LHC beam operation past, present, future

19
LHC beam operation past, present, future Mike Lamont for the LHC team

description

LHC beam operation past, present, future. Mike Lamont for the LHC team. 2011 – recap. 75 ns. 50 ns. Squeeze further. Increase number of bunches. Increase bunch intensity . Scrubbing. Reduce beam size from injectors. Initial commissioning. 2011. A nother remarkable year - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of LHC beam operation past, present, future

Page 1: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC beam operationpast, present, future

Mike Lamontfor the LHC team

Page 2: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC status

75 ns 50 ns

2011 – recap

Increase number of bunches

Reduce beam size from injectors

Squeeze further

Increase bunch intensity

Initialcommissioning

Scru

bbin

g

11/3/2012

Page 3: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC status

2011• Another remarkable year• It was nearly always a battle…• Remarkably no real show stoppers

• Successfully took on:– Total intensity– Bunch spacing– Bunch intensity– Emittance– Beta* & aperture

11/3/2012

Page 4: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC status

Operation efficiency• Overall efficiency – Pretty good considering that this is the LHC – Overall time in stable beams 34%

• Premature dumps– 50% of all STABLE BEAMS fills lasted less than 3

hours

34%

11/3/2012

Page 5: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC status

Radiation to electronics (R2E)

xMas-Mitigation crucial: patch, shielding, relocat.Patches to continue during 2012Particular emphasis (analysis) of ‘new’ failures

11/3/2012

Page 6: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC status

Vacuum

11/3/2012

LSS2

CMS

• Unexpected pressure rise (10-6 mbar) observed in LSS2-LSS8 (D1) and close to CMS: bad RF contact (x-rays inspection) interventions done in 2 & 8 & CMS to resolve RF finger issues - shouldn't be a problem in 2012.

Page 7: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC status

2011 to 2012• Well organized, productive Xmas technical stop

– Lot of R2E related work– Plus consolidation and improvements of many systems

• Vacuum consolidation to address successfully diagnosed causes of instabilities in 2011

• Injection collimators issues diagnosed and understood - spare in preparation - fingers crossed in the meantime

• Cool-down of machine exactly on schedule - cryogenics demonstrating full mastery…

• Very smooth hardware commissioning including careful quench-less commissioning of main circuits to 4 TeV

• Machine checkout proceeding well - good for beam next Tuesday afternoon

• First beam yesterday evening without major problems

11/3/2012

Page 8: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC status

2012 strategy4 TeV

50 ns

p-Pb: 3.5 TeV or 4 TeV

β*=0.6m→0.7m→0.9m

∫Ldt = 15-19 fb-1

Lpeak=5-6.8 1033 cm-2s-1

SPS Np= 1.6 1011SPS ε= 2 μm

Pile-Up=26-35

∫Ldt = 5 fb-1 in June?

β*=(0.6,0.6,0.6,3)m

TCP gap=2.2mm

LHCb ∫Ldt=1.5 fb-1

IP1 β*=500m

Dumps=30-50

∫Ldt = 15- 23 nb-1

11/3/2012 Rogelio Tomas

Page 9: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC status

IR1 and IR5 aperture at 3.5 TeV

2011’s “platinum mine”

We got 4-6 sigmas more than the expected 14 sigma Triplet aperture compatible with a well-aligned machine, a well centred orbit and a ~ design mechanical aperture (small tolerance)

Stefano Redaelli11/3/2012

~600 m

~3 cm

CMS

Page 10: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC status

Collimator settings 2012

Collimation hierarchy has to be respected in order to achieve satisfactory protection and cleaning.

Aperture plus tighter settings allows us to squeeze even further..

11/3/2012

σTCP 7 4.3TCSG 7 6.3TCLA 7 8.3TCSG 6 7.1TCDQ 6 7.6TCT 9.0Aperture 10.5

2012: tight settings

Page 11: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC status

How tight?

11/3/2012

Intermediate settings (2011):~3.1 mm gap at primary collimator

Tight settings:~2.2 mm gap at primary collimator

Norway

Iberianpeninsula

Page 12: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC status

2012 run configuration• Energy – 4 TeV– Low number of quenches (as in 2011) assumed

• Bunch spacing - 50 ns• Collimator settings – tight– As discussed – NB not yet proven operationally

• Atlas and CMS beta* - 60 cm– with 70 cm and 90 cm as fallbacks

• Alice and LHCb beta* - 3 m– Natural satellites versus main bunches in Alice

11/3/2012

Page 13: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC status

Bunch spacingPerformance from injectors

Bunch spacing

FromBooster

Protons per bunch (ppb)

Emittance H&V[mm.mrad]

150 Single batch 1.1 x 1011 1.6

75 Single batch 1.2 x 1011 2.0

50 Single batch 1.45 x 1011 3.5

50 Double batch 1.6 x 1011 2.0

25 Double batch 1.2 x 1011 2.7

11/3/2012

Page 14: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC status

2012 LHC schedule Q1/Q2

1

4

32

11/3/2012

Page 15: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC status

2012 LHC schedule Q3/Q4

5

6

11/3/2012

High beta* runs for ALFA and TOTEMVan der Meer scans

Page 16: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC status

2012 - breakdown

11/3/2012

DaysMachine check-out 2Commissioning with beam 21Machine development 22Technical stops 20Scrubbing (25 ns) 3Technical stop recovery 6Initial intensity ramp-up ~21Proton running ~126Special runs ~8Ion setup 4Ion run 24

~150 days

Page 17: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC status

50 ns performance estimate4 TeV, 50 ns, 1380 bunches, 1.6e11, 2.5 microns150 days of proton physics (assuming similar efficiencies to 2011)

Beta*[cm]

Collimators Peak Lumi[cm-2s-1]

Int. Lumi[fb-1]

Pile-up Increase in peak

90 Intermediate 5.1e33 12.1 – 14.5 2670 Tight 6.2e33 14.7 – 17.6 31 +22%60 Tight 6.8e33 16.2 – 19.3 35 +10%

11/3/2012

Page 18: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC status

25 ns performance estimate4 TeV, 25 ns, 1380 bunches, 1.6e11, 2.5 microns140 days of proton physics (extra scrubbing required)

Beta*[cm]

Collimators Peak Lumi[cm-2s-1]

Int. Lumi[fb-1]

Pile-up

80 Tight 3.8e33 8.3 10

11/3/2012

Conclusion: 25 ns not competitive with 50 ns

Page 19: LHC beam operation past, present, future

LHC status

Conclusions• Good performance in 2011 from working on all available

parameters • Very definitely exploring the effects of high intensity beams

– SEUs, beam induced heating, vacuum instabilities…– Operational efficiency suffering as a result

• Main gain in 2012 is use of tight collimator settings and reduced beta*– 5 to 6 x 1033 cm-2s-1 and 15 fb-1 should be possible

• Hope for improved operational efficiency– R2E mitigation measures– but partially countered by increased peak performance

• Another long, interesting year in prospect…

11/3/2012