Libro Ikarian Panigiri 97-2003 17x23 Cm
-
Upload
rastainsideee -
Category
Documents
-
view
107 -
download
0
Transcript of Libro Ikarian Panigiri 97-2003 17x23 Cm
1
…knowingly joined the same perpetual circle of life…
To Umì and the Alchemist, to Jina and the Cognack.
To all “my people” that are always beside me, with the heart and the soul,
supporting my dreams.
<< yacqua i rarrieri e vientu i ravanti, ma u suli ca n’asciuca nun’ha mancari
mai >>
…to the sun.
2
INDEX
Introduction
Chapter 1 Ikaria and the panigiria, an historical reconstruction
1.1 The raising of the Artemis temple, the linkages with the myth
of Icarus and Dionysus
1.2 Dyonisian symbols and the taurobolium
1.3 Ikaria, exile island
1.4 Some events connected to the panigiria during the Ottoman
Empire
1.5 Contemporary Events
Chapter 2 Ikarian Panigiria
2.1 Organization and structural components
2.2 Music and dance
2.2.2 Description of the ikariotiko dance style
2.2.3 Some reflections
2.2.4 Symbolism in the ikariotiko
Chapter 3 Other components
3.1 Introductions
3.2 Goat and wine
3
3.3 Communitary and identitarian role of the panigiria
3.4 Representing conflicts
3.5 Reflections on the fieldwork
Final observations
Bibliography and site links
4
Introduction
The intention of starting a research about Ikarian panigiri has grown since
summer 2007, after seeing and participating to theses celebrations in the
village of Vrakades. I then decided to study these festivals from an
anthropological point of view.
Ikarian panigiri are orthodox Christian festivals dedicated to the saint
patron of each village. I immediately noticed the communal character of
these celebrations and the symbolic elements refering to the Greek
mythology, religion and history. Because I had never seen that kind of
celebration, I decided to start a research that will try to rebuilt the historical
and cultural context. More precisely, I started this research with the will to
understand the symbolic and material relationship between all elements that
make the panigiri what they are: Ikarian community, music, dance, goat
meat and vine. My main purpose was to understand why these festivals are
so important for the whole Ikarian community and to describe
the roles that panigiri have in the Ikarian society.
I used different methods of research to study these celebrations from
different points of view.
Using the participant observation I was able to understand aspects that
couldn’t be understood with distant observation.
I decided to use the participant observation because it enables to grasp most
of the aspects that couldn’t be understood with only distant observation.
Then I used a more detached observation technique which enabled me to
see performances that I have already observed with the previous technique.
With this technique, I could get rid of the emotive component that is
inherent to the participant observation. Furthermore I was able to catch
elements that I wouldn’t have noticed with the participant observation. It
was then easier to understand the structure of the festivals and the ritual
elements that are part of it. I compared all the panigiri I took part in to
5
extract the symbolic constancy. I alternated these two kinds of observation
even during the same panigiri and I believe that they are complementary and
essential because each one help to throw light on different elements.
I have integrated my observations into notes, pictures, videos, audio
recordings and interviews to try and evaluate the actual knowledge of the
local people and more importantly to know what they think about panigiri.
With most of the people I interviewed, I had a conversation that went further
than a simple interview and that gave me a wider
vision about Ikarian culture and history. A book written by Miliadis d.d. and
Tripoulas c.h. (2006), “The Ikarian Voyage” contributed a lot to my
research.
To give a sense to the actions that I studied , I used the theory of Smith,
Durkeim, Rappaport and Cazeneuve to give a meaning to studied ritual
actions. The theory of Gluckman and Di Bernardo helped to understand the
conflicts inside the rituals. And finally I used the ideas of Hertz to explain
the polarity inside the sacred domain area.
I thought that it was necessary to recall the history of the island to
understand the events that marked the life of those societies.
I tried to understand the value of the vine and goat meat that were and still
are important for the Ikarian community.
What emerged from the historical introduction is a huge degree of
attachment of the Ikariotics to Panigiri that still today continue to play an
important part in their life.
In the second and third chapter I analysed the temporal structure of Panigiri
and the two couples of elements around which the festivals are constructed :
goat and vine, music and dance.
This book is an attempt to preserve the Ikarian culture by explaining what
the ikarian panigiria means to anyone who is interested in .
6
Chapter 1 - Ikaria and the panigiria, an historical
reconstruction
1.1 The raising of the Artemis temple, the linkages with the myth of Icarus
and Dionysus
An historical introduction to the ikarian panigiria1 is needed to begin with
my research. A social factor as these feasts are, has to be contextualized in
the historical evolution of a people, with an eye to the subsequent
encounters and clashes with other cultures. Thus, what follows is an outline
of the island's history, necessarily summarized, that introduces here and
there the panigiria, in order to stress their presence in the ikarian history,
trying to understand the space that these festivals occupied in the lives of the
inhabitants of Ikaria.
From the bronze age on, Ikaria, thanks to its geographical position, was
included in the routes that linked Greece to what now is Turkey. Many
adventurers and explorers traveled alongside the coast, but only few of these
reached the land.
1 The panigiria are religious festivals that take place all over Greece, mostly from March
to October. These festivals are organized to celebrate the different patron saints in
several cities or villages. The ikarian panigiria, many Greeks say, are different from
those organized in continental Greece, as they are characterized by a peculiar musical
style that is not played elsewhere, by the exaggerate consumption of goat meat and
especially wine, in addition to their duration, often extended till late morning.
7
The Greeks appeared in the Aegean sea towards the 1500 B.C. and since
1200 B.C. they had already taken control of the majority of the Aegean
islands. Nevertheless, it seems that Ikaria stayed out of the Greek control;
the reasons for this isolation are probably to be connected with the physical
conditions of the island, covered with thick woods and steep mountains,
surrounded by the ikarian sea – mentioned by Homer and known and feared
everywhere for its streams and frequent storms. Besides, the few brave
sailors that dared to face the whirls, were driven away by the lack of wharfs
or bays where it was possible to shore the boats (Papalas A. J., 1992).
In 750 B.C. Ikaria was colonized by the Greeks of Miletus, a coastal city in
Anatolia (today part of Turkey), that founded a colony in Therma and one in
Oenoe. The reason why they were interested in Ikaria was probably its
strategic position in order to foster the naval trading route from Miletus
towards its major colonies.
The sources to piece together the early history of the events that involved
Ikaria consist in a series of referrals left by such authors as Herodotus (480
B.C.), Strabo (58 B.C.), and many others that had passed through the island
or that wrote chronicles based only on what they heard and on tales that
traveled from one island to the other, from one mouth to the other and that
were often modified and emphasized. This is not to say that these sources
are not reliable or that they should be excluded from the historical account
of Ikaria. On the contrary, we should read them with an eye to the social
context and trying to understand the reason why only some specific
accounts survived. We should try to understand why the communities in the
8
near islands have always emphasized some aspects of the ikarian lifestyle, in
a way that they became elements through which identifying and often
devaluate Ikaria, its population and its lifestyle, largely different from the
ones that characterized the other Greek communities (Georgernees J., 1677;
Stamatiades E., 1864).
Eparchis, born in Oenoe (one of the first cities in the island), around 350
B.C. wrote a history of Ikaria, that seems more to be made to promote the
ikarian wine. Besides, only few fragments of Eparchis' work survived
(Miliadis D. D. e Tripoulas C. H., 2006). Oenoe was mythologically
considered as the place in which the wine appeared for the first time in
human history, given as a present by Dionysus
«it is exactly in this village that, so is believed, grapes appeared
for the first time, by the site of Ta Bra, previously called the
“Pramnia rock” and subsequently named Oenoe that, translated,
means wine» (Miliadis D. D. e Tripoulas C. H., 2006, p. 31).
The wine is one of the key elements around which ikarian panigiria are
shaped and, together with goat meat, it constitutes the main course of the
common meal in these festivals. Furthermore, among the island's
communities, these two elements have a focal position in the dynamic
process of identity building.
In the 6th
century B.C. Ikaria was taken over by Samos, a neighboring
island, becoming in this way a part of Policrates' maritime empire.
It was in that time that a temple dedicated to Artemis was raised in the
9
North-West coast, by Nas bay (Papalas A. J., 1992), (see image n° 1).
This bay had always been a highly important point, as a sacred site for the
pre-Hellenic dwellers of the Island or as last rest stop for those who dared
heading to the dangerous Ikarian sea. Travelers used to sacrifice there to
Artemis, that, among the other roles, was believed to protect their crossings
(Papalas A. J., 1992).
From the 5th
century B.C. the creation of the island begun to be linked with
the myth of Ikarus (Papalas A. J., 1992). In the first decade of the same
century an expedition of Persian forces reached Ikaria that, after the Greco-
Persian wars, joined the Delian League, meant to restrain Persian
expansionist aims. During this period the island experienced an
unprecedented development.
10
Oenoe became renown in the Greek oikoumene for its wine called Pramnio,
mythologically considered to be the first wine in the world. Some assume
that it was a dark, heavy and soporific wine, but it’s only a guess. By sure,
anyhow, it was very expensive, considering the high taxes imposed from
Athens. In fact taxes were imposed depending on the economic situation of
the area.
Hence we can understand that Ikaria was going through a flourishing
development based on the production of wine, as it was one of the most
charged territories in the documents: Ikaria was enlisted among the 30% that
paid the highest taxes (Papalas A. J., 1992).
Still nowadays there are several tales concerning the paternity of the original
wine, all of them meant to discredit one or another place in favor of one’s
own, but this debate is not central to my research. Way more important are
Ikarians’ mythical beliefs linked to their Island and, thus, the subsequent
behaviors in wine growing, production and consumption –both ritual and
not.
Up this far it is not possible to confirm the presence or the celebration of
panigiria on the Island, but I believe that at least there were rites connected
with Artemis, together with sacrifices, that have connections with the later
history of the panigiria. I assume this considering the building date of the
temple dedicated to Artemis that, being the last relief post on the dreadful
Ikarian sea, was by sure the cult centre of the goddess, to protect the
travelers.
Besides, as in that period wine became the main gaining means in the island,
11
I believe there were propitiating rituals to summon a good crop and win the
benevolence of the wine and crop gods, particularly Dionysius. To sustain
this hypothesis there is the marble mask representing Dionysius, that was
discovered in the island, which was part of a wider statue (Versnel H. S.,
1990).
Around 440 B.C., Athens founded a military settlement in Oenoe to be able
to overlook Samos, that rose against the empire.
At that time Euripides visited the island and mentioned a peculiar uneven
condition between the two main cities in Ikaria, Oenoe and Therma (Papalas
A. J., 1992). The latter had not a central role in the production of the local
and much renowned wine, whereas its prosperous economy was built on the
thermal springs of the area, considered to be highly beneficent and known
all over the Aegean sea. It seems that the two cities had almost no contacts
and this seems likely to depend on the steep mountain that divide the two
areas. This division survived till the contemporary age, when in 1912 the
two ikarian provinces almost fought a war to establish the island’s capital.
That period, one of the richest in which 13000 inhabitants could be
estimated living in the island, ended soon with the break out of the
Peloponnesian War (431 - 404 B.C.).
Twice the spartan admirals brought their fleets in Ikaria. After the war, the
Aegean sea became less controller as the power of the Greek fleets grew
weaker and weaker and this favored the pirates’ assaults that did not spare
the coastal villages (Papalas A. J., 1992).
12
1.2 Dyonisian symbols and the taurobolium
The situation got better by 387 B.C. when Ikaria became a member of the
second Athenian confederacy. This time Samos did not join the alliance,
thus making of Ikaros’ island an important border outpost in need of strong
fortifications. Its strategic position, as in the past, was used by the Athenian
Empire to supervise the Aegean traffic.
