Lessons Learned from Project to Strengthen Country Coordinating Mechanisms
-
Upload
kataisee-richardson -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Lessons Learned from Project to Strengthen Country Coordinating Mechanisms
-
7/30/2019 Lessons Learned from Project to Strengthen Country Coordinating Mechanisms
1/4
1
CSAT: lessons learned from efforts to strengthen CCMs
CCMs: The Global Funds model for promoting transparency, accountability and multi-
stakeholder involvementBy establishing Country Coordinating Mechanisms CCMs as a required entry point for countries
wishing to access funding, the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria has sought to put
into practice the principle, long held in the movement to fight AIDS in particular, of greater
involvement of people directly affected in programs that concern them. In the ten years of its
existence, the Global Fund has gradually strengthened the requirements related to the proportion of
civil society representatives on CCMs, the processes by which members are selected, and to the
management of conflicts of interest for CCM members who are also involved in implementation of
Global Fund programs. The Global Fund continues to turn down requests for funding from countries
with CCMs that do not meet the criteria, and is currently developing an enhanced performance
framework, which will aim to ensure that as well as fulfilling basic eligibility requirements, CCMs will
play a stronger role in overseeing programs. Few if any donors providing funding at such a large
scale have comparable policies aimed at promoting transparency, accountability and multi-
stakeholder involvement, with a view to increasing the impact of their programs.
Efforts to make CCMs more effective: what has worked
Country actors from government and civil society, technical partners, and advocacy and technical
support organizations have invested considerable effort in supporting CCMs to meet the eligibility
criteria and to coordinate and oversee Global Fund grants at country level.
ICASO, through the CSAT (Civil Society Action Team) initiative, has itself been involved in CCMstrengthening work since 2007, through three modes: guidance to country-level civil society
organizations on how to organize and advocate as a sector within the HIV response (for instance,
through the Coordinating with Communities guide1); short-term training and technical support in
response to requests for capacity building or crises within CCMs; and structured, ongoing financial
and technical support designed to strengthen community sector advocacy and communications
related to the Global Fund at country level.
Through these efforts, a number of strategies have emerged that have proved useful in improving
community sector engagement in CCMs, such as:
Support to transparent election processes for community sector CCM members, along withclarification of roles and improved rotation and alternate member policies, and
development of CCM charters. Also includes training and orientation for CCM members.
Establishment ofstrong, visible community sector focal points, which are not necessarilymembers of the CCM themselves but who can play the role of ensuring communication and
1Available in multiple languages in the following locations:http://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-
with-communities-book-a;http://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-book-b;
http://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-action-cards;
http://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-workshop-facilitation-notes
http://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-book-ahttp://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-book-ahttp://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-book-ahttp://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-book-ahttp://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-book-bhttp://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-book-bhttp://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-book-bhttp://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-action-cardshttp://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-action-cardshttp://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-workshop-facilitation-noteshttp://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-workshop-facilitation-noteshttp://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-workshop-facilitation-noteshttp://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-action-cardshttp://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-book-bhttp://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-book-ahttp://www.icaso.org/files/coordinating-with-communities-book-a -
7/30/2019 Lessons Learned from Project to Strengthen Country Coordinating Mechanisms
2/4
2
consultation with the broader sector; regular information sharing through newsletters,
websites and blogs.
Availability of advice and support from the Global Fund Secretariat. This support has beenprimarily provided through the now disbanded civil society team, and it is unclear how such
support will be provided under the new Secretariat configuration.
Support to broader civil society convening at national level, for instance in Jamaica the CivilSociety Forum of Jamaica
2which now includes over 100 agencies island-wide working with
people living with HIV and key affected populations, including women, people with
disabilities, and people who inject drugs.
Linking CCM work with broader civil society advocacy, for instance in Cameroon, PositiveGeneration
3has targeted CCM members as one of the audiences for the data generated
from its community level treatment access monitoring work, using access to the CCM to
create awareness of problems in treatment access at local level, both in Global Fund
supported projects and in those supported by other funding sources.
Persistent challenges in community sector engagement in CCMs
Although there have been clear improvements in the composition and functioning of CCMs in many
countries, civil society organizations, and key population organizations in particular, continue to
report that they have little or no impact within CCMs. The recent ITPC-ICASO report, Global Fund
Country Coordinating Mechanisms: a Prescription for Change in a Time of Peril4, describes a number
of common problems still faced by CCMs: limited capacity of civil society organizations to operate
effectively within the CCM environment; poor communication between CCM members and the
constituencies they represent; continued non-transparency in member selection; lack of meaningful
involvement of key populations; and continued domination of CCMs by government representatives.
