Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

download Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

of 20

Transcript of Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    1/20

    Lecture 13 137

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

    In this lecture;

    ---------------------

    A-

    Source and types.

    B- Properties, Specifications and

    Tests.

    C- Gradation.

    D Blending (Combining).

    Aggregates: Types, Properties and Gradation

    Information listed in this lecture is mainly taken from the Iraqi General Specifications

    for Roads and Bridge (SCRB, 2007), Standard Specifications for Engineering Materials

    and Methods of Sampling and Testing (AASHTO, 2013), Handbook of Highway

    Engineering (Fwa, 2006), http://www.pavementinteractive.org (Accessed on 2015)

    and Highways (OFlaherty, 2007) and Aggregate properties (NCHRP, Report 539,

    2005).

    A- Source and Types

    In ASTM D8 (ASTM, 2003), aggregate is defined as a granular material of mineral

    composition such as sand, gravel, shell, slag, or crushed stone, used with cementing

    medium to form mortars or concrete or alone as in base courses, railroad ballasts,

    etc. These aggregates can be divided into three main categories natural,

    processed, and synthetic (artificial) aggregates.

    Natural aggregates are mined from river or glacial deposits

    ( ). Gravels and

    sands are examples of natural aggregates. According to the AASHTO Specs M146,

    stone is crushed or naturally angular particles of rock while gravel is rounded

    particles of rock; both should pass a 75-mm (3-in.) sieve and be retained on a 2.00-

    mm (No. 10) sieve. In Iraq, the control sieve is No. 4 (4.75 mm) sieve.

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    2/20

    Lecture 13 138

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

    Sand is granular material resulting from the disintegration, grinding, or crushing of

    rock and that will pass the 2.00-mm (No. 10) sieve (No.4 in Iraq) and be retained on

    the 0.075 mm (No. 200) sieve.

    Silt-clay (minus 75-m (No. 200) material)fine soil particles that will pass the

    0.075 mm (No. 200) sieve.

    Processed materials include gravel or stones that have been crushed, washed,

    screened, or otherwise treated to enhance the performance of the hot mix asphalt

    concrete (HMAC). Processed materials tend to be more angular and better graded.

    Synthetic (artificial) aggregates are not mined or quarried. Rather, they are

    manufactured through the application of physical and/or chemical processes as

    either a principal product or a by-product. They are often used to improve the skid

    resistance of HMAC. Blast furnace slag, lightweight expanded clay, shale are

    examples of artificial aggregates.

    In addition to the use of traditional aggregates mentioned above, there has been an

    increase in the use of waste products in HMAC. Scrapped tires and glass are the two

    most commonly used waste products that have been disposed of in HMAC.

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    3/20

    Lecture 13 139

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    4/20

    Lecture 13 140

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

    B- Properties, Tests and Specifications

    Mineral aggregates make up between 80% and 90% of the total volume or 94% to

    95% of the mass of hot mix asphalt (HMA). For this reason, it is important to

    maximize the quality of the mineral aggregates to ensure the proper performance of

    our countrys roadways. The quality of mineral aggregates for road-paving materials

    has been specified by the toughness, soundness (durability), cleanliness, particle

    shape, angularity, surface texture, and absorption.

    This section will mainly review the key aggregates properties considered by the

    Superpave mix design method. The Superpave mix design method was recently

    designed -1993- to replace the Hveem and Marshall methods. The important

    aggregates physical properties, tests and specifications were determined by asking

    an expert group in order to determine the consensus and source aggregate

    properties. The consensus properties including coarse and fine aggregate

    angularity, flat and elongated particles, and clay content were chosen to ensure

    that the aggregate quality was sufficient to provide satisfactory HMA performance

    for the design traffic level. In contrast, the source properties - including toughness

    (Los Angeles abrasion), soundness, and deleterious materialswere to be set by the

    agency. This was done to allow for variances in locally available materials.