Many ikarians had a part in Alexander the Great’s campaign against Persia.
The war that followed Alexander’s death, in
323 B.C., saw Ikaria turning into an
important military settlement. In that period
the tower and the nearby fortress in Dracano
(today Fanari) was built and nowadays it is
the better preserved Hellenic military tower
(see image n° 2). In the third century B.C.
Theocritus referred in his writing to the
fortified citadel as “Dyonisus’ home”,
showing the evolution of the stronghold,
from military outpost to walled settlement
with his own wine production (Papalas A. J.,
1992).
This tower was a fundamental interest point to all the reigns that wanted to
control the Aegean sea; in fact, being positioned in the outmost tip of the
Immagine n° 2
13
island, overlooking nearby Samos, it was the best point to supervise the
passage of the ships heading towards continental Greece or Anatolian coasts
(Papals A. J., 1992).
Furthermore, from the tower it was possible to communicate with nearby
islands and passing ships through a sort of Morse alphabet, which used light
signals made with mirrors reflecting intermittently the sunlight.
Still nowadays it is not uncommon to see this ancient communication
system; the islanders, as ships pass by, keep communicating through their
houses’ windows, using sunlight reflections2. This, besides being another
survival of the century old traditions of the island, probably caused by the
will to preserve these peculiarities, shows us Ikarians’ attachment to their
traditions.
The 2nd
century B.C. was a declining period for all the Aegean islands, and
also the Ikarian population rapidly fell by 50%. This wasn’t the result of any
particular event, but the outcome of a gradual process that began in the
centuries that followed the death of Alexander the Great, and continued till
the entrance of the Roman Empire in the Aegean area (Papalas A. J., 1992).
As Tolomeus I took control over the Sporades Islands in the East, he
absorbed also Ikaria that, under his dynasty, saw a rich and steady
flourishing period based, as usual, on the production of wine.
2 I personally assisted to this peculiar custom during my crossing from continental
Greece to Ikaria, during the last summers. Often, while talking to Ikarians that were
heading home, this narrative was confirmed.
14
It was in that time that Oenoe began forging coins with the image of
Dionysus, grapes, Artemis and a bull, symbolizing the rituals and the
sacrifices that took place in the temple in Nas. In fact it represented the
taurobolium, a ritual based on the gesture of pouring of the blood of a
sacrificial bull either in a sacred place or on a priest. This ritual was
executed with a propitiating intention, to bring health and wealth to the
community. Later on, it was meant to regenerate the followers of the cult
making them “reborn for eternity” or simply as a vow to the goddess
(Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum VI, 510512).
As I tried to date this cult, I referred to the period in which the taurobolium
was celebrated in ancient Rome (from the 15th
to the 28th of March), to
honor the Anatolian goddess Cybele, patron of nature, animals and wild
places (Paladini V., 1952). Also in Ikaria the ritual of the bull’s blood
pouring was celebrated, for Artemis that, besides being the hunting goddess
was also the protector of wild animals and woods (Papalas A. J.,1992).
The cults and the characteristics of the two goddess were very similar and it
is not unlikely to say that this ritual survived for many centuries in the
culture and the practices of the island. Nowadays in Ikaria, precisely in the
village, if it may be called like that one that has only three inhabitants, of
Mavriannos3, close to the ruins of Artemis temple, the annunciation of
Gabriel to Virgin Mary on the incarnation of Jesus Christ4 is celebrated with
a panigiri on the 25th of March.
3 http://www.mlahanas.de/Greece/cities/armenistis .html
4 http://www.armenistis.net/festivals.html
15
Trying to track the same date back to the pre-christian times, the 25th of
March represents the day in which, during the taurobolium, the resurrection
of the god Attis (unlucky husband of the goddess Cybele) was celebrated.
This holy day was characterized by the presence of joyful parades on the
streets (Fishwick D., 1966, Vol. 97). Furthermore, it is interesting to notice
that this date also evokes the declaration of the Greek independence war
against the Ottoman Empire (25th March 1821).
It seems that the term panigiria, literary meaning all joined together, was
used to indicate the different, although similar, way to celebrate a pagan
god, a Christian saint or an historical event that had an importance on the
local identity. A way, hence, through which it was possible to regard oneself
as Ikarian.
This is where the “institution” of the panigiria starts shaping throughout the
history of the island, a history that, from the early moments of Ikarian
history up to these days, sees this ritual as a means through which the
individuals can establish a contact with the holy. Besides, being a cultural
product, it is also a vehicle through which Ikarians consciously reaffirm year
after year the fundamental characters of their economy, that have a central
part in the formation of their symbolic and identitarian language. I’m
referring to wine and goats, that are their main economic and symbolic
resources.
Going back to the coins that were forged in Oenoe, representing grapes and
its patron god, or those that showed Artemis and the bull, they show the
16
symbols through which Ikaria was known throughout the Aegean sea.
As the historical reconstruction of the island past goes on, it seems always
more clear to me the presence of Dionysian cults connected to the wine
production, main pillar in Ikarian economy and identity.
During the second century B.C. many Aegean communities set off festivals
and erected temples dedicated to various gods of the pantheon (Papalas A.
J., 1992). It looks like in Ikaria these kinds of approaches to the gods were
already present since a long time, considering the dating of Artemis temple
– way back in the 6th century B.C. – and the various activities carried on in
it.
Furthermore, the production of wine, dating back to the 5th century B.C.,
lets us think that in the Island there were already – if not festivals – at least
rituals through which Ikarians thanked Dionysus for the good crop and the
“miraculous” transformation of the grape juices into the sacred drink.
17
1.3 Ikaria, exile island
At the end of the second century, Romans began to appear in the area, even
if they weren’t able, yet, to control it all. In 129 B.C. Samos was included in
the roman province of Asia and so it was, probably, for Ikaria. A Roman
general was appointed to repair Artemis temple in Nas bay, that during the
3rd
century B.C. was left ruined, probably due to the frequent pirate
plunderings (Papalas A. J., 1992).
But the Roman control over the Aegean sea was not meant to last for long:
in the first century B.C. they had to turn back to internal problems and left
the Aegean area under the control of groups of pirates.
In this period all the coastal villages in the island were abandoned and the
few inhabitants escaped towards the inland (Miliadis D. D. & Tripoulas C.
H., 2006).
The situation meant the rising weath price and a spreading food scarcity for
all the islands that – as Ikaria – had to import most of the resources essential
to their survival.
Emperor Augustus reestablished order in the Aegean sea during the period
going from the 29 B.C. to the 14 C.E. and encouraged Samos inhabitants to
put their efforts in the development of Ikaria (Papalas A. J., 1992). It was a
precise interest of the Roman Empire to repopulate abandoned towns, in
order to collect, as they started again to flourish, tributes.
Soon, the Roman Empire began using the Aegean islands as a place where
18
political opponents were exiled. Most probably Samos, having control over
Ikaria, chose the island as one of the main destinations of some of those
exiles (Papalas A. J., 1992).
At that time Strabo (58 B.C.) passed through the island and wrote a very
negative description, representing it as a mostly deserted place, where only
two small towns were still inhabited, Oenoe and Therma. From his writings
it appears that the island was only used from Samos cattlemen that exploited
the vegetation as a large graze for their herds. In fact, during the Roman
dominion, the most largely commercialized good from Ikaria were goats.
We cannot be completely sure of the testimony of Strabo, as of that of
several explorers that pretended to have visited the island. Many of the
sources of the islanders’ history and culture were produced by people that
have never visited Ikaria (Papalas A. J.,1992). They usually relied on the
tales heard during their travels in other islands – like Samos – where the
population saw Ikaria as a place that had only to be exploited, a land with no
history and where the inhabitants had no culture and were far from being
civilized (Miliadis D. D. & Tripoulas C. H., 2006).
In the tales that reached us5, partly for the envy caused by the myths that
gave the patronage of the wine and its god to Ikaria, partly for hegemonic
desires, the picture of the island is often an uneven one, that discouraged the
travelers that arrived in Samos from verifying personally if the stories were
true, leaving them with negative descriptions.
Also Plinius the Young, during the first century C.E., passed through the
5 As those of Georgirnees J., Epaminondas S. & Plinius the Young.
19
island and was struck by the way in which its inhabitants lived, a lifestyle
that he describes as “rural” (Papalas A. J., 1992).
From the end of the 5th
century C.E. Ikaria fell into the control of the
Byzantine Empire that ensured the protection from the pirates plunders.
In the 6th century the raids of the Slavonic populations and then of the
Arabs damaged the coastal villages, but from the 1035 the Byzantine fleet
regained the control over the Aegean sea.
The first Christian Church that was built in the island seems to date back to
the first years of the Byzantine Empire; furthermore, the exile of Saint John
in Patmos and the formation of the first Christian communities in the
Aegean marked the arrival of the early Christianity in Ikaria (Papalas A. J.,
1992).
20
1.4 Some events connected to the panigiria during the
Ottoman Empire
Since the end of the 12th century C.E. the Byzantine Empire loosen the naval
defense in the Aegean sea, making way, once again, to pirates and Italian
adventurers. In this period Ikarians built fortresses in order to prevent every
possible attack (Papalas A. J.,1992).
A document preserved in Patmos monastery, on the nearby island, tells of a
pirate ship that, after a storm, shipwrecked on Ikaria coasts where the whole
crew was executed by the islanders.
The Norman invasion (XII century) touched Ikaria that by 1190, when the
invaders left the Aegean sea, became part of the Venetian lands. They used
the island as a strategic point to convoy their merchant ships towards Chios
and Constantinople.
In the 14th century C.E. Ikaria became part of the Genoese Empire, that
aimed at Dracanum fortress (nowadays Fanari) to be able to control the
commercial activities on the Aegean sea. During this period, most of the
islanders took refuge in the village of Langada, on the opposite end of the
island (Papalas A. J., 1992).
Up to now, a popular song survived that recalls the way in which the
Genoese took control of the island and how they treated the local
population. Eventually, as usual, the maritime republic forced the locals to
offer work and military services. Hence, the hate for the conquerors that the
21
Ikarians expressed through popular music was shaped.
The Giustiniani dynasty from Genoa, in particular the Arangio family, hold
the title of Ikaria barons (the island, at the time, was also known as Nikaria)
from the 1362 to the 14816.
When the Turks drove the Genoeses out of the Aegean, around 1450, Ikaria
was set free until 1521, when it was annexed to the Ottoman Empire.
The sultan sent to the island a tax collector and a group of islanders was
ordered to carry him on a sedan chair. But, when they were close to a cliff,
they intentionally threw him down, killing him7 (Papalas A. J.,1992).
Altough a cruel punishment was expected for such a dare, the sultan granted
his pardon to the Ikarian delegation that was called in front of him. Some
sources put this clemency in connection with the way in which the Ikarians
were dressed, with battered rags and a shabby look, enough to cause pity in
the sultan for their deprivation (Miliadis D. D. & Tripoulas C. H., 2006).
Some other tales present the islanders under the Ottoman dominion as the
most deprived in the whole Aegean, lacking proper clothes and
characterized by an unusual way to sleep. Eventually in Ikaria, since long
time, there were no beds (Georgernee J., 1677 & Stamatiades E., 1864).
This unusual habit was seen by most of the outsiders as a symbol of the
backwardness and of the barbarity of the Ikarians, a people so rough that
6 www.giustiniani.info
7 I was told about this episode during an interview with E. L. and I subsequently found
out more about it in Papalas A. J., Ancient Ikaria.
22
would refuse a bed even when offered one while traveling outside their
homeland.
