Learning in third space 2016

35
Learning in 3rd space Prof. II Reijo Kupiainen (Photos and media are not included)

Transcript of Learning in third space 2016

Page 1: Learning in third space 2016

Learning in 3rd space

Prof. II Reijo Kupiainen

(Photos and media are not included)

Page 2: Learning in third space 2016

Third space

• The idea of third space comes from hybridity theory (Homi Bhabha)

• Originally hybridity is a cross between two separate cultures: not diversity but hybridity: two cultures meet and interact -> something new

• Cultural hybridity is a in-between place, which brings together contradictory knowledges, practices, and discourses: signs can be appropriated, translated, rehistoricized, and read anew (c.f. remixing culture)

Page 3: Learning in third space 2016

”Third Space theory”(Pahl & Rowsell 2005, Literacy and Education)

HOME Popularculture

Multimodaltexts

SCHOOL Writing,

speaking andlisteningliteracy

Out-of-school literacies School literacies

Page 4: Learning in third space 2016

”Third Space theory”(Pahl & Rowsell 2005, Literacy and Education)

HOME Popularculture

Multimodaltexts

SCHOOL Writing,

speaking andlisteningliteracy

THIRD SPACE Drawing and

writing using homeand school literacy

Out-of-school literacies School literacies

Page 5: Learning in third space 2016

– Kupiainen, 2013

”I am […] interested in young people’s own media practices, what they bring to the school, how these practices change school spaces and teaching and learning, how they are utilized in schooling, and finally how media education with its own goals helps children and young people enhance their media literacy practices. ”

Page 6: Learning in third space 2016

Home (out-of-school): informal learning School: formal learning

Interest-driven practices Curriculum-based practices

Peer-based learning Teacher-based learning

Engaging in of participants’ own accord, ”pulled” to learning

”Pushed” on learners, direct learning in particular channels

Learning goals are open-ended, depended by available

resources and personalised

Learning goals are specifiable in advance and uniform among

students

Page 7: Learning in third space 2016

Home School

Vernacularliteracies

Institutionalliteracies

Outside the domain of power, ”in the streets”

Control over people’s literacy practices

Common in private spheres Common in public spheres

Mary Hamilton (2000), Sustainable literacies and the ecology of lifelong learning.

Page 8: Learning in third space 2016

Third-space learning: a bridge between a ”home” and a ”school”

Home

Institution

School

Street

Physical LEPersonal (virtual) LE

Private Public

LMS: Learningmanagement system

ILE: Informallearning environment

Page 9: Learning in third space 2016

Virtual

Physical

Integrated

Decentralised

Global

Local

Formal Informal

Spac

e

Place

Form

Structure

Source: Smeds et al. 2010, InnoSchool project

Page 10: Learning in third space 2016

Third-space learning: a bridge between a ”home” and a ”school”

Home

Institution

School

Street

Physical LEVirtual (personal) LE

Private Public

LMS: Learningmanagement system

ILE: Informallearning environment

Page 11: Learning in third space 2016

Rejection of binaries (1)

Home School

Page 12: Learning in third space 2016

Rejection of binaries (1)

Home Heterotopos School

Page 13: Learning in third space 2016

Rejection of binaries (1)

Home Heterotopos School

Michel Foucault (1967). On other spaces. http://foucault.info/documents/heteroTopia/foucault.heteroTopia.en.html

Page 14: Learning in third space 2016

Rejection of binaries (1)

Home Heterotopos School

Michel Foucault (1967). On other spaces. http://foucault.info/documents/heteroTopia/foucault.heteroTopia.en.html

- heterotopias: places that are ambivalent and uncertain, either because they are new and as-yet unknown or

because they are impossible archaic representations of former modes of social order that have become obsolete.