    In addition to the Superpave consensus and source properties, there are other

    properties that may influence the performance of aggregates in HMA particle

    index, plasticity index (PI), affinity ) ( for asphalt, and absorption.

    CAA; FAA;Flat & Elongated and Clay content1- Consensus (required)

    Toughness; Soundness, and Deleterious

    materials2- Source (optional)

    Particle index; PI; Ashpalt affinity and

    Absorbtion3- Other properties

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    5/20

    Lecture 13 141

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

    1- Consensus aggregate properties (required)

    a)Coarse Aggregate Angularity (CAA)

    CAA is defined as the percent by weight of aggregates retained on the No. 4

    (4.75 mm) sieve with one or more fractured face. This property is determined using

    ASTM D5821 Standard Test Method for Determining the Percentage of Fractured

    Particles in Coarse Aggregate. In this procedure, individual aggregates are manually

    examined for the presence of fractured faces.

    Once the aggregates are sorted by the number of fractured faces, their percentages

    of aggregate with at least one or two fractured faces are calculated. A fractured face

    is defined as any angular, rough, or broken surface of an aggregate particle that

    occupies more than 25% of the outline of the aggregate particle visible in that

    orientation.

    The percent of fractured particles in coarse aggregate can provide an indication of

    inter-particle shear friction or stability.

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    6/20

    Lecture 13 142

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

    b) Fine Aggregate Angularity (FAA)

    FAA is defined as the percent of air voids present in a loose uncompacted aggregate

    sample that passes the No. 8 (2.36 mm) sieve. This property is determined using

    AASHTO T304 Standard Method of Test for Uncompacted Void Content of Fine

    Aggregate Method A. In this procedure, a nominal 100 cm3calibrated cylinder

    measure is filled with fine aggregate through a funnel placed at a fixed height above

    the measure. When the measure is overfilled, it is struck off

    ( ) and the mass

    of aggregate inside the measure is determined by weighing.

    The uncompacted void content is the difference between the volume of the

    cylindrical measure and the absolute volume of the fine aggregate (calculated from

    its mass and bulk dry specific gravity). For fine aggregate with a given gradation, the

    higher the void content, the higher the assumed angularity and rougher the surface.

    High angularity results in high internal friction of aggregate and hence high shear

    strength ( = c + tan ).

    Generally, angular aggregates are harder to compact due to the aggregate-interlock

    (low workability), which gives the mix greater shear strength. These mixes tend to

    be more stable and resistant to rutting.

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    7/20

    Lecture 13 143

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

    c) Flat and Elongated Particles

    Flat or elongated particles are defined as aggregate having a ratio of width to

    thickness or length to width greater than a specified value. This property is

    determined using ASTM D4791 Standard Practice for Flat Particles, Elongated

    Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate.

    This test is conducted on aggregates retained on the No. 4 (4.75 mm) sieve. In this

    procedure, a proportional calliper ( )is used to measure the

    dimensional ratio of a representative sample of coarse aggregate. Aggregates

    exceeding the 5 to 1 ratio are considered flat and elongated in the Superpave mix

    design system. The percent of flat or elongated aggregates is reported as a

    percentage of total aggregates tested.

    Aggregates used in HMA mixes should be cubicle rather than disproportionate in

    their dimensions. Aggregates particles that are significantly longer in one dimension

    than in the other one or two dimensions have a propensity to break during the

    construction process or under traffic loading.

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    8/20

    Lecture 13 144

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

    d) Clay content

    Clay content is defined as the percentage of clay material contained in the aggregate

    fraction that passes the No. 4 (4.75 mm) sieve. This property is determined using

    AASHTO T176 Standard Method of Test for Plastic Fines in Graded Aggregates and

    Soils by Use of the Sand Equivalent Test.

    In this procedure, a sample of fine aggregate is placed in a graduated cylinder with a

    flocculating solution. The cylinder is then agitated to loosen the clayey fines within

    and surrounding the aggregate particles. After allowing the constituents to

    settle for a specific length of time, the height of suspended clay and sedimented

    aggregate is measured. The sand equivalent value is the ratio of the sand reading to

    the clay reading as a percentage.

