Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆...
Transcript of Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆...
![Page 1: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Light-cone PDFs from
Lattice QCD
Martha Constantinou
Temple University
JLab Theory Seminar
April 30, 2018
![Page 2: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
In collaboration with
⋆ C. Alexandrou1,2
⋆ K. Cichy3
⋆ K. Hadjiyiannakou2
⋆ K. Jansen5
⋆ H. Panagopoulos1
⋆ A. Scapellato1
⋆ F. Steffens5
1. University of Cyprus
2. Cyprus Institute
3. Adam Mickiewicz
University
4. Temple University
5. DESY Zeuthen
Based on:
• M. Constantinou, H. Panagopoulos, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 054506,
[arXiv:1705.11193]
• C. Alexandrou et al., Nucl. Phys. B 923 (2017) 394 (Frontiers Article),
[arXiv:1706.00265]
• C. Alexandrou et al., [arXiv:1803.02685]
![Page 3: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
OUTLINE OF TALK
A. Introduction to quasi-PDFs
B. quasi-PDFs in Lattice QCD
C. Lattice Matrix Elements
D. Renormalization
E. Towards light-cone PDFs
F. Discussion
![Page 4: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
A
Introduction
to quasi-PDFs
![Page 5: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Probing Nucleon Structure
CJ15 PDFs
[A. Accardi et al., arXiv:1602.03154]
Parton Distribution Functions
⋆ Universal quantities for the description of the nucleon’s structure
(non-perturbative nature)
⋆ 1-dimensional picture of nucleon structure
⋆ Distribution functions are necessary for the analysis of Deep
inelastic scattering data
⋆ Parametrized in terms of off-forward matrix of light-cone operators
⋆ Not directly accessible in a euclidean lattice
![Page 6: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
PDFs on the Lattice
⋆ Moments of PDFs easily accessible in lattice QCD
fn =∫ 1
−1dxxnf(x)
• one relies on OPE to reconstruct the PDFs
• reconstruction difficult task:
⇒ signal-to-noise is bad for higher moments
⇒ n > 3: operator mixing (unavoidable!)
![Page 7: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
6
PDFs on the Lattice
⋆ Moments of PDFs easily accessible in lattice QCD
fn =∫ 1
−1dxxnf(x)
• one relies on OPE to reconstruct the PDFs
• reconstruction difficult task:
⇒ signal-to-noise is bad for higher moments
⇒ n > 3: operator mixing (unavoidable!)
⋆ Alternative approaches to access PDFs:
Purely spatial matrix elements that can be matched to PDFs
• quasi-PDFs [X. Ji, arXiv:1305.1539]
• pseudo-PDFs [A. Radyushkin, arXiv:1705.01488]
• good lattice cross-sections [Y-Q Ma&J. Qiu, arXiv:1709.03018]
![Page 8: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
B
quasi-PDFs
in Lattice QCD
![Page 9: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
8
Access of PDFs on a Euclidean Lattice
Novel direct approach: [X.Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 262002, arXiv:1305.1539]
⋆ computation of quasi-PDF:
matrix elements (ME) of spatial operators
q(x, µ2, P3) =∫
dz4π
e−i x P3 z 〈N(P3)|Ψ(z) γz A(z, 0)Ψ(0)|N(P3)〉µ2
• A(z, 0): Wilson line (0 → z)
• z: distance in any spatial direction
⋆ Nucleon is boosted with momentum in spatial direction (z)
![Page 10: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
9
PDFs on the LatticeContact with light-cone PDFs:
⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs:
O(
Λ2QCD
P 23
,m2
N
P 23
)
