LEARNING IN PERSONAL NETWORKS: COLLABORATIVE KNOWLEDGE … · LEARNING IN PERSONAL NETWORKS:...
1
Funding Initiative "Societal Challenges: Innovation Processes in Economy and Society" LEARNING IN PERSONAL NETWORKS: COLLABORATIVE KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION IN VIRTUAL FORUMS innovative practices performed in four types of virtual forums: collaborative virtual workspaces, social networking software, newsgroups and weblogs; particular role of information exchange and social networking as key learning practices. What are our conceptual tools? Explorative interviews with LinkedIn, Microsoft, SAP and Spoke experts, and members of sociality and connectivity networks. What are we interested in? Complex ecologies of informal personal networks Connectivity networks Sociality networks Project networks Social logic task-related relationships; professional relationships; weak ties. Social logic career-oriented relationships; professional and private relationships; weak ties Social logic theme-oriented relationships; professional and private relationships; weak ties. Empirical focus Microsoft and SAP project networks (enhance project-related information exchange). Empirical focus Social networking software LinkedIn and Spoke (systemize the maintenance and extension of personal networks). Empirical focus Microsoft and SAP technical support newsgroups and developer weblogs (dedicated to technical information on Microsoft and SAP software applications). What are our hypotheses? hanced by means of social networking software in professional networking. When using contacts in this systemized form, the number of contacts in the individual network rises, whereas the nature of ties becomes less personal and reliable. rationalizing work flow processes and significantly reduces the time spent for face-to-face encounters, it cannot completely substitute face-to-face meetings in building up reliable ties. We assume face-to-face and virtual co-presence to mutually reinforce each other in terms of intensifying personal relations. and informal webs can only to a certain degree be in- tegrated into formal processes of knowledge production. Strategic instrumentalization will undermine the innovative potential which essentially relies on the informality of knowledge production in informal networks. provide potential actor constellations for future project networks. Members of project networks on their part will strategically use sociality and connectivity networks for extending their know-whom and know-how. support each other, but we assume that they also generate tensions and conflicts. In particular members will maintain sociality and connectivity networks at the expense of project networks. Which contributions do we expect from our research? Moving beyond the 'community of practice' Appreciating innovation in weak-tie networks From single technology to ecologies of virtual forums challenging the coherence, homogeneity and persistence of the notion of 'communities'; challenging the function of communities as complements of formal organization. exploring the creative potential of weak-tie networks of different intensities; exploring learning dynamics that are defined by rivalry, tension and dissonance. highlighting network members' simultaneous involvement in various virtual forums, and cross-forum movements regarding the observed interaction technologies; highlighting social and organizational potentials resulting from the interdependent usage patterns of the focus technologies. Which methods do we apply? Analyses of collaborative workspace, newsgroup and weblog interactions We analyze content and interaction structures of collaborative workspace, newsgroup and weblog interactions. Interaction data are either displayed or archived on the websites of the respective virtual forums. We conduct quantitative and qualitative social network analyses of posting behavior and posted contents. Co-present virtual group discussions We conduct co-present virtual group discussions with members of collaborative virtual work- spaces by using the chat tool (Microsoft and SAP workspaces). Analysis of personal networks and request chains In addition to quantitative and qualitative analyses of the personal networks of social networking software users, our analyses target request chains between LinkedIn and Spoke users. The strategic use of contacts can electronically be en- Although virtual co-presence is an important factor in Sociality and connectivity networks as self–organized We assume that sociality and connectivity networks The personal learning networks overlap and mutually Prof. Dr. David Stark, John Kelly, M.A., Center on Organizational Innovation (COI), Columbia University New York Prof. Dr. Gernot Grabher, Julia Maintz, M.A. Socio-Economics of Space (SECONS), University of Bonn
Transcript of LEARNING IN PERSONAL NETWORKS: COLLABORATIVE KNOWLEDGE … · LEARNING IN PERSONAL NETWORKS:...
Funding Initiative "Societal Challenges:Innovation Processes in Economy and Society"
LEARNING IN PERSONAL NETWORKS: COLLABORATIVE KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION IN VIRTUAL FORUMS
innovative practices performed in four types of virtual forums: collaborative virtual workspaces, social networking software, newsgroups and weblogs;particular role of information exchange and social networking as key learning practices.
What are our conceptual tools?
Explorative interviewswith LinkedIn, Microsoft, SAP and Spoke experts, and members of sociality and connectivitynetworks.
What are we interested in?
Complex ecologies of informal personal networks
Connectivity networksSociality networksProject networksSocial logic
task-related relationships;professional relationships;weak ties.
Social logiccareer-oriented relationships;professional and private relationships;weak ties
Social logictheme-oriented relationships;professional and private relationships;weak ties.
Empirical focusMicrosoft and SAP project networks(enhance project-related information exchange).
Empirical focusSocial networking software LinkedIn and Spoke(systemize the maintenance and extension ofpersonal networks).
Empirical focusMicrosoft and SAP technical support newsgroups anddeveloper weblogs (dedicated to technical informationon Microsoft and SAP software applications).
What are our hypotheses?
hanced by means of social networking software inprofessional networking. When using contacts in thissystemized form, the number of contacts in the individualnetwork rises, whereas the nature of ties becomes lesspersonal and reliable.
rationalizing work flow processes and significantlyreduces the time spent for face-to-face encounters, itcannot completely substitute face-to-face meetings inbuilding up reliable ties. We assume face-to-face andvirtual co-presence to mutually reinforce each otherin terms of intensifying personal relations.
and informal webs can only to a certain degree be in-tegrated into formal processes of knowledge production.Strategic instrumentalization will undermine the innovativepotential which essentially relies on the informality ofknowledge production in informal networks.
provide potential actor constellations for future projectnetworks. Members of project networks on their partwill strategically use sociality and connectivity networksfor extending their know-whom and know-how.
support each other, but we assume that they also generatetensions and conflicts. In particular members will maintainsociality and connectivity networks at the expense ofproject networks.
Which contributions do we expect from our research?
Moving beyond the 'community of practice'
Appreciating innovation in weak-tie networks
From single technology to ecologies of virtual forums
challenging the coherence, homogeneity and persistence of the notion of 'communities';challenging the function of communities as complements of formal organization.
exploring the creative potential of weak-tie networks of different intensities;exploring learning dynamics that are defined by rivalry, tension and dissonance.
highlighting network members' simultaneous involvement in various virtual forums, andcross-forum movements regarding the observed interaction technologies;highlighting social and organizational potentials resulting from the interdependent usagepatterns of the focus technologies.
Which methods do we apply?
Analyses of collaborative workspace, newsgroup and weblog interactionsWe analyze content and interaction structures of collaborative workspace, newsgroup andweblog interactions. Interaction data are either displayed or archived on the websites of therespective virtual forums. We conduct quantitative and qualitative social network analysesof posting behavior and posted contents.
Co-present virtual group discussionsWe conduct co-present virtual group discussions with members of collaborative virtual work-spaces by using the chat tool (Microsoft and SAP workspaces).
Analysis of personal networks and request chainsIn addition to quantitative and qualitative analyses of the personal networks of social networkingsoftware users, our analyses target request chains between LinkedIn and Spoke users.
The strategic use of contacts can electronically be en-
Although virtual co-presence is an important factor in
Sociality and connectivity networks as self–organized
We assume that sociality and connectivity networks
The personal learning networks overlap and mutually
Prof. Dr. David Stark, John Kelly, M.A., Center on OrganizationalInnovation (COI), Columbia University New York
Prof. Dr. Gernot Grabher, Julia Maintz, M.A.Socio-Economics of Space (SECONS), University of Bonn