    A low sand equivalent value, or high clay content, means that there is dirt on the

    surface of the aggregates. This dirt can reduce the bond between the aggregate

    and asphalt cement. Consequently, the mix would have a greater tendency for

    stripping. Cleaner aggregate with higher sand equivalent values will enhance the

    performance of HMA. According to SCRB (2009) sand equivalent value should not be

    less than 45%

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    9/20

    Lecture 13 145

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

    2- Source aggregate properties (optional)

    a) Toughness

    Toughness is the percent loss of material from an aggregate blend during the Los

    Angeles Abrasion (

    /

    ) test. This property is determined using AASHTO T96

    (ASTM C131) Standard Method of Test for Resistance to Degradation of Small-Size

    Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine. The Los

    Angeles (L.A.) abrasion test is a common test method used to indicate aggregate

    toughness (impact resistance) and abrasion characteristics (hardness). These

    characteristics are important because the aggregate in HMA must resist crushing

    , degradation and disintegration it might face during stockpiling,

    producing (in plant), placing, and compacting. Aggregates not adequately resistant

    to abrasion and polishing may cause premature structural failure and/or a loss of

    skid resistance.

    In this procedure, aggregate is degraded (broken apart to smaller sizes) through

    abrasion, impact, and grinding ( ) in a rotating steel drum ( ) containing steel

    spheres. The LA abrasion loss is the difference between the original and final mass

    of the sample after washing off the No. 12 (1.70 mm) screen. Typical test values

    range from 10% for extremely hard rocks (e.g. basalt) to 60% for soft rocks (e.g.limestone).

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    10/20

    Lecture 13 146

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

    b) Soundness

    The soundness test determines an aggregates resistance (durability) to

    disintegration by weathering and, in particular, freeze-thaw cycles. Aggregates that

    are durable are less likely to degrade in the field and cause premature HMA

    pavement distress and potentially, failure.

    Soundness is the percent loss of material from an aggregate blend during the

    sodium sulfate Na2SO4 or magnesium sulfate MgSO4soundness test. This property is

    determined using AASHTO T104 Standard Method of Test for Soundness of

    Aggregate by Use of Sodium Sulfate or Magnesium Sulfate. In this procedure,

    aggregate samples are put through repeated cycles of immersion in saturated

    solutions of sodium or magnesium sulfate followed by oven drying. The percent loss

    of material is determined by taking the difference between the original and final

    masses expressed as a percentage of the original mass. This test evaluates the

    aggregates ability to resist breaking down or disintegrating due to weathering (i.e.,

    wetting and drying and/or freezing and thawing). ASTM D692 Standard

    Specification for Coarse Aggregate for Bituminous Paving Mixtures specifies a 5-

    cycle weighted loss of not more than 12% when sodium sulfate is used or 18% when

    magnesium sulfate is used.

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    11/20

    Lecture 13 147

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

    c) Deleterious Materials

    The percentage of deleterious materials in blended aggregate is determined

    using AASHTO T112 (ASTM C142) Standard Method of Test for Clay Lumps

    and Friable Particles in Aggregate. In this procedure, aggregates are individually

    subjected to finger pressure (while soaking) to determine materials that are friable

    or clay lumps. The percent of clay lumps and friable particles is determined by taking

    the difference between the original and final mass retained on a No. 200 (0.075

    mm) sieve, after wet sieving, expressed as a percentage of the original mass. The

    percent of deleterious materials can range from 0.2 to 10%.

    =========================

    3- Other properties

    a) Particle Index (Shape and Texture)

    Particle index is an overall measure of aggregate particle shape and texture. This

    property is determined using ASTM D3398 Standard Test Method for Index of

    Aggregate Particle Shape and Texture. In this test method, the percent voids in the

    aggregate compacted in two stages according to a specified procedure is used to

    calculate the particle index (Ia) value. Typically, rounded particles with smooth

    surface textures may have a particle index of 6 or 7 while a highly-angular crushed

    particle with rough surface textures can have particle indices of 15 to 20 or higher.

