Lilacs submission indicadores_en

13
LILACS collaboration flow Sueli Mitiko Yano Suga LILACS Unit BIREME/PAHO/WHO [email protected]

Transcript of Lilacs submission indicadores_en

LILACScollaboration flow

Sueli Mitiko Yano SugaLILACS Unit

BIREME/PAHO/[email protected]

LILACS Operation Fflow

Publishing

Technical and methodological Support

Methodology promotion and difusion

Assessment and improvements

Scientific production records in LILACS

Collaboration flow with batches of records

LILACS Submissionindicators

Sueli Mitiko Yano SugaLILACS Unit

BIREME/PAHO/[email protected]

Some numbers

Submissions (batches of records) in the system 789

Submissions (batches of records) acepted 601

Bibliographic records in the system 14.231

Bibliographic records published or waiting for publication 7.018

CC that have sent batches 107

Countries that have sent batches 11

Users registered in the system 189

CC registered in the system 151

In 6 months of operation including tests and pilotphase with 15 CC and on demand registering.

Distribution by Type of LiteratureMonographs,

Thesis and Non-conventionals

13%

Indexed and reviewed records - LILACS Express

47%

Records as supplied by publisher -

LILACS-Express3%

Journals37%

Registros válidos: 601 – 08/04/2013

Submissions by Country

AR7%

BR64%

CL14%

CO10%

PE2%

PY1%

UY0%

MX0%

CU1%

GT0%

VE0%

Registros válidos: 601 – 08/04/2013

Distribution by Status

New submission1%

Content validation2%

Waiting for CC feedback

0%

Format validation17%

Available in LILACS44%

File validation8%

Submission re-jected24%

Wainting for publica-tion5%

Universo de registros: 789 – 08/04/2013

Reasons to reject a submission Quantity

Batches with only 1 record 108Duplicated batches already sent from the system 39Duplicated records already published in LILACS 31Without feedback 23Tests 9Corrupted files 6Record files saved with no .ISO extension 3Duplicated batches with indexing already copied from MEDLINE 2Batches re-send from CC and NCC 2Files with journals url instead of its bibliographic records 1ID entries without .ISO files 1Different total number of records from declared 1Records without main descriptors 1Wrong bibliographic type 1

Submissions by CC Code

CL1.1

BR26.1

BR33.1

BR442.1

BR85.1BR1.1

BR513.1

BR1365.1

BR926.1

BR97.1BR1.2

BR12.1

BR734.1AR1.1

CO40.1PE1

.1

BR408.1

CO185.1

AR392.1

BR13.2

BR1342.1

BR44.1

BR91.2

BR40.1

BR59.2

BR1194.1

BR66.1

CO83.1

CO87.1

BR1354.1

BR14.1

BR30.1

BR556.1

BR584.10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Recommendations:

• Check if the batches are in ISO extension;• Check duplicate in LILACS – some batches were already

published;• Fill the data field “Observations” with – Journals’ abbreviated

title, volume, issue and year of publication or the title of the books, theses and non-conventional docs.;

• Check if the batches is already sent by Submission in “Observations” data field;

• Check if the record is fully described: ej. URL, descriptors, authors’ affiliation;

• Send batches with entire issues or minimum of 10 records. Do NOT send batches with only 1 record.

Thank you very much!

http://submission.bvsalud.org/

Doubts and sugestions:[email protected]