Lect512cs (1)

63
13-1 CHAPTER 13 Capital Structure and Leverage Business vs. financial risk Optimal capital structure Operating leverage Capital structure theory

description

 

Transcript of Lect512cs (1)

Page 1: Lect512cs (1)

13-1

CHAPTER 13Capital Structure and Leverage

Business vs. financial risk Optimal capital structure Operating leverage Capital structure theory

Page 2: Lect512cs (1)

13-2

Key Concepts and Skills

Understand the effect of financial leverage on cash flows and cost of equity

Understand the impact of taxes and bankruptcy on capital structure choice

Page 3: Lect512cs (1)

13-3

Part I

Business Risk, Operating Leverage

Financial Risk, Financial Leverage

Page 4: Lect512cs (1)

13-4

Uncertainty about future operating income (EBIT), i.e., how well can we predict operating income?

Note that business risk does not include effect of financial leverage.

What is business risk?

Probability

EBITE(EBIT)0

Low risk

High risk

Page 5: Lect512cs (1)

13-5

What determines business risk?

Uncertainty about demand (sales). Uncertainty about output prices. Uncertainty about costs. Product, other types of liability. Competition. Operating leverage.

Page 6: Lect512cs (1)

13-6

What is operating leverage, and how does it affect a firm’s business risk?

OL is defined as (%change in EBIT)/(%change in sales).

Operating leverage is high if the production requires higher fixed costs and low variable costs.

High fixed cost can leverage small increase in sales into high increase in EBIT.

Page 7: Lect512cs (1)

13-7

Effect of operating leverage

More operating leverage leads to more business risk, for then a small sales decline causes a big profit decline.

Sales

$ Rev.TC

FC

QBE Sales

$ Rev.

TCFC

QBE

} Profit

Page 8: Lect512cs (1)

13-8

Using operating leverage

Typical situation: Can use operating leverage to get higher E(EBIT), but risk also increases.

Probability

EBITL

Low operating leverage

High operating leverage

EBITH

Page 9: Lect512cs (1)

13-9

What is financial leverage?Financial risk?

Financial leverage is defined as (%change in NI) / (% change in EBIT)

High usage of debt can leverage small increase in EBIT into big increase in net income.

Financial leverage is high with high level of debt.

Page 10: Lect512cs (1)

13-10

What is Financial risk?

Financial risk is the additional risk concentrated on common stockholders as a result of financial leverage. More debt, more financial leverage,

more financial risk. More debt will concentrate business risk on

stockholders because debt holders do not bear business risk (in case of no bankruptcy).

Page 11: Lect512cs (1)

13-11

A summaryOperating Leverage

Financial Leverage

Business Risk

Financial Risk

%change in EBIT/%change in sales

%change in NI/%change in EBIT

Variability in the firm’s expected EBIT.

Additional variability in net income available to common shareholders.

Increase with higher fixed cost

Increase with higher debt

Increase with high OL.

Increase with high FL.

If a firm already has high business risk, you may want to use less debt to get less financial risk. If a firm has less business risk, you may afford high financial risk.

Page 12: Lect512cs (1)

13-12

An example:Illustrating effects of financial leverage

Two firms with the same operating leverage, business risk, and probability distribution of EBIT.

Only differ with respect to their use of debt (capital structure).

Firm U Firm LNo debt $10,000 of 12% debt$20,000 in assets $20,000 in

assets40% tax rate 40% tax rate

Page 13: Lect512cs (1)

13-13

Firm U: Unleveraged Economy Bad Avg. GoodProb. 0.25 0.50 0.25EBIT $2,000 $3,000 $4,000Interest 0 0 0EBT $2,000 $3,000 $4,000Taxes (40%) 800 1,200 1,600NI $1,200 $1,800 $2,400

Page 14: Lect512cs (1)

13-14

Firm L: Leveraged Economy Bad Avg. GoodProb.* 0.25 0.50 0.25EBIT* $2,000 $3,000 $4,000Interest 1,200 1,200 1,200EBT $ 800 $1,800 $2,800Taxes (40%) 320 720 1,120NI $ 480 $1,080 $1,680

*Same as for Firm U.