⋆ Matching procedure in large momentum EFT (LaMET) torelate quasi-PDFs to light-cone PDFs
(provided that momenta are finite but feasibly large for lattice)
![Page 11: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
9
PDFs on the LatticeContact with light-cone PDFs:
⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs:
O(
Λ2QCD
P 23
,m2
N
P 23
)
⋆ Matching procedure in large momentum EFT (LaMET) torelate quasi-PDFs to light-cone PDFs
(provided that momenta are finite but feasibly large for lattice)
Exploratory studies of various aspects are maturing:
[X. Xiong et al., arXiv:1310.7471], [H-W. Lin et al., arXiv:1402.1462], [Y. Ma et al., arXiv:1404.6860],
[Y.-Q. Ma et al., arXiv:1412.2688], [C. Alexandrou et al., arXiv:1504.07455], [H.-N. Li et al., arXiv:1602.07575],
[J.-W. Chen et al., arXiv:1603.06664], [J.-W. Chen et al., arXiv:1609.08102], [T. Ishikawa et al., arXiv:1609.02018],
[C. Alexandrou et al., arXiv:1610.03689], [C. Monahan et al., arXiv:1612.01584], [A. Radyushkin et al., arXiv:1702.01726],
[C. Carlson et al., arXiv:1702.05775], [R. Briceno et al., arXiv:1703.06072], [M. Constantinou et al., arXiv:1705.11193],
[C. Alexandrou et al., arXiv:1706.00265], [J-W Chen et al., arXiv:1706.01295], [X. Ji et al., arXiv:1706.08962],
[K. Orginos et al., arXiv:1706.05373], [T. Ishikawa et al., arXiv:1707.03107], [J. Green et al., arXiv:1707.07152],
[Y-Q Ma et al., arXiv:1709.03018], [I. Stewart et al, arXiv:1709.04933], [J. Karpie et al., arXiv:1710.08288,
[J-W Chen et al., arXiv:1711.07858], [C.Alexandrou et al., arXiv:1710.06408], [T. Izubuchi et al., arXiv:1801.03917],
[C.Alexandrou et al., arXiv:1803.02685], [J-W Chen et al, arXiv:1803.04393 ], · · ·
![Page 12: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
10
Calculation of nucleon matrix elements
A multi-component task:
1. Calculation of 2pt- and 3pt-correlators (C2pt, C3pt)
dependence on : length of Wilson line z and nucleonmomentum P
C3pt : 〈N |ψ(z)ΓA(z, 0)ψ(0)|N〉
![Page 13: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
10
Calculation of nucleon matrix elements
A multi-component task:
1. Calculation of 2pt- and 3pt-correlators (C2pt, C3pt)
dependence on : length of Wilson line z and nucleonmomentum P
C3pt : 〈N |ψ(z)ΓA(z, 0)ψ(0)|N〉
2. Construction of ratios at zero momentum transfer
C3pt(t,τ,0, ~P )
C2pt(t,0, ~P )
0<<τ<<t= h0(P3, z)
![Page 14: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
11
Calculation of nucleon matrix elements
A multi-component task:
3. Renormalization
complex function, presence of mixing (certain cases)
![Page 15: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
11
Calculation of nucleon matrix elements
A multi-component task:
3. Renormalization
complex function, presence of mixing (certain cases)
4. Fourier transform to momentum space (x)
q(x, µ2, P3) =∫
dz4π e
ixP3z〈N |ψ(z)ΓA(z, 0)ψ(0)|N〉
![Page 16: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
11
Calculation of nucleon matrix elements
A multi-component task:
3. Renormalization
complex function, presence of mixing (certain cases)
4. Fourier transform to momentum space (x)
q(x, µ2, P3) =∫
dz4π e
ixP3z〈N |ψ(z)ΓA(z, 0)ψ(0)|N〉
5. Matching to light-cone PDFs (LaMET)
q(x, µ) =∫∞
−∞dξ|ξ| C
(
ξ, µxP3
)
q(
xξ, µ, P3
)
C: matching kernel
![Page 17: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
11
Calculation of nucleon matrix elements
A multi-component task:
3. Renormalization
complex function, presence of mixing (certain cases)