A tale that survived the stresses of history tells about an Ikarian that, after
several years outside his island, got used to sleep in a bed so much that,
when he got back to Ikaria, he brought one with him. His fellow islanders
could not stand it, as they thought that the novelty he brought was
unacceptable; so they broke into his house, took the bed and, once they
brought it out, they burnt it in the central square of the village, as a warning
for those who wanted to follow the example of the innovator. From that
moment up to the late 19th century no one moved away from the stark
simplicity that characterized the Ikarian lifestyle (Miliadis D. D. &
Tripoulas C. H., 2006).
The explanation that was give for such an habit was that they wanted to
sleep close to “their mother”, mother earth that every day gave them the
means to survive.
The Turks, after the killing of the tax collector, never sent again any official
in Ikaria, loosening the control and limiting the taxation to a fee called “one
of ten” that consisted in a crown for each ten inhabitants to be given to the
archbishop of Samos together with the normal taxes (Papalas A. J., 1992).
But, as no one could really check the conditions on the island, the payed
taxes were meager. Furthermore the tax collection was not entrusted to some
imperial official that could actually check the economic situation of the
islanders, but a delegation of Ikarians was to bring directly the money to the
archbishop, as usual with stark clothing in order to justify the poor amount
23
gathered for the taxes.
To check the real conditions on the island, the bishop of Samos Georgirnees
J. was sent to Ikaria (Papalas A. J., 1992). And he wrote probably the best
description of the island in that time. By 1677 he found that the island was
inhabited by more or less a thousand islanders, depicted as the poorest in the
Aegean sea.
In his writings he described Ikarians as not wearing appropriate shoes and
not using beds, but also as happy, careless and long-lived. Besides, they
believed to be direct descendents of a royal byzantine family, thus, to avoid
their “noble blood” to be corrupted by the union with commoners all
marriages with foreigners were forbidden.
During his stay in Ikaria, he noticed that the wine was stored in long pots or
jars, that were buried underground, so that when someone needed some
wine, he’d get it through empty canes (Miliadis D. D. & Tripoulas C. H.,
2006).
In the 19th century Artemis temple was sacked and raped by the villagers of
Christos Raches to use its marble to build the local church (Papalas A. J.,
1992).
In an interview, I was told the pretext used by the priest to persuade the
inhabitants to sack the temple.
«The temple in Nas was in a perfect state up to 1860s, but, after a long drought, the
Church persuaded the villagers that the fault was to be charged to Artemis’ statue, still
preserved in the temple, that caused God’s wrath. So it was destroyed and the temple
stones were used to build up churches» (Interview with Y. B., 25/08/08).
24
By 1827, Ikaria broke the few links that kept it under the control of the
Ottoman Empire, but after a few years it was forced to accept once again the
Turkish legislation and to host some imperial official, becoming once again
a part of the Empire (Papalas A. J., 1992).
In 1864 Epaminondas Stamatiades, an official in Samos, visited Ikaria and
some years later published a book titled Ikariaka, in which he confirmed the
picture of Ikarians as a backward people, uncivilized and wild. As a
reaction, the islanders, considering the writing offensive for their culture,
collected all the copies they could and they burnt them down in the public
square (Miliadis D. D. & Tripoulas C. H., 2006).
Once again we find an element which I consider very important. Twice8
during this historical reconstruction of the island’s past we see a violent
collective reaction against those who discredited their “culture” or
introduced “westernizing” elements in their lifestyle.
Both the reactions are meant to show publicly what is accepted and what is
considered a threat to the integrity of the Ikarian community. These highly
symbolic actions take place in the central square of the village and I think it
is not by chance that the same square also hosted, year after year, ever since
remote times, the celebration of many panigiria.
8 I’m referring to the tale about the bed brought in the island by an Ikarian traveler and
subsequently burnt in the public square and the one about the books considered
offensive for the island’s culture, that were burnt as well in the square.
25
I believe that the panigiria are events during which is explicitly shown what
the community accept and what, on the other hand, forbids; for example, the
immoderate use of wine, allowed during these festivals as it is publicly
done, but criticized when the abuse takes place in the everyday life.
And this is how the panigiri becomes a “place” characterized by a particular
value, a borderland in which all the characteristic behaviors of the
community are shaped, together with the ones that are not meant to be done,
as a relief valve that legitimizes the principles on which the “culture” and
the “identity” of the island are built.
26
1.5 Contemporary Events
The 20th century was an important period from an identitarian perspective.
The 17th July 1912, relying exclusively on their own strength, the local
population gained independence from the Ottoman Empire, chasing away
the few Turkish officials present on the island (Papalas A. J., 1992).
This date, besides its importance for the independence gained by the island,
is useful for my attempt to place the Ikarian festivals, known as panigiria, in
the historical evolution of Ikaria. Eventually, the 17th July of that year, as
still nowadays, Saint Marina is celebrated in Ikaria. From May to October,
actually, Ikaria sees the almost daily celebration of several saints.
From some interviews I collected in Ikaria (Y. B., 25/08/08 and E. L.,
22/08/08), I learnt a fact that lets me associate the date of the independence
with the panigiria, a presence already stable enough9 to be felt as essential.
So essential that, when – the 17th July 1912, day of Ikarian independence –
the islanders were about to drive the Turks out, while heading towards the
dock they passed through a village where a panigiri was taking place to
celebrate Saint Marina.
«The delegation stopped for the whole duration of the panigiri. They untied the Turkish
officials, gave them a table, let them eat, drink and dance. The day after the tied them
again and head again towards the dock» (Interview with Y. B., 25/08/08).
9 As I will say later, Ikarian panigiria were already well established during the pirates’
raid. Some sources allow us to date their presence as far as the period of the foundation
of the village of Langada, in the Byzantine time.
27
The importance of the celebration of the panigiria is made clear from this
tale, that points out that its compliance was so essential to Ikarian
population that it stopped for one day the ongoing revolution.
Going back to official historiography (Papalas A. J.,1992; Miliadis D. D. &
Tripouas C. H., 2006; Vaccarino G., 1988), the years that go from the
independence from the Ottoman Empire to the Balkan war saw Ikaria
showing in the Aegean sea as an independent nation, even with a flag, an
anthem and an army.
Independence lasted until November of the same year, when Ikaria was
annexed to the Greek state. Five months of independence were hard enough
for the island population, that was short on food and cut off from the rest of
the world for the absence of transportation and mail (Papalas A. J., 1992).
In that period, Ikaria was also considering the opportunity to be annexed to
the Italian lands in the Aegean sea. Throughout the years that go from the
annexing to Greece till the last decades of the 20th century, the Greek
government’s policies did not satisfy Ikaria.
The missing investments on the island development caused the
backwardness in which the island is still nowadays. Ikarians looked for
economic help in order to build streets, schools and to buy medicines, but
the lack of responses pushed them, from 1890 on, to emigrate to the United
States where some of them had luck in the mills industries or as
businessmen (Miliadis D. D. & Tripoulas C. H., 2006).
Even the panigiria represented (and still represent) some sort of solution.
28
They were occasions in which it was possible to collect small amounts of
money to be used in the construction of important infrastructures. During
these festivals such goods as wine and goat cooked in different ways, that
were the product of the hard work of the village families (Miliadis D. D. e
Tripoulas C. H., 2006).
When people gave their own goods for the panigiria, they did not want any
other income, whereas “their own things” were gave to the whole
community. Besides, in this way, they allowed the celebration of these
festivals, so important and so loved by Ikarians. These celebrations were a
kind of catalyst of sacred and profane, material and inner elements.
During World War II and German and Italian occupation, the island went
through one of the worst moments in its history, characterized by deaths and
lootings. There are no clear evidences to help us estimate how many people
starved, but only in the village of Karavostamos more than a hundred people
died for this reason (MIliadis D. D. e Tripoulas C. H., 2006).
Afterwards, the condition got worse with the damages and killings of the
Greek Civil War (1945 – 1947), that burst between the nationalists and the
philo-communists. The Greek government decided to use the island to exile
more or less 13000 comunists10
, from 1945 to 1949 (Y. B., 25/08/08 & M.
G., 24/08/08).
Even after this date, most of the population kept a certain sympathy for
communism, so that Ikaria i salso known in Greece as “Red Island” or “Red
Rock” (Miliadis M. M. & Tripoulas C. H., 2006).
10 From Papalas A. J., 1992.
29
Also for this reason the island went through moments of hunger and despair,
as the land could not produce enough for everyone.
The quality of life started increasing only after the 1960s, when the Greek
government began to invest in the island infrastructures, promoting tourism.
Notwithstanding this, economic help before reaching Ikaria were always
passing through Samos administration, that deducted a “charge” from the
total amount of money (Papalas A. J., 1992).
This sort of bribe that Samos applied to Ikaria money is still common and
obliges Ikarians to satisfy some of their needs through the money gathered
in the panigiria, perpetuating the twofold aspect, both symbolic and
material.
30
Chapter 2 - Ikarian Panigiria
2.1 Organization and structural components
The aspect that I want to underline and analyze in this chapter is the
socializing character of the panigiria and the role that they have in the
Ikarian community11
.
In doing this, I think it is important to analyze separately the various
elements that constitute these festivals, stressing mostly the relations
dance/music, food/wine and the interpersonal relationships that are shaped
during the celebration.
These elements characterize the Ikarian panigiria, as they differ from the
ones in the whole continental Greece, as some informants told me
«Ikarian panigiria are unique, full of youth, with music and dancing till late morning and
the Pipperi closes all the panigiria, whereas it happens rarely in the rest of Greece»
(Interview with J. P., 17/08/08).
I believe that, above all, it is important to propose an explanatory framework
for the Ikarian panigiria, so that, even those who have never celebrated one,
can figure them out, in order to understand them better.
11 As I’ve already explained in the footnote 8, by Ikarian community I mean the whole
group of islanders born in Ikaria that, even if the reside somewhere else, each year go
back to their village to celebrate the panigiria.
31
Ikarian panigiria are festivals meant to celebrate important events in the life
of certain saints, remember the dead or the anniversary of highly
representative events that have a sense of “collective identity”, as the Ikarian
independence from the Ottoman Empire (17th July 1912).
There are festivals throughout the year, but they are more frequent between
May and September. The panigiria follow a definite ceremony formed by a
series of ritual actions, as the dance or the common meal, in which
individuals seem to perform, ritually, the values that are shared by the
community. The awareness of doing something that is approved by the
group necessarily leads to positive ends, verified or believed to be so
(Destro A., 2009).
«By the term ritual I mean a performance with more or less
invariable sequences of formal acts and enunciates not totally
codified by their executors» (Rappaport R. A., 1999, p. 36).
After taking part in a ritual, individuals are in a condition that differs from
the starting one. At the end of a ritual, the participants are not the same.
At the end of the panigiri the community will be partly different: its union
will be made stronger, during the ritual the community itself will be born
again (Destro A., 2009).
Basing on what I saw, I divide the panigiria into two fundamental moments:
The first one begins in the early morning and ends in the early afternoon.
Each family in the village contributes to the common banquet bringing goat
32
meat, if they have any, some wine, if they produce it, or some money. Those
who can’t contribute economically nor materially help out in some other
way, for example working in the preparation of the square where the
panigiri will take place.
In the early morning the whole village goes to the church to remember the
dead and celebrate their own patron saint. At lunch time a big tableful will
be ready in the central square, where everyone will eat together and then go
back to its own house. This first part of the panigiri is closed to those who
are not from the village.
The second moment begins in the evening, around eight or nine p.m., when
the village, and everyone who wants to join in, meets in the main square
where several tables are placed on the perimeter, leaving the center free for
the dances and a group of Ikarian musicians. The dinner and the dance are
not divided. Panigiria are characterized by an alternance, better said a
concomitance, of food and dance, all washed with abundant Pramnio wine.
