Lessons learned during design, construction and ...
Transcript of Lessons learned during design, construction and ...
UnternehmungWendelstein 7-X
Lessons learned during design,
construction and commissioning of the
magnet system for Wendelstein 7
Compiled by Thomas Rummel
5th IAEA DEMO ProgrammeTh. Rummel
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
Lessons learned during design,
construction and commissioning of the
magnet system for Wendelstein 7-X
Compiled by Thomas Rummel
1Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Outline
§ Wendelstein 7-X Overview
§ Lessons learned during
§ Design, Production and Test of
§ Superconductor
§ Superconducting coils
§ Commissioning
§ Summary
Th. Rummel
“This work has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium and has received funding from the Euratom r2014-2018 under grant agreement No 633053. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the Europ
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 2
Outline
X Overview
Lessons learned during
Design, Production and Test of
Superconductor
Superconducting coils
“This work has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium and has received funding from the Euratom research and training programme2018 under grant agreement No 633053. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission.”
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Overview
Th. Rummel
Outer vessel (cryostat)(170 t)
Plasma(0.01 g)Divertor
(14 t)
Machine support
Central coil support structure
Parameters of W7-X
Major radius: 5.5 m
Minor radius: 0.53 m
Plasma volume: 30 m3
Plasma surface: 110 m3
Magn. field (on axis): < 3 T
Magn. field energy: 620 MJ
Heating power: 10 - 30 MW
Plasma pulse length: 30 min
Machine height: 5.5 m
Machine diameter: 16 m
Machine mass: 725 t
Cold mass: 425 t
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 3
Overview
Plasma(0.01 g)
254 Ports (12 t)
50 Non planar coils(265 t)
Plasma vessel(85 t)
Machine support
Central coil support structure(85 t)
20 Planar coils(45 t)
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Overview Magnets
Non-planar coils
Th. Rummel
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 4
Overview Magnets
Planar coils
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Superconductor
Th. Rummel
outer dimensions 16 x 16 mm2
wall thickness > 2 mm (Al alloy)number of strands 243strand diameter 0.57 mmvoid fraction 37 ± 2 %cabling law 3x3x3x3x3Ic (6 T / 4.2 K) > 150 A (strand)number of filaments 144 (NbTi)filament diameter 26 µmCu/Sc ratio 2.6 ± 0.1
Key data of the
W7-X superconductor
(for all coils and bus bars)
Jacket:• Aluminum Alloy AlMgSi (6063)• Yield strength Rp0.2
• <150 MPa (soft, room temp.)• >280 MPa (hardened, 4 Kelvin)
• Allows bending radii of 120 mm
Strand
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 5
Superconductor
Filament
W7-X Superconductor
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
The production sequence of the W7-X superconductor:• Strand production• Cabling (5 steps)• Cable check and preparation for the co-extrusion
• Co-extrusion of the aluminum jacket• Final tests of the conductor• Delivery to the customers
Summary:§ First conductor in 2001§ Last conductor in 2006§ Finally 390 parts (about 60 km) produced, tested
and delivered for coils, bus bars and spares
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
6
Superconductor
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 6
X superconductor:
extrusion
Finally 390 parts (about 60 km) produced, testedand delivered for coils, bus bars and spares
Co-extrusion and geometry check
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Superconductor
Experiences and lessons from W7
- The start of the series production of the superconductor was delayed by 18 month to set upthe cabling and co-extrusion process to meet the void fraction and the geometry.
Th. Rummel
Changes of many parameters to achieve a stable production process:
- stabilisation ratio Cu/NbTi- strand diameter- filament diameter- void fraction- tolerance of He gas flow- twist pitch of 1st cabling stage- twist pitch of 5th cabling stage- dimensions 16 x 16 (mm)
With a proper pre production R&D and optimization program this could have been avoided.
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 7
Superconductor
Experiences and lessons from W7-X conductor production
The start of the series production of the superconductor was delayed by 18 month to set upextrusion process to meet the void fraction and the geometry.
Changes of many parameters to achieve a stable production process:
With a proper pre production R&D and optimization program this could have been avoided.
