Lec Feb09 2009

Anshul Kumar, CSE IITD

CSL718 : Superscalar Processors

CSL718 : Superscalar CSL718 : Superscalar ProcessorsProcessors

Dynamic Scheduling andSpeculative Execution

9th Feb, 2009

Anshul Kumar, CSE IITD slide 2

Handling Control DependenceHandling Control DependenceHandling Control Dependence

• Simple pipeline– Branch prediction reduces stalls due to control

dependence• Wide issue processor

– Mere branch prediction is not sufficient– Instructions in the predicted path need to be

fetched and EXECUTED (speculated execution)


What is required for speculation?What is required for speculation?What is required for speculation?

• Branch prediction to choose which instructions to execute

• Execution of instructions before control dependences are resolved

• Ability to undo the effects of incorrectly speculated sequence

• Preserving of correct behaviour under exceptions


Types of speculationTypes of speculationTypes of speculation

• Hardware based speculation– done with dynamic branch prediction and

dynamic scheduling– used in Superscalar processors

• Compiler based speculation– done with static branch prediction and static

scheduling– used in VLIW processors


Extending Tomasulo’s scheme for speculative execution

Extending Extending TomasuloTomasulo’’ss scheme for scheme for speculative executionspeculative execution

• Introduce re-order buffer (ROB)• Add another stage – “commit”

Normal execution• Issue• Execute• Write result

Speculative execution• Issue• Execute• Write result• Commit

f xfx

i i x x


Extending Tomasulo’s scheme for speculative execution – contd.

Extending Extending TomasuloTomasulo’’ss scheme for scheme for speculative execution speculative execution –– contd.contd.

• Write results into ROB in the “write result” stage• Write results into register file or memory in the

“commit” stage• Dependent instructions can read operands from

ROB• A speculative instruction commits only if the

prediction is determined to be correct• Instructions may complete execution out-of-order,

but they commit in-order


Recall Tomasulo’s scheme ......


IssueIssueIssue

• Get next instruction from instruction queue• Check if there is a matching RS which is

empty– no: structural hazard, instruction stalls– yes: issue the instruction to that RS

• For each operand, check if it is available in RF– yes: put the operand in the RS– no: keep track of FU that will produce it


ExecuteExecuteExecute

• If one or more operands not available, wait and monitor CDB

• When an operand becomes available, it is placed in RS

• When all operands are available, start execution

• Choice may need to be made if multiple instructions become ready at the same time


Write resultWrite resultWrite result

• When result is available– write it on CDB and – from there into RF and relevant RSs

• Mark RS as available


More formal description ......


RS and RF fieldsRS and RF fieldsRS and RF fields

op busy Qj Vj Qk Vk val Qi


IssueIssueIssue

• Get instruction <op, rd, rs, rt> from instruction queue

• Wait until ∃

r |

RS[r].busy = no and RF[rd].Qi = φ• if (RF[rs].Qi ≠ φ)

{RS[r].Qj ← RF[rs].Qi}else {RS[r].Vj ← RF[rs].val; RS[r].Qj ← φ}

• similarly for rt• RS[r].op ← op; RS[r].busy ← yes; RF[rd].Qi ← r


ExecuteExecuteExecute

• Wait until RS[r].Qj = φ

and RS[r].Qk = φ• Compute result: operation is RS[r].op,

operands are RS[r].Vj and RS[r].Vk



• Wait until execution complete at r and CDB available

• ∀

x if (RF[x].Qi = r) {RF[x].val ← result; RF[x].Qi ← φ}

• ∀

x if (RS[x].Qj = r) {RS[x].Vj ← result; RS[x].Qj ← φ}

• similarly for Qk / Vk• RS[r].busy ← no


Tomasulo’s scheme plus ROB......


IssueIssueIssue

• Get next instruction from instruction queue• Check if there is a matching RS which is empty

and an empty slot in ROB– no: structural hazard, instruction stalls– yes: issue the instruction to that RS and mark the ROB

slot, also put ROB slot number in RS

• For each operand, check if it is available in RF or ROB– yes: put the operand in the RS– no: keep track of FU that will produce it


Execute (no change)Execute (no change)Execute (no change)

• If one or more operands not available, wait and monitor CDB

• When an operand becomes available, it is placed in RS

• When all operands are available, start execution

• Choice may need to be made if multiple instructions become ready at the same time



• When result is available– write it on CDB with ROB tag and – from there into ROB RF and relevant RSs

• Mark RS as available


Commit (non-branch instruction)Commit (nonCommit (non--branch instruction)branch instruction)

• Wait until instruction reaches head of ROB• Update RF• Remove instruction from ROB


Commit (branch instruction)Commit (branch instruction)Commit (branch instruction)

• Wait until instruction reaches head of ROB• If branch is mispredicted,

– flush ROB– Restart execution at correct successor of the

branch instruction• else

– Remove instruction from ROB


More formal description ......


RS fieldsRS fieldsRS fields

op busy Qi Qj Vj Qk Vk


RF fieldsRF fieldsRF fields

val Qi busy


ROB fieldsROB fieldsROB fields

inst busy rdy val dst


IssueIssueIssue• Get instruction <op, rd, rs, rt> from instruction queue• Wait until ∃r |

RS[r].busy=no and RF[rd].Qi = φ

ROB[b].busy=no, where b = ROB tail• if (RF[rs].Qi ≠ φ RF[rs].busy) {h ← RF[rs].Qi;

if (ROB[h].rdy) {RS[r].Vj ← ROB[h].val; RS[r].Qj ← φ}else {RS[r].Qj ← h}

} else {RS[r].Vj ← RF[rs].val; RS[r].Qj ← φ}• similarly for rt• RS[r].op ← op; RS[r].busy ← yes; RS[r].Qi← b• RF[rd].Qi ← rb; RF[rd].busy ← yes; ROB[b].busy ← yes• ROB[b].inst ← op; ROB[b].dst ← rd; ROB[b].rdy ← no


Execute (no change)Execute (no change)Execute (no change)

• Wait until RS[r].Qj = φ

and RS[r].Qk = φ• Compute result: operation is RS[r].op,

operands are RS[r].Vj and RS[r].Vk


Write resultWrite resultWrite result• Wait until execution complete at r and CDB

available• b ← RS[r].Qi• ∀

x if (RF[x].Qi = r) {RF[x] ← result; RF[x].Qi ← φ}

• ∀

x if (RS[x].Qj = r b) {RS[x].Vj ← result; RS[x].Qj ← φ}

• similarly for Qk / Vk• RS[r].busy ← no• ROB[b].rdy ← yes; ROB[b].val ← result


Commit (non-branch instruction)Commit (nonCommit (non--branch instruction)branch instruction)

• Wait until instruction reaches head of ROB (entry h) and ROB[h].rdy = yes

• d ← ROB[h].dst• RF[d].val ← ROB[h].val• ROB[h].busy ← no• if (RF[d].Qi = h) {RF[d].busy ← no}


Commit (branch instruction)Commit (branch instruction)Commit (branch instruction)

• Wait until instruction reaches head of ROB (entry h) and ROB[h].rdy = yes

• If branch is mispredicted, – clear ROB, RF[ ].Qi– fetch branch dest

• else– ROB[h].busy ← no– if (RF[d].Qi = h) {RF[d].busy ← no}

Lec Feb09 2009

Technology

Transcript of Lec Feb09 2009