Leveling 1

download Leveling 1

of 51

Transcript of Leveling 1

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    1/51

    Surveying & Measurement

    Levelling

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    2/51

    Levelling

    The general term applied to any of the

    various processes by which elevations of

    points or differences in elevation are

    determined.

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    3/51

    Levelling

    To measure the difference in height (H)

    between two points and !" vertical rods are

    set up at each of these two points and a level

    somewhere between them. The height difference between and ! is the

    difference between the rod (staff) readings.

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    4/51

    #nce the elevation of a point is

    determined" that point can be used for

    determining the elevations of other points.

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    5/51

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    6/51

    Some $efinitions (%)

    Levelling surveying operation carried out todetermine the elevation of points or to find the differencein elevation of points

    Spirit Level/Engineers Level surveying instrumentused to carry out levelling

    Backshot (BS) sighting with a level bac' to a pointof 'nown elevation

    Foreshot (FS) sighting with a level to determine theelevation of a point

    Turning Point point at which you have establishedan elevation with S and on which you will subseuentlyta'e a !S

    Intermediate Shot foreshot to a point at which youwant to 'now the elevation but which will not be used asa turning point

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    7/51

    Some $efinitions (*)

    Peg Test Surveying operation carried out to determineif the levelling bubble and telescope line+of+sight areparallel

    Elevation o Instrument (EI) ,levation of the

    telescope cross+hairs Balancing shots ttempt when doing a levelling

    survey to 'eep the lengths of S and !S at any giveninstrument setup as close as possible.

    !losure Error $ifference in elevation determined fromthe levelling survey and the 'nown elevation of abenchmar'.

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    8/51

    The -se of Levelling

    To design highways" railroads" canals" sewers"

    water supply systems etc" having grade lines

    that best conform the eisting topography"

    To lay out construction pro/ects according toplanned elevations"

    To calculate volume of earthwor's and other

    materials"

    To investigate drainage characteristics of an

    area" etc.

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    9/51

    The ,uipments 0

    1od (Staff) (%)

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    10/51

    The ,uipments 0

    1od (Staff) (*)

    2hiladelphia 1od (front)

    2hiladelphia 1od (rear)

    $ouble faced levelling

    rod

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    11/51

    The ,uipments 0

    1od Level and Tripod

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    12/51

    3arrying and Setting -p a Level

    lways carry it in the container.

    Screw the head snugly on the tripod.

    or bull eye4s bubble" alternately turn one screw

    and then the other two.

    #n side+hill setups" place one leg on the uphill

    side and other two on the down hill side.

    -se hand level to chec' for proper height of thesetup before precisely levelling the instrument.

    vial

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    13/51

    3arrying and Setting -p a Level

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    14/51

    3arrying and Setting -p a Level

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    15/51

    2ond !ubble

    5hen pond bubble is centred the instrument4sstanding ais is approimately vertical.

    The compensators in the instrument ta'e overand ad/ust the optical Line of 3ollimation so that

    it is hori6ontal. 5hen the instrument is rotated the

    compensators ensure that a hori"ontal plane ocollimationis swept out.

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    16/51

    #utomatic Levels

    fter the pond bubble

    is manually centered"an automatic

    compensator levels the

    line of sight" and 'eepsit level.

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    17/51

    utomatic Level

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    18/51

    ,+type Levelling Staff (%)

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    19/51

    ,+type Levelling Staff (*)

    %.788%.7%8%.7*8%.798

    %.79*

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    20/51

    ,+type Levelling Staff (9)

    %.%88%.%%8

    %.%*8%.%98

    %.%99

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    21/51

    3ommon ,rror Sources

    Level rod not vertical

    Levelling rod not fully etended or

    incorrect length

    Level instrument not level

    :nstrument out of ad/ustment

    ,nvironment + wind and heat

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    22/51

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    23/51

    ,limination of 2aralla

    2aralla is the apparent movement of the

    image produced by movement of the

    observer

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    24/51

    Types of Levelling =ets

    #pen leveling nets

    3losed loop leveling nets

    height

    kno$n

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    25/51

    Types of Level>ng =ets

    3losed lin' or closed connecting leveling nets

    Leveling between two points is performed in two

    steps0 forward (HAB) and bac'ward (HBA).

    The height differences"HAB

    andHBA

    shouldbe theoretically eual.

    HAB - HBA d

    height

    kno$n

    height

    kno$n

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    26/51

    HPC MethodHeight of the Plane of Collimation Method

    :t consists in finding the elevation of the

    plane of collimation for every set up of the

    instrument and then obtaining the reduced

    levels (1L) of point with reference to therespective plane of collimation.

    The ?23 method is generally used in

    profile levelling and in setting out levels forconstructional wor'.

