LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video...

70
LESSON TWO

Transcript of LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video...

Page 1: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWO

Page 2: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

Is There Any

Evidence for a

Creator in the

Universe?By Claude LeBlanc, M.A., © Magis Center, 2016

LESSON TWO

Page 3: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOOpening Prayer

Father, you give us the ability to learn

about the world you created. Through

our senses we experience the things

you made; and through our minds,

how they came to be and why they

exist. As we learn more about your

creation, may we come to know you

better. Amen.

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 4: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOPre-Viewing Questions

1) Is there any evidence for a Creator in

the Universe?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 5: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOPre-Viewing Questions

1) Is there any evidence for a Creator in

the Universe?

2) Do you think God’s existence can be proven, or at least supported, by

science?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 6: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

The REASON Series LESSON TWO

Supplemental Video 1: The Expanding Universe (Watch at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3I37enbWROo)

Page 7: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

“So, it’s quite simple really. Follow the clues and we can

deduce that a very long time

ago the universe simply

burst into existence.”From Stephen Hawking’s

“The Expanding Universe”

LESSON TWO

Page 8: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOPre-Viewing Questions

3) Stephen Hawking’s video said, “We

can deduce that a very long time ago

the universe simply burst into existence.” Do you believe a universe, or any reality,

could suddenly bring itself into

existence…from nothing?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 9: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWO

Watch Video

Episode Two:

Is There Any

Evidence for a

Creator in the

Universe?, taking

notes on Handout

2a—Video Review

and Discussion.Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 10: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOActivity

BIG BANG BALLOONS

Directions

1) Each pair of students

gets a balloon and a

permanent marker.

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 11: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOActivity

BIG BANG BALLOONS

Directions

1) Each pair of students

gets a balloon and a

permanent marker.

2) Place dots on balloon as in the video.

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 12: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOActivity

BIG BANG BALLOONS

Directions

1) Each pair of students

gets a balloon and a

permanent marker.

2) Place dots on balloon as in the video.

3) Blow up balloon, hold it without tying

it. Discuss expansion of the universe.

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 13: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOActivity

BIG BANG BALLOONS

Directions

1) Each pair of students

gets a balloon and a

permanent marker.

2) Place dots on balloon as in the video.

3) Blow up balloon, hold it without tying

it. Discuss expansion of the universe.

4) Deflate balloon slowly. Discuss time

limit for deflation and BB implications.Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 14: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

1. What does Tyler say science can do to

any proof for God’s existence developed from philosophy, and what evidence

does he use to support his claim?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 15: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

1. What does Tyler say science can do to

any proof for God’s existence developed from philosophy, and what evidence

does he use to support his claim?

He claims “There’s no evidence for God that

can’t be explained away by science,” but gives no evidence to support this.T

he

RE

AS

ON

Se

rie

s

Page 16: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

2. What does it mean that “before the universe existed it was nothing?”

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 17: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

2. What does it mean that “before the universe existed it was nothing?”Before the Big Bang there was no time,

space, matter, or energy. The physical

universe was essentially NOTHING.

(continued)

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 18: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

2. (cont.) If the

universe was

nothing, it could not

have made itself

into something.

Something outside

of it had to move it

from nothing to

something.Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 19: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

3. What can we learn from philosophy

about what is required for things to exist?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 20: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

3. What can we learn from philosophy

about what is required for things to exist?

Logically, we know that nothing comes

from nothing. That means that, through

cause and effect, everything that exists

in the universe comes from something

else. Given that the universe had a

beginning, prior to which it was nothing,

it too must have been caused by

something outside of it. (continued)

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 21: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

3. (cont.) Furthermore, there must be

at least one uncaused cause or being,

because, as Aristotle showed about

2,400 years ago, all of reality cannot

be caused beings. Why? (continued)

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 22: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

3. (cont.) Why? Because:

a. Caused beings are nothing before

they are caused, and

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 23: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

3. (cont.) Why? Because:

a. Caused beings are nothing before

they are caused, and

b. If all the causes are nothing before

they are caused,

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 24: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

3. (cont.) Why? Because:

a. Caused beings are nothing before

they are caused, and

b. If all the causes are nothing before

they are caused,

c. Then all there would be is nothing at

all (zero times infinity is still zero).

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 25: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

4. Even though his theory

of relativity had predicted

the universe was

expanding, why didn’t Einstein want to believe it?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 26: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

4. Even though his theory

of relativity had predicted

the universe was

expanding, why didn’t Einstein want to believe it?