    Surface texture, similar to particle shape, influences the workability and strength of

    HMA. Aggregates with rough textures, such as crushed limestone or gravel, tend to

    form stronger bonds with asphalt cement and increases the strength and asphalt

    cement demand of a mix. On the other hand, aggregates with smooth textures, such

    as river gravels and sands, tend to form weaker bonds with asphalt cement which

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    12/20

    Lecture 13 148

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

    leads to reduced strength and decreased asphalt cement demand. However, smooth

    aggregate surface textures may provide more workability.

    b) Plasticity Index

    The Plasticity Index (PI) is a measure of the degree of plasticity of fines (material

    passing the No. 200 sieve). It can provide an indication of the amount and type of

    fines. This property is determined using ASTM D4318 Standard Test Method for

    Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. The PI is defined as the

    difference between the liquid limit (LL) and plastic limit (PL).

    c) Affinity for Asphalt

    An aggregates affinity for asphalt cement is its propensity to attract and remain

    attached to asphalt cement. Asphalt cement must coat the aggregate, stick to the

    aggregate, and resist stripping of the asphalt film in the presence of water. It is

    important to recognize that some aggregates appear to have a greater affinity for

    water than for asphalt cement. These hydrophilic (water-loving) aggregates have a

    tendency to get stripped (asphalt film gets detached from the aggregate) with

    exposure to water. On the other hand, hydrophobic (water-hating) aggregates have

    a greater affinity for asphalt cement. Limestone and dolomite are examples of

    hydrophobic aggregates.

    d) Absorption

    Absorption is a measure of an aggregates porosity. While porosity is generally

    associated with the absorption of water, a porous aggregate also tends to absorb

    asphalt cement. Porous aggregates have a greater asphalt cement demand and

    require additional asphalt cement for a comparable mix. Therefore, highly porous

    aggregates are generally not used for HMA unless the aggregates possess certain

    desirable qualities that outweigh the cost of additional asphalt cement.

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    13/20

    Lecture 13 149

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

    C Aggregates gradation

    According to Iraqi roads specifications, Coarse Aggregate is that portion of the

    combined aggregate retained on the 4.75 mm (No. 4) sieve used for asphalt

    concrete. Fine Aggregate is that portion of the combined aggregate passing the 4.75

    mm (No. 4) sieve shall consist of stone screenings (dust) and natural sand. Natural

    sand shall not exceed 25% of the portion fines than 2.36 mm for surface and binder

    courses. Mineral Filler shall consist of limestone or other stone dust, portland

    cement, hydrated lime or other non-plastic mineral matter from approved sources.

    It shall conform to the grading requirements shown in Table R9/1.

    The plasticity index as determined by ASSHTO T90 shall not be greater than 4. The

    amount of filler to be added shall be only that amount which is necessary to the

    grading requirements for the completed mixture prescribed.

    Aggregate gradation is the distribution of particle size expressed as a percentage of

    the total sample weight. This property is determined using AASHTO T27 (ASTM

    C136) Standard Method of Test for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate.

    In this test, aggregate passed through sieves with progressively smaller openings.

    The mass of aggregate retained is then used to determine the percent of aggregate

    retained on and/or passing each sieve. Gradations can be represented graphically

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    14/20

    Lecture 13 150

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

    using percent passing (by weight) as the ordinate and particle size as the abscissa.

    Fuller and Thompson (1907) developed one of the best-known grading charts in the

    early 20th century. The equation for Fullers maximum density curve is as follows:

    P = (d/D)0.45

    * 100

    where d is the diameter of the sieve in question, P total percent passing or finer

    than the sieve, and D is the maximum size of the aggregate. Maximum size is the

    smallest sieve through which 100 percent of the aggregate sample particles pass.