4. Fourier transform to momentum space (x)
q(x, µ2, P3) =∫
dz4π e
ixP3z〈N |ψ(z)ΓA(z, 0)ψ(0)|N〉
5. Matching to light-cone PDFs (LaMET)
q(x, µ) =∫∞
−∞dξ|ξ| C
(
ξ, µxP3
)
q(
xξ, µ, P3
)
C: matching kernel
6. Target mass corrections
elimination of residual mN/P3 dependence
![Page 18: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
C
Lattice
Matrix Elements
![Page 19: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
13
Parameters of Calculation[C. Alexandrou et al. (ETMC), arXiv:1803.02685]
⋆ Nf=2 Twister Mass fermion action with clover term
⋆ Ensemble parameters:
β=2.10, cSW=1.57751, a=0.0938(3)(2) fm
483 × 96 aµ = 0.0009 mN = 0.932(4) GeV
L = 4.5 fm mπ = 0.1304(4) GeV mπL = 2.98(1)
![Page 20: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
13
Parameters of Calculation[C. Alexandrou et al. (ETMC), arXiv:1803.02685]
⋆ Nf=2 Twister Mass fermion action with clover term
⋆ Ensemble parameters:
β=2.10, cSW=1.57751, a=0.0938(3)(2) fm
483 × 96 aµ = 0.0009 mN = 0.932(4) GeV
L = 4.5 fm mπ = 0.1304(4) GeV mπL = 2.98(1)
⋆ Nucleon Momentum & Measurements
P = 6πL
(0.83 GeV) P = 8πL
(1.11 GeV) P = 10πL
(1.38 GeV)
Ins. Nconf Nmeas Ins. Nconf Nmeas Ins. Nconf Nmeas
γ3 100 9600 γ3 425 38250 γ3 655 58950
γ0 50 4800 γ0 425 38250 γ0 655 58950
γ5γ3 65 6240 γ5γ3 425 38250 γ5γ3 655 58950
![Page 21: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
13
Parameters of Calculation[C. Alexandrou et al. (ETMC), arXiv:1803.02685]
⋆ Nf=2 Twister Mass fermion action with clover term
⋆ Ensemble parameters:
β=2.10, cSW=1.57751, a=0.0938(3)(2) fm
483 × 96 aµ = 0.0009 mN = 0.932(4) GeV
L = 4.5 fm mπ = 0.1304(4) GeV mπL = 2.98(1)
⋆ Nucleon Momentum & Measurements
P = 6πL
(0.83 GeV) P = 8πL
(1.11 GeV) P = 10πL
(1.38 GeV)
Ins. Nconf Nmeas Ins. Nconf Nmeas Ins. Nconf Nmeas
γ3 100 9600 γ3 425 38250 γ3 655 58950
γ0 50 4800 γ0 425 38250 γ0 655 58950
γ5γ3 65 6240 γ5γ3 425 38250 γ5γ3 655 58950
⋆ Excited states investigation:Tsink/a = 8, 10, 12 (Tsink = 0.75, 0.094, 1.13fm)
![Page 22: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
14
Set up of calculation
Signal-to-noise problem must be tamed to reliablyinvestigate systematic uncertainties
![Page 23: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
14
Set up of calculation
Signal-to-noise problem must be tamed to reliablyinvestigate systematic uncertainties
⋆ Statistics:
• 6 directions of Wilson line: ±x,±y,±zwith momentum boosted in same direction
• 16 source positions using (CAA):⇒ 1 high precision (HP) inversion
⇒ 16 low precision (LP) inversions
[E. Shintani et al., Phys. Rev. D91, 114511 (2015)]
![Page 24: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
14
Set up of calculation
Signal-to-noise problem must be tamed to reliablyinvestigate systematic uncertainties
⋆ Statistics:
• 6 directions of Wilson line: ±x,±y,±zwith momentum boosted in same direction
• 16 source positions using (CAA):⇒ 1 high precision (HP) inversion
⇒ 16 low precision (LP) inversions
[E. Shintani et al., Phys. Rev. D91, 114511 (2015)]
⋆ Signal improvement:
• Stout Smearing: 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 steps
• Momentum smearing: tuning for each momentum P
![Page 25: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
15
Systematic uncertainties
Laborious effort to eliminate uncertainties
⋆ Cut-off Effects due to finite lattice spacing
⋆ Finite Volume Effects
⋆ Contamination from other hadron states
