Letter: To R. S. Boyd, from C. W. Keller, Re: Proposed ...

W AlrytenJ" D. C.200J

AMONVIO mr QIe -?yd CAL~ -. ý

majeo ~¾Thj 1, 100.; O3AJ itSOMI*~ .A it

RoC-wa

MIA 6-26 A- 'R $

ynad A Nagwunu WZZ 70 rF,

EE l~ar *4*c. 3-1 ,5 Isa An

A , No l- v o -. ,, E YO 3

WO- OwArth 00 1t McneC-, km. 1 (1)

Ond (5 mtle yod ýIy~j. f the abolvlwo MAA'-1ejm v

WA An USngvr M ev TnWDufan"ro A1A

too QIM-1 WOMY

wI woS'rw WA r9ony e'''A 00" aqshQ nvia

LU;.

A )

to- QUO *3.9;. 24 *1 32Rkt o!WO'

WW,! Lapprmatet &'eO'aiwrn 'a'twa1a no later than~ May Y

ap~e !¼Je) Cor let an~d corec to theI besBt of ...y

C. , teller,

/uvi::nd an 3 c M

Waor W4

redacted for the following reason:

(b)(4)

/

jj 1

I ..-..*~--'...'..**.-~.-~*.-..-...-*'-*--*-.-.'I & CsI I

~1~ iiI I

I I 1

I I It I

I II 1

:2Ž1 I

(

I I

U' .1 2 .1

or. Tat,

redacted for the following reason:

(b)(4)

Nuclear Storage Area E

Diamond Mesh Fencing

r.o

00

- Oi

U -1-4

U)

0

Ca

0.0

CU

CU

Diamond Mesh Fencing

FIGURE 4

redacted for the following reason:---------------------(b)(4)

Paul a. Nelson, Radiation Specialist DEC 1 1 1964(Supervisory), Region 1, Division of Gampianc1 W ,INAL R BY

W. J. Cooley, Inspection Specialist (Criticalityv'Region V, Division of Compliance

MAIm COwmy, UL DmSIOm, BALTnmE, mafLnD - SPECIALNUCLEM MAMRIAL LICENSE SHM-53, DOCKET NO. 70-58

cO:V:WXC

Attached is the report of a nuclear safety inspection conductedat the Baltimore facilities of the subject licensee on November 12,1964. The inspector was accompanied by Mr. Robert E. Corcoran,Public Health Radiation Specialist, Maryland State Health Department.

At the time of this inspection the licensee was doing assemblywork on low enriched uranium, tubular fuel elements. All operationsin this assembly are unsmderted. A large, inherent safety factorderives from the lack of moderation and the approximate 5% enrichment.

The licensee possesses 9 or 10 Hurst dosimeters each containingapproximately I gram of plutonium. the New York Operations Officehas permitted Martin to ,write this material off its accountabilitybalance. At this time it is not clear to the writer whether theplutonium in the Hurst dosieasters is held under Comission Contractfor health and safety purposes. This amount of plutonium does notappear within the scope of license SHH-53. Therefore, a possibleitem of ,noncompliance involving the unauthorised possession ofapproximately 10 gram of plutonium may exist. These matterswere discussed with Mr. R. B. Chitwood at Headquarters.

There appeared to be a lack of formality in the licensee'sorganisation with respect to nuclear safety control. This wasevidenced by the lack of formal reports of the results of internalcriticality control audit, and the lack of a formal nuclearsafety progran. Nevertheless, it appears that the licensee isconducting an adequate criticality prevention progra.

Enclosure%Inspection Report

SUM-53

cc: R. B. Chitwood(2), C0, HQE. R. Price(l), SLR, HQ (-.-

L. Johnson(l), ML., QW. G. Brown(l), C0, Region In. w. Crocker(l), Region III

Tit le; IIAXTIý COM4PANY; MUCULLM DIVISION; "LU'DO~ ilwy1AnlD SPECI.AL.NIIULAM 'HATURIL J.TCE!NfS~ I6-53, D5CKF NO. 705

Pate of Visit. Novaambr 12, 1964

3y J. coalay, Inspection Specialist (Criticality)

ýýQaioa V, "'ivi~S"O' of Compliance

--M Novaobi~r-12, 1964, an announced Inspact ion of the Mart in Company'Aclear Division facilities at Hliddle Ri1ve.r Maryland. was conductedby U.* 1. Cooley. "Sgion V, Dtivision of Compliance. The inspector wasaccompanied by Mr. Robert E. Corcoran, Public Healith RadiatioaSpecialist. Maeryland Stat* Hiealth D)epartamt. The purpose of theInpcto wm toeaut the l icensees S5o?$mSeizti4c% proceduAres aW

motadsas hayreateto uclarsafety control and todetermine itsstatus of compliance with appropriate rtsics aind regulations. Stistievmtsof liconsee represen tat ives Imd icated that 14arti.a possessev approximately10 grae p Ltonium 239 i-n Hiurst dosimeters, fuarnished by-tbe 4&v Yorkt.iperat ions .'fiice -in connection with Commission contract.