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Superconductor
Experiences and lessons from the W7
- It turned out to be complicated to deliver according the required and agreed schedule whichled to further delays. The reasons were technical problems, but also partially due to thecomplicated relationship, if competitors form a consortium.
Try to avoid a consortium, formed by competitors. A possibility could be a cleverselection of production technologies.
-The design is mainly focused on “technical” parameters. The influence of the design to theproduction process should not be forgotten. A design is a good design only, if it allows a stableseries production.
The design of the conductor should respect production methods and should beaccompanied by production test of representative quantities.
Th. Rummel
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 8
Superconductor
Experiences and lessons from the W7-X conductor production
It turned out to be complicated to deliver according the required and agreed schedule whichled to further delays. The reasons were technical problems, but also partially due to thecomplicated relationship, if competitors form a consortium.
Try to avoid a consortium, formed by competitors. A possibility could be a clever
The design is mainly focused on “technical” parameters. The influence of the design to theproduction process should not be forgotten. A design is a good design only, if it allows a stable
The design of the conductor should respect production methods and should beaccompanied by production test of representative quantities.
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Superconductor
Th. Rummel
Cabling law 3x3x3x3x3
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
-8 -6 -4 -2 0
X
Y
§With the chosen 3x3x3x3x3 cabling law all the subcables become a triangularshape.
§Due to this deep irregular grooves between the sub
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 9
Superconductor
Cabling law 3x3x3x3x3
2 4 6 8
With the chosen 3x3x3x3x3 cabling law all the subcables become a triangularshape.
Due to this deep irregular grooves between the sub-cables cannot be avoided
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Superconductor
Th. Rummel
§Typical cabling irregularities of a 3x3x3x3x3 cable
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 10
Superconductor
Typical cabling irregularities of a 3x3x3x3x3 cable
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Superconductor
Th. Rummel
3x3x3x3x3 Optimisation of cable layout [R.K. Maix] 3x4x5x4
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8
X
Y Y
§A slightly different 3x4x5x4 cable (240 strands) would have been better compressible and thusthe grooves would have been less pronounced and the cable pattern more homogeneous.
§A 4-stage cable would also have brought a reduction of production time and cost.
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 11
Superconductor
3x3x3x3x3 Optimisation of cable layout [R.K. Maix] 3x4x5x4
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8
XY
A slightly different 3x4x5x4 cable (240 strands) would have been better compressible and thusthe grooves would have been less pronounced and the cable pattern more homogeneous.
stage cable would also have brought a reduction of production time and cost.
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Superconductor
Experiences and lessons from W7
-Dealing with non conformities requires a substantial amount of resources and experiences.
Resources for the analysis of con conformities should be allocated (either to bedeveloped in-house or hired externally).
Define rules for each class of failures and follow the rules for similar failures. Thissaves time for respective discussions.
Th. Rummel
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 12
Superconductor
Experiences and lessons from W7-X conductor production
Dealing with non conformities requires a substantial amount of resources and experiences.
Resources for the analysis of con conformities should be allocated (either to behouse or hired externally).
Define rules for each class of failures and follow the rules for similar failures. Thissaves time for respective discussions.
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Superconductor
Experiences and lessons from W7
- Only during production the manufacturer learned how to measure mass flow, leakrate, jacket quality or to handle the conductor during tests.
A clear definition of clean conditions, QA and test procedures andinspection devices has to be given in the specification, based on pre seriesproduction.
- The quality assurance and related documentation for the conductors neededadditional efforts from IPP.
Quality procedures and electronic data filing has to be agreed in advance.Close monitoring of the whole production incl. tests and of the timeschedule is necessary.
- There was sufficient margin to accept some broken strands or reduced criticalcurrents in the layers 2 to 6 of the winding packs of the coils.
2 or 3 grades of conductors could have been used for the different layers toreduce costs.
Th. Rummel
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 13
Superconductor
Experiences and lessons from W7-X conductor production
Only during production the manufacturer learned how to measure mass flow, leakrate, jacket quality or to handle the conductor during tests.
