Ledolter & Hogg: Applied Statistics Section 6.2: Other Inferences in One-Factor Experiments (ANOVA,...
-
Upload
robyn-beasley -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Ledolter & Hogg: Applied Statistics Section 6.2: Other Inferences in One-Factor Experiments (ANOVA,...
Ledolter & Hogg: Applied StatisticsSection 6.2: Other Inferences in
One-Factor Experiments(ANOVA, continued)
1
Completely Randomized Experiment:Fixed effects model
• k treatment groups• Experimental units assigned to treatments at
random.• Thus samples from each treatment group
are independent.• Assume each treatment group has a mean
and distribution of response about mean follows normal distribution.
• (Here) assume equal variance within each treatment group.
2
Null hypothesis: all treatment means equalWhat if reject null hypothesis?
Section 6.2-1: Reference Distribution• t-distribution with d.f. with unknown mean
and estimated s.d. • Approximate • Analyze group means graphically by sliding
reference distribution along axis• Hypothesis test graphically using sliding
CI: 3
Reference Distribution (continued)
• Text example: p. 349• Treatment means: • CI: • Can place CI to include means (B) and (C)
but can’t place CI to include all means• Hence F statistic will show a significant
difference between means: reject null hypothesis that all means same
4
Section 6.2-2: Confidence IntervalFor a particular difference
But so CI for is
Recall: if zero in CI then treatment means are (probably) not significantly different.But there is a problem!
5
Section 6.2-2: Confidence IntervalFor a particular difference
• This procedure only works for one confidence interval.
• Particular difference should have been selected prior to experiment.
• Creating multiple CI based on same data will increase probability of error somewhere.
• What to do?
6
Bonferroni method (not in text)
• Perform one test at significance level • Perform multiple independent tests by
“allocating” between all tests• Thus perform m independent tests, each at
level • This method is very conservative: too many
tests will result in almost never rejecting null hypothesis.
7
Section 6.2-3: Tukey to the rescue!
Tukey’s Multiple-Comparison Procedurea.k.a.
Tukey’s Honest Significance Difference Test
• Calculate confidence interval uses Studentized Range distributioninstead of t-distribution (see Table C.8, p.574)
8
Confidence Interval using Tukey HSD
where
Example 6.2-2 (p. 351) (using R) diff lwr upr p adjB-A -7 -10.393648 -3.606352 0.0001683C-A -5 -8.393648 -1.606352 0.0040464C-B 2 -1.627963 5.627963 0.3560072
9
Fixed effects model vsRandom effects model (Section 6.2-5)
• k treatment groups (both models)• Fixed effects model: k is fixed. Results
can’t be extended to include other treatments. (Why?) Group means are fixed but unknown.
• Random effects model: k represents a sample of “treatments” (e.g. batches) Group means are a random variable
10
Random effects model (continued)
• How to distinguish fixed effects model from random effects model?• Observations are sample of larger
population• Observations are not randomly assigned
to batches• Note that estimate of may be negative.
What does this mean?• Batch model often has all sample sizes
equal (slightly simplifies calculation)12