There appeared to be a lack-of formality in the licet~see' a organizatioiawith respect to t~uclear safety control. This was evidenced by the lac'kof formal reports of the results of internal criticality control audits, =4dthe lack of a iormial muclear safety training program. N~o imuclearly unsafecondition or p ac~.ce wav observed during this inspection.

nTtAII.S

This inspection included a review of the licene" 'a organizationand pi-soaimel as It pertains to nuclear safety, tatervieve with manapmewntand operati'ma personnel., and a physical review of maBt of the licanseoe,apecial nuclear material storage and fabrication facilities. Discu~ssions.during the coarse of tho inspection were wAd with the following MtartinC.ompany personlnel-

D~. ,.nnatt, Vice iFrosident, Nuclear D~ivision%. Ac~arxiel, Chairnan, Reactor Safety Advisory Coumitti.. aad

Manager, nnginee.rins Department

(c~ontinaed)

'rid,: MARTUI C(MPAM(; NUCLKA DIVISION; PILTLUiOM NARYUND - nPCIAI.NUCLLAR MATC'IA1, LICEKH" SWt'-53, Dt CKET NO. 70-58

Date of Visit: ý4vwdo' r 12. 1)64

By : .. Coaley, Inspoction Specialist (Criticality)-agion V, rlvi.sion of Compliance

kwv)n b*br 12, 1964, an mnounced inspection of the Martin CmpnyMucleax Division facilitles at Middle River, M4arylad, was conductedby t4. J. Cooley, Region V, Division of Copltance. The inspector wasaccompanied by Mr. Robert E. Corcoran, Publicecalth RAdLationSpecialist, *aryland State Hlalth Departmnt. The porposo of theinspection was to evaluate t.e l¢cei'se's orWisation, procedures andmethods as they relate to miclear safety control and to determine itsstatus of compliance with appropriate rules and reglations. Statemsetsof licenses representat.ives indicated that Martim posse.se* approximately10 grams plutonium 239 in Hurst dosimeters, furnisbed by the New YorkJperations Office in connection with Covmmission coatract.

There appeared to be a lack *f formality In the lice-nsoe's organizationwith respect to twclear safety control. This vas evidenced by the lackof formal reports of the results of internal criticality control audits, andthe lack of a iormal nuclear safety tataing program. Heo uclearly unsafecondition or practice was observed during this Inspection.

1. Results of V10it

This inspection included a review of the licensee's organizationand persomel as it pertains to nuclear safety, interviews with managementand operating personnel, and a physical review of most of the licenseesspecial uuclear material storage and fabrtcation facilities. Discussionsduring the coarse of the inspection were had with the following MartinCompany personnel

,. D. 5•etwtt, Vice President, Nuclear DiivisionN.•.)M•a•iel, Chairman, Reactor Safety Advisory Co ittee a&-

MUntaer, Rnsiosering Depart-me t

(contL uued)

hartin (oWpa•y .-2

Q. J. Uifssou, tRspresentative, Reactor Safety Advisory Committeeand Chief, Helt Physics Uctioa

C. ,-. Keller, ýIuclear A~ccruntaiity and Licensing RepresentativoJ. Iv. Pollar~d, ftrnejner and Criticality Control AnalystP. L"'. R4ech, Special Nu~clear Mlaterial VaulIt Custodiani

J. ~Re~aloi Suerisr Pilot Sbap p

,.4th r6spect to licenseS* lW-f3, a functional orgsulaation at-v4artia say be described, 'Hr. ýeller as Read of 14uc1.ar Katerial~s?4anageeunt, reports through Mi. W. Alper, Managor, NAwlear Division tothe Vice P'resident of the ?haclear Divlisoa, Dr. R. ID. beenett. Keller'sfunctions include all planning anid negottatioms for SM~-53 ticenseadjustments, Rure~a of Explosivese shipping container permits, =4a receiptand distribu.tion of spe.cial rnjclear mantorial (accoksataility). Adaxu-ýstratfvely, Mir. ifoler has hine assistant, ",r. R. 17, Mech, AccountabiILY,ault Attondaut. Mr.1 '9alIsr also drawti pon talents of the Martin Secuar ty

Pepartment -for #*c4rity and health physics technical asstetanca, the!trgineering Ve-partunt for criticality analyses, and the Martin Companyuser' 3f speciat nactar *satertal which Ls norwally the fuel fabrication,

aarea in the case of the subject licanse.

Before work begins *a the givea fuel fabrication contract, thec~antribtautone of accountability, security end health physics, criticalityanalysts, and mazni-4actarirag area are coordinated by Mre. Keller into aso-called 'Job operat inn report: wicih to the documient #ubmItted to the,iaterials UAceaeing Division iii applicatiown for an emndamt to SM~-33permitt~ing, the w~ork to be done. Coinceidentally, a so-called ari'eroce4gre M~anual, is developed by Keller which way Ue described an adetailed process instriact ion determining how the special nuclear materialwill 1 be handled throughout the job. The procedure manul many niot be patLtuct effect without the signatures of Rr. ifollard and M'r. Brissou,~representing,. resepctively, nuclear safety control aud health physicaconttrol,

-the ýuciear materials Mana~meant procedure also requires thatthew fuel fabrication prooess be nuittowed by nuclear safety, healthpbysics and accountability. Finally, ulilpvmnt of the completed prodisctmay not be suedo without the signature ampprroval of both nuclear safetyantd health physics personnel.

