Maputo Port Development & Citrus Planning Workshop 10h30 – 6 th April 2011 CRI, Nelspruit
LETSITELE CITRUS RAIL WORKSHOP 10h30 - 10 TH MARCH 2011 THE JUNCTION, LETSITELE
description
Transcript of LETSITELE CITRUS RAIL WORKSHOP 10h30 - 10 TH MARCH 2011 THE JUNCTION, LETSITELE
LETSITELE CITRUS RAIL WORKSHOP
10h30 - 10TH MARCH 2011
THE JUNCTION, LETSITELE
AGENDA1. INTRODUCTION 2. TRENDS IN ENERGY RESOURCES3. SESSION 1: CITRUS BREAK-BULK RAIL ACTIVITIES
a. Mitchell Brooke – Break-bulk Rail Project Status Updateb. Nelis van Tonder – TFR Focus on Citrus Transportc. Discussionsd. Way Forward
4. LUNCH BREAK: 30 MINUTES5. SESSION 2: CITRUS CONTAINER RAIL ACTIVITIES
1. Mitchell Brooke – Time and Temperature Factors for Reefers Inland Loaded vs. Port Loaded
2. Mitchell Brooke – Polokwane Hub Project Status Update3. Andy Connell – Letsitele Container Train Value Added Services 4. Daleen Endley – Letsitele Container Train Critical Success Factors5. Discussions6. Way Forward
6. EU 24-HOUR RULE - REG EC/1785 of 2006
AGENDA1. INTRODUCTION
2.TRENDS IN ENERGY RESOURCESa)Electricity Indexb)Basic Diesel Pricec)Transport Costsd)RSA – EU Ave BAF Indicator
1. Consumers can expect a 300% increase in electricity from 2008 – 2012
2. Likely to add pressure on production, port handling and storage costs
Jan/06
Apr/06
Jul/0
6Oct/
06Ja
n/07Apr/0
7Ju
l/07
Oct/07
Jan/08
Apr/08
Jul/0
8Oct/
08Ja
n/09Apr/0
9Ju
l/09
Oct/09
Jan/10
Apr/10
Jul/1
0Oct/
10Ja
n/11Apr/1
1Ju
l/11
Oct/11
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450RSA Electricity Index
PPI - Domestic Electricity
Source: www.statssa.gov.za
1. Diesel price at the pump >R3.00 – R4.00 per litre above Basic Diesel price
2. Indications that we could expect a ~R2.00 per litre increase to June 2011
3. Data March 2011 – June 2011 is an assumption based on trend
Jan/06
Apr/06
Jul/0
6Oct/
06Ja
n/07Apr/0
7Ju
l/07
Oct/07
Jan/08
Apr/08
Jul/0
8Oct/
08Ja
n/09Apr/0
9Ju
l/09
Oct/09
Jan/10
Apr/10
Jul/1
0Oct/
10Ja
n/11Apr/1
1Ju
l/11
Oct/11
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
$ 0
$ 20
$ 40
$ 60
$ 80
$ 100
$ 120
$ 140
$ 160
Basic Diesel Price in Relation to US$ Brent Crude & ZAR Price Brent Crude
US$ Ave Brent Crude (Sec. Axis) ZAR Brent Crude rpb (Prim. Axis)Basic Diesel Price cpl Ave US$ Echange Rate (Cents per $)
ZAR
per
Bar
rel /
Cen
ts p
er L
tr /
Cen
ts p
er U
S$
US$
per
Bar
rel
Source: www.energy.gov-.za
• By indication, transport costs may increase by 72% over the last 5 years • Fixed cost increased by 52% - Labour cost / Capital Cost• Variable cost increased by 86% - Fuel (100%) / Maintenance (80%) / Tyres (90%)
Feb
May
Aug
Nov
Feb
May
Aug
Nov
Feb
May
Aug
Nov
Feb
May
Aug
Nov
Feb
May
Aug
Nov
Feb
May
Aug
Nov
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
R 0
R 2
R 4
R 6
R 8
R 10
R 12
R 14
2006 Feb; Total Truck CPK; 6.72006 May; Total Truck CPK; 7.1
2006 Aug; Total Truck CPK; 7.72006 Nov; Total Truck CPK; 7.4
2007 Feb; Total Truck CPK; 7.82007 May; Total Truck CPK; 8.3
2007 Aug; Total Truck CPK; 8.92007 Nov; Total Truck CPK; 9.1
2008 Feb; Total Truck CPK; 10.1