    For example, for surface course; P(#4) = (4.75/19)0.45

    * 100 = 53.58 %

    for surface course; P(#200) = (0.075/19)0.45

    * 100 = 8.28 %

    for binder course; P(#4) = (4.75/25)0.45

    * 100 = 47.36 %

    for binder course; P(#200) = (0.075/25)0.45

    * 100 = 7.32 %

    ---------------------------------------------------------

    Types of Aggregate Gradation

    Dense or Well-Graded: The most common HMA and PCC mix designs in the U.S.

    tend to use dense graded aggregate. Typical gradations are near the 0.45 power

    curve but not right on it. Generally, a true maximum density gradation (exactly on

    the 0.45 power curve) would result in unacceptably low VMA (voids in mineral

    aggregate).

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    15/20

    Lecture 13 151

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

    Gap Graded: Refers to a gradation that contains only a small percentage of

    aggregate particles in the mid-size range. The curve is flat in the mid-size range.

    Some PCC mix designs use gap graded aggregate to provide a more economical mix

    since less sand can be used for a given workability. HMA gap graded mixes can be

    prone to ( ) segregation during placement.

    Open Graded: Refers to a gradation that contains only a small percentage of

    aggregate particles in the small range. This results in more air voids (permeable

    aggregate) because there are not enough small particles to fill in the voids between

    the larger particles. The curve is near vertical in the mid-size range, and flat and

    near-zero in the small-size range.

    Uniformly Graded: Refers to a gradation that contains most of the particles in a very

    narrow size range. In essence, all the particles are the same size. The curve is steep

    and only occupies the narrow size range specified.

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    16/20

    Lecture 13 152

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

    D Aggregate Blending (Combining)

    The first phase in any asphalt mix design is the selection and combination of

    aggregates to obtain a gradation within the specification limits. This sometimes is

    referred to as mechanical stabilization.

    Several aggregate gradations are usually proportioned for three reasons: (1) to

    obtain the desired gradation; (2) single natural or quarried materials not enough and

    (3) it is economical to combine natural and process materials.

    According to the Iraqi specification (SCRB, 2007, R9), the asphalt concrete mixtures

    for base course (type I), binder course (type II) and surface course (type IIIA or IIIB)

    shall be composed basically of coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, mineral filler (if

    needed), and asphalt cement. The several mineral constituents shall be sized,

    uniformly graded and combined in such proportions that the resulting blend meets

    the grading requirements for the specific type under contract. The requirements for

    the asphalt concrete mixtures shall conform to grading shown in the Table below.

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    17/20

    Lecture 13 153

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

    The Job Mix Formula (JMF)

    Generally, a job-mix formula consists of two parts: (1) The combined gradation of

    the aggregates to be used in the production of the asphalt concrete mixture; (2) The

    asphalt content necessary to produce a satisfactory mix meeting all the specification

    requirements (next lectures). The Iraqi SCRB (2009, R9) stated that contractor will

    be allowed the tolerances from the approved job-mix formula shown in Table R9/4.

    How to Combining Aggregates to Achieve the Target Blend?

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    18/20

    Lecture 13 154

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

    Proportioning Determinations

    (1) Combining Two Aggregates

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    19/20

    Lecture 13 155

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr. Firas Asad

    Figure 3.10 Trial-and-Error calculations for combining two aggregates.

    (2) Combining Three Aggregates or More

    The same procedure adopted in blinding two aggregates can be followed to

    determine the adequate proportions for combining three or more aggregates. For

    example, when three aggregates needs to be combined (Coarse agg. A, Fine Agg. B

    and Mineral Filler C) the following Basic Formula and Trial-and-Error procedure

    should be applied.

    P = aA + bB + cC

    a + b + c = 1

    ===================================

  • 7/25/2019 Lec 13 Highway Engineering - Aggregate Tests Gradation and Blending

    20/20

    Lecture 13 156

    Highway Eng. Aggregates of Road Pavements 14 15

    Dr Firas Asad