The main course eaten in these festivals is goat meat, variously cooked. As
the time passes by, the food becomes less important, whereas the wine and
the dance become the heart of the party.
The speed of the rhythm grows proportionally as the time goes by, so that
around one or two in the night the panigiria show a face that during the day
is hidden, characterized by frantic dances, joined in by the whole
community, that merges all individuals in one dancing spiral.
33
.
34
The end of the festival, often in the late morning, the day after, depends on
how tired the participants or the musicians are; thus, often a certain
challenge between the two parts takes place, with the musicians pushing up
the rhythm and the dancers inciting them with booing and hisses typical of
these moments.
Observing the ritual processes, we can understand the ideological asset of a
specific community (Destro A., 2009). For example, looking at the gestural
language in the panigiria we can understand whether there are strong
hierarchies or not.
Considering the festivals’ dynamics, it is possible to notice that Pan and
Dionysus12
share the day in a way that prevents the contrast between them.
Pan prefers the first hours of the afternoon, as Dionysus prefers the night.
There is another analogy between the religious and the everyday domain:
indeed, as we said before, also the panigiria are divided in two parts. The
first one characterized by a calm lunch without music or dances; the latter
consisting in a dinner, followed by frantic dances, driving rhythm and large
quantities of wine.
This is how the panigiria become the metaphorical place where several
forces come into action, belonging to different spheres. The two souls of the
12 Pan, goat shaped god. Connected with the soil and the fertility, wanders through the
woods, followed by nymphs, playing the flute and dancing. He is mainly considered the god of the fields and the woods during the day. He protects the cattle and holds sacred
the mountains peaks. He is a quiet loving god and does not like to be bothered.
Dionysus, linked to the vegetation, was responsible for the ripening of the crops. Often
represented as a chaotic god. The main plants with which he is represented are ivy and
grape, through which he gave the wine to the mankind. He is usually associated with the
night.
35
religious sphere, Pan and Dionysus, beat the rhythm of the panigiri,
regulating the actions that take place in the festivals. The calm of the day
precedes the chaos of the night.
As I’ve already said, to better understand the various elements and aspects
of which the Ikarian panigiria are composed, I will split my analysis, in this
and in the next chapter, looking at music/dance and food/wine as separate
moments for practical reasons, but being aware of their mutual
interdependence.
36
2.2 Music and dance
I think it is appropriate to present a synthesis of the different musical styles
and related dances present on the island. The main styles I found in Ikaria
are:
• The ballroom dancing, present in Europe from the 20th century.
«Ballroom dancing was imported in Ikaria through the nearby Smirni (ancient Greek town,
nowadays part of Turkey), considered the Greek Paris. It was from there that all the latest
fashions came, among them ballroom dancing, one of the more common dance styles in
Europe at the time» (Interview with Y. B., 25/08/08).
• The rebetiko, a decidedly masculine dance, defined as a sort of “Greek
blues” the contents of which recall the hard life of the emigrants.
• The tsifteteli, a traditionally feminine dance, similar to a sort of belly
dance with clear Turkish origins.
• Several dances performed in circles, as the nisiotiko (literary music of the
islands) that usually focuses on tales about the sea.
• The ikariotiko, a dance exclusive to this island.
An element that I regard as important is the lack, in the practices I was able
to observe in Ikaria, of forceful sexual discriminations in dancing, as
opposed to what happens in continental Greece or elsewhere, where it is not
37
allowed for a woman to lead the dance circles or spirals or to dance a music
traditionally associated to the other gender, for example for a man to dance
the tsifteteli or for a woman to dance the reberiko, as I was told during an
interview
«one thing that I like here in Ikaria is that even women can lead the circle and design their
own figures, something that in Greece is not accepted as girls have and are meant to keep
a prudish role» (Interview with M. G., 24/08/08).
Indeed, only in this Greek island it is allowed for women to dance rebetiko
and lead ikariotiko13
(masculine dance), as much as the men can enjoy the
tsifteteli (feminine dance). I believe that women still hold leading and
important positions in this communities. Above all, from this peculiarity we
can understand that these roles are credited a high importance and
represented also on a choreographic and ritual level.
A source that seems to confirm this analysis of the Ikarian society comes
from the pen of the Spaniard Ruy Gonzales de Clavijo that in 1403 C.E.
affirms:
«Ikaria is a populous island and it’s full of well cultivated fields.
It is ruled by a woman that owns her own jail» (Miliadis D. D. &
Tripoulas C. H., 2006, p. 42) .
13 Ikariotiko is a dance style characterized by a series of basic codified steps, among
which the one called “Ikarus fly” or “Ikarus step”, representing his mythical fall and the
island formation, is mostly noticeable.
38
The panigiria, being a sort of medium for identitarian elements, to my
advice fundamental for Ikarian culture, could not avoid representing the
women position, that in Ikaria was a key role even in the political arena.
The dance, and the related music, on which I will focus, as I consider it to
be the most representative medium for the symbols that Ikarian
communities express through this kind of language, is the ikariotico.
This peculiar dance style translates the images and the behaviors that seem
to be part of the “Ikarian identity”, as the islanders themselves consider it. In
its steps it tells the story of the birth and growth of Ikaria, with the mythical
fall of Ikarus and the formation of the island; eventually, since the 5th
century B.C. the island was known as Ikaria, which means “Ikarus island”
(Miliadis D. D. & Tripoulas C. H., 2006).
The basic steps seem to be codified and standardized since a long time, even
if every single person used to characterize its own dance with unique forms
and circles, «intertwining the repetitive characters with more
extemporaneous and personal attitudes» (Destro A., 2009, p.64).
Observing the dance, listening to the music and considering the context in
which these two elements appear, it is possible to seize and piece together
the socio-cultural processes that characterized that territory.
Often, studying a social phenomenon as a festival and the performances that
take place during it, in areas “ethnically” and linguistically homogeneous, it
is possible to distinguish more permanencies in some places and more
disintegration in others.
A research that starts from these forms of cultural expression, through which
39
are conveyed, expressed and renewed the collective values, brings
inevitably to relate to other aspects of the local culture and history.
Dance and music, in a festival that acts as a case in which “everything”14
can take place and be shaped, often hide some practical needs of the
community itself.
Dance has an autonomous character; it can be performed without music or it
can even produce sounds itself (Leydi R., 1991).
Starting with elements like this one, it is possible to go back in time and to
question ourselves on the reasons that gave birth to certain habits and
consolidated them, necessarily running into meaningful historical events
that marked the whole community, shaping the individual lifestyle,
including the habits and the rituals.
For a long time Ikaria was prone to lootings from groups of pirates that
infested the Aegean sea (Papalas A. J., 1992). This formed the lifestyle of its
inhabitants, in which both work and leisure had to face this constant threat.
Thus the panigiria changed in response to these events
«when pirates approached the coasts, the inhabitants took shelter in the mountains, for
example in Langada, and continued to celebrate panigiria, but, as they were afraid that the
music would reveal them, they beat the rhythm clapping their hands» (Interview with E.
L., 22/08/08).
14 Rituals are the “places” and means through which the traditions of a community are
made clear, together with some characters of the identities of the individuals and
therefore of the community itself. Besides, the conflicts and the solutions to these are
shaped in the rite.
40
Thereof we can gather two important information. The first one concerning
the movements from the coastal villages to the refuges in the mountains and
the subsequent changes in habits for the population15
; they had to work
during the night, not to be seen by the pirates that waited on the shores.
The second one, on the other hand, shows the moldable and yet durable
aspect of these festivals, that were celebrated even without the music. These
ritual celebrations, therefore, have changed following the historical and
social needs; the musical panigiria became silent festivities, in which the
only melody was created by the rhythmic clapping of the hands that gave
the beat to the dance and by the dancing itself.
Many ritual celebrations, notwithstanding the formal and codified character,
undergo transformations, caused by the adaptation to the new contexts that
the historical and social evolution continuously create (Destro A., 2009).
After this historical parenthesis, going back to the elements that constitute
the panigiria, I think it is necessary to look into the dance language.
The gestures that are present in it are codified from the society, that hands
down from generation to generation the basic steps, but, far from being a
fixed repetition of choreographic codes, it is, as all the elements that
permeate social life, subject to the appropriation of the individuals. So the
basic step is enriched by peculiar forms representative of a community, that
are shown during the celebration as a identity card in which the village from
15 Moving from the coasts to the mountains they inevitably had to change their lifestyles
and their livelihood.
41
which the dancer comes, recalling the attention of the collectivity to the
history and the identity of the community itself. During my fieldwork I
often found myself in front of the ikariotiko led by individuals coming from
different villages; it was easy to distinguish them from the forms they were
performing.
The dance, a fundamental element in the panigiria, actually varies from
place to place, depending on the geographical position and on the peculiar
history that the particular community faced and that is affirmed, time to
time, in each festival, through its identitarian characters, showing what is
accepted and what is not.
42
Dance uses a gestural language that the ethnomusicologist Roberto Leydi
(1991) divides, considering the main function of the event – social dance,
ceremonial dance and therapeutic dance.
I believe that the analysis of these three kinds of dance is useful to
understand the role that the ikariotiko has in the island’s communities.
The main function of social dance is an aggregative-recreational one, as it
allows the strengthening of the interpersonal communication through the
gesture within the group (Leydi R., 1996). Are part of this category
courtship dances, game dances and educational dances that are meant to
teach and train specific skills.
The gestural language used, that differs from one community to the other,
constitutes what we call “style”. It reflects the behavioral rules that form the
gestural habitus of an individual in a community. As I said, the set of
gestures varies from community to community, even in adjacent territories
and in groups that share the same dance repertory; furthermore, it varies
with age class, social role and gender (Leydi R., 1996).
As I was able to observe in Ikaria, masculine gestural language seems to be
characterized by movements with a stronger visual impact. For example in
“Ikarus step” men keep their legs open wider and jump or walk with longer
steps than the women do.
The ritual, being a human activity with formal characteristics, is learnt and
passed on, leaving space for the individual spontaneity (Destro A., 2009).
43
Dance is learnt through imitation and direct transmission adult-child or
child-child, and the basic step is built since the first children’s plays. These
practices are real educational practices needed in order to keep the tradition
alive (Leydi R., 1996).
Social dance is what is more subject to evolution, transformation and
decadence if the community loses chances to gather. The presence in Ikaria
of these festivals, very similar to the ones that took place in the last century,
seems to raise some questions – according to some of my informants (Y. B.,
25/08/08 & E. L., 22/08/08) – like: why these festivals survived up to these
days? Maybe for some sort of identitarian recognition16
? For touristic
reasons or because they still satisfy the community needs?
I believe that the local inhabitants were always reluctant to stop these
practices17
and the reason for that should be found in the role that the
panigiria had in Ikarian communities. They represented the moment in
which different groups in the island met not for work or trade, but in a
festive atmosphere.
Ceremonial dance is shaped during ritual events in which choreographic
groups offer to the community a ceremonial performance with a ritual,
cathartic character and charged with symbolic meaning related to the
16 By identitarian recognition I mean the need to be recognized in the rest of the country
as a community with its own origins, traditions and values; something that has been
denied to Ikarians for a long time.
17 As it is made clear in the various events and adaptations through which Ikarians kept
the tradition of the panigiria; for example in the above mentioned case of the silent
festivals during pirates raids.
44
boundaries and the purification of the territory, together with an exorcistic-
propitiatory function (Leydi R., 1996).
Considering what I’ve seen on the field and the literature on the issue, I
think that in Ikarian panigiria there is no internal partition within the
community. Rather, the whole collectivity is charged with this role and this
honor through dance and the related symbolism.