2008 May; Total Truck CPK; 11.92008 Aug; Total Truck CPK; 12.5
2008 Nov; Total Truck CPK; 11.3
2009 Feb; Total Truck CPK; 9.92009 May; Total Truck CPK; 10.02009 Aug; Total Truck CPK; 9.92009 Nov; Total Truck CPK; 10.02010 Feb; Total Truck CPK; 10.12010 May; Total Truck CPK; 10.72010 Aug; Total Truck CPK; 10.42010 Nov; Total Truck CPK; 10.5
2011 Feb; Total Truck CPK; 11.02011 May; Total Truck CPK; 11.5
2006 Feb; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 2.52006 May; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 2.62006 Aug; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 2.72006 Nov; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 2.72007 Feb; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 2.92007 May; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 2.92007 Aug; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 2.92007 Nov; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 2.92008 Feb; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 3.12008 May; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 3.52008 Aug; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 3.62008 Nov; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 3.52009 Feb; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 3.62009 May; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 3.62009 Aug; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 3.52009 Nov; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 3.42010 Feb; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 3.42010 May; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 3.52010 Aug; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 3.52010 Nov; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 3.62011 Feb; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 3.82011 May; Total Fixed Cost cpk; 3.8
2006 Feb; Total Variable Cost cpk; 4.32006 May; Total Variable Cost cpk; 4.5
2006 Aug; Total Variable Cost cpk; 5.12006 Nov; Total Variable Cost cpk; 4.72007 Feb; Total Variable Cost cpk; 4.9
2007 May; Total Variable Cost cpk; 5.42007 Aug; Total Variable Cost cpk; 6.02007 Nov; Total Variable Cost cpk; 6.2
2008 Feb; Total Variable Cost cpk; 7.0
2008 May; Total Variable Cost cpk; 8.42008 Aug; Total Variable Cost cpk; 9.0
2008 Nov; Total Variable Cost cpk; 8.3
2009 Feb; Total Variable Cost cpk; 6.32009 May; Total Variable Cost cpk; 6.42009 Aug; Total Variable Cost cpk; 6.42009 Nov; Total Variable Cost cpk; 6.52010 Feb; Total Variable Cost cpk; 6.62010 May; Total Variable Cost cpk; 7.12010 Aug; Total Variable Cost cpk; 6.92010 Nov; Total Variable Cost cpk; 6.9
2011 Feb; Total Variable Cost cpk; 7.2
2011 May; Total Variable Cost cpk; 8.0
Total Truck CPK Total Fixed Cost cpk Total Variable Cost cpk
Rand
per
Kilo
met
er
www.fleetwatch.co.zaTruck Operating Cost Trends
Feb
May
Aug
Nov
Feb
May
Aug
Nov
Feb
May
Aug
Nov
Feb
May
Aug
Nov
Feb
May
Aug
Nov
Feb
May
Aug
Nov
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
R 0
R 1
R 2
R 3
R 4
R 5
R 6
R 7
R 8
R 9
R 10
2006 Feb; Total Variable Cost cpk; 4.3
