Lecture 19 Implementing Strategies: Marketing, Finance/Accounting, R&D, and MIS Issues.
-
Upload
oswin-york -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
3
Transcript of Lecture 19 Implementing Strategies: Marketing, Finance/Accounting, R&D, and MIS Issues.
Finance/Accounting Issues
Central to Strategy Implementation –
– Acquiring needed capital– Developing pro forma financial statements– Preparing financial budgets– Evaluating worth of a business
Decisions Requiring Finance/Accounting PoliciesDecisions Requiring Finance/Accounting Policies
Raise capital w/ short-term, long-term preferred or common stock
Lease or buy fixed assets
Determine an appropriate dividend payout ratio
Use LIFO, FIFO, or market-value accounting approach
Decisions Requiring Finance/Accounting PoliciesDecisions Requiring Finance/Accounting Policies
Extend time of accounts receivable
Establish percentage discount on accounts for terms
Determine the amount of cash kept on hand
Finance/Accounting Issues
Acquiring Capital to Implement Strategies –
• Basic sources of capital:– Debt– Equity
Finance/Accounting Issues
Debt vs. Equity Decisions –
• EPS/EBIT analysis– Earnings per share/Earnings before interest and
taxes
Finance/Accounting Issues
Pro Forma Financial Statements -
• Allows an organization to examine the expected results of various actions and approaches
Finance/Accounting Issues
6 Steps in Pro Forma Financial Analysis
1. Prepare income statement before balance sheet (forecast sales)
2. Use percentage-of-sales method to project CGS and expenses
3. Calculate projected net income4. Subtract dividends to be paid from Net Income and add
remaining to Retained Earnings5. Project balance sheet times beginning with retained
earnings6. List comments (remarks) on projected statements
Finance/Accounting Issues
Financial Budget –
Document that details how funds will be obtained and spent for a specified period of time.
Finance/Accounting Issues
Types of Budgets –
– Cash budgets– Operating budgets– Sales budgets– Profit budgets– Factory budgets– Capital budgets– Expense budgets– Divisional budgets– Variable budgets– Flexible budgets– Fixed budgets
Evaluating Worth of a Business
Central to strategy implementation as integrative, intensive and diversification strategies are often implement through acquisitions of other firms.
Evaluating Worth of a Business
3 Basic approaches:
1. What a firm owns2. What a firm earns3. What a firm will bring in the market
Research & Development Issues
New products and improvement of existing products that allow for effective strategy implementation
Research & Development Issues
• Level of support is constrained by resource availability
• Technological improvements shorten product life cycles
Research & Development Issues
3 Major R&D approaches to implementing strategies –
1. First firm to market new technological products2. Be an innovative imitator of successful products3. Low-cost producer of similar but less expensive
products
Key Terms
• Cash Budget• E-mail• EPS/EBIT Analysis• Financial Budget• Information Systems• Market Segmentation• Marketing-mix Variables
Key Terms
• Multidimensional Scaling• Outstanding Shares Method• Price-earnings Ratio Method• Pro Forma Financial Statement Analysis• Product Positioning
Topic Outline
• The Nature of Strategy Evaluation
• A Strategy-Evaluation Framework
• Published Sources of Strategy-Evaluation Information
Topic Outline
• Using Computers to Evaluate Strategy
• Guidelines for Effective Strategic Management
Implementing Strategies
Organizations are most vulnerable when they are at the peak of their success.
-- R.T. Lenz
Systematic Review, Evaluation & Control –
– Strategies become obsolete– Internal environments are dynamic– External environments are dynamic
Strategy Review, Evaluation & Control
• Strategy evaluation is vital to the organization’s well-being
• Alert management to potential or actual problems in a timely fashion
• Erroneous strategic decisions can have severe negative impact on organizations
Strategy EvaluationStrategy Evaluation
3 Basic Activities –
1. Examining the underlying bases of a firms’ strategy
2. Comparing expected to actual results3. Corrective actions to ensure performance
conforms to plans
Strategy EvaluationStrategy Evaluation
Strategy evaluation –
– Complex and sensitive undertaking
– Overemphasis can be costly and counterproductive
Strategy EvaluationStrategy Evaluation
In many organizations, evaluation is an appraisal of performance –
• Have assets increased?• Increase in profitability?• Increase in sales?• Increase in productivity?• Profit margins, ROI and EPS ratios increased?
Strategy EvaluationStrategy Evaluation
Four Criteria (Richard Rummelt):
• Consistency• Consonance• Feasibility• Advantage
Strategy EvaluationStrategy Evaluation
Consistency
– Strategy should not present inconsistent goals and policies.