⋆ Chiral extrapolation for unphysical pion mass
⋆ Renormalization and mixing
![Page 26: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
16
Systematic uncertainties
Laborious effort to eliminate uncertainties
⋆ Cut-off Effects due to finite lattice spacing
⋆ Finite Volume Effects
⋆ Contamination from other hadron states
⋆ Chiral extrapolation for unphysical pion mass
⋆ Renormalization and mixing
Discussed in this talk
![Page 27: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
17
Reduction of Noise-to-signal ratio
Smom[ψ(x)] =1
1 + 6α
ψ(x) + α
±3∑
j=±1
Uj(x)eiξjψ(x+ j)
[G. Bali et al., Phys. Rev. D93, 094515 (2016)]
0 2 4 6 8
�✁✂
10-1
100
✄☎✆✝✞✟✠☎☎✡✡☛✡☛☞✌✍✎✏ ✑✒✓
✔ ✕ ✖
✔ ✕ ✖✗✘✙
✔ ✕ ✖✗✚
✔ ✕ ✖✗✛✙
✔ ✕ ✖✗✜
✔ ✕ ✖✗✢✙
⋆ Momentum smearing helps reach higher momenta
![Page 28: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
17
Reduction of Noise-to-signal ratio
Smom[ψ(x)] =1
1 + 6α
ψ(x) + α
±3∑
j=±1
Uj(x)eiξjψ(x+ j)
[G. Bali et al., Phys. Rev. D93, 094515 (2016)]
0 2 4 6 8
�✁✂
10-1
100
✄☎✆✝✞✟✠☎☎✡✡☛✡☛☞✌✍✎✏ ✑✒✓
✔ ✕ ✖
✔ ✕ ✖✗✘✙
✔ ✕ ✖✗✚
✔ ✕ ✖✗✛✙
✔ ✕ ✖✗✜
✔ ✕ ✖✗✢✙
100000
1x106
1x107
1x108
0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6cost [C
PU
h for
10%
err
or]
P3 [GeV]
γ0
γ3
γ5γ3
σ12
⋆ Momentum smearing helps reach higher momenta
⋆ BUT: limitations in max momentum due to comput. cost
Tsink∼1.13fm
![Page 29: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
17
Reduction of Noise-to-signal ratio
Smom[ψ(x)] =1
1 + 6α
ψ(x) + α
±3∑
j=±1
Uj(x)eiξjψ(x+ j)
[G. Bali et al., Phys. Rev. D93, 094515 (2016)]
0 2 4 6 8
�✁✂
10-1
100
✄☎✆✝✞✟✠☎☎✡✡☛✡☛☞✌✍✎✏ ✑✒✓
✔ ✕ ✖
✔ ✕ ✖✗✘✙
✔ ✕ ✖✗✚
✔ ✕ ✖✗✛✙
✔ ✕ ✖✗✜
✔ ✕ ✖✗✢✙
100000
1x106
1x107
1x108
0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6cost [C
PU
h for
10%
err
or]
P3 [GeV]
γ0
γ3
γ5γ3
σ12
⋆ Momentum smearing helps reach higher momenta
⋆ BUT: limitations in max momentum due to comput. cost
Conclusion:
Reliable results (Tsink>1fm) limit the momentum we can reach
Tsink∼1.13fm
![Page 30: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
18
Reduction of Noise-to-signal ratio
⋆ Smearing improves the signal-to-noise ratio
P=6π/L
-10 0 10
�✁✂
0
0.5
1
1.5✄☎ ✆✝✞✟✠✡☛ ☞ ✌✍✎✏✍
✑ ✌✍✎✏✍
✒☞ ✌✍✎✏✍
✒✑ ✌✍✎✏✍
-10 0 10
�✁✂
-0.6
-0.3
0
0.3
0.6✄☎ ✆✝✞✟✠✡☛
☞ ✌✍✎✏✍
✑ ✌✍✎✏✍
✒☞ ✌✍✎✏✍
✒✑ ✌✍✎✏✍
⋆ Smearing suppresses linear divergence
⋆ Application of stout smearing with 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 steps
![Page 31: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
19
Bare Nucleon Matrix Elements[C. Alexandrou et al. (ETMC), arXiv:1710.06408] [C. Alexandrou et al. (ETMC), arXiv:1803.02685]
Unpolarized
-20 -10 0 10 20
�✁✂
0
0.5
1
1.5✄☎ ✆✝✞✟✠✡ ☛☞✁✌
✍☞✁✌
✎✏☞✁✌
-20 -10 0 10 20
✑✒✓
-0.5
0
0.5 ✔✕ ✖✗✘✙✚✛ ✜✢✒✣
✤✢✒✣
✥✦✢✒✣
Polarized
-20 -10 0 10 20
�✁✂
0
0.5
1
1.5✄☎ ✆✝✞✟✠✡☛ ☞✌✁✍
✎✌✁✍
✏✑✌✁✍
-20 -10 0 10 20
✒✓✔
-0.5
0
0.5✕✖ ✗✘✙✚✛✜✢ ✣✤✓✥
✦✤✓✥
✧★✤✓✥
⋆ Addressing systematic uncertainties is imperative
![Page 32: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
20
Challenges of Calculation
Excited States
Tsink∼0.75fm
✲�✁ ✲✂✁ ✁ ✂✁ �✁
�✁✂
✁
✁✵✄
✂
✂✵✄
✄☎ ✆✝✞✟✠✡☛☞✌
✍✎✏✑✒ ✓ ✔
✕ ✖ ✗✘✙✚
✕ ✖ ✛✘✙✚
✕ ✖ ✜✢✘✙✚
-20 -10 0 10 20
�✁✂
-0.6
-0.3
0
0.3
0.6
✄☎✆✝✞ ✟ ✠
✡☛ ☞✌✍✎✏✑✒✓✔ ✕ ✖ ✗✘✙✚
✕ ✖ ✛✘✙✚
✕ ✖ ✜✢✘✙✚
⋆ Excited states contamination are worse for large momenta
![Page 33: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
21
Challenges of Calculation
Excited States
Tsink∼1.13fm
-20 -10 0 10 20
�✁✂
0
0.5
1