(cont ined)

Martin Company -3-

C. [upte*itmut~aon f Pra**"ras

Mr. Pollard indicated that he makes periodic inpectioWs w1throspet to onclear safety control in those ar*as %ere special nuclearmateriel is used. He iLdicated that normally he makes no formal recordsor reports of tbese inspections. Any correction of deficiencies is madeat the informal directio o f ?ollard during his inspections. M-fr. R.. rirssonindicated that in the course of his routlue iuspections, with regard tohealth obysics control, be had on occasioa dlscovered minor infractions ofacLear safety rgL4 and had reported these to Pollard for his action.

Criticality eontrol limit signs are posted at all storaoelocations and workin aras "in the fIul farication Building 0. Thesesipts are wade and maintained by Mr. Koch. the vault attendant, frominformation furnished by Kr. Pollard, It is noted that a11 aLps areinitialled by Follsr. so that they can be tiadiataly recolasiod asauthent ic.

The litcensee m & Reactor Safety Advisory Committee, theChairman of which Ls Dr. '9. N. HManiel. r'r. MtcDa•iel Ln an Lnteriewtich the inspector indicated Lthajt the CoMaitt~ee is required by charterto umet at least once each quarter. )il stated that in the last toyears the Coittee has conducted abo4t 26 ettings. ftDaniel statedthat the comuittee Wad zme physical inspections of all faciltiet atthe Msrtin Company in tba interest of safety asd that the last inspectionwas made about Hay 1964. He indicated that s a result of this inspectioncertain corrective actions were required of Martin personnel by letterfrom the Comittee to the affected persons.

In answr to a quwmtion, *14l4eniel indicated that no Committeereview a atsda of the Hartin Company's criticality control procedureswhich are aubmtitted to the Cotwaislon pursuant to license S&W-53..xDantel further indicated that as Chair-em of the Co itttee, be i•reiquird to do all that is neestary to maintain safe working conditionsat the Martin facility. Neverthleesa, he indicated that he had neverrequired any formal report from Messrs. Brisson or Pollard regarding theresults of internal Inspections whtic hbe kew they were coaductinr. itsstated that he had %e,*ired, in an infor"al way, a report from these twperson. for the first time about six montbhe previous to this inspectionvisit. In closing, Dr. McDaniel stated that as of lowo he was reqzirtnaa formal report. from 4IrLason and Pollard in tha areas of health andnmmlear safety.

(cont inued)

Kart in Company --4-

late-vew0 Vith Mir. J. Moil, Supervisor, Pilot Shop IndLicatdthat be was vary ko wt1ogedle of criticality control pr•ocares and thatbe Wad a god worktng relationship with Pollard, Briusem and K1ller. Reiadicated to the iaspector that he would iniclate no naw processes,witbout first soliciting the advice of rollard and Keller In the xr*seof nwcleax safety and mountability.

ThM lLcensee wees special €uclear material in Building 1 of theMiddle Wiver Martin Plant. A relatively small portion of that buildianhas bee" set off as an exclusion area in which flat plate and t"Wlar typereactor fuel eloments can be fabricated and asesaled, The fAbrieationplant Is equipped with 12 Nuclear Measuremet Corporati•i S alarmdetectors mhieh comprise the licenee.e's criticality mouietring system.Seah Local detector unit tndluissee an audible sad visible alasm •btileall 12 detectors hame a central alarm signal readout at the receptiondesk to the Building D fabrication area. Eacmb detector cwAttio my beidentt.ited at the alarm signal readout. A 10-soed delay hae beenInserted bet%een the dete~ctr reedet sad the acto~ativn of fiveovac~uttion sireos located in the fabrication shop. A local monitoringsystem alarm signals local evacatiom while the stiren alarm signalstotal evacUation of the fabrication shop. This system bas bee describedin the license's applictlion dated July 20, 1961.

All vault Storage lovatLous appeared to be properly identifiedwith inventory taps indicating the element, total mauet of materialper location and enrichment. At the time of the inspection, vault Bconcairad approxtnately 59.6 kilograms coz•tainrd U-235 at about 90 percenteurtcumint while vault A contained "proximately 9 kilograms UJ-235 in aotal of 21 kilogram qrani'.m.

At the tife of this inapectios, the license* was processing atype Wt-IA reactor fuel core. The 4artin Compmay starting umtertal wasseel tubes loaded vith aranLia oxide pellets of lIas than 5 percentenrichment. The pellets had been manufactured by Xulear fuel Servicesand had baeo loaded it the steal tubes by that organization.