• Conflict and interdepartmental bickering symptomatic of managerial disorder and strategic inconsistency
Rummelt’s CriteriaRummelt’s Criteria
Consonance
– aNeed for strategies to examine sets of trends
• Adaptive response to external environment• Trends are results of interactions among other trends
Rummelt’s CriteriaRummelt’s Criteria
Feasibility
– Neither overtax resources or create unsolvable subproblems
• Organizations must demonstrate the abilities, competencies, skills and talents to carry out a given strategy
Rummelt’s CriteriaRummelt’s Criteria
Advantage
– Creation or maintenance of competitive advantage
• Superiority in resources, skills, or position
Rummelt’s CriteriaRummelt’s Criteria
Difficulty in strategy evaluation –
1. Increase in environment’s complexity2. Difficulty predicting future with accuracy3. Increasing number of variables
Strategy EvaluationStrategy Evaluation
Difficulty in strategy evaluation –
4. Rate of obsolescence of plans5. Domestic and global events6. Decreasing time span for planning
certainty
Strategy EvaluationStrategy Evaluation
Strategy evaluation should –
– Initiative managerial questioning– Trigger review of objectives and values– Stimulate creativity in generating
alternatives
Process of Strategy EvaluationProcess of Strategy Evaluation
Review of underlying bases of strategy –
– Develop revised EFE Matrix
– Develop revised IFE Matrix
Reviewing Bases of StrategyReviewing Bases of Strategy
Review effectiveness of strategy –
1. Competitors’ reaction to strategy2. Competitors’ change in strategy3. Competitors’ changes in strengths and
weaknesses4. Reasons for competitors’ strategic change
Reviewing Bases of StrategyReviewing Bases of Strategy
Review effectiveness of strategy –
5. Reasons for competitors’ successful strategies6. Competitors’ present market positions and
profitability7. Potential for competitor retaliation8. Potential for cooperation with competitors
Reviewing Bases of StrategyReviewing Bases of Strategy
Monitor Threats and Opportunities and Weaknesses and Strengths
• Are our internal strengths still strengths?• Have we added additional strengths?• Are our weaknesses still weaknesses?• Have we other internal weaknesses?
Reviewing Bases of StrategyReviewing Bases of Strategy
Monitor Threats and Opportunities and Weaknesses and Strengths
• Are opportunities still opportunities?• Other external opportunities?• Are threats still threats?• Are there other threats?• Are we vulnerable to a hostile takeover?
Reviewing Bases of StrategyReviewing Bases of Strategy
Evaluation FrameworkEvaluation FrameworkI. Review Underlying Bases
Continue present course
II. Measure Firm Performance
III.Take
Corrective Actions
Differences?
Differences?
Yes
NO
Yes
NO
• Comparing expected to actual results• Investigating deviations from plan• Evaluating individual performance• Progress toward stated objectives
Measuring Organizational Measuring Organizational PerformancePerformance
Quantitative criteria for strategy evaluation –
– Financial Ratios:• Compare performance over different periods• Compare performance to competitors• Compare performance to industry averages
Measuring Organizational Measuring Organizational PerformancePerformance
Key Financial Ratios –
– Return on investment– Return on equity– Profit margin– Market share
Measuring Organizational Measuring Organizational PerformancePerformance
Key Financial Ratios –
– Debt to equity– Earnings per share– Sales growth– Asset growth
Measuring Organizational Measuring Organizational PerformancePerformance
Qualitative evaluation of strategy -
– Internal consistency of strategy– Consistency of strategy with environment– Strategy appropriate in view of resources– Acceptable degree of risk– Appropriate time frame– Workability of the strategy
Measuring Organizational Measuring Organizational PerformancePerformance
Basic requirements for effective strategy evaluation –
– Economical– Meaningful– Generate useful information– Timely information– Provide a true picture of what is happening
Characteristics of EvaluationCharacteristics of Evaluation
Premise of sound strategic management –
– Planning to deal with unfavorable and favorable events before they occur.
Contingency PlanningContingency Planning
Contingency Planning –
– Alternative plans that can be put into effect if certain key events do not occur as expected
Contingency PlanningContingency Planning
• Financial audits to determine correspondence between assertions based on strategic plans and established criteria
• Environmental audits to insure sound and safe practices
AuditingAuditing
Key Terms
• Advantage• Auditing• Consistency• Consonance• Contingency Plans• Corporate Agility• Feasibility
Key Terms
• Future Shock• Management by Wandering Around• Measuring Organizational Performance• Planning Process Audit (PPA)• Reviewing the Underlying Bases of an
Organization’s Strategy