The knowledge of this repertory is not the legacy of a narrow number of
“specialists”, but it is collective. In the panigiria I took part in, I’ve never
seen a group of “specialists” performing a special dance closed to the other
participants.
As I said, most of the panigiria take place in the period that goes from May
to October, with a larger frequency in summer.
«From the 9th February to mid October more than 96 panigiria are celebrated» (Interview
with Y. B., 25/08/08)
This characteristic may have several practical reasons. Actually, many
recreational and aggregative events are organized in summer, the season in
which it is possible to relax from winter hard work. But, as in Ikaria winter
is very severe and the economy is mainly based on wine production and
cattle breeding, the hardest work takes place from spring, when the sowing
and the pruning take place, to autumn, the season of the grape harvest. Thus,
it is more reasonable to justify the summer panigiria basing on their
propitiatory character, as that is the period just before the harvest, a
45
fundamental step in the island economy.
The island receives scarce economic aid from the Greek government
(Papalas A. J., 1992). Ikarian population, therefore, relies also on the
production and the commerce of wine for the maintenance and construction
of several infrastructures; wine that is exported to Greece and, above all,
sold during the panigiria that have an importance also on the economic side.
«The Greek government does not support us economically and the few money we get are
managed by Samos, that deducts some of the money. Therefore the gains collected during
the panigiria are used to build schools, churches and streets in the villages. Time ago we
didn’t even received the little we have now from Greece. In my village we are celebrating
panigiria to build a big common hall to celebrate marriages, baptisms, dance and so on. All
the basketball courts that you saw were built with the money from the panigiria» (Interview
with E. L., 22/08/08)
Therapeutic dance is meant to obtain a collective wellness through the
attainment of altered states of consciousness; many circular dances from all
around the world fall within this category (Leydi R., 1996), from the
Sardinian “ballo tondo” to the ikariotiko.
The will to aim to that peculiar state of consciousness through dance is
sometimes made explicit through the lyrics of the songs. I remember a song,
sung over a rebetiko melody, that said: “let your clothes fall and dance,
jump, let yourself go, live this moment as you never know how long you’ll
live”.
The peculiar association of dance, music and wine found in Ikaria, famous
46
in Greek mythology for its qualities, brings the participants to alterd states
of consciousness, desired and sought after during these festivals from the
collectivity, with the will to renew the unity of the community itself and
obtain a collective wellness.
«if you listen to this music for the whole night, drinking that wine, you’ll become like
Dionysus or Pan, you become crazy, but in a good way. This is the meaning of the
panigiria» (Interview with Y. B., 25/08/08).
Going on what I experienced on the field, I think that these three kinds of
dance, social, ceremonial and therapeutic, far from being divided elements,
are merged together in the panigiria, shaping its peculiar gestural language.
Typical characters of the social, ceremonial and therapeutic dance take place
in the same dance style, living together in the same time, contributing
altogether in the satisfaction of the Ikarian communities needs. By needs I
mean both the decidedly material ones, as meeting other people, socializing
and renewing social linkages, and those more subconscious, as the need to
let go oneself to certain behaviors like frantic dance and party. And I believe
that this is a key need for human beings.
47
2.2.2 Description of the ikariotiko dance style
Ikariotiko dance is characterized by a rhythmic, measured step, beaten by
the foot against the ground, as to establish some sort of connection with it
and all that it represent.
The circle then becomes a spiral, in which the leader dictates the forms of
his community, that are followed by everyone. He will not take the lead for
the whole duration of the dance; after some time he will leave his place to
someone else autonomously.
The feature of this dance is that the positions are continuously changing, so
that the one that leads in the beginning is often closing the spiral in the end;
and the spiral itself gets tighter and tighter with time, till the bodies of the
participants touch each other. At this point the musician, often the violinist,
can decide whether to stop the melody or to let the dance continue.
If the dance goes on, the leader has to get out of the circle, through the arms
of the dancers, taking the whole spiral with him and leading it towards
wider spaces, for example heading towards the nearby streets. The longer
the song is, the bigger is the number of dancers that will join the spiral. The
musicians, led by the violinist, decide the rhythm and the execution of the
various songs. Only the violin player can decide when to stop a dance, when
to make it frantic or slow it down.
The violinist, together with the mpouzouki18
player, has this special position
18 String instrument of the same family as the lyre. Similar to a mandolin, with a swollen
48
in the panigiria and is therefore highly estimated and respected. It is not
unusual, in the first hours of the morning, as the sun becomes warm, to see
someone taking an umbrella and putting it above the violinist, to protect him
from the sunbeams and the heat, while the rest of the band goes on
playing19
.
A characteristic of the ikariotico is that it has no clear, definite ending; it can
even go on for thirty or forty minutes. When this happens, the melody goes
on and on causing some sort of alienation from reality, losing the sense of
time, concentrating on the dance and giving the sensation that hours of
music are just minutes.
As the time goes by, the melody becomes faster and the dance more
measured and frantic. Often, the dance and the music reach their peak
during late night, when everything seems to change, revealing a hidden side
of the panigiria, charged with Dionysian elements.
Wine is central to this, as it helps the performers to let themselves go into
the music, overcoming personal resistances and letting the individuals
express their feelings better.
«Wine is important, it makes you feel comfortable, it lets you dance and talk to others,
reduces your logic, lets you have fun till the ecstasy» (Interview with M. G., 24/08/08).
It is in this moment that the therapeutic character of the dance starts
body and a high pitched sound, it comes from Asia Minor.
19 I myself saw this peculiar form of respect towards the violinist during a panigiri in
Amalou; besides this habit was later confirmed through the interviews.
49
working, channeling stress, frustrations and the “instinctive/wild” side of the
dancers in the unbridled dance.
«Ikariotiko is a music with no fixed beginning nor ending, it is just a melody that can be
reproduced on and on with some small variations, the sound is high pitched, andante and
leads dancers to let themselves go fully» (Interview with E. L., 22/08/08).
And it is exactly this “letting oneself go” without any restraint (to one’s
instincts and drives, channeling them in the dance) that is beneficial for the
participants of the panigiria.
50
2.2.3 Some reflections
To me, panigiria are important moments of sociality: channeling stress and
frustration through dance, they influence individuals and their way to relate
to others.
During the day in the island there is a very relaxed atmosphere, the time
seems to follow a course of its own. Each action, even the easiest and most
common one, seems to be carried out according to a ceremony, focusing on
each single gesture.
People seem to be prone to relate openly with everyone, sharing – even if it
is only for a moment, only for a dance – their emotions.
I believe that this behavior, this way of being and relating comes or anyhow
depends highly on the panigiria themselves, that contribute to shape the
individuals, preparing them to this kind of relations.
«The impact of the ritual is closely linked to the sensations that it
produces», as «the ritual brings results only as far as it is understood»
(Destro A., 2009, p. 71).
In this process the character of the festivals and the elements that compose
them – dance/music, food/wine and interpersonal relations – are
fundamental.
Joining the circle, during an ikariotiko, you feel accomplice of something,
as if in that precise moment everyone is struggling to overcome, to achieve
the same aim. This is made clear by the looks and by small gestures that the
51
participant let us see: channeled in such a way in the flow of the dance, you
feel carried away and sustained by the others, part in a flow.
As I said, you don’t dance only to be seen by the collectivity20
, but you do
it, especially in the night, to reach that something I was saying before. This
something is not easy to define and it would be restrictive to try to represent
it only by one concept: merging all together, becoming one single dancing
body, being accomplices, feeling a mutual communion, are some of the
concept that can evoke that something.
It is not unusual to see someone losing the rhythm and stopping; promptly,
the others sustain him and carry him to the circle once again, because, as
one of my informants suggested me
«the important thing is that everybody dances together, tighten in the same circle to give
and share the Energy. To be able to feel the circle as if it was one single body» (Interview
with E. L., 22/08/08).
This is the meaning of the term panigiri itself, “all merged together”; it is
thus extremely important that all those who start dancing an ikariotiko finish
it, because, to reach that something, the energy and complicity of every
single one is needed. To reach union and complicity among all the
participants, to feel like being part of21
, everyone should join in the main
20 By collectivity I mean a group of individuals formed by every participant in the
panigiri, both locals and foreigners.
21 Part of a community, even if in this case, we mean a provisional community that is
shaped in each panigiri. To join in something that is socially accepted, this is another
important feature of the panigiria.
52
aggregative features, the common meal and the dance.
53
2.2.4 Symbolism in the ikariotiko
Beginning from the consideration that «within every ritual are present
crossed notions and messages, like those of solidarity, conflict, violence and
pacification» (Destro A., 2009, p. 67), I think that a perfect starting point to
analyze Ikarian panigiria will be the deciphering of the symbols within
them.
A feature that I consider highly important and that is expressed through
ikariotiko dance is the life and death symbolism.
Indeed, as I said before22
, panigiria are also moments to commemorate the
deceased; as individual commemorate their own dead fathers and relatives,
the whole community, through the ikariotiko steps, representing the fall of
Ikarus, commemorates its mythical father.
«In ritual practices, ideal implications need the symbolized action of the rite
to be made clear and to be useful» (Destro A., 2009, p. 86), so the step that
stages the falling of Ikarus is to be considered as the symbol of the mythical
descent of all Ikarians from their forefather and therefore strengthens the
union between individuals, contributing to the renewal of their identity23
.
This is the moment in which the myth enters and acquires a place in the
ritual.
22 See page 27.
23 By this I mean the identification of Ikarians with their mythical father, Ikarus. The
belief of sharing a common descent, having common origins, leads to a sort of union
and communion between individuals that identify in Ikarus mythical character, shaping
in such way Ikarian identity.
54
In Ikaria dance has a “sacred” dimension: no one should over indulge in it,
to the point that Ikarians warn everyone «not to execute the steps without
music» (Miliadis D. D. & Tripoulas C. H., 2006, p. 23).
In many Greek dances it is possible to find the symbolism of the human
struggle against death: also Ikarian dance expresses, with the spiral turning
right, the perpetual circle of life (Miliadis D. D. & Tripoulas C. H., 2006), as
the dance going towards the right has a precise meaning (Hertz R., 1978).
Eventually, religious views among mankind usually develop through the
dichotomy between sacred and profane: this view usually brings humans to
structure their own universe on a bipolar principle, in which dry and humid,
right and left, as ultimately every antithetic couple reproduce the division
between sacred and profane.
In particular, right embodies the sacred, the life, the concepts of strength,
ability, rectitude and morality, whereas the left represents opposite concepts
(Hertz R., 1978).
And this is the reason why most of the collective dances, including the
Ikarian ones, are characterized by the rotation of the circle or spiral formed
by the participants towards the right (as the Sardinian ballo tondo, the Greek
nisiotika, the ikariotiko, the sirtaki and the Sicilian tarantella).
In the ikariotiko individuals express the perpetual circle of life, by
performing the death: indeed, the steps that recall the fall and death of
Ikarus, also represent the foundation of the island. The performing of Ikarus’
death is channeled in a dance that goes towards the right.
As the right represents life in religious polarity (Hertz R., 1978), Ikarians, in
55
the same moment in which they perform and remember their founding
father’s death and their ancestors’, affirm the union between the community
of the deceased and the communities of the island. It seems as if the
panigiria represents moments in which these twofold communities, the
livings’ one and the ancestors’ one, meet and renew their ancestral union.
In approaching death, each «group needs acts that orientate its members’
imagination towards a defined sense, that suggest to everyone a certain
belief» (Hertz R., 1978, p. 91) and this is also a reason why dance and
panigiria themselves are occasions through which account for death and its
sphere to reaffirm life and its continuity among Ikarian communities.