A clear definition of clean conditions, QA and test procedures andinspection devices has to be given in the specification, based on pre series
The quality assurance and related documentation for the conductors needed
Quality procedures and electronic data filing has to be agreed in advance.Close monitoring of the whole production incl. tests and of the time
There was sufficient margin to accept some broken strands or reduced criticalcurrents in the layers 2 to 6 of the winding packs of the coils.
2 or 3 grades of conductors could have been used for the different layers to
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Non Planar Coils
Non-planar coilsnumber of differentlyshaped types
5
casings cast stainless steelweight per coil about 5.5 tons per coildimension » 3.5 m x 2.5 m x 1.5 mnominal current 17.6 kA at 4 K and 6 TNumber of turns 108 (6 double layers)safety margin current Icrit ³ 35 kA at 4 K and 6 Tnominal insulation voltage 6 kV dcnominal voltage overterminal ends
1 kV (Highest discharge voltage between terminalswhich occurs in operation)
resistance over coil < 6 nWleak rate < 10 –7 mbar l/s at RT and 4 Kmass flow winding pack > 0.6 g/s at 4 K
p(in)=6 bar, Dp < 1 barmass flow tolerance at RT 4700 l/h ± 20% p(in)=20 bar, 20°Cnominal he-pressure 20 barlife cycle 15 years, 50 cool downs, 50 quenches and
5000 full current changes
Main technical parameter of the non planar coils
Th. Rummel
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 14
Non Planar Coils
between terminalswhich occurs in operation)
bar, 20°C
15 years, 50 cool downs, 50 quenches and
Main technical parameter of the non planar coils
W7-X Planar Coils
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
Planar coilsnumber of differently shaped types 2Number of coils per type 10windings 36 turns, divided intocasings Welded and bolted stainless steel platesweight per coil about 3dimension » 4 m diameternominal current 16 kA at 4 K and 6nominal insulation voltage 4 kV dcresistance < 2.5 nW
leak rate < 10 –7 mbar l/s at RT and 4
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
15
Planar Coils
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 15
lanar coils
turns, divided into 3 double layersWelded and bolted stainless steel plates
tons per coildiameter
6 kA at 4 K and 6 T
W at 4 K
mbar l/s at RT and 4 K
W7-X Non Planar Coils
Winding of the non planar winding packs
Winding work at ABB (Germany)
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
16
Non Planar Coils
Pictures by courtesy of BNN, ABB, ASG
Winding of the non planar winding packs
Winding work at ASG (Italy)
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 16
W7-X Non Planar Coils
Winding pack AAB13 after impregnation and with conductive paint
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
17
Non Planar Coils
Winding pack AAB13 after impregnation and with conductive paint
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 17
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Non Planar Coils
Average deviations of the non planar winding packs
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
10 11 20 21 50 41 40 31 51 30 12 19 22 29 52 59 42 32 39 49 13 18 23 28
abs. dev. (to CAD)rel.dev. (to mean shape)
type 2type 1 type 3
dev.
[mm
]
Non-Planar WPs
aver
age
devi
atio
n[m
m]
Th. Rummel
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 18
Non Planar Coils
Average deviations of the non planar winding packs
28 53 58 43 48 33 38 14 17 24 27 54 57 44 47 34 37 15 16 25 26 45 46 55 56 35 36
abs. dev. (to CAD)rel.dev. (to mean shape)
type 4type 3 type 5
Planar WPs
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Planar Coils
Th. Rummel
aver
age
devi
atio
n[m
m]
Planar Winding Packs
Average deviations of the planar winding packs
Result: - The accuracy meets the requirements- Similar to the accuracy of the non planar winding packs
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 19
Planar CoilsPlanar Winding Packs
Average deviations of the planar winding packs
The accuracy meets the requirementsSimilar to the accuracy of the non planar winding packs
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Accuracy of the Coils
For 50 Non Planar winding packs:
absolute average deviations < 3 mm,
relative average deviations < 2 mm
For 20 Planar winding packs:
absolute average deviations < 3.5 mm,
relative average deviations < 1.5 mm
Conclusion:
Ø Achieved accuracy within the requirements
Ø No significant difference between non planar (3 D) coils and planar coils
Th. Rummel
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 20
Accuracy of the Coils
Achieved accuracy within the requirements
No significant difference between non planar (3 D) coils and planar coils
W7-X Non Planar Coils
Coil casing production
propertiescasing made by two cast half shells