The Martin Company operations, therefore. were 3Lmited to arc-welding end plogs an tho loaded tubes and foel elesrt assembly work -alwoU witb qjsality control Inspection of the elements. These operations

(continwjed)

Mart in Company -5-

are carried o*t at several locations in the fuel fabrication area. Manyof these working are"a. e provided with in-process storae bamosa. Tbesebotcs are munted two high on a portable rack. tiach rack in keyed byidentifying markings with its authoriaed position of the fuel fabrication

plant floor. Thevracks are posted with tto criticality limits imposeand it is noted that the stor*4e baoes themsolvuB are suberiticalcootainers by virtue of geometry for Ohe enrtctlvnt in process at thetilm of this inspection,

1.n Seneral, the operation. perfor-lwd on the 1ill-IA fuel tubesdo not retire large qu•atities of fuel in process. he weldingpreparation, weldin and nspect ior operations are corveaieuatlly doneunder 350 graze ecntained4 U-235 oss 1 timitations. (There are 40 gramU-235 per fuel tube.) An ievption to this rqle is in the •icnse•.'afuel element asseebly roz. A limitation of approximately 8.3 kilogramU-235 has been ploed on this room. This Is eqtivalent to 208 loadedfqal trbes vhich constict-4a the loading for two frel elements. Restriction&wit•hi the room limit the nwaber o) t4bes in a ,uel element assembly jigto 104 (1 element) aM an additional 104 ,,Axes Aouated in a two highstorage rack. An equivalent situatio* which is permitted in the room Lsa total of 2,)8 ,fuel tubes distributed eqaally in tw. two hbi storaperacks. Yuel is not permitted in this rmo under any other conditioosthan in tite Net elot•at aSSembly Jii o0 Lbe stor-ge racks.

A yereral tuel storage area ts located outside and adjacent to

Oew fuel fabrication. area. The storap facility is completely enclosedby a wite cafe, the entrance to which Is normally locked, and surveillanceof which is under Ow Nu clear Materials fauagenmnt grop. At the time ofthis inspection, a nwador of loaded shipping containers received fromNuclear Fuel Services were stored there. These containers ware constrictedof a four-lnch ID central, achedatle 4W pife sapported aloug the axis ofa 55-gallon drum. Each of parhaps YJ dr%"s of thiv type ~aantsined 26loaded stainless steel tubes fa the central pipe. 9ach drua carried apacking slip identityin, the Nie tube %=&er *md otnrichaent of thamaterial contaived. Also stored in this ares were approximately 10

"Iyethyieue lLnad 55-gailon drums containin$ ;ramtm in solution. Themazimuoa quantity of U-235 in solution per drm was about 300 grams. Thislatter material had been aecomlated froom pickiing operations performedon ?X, and Pathfinder reactor type fuael cores. 11e solutions were intendedfor shipment to Raclear 1uel Services for Araniun value recovery.

(coat tnxed)

Hart is Company 6-6-

With mespect to Martin Company's 0osecaSiOU Of Rurst deastmter*,each .atanitu& apprmimtely 1 za of plutountm, Mr. Keller Indicatedthat be felt that Xnrtia bad been relieved of any monLtary remouslbilttyfor the plutcoL'u bcaas it had been given permission by the New Yorkýperations Office to write the material off its steountabilty balmiae.He indicated that be felt no health hasard enietod frm plutouiwm inthese quantities. M ,40mober 16, 1964, the writer received a telephonecall from Mr. N0lLer giving additional information w•th respect to theaccountability of the plutonium in these doeasmters. He stated tbat a14r. S. 1. Bra•edn, .aclesr Materials HKanaumt, 1ew York OperatleasO)ffice, AJC bed #ented approval of the matertial wite-off on Kay 24,1963, pursuant to Martino reqesat No. 195. Koller felt that theNew York Operations Off Lee had takes bsalth and safety into eassidrstationin this wits-off. It is m0tod that the possibility of plutoniumdistriWstiea as a result of a fire involvinS this type of dosimeter wasdiscussed with the license during the last inspection of this facility.

Lt Ls conclaod as a result of this inapecticm that the liesume toconducting a nuclearly safe fuel fabricat ion program. Nuclear safety isenhanced by the coordinating fnction of the Nuclear Katerials Manage-went group zmdls C. A. Keller, by the apparent teobaita1 ability ofmr. Pollard, Criticality Aoalyst, and by the apparmt coopratioa ofMr. Jack Hell, uprvisor, Fabrication Shop with the" tte people inthe area of criticality control. Nevertheless, 'he inspector was leftwith the iproession that no sharp focal point in the area of nuclearsafety control existed. This impression resulted from the obsorvatioathat internal sumlear safety &udits are not formally reported by Pollard"nd that no formal trainins program in oucleax safety seem to be inexisteoce.

The inspector's impressLons were convewyd to Kweers. Keller andPollard in the press=* of Xr. Robert X. Cormeras at the oonclasion ofthLs inspection. Additionally, the inspector's impsoesiouas with regardto the infortalLty of numlear safety audits werecoan"yed to Dr. W. N.t4epanel near the end of the InspectLon.

Dr. MtcDaniel indicated that in his capacity as Chairems of theSafeigards Committee, he would oemdLately institute the requirement offormal lnspection reports from Messrs. BrLasoa and Pollard it the areasof health ad nuclear safety.

Form AEC-591 ITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMIS ;N

DIVISION OF COMPLIANCE

INSPECTION FINDINGS AND LICENSEE ACKNOWLEDGMENTA(1) I

I. LICENSEE 2. REGIONAL OFFICE

Isotopes Inc. U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY C0,1ISSION

Nuci.enr ;ystemn Dis iion .t .on i Division of Cur-npli'snce

P.O. 4937 970 'ird Jtrect

li ddle ', iver, 21d., 2 -.22( .•war., 1kw ersey 071.2

S. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 4. DATE OF INSPECTION ,einspection

DhM-53 Docket No. 7C,-58 -Ma 1969

S. INSPECTION FINDINGS

X•L A. No item of noncompliance was found.