Ikarian dance is also charged with heroic features; for example the leader of
the spiral, putting all his efforts and passion in his movements, shows to the
participants what he is able to do, “what he’s made of”. The figure of an
individual that leads, with his body and his original steps, a whole group of
people, even if only for a short time, so that everyone can see he’s able to be
a leader but also that others are able to do that, is an interesting and heroic
one. Besides, the frantic dance, the jumping, the beating the foot, the wine
and the promiscuity of the bodies, produces an excitation that is hard to
control (Miliadis D. D. Tripoulas C. H., 2006).
The style of the dance, featuring the endless loop of the same musical
pattern and the same steps, together with the wine and the whirl of the
spiral, brings the paticipants to an altered state of consciousness.
56
«if you listen to this music all night long, drinking this wine, you become like Dionisos and
Pan, you get crazy, but in a good way» (Interview with Y. B., 25/08/08);
«when you dance it, you feel like you are a wave or a seagull in flight, you have this
feeling, this is how you have to feel to dance this music the right way» (Interview with M.
G., 24/08/08);
«when I dance in a panigiri I feel like I go backward in time, to my youth»;
«the Ikariotiko doesn’t have a precise beginning neather fixed ending , it is composed with
a riddim that can be indefinitly repeated, the sound is sharp, rhythmic and allow the people
to free them self»;
«let’s go togheter, unity, jump, dance and let’s that you clothes fly away in the air. We don’t
know when the end will come, sp enjoy the present moment. This is how we feel the
Ikariotiko, the more you dance the more your mind is light and free» (Interview with E. L.,
22/08/08).
My informants describe themselves in this moment, excited and full of
“wild” Energy, as if the body moves by itself, as if those steps were always
part of their subconscious, while the mind seems empty, careless. This is the
moment in which the distance from the human and the godly world is
cancelled.
Now the right hand of the leader, that is free as it does not have to sustain
anyone, begins to move on the right and on the left, up and down, as to
remove imaginary obstacles from the path, clearing it and making it safe for
all the others in the spiral.
From time to time the leader puts the right palm behind his neck, as to
57
protect from some danger that could hit him in that defenseless point. The
leader protects the whole spiral from the dangers of the “sacred” and
“dreadful” approach with the other world (Miliadis D. D. & Tripoulas C. H.,
2006).
Music is a magical element that introduces to symbolic forms of knowledge
and behavior, that make sense only from ritual perspectives and in ritual
times, alien to the “normal” logic of the everyday (Leydi R., 1991).
There are features that remember us the cults that once surrounded the
figure of Dionysus. One of these is the certified presence, in 1951, of a
primordial prototype of a drum, symbol of the Dionysian cults, as Euripides
himself affirms in his work Bacchae, when Dionysus orders «take your
drums, invention of Rea mother and myself» (Scazzoso P., 1983, p. 84). The
testimony of the existence of this drum, survived till the 20th
century C.E.,
comes from the Ikarian lawyer Christos Makkas, that says that
«in an Ikarian village, they had the base of a hollow tree, covered
by a stretched piece of gout skin, that they beat with a stick of
wood» (Miliadis D. D. e Tripoulas C. H., 2006, p. 30).
The village of Akamatra is where this ancient musical instrument existed.
And the same village is where grape is thought to have appeared for the first
time, in the nearby site of Ta Bra, previously called “Pramnia rock” and
subsequently called Oenoe that means “wine” (Miliadis D. D. & Tripoulas
C. H., 2006).
58
Furthermore, the 15th of August, each year, the biggest panigiri in the island
is celebrated in Akamatra. The drum was probably the first musical
instrument that was played along with the Dionysian festivals. Soon,
anyway, another instrument followed, one that is still nowadays present in
local culture: the bagpipe.
This new instrument was produced by adding a flute to the skin filled with
air (Leydi R., 1991), symbol of the Askolia festival (Miliadis D. D. &
Tripoulas C. H., 2006), so that also to a figurative and ritual level the voice
was given back to the sacrificed animal. Askolia festival was celebrated
predominantly in Attica, in the second day of the spring equinox, when
goats were sacrificed for the gods and, inflating their skins, bags were made
and people danced over them. Moreover, the dances and the challenges that
took place during that festival often had to do with the skill of dancing or
standing on only one leg (Miliadis D. D. & Tripoulas C. H., 2006). There is
a similarity between the ikariotiko steps and the games that took place
during Askolia.
As I said before, nowadays one dance is the most typical of the island’s
panigiria, ikariotiko, which is based on “Ikarus step”, consisting in a left
heel beat on the ground, then turning the feet after the standing leg and
keeping balance for a while.
The step clearly stages the mythical episode of the fall of Ikarus, that
originated the island, but in the same time it shows similarities with the
dances and games performed during askolia. Ancient Dionysian dances
featured the jump; as «Dionysus is the jumping god, the kid god» (Detienne
59
M., 1986, p. 69), jumping is a fundamental character of Dionysian trance.
«When the push of the jump pervades the body, removing it from its own
control, carrying it away overwhelmingly» (Detienne M., 1986, p. 70).
There are no documented sources that let us confirm the presence of these
festivals also in Ikaria, but it is likely that such events were diffused by
travelers and this hypothesis seems to be strengthen the diffused union, in
Hellenic culture24
, between Dionysus and Ikaria.
If, instead of looking at the single dancers, we consider the whole spiral, it
seems to be moving toward the center with several jumps. I believe that this
dance style, characterized by jumping and beating steps, together with the
particular music and the wine consumption, drives the participants to altered
states of consciousness, «it’s not to be doubt, Dionysian trance begins with
the feet, with the jump» (Detienne M., 1986, p. 70).
By altered state of consciousness I mean a not ordinary state of
consciousness, characterized by modified perceptions and by uncommon
feelings coming from them.
«Altered states of consciousness are means to know ourselves
and the other levels of perception that are normally unknown to
us» (Bettelli O., 2003, p. 38).
24 Many of the Greeks I had a chance to talk to associated Ikaria and its wine with
Dionysus. Furthermore, even Homer talks about the habit to associate Ikaria as the
god’s birthplace when, narrating the birth of Dionysus, he discredits some of the places
that pretended to be his homeland; the first two are Dracano, a village in Ikaria, and
Ikaria itself.
60
The bagpipe and the drum, symbolic instruments of the askolia, both built
with goat skin, still hold an important role in Ikarian culture and the players
of these instruments have with them a humble and ceremonial relation, in
which playing them together means giving them back to life.
Musicians have ritual attitudes, like preparing the instrument before playing.
The drum player will spend the minutes before the exhibition stroking and
caressing the goat skin of his instrument, in order to warm up the skin and
making it more flexible; the same will do the bagpipe player. Furthermore,
the belief that, when played, the instrument will give the voice back to the
animal that sacrificed to produce it, is pretty diffused. A special relation is
made between the musician and his instrument; the instrument acquires an
important symbolic value that removes it from its simple material nature.
61
Chapter 3 Other components
3.1 Introduction
Through historical analysis and fieldwork observation, I believe I can say
that goat and wine are two fundamental features that define and shape
Ikarian social life. These two elements seem to have an high importance in
several social spheres, from sacred symbolism25
, to material and economic
issues26
. In Ikaria culture and, subsequently, religion were built around
them.
On the one hand, there’s the goat, representation of the god Pan, half man
and half goat, protector of calm, nature and animals. On the other side
there’s the wine, image of Dionysus, standing for chaos, irrationality,
instinct. But also beneficial god, as it represented that natural energy that
helps ripen the fruits, above all grape, from which the god taught men how
to extract one of the most important and “culturalized” drinks, the wine
(Dalby A., 2005).
Furthermore, goat is competing with wine in a power relation; the goat eats
grapes, going against Dionysus’ creation, but also Dionysus himself has
often goat-like semblance and his rituals often featured the sacrifice of
25 The symbols of goat and grapes are engraved on several tombstones in Akamatra grave
yard. Moreover goat and wine are essential in the panigiria common meals.
26 Goat and wine are central in the livelihood of Ikarian population, and even trade
revolves around them.
62
goats. This two elements, therefore, seem to be linked by an ancient tie.
There are also documents that stress the conflict between goat and wine,
solving their peculiar relation in the sacrificial banquet, as Leonidas of
Taranto’s work.
«In a vineyard, an adult, hairy male billy-goat ate all the tender
tendril. But from the ground the grape said: Come on, eat the
fertile tendril, you wicked! Anyway, the stump is solid and it will
produce so much sweet nectar, that will be poured on you when
they’ll sacrifice you» (Pontani F. M., 1980, book IX-99).
In the same way as a chain where all the rings are welded together, the
conflict started by the goat’s action is balanced by its sacrifice made by men.
And this is how these two elements, representing the two gods, Pan and
Dionysus, live together in the island, now as a long time ago.
63
3.2 Goat and wine
Trying to go back in time to find special linkage between Ikarians and goat,
we have to look at the birth of the island’s communities.
Ikaria was formed around 12000 B.C. when the sea flooded the nearby
territories, originating the archipelagos of the northern Aegean sea.
At that time, as it is easy to suppose, men were not used to live in the
mountains; thus, forced by the rising sea levels to take shelter on the high
peaks, they had to adapt to a different life, on the mountains, with all the
hardships it involved (Miliadis D. D. & Cristopher C. H., 2006).
The vegetation was different from the one they were used to, so thay had to
rebuild their own experience on what was edible and what wasn’t.
In this context the beneficial figure of the goat appeared, showing to men
what to eat and what to avoid. Indeed, it was through the observation of this
“guide animal” that men found many plants that we still eat nowadays.
Furthermore, another positive aspect of the goat is the result of its habit of
eating grapes: eventually, considering Ikaria as a balanced ecosystem in
which man, goat and grapes were part of the same food chain, there was an
equilibrium between the species that allowed their presence and their
survival. The goat, eating the grapes, do not damage the vineyards; we could
even say that it helps the plant to produce more fruits. It is known that
grape-vine needs to be pruned, and the goat action can be compared to that
of the pruning. This seems to be confirmed by the ancient Greek name that
64
was used to refer to the goat, tragos. Its connection with trigan, which refers
to the pruning of the vine (Miliadis D. D. & Tripoulas C. H., 2006), seems
self evident; in this sense the etymology seems to confirm that the pruning is
the goat role in the wine production.
Thus, if the goat showed the man which plants and fruits were edible, we
can believe that it also showed the man the grape-vine, bringing us back to
the historical and cultural connection between goat and wine.
As the centuries passed, through the historical and social evolution of the
island, the relation with the goat grew deeper and deeper: from guide, to
food and milk production, it became central in Ikarian diet. Moreover, men
began to use its skin and its wool to produce clothes and, as other people
entered the Aegean sea, it also became a trading good, helping the island’s
economy.
Another element that allows us to focus the importance of this animal in
Ikarian culture and symbology, is connected to the granting of the juridical
pardon (Miliadis D. D. & Tripoulas C. H., 2006).
The historian Melas Ioannis recorded this ancient practice
«the mayor had the privilege of granting the pardon, if he
believed that the punishment was inappropriate or if the convicted
moved him, he could decide at the last moment, to pardon him by
throwing his cloak made of goat skin» (Miliadis D. D. &
Tripoulas C. H., 2006, p. 31).
65
The wine, another important element in Ikarian culture, appeared in remote
times. To date its production on the island we need to refer to several written
sources that attest its presence, and above all its high quality known in a vast
territory, dating back to the 5th century B.C. (Papalas A. J., 1992).
Is to be considered that the sources that can be used to track the production
back before the 8th century B.C. don’t talk about Ikarian wine, but about
Pramnio wine.
