1. This document is under Creative Commons Licence : CC-by-nc 5 Feb 2007 Author : Krajewski Pascal http://bibliotheque20.wordpress.com

2. Web 2.0 and Libraries 2.0 :The French Touch

What is Web 2.0 ?

What is Library 2.0 ?

Do we have to be 2.0 ?

3. Web 2.0 in 2 words

Web 1.0 :

• Surfer

• Passive

• Get Information

Web 2.0 :

• Contributor

• Active

• Create Information (**)

(**) On 3 levels :

• • Content

• • Shape

• • Description

4. Web 2.0 in acts

The development of New Tools

• RSS - Syndication - Feed

• Blogs

• Wiki

• Tags

Goes with the eruption of new concepts

• Social network

• Social bookmark

• Crowd sourcing

• Customisation

• Nomad Access

• Folksonomy

5. Libraries 2.0

A Mash Up of tools from the Web 2.0.

For new services. Libraries 2.0 :

• are user-centered

• provide a multi-media experience

• are socially rich

• are communally innovative.

• From Maness :Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 andItsImplications forLibraries

6. Libraries 2.0 : 5 corner stones To Deliver new services To Improve existing services To Be Self-Promoting To be the Core of the Community To Open to user 7. 1. To Improve existing services

New OPAC : Ex :QueensLibrary

8. 2.To Deliver new services

Example :Hennepin CountyLibrary

9. 3.To Open to user

Social OPAC : Ex:Ann Arbor District Library (AADL)

10. 4.To Be Self Promoting

ALA onMyspace :

American Library Associationisinyourextended network

MySpace isYour Librarys Space : Reference, Programing andPromotion /presentationof: Angela Semifero , Marshall District Library

Second Life Symptom :

ALAs Washington Office openson SL

(NB : Many commercial societies, as well as politicians, are on SL ; Sweden has just opened anembassyon SL.)

11. 5. To be the Core of the Community

This time, the motto would be :

Toto Libraryis (one of) yourextended network

Examples :Picture AnnHarbor : Our mission is to gather, capture and share information and images that reflect everyday life inourcommunity

Call for help from contributors.

12. Do we have to be 2.0 ?

The American answer : The concept of relevancy

Does the surfer 2.0 need :

Enlightment 2.0?

Relevancy for whom ? Is there a demand face to the offer ?

French Open Source Proposition :PMB 3.0andAFI-OPAC 2.0

13. Picture: Bungy jump in New Zealand : in the French settlement ofAkaroa ! From a previous paper : Cultureat riskof Web 2.0