Page 15: Lect512cs (1)

13-15

Ratio comparison between leveraged and unleveraged firms

FIRM U Bad Avg GoodBEP 10.0% 15.0% 20.0%ROE 6.0% 9.0% 12.0%BEP=EBIT/assets (basic earning power)

FIRM L Bad Avg GoodBEP 10.0% 15.0% 20.0%ROE 4.8% 10.8% 16.8%

Page 16: Lect512cs (1)

13-16

Risk and return for leveraged and unleveraged firms

Expected Values:Firm U Firm L

E(BEP) 15.0% = 15.0%E(ROE) 9.0% < 10.8%

Risk Measures:Firm U Firm L

σROE 2.12% < 4.24%

Page 17: Lect512cs (1)

13-17

The Effect of Leverage on

profitability How does leverage affect the EPS and ROE of a

firm? When we increase the amount of debt financing,

we increase the fixed interest expense If we have a good year (BEP > kd), then we pay

our fixed interest cost and we have more left over for our stockholders

If we have a bad year (BEP < kd), we still have to pay our fixed interest costs and we have less left over for our stockholders

Leverage amplifies the variation in both EPS and ROE

Page 18: Lect512cs (1)

13-18

Conclusions Basic earning power (BEP) is

unaffected by financial leverage. Firm L has higher expected ROE. Firm L has much wider ROE (and

EPS) swings because of fixed interest charges. Its higher expected return is accompanied by higher risk.

Page 19: Lect512cs (1)

13-19

Quick Quiz Explain the effect of leverage on

expected ROE and risk

Page 20: Lect512cs (1)

13-20

The degree of operating leverage is defined as:

a. % change in EBIT_____ % change in Variable Cost b. % change in EBIT % change in Sales c. % change in Sales % change in EBIT d. % change in EBIT_______________ % change in contribution margin

Page 21: Lect512cs (1)

13-21

Leverage will generally __________ shareholders' expected return and _________ their risk.

a. increase; decrease b. decrease; increase c. increase; increase d. increase; do nothing to

Page 22: Lect512cs (1)

13-22

If a 10 percent increase in sales causes EBIT to increase from $1mm to $1.50 mm,

what is its degree of operating leverage?

a. 3.6 b. 4.2 c. 4.7 d. 5.0 e. 5.5

Page 23: Lect512cs (1)

13-23

Part II

Capital Structure

Page 24: Lect512cs (1)

13-24

Capital Restructuring We are going to look at how changes in

capital structure affect the value of the firm, all else equal

Capital restructuring involves changing the amount of leverage a firm has without changing the firm’s assets

Increase leverage by issuing debt and repurchasing outstanding shares

Decrease leverage by issuing new shares and retiring outstanding debt

Page 25: Lect512cs (1)

13-25

Choosing a Capital Structure

What is the primary goal of financial managers? Maximize stockholder wealth

We want to choose the capital structure that will maximize stockholder wealth

We can maximize stockholder wealth by maximizing firm value (or equivalently minimizing WACC).

Page 26: Lect512cs (1)

13-26

Optimal Capital Structure

Objective: Choose capital structure (mix of debt v. common equity) at which stock price is maximized.

Trades off higher ROE and EPS against higher risk. The tax-related benefits of leverage are offset by the debt’s risk-related costs.

Page 27: Lect512cs (1)

13-27

What effect does increasing debt have on the cost of equity for the firm?

If the level of debt increases, the riskiness of the firm increases.

The cost of debt will increase because bond rating will deteriorates with higher debt level.

Moreover, the riskiness of the firm’s equity also increases, resulting in a higher ks.

Page 28: Lect512cs (1)

13-28

The Hamada Equation

Not Required

Page 29: Lect512cs (1)

13-29

Finding Optimal Capital Structure

The firm’s optimal capital structure can be determined two ways: Minimizes WACC. Maximizes stock price.

Both methods yield the same results.

Page 30: Lect512cs (1)

13-30

Table for calculating WACC and determining the minimum WACC

D/A ratio

0.00%

12.50

25.00

37.50

50.00

WACC

12.00%

11.55

11.25

11.44

12.00

ks

12.00%

12.51

13.20

14.16

15.60

kd (1 – T)

0.00%

4.80

5.40

6.90

8.40

Amount borrowed

$ 0

250K

500K

750K

1,000K

Page 31: Lect512cs (1)

13-31

Table for determining the stock price maximizing capital structure

AmountBorrowed EPS ks P0

$ 0 $3.00 12.00% $25.00

250K 3.26 12.51

500K 3.55 13.20

26.03

26.89

750K 3.77 14.16 26.59

1,000K 3.90 15.60 25.00

Page 32: Lect512cs (1)

13-32

What is this firm’s optimal capital structure?

Stock price P0 is maximized ($26.89) at D/A = 25%, so optimal D/A = 25%.