El B. Rooms or areas were not properly postedto indicate the presence of a RADIATION AREA.

10 CFR 20.203(b) or 34.42

5 C. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of a HIgH RADIATION AREA.

10 CFR 20.203(c) (1) or 34.42

El D. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of an AIRBORNE RADIOACTIVITY AREA,10 CFR 20.203(d)

El E. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL.10 CFR 20.203(e)

E] F. Containers were not properly labeled to indicate the presence of RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL.10 CFR 20.203(f) (1) or (f) (2)

El IG. A current copy of 10 CFR 20, a.copy of the license, or a copy of the operating procedures was not properly posted ormade available. 10 CFR 20.206(b)

El H. Form AEC-3 was not properly posted. 10 CFR 20.206(c)

1l I. Records of the radiation exposure of individuals were not properly maintained. 10 CFR 20.401(a) or 34.33(b)

El J. Records of surveys or disposals were not properly maintained. 10 CFR 20.401(b) or 34.43(d)

El K. Records of receipt, transfer, disposal, export or inventory of licensed material were not properly maintained.10 CFR 30.51, 40.61 or 70.51

E3 L. Records of leak tests were not maintained as prescribed in your license, or 10 CFR 34.25(c)

El M. Records of inventories were not maintained. 10 CFR 34.26

C] N. Utilization logs were not maintained. 10 CFR 34.27

i '.11-1 on ... as•I "•': Compliance Inspecer)

4. LICENSEES• ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The AEC Compliaince j.nspect.or 1ýaq e~lqn~d and I understand the items of noncompliance listed above. The itemsof noncompliance Ivill be .cotrected -wiihi Yhe next 30 days.

(Dete) (LUeensee Representativ;e - Tide or Pamition)

ORIGINAL; LICENSEE. COPIES: [] CO REGION 5 CO HEADQUARTERS F] CO ENFORCEMENT

Form AEC.891 L rED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMIS ,(7/67) DIVISION OF COMPLIANCE A

INSPECTION FINDINGS AND LICENSEE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

1. LICENSEE 2. REGIONAL OFFICE

M U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSIONMARTIN-MARIETTA CORPORATION Region I, Division of ComplianceBaltimore, Maryland 21203 970 Broad Street

Newark, New Jersey 071023. LICENSR NU•MER(S) r7 0 4. DATE OF INSPECTION

.. < ,/ .-. ' , ;;j' yAugust 14, 1968... j (Reinspection)

5. INSPECTION FINDINGS

tfl A. No item of noncompliance was found.

El B. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of a RADIATION AREA.

10 CFR 20.203(b) or 34.42

El C. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of a HIGH RADIATION AREA.

10 CFR20.203(c) (1) or 34.42

El D. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of an AIRBORNE RAD1OACTIVITY AREA.

10 CFR 20.203(d)

El E. 'Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of RADIOACTIVE MAj'.RIAK

10 CFR 20.203(e)

El F; Containers were not properly labeled to indicate the presence of RADIOACTIVE MATERIJ."

10 CFR 20.203(f) (1) or (f) (2) Y: -

El G. A current copy of 10 CFR 20, a copy of the license, or a copy of the operating pr6ctkdures was not propefly posted ormadle available. 10 CFR 20.206(b)

El H. Form AEC-3 was not properly posted. 10CFR 20.206(c)

El I. Records of the radiation exposure of individuals were not properly maintained. 10 6FR':').401 (a)"'or 34.33(b)

El J. Records of surveys or disposals were not properly maintained. 10 CFR 20.401(b) or 34.43(d)

El K. Records of receipt, transfer, disposal, export or inventory of licensed material were not properly maintained.10 CFR 30.51, 40.61 or 70.51

El L. Records of leak tests were not maintained as prescribed in your license, or 10 CFR 34.25(c)

El M. Records of inventories were not maintained. 10 CFR 34.26

El N. Utilization logs' were not maintained. 10 CFR 34.27

/ .,. ... ",. ,./, /.:' ,•".-. .

char W" .as w - q.,... ......(AEC Compliane Inspector)"

6. LICENSEE'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The AEC Compliance Inspector has explained and I understand the items of noncompliance listed above. The itemsof noncompliance will be corrected within the next 30 days.

(Date) (Licensee Representative - Title or Position)

ORIGINAL: LICENSEE. COPIES: El CO REGION El CO HEADQUARTERS E] CO ENFORCEMENT

Form AEC-59I UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSIONt11/3/sst DIVISION OF COMPLIANCE



,AIlT"N-Mariettti 2orporntion U. ';. xTOITi'i LNZRGY COMMISSIONBaltimore, Maryland 21293 Region 1, Division of Compliance

376 Hudson 6treetNew York, New York 1001.4

S. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 4. DATE OF INSPECTION

5 4M- 53 (70-58) 0:/12/67 (RcLI1NSPLCTION)

S. INSPECTION FINDINGS

2 A. No item of noncompliance was found.

El B. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of a RADLIAT'lON AREA.

10 CFR 20.203(b) or 34.42

0 C. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of a HIGH RA DIAT7O AREA.

10 CFR 20.203(c) (1) or 34.42

[] D. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of an AIRBORNE RADIOACTIVITY AREA.

