Lecture Four Power in International Politics
Transcript of Lecture Four Power in International Politics
-
8/8/2019 Lecture Four Power in International Politics
1/15
Power in International Politics
State Power/Power PoliticsBalance of Power
International Systems
-
8/8/2019 Lecture Four Power in International Politics
2/15
Key Concepts
Anarchy and self-help.
The security dilemma.
Security dilemma within a society of states.Power Politics: whereas power is unequally distributed,each state must provide its own security, and whereasone states security is anothers threat, states
continually vie for power to be secure.PP includes diplomacy, alliance, BoP, War, Peace,even IL and IO. Primacy is Power.
-
8/8/2019 Lecture Four Power in International Politics
3/15
Types of State Power
The form of PP changes, but the nature of staterelations remains the same.
Great Powers have five features. (Roman, Napoleonic,British empires, USA/USSR post 1945).
Middle Powers: GPs value its resources, strategicposition and military value added. (Regional MPs:
France, Indonesia).Small Powers: do not affect BoP (Netherlands), aremost insecure, can be flashpoints (Israel).
-
8/8/2019 Lecture Four Power in International Politics
4/15
Nature of GP Power Politics
Status Quo vs. Revolutionary GPs.
Tools: national power, alliances, diplomacy. (Classical
vs. Cold War: Structural Realism {K. Waltz})
GPs may seek concert for world domination.
GP may seek universal empire.
Former GPs may be submerged in power structure ofsupplanter: Holland-England, A-H Empire-Germany,
UK-US, ?USA-China?
-
8/8/2019 Lecture Four Power in International Politics
5/15
End of Part I
-
8/8/2019 Lecture Four Power in International Politics
6/15
Balance of Power: various meanings
Historical/descriptive assessment of power.
BoP not as conscious state policy but as a function of
systems equilibrium.Grotian (Liberal) Balance: enlightened self-interestmakes near equilibrium a founding principle of thesociety of states (eg: Concert of Europe), used to limit
conflict, grant compensation, and avert hegemony,eventually overcome war.
Machiavellian Balance: BoP is inevitable. States onlyhave permanent interests: maintaining the scales in
their favour. BoP is inherently unstable.
-
8/8/2019 Lecture Four Power in International Politics
7/15
Realist Rules for BoP
Always increase capabilities, but choose
diplomacy over war. (Morton Kaplan)
War rather than a loss in capabilities.
Oppose preponderance by one GP.
Avoid uncertainty of eliminating other GPs
(Versailles, Gulf 1991) or allowing a new order
not based on Power Politics.
-
8/8/2019 Lecture Four Power in International Politics
8/15
Preponderance rather than Balance
Preponderance of Power school of thought. (balances
are unstable, benevolent hegemony is better {Cold
War}, war is likely when hegemon declines orchallenger closes the gap).
Hegemonic stability theory: hegemon underwrites rules
of trade and diplomacy which creates stability
Declining hegemons/stability causes war or systems
change
-
8/8/2019 Lecture Four Power in International Politics
9/15
-
8/8/2019 Lecture Four Power in International Politics
10/15
Types of Structure
Unipolar (tether pole). National or bloc power: RomanEmpire.
Multipolar (merry-go-round). National power andalliances. (1648-1814 Europe), South Asia today.
Bipolar (see-saw). National power and alliance blocs.Triple Alliance {Ge, It, A-H, 1882) and Triple Entente
{Eng-Fr-Rus. 1907}, and Cold War.Each has its own type of dominant security problem:challenger/assimilation; shifting alliances;escalation/zero-sum conflict
-
8/8/2019 Lecture Four Power in International Politics
11/15
Conflict Potential and Risk
calculationDeutsch and Singer definition of stability (no dominant,
all GPs remain, no large-scale war)
Multipolar: potentially many conflicts, but alsocountervailing alliances and BoP holder.
Bipolar: potential zero-sum and high risk of escalation,
but more political control.(offset by ideology and MAD)
Structure of IS is also contextual: rules of war and
diplomacy change.
-
8/8/2019 Lecture Four Power in International Politics
12/15
Todays International System
Boundaries: global strong points
Units: democracies vs. the rest
Interaction: eco, pol, mil, cult.
Structure: unipolar and multipolar mixed.
-
8/8/2019 Lecture Four Power in International Politics
13/15
Complicating Factors
Non-state actors and intrastate wars.
Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and Weapons of
Mass Destruction (WMD).Trade blocs vs. WTO
USA is not a traditional empire. It is a mixture of: primusinter pares, benevolent hegemon, globocop, and
traditional GP.Triumph of Liberalism and instant communicationchallenges legitimacy of national interest and possibilityof limited war.
-
8/8/2019 Lecture Four Power in International Politics
14/15
Conclusion
Does the end of territorial aggrandizement mean theend of GP Power Politics?
Does the presence of Nuclear Weapons mean the endof GP Power Politics?
Does Globalization?
Can regional or global organization (NATO/UN)
prevent/overcome GP politics?Each GP has its own power and normative context.
Todays Power Politics: The Role of one Hyper Power.
-
8/8/2019 Lecture Four Power in International Politics
15/15
Future System Watch
Will a multipolar MAD be as stable as the Cold War
MAD?
Will missile defence replace deterrence?
Will WMD replace Nuclear Weapons?
Will rigid trade blocs emerge from globalization?
Will the state system weaken from quasi states andglobal economics?
Will civilization/religion clashes replace inter-state war?