
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 283563.3527 NA NA 9.51E-06
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Pyrene - worker proposed jail and expansion
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 283563.3527 NA NA 7.99E-06
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Pyrene - worker Sheriffs Office
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 283563.3527 NA NA 2.48E-05
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
2-Methylnaphthalene-resident proposed jail
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 139524.4131 NA NA 4.72E-05
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
2-Methylnaphthalene-resident proposed jail and expansion
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 139524.4131 NA NA 3.97E-05
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
2-Methylnaphthalene-worker proposed jail
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 139524.4131 NA NA 3.23E-05
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
2-Methylnaphthalene-worker proposed jail and expansion
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 139524.4131 NA NA 2.72E-05
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
2-Methylnaphthalene-worker Sheriff's office
RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:
Incremental Hazard
Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient
exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor
soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to
conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,
carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)
NA NA NA 139524.4131 NA NA 8.43E-05
MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)
MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.
Appendix O
Statistical summary and UCL calculations
for lead (0-8 feet)