Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

download Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

of 35

Transcript of Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    1/35

    Lecture #13

    The Analysis of a Single Pile

    - Load Transfer Theor ies

    - Static Analysis

    - Dynamic Analysis

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    2/35

    Introduction:

    Pile foundations have been in use since prehistoric times. The Neolithic inhabitants of

    Switzerland drove wooden poles in the soft bottoms of shallow lakes 12,000 years ago and

    erected their homes on them (Sowers 1979). Venice was built on timber piles in the

    marshy delta of the Po River to protect early Italians from the invaders of EasternEurope and at the same time enable them to be close to the sea and their source of

    livelihood. In Venezuela, the Indians lived in pile-supported huts in lagoons around the

    shores of Lake Maracaibo. Today, pile foundations serve the same purpose: to make it

    possible to build in areas where the soil conditions are unfavorable for shallow

    foundations.

    The commonest function of piles is to transfer a load that cannot be adequately

    supported at shallow depths to a depth where adequate support becomes available.

    When a pile passes through poor material and its tip penetrates a small distance into a

    stratum of good bearing capacity, it is called a bearing pile(Figure 1a). When piles are

    installed in a deep stratum of limited supporting ability and these piles develop their

    carrying capacity by friction on the sides of the pile, they are called fr iction piles(Figure

    1b). Many times the load-carrying capacity of piles results from a combination of points

    resistance and skin friction. The load taken by a single pile can be determined by a static

    load test. The allowable load is obtained by applying a factor of safety to the failure load.

    Although it is expensive, a static load test is the only reliable means of determining

    allowable load on a friction pile.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    3/35

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    4/35

    Different uses of piles: (a) bearing pile, (b) friction pile, (c) piles under uplift.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    5/35

    (d) piles under lateral loads, (e) batter piles under lateral loads.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    6/35

    Transfer of L oad.

    The way that the load from a column transfers into the soil through the pile has evolved

    during the past fifty years, from Terzaghi at the extreme left figure, through to Prieto

    (1978) on the extreme right.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    7/35

    Tension pil esare used to resist moment in tall structures and upward forces (Figure 1c),

    and in structures subject to uplift, such as building with basements below the

    groundwater level, or buried tanks. For piles under tension both in sands and clays, the

    bearing capacity at the tip is lost. For piles of uniform diameter in sands, the ultimate

    uplift capacity is made up of the shaft resistance and the weight of the pile.

    Laterall y loaded pil essupport loads applied on an angle with the axis of the pile in

    foundations subject to horizontal forces such as retaining structures (Figure 1d and e). If

    the piles are installed at an angle with the vertical, these are called batter pil es(Figure

    1e).

    Dynamic load may act on piles during earthquakes and under machine foundations.

    During pile driving, the resistance to penetration is a dynamic resistance. When a pile

    foundation is loaded by a building, the resistance to penetration is a static resistance. Both

    the dynamic resistance and the static resistance are generally composed of point resistance

    and skin friction. However in some soils, the magnitudes of the dynamic and static

    resistance may not be quite similar. In spite of this difference, frequent use is made ofestimates of dynamic resistance by dynamic formulas and the wave equation for the load

    capacity of the pile. Therefore, we also describe an understanding soil action during

    loading.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    8/35

    The Behavior of Soils Around a Dr iven Pi le.

    The effect of pile is reflected in remolding the soil around the pile. Sands and clays

    respond to pile driving differently. First, we describe the behavior of clays and then the

    behavior of sands.

    Clays.

    The effects of pile driving in clays are listed in four major categories:

    1. Remolding or disturbance to structure of the soil surrounding the pile

    2. Changes of the state of stress in the soil in the vicinity of the pile

    3. Dissipation of the excess pore pressure developed around the pile4. Long term phenomena of strength regain in the soil

    The essential difference between the actions of piles under dynamic and static loading is

    the fact that clays show pronounced time effects, and hence the show the greatest

    difference between dynamic and static action. These effects may be mechanistically

    described as follow.

    Let us consider piles driven into a deep deposit of a soft impervious saturated clay. Since

    a pile has a volume of many cubic feet, an equal volume of clay must be displaced when

    the pile is driven.