ICASOs experience of working with CCMs, and with national civil society actors in general, suggests
that the fact that the community sector continues to face these challenges needs to be understood
as part of broader national contexts, for instance:
Legal frameworks and policies in the country, in particular those that marginalize orcriminalize populations affected by AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria, or that limit the role of
civil society.
The range of other forums where decisions and policies on AIDS, tuberculosis and malariaare formed including national strategy and policy planning processes, but also including
informal processes where senior government officials, donors and technical agencies are
influential.
The fact that CCMs are not policy making entities in their own right, but that they are madeup of individuals each of whom has an institutional position or identity, and some of whom
have far more institutional power than others. (Experience has shown, for instance, that
where community sector actors have successfully influenced CCMs, this has often required a
2The Civil Society Forum of Jamaica is a local coalition advocating for the greater inclusion of civil society organisation in
decision making in the Jamaican health sector.http://www.cvccoalition.org/downloads/CSFbooklet.pdf3
Positive Generation is a grass roots network of people living with HIV based in Yaound, Cameroon(http://camerounaids.org/).4http://www.csactionteam.org/?file=175
http://www.cvccoalition.org/downloads/CSFbooklet.pdfhttp://www.cvccoalition.org/downloads/CSFbooklet.pdfhttp://www.cvccoalition.org/downloads/CSFbooklet.pdfhttp://camerounaids.org/http://camerounaids.org/http://camerounaids.org/http://www.csactionteam.org/?file=175http://www.csactionteam.org/?file=175http://www.csactionteam.org/?file=175http://www.csactionteam.org/?file=175http://camerounaids.org/http://www.cvccoalition.org/downloads/CSFbooklet.pdf -
7/30/2019 Lessons Learned from Project to Strengthen Country Coordinating Mechanisms
3/4
3
considerable amount of preparatory work with individual CCM members in advance of any
CCM decision).
The artificial nature of civil society and key population group constituencies, and theexpectation or requirement that civil society organizations should have common positions or
agreements on issues related to AIDS, tuberculosis or malaria while the reality is that
organizations from civil society often have divergent and even antagonistic viewpoints.
The generally marginalized status of the community sector and the lack of recognition ofthe roles it can play in implementing and monitoring programs.
In other words, although in many countries CCMs provide an entry point for community sector
organizations to engage with policy and decision makers, the ability of the sector to have an
influence is to some extent determined by the structures that exist outside of the CCM.
In addition, the tendency of CCMs to focus on relatively abstract concepts such as grant
performance indicators, spending rates, and CCM and PR adherence to Global Fund conditions,
often leaves little space for representatives of affected communities to assess and raise practical
problems faced in the delivery of programs despite the fact that these are the issues that
community sector representatives are uniquely qualified to comment on. Community sector
organizations often avoid speaking out about problems as they feel it may jeopardize their
relationships with PRs and other CCM members. To make matters worse, when community sector
representatives do not provide input, they are seen as nave or lacking relevance and this gives a
negative perception of their role.
Toward a more comprehensive approach to CCM support
The conclusion that ICASO draws from its experience, and from its understanding of the experiences
of other organizations involved in CCM support work, is that the standard model of CCM
strengthening should be accompanied by efforts to strengthen civil society convening and advocacy
more broadly. It is also essential that CCMs provide a space for discussion of the issues that are
most relevant to community sector actors. ICASO offers a number of recommendations that should
be considered by community sector actors and their supporters in taking forward this important
work:
Continue to provide core support to community sector engagement in CCMs: support toelections, training on roles, and communications in particular. The provision of financial
support to a national level community sector organization not necessarily a CCM member
to act as communications facility for the sector is also a sound investment.
Enable convening of the community sector beyond the specific context of the Global Fund,so that plans for advocacy and engagement with the CCM can be developed based on the
broader agendas of the sector. At the same time, the community sector should not be
required to adopt consensus positions on every issue the diversity of views within the
sector should be acknowledged and accepted.
Enable the sector to effectively assess progress of their advocacy engagement work, tounderstand what can and cannot be achieved through CCM-focused work, and to develop
plans to advocate beyond the CCM where necessary.
-
7/30/2019 Lessons Learned from Project to Strengthen Country Coordinating Mechanisms
4/4
4
Support good quality community level monitoring of AIDS, tuberculosis and malariaprograms, including of aspects related to stigma, human rights and gender equity, so as to
provide reliable, credible data to inform advocacy within CCMs and other relevant forums.
Enable CCM members in particular those from the community sector to define what theCCM should monitor and how, rather than focusing only on top-level grant data and periodic
site visits (such visits cannot be expected to provide a reliable picture of overall program
performance).
Ensure national networks are linked to regional and global networks, to ensure the flow ofinformation and the provision of additional technical support and mentoring where
necessary.
Ensure linkages between CCM and other national level activism and advocacy, for instanceby using the CCM as a forum for channeling and discussing information about broader
national program barriers and failures.