1.5✄☎ ✆✝✞✟✠✡ ☛☞✁✌
✍☞✁✌
✎✏☞✁✌
-20 -10 0 10 20
✑✒✓
-0.5
0
0.5 ✔✕ ✖✗✘✙✚✛ ✜✢✒✣
✤✢✒✣
✥✦✢✒✣
⋆ Excited states contamination are worse for large momenta
![Page 34: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
22
Challenges of Calculation
Excited States
P = 0.83GeV
✶�✁
✶�✂
✶�✄
✶�☎
✶�✆③✝✞✟✠
✵�✄
✵�☎
✵�✆✉✡☛
③✝✞✟☞
✼ ✽ ✾ ✶✵ ✶✶ ✶✁ ✶✂✵�✵✂
✵�✵✆
✵�✵✾
✵�✶✁ ③✝✞✟✌✠
✵�✵✁
✵�✵✂
✵�✄☎
✵�✄✆ ③✝✞✟✠
✵�☎✵
✵�☎✆
✵�✡✵
✵�✡✆✉☛☞
③✝✞✟✌
✼ ✽ ✂ ✄✵ ✄✄ ✄☎ ✄✡
✵�✄☎
✵�✄✆
✵�✄✽③✝✞✟✠✍
⋆ Non-predictable behavior for all regions of z
⋆ Real and imaginary part of ME affected differently
![Page 35: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
22
Challenges of Calculation
Excited States
P = 0.83GeV
✶�✁
✶�✂
✶�✄
✶�☎
✶�✆③✝✞✟✠
✵�✄
✵�☎
✵�✆✉✡☛
③✝✞✟☞
✼ ✽ ✾ ✶✵ ✶✶ ✶✁ ✶✂✵�✵✂
✵�✵✆
✵�✵✾
✵�✶✁ ③✝✞✟✌✠
✵�✵✁
✵�✵✂
✵�✄☎
✵�✄✆ ③✝✞✟✠
✵�☎✵
✵�☎✆
✵�✡✵
✵�✡✆✉☛☞
③✝✞✟✌
✼ ✽ ✂ ✄✵ ✄✄ ✄☎ ✄✡
✵�✄☎
✵�✄✆
✵�✄✽③✝✞✟✠✍
⋆ Non-predictable behavior for all regions of z
⋆ Real and imaginary part of ME affected differently
Conclusion: Reliable results require Tsink>1fm
![Page 36: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
23
Systematic uncertainties in a nutshell
⋆ Excited states uncontrolled for source-sink separations
below 1fm
⋆ Excited states contamination worse for large momenta
⋆ Exponential signal-to-noise problem difficult to tackle
⋆ 2-state fit and summation method: alternative analysistechniques
similar accuracy between different source-sink separations
vital to eliminate bias from the small Tsink values
![Page 37: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
D
Renormalization
of quasi-PDFs
![Page 38: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
25
Renormalization
Critical part of calculation
⋆ elimination of power and logarithmic divergences anddependence on regulator
⋆ identification and elimination of mixing
⋆ Comparison with phenomenology becomes a real possibility
M. Constantinou, H. Panagopoulos, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 054506, [arXiv:1705.11193]
C. Alexandrou, et al., Nucl. Phys. B 923 (2017) 394 (Frontier Article), [arXiv:1706.00265]
J. Chen, et al., Phys. Rev. D 97, (2018) 014505, [arXiv:1706.01295]
Renormalization scheme
⋆ RI′-type
⋆ Use 1-loop conversion factor to convert to the MS at 2 GeV
⋆ Also applicable for cases of mixing
![Page 39: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
26
Mixing pattern (based on PT)
Depends on the relation between the current & Wilson line direction
V S
mixing with
V
no mixing
A, T
no mixing
A, T T, A
mixing with
: Wilson line direction
: Current insertion direction
![Page 40: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
27
Non-perturbative Renormalization
⋆ same divergence in vertex function and nucleon ME
No mixing: helicity, transversity, unpolarized (γ0)
ZO(z) =Zq
VO(z), VO =
Tr
12
[
V(p)(
VBorn(p))−1
]
∣
∣
∣
p=µ
⋆ Zq: fermion field renormalization
⋆ ZO includes the linear divergence
Mixing: Unpolarized (γ3)
(
ORV (P3, z)
ORS (P3, z)
)
= Z(z) ·
(
OV (P3, z)
OS(P3, z)
)
, Z−1q Z(z) V(p, z)
∣
∣
∣
p=µ= 1
hRV (P3, z) = ZV V (z) hV (P3, z) + ZV S(z) hS(P3, z)
![Page 41: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
28
Conversion to MS - Evolution to 2GeV
⋆ 1-loop perturbative calculation in DimensionalRegularization
⋆ Evaluation of conversion factor to MS
⋆ Conversion factor: a complex function
⋆ Necessary ingredient for non-perturbative renormalization
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15z