    The pile-driving operations may cause the following changes in the clay:

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    9/35

    The soil may be pushed laterally from its original position BCDE to BCDE (Figure 2)

    or from FGHJ to FGHJ. If the clay has strength which is lost on disturbance, then

    relatively small amount of skin friction exist during driving. Since the pile is being driven

    into a saturated impervious clay, the ground surface nay heave considerably because of

    the displaced volume of clay. This movement may have a significant effect on adjacent

    structures. The piles driven earlier in a multiple-pile installation may heave during thedriving of the later piles. If heave of adjacent structures and/or of the piles already

    installed is to be avoided, bored piles are sometimes used.

    The displacement and distortion of soil caused by a pile during driving.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    10/35

    Sands

    A pile in sand is usually installed by driving. The vibrations from driving a pile in sand

    have two effects:

    1. Densify the sand, and2. Increase the value of lateral pressure around the pile.

    Penetration tests results in a sand prior to pile driving and after pile driving indicate

    significant densification of the sand for distances as large as eight diameters away from

    the center of the pile. Increasing the density results in an increase in friction angle.

    Driving of a pile displaces soil laterally and thus increases the horizontal stress acting onthe pile. For example, according to Meyerhof (1951) based on analysis of field data the

    horizontal stress on pile driven in sand is,

    s h = 0.5 sv for loose sand

    s h

    = 0.1 sv

    for dense sand

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    11/35

    Group Action of Pi les.

    Piles are driven in groups at a spacing ranging from 3 to 4Bwhere Bis the diameter

    or side of a pile. The behavior of piles in a group may be quite different than that of a

    single pile if the piles are friction piles. This difference may not be so marked in bearingpiles.

    A typical bearing pile usually penetrates a short distance into the soil stratum of good

    bearing capacity, and the pile transfers its load to the soil in a small pressure bulb

    below the pile tip (Figure 3a). If the stratum in which the piles are embedded and all

    strata below it have ample bearing capacity, each pile of the group is capable of carryingessentially the same load as that carried by a single piles. If compressible soils exist below

    the pile tips, the settlement of the pile group may be much greater than the settlement

    observed in the single pile tests, although the bearing pressure may be smaller than the

    allowable value. This is due to the overlap of the zones of increased stress below the tip of

    the bearing piles and the pile group is likely to act as a unit (Figure 3b). The total stress

    shown by the heavy lines may be several times greater than that under a single pile. Theeffective width of the group is several times that of a single pile. However, if the bearing

    stratum is essentially incompressible and there are no softer strata below the pile tips, the

    settlement of a group of bearing piles may be essentially equal to the settlements observed

    in loading tests on isolated piles. In this case, the piles may, if desired, be spaced about as

    closely as it is practicable to drive them.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    12/35

    Stress condition below tips of piles: (a) a single pile, (b) a group of piles.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    13/35

    Usually, friction piles are driven in groups, the spacing of piles being from 3 to 4B. A

    group of piles may fail under a load per pile less than the failure load of a single pile.

    The load carrying capacity of group of piles may be determine by considering failure

    along the perimeter of the pile groups.

    The load-carrying capacity of the friction pile groups in clay is smaller of the two:

    - The sum of the failure load of the individual piles or

    - The load carried as in group action and the failure as a pier along the perimeter.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    14/35

    Negative Skin Friction.

    If a pile is driven in a soft clay or recently placed fill and has its tip resting in a dense

    stratum (Figure 4), the settlement of both the pile and the soft clay or fill is taking place

    after the pile has been driven and loaded. During and immediately after driving, aportion of the load is resisted by adhesion of soft soil with pile (Figure 4a). But, as

    consolidation of the soft clay proceeds, it transmits all the load onto the tip of the pile.

    In case of a fill, the settlement of the fill may be greater than that of the pile. In the

    initial stages of consolidation of the fill, it transmit all the load resisted by adhesion onto

    the tip of the pile. A further settlement results in a downward drag on the pile. It isknown as negative skin fr iction(Figure 4b). Both these cases should be recognized in

    the field in the design of bearing piles. When this condition occurs, the pile must be

    capable of supporting the soil weight as well as all other loads that the pile is designed to

    carry. Also, if fill is to be placed around an existing pile foundation, the ability of the

    piles to carry the added load should be thoroughly investigated.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    15/35

    Piles in a soft soil overlying a dense strata: (a) Skin friction immediately and during piledriving, (b) negative skin friction afterwards.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    16/35

    Equations for estimating the static pile capacity:

    Meyerhofs Method: Qp= Ap q Nq

    Vesics Method: Qp= Ap (c Nc + o N)

    Janbus Method: Qp= Ap (cNc + qNq)

    Coyle and Castellos: Qp= q Nq Ap

    Nordlund Method: Qu= Rs + Rt

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    17/35

    Q ult

    rsh

    rt

    Static Analysis.