2006 May; Total Variable Cost cpk; 4.5
2006 Aug; Total Variable Cost cpk; 5.12006 Nov; Total Variable Cost cpk;
4.72007 Feb; Total Variable Cost cpk; 4.9
2007 May; Total Variable Cost cpk; 5.4
2007 Aug; Total Variable Cost cpk; 6.0
2007 Nov; Total Variable Cost cpk; 6.2
2008 Feb; Total Variable Cost cpk; 7.0
2008 May; Total Variable Cost cpk; 8.4
2008 Aug; Total Variable Cost cpk; 9.0
2008 Nov; Total Variable Cost cpk; 8.3
2009 Feb; Total Variable Cost cpk; 6.32009 May; Total Variable Cost cpk;
6.42009 Aug; Total Variable Cost cpk;
6.42009 Nov; Total Variable Cost cpk;
6.52010 Feb; Total Variable Cost cpk; 6.6
2010 May; Total Variable Cost cpk; 7.12010 Aug; Total Variable Cost cpk;
6.92010 Nov; Total Variable Cost cpk;
6.92011 Feb; Total Variable Cost cpk; 7.2
2011 May; Total Variable Cost cpk; 8.0
2006 Feb; Fuel cpk; 2.82006 May; Fuel cpk; 3.0
2006 Aug; Fuel cpk; 3.52006 Nov; Fuel cpk; 3.22007 Feb; Fuel cpk; 3.1
2007 May; Fuel cpk; 3.52007 Aug; Fuel cpk; 3.72007 Nov; Fuel cpk; 3.8
2008 Feb; Fuel cpk; 4.5
2008 May; Fuel cpk; 5.8
2008 Aug; Fuel cpk; 6.3
2008 Nov; Fuel cpk; 5.7
2009 Feb; Fuel cpk; 3.72009 May; Fuel cpk; 3.82009 Aug; Fuel cpk; 3.82009 Nov; Fuel cpk; 3.92010 Feb; Fuel cpk; 4.02010 May; Fuel cpk; 4.5
2010 Aug; Fuel cpk; 4.22010 Nov; Fuel cpk; 4.32011 Feb; Fuel cpk; 4.5
2011 May; Fuel cpk; 5.0
2006 Feb; Tyre cpk; 0.32006 May; Tyre cpk; 0.32006 Aug; Tyre cpk; 0.32006 Nov; Tyre cpk; 0.32007 Feb; Tyre cpk; 0.32007 May; Tyre cpk; 0.32007 Aug; Tyre cpk; 0.42007 Nov; Tyre cpk; 0.42008 Feb; Tyre cpk; 0.42008 May; Tyre cpk; 0.42008 Aug; Tyre cpk; 0.42008 Nov; Tyre cpk; 0.42009 Feb; Tyre cpk; 0.42009 May; Tyre cpk; 0.42009 Aug; Tyre cpk; 0.42009 Nov; Tyre cpk; 0.52010 Feb; Tyre cpk; 0.52010 May; Tyre cpk; 0.52010 Aug; Tyre cpk; 0.52010 Nov; Tyre cpk; 0.52011 Feb; Tyre cpk; 0.52011 May; Tyre cpk; 0.5
2006 Feb; Maintenance cpk; 1.02006 May; Maintenance cpk; 1.02006 Aug; Maintenance cpk; 1.02006 Nov; Maintenance cpk; 1.02007 Feb; Maintenance cpk; 1.32007 May; Maintenance cpk; 1.32007 Aug; Maintenance cpk; 1.32007 Nov; Maintenance cpk; 1.32008 Feb; Maintenance cpk; 1.42008 May; Maintenance cpk; 1.52008 Aug; Maintenance cpk; 1.52008 Nov; Maintenance cpk; 1.42009 Feb; Maintenance cpk; 1.52009 May; Maintenance cpk; 1.52009 Aug; Maintenance cpk; 1.52009 Nov; Maintenance cpk; 1.52010 Feb; Maintenance cpk; 1.52010 May; Maintenance cpk; 1.52010 Aug; Maintenance cpk; 1.52010 Nov; Maintenance cpk; 1.52011 Feb; Maintenance cpk; 1.52011 May; Maintenance cpk; 1.6
Total Variable Cost cpk Fuel cpk Tyre cpk Maintenance cpk
Rand
per
Kilo
met
er
www.fleetwatch.co.zaTruck Operating Cost Trends
Influence on Variable Transport Costs
• By indication, transport costs may increase by 72% over the last 5 years • Fixed cost increased by 52% - Labour cost / Capital Cost• Variable cost increased by 86% - Fuel (100%) / Maintenance (80%) / Tyres (90%)
• The average BAF US$ pp is estimated to peak at the 2008 levels.• The strengthening of the ZAR / US$ has deflated the BAF increase in ZAR terms.• Ave BAF could reach R800 pp by July 2011.