welded togethercase material DIN 1.3960 (eq. to AISI 316LN)cobalt content < 500 ppmYield stength (Rp0,2) > 800 MPa at 4 KBreaking elongation > 25 %permeability < 1,01
permeability for welds < 1,05contour tolerance outer side +/-5mm
side faces +/-5mmcontour tolerance inspec. defined collisionareas
side faces +/- 3mminner side +/-2mm
different machinedsupport blocks
central, assembly, weight,lateral, narrow supports partiallycast or welded
position tolerance ofthread holes / or fittingholes
0,2mm till 0,6mm
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
21
Non Planar Coils
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 21
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Non planar coils
Coil production
Th. Rummel
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 22
Non planar coils
Coil production
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Non Planar Coils
Summary:
§ First coil in 2003§ Last coil in 2008
Delays due to:•Late delivery of Superconductor•Repairs:
• Insulation• QD-cables• Welds
•Design changes:• structural reinforcements
•What else ?• Paschen tests have proven as a
very efficient tool to verify thequality of an insulation
Th. Rummel
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 23
Non Planar Coils
W7-X Planar Coils
Summary
§ First coil in 2003§ Last coil in 2007
Delays due to:•Late delivery of Superconductor•Repairs:
• Insulation• QD-cables• Welds• Soldering of cooling tubes
to copper blocks
•Design changes:• structural reinforcements
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
24
Planar Coils
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 24
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Coil production
Th. Rummel
Lessons learned (focused on electrical insulation)
The design of the components has to respect the insulationwhich will be applied during the manufacturing process.
A rounded outer shape and a good accessibility without hiddenareas help to manufacture the insulation and increase thequality.
The efforts to create a reliable handmade insulation are oftenunderestimated. The failure rate is by far higher than by usingVPI.
Therefore it is strongly recommended to find a design whichallows to use vacuum-pressure-impregnation of the completewinding pack (not only parts of it).
Higher effort for development of the impregnations case wouldhave been at the end cheaper and faster than the repairs.
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 25
Coil production
Lessons learned (focused on electrical insulation)
The design of the components has to respect the insulationwhich will be applied during the manufacturing process.
A rounded outer shape and a good accessibility without hiddenareas help to manufacture the insulation and increase the
The efforts to create a reliable handmade insulation are oftenunderestimated. The failure rate is by far higher than by using
Therefore it is strongly recommended to find a design whichimpregnation of the complete
Higher effort for development of the impregnations case wouldhave been at the end cheaper and faster than the repairs.
Joint
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Non Planar Coils
Th. Rummel
Lessons learned
The workshop for the winding and insulation work must be clean to avoid anydamage of the insulation system.
A guideline of electrical tests has to be implemented for all steps of themanufacturing process from the beginning on. The test equipment should beidentical in different workshops. The customer should witness the tests.
As earlier the tests will be done in the production process, as easier a repair can bedone. Do not relay on one test after fabrication. Require intermediate tests, too.Paschen Tests (HV test under reduced air pressure) are a powerful method andcan be combined with the leak test.
It is recommended to implement a safety margin into the manufacturing process byan high test voltage at the beginning, which will be gradually reduced during themanufacturing until the final acceptance test in the workshop.
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 26
Non Planar Coils
The workshop for the winding and insulation work must be clean to avoid any
A guideline of electrical tests has to be implemented for all steps of themanufacturing process from the beginning on. The test equipment should beidentical in different workshops. The customer should witness the tests.
As earlier the tests will be done in the production process, as easier a repair can bedone. Do not relay on one test after fabrication. Require intermediate tests, too.Paschen Tests (HV test under reduced air pressure) are a powerful method and
It is recommended to implement a safety margin into the manufacturing process byan high test voltage at the beginning, which will be gradually reduced during themanufacturing until the final acceptance test in the workshop.
