Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning...

31
Learning Review Game Test Tuesday

TAGS:

Transcript of Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning...

Page 1: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Learning Review Game

Test Tuesday

Page 2: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n):

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

20

1. Unconditioned stimulus

2. Neutral stimulus

3. Conditioned stimulus

4. Responsive Stimulus

5. Conditioned response

Page 3: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Shaping is:

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

201. A pattern of responses that must

be made before classical conditioning is completed

2. Rewarding behaviors that get closer and closer to the desired goal behavior

3. Completing a set of behaviors in succession before a reward is given

4. Giving you chocolate pudding to increase the likelihood you will eat more carrots

5. Inhibition of new learning by previous learning

Page 4: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

John loves to fish. He puts his line in the water and leaves it until he feels a tug. On what reinforcement schedule is he rewarded?

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

20

1. Continuous reinforcement

2. Fixed ratio

3. Fixed interval

4. Variable ratio

5. Variable interval

Page 5: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Chimpanzees given tokens for performing tricks were able to put the tokens in vending machines to get grapes. The tokens acted as:

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

20

1. Primary reinforcers

2. Classical conditioning

3. Secondary reinforcers

4. Negative reinforcers

5. Unconditined reinforcers

Page 6: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Watson’s classical conditioning of “Little Albert” was helpful in explaining that:

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

201. Some conditioned stimuli do not

generalize

2. Human emotions such as fear are subject to classical conditioning

3. Drug dependency is subject to classical conditioning as well as operant conditioning

4. Small children are not as easily conditioned as older children

5. Fear of rats and rabbits are innate responses previously undiscovered

Page 7: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Participant Scores

0 Participant 1

0 Participant 2

0 Participant 3

0 Participant 4

0 Participant 5

Page 8: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Jamel got very sick after eating some mushrooms on a pizza at his friend’s house. He didn’t know that he had a stomach virus at the time, blamed his illness on mushrooms, and refused to eat them again. Which of the following is the unconditioned stimulus for his taste aversion to mushrooms?

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

20

1. Pizza

2. Stomach virus

3. Mushrooms

4. Headache

5. Aversion to mushrooms

Page 9: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

While readying to take a free-throw shot, you suddenly arrive at the answer to a chemistry problem you’d been working on several hours before. This is an example of:

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

20

1. Insight

2. Backward conditioning

3. Latent learning

4. Discrimination

5. The Premack Principle

Page 10: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Latent learning is best described by which of the following:

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

201. Innate responses of an organism

preventing new learning and associations

2. Unconscious meaning that is attributed to new response patterns

3. Response patterns that become extinguished gradually over time

4. Delayed responses that occur when new stimuli are paired with familiar ones

5. Learning that occurs in the absence of rewards

Page 11: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Rats were more likely to learn an aversion to sour foods than bright lights. This illustrates:

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

20

1. Insight

2. Preparedness

3. Extinction

4. Observational learning

5. Generalization

Page 12: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Spontaneous recovery refers to the:

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

201. Extinction of a previously

learned behavior

2. Disappearance of a previously extinguished US after a rest period

3. Return of a behavior after a conditioning phase has ended

4. Tendency of newly acquired responses to be intermittent at first

5. Organism’s tendency to forget previously learned responses, but to relearn them more quickly during a second training period

Page 13: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Participant Scores

0 Participant 1

0 Participant 2

0 Participant 3

0 Participant 4

0 Participant 5

Page 14: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Which of the following would be an example of learning?

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

201. A newborn infant sucks on a

bottle filled with milk

2. A teenager falls asleep after staying after for 96 hours

3. A rat presses a lever to obtain a food pellet

4. A patient clenches his teeth when he sees the dentist’s drill, even though he has never had a tooth filled

5. A student jumps when she hears someone drop a book in the library stacks

Page 15: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

An unconditioned stimulus is any stimulus that:

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

201. Triggers a learned

response

2. Is based upon its association with another unconditioned stimulus

3. Provides positive or negative reinforcement

4. Naturally elicits a reflexive behavior

5. Inhibits previously learned behavior

Page 16: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

The initial learning stage in classical conditioning in which the neutral stimulus is repeatedly paired with the unconditioned stimulus is known as:

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

20

1. Prompting

2. Trial and error learning

3. Acquisition

4. Insight learning

5. Shaping

Page 17: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Which one of the following poses a problem for classical conditioning theory?

