Learning styles
-
Upload
tony-kazanjian -
Category
Documents
-
view
2.307 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Learning styles
![Page 1: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
OVERVIEW
Learner differences (IDs) • Learning styles
o Allport (1937) - Cognitive style • Learning strategies
o L2 research o Various models
• Pedagogy • Affective variables
o Motivation o Expectancy o Self-efficacy o Anxiety
• Conclusion o 21st century
![Page 2: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
LEARNING STYLES AND STRATEGIES
DEREK YIU, ELIZ TCHAKARIAN, TONY KAZANJIAN
2/24/2011 LING 8630: SLA
PROFESSOR HEEKYEONG LEE
![Page 3: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
(BRIEF) HISTORY OF LEARNING STYLES
• Cognitive style research o 1920s - 1930s
Perceptual speed & flexibility o 1940s
Field Independence - Field Dependence (FI-FD)
o 1950s - 1970s Thelen (1954) - Learning style Thomas & Chess (1977)
Temperament theory
![Page 4: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
CONT. o 1980s - today (Personality
variables) McCarthy (1980)
4-MAT Schmeck (1988)
Leveling-sharpening Impulsivity-reflectivity
Myers et al. (1998) Myers-Briggs Type
Indicator (MBTI) Busato et al. (1999)
Five Factor Personality Model
Gardner (1983, 2000) Multiple Intelligences
Model
![Page 5: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
LEARNING STRATEGIES
• Neither good nor bad • Useful under certain conditions
o Relevance to L2 task o Student's learning style
preference o Effectively linking and making
connections • Biggs (1992), Schmeck (1988)
o Purpose of learning Surface Achieving Deep
![Page 6: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
ISSUES IN L2 LEARNING STRATEGIES RESEARCH
1. Identification of language learning strategies. • Identified through self-report. • How?
o Retrospective interviews o Stimulated recall interviews o Questionnaires (2 types) o Diaries and Journals o Think - aloud and individual interview.
![Page 7: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
ISSUES IN L2 LEARNING STRATEGIES RESEARCH
2. Other variables must be considered: • Gender • L2 proficiency
3. Influence of cultural context: • Individualist cultures vs collectivist culture
4. Explicit and integrated strategy instruction: • Researchers agree strategies should be explicitly taught. • Central argument: should strategies be taught
separately or integrated into the curriculum? Pro to integrated: Allows learners to work with authentic tasks. Con: What do you think?
![Page 8: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ISSUES IN L2 LEARNING STRATEGIES RESEARCH
5. Language of instruction • L1 vs L2 • Most research shows that L1 support is needed especially at
the beginners level
6. Transfer of strategies to new tasks • Transfer of strategies to new tasks proved to be hard
in L1. • Harris (2004): study on strategy transfer
taught in L1 to L2 learning. The higher achieving students showed a higher rate of transference.
![Page 9: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
LEARNING STYLES VS. LEARNING STRATEGIES • Styles are general approaches
o visual/kinesthetic/auditory o abstract-intuitive/concrete-sequential o synthesizer o global/particular o extrovert/introvert
• Strategies are specific behaviors and how we use them (i.e. cognitive, metacognitive, affective, social) o cognitive o metacognitive o affective o social
used in retrieving language info, rehearsing target structures, compensating for communication gaps
![Page 10: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
STYLES...MEET STRATEGIES
• Ehrman and Oxford (1990) study, using SILL and MBTI, determined which styles apply which strategies. o extroverts -> social strategies o concrete - sequential -> memory strategies o abstract - intuitive -> comprehension strategies o thinkers -> metacognitive strategies o feelers -> social strategies o open learners -> affective strategies
• Study by Rossi-Le (1995) o Tactile and kinesthetic learning styles preferred
socializing and interacting in conversation with native speakers
![Page 11: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
INTERACTION OF STYLES, STRATEGIES, AND TASKS
• Task - meaningful activity designed to elicit specific grammatical forms which has a goal to work toward. o Primarily based in real-world, evaluated by success of the
outcome • Learners will deal with tasks consistent with their individual
styles and strategies o Many factors (age, proficiency, aptitude, motivation etc.)
can influence which strategies a learner applies to the task o No single strategy can work for everyone
![Page 12: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
LEARNING STYLES AND RECEPTIVE STRATEGIES • Gallin (1999) study on the relationship of reading strategies
and learning style o Visual learning styles tend to use more strategies overall o Concluded that abstract-intuitive and concrete-sequential
styles are most likely to affect reading, in terms of inferencing skill
• Similar study on learning styles and listening strategies concluded that: o Synthetic learners liked summarizing, planning and social
strategies o Open and kinesthetic learners preferred social strategies o Introverts did not like summarizing strategies o Concrete-sequential learners used less resources o Abstract-intuitive used more monitoring strategies
![Page 13: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
GENERAL IDEA, INFERENCING, AND SUMMARIZING
• To get the general idea in a reading task, concrete-sequential learners will sense the organization of a text first, while abstract-intuitive will skip around, looking for key words.
• Abstract-intuitive learners rely more on their own schemata to infer, whereas concrete-sequential learners focus more on clues in the text.
• Synthetic and global learners were better at summarizing • Introverted learners may want to listen or read over and
over to fully understand new vocabulary • Extroverted learners prefer to engage instructor or peers in
the topic to understand the form, meaning, and use of certain vocabulary
![Page 14: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS
1. Teachers must know their students and what strategies the students are already using.
2. Students have the potential to become better language learners if they are aware of the different types of learning strategies.
![Page 15: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
MODELS OF LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGY INSTRUCTION
There are many different models, but all agree: 1. Making students aware of the value of using different
learning strategies facilitated through demonstrations. 2. Practice is essential and students may use strategies
autonomously. 3. Students should evaluate how well different certain
strategies worked for them.
Current Models: SSBI (Cohen, 1998); CALLA (Chamor, 2005; chamot et al., 1999); and Grenfell & Harris (1999).
All three models are grounded in developing student awareness and encouraging the adoption of different strategies that may help them improve.
![Page 16: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
AFFECTIVE VARIABLES - MOTIVATION
• Gardner & Lambert (1959) o Socio-Educational Model of Language Learning
Integrative Instrumental
![Page 17: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
MOTIVATION CONT.
• Deci & Ryan (1985) o Intrinsic motivation o Extrinsic motivation
• Combination of both o Continuum
• Context o Types of instruction
• People o Teachers, parents,
administrators • Environment
o Classroom, local community
![Page 18: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
EXPECTANCY MODEL
• Bandura (1993); Schunk (1991); Weiner (1986) o Self perception of abilities to be successful
![Page 19: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
ATTRIBUTION THEORY
• Weiner (1986) o Choice vs. fate
![Page 20: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
SELF-EFFICACY
• Bandura (1997) o Believing in one's capability to take action
Effort
![Page 21: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
CRITICISM
• Too broad • Too simplistic • Too ambiguous
• Other variables o Anxiety o Defense mechanisms o Internal attitudes o Self-esteem o Activation o Beliefs o Affective filter
![Page 22: Learning styles](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052315/547ba80bb4af9f83598b45bd/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
CONCLUSION
• Universality vs. Individuality o Students o Teachers
• Learning styles, learning strategies, and affective factors are inseparable
• Future directions o Expansion of previous models o Multiple methodologies