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Non Planar Coils
Th. Rummel
Example for the definition of the test voltage:
• Maximum voltage to ground during a fast discharge: 2 kV
• Maximum voltage to ground during a fast discharge assuming an undetectedground fault (which might be difficult to detect in superconducting systems)
Þ + 50 % margin = 6 kV = “Nominal voltage”
• Test voltage for the production: 2 x “Nominal voltage” + 1 kV = 13 kV (=100%)
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 27
Non Planar Coils
Example for the definition of the test voltage:
Maximum voltage to ground during a fast discharge: 2 kV
Maximum voltage to ground during a fast discharge assuming an undetected(which might be difficult to detect in superconducting systems) : 4 kV
+ 50 % margin = 6 kV = “Nominal voltage”
Test voltage for the production: 2 x “Nominal voltage” + 1 kV = 13 kV (=100%)
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Non Planar Coils
Th. Rummel
Manufacturingand factoryacceptance test
Acceptancetests at 4 K
W7-X assemblypreparation
100% ofthe testvoltage
= 13 kV
80% ofthe testvoltage
= 10.4 kV
70% ofthe testvoltage
= 9.1 kV
Transition of property
ResultThe test voltage of 5 kV provides§ a comfortable margin of 3 kV in a faultless system and§ a sufficient margin of 1 kV in case of a ground fault and§ does not pose a high long term risk for the insulation.
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 28
Non Planar Coils
X assemblypreparation
70% ofthe testvoltage
= 9.1 kV
Transition of property
Assembly andcommissioning
40% ofthe testvoltage
= 5 kV
Result
a comfortable margin of 3 kV in a faultless system anda sufficient margin of 1 kV in case of a ground fault anddoes not pose a high long term risk for the insulation.
Transition of responsibility
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Non Planar Coils
Th. Rummel
Communication is always an issue…
Support blocks were intended to be weldedonto the casing.Due to changes in the production technology ofthe casings from welding of forged plates tocasting an improvement was announced:casting the blocks together with the casingcould save time.Unfortunately the geometry was optimized forwelding but not for casting (sharp edges, nosmooth transition from main body to casing.
Result: bubbles and holes
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 29
Non Planar Coils
Communication is always an issue…
Support blocks were intended to be weldedonto the casing.Due to changes in the production technology ofthe casings from welding of forged plates tocasting an improvement was announced:casting the blocks together with the casingcould save time.Unfortunately the geometry was optimized forwelding but not for casting (sharp edges, nosmooth transition from main body to casing.
Result: bubbles and holes
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Non Planar Coils
Th. Rummel
Recommendation: Analysis of proposed improvementsshould be made under integration of the designer andof manufacturing experts.
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 30
Non Planar Coils
Recommendation: Analysis of proposed improvementsshould be made under integration of the designer andof manufacturing experts.
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Coil Test under cryogenic conditions
Th. Rummel
§ All coils were tested up to the nominal current§ Two cryostats, hosting two coils each§ Cool down within 10 days, test duration 1 week§ Full current tests at 5 K in the self field:
§ Thermal Stability§ Deformation§ Mechanical stress in the casings
§ Quench test at selected coils to check the margin§ High voltage tests§ Helium leak tests
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 31
Coil Test under cryogenic conditions
W7-X Coil Test under cryogenic conditions
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
Summary§ First coil tested in 2003§ Last coil tested in 2009§ In total 99 tests (due to repairs and changes during the coil fabrication)§ Finally all coils accepted§ Superconductivity was never the problem !
Identified problems:• Cold leaks in welds (Al, StSt.)• Cracks in the insulation• Insufficient QD cables• Detached sensors
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
32
Coil Test under cryogenic conditions
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 32
Summary
In total 99 tests (due to repairs and changes during the coil fabrication)
Superconductivity was never the problem !
W7-X Coil Test under cryogenic conditions
Lessons learned:
• Cold tests are mandatory to identify failures which could otherwise risk the total project.
• The majority of the failures appeared during the first cool down, but the most dangerous
failure (interlayer short) only after the test with nominal current.
• Cold testing is itself a project and should be handled accordingly.
• It should be clear from the very beginning (or at least when the specification of the
magnets is finalized), if there will be cold tests, because it influences strongly the test
strategy during the production.
• It is mandatory to have personal from the customer on site, which have also the
knowledge about production and the intended use of the magnets in the machine.
