Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI
-
Upload
jacklee1918 -
Category
Documents
-
view
238 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI
![Page 1: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
INTERNATIONAL MARKETINGINTERNATIONAL MARKETING
MARK 40MARK 4022
Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDILicensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI
SESSIONSESSION 66
Near East University
INTERNATIONAL MARKETINGINTERNATIONAL MARKETING
MARK 40MARK 4022
Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDILicensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI
SESSIONSESSION 66
Rana SerdarogluSource:Malhotra and Birks, et al. Chp 6
![Page 2: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Home country
LICENSING
Blueprint : “how to do it”Host Country
Host C
ounty
Three modes of entry
STRATEGIC ALLIANCE (J.V.)WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY
Host C
ounty
A “joint effort”A replica of home
6-2
![Page 3: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
LicensingLicensing
◦ LICENSING refers to offering a firm’s know-how or other intangible asset to a foreigncompany for a fee, royalty, and/or other type ofpayment Advantages for the new exporter
The need for local market research is reduced The licensee may support the product strongly in the new
market Disadvantages
Can lose control over the core competitive advantage of thefirm.
The licensee can become a new competitor to the firm.
◦ LICENSING refers to offering a firm’s know-how or other intangible asset to a foreigncompany for a fee, royalty, and/or other type ofpayment Advantages for the new exporter
The need for local market research is reduced The licensee may support the product strongly in the new
market Disadvantages
Can lose control over the core competitive advantage of thefirm.
The licensee can become a new competitor to the firm.
6-3
![Page 4: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
FranchisingFranchising
Definition: franchising is a licensing option where thefranchisor offers a local franchisee the use of thebusiness model.
The local franchisee:◦ raises the required capital to establish the business,◦ obtains real estate and capital investment◦ hires local employees, and establishes a place of
business. The franchisor:◦ offers the use of a well-known brand name,◦ contractual promises of co-op advertising and
promotion,◦ assistance in finding and analyzing promising locations,◦ training and a detailed blueprint for management.
Definition: franchising is a licensing option where thefranchisor offers a local franchisee the use of thebusiness model.
The local franchisee:◦ raises the required capital to establish the business,◦ obtains real estate and capital investment◦ hires local employees, and establishes a place of
business. The franchisor:◦ offers the use of a well-known brand name,◦ contractual promises of co-op advertising and
promotion,◦ assistance in finding and analyzing promising locations,◦ training and a detailed blueprint for management.
6-4
![Page 5: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Franchising pros and consFranchising pros and cons
The Franchisor: Pro: The franchisor typically gets income as a royalty on gross
revenues. Con: The franchisor needs to establish controls over the use of the
brand name and the level of quality provided by the local operation. The Franchisee: Pro: The franchisee can start a business with limited capital and
benefit from the business experience of the franchiser. Con: The franchiser’s ability to dictate many facets of business
operation limits local adaptation.
The Franchisor: Pro: The franchisor typically gets income as a royalty on gross
revenues. Con: The franchisor needs to establish controls over the use of the
brand name and the level of quality provided by the local operation. The Franchisee: Pro: The franchisee can start a business with limited capital and
benefit from the business experience of the franchiser. Con: The franchiser’s ability to dictate many facets of business
operation limits local adaptation.
6-5
![Page 6: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• Has been growing in the last two decades
• Mitigates risk of financial exposure in othercountry markets
• Common method of penetrating newmarkets, leveraging existing brand names
• Firms provide pre-planning tools to enticelocal investors, including location advice.
• Coop advertising of the brand name
E.g. McDonalds, Wendy’s, Dunkin Donuts, Yum (Pizza Hut, KFC,Taco Bell)
Close-up: Fast Food Franchising
• Has been growing in the last two decades
• Mitigates risk of financial exposure in othercountry markets
• Common method of penetrating newmarkets, leveraging existing brand names
• Firms provide pre-planning tools to enticelocal investors, including location advice.
• Coop advertising of the brand name
6-6
![Page 7: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Franchising a la McDonalds:Franchising a la McDonalds:Pros and ConsPros and Cons
◦ Advantages The basic “product” sold is a well-recognized brand name (50-50
split on advertising costs). The franchisor provides various production and marketing
support services to the franchisee (potatoes in Russia). The local franchisee raises the necessary capital and manages
the franchise .
◦ Disadvantages Careful and continuous quality control is necessary to maintain
the integrity of the brand name (Paris problem).
◦ Advantages The basic “product” sold is a well-recognized brand name (50-50
split on advertising costs). The franchisor provides various production and marketing
support services to the franchisee (potatoes in Russia). The local franchisee raises the necessary capital and manages
the franchise .
◦ Disadvantages Careful and continuous quality control is necessary to maintain
the integrity of the brand name (Paris problem).
6-7
![Page 8: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Strategic AlliancesStrategic Alliances
Strategic Alliances (SAs)◦ Typically a collaborative arrangement between
firms, sometimes competitors, across borders Based on sharing of vital information, assets, and
technology between the partners Have the effect of weakening the tie between potential
ownership advantages and company control
Strategic Alliances (SAs)◦ Typically a collaborative arrangement between
firms, sometimes competitors, across borders Based on sharing of vital information, assets, and
technology between the partners Have the effect of weakening the tie between potential
ownership advantages and company control
6-8
![Page 9: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Non-equity Strategic Alliances:
Equity Strategic Alliances
– Joint Ventures
Equity and Non-Equity SAs
Non-equity Strategic Alliances:
– Distribution Alliances
– Manufacturing Alliances
– Research and Development Alliances
6-9
![Page 10: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Equity Alliances: Joint VenturesEquity Alliances: Joint Ventures
Joint Ventures◦ Involve the transfer of capital, manpower, and
usually some technology from the foreignpartner to an existing local firm.◦ Examples include Rank-Xerox, 3M-Sumitomo,
several China entries where a government-controlled company is the partner.◦ This was the typical arrangement in past
alliances – the equity investment allowed bothpartners to share both risks and rewards.◦ Today non-equity alliances are common.