    Disregarding the weight of soil displaced versus the new concrete and/or steel

    introduced, the ultimate pile load Qul tis,

    tip bearing shaft frictionQul t = A tx rt + Ashx rsh

    In granular soils, the laterally displaced material

    compacts the soil around the shaft. Therefore,

    Qul t

    =(ox N

    q) x A

    t+(Kx

    ox tan) x A

    sh

    i

    where o

    is the effective stress at each level

    considered,

    K( for driven piles) is 1.00 to 2.5, K( for shafts) is 0.25to 0.70 (that is, loose to dense) and

    = for in-situ shafts

    = 2/3 for driven concrete piles

    = 1/3 for driven steel piles

    where is the friction angle between the soil and the

    pile or the shaft.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    18/35

    Both rtand rshincrease with depth, but not indefinitely. They stabilize at a particular

    value at a depth that is approximately 20 pile diameters. Alternatively, the values for rtand rsh can be found from:

    rt = 5 Nq tan

    ( tons / m

    2

    )and rsh= rt

    11090705040a f

    15090703020Nq

    4036333028f

    >5030-5010-304-100-4N (S.P.T.)

    very dense sanddense

    sand

    medium

    sand

    loose

    sand

    very loose sandRelative density

    Parameter

    TABLE 1. Relationship betweenN(SPT) and for piles in sand.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    19/35

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    20/35

    Buckling of Piles.

    The buckling of fully embedded piles, under the influence of vertical loads only, appears

    to be rare. Long, unsupported lengths of timber and H-pile sections have been shown to

    be vulnerable to buckling failures. However, modern pile practices use very longunsupported lengths of piles for offshore structures; therefore, buckling of piles may

    become important.

    Two cases must be recognized. First, the pile is perfectly vertical and there is no

    eccentricity in the vertical load. These are ideal situations and may not be fully realized

    in practice. There is eccentricity both due to pile driving as well as due to vertical loadbeing not at the center of the section.

    However, when a lateral and a vertical load are applied simultaneously the deflections

    due to lateral loads result in automatic eccentricity of the vertical loads. Pile with large

    eccentricities tend to deflect laterally quite rapidly at low loads. The lateral deflection of

    the pile produces soil reactions which may exceed the bearing capacity of the soil.Slender piles sections have a low ultimate bearing capacity resistance because the

    bearing capacity is proportional to the pile width.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    21/35

    Dynamic analysis of pile capacity:

    1. The rational pile formula (the basic formula);

    2. The Danish formula;

    3. Eytelwein formula;

    4. Engineering News formula (the most used); and

    5. The Wave equation.

    Pile driving studies are required for effective design of constructible pile foundations.

    Perhaps the oldest method of estimating load capacity of driven piles is to use the

    dynamic formula. These formulae relate the measured permanent displacement of thepile at each blow of the hammer, to the pile capacity. They are considered outdated and

    seldom used today in pile capacity calculations. Load tests and the use of the wave

    equation are more reliable methods of measuring load capacity and are the most

    frequently used.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    22/35

    The Method of I nstallation.The traditional method of inserting piles into the ground is to use the various types of

    pile-driving hammers. Drop hammers, single acting hammers, double acting hammers,

    diesel hammers and vibratory pile drivers are the principal types of hammers that have

    been commonly used in the pile-driving industry.

    Drop Hammer. Drop hammers are weights which are raised and allowed to fall freely on

    the head of the pile. The hammer is controlled by guides during the fall in order to

    ensure axial and square impact. The manner in which the operator releases the hammer

    has an important effect on the velocity at impact, and thus on the effective energy

    delivered by the blow. Single-Acting Hammer. The single acting hammer uses steam orair pressure to raise the ram, which then falls under gravity imparting its blow to the

    head of the pile. Sufficient pres-sure must be supplied to raise the ram to the top of its

    stroke, and thus trip the valve. Energy can be reduced to meet special driving conditions

    by adjusting external valve slide bars. Double-acting hammer. Double acting hammers

    utilize steam or air to power both the up and down strokes of the hammer ram.