• Cold tests make the commissioning easier (confidence, failure localization).
• Superconductivity was never the problem. Application of electrical insulation,
imperfect stainless steel and aluminum welds, reliable function of sensors
(temperature sensors, strain gages) posed the problems.
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
33
Coil Test under cryogenic conditions
Cold tests are mandatory to identify failures which could otherwise risk the total project.
The majority of the failures appeared during the first cool down, but the most dangerous
failure (interlayer short) only after the test with nominal current.
Cold testing is itself a project and should be handled accordingly.
It should be clear from the very beginning (or at least when the specification of the
magnets is finalized), if there will be cold tests, because it influences strongly the test
It is mandatory to have personal from the customer on site, which have also the
knowledge about production and the intended use of the magnets in the machine.
Cold tests make the commissioning easier (confidence, failure localization).
Superconductivity was never the problem. Application of electrical insulation,
imperfect stainless steel and aluminum welds, reliable function of sensors
(temperature sensors, strain gages) posed the problems.
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 33
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018
Assembly
Th. Rummel
Prepared for the first plasma (Dec. 2015)
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 34
Assembly
Prepared for the first plasma (Dec. 2015)
W7-X Commissioning
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
Commissioning is a point of an important transition:
From a
Component
to a
System
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
35
Commissioning
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 35
Commissioning is a point of an important transition:
W7-X Magnet circuit
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
In W7-X there are seven electricalcircuits with 10 coils of the sametype each, bus bars, joints andcurrent leads.
BS = bypass switch;FDBU = fast discharge breaker unit (two bypass switches, two
DC breakers and one explosive fuse);RD = discharge resistor;L1 , L2 …L10 : ten coils of the same type in series (
Joint
PowerSupply+/- 30 V
RD
FDBU
BS
Magnet safetysystem
Normalconductingbus bar
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
36
Magnet circuit
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 36
BS = bypass switch;FDBU = fast discharge breaker unit (two bypass switches, two
DC breakers and one explosive fuse);= discharge resistor;
: ten coils of the same type in series (1 H per circuit)
-
+L1
L10
L2
Current lead
Current lead
Cryostat
Superconductingbus bar
conductingCoil
Coil
Coil
W7-X Magnet circuit
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
Not tested before at highinductive load
PowerSupply+/- 30 V
RD
FDBU
BS
Magnet safetysystem
Normalconductingbus bar
Not tested before undercryogenic conditionswith current
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
37
Magnet circuit
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 37
-
+
L1
L10
L2
Current lead
Current lead
Cryostat
Superconductingbus bar
conductingCoil
Coil
Coil
Not tested before undercryogenic conditionswith current
W7-X Commissioning
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
Challenges of the commissioning of the magnet system:
• Operation of the superconducting bus bars and of the joints for the firsttime ever,
• Operation of the quench detection system together with sc coils, busbars, current leads for the first time,
• Operation of the power supplies with a high inductive load (factor 300higher than the dummy load),
• Operation of the cryo plant under the final load for the first time
• Co-ordination between magnets, cryogenics, vacuum systems,mechanical engineering, computer networks, main control room,….
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
38
Commissioning
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 38
Challenges of the commissioning of the magnet system:
Operation of the superconducting bus bars and of the joints for the first
Operation of the quench detection system together with sc coils, bus
Operation of the power supplies with a high inductive load (factor 300
plant under the final load for the first time
ordination between magnets, cryogenics, vacuum systems,mechanical engineering, computer networks, main control room,….
W7-X Commissioning phases
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
The commissioning was divided into six phases:i. Vacuum tests of the cryostatii. Cu-coil systems testsiii. Cryogenic tests of the cryostativ. Vacuum tests of the plasma vesselv. Superconducting magnet coil systems testsvi. Preparation for the first plasma
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
39
Commissioning phases
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 39
The commissioning was divided into six phases:
Superconducting magnet coil systems tests
W7-X Magnet Commissioning strategy
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
The strategy for the commissioning is divided in several mainsteps:
1. Test of the seven coil groups one by one up to the requiredcurrent for the first plasma operation phase,
2. Test of the seven coil groups togetherforeseen for the first plasma operation phase only
3. Higher currents for further plasma campaigns will requireagain a commissioning phase.
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
40
Magnet Commissioning strategy
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 40
The strategy for the commissioning is divided in several main
Test of the seven coil groups one by one up to the requiredcurrent for the first plasma operation phase,
Test of the seven coil groups together up to the currentforeseen for the first plasma operation phase only.