On the real meaning of this term there are still open discussions: some
believe in the Ikarian descent, as they see a link with the Pramnio mountain
on the island (Miliadis D. D. & Tripoulas C. H., 2006), whereas others hold
that it is an adjective used to refer to a dark and strong wine, typical of
Aegean islands in general.
Anyway, we can see how common the referrals to this wine were in the
antiquity, considering that even Homer said: «exotic charm-ladies prefer
pramnio wine» (Turolla E., 1929, p. 93).
Another example that seems to associate wine and Ikaria comes from a
significant extract from the Hymn to Dionysus27
that starts stating that
«For some say, at Dracanum; and some, on windy Icarus; and
some, in Naxos, O Heaven-born, Insewn; and others by the deep-
eddying river Alpheus that pregnant Semele bare you to Zeus the
thunder-lover. And others yet, lord, say you were born in Thebes;
but all these lie. The Father of men and gods gave you birth
remote from men and secretly from white-armed Hera. There is a
27 This Hymn is attributed to Homer. Cassola F., 1994.
66
certain Nysa, a mountain most high and richly grown with woods,
far off in Phoenice, near the streams of Aegyptus. » (Cassola F.,
1994, p. 5).
In this passage there are two peculiarities: the first two places where “some
say” that Dionysus was born refer to Ikaria. The first is Dracanum,
nowadays Fanari, a village in North-Eastern Ikaria, that represented a
strategic position during the island’s history to overlook sea trades.
The second one is the island itself, Ikaria. Having the first two places of the
list of the places that were thought to be Dionysus’ birthplace both in Ikaria
lets us understand how strong the connection between the island and the god
with his sacred drink was.
For many Ikarians and Greeks the birth of the wine god was to be associated
with Ikaria; I believe that wine was hold more than sacred in the island. This
would have led to the institution of some rituals and festivals filled with
symbolic elements that referred to Dionysus’ birth and the drink he gave to
mankind. To back this hypothesis there seems to be the finding of a mask,
«the marble mask representing Dionysus, found in Ikaria (530 B.C.)»
(Versnel H. S., 1990, p. 147) that subsequently, thanks to the contribute of
the researcher Romano I. B.28
, was discovered being part of the head of a
marble statue of Dionysus, found on the island as well (Versnel H. S., 1990).
I believe that the finding of the statue helped adding a piece in the puzzling
identity of the island.
28 Researcher in the Archaeology Department in Bryn Mawr College (Pennsylvania).
67
«The quite childish explanation that was given to the cult, that it was forged
on the myth, is certainly inadequate» (Otto W. F., 1997, p. 72), as there
were, even before the birth of Dionysus’ myth, ceremonial behaviors and
rituals through which man related to mysterious natural forces, as, for
example, the “magic” fermentation process. Besides, all the features that are
represented in Dionysus are nothing more than the mirror of a side of human
life. Even before coming from Thrace or Asia Minor, Dionysus was already
present in the mind of each man (Otto W. F., 1997).
Nowadays a new theory is taking shape concerning the mythical origins of
Dionysus: it commits the cult to Greece itself, tagging the post-Homeric
excitement for this god as a mere reawakening of primordial cults (Otto W.
F., 1997).
In the 2nd century B.C. Athenaeus tells us, through a passage of the first
book of the Deipnosophists, that grapevine was called «sacred from
foreigners and Dionysian from the inhabitants of Oenoe» (Athenaeus, 2001,
p. 98). Oenoe was the name of the ancient Ikarian city where it was said that
grapevine was grown for the first time and was therefore linked to the first
wine production.
Eustatius of Thessalonica, eloquence professor in Constantinople and
archbishop in Thessalonica, wrote in his commentaries to the Iliad that
«in Ikarus’ island, grape emerged from within the ground for the
first time, and its wine is called Pramnio» (Miliadis D. D. &
Tripoulas C. H., 2006, p. 8).
68
Source after source, the connection between Ikaria and Dionysus birth,
grape appearance and, subsequently, wine production is getting stronger and
stronger; but, as I said before, I don’t want to use these testimony to prove
whether the god and its sacred plant appeared in one place or another.
The element which I believe is very important is, instead, the imaginaries,
what individuals think about the practices and beliefs that they produced and
still produce around grapevine, the drink obtained from it, the god linked to
its growth, its ripening and its transformation in holy drink.
Another element that confirms the connection between Dionysus and
Ikarian culture is to be found in Apollodorus
«as he wanted to move from Ikaria to Naxos, Dionysus rent a
trireme owned by Tyrrhenian pirates. They embarked him, but
passed Naxos and headed towards Asia, willing to sell him as a
slave. Thus Dionysus transformed the mast and the oars in
snakes, filled the ship with ivy and made the flutes play. The
pirates, gone mad, threw themselves into the sea and were
transformed in dolphins» (Scarpi P., 1996, III, 5.38).
This myth, originated in the Aegean islands, always subject to the pirates
raids, lets us know the importance of Dionysus in the islanders’
communities. The experiences of these communities nourished the mythical
apparatus, thus pirates, the main menace for them, were also enemies for
their protector god (Otto W. F., 1997).
69
The last element that I want to consider is the wine trade from Ikaria and the
rest of Greece. Since there are no finds that can lead us to affirm that Ikarian
wine was present in the rest of the Hellenic market, this hypothesis could be
sustained or proved wrong by two different assumptions:
The first one, that should confirm the presence of a commercial trade of
Ikarian wine, is the high taxation that Athens imposed to the island. These
fees were too high for such a small village as Oenoe was, thus leading to the
conclusion that the commerce of the local wine (as we already saw, most
probably a famous one) was the only way for the islanders to pay the taxes
(Papalas A. J., 1992).
On the other hand, the second assumption, that seems to promote the sacred
character of the wine for the Ikarian population, suggests that there was not
such trade, as it was considered a gift from Dionysus and not a good to trade
(Miliadis D. D. & Tripoulas C. H., 2006). To sustain this hypothesis, besides
the absence of archeological finds that could prove the wine trade, there are
some testimonies of travelers that, visiting the island, were surprised by the
unusual attachment that the locals had with wine itself. First of all the
bishop of Samos, J. Georgirnees, that wrote that «Ikarians are the only
islanders that don’t sell their wine» (Miliadis D. D. & Tripoulas C. H., 2006,
p. 39).
Furthermore, there are several ancient writers29
that talk about Ikarian wine
as a famous and sought after drink, but none that talks about ships
29 Athenaeus in the Deypnosophists and Homer in the Odyssey.
70
transporting it, or selling it (Papalas A J., 1992).
«In Turi oil, in Gela lentils, Wine from Ikaria, dry figs from
Kimolos» (Athenaeus, 2001, p. 92).
Hence we can assume that wine was only bartered in small amounts, in
order to let its fame diffuse among wide distances, but keeping it elusive,
almost mythical to the most.
Homer talks about ships loaded with wine intended for trade, that was
bartered with iron, bronze, leather, animals and prisoners (Turolla E., 1929).
Several factors combine to testify the absence of money in the wine trade, as
if such a sacred drink was not meant to be bought with artificial coins or
gold, but with other goods coming from mother Earth and, sometimes, even
with people.
71
3.3 Communitary and identitarian role of the panigiria
The panigiria, considered as religious festivals in which several ritual
actions and behaviors are shaped, represent
« a group of acts which effectiveness, real or imagined, does not
end in an empiric concatenation of cause/effect. If they are useful,
it is not just for natural reasons, and in this there is the difference
between ritual and technical practice» (Cazeneuve J., 1971, p.
17).
For this reason I will analyze the various practices and attitudes separately,
trying to see, where they exist, the effectiveness and the effects of certain
ritual acts.
Nowadays panigiria represent a way to feel safer for the Ikarian
communities. Many islanders migrate to look for a job, in continental
Greece or somewhere else; in this way communities are hit strong, at their
grassroots, losing their life blood.
This is where the panigiria comes into action, assuming its invigorating
character on a social and identitarian level, as it strengthen the union
between individuals coming from a community, both if they live in Ikaria
and if they migrated elsewhere. Eventually, the latter have the “moral
obligation” to come back to their homeland at least for the panigiria.
In other words, the Ikarian village communities gather together annually
72
during the panigiria, that have the role of social coagulant.
This value of the panigiria was confirmed by the words of one of my
informants
«we dance in circle, we become one. This have a strong communitary value, even the crazy
man of the village, the poorest, the oldest and children, have to be in the dance circle»
(Interview with Y. B., 25/08/08).
Thus, in understanding the Ikarian panigiria, I believe it will be appropriate
to use the definition of communitarian rituals promoted by W. R. Smith. The
fundamental feature of these religious festivals is their collective dimension
that, revealing the social nature of religion, stresses their role as cohesive
element in society (Fabietti U., 2001).
The bloody sacrifice present in some rituals, or in this case the animals
killed for the common meal, represent, for Smith, a communion between the
community and the divinity, that, as Durkheim said later, symbolically
embodies the unity of the society itself, acting as a social coagulant.
Individual, identifying themselves in the sacrificial animal, celebrate the
social union (Alessandrini R. & Borsari M., 1999).
The saints that are celebrated during the panigiria are meant to gather the
believers around the village church and in this way they strengthen the ties
between individuals, stressing the common origin of the community.
This vision of the god or the saint as tutelary deity of a group, gives to
religion the possibilità to regulate social relations as, «through the
73
compliance of the public rituals, presses individuals to conform themselves
to the collective standard behaviors» (Fabietti U., 2001, p. 23), following
the rule that: taking part in a collective rite, you accept the rules, written or
not, of that community.
The panigiria, by gathering together individuals during spring and summer,
strengthen among the participants the sense of belonging to only one social
body.
Basing on what I said, I believe that these festivals are celebrated to renew
the social bonds and bring wellness to the society itself.
During the panigiria there are no gestures that directly confirm the
immediate identification of Ikarians with wine and goat, but, by sure, this
identification is present since Ikaria entered in Greek historiography. It
differs from these the third element, ikariotiko dance with its characteristic
“Ikarus step”, through which individuals stage the forefather’s fall and the
subsequent formation of the island. The whole community, taking part in the
dancing spiral, identify itself with Ikarus, the mythical father, thus fixing
through the performance the common and archaic kinship of all Ikarians;
besides identifying themselves in Ikarus, they are also identified through
him in the rest of Greece. The character of Ikarus is promoted and staged
time after time in the main ceremonies for the island’s community, the
panigiria: being the common denominator of all the festivals, it identifies
under its one banner all the communities.
As to the identitarian “banner” of the goat and the wine, it is interesting to
notice, even though not directly represented in the panigiria, the custom to
74
engrave on the tombstones, near the name of the deceased, the image of a
goat or grapes, as it is still possible to see in Akamatra graveyard (Miliadis
D. D. & Tripoulas C. H., 2006).
This symbolize the tight union between the Ikarians and the two elements,
almost sacred, that beat the rhythm of their lives, so much that they are used
even in the last journey. Thus goat and wine, the embodiments of the
islanders’ identity, together with the ikariotiko dance, the performance of
Ikarian descent through “Ikarus step”, work as vehicles through which it is
possible to perpetuate, each time renewed, the mutual connection between
the islanders and their identity, their past.
Identity is shaped by the opposition to alterity, by the dialectic between self-
awareness and awareness coming from outside. If others identify us with
one or more elements, in Ikaria case these are the goat, the wine and the
myth of Ikarus, these elements will become what we ourselves use to
identify us.
In ancient Greek rituals, goat was often used as sacrificial animal: its meat
was often boiled and a regenerative function was connected with this
process (Detienne M. & Vernant J. P., 1982).