    Di ff erential acting hammer. Differential acting hammers use steam, air, or hydraulic

    pressure to raise and force down the ram. This type of ram differs from a double acting

    hammer in that on the down stroke the cylinder, both above and below the piston, is

    under equal pressure and the exhausts only on the upward stroke.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    23/35

    Diesel hammer. Diesel hammers consist of a cylinder or casing, ram, anvil block, and

    simple fuel injection system. To start the operation, the ram is raised in the field as

    fuel is injected near the anvil block, then the ram is released. As the ram falls, the air

    and fuel compress and become hot because of the compression: when the ram is near

    the anvil, the heat is sufficient to ignite the air -fuel mixture. The resulting

    explosion(1) advances the pile and (2) lifts the ram.

    Vibratory hammmer. The principle of the vibratory driver is two counter-rotating

    eccentric weights. The driver provides two vertical impulses of as much as 700 kN at

    amplitudes of 6 to 50 mm each revolution-one up and one down. The downward pulse

    acts as with the pile weight to increase the apparent gravity force. The pile insertion isaccomplished by the push-pull of the counter-rotating weights, which increases the

    pore water pressure to a point where the shear strength approaches zero; the soil in

    the immediate vicinity of the pile behaves as a viscous fluid.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    24/35

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    25/35

    Pile driving cushions.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    26/35

    The Dynamic Formulae.

    The driving formula are based on an energy balance between the input energy of the

    hammer and the work required to move the pile a small distance. Although the use of the

    driving formula is not common practice, the Hileyform of the equation is sometimesused in small projects. Even though it is a well known fact that the results of the dynamic

    formula are unreliable and their validity is a controversial subject, engineers use the

    formula as a quick reference or starting point to determine the pile capacity. The

    following examples illustrate how the formula are used.

    TABLE: Basic Pile-driving Formulas

    (Qv)b

    all = 2E/s+0.1(WD/W)(Qv)b,c

    all= 2WH/s+0.1(WD/W)

    (Qv)c

    all = 2WH/s+1

    (Qv)a

    all = 2E/s+0.1(Qv)a,c

    all = 2WH/s+0.1

    For Double-Acting HammerFor Single-Acting HammerFor Drop Hammer

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    27/35

    where,

    a Use when driven weights are smaller than striking weights;

    b Use when driven weights are larger than striking weights;

    c This is based on the most commonly used formula, known as the Engineering NewFormula;

    and,

    Qal l= allowable pile load in pounds;

    Wr= weight of striking parts of hammer (ram) in pounds;

    H= effective height of fall (of the ram) in pounds;

    E= actual energy delivered by the hammer per blow in foot-pounds;s= average net penetration in inches per blow for the last six inches of driving set; and

    WD= driven weights including piles.

    Since the appearance of the Engineering News formula in 1893, over 400 dynamic driving

    formulas have been proposed. Few have been proven useful, and only two will be

    considered as relevant here, the Hiley formula, proposed in 1930 and used considerablyin the United States, and the Janbu formula (1962), used extensively in Europe and

    adopted there as a standard in 1978. The original ENR formula of 1893 was developed

    for wood piles in sand using a simple drop hammer.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    28/35

    One simple and widely used pile-driving formula is known as the Engineering-News

    formula given by:

    Qal l= 2WrH

    2 + C

    or Qal l= 2E

    2 + C

    where Qal l= allowable pile capacity,

    Wr= weight of ram,

    H= height of fall of ram, ft.

    s= amount of pile penetration per blow, in./blowC= 1.0 for drop hammer

    C= 0.1 for steam hammer

    E= driving energy

    The Engineering-New formula given before has a built-in factor of 6. Tests have shown

    that this formula is not reliable for computing pile loads, and it should be avoided exceptas a rough guide.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    29/35

    Another pile-driven formula is Knaumas, the Danish formula. It is given by:

    Qult = ek (Ek)

    s + 0.5 so

    where Qul t = ultimate capacity of the pile

    ek = efficiency of pile hammer

    Ek = manufacturers' hammer energy rating

    s = average penetration of the pile from the last few driving blows

    so = elastic compression of the pile

    so = 2ekEkL

    AE

    L = length of pile

    A = cross-sectional area of pile

    E = modulus of Elasticity of pile material

    Statistical studies indicate that a factor of safety of 3 should be used as a field control

    during pile driving to indicate when desired pile driving to indicate when desired pile

    capacity has been obtained.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    30/35

    Example 1.

