Lect 4016

27
[email protected] Lecture 6. Page 1 of 27 Quality Function Deployment QFD House of Quality (HOQ) WELCOME TO LECTURE 6

description

4016

Transcript of Lect 4016

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 1 of 27

    Quality Function DeploymentQFD

    House of Quality (HOQ)

    WELCOME TO LECTURE 6

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 2 of 27

    COURSE PERT CHART

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 3 of 27

    Where we are

    We have seen how to define the problem We have seen how to decompose it We have seen how to be creative We have seen how to evaluate solutions Now how can we improve on existing

    products? - What does the CUSTOMER want?

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 4 of 27

    QFD:Definition

    QFD stands for Quality Function Deployment.Derived from six Chinese/ Japanese characters:1. Hin shitsu: Qualities, features or attributes2. Ki no: function3. Ten kai: deployment

    QFD:- systematic way for developing products based on the needs of the customer.

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 5 of 27

    History of QFD

    Originally developed by Yoji Akao of Tokyo in 1966.First implemented at the Kobe Shipyard of

    Mitsubishi in 1972.Subsequently adopted by Toyota and other

    Japanese Firms. First QFD Training outside Japan at GM and

    Ford in 1972.Later by other companies around the world

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 6 of 27

    QFD : QUALITY FUNCTION DEVELOPMENT

    GOAL:

    Recognize the correlations between the customerrequirements and the product characteristics

    Identify the product characteristics that affectspecific customer requirements

    Recognize the correlations within the engineeringcharacteristics

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 7 of 27

    QFD : QUALITY FUNCTION DEVELOPMENT

    Paper by Hauser and Clausing in Harvard Business Review 1988 prompted the introduction of the Japanese House of Quality into US companies.

    Quality:Basic (unspoken, assumed) expected, typicalPerformance (spoken) one dimensional,

    market research resultsExcitement (unspoken, the customer does not

    know s/he wants it) pleasant, surprises or delights customer

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 8 of 27

    QFD

    what

    How

    what/How

    why

    what/why

    How/HowmuchHowmuch

    How/How

    # designchanges

    Before After

    US

    Japan

    HOUSE OF QUALITY

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 9 of 27

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 10 of 27

    QFDHouse of Quality

    E

    C

    1

    E

    C

    2

    .

    .

    .

    CA 1 W1 CA 2 W2 ... ...

    Engineering Characteristics 3

    C

    u

    s

    t

    o

    m

    e

    r

    A

    t

    t

    r

    i

    b

    u

    t

    e

    s

    1

    W

    e

    i

    g

    h

    t

    s

    2

    ++

    ++

    - Goal-Conflicts 9

    Correlation-Matrix 4

    Assessment 5Targets6

    techn. Competition compar. 7

    C

    o

    m

    p

    e

    t

    i

    t

    i

    o

    n

    c

    o

    m

    p

    a

    r

    .

    I

    n

    c

    u

    s

    t

    o

    m

    e

    r

    '

    s

    v

    i

    e

    w

    8

    Ex.: 1-10 Ex.: 1-10

    PointsStrong relationship 9

    Medium relationship 3

    Weak relationship 1

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 11 of 27

    EXAMPLE

    B

    o

    d

    y

    m

    a

    t

    e

    r

    i

    a

    l

    L

    e

    a

    d

    m

    a

    t

    e

    r

    i

    a

    l

    D

    e

    s

    i

    g

    n

    /

    C

    o

    l

    o

    r

    E

    r

    a

    s

    o

    r

    E

    n

    g

    r

    a

    v

    i

    n

    g

    a

    b

    i

    l

    i

    t

    y

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    C

    o

    m

    p

    e

    t

    i

    t

    o

    r

    1

    C

    o

    m

    p

    e

    t

    i

    t

    o

    r

    2

    O

    u

    r

    p

    r

    o

    d

    u

    c

    t

    G

    o

    a

    l

    Easy to erase 5 9 9 7 5 5 7Writes forever 10 1 9 4 4 4 6Feels good in hand 5 3 9 6 4 7 7Will not leak 4 9 3 3 4 3 6Not easy to lose 1 1 1 3 3 3 8Cost 5 9 3 3 1 7 6 5 8.....

    70 186 61 62 1

    2 1 4 3 5

    Customer Attributes

    Priority

    E. Characteristics

    Caution: oversimplified! And only top level considered! Check publications

    (ref. von Helbling Management)

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 12 of 27

    QFD Analysis

    Potential for Use of a House of Quality Matrix Technique in Rehabilitation

    Engineering

    by: Logan, G.D. & Radcliffe, D.F.IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation

    Engineering

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 13 of 27

    Goal: Improve wheelchair seating to people with disabilities.

    Acquired customer requirements through interaction with patients, and videotaped sessions.

    Case 1: improving controls on wheelchair Case 2: attaching oxygen tank to wheelchair

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 14 of 27

    Case 1 H.O.Q.

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 15 of 27

    Case 1 results:

    H.O.Q. provided accurate results.

    Top 3 ranked items lead to a successful product and had considerably higher totals than the remaining engineering features.