Joint Ventures◦ Involve the transfer of capital, manpower, and
usually some technology from the foreignpartner to an existing local firm.◦ Examples include Rank-Xerox, 3M-Sumitomo,
several China entries where a government-controlled company is the partner.◦ This was the typical arrangement in past
alliances – the equity investment allowed bothpartners to share both risks and rewards.◦ Today non-equity alliances are common.
6-10
![Page 11: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Rationale for Non-Equity Alliances
• Tangible economic gains at lowerrisk
• Access to technology
• Markets are reached without a longbuildup of relationships in channels
• Efficient manufacturing madepossible without investment in a
new plant
• Tangible economic gains at lowerrisk
• Access to technology
• Markets are reached without a longbuildup of relationships in channels
• Efficient manufacturing madepossible without investment in a
new plant
SA’s allow two companies to undertake missions impossiblefor one individual firm to undertake.
• Strategic Alliances constitute an efficient economic responseto changed conditions.
6-11
![Page 12: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
FDI: AcquisitionsFDI: Acquisitions
◦ Instead of a “greenfield” investment, the company canenter by acquiring an existing local company.◦ Advantages Speed of penetration Quick market penetration of the company’s products
◦ Disadvantages Existing product line and new products to be
introduced might not be compatible Can be looked at unfavorably by the government,
employees, or others Necessary re-education of the sales force and
distribution channels
◦ Instead of a “greenfield” investment, the company canenter by acquiring an existing local company.◦ Advantages Speed of penetration Quick market penetration of the company’s products
◦ Disadvantages Existing product line and new products to be
introduced might not be compatible Can be looked at unfavorably by the government,
employees, or others Necessary re-education of the sales force and
distribution channels
6-12
![Page 13: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Entry Modes and Local Marketing Control The local marketing can be controlled to varyingdegrees, quite independent of the entry mode chosen. Thetypical global firm maintains a sales subsidiary to managethe local marketing. Examples:
marketing controlmode of entry independent agent joint with alliance partnerown sales subsidiaryexporting Absolut vodka in the US Toshiba EMI in Japan Volvo in the USlicensing Disney in Japan Microsoft in Japan Nike in Asiastrategic allianceautos in China EuroDisney Black&Decker in ChinaFDI Goldstar in the US Mitsubishi Motors in US P&G in the EU
6-13
![Page 14: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The Internationalization StagesThe Internationalization Stages
Internationalization Stages Stage 1 – Indirect exporting, licensing Stage 2 – Direct exporter, via independent distributor Stage 3 – Establishing foreign sales subsidiary Stage 4 – Local assembly Stage 5 – Foreign production
Internationalization Stages Stage 1 – Indirect exporting, licensing Stage 2 – Direct exporter, via independent distributor Stage 3 – Establishing foreign sales subsidiary Stage 4 – Local assembly Stage 5 – Foreign production
6-14
![Page 15: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Trade barriers will typically force the firm to un-bundle its valuechain & engage in non-exporting modes of entry, such as
licensing or strategic alliances -
- or invest in a wholly owned manufacturing subsidiary.
Takeaway
Trade barriers will typically force the firm to un-bundle its valuechain & engage in non-exporting modes of entry, such as
licensing or strategic alliances -
- or invest in a wholly owned manufacturing subsidiary.
6-15
![Page 16: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Licensing & strategic alliances may dilute firm specificadvantages through transfer of know-how, but the need for
partners with local knowledge and the need to reduce afirm’s risk exposure offsets this.
Takeaway
Licensing & strategic alliances may dilute firm specificadvantages through transfer of know-how, but the need for
partners with local knowledge and the need to reduce afirm’s risk exposure offsets this.
6-16
![Page 17: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The optimal mode of entry is to find a way over entry barriers,then to make trade-offs between strategic posture and the
product/market situation.
Takeaway
The optimal mode of entry is to find a way over entry barriers,then to make trade-offs between strategic posture and the
product/market situation.
6-17
![Page 18: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
In the past, foreign expansion started with culturallysimilar countries leveraging existing know-how in similar
markets.
Now, with a higher commitment to international markets,we observe firms that are “born global”. These firms sell
abroad from the start.
Takeaway
In the past, foreign expansion started with culturallysimilar countries leveraging existing know-how in similar
markets.
Now, with a higher commitment to international markets,we observe firms that are “born global”. These firms sell
abroad from the start.
6-18
![Page 19: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
When rapid entry into several countries is important,firms follow a “sprinkler” strategy, entering countries
simultaneously.
Past patterns followed a less risky but slower “waterfall”strategy where firms gradually expand from country to
country.
Takeaway
When rapid entry into several countries is important,firms follow a “sprinkler” strategy, entering countries
simultaneously.
Past patterns followed a less risky but slower “waterfall”strategy where firms gradually expand from country to
country.
6-19
![Page 20: Licensing, Strategic Alliances, FDI](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051417/55cf9147550346f57b8c41d0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
• By establishing a sales subsidiary in themarket country, the firm can control thelocal marketing effort quite independentof which particular mode entry mode hasbeen chosen.
Controlling the local marketing effort:
Takeaway
• By establishing a sales subsidiary in themarket country, the firm can control thelocal marketing effort quite independentof which particular mode entry mode hasbeen chosen.
6-20