10 CFR 20.203(d)

0 E. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of IkADIOACTIVE MAT.E'•A..

10 CFR 20.203(e)

E] F. Containers were not properly labeled to indicate the presence ot RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL.

10 CFR 20.203(f) (1) or (f) (2)

ED G. A current copy of 10 CFR 20, a copy of the license, or a copy Of the operating procedures was not properly posted ormade available. 10 CFR 20.206(b)

LI H. Form ALC-3 was not properly posted. 10 CFR 20.206(c)

ED 1. Records of the radiation exposure of individuals were not properly maintained. 10 CFR 20.401(a) or 34.33(b)

[ J. Records of surveys or disposals were not properly maintained. 10 CFR 20.401(h) or 34.43(d)

LI K. Records of receipt, transfer, disposal, export or inventory of licensed material were not properly maintained.10 CPR 30.51, 40.61 or 70.51

[] L. Records of leak tests were not maintained as prescribed in your license, or 10 CFR 34.25(c)

E M. Records of inventories were not maintained. 10 CFR 34.26

LI N. Utilization logs were not maintained. 10 CFR. 34.27

C'harles I. Nilsen - . ...(AEC Compliance Infspector)


The AEC Compliance Inspector has explained and I understand thet- items of noncompliance lie.ed above. The itenisof noncompliance will be corrected wvilhin the next 30 days.

(Date) (Licensee Represenative - Title or Position)

COPIES: 0 LICENSEE: 0] COMPLIANCE REGIONz 0 DIV. OF CT, & LIC. RE.L..: 0 DIV. OF C.rPLIfANCE

Form AEC-bgl UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION(6/1/65) DIVISION OF COMPLIANCE

INSPECTION FINDINGS AND LICENSEE ACKNOWLEDGMENT /ý -


Martin-Marietta Corp. U. S. A. E.C.Division of Compliance

Baatimore, Maryland 21203 376 Hudson Street

New York, N._Y. . _. ..3. LICENSE NUMBER(SI 4, DATE OF INSPECTION

SNM-53 - November 8, 1966 (Reinspection)

b. INSPECTION FINDINGS

A A. No itein of Ilonlcoflpiiaice Was found.

[1 1). Rooms or areas were n1ot .IllrIy lOStCd to ilIdiCOIC tle ]IlletsCIICC Of a IIlA'ATIoN AIZEA.

10 CFR 20.203(h) or 34.42

[2 C. 1tooios or areas were no0 prop)erly poisetd to iildi¢ale tIllhe pirst-lice ofa 111;II ItAIll\.l N A1l N.

10 CFR 20.203(c) (1) or 34.-12

[ ]'.). R OIIIS Or areas \verc Io ) prol)perly iw ttd I Ih indicatu illi, -iAll '\]lsl Kl. I;AIIIIlACTV1 I'I Y AidA..

10 CFR 20.2(13(d)

I.. 1 0111nin or Iri-a WerleC not p)rpllIV p0t1:J] 1i indica(tt' thC j)ICSivlCC it IIAIIIACIIA'VK MAArNIlRI:.

11) CUR 20.203(v)

0 I. C'o0ot;olilrs were not piolcrly Ibh'jd 1o illdiCnIC tihe inl(evIeCC of IZA IO.•0.("lVI' .r l..

10 CFR 20.203(f.) (1) or (f) (2)

[-" : -Stbrage contnlirters were not-'lrollerly labelred to show tie aMIlntIily, t dlte IC f Ililae urt-iIIllit, or kinld of ralioactiveniaterial in tile containlers. 10 CFU 20.203(f) (4)

[2 f-I. A ciiri'ct copy (li 10 CIZR 20, a Copy of tile licelO.c, III a copy of thO p(e:ratilng IroCle(, is was III,( properly posted or

m;Ide availablle. 10 CFlR 211.206(b)

[J 1. no-m AEC-3 was not pir)opcrlv pIlolO. 10 CI"IVl 20.20J6(c)

[2 . 1cecords (of Ill ralli:iIill exposllrc of ilnliv\llhl; were 110t lprOllIc y malaildL ii ovd, 0l CF1 20.4(I(al ..r 34.33(b),

[2 P. R c,,-Is of corveys or dispro:als \,'re 1101, )roperly IIlaintllimld. 10 CFll 20.401(h) or 34.4;(,)

[2 I.. 1tre'or ,s of receipt, Ir isfer, disijposail, 'xpo rI (r ilov,.lltory of liocited ull:lcrial were wit trioleIrN I:lailitailled.

10 (:UR 3(1.51, 40.61 or 70.51

[2 M. rol-.wd of hti-i Il.•l :1 wir 00. 1;1;'ll;incd 1is !l,'UC. ili))(I ill )(,1 lice s, 0 t" 0 0CFV' 341.25(c)

[2 N. Recokrl f ilvehtorici l ,'rv elot 10ntintairied. 10 CIlR 34.26

[_ (. Ultiliz~aiol logs werte it ,mtii(tlidn,1 . 10 CFR 34.27

C. LICENSEE'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT

filc ArEC Compliance 1nfplctoIr }lws eC1)ainc:(1 andl I unleristand the items of nfi,:onwoioLpani e listC(f 11 lnv1 . 'lte itcmns

of noncompliance will Ile corrected within tlie inelt 30 days'.