    Find the allowable load on a steel pipe pile that was driven by a 5000 lb drop hammer

    having a 6.5 feet free fall. The pile-driving record showed 12 blows for the last foot of

    driving into the granular soil. Of these 12 blows, the last six inches had seven blows.Determine the allowable load on the pile.

    Solution.

    W = 5000 lb, H = 6.5 feet

    s = set or penetration in inches per blow = 6/7 = 0.86 inches / blow

    Qal l= 2 WH / (s+1) (from table for drop hammer)

    = (2)(5000)(6.5) / (0.86 +1) = 34.8 kips

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    31/35

    Example 2.

    A steel HP 14x73 pile was installed by using a Delmag D-22 double acting hammer

    having a rated energy of 39,800 ft-lb. Driving records showed 54 blows for the last 9

    inches of driving. Estimate the allowable load on this pile.

    Solution.

    E = 39,800 ft-lb, s = 9/54 = 0.167 in./blow

    Qal l= 2E / (s + 0.1) = (2)(39,800) / (0.167 + 0.1) = 298 kips

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    32/35

    Example 3.

    Select a suitable driving hammer for a

    highway bridge that will be supported on

    14 x 14 square precast prestressedconcrete piles (PSPC) at a mid stream, and

    establish the driving criterion for a 50-ton

    capacity pile with a FS=3.

    Solution.

    Design load Qal l= 100 kips

    Concrete pile length L = 50 feet

    Width of pile b = 14 in,

    and assume that the driving cushion is

    made up of plywood boards, so that thecoefficient of restitution for plywood n = 0.4

    River

    Marl

    Limestone

    25

    15

    10Pile(s)

    14 x 14

    PSPC

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    33/35

    Weight of the pile Wp= (14/12)2(50 feet)(0.150 kips/ft3) = 10.2 kips

    Try a, Weight of the ram Wr= 14 kips (for an MKT S-14, see table on next slide)

    Check the ratio of Wr / Wp = 14 / 10.2 = 1.37 < 1.5 which is satisfactory.

    The MKT S-14 hammers energy HE= 37.5 ft-kips

    The height of fall of the ram h= HE/ Wr= 37.5 / 14 = 2.67 feet

    and that hammer has an efficiency e = 0.9.

    The elastic compression of the pile cap, sc= 0.37 in

    The elastic compression of the pile itself, sp= 0.006 L = 0.006(50) = 0.30 in

    The elastic compression of the soil, ss= 0.10 in

    Table of most commonly used hammers.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    34/35

    752054.37439-603.06.629DieselDelmag D-39

    833060.18140-603.27.132DieselKobe K-32

    4160304180-842.35.123DieselLink Belt 520

    44303243481.8418DieselMKT C-826

    22201622480.929DieselMKT C-826

    270019.5261303.06.529HydraulicRaymond 0-30

    500036491036.41462DifferentialVulcan 140C

    340024.5331113.6836DifferentialVulcan 80C

    33302433953.6836CompoundMKT C-826

    265019.126952.3522Double-actingMKT 11B-3

    222016221102.3522Double-actingMKT C-5

    520037.551606.41462Single-actingMKT S-14

    226016.322602.3522Single-actingMKT S-5

    623604506106068150668Single-actingVulcan 3150 CT

    16630120163601840178Single-actingVulcan 040

    338024.466503.47.533Single-actingVulcan, Raymond 0

    20801520602.3522Single-actingVulcan, Raymond 1

    kgfmft-kipskNmMin.103kgkipskN

    BlowPerEnergyperWt. RamTypeHammer

    Blows

    b e o os co o y used e s.

  • 7/27/2019 Lecture13 Analysis of Single Piles

    35/35

    2

    2

    12 ( )

    (0.5)( ) ( )

    12(14)(0.90) [(14) (0.40) (10.2)]300(0.5)[(0.37) (0.30) (0.10)] (14 10.2)

    0.49

    125 50 .

    R R Pu

    c p s R P

    W e W n W Q

    s s s s W W

    kipss

    s inches per blow

    or blows per foot driving criterion for a ton designs

    +=

    + + + +

    +=+ + + +

    =

    = =