Jan/06
Apr/06
Jul/06
Oct/06
Jan/07
Apr/07
Jul/07
Oct/07
Jan/08
Apr/08
Jul/08
Oct/08
Jan/09
Apr/09
Jul/09
Oct/09
Jan/10
Apr/10
Jul/10
Oct/10
Jan/11
Apr/11
Jul/11
Oct/11
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
Ave RTM - SIN Bunker Price US$ per MT (Prim. Axis) Ave BAF EU - US$ per STD Pallet
Ave US$ Echange Rate (Cents per $) Ave BAF EU - ZAR per STD Pallet
Source: Furnesswithy (UK) / Maersk / Ocean Shipping Ltd.
Relationship Between EU Freight Rates, Bunkers & BAF (Ave Reefer & Container)C
ost U
S$ p
er P
alle
t / C
ost U
S$ p
er M
T
Cen
ts p
er U
S$ /
ZAR
per
STD
Pal
let E
q
AGENDA1. INTRODUCTION 2. TRENDS IN ENERGY RESOURCES
3.SESSION 1: CITRUS BREAK-BULK RAIL ACTIVITIESa.Mitchell Brooke – Break-bulk Rail Project
Status Updateb. Nelis van Tonder – TFR Focus on Citrus Transportc. Discussionsd. Way Forward
Rail Characteristics1. Rail transportation requires homogenous (Same) types of cargo
transported in bulk volume over great distances to be viable and feasible.2. Requires wagons lots of ~40 wagons from point of loading to point of off-
loading to be efficiency.3. Where rail lines are not accessed directly, there is a dependence of road
transport to deliver cargo to rail sidings – Adds pressure on the rail rate. O Type – 24 Standard Height Pallets Pallet Friendly – 24 High Cube Pallets
1. Rail transportation requires homogenous types of cargo transported in bulk volume over great distances to be viable and feasible.
2. Northern Limpopo, Letsitele, Hoedspruit and Malelane are bulk rail viable.
1. 2010 Regional production volume of pallets travelled to ports.2. Areas above 80 million pallet kilometres could be rail friendly.
Zim
babw
e - Z
W
Nor
ther
n Li
mpo
po -
LP
Lets
itele
/ Tz
anee
n - L
P
Hoe
dspr
uit -
LP
M H
all /
Gro
bler
sdal
- M
P
Nel
spru
it - M
P
Mal
elan
e - M
P
Nor
th S
waz
iland
- SZ
Pong
ola
- KZN
Nkw
alin
i Val
ley
- KZN
KZN
Mid
land
s - K
ZN
Fort
Bea
ufor
t - E
C
Sund
ays
Riv
er -
EC
Vaal
harts
Pate
nsie
- EC
Swel
lend
am -
WC
Citr
usda
l - W
C
Kak
amas
- N
P
Durban Port Elizabeth Cape Town
0
20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
80,000,000
100,000,000
120,000,000
140,000,000
160,000,000
180,000,000
200,000,000Citrus Regional Ave Pallet Kilometers
Palle
t KM
's
If we can’t get it right in Letsitele how will rail operate elsewhere?