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
Re[CT]
Re[CV1/A1]
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15z
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Im[CT]
Im[CV1/A1]
![Page 42: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
29
Numerical Results
⋆ Twisted Mass fermions, mπ=375MeV, 323 × 64, HYP smearing
⋆ Conversion &Evolution to MS(2GeV) (Perturbatively)
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15z/a
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
Z∆h
Re[ZRI]
Im[ZRI]
Re[ZMS]
Im[ZMS]
(7,3,3,3)
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15z/a
-2
0
2
4
6
RI
Re[Zvv]Im[Zvv]Re[Zvs]Im[Zvs]
(7,3,3,3)
Plot from [C. Alexandrou at al., arXiv:1706.00265]
µ0=3GeV µ0=3GeV
![Page 43: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
29
Numerical Results
⋆ Twisted Mass fermions, mπ=375MeV, 323 × 64, HYP smearing
⋆ Conversion &Evolution to MS(2GeV) (Perturbatively)
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15z/a
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
Z∆h
Re[ZRI]
Im[ZRI]
Re[ZMS]
Im[ZMS]
(7,3,3,3)
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15z/a
-2
0
2
4
6
RI
Re[Zvv]Im[Zvv]Re[Zvs]Im[Zvs]
(7,3,3,3)
Plot from [C. Alexandrou at al., arXiv:1706.00265]
⋆ Z-factors are complex functions
⋆ Im[ZMSO ] < Im[ZRI′
O ] (expected from pert. theory)
µ0=3GeV µ0=3GeV
![Page 44: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
30
Systematic uncertainties
Ultimate goal: Reliability in final estimates
![Page 45: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
30
Systematic uncertainties
Ultimate goal: Reliability in final estimates
Systematic uncertainties need to be addresses
![Page 46: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
30
Systematic uncertainties
Ultimate goal: Reliability in final estimates
Systematic uncertainties need to be addresses
⋆ Upper bounds estimated in [C. Alexandrou et al., arXiv:1706.00265]
⋆ Both the ME and Z-factors are complex functions,
in absence of mixing, e.g. unpolarized with γ0 (h ≡ hu−d):
hren = Zh h = Re[Zh]Re[h]− Im[Zh] Im[h]
+ I (Re[Zh] Im[h] + Im[Zh]Re[h])
![Page 47: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
30
Systematic uncertainties
Ultimate goal: Reliability in final estimates
Systematic uncertainties need to be addresses
⋆ Upper bounds estimated in [C. Alexandrou et al., arXiv:1706.00265]
⋆ Both the ME and Z-factors are complex functions,
in absence of mixing, e.g. unpolarized with γ0 (h ≡ hu−d):
hren = Zh h = Re[Zh]Re[h]− Im[Zh] Im[h]
+ I (Re[Zh] Im[h] + Im[Zh]Re[h])
⋆ Uncertainties in Z-factors may have important implicationson the final estimates for PDFs
![Page 48: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
31
Systematic uncertaintiesTruncation effects in C:
RRI′ (MS)
Re (Im) (z, µ0, µ′0; µ) ≡
ZRI′ (MS)
Re (Im) (z, µ0; µ)
ZRI′ (MS)
Re (Im) (z, µ′0; µ)
, (µ′
0=2.67GeV)
Evolution to 2 GeV in RI ′ and MS schemes:
slope in R reveals truncation effect in conversion factor
0.7
1.0
1.4
RI(2GeV)
MS(2GeV)
0.7
1.0
1.4
RR
e
z/a=10
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4
(a µ0)2 _
0.7
1.0
1.4 z/a=15
0.7
1.0
1.4 z/a=5
0.3
0.7
1.0
RI(2GeV)
MS(2GeV)
0.3
0.7
1.0
RIm
z/a=10
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4
(a µ0)2 _
0.3
0.7
1.0 z/a=15
0.3
0.7
1.0 z/a=5
⋆ Effect in Real part: ∼2%
⋆ Effect in Imaginary part: ∼100% (Im[ZMS]=0 in Dim. Regul.)