Higher currents for further plasma campaigns will requireagain a commissioning phase.
W7-X Magnet Commissioning: current levels
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
Integral commissioning NPC 5
6 kA
2 kA
0.5 kA
10 kA
1 h
Cur
rent
[kA] Slow
dischargeFastdischarge
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
41
Magnet Commissioning: current levels
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 41
Integral commissioning NPC 5
10 kA
Time [h]
Fastdischarge
W7-X Magnet Commissioning: all circuits
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
Non planar coil circuits planar coil circuits
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
42
Magnet Commissioning: all circuits
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 42
Stepwise increase of the
currents in all circuits up to:
•12,8 kA in the non planar
coil circuits and
•5 kA in the planar coil
circuits
• adjustment of the controller
to the magnetically coupled
circuits
planar coil circuits
Time [h]
W7-X Magnet Commissioning results
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
• The cool down ran smoothly. The mass flow and its distribution was successfullyadjusted. The thermal insulation is working well.
• The Quench detection system was successfully adjusted and is working stable.
• The several levels of the current were reached and operated without problems (noquenches).
• The accuracy of the power supplies’ controllers and the electrical and thermal longterm stability during “pulses” of up to 8 hours as well as the reproducibility are wellwithin the specification.
• Slow and fast discharges of the coil circuits were performed in the expectedmanner. The cryo plant is able to manage the amount of gas, but need up to oneday to recover.
• The displacement and the stresses in coils and support elements are far belowany critical limit and in good agreement with the FE calculations.
• There are no signs of too high resistances of the joints.
• The magnet system commissioning took 21days.
• The warm-up ran smoothly and without severe disturbances.
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
43
Magnet Commissioning results
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 43
The cool down ran smoothly. The mass flow and its distribution was successfullyadjusted. The thermal insulation is working well.
The Quench detection system was successfully adjusted and is working stable.
The several levels of the current were reached and operated without problems (no
The accuracy of the power supplies’ controllers and the electrical and thermal longterm stability during “pulses” of up to 8 hours as well as the reproducibility are well
Slow and fast discharges of the coil circuits were performed in the expectedplant is able to manage the amount of gas, but need up to one
The displacement and the stresses in coils and support elements are far belowany critical limit and in good agreement with the FE calculations.
There are no signs of too high resistances of the joints.
The magnet system commissioning took 21days.
up ran smoothly and without severe disturbances.
W7-X Commissioning
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
Lessons learnedØCommissioning in parallel to assembly induces additional
efforts, but is not an unsolvable problem.ØPaper work for preparing the commissioning is tedious but
mandatory.ØFor complex commissioning tasks, a trial run has proven to be
very important.ØFor preparation of commissioning, also the peripheral systems
have to be monitored and coordinated in detail (time issue).ØChanges in the sequence or additional tests require much
more organizational effort compared to the component tests.Ø Issues during Magnet system commissioning came not from
the magnets, but from periphery !ØProposal for improvement: Use the power supply, quench
detection, magnet safety system, and cryo plant already forthe cold test of the magnets. For large and heavy magnets thiswould pose also handling and transportation advantages.
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
44
Commissioning
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 44
Commissioning in parallel to assembly induces additional
Paper work for preparing the commissioning is tedious but
For complex commissioning tasks, a trial run has proven to be
For preparation of commissioning, also the peripheral systemshave to be monitored and coordinated in detail (time issue).Changes in the sequence or additional tests require muchmore organizational effort compared to the component tests.Issues during Magnet system commissioning came not from
Proposal for improvement: Use the power supply, quenchplant already for
the cold test of the magnets. For large and heavy magnets thiswould pose also handling and transportation advantages.
Just a reminder:The successful commissioning ofthe magnets is not the end, it is thebegin of the commissioning for theintended use of the machine….