Northern Region Production Grouping
1. Northern Limpopo from Letsitele upwards to Zimbabwe produce large Valencia crops
2. Central Limpopo from Letsitele to Hoedspruit and Malelane produce large Grapefruit crops
3. Groblersdal, Marble Hall and Zebidiela produce large Navel and Lemon crops.
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 400
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
North Limpopo South Limpopo / East Mpumalanga
Cart
ons
per
Wee
k
Mid season Valencia from
Letsitele northwards to
Zimbabwe
Northern Region Production Volume Overview
Early season Grapefruit from Letsitele, Hoedspruit and
Malelane
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 280
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
Letsitele Hoedspruit Malelane
Cart
ons
per
Wee
kNorthern Region Grapefruit Production Overview
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 280
2
4
6
8
10
12
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
16; Acc Plts; 0
17; Acc Plts; 2854.55212121212
18; Acc Plts; 10115.6090909091
19; Acc Plts; 18267.4666666667
20; Acc Plts; 26550.9466666667
21; Acc Plts; 35239.5760606061
22; Acc Plts; 43786.2439393939
23; Acc Plts; 51674.5093939394
24; Acc Plts; 57675.8590909091
25; Acc Plts; 62725.183333333326; Acc Plts; 6272527; Acc Plts; 6272528; Acc Plts; 62725Acc Plts; 62725Acc Plts; 62725
Japan GF Plts Acc Plts
Palle
ts p
er W
eek
Palle
ts A
ccum
ulat
ed
Northern Region Grapefruit Rail Volume Overview
Letsitele / Hoedspruit / Malelane to
Durban
50% GF Production for Japan & other
markets
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 400
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
Letsitele Limpopo River
Cart
ons
per
Wee
kNorthern Region Valencia Production Overview
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 400
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
20; Acc VAL Volume; 0
21; Acc VAL Volume; 0
22; Acc VAL Volume; 0
23; Acc VAL Volume; 0
24; Acc VAL Volume; 0
25; Acc VAL Volume; 5,265
26; Acc VAL Volume; 10,212
27; Acc VAL Volume; 16,437
28; Acc VAL Volume; 23,576
29; Acc VAL Volume; 30,519
30; Acc VAL Volume; 37,005
31; Acc VAL Volume; 44,121
32; Acc VAL Volume; 51,469
33; Acc VAL Volume; 58,751
34; Acc VAL Volume; 65,003
35; Acc VAL Volume; 70,856
36; Acc VAL Volume; 76,387
37; Acc VAL Volume; 76,387
38; Acc VAL Volume; 76,387
39; Acc VAL Volume; 76,387
40; Acc VAL Volume; 76,387
VAL Plts 40% Volume Acc VAL Volume
Palle
ts p
er W
eek
Palle
ts A
ccum
ulat
ed
Northern Region Valencia Rail Volume Overview
Letsitele / Polokwane to Durban
30% Val Production
for Russia & other
markets
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 360
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
17; Acc Rail Wagons; 11918; Acc Rail Wagons; 421
19; Acc Rail Wagons; 76120; Acc Rail Wagons; 1,106
21; Acc Rail Wagons; 1,46822; Acc Rail Wagons; 1,824
23; Acc Rail Wagons; 2,15324; Acc Rail Wagons; 2,403
25; Acc Rail Wagons; 2,83326; Acc Rail Wagons; 3,03927; Acc Rail Wagons; 3,298
28; Acc Rail Wagons; 3,59629; Acc Rail Wagons; 3,885
30; Acc Rail Wagons; 4,15531; Acc Rail Wagons; 4,452
32; Acc Rail Wagons; 4,75833; Acc Rail Wagons; 5,061
34; Acc Rail Wagons; 5,32235; Acc Rail Wagons; 5,566
36; Acc Rail Wagons; 5,796
17; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 2,855
18; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 10,116
19; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 18,267
20; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 26,551
21; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 35,240
22; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 43,786
23; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 51,675
24; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 57,676
25; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 67,990
26; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 72,936
27; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 79,161
28; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 86,299
29; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 93,242
30; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 99,727
31; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 106,843
32; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 114,190
33; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 121,471
34; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 127,722
35; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 133,575
36; Acc Plts Total (Sec Axis); 139,106
Japan GF Plts VAL 40% Volume Plts Acc Rail WagonsAcc Plts Total (Sec Axis)
Palle
ts p
er W
eek
/ Acc
umul
ated
wag
ons
Accu
mul
ated
pal
lets
Service 1
Northern Region Total Rail Volume Overview Service 2
20% of citrus volume to Durban = 5,500 citrus road trucks off our roads
Grapefruit Rail Service 1 Wk 17 – 25Valencia Rail Service 2 Wk 26 – 36
Northern Region Break-bulk Rail Overview
Grapefruit 1 Wk 17 -
25
Valencia 2 Wk 25 - 36
Durban Port Rail Siding Overview
ECS 30km South
Rail Proposal for LetsitelePrinciple:
a) To rail exporters and agents have to contract capacity at a cold store with a rail siding.
