Lessons in Knowledge Management: Unified coding structure Instructions for use of Landscape Study...
-
Upload
bathsheba-hood -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Lessons in Knowledge Management: Unified coding structure Instructions for use of Landscape Study...
Lessons in Knowledge Management:Unified coding structure
Instructions for use of Landscape Study coding on ATLAS.ti for
Colombia in-depth study
Purpose
The following tutorial was designed for researchers working on Colombia Public Access study.
--After completing this tutorial, participants will understand
the coding logic of the Global Landscape study.--
Researchers will be able create a coding structure that is modeled after the Global Landscape study.
How are codes organized?
• 81 Unique codes• Each Code has 3 components:
1. Symbol or identifier (LC1)2. Sub-category (‘Staff Capacity’)3. Description of the code (‘Digital literacy of
operator’)EX: ‘LC1 Staff Capacity: Digital literacy of operator’
*For a complete table of all codes and their definitions, click here.
Symbol or Identifier
• Put in place to organize codes alpha-numerically within ATLAS.ti
• Distinguish codes based on three venue types (Library, Cybercafe, Telecenter)
• Distinguish codes based on three categories (Access, Capacity, Environment)
Code Structure
3 Examples:
• Operators’ attitude to support information needs
LC1: Staff Capacity
• Popular Support to improve venuesTE6: Support
• Appropriateness of Technology
CA7: Technology
Access
Venue Types
Library Cybercafe Telecenter
Categories
Access Capacity Environment
Access – Subcategories
Physical Access Suitability
Affordability Technology Access
Return to ACE Framework
Capacity - Subcategories
Staff Capacity User Perception
Local Needs Appropriation
Return to ACE Framework
Environment – Subcategories
Socio-cultural factors Discrimination
Regulation Support
Return to ACE Framework
Physical Access
A1: Basic infrastructure
A2: Hours of operation
Return to Access Page
Suitability
A3: Venue meets local needs and conditions
A4: Venue as a place people want to go
Return to Access Page
Affordability
A5: Cost in relation to daily needs
Return to Access Page
Technology Access
A6: Basic infrastructure
A7: Appropriateness of technology
Return to Access Page
Staff Capacity
C1: Digital literacy of operator
C2: Operators’ attitude to support information needs
Click to return to Capacity Page
User Perception
C3: Perception of venue
C4: Trust information in venue
Click to return to Capacity Page
Local Needs
C5: Local needs are met
C6: Locally relevant needs
C7: Sharing between venues
C8: Venue integration into culture
Click to return to Capacity Page
Appropriation
C9: Venue integration into culture
Click to return to Capacity Page
Socio-Cultural Factors
E1: Socio-cultural factors
Click to return to Environment Page
Discrimination
E2: Gender
E3: Ethnicity or race
Click to return to Environment Page
Regulation
E4: Political will for venues
E5: Use/censorship of materials
Click to return to Environment Page
Support
E6: Popular support for venues
E7: Involved stakeholders
E8: Champion for the cause
Click to return to Environment Page
Putting it all together
AccessCA1 Physical Access: Basic Infrastructure
CA2 Physical Access: Hours of operation
CA3 Suitability: Venue meets local needs and conditions
CA4 Suitability: Venue as a place people want to go
CA5 Affordability: Cost in relation todaily needs
CA6 Technology Access: Basic Infrastructure
CA7 Technology Access: Appropriateness of Technology
CapacityCC1 Staff Capacity: Digital literacy of operatorCC2 Staff Capacity: Operators' attitude to support information needsCC3 User Perception: Perception of venueCC4 User Perception: Trust information in venueCC5 Local Needs: Local needs are metCC6 Local Needs: Locally relevant needsCC7 Local Needs: Sharing between venuesCC8 Local Needs: Locally relevant contentCC9 Appropriation: Venue integration into Culture
Environment
CE1 Socio-cultural factors
CE2 Discrimination: Gender
CE3 Discrimination: Ethnicity or race
CE4 Regulation: Political will for venues
CE5 Regulation: Use/censorship of materials
CE6 Support: Popular support to improve venues
CE7 Support: Involved stakeholders
CE8 Support: Champion for the cause
Codes for CYBERCAFE
Review
• Basic infrastructureCA1: Physical Access
• CYBERCAFEC
• ACCESSA
Sub-Category and Variable
Definition of variable
ACCESS Composite – see summary per venue
Physical Access: Basic infrastructure
Is venue space adequate and sufficient to offer the necessary services?
Physical Access: Hours of operation
Are the hours of operation of the venue convenient for the users? Or does it preclude certain users from accessing the venue?
Suitability: Venue meets local needs and conditions
Does the venue meet basic local information needs and services?
Suitability: Venue as a place people want to go
Do people perceive the venue as a place they want to go? Is the venue welcoming?
Affordability: Cost in relation to daily needs
Given the average income, etc. of the people, is the cost of using the venue proportionately affordable?
Technology Access: Basic infrastructure (electricity)
Is there sufficient electricity/alternate power source for the venue to continuously function?
Technology Access: Appropriateness of technology
Is the available technology suitable to meet local needs?
CAPACITY Composite – see summary per venueStaff capacity: Digital literacy of operator
The ability to use digital technology, communication tools, or networks to locate, evaluate, use and create information
Staff capacity: Operators' attitude to support information needs
Is the venue operator willing to help users find what they need?
Users Perception: Users perception of venue
How is the venue perceived by its users?
Users Perception: Users trust information in the venue
Do people trust the information gathered from the venue?
Local Needs: Local needs are met (resources, skills, & info)
Does the venue meet local needs in terms of resources available, skills and staff capacity?
Local Needs: Locally relevant content
Is the content offered in the library locally relevant?
Local Needs: Info available in local languages
Is content produced in local languages available in the venue?
Local Needs: Sharing between venues
Do different venues collaborate with each other on resources, training, etc. (libraries, cybercafes and telecentres)?
Appropriation: Venue integration into culture
How easy or difficult is it for people to integrate libraries into their daily lives?
RETURN TO LAST SLIDE
Sub-Category and Variable Definition of variable
ENVIRONMENT Composite – see summary per venue
SOCIO-CULTURAL FACTORS
Composite
Discrimination: Gender Are there biases against anyone in the following six categories based upon the listed factors
Discrimination: Ethnicity or race
Regulation: Political will for venues
Is there support among policy makers for the venue?
Regulation: Use/censorship of materials (including ICT) in venues
Are there any explicit censorship rules that prohibit use of certain materials/services (excluding the social and popular norms that govern information behaviour)?
Support: Popular support to improve venues (including ICT)
Do the venues (including the ICT they provide) enjoy popular support?
Support: Involved stakeholders including NGOs, civil society, community organizations, etc.)
Are there any other stakeholders such as NGOs, civil society organizations, etc. that are involved with the venues?
Support: Champion for the cause
Is there a particular champion for the cause of any of the venues? E.g. first lady in Egypt is a champion of libraries
Sub-Category and Variable
Definition of variable