First Plasma, December 10, 2015
W7-X Summary
§ A competent project team must be set up prior to design completion, componentspecification, and start of procurement. Any lack in the work done at this stage willcreate dramatically higher efforts, in cost and time, later in the project.
§ There must be five to ten persons in the project that know the machine from a − z.Clear project structures and responsibilities are mandatory. Matrix structures shouldbe avoided wherever possible.
§ As time goes by: the total duration of the project from first application 1990 until firstplasma in 2015 created unexpected loss of (design) knowledge during therealization. Future projects might even exceed the professional lifetime of the crewmembers. An active recruitment management to have a proportional mix of the agescould be a way out (the better way would be to shorten the duration of projects…).
§ “Margin can only be replaced by more margin!” A lack of generous margins,clearances, and reasonable tolerance levels implies uncontrolled and unnecessaryincrease of complexity and frequent changes. This has a strong impact on time,costs, and manpower demands (and potentially sours the relationship to fundingbodies). Margins should be an essential part of the design, should reserved as longas possible and spent only in case repairs are not possible.
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
45
Summary
A competent project team must be set up prior to design completion, componentspecification, and start of procurement. Any lack in the work done at this stage willcreate dramatically higher efforts, in cost and time, later in the project.
There must be five to ten persons in the project that know the machine from a − z.Clear project structures and responsibilities are mandatory. Matrix structures should
As time goes by: the total duration of the project from first application 1990 until firstplasma in 2015 created unexpected loss of (design) knowledge during therealization. Future projects might even exceed the professional lifetime of the crewmembers. An active recruitment management to have a proportional mix of the agescould be a way out (the better way would be to shorten the duration of projects…).
“Margin can only be replaced by more margin!” A lack of generous margins,clearances, and reasonable tolerance levels implies uncontrolled and unnecessaryincrease of complexity and frequent changes. This has a strong impact on time,costs, and manpower demands (and potentially sours the relationship to fundingbodies). Margins should be an essential part of the design, should reserved as longas possible and spent only in case repairs are not possible.
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 45
W7-X Summary
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
- The superconducting magnet system is the technical heart of themachine.
- It’s procurement and assembly was running nearly over the wholeconstruction period of the machine from 1998 until 2013.
- A number of important lessons had to be learned by all (!) partners.
- Wendelstein 7-X magnets turned into a success story: At the end themagnet system was produced, assembled and commissioned successfully.
- Thanks to the intensive tests in advance, the commissioning wasperformed without substantial problems.
- Meanwhile the magnet system is in regular operation. Two plasmaoperation campaigns of Wendelstein 7
- The preparation for the third campaign has just been started with thebeginning of the cool down last Friday.
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
46
Summary
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 46
The superconducting magnet system is the technical heart of the
It’s procurement and assembly was running nearly over the wholeconstruction period of the machine from 1998 until 2013.
A number of important lessons had to be learned by all (!) partners.
X magnets turned into a success story: At the end themagnet system was produced, assembled and commissioned successfully.
Thanks to the intensive tests in advance, the commissioning wasperformed without substantial problems.
Meanwhile the magnet system is in regular operation. Two plasmaoperation campaigns of Wendelstein 7-X were successfully completed.
The preparation for the third campaign has just been started with thebeginning of the cool down last Friday.
W7-X
5th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018Th. Rummel
Thank you !
Special thanks for their contribution to this presentation:Konrad Riße, Hans-Stephan Bosch, Kerstin Rummel, Andre John, Walter H. Fietz, Reinhard Heller, Reinhard K. Maix,Harald Fillunger, Holger Viebke, Hartmut Ehmler, Olaf Neubauer, Thomas Mönnich, Tamara Andreeva, Johann Kißlinger,Mathias Köppen, Torsten Bräuer, and many more
Max-Planck-Institutfür Plasmaphysik
475th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop, Daejeon, May 2018 47
Thank you !
Stephan Bosch, Kerstin Rummel, Andre John, Walter H. Fietz, Reinhard Heller, Reinhard K. Maix,Harald Fillunger, Holger Viebke, Hartmut Ehmler, Olaf Neubauer, Thomas Mönnich, Tamara Andreeva, Johann Kißlinger,