(Kevin Hetherington (1997). The badlands of modernity: Heterotopia and social ordering)

Page 15: Learning in third space 2016

Tactics and strategies

Kupiainen, R. 2013, Media and Digital Literacies in Secondary School

”Michel de Certeau (1984) called strategy the logic of closure and internal administration of institutions (Lankshear & Knobel, 2011). In his theory, de Certeau distinguished between two social forces: production and consumption. Production is controlled through those who have power, who create, maintain, and impose disciplined spaces, make timetables and procedures, and organize the life in spaces. They control through strategies, which are processes directed toward disciplining places and maintaining power (Gomez, Stone, & Hobbel, 2004). ”

”In de Certeau’s theory, tactics is an art of the weak. He illustrated this by explaining the practices of North African migrants living in Paris. According to de Certeau, these migrants insinuate into the system imposed on them “the ways of ‘dwelling’ (in house or a language) peculiar to [their] native Kabylia” (p. 30; cf. Lankshear & Knobel, 2011, p. 243). They create their own plural space to be by the “art of being in between.” ”

Page 16: Learning in third space 2016

Media in education

• Makes the school space ”smoother” and changes social order (heterotopia)

• Enhances collaboration between peers/students

• Enhances ”collegial pedagogy”: students and teachers are needed (Soep & Chávez, 2010)

• Enhances ”social learning”, learning to be a participant (Brown & Adler, 2008)

• Enhances media education: learning about the media

Page 17: Learning in third space 2016

Rejection of binaries (2)

”Street” Institution

Page 18: Learning in third space 2016

Rejection of binaries (2)

”Street” Mobile Institution

Page 19: Learning in third space 2016

Rejection of binaries (2)

”Street” Mobile Institution

Page 20: Learning in third space 2016

Rejection of binaries (2)

”Street” Mobile Institution

http

://w

ww.

teac

htho

ught

.com

/tech

nolo

gy/1

2-pr

incip

les-o

f-mob

ile-le

arnin

g/

Page 21: Learning in third space 2016

Content curation

Source: http://www.business2community.com/content-marketing/content-curation-tools-selection-evaluation-criteria-worth-considering-01315342#yXiFATVEPviUF3T3.97

E.g.: https://fi.pinterest.com/rkupiainen/media-education/

Page 22: Learning in third space 2016

”Camera pen” pedagogy

• http://kaikkikuvaa.fi/edu/

• http://www.mystinenportaali.com/mediakasvatus/kamerakyna.html

Page 23: Learning in third space 2016

Rejection of binaries (3)

Physical Virtual

Page 24: Learning in third space 2016

Rejection of binaries (3)

Physical Augmented Virtual

Page 25: Learning in third space 2016

Rejection of binaries (3)

Physical Augmented Virtual

Page 26: Learning in third space 2016

QR-codes in a ”Digital Book Project”

Page 27: Learning in third space 2016

Augmented reality

• Apps used: Explain Everything & Aurasma

• Also used: ThingLink

Page 28: Learning in third space 2016

Rejection of binaries (4)

Private Public

Page 29: Learning in third space 2016

Rejection of binaries (4)

Private Networked publics

Public

Page 30: Learning in third space 2016

Rejection of binaries (4)

Private Networked publics

Public

- Networked publics are spaces that are constructed through networked technologies and collective spaces

that emerge from the intersection of people, technology, and practice (danah boyd (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi, (Ed.) A Networked self: Identity,

community, and culture on social network sites)

Page 31: Learning in third space 2016
Page 32: Learning in third space 2016

http://connectedlearning.tv/

Page 33: Learning in third space 2016

Third-space learning

• Creating new learning spaces in education

• Learning in hybrid, networked, bridged (between lifeworld and schooling), dynamic, multimodal, and open time-space.

• ”Learning in the context of everyday experiences of participation in the world” (Etienne Wenger)

Page 34: Learning in third space 2016

Problems

• ”Knowmad society” (knowledge + nomad) (Besselink, de Bree, Cobo, Hart et al., Knowmad Society

• Connected with everybody, everywhere, anytime

• Flexible workers in the new economy

• Lifelong learning = ”life imprisonment learning”

• Technological determinism

Page 35: Learning in third space 2016

Thank you!