COPIES: [7 L.ICCNSEC. 2 CCMPL. IAiCr rc[IzOI; Li cl.'. c- D"r. C. LIC. REL.: 0i WIV. OF CC:.4PLI., NCC

Form AEC-l91(6/1/65)

UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION




Martin-Marietta Corporation U. S. Atomic &iergy CommissionThe Martin Company Region I, Division of ComplianceAerospace Division 376 Hudson StreetBaltimore, Maryland New York, New York .10014

S. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 4. DATE OF INSPECTION

SNM-53 (Docket No. 70-58) May 20, 1966


[ A. No item of noncompliance was found.

El B. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of a RADIATION AREA.10 CFR 20.203(b) or 34.42

El C. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of a HuIG RADIATION AREA.10 CFR 20.203(c) (1) or .34.42

El D. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of an AIRBORNE RADIOACTIVITY AREA.

10 CFR 20.203(d)

Cl E. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL.

10 CFR 20.203(e)

El F. Containers were not properly labeled to indicate the presence of RADIOACTIVE MATERfIAL.

10 CFR 20.203(f) (1) or (f) (2)

El G. Storage containers were not properly labeled to show the quantity, date of measurelment, or kind of radioactive2" material in the containers. 10 CFR 20.203(f) (4)

El H. A current copy of 10 CFR 20, a copy of the license, or a copy of the operating procedures was`not properly posted or

made available. 10 CFR 20.206(b)

E] I. Form AEC-3 was not properly posted. 10 CFR 20.206(c)

El J. Records of the radiation exposure of individuals were not properly maintained. 10 CFR 20.401 (a) or 34.33(b)

El K. Records of surveys or disposals were not properly maintained. 10 CFR 20.401(b) or 34.43(d)

El L. Records of receipt, transfer, - disposal, export or inventory of licensed material were not properly maintained.10 CFR 30.51, 40.61 or 70.51'

C] M. Records of leak tests were not maintained as prescribed in your license, or 10 CFR 34.25(c)

E] N. Records of inventories were not maintained. 10 CFR 34.26

El 0. Utilization logs were not maintained. 10 CFR 34.27

6. L-ICENSEE'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT " /The AEC; Compliance Inspector has explained and I understand the items of noncompliance listed above. The itemsof noncompliance will be corrected within the next 30 days.

ic/ .'L~icensee- Representative -- Title or Position)(Date)

COPIES: 0 LICENSEE: E0 COMPLIANCE REGION: DIV. OF ST. & LIC. REL,: 0 DIV. OF COMPLIANCE

Form AEC-591 UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION(6/1165) DIVISION OF COMPLIANCE



Babcock and Wilcox Compar U.S. Atomic Energy Commission4ynchburg, Virginia Region HI, Division of Compliance

50 Seventh Street, N. E.Atlanta, Georgia 30323

3. LICENSE NUMSER(S) 4. DATE OF INSPECTION

SI-42 (70-27) - SNM-730 (70-795) May 18-19, 19665. INSPECTION FINDINGS

M A. No item of noncompliance was found.

02 B. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of a RADIATION AREA..10 CFR 20.203(b) or 34.42

E2 C. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of a HStro RADIATION AREA.]0 CFR.20.203(c) (1) or 34.42

E3 1). Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of an AIRBORNE RADIUACT . IIITY AREA":="10 CFR 20.203(d)

DE F. Rooms or areas were not properly posted'to indicate the presence of RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL.I0 CFR 20.203(e)

12 F. C6ntainers were not properly labeled to indicate the presence of RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL.

10 CFR 20.203(f) (1) or (f) (2)

12 G. Storage containers were not properly labeled to show the quantity, date of.measurement, or kind of radioactivematerial in the containers. 10 CFR 20.203(f) (4)

12 H. A current copy of 10 CFR 20, a copy of the license, or a copy of the operating procedures was not properly posted or

made available. 10 CFR 20.206(b)

12 1. Form AEC-3 was not properly posted. 10 CFR 20.206(c)

E] J. Records of the radiation exposure of individuals were not properly maintained. 10 CFR 20.401 (a) or 34.33(b)

12 K. Records of surveys or disposals were not properly maintained. 10 CFR 20.401(b) or 34.43(d)

12 L. Records of receipt, transfer, disposal, export or inventory of licensed material were not properly maintained.10 CFR 30.51, 40.61 or 70.51

12 M. Records of leak tests were not maintained as prescribed in your license, or 10 CPR 34.25(c)

12 N. Records of inventories were not maintained. 10 CFR 34.26

02 0. Utilization logs were not maintained. 10 CFR 34.27

6. LICENSEE'S ACNOWLOOEDGET / /The AEC Compliance Inspector has explained and I understand the it, ins of noncompliance listed above, The itemsof noncompliance will be corrected within the next 30 days..I•

/'i

(Date) (Licenjee Representative -- Title or Pesition)

COPIES: El LICENSEE: 0 COMPLIANCE REGION: 0 DIV. OF ST. & LIC. REL.: C DIV. OF COMPLIANCE

Form AEC-591(6/1/65)





U. S. Atomic Energy ComissionMartin-Mariett Corporation Region I[ Division of Compliance

Baltimore, Maryland 376 Hudson StreetNew York, New York 10014

3, LICENSE NUMSI9R(S) 4. DATE OF INSPECTION

SNK-53, Docket No. 70-58 November 18, 19655. INSPECTION FINDINGS

E] A. No item of noncompliance was found.

l 11. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of a RADIATION AREA.10 CFR 20.203(b) or 34.42

El C. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of a HIGH RADIATION AREA..