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

201. Conditioning usually occurs

gradually

2. Experimental nervosis

3. Taste aversions are learned through observation

4. Taste aversions are generalizable

5. Taste aversions develop after a long time delay between the CS and the UCS

Page 18: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

These are consequences that alter the likelihood of behaviors:

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

201. Conditioned and

unconditioned reflexes

2. Successive approximations

3. Rewards and Punishments

4. Conditioned and unconditioned stimuli

5. Discrimination and generalization

Page 19: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Participant Scores

0 Participant 1

0 Participant 2

0 Participant 3

0 Participant 4

0 Participant 5

Page 20: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Negative and positive reinforcers are similar in that these always ______ the likelihood of ensuing responses.

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

20

1. Decrease

2. Increase

3. Extinguish

4. Eliminate

5. Have no effect on

Page 21: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

The Premack principle states that:

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

201. A preferred activity can be

used to reinforce a less preferred one

2. In order to be effective, reinforcement must be unpredictable

3. Reinforcement is more effective than punishment

4. Punishment must be used consistently and immediately

5. Using two types of punishment works better than using only one

Page 22: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Which of the following is true of punishment?

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

201. Punishment may involve the

application of an aversive stimulus

2. Punishment must be used consistently in order to be effective

3. Aggression may be produced by punishment

4. Punishment interferes with the learning of new and better behaviors

5. All of the above are correct

Page 23: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Tolman concluded that the rats he ran through mazes had created _________ to help them find where the food was placed.

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

20

1. Insight learning

2. Cognitive maps

3. Classical conditioning

4. Observational learning

5. Operant conditioning

Page 24: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Your brother comes home after curfew and is grounded by your parents. In the future, you come home on time. This type of learning is best explained by:

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

20

1. Social learning

2. Insight learning

3. Classical conditioning

4. Operant conditioning

5. Vicarious trial and error

Page 25: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Participant Scores

0 Participant 1

0 Participant 2

0 Participant 3

0 Participant 4

0 Participant 5

Page 26: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

_______ reported that watching violent behaviors makes children more likely to behave violently.

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

20

1. Watson

2. Thorndike

3. Tolman

4. Bandura

5. Garcia

Page 27: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Thorndike’s Law of Effect said that an organism will learn to perform responses that are:

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

20

1. Preceded by a conditioned stimulus

2. Reflexive

3. Prompted

4. Preceded by a neutral stimulus

5. Rewarded

Page 28: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Which one of the following would be considered a primary reinforcer?

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

20

1. Money

2. Achievement

3. Food

4. Status

5. Both 1 and 3

Page 29: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Which of the following proved to be difficult to explain in purely behavioral terms?

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

201. A child learning to read by

receiving rewards

2. A pigeon learning to press a lever in a Skinner box for a food reward

3. A chimpanzee using a pile of boxes and a stick to obtain food hung high in its cage

4. A dog salivating at the sound of a bell

5. A trained seal doing a trick for a fish

Page 30: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Operant conditioning, in contrast with classical conditioning, emphasizes events (such as rewards and punishments) that occur:

1 2 3 4 5

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

20

1. After the behavior

2. Concurrently with another response

3. At the same time as another stimulus

4. During the behavior

5. Before the behavior

Page 31: Learning Review Game Test Tuesday. Once Pavlov’s dogs learned to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork, the tuning fork was a(n): 1234567891011121314151617181920.

Participant Scores

0 Participant 1

0 Participant 2

0 Participant 3

0 Participant 4

0 Participant 5


1 st MEMS Commercial Tuning Fork Gyroscope Draper Labs

1 st MEMS Commercial Tuning Fork Gyroscope Draper Labs

Chapter 16 Vibrations and Waves. Vibrations/Oscillations Object at the end of a spring Object at the end of a spring Tuning fork Tuning fork Pendulum.

Chapter 16 Vibrations and Waves. Vibrations/Oscillations Object at the end of a spring Object at the end of a spring Tuning fork Tuning fork Pendulum.

Chapter 14 Sound. Using a Tuning Fork to Produce a Sound Wave A tuning fork will produce a pure musical note A tuning fork will produce a pure musical.

Chapter 14 Sound. Using a Tuning Fork to Produce a Sound Wave A tuning fork will produce a pure musical note A tuning fork will produce a pure musical.

Galaxy Morphology The Tuning Fork that Blossomed into a Lemon

Galaxy Morphology The Tuning Fork that Blossomed into a Lemon

Improving the Lateral Resolution of Quartz Tuning Fork ...

Improving the Lateral Resolution of Quartz Tuning Fork ...

