License Usage and other matters...

-How people perceive CCL

Share but how?

Convenient answer:

They have problems…

http://flickr.com/photos/westerndave/428979524/

Past Contents

National Assembly Library

http://flickr.com/photos/umjanedoan/497374910/

Should have known better…

Ministry of Education

KERIS

Edunethttp://www.edunet4u.net

Aim: To teach and learn freely

http://www.flickr.com/photos/behshadpoor/256063943/

License "P"

You can use of the work only for personal or educational purpose.

Otherwise, you cannot distribute the work

“P” = C

Why they had to make license “P”

• They had no prior legal considerations • CCL has no retroactive power • They wanted to embrace the people who

wanted more protection (or avoid legal conflicts)

Minimum Freedomand

Maximum Security

The matter of Sampling

By Javier Piragauta

KBS, SBS, MBC vs.

UCC sites

Right to "Quote" or

Fair "Use"

Make it legal for everyone to use multi media contents under 5 minutes FREELY

Sampling License

CC Sampling Licenses Sampling Plus You can take samples except for advertising You can use the entire work non-comercially.

NC-Sampling Plus You can take samples only for non-comercial purpose. You can use the entire work non-commercially.

"Sampling" - retired

Deprecation of sampling licenseTwo of those versions permit noncommercial sharing of the licensed work (SamplingPlus, and Noncommercial SamplingPlus). One (the Sampling License) only permits the remix of the licensed work, not the freedom to share it.... We will not adopt as a Creative Commons license any license that does not assure at least this

minimal freedom, the freedom to share a work noncommercially. -Lawrence Lessig, June 4th, 2007

CCL principle vs.

Commons' need

By: Sungwoo HU

이 저작물은 크리에이티브 커먼즈 저작자표시 2.0 대한민국 라이선스에 따라 이용할 수 있습니다 . 이용허락조건을 보려면 ,

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/kr/ 을 클릭하거나 , 크리에이티브 커먼즈 코리아에 문의하세요 .