In Greece sacrifices could be found also in orthodox Christian ceremonies;
often some goats offered by a believer or bought by the whole community
were sacrificed to a saint, in order to help the whole village. This bloody
sacrifice is called «kourbani» (Detienne M. & Vernant J. P., 1982, p. 184)
and it was characterized by a series of prayers through which the community
asked the saint to accept the sacrifice and help the village.
75
«Most of the kourbania take place from April to October. It is
an open air event, were even hundreds of participants are
gathered. It is an event that, for some villages, constitutes the
most important event in the year, a source of prestige and
economic advantages for the community and its church»
(Detienne M. & Vernant J. P., 1982, p. 185).
«Nowadays, for several reasons, the ritual is mutilated, amputee
of some elements that once constituted its core and its meaning»
(Detienne M. & Vernant J. P., 1982, p. 184).
It is likely that, once, Ikarian panigiria included also the sacrifice of the goat
(kourbani). I personally never assisted to any feature that could let me
affirm the presence of ritual sacrifices in the panigiria, a part from the habit
of boiling the goat meat that is eaten in the common meal. One of my
informants once told me that in the panigiria
«in the past, goat meat was always boiled. Now it is also roasted» (Interview with D. V.,
12/08/08).
The sacrifice, being a cultural practice, adapts to social changes and
evolutions. In different cultures
«eating meat coincide with sacrificial practice; every meat eaten
equals a victim ritually killed, and the butcher that spills the
blood has the same functional name of the celebrant near the
76
blood-stained altar» (Detienne M. & Vernant J. P., 1982, p. 9).
From what we have said, we can now understand the value of the meal
during the panigiri. From the presence in Ikarian panigiria of an hypothetic
sacrificial meal, nowadays we witnessed a meal that, even if it lost its
“classical”30
bloody sacrificial features, it still holds its role as a social
coagulant, as the sacrificial victim itself, the goat. All of this in a socially
accepted and shared ritual context.
Thinking about the shapes that a sacrifice could take in a contemporary
societya, there could exist rituals that still have sacrificial actions but these
are not boasted nor showed off through ceremonial and bloody practices,
even if the whole group is aware of the importance of the animal or plant for
their own survival. Radcliffe Brown suggested
«the ritual behavior towards plants and animals was dictated by the
importance that these elements had on the economic life of
certain groups» (Fabietti U., 2001, p. 153).
Around the goat, the wine and the ikarioriko dance its formed and shaped
most of the social life, the ceremonial symbolism and the economy of the
island.
30 The animal sacrifice meant as ceremonial choice of the victim, its preparation to the
sacrifice through prayers, symbolic decorations and, finally, the sacrifice itself, with the
bloodshed in a defined place.
77
3.4 Representing conflicts
Another element represented in the ritual, which I believe is present also in
the panigiria, is the concept of conflict as expressed by Gluckman,
according to which the rite stages a both individual and collective conflict,
always directed towards the solution and thus the reestablishment of the
social order (Gluckman M., 1973).
The rite acts in a cathartic way. Observing a ritual it is possible to notice
certain tensions, performed in a symbolic, or sometimes realistic, way
(Bernardo B., 2006).
This was confirmed by an informant
«often, in the panigiria there are quarrels between the participants, they get drunk and they
solve their problems fighting» (Interview with D.V., 12/08/08).
In my opinion, in the panigiria there are two different kinds of conflicts, one
between individuals and a second one within the individual himself.
The first conflict, between the components of the society, is enacted in the
dance, in which the continuous changing of leaders in the spiral shows the
“healthy rivalry”31
internal to Ikarian communities.
A second kind of conflict is the one within each individual, that rise from
31 By healthy rivalry I mean a rivalry ruled by the common sense of each individual, in
which the individuals compete to show to the whole society their skills in leading and
defending, in a simboli way, the whole community.
78
the mismatch between one’s instincts, one’s needs and everything that is
socially accepted or not allowed. I’ll consider, as an example, the excessive
wine consumption and the altered states of consciousness that it provokes.
The panigiria are events in which it is possible to perform behavior that are
normally considered unseemly in the ritual frame, thus avoiding the social
critique. In some rituals behaviors normally not allowed in everyday life are
accepted, not – as it may seem – as a protest against the social order, but as a
practice strengthening and confirming that order (Gluckman M., 1973).
They are therefore meant to stage those conflicts that are shaped in the
individuals’ subconscious, acting as a relief valve for certain “needs”. Thus
the excessive consume of wine and whatever it implies is accepted during
the panigiria but blamed in normal everyday life.
Ritualized conflicts, both between individuals and in the individual himself,
have a key role in the production of the balance that constitutes every
society (Gluckman M., 1973).
79
3.5 Reflections on the fieldwork
A feature of my research that I like to stress and that gave me the energy to
conclude it was the enthusiasm that those who knew the reason of my stay
in Ikaria and of my research passed on to me.
Everyone, in a way or another, tryed to help out. So I often found myself
together with Greeks that translated for me or helped me supervising the
interviews.
Many gave me useful suggestions concerning the questionnaire, others
showed me elements that I failed to notice. To each one I asked their opinion
on the panigiria and the element that they thought was the most important,
so that many aspects that I could not notice in the beginning were then made
clear.
Through this experience I understood that the research is not only made by
the researcher that goes in an unknown place, but rather all those who come
into its orbit and its framework, in different ways, take part in it.
80
Final observations
Tracing back the various steps through which I developed my work, I think
it is right to say that Ikarian panigiria, far from representing a folkloristic
event, have still nowadays a key role in the island’s society.
Analyzing the different aspects of the panigiria and confronting myself with
history, mythology and anthropology, many features that require a deeper
study. I kept a limited and aware point of view to avoid the risk of getting
lost in the deviousness of certain traks.
To be clearer, I will consider the results I obtained analyzing the constitutive
features of the panigiria (music-dance, goat-wine).
Regarding music and dance, it is worth mentioning the Ikariotiko, with its
characteristic “Ikarus’ step”, that represents a key element in shaping what
they consider “Ikarian identity”. Ikaria island has the same name of the
mythical character, as to celebrate the birth of the island that followed the
fall of Ikarus from the sky. Ikariotiko, danced from panigiria to panigiria,
recalls the event, now ritualized, of the island’s formation.
Ikarians identify themselves and are identified in the rest of Greece in the
image of Ikarus that is advertised time to time in the main festivals in the
island, the panigiria.
This is the constant; actually, even if in each panigiri the celebrated saints
are different, the element that is always present and thus coagulates and
identifies under the same banner all Ikarian communities is the character of
81
Ikarus, ritually staged through the ikariotiko dance.
Ikarian panigiria can be classified as commemorative rituals, as – through
the performance of the ikariotiko – they «insert in history the mythical
models that are situated outside time, in some sort of eternity, that is the one
of the sacred world of the descendants, or if you prefer, of the eternal
restarting» (Cazeneuve J., 1971, p. 35).
The panigiria are divided in two moments, during tha day: the morning,
characterized by the gathering of the community in its church to remember
the dead, immediately followed by a lunch – this one is a moment open only
to the inhabitants of the village and do not include music nor dance; and the
evening, that is open to anyone and includes an abundant meal of goat meat
and wine, several musical styles and the corresponding dances, among
which, for fame and clamor, ikariotiko stands out. This is the most felt dance
and also the most participated, and includes the performance of Ikarus
death, to remember the “forefather”.
Thus, besides the goat and the wine that constitute two of the features that
shape the islanders’ identity, ikariotiko dance is a vehicle through which the
connection between the islanders and their forefather, the community of the
living and the one of the dead, is perpetuated and renewed from time to
time.
82
This strengthens the union between individuals in the communities, that
identify themselves as Ikarians, inhabitants of Ikaria, the island mythically
originated from Ikarus’ death and all these have a strong identitarian value.
Another elements that emerges analyzing the Ikarian panigiria is the
rapresentation of the social conflicts in the ikariotiko. Observing a ritual it is
possible to see the tensions that characterize the group’s social life, that can
manifest in a symbolic way or even in a real way (Bernardo B., 2006). This
understanding of the ritual was confirmed by an informant interviewed on
Ikarian festivals
«often, in the panigiria there are quarrels between the participants, they get drunk and they
solve their problems fighting» (Interview with D.V., 12/08/08).
83
The ritual thus stages a conflict, both individual and collective, always
tending towards the solution and the reestablishment of the social order
(Gluckman M., 1973). The constant changing of the leader in the dance
spiral shows the “healthy rivalry”32
within Ikarian communities. I believe
that this ritualized conflict is a model through which society tries to solve
conflicts without worsening them.
32 See page 51.
84
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books:
Miliadis D. D. e Tripoulas C. H., 2006, The ikarian voyage, Ithaca,
Voulgaris M.
Papalas A. J., 1992, Ancient Ikaria, Wauconda (Illinois), Bolchazy-Carducci
Publishers.
Vaccarino G., 1988, La Grecia tra resistenza e guerra civile, 1940-1949,
Milano, Angeli F.
Hertz R., 1978, Sulla rappresentazione collettiva della morte: la preminenza
della mano destra, Roma, Savelli.
Cazeneuve J., 1971, La sociologia del rito, Milano, Il Saggiatore.
Destro A., 2009, Antropologia e religioni, Brescia, Morcelliana.
Leydi R., 1991, L'altra musica: Etnomusicologia, Firenze, Giunti-Ricordi.
Leydi R., 1996, Guida alla musica popolare in Italia: Forme e strutture,
85
Lucca, Libreria Musicale Italiana.
Otto W. F., 1997, Dioniso: mito e culto, Genova, Il Melangolo.
Cassola Filippo (a cura di), 1994, Inni omerici, Milano, Mondadori.
Stoll E. G., 1883, Manuale della religione e mitologia dei greci e romani,
Firenze, Paggi F.
Fabietti U., 2001, Storia dell'antropologia, Bologna, Zanichelli.
Gluckman M., 1973, Custom and conflict in Africa, Oxford, Blackwell.
Levi-Strauss C., 1986, L’identità, Palermo, Sellerio.
Fabietti U., 1998, L’identità etnica, Roma, Carocci.
Paladini V. (a cura di), 1952, Claudianus minor: Il ratto di Proserpina,
Roma, Gismondi.
Versnel H. S., 1990, Ter unus: Isis, Dionysos, Hermes: three studies in
henotheism, Leiden, Brill E. J.
Duthoy R., 1969, The Taurobolium: its Evolution and Terminology, Leiden,
86
Brill E.J.
Scarpi P. (a cura di), 1996, Apollodoro, I Miti greci, , Milano, Mondadori .
Ateneo, 2001, I Deipnosofisti: i dotti a banchetto Libro I e IX, Roma,
Salerno.
Detienne M. e Vernant J. P., 1982, La cucina del sacrificio in terra greca,
Torino, Boringhieri.
Detienne M., 1986, Dioniso a celo aperto, Hachette, La Terza.
Alessandrini R. e Borsari M. (a cura di), 1999, La sacra mensa: condotte
alimentari e pasti rituali nella definizione dell'identità religiosa, Modena,
Banca Popolare dell'Emilia Romagna.
Rappaport R. A., 1999, Ritual and religion in the making of humanity,
Cambrige, Cambrige university press.
87
Bettelli O., 2003, Il sentiero della conoscenza, Brescia, Starrylink.
Bernardo B., 2006, Le culture orali dell’Africa, Milano, Angeli F.
Dalby Andrew, 2005, The story of Bacchus, United Kingdom, British
Museum Press.
Magazines:
Fishwick D., 1966, “The Cannophori and the March Festival of Magna
Mater”, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological
Association, Vol. 97.
Site links:
www.armenistis.net/festivals.html
www.mlahanas.de/Greece/Cities/Armenistis.html