EPS is maximized at 50%(EPS= $3.90), but primary interest is stock price, not E(EPS).

We could push up E(EPS) by using more debt, but the higher risk more than offsets the benefit of higher E(EPS).

Page 33: Lect512cs (1)

13-33

Capital Structure Theory Under Five Special Cases

Case I – Assumptions No corporate or personal taxes No bankruptcy costs

Case II – Assumptions Corporate taxes, but no personal taxes No bankruptcy costs

Case III – Assumptions Bankruptcy costs Corporate taxes, but no personal taxes

Case IV – Assumptions Managers have private information

Case V – Assumptions Managers tend to waste firm money and not work hard.

Page 34: Lect512cs (1)

13-34

Case I: Ignoring taxes and Bankruptcy Cost

The value of the firm is NOT affected by changes in the capital structure

The cash flows of the firm do not change, therefore value doesn’t change

The WACC of the firm is NOT affected by capital structure

In this case, capital structure does not matter.

Page 35: Lect512cs (1)

13-35

Figure 13.3

Page 36: Lect512cs (1)

13-36

Case II consider taxes but ignore bankruptcy cost

Interest expense is tax deductible Therefore, when a firm adds debt,

it reduces taxes, all else equal The reduction in taxes increases

the firm value. Other things equal, the less tax paid to the IRS, the better off the firm.

Page 37: Lect512cs (1)

13-37

Case II consider taxes but ignore bankruptcy cost

The value of the firm increases by the present value of the annual interest tax shield Value of a levered firm = value of an

unlevered firm + PV of interest tax shield (VL = VU + DTC)

The WACC decreases as D/E increases because of the government subsidy on interest payments

Page 38: Lect512cs (1)

13-38

Page 39: Lect512cs (1)

13-39

Illustration of Case II

Page 40: Lect512cs (1)

13-40

Case III consider both taxes and bankruptcy cost

Now we add bankruptcy costsAs the D/E ratio increases, the probability of bankruptcy increases. This increased probability will increase the expected bankruptcy costs

Page 41: Lect512cs (1)

13-41

Bankruptcy Costs (financial distress cost)

Direct bankruptcy costs Legal and administrative costs Creditors will stop lending money to the firm.

Indirect bankruptcy costs Larger than direct costs, but more difficult to

measure and estimate Also have lost sales, interrupted operations

and loss of valuable employees

Page 42: Lect512cs (1)

13-42

Case III At some point, the additional value of

the interest tax shield will be offset by the expected bankruptcy cost

After this point, the value of the firm will start to decrease and the WACC will start to increase as more debt is added

Page 43: Lect512cs (1)

13-43

Page 44: Lect512cs (1)

13-44

Case III (also called Modigliani-Miller static Theory)

The graph shows MM’s tax benefit vs. bankruptcy cost theory.

With more debt, initially firm will benefit from tax reduction.

With high debt, the threat of financial distress becomes severe.

As financial conditions weaken, expected costs of financial distress can be large enough to outweigh the tax shield of debt financing.

Optimal debt level is some trade-off point.

Page 45: Lect512cs (1)

13-45

Conclusions Case I – no taxes or bankruptcy costs

No optimal capital structure. Debt level does not matter.

Case II – corporate taxes but no bankruptcy costs Optimal capital structure is 100% debt More debt—more tax shield—higher firm value.

Case III – corporate taxes and bankruptcy costs Optimal capital structure is part debt and part

equity Occurs where the marginal tax benefit from debt

is just offset by the increase in bankruptcy costs

Page 46: Lect512cs (1)

13-46

3 cases

Page 47: Lect512cs (1)

13-47

Case IV--Incorporating signaling effects

When managers know private information about the firm’s future than the market, there is a signaling effect.

Signaling theory suggests when firms issue new stocks, stock price will fall. Why?

Page 48: Lect512cs (1)

13-48

What are “signaling” effects in capital structure?

Assume managers have better information about a firm’s long-run prospect than outside investors. They will issue stock if they think stock is overvalued; they will issue debt if they think stock is undervalued.

But outside investors are not stupid. They view a common stock offering as a negative signal--managers think stock is overvalued.

Page 49: Lect512cs (1)

13-49

Case IV--Incorporating signaling effects

Conclusion: firms should maintain a lower debt level so that in case the firm needs to raise money in the future, it can issue debt rather than sell new stocks.

Page 50: Lect512cs (1)

13-50

Case V—High debt constrains managers’ bad behavior

When would you more likely to go to a lavish restaurant?