    Paper Conclusions

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 16 of 27

    Define the Performance Measures columns on the top

    QFD INTENTIONS

    Cross Functional Teams

    Development of a new product , service, or process

    Team fills out a House of Quality

    Define the Voice Of the Customer rows on the left

    Forces creative thinking and continual evaluation of progress

    Refining an existing product , service, or process

    Engineering Characteristics Technical Quality Characteristics Quality Specifications Functional Requirements The Hows

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 17 of 27

    Parts Specifications

    F

    e

    a

    t

    u

    r

    e

    s

    a

    n

    d

    T

    e

    c

    h

    n

    o

    l

    o

    g

    i

    e

    s

    Manufacturing Processes

    P

    a

    r

    t

    s

    S

    p

    e

    c

    i

    f

    i

    c

    a

    t

    i

    o

    n

    s

    Using QFD to deploy the VOC throughout the development process

    One is not enough

    Features and Technologies

    P

    e

    r

    f

    o

    r

    m

    a

    n

    c

    e

    M

    e

    a

    s

    u

    r

    e

    s

    Performance Measures

    C

    u

    s

    t

    o

    m

    e

    r

    N

    e

    e

    d

    s

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 18 of 27

    UNREALISTICPerformance Measures

    C

    u

    s

    t

    o

    m

    e

    r

    N

    e

    e

    d

    s

    Features and Technologies

    P

    e

    r

    f

    o

    r

    m

    a

    n

    c

    e

    M

    e

    a

    s

    u

    r

    e

    s

    Parts Specifications

    F

    e

    a

    t

    u

    r

    e

    s

    a

    n

    d

    T

    e

    c

    h

    n

    o

    l

    o

    g

    i

    e

    s

    Manufacturing Processes

    P

    a

    r

    t

    s

    S

    p

    e

    c

    i

    f

    i

    c

    a

    t

    i

    o

    n

    s

    Eager to get to design Substitute a design matrix for second house 80 - 90% of learning occurs in the initial HOQ

    Initial HOQ takes 2 - 6 days to complete

    15 - 20 rows

    40 - 60 columns

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 19 of 27

    QFD software

    QFD Capture (free evaluation download)

    http://www.gsm.mq.edu.au/cmit/ German, Excel,

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 20 of 27

    The House of Quality Construction of the House of Quality (HOQ) is an initial step in

    launching Quality Functional Deployment (QFD). The HOQ provides a means to recognize correlation among customer requirements, engineering characteristics, part characteristics, process operations, and production requirements. Additionally, the HOQ can be used atool for comparing existing and potential designs with the competitions designs. Findings from the HOQ can help groups develop targets and understand priorities and goals throughout the development process.

    In this exercise, 2 HOQs are considered: Voice of the Customer vs. Engineering Characteristics and Engineering Characteristics vs. Part Characteristics.

    The product at hand is a compressed air handheld pump commonly used for inflating bicycle tires.

    The first step in building the HOQs is to list the requirements and characteristics pertaining to the product. The table below lists the customer requirements, engineering characteristics, and part characteristics for the handheld pump.

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 21 of 27

    Requirements and Characteristics for HOQ

    Part CharacterisiticsEngineering CharacteristicsCustomer Requirements

    Threaded fittingCompetitive in market

    Valve Stem SeatCost

    NozzleBe safe in all sporting conditions

    MaterialBe recyclable

    Seal, cartridge to valveBe reusable

    Pressure (40-110 psi)Over-pressure protectionEnvironment

    Capacity (12-25g)Offer control of flowMaintenance free

    Safety Pressure reliefAdapt to Sxx,Pxx needle valvesReadily available replacements

    CartridgeCompressed air retentionMaintenance

    MaterialPressure to inflate 40-110 psiPrevent freezing discharge of CO2 from cartridge

    Interface w/ valve headOperate in temp range 10F-120FAccommodate threaded or non-threaded cartridges

    MassUse of varying cartridge designsAccommodate varying cartridge sizes

    LengthVolume for 12-25gr cartridgeInflate mountain bike tires

    Inside diameterCompact constructionInflate road tires

    Outside diameterLightweightHouse unpunctured cartridge

    Cartridge housingImpact resistancePerformance

    MaterialConvenient geometryEasy to carry

    Lever strokeAccessible trigger locationEasy to store

    Lever lengthassbly of valve body to containerEasy cartridge loading

    TriggerMinimum trigger forceErgonomics

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 22 of 27

    HOQ1 CRs vs ECs

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 23 of 27

    HOQ1 CRs vs ECs

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 24 of 27

    HOQ1 ECs vs PCs

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 25 of 27

    Conclusion: Summary Value of QFDStrengthens current development process - Clear targets defined early based on

    market/business demands- simultaneous focus on product and process

    technologies- key issues remain visible for prioritizing resource

    allocation- communication and teamwork are enhancedDesired output efficiently achieved- Products meet customer needs- Products provide a competitive edge

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 26 of 27

    Conclusions

    Powerful tool to help you prioritize what to work on.

    Powerful tool to allow you to compare your product to the competitions products and target how to better satisfy the customer

    Weakness is lack of scientific basis. More heuristic method proven to help companies

  • [email protected] Lecture 6. Page 27 of 27

    Presentations Provide pertinent facts to busy people Be systematic: Carefully prepare

    Analyze the audience State your objective Define your main message and support it

    Introduction Body Conclusion

    Watch presentation skills, do not distract Support your material with facts, references- Make sure they are correct Use professional language, no slang, no excessive acronyms Proper grammar, articulation, loudness Variety in pitch, rate, intensity Eye contact Watch for hesitations, filler words Stay on time Use appropriate number of visual aids, and make them good quality Use clear fonts (Arial), large size fonts (readable from back of room) Do not use distracting color Put the name of each presenter at the bottom of the slide REHEARSE!!!!!! You should not have to look back at the screen