![Page 49: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
32
Refining Renormalization⋆ Improvement Technique:
• Computation of 1-loop lattice artifacts to O(g2 a∞)
• Subtraction of lattice artifacts from non-perturbative estimated
⋆ Application to the quasi-PDFs: PRELIMINARY
1.4
1.5
1.6
unsubsub
3.5
3.6
3.7
Re[Z
A] z/a=10
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
(a µ0)2 _
10.0
10.5z/a=15
1.4
1.5
1.6z/a=5
-0.1
0.0
unsubsub
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
Im[Z
A] z/a=10
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4
(a µ0)2 _
-1.5
-1.0
z/a=15
-0.1
0.0 z/a=5
![Page 50: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
32
Refining Renormalization⋆ Improvement Technique:
• Computation of 1-loop lattice artifacts to O(g2 a∞)
• Subtraction of lattice artifacts from non-perturbative estimated
⋆ Application to the quasi-PDFs: PRELIMINARY
1.4
1.5
1.6
unsubsub
3.5
3.6
3.7
Re[Z
A] z/a=10
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
(a µ0)2 _
10.0
10.5z/a=15
1.4
1.5
1.6z/a=5
-0.1
0.0
unsubsub
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
Im[Z
A] z/a=10
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4
(a µ0)2 _
-1.5
-1.0
z/a=15
-0.1
0.0 z/a=5
⋆ Real part significantly improved
⋆ Mild change in imaginary part (expected to change with smearing)
• Behavior might be a consequence of absence of smearing in pert. calculation
![Page 51: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
33
Renormalized Matrix Elements
⋆ Renormalized ME must be independent of stouts steps
-10 0 10
�✁✂
-1
0
1
2
3
✄☎✆✝✞✟✄☎ ✠✡☛☞✌✍✎ ✏ ✑✒✓✔✒
✕ ✑✒✓✔✒
✖✏ ✑✒✓✔✒
✖✕ ✑✒✓✔✒
-10 0 10
�✁✂
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
✄☎✆✝✞✟✠✡ ☛☞✌✍✎✏✑ ✒ ✓✔✕✖✔
✗ ✓✔✕✖✔
✘✒ ✓✔✕✖✔
✘✗ ✓✔✕✖✔P3=
6πL
![Page 52: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
33
Renormalized Matrix Elements
⋆ Renormalized ME must be independent of stouts steps
-10 0 10
�✁✂
-1
0
1
2
3
✄☎✆✝✞✟✄☎ ✠✡☛☞✌✍✎ ✏ ✑✒✓✔✒
✕ ✑✒✓✔✒
✖✏ ✑✒✓✔✒
✖✕ ✑✒✓✔✒
-10 0 10
�✁✂
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
✄☎✆✝✞✟✠✡ ☛☞✌✍✎✏✑ ✒ ✓✔✕✖✔
✗ ✓✔✕✖✔
✘✒ ✓✔✕✖✔
✘✗ ✓✔✕✖✔
⋆ Renormalized ME with and without smearing are compatible
⋆ Absence of stout smearing leads to increased noise
P3=6πL
![Page 53: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
E
Towards
light-cone PDFs
![Page 54: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
35
Towards light-cone PDFs
Upon Fourier Transform of renormarmalized matrix elements
P3 = 1.4GeV
![Page 55: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
36
Towards light-cone PDFs
Upon matching of quasi-PDFs
q(x, µ) =
∫ ∞
−∞
dξ
|ξ|C
(
ξ,µ
xP3
)
q
(
x
ξ, µ, P3
)
C
(
ξ,ξµ
xP3
)
=δ(1−ξ)+αs
2πCF
[
1+ξ2
1−ξln
ξ
ξ−1+1+
3
2ξ
]
+
ξ>1,
[
1+ξ2
1−ξln
x2P 23
ξ2µ2(4ξ(1−ξ))−
ξ(1+ξ)
1−ξ+2ι(1−ξ)
]
+
0<ξ<1,
[
−1 + ξ2
1 − ξln
ξ
ξ − 1− 1 +
3
2(1 − ξ)
]
+
ξ<0,
[J.W. Chen et al., Nucl. Phys. B911 (2016) 246, arXiv:1603.06664]
γ0 : ι=0, γ3/γ5γ3 : ι=1
Prescription at ξ=1:∫
dξ
|ξ|
[
C(
ξ, ξµ
xP3
)]
+q(
xξ
)
=∫
dξ
|ξ|C(
ξ, ξµ
xP3
)
q(
xξ
)
−q (x)∫
dξC(
ξ, µ
xP3
)
[C. Alexandrou et al. (ETMC), arXiv:1803.02685]
![Page 56: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
37
Towards light-cone PDFs
Upon matching of quasi-PDFs
P3 = 1.4GeV
⋆ Matched quasi-PDfs have similar behavior with thephenomenological curves
⋆ Last piece missing: target mass corrections (TMC)
![Page 57: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
38
Towards light-cone PDFs
Upon target mass corrections
⋆ Finite nucleon momentum ⇒
⋆ Correction is necessary for mN/P3 6= 0(particle number is conserved)