b) There should be more focus on acquiring train lots ~ 40 wagons to these cold stores to ensure better efficiency.
c) FPT / 333 Logistics / 328 Logistics / MFT / ECS.Grapefruit week 17 – 25:
d) Japan Grapefruit to Durban ambient store – rail siding available! (333 Logistics).
e) Japan Grapefruit to MFT.f) Accumulation of Grapefruit to other markets for a specific cold store.
Valencia's week 26 – 36:g) Valencia to Russia (standard pallets) accumulated from packhouses.
• 95% of fruit sent to Russia is loaded at FPT Terminal.h) Accumulation of Valencia’s to other markets for a specific cold store.
CITRUS RAIL VS ROAD PRICING - CGA Indications 2011
Citrus Production Region
Durban Port by Road - Grapefruit 17kg Cartons Durban Port by Rail - 24 plts Standard 'O' type wagons
Durban Port by Rail - 24 plts High Cube CX Containers
KM to DBN
Rand per KM
Ave. Cost per
Truck Trip
STD 32 plts per Truck
H/C - 28 plts per Truck
Transport packhous
e to rail siding
Rail to port per wagon
Rail to port per
palletIns & Levy Ave. Cost
Transport packhous
e to rail siding
Rail to port per wagon
Rail to port per
palletIns & Levy
Ave. Cost
Letsitele via Letsitele 900 R 18.0 R 16 200 R 506 R 579 R 35 R 10 250 R 427 R 20 R 482 R 35 R 12 000 R 500 R 20 R 555
Savings Potential -R 24 -R 24
Hoedspruit via Hoedspruit 850 R 18.0 R 15 300 R 478 R 546 R 35 R 9 250 R 385 R 20 R 440 R 35 R 11 000 R 458 R 20 R 513
Savings Potential -R 38 -R 33
Malelane via Komatipoort 680 R 18.0 R 12 240 R 383 R 437 R 35 R 6 250 R 260 R 20 R 315 R 35 R 8 000 R 333 R 20 R 388
Savings Potential -R 67 -R 49
Citrus Production Region
Durban Port by Road - Valencia 15kg Cartons Durban Port by Rail - 24 plts Standard 'O' type wagons
Durban Port by Rail - 24 plts High Cube CX Containers
KM to DBN
Rand per KM
Ave. Cost per
Truck Trip
STD 28 plts per Truck
H/C - 26 plts per Truck
Transport packhous
e to rail siding
Rail to port per wagon
Rail to port per
palletIns & Levy Ave. Cost
Transport packhous
e to rail siding
Rail to port per wagon
Rail to port per
palletIns & Levy
Ave. Cost
Letsitele via Letsitele 900 R 20.0 R 18 000 R 643 R 692 R 35 R 13 000 R 542 R 20 R 597 R 35 R 14 750 R 615 R 20 R 670
Savings Potential -R 46 -R 23Thohoyandou via Polokwane 1050 R 20.0 R 21 000 R 750 R 808 R 170 R 12 600 R 525 R 20 R 715 R 170 R 13 600 R 567 R 20 R 757
Savings Potential -R 35 -R 51
Tshipise via Polokwane 1100 R 20.0 R 22 000 R 786 R 846 R 180 R 12 600 R 525 R 20 R 725 R 200 R 13 600 R 567 R 21 R 788
Savings Potential -R 61 -R 58
Weipe via Polokwane 1100 R 20.0 R 22 000 R 786 R 846 R 180 R 12 600 R 525 R 20 R 725 R 200 R 13 600 R 567 R 22 R 789
Savings Potential -R 61 -R 57
Zimbabwe via Polokwane 1200 R 20.0 R 24 000 R 857 R 923 R 280 R 12 600 R 525 R 20 R 825 R 300 R 13 600 R 567 R 20 R 887
Savings Potential -R 32 -R 36
AGENDA1.SESSION 2: CITRUS CONTAINER RAIL ACTIVITIES
1.Mitchell Brooke – Time and Temperature Factors for Reefers Inland Loaded vs. Port Loaded
2.Mitchell Brooke – Polokwane Hub Project Status Update
3. Andy Connell – Letsitele Container Train Value Added Services 4. Daleen Endley – Letsitele Container Train Critical Success Factors5. Discussions6. Way Forward
2. EU 24-HOUR RULE - REG EC/1785 of 2006
Overview of Citrus Rain Transportation?