1. After receiving a good salary. 2. After receiving a lot of credit card

bills.

Page 51: Lect512cs (1)

13-51

Case V—High debt constrains managers’ bad behavior

Managers tend to spend a lot of cash on lavish offices, corporate jets, etc.

With more debt, the need to pay interest and the threat of bankruptcy remind managers to waste less and work harder.

The fact that managers are not born to work whole heartedly for stockholders suggests using more debt.

Page 52: Lect512cs (1)

13-52

Observed Capital Structure In Reality

Capital structure does differ by industries. Even for firms in same industry, capital structures may vary widely.

Lowest levels of debt Drugs with 2.75% debt Computers with 6.91% debt

Highest levels of debt Steel with 55.84% debt Department stores with 50.53% debt

Page 53: Lect512cs (1)

13-53

Conclusions on Capital Structure Need to recognize inputs (such as

bankruptcy cost) are “guesstimates.” As a result of imprecise estimates, capital

structure decisions have a large judgmental content.

It may also mean you might feel the knowledge is not very “systematic” in this chapter. The textbook says that “if you feel our discussion of capital structure theory imprecise and somewhat confusing, you are not alone.” .

Page 54: Lect512cs (1)

13-54

How would these factors affect the target capital structure?

1. High sales volatility? decrease

2. High operating leverage? decrease

3. Increase in the corporate tax rate? increase

4. Increase in bankruptcy costs? decrease

5. Management spending lots of money on lavish perks? increase

Page 55: Lect512cs (1)

13-55

The tax savings of the firm derived from the deductibility of interest expense is called the:

a. Interest tax shield. b. Depreciable basis. c. Financing umbrella. d. Current yield. e. Tax-loss carryforward

savings.

Page 56: Lect512cs (1)

13-56

A firm's optimal capital structure occurs where? a. EPS are maximized, and WACC is

minimized. b. Stock price is maximized, and EPS

are maximized. c. Stock price is maximized, and

WACC is maximized. d. WACC is minimized, and stock

price is maximized. e. All of the above.

Page 57: Lect512cs (1)

13-57

The unlevered cost of capital is a. the cost of capital for a firm with no

equity in its capital structure b. the cost of capital for a firm with no debt

in its capital structure c. the interest tax shield times pretax net

income d. the cost of preferred stock for a firm with

equal parts debt and common stock in its capital structure

e.equal to the profit margin for a firm with some debt in its capital structure

Page 58: Lect512cs (1)

13-58

The explicit costs associated with corporate default, such as legal expenses, are the____ of the firm

a. flotation costs b. default beta coefficients c. direct bankruptcy costs d. indirect bankruptcy costs e. default risk premia

Page 59: Lect512cs (1)

13-59

The implicit costs associated with corporate default, such as lost sales, are the of the firm

a. flotation costs b. default beta coefficients c. direct bankruptcy costs d. indirect bankruptcy costs e. default risk premia

Page 60: Lect512cs (1)

13-60

Which of the following conclusions can be drawn from M&M Proposition I with taxes (case II in our slides)?

a.The value of an unlevered firm exceeds the value of a levered firm by the present value of the interest tax shield.

b. There is a linear relationship between the amount of debt in a levered firm and its value.

c.A levered firm can increase its value by reducing debt.

d. The optimal amount of leverage for a firm is not possible to determine.

e.The value of a levered firm is equal to its aftertax EBIT discounted by the unlevered cost of capital.

Page 61: Lect512cs (1)

13-61

Which of the following statements regarding leverage is true?

a. If things go poorly for the firm, increased leverage provides greater returns to shareholders (as measured by ROE and EPS).

b. As a firm levers up, shareholders are exposed to more risk.

c. The benefits of leverage will be greater for a firm with substantial accumulated losses or other types of tax shields compared to a firm without many tax shields.

d. The benefits of leverage always outweigh the costs of financial distress.

Page 62: Lect512cs (1)

13-62

If managers in a firm tend to waste shareholders’ money by spending too much on corporate jets, lavish offices, and so on,

then a firm may wants to use______ debt to mitigate this behavior.

a. more b. less c. It does not matter.

Page 63: Lect512cs (1)

13-63

If you know that your firm is facing relatively poor prospects but needs new capital, and you know that investors do not have this information, signaling theory would predict that you would:

a. Issue debt to maintain the returns of equity holders.

b. Issue equity to share the burden of decreased equity returns between old and new shareholders.

c. Be indifferent between issuing debt and equity.

d. Postpone going into capital markets until your firm’s prospects improve.