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    27/51

    HPC MethodHeight of the Plane of Collimation Method

    Same staff position as last reading

    therefore the same row =ew staff position therefore a new row

    ?23 @ 1educed Level (1L) A !S

    1L @ ?23 + S

    1L @ ?23 + :S

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    28/51

    !L%SE&'L%%P LEELI* !%+P,T#TI%

    !ollimation +ethod

    -od -eadings (m)Bench+arks

    &istance(m) BS IS FS

    !ollimation.eight

    .eights !orrected.eights (m)

    /

    *

    9

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    /

    B8

    F8

    E8

    C8

    D8

    E8

    FB

    B*

    *.%BE

    %.D%9

    %.8E7

    9.BC*

    8.9%B

    8.*E%

    *.EBC

    8.DF*

    8.B7%

    *.9%*

    8.*FD

    8.%E7

    9.C7F

    %.8C*

    %.B*9

    *.7C9

    %*F.D*%

    %*7.EB9

    %*F.C%8

    %9%.DED

    %9%.F%%

    %*F.BFB

    %98.%EE

    %*7.B9D

    %*D.BEB

    %*F.%98+%

    %*E.B9%+*

    %*F.**B

    +9

    %9%.B7E+B

    %*F.*%9+C

    %*E.B9*+D

    %*F.ECB+F

    %*D.BF9+7

    /012343

    %*F.%*7

    %*E.B*7

    %*F.**%

    %9%.B79

    %*F.*8F

    %*E.B*D

    %*F.EBD

    /012343

    L @ B7D m !S@%*.989 %*D.BF9 G %*D.BEB @ 8.887 m

    3hec' 0 !S+ S @%*.989 G %*.*7B @ 8. @ 8.887m

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    29/51

    HPC MethodHeight of the Plane of Collimation Method

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    30/51

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    31/51

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    32/51

    !alculation checks

    S + !S @ %st 1L + Last 1L

    :S A S A (1Ls ecept first)@ (each ?23 number of applications)

    !heck +isclosure

    llowable Misclosure @ H C= mm. (I1ule of ThumbI)

    5hen calculations are chec'ed andif the misclosure is allowable

    $istribute the misclosure.

    Simple check

    Full check

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    33/51

    1ise and all Method

    :t consist in determining the difference of levelbetween consecutive points by comparing eachpoint after the first with that immediatelypreceding it.

    The difference between their staff readingindicates a rise or a fall according as the staffreading at the point is smaller or greater thanthat preceding point.

    The 1L of each point is then found by addingrise or subtracting fall to or from the 1L.

    The 1 method provides complete chec' on :S.

    :t is commonly used for differential levelling.

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    34/51

    !L%SE&'L%%P LEELI* !%+P,T#TI%

    -ise 5 Fall +ethod-od -eadings (m) &. (m)Bench

    +arks

    &istance

    (m) BS IS FS -ise (6) Fall (')

    .eights (m)

    /

    *

    9

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    /

    B8

    F8

    E8

    C8

    D8

    E8

    FB

    B*

    *.%BE

    %.D%9

    %.8E7

    9.BC*

    8.9%B

    8.*E%

    *.EBC

    8.DF*

    8.B7%

    *.9%*

    8.*FD

    8.%E7

    9.C7F

    %.8C*

    %.B*9

    *.7C9

    %.DCD+%

    8.E79+%

    9.*E9

    +%

    %.9**+*

    8.D77+%

    9.*FB+%

    8.EF%+%

    *.*E%+%

    /012343

    %*F.%*7

    %*E.B*7

    %*F.**%

    %9%.B79

    %*F.*8F

    %*E.B*D

    %*F.EBD

    /012343

    L @ B7D m !S@%*.989 S@%*.*7B @ E.8BB @ E.89C

    3hec' 0 !S+ S @%*.989 G %*.*7B @ 8.887 1:S,+ LL @ E.8BB + E.89C @ 8.887

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    35/51

    1ise and all Method

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    36/51

    1ise and all Method

    all @ S + !S

    all @ :S + !S

    1ise @ !S + S1L @ 2revious 1L A 1ise

    1L @ 2revious 1L + all

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    37/51

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    38/51

    3ollimation ,rrorTwo 2eg Test

    The trueheight difference" hT

    The visi7leheight difference" h

    S%@ S

    %4A and

    S*@ S

    *

    4 A

    ?ori6ontal

    Line of sight

    !

    d

    S%

    S%4

    S*

    S*4

    L J *

    L

    L J *

    hT @ S%4 + S*4

    @ S% + S*h

    h @ S%4+ S*4 @hT

    h @ (S%4A ) + (S*4 A )

    Since the instrument

    is the same distancefrom both staff

    positions and the

    errors are eual

    and cancel out.

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    39/51

    3ollimation ,rrorTwo 2eg Test

    ?ori6ontal

    !

    S9

    S94

    SB

    SB4

    L J %8L

    :f =#T then the error is @

    The visi7leheight difference!ut the trueheight difference

    :f h @ hT then the instrument is #K

    (S% + S*) + (S9 + SB) J L mm J m

    h @ S9 + SBhT @ S% + S*

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    40/51

    3ollimation ,rrorTwo 2eg Test

    2lace two pegs about L @ 98m (to B8m) apart. Set up level midway between the two pegs. 1ead staff on each peg" and calculate true

    height difference . Move level about L J %8 @ 9m (or Bm) beyond

    one of the pegs. 1ead staff on each peg again" and calculate

    height difference.

    3ollimation ,rror" @ difference in the differencesand is epressed as a number of mm per L m

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    41/51

    3ollimation ,rrorTwo 2eg Test

    cceptable errors -ren and 2rice %mm per *8m 5impey Bmm per C8m

    Test should be carried out regularly.

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    42/51

    ?ori6ontal

    Line of sight

    !

    d

    S%S*

    L J *

    L

    L J *

    ?ori6ontal

    !

    S9

    SB

    L J %8L

    3ollimation error" @ (S% + S*) + (S9 + SB) J L" mmJm

  • 7/26/2019 Leveling 1

    43/51

    2834 m 249 m

    2:38 m

    02;09 m

    # t$o peg test gave the ollo$ing results