[J.W. Chen et al., Nucl. Phys. B911 (2016) 246, arXiv:1603.06664]
P3 = 1.4GeV
![Page 58: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
39
Towards light-cone PDFs
Unpolarized Polarized
⋆ Increasing momentum approaches the phenomenological fits
a saturation of PDFs for p=8π/L and p=10π/L
⋆ 0<x<0.5 : Lattice polarized PDF overlap with phenomenology
⋆ Negative x region: anti-quark contribution
![Page 59: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
40
Pion Mass Dependence for quasi-PDFs⋆ Simulations at physical mπ crucial for above conclusions
[C. Alexandrou et al. (ETMC), arXiv:1803.02685]
⋆ Large pion mass ensembles: Lattice data saturate away from
phenomenological curves
![Page 60: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
F
Discussion
![Page 61: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
42
DISCUSSIONGreat progress over the last years:
⋆ Simulations at the physical point
⋆ unpolarized operator that avoid mixing (γ0)
⋆ Development of non-perturbative renormalization
⋆ Improving matching to light-cone PDFs
![Page 62: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
42
DISCUSSIONGreat progress over the last years:
⋆ Simulations at the physical point
⋆ unpolarized operator that avoid mixing (γ0)
⋆ Development of non-perturbative renormalization
⋆ Improving matching to light-cone PDFs
Further investigations:
Careful assessment of systematic uncertainties
⋆ Volume effects
⋆ quenching effect (strange and charm)
⋆ continuum limit
![Page 63: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
43
DISCUSSIONGreat progress over the last years:
⋆ Simulations at the physical point
⋆ unpolarized operator that avoid mixing (γ0)
⋆ Development of non-perturbative renormalization
⋆ Improving matching to light-cone PDFs
Further investigations:
Careful assessment of systematic uncertainties
⋆ Volume effects
⋆ quenching effect (strange and charm)
⋆ continuum limit
Dedicated effort from community
![Page 64: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
THANK YOU
TMD Topical Collaboration Grant No. PHY-1714407
![Page 65: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
BACKUP SLIDES
![Page 66: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
46
Numerical Results
⋆ Computation on a variety of scales
⋆ Conversion &Evolution to MS(2GeV) (Perturbatively)
⋆ Extrapolation to eliminate residual dependence on initial
scale
▼�
✵✁
∆❤
▼�
✵✁
∆❤
![Page 67: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
46
Numerical Results
⋆ Computation on a variety of scales
⋆ Conversion &Evolution to MS(2GeV) (Perturbatively)
⋆ Extrapolation to eliminate residual dependence on initial
scale
▼�
✵✁
∆❤
▼�
✵✁
∆❤
⋆ Z-factors are complex functions
⋆ Increasing stout steps reduces renormalization
![Page 68: Light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD...9 PDFs on the Lattice Contact with light-cone PDFs: ⋆ Difference between quasi-PDFs and light-cone PDFs: O Λ 2 QCD P 2 3,m N P 3 ⋆ Matching](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060705/60719d6b017b854b06315338/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
47
Standard vs. derivative Fourier transformStandard Fourier transform defining qPDFs:
q(x) = 2P3
∫ zmax
−zmax
dz4π
eixzP3h(z)
can be rewritten using integration by parts as:
q(x) = h(z) eixzP3
2πix
∣
∣
∣
zmax
−zmax
−∫ zmax
−zmax
dz2π
eixzP3
ixh′(z)
[H.W. Lin et al., arXiv:1708.05301]
Truncation h(|z| ≥ zmax)=0 : equivalent to neglecting surface term
Oscillations reduced, but small-x not well-behaved