He wanted to believe that the universe

had always existed in a steady state,

neither expanding nor contracting. He

believed that an expanding universe was

too disordered and difficult to believe.Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 27: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

5. What contribution

did Fr. Georges Lemaitre

make in convincing

Einstein the universe

was expanding?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 28: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

5. What contribution

did Fr. Georges Lemaitre

make in convincing

Einstein the universe

was expanding?

Lemaitre formulated

the Big Bang Theory in

response to a problem

related to Einstein’s theory of relativity.T

he

RE

AS

ON

Se

rie

s

Page 29: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

6. What contribution did Edwin Hubble

make in convincing Einstein the universe

was expanding?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 30: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

6. What contribution did Edwin Hubble

make in convincing Einstein the universe

was expanding?

Hubble showed

Einstein

observational

evidence that

the universe

was expanding.

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 31: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

7. What was the result of Lemaitre’s mathematics and Hubble’s evidence?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 32: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

7. What was the result of Lemaitre’s mathematics and Hubble’s evidence?Einstein accepted the Big Bang Theory.

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 33: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

8. What is some of the other evidence for

the Big Bang that science has discovered?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 34: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

8. What is some of the other evidence for

the Big Bang that science has discovered?

We have discovered :

a. Microwave Background Radiation

equally distributed all over the universe,

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 35: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

8. What is some of the other evidence for

the Big Bang that science has discovered?

We have discovered :

a. Microwave Background Radiation

equally distributed all over the universe,

b. the age of the universe (about 13.8

billion years), and

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 36: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

8. What is some of the other evidence for

the Big Bang that science has discovered?

We have discovered :

a. Microwave Background Radiation

equally distributed all over the universe,

b. the age of the universe (about 13.8

billion years), and

c. how much matter there must be in the

universe, and what kind of matter it is.Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 37: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

9. Though most physicists believe the

universe started with the Big Bang, why

don’t all of them?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 38: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

9. Though most physicists believe the

universe started with the Big Bang, why

don’t all of them?Some don’t believe the Big Bang was the beginning, but they hypothesize a pre-Big

Bang period (for

which there is

currently no

evidence).

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 39: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

10. What do these other physicists think

are better explanations for the existence

of our universe?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 40: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

10. What do these other physicists think

are better explanations for the existence

of our universe?

There may have been something that

existed before the Big Bang, such as a

multiverse that the universe came from,

or that our universe is an oscillating, or

bouncing, universe that expands and

contracts over and over again.

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 41: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

11. What evidence do these

physicists use to support

their beliefs?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 42: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

11. What evidence do these

physicists use to support

their beliefs?

There is NO evidence for

any of these theories. They

are based on speculation.

Even if there is a multiverse

or bouncing universe, they

would have to have a

beginning (BVG theorem).Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 43: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

12. How do these scientists’ beliefs in speculative theories compare to Einstein’s belief in the steady state theory.

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 44: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

12. How do these scientists’ beliefs in speculative theories compare to Einstein’s belief in the steady state theory.

They give credence to assumptions not

proven, leading either

to retractions when

evidence becomes

available (like Einstein),

or continued rejection of

the evidence causing more confusion.Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 45: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

13. What is the BVG Theorem?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

B

V

GTHEOREM

Page 46: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

13. What is the BVG Theorem?

In 2003, Arvind Borde,

Alexander Vilenkin, and Alan

Guth devised a proof that was

named after them. It has only

one requirement—that the

average rate of expansion of

any possible universe be

greater than zero.

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

B

V

GTHEOREM

Page 47: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

14. What does the BVG Theorem suggest

about speculative theories of the universe?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 48: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

14. What does the BVG Theorem suggest

about speculative theories of the universe?

It means our universe, and any multiverse

it may be a part of, require a beginning

and therefore, is very difficult to refute. If

the purpose of a speculative theory is to

‘get around’ the beginning, and a

Creator, it most

probably won’t.Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 49: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

15. What is the significance

of Dr. Vilenkin’s statement, “Inflation without a beginning is impossible.”

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 50: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

15. What is the significance

of Dr. Vilenkin’s statement,

“Inflation without a beginning is impossible.”As long as the average

rate of expansion is

greater than zero, any kind

of universe must have a

beginning, implying they

were created. (continued)Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 51: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOVideo Comprehension

15. (cont.) He uses the word ‘impossible’ because his conclusion is derived from a

proof, and if one denies the conclusion to

a proof, one is confronted with an intrinsic

contradiction in logic, which is impossible.

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 52: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOSmall Group Activity:

Share your thoughts

about these Reflection

and Discussion

Questions then share

them with the class.

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 53: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOSmall Group Activity:

Share your thoughts

about these Reflection

and Discussion

Questions then share

them with the class.