10 CFR 20.203(c) (1) or 34.42

El D. lRooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of an AIRBORNE RADIOACTIVITY' AREA.10 CFR 20.203(d)

El E. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence Of RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL.

10 CFR 20.203(e)

El F. Cantainers were not properly labeled to indicate the presence of RADIOACTIVE .MATERIAL.16 CFR 20.203(f) (1) or (f) (2)

El G. Storage containers were not properly labeled to show the quantity, date of measurement, or kind of radioactivematerial in the containers. 10 CFR 20.203(f) (4)

El H. A current copy of 10 CFR 20, a copy of the license, or a copy of the operating procedures was not properly posted ormade available. 10 CFR 20.206(b)

1l I. Form AEC-3 was not properly posted. 10 CFR 20.206(c)

E] J. Records of the radiation exposure of individuals were not properly maintained. 10 CFR 20.401(a) or 34.33(b)

E] K. Records of surveys or disposals were not properly maintained. 10 CFR 20.401(b) or 34.43(d)

E] L. Records of receipt, transfer, disposal, export or inventory of licensed material were not properly maintained.10 CFR 30.51, 40.61 or 70.51

El M. Records of leak tests were not maintained as prescribed in your license, or 10 CFR 34.25(c)

El N. Records of inventories were not maintained. 10 CFR 34.26

E] O. Utilization logs were not maintained. 10 CFR 34.27 7

B.* J. Youngb-ood ' In mpeition Spetoirt,(.4EC Compliance Inspector ) (Critica ity)

6. LICENSEE*S ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The AEC Compliance Inspector has explained and I understand the items of noncompliance listed above. The itemsof noncompliance will be corrected within the next 30 days.

(Date) (Licensee Reprcsentative - Title or Position)

COPIES: E0 LICENSEE; 0 COMPLIANCE REGION: 0 DIV. OF ST. 8. LIC. REL.; 0 DiV. OF COMPLIANCE DML



INSPECTION FINDINGS AND LICENSEE ACKNOWLEDGMENT SEP "

Form AEC-591"(6/1/65)


Martin Company U. S. Atomic Energy CommissionRegion I, Division of Compliance

Baltimore, Maryland 21203 376 Hudson Street

New York, New York 10014

3. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 4. DATE OF INSPECTION

SNM-53 September 14 and 15, 1965


C A. No item of noncompliance was found.

C B. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of a RADIATION AREA.10 CFR 20.203(b) or 34.42

El C. Rooms or areas ,vere not properly posted to indicate the presence of a 1im0 RADIATION AREA.10 CFR 20.203(c). (1) or 34.42

C D. Ro'oms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of an AIRBORNE RADIOACTIVITY AREA.10 CFR 20.203(d)

C F. R6oftis or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL,10 CFR 20.203(e)

[ F. Cdntainers were not properly labeled to indicate the presence of RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL.

10 CFR 20.203(f) (1) or (f) (2)

C G. St'orage containers were not properly labeled to show the quantity, date of measurement, or kind of radioactivematerial in the containers. 10 CFR 20.203(f) (4)

H H. A current copy of 10 CFR 20, a copy of the license, or a copy of the operating procedures was not properly posted ormade available. 10 CFR 20.206(b)

C] I. Form AEC-3 was not properly posted. 10 CFR 20.206(c)

EC J. Records of the radiation exposure of individuals were not properly maintained. 10 CFR 20.401(a) or 34.33(b)

C K. Records of surveys or disposals were not properly maintained. 10 CFR 20.401(b) or 34.43(d)

Cl L. Records of receipt, transfer, disposal, export or inventory of licensed material were not properly maintained.10 CFR 30.51, 40.61 or 70.51

C] M. Records of leak tests were not maintained as prescribed in your license, or 10 CFR 34.25(c)

C N. Records of inventories were not maintained. 10 CFR 34.26

0 0. Utilization logs were not maintained, ID CFR 34.27

.Tnrnpq F. Brsgf

(AECG Compliance Inspeceor)


The AEC Compliance Inspector has explained and I understand the items of noncompliance listed above. The items-of noncompliance will be corrected within the next 30 days.

Sent.Pmht--v Pq 10il W- TCAII&pr- Niii-1e.ov Anomr i,+-=h4i+-~ 2. TA^.a-mf Th0,(Date) (L censee Representative .- litle or 'osiion)

COPIES: [I LICENSEE: 0- COMPLIANCE REGION: 0] DIV. OF ST. & LIC. REL.: 0l DIV. OF COMPLIANCE.

Letter: To R. S. Boyd, from C. W. Keller, Re: Proposed ...

Documents

Transcript of Letter: To R. S. Boyd, from C. W. Keller, Re: Proposed ...