Definition : Intermodal freight transport involves the transportation of freight in an intermodal container or vehicle, using multiple modes of transportation (rail and truck), without any handling of the freight itself when changing modes. The method reduces cargo handling, and so improves security, reduces damages and losses, and allows freight to be transported faster. Reduced cost and increased efficiency is achieved by utilizing this method of transportation.
Packhouse
Packhouse
Packhouse
Inland Facility
Port Cold Store
Inland Transfer HubFruit transferred from
Road to Rail(Breakbulk & Containers)
Port Dispersion Siding - wagons
are routed directly to
Receiving Point
Container Terminal
Fruit Terminal
Rail Journey
Road Journey
The Intermodal Concept Flow Model
3 Mode Approach:1. Ambient break-bulk2. Packhouse stuffed Reefer
Containers3. Reefer Containers stuffed at
inland facility
Main delay factor is at
the port routing points
Reefer Container Loading Comparison(Pre-cooling and Shipping Timeframes)
Packhouse
Cold Store
Cold Room or Container Stuffing
Pre-cooling Temp>/= 10 DAYS
</= 3 DAYS
</= 1 DAY
>/= 6 DAYS
Inland Ambient Store
Container Stuffing
Pre-cooling Temp</= 8 DAYS
</= 4 DAYS
</= 4 DAYS
PackhouseContainer Stuffing
Pre-cooling Temp</= 4 DAYS
Port Stuffed Reefer
Packhouse Stuffed Reefer
Inland Stuffed Reefer
Container Terminal>/= 10 DAYS
> Handling and Storage Charges< Fruit Quality and Damages due to excessive handling?Highest Carbon Footprint Factor
Logistics Nightmare
Container Terminal</= 7 DAYS
Container Terminal</= 3 DAYS
Zero Handling and Storage Charges
High Risk Logistics
Best for Fruit IntegrityBest Carbon Footprint Factor
< Handling and Storage Charges
Medium / High Risk Logistics
Better for Fruit IntegrityBetter Carbon Footprint Factor
It must be noted that fruit could be </= 7 days of age
before being stuffed
PackhouseNIL DAYS
Best Shipping time to Markets
Better Shipping time to Markets Note: this assumption is based on
Letsitele - Durban average times during peak season.
It must be noted that cooling times may vary
depending on refrigeration
environment – Forced air or static cooling
rooms.
AGENDA1.SESSION 2: CITRUS CONTAINER RAIL ACTIVITIES
1. Mitchell Brooke – Time and Temperature Factors for Reefers Inland Loaded vs. Port Loaded
2. Mitchell Brooke – Polokwane Hub Project Status Update
3.Andy Connell – Letsitele Container Train Value Added Services
4.Daleen Endley – Letsitele Container Train Critical Success Factors
5.Discussions6.Way Forward
2. EU 24-HOUR RULE - REG EC/1785 of 2006