1) What do you think of the claim that

philosophy can prove that there must be an

eternally-existing being outside of the

universe? Why?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 54: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOSmall Group Activity (continued)

2) Why do you think some scientists reject

the evidence for the Big Bang, but accept the

speculative competing theories?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 55: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOSmall Group Activity (continued)

2) Why do you think some scientists reject

the evidence for the Big Bang, but accept the

speculative competing theories?

3) What is the real significance of the BVG

Theorem to science and faith?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 56: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOSmall Group Activity (continued)

2) Why do you think some scientists reject

the evidence for the Big Bang, but accept the

speculative competing theories?

3) What is the real significance of the BVG

Theorem to science and faith?

4) Have you ever been biased, not accepting

evidence that is verifiable while holding onto

beliefs that are not? What did it take (or

would it take) for you to finally accept the

evidence in the way Einstein did?Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 57: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOAssessment of Understanding

(Match the scientist with their contribution)

1) Albert Einstein

2) Alan Guth, Alexander Vilenkin, Arvind

Borde

3) Edwin Hubble

4) Fr. Georges Lemaitre

a) Formulated the Big Bang Theory.

b) Contributed to the BVG Theorem.

c) Developed the general theory of relativity.

d) Found evidence the universe is expanding.

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 58: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOAssessment of Understanding

(Match the scientist with their contribution)

1) Albert Einstein

2) Alan Guth, Alexander Vilenkin, and

Arvind Borde

3) Edwin Hubble

4) Fr. Georges Lemaitre

a) Formulated the Big Bang Theory.

b) Contributed to the BVG Theorem.

c) Developed the general theory of relativity.

d) Found evidence the universe is expanding.

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 59: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOAssessment of Understanding

(Modified True or False—if a statement is

false, change it to make it true)

5) Philosophy demonstrates there has to be

an eternally-existing being or nothing else

could exist.

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 60: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOAssessment of Understanding

(Modified True or False—if a statement is

false, change it to make it true)

5) Philosophy demonstrates there has to be

an eternally-existing being or nothing else

could exist.

6) While the evidence for the Big Bang is only

speculative, there is much evidence for

competing theories

such as bouncing

universes or the multiverse.Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 61: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOAssessment of Understanding

7) Scientists are always unbiased in

evaluating scientific evidence.

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 62: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOAssessment of Understanding

7) Scientists are always unbiased in

evaluating scientific evidence.

8) The BVG Theorem has only one condition

for proving a universe would have a

beginning; that is has a rate of expansion

greater than zero.

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 63: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOAssessment of Understanding

7) Scientists are always unbiased in

evaluating scientific evidence.

8) The BVG Theorem has only one condition

for proving a universe would have a

beginning; that is has a rate of expansion

greater than zero.

9) The significance of the BVG Theorem is

that any possible universe we can imagine

would have to be expanding and have a

beginning.Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 64: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOAssessment of

Understanding

10) This episode

of The Reason

Series concludes

that Tyler was

right—science

can disprove any

proof for the

existence of God

from philosophy.

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 65: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

The REASON Series LESSON TWO

Supplemental Video 2:The Universe Has A Cause—Evidence for a Creator

(Watch at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CulBuMCLg0)

Page 66: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

“The Cosmological Argument shows that,

in fact, it is quite

reasonable to believe

that God does exist. From “The Universe Has a Cause—

Evidence for a Creator”

LESSON TWO

Page 67: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOSo, what does all this MEAN for you?

The video said, The cause of the

Universe must be, “spaceless, timeless,

immaterial, uncaused, and unimaginably

powerful…in other words, God.” If we

can know so much about God, then why

are so many losing faith in Him?

Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 68: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOAdditional Activities (for class or home)

Your teacher may assign one or both of these

activities due the next class session:

Handout 2b:

What Caused Aristotle

to Consider an

Uncaused Cause?

Handout 2c: Vilenkin’s Response to Hawking:

The Worst Present Ever!Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 69: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

LESSON TWOClosing Prayer

Dear God, through science, you have

given us the ability to learn that the

universe had a beginning, and

through philosophy, that it couldn't

make itself, meaning it was created.

May we always be open to truth,

whether it comes from science or

philosophy, but most of all because it

comes from you. Amen.Th

e R

EA

SO

NS

eri

es

Page 70: LESSON TWO - Magis Center › ... › 07 › TRS_Lesson2_Presentation.pdfLESSON TWO Video Comprehension 2. (cont.) If the universe was nothing, it could not have made itself into something.

SEE YOU NEXT TIME!