The vale-maintained tuning-fork as a precision time-standardrspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/royprsa/103/721/240.full.pdf · The Valve-maintained Tuning-fork as a Precision

The vale-maintained tuning-fork as a precision time-standardrspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/royprsa/103/721/240.full.pdf · The Valve-maintained Tuning-fork as a Precision

Classical Conditioning Pavlov’s Experiment. Neutral Stimulus Pavlov used a tuning fork Pavlov used a tuning fork A tuning fork has nothing to do with.

Classical Conditioning Pavlov’s Experiment. Neutral Stimulus Pavlov used a tuning fork Pavlov used a tuning fork A tuning fork has nothing to do with.

From Great Writ to Tuning Fork: How Habeas Corpus was ...

From Great Writ to Tuning Fork: How Habeas Corpus was ...

SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Sol 1. · Since tuning fork is in resonance therefore frequency of tuning fork is 400 Hz. The observer is hearing one beat per second when the tuning fork is

SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Sol 1. · Since tuning fork is in resonance therefore frequency of tuning fork is 400 Hz. The observer is hearing one beat per second when the tuning fork is

SC Tuning Fork Level Switch B0 01 - ymsystem.co.krymsystem.co.kr/down/YSC Tuning Fork Level Switch.pdf · level switch provides reliable & maintenance-free for bulk solids. Just a

SC Tuning Fork Level Switch B0 01 - ymsystem.co.krymsystem.co.kr/down/YSC Tuning Fork Level Switch.pdf · level switch provides reliable & maintenance-free for bulk solids. Just a

Sound Waves Vibration of a tuning fork .

Sound Waves Vibration of a tuning fork .

Tuning Fork Analytical Balanc e HT/HTR CEN Series ... › system › en_product_catalog › 5_file_1.pdf · 270019M01 Tuning Fork Analytical Balanc e HT/HTR CEN Series Operation Manual

Tuning Fork Analytical Balanc e HT/HTR CEN Series ... › system › en_product_catalog › 5_file_1.pdf · 270019M01 Tuning Fork Analytical Balanc e HT/HTR CEN Series Operation Manual

Wafer-Level Vacuum-Encapsulated Ultra-Low Voltage Tuning Fork MEMS

Wafer-Level Vacuum-Encapsulated Ultra-Low Voltage Tuning Fork MEMS

Chapter 6 Quartz Tuning Fork Based Low Temperature …thesis.library.caltech.edu/6432/7/Chapter6_Low-temperature_AFM.pdf · Quartz Tuning Fork Based Low Temperature Atomic Force Microscopy

Chapter 6 Quartz Tuning Fork Based Low Temperature …thesis.library.caltech.edu/6432/7/Chapter6_Low-temperature_AFM.pdf · Quartz Tuning Fork Based Low Temperature Atomic Force Microscopy

Magnetic Force Microscopy using Quartz Tuning Fork

Magnetic Force Microscopy using Quartz Tuning Fork

Tuning fork tests

Tuning fork tests

High-Precision, Advanced Tuning Fork Balance LN Seriesvibra.co.jp/global/pdf/manual/LN/360002M01_LN.pdf · 360002M01 High-Precision, Advanced Tuning Fork Balance LN Series Operation

High-Precision, Advanced Tuning Fork Balance LN Seriesvibra.co.jp/global/pdf/manual/LN/360002M01_LN.pdf · 360002M01 High-Precision, Advanced Tuning Fork Balance LN Series Operation

Tuning Fork Crystals and Oscillator - abracon.com · SMD Tuning Fork Crystal Oscillator ABRACON is a one-stop-solution provider for 32.768kHz products. From legacy – cylindrical

Tuning Fork Crystals and Oscillator - abracon.com · SMD Tuning Fork Crystal Oscillator ABRACON is a one-stop-solution provider for 32.768kHz products. From legacy – cylindrical

LFV200 Vibrating Level Switches - LC Automation · tuning fork is piezo-electrically energized and vibrates at its resonance frequency. Once the tuning fork is covered with liquid,

LFV200 Vibrating Level Switches - LC Automation · tuning fork is piezo-electrically energized and vibrates at its resonance frequency. Once the tuning fork is covered with liquid,

INTRODUCTION OF TUNING FORK QUARTZ …Tech Info & Training – # xx 5. TUNING FORK FLEXURE MODE OPERATING PRINCIPLE The name Tuning Fork comes from the design of the crystal plate

INTRODUCTION OF TUNING FORK QUARTZ …Tech Info & Training – # xx 5. TUNING FORK FLEXURE MODE OPERATING PRINCIPLE The name Tuning Fork comes from the design of the crystal plate